HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1994-017 Fire Fighter Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) ProgramRESOLUTION NO. R-94 - 17
A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of
Yakima to execute a Recruit Class Agreement Between The City
Of Yakima And The Yakima Valley Opportunities
Industrialization Center for a Recruit Training Class for Cadets
enrolled in the Yakima Valley Opportunities Industrialization
Center (YVOIC) Fire Fighter Job Training Partnership Act
(JTPA) Program.
WHEREAS, YVOIC needs a Recruit Class for the 10 enrolled Cadets in its Fire
Fighter Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program; and
WHEREAS, the City has the necessary services, facilities, equipment, and
staff to provide said Recruit Class, and agrees to provide same for YVOIC under the
terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The Cit} Manager and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the attached agreement entitled, "Recruit Class Agreement Between The
Cit} Of Yakima And The Yakima Valley Opportunities Industrialization Center."
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 22ndav of February , 1994.
Ad,t- &.11,044
ATTEST: Mayor
c<'
City Clerk
(1s)res/recruit class pa.
RECRUIT CLASS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF YAKIMA
AND
THE YAKIMA VALLEY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this % day of I L, 1994, by
and between THE CITY OF YAKIMA, FIRE DEPARTMENT (hereinafter e "City"), and
THE YAKIMA VALLEY OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER (hereinafter
"YVOIC").
WHEREAS, YVOIC needs a Recruit Class for the 10 enrolled Cadets in its Fire
Fighter Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program.
WHEREAS, the City has the necessary services, facilities, equipment, and staff
to provide said Recruit Class, and agrees to provide same for YVOIC under the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and
agreements set forth herein, it is agreed by and between YVOIC and the City as
follows:
Section 1: Duties and Responsibilities
a. The City agrees to offer a Recruit Training Class for the 10 enrolled
Cadets in the YVOIC Fire Fighter JTPA Program. Instructors, instruction, facilities,
apparatus, and training space for the Recruit Training Class will be provided from the
Yakima City Fire Department and Emergency Services. Each class participant will
recieve a total of 48 hours of training covering the following areas:
i. Orientation and Safety/Apparatus and Equipment Safety;
ii. Hose Types, Construction, Loads, Knots, and Ropes;
ill. First Aid/CPR;
iv. Wet Hose Use;
v. Basic Air Tanks;
vi. Search and Rescue I;
vii. Basic and Extension Ladders;
viii HIV/AIDS Awareness;
ix. Search and Rescue II.
b. The Yakima Fire Department will be responsible for providing progress
and attendance reports for said Cadets in a timely manner to YVOIC.
c. YVOIC will provide all necessary time sheets, evaluation forms, and any
other JTPA specific tools required for participant record-keeping.
Page 1 of 4
(1s)agr/recruit class.pm
d. YVOIC represents that all class participants will utilize their best efforts
to be responsible, prompt, efficient, and timely in all academic assignments and
training activities. YVOIC further represents that all class participants will abide by
all rules of conduct of employees of the City.
e. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time for any class
participant for any reason related to the Cadet's attitude, attendance, work habits,
performance, etc. No prior written notice will be required in such event.
f. YVOIC will serve as the liaison between the City and respective Cadet in
all behavioral and/or disciplinary matters.
Section 2: Consideration
YVOIC agrees to compensate the City for all work and services performed under
and pursuant to this Agreement in the form of tuition of Ninety Six Dollars ($96.00)
per enrolled Cadet. YVOIC agrees it will make said payment within thirty (30)
calendar days of receiving the billing statement from the City.
Section 3: Time of Performance
The term of this Agreement shall commence when the City and YVOIC have
duly executed this Agreement, and terminate when the 10 enrolled Cadets have
received the specified 48 hours of training or on the 31st day of December, 1994,
whichever shall occur first.
Section 4: Status of Cadets
YVOIC and the City understand and expressly agree that the 10 enrolled Cadets
are not employees of the City and are in no way entitled to benefits provided by the
City to its employees, including but not limited to health benefits, workers'
compensation, employment insurance, and retirement benefits.
Section 5: Insurance
YVOIC agrees to maintain such insurance, including medical insurance, as will
fully protect both YVOIC and the City from any and all claims of whatsoever kind or
nature for the damage to property or from personal injury, including death, made by
anyone whomsoever, that may arise from the performance of this Agreement by the
City. YVOIC agrees to provide the City with satisfactory documentation evidencing the
required insurance coverage before the City begins work hereunder.
Section 6: Hold Harmless
YVOIC shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers,
and employees from any all liability or loss, and against all claims or actions based
upon or arising out of damage or injury, including death, to persons or property
caused by or sustained in connection with the performance of this Agreement or by
conditions created hereby, or based upon any violation of statute, ordinance, or
regulation.
Page 2 of 4
(1s) gr/recruit class pm
Section 7: Assignment
This Agreement, or any interest herein, or claim hereunder, shall not be
assigned or transferred in whole or in part by YVOIC to any other person or entity
without the prior written consent of the City.
Section 8: Termination
Except as stated otherwise herein, this Agreement may be terminated by either
party, with or without cause, by providing the other party fifteen (15) days written
notice of termination.
Section 9: Full Force and Effect
If any portion of this Agreement is changed per mutual agreement or held
invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 10: Integration
This written document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties.
No change or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either party
unless such change or addition be in writing and executed by both the City and
YVOIC.
Section 11: Notices
Unless stated otherwise herein, all notices and demands shall be in writing and
sent to the parties at their addresses as follows:
To City:
To YVOIC:
Chief, Yakima City Fire Department
401 North Front Street
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima Valley Opportunities
Industrialization Center
815 Fruitvale Blvd.
Yakima, WA 98902
or to such addresses as the parties may hereafter designate in writing. Notices and
demands shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid. Such notices
shall be deemed effective when mailed or hand delivered at the addresses specified
above.
Section 12: Litigation
In the event that any suit or action is instituted by the City or YVOIC to enforce
compliance with or interpret any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to collect, in addition to necessary
court costs, such sums as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney's fees. The
venue for any such action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall lie in the
Superior Court of Washington for Yakima County, Washington.
Page 3 of 4
(1s)age/recruit class.pm
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first herein written.
CITY OF YAKIMA
R. . ZAIS, JR., City Manager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
�)ry colkrur.-
Page 4 of 4
(ls)agr/recruit class pm
YAKIMA VALLEY OPPORTUNITIES
INDUSTIZATIO ' EN . R
•T • • ' • BOSLER
Program Director
By:
SONDRA WELLS
Program Case Manager
I♦
1111
O A S r i M G 1 G A SIANE
O E P A A 1 Y E A 1 O P
ECO L0G1
CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER FUND
PROTOTYPE OUTCOME FUNDING INITIATIVE APPLICATION
PART I
Ecology Use
Application Number
1. PROJECT TITLE (Five words or less)
YAKIMA URBAN AREA WASTEWATER PLANNING
2. PROJECT TYPE (Check one)
t3 Activity ❑ Facility
4. CONTACT PERSON: Dennis Covell
Title: Director of Engineering & Utilities
Address: 129 N 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Telephone Number: (509) 575-6111
3. APPLICANT NAME (PUBLIC BODY) AND ADDRESS
City of Yakima
129 N. 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Authorized Signatory Name and Title:
R. A. Zais Jr.
City Manager
The person whose name is listed here must sign the
application.
5. If funded, we will offer a grant or grant/loan as required by the Program Guidelines. If you are applying for a 100%
loan, check box 0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
.a. Total Estimated Project Cost $505 000 f. Will you receive other state or federal funding to
-b. Total Estimated Eligible Project Cost $ 100% complete this project? If yes, list source amount.
c. Ecology Grant Share La%) $250,000 NO ._(---.%) v $
d. Ecology Loan Share ( 0 %) $ II
e. Applicant's Share5(�0 %) S255,000 (—%) S
The total project cost may include costs necessary for the successful completion of the project that may NOT be
eligible for grant or loan participation under the Centennial Clean Water Fund program.
Amount used as the base cost for Ecology grant or loan share.
7. REQUESTED LOAN TERMS
a. 0 0 - 5 Year Term - 0% Interest Rate
❑ 6 - 14 Year Term - 3 1/2% Interest Rate
01.5 - 20 Year Term - 4 1/2% Interest Rate
b. Specific Term Requested: Years
S. FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ASSISTANCE
Financial hardship assistance grants and/or loans are being
requested in accordance with WAC 173-95-150:
❑Yes ONo
If yes, please submit Financial Capability Outline with your
application.
9. APPLICANT AND PROJECT LOCATION
a. County of Applicant: Xa�d
b. County of Project: a u.ma
c. What is the legislative district of applicant: 14
d. Does the project involve an activity covering legislative
districts statewide?
❑Yes ®No
e. Legislative district(s) of project:
Include all state legislative districts where at least five
percent of the project will be accomplished. (Total must
equal 100%)
District No. 13 Percent 5
District No. 14 Percent 90
District No. 15 Percent 5
District No. Percent
10. FOR FACILITY PROJECTS ONLY
a. Type of Project: (Check one)
Planning (Step 1) , facilities plan or engineering report required)
O Design (Step 2 - Department of Ecology WQFA approved facilities
O Construction (Step 3 - Department of Ecology WQFA approved plans and specifications required)
O Design and Construction re required - see guidelines for
(Step 4 - Department of Ecology approved facilities plan or engineering report
eligibility)
b. Facility Project Status
DOCUMENT
APPROVED DATE
Engineering Report
Facilities Plan
Plans and Specifications
If yes, attach approval letters from the Department of Ecology Water Quality Financial Assistance Program and copy
of report or plan cover page.
Note: All facilities construction projects must have an engineering report ofacilitiespplancial (Stence p)�dlans andme of
specifications (Step 2) approved by the Department's Water Quality
application.
11. FOR PUGET SOUND WATERSHED PLANNING PROJECTS ONLY N/A
a. Planning document status:
b. Puget Sound Watershed Projects:
ro sed project in sequence with the co"nt}�s
(1) Has a planning documentpfor an implementation (1) Pp� ed P°anking of watersheds according to � 'r
project been completed? 400-12 WAC.
o Yes o No
(2) If yes, what is the ranked number of the proposed
watershed project?
O Yes
O Yes
O Yes
O No
o No
❑ No
O Yes O No
If yes, date of completion:
12. PROJECT DURATION
_._n
a. How long will the project take to compete: 24 MO
bt What
is / 1 r the
earliest date you could be ready
to
Number:
13. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
noes this project involve or impact more than one public
y
Yes 0 N
If yes, do all public bodies support the goals and objectives
of the project?
tsa Yes 0 No
14. WATER BODY TYPE INVOLVED IN PROJECT (Check one or more)
o Marine Water other than Puget Sound ® Freshwater River or Stream
O Puget Sound (direct discharge) 0 Federally Designated Sole Source Aquifer
3i Ground Water
O Wetlands Specify Freshwater Lake 0 Other
15. WETLANDS
Will this project negatively impact a wetland?
o Yes E No
16. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
you currently in compliance with the deadlines established in Chapter 36.70 RCW, "Growth Management Act?"
121 Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
17. 303(d) LISTED WATER BODIES
Will the proposed project protect or improve the water quality of 303(d) listed waterbodies?
p Yes ❑ No
18. POLLUTION PREVENTION
Does your project contain a pollution prevention component?
55Yes 0 N
19. IMPLEMENTING COMPREHENSIVE PLANS
Would this project implement a specific recommendation of a comprehensive planning effort completed or updated in
the last five years?
❑ Yes N/A G No
20. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES
Are you proposing this project to comply with a statutory or regulatory requirement?
5 Yes ❑ No
If yes, list.
21. ECONOMICALLY DEPRESSED AREAS Ecology Use Only
22. PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES
Would this project eliminate a public health emergency declared by the Washington State Department of Health?
•
❑Yes RI No
23. I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS
TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT I AM LEGALLY AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SUBMIT THIS
INFORMATION ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. This must be the same person listed in item 3 above. If the
signatory is not a mayor, city manager, county executive, board of commissioners chairman, etc., a resolution authorizing
the signatory to sign on behalf of the public body must be attached.
R. A. Zais Jr.
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE
City Manager
TITLE DATE
24. Send 5 copies, one of which is an original with original signature to:
Department of Ecology
Water Quality Financial Assistance Program
Policy and Support Section
I P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
PROTOTYPE OUTCOME FUNDING INITIATIVE
APPLICATION
PART 2
L What type of plan will you do?:
Watershed Plan in the Puget Sound Basin
_ Watershed Plan outside the Puget Sound Basin
— Ground Water Management Area
Wellhead Protection Plan
x General Sewer Plan
_ Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
Lake Restoration Plan Phase I
_ Other (please list which type)
II. The rest of your application consists of your Target Plan. There are six pieces in
a Target Plan:
1. The geographical area and baseline information of the planning area
2. Your customers who must support and complement the plan in order to
achieve results
3. Your Performance Targets that list your commitments to results and
achievements that directly contribute to the Centennial_ water quality outcome
4. Verification measures to know if you've accomplished what you projected
5. Your Key People who have the ability and energies to reach your results
6. Financial Projections on planning costs... including some early implementation
The "Prototype Outcome Funding Initiative Instructions" (attached) explains exactly what
you need to know to develop your Target Plan. We ask that you limit your discussion of
each plan piece to no more than two pages and your total Target Plan to no more than
eight pages. We will talk with you about your plan in more detail during April, after
reviewing your Target Plan, and we will help you get a start on it at the briefings.
PROTOTYPE OUTCOME FUNDING INITIATIVE APPLICATION
FART II
TARGET PLAN
1. Identify the geographical area and baseline information of the planning area.
Per Growth Management Act requirements, an interim urban growth area has
been recommended by the Yakima City Council and approved by the Board of
County Commissioners (see attached map and statistics). The "new" urban
growth area includes the City of Yakima, City of Union Gap, the community of
Terrace Heights, and unincorporated portions of Yakima County surrounding
the urban core. The existing urban area boundary has been expanded to reflect
the community's understanding (see the attached January, 1992 Vision 2010
document) of where urban growth in the Yakima area will occur in the coming
years (and to some extent has already occurred). Importantly, the communities
of Wiley City and Ahtanum to the southwest and portions of Gleed to the
northwest have been included; in part, because of presently understood sewer
and groundwater needs. The Terrace Heights area has also been slightly
expanded reflecting community consensus that this area will see significant
increases in residential development. The current comprehensive improvements
to various Terrace Heights water systems are expected to further fuel growth in
Terrace Heights.
2. Identify your customers who must support and complement the plan in order to
achieve results.
The traditional list of participants include City and County officials who are active
in land use and utility planning. A larger, more representative, group is
embodied by those 300 citizens who participated in the Vision 2010 process. The
existing sewer service area is guided by the 4 -Party Agreement for sewer and
planning services in the urban area. A Urban Area Zoning Ordinance has also
been developed between the jurisdictions and provides a common field for local
government, developers and the public. Importantly in this new Plan, the
residents of Gleed, Wiley City, and Ahtanum must be informed as to the cost
implications of future sewer service in their areas. The traditional participants in
sewer planning have been Yakima City and County, Union Gap and Terrace
Heights. They also must be aware of the cost and land use implications of
extending sewer service in their areas. Common to all of the participants are the
implications of continuing to meet ever increasing water quality standards; this
will relate back to treatment facility capacity and capability. The City of
Yakima's Pretreatment Program has an integral business education and
information activity through the Pretreatment Quarterly newsletter. The
newsletter reaches over 700 commercial and industrial customers within the
service area. The Yakima Health District is also an important customer because
ccwf app. II text
page 1
February 18, 1994 cw
of their role in dealing with environmental threats. The Wastewater Division has
worked closely nn various issues with the Greater Yakima Chamber of
Commerce and Yakima County Development Association. The key issue with
IIIUbe IWU 61 VU1.JJ 110.) UCCII lV w 6.111%. Ll, VII al lla DUalamct VlC uc v cll1•V11 tLC.llt /u u
manner that will avoid long term environmental degradation while still
providing an attractive business climate. A strong economy does not preclude
environmental protection; in fact, to support the ever increasing costs of
environmental protection, a strong economy is an important factor in financing
the costs of environmental protection and enhancement.
3. Identify your Performance Targets that list your commitments to results and
achievements that directly contribute to the Centennial water quality outcomes.
a) Prevention of further degradation of groundwater quality by encouraging
regional sewer service and discouraging new onsite sewage systems within the
urban area. Residential growth is anticipated to continue to grow at a pace of 2
to 3 % per year within the urban area. Sewer service to accommodate this
growth must be planned or continued degradation of the groundwater is
assured. The costs of providing transmission and collection capability are lowest
at the time of development before streets and other urban utilities are
constructed.
b) Remediate existing groundwater degradation by providing the availability of
sanitary sewer service within the interim urban area boundary. Explore annual
City program to construct local sewers in low income area with groundwater
contamination problems. This program would require coordination with the
Yakima Health District.
c) Continued interceptor construction as appropriate and where development is
likely or has occurred. The topographical analysis of the study area is key to
planning for this service within the sewer service area.
d) Ensure quality meets applicable standards n and the
Ensure that effluent li 110.116] ap4,11L4�a L1LC alaL14%at 4.4a now into the
future. The comprehensive planning should consider facility capacities,
necessary facility process units, and planned rehabilitations.
e) Continue to lead participation in Local Improvement Districts as one method
of providing sewer availability within the urban area.
f) Develop a community education program for citizens raising level of
awareness to environmental and water quality issues and the part they play in
creating a sustainable community.
4. Identify verification measures to know if you've accomplished what you projected.
ccwf app. II text
page 2
February 18, 1994 cw
a & b) Verification measures may include using City's Geographical Information
System to monitor sewer hook-ups from new and existing parcels to establish
performance trends. Coordinate information sharing with the Yakima Valley
Council of Governments on local surface water quality studies. Monitor Yakima
Health District's approval of new onsite system permits and rehabilitation
permits within the Yakima Urban Area. Monitor the dry sewer construction in
new developments not close to sewer collectors. Verification measures also
include incorporating the strategy of "investing in low income areas for sewer"
into Comprehensive Plan for legislative review
c) Verification measures include projected transmission main preliminary design
based on GMA and land use planning projections. This task is dependent on
accurate topographical information generated as part of Plan activities.
d) Verification measures include the following: Analyze existing treatment
capacity; determine facility projected needs; analyze effluent requirements;
continue pretreatment program progress; budget, design, finance and construct
improvements; continue Infiltration and Inflow elimination progress over last
three years (see WWTP flow chart). Further identify water quality standards
which impact the planning area and develop within the plan both short and long
term recommendations to meet these standards.
e) Verification measures include monitoring LID projects initiated.
f) Verification measures include production of deliverables which include video
productions (City's local access production facilities), quarterly newsletters, and
newspaper inserts.
Verification measures common in one fashion or another to all of the
performance targets are discussed in the following. The development of a
Capital Improvement Plan which meets the requirements of the Growth
Management Act covers two areas; the formal adoption of "what must happen"
and the policy discussion of "how it gets paid for." The City of Yakima has a
significant investment into its Growth Management Act planning. Draft
elements presently include Land Use, Parks and Recreation, Transportation,
Transit, Stormwater, and Mapping (GIS). Water and Sewer Plans are being
prepared to fold into the Utilities requirements of GMA. Environmental review
of some these elements is scheduled to begin this year. The environmental
review process will provide a unique opportunity to compare goals and targets
to achievements. The public process, integral to environmental review, will
involve the citizens of the area and expose them to the interconnecting nature of
all urban activity to environmental quality. The Plan will include tests within its
6 -year Capital Improvement Plan to determine if early implementation actions
are achieving the desired results.
ccwf app. II text
page 3
February 18, 1994 cw
The City has already prepared a draft Citizen participation strategy for the Water
and Sewer Comprehensive Plans. Utilizing the existing Utility Rate Advisory
Board (URAB) as the core, this group may easily be expanded to include many
facets of community interest. URAB historically has members which include
banking, engineering, industry and government expertise. Since DRAB meetings
are, by law, open meeting, we believe it makes sense to expand the participation
in the existing DRAB process to a broader spectrum of input.
Finally, the GMA planning process for some urban services requires a Level of
Service (LOS) evaluation. This approach is well suited to Outcome based
planning. Identification and adoption through the Plan of regional LOS's for
sewer service lend well to evaluating whether these "targets" or level of services
are being met.
5. Identify your Key People who have the ability and energies to reach your results.
The City of Yakima's strength in project accomplishment comes through its
reliance on team work. The key people included in the discussion which follows
all have impressive histories of individual project experience, but what this
organization has discovered is the importance of focusing and coordinating
collective efforts based on individual talents and experience. Additionally, the
continuity of the personnel involved offers the benefit of these key people living
with and understanding the consequences of planning implementation.
Dick Zais, Yakima City Manager, can trace his experience with wastewater issues
back to the mid 1970's when the original regional approach to wastewater and
planning needs was begun. He provides the important link between the policy
makers, City Council, and staff. Glenn Rice, now Assistant City Manager, was
also involved in the original planning and wastewater regional approach in the
1970's and previously held the position of Director of Community Development.
His strengths include understanding and addressing the importance of inter -
jurisdictional cooperation between governmental agencies, the development
community, and citizens of the region. These two individuals are very serious
concerning the task of informing City Council on important policy issues and
translating those policy positions into action at the staff level.
Denny Covell, Director of Engineering and Utilities, has managed a number of
important planning and project tasks in the Yakima Urban Area. These include
comprehensive sewer and water planning, transportation planning, and Growth
Management activities. He presently is lead City staffer on the Yakima Avenue -
I -82 "Gateway" project which has State, City, County and local business
involvement. This major project, eventually projected to cost $20 million at full
potential, has an extensive public participation facet which has taken great skill
to coordinate. Denny Covell is also the lead City Staffer on the region's
Stormwater Management Plan funded in part by WDOE. The Storm Water Plan
ccwf app. It text
page 4
February 18, 1994 cw
is presently in draft form and the public participation process is shortly to
emerge into a new phase.
Glenn Valanzuela, Director of Community Development, and Don Skone,
Planning Manger, team up to provide extensive knowledge and expertise in the
planning and community development field. Areas of expertise and experience
include regional zoning and land use planning and its implementation among
the jurisdictions in the upper Yakima Valley; Growth Management Act planning
activities; and extensive public participation processes. The City's planning
department is fully integrated into the City's Geographical Information System
(Arc/Info based) so information is more readily available and translatable into
usable form for those who need it.
Chris Waarvick, Wastewater Manager, Bruce Bates, Assistant Manager, and
Doug Mayo, Project Engineer comprise the Wastewater Division's team for
Wastewater Comprehensive planning. These individuals have the experience
and knowledge gained from preparing and implementing the 1988 Sewer
Comprehensive Plan, Biosolids Management Plan, Wastewater Cost of Service
Studies, Pretreatment Program Planning, and numerous other wastewater
related planning and implementation activities. The 1988 Comprehensive Plan
translated into action; over $20 million in construction of treatment facility
improvements over the last 8 years. This has kept the City's regional facility in
good stead for capacity to serve the region. Other Sewer Comprehensive Plan
recommendations have also been implemented including the City's Infow and
Infiltration (I/I) removal program and sewer line rehabilitation projects. The I/I
removal program has resulted in a reduction of nearly 3 million gallons per day
from the treatment facility at peak flow (see attached chart). Sewer line
rehabilitation is ongoing financed by the Public Works Trust Fund loan program.
Chris Waarvick, Bruce Bates and Doug Mayo have also been involved in
important community activities such as the Solids Waste Management Plan,
Vision 2010 community consensus development, and Total Quality Management
program development for the City. These three individuals also provide detailed
staff presentations to City Council on wastewater issues.
HDR Engineering, Inc. is the City's wastewater engineering consultant. This
present comprehensive plan would utilize the consultants knowledge and
expertise gained from the 1988 Comprehensive Sewer Plan. This firm also
provided the technical engineering expertise for recent treatment facility
improvements. This required a high level of understanding of the City's
treatment facility abilities and capacities. The City's contractual relationship with
HDR Engineering, Inc. presently includes an overarching TQM approach to
consultant/client relationships.
Finally, two individuals from outside the City's organization are mentioned for
their importance in achieving Plan outcomes. Skip Steinmetz, Yakima Health
District Environmental Director, is very interested in the outcomes of this Plan
ccwf app. II text
page 5
February 18, 1994 cw
and has provided a letter to the City outlining some important issues. Bob
Barwin, Section Head of the Water Quality Division of the Central DOE office,
the _i_ of this
Plan. Tl... City has
also shares a significant interest in outcomes The has
established a successful working relationship with Bob Barwin and he has made
joint presentations with City staff to the Yakima City Council on broad water
quality issues before they have become issues of immediate concern.
ccwf app. II text
page 6
February 18, 1994 cw
SIMMI VIE
HM
1
111
•
I"._ III■r �- "�� :ao- '_�.. 111,1.-1 ►`
N114
!iii!!! •`11L1•
I', X11 �— AIR + „r
:w 1 1 �IIC11II11 L Itis\`"��,. \\
17iiT1111IEni11- _ _ __ti_ ,,,,,�,,,,�®��.
in II III111111 1115 ais IIv IIJI''" tnilllllllll— v1` �r
,�GIIi�liIIII-Emnillinu II nomilllllll iiii,o..0 ��m� �I
T1 ,I'oulluliuu�;l;l;,;,u��.,�.
11 a1� 11pnn1�
�trC1
11 ununl
1 III III
■ 111111 IIIIII� ��li'111llllllll_
1- W ►OB HIL II'!!� ■h ��IWIYIIIIIIIIIIL':I171`r7.;:I� I.
li»l r..Inl�IIuIIII■:1- I lunl.uhuiI 1
—1 Il. 11- ••nlnlii111111I111nuin
.— L ;".- 111 r
�' it .N1
T AII� I�1"j1i1111i11■ 111' 11
n ^3?GI1i75111
I� ;;,�� il� I ra11111;11
ii1�`'V-� 111111111.
ropose
ANUM RD
RPC 117(17.12-1
Yakima Interim
Urban Growth Area
February 15, 1994
Existing Urban Area
Proposed Yakima
Interim Urban Area
N Yakima City Limits
Urban Area Boundary
Interim Urban Growth
Area (2/15/94)
Other Municipal
Interim Urban Area
♦�I
•
ti4 oI Y.4.
P
m
to
:„b
M
w
lion $•
•Copy.Ithl City of Yakima. Washington 1992
Scale - 1 : 5600
0
2800
5600