The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutR-1992-D6084 Department of Transportation / Federal AidRESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute and submit a Federal -Aid Project Prospectus to the Washington State Department of Transportation. WHEREAS, the City of Yakima desires to improve the safety of certain street intersections located within the City; and WHEREAS, federal funds are available for such safety improvement projects through the Hazard Elimination Program administered by the Washington State Department of Transporta- tion; and WHEREAS, this project has been reviewed by the City Council and has been determined to be not inconsistent with the City's comprehensive plan for community development; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City of Yakima to execute and submit a Federal -Aid Project Prospectus to the Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City Manager and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and submit a Federal -Aid Project Prospec- tus to the Washington State Department of Transportation. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this -.4.1 day of r\AWal 1992. ATTEST: ›g /2,9-4e} City Clerk (res/fdrlaid.rp) 4, Mayor APPENDIX 11-1-3 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL - AID PROJECT PROSPECTUS DATE _3. 19: qa AGENCY CITY OF YAKIMA FEDERAL -AID PROJECT NUMBER...S _.,., • 4648 ( ) re ix ute FEDERAL PROGRAM TITLE 0 20.204 0 20.205 C) 20.206 0 20.209 XS Other PROJECT TITLE: SIGNALIZATION-SCHOOL CROSSING BETWEEN 28TH AVE & 9T1-1 AVF_ PROJECT TERMINI FROM N/A FROM:MPA TO N/A MP —TO-. N/A Length of Project N/A Miles AWARD TYPE Federal Agency : FHWA 0Others...r Dc Local 0 Local Forces 0 State o Railroad City Number_ .1485 _ ....... County Number.. .. EIS CE EA DOT Oistr' t..._� 5 __.M. Congressional District.._.. 4 _...... 31 all 0111 Legislative Districts 14 Urban Area Number 05 Area Clearinghouse 21 MPO Y •TOTA .t.pCALAGFs#CY " ,.>`:;' -: PHASE ESTIMATED COST ._'.; .FUNDING earesi Dollar ?;: Nearest Dollar P.E. 3, 000 CONS 30,000 300 3,000 " FJNOS r ;FEDERAI. ,DATE Barest Ogllar :.4 ,.:fiiN0.S y .Monih ear., 2,700 27,000 90% 5/92 90% 9/92 TOTAL 33,000 3,300 29,700 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITY (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width: 39 ' 6" Number of Lanes: 4 lanes SEE EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK ,r'.".'.t.New Construction Roadway Width: 39 ' 6" Install mid -block pedestrian actuated illuminated school crossing sign, and Replacement of curb and sidewalk sect handicap ramps. Local Agency Contact PersonIS$EI.L Mailing Address -21 Fruitvale Boulevard „City Yak ma LOCATION AND DESIGN APPROVAL By; (Optional for CA Agencies Only) TITLE: L. pc 3R Number of Lanes: 4 signal system with advanced crossing signs. ion for installation of Tit`fe 1anagerJ reefs Phone,[509' 57�;OQ.L_, Washington Zip Code 98902 (Approving Authority) DATE: DOT Form 140-009A Revised7/87 Page 1 of 3 June 1987 Traffic APPENDIX II•1.3 AGENCY PROJECTTME 2D t -'ACS DATE CITY OF YAKIMA SIGNALIZATION-SCHOOL CROSSING BTW 28TH, 3-19-92 ` GEOMETRIC DESGN:DATA DESCRIPTIONTHROUGH ROUTE CROSSROAD I 1 I FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Terrain Posted Sed Design Speed Existing ADT $ QQQ, Design Year ADT y5 .OQD Design Year Design Hourly Volume (DHV) Principal Arterial Minor Arterial cc P Collector WMajor Collector ' Minor Collector a 0 Access Street/Road 0 FLAT .fit<ROLL :.:MOUNTAIN 0 Principal Arterial 0 Minor Arterial cc t' 1 Collector 0 Major Collector 0Minor Collector E CI Access Street/Road i..i Fafri ROLL 0 MOUNT/AI 3.5 mph 1A Property Damage YEAR ) Accidents Number of ...... igg Accicte.Na. 1990 �.I 0 _ .._ 1.-. 1 ,1.5.0_ ACCIOENT_� 3 AR'EXPER1 INJURY ACCIDENTS Number of 1 Number of Accidents I Inuries FATAL ACCIDENTS Number of Accidents Number of Fatalities 0 0 Total Number of Arxidents 7OTAi, NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO LACK OF HAVING. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMEN T w..... w. M._ ..:.: _ ..:.....:: _ . .w.,. ,, :::._. FORMA6W :w. WOR :..:....w.:. ...:.:..:.:.......:.....:..:......::,....::... :m......:.:.::..,........ .......... , ... Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By: Others % Agency 0 x,00 % Contract Agency 100 % 0 % Construction WiII Be Performed By: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS This project has a Class II project classification and is categorically excluded. RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION No relocation or right-of-way acquisition required. WATER AREA INVOLVEMENT N/A DOT Form 140-009 A Revised 7/87 Page 2 of 3 3une 1987 APPENDIX 11-1-3 AGENCY PROJECT TITLE Z91H AVE. CITY OF YAKLMA SIGNALIZATION-SCHOOL CROSSING BTW 28TH $ DATE T19-92 DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS AND EXISTING MAJOR STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT : REMOVAL OF EXISTING OVERHEAD SIGN AND BEACON. FAA INVOLVEMENT Is any airport located within 2 miles of the proposed project ' Yes XX No REMARKS: 1 THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE ADMINISTRATION AGENCY OR AGENCIES, OR ITS' DESIGNEE, AND IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE AGENCY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. AGENCY: DATE:.. ..� BY: (Mayor/Chairman) DOT Form 140-009 A Revised7/87 Page 3 of 3 June 1987 SIGNALIZATION OF SCHOOL CROSSUjQ VICINITY OF 28TH AVENUE AND LINC1 Lincoln Avenue is a minor arterial street that connects the western residential areas of Yakima with the Central Business District. TIB funding has been secured to extend Lincoln Avenue east to an interchange on 1-82. The proposed project is located near 28th Avenue, where currently there is a 20 -year old, key activated flashing beacon and wooden sign that warns motorists of the 1Robertson Elementary School patrolled crossing. Visibility of the crossing is reduced by a knoll as motorists approach from the east, and seasonal problems occur as the sun's alignment causes glare for motorists. Engineering studies completed in March 1992 indicate that the crossing satisfies the school warrant for signalization. This location was originally identified in 1986 as meeting the crossing warrant. Volume increases on the street have made it increasingly difficult for the elementary children to cross Lincoln Avenue. 180 crossings are made each day at this location by elementary children. Several near misses have been witnessed by parents and school personnel as motorists have driven past the patrol guards and into the crosswalk where children were crossing the street. A pedestrian/vehicle collision was reported in 1990. There are 5 reported collisions in the vicinity of the crossing, it is quite possible that there have been unreported collisions or collisions that occurred at this location that were coded to a different location. The proposed project will remove the existing flashing beacon at the intersection of 28th Avenue and Lincoln Avenue and will install a pedestrian actuated signal midblock between 28th Avenue and 29th Avenue. This signal will serve only pedestrian traffic and will not interrupt arterial flow for side street traffic, thus preserving the traffic carrying capacity of the street without changing neighborhood traffic patterns. EXHIBIT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS �p $, f " _ DATE t (*—_! L+ CALC DIST CO RTL PAI CHK Major St: Minor St: U) . t-6�.lc4ot..N AUENUE N . 28+0 d VE.t41JJE Critical speed of majorstreet traffic ! 40 mph Critical Approach Speed Critical Approach Speed ❑ l RURAL (R) ❑ URBAN (U) In built up area of Isolated community of <10.000 pop. DATE b5. mph 2.D mph WARRANT 1 — Minimum Vehicular Volume APPROACH LANES Minimum Requirements U R U R 1 2 or more Major Street 500 350 • 600 420 Minor Street 150 105 200 140 Satisfied Yes 5t % No D CVO /0809/100ji7OD/ /u,cri / 1810 flour Zr0 Zq 8t(a 14. (o7z 33 6,41 22 151 LtD 710 41 846 24 NOTE. Left tum movements from Major St. included when LT -phasing is proposed 0 WARRANT 2 — Interruption of Continuous Traffic APPROACH LANES Minimum Requirements U R U R 1 2 or more Major Street 750 525 630 Minor Street a 53 100 70 Satisfied Yes ❑ No ❑ mop lcecoAlco l ion /-woAtoo Hour 64l 2q pco t'o7L 22 ►1.0 11 Stio 2.1 1020 vo NOTE: Left tum movements from Major St. included when LT -phasing is proposed 0 WARRANT 3 — Minimum Pedestrian Volume Minimum Requirements U R Satisfied YesO No Major Street Volume Ped's Xing Major Street No Median Raised 4" Median 600 420 1000 700 /. / / /Hour 150 105 MIDILOCK SIGNAL PROPOSED MIN. REQUIREMENT DISTANCE TO NEAREST ESTARUSNEO CROSSWALK 150 Feet N/E ft S/W ft SatisfiedNo ❑ Yes ❑ AVARRANT 4— School Crossings TS -10A (3W7a) See Chapter 10 Not Applicable , t� See School Crossings Warrant Sheet (d' MEE'T''� 1 Qk RR4 1 ' fop. 4 17e.ritcwi --c C C (ZO,-51r,1(7 `�t�j�A� SEElt: croeD -4E. / l � .TTI o'1 t rnlo) TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 5 — Progressive Movement MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1000 ft I N S Satisfied Yes❑ No DISTANCE TO NEAREST S9GNAL �—�-- ft E ft W.___ ft 1 Not Satisfied 0 ON ISOLATED ONE WAY ST. OR ST. WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING i SPEED CONTROL WOULD ISE LOST ON 2.WAY ST WHERE ADAJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM D. Fulfilled ❑ Not Satisfied ❑ WARRANT 6 — Accident Experience Satisfied Yes ❑ Lam' SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW ❑ ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACC FREQ 0 ACC WITHIN A 12 M0.PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR.& INVOLVING INJURY OR>5100 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT J NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS- SOR MORE ❑ MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT OR MORE OF WARRANT 1 -MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME !MAR ORNT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS T•• _F . WARRANT 3 - MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME SATISFIED - %- % 0 WARRANT 7 — Systems Warrant Satisfied Yes ❑ No MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES 500 VEH/HR DURING TYPICAL. WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEH/HR YEN FOR EACH OF ANY 5 MRSOrA SATURDAY AND/OR SUNDAY CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES 0 Not Satisfied Fulfilled PART OF HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TFC CONNECTS AREAS OF PRINCIPLE TRAFFIC GENERATION RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVELING A CITY HAS SURFACE STREET FRY OR EXPWAY RAMP TERMINALS APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS NET, BOTH STS. WARRANT 8 — Combination of Warrants Satisfied Yes C� 0 0 lE Not Satisfied 0 Fulfilled No REQUIREMENT WARRANT 1 SATISFIED TWO WARRANTS SATISFIED SO% OR MORE 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME j % 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC! 3 ..MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME � The satisfaction of a warrant is n6t necessarily justification for signals. Delay. congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment must be shown. T3.10912/72) w ,f -N' s �, t Oe 4, 11 4 -Re Nor" sA-'r > pot 1 :1 T- S t�CIF' C IT � c I:li_ it c) A I:1,H 111E PFIWFR POLE r-',Ff irl, 10 ,/ 1INC Ol_N A'VLNLIE f i";i1tl(� -1 ;Ult. FLA -LIEF L NI F•'(',NIr,F_ i,HonL_ CFOs Reli SIGs EXISTING CROSSWALK / TRArr 1 L.: [1]NTRLL._ FUR/C L \A" L1T \C -L _N ()VENUE_ NUL___ TI AT LlJ f IN\J_IF Y/ 1 1GHT POLE N 1 IN. = ZO FT. EV z ]nN ]n d H18 CM- •01111111111•11=1=1.. \STOP SI - 1 I PARI/ 111(3 111 -1 111-:'1)111,r. I cif 111 1 11 r 1 I 1111' W LINCNLN—A'v'[HUE 'CIWER POOLE PR z RIO -6 b hninoir Ownr mow 4 F P 10 -(?) .- 114 Uf' 1!.1F WALKWAY N1=: l } N 1) H17[:IL CF'CJC:.`J(L TYPE 1 - J NIX SE TRAF IE EIINTR[1L FUR /I n { w. L_LINL,uEIN n f" r I 1 1 C HL.1L- N. E8 I L1 A\ LNiJL EIGH1 POLE,_ T 1 IN. 20 FT. FFOFOT>ED 1 i 71N-3AV 1-iteE C,[11 ,_ , s1UN CAUSE Il_r 1!.'I PTJPEP L ANE_ CI-1Ahdr,E "1'1 P1; .r , rEt IPI r�L'Pr ' PIGN1 TLIr2N "A1 I I_F r iiiF'LI Ari6111`;1 "WOE TC, 1 PEP L WAIT T I•i'I tll ,I ;I I IT DPiv11jr p[I ?iFFI-I 11 /r FEAKL`_ r rF r 411 "PE_ 111 1IELTiP1Liil-lt [1F \v ( T)'.1 Pi.1 it Ii WNILL INTI>lrATE 1T 'I. ": ;F'[fVN 17(411_1 1r' Ir+t'POF'EN PA;,, F F x111 (1) IU SILT 11;" IIIA1 FFFIT ION I`11 N1i I'IIr1PT,E FP F!IT AHD FUN F 1 FIJLr FIVINi.I 1L1 CLCISE IP r ' r:OAP S r Fofir_KI NG WITH I_sIDUL CARE �--# vE111ClE MtV1NC, MEAD .4.44411. vENCCLE IA1-41,JG UP REIR STRJAN $i'E.ETCAR 0D' TRAIN RANKtr JEI['LF 111111111111. L. . [1 r1xE0 DRirCT rMAL ACCII ENT yE , , NON -?tea rAL nrf1TKNT r IPO( lr•pT Y 6AM At,E ONLY NF:AutON FIC AV -01 MEW IE —00-0 RE AR EN 0 OvtRTMttN6 7StOt sw(Rt MORISON "'1Q1 flVtfTAKtN6 TURN .__ . tJT OR CONTRtL *MI6' VCMQt TURNED OVER MC LR 1C L DAY 1Ft -1T L nApfi vi CRU `:WALK vl \ \ 11 / 1 6.• 8 9 1 720 INA •V2 tvl 1 11 , 0'.' a 1 7500 11,1 A LJ J C1 L1 joommourneorsur INDICATE HOP N. EATH AVENUE- ----- ------ vl 04/03/Q1 1200-2100 UV/LN•JA1IENII CITY ❑F YAKIMA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIV COLLISION PLOT: W. LINCOLN AVE. fl. N. 28111 AVE. TJATE1o3/ 11/92 DR AV N! IIFCKELI (1PF'PLJVII 11 PERIOD: 01/01/89 THPIJ: 12/ _HEFT 1 MEMORANDUM MARCH 16, 1992 TO: Shelley Willson, Supervising Traffic Engineer FROM: Bill Quitta, Traffic Technician SUBJECT: Traffic Gap/Pedestrian Delay Study at W. Lincoln Avenue and N. 28th Avenue School Crossing Survey *1: March 3, 1992, 14:16 to 15:16 (60 minutes) * school patrol active from 14:19 to 14:28 * 73 children crossed - 13 groups of 3 to 5 - 3 groups of 6 to 10 - 1 group of 11 to 15 * "G" - acceptable 85% gap time = 17 seconds * 70 total gaps ranging from 8 to 16 seconds * 18 total gaps ranging from 17 to 43 seconds - "t" - 547 seconds of gaps equal to or greater than "G" - "D" - pedestrian delay (intervals between acceptable gaps) = 85% Survey #2: March 4, 1992, 7:45 to 8:45 (60 minutes) * school patrol active from 8:03 to 8:37 * 91 children crossed - 16 groups of 3 to 5 - 4 groups of 6 to 10 Si - acceptable 85% gap time = 17 seconds * 50 total gaps ranging from 8 to 16 seconds • 20 total gaps ranging from 17 to 39 seconds - "t" - 473 seconds of gaps equal to or greater than "G" - "D" - pedestrian delay (intervals between acceptable gaps) = 87% Results As per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), to meet the School Crossing Warrant, the number of acceptable gaps ('6') during a specific period of time must be less than the number of minutes in that same period, or restated, one acceptable gap per minute. At this location, for the two surveys, their was an average of only 18 acceptable gaps for the 60 minute period. This is equivalent to one adequate gap every 3 minutes - 18 seconds, and only one-third (5.4 sec ) the adequate gap each minute. Therefore, W. Lincoln Avenue, just west of N. 28th Avenue, meets \A/arrant #4 of the MUTCD for a pedestrian -actuated school crossing signal. Robertson School 2807 W. Lincoln Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Esperanza Lemos, Principal March 16, 1992 To Whom This May Concern, 1 am principal of Robertson Elementary School in Yakima. 1 have been here for four years and in these four years I have been very concerned about the lack of a signalized crossing at South 28th Avenue and West Lincoln Avenue for our students. West Lincoln Avenue is a busy street and our crossing guards are only 5th grade students. They must rely on the children crossing to be very responsible in waiting to be crossed at this intersection. We have many children crossing this street before and after school on their way home (approximately 95 in the morning and 78 in the afternoon). The cars coming down Lincoln Avenue frequently do not observe the speed limit thereby making it even more unsafe. A signalized crossing would make this a very safe crossing as well as assist the school crossing guards. Please consider this request for the safety of our children. Sincerely, <4 c.__( ,4f Mrs. Esperanza Lemos Principal U SCHOOL CROSSIN; ® " APPENDIX 11-1-3 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL - AID PROJECT PROSPECTUS DATE 3 ►q • AGENCY CITY OF YAKIMA FEDERAL -AID PROJECT NUMBE8Sa - 4 5 7 9uts ( ) �Pre11 o FEDERAL PROGRAM TITLE 0 20.204 0 20.205 0 20.206 0 20.209 Other PROJECT TITLE. SIGNALIZATION NORTH 1ST ST.RF.ET AND Tl STREET PROJECT TERMINI FROM_.._ NLA FROM :MP J J A TO N A MPLength of Project.---- Miles AWARD TYPE Federal Agency : i FHWA l Others... City Number 14 8 S County Number 39 DOT District.........s ._ .. ....... Congressional District 4 --- Legislative Districts 14 Urban Area Number 0 5 TOTAL PHASE ESTIMATED COST (Newest Dollar) P.E. 15000 CONST 150 000 TOTALI :LOCAL AGENCY FUNDING (Nearest Dollar) 1t Local G Local Forces EIS CE 01 4341 Area Clearinghouse FEDERAL. PERCENT FUNDS =FEDERAL; (Nearest Dollar) . FUNDS 0 State 0 Railroad EA 0111 21 MPO Y OBUGATIOK 'PATE _ Mori h..Yeas': : 1,500 13,500 90% 5-92 15000 135,000 16,500 148500 90% 11-92 • DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITY (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width: 63'10 " Number of Lanes: _ S ._1 arie s SEE EXHIBIT A • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK 0 New Construdion 12 3-R Roadway Width: &..3.1.1D22. Number of Lanes: 5 Installation of 6 phase actuated -coordinated signal system, with pedestrian indications and emergency vehicle pre-emption. Re- place curb and sidewalk section with handicap ramps. Local Agency Contact Person TAt7E"HUSSEI;L TitleTana 11- S'IWreet... Tr af fis • Mailing Address 2301 Fruitvale Boulevard Phone (509) 575-6005 City.-_,,, ki na WashingtonZip Code 98962— ..__.._ LOCATION AND DESIGN APPROVAL BY: (Optional for CA Agencies Only) (Approve' utliority) TITLE: DATE: DOT Form 140-009A Revised7/87 Page 1 of 3 3une 1987 APPENDIX 11.1.3 AGENCY PROJECT TITLE DATE CITY OF YAKIMA SIGNALIZATION NO 1ST STREET is D STREET 3-1'9 - 9 : ... ... . ., .GEOMETRIC DESIGN DATA:.......::::.. ......................:::...:..:... DESCRIPTION THROUGH ROUTE CROSSROAD FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Terrain IX Principal Arterial t Minor Arterial cc Collector Major Collector Minor Collector a D Access Street/Road FLAT .< ROLL .MOUNTAIN! Posted Speed Design Speed Existing ADT 35 Rub_ 4O...mt 3 i:] Principal Arterial 0 Minor Arterial D Collector D Major Collector Minor Collector it C7 Access Street/Road ?J FLAT E.D ROLL 0 MOUNTAIN` 21( Design Year ADT 26 ,anfl 3100 Den Year Design, Hourly Volume (DHV) YEAR 20,7 200 7 2600........:........�H..,<;.;.3 0..N� v. 1DENT'.•'3 YEAR XPERII±NC ;.:' : °. Property f INJURY ACCIDENTS FATAL ACCIDENTS Damage Accidents Number of AC• . jsierdtc 90 , :__..1991... Number of Accidents Number of Number of 'nudes Accidents Number of Fatalities Total Number of Aocidents • TOTAL: NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO LACK OF'HAVING THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT 7 1 10 w..1.:r....., w . P ERFORMANCEC►F WORK Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By: Others Agency 0 % 1.00 Construction Will Be Performed By: Contract { Agency 100 % 0 % ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS This project has excluded. a Class II project classification and is categorically RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION No relocation or right of way acquisition required. WATER AREA INVOLVEMENT None. DOT Form 140-009 A Revised 7/87 Page 2 of 3 lune 1937 APPENDIX 11-1-3 AGENCY ::. w, PROJECT TITLE QQATEE 3-1992 CITY 0Y YAKLTIA j SIGNALIZATION 1ST AND D STREET DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY RELOCATION OR ADJUSTMENTS AND EXISTING MAJOR STRUCTURES INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT : REMOVAL OF EXISTING FIRE BEACON. FAA INVOLVEMENT Is any airport located within 2 miles of the proposed project(. Yes ACX No REMARKS: N/A THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF THE ADMINISTRATION AGENCY OR AGENCIES, OR ITS' DESIGNEE, AND IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE AGENCY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. AGENCY: DATE: BY: ...._. DOT Form 140-009 A Revised7/87 Page 3 of 3 June 1987 (Mayor/Chairman)...-....................-...�..,,.........�........ SIGNALIZATION OF NORTH FIRST STREET AND► D STREET The existing intersection of North First Street and D Street is located north of Yakima's Central Business District; east of a large number of agricultural and industrial warehouses; south of a strip of rnotels and restaurants; and west of an area zoned business and residential. The City's main fire station, Station 1, is located one- half block from the intersection of North First Street and D Street. This station responded to 1,578 or 43% of the aid calls received in 1991. There were 3,629 calls received by the five fire stations within the City of Yakima. Fire District 1 is bounded by I-82/SR12 on the north, Walnut Street on the south, and the City limits to the east. A major response route for the station is east on D Street to First Street. The current fire signal does not conform to the requirements stated in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The resting presentation on North First Street is a 12 inch, half brilliance, yellow flashing beacon and a 12 -inch red flashing beacon on D Street. When activated from the Fire Station 1, the beacon indication on North First changes to solid full brillance yellow and then to solid red. The beacon on D Street remains a flashing red indication. The assembly includes a wooden "FIRE SIGNAL" sign. The signal warrant analysis completed in March 1992, indicates that the intersection also meets warrants #2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic, #6 - Accident Experience, #8 - Combination of #1 and #2, and #9 - 4 -hour volumes. Collision and volume information - 15 collisions; NBD - 9,500; SBD - 13,700; WBD - 600; EBD - 1,500. The proposed project will replace the existing flashing beacons with a six phase actuated coordinated siignal system with pedestrian indications and emergency vehicle pre-emption. The signal will be tied into the Central Business District closed loop system in order to minimize impacts on air quality and delay experienced my 'motorists. Minor curb and sidewalk replacement will be cornpleted to install handicap access ramps. EXHIBIT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS DI{T Co RTC PM ll, 1S 5TREST- Major St: Minor St: CALC CNK Critical Approach Speed • ,D..` Critical Approach Speed Critical speed of majorstreet traffic 40 mph In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 pop. DATE DATE 35 mph 20 mph ❑� RURAL (R) ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 — Minimum Vehicular Volume APPROACH LANES Minimum Requirements U R U R 2 or more Major Street 500 350 420 Satisfied Vest] No -Lte4.. 0000/100/(21,o/0i/%4vo/I5o0/ /Z00JHour 174- 12:13 1410 ct 129q 1 14-11 14'{2. Minor Street (150) 105 200 140 13 1I11 - SO 1Z, Bio X21 ( 25 107 NOTE' Left tum movements from Maio St included when LT -phasing is proposed WARRANT 2 — Interruption of Continuous Traffic Minimum U APPROACH LANES Major Street 750 Minor Street 75,E Requirements R U R 2 or more 525 900 630 Satisfied Yes loa No ❑ can°A Ict) A2o0A j A6 /4.40/1Yb Hour 1442 107 ¶1L1- 12?3 14x0 14671 12.q1 I 1411 53 100 70 114 123 '0 (2.1 NOTE Left tum movements from Major St. included when LT -phasing is proposed El -- (2.1 — WARRANT 3 — Minimum Pedestrian Volume Minimum Requirements U R Major Street Volume Ped's Xing Major Street No Median 600 420 Raised 4" Median 1000 700 Satisfied Yes❑ No {u / / / / • / { J Hour 105 MID/MOCK SIGNAL PROPOSED MIN. RCOUIREMENT DISTANCE TO NEAREST C{TA{USNED CROSSWALK 150 Feet N/E ft S/w ft Satisfied Yes ❑ No ❑ WARRANT 4 — School Crossings Not Applicable See Chapter 10 TC -10A 13/72) See School Crossings Warrant Sheet 0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 5 — Progressive Movement Satisfied 'Yes❑ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL No 0 1000 ft 1 N 225D S 3Z5 ft E ,J4 ft W NAL ft 1 Not Satisfied Er ON ISOLATED ONE WAY ST.OR ST. WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE 50 FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING 5 SPEIED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2.WAY ST WHERE ADAJACENT SIGNALS 00 NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING•5 SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM on Fulfilled ❑ Not Satisfied WARRANT 6 — Accident Experience Satisfied Yes No 9-_ 0 SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW 10 ADEQUATE TRIAL OF 1.555 RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES MAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACC FREQ ACC WITHIN A 12 MQPERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR.& INVOLVING INJURY OR>5100 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS .— _--- s 5 OR MORE / .- )9_/-7/40)9_/-7/40 — iv Lo MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT SATISFIED WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME 115 Iio OR ORE OF WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TFC _11)Q_ �0_ Er WARRANT 3 - MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME WARRANT 7 -. Systems Warrant 0 Satisfied Yes 0 No [}'� MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES 0 Not Satisfied 500 VEH/NR DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEHJHR Y _..— VEN FOR EACH OF ANY 5 HRSOFA SATURDAY ✓t ND/OR SUNDAY _on - Fulfilled CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR 3T MINOR37 ®- Not Satisfied PART OF HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TFC CONNECTS AREAS OF PRINCIPLE TRAFFIC GENERATION V/ RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVELING A CITY HAS SURFACE STREET FWY OR EXPWAY RAMP TERMINALS APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. DOTH 5T5. WARRANT 8 — Combination of Warrants E & ❑ Fulfilled Satisfied Vim li No ❑ REQUIREMENT WARRANT j SATISFIED TWO WARRANTS -MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME t SATISFIED 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC1 Ibp % $0S OR MORE 3 - MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME � Iic The satisfaction of a warrant is ndt necessarily justification for signals. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment must be shown. 75.105 (2/72) VJ NottJT 1— d-1+o,)R VoLUME5 100°A -T F iE - - (izoo,L3oo, tWO, t709) W ARRA-NT i 0 k- bi — or/r 6,3-n f,tecD WARRANT 7 -. Systems Warrant 0 Satisfied Yes 0 No [}'� MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES 0 Not Satisfied 500 VEH/NR DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VEHJHR Y _..— VEN FOR EACH OF ANY 5 HRSOFA SATURDAY ✓t ND/OR SUNDAY _on - Fulfilled CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR 3T MINOR37 ®- Not Satisfied PART OF HWY SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TFC CONNECTS AREAS OF PRINCIPLE TRAFFIC GENERATION V/ RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVELING A CITY HAS SURFACE STREET FWY OR EXPWAY RAMP TERMINALS APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET. DOTH 5T5. WARRANT 8 — Combination of Warrants E & ❑ Fulfilled Satisfied Vim li No ❑ REQUIREMENT WARRANT j SATISFIED TWO WARRANTS -MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME t SATISFIED 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC1 Ibp % $0S OR MORE 3 - MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN VOLUME � Iic The satisfaction of a warrant is ndt necessarily justification for signals. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment must be shown. 75.105 (2/72) VJ NottJT 1— d-1+o,)R VoLUME5 100°A -T F iE - - (izoo,L3oo, tWO, t709) W ARRA-NT i 0 k- bi — or/r 6,3-n f,tecD The satisfaction of a warrant is ndt necessarily justification for signals. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right of way assignment must be shown. 75.105 (2/72) VJ NottJT 1— d-1+o,)R VoLUME5 100°A -T F iE - - (izoo,L3oo, tWO, t709) W ARRA-NT i 0 k- bi — or/r 6,3-n f,tecD /IF TZ/A SIVEVALK PAWING \s. NO PAPKING---- ANY "T (NE F At* HO PAP. PI, 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 f ONFPEIL l I P DO X IP I Lno[Nr.,' 1PE FT AI [LE [ 1 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTPCIL z `101, ',MN/ FOR N. LST STREET R, E. 'D' STPLE1 111 „PAN N31- 1411 111 TI 11 1" [LL, (IV rifi uJNG r IPE BE /ICON SPEED UNIT JV fiF1-1 NO TRW,. r.ymor4r, LIL 5n F T, 11;y1; ft( ir mni !AI SRA SIIIGVA LK r C.OPUTTC MIZE,& GLITTCP [-Jill ILE ot. E. 'D' STREET StnEvALK DEAL ES "FAIE OFFICE T 1 P]ETRO'S PIZZA PARKING LOT 1 1 1 1 I� NO PARKING' 1 1 1 NO PARKING-- ANY ARKING ANY TIME (� .11-1 nnnnnc-r T1 Tn ArrTr• rr1nr-r- r four iJJC_L I rs HM 1 ,l L.. l.. LJ IV I 1\LJM— FOR N. 1ST STREET & E. 'D' STREET 171Fi SPEED LIMI 3111 iI NO TRUCK PARKING N 1ST STREET 1* K V MAST ARM MOUNTER RAF] s:.r..A.L .4y TRANSIT :TOP CASCADE NATURAL GAS [TREWS OAR L GUTTER ITYRGAL> SIX -WALK GEE E. 'D' STREET 7 r .� 1\ // S1 µM k41 11.E] IV LUKMVLK T ( / REAL ESTATE OFFICE I Sfl FT COLLISION CAUSE (LC IMPROPER LANE CHANGE SP SPEEDING 1RT IMPPCPER RIGHT TURN LTAT LEFT TURN AGAINST TRAFFIC ARL AGAINST RED LIGHT ND NEGLICENT DRIVING DB DEFECTIVE BRAKES FYI? FAILURE ro YIELD RIGHT OF !JAY DVI DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED PF PEDESTRIAN FAULT IP IMPROPER PASS FS FAILED TO STOP INA INATTENTION V1 NC NO CHARGE HB.R H1T AND RUN FTC FOLLOWING TO CLOSE IR ICY ROADS BWUC BACKING VITH UNDUE CARE 09/99_9115 V23 O 09/19/91 1040 FTYROVpti2h V1 nl� V1 V2 VZ [17/30/90 143E1 FTVJV VI 04/25/90 1130 FTYROv1OTRF■ VI 07/22/91 1049 INA 1776/69 0130 HIR/FLSD SO rL IN PARKING LOT 1 S V01)CLC MOV[NC AICAO ICAA-OI -444i. VE i'L�SVIDC -�4*EL( BACKING LP -** 0-IKA? ENO a� �► PEDESTRIAN OVERTAKl�S STLSVIPE 1111111110. STREETCAR DR TRAIN P ARK CO VCIJCCLC TXED OBJECT ACC[7ENT -FATAL ACCIDENT MATY (JAM AOC ON LT ADEN 'D'D� Cfb L IDAYLEMT L OA RK S2dDS)1C ovormaNc TURN VI N. 1ST STREET 12/07/90 2305 FTYROW V 09/23/91 0105 F'TYROW MD/91 1355 FTYROV V2 07/D3/90 1650 H 6, R ATTEND V1 10/09/91 1130 07/27/91 1420 HIR/FLED V1 H&P/ ATTEND/FLED V1 V2 V2 04/1E/91 1643 OV OUT OF CONTROL VEF[QE TURNEI OVER NC OR IC INDICATE NORTH E. 'D' STREET CITY TRAFFIC DIV, IF YAKIMA ENGINEERING COLLISION PLOT; N 1ST ST. P. E. 'D' ST. DATE; 03/10/9E PERIOD: SHEET 1 DRAWN; B.R. 01/01/89 CHECKED: TNRUI 12/31/91 OF 1 APPROVED!