HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/08/1969 Business Meeting 612'
• - SEPTEMBER 8, 1969 • •
The City Council metin regular session, Mayor Larson presiding, Councilmen Brown,- Kurbitz,
,Lambert,- McNeice and Robinson, City Manager McMicken'and City Attorney Andrews present on
roll call. Councilman Keith absent on roll call, having been excused at a previous meet
ing.
The Invocation was given by Councilman Brown.
The minutes of the regular meeting of September 2, 1969, having been duly certified accur-
ate by two Councilmen, and no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly,'
Mayor Larson declared said minutes approved as recorded. •
This being the time fixed for the Hearing on Petition No. 643, filed by Glascam Builders,
Inc., : requesting annexation of property situated. northwest of the intersection of 58th
• Avenue and Barge Street,.Bruce Finke, Director'of Planning and Community Development,
reviewed this matter, stating that the annexation area contains approximately 6.1 acres..
and is presently in orchard. He reported that on September 2, 1969, the Planning Commis-
.
sion recommended that the annexation be accepted and zoned a Planned Development Zone,
subject to conditions to the zoning as follows:
• (1). that the maximum number of residential units 'shall be 43.
(2) .that guest parking shall be provided according to the Development Plan with a
minimum of 40 spaces and that landscaped islands shall be added to the guest
parking areas.
(3) that written.access agreements with property to the west of the proposed
development, subject to the approval* of the City,Attorney, shall'be secured
•
' prior to the issuance of a City Building Permit. .
(4) that a firm written agreement with property owners to the south of the proposed
development regarding vacation of Barge Street between 58th and 60th Avenues
and the. development of cul -de -sacs at North 59th and North 60th Avenues at Barge
Street be obtained prior to the approval of the annexation and zoning,by the
•
Yakima City Council. .
(5) that approval of the cul -de -sac design shall:be obtained from City . and County
Engineers prior to approval by the City Council. •
•
(6) that} •if items •3, . 4 arid. ::5 cannot be accomplished as required, the developer shall
be required to set the entire project in 20 feet from all service roads.on the
north, south, east.and west and dedicate a minimum of 25 feet of public right -
of way.
II (7) that an adequate water supply shall be supplied for domestic and fire fighting •
purposes and that six fire hydrants shall be provided around the exterior of the •
development, - subject :to the-approval of the :Fire :Chief:. The Yakima City :Fire
Department recommends that one hydrant be located at each.corner.'of the ,develop-
ment, with hydrants at the midpoint along the north and south sides of the
development.
(8) that the access'road to- Summitview tAvenue shall be screened as indicated by the
Development Plan and that a four foot sidewalk shall be..c.onstructed on the west,
• east and.south.sides of the subject property outside of the perimeter fence. The
sidewalk on the west shall extend to Summitview Avenue.'
•
(9) that the entire project, with the!lexception of access driveways orpublic,:rights-
.ofways, shall be surrounded by a four foot.landscaped buffer strip and fence.
• This strip shall be used for the landscaping and screening of the project. Final
design of the screening and fencing shall be r subj ect.: to_: the approval- of the De-
partment Planning , and -Community- Development ... : .. .
. is i . i •
(10) that all buffer areas and open space that abut a service road shall.be enclosed
within . a concrete curb. _
Public Utilities Director Frank Stein explained the water system in the vicinity,. stating
that it will be best to use Nob Hill Water as it would be a duplication■of lines to require
this annexation area to use City water. Mr. Ron Whitaker,' Attorney representing Glascam
Builders, Inc: referred-to the:ten conditions:that:have been suggested. by -the Planning
Commission and asked the- City -Council- toc change;or• eliminate.. some of. them: ., He•, expla•ined-
• the reasons for not being able to comply with all of these conditions. Mr. Whitaker re-
ferred to the third condition, (listed above) stating that they have been unable to obtain
a written- access• agreement - -from: Mr -. :Pickens., as he _± _out of town c and they have .no idea.
when they wil•1 'be able to contact him. - He - =ind ica.ted .that :they would like-to-make some kind •
of arrangement whereby when 'he :i s reached.,_: they are.:will-ing to give shim any access that he
may want: -Mr. Whitaker referred to condition number 4, in which thelPlanning.Commission
proposed the construction of cul -de -sacs at the end of north 59th and 60th Avenues, stating
that they would like to propose an alternate plan, which would make a through street of
. Barge and would dedicate an additional 20 fee.t.:to give Street a 50 -foot right -of -way.
• . Property owners in this vicinity .•present and : Ito this matter. were Mr.: :Fred Reiner,
Mr. Jim Rosenkranz, Mrs. Pool, Mr. Stan Paxton, Mr ::' Bob: Brus;ic and Mr :E-Bob Ware::, They
indicated that are' concerned that there are. too many condominiums being built in this
area and will create traffic problems, and are not too anxious to have.such a development
in their area. Council members reviewed the conditions as recommended by the Planning
. Comm'ission 'and• suggested 'amendments to .sotefof.'rthe conditions City.:: AttorneyFred Andrews
explained • that in the existing ,Ordinance on Planned ,Development, :.are itemized: many re.-
quirements and' details - tha't must' be-included as 'a? par't`` of :the .plan for . that development.
He explained -that :the Planning Commission :has the:duty, either of granting the zoning,
disapproving it, or granting it with modifications, and that they have now recommended the
zoning of this annexation with certain .mod if.ications.. s:ubj ect to_ :certain, other :conditions,
to be taken care of prior -to ;the annexation. - .Mr. - Andrews :indicated. that rom . a legal stand-
point, the plan is not quite ready•to be submitted to and passed on by the City Council
yet, and that the -conditions finally :cons idered should.:.be =made . :a -part : of . the • plan: He
recommended that the. conditions as discussed and suggested amendments be referred back to
the Planning Commission for their further study and recommendation. After due discussion,
•
•
. 613 � .
SEPTEMBER 8, 1969 •
i was MOVED by McNeice, seconded by Robinson that. this matter be remanded to the Planning
Commission for its further consideration and that the following list of suggested changes
in conditions recommended by the Planning Commission, be considered by the Planning
Commission as part of its Hearing, and that upon the conclusion of the Planning Commission'
Hearing, that the matter then be heard again by the City Council for its final action; the
conditions, and changes thereto, considered by.the City Council and referred to the Plan-
ning Commission are as follows: .
•
(1) No change recommended. .
•
(2) No change recommended.
(3) that written access agreements with property owners Pickens and Rosenkranz to the •
west and east respectively of the proposed development, shall be secured prior
to approval of the Plan, which agreements shall be subject to the approval of the
City Attorney. •
•
(4) that one of the following alternative provisions be accomplished:
(a) that a cul -de -sac be developed on 58th, 59th and 60th. Avenues on the
south boundry of the development
•
(b) that cul -de -sacs be developed on 59th and 60th Avenues and direct access
into the Village Square be provided from 58th Avenue
(c) that the developer dedicate 20 feet on the south side of the development •
between 58th. and 60th Avenues to allow the opening of Barge.. Street and
the intersection of 58th, 59th and 60th Avenues with Barge Street,
with the necessary dedications and agreements to be executed prior to the Planning
Commission's meeting. .
•
(5) No change recommended. • •
(6) recommend that this condition be deleted.
(7) No change recommended.
(8) that the access road to Summitview Avenue shall be screened.as indicated by the
Development Plan and that a four foot strip .,on .,the west, east and_ south sides
of the development, be dedicated to the.public for sidewalk purposes, .which
strip shall be situated outside the perimeter fence. The sidewalk dedication
.on the west shall extend to Summitview Avenue. .
(9) that the entire project, with the exception of access' driveways or .public
rights-of-ways, shall be surrounded by a sight screening fence, five or six •
feet in height. •
(10) No change recommended. •
•
carried: Brown,- Lambert, Larson, McNeice and Robinson'voting aye by -voice vote. Keith
and Kurbitz absent. (Councilman Kurbitz excused during this Hearing at 5:00.P.M.)
•
Petition No. 644, having been filed with the City Clerk on August 29, 1969, by J. P.
Pavlick & Others, requesting improvement of property by the paving of an alley, 19th to
20th Avenues between Tieton & MacLaren, and a Petition'protesting this requested improve-
ment, having been filed with the City Clerk on September 8, 1969, by Thomas J. Cavanaugh
& Others, Public Works Director,'John Mayo, reported that protests on this Petition amount-
ed to 53.9% of the proposed improvement. In discussion it was pointed out that 60% protest
legally protests out a district, but in the past Council members have felt that if over
50% of the property owners do not wish an improvement, then it should not be improved, and
whereas. this protest has :come in before the District has been formed, they feel that it
should not be formed. It was then MOVED by Robinson, seconded by Lambert that this re-
quested alley district not be formed and that Mr. Pavlick and the others that filed Peti-
tion No. 644 requesting this improvement, should, be so' i_nformed :carried, Brown, Lambert,
Larson, McNeice and Robinson voting aye by voice vote. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
Mr. Charlie Huff and Mr. Del Trimble were present representing the Transportation Union of
the Northern Pacific Railroad, to report that it is proposed to discontinue the service of
the.Mainstreeter through the City of and they are seeking to present the case for
maintaining this service before the people because they feel. the service is needed and
will be especially needed in the future as other modes of transportation become over
crowded. They stated that the County Commissioners are. in accord with them and would like
the City Council to go on record as supporting this move to keep this train on. Council
members indicated their interest in this matter, but no formal action was taken at this •
meeting.
•
•
A report having been received from the Planning Commission on its Resolution of Intention
to amend Title 12 - Zoning, of the Yakima Municipal Code, it was MOVED by Robinson,
seconded by Brown that September 29, 1969, be fixed as-the time for a Hearing ,by the City
Council on this matter: carried, Brown, Lambert,.Larson, McNeice and Robinson voting aye
by voice vote. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
A report having been received from the Planning Commission on its reconsideration of the
Rezone Application, ;filed by Mrs. Mary Brewer,. for the rezone of property - situated at 810
and 812•South 14th Avenue, it was MOVED by Robinson, seconded by McNeice that September
29, 1969, beset 'as the time for a hearing. by the.City Council.on the matter of::.the•
rezone of certain real property as requested by Mrs. Mary Brewer, and that the City Clerk
give notice of such hearing as required by law: carried, Brown, Lambert, Larson, McNeice
and Robinson voting aye by voice vote. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
•
The City Treasurer submitted the following report for the month of August, 1969:
• •(continued)
•
•
61.4
SEPTEMBER 8, 1969 .
August 31, 1969
Mr. Craig McMicken.
City Manager
Yakima, Washington
Dear Sir :. .
The following investments were purchased during the month of August, 1969:
CITY STREET .
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2818115A/16A @ 10M
SKR #7684 - DUE 11/28/69 $ 19,661.28 $ 19,661.28
ARTERIAL STREET
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2818113A/14A @ 10M
SKR #7683 - DUE 11/28/69 . . 19,661.28 19,661.28
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND REDEMPTION FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS - DUE 2/5/70 9,700.00 9,700.00
TRANSIT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2818448A/49A @ 10M
SKR #7685 - DUE 4/30/70 19,037.56 19,037.56
IRRIGATION .
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2818450A/51A @ 10M
SKR #7686 - DUE 4 /30/70 19,037.56 19,037.56
WATER -SEWER REVENUE BOND REDEMPTION 1964 PRINCIPAL & INTEREST
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS - DUE 12/4/69 14,748.20 14,748.20
WATER -SEWER REVENUE BOND REDEMPTION 1968 PRINCIPAL & INTEREST
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS - DUE 2/5/70 9,700.00 9,700.00
CUMULATIVE RESERVE FOR DOMESTIC WATER DEVELOPMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS' - DUE 2/26/70 19,304.16 19,304.16
SPECIAL WATER DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF L.I.D.
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2818451A/53A @ 10M
SKR #7687 - DUE 4/30/70 19,037.56 19,037.56
DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #236535A/36A & #40223 '
100M - SKR #7357 - DUE 8/31/69 298,666.67 298,666.67
FIREMEN'S RELIEF & PENSION
U.S TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2675343A/6A @ 10M
SKR #7353 - DUE 7/31/70 37,124.01 37,124.01
FIRE CAPITAL
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #2661462 @ 10M &: #373509 @.
50M - SKR #752.5 - DUE 9/25/69 59,658.75. 59,658.75
CEMETERY TRUST
YAKIMA L.I.D. #971 - WARRANT #4 @ 6% 7,951.94 7,951.94
L. I. GUARANTY
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS - DUE 7/31/70 28,014.80 28,014.80
TREASURER'S SURPLUS CASH
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #703757A/58A @ 100M
SKR #7352 - DUE 7/31/70 185,620.06 185,620.06
Total investments purchased during the month of August, 1969 $766,923.83
(continued)
J
61.5
SEPTEMBER 8, 1969
(Investment Committee Report, continued - August, 1969)
The following investments were sold during the month of August, 1969:
CURRENT EXPENSE
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILL #288065A 50M -SKR #5213 $ 48,481.33 $ 48,481.33
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND REDEMPTION FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1590133A/34A @ 10M
SKR #5201 19,457.30 19,457.30
TRANSIT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1899246A/48A 10M .
SKR #5210 29,091.00 29,091.00
IRRIGATION .
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT. BILLS #1899249A/51A @ 10M
SKR #5209 29,091.00 29,091.00
WATER -SEWER REVENUE BOND REDEMPTION 1968 PRINCIPAL &- INTEREST
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1590135A/36A @ 10M
SKR #5200 19,457.30 .
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1606349/41 @ 10M & .
#1615220/4 C 1M - SKR # 5620 24,464.31 43,921.61
CUMULATIVE RESERVE FOR DOMESTIC WATER DEVELOPMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1899255A/56A C 10M
SKR #5215 19,395.83 19,395.83
SPECIAL WATER DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF L.I.D.
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILLS #1899252A/54A @ 10M
SKR #5207 29,091.00 29,091.00
DOMESTIC WATER IMPROVEMENT
U.S. TREASURY DISCOUNT BILL #288066A C 50M - SKR #5212 48,481.33 48,481.33
FIREMEN'S RELIEF & PENSION
SAVINGS IN ACCOUNT #32090 - WASHINGTON MUTUAL SAVINGS
BANK 9,600.00
SAVINGS IN ACCOUNT #6986 - HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS &
LOAN ASSOCIATION 9,600.00
- SAVINGS IN ACCOUNT #56030 -0 - YAKIMA FEDERAL SAVINGS
& LOAN ASSOCIATION 10,000.00
YAKIMA L.I.D. #899 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 698.29
YAKIMA L.I.D. #910 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 247.14
YAKIMA L.I #922 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 3,575.84
YAKIMA L.I.D. #923 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 337.30 34,058.57
CEMETERY TRUST
YAKIMA L.I.D. #884 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 965.64
YAKIMA L.I.D. #897 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 210.33
YAKIMA L.I.D. #898 - INSTALLMENT LOAN NOTE 96.29
YAKIMA L.I.D. #880 - WARRANT #13 75.00 1,347.26
L. I. GUARANTY
YAKIMA L.I.D. #891 - BOND #20 $ 500.00
TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT #1397 15,000.00
TIME CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT #15548 15,000.00 $30,500.00
Total investments sold during the month of August, 1969 $332,916.23
Respectfully submitted,
s/ DORIS A. HUFFERD
Doris A. Hufferd
DAH:dh Deputy City Treasurer
APPROVED: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
s/ JOHN LARSON MAYOR
s/ CRAIG McMICKEN CITY MANAGER
s/ LEONARD CROSE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
s/ WALTER CHAPPEL CITY TREASURER
•
616
•
•
•
SEPTEMBER 8; 1969
It was MOVED by McNeice, seconded by Brown that the report of the City Treasurer dated
"August 31, 1969, regarding the investments of the.City of Yakima, be accepted and approved:
Carried, Brown,. Lambert,. Larson, McNeice and Robinson voting aye by voice vote. . Keith and
Kurbitz absent. •
City Manager McMicken explaining that it is necessary to transfer funds within the 1969
Budget for the Transit Fund, to take care of additional salaries, vacations, etc., it was
MOVED by Brown, seconded by . Lambert that Resolution No. D -1387 authorizing the transfer of
111 .$3,500 within the Transit passed as read: carried, Brown, - Lambert,- Larson, McNeice
and Robinson voting aye on roll call. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
•
' RESOLUTION NO. D -1387, A.RESOLUTION transferring the amount of $3,500 within the 1969
appropriation for 410 - Transit Fund.
City Manager referred to the Damage Claim, filed by H. E. Cushing, requesting
payment for damages caused by a fire hydrant leaking into his basement, and to City
Attorney Andrews' Memo regarding this matter. .Mr. Andrews explained that Mr. Cushing had
filed the claim in the amount of.$288.54, and after investigation and a more detailed
accounting was made of actual costs. incurred, this amount was reduced to $146.93, and
recommends that this claim should be paid in the reduced amount. After due discussion, it
' was MOVED by Robinson, seconded by McNeice that Resolution No. D -1388 authorizing the pay-
. ment of said damage claim to Mr. H. E. Cushing in the amount of $146.93, be passed as read:
carried, Brown, Lambert, Larson, McNeice and Robinson. voting aye on roll call. Keith and
Kurbitz absent. .
•
RESOLUTION NO. D- 1388,.A RESOLUTION authorizing the payment of.$146.93 to H. E. Cushing in •
settlement of a damage claim.
•
City Manager McMicken referring to the City,Engineer's report on the completion of- L.I.D.
•
No. 971, Richey Road and Others Paving District, it. was MOVED by McNeice, seconded by.
Robinson that October 6, 1969, be fixed as the time of hearing on'the assessment roll for
said project: carried, Brown,, Lambert,. Larson,..McNeice and Robinson voting aye by voice
vote. Keith and'Kurbitz absent. • .. . •
•
City Manager McMicken reported that in accordance with action taken by the City Council at
its meeting of August 4, 1969, when John DeLaney, chairman of the .Senior Citizens
Board of Directors, requested financial assistance, since funding by the Federal Govern-
ment ends September the.City staff has been studying the problem. He further
. reported that the Metropolitan Park Department has provided' funds in the 1970 Budget suffi-
cient to finance the Center, and that under the Park Department, the Center would not have
its own director,.but would have a hostess working under the guidance of the Park Depart-
.
•
ment's recreation director. ..Mr. McMicken stated that there is no way for the City to •
donate funds to the Center for the next three months, and recommended that a meeting be
arranged with the Board of Directors of the Center and see if there is some way they can
trim expenses for the next three months until the problem can be resolved through the Park
Department budget at the beginning of next year. Council.members'indicating that they feel
that all the help possible should be given to keep this program going, it was MOVED by
•Lambert,.seconded by Brown that City. Manager McMicken be directed to meet with the Board of
Directors of the Center, in accordance with Mr. McMicken's recommendation: carried, Brown, •
Lambert, Larson and McNeice Voting aye by voice vote. Robinson not voting because of a
conflict of interests. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
•
City Manager McMicken reported that Mr. Walter Philipp's.term on the .Planning Commission
expires as of August,.1969.and that he has indicated'that he is willing to serve another.
term. .After due discussion, it was MOVED by Lambert, seconded by Robinson that this
matter be continued for one week in order to give further' consideration to the appointment:
carried,-Brown, Lambert, Larson,. McNeice, and Robinson voting aye by voice vote. .Keith and
Kurbitz absent. • ..
There being no further business 'to come before the Council, was MOVED by McNeice,
seconded by Lambert that we do now adjourn at the hour of 6:05 P.M.: carried, Brown, Lam -
bert, Larson, McNeice and Robinson voting aye by voice- vote. Keith and Kurbitz absent.
•
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY DATE
•
•
COU IL
1 1 J~ DATE — Vi +o
OUNCILMAN. •
•
•
•
ATTEST: •
/ ®/ •
C I T Y C L E R K . Y 0 R •
•
•
•
1'