HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1993-070 Growth ManagementRESOLUTION NO. R-93-
70
A RESOLUTION approving the Yakima County -Wide Planning Policy in
accordance with RCW 36.70A.210(2).
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires Yakima
County to adopt a county -wide planning policy in cooperation with the cities
located within the county; and
WHEREAS, the process and framework for adoption of the county -wide
planning policy is contained within an interlocal agreement entitled "Framework
Agreement for the Adoption of the County -Wide Planning Policy" which was
previously adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, under terms of the aforementioned interlocal agreement, a
County -Wide Planning Policy Committee of local elected officials and staff has
orked with Yakima County to develop the Yakima County -Wide Planning Policy;
and
WHEREAS, after several drafts and extensive public review, the County -
Wide Planning Policy Committee has recommended to individual jurisdictions that
the Yakima County -Wide Planning Policy should be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Yakima County Commissioners has formally adopted
said policy; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The Yakima County -Wide Planning Policy, a true copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein, is approved as the policy framework to guide the
dei elopment of comprehensive plans under the Washington State Growth
Management Act.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 6th day of July , 1993.
g4,e-
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
is)res;vanek cnty-wde ping picy.jv
YAKIMA COUNTY -WIDE
PLANNING POLICY
A Policy Framework to Guide the Development of
Comprehensive Plans Under the
Washington State Growth Management Act
June, 1993
Board of Yakima County Commissioners
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING THE
Y4KIMAI COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING
POLICY AS REQUIRED BY THE
WASHINGTON STATE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT ACT
RESOLUTION NO. 322-1993
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires Yakima County to
adopt a county -wide planning policy in cooperation with the cities located within the county; and
WHEREAS, the process for development and adoption of the county -wide planning
policy is contained within an interlocal agreement which was previously adopted by the Board
of Yakima County Commissioners under Resolution No. 83-1992; and
WHEREAS, under terms of the interlocal agreement, a County -wide Planning, Policy
Committee of local elected officials and staff has worked with Yakima County to develop the
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy; and
WHEREAS, after several drafts and extensive public review, the County -wide Planning
Policy Committee recommended to individual jurisdictions that the policy document should be
approved and referred to the Board of Yakima County Commissioners for adoption; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Yakima County Commissioners held a public hearing on April
27, 1993 to receive public testimony concerning the proposed planning policy and is satisfied
that the matter has been fully considered; and
WHEREAS, the Board has received resolutions recommending adoption of the Yakima
County -wide Planning Policy from eleven of fourteen city councils; now, therefore
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Board of Yakima County Commissioners that the
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy is approved and hereby adopted as the policy framework
to guide the development of comprehensive plans under the Washington State Growth
Management Act.
Done this 29th day of June, 1993.
Charles J. Klarich
Attest:
Sylvia E. Hinojosa Bettie Ingham, Commissi
of the Board
J 2t nes M. Lewis, of n ' sioner
Constitutes the Board of County Commissioners
richln\...\rc:gpp\ndoptboc res fin. Yakima County, Washington
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Introduction
County -wide Planning Policies - A Policy Framework for 1
Comprehensive Planning
Policy Development 2
Guiding Principles - Coordination and Cooperation 3
Roles and Responsibilities 4
2. Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A. Urban Growth Areas 7
B. Contiguous and Orderly Development 10
C. Siting Public Facilities 12
D. County -Wide Transportation Facilities 14
E. Affordable Housing 17
F. Joint Planning 20
G. Economic Development 22
H. Fiscal Impact Analysis 24
I. Coordination with Special Purpose Districts, Adjacent 26
Counties and State, Tribal and Federal Governments
3. Appendices
Planning Goals of the Growth Management Act A-1
Glossary of Terms A-3
County -wide Planning Policy Committee Membership A-5
policy7.pin
1
INTRODUCTION
County -wide Planning Policies - A Policy Framework For Comprehensive
Planning
The passage of the Growth Management Act (GMA) (ESHB 2929) by the Washington State
Legislature in 1990 fundamentally changed the way comprehensive land use planning is carried
out in the state. The GMA requires that cities and counties update their comprehensive land use
plans consistent with state-wide goals and minimum requirements as established by the statute,
and coordinate their planning efforts with each other.
To assure that this principle is carried out, the 1991 Legislature passed companion legislation
(ReESHB 1025) requiring counties and cities to coordinate the independent development of local
comprehensive plans through a set of mutually developed county -wide planning policies. These
written policy statements are to address eight subject areas:
► The designation of urban growth areas;
► Promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to
such development;
► The siting of public capital facilities of a county -wide or state-wide nature;
► County -wide transportation facilities and strategies;
► The need for affordable housing for all segments of the population;
► Joint city and county planning within urban growth areas;
► County -wide economic development and employment; and
► Analysis of fiscal impact.
Optional subject areas may also be addressed. The Yakima County -wide Planning Policy also
contains a section on:
► Coordination with special purpose districts, adjacent counties and state, tribal and
federal governments.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
2
Policy Developrnent
In 1991, hundreds of local citizens took part in Vision Yakima 2010/Focus 2010, two separate
but similar visioning projects to develop a preferred future for the Yakima Valley based on the
community's beliefs and values. In the Upper Valley, issue committees were formed in the
areas of: Economic Development, Education & Employ:ment Training, Environment, Growth
Planning, Health Care, Housing, Humanity & Family, Quality of Life and Rural & Agriculture.
In the Lower Valley, six issue topics were addressed: Urban Growth & Land Use, Government
Services & Facilities, Housing, Transportation, Economic Development & Employment, and
Environment & Resource Protection. Committees met separately over several months and
submitted reports that were edited only for style and format. Though each committee had a
different assignment, there were dramatic similarities in the beliefs and values that drove their
recommendations. Public forums were held to present the citizen reports. In recognition of this
citizen -based effort, the Board of Yakima County Commissioners and city councils of the six
upper valley communities approved the Upper Valley Vision Yakima 2010 report as a foundation
for more detailed comprehensive plans and implementation programs.
Much of the visioning effort bears direct relationship to the policy areas covered in this County-
wide Planning Policy. Accordingly, each policy section is headed by selected quotations from
the visioning reports that relate to the particular policy area. In addition, a summary of
applicable statewide planning goals and a discussion of the general philosophy underlying the
development of each County -wide planning policy is provided.
A County -wide Planning Policy Committee of elected officials and staff from Yakima County,
each of the cities and towns and the Yakima Indian Nation was formed to oversee development
of the planning policies. An initial draft was reviewed by the Committee in the fall of 1992.
A second draft with Committee changes was circulated to agencies and organizations charged
with implementing the community vision. A third draft was reviewed by city council and
planning commission members. Additional changes were made, resulting in a public hearing
draft. Hearings were held and further minor changes were recommended by the County -wide
Planning Policy Committee. After approval by a majority of cities and towns, the Board of
Yakima County Commissioners adopted the County -wide Planning Policy as required, by the
GMA.
The County -wide Planning Policv represents a composite framework not a. series of individual
stand-alone concepts. Ideas represented here are intended to balance each other to create an
overall direction for development of individual comprehensive plans. These policies establish the
foundation for determining consistency of individual plans with each other and with the tenets
of the Growth Management Act and will. like the plannidocuments they are intended to
Guide. evolve over time.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
3
Guiding Principles - Coordination and Cooperation
The GMA is founded on the principle that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the State to
foster coordination and cooperation among units of local and state governments. Cities and
counties must engage in a collaborative planning process under the requirements of the Act.
Specifically, the Act states that "The Legislature finds that uncoordinated and unplanned growth
... pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety,
and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of the State. It is in the public interest that citizens,
communities, local governments, and the private sector cooperate and coordinate with one
another in comprehensive land use planning".
The Legislature established "growth planning hearing boards" to which the state, a county, a city
or a person with standing may request a review of whether a city or county has failed to timely
adopt a county -wide planning policy, comprehensive plan, or development regulation or whether
the county -wide planning policy, comprehensive plan, or development regulation is in
compliance with the Act. Therefore, state government involvement in the local planning process
will result if cities and the county do not achieve consensus. In order to avoid state involvement
in the development of local land use plans, the following principle is declared:
A. Local governments within Yakima County do hereby agree to strive toward the
principle that all local planning differences should be discussed and settled
locally. Appeals or requests for review shall be referred to the Eastern
Washington Growth Planning Hearings Board only when the local resolution
process has been exhausted.
The planning process should flow smoothly and logically beginning with the manner in which
data is collected to the way in which land use plans and development regulations are crafted.
The County and cities are utilizing a planning technical committee to develop consistent methods
of data collection, land use plan formatting, and development regulations. Common format and
consistent definitions will reduce complexity and better enable communication and understanding
between citizens and elected and appointed officials. To this end, the following principle is
declared:
B. In order to enhance coordinated planning, Yakima County and the cities agree
to develop a common system for data collection and analysis and consistent
terms for comprehensive land use categories. [Note: It is recognized that the
planning process required by the GMA is presently underway in all Yakima County
jurisdictions and that full implementation of this policy may not occur until after initial
comprehensive plans are adopted.]
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
4
It should be recognized that the county -wide planning policy is a new process in Yakima County.
At no other time has a similar document been prepared, adopted and implemented. Without a
history to evaluate the impact and utility of this document, the policy should be dynamic and
regularly monitored, for applicability and effectiveness. Therefore, the following principle is
declared:
C. The Interlocal Agreement for the Adoption of the Count -wide PlannincP� olicv
will be amended to establish the process an_ d guidelines for reviewing and
amending the County -wide Planning Policy. Amendments will address
timeframes, citizen participation, how amendments may be proposed and
:specific adoption proceedings and will be considered by each jurisdiction no
dater than 120 days after the initial adoption of the County -wide Planning Polic
Iby the Board of Yakima County Commissioners and be enacted no later than
180 days after adoption.
The Growth Planning Roles and Responsibiilities of Yakima County, the
Cities and the Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
Yakima County, the cities and the Yakima Valley Conference of Governments are all i.nvolved
in planning activities related to their statutory authority and responsibility. The following further
clarifies the role and land use planning authority of each type of govemmental unit.
Yakima County is the regional government within the county boundaries providing various
services within unincorporated and incorporated areas. Yakima County will:
*Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive
plans and development regulations and the processing of land use permits within the
unincorporated portions of the County.
•Develop and maintain informational data bases to support the regional geographic
information system.
•Perform responsibilities as identified in the most recent GMA regional strategy.
*Enter into separate urban growth management agreements with each city to address
joint issues identified in the county -wide planning policy and other matters agreed to be
of mutual interest.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
5
• Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous
public involvement throughout short and long range planning projects.
• Coordinate with other agencies as appropriate in multi jurisdictional planning activities.
Cities within Yakima County provide a variety of services primarily to residents within their
respective municipal boundaries. Cities will:
•Provide urban governmental services as identified in the GMA (Chapter 36.70A RCW)
and adopted urban growth management agreements.
•Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive
plans and development regulations and the processing of land use permits within the
incorporated city and within unincorporated portions of urban growth areas as may be
agreed upon through interlocal agreements.
•Within their capabilities, develop and maintain informational data bases to support the
regional geographic information system.
•Perform responsibilities identified in the most recent GMA regional strategy.
•Enter into separate interlocal agreements with Yakima County to address joint issues
identified in the county -wide planning policy and other matters agreed to be of mutual
interest.
•Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous
public involvement throughout short and long range planning projects.
• Coordinate with other agencies as appropriate in multi jurisdictional planning activities.
The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments was established by interlocal agreement
to assure coordination, consensus, consistency and compliance over issues of common concern
to its membership. The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments will:
•Serve as the Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) for the region.
•Be responsible for coordinating water quality planning in multi jurisdictional watersheds
and for other environmental planning activities as agreed to by all affected and interested
parties.
•Perform responsibilities as identified in the most recent GMA regional strategy.
*Develop and maintain informational data bases to support the regional geographic
information system.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
6
•Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous
public involvement through short and long range planning projects.
•Coordinate with other agencies as appropriate in multi jurisdictional planning activities.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
7
YAKIMA COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICY
A. URBAN GROWTH AREAS
"We need to [e]ncourage the increased centralization and density of growth to mitigate the
effects of unplanned, undefined growth in the regional area." (U.V. Vision, p37).
"Designated urban growth areas (UGAs) will clearly define where urban level development
ought to occur as distinguished from rural level development or no development at all." (L. V.
Vision, p. 7).
A.1. STATEWIDE URBAN GROWTH AREA GOAL
The basic premise for designating urban growth areas is to encourage the location of urban
density residential, commercial and industrial developments in areas where services can be most
economically provided. The benefits of directing growth to designated urban areas include:
* Higher density residential development within walking distance of jobs, transit,
schools, and parks.
* Limiting urban expansion into rural, agricultural and forested areas.
* Promotion of in -fill or redevelopment of existing urban areas.
* Preservation of open space, critical areas and lands designated for resource
protection.
* Accommodation of employment growth in a concentrated pattern.
* More economical provision and maintenance of streets, sewers and water lines and
other public facilities.
* Promotion of attractive residential neighborhoods and commercial districts which
provide a sense of community.
The GMA states that "Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by
urban growth that have existing public facility and service capacity to serve such development,
and second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination
of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and
services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that
urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should not be
provided in rural areas." [RCW 36.70A.110(3)]
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
8
A.2. COUNTY -WIDE URBAN GROWTH AREA POLICY DEVELOPMENT
Designating urban growth areas alone will not assure that development follows a desired growth
pattern. The potential remains for leapfrogging and scattered development patterns within a
designated UGA unless policies are developed to guide decisions regarding the location and
timing of development.
The policies in this section are concerned with encouraging growth in UGA's and discouraging
urban growth outside of these areas. Also, development within UGA's should occur in a logical
fashion outward from the edge of developed land in conjunction with service and infrastructure
provision.
A.3. URBAN GROWTH AREA POLICY STATEMENTS
The following county -wide policies are related to the process and criteria for
establishing and amending urban growth areas in Yakima County:
A.3.1. Areas designated for urban growth should be determined by preferred development
patterns, residential densities, and the capacity and willingness of the community to
provide urban governmental services.
A.3.2. All cities will be within a designated urban growth area. Urban growth areas may
include areas not contained within an incorporated city. [RCW 36.70A.110]
A.3.3. All urban growth areas will be reflected in County and respective city comprehensive
plans.
A.3.4. Urban growth will occur within urban growth areas only and not be permitted[ outside
of an adopted urban growth area except for new fully contained communities. [RCW
36.70A.350]
A.3.5. The baseline for twenty year County -wide population forecasts shall be the official
1990 Census count (188,823) plus an estimated 5.2%® estimated undercount. A process
for allocating forecasted population will be cooperatively developed.
A.3.6. Sufficient area must be included in the urban growth areas to accommodate a minimum
20 -year population forecast and to allow for market choice and location preferences.
[RCW 36.70A.110 (2)]
A.3.7. When determining land requirements for urban growth areas, allowance will be made
for greenbelt and open space areas and for protection of wildlife habitat and other
environmentally sensitive areas. [RCW 36.70A.110(2)]
Yakima County -wide Planning; Policy
9
A.3.8. The County and cities will cooperatively determine the amount of undeveloped
buildable urban land needed. The inventory of the undeveloped buildable urban land
supply shall be maintained in a Regional GIS data base.
A.3.9. The County and cities will establish a common method to monitor urban development
to evaluate the rate of growth and maintain an inventory of the amount of buildable
land remaining.
A.3.10. The County, city, or interested citizens may initiate an amendment to an existing urban
growth area through the normal comprehensive plan amendment process, however in
no case will amendments be processed more than once a year. [RCW 36.70A.130 (2)]
A.3.11. Prior to amending an urban growth area the County and respective City will determine
the capital improvement requirements of the amendment to ascertain that urban
governmental services will be present within the forecast period.
A.3.12. Annexations will not occur outside established urban growth areas. [RCW 35.13.005].
Annexations will occur within urban growth areas according to the provisions of
adopted interlocal agreements, if any.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
10
B. CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT AND THE
PROVISION OF SERVICES IN URBAN GROWTH AREAS
"As a means of achieving well planned, orderly growth and development, we believe that
future growth in the Lower Valley should be managed by limiting and encouraging urban and
industrial development to designated urban and rural settlement areas while promoting the
continued development of agriculture, agricultural processing and related service industries.
Designated urban growth areas (UGAs) will clearly define where urban level development
ought to occur as distinguished from rural level development or no development at all," (L. V.
Vision, p. 7).
"As the economic base of the region expands and diversWes the orderly flow of materials and
labor must be accommodated. Additional access to developable properties will be needed to
make such properties competitive. Certain streets and roads will require upgrading in order
to handle the anticipated increase in truck, automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic.
Enhanced public transit availability will be required to effect the movement of the workforce
and consumers in an efficient and orderly manner." (U, V. Vision, p. 39).
B.1. STATEWIDE GOAL(S) RELATING TO CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY
DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES IN UGA'S
A basic goal of the GMA is to reduce sprawling, low-density development, and to avoid the
inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land. While only a percentage of the land is available
for urban development at any one time, it is important that land supply and densities within an
UGA be sufficient to ensure a climate appropriate to a competitive development market. To
help ensure this the GMA requires that "... ,those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is
available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards. [RCW 36.70A.020(12)]
B.2. COUNTY -WIDE POLICY DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO CONTIGUOUS AND
ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROVISION OF SERVICES WITHIN UGA'S
Upon designation of urban growth areas the County and cities will need to develop consistent
implementation measures to ensure that development occurs in an orderly and contiguous
manner. The intent of the following policies is to minimize differences in urban development
regulations and standards between the County and the cities and to facilitate the economical
provision of urban services to development.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
11
B.3. POLICIES TO PROMOTE CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT AND
PROVIDING URBAN SERVICES TO SUCH DEVELOPMENT
The following policies relate to phasing growth and development with service and
infrastructure provision:
B.3.1. Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that
have existing public facilities and service capacities to serve such development, and
second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served by a
combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed
public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources.
Further, it is appropriate that urban government services be provided by cities, and urban
government services should not be provided in rural areas. [RCW 36.70A.110 (3)]
B.3.2. Urban growth management interlocal agreements will identify services to be provided in
an urban growth area, the responsible service purveyors and the terms under which the
services are to be provided.
B.3.3. Infill development, higher density zoning and small lot sizes should be encouraged where
services have already been provided and sufficient capacity exists and in areas planned
for urban services within the next 20 years.
B.3.4. The capital facilities, utilities and transportation elements of each local government's
comprehensive plan will specify the general location and phasing of major infrastructure
improvements and anticipated revenue sources. [RCW 36.70A.070(3)(c)(d)]. These plan
elements will be developed in consultation with special purpose districts and other utility
providers.
B.3.5. New urban development should utilize available/planned urban services. [RCW
36.70A.110(3)]
B.3.6. Formation of new utility special purpose districts should be discouraged within designated
urban growth areas.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
12
C. SITING PUBLIC FACILITIES OF A COUNTY -WIDE
OR STATE-WIDE NATURE
"New technologies will advance the areas of energy production and solid waste reduction. For
example, in the year 2010 there will be integrated recycling, solid waste and solar facilities in
areas of the Valley not in conflict with agricultural, residential or commercial uses." (L. V.
Vision, p.39).
C.1. STATEWIDE GOALS RELATING TO THE SITING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES OF A
REGIONAL OR STATE-WIDE NATURE
The GMA requires local governments to inventory existing capital public facilities to identify
location and to determine capacities to meet future demand for growth without decreasing levels
of service and to include within their comprehensive plans a process for identifying and siting
essential public facilities. The Washington State Office of Financial Management is responsible
for identifying and maintaining a list of essential state public facilities that are required or likely
to be built within the next six years as required by the GMA. Counties and cities are also
required to coordinate the siting of county -wide and state-wide capital facilities to mitigate
potential adverse impacts from the location and development of these facilities.
C.2. COUNTY -WIDE POLICIES RELATING TO THE SITING OF FACILITIES OF A
COUNTY -WIDE OR STATE-WIDE NATURE
The siting of essential public capital facilities such as landfills and jails is a difficult task at best.
Although these facilities are necessary for the common good, they are seldom welcome into a
community or neighborhood. Recognizing that: public facilities of a state-wide or county -wide
nature are an essential part of our society, policies for their siting and construction are necessary
to ensure a reasonable approval process.
C.3 POLICIES FOR SITING PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES OF A COUNTY -WIDE OR
STATEWIDE NATURE
The following policies relate to the identification of needed facilities:
C.3.1. The County and the cities will inventory existing capital facilities and identify needed
facility expansion and construction. [RCW 36.70A.070(3)(a)(b)]
C.3.2. From local inventory, analysis and collaboration with state agencies and utility
providers, a list of County -wide and statewide public capital facilities needed to serve
the Yakima County region will be developed. These include, but are not limited to,
solid and hazardous waste handling facilities and disposal sites, major utility generation
and transmission facilities, regional education institutions, airports, correctional
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
13
facilities, in-patient facilities including hospitals and those for substance abuse and
mental health, group homes and regional park and recreation facilities.
The following policies relate to establishing a process and review criteria for the siting
of facilities that are of a county -wide or state-wide nature:
C.3.3. When a public facility of a county -wide or state-wide nature is proposed in the Yakima
County region a Facility Analysis and Site Evaluation Advisory Committee including
citizen members will be formed to evaluate the proposed public facility siting. At a
minimum this evaluation shall consider:
a. The potential impacts (positive or negative) of the proposed project on the
economy, the environment and community character;
b. The development of specific siting criteria for the proposed project;
c. The identification, analysis and ranking of potential project sites;
d. Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential physical impacts
including, but not limited to, those relating to land use, transportation, utilities,
noise, odor and public safety;
e. Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential fiscal impacts.
C.3.4. Major public capital facilities that generate substantial travel demand should be located
along or near major transportation corridors and public transportation routes.
C.3.5. Some public facilities may be more appropriately located outside of urban growth areas
due to exceptional bulk or potentially dangerous or objectionable characteristics. Public
facilities located beyond urban growth areas should be self-contained or be served by
urban governmental services in a manner that will not promote sprawl. Utility and
service considerations must be incorporated into site planning and development.
C.3.6. The multiple use of corridors for major utilities, trails and transportation right-of-way
is encouraged.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
14
D. COUNTY -WIDE TRANSPORTATION IFACILITIES & STRATEGIES 1
"A key factor in the Lower Valley's future growth and development will be an upgraded
transportation system to accommodate the safe, efficient movement of people and goods."
(L.V. Vision, p. 25).
"We envision a comprehensive, multi -modal transportation system that is well planned, safe,
efficient, cost effective and capable of supporting increased levels of traffic over time. " (Ibid).
"As the economic base of the region expands and diversifies the orderly flow of materials and
labor must be accommodated. Additional access to developable properties will be needed to
make such properties competitive. Certain streets and roads will require upgrading in order
to handle the anticipated increase in truck,, automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic.
Enhanced Public Transit availability will be required to effect the movement of the workforce
and consumers in an efficient and orderly manner." (1U.V. Vision, p. 39).
D.1. STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION GOALS
The goal of the GMA is to encourage efficient multi -modal transportation systems that are based
on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. To accomplish
this goal the GMA establishes Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO's) and
directs that they develop a regional transportation plan. The RTPO is empowered to certify that
local government transportation elements are consistent with the regional transportation plan.
Local government transportation elements must be consistent with and support the land use
element of the plan. The transportation element must include an analysis and determination of
the level of service standards for all arterials and transit routes to judge the performance of the
system. A multi-year financing plan is required and if funds fall short of meeting identified
needs, a local government must either find a source of funds or reassess its land use assumptions
to ensure that an adequate level of service will be met.
Once the transportation element and the comprehensive plan is adopted, local government must
adopt ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development would cause the level
of service on the transportation facility to decline below the adopted level of service. Such
development may be approved, however, if transportation improvements or strategies to
accommodate the impacts are made "concurrent" with the development. Concurrent means the
system improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or a financial
commitment is made to complete the improvement or strategies within six. years.
D.2. COUNTY -WIDE TRANSPORTATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT
The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments serves as the lead agency for the RTP() for the
Yakima County area and is responsible for development of a regional transportation plan. Cities
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
15
and the County will each develop a transportation element to their comprehensive plans that
emphasizes local transportation needs. In developing these transportation elements, specific
linkages will be undertaken in order to integrate the local and regional plans.
D.3. TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENTS
The following policies relate to the development of an integrated multi -modal
transportation system within Yakima County:
D.3.1. The transportation plan element for each jurisdiction will be consistent with and
support the land use element of its comprehensive plan. [RCW 36.70A.070(6)]
D.3.2. Each transportation plan element will include the following sub -elements:
a. Land use assumptions used in estimating travel;
b. A statement of facilities and service needs, including:
i. An inventory of air, land and water transportation facilities and services to
define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning;
ii. Level of service standards for arterials, collectors and transit routes which will
be regionally coordinated;
iii. Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance any facilities or
services that are below an established level of service standard;
iv. Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plans to
provide information on the location, timing and capacity needs of future growth;
and
v. Identification of system expansion needs and transportation system management
needs to meet current and future demands. [RCW 36.70A.070(6)(a)(b)]
D.3.3. Comprehensive plans for each jurisdiction will contain a multi-year financing plan
which includes an analysis of the jurisdiction's ability to fund existing or future
transportation improvements and identifies existing and new revenue sources, which
may include impact fees. If identified funding falls short, the jurisdiction will reassess
land use assumptions to assure that level of service standards will be met. [RCW
36.70A(6)(c)]
D.3.4. Transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts resulting from
new development will be implemented concurrent with new development. "Concurrent
with new development" means that improvements or strategies are in place at the time
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
16
of development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the
improvements or strategies within six years. [RCW 36.70A.070(6)(e)]
D.3.5. Local jurisdictions will coordinate transportation planning efforts through the Yakima
Valley Conference of Govemments, which is designated as the Regional Transportation
Planning Organization (RTPO). This regional coordination will assure that an
assessment of the impacts of each transportation plan and land use assumptions on the
transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions is conducted and conflicts prevented.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
17
E. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
"We value communities that offer affordable housing choices to their residents; where there
exists a partnership between the public and private sectors, and results in a diverse choice of
housing affordable to all income ranges from the very low to the upper income; a community
that offers affordable housing to special needs people, e.g., persons with mobility limitations,
elderly, and developmentally disabled. We [envision a future in which./ communities have
addressed the need for housing of [their] permanent and transient agricultural labor force."
(U.V. Visioning Report, p. 59).
"Shelter is one of man's most basic needs. The comfort and security of one's shelter
contribute to a sense of personal well being and the well being of the community as a whole.
To a large degree, the vitality of a community is reflected in its housing stock." (L.V.
Visioning Report, p. 19).
E.1. STATEWIDE HOUSING GOAL
A goal of the GMA is to encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic
sectors, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation
of existing housing stock. The GMA requires the comprehensive plans of local governments to
include a housing element which, among other things, inventories and analyzes housing needs,
identifies sufficient land for all types of housing stock and provides for the needs of all economic
segments of the community.
E.2. COUNTY -WIDE HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
"Affordable housing" is a term which applies to the adequacy of the housing stock to fulfill the
housing needs of all economic segments of the population. The underlying assumption is that
the marketplace will guarantee adequate housing for those in the upper economic brackets, but
that some combination of appropriately zoned land, regulatory incentives, financial subsidies,
and innovative planning techniques will be necessary to make adequate provisions for the needs
of middle and lower income persons.
Local residents have discussed housing problems through the county -wide visioning effort. The
results of this effort have been used as the basis for the following policy statement. The purpose
of this policy directive is to provide a common ground and some universally acceptable
parameters to help guide decision -makers through the complex topic of affordable housing.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
18
E.3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY STATEMENTS
The following policies relate to the provision of affordable housing:
E.3.1. The County and the cities will inventory the existing housing stock and correlate with
the current population and economic condition, past trends, and twenty year population
and employment forecasts to determine short and long range affordable housing needs.
[RCW 36.70A.070(2)]
E.3.2. Local housing inventories will be undertaken using common :procedures so as to
accurately portray county -wide conditions and needs.
E.3.3. Each jurisdiction will identify specific policies and measurable implementation
strategies to provide a mix of housing types and costs to achieve identified affordable
housing goals. Affordable housing strategies should:
a. Encourage preservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of existing
neighborhoods, as appropriate;
b. Provide for a range of housing types such as multi -family and manufactured
housing on individual lots and in manufactured housing parks;
c. Promote housing design and siting compatible with surrounding neighborhoods;
d. Facilitate the development of affordable housing (particularly for low-income
families and persons) in a dispersed pattern so as not to concentrate or
geographically isolate these housing types; and
e. Consider public and private transportation requirements for new and redeveloped
housing.
E.3.4. Housing policies and programs will address the provision of diverse housing
opportunities to accommodate the elderly, physically challenged, mentally impaired,
migrant and settled -out agricultural workers, and other segments of the population that
have special needs.
E.3.5. Local governments, representatives of private sector interests and neighborhood groups
will work cooperatively to identify and evaluate potential sites for affordable housing
development and redevelopment.
E.3.6. Public and private agencies with housing expertise should implement early and
continuous cooperative education programs to provide general information on
affordable housing issues and opportunities to the public including information intended
to counteract discriminatory attitudes and behavior.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
19
E.3.7. Mechanisms to help people purchase their own housing will be encouraged. Such
mechanisms may include low interest loan programs and "self-help" housing.
E.3.8. Local comprehensive plan policies and development regulations will encourage and not
exclude affordable housing. [RCW 36.70A.070(2)(c)(d)]
E.3.9. Innovative strategies that provide incentives for the development of affordable housing
should be explored.
E.3.10. The County and the cities will locally monitor the performance of their respective
housing plans and make adjustments and revisions as needed to achieve the goal of
affordable housing, particularly for middle and lower income persons.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
20
F. JOINT PLANNING WITHIN UGA'S
"Cluster communities comprising the regional area should look to combine and assist in
service areas such as criminal justice, fire protection, public transit, water /sewer,
administration, and other services where such combinations implement efficient, cost effective
delivery of services. Cooperation among and between the separate governmental entities of
each cluster will be encouraged, and the citizens should hold elected and appointed officials
accountable for carrying out such a vision." (U. V. Vision, p. 49).
"Individual communities will continue to provide the public services now available to citizens
but a new spirit of coordination and cooperation among all levels of government, including
federal, state, county, municipal, and tribal governments, will result in a more equitable,
better balanced delivery of services. Residents of the Lower Valley will benefit from this
improved level of coordination by less duplication of services, streamlined delivery, and cost
efficiencies." (L. V. Vision, p. 13).
F.1. STATEWIDE JOINT PLANNING GOALS
Consistent with a goal of the GMA to ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions
to reconcile conflicts, the county -wide planning policy must address coordination of planning
efforts within urban growth areas. It is recognized that in many instances, land use activities
may be ;affected by the plans and regulations of several jurisdictions including Yakima County,
a city and special purpose districts. Coordinated planning is not only a requirement of local
government; it will facilitate implementation of plans, lead to more efficient delivery of urban
governmental services and will promote a sense of community through co:mmon, agreed upon
development standards.
F.2. COUNTY -WIDE JOINT PLANNING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
The UGA is not only a line which distinguishes urban level growth from rural growth, it also
carries implications about coordination of plann:ing within the UGA. Because the UGA defines
where the city is financially capable of providing urban services and may ultimately annex, land
use decisions need to respect the desires of the community. Agreement on land use planning
within the UGA is as important as designating the boundary itself.
F.3. JOINT PLANNING POLICY STATEMENTS
The following policies relate to coordinated planning for land use, capital facilities and
infrastructure within urban growth areas:
F.3.1. The County and cities will work with special purpose districts and other agencies to
establish a process for mutual consultation on proposed comprehensive land use plan
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
21
policies for lands within urban growth areas. Actions of special purpose districts and
other public service providers shall be consistent with comprehensive plans of the
County and the cities. [RCW 56.08.020, RCW 57.16.010]
F.3.2. The use of interlocal agreements is encouraged as a means to formalize cooperative
efforts to plan for and provide urban governmental services.
F.3.3. Joint financing ventures should be identified to provide services and facilities that will
serve the population within the urban growth area.
The following policy relates to the process for comprehensive plan amendments, zone
changes and development review and approval within urban growth areas:
F.3.4. While it is recognized that nothing in the county -wide planning policy will be construed
as altering the land use planning authority of the County or the cities, adopted
interlocal agreements shall specify the process by which affected local governments
may review and comment on comprehensive plan amendments, zone changes and
development applications processed by another jurisdiction within urban growth areas.
The following policy relates to the establishment of common and consistent
development and construction standards:
F.3.5. Each interlocal agreement will require that common and consistent development and
construction standards be applied throughout that urban growth area. These may
include, but are not limited to standards for streets and roads, utilities and other
infrastructure components.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
22
G. COUNTY -WIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & EMPLOYMENT
"Indeed, we support future growth in the Lower Valley that is well planned and supportable
by infrastructure and which minimizes conflicting or incompatible uses in proximity to one
another." (L. V. Vision, p. 7).
"With economic diversification and expansion;, we will see the development of desirable jobs
and full employment. We envision an economic and educational climate that enables our
citizens to find gainful employment within the Valley". (Mid).
"The next 20 years will see a broadening of the Upper Yakima Valley's economy. High-tech
industries and new businesses will complement and enhance the agricultural base." (U.V.
Vision, p. 92).
"Adequate developable property will be made available through land use planning and
appropriate zoning implementation. A diverse mixture of industrial, commercial, residential,
recreational and agricultural land uses will be planned for to concentrate development within
set community boundaries to encourage community revitalization and increased band use
density where it is Specifically planned." (U.V. Vision, p. 43).
G.1. STATEWIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS
The goals of the GMA encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent
with adopted comprehensive plans; promote economic opportunity for all citizens of the state,
especially for unemployed and disadvantaged persons; and encourage growth in areas
experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural
resources, public services and public facilities.
G.2. COUNTY -WIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT
County -wide economic development policies should promote a regional economic development
program consistent with local community preferences. The rural and urban economies within the
county are inextricably connected, and economic development opportunities should strengthen
linkages between population centers and outlying areas. A County -wide economic development
plan will be built in partnership with local jurisdictions to ensure that economic development
goals and objectives are community based.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
23
G.3. COUNTY -WIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY STATEMENTS
The following policies relate to a general strategy to help ensure future economic vitality,
broaden employment opportunities to meet the needs of projected future growth while
maintaining a high-quality environment:
G.3.1. Encourage economic growth within the capacities of the region's natural resources,
public services and public facilities.
a. Identify current and potiential physical and fiscal capacities for municipal and
private water systems, wastewater treatment plants, roadways and other
infrastructure systems.
b. Identify economic opportunities that strengthen and diversify the county's economy
while maintaining the integrity of our natural environment.
G.3.2. Local economic development plans should be consistent with the comprehensive land
use and capital facilities plans, and should:
a. Evaluate existing and potential industrial and commercial land sites to determine
short and long term potential for accommodating new and existing businesses;
b. Identify and target prime sites, determine costs and benefits of specific land
development options and develop specific capital improvement strategies for the
desired option;
c. Implement zoning and land use policies based upon infrastructure and financial
capacities of each jurisdiction;
d. Identify changes in urban growth areas as necessary to accommodate the land and
infrastructure needs of business and industry;
e. Support housing strategies and choices required for economic development.
G.3.3. Coordination of efforts between the many diverse economic development organizations
and other related agencies within Yakima County should be encouraged by:
a. Identifying linkages between economic development issues and strategies and other
growth planning elements (i.e. housing, transportation, utilities and land use);
b. Defining roles and responsibilities for carrying out economic development goals,
objectives and strategies.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
24
H. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
"Cluster communities comprising the regional area should look to combine and assist in
service areas such as criminal justice, fire protection, public transit, water/sewer,
administration, and other services where such combinations implement efficient, cost effective
delivery of services" (U.V. Vision, p. 49).
"Cooperation among and between separate service/government entities of each cluster should
be encouraged,..." (bid).
H.1. STATEWIDE FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS GOALS
The GMA requires that local governments, as part of the county -wide planning policies, address
the issue of fiscal impact analysis. The legislature did not define or give specific guidance on
matters to be considered in analyzing fiscal impacts. Since the GMA devotes much of its text
to the provision of cost-effective urban infrastructure, the ability to pay for needed capital
facilities and the development of affordable housing, it is presumed that these areas should be
the focus of the fiscal impact analysis.
H.2. COUNTY -WIDE POLICY DEVELOPMIENT
Local plan development should provide for cooperation between the public and private sectors
to insure coordination of capital improvements with emphasis on the efficient provision of
service at adopted levels concurrent with the demand for such service.
Local government should consider the use of innovative financing strategies for capital
improvements which minimize the financial cost to taxpayers and provide for the equitable
assignment of costs between existing and new development.
Annexation is another area which may impact 1:he fiscal resources of local government. Cost
and revenue sharing are techniques that should be examined to help alleviate the fiscal impacts
associated with annexation.
H.3. FIISCAL IMPACT POLICY STATEMENTS
The folllowing policies are related to the provision of cost-effective urban
infrastructure:
H.3.1. Each local government will prepare a capital facilities plan consisting of:
a. An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the
locations and capacities of the capital facilities;
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
25
b. A forecast of the future needs for such capital facilities;
c. The proposed locations, capacities and costs of expanded or new capital facilities;
d. At least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected
funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes;
and
e. A requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of
meti ting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, the capital facilities
pl.._-1 element and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are
coordinated and consistent.
H.3.2. As part of the planning process, the County and the cities should coordinate with capital
facilities providers and other interested parties to ensure that consideration is given to
all capital service requirements and the means of financing capital improvements.
H.3.3. The County and the cities should consider an impact fee process, as provided for in
RCW 82.02.050-090, to insure that new development pays its fair share of the cost of
improvements necessitated by growth and contributes to the overall financing of capital
improvements.
H.3.4. To minimize the potential economic impacts of annexation activities on the County and
cities, consideration will be given to negotiating agreements for appropriate allocation
of financial burdens resulting from the transition of land from county to city
jurisdiction.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
26
I. POLICIES PERTAINING TO COORDINATION WITH SPECIAL
PURPOSE DISTRICTS, ADJACENT COUNTIES AND STATE, TRIBAL
AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS
Special :purpose districts, adjacent counties, state agencies, Yakima Indian Nation (as a sovereign
government) and the federal government are distinct entities that have unique authorities,
responsibilities, interests and/or treaty rights affecting land use and other activities. Since the
impacts of future growth and development in Yakima County will affect all governmental units,
all agencies must be well informed and continuously involved in regional and local planning.
The following poliicies relate to coordination among jurisdictions:
The County and the cities will work with special purpose districts, adjacent counties,
state, tribal and federal governments to formalize coordination and involvement in
activities of mutual interest.
1.2. Jurisdictions will be encouraged to coordinate plans among and between governments
and agencies to make plans consistent and compatible for lands over which they have
authority.
I.3. Special districts, adjacent counties, state agencies, the tribal government and federal
agencies will be invited to participate in comprehensive planning and development
activities that may affect them, including the establishment and revision of urban
growth areas; allocation of forecasted population; regional transportation, capital
facility, housing and utility plans; and policies that may affect natural resources.
1.4. Each of the governmental entities will be included in the normal public notice and
comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of interest to them.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A-1
APPENDIX
PLANNING GOALS OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT
(from RCW 36.70A.040)
The Washington State Legislature adopted the following goals to guide the development of
comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required
or choose to plan under the Growth Management Act (Yakima County was one of the original
counties required to plan under the Act). The following goals are not listed in order of priority:
(1) Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public
facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
(2) Reduce Sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into
sprawling, low-density development.
(3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based
on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.
(4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments
of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
(5) Economic Development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that
is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens
of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth
in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural
resources, public services, and public facilities.
(6) Property Rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just
compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from
arbitrary and discriminatory actions.
(7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed
in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
(8) Natural Resource Industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation
of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses.
(9) Open Space and Recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development
of recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A-2
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
(10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life,
including air and water quality, and the availability of water.
(11) Citizen Participation and Coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in
the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile
conflicts.
(12) Public Facilities and Services. Ensure that those public facilities and services
necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the
development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below
locally established minimum standards.
(13) Historic Preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and
structures, that have historical or archaeological'. significance.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A-3
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Unless otherwise noted, the following terms used in the County -wide Planning Policy are
defined by the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70.030) or Washington Administrative Code
(WAC 365-195-210). Definitions are restated here for convenience of the reader.
(1) "Adequate public facilities" means facilities which have the capacity to serve
development without decreasing levels of service below locally established minimums.
(2) "Affordable housing" is a term which applies to the adequacy of housing stocks to
fulfill the housing needs of all economic segments of the population. Affordable housing for
middle and lower income persons is targeted to those whose incomes are 120% of median
income or less.
(3) "Available public facilities" means that facilities or services are in place or that a
financial commitment is in place to provide the facilities or services within a specified time.
(4) "Concurrency" means that adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of
development occur. This definition includes the two concepts of "adequate public facilities" and
of "available public facilities" as defined above.
(5) "Financial commitment" means that sources of public or private funds or combinations
thereof have been identified which will be sufficient to finance public facilities necessary to
support development and that there is reasonable assurance that such funds will be timely put
to that end.
(6) "Interlocal agreements" are authorized by state law and allow local governments
(through written agreements) to cooperate with each other on a basis of mutual advantage to
provide services and facilities in a manner that best meets the needs and development of local
communities. [Paraphrase of RCW 39.34.010]
(7) "Level of Service" means an established minimum capacity of public facilities or
services that must be provided per unit of demand or other appropriate measure of need.
(8) "New fully contained community" is a development proposed for location outside of
the existing designated urban growth areas which is characterized by urban densities, uses and
services and meets the criteria of RCW 36.70A.350.
(9) "Public facilities" include streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting
systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and
recreational facilities, and schools.
(10) "Public services" include fire protection and suppression, law enforcement, public
health, education, recreation, environmental protection, and other governmental services.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A-4
(11) "Rural lands" means all lands which are not within an urban growth area and are not
designated as natural resource lands having long term commercial significance for production
of agricultural products, timber, or the extraction of minerals.
(12) "Transportation level of service standards" mean a measure which describes the
operational condition of the travel stream and acceptable adequacy requirements. Such standards
may be expressed in terms such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic
interruptions, comfort, convenience, geographic accessibility and safety.
(13) "Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of
buildings, structures,, and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the
primary use of such :land for the production of food, other agricultural products, or fiber, or the
extraction of mineral resources. When allowed to spread over wide areas, urban growth
typically requires urban governmental services. "Characterized by urban growth" refers to land
having urban growth located on it, or to land located in relationship to an area with urban
growth on it as to be appropriate for urban growth.
(14) "Urban growth area" means those areas designated by a county pursuant to RCW
36.70A.110.
(15) "Urban governmental services" include those governmental services historically and
typically delivered by cities, and include storm and sanitary sewer systems, domestic water
systems, street cleaning services, fire and police protection services, public transit services, and
other public utilities associated with urban areas and normally not associated with nonurban
areas.
(16) "Visioning" means a process of citizen involvement to determine values and ideals for
the future of a community and to transform those values and ideals into manageable and :Feasible
community goals.
Yakima County -wide Planning Policy
A-5
COUNTY -WIDE PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE
Representation As of May 27, 1993
Jurisdiction Elected Designee Alternate(s):
GRANDVIEW Jesse Palacios Gay Brewer
Ed Powell
Jim Sewell
GRANGER Gary Anderson David Leach
Patty Stewart
HARRAH Barbara Harrer Pat Krueger
MABTON Jo Marie Balfour Bob Wailar
MOXEE Michael Briggs Robert Nelson
NACHES Janet Anderson Kit Hawver
SELAH Cliff Peterson Dennis Davison
Dale Nobel
SUNNYSIDE Ed Prilucik Leo Fancey
TIETON Marcus Dilley Dick Kroger
TOPPENISH Bill Rogers James Southworth
Elaine Willman
UNION GAP Bill Ackerman Ronald Krebs
Paul Burlingame
Bill Rathbone
WAPATO Richard Calahan William Coleman
YAKIMA Skip Semon Don Skone
YAKIMA COUNTY Chuck Klarich Bettie Ingham
Dick Anderwald
YAKIMA TRIBE Victor Andrews
Chris Cassidy
ZILLAH Mark Harris Janice Gonzales
Yakima County -wide Planning Pclicy