HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1993-012 HDR / MetroRESOLUTION NO R-93- 12
A RESOLUTIONauthorizing execution of assignments regarding
subconsultants' agreements involving HDR Engineering, Inc
and professional services for the Metropolitan Yakima
Comprehensive Plan Project (06539-028-002)
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima now has the capacity for contract
management of subconsultants under contract currently with HDR Engineering,
Inc , with IN hich the City of Yakima has a primary contract for professional
services regarding the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan Project, the
subconsultants have agreed to the assignment of HDR Engineering, Inc 's contract
management responsibilities to the City of Yakima, and the City Council of the City
of Yakima deems it in the best interest of the City that the assignments be carried
out, in order to provide, among other things, a reduction in the cost of the project
and an ability to apply the savings of the cost reduction to elements of the project
requiring resources beyond w hat is currently available; and
WHEREAS, the assignments are consistent and necessary to comply with the
1993 approx ed budget for the Metropolitan Yakima ComprehensiN e Plan, now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima are hereby
authorized and directed to execute an assignment, a copy of NN hich is attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, with each of the following
subconsultants Bucher, Willis & Ratliff, Bell -Walker Engineers, Inc , Adolfson
Associates, Inc , Hall & Associates, Kato & Warren, Inc
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL thisP?lay of rf4:5K052-1 , 1993
ATTEST Mayor
17C0u2--,--
City Clerk
res hr sc
PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT
This ASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this S g , day of R ra v5.21
by and between the City of Yakima (City), HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant), and Kato
& Warren, Inc. (Subconsultant).
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated April 24,
1991, (Agreement) under which the Consultant was to provide certain professional services
for the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan (Project); and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has entered into a subconsultant agreement with
Subconsultant, dated June 4, 1991, (Subconsultant Agreement) in which Subconsultant was
to provide a portion of the professional services on the Project on behalf of Consultant as
more fully described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide a portion of the services on the
Project that are described in the Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Subconsultant agrees to perform that portion of its service sunder the
Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED:
1. The Subconsultant shall perform the following services, which are listed in the
Subconsultant Agreement, directly for and on behalf of the City: Financial alternatives
services for support of Land Use, Transportation, Transit (Public Transportation), Park and
Recreation, and other ELEMENTS of the Project except to the extent that Subconsultants
services pertain to the Drainage ELEMENT (The services are hereinafter called "Direct
Services").
2. The Consultant hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the
Subconsultant Agreement to the City in so far as they relate to the Direct Services to be
provided by the Subconsultant to the City.
3. The City hereby accepts this Assignment of the Direct Services, and the City
assumes and agrees to fulfill all of the obligations of the Consultant under the Subconsultant
Agreement in so far as they relate to the same. The City specifically agrees to release and
discharge the Consultant from all of its duties and responsibilities under the Agreement to
the Extent that they are connected with the Direct Services to be provided by Subconsultant
under the Subconsultant Agreement.
d:\agree\yakkato.asn
4. The Subconsultant agrees to the Consultant's assignment of the Subconsultant
Agreement to the City as described herein and agrees to release and discharge the
Consultant from its duties and responsibilities under the Subconsultant Agreement as they
relate to the Direct Services.
City of Yakima
"City"
By:
ATTEST:
City Manager'
CTy Clerk
"Subconsultant"
By:
Title:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
"Consultant"
By:
Title:
rrry C•!•ITRhCT NO.
;3' J 8.-9-/�
PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT
This ASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this (9 day of \g91
by and between the City of Yakima (City), HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant), and Hall
& Associates (Subconsultant).
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated April 24,
1991, (Agreement) under which the Consultant was to provide certain professional services
for the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan (Project); and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has entered into a subconsultant agreement with
Subconsultant, dated May 17, 1991, (Subconsultant Agreement) in which Subconsultant was
to provide a portion of the professional services on the Project on behalf of Consultant as
more fully described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide a portion of the services on the
Project that are described in the Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Subconsultant agrees to perform that portion of its service sunder the
Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED:
1. The Subconsultant shall perform the following services, which are listed in the
Subconsultant Agreement, directly for and on behalf of the City: Public involvement
services for support of Land Use, Transportation, Transit (Public Transportation), Park and
Recreation, and other ELEMENTS of the Project except to the extent that Subconsultants
services pertain to the Drainage ELEMENT (The services are hereinafter called "Direct
Services").
2. The Consultant hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the
Subconsultant Agreement to the City in so far as they relate to the Direct Services to be
provided by the Subconsultant to the City.
3. The City hereby accepts this Assignment of the Direct Services, and the City
assumes and agrees to fulfill all of the obligations of the Consultant under the Subconsultant
Agreement in so far as they relate to the same. The City specifically agrees to release and
discharge the Consultant from all of its duties and responsibilities under the Agreement to
the Extent that they are connected with the Direct Services to be provided by Subconsultant
under the Subconsultant Agreement.
d:\agree\yakhallam
4. The Subconsultant agrees to the Consultant's assignment of the Subconsultant
Agreement to the City as described herein and agrees to release and discharge the
Consultant from its duties and responsibilities under the Subconsultant Agreement as they
relate to the Direct Services.
City of Yakima
"City"
By:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
"Consultant"
By:
Uity M. ;ger
�1
ATTEST: Title:
City Clerk
CITY CONTRACT PO.
ASSIGNMENT
This ASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this l" j day of ISk- PY \i3A.
by and between the City of Yakima (City), HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant), and
Adolfson Associates, Inc. (Subconsultant).
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated April 24,
1991, (Agreement) under which the Consultant was to provide certain professional services
for the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan (Project); and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has entered into a subconsultant agreement with
Subconsultant, dated May 10, 1991 (Subconsultant Agreement) in which Subconsultant was
to provide a portion of the professional services on the Project on behalf of Consultant as
more fully described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement: and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Subconsultant agrees to perform its services under the Subconsultant
Agreement directly for the City;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED:
1. The Consultant hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the
Subconsultant Agreement to the City.
2. The City hereby accepts this Assignment, and the City assumes and agrees to
fulfill all of the obligations of the Consultant under the Subconsultant Agreement, and
specifically agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from all of its duties and
responsibilities under the Agreement to the extent that they are connected with the services
to be provided by Subconsultant under the Subconsultant Agreement.
3. The Subconsultant agrees to the Consultant's assig�arent of the Subconsuhart
Agreement to the City and agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from its duties
and responsibilities under the Subconsultant Agreement.
City of Yaioma
"City"
HDR Engineering, Inc.
"Consultant"
By: By:
City Manager
G¢AI. „__ 12.,--i• i� Title: ,
ATTEST: 's : � %°
City Clerk
"Subconsultant"
By:
Title:
Yin
31, ,t? .i 3 / d:\agree\yakadolf.asn
f c'�,t
ASSIGNMENT
This ASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this MA -L, day of _ cf. N). \593
by and between the City of Yakima (City), HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant), and Bell -
Walker Engineers, Inc. (Subconsultant).
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated April 24,
1991, (Agreement) under which the Consultant was to provide certain professional services
for the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan (Project); and ,
WHEREAS, the Consultant has entered into a subconsultant agreement with
Subconsultant, dated June 4, 1991 (Subconsultant Agreement) in which Subconsultant was
to provide a portion of the professional services on the Project on behalf of Consultant as
more fully described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Subconsultant agrees to perform its services under the Subconsultant
Agreement directly for the City;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED:
1. The Consultant hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the
Subconsultant Agreement to the City.
2. The City hereby accepts this Assignment, and the City assumes and agrees to
fulfill all of the obligations of the Consultant under the Subconsultant Agreement, and
specifically agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from all of its duties and
responsibilities under the Agreement to the extent that they are connected with the services
to be provided by Subconsultant under the Subconsultant Agreement.
3. The Subconsultant agrees to the Consultant's assignment of the Subconsultant
Agreement to the City and agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from its duties
and responsibilities under the Subconsultant Agreement.
City of Yakima
"City"
City Meager
ATTEST:
City Clerk
By:
"SubconsCu,,tl�In , �--
By:
Title:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
"Consultant"
By:
Title:
^/ .
3-l'
•'.\agree\yakbell asn
ASSIGNMENT
This ASSIGNMENT is made and entered into this VI %4 day of P 01 V`'6`5
by and between the City of Yakima (City), HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant), and
Bucher, Willis & Ratliff (Subconsultant).
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have entered into an agreement, dated April 24,
1991, (Agreement) under which the Consultant was to provide certain professional services
for the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan (Project); and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has entered into a subconsultant agreement with
Subconsultant, dated June 4, 1991 as amended October 31, 1991 (Subconsultant Agreement)
in which Subconsultant was to provide a portion of the professional services on the Project
on behalf of Consultant as more fully described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have agreed that it would be in the best
interests of the Project for the Subconsultant to provide the services on the Project that are
described in the Subconsultant Agreement directly for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Subconsultant agrees to perform its services under the Subconsultant
Agreement directly for the City;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED:
1. The Consultant hereby assigns all of its right, title and interest in and to the
Subconsultant Agreement to the City.
2. The City hereby accepts this Assignment, and the City assumes and agrees to
fulfill all of the obligations of the Consultant under the Subconsultant Agreement, and
specifically agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from all of its duties and
responsibilities under the Agreement to the extent that they are connected with the services
to be provided by Subconsultant under the Subconsultant Agreement.
3. The Subconsultant agrees to the Consultant's assignment of the Subconsultant
Agreement to the City and agrees to release and discharge the Consultant from its duties
and responsibilities under the Subconsultant Agreement.
City of Yakima HDR Engineering, Inc.
"City" "Consultant" /
By: By: e„,L______7
City anger
ATTEST: 'l '<a--c--w ,� Title:
City Clerk
"Subconsultant”
By:
Title:
c r-" (l'uTr'(7 O.Ih
06539-027-002-01
October 5, 1992
Mr. Don Skone
Planning Manager
City of Yakima
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
T•
Subject: Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan
Consulting Services
Dear Don:
\I\ETEF\
SF\ EN -TEEN
\ice EE\ \I\ET\ TV()
75th LIniversar y
As we have discussed over the past several months, HDR Engineering, Inc. continues
in its pledge to offer services to the City of Yakima which meet the City's expectations
and needs. It is our goal to provide the City with those services that the City desires us
to provide - no more or no less.
As work has proceeded over the past few months on the Metropolitan Plan there has
been a growing consensus that the management of the project ELEMENTS, and
coordination activities, that were originally assigned to HDR Engineering, Inc. should
become a responsibility of the City of Yakima with the exception of the Drainage
ELEMENT.
In reviewing our current agreement with the City, we see no reason why we can not
simply transfer and assign the management and coordination responsibilities to the City.
Primarily, these responsibilities include:
■ Coordination of work products to address the scope -of -services.
■ Assure technical accuracy to reflect City's Visioning document and generalized
"style" of the community.
■ Standardize document format and technical layout to reflect a coordinated plan.
■ Keep subconsultants for various ELEMENTS "up-to-date" on work activities,
requirements, schedules, and budgets.
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Suite 200 Telephone
Lincoln Placa 206 453-1523
11225 S E. Sixth Street, Building C
Bellevue, Washington
98004-6441
Mr. Don Skone
City of Yakima
October 5, 1992
Page 2
■ Prevent duplication of efforts by consultant team members in development of each
ELEMENT.
■ Distribute "draft" documents for review and comments to appropriate City and
Consultant team members and follow-up to assure timely response.
■ Prepare the overall capital facilities plan and coordinated operating plan from the
various parts (ELEMENTS) as provided by the Consultant team and City staff.
• Integrate the planning process with the community program to assure community
growth and development while continuing the efficient expenditure of public funds
for facilities and services.
• Documentation of policy issues and decisions and distribution to Consultant team
members and City staff.
• Participate in discussions with City staff and City Council as requested to apprise
them of current project status and expenditures.
We understand that the City does not want to enter into separate contracts with the
subconsultants employed by HDR Engineering, Inc., however, issues surrounding those
items listed above, as well as questions of insurance, taxes, and other issues, could
probably be more easily resolved with individual agreements. To find a means to an end
we suggest that it would be appropriate for HDR Engineering, Inc. to assign our duties,
rights, responsibilities, and obligations under the terms of the Agreement and
Subconsultant Agreements to the City of Yakima as the principal. The subconsultants
of HDR Engineering, Inc. that would be effected by this assignment include:
• Bucher, Willis and Ratliff - Land Use ELEMENT, Transit ELEMENT, and Park
and Recreation ELEMENT.
• Bell -Walker Engineers, Inc. - Transportation ELEMENT.
• Hall & Associates - Public Involvement (Other than Drainage ELEMENT).
• Adolfson Associates, Inc. - Land Use and Environmental support.
■ Kato & Warren, Inc. - Financial support to all ELEMENTS (Other than Drainage
ELEMENT).
Mr. Don Skone
City of Yakima
October 5, 1992
Page 3
Copies of our current Subconsultant Agreements with these consultants are attached for
your reference. Our current Agreement would be reduced in scope to services expressly
identified in the Drainage ELEMENT (Task E). We would maintain responsibility for
services provided by Kato & Warren, Inc. and Hall & Associates as they directly relate
to the Drainage ELEMENT.
Proposed "Assignments" of the Agreement and Subconsultant Agreements are attached
hereto for the City's consideration. We are notifying our subconsultants of the future
assignment of their services by copy of this letter. If you have any questions regarding
this matter, please feel free to give me a call.
Very truly yours,
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
Anthony H. Kru sch
Vice President
AHK/sdh
Enclosure
cc: Glenn Rice, City of Yakima
Chris Waarvick, City of Yakima
Steve Lewis, BWR
Ted Bell, Bell -Walker
Mimi Sheridan - Hall & Associates
Molly Adolfson, Adolfson & Associates
Dick Warren, Kato & Warren
Chuck Gentile, HDR
HDR File
DOD
BELL•WALKER ENGINEERS :Inc.
914 140th Avenue N.E.
Suite 100
Bellevue, Washington 98005-3464
April 22, 1994
Mr. David A. Hussell
City of Yakima
2301 Fruitvale Boulevard
Yakima, Washington 98902
RE: CITY OF YAKIMA TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Dear Dave,
(206) 643-2002
FAX (206) 641-6985
Following our meeting on January 19, 1994, we have developed the following scope of work for the
transportation element of the City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan.
Traffic Model: Bell—Walker Engineers, Inc. (BWE) will receive the traffic model being developed by
TMODEL Corporation, review documentation and test the model operation on our computer network.
We will review the Yakima land use map and future population and employment projections. We will
convert the future demographic projections for input into TMODEL2 and estimate increase in external
traffic. Using this information, we will provide a forecast of future traffic demand without improvements
to the transportation system.
System Deficiency Analysis: BWE will analyze the existing street network with future land use (travel
demand) and identify deficiencies based on the City's level of service criteria. Improvements to correct
the deficiencies will be prepared and incorporated into the street system for comparison to the existing
network. Two possible City—wide system alternatives will be analyzed based on identified system
deficiencies.
In addition, the one—way street system will be reviewed to determine capacity or operational deficiencies
based on existing land use (travel demand). If operational or capacity deficiencies are identified
recommended solutions will be offered for further analysis. Appropriate modifications will then be
analyzed using the traffic model.
System Evaluation: Each of the improvement concepts will be evaluated in comparison to the existing
system. Evaluation parameters will include the following items:
c:\wp51\92040.0114001
Bellevue, Washington • Boise, Idaho
Mr. David A. Hussell
City of Yakima
• Change in vehicle miles of travel
• Change in vehicle hours of travel
• Safety
• Cost to construct
• Benefit—cost ratio
April 22, 1994
Page Two
Results of this evaluation will be summarized in an evaluation matrix. This matrix should form the basis
for accepting a recommended plan. A summary table will be prepared which will detail the level of
service at intersections, on segments of arterials, and a combination of intersections and roadway
segments.
Recommended Plan: Based upon the evaluation matrix and input from the City Council, citizens of
Yakima, and City staff, a recommended plan will be developed. A report describing the plan process,
analysis, evaluation, and recommendation will be prepared. A matrix will be prepared for concurrency
management which will detail the existing conditions and future conditions for each intersection and
roadway segment analyzed through this study process. This will allow the City of Yakima to adequately
track the impact of development on the street network.
The attached personnel—hour estimate is a modified version of the estimate prepared in December 1992.
Modifications reflect the change in scope of work on items such as addition of one—way street altemative
and deletion of financial element and sample mitigation fee ordinance. Public participation will be
scheduled and organized by City of Yakima staff with Bell—Walker Engineers presenting our findings
and recommendations.
If you have any further questions, please contact us at your convenience. Please indicate acceptance of
this proposal so we can begin preparation of a contract amendment.
Very truly yours,
BELL—WALKER ENGINEERS, INC. APPROVED:
Theodore T. Bell, P.E.
President
c:\wp51\92040.01\4001
Date
CITY CONTRACT NO. /
Mr. David A. Hussell
City of Yakima
City of Yakima
Transportation Element — Comprehensive Plan
Revised Scope of Work
Personnel Hour Estimate
April 22, 1994
Page Three
Task
Principal Planner Engineer Technician Clerical
1. Traffic Model
a. Transfer Traffic Model - 8 16 - -
b. Review documentation - 4 4 - -
c. Test Traffic Model 2 8 8
d. Input Projected Land Use - - 8 - 8
e. Input External Traffic - - 8 - 8
f. Forecast Travel Demand 2 4 4 - -
g. Prepare Summary Table
- Intersection LOS - 16 40 8 -
- Roadway LOS - - 8 8 -
h. Develop Improvements - 16 32 - -
i. Estimate Cost 12 24 32 24 8
j. Public Meeting 12 12 8 4 4
k. Council Meeting 12 12 = - 4
Subtotal 38 98 168 44 32
2. Develop and Test Alternatives
a. Intersection 8 20 40 8
b. Roadway 8 20 40 8
c. System 16 28 40 8
Subtotal 32 68 120 24
3. Alternative Evaluation
a. Intersection 4 12 16 12
b. Roadway 4 12 16 12
c. System 4 12 16 12
Subtotal 12 36 48 36
4. Evaluation Matrix
a. Intersection - 2 4 8 8
b. Roadway - 2 4 8 8
c. System - 2 4 8 8
d. Staff Meeting 12 12 8 4 4
Subtotal 12 18 20 28 28
5. Recommended Plan
a. Report 12 24 12 32 16
b. Public Meeting 12 12 8 4 4
c. Council Meeting 12 12 8 4 4
Subtotal 36 48 28 40 24
TOTAL
130 268 384 172 84
c:\wp5i\92040.01\4001
Mr. David A. Hussell
City of Yakima
Fee Estimate
April 22, 1994
Page Four
Labor Hours Rate Cost
Personnel
Principal 130 $ 37.50 $ 4,875.00
Planner 268 30.00 8,040.00
Engineer 384 17.16 6,590.00
Technician 172 14.18 2,440.00
Clerical 84 13.63 1,145.00
Subtotal 1,028 $ 23,090.00
Overhead Cost 135% X 31,170.00
DSC
Subtotal 54,260.00
Net Fee 15% 8,140.00
Subtotal 62,400.00
Direct Expenses
Reproduction
Travel
Per Diem
Telephone
Subtotal
TOTAL
500.00
300.00
1,200.00
500.00
2,500.00
$ 64,900.00
c:\wp51\92040.01\4001
D
DUD
BELL -WALKER ENGINEERS Inc.
914 140th Avenue N.E.
Suite 100
Bellevue, Washington 98005-3464
December 7, 1992
Mr. David A. Hussell
Street and Traffic Operations Manager
City of Yakima
2301 Fruitvale Boulevard
Yakima, Washington 98902
Re: Metropolitan Yaldma 2010 Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Element Scope of Work
Dear Dave,
(206) 643-2002
FAX (206) 641-6985
In response to your memorandum dated December 1, 1992 and our discussions on December 2,
we have prepared the following:
1. The transportation scope of work can be divided into two parts. The first portion would
include the data collection, inventory, background information, and setting up the
transportation model. This would be accomplished in 1993. The remainder of the work
would be completed in 1994.
2. The estimated cost for accomplishing the work identified above is $48,350. We would
accomplish as much of the items identified in Item No.1 above so as not to exceed your
requested limit of $40,000.
3. By dividing the contract into two years, we would anticipate salary and expense cost
increases of approximately 5 percent. Based on this, with $40,000 of work being
completed in 1993, a remainder of $53,400 would be spent in 1994. Assuming a 5
percent increase for the 1994 work, the increased cost would be $2,600, for a total of
$96,000 for the project.
4. Our original proposal included a non—motorized travel plan for a cost of $6,875.
Assuming this work would be accomplished in 1994, the cost would be $7,220,
considering a 5 percent increase for this work.
c:\wp51\bus—dev\2010—yak.pro
Bellevue, Washington • Boise, Idaho
Mr. David A. Hussell
Street and Traffic Operations Manager
City of Yakima
December 7, 1992
Page 2
5. Our proposal to evaluate the transportation system includes analysis of a number of areas
identified as requiring capacity and safety improvements. Using the traffic model, an
evaluation will be prepared of each problem location and the best solution would be
combined into two area—wide systems. This step process of analyzing local areas in
developing solutions simplifies the evaluation of the overall system.
6. The future summary table will include estimated costs and deficiencies.
7. The existing summary table will identify deficient streets and intersections based on
capacity, operations, or safety.
It is hoped that this information is sufficient to evaluate our proposal.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact this office.
Very truly yours,
BELL—WAL R ENGINEERS, INC.
Theodore T. Bell, P.E.
President
TTB/dc
c:\wp51\bus-dev\2010-yak.pro
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
SCHEDULE
TASK
1993
1994
JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
JUNE
JULY
1. BACKGROUND,
INVENTORY & ANALYSIS
2. TRAFFIC MODEL &
SYSTEM ANALYSIS
3. DEVELOP & EVALUATE
ALTERNATIVES
4. DEVELOP IMPACT
FEE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
5. REVIEW RECOMMENDED
PLAN
N OLO
N ogg BELL -WALKER ENGINEERS Inc.
}