Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/17/2015 09 2016 Ad Valorem Taxes - Public HearingBUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 9. For Meeting of. November 17, 2015 ITEM TITLE: Public hearing pertaining to Ad Valorem Taxes to be levied for collection in Fiscal Year 2016 SUBMITTED BY: Tony O'Rourke, City Manager Cindy Epperson, Director of Finance and Budget SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Ordinance A Declaring the City Council's intent to increase the City's 2015 regular property tax levy up to 101% of the amount levied in the previous year, plus new construction, annexation, and refunds. Ordinance B —Bing and levying the 2016 ad valorem property taxes and excess levy taxes for the City of Yakima. These ordinances follow state law imposing a 1% increase in the property tax levy for 2016, plus new levies for construction and refunds, and are the basis on which the 2016 budget was developed and balanced. Because the 1% increase is greater than the inflation rate (Implicit Price Deflator or IPD), these ordinances require super - majority approval (i.e. 5 -2). The attached memorandum discusses the importance of the property tax levy, and sets forth the "substantial need" to exceed the rate of inflation of 0.25 %, and approve a modest 1% increase in the levy. The full 1% increase amounts to about $177,000, while the inflationary increase is about $44,000. So if Council does not approve the 1 %, then General Government revenue would be reduced by $133,000. Since this budget is balanced with revenue exceeding expenditures of $31,000, Council could then choose to use beginning fund balance of approximately $102,000, or direct a corresponding reduction in expenditures. Resolution: Other (Specify): Memo, Exhibit I, Attachments 1 -5 Contract: Start Date: Item Budgeted: Yes Funding Source/Fiscal Impact: Strategic Priority: Insurance Required? No Ordinance: X Contract Term: End Date: Amount: Public Trust and Accountability Mail to: Phone: APPROVED FOR &aj, City Manager SUBMITTAL: City Management is recommending that City Council conduct a public hearing on the 2016 property tax levy, and then pass ordinances. ATTACHMENTS: Description D 2016 Ad Valcreirn IMerry.yairndUrrn D Ors. lhnaince A lin�ein� k) Ilirnc reose 2016 IPro perty Tax D Ordlhnaince IB Seffing Ad Vallore..irn Tax 11 evy D Exlhilbi� 1 IPropearty Tax (.1011CM11ahon D ARaclhiryein� 1 Ad Valcre.irn Upload Date Type 11/10/2015 Cbmar Memo 11/10/2015 Ordl Irma nce 11/10/2015 Ordl Irma nce 11/10/2015 Exlhilbi� 11/10/2015 Exlhilbi� Memorandum Date: November 12, 2015 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Cindy Epperson, Director of Finance and Budget Re: 2016 Property Tax Levy Background State law requires several administrative and legal steps to establish the property tax levy. This agenda item includes two (2) separate ordinances. Ordinance A and B will set the property tax levy for collection in 2016, based on the limit of a 1% increase (or the rate of inflation, whichever is less) over the prior year base levy, plus new levies for construction and annexation. The law defines the rate of inflation as measured by the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD) for consumer goods. For this year, the IPD increased by 0.25% from June 2014 to June 2015. Since this is less than the statutory 1 %, our property tax increase is limited to a 0.25% increase. However, state law does allow the property tax to be levied at the 1 % maximum, by a super- majority (i.e. 5 -2) vote of Council declaring the existence of "substantial need" for the increase. The 2016 budget was developed assuming a 1% increase. Exhibit I details the calculation of the property tax levy with a base of 101% of the prior year using preliminary information obtained from the County Assessor's office. According to state law, the certification of ad valorem taxes must be filed with the Board of Yakima County Commissioners on or before November 30, 2015 or the City will receive no funding from this source in 2016. The Commissioners have requested to receive this packet by November 20 so they can incorporate all of the requests into their required legislation. Ordinance purposes are: Ordinance A identifies Council's intent to authorize an increase in the tax levy over 2015 levels. Because the limit factor is greater than the rate of inflation, this ordinance requires a super - majority (i.e. a minimum affirmative vote of five members) to pass. It is required by RCW 84.55.120. This is legally necessary to increase the 2016 tax collections by any amount over 2015 levels. Ordinance B fixes the tax levy for collection by the City in 2016. This ordinance would include not only the regular tax but also special levy taxes for bond repayments. It should be noted that all voted bond issues were paid in full in 2014, so the 2016 levy does not include a special bond levy. This ordinance complies with RCW 35.33.135 and in accordance with Article VII, Section 2 of the City Charter, also requires a super- majority approval by City Council. These ordinances are in substantially the same format as the prior year levy legislation, with the exception of the additional declaration of substantial need in Ordinance A. General Government Revenue Discussion In reviewing General Government revenue, there are 4 revenues that each make up approximately one fourth of the total —i.e. there are four "legs" that support General Government operations. Sales Tax (including the City's allocation of both county -wide Criminal Justice sales taxes) represents about 27% of the total. Property tax as proposed is about 23 %; Utility Taxes as presented in the Preliminary Budget make up about 22 %; and all other revenue comprise the remaining 28 %. (See Attachment 1 for a summary of General Government revenues.) 2015 General Government revenue is estimated to be $70.9 million, $3.5 million or 5.2% more than 2014, primarily because of the contract with Union Gap that added $1.2 million. Additionally, the city experienced sales tax growth of about 4 %; and was successful in obtaining a Firefighter hiring grant (SAFER) and an airport marketing grant. Going into 2016, Sales and utility tax revenues are projected to grow as a result of ongoing economic development in our community so that revenues are forecast to grow by $2.5 million or 3.5% from the 2015 estimate, (and $1.8 million or 2.6% from the 2015 Budget). The proposed 1% increase in Property Tax is projected to be $176,000 in 2016. The initial estimates from the County on the 2016 property tax levy included a growth rate for new construction that is 1.2% or $209,000, along with a refund levy of about $97,000 which approximates the budget estimate when added together. Property Tax Discussion The total 2016 City of Yakima property tax levy includes the 101 % levy, and amounts for new construction and prior year refunds. The 2016 budget currently includes an estimated revenue of $18,026,000 for the regular levy, an increase of $439,000 over the 2015 year -end estimate of $17,587,000. There is no voted levy debt, since the 1995 voted Fire bond issue paid in full in 2014. The total operating tax rate for next year is estimated to be $3.111 per $1,000 of Assessed Valuation (AV), down from the 2015 rate of $3.1239. (The statutory limit is $3.60 less the Library levy, which is capped at 50 cents per $1,000. The estimate for the 2016 Library levy is 47.4 cents per thousand) It should be noted that the amounts included in the budget differ from the levy as shown in attached Exhibit I because of the timing of collections. In other words the budget is built on collection estimates of the levy. A home with an assessed value of $150,000 in 2015 paid $468.59 for the regular levy —this was the first year without a voted bond levy. (According to the preliminary valuation estimate provided by the County Assessor, the underlying assessed value of all taxable property in the City grew a little more than 1 %). The regular levy tax is estimated to be $466.65, and there is no voted levy so there is a slight decrease of ($1.94) in the total annual levy. We believe the current request for the property tax levy is justified by the following conditions, which combine to indicate the City has a substantial need to increase the levy to the statutory maximum of 1%: 1. The property tax is needed to help meet mandates and contractual obligations, principally Public Safety pensions /medical costs. Attachment 2 demonstrates the amount of property taxes dedicated to these areas. 2. In the Street budget, property tax represents about 66% of all revenue in this budget. (see Attachment 3). Investing in maintaining and repaving the City streets has been a high Council priority for several years. The other major revenue source in this fund is Gas Tax, which is based on a "per gallon" charge. The economic downturn created a "new normal" in consumption -- the 2016 gas tax estimate is about equal to 2007 levels. 3. Property tax is also a key revenue source for the Parks and Recreation Division, representing about 48% of all Parks revenue. Parks maintenance is supported entirely by property taxes, along with the funding of the new City Charter amendment to spend $750,000 on Parks capital project. Other programs such as the Senior Center and Aquatics are supported in part by the property tax. The cost to maintain and operate these facilities increases annually. (Also see Attachment 3). 4. Again this year, the City is not expected to collect the full levy because of senior citizen exemptions, delinquent taxes and other refunds for disputed values. For the year 2016, the City is estimating a reduction of up to 2.3% in actual collections from the authorized levy, offset by a portion of delinquent taxes that are predicted to be collected. 5. Yakima's per capita property tax ranks $84 below the average of comparable Washington cities with populations of 50,000 to 135,000 in 2014, the most recent year this information has been compiled. Yakima ranks 9th out of 11 cities in this group. Further, for these same cities, Yakima's total per capita revenue collected from all taxes, fees and charges is $1,561 or $582 less than the average of $2,143 and again ranks 9th out of the 11 cities. Our residents are currently taxed and /or charged substantially less than other similar size cities. (See Attachments 2 & 4). 6. Finally, the City's current property tax levy represents only 24% (approximately 1/4) of the total property taxes paid by City residents. The State, local School District levies and County government receive approximately 3/4 of all property taxes paid. (See Attachment 5). In conclusion, property tax is a vital component of General Government revenue. Based upon the previous discussion, City management /budget staff respectfully requests the passage of both Ordinances A and B to set the 2016 property tax levy, which is the basis on which the 2016 budget was developed. If a super- majority does not approve "substantial need" to go to the 101 %, then the ordinance will need to be modified for the increase to be 100.25 %, and the requested amount will be reduced by $132,570 from $18,208,602 to $18,076,032. Since the General Government budget is virtually balanced, with revenues slightly exceeding expenditures by about $31,000, a reduction in property taxes of $132,000 would result in a budgeted use of about $100,000 of reserves, unless Council directs a reduction in expenditures. ORDINANCE A ORDINANCE NO. 2015 AN ORDINANCE relating to the annual property tax levy; declaring the City Council's intent to increase the City's 2016 regular levy up to 101% along with new construction, annexation, refunds and growth in state - assessed property values from the amount levied the previous year. WHEREAS, RCW 84.55.120 requires a taxing district that collects regular levies to hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the district's following year's current expense budget, including consideration of possible increases in property tax revenues; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 84.55.120 and the City Charter, on November 17, 2015, upon due and proper legal notice, the Yakima City Council held a public hearing to consider the City's general government revenue sources for the 2016 current expense budget, and the total proposed property tax levy amount pertaining to 2016 revenues from real and personal property taxes; and WHEREAS, RCW 84.55.120 provides that no increase in property tax revenue, other than that resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property in any increase in the value of state - assessed property, may be authorized by a taxing district, except by adoption of a separate ordinance or resolution, pursuant to notice, specifically authorizing the increase in terms of both dollars and percentage; and WHEREAS, RCW 84.55.005 sets the limit factor for the increase in the regular property tax levy at the lesser of one hundred one percent or one hundred percent plus inflation, which is defined as the percentage change in the implicit price deflator (IPD) for person consumption expenditures for the United States as published for the most recent twelve -month period by the bureau of economic analysis of the federal department of commerce by September 25th of the year before the taxes are payable; and WHEREAS, the applicable percentage change in the Implicit Price Deflator was 0.25 %; and WHEREAS, RCW 84.55.0101 allows a taxing district to use a limit factor of one hundred one percent upon a finding of substantial need by the legislative authority by a super- majority vote; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after the public hearing on November 17, 2015, and after duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, has determined that the City requires an increase in property tax revenue from the previous year above the rate of inflation, along with the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state - assessed property, in order to discharge the expected expenses and ORDINANCE A obligations of the City, and as being necessary and in the best interests of the citizens of the City of Yakima; and WHEREAS, the amount of property tax levied for collection in 2015 was $17,676,090 for general government purposes; and WHEREAS, the discretionary increase in property tax levied attributable to the inflation factor for collection in 2016 shall be in the amount of $44,190, which is a percentage increase of one quarter of one percent (0.25 %) from the previous year; and WHEREAS, the discretionary increase in property tax levied attributable to substantial need for collection in 2016 shall be in the amount of $132,571, which is a percentage increase of three - quarters of one percent (0.75 %) from the previous year; and WHEREAS, these discretionary increases in property tax levied for collection in 2016 combine to be in the amount of $176,761, which is a percentage increase of one percent (1 %) from the previous year; and WHEREAS, the non - discretionary increases in property tax levied for collection in 2015 can only be estimated due to the absence of final values to be provided by the Yakima County Assessor, now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA: Section 1. The following increases in the regular property tax levy, over the amount of the previous year's levy, are hereby authorized to be cumulatively levied for collection in 2016: A. A discretionary increase of $44,190, attributable to the inflation factor which is a percentage increase of one quarter of one percent (0.25 %) over the amount levied for collection in 2015; plus B. A discretionary increase of $132,571, attributable to the declaration of substantial need, which is a percentage increase of three - quarters of one percent (0.75 %) over the amount levied for collection in 2015; plus B. An estimated increase of $0 for recent annexations; plus C. An estimated increase of $208,991 for new construction and improvements to property; plus D. An estimated increase of $96,760 for a refund levy; plus E. An increase authorized by state law for state - assessed property values. ORDINANCE A Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to transmit and file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Board of Yakima County Commissioners and the Yakima County Assessor on or before November 30, 2015. Section 3. Pursuant to Article VI, Section 2 of the Yakima City Charter, this ordinance shall take effect on November 17, 2015. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 17th day of November, 2015. ATTEST: City Clerk Publication Date: Effective Date: Micah Cawley, Mayor ORDINANCE B ORDINANCE NO. 2015 AN ORDINANCE fixing and levying the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to balance estimated revenue with estimated expenditures for the 2016 Budget for the City of Yakima. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the total net amount of $18,208,602 in revenue must be raised by ad valorem taxes on real and personal property within the corporate limits of the City of Yakima to balance estimated revenues and expenditures for the 2016 Budget for the City of Yakima, now therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA: Section 1. There is hereby fixed to be raised by general property taxes upon real and personal property within the City of Yakima the amount of $18,208,602 for the following purposes: General Government Levy Operating Funds $16,967,842 Firemens' Relief & Pension Fund 1,240,760 Amount of tax levy for General Government Purposes (1) $18,208,602 Special Purpose Tax Levy 0 Total Levy Amount (1) $18,208,602 (1) Includes an additional $50,000 to provide for final adjustments in State assessed, refunds, new construction and annexation values. Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to transmit and file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Board of Yakima County Commissioners and the Yakima County Assessor on or before November 30, 2015. Section 3. Pursuant to Article VI, Section 2 of the Yakima City Charter, this ordinance shall take effect on November 17, 2015. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 17th day of November, 2015. ATTEST: City Clerk Publication Date: Effective Date: Micah Cawley, Mayor City of Yakima Property Tax Limitation Calculation Prior Year (2015) = Base 1% Increase Base 101% Valuation Increase - - -1.4% New Construction - -- 1.2% State Assessed Value Tax Limit Before Annexations Add for Annexation Limit for Subsequent Years Plus Refunds Plus Contingency Total- ordinance 2015 Tax Assessed Rate Values Applied (Dollars in Thousands) $5,658,387.596 $3.1239 $80,507.242 N/A $66,900.554 $3.1239 $3.1239 $5,805,795.392 $3.1110 $0.000 $3.1110 $5,805,795.392 $3.1110 State of Washington Constitutional Limit Assessed Valuation $5,805,795.392 $3.6000 Less: Library Levy (Estimate) $0.4743 2015 Levy for Collection in 2016 (Estimate) $3.1257 2016 Levy Dollars $17,676,090 $176,761 $17,852,851 $0 $208,991 $0 $18,061,842 $0 $18,061,842 $96,760 $50,000 $18,208,602 $20,900,863 $2,753,689 $18,147,175 EXHIBIT I C: \Program Files ( x86 ) \neevia.com \docConverterPro\ temp \NVDC \4F89CE2D- B609- 42A9 -A060- 11/10/20156:14 PM 6EC9393E8050 \Yaki ma. 6215.1. pro p_tax calc_2016_Council.xlsx 27.3¢ Sales Tax ($20,011,900) ­ _ M Source General Sales Tax Crim. Justice Sales Tax (1) Property Tax Utility & Franchise Taxes Charges for Services State Shared Revenue Fines and Forfeitures Other Taxes Other Revenue Transfers from other Funds Other Intergovernmental Licenses and Permits Total Revenue Beginning Fund Balance Total Resources GENERAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE (BASED ON 2016 BUDGET OF $73.4 MILLION) 22.2Q Franchise & Utility Tax ($16,278,300) ATTACHMENT #1 22.,2 ,p 22.9Q Property Tax ($16,785,600) GENERAL GOVERNMENT RESOURCES THREE YEAR COMPARISON 2014 Actual $15,461,201 3,103,814 16,016,029 15,848,483 6,684,115 2,648,633 1,578,124 1,453,227 939,491 1,413,706 1,370,523 865,334 2015 Year-End Estimate $16,010,000 3,226,800 16,376,215 15,821,650 8,118,341 2,914,000 1,675,500 1,467,550 1,273,045 1,426,035 1,667,463 894,000 67,382,678 70,870,599 10,885,034 9,412,400 $78,267,712 $80,282,999 4.4q Fines & Other Taxes ($3,242,110) % of -- 2016 vs. 2015 -- 2016 Increase Percent Total (Decrease) Change 22.7% 2016 Percent Projected Change Revenue 3.5% $16,650,400 4.0% 3,361,500 2.2% 16,785,600 (0.2 %) 16,278,300 21.5% 8,666,253 10.0% 3,121,100 6.2% 1,707,110 1.0% 1,535,000 35.5% 1,296,450 0.9% 1,450,000 21.7% 1,585,937 3.3% 916,470 5.2% 73,354,120 (13.5 %) 8,925,128 2.6% $82,279,248 4.4q Fines & Other Taxes ($3,242,110) % of -- 2016 vs. 2015 -- 2016 Increase Percent Total (Decrease) Change 22.7% $ 640,400 4.0% 4.5% 134,700 4.2% 22.9% 409,385 2.5% 22.2% 456,650 2.9% 11.8% 547,912 6.7% 4.3% 207,100 7.1% 2.3% 31,610 1.9% 2.1% 67,450 4.6% 1.8% 23,405 1.8% 2.0% 23,965 1.7% 2.2% (81,526) (4.9 %) 1.2% 22,470 2.5% 100.0% 2,483,521 3.5% (487,272) (5.2 %) $1,996,249 2.5% (1) Some Criminal Justice sales tax is allocated to the Law and Justice capital fund (a non - general Governmental fund) for capital needs. 2016 PROPOSED GENERAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY — BY FUNCTION General Parks & Recreation Street & Traffic Sub -Total General Government Fire Pension Total Parks $2,659,400 14.8 %, 2014 Actual 2015 Amended Budget 2015 Year -End Estimated 2016 Projected Revenue $ 11,037,490 $ 10,504,600 $ 10,530,230 $10,793,500 1,875,098 2,661,290 2,667,785 2,659,400 3,103,441 3,170,500 3,178,200 3,332,700 16,016,029 16,336,390 16,376,215 16, 785,600 1,192,883 1,207,500 1,210,500 1,240, 760 $ 17,208,912 $ 17,543,890 $ 17,586,715 $18,026,360 ATTACHMENT #2 2015 Est. vs. 2016 Budget 2.5% (0.3 %) 4.9% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% The graph below depicts how the City of Yakima compares to other cities of somewhat similar population relative to property tax. This comparison shows that Yakima's property tax is below the state average. This data was compiled from the State Auditor's Local Government Comparative Statistics. $450 $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 2014 PER CAPITA PROPERTY TAXES Comparable Cities between 50,000 and 135,000 in Population (Rounded to the closest dollar) Takima s per capita property taxis $156, which is $6 ess Kennewick Kent Yakima Auburn Marysville Bellevue Richland Kirkland Renton Redmond Everett PROPERTY TAX AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FUND REVENUE 2015 BUDGET YEAR ATTACHMENT #3 O O j j j j o ATTACHMENT #3 ATTACHMENT #4 The largest revenue source for the General Government Funds is sales tax. Yakima is just slightly below the average per capita sales tax compared with similar cities in the State. However, Yakima is in the lower 1/3 of ranking in all other revenue comparisons per capita and is the fourth lowest out of the twelve cities compared in combined per capita revenue. This comparison demonstrates that the City of Yakima has limited revenue /tax base compared with most cities of its size in the state, and yet provides similar or enhanced services to its citizens. (For example, of the cities included in the comparison, only Everett has a transit system; there are no other city -owned irrigation systems; and a few of the cities are members of a Regional Fire Authority, so have no fire expenditures). $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 2014 PER CAPITA TOTAL REVENUES Comparable Cities between 50,000 and 135,000 in Population (Rounded to the closest dollar) $3,212 Kennewick Marysville Yakima Kent Auburn Kirkland Renton Everett Bellevue Redmond Richland ATTACHMENT #5 Property Taxes The total property taxes paid by property owners within the City of Yakima include taxes levied by several governmental entities: the State, School Districts, special county -wide voted levies and the City's general and special voter approved levies. The percentage of the total property taxes levied by, and allocated to, each individual governmental entity will change slightly from year to year. The City's portion is generally under 30% of the total amount collected. (Refer to the graph and chart below for how the 2015 property taxes were allocated between these governmental entities.) Yakima School District 0.38 2015 PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION State of Washington Schools Library 0.18 .04,� k � i City of Yakima .24,� w 0 Yakima County EMS .14¢ .02,� City of Yakima Property Tax — In 2015, a typical City resident pays approximately $12.70 per thousand of assessed value on property taxes. Only $3.12, or about 24.5 %, goes to the City, with the balance divided between the County, schools, and other special districts. Description Of How Property Taxes Are Levied — The following explanation is included to help the reader understand how property taxes are assessed to the individual property owners. To aid in this explanation, three commonly used terms must be understood. They are Property Tax Levy, Property Tax Rate and Assessed Value. ➢ Property Tax Levy — is the total amount of money that is authorized to be collected. ➢ Property Tax Rate — is the property tax amount that will be applied to every $1,000 of assessed value; the rate is determined by simply dividing the levy amount by the total assessed value amount and dividing that number by 1,000. ➢ Assessed Value — is the total value, as determined by the County Assessor's Office, of all property within the City.