HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/21/2009 00 Memorandum RE: Proposed Yakima Council Budget Priorities Model - Methodologies, Policies and Procedures MEMORANDUM
July 16, 2009
To: The Council Budget Committee
From: Dick Zais, City Manager
Rita DeBord, Finance Director
Cindy Epperson, Deputy Director of Accounting & Budgeting
Re Proposed Yakima Council Budget Priorities Model — Methodologies, Policies
and Procedures to:
• Establish Priorities
• Allocate Resources
• Balance the 2010 Budget
Background
As a result of discussions around developing /communicating the City's budget in
accordance with Council's Strategic Priorities, the budget staff has been preparing a
presentation of the 2009 budget which re -aligns the service units into these priorities.
This produces a slightly different "look" to the budget, since historically the budget was
summarized at the departmental level, while the summary by priority crosses
department lines. The Council Budget Committee reviewed and modified the initial
presentation, and the chart is now updated with those recommendations.
Initial 2010 Budget Development
With the national recession causing a slow -down in a few major revenues (primarily
sales tax, building permitting, and interest earnings), a cost reduction plan was
implemented in April, 2009. As the timeline for development of the 2010 budget neared,
the budget staff took a critical look at General Government revenues and expenditures
for both 2009 and 2010 to create a first draft of the budget to gauge the magnitude of
additional program reductions required for next year.
The 2009 year -end estimate was modified from the amended budget by lowering the
revenues that are negatively affected by the recession (about $12 m), and lowering the
expenditures by both the cost reduction plan, and the adjusted state pension rates for the
2nd half of the year. However, these expenditure reductions were almost offset by
rapidly increasing jail costs, so that the year end estimate for expenditures is only $321 k
less than the amended 2009 budget.
Page 1 of 2
This first "look" at the 2010 budget is using the 2009 budget as a baseline, lowered by
the continuation of the cost reduction measures begun in 2009 and with some
modification for mandated /contractual costs (such as jail costs, utilities, medical
inflation, etc.). Revenues are projected to remain flat compared to the 2009 year -end
estimate, as the timing and extent of an economic recovery is unknown. These
assumptions created a gap. of $3.9 million, and staff is requesting Council direction on
how to bridge that gap.
The 2010 budget (before any input from Council or the departments) is charted by
strategic priority, and different variations of the priorities of government resource
allocation model are shown for comparative-purposes.
The draft budget printouts were distributed to Division Managers on Monday, July13.
A copy of the Budget Guidelines are enclosed for your review.
Draft Budget Policy Guidelines
Staff was tasked with drafting budget policies for Council review. After much review of
our current practices and additional study of Yakima County's policies, we have
determined that all of the policies are inter- related, and additional research is still
needed to understand the application of the County's budget development process, and
develop appropriate policies for the City. At this point, there is a conceptual framework
• of the policies included for the Committee's review and input.
The attached draft of the 2010 General Government Budget Priorities Model
demonstrates the different budget results using a straight prior year allocation of
resources (i.e. the Yakima County model) vs. a variable range focusing on highest
priorities (i.e. the historical City model). Staff is requesting additional direction from the
Committee before policies are drafted for the Committee's consideration.
Future Direction/Actions
Since we have begun the 2010 budget development, the budget staff is requesting
Committee direction on the application of the Priorities of Government process. Key
direction is needed in the areas of:
• Adoption of Council Budget Priorities for the City of Yakima — recommend to
full Council,
• Approval of resource allocation by strategic priority, and
> Determination of the utilization of reserves for the 2010 budget.
The budget staff will continue to work with the Council Budget Committee to finalize
these documents, prepare budget policies for Committee review, and implement the
plan for presentation to the full Council (possibly as a Study Session) for
review /approval.
Page 2 of 2
City of Yakima
General G yernment
,Budget Pri ®cities
Draft: July{ 1 X2009
The Yakima City Council has established six General Government Budget Priorities
in order to provide guidance in the allocation of resources which fund basic City
services. The General Government Budget Priorities, which are implemented
according to accompanying budget policies, reflect the City Council's
commitment to balance community needs with the availability of resources.
The City Council and City staff develop and refine the General Government
Budget Priorities by consistently seeking input from various constituencies. By
utilizing an open and accessible budgeting process, the City is able to assess and .
adapt to evolving community needs, meet state and federal mandates,
effectively communicate budget decisions, and be held accountable to provide
responsive, efficient, and productive programs and services.
The Yakima City Council's six General Government Budget Priorities are:
1. Health and Safety
Programs and services which maintain and /or improve public health and
safety. Examples: law enforcement, fire protection, court services, streets and
traffic, code enforcement, community -based treatment programs.
2. Resource Management
Programs and services which contribute to the efficient management of public
resources and /or ensure the City's fiscal stability. Examples: financial services,
information systems, legal services, licensing, human resources.
3. Economic Development
Programs and services which promote economic development and /or
diversification. Examples: environmental planning, grants management,
development incentives, street maintenance, support for local economic
development agencies.
4. Quality of Life
Programs and services which preserve and /or enhance Yakima's quality of life.
Examples: parks, youth and adult sports activities, community recreation,
aquatics, senior center, support for local arts organizations.
5. Customer Service and Communications
Programs and services which contribute to the provision of responsive customer
service and /or effective communications. Examples: city clerk, printing and
publications, public disclosure request response.
6. Strategic Partnerships
Programs and services which contribute to building and /or utilizing strategic
partnerships. Examples: City /County purchasing operations consolidation,
Yakima Valley Conference of Governments, Citizens for Safe Yakima Valley
Communities, Blockwatch.
2009 - 2010 General Government Budget Summary Assumptions
What's In
Projected Revenues - virtually no change in aggregate revenues compared to 2009
o 2009 - $57,452 million
o 2010 - $57,437 million
• Mandated Contractual Expenses
o YPPA Labor Settlement
o Tentative Teamsters Labor Settlement
o Medical Inflation / Other ongoing payroll obligations
o Utility increases - both private and public
o Projected jail cost increases -
o Grants - either new or expected to continue (both revenue and expense)
What's Out
Reductions from 2009 continued into 2010
o No salary increases for any other employee group
o 9 FTE vacant positions (excludes Police and Fire commissioned personnel)
o No Cash -outs for retirements
o No new capital outlay
o Grants that were one -time or otherwise discontinued
o No other one -time expenses (except for election costs)
o No reserves allocated yet
What's the Projected Impact on Reserves
Estimated ending reserve balance - 2009 $5,619K 9.0%
> Deficit (without using any reserves) $3,902K 6.3%
• Estimated ending reserve balance if reserves used - 2010 $1,717K 3.0%
• Reserves needed to maintain 7% target by end of 2010 $4,119K 7.0%
Recommended maximum use of reserves to maintain 7% target - 2010 $1,500K 2.6%
Reductions from 2010 expenditures to maintain 7% target $2,402K 4.0%
Revised: 7/17/2009
2009 vs. 2010 General Government Summary
by Budget Priority
Health & Safety
Resource Management
Economic Development
Quality of Life
•
Customer Service & Communications 2009 Adopted Budget
J '' 2010 Projected Expenditures
Strategic Partnerships
$0 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000
Revised: 7/17/2009
Table I
DRAFT
2010 General Government Budget
Priorities Model
Amg„
(1) (2)4 k
3 '* i 5 �
2009 � 20�o fa
Adopted % of L i - ,4Resourc + ='
9
t fF f X g -0, i1x4
Budget Total All o cation
Resources tit* � 4
Projected Revenues $58,657,610 X4437 069
Plus Reserve Allocation " 2,121,348
Net Resources to be Allocated $60,778,958 ,01 $57 ,437 0 69 '
Budget Priorities o §
Public Health & Safety $40,862,436 67.2% • . ‚ a$38,6l5 ;6'43 °
Resource Management 9,573,124 15.8 %9
Economic Development 3,432,141 5.6% 1 * 1 : 3 4 327 '
Quality of Life 4,562,973 7.5% 01 '4 0
Customer Service & Communications 1,848,183 3.0% { ' I 746 5 62
Strategic Partnerships 500,101 1 0.8% 'mik472,603;
Total $60,778,958 100.0% l; $57437069
*2009 General Government projected revenues per the adopted budget at December 2008, was
$58,657,610; current year end estimate is $57,452,000
Revised: 7 /17/2009
Chart I
DRAFT
City of Yakima
General Government 2010 Revenue Allocation
Priorities Model
(by Budget Priority)
Resource Management
$9,046,752
15.8%
Public
Health & Safety
$38,615,643 Economic Development
67.2% $3,243,427
5.6%
Quality of Life
$4,312,081
7.5%
Customer Service &
Communications
Strategic $1,746,562
Partnerships 3.0%
$472,603
0.8%
Draft 2010 Expenditure Projections $57,437,069
Revised: 7/17/2009
Table II
DRAFT .
2010 General Government Bud
Expenditure Projections
(1) (2) (3) (5)
r
FF.!Fort Targ eted
2009 2010 by Draft ° : (Reduction)
Adopted % of Resource . Ex pend iture Adjustment
Budget Total Allocation Projections (3 -4)
Resources
0.4044$4V
�,
Projected Revenues $58,657,610 $57,437,069 am 4 �t
Plus Reserve Allocation 2,121,348 0 a* s .
Net Resources to be Allocated $60,778,958 $57,437,0.69 61}
t� �A�� � t Pry°
Budget Priorities t r y x �'�`
Public Health & Safety $40,862,436 67.2% $38,615,643 :r4„' 42;22c,257 q ($3,610,614)
Resource Management 9,573,124 15.8% 9,046,752 � 9 ,211,6241 (164,869)
Economic Development 3,432,141 5.6% 3,243,427 3,3 (131,904)
Quality of Life 4, 562,973 7.5% 4,312,081 4,184 2 ,
" � i via 1 27 260
Customer Service & Communications 1,848,183 3.0% 1 0,14,„„,1,144425 57 99 945
4, 7 (22,268)
Strategic Partnerships 500,101 0.8% 472,603494;871
Total ; $60,778,958 100.0% $57,437,069 $ ($3,902,339)
EN: ko f.4 - Z.cdt: . 4,iz"'3a'�+'i:.!:Yu7
I
,
Revised: 7 /17/2009
Table III
DRAFT
2010 General Government Budget
Priorities Model - Management Recommendations
Resource Allocation
4: - ,M � ; 07
*
0 2010 T argete d , a.
2009 2010 L. Man m Draft !' (Re "duc
Adopted % of Priorities R "ecommen -� ` . % of Expenditure %A „ '
VONOSISM Budget Total Model d �, Total Projections � 6),
® kT' �' , a,'�� ® , $� 5 fi
Resources I ���
�� l ��
' ,0 <t* �, 1
Projected Revenues $58,657,610 $57,437,069 $57,
Plus Reserve Allocation 2,121,348 0 x T. 15 3 , „
Net Resources to be Allocated $60,778,958 $57,437,069 , $ 58937,06.9` ' ' t � ""��
Budget Priorities d ��1qx k - it z � , +
�}�� .41 3 01 i 3t, i'.s,�"1".sq
Public Health & Safety $40,862,436 $38,615,643 h$38 61 �., t „
Public H & S Rese a Allocation 0 0 Ria ^'�. 1 ` '500 , 0 0 iO ` " f
40,1115, � E R , 14
� �
Total Public Health & Safety 40,862,436 67.2% 38,615;643 �"�'� ' '� � x`643 68.1% $42,226,257 �($2�1a
Resource Management 9,573,124 15.8% 9,046,752 '4�, 9 0 t 15.3% 9,211,621 Y ((1 .6 4 , 869)'
Economic Development 3,432,141 5.6% 3,243,427 i 3 243 427. 5.5% 3,375,331 (131.'90
Quality of Life 4,562,973 7.5% 4,312,081 yr (4,312,081;• 7.3% 4,184,821 `Y X127,260
Customer Service & Communications 1,848,183 3.0% 1,746,562 t � 1,746,5 y 3.0% 1,846,507 £'( )
99 9451
Strategic Partnerships 500,101 0.8% 472,603 k ,,, 472,603, - 0.8% 494,871 x - .(22,268) ;
Total $60,778,958 100.0% $57,437,069 ` ,' ' $937
. 587; 0 69 100.0% $61,339,408 ($2 4Q2;33)
9
Revised: 7 /17/2009
Table N •
DRAFT
•
- 2010 General Government Budget
Public Health & Safety Fully funded
Resource Allocation
7 45:tv, 47117 TA r
(1) (2) (3) A�!('4 (5) (6) "�`
P � Fully � 2010 E€ 0.Targetedl
2009 2010 k - * Fund o tl % of Draft � (R°
Adopted % of Priorities � Public Sub- Expenditure sNAdlustmen
Budget Total Model ' 1 ( Op ti onn Total Projections 4 ) 4 ai
--- - '- -- Kea I N� � .fii W,'°,,� 4 �'
Resources a <� t i 3 S }
Projected Revenues $58,657,610 $57,437,069 tlai$57,4 h
Plus Reserve Allocation 2,121,348 0 1 $ Pr 1`,500,000 I ' '` liti
Net Resources to be Allocated $60,778,958 $57,437,069 $58,937,069 ; ' ' f 2� s
'� n YS ,x' t � r �'� � �i`�k r ON z k3
Budget Priorities f� ��� k�; �= � � "`, �� Stu{
Public Health & Safety $40,862,436 67.2% 38,615,643 t1 71.6% $42,226,257 t i � y $ � 0�
Resource Management 9,573,124 15.8% 9,046,752 f; '$ ;032 13.6% 9,211,621 4 (1
Economic Development 3,432,141 5.6% 3,243,427 €r R 2,879, 4.9% 3,375,331 l °
Quality of Life 4,562,973 7.5% 4 312 081 r �� `3828,5290,1 6.5% 4,184,821 " ( 3 56 , 2 92) 4
r r �' � r � ir' r �"r°: ' � r
Customer Service & Communications 1,848,183 3.0% 1,746,562 h �. r $ 2.6% 1,846,507 , ( =2
�� � �'a�r � �� . mss �� -�,�
Strate lc Partnerships 500,101 0.8% 472,603 x #f ` '419,606 0.7% et: . _ 65� ,
g p �. �:) 494,871 ., �� (75,2 -4
Total $60,778,958 100% $57,437,069 x$58 937,069n1 100% $61,339,408 k4($2,4
Revised: 7 /17/2009
Chart II
DRAFT
City of Yakima
General Government 2010 Resource Allocation
Management Recommendation
(by Budget Priority)
Resource Management
$9,046,752
15.3%
Public
Health & Safety
$40,115,643
68.1% Economic Development
$3,243,427
5.5%
Quality of Life
$4,312,081
7.3%
Customer Service
& Communications
Strategic $1,746,562
Partnerships 3.0%
$472,603
0.8%
Draft 2010 Expenditure Projections $58,937,069
Revised: 7/17/2009
Table III(a) ,
General Government Reserves
Usage and Balances
(2008 - 2010)
2008 < 2009 > < 2010 >
' Bud et Utilizin' i
Current Budget Reserves Above
Year -End v01� iiz at40
Adopted Utilizing No Mini 7% Bad
Actual Budget Estimate (1) Reserves (� endedd)'
Beg. Reserve Balance $8,186,216 $7,464,000 $8,622,738 $5,618,901 i Y ,' $5;
Revenue 57,435,372 58,657,610 57,454,256 57,437,069
Total Resources $65,621,588 $66,121,610 $66,076,994 $63,055,970 r $6`3,0.1 *7ig
rONI*Vire VI
Expenditure Budget 56,998,850 60,778,958 60,458,092 57,437,069 4, 4 , 5 8 937,069` `y
End. Reserve Balance $8,622,738 $5,342,652 $5,618,901 $5,618,901 ,a �5 $`441 18
% of Annual Expenditures n/a 8.8% 9.3% 9.8% 70%
WrooteV $
Incr, / (Decr.) in Reserves fr. Prior Year (1) $436,522 (2,121,348) (3,003,837) 0 �e X1,
% of Expenditure Budget n/a -3.5% -5.0% n/a . P 2 5=/°
Legend:
(1) The Year -end estimate for 2009 Expenditures reflects a "worst case" scenario; some savings is anticipated from this estimate; which would
then result in a lower utilization of reservces than is reflected above.
Revised: 7 /17/2009
City of Yakima
Proposed Cowl cil udget Policies
Conceptual Framework — for CBC Review:
(July 16, 2009)
Note: per Council's request, staff has reviewed the County's budget and expenditure
policies (as presented to Council during the City /County study session earlier this year)
and the City's existing policies and guidelines and is reporting back to the Council
Budget Committee (CBC) with the following recommendations to modify, enhance
and/or establish related policies for the City. The items below identify the conceptual
framework only of the respective polices; once Council agrees on these baseline concepts
- . which will provide the foundation for the policy — staff will prepare a formal policy for
Council's consideration.
1. Resource Allocation Policy:
a. City Manager and staff will prepare an estimate of anticipated General
Government revenues for the subsequent budget year. This revenue
estimate will form the baseline point of reference for the General
Government budget process for the upcoming budget year;
b. It is clearly understood by.the Council, City Manager, Finance staff,
Department Heads and other Elected Officials that this is only an
"estimate" and that staff will continually monitor and update this estimate
throughout the budget process;
c. The Council, City Manager and Finance staff must evaluate fiscally
responsible level of reserves to address unanticipated funding shortfalls,
expense overruns, cash flow fluctuations, etc. The minimum level of
Reserves, as defined in the City's "Reserve Policy, should be funded prior
to the allocation of any anticipated revenues during the budget process;
d. Council will establish the General Government Budget Priorities, as an
initial step in preparing the annual Gen.Gov. budget;
e. Based on the City's then current fiscal position and known / anticipated
future fiscal impacts, the City Manager and staff will develop a
recommendation regarding the allocation of available resources to each
Budget Priority for the upcoming year's General Government budget; and
will present to City Council for their consideration;
f. Council will review Staff's recommendation and will provide direction to
the City Manager as to how the City's available resources should be
allocated among the Council's Budget Priorities;
g. City Manager and staff will prepare the General Government Expenditure
Budget for the subsequent year, within the resources allocated to the
Budget Priorities as set by Council, and will submit this budget to Council
for review no later than 1 s ` of November, as required by State law;
Page 1 of 3
'. t h. Council will approve the annual General Government Budget no later than
Alli S
Dec. 31 of the year preceding the budget year, as required by State law;
2. Reserve Policy:
a. The City's fiscal year end General Government cash balance (reserves)
should be maintained at a minimum of 7% and a maximum of 12% of the
normal annual Gen.Gov. expenditures;
b. Council may choose to adjust these levels up or down, by a future
resolution, depending on the Council's assessment of the City's fiscal
situation;
c. Based on the City's then current fiscal position and known / anticipated
future fiscal impacts, the City Manager and staff will develop a
recommended reserve level for the upcoming year's General Government
budget, and will present to City Council for their approval;
d. The allocation (or budgeted usage of) Gen.Gov. unrestricted Cash
Reserves should be limited to a maximum of 3.0% of normal annual
expenditures in any given budget year; subject to the minimum /
maximum reserve levels noted above;
e. If at any time the level of Gen. Government Cash Reserves should drop
below the minimum level established by Council, the City Manager will
propose budgetary action to be taken to bring the Reserve level up to the
established minimum level within the following two (2) subsequent annual
budget cycles; -
3. General Government Expenditure Policy:
Staff does not have a recommendation to present to CBC at this time, as we
have not had time to review the County's Expenditure Policy in any detail nor •
to research how it may be incorporated into the City's budget policies.
Further research will be performed and a recommendation will be submitted
to CBC for review at a future date.
Note: the County has an Expenditure policy that includes a "5 % Rule" that
essentially gives departments the latitude to move money from one line item
within their budget to another, at their own discretion, up to 5% of the
budgeted amount. Additionally, the County establishes a
"contingency /capital" budget within each department of 1% of the total
allocated resources of the respective department (excluding grants/contracts,
fixed and "flex" costs); these funds may be used at the department's discretion
as needed during the budget year. Further, the County allows departments to
"rollover" unused "Contingency /Capital" expenditure funds to the next budget
year, up to 5% of the respective department's total allocated resources (same
exclusions as above, apply).
Page 2 of 3
V rit%
4. Flex Costs Policy:
Staff does not have a recommendation to present to CBC at this time, as we
have not had time to review the County's Flex Cost Policy in any detail nor to
research how it may be incorporated into the City's budget policies. Further
research will be performed and a recommendation will be submitted to CBC
for review at a future date.
Page 3 of 3
City of Yakima
SUMMARY OF DEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION
2009 Adopted General Government Budget
Targeted Budget Reductions as of March 11, 2009
Non -
Fund/Department Personnel Personnel Total Tier 1
Police 16,738,335 5,696,280 22,434,615 12% 269,215
Fire 7,764,410 1,144,905 8,909,315 1.0% 89,093
Public Works - Street & Traffic Operations 2,995,420 3,032,045 6,027,465 3.0% 180,824
Finance
Financial Services 1,395,645 145,233 1,540,878
Intergov't/Outside Agencies 0 370,076 370,076.
Information Systems 1,694,741 788;843 2,483,584
Sub -Total Finance and Budget 3,090,386 1,304,152 4,394,538 3.0% 131,836
Public Works - Parks & Recreation $2,176,486 $2,201,057 $4,377,543 4.0% 175,102
Com & Econ Development
Environmental Planning 760,422 138,610 899,032
Code Administration 1,481,934 301,921 1,783,855
City Hall Maintenance 199,585 222,593 422,178
Hearing Examiner 0 51,000 51,000
Engineering 1,057,224 137,492 1,194,716
Sub -Total Corn & Econ Dev 3,499,165 851,616 4,350,781 3.0% 130,523
General Administration
City Council $102,844 $110,696 $213,540
City Manager 482,884 38,423 521,307
City Clerks 258,851 180,480 439,331
Human Resources 431,058 57,982 489,040
Legal 1,274,977 184,818 1,459,795
Risk Management N/A N/A N/A
Purchasing 290,277 39,604 329,881
Sub -Total General Admire 2,840,891 612,003 3,452,894 3.0% 103,587
Municipal Court 1,001,014 320,290 1,321,304 2.0% 26,426
Sub - Total $40,106,107 $15,162,348 $55,268,455 2.0% $1,106,607.
Exemptions
Customer Services $957,869 $267,599 $1,225,468
Probation 0 25,000 25,000
State Examiner 0 103,000 103,000
indigent Defense 0 385,000 385,000
Police Pension 583,685 804,272 1,387,957
Transfers 0 2,232,275 2,232,275
Sun Dome 0 150,000 150,000
District Court 0 1,800 1,800
Sub -Total Exemptions 1,541,554 3,968,946 5,510,500
GRAND TOTAL $41,647,661 $19,131,294 $60,778,955
,
Note: This is the budget reduction plan implemented in April 2009 which induded a decrease in jail cost of $150,000.
Since that time there has been a significant escalation in jail cost, so that current year-end estimate is only $321,000 less
than the 2009 Adopted Budget.
updated by erp gengov info crp 2009.xls
City of Yakima - 201C
General Government Bud
General Government Expeditures
$61,339,408
$60,778,958
$56,961,230
$53,211,965
$50,379,358
Public Health and Safety FTE's Resource Management FTE's
$42,226,257 68.8% 2010 $9,211,621 15.0% 2010
$40,862,436 67.2% 2009 323.950 $9,573,124 15.8% 2009 73565
$38,128,313 66.9% 2008 $9,226,096 16.2% 2008
$35,578,190 66.9% 2007 $8,692,229 16.3% 2007
$33,246,855 66.0% 2006 $8,384,364 16.6% 2006
I POLICE - HEALTH & SAFETY I I CITY MANAGER - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
I
CJ Tax / Police (103) FTE's Ded. Rev. Police Inveeiigation 1112) FTE'. Ded. Rev. Police Sup Sys / Records (114) FTE's Ded. Rev. Police Special Operations (117) FTE's Ded. Rev, City Council (611) FTE's Ded. Rev. Police/Fire Civil Service 16271 PTE'S Ded. Rev.
$2313,648 5.5% 2010 $2,313,648 $2362999 6.1% 2010 $3550D $1385528 3.3% 2010 $0 $2,776,834 6.6% 2010 $110000 $213593 2.3% 2010 $0 $150329 1.6% 2010 $6500
$1,290,413 12% 2509 6.000 $1,290,413 92,610,490 6.4% 2009 98.990 $35,500 51,651,485 40% 2009 24.000 SO $2.760,992 68% 2009 24.800 $463,981 $213,540 2.2% 2009 7.000 S0 $150,949 1.6% 2009 1.730 $6,500
$1,235,395 3.2% 2508 31,235,395 $2,442,730 6.4% 2008 $99,442 01,577,253 4.1% 2008 $44,694 $2,347,557 6,2% 2008 $53579 9204586 2.2% 2008 $0 9136,691 1.5% 2008 $5
$1,133,947 3.2% 2007 $1,133,947 $2,333,486 6.6% 2007 $55,132 $1,521,463 4.3% 2007 ($39,156) $2,200,775 6.2% 2007 811 829 $182,758 2.1% 2007 $0 $127,719 1.5% 2007 $0
$1,030,588 3.1% 2006 11,030,588 $2,283,497 6.9% 2006 066,582 $1,433,128 4.3% 2006 $49,266 $84,253 03% 2006 $0 $177,503 2,1% 2006 $0 $121740 1.5% 2006 $2,645
Police GREAT Program (104) FTE's Ded. Rev. Preventative Patrol (113) FTE's Ded. Rev. Detention /Jail (115) FTE's Ded. Rev. Admin /Out Jail Contracts 1119) FTE's Ded. Rev. City Management (621) FTE's Ded. Rev. Charter Civil Service (628) FTE's Ded, Rev.
$131,950 0.3% 2010 80 $9,486,298 22.5% 2010 $3,091,145 $1,518,219 3.6% 2010 1230,000 $3,693,459 8.7% 2010 $20 000 $520,805 5.7% 2010 SO $152,781 1.7% 2010 $0
$103,875 0.3% 2009 1.000 SO $9,054,536 22.2% 2009 7.000 $2,892,145 $1,322,698 3.7% 2009 15000 $245,000 $3,336,714 8.2% 2009 6,980 $25000 $521,307 5,4% 2009 3.800 $0 $154,137 1.6% 2009 1.570 $0
$170,843 0.4% 2008 $94,701 $8,205,509 21.5% 2008 $2,863,685 $1,404,345 3.7% 2008 1229,901 61426,688 9,0% 2008 $49 170 $483,312 5.2% 2008 SO $139,128 1.5% 2008 $0
$223,640 0.6% 2007 $174,591 $7,319,199 20.6% 2007 $2,709,877 $1,337,092 3.8% 2007 $201198 $3,080,305 8.7% 2007 $41 641 $450,429 5.2% 2007 $0 $121,179 1.4% 2007 $0
$74,909 0,2% 2006 $68,508 $8,741,752 26.3% 2006 $2,536,136 $1,272,006 3.8% 2006 $188,821 $2,555,388 7.7% 2006 $100 $459,586 5.5% 2006 $0 $118,857 1.4% 2006 $0
I FIRE - HEALTH & SAFETY I Human Resources (623) FTE's Ded. Rev. Legal (622) FTE's Ded, Rev.
$171,213 1.9% 2010 $0 $455,501 4.9% 2010 $0
Fire Auxiliary (121) FTE's Ded. Rev. Fire Investigation (123) FTE's Ded. Rev. P. Training (125) FTE's Ded, Rev. Fire Administration (129) FTE's Ded, Rev. $175,554 1.8% 2009 1.650 $0 $610.326 64% 2009 4.425 $0
$10,900 0.0% 2010 $0 $155,769 0.4% 2010 $1,105 $317,339 0.8% 2010 $86,786 $714,498 1.7% 2010 SO $147,225 1,6% 2008 S0 $552,586 6,0% 2008 $0
$10,900 0.0% 2009 5500 $0 $158 ,762 0.4% 2009 1.000 $1,100 $315,402 0.8% 2009 2.000 $86,786 $716,266 1.8% 2009 5.000 $0 $149,891 1.7% 2007 S0 $626,955 7.2% 2007 $0
$11,266 0.D% 2008 SO 8160,795 0.4% 2008 $74 $297,422 0.8% 2008 $86,081 $685,034 1.8% 2008 SO $162,050 1.9% 2006 SD 9552,848 6.6% 2006 $0
$7,754 0.0% 2007 SO $151,612 0.4% 2007 83,000 8266,230 0.7% 2007 581,398 $713,316 2.0% 2007 80
$6,135 0,0% 2006 $0 $178,629 0.5% 2006 $485 $339,929 1.0% 2006 876,335 9546678 1.6% 2006 $0 I FINANCE - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Fire Suppression 2122) PTE'S Ded. Rev. State Examiner (624) FTE's Ded. Rev. SunDnme Debt Service (699) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$7,818,079 18.5% 2010 530,000 $103,000 1.1% 2010 SO $150,000 16% 2010 $40,000
$7,715,985 18.9% 2009 72.000 590,000 $103,000 1.1% 2009 0.000 $0 $150,000 1.6% 2009 0.000 $40,000
$7,281,867 19.1% 2008 $110,874 $96,297 1.0% 2008 S0 $150,000 1.6% 2008 $40,000
$6,802,461 19.1% 2007 9330,989 595,467 1.1% 2007 SO $150,000 1.7% 2007 $40,000
$6,605,052 19,9% 2006 $91,200 $90,968 1.1% 2006 10 $149,173 1.8% 2006 $40,000
I CITY MANAGER - HEALTH & SAFETY I Finance (624) FIT'. Ded. Rev. Transfers - General (550) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$1,519,150 16.5% 2010 $5,000 $1,352,275 14.7% 2010 $0
CJ Tax / Police Reuniting (103) FTE's Ded. Rev. CJ Tax / Prosecution (103) ATE'. Ded. Rev. Indigent Defense 1132) FTE's Ded. Rev. Prosecution a33) FTE's Ded, Rev. $1,540,878 16.1% 2009 17.000 85,000 $1,352,275 141% 2009 0.000 80
$7,500 0,0% 2010 $7,500 $171,069 0.4% 2010 $171,069 $427,000 1.D% 2010 $0 $680284 1.6% 2010 00 $1,440,634 15.6% 2008 $7,189 $1,487,970 151% 2008 SO
$7,500 0.0% 2009 0.000 $7.500 $167,864 0.4% 2009 2.000 $167,864 $385,000 1.D% 2009 0.000 $115,000 $681,605 1,7% 2009 6.450 $0 $1,219,856 14.0% 2007 $2,618 $1,252,216 14.4% 2007 50
87.100 0.0% 2008 $7,100 $142,175 0.4% 2008 $142,175 $360,000 0.9% 2008 $110000 $604,885 1.6% 2008 $0 $1,168,274 13.9% 2006 $1,998 $1,271,548 15.2% 2006 $0
$11340 0,0% 2007 $11,340 $102,535 03% 2007 $102,535 0360,797 1.0% 2007 $0 $578,786 1.6% 2007 80
$10936 0.0% 2006 $10,936 $102,157 0.3% 7.006 $102,157 $241,186 0.0% 2006 990,000 $566,786 1,7% 2006 $0 Information System. (631) PTE'. Ded. Rev.
82,212,752 240% 2010 $35,000
I MUNICIPAL COURT - HEALTH & SAFETY I $2,224,354 23.2% 2009 18.500 $35,000
$2,218,664 24.0% 2008 $49.304
CJ Tax /Municipal Court (103) PTE'. Ded. Rev. Municipal Court (129) PTE'. Ded. Rev. Probation (134) FTE's Ded. Rev. $2,160,770 249% 2007 525.150
$251,412 0.6% 2010 $251,412 $1,070,103 25% 2010 $0 $25,000 0.1% 2010 $0 $2,081,073 24.8% 2006 $25,000
$252,821 0.6% 2009 3.000 $252,821 $1,068,483 2.6% 2.009 10.000 $0 $25,000 0,1% 2009 0.000 S0
$121,971 03% 2007 $172,743 $1,029385 27% 2008 $0 $24,177 0.1% 2008 (8767) I CED - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I
9172,743 0.5% 2008 6121,971 $864,404 2.4% 2006 $0 $48,233 0.1% 2007 S0
$141,453 0.4% 2006 8141453 $950,707 2.9% 2007 $0 $50,451 0,2% 2006 1$285) Licensing 1626) FTE's Ded. Rev. City Hell Maintenance (633) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$164,523 1.8% 2010 $542,800 9421520 4.6% 2010 90
I FINANCE - HEALTH Ss SAFETY I $229,324 2.4% 2009 3.380 $542.800 $422,178 4.4% 2009 2240 $0
$202,786 2.2% 2008 $554.985 $403,570 4,4% 2008 $0
CJ Tax / Info Systems (103) FTE's Ded. Rev. Clean Air Authority 1319) FTE's Ded. Rev. District Court 14101 FTE's Ded. Rev. Police Pension 1642) FTE'e Ded. Rev. $194,173 2.2% 2007 $544,532 $395.937 4.6% 2007 $0
$44,346 0.1% 2010 $44.346 $22,394 0.1% 2010 $0 91,800 0.0% 2010 $0 $1,387,957 3,3% 2010 $0 $201,091 24% 2006 $527,589 $320,771 18% 2006 $0
$75,848 0.2% 2009 0.000 $75,848 $22,394 0.1% 2009 0.000 $0 $1,800 0.0% 2009 0.000 $0 $1,387,957 3.4% 2009 0.000 $0
$121,177 0.3% 2008 $121,177 $22062 0.1% 2008 $0 $3,216 0.0% 2008 $0 $1,279,173 3.4% 2008 $0 Engineering 1528) $TE's Ded. Rev.
$93,420 0.3% 2007 $93,420 $12,622 0.0% 2007 $0 $10,645 0.D% 2007 SO $1,384,894 3.9% 2007 $0 01096,116 11.9% 2010 $564.700
$69,877 0.2% 2006 $69,877 $12,622 D.0% 2006 9D $24,122 0.1% 2006 $0 $1,235,437 3,7% 2006 $0 $1,194,716 12.5% 2009 11.370 $589,700
$1,034,701 11.2% 2008 $796.382
Yakima Co Emer Mgmt 1129) PTE'S Ded, Rev. Alcoholism Prevention 1411) FTE's Ded. Rev. Transfers - PS. Dispatch 1550) FTE'e Ded. Rev. $1,029,928 11.8% 2007 $607,891
$59,937 0.1% 2010 $0 $20,790 0.0% 2010 $0 $880,000 2.1% 2010 $0 $1,021,594 112% 2006 $586.176
$59,937 0.1% 2009 0.000 $0 $20,790 0.1% 2009 0.000 $D $880,000 2.2% 2009 0,000 $0
$57,212 0.2% 2008 90 $19.418 0.1% 2008 $0 $830,000 2.2% 2008 $0 I PUBLIC WORKS - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
$54,721 0,2% 2007 $0 $19,606 0,1% 2007 $0 $830,000 23% 2007 $0
942,244 0.1% 2006 S0 $17369 0.1% 2006 $0 $810,000 2.4% 2006 $0 Streets Administration (5291 FTE's Ded. Rev. Streets Inlerfund (6451 PTE'S Ded. Rev.
$254,166 29% 2010 SO 9210.942 23% 2010 $25,000
I CED - HEALTH Sr SAFETY I $251,260 26% 2009 0.000 $0 $210,942 22% 2009 0,000 $25,000
$196,616 2.1% 2008 $0 4269,057 29% 2008 $0
CJ Tax / Animal Control (103) FTE's Ded. Rev. Deng Bldg Rep & Demo (145) FTE's Ded. Rev. Codes Administration (149) FTE'e Ded. Rev. Animal Control 1223) FTE's Ded. Rev. $157,919 1.8% 2007 SO $317.188 3.6% 2007 S0
$74519 0.2% 2010 $74,519 $15,000 0,0% 2010 $42,000 $1,096,280 2.6% 2010 $817,330 9235,818 0.6% 2010 $13.700 953,625 0.6% 2006 $0 $381129 4.6% 2006 $0
$75,025 0.2% 2009 1.000 975,025 $25,000 0.1% 2009 0.000 842,000 $1,213,524 3,0% 2009 13.620 $1.109,330 $240,982 D.6% 2009 1080 $13,700
960,882 0.2% 2008 $60,882 822.560 0.1% 2008 $53,035 91.034,728 2.7% 2008 $1,281,823 $225,682 D.6% 2008 $16.867 Traffic Interfuud (646) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$66,953 0.2% 2007 966,953 $25,878 0.1% 2007 $40,364 $1,028,918 2.9% 2007 $1.303,840 $214,209 0.6% 2007 $37.290 $62,455 0.7% 2010 $5.000
$61,696 0.2% 2006 $61,696 $58,470 0.2% 2006 933.966 $930,103 2.8% 2006 9952,001 9210,275 0,6% 2006 853.234 968,484 0,7% 2009 0.900 $5.000
$62,283 0,7% 2008 $27,525
I PUBLIC WORKS - HEALTH Sr SAFETY I $59,844 0.7% 2007 852.302
$47,534 0.6% 2006 922,029
Public Area Lighting (116) FTE's Ded. Rev. Traffic Engineering 15261 PTE'S Ded. Rev. Traffic Administration (639) FTE's Ded. Rev. Snow & Ice Removal (524) ETES Ded. Rev.
$428,247 1.0% 2010 $0 $360,011 0.9% 2010 $2,000 $207,198 0.5% 2010 S0 $414,627 1.0% 2010 $0
$417,283 1.0% 2009 1.000 SO 5405,932 1.0% 2009 4.000 52.000 $2 06,997 0.5% 2009 0.000 $0 $415,739 1.0% 2009 3.440 $0
9406,501 1.1% 2008 90 $348,172 0.9% 2008 $21.126 $202,292 0.5% 2008 $0 $468,067 1.2% 2008 $91 834
$348,434 1.0% 2007 50 $333,781 0,9% 2007 $40,264 $197,551 0.6% 2007 90 $409,588 1.2% 2007 $0
9359,082 1.1% 2006 $0 $329,773 1,0% 2006 913236 $176,835 0.5% 2006 90 9394,473 1.2% 2006 90
Traffic Control (525) FTE'e Ded. Rev. Street Cleaning (224) FTE'e Ded. Rev.
$1,112,810 2.6% 2010 $0 $346,535 5,8% 2010 $0
91,237,352 3.0% 2009 10.100 $0 $347,085 D.8% 2009 2,490 $0
81,094,371 2.9% 2008 $0 $396,403 1.D% 2008 $0
$1,031,165 2.9% 2007 $14,396 $285,687 D.8% 2007 90
$997,602 3.0% 2006 $0 $501,055 0.9% 2006 $0
City of Yakima - 2010 Budget
General Government Budget - Priorities Model
General Government Expeditures FTE's
$61,339,408 2010
$60,778,958 2009 478.075
$56,961,230 2008
$53,211,965 2007
$50,379,358 2006
Resource Management FTE's Economic Development FTE's Quality of Life
$9,211,621 15.0% 2010 $3,375,331 5.5% 2010 $4,184,821 6.89
$9,573,124 15.8% 2009 73.565 $3,432,141 5.6% 2009 30.060 $4,562,973 7.5°
$9,226,096 16.2% 2008 $3,098,419 5.4% 2008 $4,490,696 7.99
$8,692,229 16.3% 2007 $2,893,771 5.3% 2007 $4,245,915 8.01
$8,384,364 16.6% 2006 $2,662,396 5.3% 2006 $4,017,229 8.09
I CITY MANAGER - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I ( FINANCE - ECON DEV I I FINANCE - Ql
City Council (611) FTE's Ded. Rev. Police/Fire Civil Service 1627) FTE'a Ded. Rev, YC DA (322) FTE's Ded. Rev. Sunfair Parade (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$213,593 13% 2010 5D $150529 1.6% 2010 $6 500 $30,000 0.9% 2010 $0 $1,000 0.D% 2010 SO
$213,540 22% 2009 7,000 $0 $150,849 1.6% 2009 1.730 $6500 $30,000 0.9% 2009 0,000 SO $1,000 0,0% 2009 0.000 $0
$204,586 22% 2008 SO $131681 1.5% 2008 $5 $20,000 0.6% 2508 $0 $1,000 0.D% 2008 $0
$182,758 2.1% 2007 50 $127,719 1.5% 2007 $0 $19,913 0.7% 2007 $0 $1,000 00% 20107 $0
$177103 2.1% 2006 $0 $123740 1.5% 2006 $2645 $11913 0.7% 2006 SO $1,000 0.D% 2006 $0
City Management (621) FTE's Ded. Rev. Charter Civil Service (6281 FTE's Ded. Rev. Chambers of Commerce (611) FRB Ded. Rev. Allied Arta (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$520,805 5.7% 2010 $0 $1527B1 1.7% 2010 $0 $11,800 0.3% 2010 $0 $5333 0.1% 2010 $0
$521107 5.4% 2009 3.800 S0 $154,137 1.6% 2009 1.570 $0 $11,800 0.3% 2009 0.000 $0 $5333 01% 2059 0,OD0 SO
$483.312 5.2% 2008 $0 $139,128 1.5% 2008 SO $11100 0,4% 2008 $0 $5,333 0.1% 2008 SO
$450129 5.2% 2007 $0 5121.179 1.4% 2007 $0 $11,800 0A% 2D07 $0 55,333 0.1% 2007 $0
$459,586 5.5% 2006 $0 $118,857 1.4% 2006 $0 $11,800 0,4% 2006 $0 $5333 0.1% 2006 S0
Human Resources 1623) FTE's Ded. Rev. Legal (622) FTE's Ded. Rev. Debt Service CERB 1611) FTE's Ded. Rev. I CITY MANAGER
$171,213 11% 2010 SO $455501 49% 2010 $0 $35,602 1.1% 2010 $0
$175554 1.8% 2009 1.650 $0 $610,326 6.4% 2009 4,425 $0 $35,602 1.0% 2009 0.000 $0 Diversity Promotion (629) FTE's Ded. Rev,
$147,225 1.6% 2008 $0 $552,586 6,0% 2008 $0 $35,601 1.1% 2008 $0 $1,000 0.0% 2010 $0
$149,891 1.7% 2007 SD $626,955 7.2% 2007 SO $35601 1.3% 2007 $0 $1,000 0.10% 2059 0.000 $0
$162,050 1,9% 2006 SO $552,848 6.6% 2006 $0 $35,601 1.3% 2006 $0 $0 0.0% 2008 SO
$0 0.D% 2007 SD
I FINANCE - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I I PUBLIC WORKS - ECON DEV I $419 0.D% 2056 so
State Examiner (624) FTE's Ded. Rev. SunDome Debt Service (6991 FIE'. Ded. Rev. Streets Maintenance 1521) FTE's Ded. Rev. I PUBLIC WORKS
5103,050 1.1% 2010 SO $150,000 1.6% 2010 $40,000 $2,261,874 67.0% 2010 51,208,760
$103,050 1.1% 2009 0.000 SO 5150,000 1.6% 2009 0.000 $40,000 $2,301,295 67.1% 2509 19.270 $1,358,760 Parks Maintenance 14211 PTE'S Ded. Rev.
$96,297 1.0% 2008 $0 9150,000 1,6% 2008 $40,000 $2,167,831 70,0% 2508 51,306,335 $1,325,882 31.7% 2010 519.500
$95,467 1.1% 2007 SO $150,000 1.7% 2007 $40,000 $1,963,672 69.1% 2007 51,381,901 $1,512,164 33.1% 2009 12300 $19.000
$90968 1.1% 2006 $0 $149,173 19% 2006 $40,000 $1,903,166 715% 2006 11,307,718 $1,434,629 31.9% 2008 $15,866
$1,390,119 32.7% 2007 $10.302
Finance (6241 FTE's Ded. Rev. Transfers - General 1$50) PTE'. Ded. Rev, I POLICE - ECON DEV I $1,382512 34.4% 2056 510,558
$1,519,150 16.5% 2010 55,000 $1,352,275 14.7% 2010 $0
$1140,878 16.1% 2009 17.000 95.000 $1,352,275 14.1% 2009 0.000 $0 Perking Enforcement (3231 FTE's Ded. Rev. Community Recreation (4221 FTE's Ded. Rev.
$1,440,634 15.6% 2008 57.189 $1,487,970 16.1% 2008 50 5107.314 3.2% 2010 $100,150 $76,189 1,8% 2010 55,500
51,219,856 110% 2007 $2,618 81,232.216 14.4% 2007 $0 $103,413 3.0% 2009 1,230 $100.150 $75,413 1.7% 2009 0.750 $5.1100
$1,168,274 13,9% 2006 $1,998 $1,271,548 151% 2006 50 $92,656 3.0% 2008 $102,333 864,910 1.4% 2008 $3.500
$61,125 2.1% 2007 569,887 $18,085 04% 2007 $5,223
Information System. (631) FTE's Ded. Rev. 576.022 29% 2006 $43570 $86,802 2.2% 2006 $9150
$2,212,752 24.0% 2010 $35,000
$2,224,354 23.2% 2009 18.500 $35,000 I CED - ECON DEV I Fisher Golf Course (423) PTE'. Ded. Rev,
$2,218,664 24.0% 2008 $49,304 $193,336 4.6% 2010 8107,250
$2,160,770 219% 2007 525,150 Hearing Examiner (313) PTE'. Ded. Rev. $234181 5.1% 2009 3.000 $107,250
$2,081,073 248% 2006 825,000 851,000 13% 2010 862200 $209 ,586 17% 2008 $119,066
$51,000 1.5% 2509 0.550 862,200 $194,286 4.6% 2057 $113143
I CED - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I $65,193 2.1% 200$ $65,229 $183,617 46% 2006 _ $106,196
560.155 21% 2007 $61070
Licensing (626) FTE's Ded. Rev. City Hall Maintenance (6331 FTE's Ded. Rev. $46,905 18% 2006 944.518 Aquatics (424) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$164,523 1.8% 2010 5542,800 9421,820 46% 2010 $0 $563,408 115% 2010 $213,915
$229,324 2.4% 2009 3.380 $542.800 $422,178 4.4% 2009 2240 $0 Comprehensive Planning (310) FTE's Ded. Rev. $556,720 12.2% 2009 3.000 $213,915
$202,786 2.2% 2008 9554.985 $403,570 4.4% 2008 $0 $776128 23.0% 2010 55.000 $553,739 123% 2008 $212,182
$194,173 12% 2007 5544532 $395,937 46% 2007 $0 9667,863 195% 2009 7,750 95.000 $496,696 11.7% 2007 $180,068
$201,091 2.4% 2006 $527,589 $320,771 3.8% 2006 $0 $629,164 20.3% 2008 911.025 $544,520 116% 2096 $197,825
$623,670 21,9% 2007 $9,224
Engineering (528) FTE's Ded. Rev. 8505.508 190% 2006 $6,213 Harmon Center (425) PTE'S Ded. Rev.
$1.096,116 11.9% 2010 9564.700 $703,816 16.8% 2010 $580,300
$1,194,716 125% 2009 11.370 $589700 Planning Administration (3191 FTE's Ded. Rev. $700,004 15.3% 2009 2550 $580,300
$1,034,701 11.2% 2008 $796,382 $101,213 3.0% 2010 $1,000 $654,775 14.6% 2008 $534,193
$1.029,928 11.8% 2007 $607.891 $231,168 6.7% 2009 1.810 $1.000 $638,827 15.5% 2007 $505,611
$1,021,594 12.2% 2006 $586,176 $76,174 2.5% 2008 5875 $467,143 11.6% 2006 $344,904
$67,835 2.4% 2007 $2,445
I PUBLIC WORKS - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT I $63,481 2.4% 2506 $786
Streets Administration ($291 FTE's Ded. Rev. Streets Interfund (645) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$254,166 18% 2010 SO $210,942 23% 2010 $25,000
$251,260 16% 2009 0.000 $0 $210,942 2.2% 2009 0.000 925000
$196,616 11% 2008 $0 $269,057 2,9% 2006 $0
$157,919 1.8% 2007 90 $317,188 3.6% 2007 90
$53,625 0.6% 2006 $0 $384.129 4.6% 2006 50
Traffic Interfund (646) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$62,455 0.7% 2010 $5,000
$68,484 0.7% 2009 0.900 $5,000
$62,283 07% 2008 $27.525
$59,844 0,7% 2007 $52,302
$47,534 0.6% 2006 $22,029
of Yakima - 2010 Budget
nt Budget - Priorities Model
3editures FTE's
2010
2009 478.075
2008
2007
2006
Economic Development FTE's Quality of Life FTE's Cust Svc & Communication FTE's Strategic Partnerships FTE's
$3,375,331 5.5% 2010 $4,184,821 6.8% 2010 $1,846,507 3.0% 2010 $494,871 0.8% 2010
$3,432,141 5.6% 2009 30.060 $4,562,973 7.5% 2009 28.800 $1,848,183 3.0% 2009 18.700 $500,101 0.8% 2009 3.000
$3,098,419 5.4% 2008 $4,490,696 7.9% 2008 $1,645,941 2.9% 2008 $371,765 0.7% 2008
$2,843,771 5.3% 2007 $4,245,915 8.0% 2007 $1,493,730 2.8% 2007 $358,130 0.7% 2007
$2,662,396 5.3% 2006 $4,017,229 8.0% 2006 $1,772,127 3.5% 2006 $296,387 0.6% 2006
FINANCE - ECON DEV ( ( FINANCE - QUALITY OF LIFE I I FINANCE •CUST SVC & COMM I I CITY MGR - STRATEGIC PART I
Ded. Rev. YCDA 1322) FIT'. Ded. Rev. Sunfair Parade 1611) FTE's Ded. Rev. RSVP (611) FTE's Ded, Rev. Copy Center (653) Firs Ded. Rev. Purchasing (632) Firs Ded. Rev.
16.500 $30,000 0.9% 2010 $0 $1,000 0.0% 2010 $0 13,000 01% 2010 $0 $181813 9.9% 2010 $170,000 $324,651 35% 2010 $61,400
$6.500 $30,000 0.9% 2009 0.000 $0 $1,000 0.0% 2009 0.000 $0 $3,000 0.1% 2009 0.000 $0 $183383 9.9% 2009 1.000 $150,000 6329,1181 14% 2009 3.000 $61,400
$5 $20,000 0.6% 200$ $0 $1,000 0.0% 2000 $0 $0 0.0% 2008 $0 $202,005 12.3% 2008 $180.934 $258,089 28% 2008 $1069
$0 $19,913 07% 2007 40 9100 0.0% 2007 SO $0 0.0% 2007 SO $169354 11.3% 2007 9147339 $234,303 27% 2007 $8,499
$2645 $19,913 0.7% 2006 $0 $1,000 0. 0% 2006 $0 $0 0.0% 2006 $0 $198,000 11.2% 2006 9148.500 $218,162 26% 2006 $5,191
Ded. Rev. Chambers of Commerce (611) FTEL Ded, Rev. Allied At 16111 FTE's Ded. Rev. Yakima Symphony (611 FTEL Ded. Rev. Utility Services (635) Firs Ded. Rev. I FINANCE - STRATEGIC PART I
$0 $11.800 03% 2010 $0 95333 0.1% 2010 SO $10,000 0.2% 2010 $0 $1,221,015 66.1% 2010 $1,225000
$0 $11,800 03% 2009 0.000 40 $5333 0.1% 2009 0.0D0 SO 910.000 0.2% 2009 0.000 S0 $1,25,469 66.3% 2009 11300 $1225,000 Con( of Governments (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$0 $11,800 0.4% 2008 $0 $5333 0.1% 2008 S0 $0 0.0% 2008 $0 $1,034,016 62.8% 2008 $1,039297 $41,125 8.2% 2010 S0
$0 $11,800 0.4% 2007 $0 $5,333 0.1% 2007 $0 $0 0.0% 2007 $0 $958392 64.2% 2007 $958392 $41,15 13.9% 2009 0.000 SO
$0 $11,800 0.4% 2006 60 $5333 0.1% 2006 $0 $0 0.0% 2006 S0 1958,990 54.1% 2006 $963.127 442,581 11.9% 2008 $0
$42,732 11,5% 2007 S0
Ded. Rev. Deb! Service CERB 1611) FTE's Den. Rev. I CITY MANAGER • QUALITY OF LIFE I I CITY MGR - CUST SVC & COMM I $39,130 7.9% 2006 $0
$0 $35,602 1.1% 2010 $0
$0 $35,602 1.0% 2009 0.000 $0 Diversity Promotion (629) FTE's Ded. Rev. City Clerks - Legislation (611) PTE'S Ded. Rev. Annexation Ramp Down (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$0 $35,601 1.1% 2008 S0 $1,000 0.0% 2010 90 $145595 7.9% 2010 $0 $39,095 7.9% 2010 $0
$0 935,601 13% 2007 $0 $1,000 0.D% 2009 0.000 $0 $141,812 7.7% 2009 1.250 $0 $39,095 7.8% 2009 0.000 $0
$0 $35,601 1.3% 2006 40 40 0.0% 2008 SO $126,062 7.7% 2008 $0 $39,095 10.5% 2008 $0
$0 0.0% 2057 $0 $124,343 8.3% 2007 $0 181,095 226% 2007 $0
] I PUBLIC WORKS • ECON DEV I $419 0.0% 2006 SO $183,067 10.3% 2006 $0 $39,095 13.2% 2006 $0
■ Ded. Rev. Streets Maintenance (521) PTE'S Ded. Rev. I PUBLIC WORKS- QUALITY OF LIFE I City Clerk - Records (625) ATE'. Ded. Rev. Black Rock 1$11) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$40,000 $2261,874 67.0% 2010 $1,208,760 $297,084 16.1% 2010 $0 $10,005 0.3% 2010 $0
$40,000 $2,301,295 67.1% 2009 19.270 $1358.760 Parks Maintenance 1421) PTE'S Ded. Rev. Sports 1426) PTE'S Ded. Rev. $297,519 16.1% 2009 2150 $0 $10,000 0.3% 2009 0.000 SO
$40,000 $2,167,831 70.0% 2008 $1,306,335 $1,325,882 31.7% 2010 $19,000 $349,675 8.4% 2010 $263,850 $53,858 17.2% 2008 $0 $12,000 0.4% 2008 S0
$40,000 $1963,672 69.1% 2007 41,381,901 $1,512,164 33.1% 2009 12.300 $19,000 $389,553 8.5% 2009 1750 $263,850 $241,441 16.2% 2007 $0 $0 0.0% 2007 $0
$40,000 $1903,166 715% 2006 41,307,718 61.434,629 31.9% 2008 $15,866 $333,728 7.4% 2008 $246,233 $432.070 214% 2006 $0 $0 0.0% 2006 S0
$1,390,119 327% 2007 $10302 $381,791 10% 2007 $243,597
r Ded. Rev. I POLICE - ECON DEV I $1 382,512 344% 2006 $10058 $375,532 9.3% 2006 $243,078 C iNsens f /Safe Yak Comm (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
80 $20,000 0.0% 2010 $0
$0 Parking Enforcement (323) FTE's Ded Rev. Community Recreation (422) FTE's Ded. Rev. Americorps (4271 PTE's Ded. Rev. $20,000 0.0% 2009 0.000 $0
$0 $107314 31% 2010 $100.150 $76,189 1.8% 2010 $5,000 4157.496 3.8% 2010 $93,600 $20,000 0.1% 2008 SO
$0 1103,413 3.0% 2009 1.230 $100,150 475,413 1.7% 2009 0.750 $5.000 $170,55 3.7% 2009 1300 $93,600 $0 0.0% 2007 $0
$0 $92,656 10% 2008 $102.333 164,910 14% 2008 $3,000 $150,696 3.4% 2008 182,461 $D 0.0% 2006 50
$61.15 2.1% 2007 $69.887 $18,080 0.4% 2007 65,25 $133,448 3.1% 2007 $101,884
$76,022 2.9% 2006 $43,570 $86,802 2.2% 2006 $9,50 $61,968 1.5% 2006 $31,031 CSC Blockwalch (611) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$60,000 0.1% 2010 40
I CFD - ECON DEV I Fisher Golf Course (423) PTE'S Ded. Rev. Parks Administration (429) PTE'S Ded. Rev. $60,005 0.1% 2009 0.000 40
$193,336 4.6% 2010 $107,50 6593368 14.2% 2010 $2.200 $0 0.0% 2008 $0
Hearing Examiner 1313) ATE'. Ded. Rev. $234,181 5.1% 2009 3.000 $107.50 6592774 13.0% 2009 1000 62200 $0 0.0% 2007 $0
151,000 13% 2010 562,200 $209,586 4.7% 2008 $119,066 8661332 147% 2008 $2066 $0 0.0% 2006 SO
651.000 1.5% 2009 0.000 562,200 $194,286 16% 2007 $113,643 5567,568 13.4% 2007 $1.959
$65,193 2.1% 2508 665,229 $183,617 16% 2006 $106,196 $460,679 113% 2006 $4,175
$60,155 2.1% 2007 $61,070
s Ded. Rev. $46,905 1.8% 2006 _ 944.518 Aquatics (424) FTE's Ded. Rev. Parks Miscellaneous (645) FTE's Ded. Rev.
$0 $563,408 13.5% 2010 $213,915 $121,500 29% 2010 $1,117 000
I $0 Comprehensive Planning (3101 FTE's Ded. Rev. $556,720 12.2% 2009 3.000 $213,915 $146,500 3.2% 2009 0.000 $1,071000
$0 $776,528 23.0% 2010 $5.000 $553,739 123% 2008 $212,182 $210.865 17% 2008 $1,046,360
$0 $667,863 19.5% 2009 7.750 $5,000 $496,696 11.7% 2007 5180,068 $242.381 5.7% 2007 $1,023,126
$0 9629,164 203% 2008 911,05 $544,520 116% 2006 $197,825 $293.962 7.3% 2006 $1,015,105
$65,670 21.9% 2007 $9,224
$505,508 190% 2006 $6.213 Harmon Center 1425) FTE's Ded. Rev. Pedestrian & Bikeways (5221 FTE'e Ded. Rev. 1
5703,816 16.8% 2010 $580,300 $79,618 1.9% 2010 $0
Planning Administration 1319) FTE's Ded. Rev. $700,004 15.3% 2009 2550 $580,300 9165,096 3.6% 2009 0.800 $0
9101,213 3.0% 2010 $1.000 $654,775 14.6% 2008 $534.193 $210,103 4.7% 2008 52.50
$231,168 6.7% 2009 1.810 $1,000 5638,827 150% 2007 $505,611 $176,386 4.2% 2007 511.676
$76,174 2.5% 2008 $875 $467,143 11.6% 2006 $344,904 5153.742 3,B% 2006 $0
$67,835 2.4% 2007 $2,445
] $63,481 2.4% 2006 $786
s Ded. Rev.
$25,000
1 $25,000
$0
$0
$0