HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1991-D5904 Metropolitan Comp Plan / HDR EngineeringRESOLUTION NO. D 5904
A RESOLUTION authorizing the execution of a professional services
agreement with HDR Engineers, Inc.
WHEREAS, the City desires professional services of a consultant, which
services are to include design, planning, and economic consultation regarding
land use within the City, and
WHEREAS, the City has conformed to the requirements of RCW 39.80,
including advance publication by placement of a Request for Proposal in
appropriate publication and by eliciting from applicants statements of their
qualifications and performance data, and
WHEREAS, HDR Engineering, Inc. has completed all requirements and
demonstrated that it is the most qualified firm ready to proceed at a fair and
reasonable price, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
YAKIMA:
The City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima are hereby
authorized and directed to execute a contractual agreement, Phase I, with HDR
Engineers, Inc., for the purpose described above, a copy of which agreement is
attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
7)
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this D day of L -e r-, I, 1991.
AYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Legalibd
Resolutions
RES B1
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AND
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR THE
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PROJECT
APRIL, 1991
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARTIES 1
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1
SECTION I --BASIC SERVICES 1
1.2 General 1
SECTION 2 --ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1
2.1 General 1
SECTION 3 --CITY RESPONSIBILITIES 2
SECTION 4 --PERIODS OF SERVICE 4
4.1 General 4
SECTION 5 --PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT 4
5.1 Methods of Payment for Services and Expenses of Consultant 4
5.2 Basis and Amount of Compensation for Basic Services 5
5.3 Basis and Amount of Compensation for Additional Services 5
5.4 Intervals of Payments 5
5.5 Other Provisions Concerning Payments 5
SECTION 6 --GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 6
6.1 Termination 6
6.2 Reuse of Documents 7
6.3 Limitation of Liability 7
6.4 Insurance 8
6.5 Controlling Law 8
6.6 Successors and Assigns 8
6.7 Equal Employment and Nondiscrimination 8
6.8 Indemnification 9
6.9 Changes and Modifications 9
6.10 Separability of Waiver 9
6.11 Extent of Agreement 1 0
6.12 Notice 10
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AND
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of , 1991, between City of Yakima,
Washington with principal offices at 129 N. Second Street, Yakima, Washington
98901, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and HDR ENGINEERING, Inc., with offices at
11225 S.E. Sixth Street, Building C, Suite 200, Bellevue, Washington 98004,
hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT," for the Metropolitan Yakima
Comprehensive Plan, hereinafter called the "PROJECT".
Consultant reserves the right and nothing in this agreement shall preclude the
consultant from providing basic services to Yakima County, Yakima Valley
Conference of Governments, and other municipalities under separate contract with
those entities.
CITY and CONSULTANT, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein agree as follows:
SECTION 1 - BASIC SERVICES
1.1 CONSULTANT's Basic Services and responsibilities are outlined here and further
defined in the Appendix, Exhibit A, "Scope of Services," which is part of this
Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
1.2 General.
1.2.1 CONSULTANT shall provide professional services to CITY as hereinafter
provided to carry out the Appendix, Exhibit A, Scope of Services. These services will
include providing professional design, planning, architectural/engineering and
economic consultation and advice and furnishing other professional services and
design, planning, architectural/engineering and economic consulting services
incidental thereto.
SECTION 2 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES
2.1 General
The following Additional Services are not included in the Basic Services. They shall
be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the CITY, and shall be paid for by
the CITY as provided in this Agreement, in addition to compensation for Basic
Services.
HDR -- 1
4/19/91
2.1.1 Performing Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope,
extent or character of the PROJECT including, but not limited to, changes in size,
complexity, CITY's schedule, character of work or method of financing. Revising
previously accepted studies, reports, or documents when such revisions are required
by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted
subsequent to the preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any
other causes beyond CONSULTANT's control. This includes those services resulting
from incorporating information required by Paragraph 3.2 which is furnished to
CONSULTANT after the stated time schedule.
2.1.2 Providing any type of property surveys or related professional services needed
for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys, except as described in
Basic Services.
2.1.3 Preparing applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished
under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in
connection with the PROJECT, preparing or reviewing environmental impact
statements and assessments.
2.1.4 Performing services to make measured drawings of, or to investigate existing
conditions or facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information
furnished by CITY.
2.1.5 Providing renderings or models for CITY's use, except as described in Basic
Services.
2.1.6 Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for
other than Basic Services as defined in Basic Services.
2.1.7 Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for CITY in any litigation,
arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the PROJECT.
2.1.8 Performing services in connection with work directive changes and change
orders to reflect changes requested by CITY.
2.1.9 Performing additional Services in connection with the PROJECT, including
services which are to be furnished by CITY in accordance with Section 3, and as set
forth in Appendix, Exhibit A, "Scope of Services", and services not otherwise provided
for in this Agreement.
SECTION 3 - CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
CITY shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of
CONSULTANT:
3.1 Designate in writing a person -to act as CITY's representative with respect to
services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have complete
authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define CITY's
policies and decisions with respect to CONSULTANT's services for the PROJECT.
HDR -2
4/19/91
3.2 Provide to CONSULTANT existing data, plans, reports and other information
known to, in possession of, or under control of CITY which are relevant to the
execution of CONSULTANT's duties on the PROJECT. Also, provide all criteria and
full information as to CITY's requirements for the PROJECT, including criteria,
objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility
and expandability, and any budgetary limitations and furnish copies of all standards
which CITY will require to be included.
3.3 Furnish the services of soils/geotechnical CONSULTANTS or other consultants
when such services are deemed necessary by CONSULTANT. Such services shall
include without limitation, borings, probings and subsurface explorations,
hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and
equipment, with reports and appropriate professional recommendations.
3.4 Provide land surveys to include property, boundary, easement, right-of-way,
topographic and utility surveys; property descriptions, zoning, deed or other land use
restrictions.
3.5 Arrange for access to, and make all provisions for, CONSULTANT or
CONSULTANTs Subconsultants to enter upon public and private property as required
for CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT's Subconsultants to perform services under
this Agreement.
3.6 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, proposals and other documents presented
by CONSULTANT, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other
consultants as CITY deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing
decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of
CONSULTANT.
3.7 Provide, Environmental Assessments, or Environmental Impact Statements related
to the PROJECT. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the PROJECT and approvals and consents from others as may
be necessary for completion of the PROJECT.
3.8 Provide design, planning, mapping and other services as described and set forth
in Appendix. Exhibit A, "Scope of Services" within a reasonable time so as not to delay
the services of CONSULTANT.
3.9 Provide accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling
services as may be required for the PROJECT, legal services as CITY may require or
CONSULTANT may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the
PROJECT, and auditing service as CITY may require.
3.10 Give prompt written notice to CONSULTANT whenever CITY observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any condition that affects the scope or timing of
CONSULTANT's services, or any defect or non-conformance in the Work.
3.11 At no cost to CONSULTANT, provide the above data and services and shall
render approvals and decisions as is necessary for the orderly progress of
CONSULTANT's services. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy
and completeness of all information and services provided by CITY or at CITY's
direction.
HDR -- 3
4/19/91
SECTION 4 - PERIODS OF SERVICE
4.1 General
The provisions of this Section 4 and the various rates of compensation for
CONSULTANT's services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been
agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the PROJECT
through completion of the Services contained herein. CONSULTANT's obligation to
render services hereunder will extend for a period which may reasonably be required
for the performance of CONSULTANT's services and required extensions thereto. If
specific periods of time for rendering services are set forth or specific dates by which
services are to be completed are provided, and if such dates are exceeded through no
fault of CONSULTANT, all rates, measures and amounts of compensation provided
herein shall be subject to equitable adjustment.
4.2 Each element of service as defined in Basic Services shall be authorized in
writing. Each written authorization will include a schedule for work products within
which will be completed and submitted within the stipulated period indicated, after
written authorization to proceed by the person designated in paragraph 3.1.
4.3 CONSULTANT's services shall be considered complete at the earlier of (I) the date
when the submissions for that Element have been accepted by CITY; or (2) thirty days
after the date when such submissions are delivered to CITY for final acceptance. In
each case, such additional time as may be mutually agreed for obtaining approval of
governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the PROJECT shall be added
to that particular Element.
4.4 If CITY requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent
or character of the PROJECT, the time of performance of CONSULTANT's services
and the various rates of compensation shall be subject to additional compensation as
set forth in SECTION 2..
SECTION 5 - PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT
5.1 Methods of Payment for Services and Expenses of Consultant
5.1.1 Compensation Terms Defined
1. Direct Labor Costs shall mean salary or wages at the time services are performed of
all personnel engaged directly on the PROJECT, including, but not limited to,
consultants, planners, economists, engineers, designers, architects, specification
writers, estimators, other technical and business personnel but does not include
indirect payroll -related costs or fringe benefits.
2. Per Diem shall mean an hourly rate equal to Direct Labor Costs times an Overhead
Multiplier of three and one-tenth (3.1) to be paid to CONSULTANT as total
compensation for each hour an employee of CONSULTANT works on the PROJECT,
plus Reimbursable Expenses.
HDR --4
4/19/91
3. Reimbursable Expenses shall mean the actual expenses incurred directly or
indirectly in connection with the PROJECT, including, but not limited to Subconsultant
or Subcontractor costs, transportation and subsistence, toll telephone calls, express
mail and telegram, and reproduction of Reports and similar PROJECT -related items.
In addition, Reimbursable Expenses will also include expenses incurred for computer
time and other highly specialized equipment, including an appropriate charge for
previously established programs and expenses of photographic production
techniques. Reimbursable Expenses shall include a 10% markup over
CONSULTANT's cost.
4. The amount of any sales tax, excise tax, value added tax (VAT), or gross receipts
tax that may be imposed on this Agreement shall be included in the CONSULTANT's
compensation as Reimbursable Expenses.
5.2 Basis and Amount of Compensation for Basic Services
5.2.1 Basis and Amount of Compensation for Basic Services
5.2.1.1 Compensation shall be based upon the Per Diem Costs and Reimbursable
Expenses identified in the Appendix, Exhibit A. The total fee for these services will not
exceed eight hundred thirty-eight thousand thirty two dollars and fity nine cents
($838,032,59).
5.2.2 Reimbursable Expenses incurred in connection with such services shall be
included in the foregoing compensation.
5.3 Basis and Amount of Compensation for Additional Services
Compensation for Additional Services shall be on the basis of Per Diem Costs and
Reimbursable Expenses to be agreed upon at time of request for Additional Services.
The estimated amount of Additional Services will be determined at the time the
Additional Services are requested.
5.4 Intervals of Payments
5.4.1 Payments to CONSULTANT for Basic Services and Additional Services
rendered and Reimbursable Expenses incurred shall be made once every month by
CITY. CONSULTANT's invoices will be submitted to the designated CITY
representative once every month prior to the 15th of every month and will be based
upon total services completed at the time of billing. CITY shall make prompt payments
in response to CONSULTANT's invoices.
5.5 Other Provisions Concerning Payments
5.5.1 If CITY fails to make any payment due CONSULTANT for services and expenses
within 30 days after receipt of CONSULTANT's statement, the amounts due
CONSULTANT will be increased at the rate of 1-1/2% per month from date of invoice,
and in addition, CONSULTANT may, after giving seven days' written notice to CITY,
suspend services under this Agreement until CONSULTANT has been paid in full all
amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
HDR -- 5
4/19/91
5.5.2 If the PROJECT is suspended or abandoned by the City in whole or in part for
more than 90 days, CONSULTANT shall be compensated for all services performed
prior to receipt of written notice from the CITY of such suspension or abandonment,
together with Reimbursable Expenses then due. If the PROJECT is resumed after
being suspended for more than 90 days, CONSULTANT's compensation shall be
subject to an Amendment.
5.5.3 If and to the extent that the Contract Time initially established in the Contract is
exceeded or extended through no fault of CONSULTANT, compensation for any Basic
Services required during such extended period shall be computed as set forth for
Additional Services.
5.5.4 If any items in any invoices submitted by CONSULTANT are disputed by CITY
for any reason, including the lack of supporting documentation, CITY may temporarily
delete the disputed item and pay the remaining amount of the invoice. CITY shall
promptly notify CONSULTANT of dispute and request clarification and/or remedial
action. After any dispute has been mutually settled, CONSULTANT shall include the
disputed item on a subsequent regularly scheduled invoice or on a special invoice for
the disputed item only. Disputed amounts shall not be subject to 5.5.1.
5.5.5 In the event of termination of this Agreement by either CITY or CONSULTANT,
CONSULTANT shall be entitled to payment for Services up to the time of termination,
plus termination expenses. Termination expenses shall include labor, reimbursable
expenses directly attributed to termination, and direct expenses associated with
mobilization and demobilization of CONSULTANT's personnel and facilities and any
other costs incurred by CONSULTANT not otherwise reimbursed. Termination
expenses shall not exceed the limits on individual tasks.
5.5.6 Records of CONSULTANT's Direct Labor Costs and Reimbursable Expenses
pertinent to CONSULTANT's compensation under this Agreement will be kept in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles at its Seattle office. Upon
CITY's request, copies will be made available to CITY at cost prior to final payment for
CONSULTANT's services or any installment thereof.
SECTION 6 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
6.1 Termination
6.1.1 This Agreement may be terminated in writing by either party in the event of
substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement
through no fault of the terminating party. However, no termination for default may be
initiated unless the party in breach is given a ten (10) calendar day cure period after
written notice (delivery by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate.
Such notice shall contain a concise description of the breach(s) and the remedy
required.
6.1.2 This Agreement may be terminated in writing (delivered by certified mail, return
receipt requested) by CITY without cause.
HDR -- 6
4/19/91
6.1.3 Upon any termination, CONSULTANT shall (I) promptly discontinue all Services
affected (unless a termination notice from CITY directs otherwise); and (2) deliver or
otherwise make available to CITY after full payment for services, all documents, data,
drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and such other information
and materials as may have been accumulated by CONSULTANT in performing this
Agreement, whether completed or in process. All payments due CONSULTANT at
termination shall be made as provided in SECTION 5, paragraph 5.5.5.
6.2 Reuse of Documents
6.2.1 All documents prepared or furnished by CONSULTANT pursuant to this
Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the PROJECT and
CONSULTANT shall retain an ownership and property interest therein whether or not
the PROJECT is completed. CITY may make and retain copies for information and
reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the PROJECT by CITY and
others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by CITY or others on extensions of the PROJECT or on any other PROJECT.
Any reuse without verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT for the specific purpose
intended will be at CITY's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to
CONSULTANT, and CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT
from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of
or resulting therefrom. Any verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT will entitle
CONSULTANT to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by CITY and
CONSULTANT.
6.2.2 CITY will be permitted to retain copies of computer discs and/or magnetic tapes
prepared for the CITY'S information in its use on the PROJECT. Because information
contained on computer discs and/or magnetic tapes can be unintentionally or
otherwise modified by others besides CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT reserves the
right to remove all indicia of ownership and/or involvement from any disc/magnetic
tape provided to CITY. The original data will be retained by CONSULTANT. In
addition, the information set forth on any disc/magnetic tape shall not be used by CITY
on other projects, for additions to this project. Any such use or re -use by CITY or
others without adaptation by CONSULTANT for the specific purpose intended will be
at the user's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT. CITY
shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, defend, indemnify and hold harmless
CONSULTANT from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney's
fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation by
CONSULTANT will entitle CONSULTANT to further compensation at rates to be
mutually agreed upon by CITY and CONSULTANT.
6.3 Limitation of Liability
6.3.1 CONSULTANT agrees to perform its services under this Agreement in
accordance with generally accepted standards of professional care. CONSULTANT
shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies in
the services. CONSULTANT shall have no liability to CITY for consequential damages,
loss of use or Toss of profits incurred by CITY regardless of whether such claim is
based upon alleged breach of contract, willful misconduct or negligent act or omission,
whether professional or nonprofessional, of CONSULTANT or its employees, agents,
or sub -consultants.
HDR - 7
4/19/91
6.4 Insurance
6.4.1 CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from claims
under workers' compensation acts, employer's liability claims, claims for damages
because of bodily injury, including personal injury, sickness or disease or death of any
and all employees, or of any person other than such employees, and from claims or
damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including loss of use resulting
therefrom.
6.5 Controlling Law
This Agreement is to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Washington. Place of venue is Yakima Superior Court, Yakima, Washington.
6.6 Successors and Assigns
6.6.1 The parties hereby bind their respective partners, successors, executors,
administrators, legal representatives and, to the extent permitted by paragraph 6.6.2.,
their assigns, to the terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement.
6.6.2 Neither CITY nor CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under
or interest in this Agreement (including, but without limitation, monies that may become
due or monies that are due) without the written consent of the other, except to the
extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of
this limitation may be restricted by law.
6.6.3 Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment,
no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility
under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent
CONSULTANT from employing such independent professional associates,
subconsultants and consultants as CONSULTANT may deem appropriate to assist in
the performance of Services. However, no change or substitution in the personnel
assigned as presented in the Subcontract elements defined in Appendix, Exhibit A,
"Scope of Services" shall occur without written consent of the CITY.
6.6.4 Except as may be expressly stated otherwise in this Agreement, nothing under
this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to
anyone other than CITY and CONSULTANT, and all duties and responsibilities
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of
CITY and CONSULTANT and not for the benefit of any other party.
6.7 Equal Employment and Nondiscrimination
In connection with the Services under this Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees to
comply with the applicable provisions of State and Federal Equal Opportunity statutes
and regulations.
HDR -8
4/19/91
6.8 Indemnification
6.8.1 CONSULTANT hereby states, and the CITY acknowledges, that neither
CONSULTANT nor CONSULTANT's subconsultants have any professional liability
(errors and omission) or other insurance, and is unable to reasonably obtain such
insurance, for claims or claims expenses arising out of the performance of or failure to
perform professional services, including, but not limited, to the preparation of reports,
designs, drawings and specifications, related to the investigation, detection,
abatement, replacement or removal of parts, materials or processes containing
asbestos or relating to the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, release
or escape of pollutants (defined herein as any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant
or contaminant, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals and
waste). Accordingly, CITY hereby agrees to bring no claim for negligence, breach of
contract, indemnity or otherwise against CONSULTANT, its principles, employees,
agents and subconsultants if such claim in any way would relate to asbestos or
pollutants in the PROJECT. CITY further agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law to
defend, indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT, its principals, employees,
agents and subconsultants from and against all claims, damages, losses and
expenses, including, but not limited, to fees and charges of attorneys and court and
arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting from the performance of CONSULTANT's
services hereunder, or claims against CONSULTANT brought by third parties arising
from CONSULTANT's services or the services and/or work of others, related to
asbestos and/or pollutant activities, PROVIDED that this indemnification does not
include consequential damages.
6.8.2 The CONSULTANT hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
CITY, its agents, officers, and employees for claims arising solely from negligent acts,
errors, or omission of the CONSULTANT in the performance of professional services
under this Agreement, PROVIDED that the claims for which the consultant agrees to
indemnify the CITY exclude any claim or portion thereof that relates to consequential
damages, loss of use or loss of profits. This indemnification includes fees and charges
of attorneys and court and arbitration costs.
6.9 Changes and Modifications
The parties agree that no change or modification to this Agreement, or any
attachments hereto, shall have any force or effect unless the change is reduced to
writing, dated, and made a part of this Agreement. The execution of the change shall
be authorized and signed by the authorized representative of the CITY as set forth in
Section 3.
6.10 Separability and Waiver
In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid and unenforceable,
the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties. One or more
waivers by either party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be
construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the
other party.
HDR --9
4/19/91
6.11 Extent of Agreement
This Agreement, including all Exhibits, and any and all amendments, modifications,
and supplements duly executed by the parties in accordance with this Agreement,
govern and supersede any and all inconsistent or contradictory terms, prior oral or
written representation or understandings, conditions or provisions set forth in any
purchase orders, requisition, request for proposal, authorization of services, notice to
proceed or other form or document issued by CITY with respect to the PROJECT or
CONSULTANT's services.
6.12 Notice
All notices provided for in this agreement shall be sent as follows: 1) to the City
Manager and his address as listed in the Preamble; 2) to the HDR Department
Manager at his address as listed in the Preamble.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first written above.
"CITY"
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
By Title: Richard A. Zais, Jr.
City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Ci71 COT 1CT NO. G/-3 ID-s'7oz/
"CONSULTANT"
r
HDR E EERING, INC.
By: 4%,
Name: QrC(on C -4.4 1p
Title: 6?Ceculiv+r Vic, -Ais 1c/S►.t
Approved By:
Address: 1 2.2S SG. Sk
e>g--\ evuJ „ W P4, 951)004,
HDR ENGINEERING, Inc.
HDR --10
4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
APPENDIX
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
�l
ME l'KO1.,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS,.. E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.1 Area Wide Interviews
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Conduct group interviews with key members in each affected community to discuss
relevant land use issues. It is anticipated that these preliminary interviews will be with key
staff members, planning commissioners, visioning steering committee, subcommittees of
visioning process and members of respective governing bodies.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing all interviews. Key areas of the interview process
include current land use issues, natural boundaries, political boundaries, areas of
concern/conflict, areas of cooperation, cultural boundaries and/or needs, and others as may
'le added. A map of political boundaries, natural boundaries, cultural boundary, and
Tanning boundary responsibility will be produced in this subtask.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct various interviews. Three to four hours per interview to setup, conduct, analyze
and report. Interviews can be coordinated with the research tasks of the Vision 2010
subcommittees. Two to four people per interview.
City of Yakima will perform the following support:
a) Summaries will be prepared by City for Metropolitan area identifying current land use
issues; planning boundaries; natural boundaries; political boundaries; areas of
concern/conflict; areas of cooperation; cultural boundaries and/or needs; and other
key issues. Summaries will be used by Visioning committee and Consultant team.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in developing the information
format to be used in the interview process, and (to extent possible) with the remaining
budget, participate in the interviews.
c) See MAPPING ELEMENT for product maps to be produced from information
developed in this Subtask.
METRO 8
A - Elements
1 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.1 Area Wide Interviews
Page 2
d) Summaries to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days after completion of
interviews and within 30 days of "start date". See MAPPING ELEMENT for schedule
of maps.
e) We would encourage the City to conduct group interviews and/or technical seminars
with these groups either as part of the "Visioning" process or separately for purposes
of gathering this information.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
2 — 4/79/91
ME1'ROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 v E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.2 Wetlands Survey
TASK LEADER: Molly Adolfson
WORK ITEM:
Conduct a wetlands survey of the Metropolitan area. A wetlands survey is a requirement
of GMA and will be an important inventory consideration for all the other elements. The
wetlands survey will consist of the following components:
_ Using the Soils Survey of Yakima County Area, Washington (Soil Conservation
Service, 1985), we will identify areas with hydric soil conditions. The Soil Survey
indicates the presence of eight different types of hydric soils within the study area.
The largest areas of hydric soils include the Spring Creek Drainage Basin, the Cowiche
Creek Basin, and a former channel of the Yakima River lying 0.5 to 0.75 miles east of
the current river channel between approximately Yakima Avenue East and the
southern boundary of the Yakima Urban Service Area.
Using the National Wetlands Survey and available aerial photographs, we will study
all areas of hydric soils to identify potential wetlands. Using the same aerial
photographs, we will identify all open water bodies and riparian corridors within the
study area.
Public Works and Planning Department officials in the planning area will be
interviewed concerning the presence of wetlands that may have been recently created
through anthropogenic activities (total of four meetings).
_ Field surveys will be conducted to verify the presence of potential wetlands, to
generally characterize wetland plant communities, and to preliminarily evaluate
wetland functions and values. Riparian corridors and the nearshore and shoreline
areas of open water bodies will be similarly evaluated.
The general boundaries of all probable wetland areas, riparian corridors, and open
water bodies that constitute wetland systems will be placed on a map.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay map of identified wetlands, riparian corridors, flood prone areas, and open water
bodies. Technical memorandum will accompany overly map describing characteristics and
imitations within identified areas.
METRO 8
A - Elements
3 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.2 Wetlands Survey
Page 2
ASSUMPTIONS:
Two copies of SCS documents will be provided. Aerial photographs will be provided under
other subtask work. Urban area requires a minimum budget of $12,000 which includes
Yakima, Union Gap, Terrace Heights, and the current unincorporated area within the
existing Urban area boundary.
TOTAL BUDGET $12,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
4 — 4/19/91
MEI ROI TITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
ASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.3 Resource Lands and Critical Area Mapping
TASK LEADER: Debby Howe
WORK ITEM:
From collected information supplemented by State and Federal resource documents we
will identify natural resource areas, critical areas, and other natural features (Wetlands as
separate item under subtask 1.3), forestry/woodlands, geology/soils (Soils in Subtask 1.2),
agricultural lands, air quality information (if available), and mineral resources.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay map of identified resource lands, critical areas, and other natural features,
forestry/woodlands (Includes orchard lands), geology, mineral resources, aquifer recharge
areas, agricultural lands, and air quality information (if available). An objective is to be able
to determine the capability of the land to sustain development while protecting the assets
of the region. Technical memorandum will accompany overlay map describing
characteristics and limitations within identified areas.
.SSUMPTION:
Existing information will be available for identification of resource lands and other critical
areas. Local, State and Federal documents will be reviewed for information.
City of Yakima will perform the following with support by the Consultant Team:
a) Summaries identifying specific characteristics and limitations within each of the
identified resource and/or critical areas will accompany the maps.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in developing resource lands and
critical area mapping (to extent possible).
c) To be delivered to Consultant team within 90 days after "start date" and within 7 days
of delivery of hand -scribed maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
5 — 4/19/91
ME 'ROE —ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS:. : PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.4 Neighborhood Conservation
TASK LEADER: Bob Burke
WORK ITEM:
Area Wide Interviews will identify neighborhood associations, and leaders. An overlay
map will be prepared identifying the boundaries of each neighborhood association. Group
interviews will be held within each neighborhood (including neighborhood associations)
to discuss land use issues and concerns.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay map of identified neighborhood associations. Technical memorandum will
accompany overlay map which identifies specific neighborhood association and their
identification of key issues, needs and concerns.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct interviews. Neighborhoods with common characteristics will be combined into
common interviews.
Consultant team to provide:
a) Interviews would be conducted.
b) See MAPPING ELEMENT for responsibility for background mapping and hand -
scribed maps to be developed under this Subtask.
c) Completed maps to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days of delivery of
hand -scribed maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $8,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
6 — 4/19/91
ME, R01 ,TITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.5 Business, Industry, Commerce and Trade, Central Business
District, Tourism, and Convention Facilities
TASK LEADER Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Interviews with administrative authorities in the cities and county, the business and
industrial climate in the area will be identified with issues, needs and concerns
documented. Specific attention will be directed to the central business district, convention
facilities, SunDome, fair activities, and general commerce and trade.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing information and identifying common and
conflicting issues, needs and concerns.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct interviews.
City of Yakima (Visioning) will perform the following with support by Consultant team.
a) Summaries may be prepared or presented by City for the Metropolitan area identifying
current issues, needs, and concerns of business, industry, commerce and trade, central
business district, tourism, and convention facilities.
b) Consultant team services would include developing the information format to be
used in the interview process, and (to extent possible) with the remaining budget,
participate in the interviews.
METRO 8
A - Elements
7 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.5 Business, Industry, Commerce and Trade, Central ..usiness District, Tourism,
and Convention Facilities
Page 2
c) To be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days after completion of interviews and
delivery of hand -scribed maps, and within 120 days of "start date".
d) Consultant would encourage the City to conduct group interviews and/or technical
seminars with these groups either as part of the "Visioning" process or separately for
purposes of gathering this information.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
8 — 4/19/91
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS,.. E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.6 Police, Fire, Emergency Services, and Public Safety
TASK LEADER: Bob Burke
WORK ITEM:
Interviews with administrative authorities in the cities and county, the police, fire
emergency services, and public safety conditions in the area will be identified with issues,
needs and concerns documented.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing information and identifying common and
conflicting issues, needs and concerns.
(Note: Overlay of police, fire, and emergency services could be prepared under this
subtask. Overlay might include response contours from established service
locations, statistics, etc.) (Estimates do not include these overlays at this time.)
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct interviews.
City of Yakima (Visioning) will perform with support by Consultant team.
a) Summaries will be prepared by City for Metropolitan area identifying current issues,
needs and concerns of police, fire, emergency services, and public safety.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in developing the information
format to be used in the interview process, and (to extent possible) with the remaining
budget, participate in the interviews.
c) Summaries to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days after completion of
interviews and within 120 days of "start date". See MAPPING ELEMENT for schedule
of maps.
METRO 8
A - Elements
9 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.6 Police, Fire, Emergency Services, and Public Safety
Page 2
d) Consultant would encourage the City to conduct group interviews and/or technical
seminars with these groups, either as part of the "Visioning" process or separately for
purposes of gathering this information.
TOTAL BUDGET $1,700.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
10-4/15191
ME'1"ROI .ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.7 Schools
TASK LEADER: Bob Burke
WORK ITEM:
Interviews with administrative authorities at the local school districts, community college,
and special purpose education facilities, specific area issues, needs and concerns will be
identified. Local school district boundaries and school service areas will be identified on an
overlay.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay map of identified local school district boundaries and school service areas.
Technical memorandum will accompany overlay map which describes key issues,
standards, needs and concerns.
1SSUMPTIONS:
onduct interviews.
City of Yakima (Visioning) will perform with support by Consultant team.
a) Summaries will be prepared by City for Metropolitan area identifying current issues,
needs and concerns of local school districts, community college, and special purpose
education facilities.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in developing the information
format to be used in the interview process and participation at interviews (to extent
possible).
c) Summaries to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days after completion of
interviews and within 120 days of "start date". See MAPPING ELEMENT for schedule
of maps.
METRO 8
A - Elements
11 -- 4/19/91
Subtask 1.7 Schools
Page 2
d) Consultant would encourage the City to conduct group interviews and/or technical
seminars with these groups,, either as part of the "Visioning" process or separately for
purposes of gathering this information.
TOTAL BUDGET' $1,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
12 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.8 Utilities
TASK LEADER: Tony Krutsch
WORK ITEM:
Interviews with local administrators, the issues, needs and concerns of water, sewer,
irrigation, industrial treatment, drainage, solid waste, hazardous waste, electricity, natural
gas, telephone, TV cable and other utility services will be identified. Jurisdictional
boundaries will be ide:.:ified on overlays when appropriate.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay map of identified jurisdictional boundaries when appropriate. Technical
memorandum will accompany overlay maps which describes key issues, needs and
concerns.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct interviews.
'ity of Yakima (Visioning) will perform with approximately 60 hours ($5,000) of support by
Consultant team.
a) City will provide utility service boundaries as identified in the MAPPING ELEMENT
from existing documents and reports, and, if necessary, from contacts with utility
agencies.
b) Summaries will be prepared by City identifying current issues, needs and concerns of
local utilities.
c) Consultant team services would include developing the information format to be
used in the interview process, and (to extent possible) with the remaining budget,
participate in the interviews.
d) Consultant would encourage the City to conduct group interviews and/or technical
seminars with these groups as part of the "Visioning" process to assure that input is
received.
e) Additional Consultant team services would be required in the implementation phase
of the Land Use Plan to identify future impacts on utilities. The scope of work and
costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
13 -- 4/19/91
ME 1'ROI WITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
LANs) USE ELEMENT
TASK A: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATA BASE
SUBTASK: 1.9 Development Regulations
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis;; Bucher, Willis, Ratliff
WORK ITEM:
By September 1, 1991, cities must have development regulations in place to protect and
preserve agricultural lands, mineral resources, forest lands, critical areas (i.e. wetlands,
flood prone areas, geological hazardous areas, aquifer recharge areas). We will assist the
Metropolitan Planning groups meet initial dates by reviewing existing zoning ordinances
shoreline master programs and flood hazard ordinances, and proposing modifications.
During the development of regulatory tools later in the planning process, these initial
modifications can be revisited and updated to conform with the future growth scenarios.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing development regulations in place to protect and
preserve those resources described above. Conflicts in development regulations between
participating agencies will be identified. Recommendations will be developed on
modifications needed to bring current regulations into compliance with GMA and into
harmony with each other within the Metro planning boundary.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Implementation of recommendations in the form of draft ordinance revisions would be
performed/reviewed by Preston, Thorgrimson, Shidler, Gates & Ellis under separate
contract.
Consultant team to provide For Urban area only including Yakima, Union Gap, Terrace
Heights, and the current unincorporated area within the existing Urban area boundary.
Only conflicts in development regulations between these parties will be identified for the
Urban area.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
14 -- 4/19/91
ME 1'KOl LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
ASK A: ANALYSIS OF LAND USE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.1 Population and Employment/Land Need Projections
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Based upon the data collected, the consultant will complete a series of projections (cohort,
linear, and curvilinear) to compare against previous local population and employment
projections and OFM provided data. Consensus must be established concerning which
projections or range of projections to utilize within the remainder of the plan and its
allocation between jurisdictions. Population and employment projections will be translated
into land use demand characteristics.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum on analysis of findings and projections within the Metro
planning boundary.
(Note: Approval of projections and allocations by governing and participating agencies
will be required before proceeding with next subtask.)
Consultant team to provide:
a) Translation of population and employment projections into land use demand
characteristics will be made for the Urban area only, including Yakima, Union Gap,
Terrace Heights, and the current unincorporated area within the existing Urban area
boundary.
b) The population and employment projections for the Metropolitan area will consider
alternate conditions of the Puget Sound influence, labor availability and costs, cost of
living, transportation availability and costs, and other such factors. Assumptions and
strategies will be documented. Only cohort and linear projections will be made.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A • Elements
15-4119/91
METRO' -..LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: IMPACT
SUBTASK: 3.1 Policy Planning
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The "Visioning Process" will establish the image of the Metropolitan area in the future.
However, this vision must be converted into detailed land use policies in order to be of use
as a decision making tool. Consequently, in this task a series of land use policies will be
developed with which the participating agencies can make effective land use
recommendations. Land use policy statements will include, at a minimum, the following
subjects:
General development policies;
Land use policies;
Transportation policies;
Transit policies;
Research policies;
Parks & open space policies;
Conservation policies;
Historic preservation policies;
Commercial development policies;
Industrial development policies;
Housing policies;
Broad economic development policies;
Public service and annexation policies;
Neighborhood protection policies;
Education policies;
Utility policies
Water
Sewer
Irrigation
Drainage
Solid Waste
- Private Utilities
Design policies and standards
Each category will be divided into broad planning goals (visions), more specific objectives,
and very specific decision making policies. The initial set of land use policies will be based
upon the visioning process.
METRO 8
A - Elements
16 -- 4/15/91
Subtask 3.1 Policy Planning
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum discussing goals, objectives and decision-making policies in each
of the above referenced areas.
ASSUMPTIONS:
City of Yakima (Visioning) will perform with support by Consultant team.
a) It is assumed that the "Visioning" process, with City assistance, will establish the
planning goals, specific objectives, and very specific decision-making policies.
b) Consultant encourages the City to conduct workshops, once the planning goals have
been developed, to prepare the specific objectives, and very specific decision-making
policies.
c) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in converting planning
goals to specific objectives and very specific decision-making policies.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
17 -- 4/19/91
METRO' JTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: IMPACT
SUBTASK: 3.2 Urbanization Study
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
With information maps and consensus developed in previous Tasks, preliminary urban
growth boundaries will be proposed.
Urban growth boundaries will be established for the twenty year period (2010) required by
the Growth Management Act.
We believe this is an important step in ultimate plan acceptance, since each of these areas
will no doubt want to maintain a sense of place and identity. The important issue at later
points in the process will be to ensure the overall systems integrate with one another and
that there is general consensus on total area needs.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay maps of urban area boundaries to 2010, technical memorandum will accompany
overlay maps which describes process of identification of area boundaries.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team will perform (2010 Only):
a) See MAPPING ELEMENT for responsibility for hand -scribed map to be developed
under this Sub task to be delivered to City for entry into their computer mapping
system.
b) Completed maps to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days of delivery of
hand -scribed maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $11,878.12
METRO 8
A - Elements
18 -- 4/1991
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSTVE PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: IMPACT
SUBTASK: 3.3 Neighborhood Policies
TASK LEADER: Bob Burke
WORK ITEM:
In addition to the area wide policy planning goals, objectives and decision-making policies,
neighborhood policies and design guidelines will be developed.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum discussing goals, objectives and decision-making policies for
neighborhood groups (associations).
TOTAL BUDGET $12.283.36
METRO 8
A - Elements
19 -- 4/19/91
METROP.;LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.1 Yakima Urban Area Growth Scenarios
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Based upon the data collected in previous tasks and other elements, the visioning process,
and the land use goals, objectives, and policies, land use scenarios will be developed for the
Yakima Urban Area. The initial land use scenario may be based upon a continuation of
present trends, including densities and service extensions. A second land use scenario will
be based upon the goals of the Growth Management Act, including defining urban edges,
preserving open space, resource lands, wetlands, and other critical areas, encouraging
creative design to increase density and minimize sprawl. Both scenarios will take into
consideration strategic growth corridors and logical growth trends, but each will have
decidedly different impacts on community service levels.
Once each scenario is developed, a consensus plan which complies with the GMA will be
developed. Again, while each planning area may place more or less emphasis on specific
elements, we will strive to maintain system continuity (For example, it is important that
the arterial street system between Yakima and Union Gap be integrated. Likewise, the
overall method of treating storm water runoff within a given drainage basin should be
consistent, regardless of political or enforcing jurisdiction).
Ultimately, a plan will be developed) which includes separate entities, the key components
of which can be integrated into a cohesive, functioning whole. Each of the initial land use
strategies and the consensus land use plan will deal with the defined Yakima Urban Area.
PRODUCTS:
Overlay maps of land use scenarios including: continuation of present trends; implied goal
trends; and consensus plan for the Yakima Urban Area. Technical memorandum
discussing scenarios and relationship with area policy planning.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team willperform:
a) Completed maps to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days of delivery of
hand -scribed maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $12,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
20 — 4/15/91
ME i ROPOLITAN YA' 'A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 5.1 Financial Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Concepts for funding will be prepared and evaluated to include potential sources of
funding in conjunction with other elements. Consideration of local resources, private
resources, state and federal funding will be incorporated into the analysis. An evaluation
of funding sources would include, but not be limited to, development impact fees,
development agreements, linkage fees, improvement taxes, real estate transfer taxes, special
districts, tax increment financing, and local option taxes and fees. Other elements will look
at specific funding sources for that element. In this subtask, we will be looking at general
sources of funding for housing, schools, police, fire, emergency services, government
operations and other non-specific costs of government.
PRODUCTS:
The financial plan technical memorandum will incorporate an evaluation of funding
sources as described above and their applicability to the Metropolitan area. Individual
elements will be more specific to funding individual programs. Recommendations will be
included in the subtask regarding possible legislation action required at the local and/or
state level to impose these funding sources.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Legal opinions will be required under this subtask from Preston, Thorgrimson, Shidler,
Gates & Ellis which are provided under separate contract.
City of Yakima will perform with support by Consultant team.
METRO 8
A - Elements
21 — 4/19/91
Subtask 5.1 Financial Plan
Page 2
a) City will identify concepts for potential sources of funding for housing, police, fire,
emergency services, government operations, and other non-specific costs of
government through such sources as development impact fees, development
agreements, linkage fees, improvement taxes, real estate taxes, tax increment
financing, and other local option taxes and fees.
b) Consultant team services would include meetings with City staff for discussion of
alternate funding sources and detailed review of selected alternates as applicable to the
Urban area (to the extent possible).
c) Additional Consultant team services would be required in the implementation phase
of the Land Use Planto develop implementation strategy for alternate funding
sources. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a
later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $7,500.00
METRO 8
A • Elements
22 — 4/19/91
ME! ita LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHEND. E PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 7.1 Community Involvement
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
A comprehensive program will be developed and implemented to inform the community,
so it can be used effectively in designing the land use plan. All activity will be consistent
with the Vision 2010 process.
Informational activities: Community involvement briefings with project staff to inform
the public about the Land Use planning process and their role in it. This will be done
through:
Fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts.
News releases to local newspapers, radio, and television stations.
Feature articles in the local newspaper.
_ Mailings to community, business groups, and interested citizens including
material to be printed in their own newsletters.
_ Staff and consultant presentations to local organizations.
Community consultation: The second part of the community information is consultation,
getting public ideas and opinions about the land use plan. Many of these activities will be
concurrent with those above. The proposed activities may include:
Working with the Advisory Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
Workshops involving the most interested citizens in problem -solving sessions
on specific land use issues.
_ Open houses where people can drop in to see graphics and discuss possibilities
one-on-one with staff and consultants.
Comment forms distributed at all meetings.
_ Presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
METRO 8
A - Elements
23 -- 4/19^91
Subtask 7.1 Community Involvement
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
This task will be combined with other comprehensive plan elements as part of an ongoing
process.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team/City of Yakima will perform: $40,000.
a) Consultant team will conduct informational activities.
b) City will conduct community consultation activities with support from Consultant
team (to the extent possible).
TOTAL BUDGET $30,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
24 -- 4/19/91
ME 1KOPuLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI VE PLAN
LAND USE ELEMENT
TASK A: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 8.1 Land Use Plan
TASK LEADER Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
All comments received and incorporated into previous tasks and subtasks, and those
received during the review period will be compiled. All comments will either be
incorporated into the final document or be addressed in writing. A consensus land use
plan overlay will be prepared.
PRODUCTS:
This Subtask includes the Draft Land Use Plan with sufficient detail to address
neighborhood issues and incorporation of previous Task and Subtask development.
Technical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Land Use Plan and Land Use Map.
ASSUMPTIONS:
consultant team will perform:
a) Completed map to be delivered to Consultant team within 7 days of delivery of hand -
scribed map.
TOTAL BUDGET $11,344.69
METRO 8
A - Elements
25 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREI-IENS: vE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.1 Accident Data
TASK LEADER: Dave Almond
WORK ITEM:
Summary accident information for the past three years will be obtained for the study area
from available information.
PRODUCTS:
Accident occurrence map and technical memorandum describing the map with
presentation of an accident summary file.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in obtaining accident
information.
TOTAL BUDGET $829.89
METRO 8
A - Elements
26 — 4/15/91
METRON,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI . d PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.2 Regional Transportation Data
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
The YMATS QRSII transportation model has been used to prepare a TMODEL 2 micro
model of the existing YMATS street network. This TMODEL2 has been calibrated and was
used for traffic analysis of alternatives developed as part of the Yakima Traffic Alternatives
study prepared for review of the I-82 traffic corridor between Yakima Avenue and Nob Hill
Blvd. Regional transportation data will be used to update the TMODEL 2 files.
PRODUCTS:
A technical memorandum will be prepared identifying the updating process together with
in updated map of transportation data (Computer generated map).
TOTAL BUDGET $2,173.53
METRO 8
A - Elements
27 — 4/15/91
METROF _ 4JTAN YA]KIMA COMPREHENS,. d PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZIE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.3 Evaluate Criteria and Standards
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
A joint meeting with the staff will be conducted to establish evaluation criteria and
standards for the study. This will include performance and operational characteristics.
This meeting will review the goals and objectives and information to be used in the
development of the Transportation Plan.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum of background and inventory. Goals and objectives of the
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT will be identified.
TOTAL BUDGET' $1,867.12
METRO 8
A . Elements
28-4/191 1
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.1 Traffic Capacity
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
Existing traffic capacity for the key intersections will be computed utilizing NCAP, a PC
based program that utilizes 1985 Highway Capacity Manual procedures. This traffic data,
which will be input into the transportation planning model (TMODEL 2) will be used both
for system evaluation and model calibration.
PRODUCTS:
. 'raffic capacity map (Computer generated map) together with technical memorandum
describing the map and capacity calculation file.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,770.79
METR0 8
A - Elements
29 -- 4115/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI v E PLAN
TRA.NSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.2 Operation Review
TASK LEADER: Dick Marshall
WORK ITEM:
Street geometrics, channelization, holding lanes, sight distances, and safety related features
will be reviewed to identify deficiencies.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum will be prepared describing the operational review.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,610.65
METRO 8
A - Elements
30 -- 4/19191
METROP(LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 v E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.3 Functional Classification
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
A compatible functional classification system for the arterial streets will be prepared using
the currently adopted system with agreed upon modifications as may be required. The
functional classification will be based on traffic volume, type of use, and system continuity.
Recommendations will be made regarding any needed amendments.
PRODUCTS:
Functional classification map and technical memorandum describing classification
parameters.
ASSUMPTIONS:
The existing functional classification system for the YMAT area will be used as a guide for
further classification.
a) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in amending the
functional classification system for the arterial streets.
TOTAL BUDGET $1,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
31 — 4/19/91
METROPL JITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI .i PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.4 Transportation Program Review
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
Complete review of transportation plans and policies in the Metropolitan area will be
made to include the following items:
_ Urban arterial needs
Six-year transportation improvement program update
_ Code revisions
Transportation policies
_ Transportation standards
Transportation staff and procedures
Each of these elements of the transportation program will be reviewed and
recommendations for modifications or additions will be made. This will include the
development of design standards, project development procedures and control, staffing
levels, and interdepartmental working relationships.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing all information and identifying those items
described above.
ASSUMPTION:
a) Reviews would be prepared by City for Metropolitan area.
b) Consultant team services would include recommendations :regarding design
standards, procedures and controls, staffing levels, andworking relationships.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
32 -- 4/19191
METRO!' JTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.5 Accident Analysis
TASK LEADER: Dave Almond
WORK ITEM:
An accident analysis will be prepared to determine high accident locations and possible
corrective actions.
PRODUCTS:
Accident analysis technical memorandum providing evaluation of high accident location
with suggested corrective action.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,283.55
METRO 8
A - Elements
33 — 4119/91
METROPOLITAN YA]KIMA COMPREHENSI. v E PLANE
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.6 Traffic Signal System
TASK LEADER: Dick Marshall
WORK ITEM:
A review of the traffic signal system and warrants for new installation will be made jointly
with the staff.
PRODUCTS:
Traffic signal system technical memorandum including warrant analysis and presenting
recommendations on possible new installations and/or modifications to existing facilities.
TOTAL BUDGET' $4,203.73
METRO 8
A - Elements
34 -- 4/19/91
METROP� LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS, c PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.1 Define and Digitize System
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
The expanded network will be input into the computer by digitizing a scale map of the
Metropolitan area.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum and arterial street map showing transportation model coding.
TOTAL BUDGET $784.40
METRO 8
A - Elements
35 -- 4/19/91
METROI JITAN YA]KIMA COMPREHENS: : PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.2 Input Network Attributes
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
The expanded street network will be subdivided into links, and attributes will be assigned
including length, speed, capacity, existing volume, functional classification, and other
descriptive features consistent with the existing QRSII YMATS model we have converted
to TMODEL2 for analysis purposes. Our TMODEL2 traffic model is a calibrated working
model of the YMATS network.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum and arterial network file (TMODEL 2).
TOTAL BUDGET $978.80
METRO 8
A • Elements
36 — 4/15/91
METROP JLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1. E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.3 Input Zone Attributes
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
The expanded study area will be subdivided into analysis zones which will provide the
basis for travel characteristics. Zone data will include retail employment, non -retail
employment, and households per zone. This information will be obtained from the
LAND USE ELEMENT.
PRODUCTS:
,Technical memorandum and zone file (TMODEL 2).
TOTAL BUDGET $1,173.20
METRO 8
A - Elements
37 -- 4/1991
METROPOLITAN 'YAKIMA COMPREHENSI v E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.4 Model Calibration
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
The expanded model will be calibrated through adjustments to link, node, and zone
attributes as well as possible modifications to the gravity model parameters including trip
length distribution and the relationship of travel time to trip length.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing travel time to trip length characteristics and TMODEL
2 computer file with identification of calibration procedures.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,065.88
METRO 8
A - Elements
38 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.5 Input Future Conditions
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
Future network and zone conditions for the model will be developed with input from the
consensus land use plan and other elements. Future land use conditions will be based on
land use estimates for a horizon year 2010 and 2025. Specific land use issues relating to
individual site conditions will be evaluated and reviewed for compatibility with the goals
of the TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.
PRODUCTS:
'echnical memorandum with future population and employment file for 2010 and 2025
(TMODEL 2).
TOTAL BUDGET $590.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
39 -- 4/19/91
METROT , .ITAN 'YAKIMA COMPREHENS' : PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: DEVELOP TRAFFIC FORECAST MODEL
SUBTASK: 3.6 Prepare Future Assignments
TASK LEADER: Wallace Turner
WORK ITEM:
A future traffic assignment will be prepared to provide a base no -build assignment to be
used in the evaluation of future conditions. Alternative assignments will be run and
compared to the base model to determine relative effectiveness of improvement
alternatives, and land use changes.
PRODUCTS:
Traffic assignment technical memorandum describing the following:
_ Traffic volumes
_ System characteristics file
Measures of effectiveness
TOTAL BUDGIET $3,630.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
40 — 4/15/91
METROF .ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS' ? PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 4.1 Goal Setting
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
The analysis of future network and traffic zone conditions must incorporate compatibility
guidelines developed as part of the goals of the TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT and the
related Elements of the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan.
A critical issue to be incorporated into this planning process is the Washington State
Growth Management legislation. The intent of this legislation is the development and
improvement of interconnected and coordinated transportation systems serving
numerous jurisdictions. Coordination between local comprehensive plans is required in
order to achieve local and statewide goals. Key tasks necessary to satisfy this legislation are:
Develop consensus for land use assumptions
_ Prepare complete inventory of existing transportation system.
- Compared by level of service standards.
- Recommended section to improve substandard facilities to meet LOS criteria.
- Adopt traffic forecasts based on approved Land Use.
- Identify system expansion requirements.
_ Analyze funding capability and resources.
- Develop multi-year financing plan needed to implement system
improvements.
- Evaluate funding limitation with Land Use to address funding shortfall.
Intergovernmental Coordination.
Develop Management Strategies.
- Adopt ordinances that link development approvals to level of service
standards.
_ Concurring Requirements.
- Establish controls locally which define concurring standards based on system
needs and funding resources.
The process for setting goals must be an ongoing element throughout the development of
the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan. It must initially incorporate the
individually generated goals for the agencies included within the Metropolitan area.
These must be reviewed and modified as the project proceeds to mitigate conflicts.
METRO 8
A - Elements
41 -- 4/19/91
Subtask 4.1 Goal Setting
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
Transportation goals technical memorandum to be incorporated as part of the LAND USE
ELEMENT, Policy Planning.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Coordinated with Land Use Element Policy Planning.
City of Yakima (Visioning) will perform with support by Consultant team.
a) Consultants encourage the City to conduct workshops, once the planning goals
have been developed, to prepare the specific objectives, and very specific decision-
making policies.
b) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in converting planning
goals to specific objectives and very specific decision-making policies.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
42 — 4/19/91
METROI LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 5.1 Short Term Traffic Plan
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
A traffic plan will be developed to provide short term improvements to correct significant
deficiencies in the existing system. A phased, short-term, traffic plan will be based on
existing traffic conditions. It will be a short term project phase compatible with the long
range TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.
PRODUCTS:
Short term traffic technical memorandum that documents the short term improvements
including the analysis, alternative evaluation, and priority ranking of the recommended
mprovement projects.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,975.07
METRO 8
A - Elements
43 — 4/19/91
METROPuLITAN 'YAIKIMA COMPREHENSI . i PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 5.2 Arterial Street System Plan
TASK LEADER Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
Based on previous task and subtask evaluations, the arterial street system plan will be
developed. Each street will be classified and a recommended typical street section
including lanes, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, and total right-of-way will be
developed. The street system plan will identify the location of new routes or changes in
the existing street network.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing the arterial system plan.
TOTAL BUDGET' $8,117.38
METRO 8
A - Elements
44 — 4/1991
METRO'', JITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSi j PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 5.3 Traffic Signal System Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Marshall
WORK ITEM:
The traffic signal plan will identify those intersections requiring signalization based on
existing conditions or warranted in accordance with future traffic demands. A signal
progression analysis will be conducted using TRANSYT 7F to determine the effectiveness
of signal system coordination and master control. The signal system plan may include
warrant analysis for flashing beacons, four-way stops, or special crosswalk protection.
PRODUCTS:
Traffic signal system technical memorandum describing the following:
_ New signal locations
_ Existing modifications
Signal timing data
Recommendations
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) Signal progression analysis would be required in the implementation phase of the
Land Use Plan to develop implementation strategy.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,600.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
45 — 4/19/91
METROPt.,LITAN'YAKIMA COMPREHENSi PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 5.4 Pedestrian Plan
TASK LEADER: George Reynolds
WORK ITEM:
Recommendations for a comprehensive pedestrian walkway plan including crosswalks
and school walkways will be prepared based on appropriate coordination with local school
districts.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing the pedestrian plan.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) City will conduct coordination activities with local school districts.
TOTAL BUDGET $1,200.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
46 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI v E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 5.5 Bicyde Plan
TASK LEADER: George Reynolds
WORK ITEM:
A bicycle plan will be prepared that identifies routes considering commuter, recreational,
and school bicyclists. Standards and a map will be prepared for this system.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing the bicycle plan and facility standards.
TOTAL BUDGET $1,800.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
47 — 4!19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS)i v E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: OPERATIONS EVALUATION
SUBTASK: 6.1 Traffic Service
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
Each alternative system will be evaluated with respect to the following ii:ems:
_ Capacity
_ Operation
_ Safety
_ System Integration
_ Cost/Benefits
PRODUCTS:
Transportation system technical memorandum describing alternate systems and those
items described above.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) 2010 alternates only with maximum of 2 alternates investigated.
TOTAL BUDGET $'10,500.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
48-4/19/91
METROI ..ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: OPERATIONS EVALUATION
SUBTASK: 6.2 Compatibility
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
The systems will be evaluated and rated considering the compatibility with the
community. The following items will be considered:
Business and community impacts
Conformance with other plans
_ Visual and aesthetic impacts
PRODUCTS:
Transportation system technical memorandum describing alternate systems and those
compatibility items described above.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) 2010 alternates only.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,800.00
METRO 8
A • Elements
49 -- 4/19/91
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREEIENSJL . E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: OPERATIONS EVALUATION
SUBTASK: 6.3 Evaluation Matrix
TASK LEADER: George Reynolds
WORK ITEM:
A comparative matrix of all evaluation criteria will be prepared that weights each factor.
PRODUCTS:
The matrix will be incorporated into a technical memorandum describing evaluation and
rating priorities.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) 2010 alternates only.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,600.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
50 -- 4/19191
METROP^LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS" TE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 7.1 Financial Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Concepts for project funding will be prepared and evaluated to include potential sources of
transportation funding assistance. Consideration of local resources, private resources, state
and federal funding will be incorporated into the analysis. An evaluation of funding
sources would include, but not be limited to, the use of councilmanic bonds, street utility
programs, tax and increment financing, transportation benefit districts, impact fees, and
general obligation bonds.
Alternative processes will be evaluated to establish a program of developer traffic impact
fees based on the transportation modelling. The impact of the proposed development can
be measured and related to appropriate elements of the transportation improvement
system costs.
PRODUCTS:
rhe financial plan technical memorandum will incorporate an evaluation of funding
sources, a suggested funding program for improvement projects, and a cash flow analysis.
Suggested traffic impact assessments and mitigation system ordinances will be prepared.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City to develop strategy for funding future Transportation needs including Federal,
State, Local, Public, and Private funding through such sources as grants, loans, user
fees, employee head tax, tax increment financing, and other option taxes and fees.
b) Consultant team services would include meetings with City staff for discussions of
alternate funding and detailed review of selected alternates as applicable to the Urban
area.
c) Additional Consultant team services would be required in the implementation phase
of the Land Use Plan to develop implementation strategy for alternate funding
sources. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a
later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
51 -- 4/19/91
METROF aITAN YAKIMA COMPREFIENS"_ ,E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 8.1 Implementation Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A plan for accomplishing the recommended system development will be prepared that
outlines priorities of activities with a schedule and phasing program that incorporates
project costs, funding and resources. Recommendations on transportation government
structure can be identified in this subtask.
PRODUCTS:
The implementation plan will combine the improvement schedule, financing plan and
identification of responsibilities. Specific actions will be outlined for project development
in a technical memorandum. Alternate government control can be described. Joint
agreements can be identified.
ASSUMPTIONS:
The implementation plan will be developed through meetings with the City and
participating agencies.
a) City to establish priorities of activities and develop a schedule and phasing program.
City to consider alternate government structure for responsibilities for
Transportation systems and improvements.
b) Consultant team services would include meeting with City staff for discussions of
priorities, scheduling, phasing, and alternate government structure. Additional
assistance in development of project costs, funding and resources.
TOTAL BUDGET $10,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
52 -- 4/19/91
METRO1 STAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT & INFORMATION
SUBTASK: 9.1 Community Involvement & Information
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
Informational activities: Community involvement briefings with project staff to inform
the public about the transportation planning process and their role in it. This may be done
through:
_ Fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts.
_ News releases to local newspapers and radio and television stations.
Feature articles in the local newspaper.
Mailings to community, business groups, and interested citizens, including
material to be printed in their own newsletters.
Staff and consultant presentations to local organizations.
Community consultation: The second part of the community involvement is
consultation, getting public ideas and opinions about the transportation plan. Many of
these activities will be concurrent with those above. The proposed activities may include:
_ Working with the Advisory Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
_ Workshops involving the most interested citizens in problem -solving sessions
on specific transportation issues.
_ Open houses where people can drop in to see graphics and discuss possibilities
one-on-one with staff and consultants.
Comment forms distributed at all meetings.
Presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
PRODUCTS:
This task will be combined with other comprehensive plan elements as part of an ongoing
process.
METRO 8
A - Elements
53 — 4/19191
Subtask 9.1 Community Ir- ilvement
Page 2
ASSUMPTIONS:
Informational activities include fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts; news
releases to local newspapers and radio stations; mailings to community and business
groups; and presentations to local organizations.
Community consultation activities include meetings with the Advisory Committee
and/or Visioning Committee; workshops with interested citizens on specific
transportation issues; open house; and presentations to City Council and/or County
Commissioners.
a) Consultant team will conduct informational activities.
b) City will conduct community consultation activities with support from Consultant
team (to the extent possible).
c) Majority of Consultant team effort to be provided in meeting with Visioning
committee to address specific issues.
TOTAL BUDGET $10,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
54 — 4/19/91
METROT LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 10.1 Short Range Transportation Plan
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
A short range traffic plan will be prepared to identify immediate safety and capacity traffic
improvements. This plan will focus on substandard or inadequate facilities that can be
improved within a short time frame and will require only minimum funding. All
comments received during the review period will be compiled. All comments will either
be incorporated into the final document or be addressed in writing.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Short Range Transportation Plan.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team will perform:
a) For Urban area only.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,800.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
55 -- 4/15/91
METROP"LTTAN YAKIMA COMPREFIENSTvE PLAN
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TASK B: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 10.2 Long Range Transportation Plan
TASK LEADER: Ted Bell
WORK ITEM:
The street, traffic control and non -motorized traffic plans will be combined into an
integrated Transportation Plan. All comments received during the review period will be
compiled. All comments will eiither be incorporated into the final document or be
addressed in writing.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Long Range Transportation Plan.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team will perform:
a) For Urban area only.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,600.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
56 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.1 Review Existing Data and Surveys
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Existing data will be inventoried and reviewed including:
On -board Survey
_ Dial -a -ride Data
Area -Agency on Aging Transportation Data
_ Sign Inventory Report
_ Bus Shelter Inventory Report
?RODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying all inventoried and reviewed data summarizing
previous efforts and identifying any observed deficiencies.
TOTAL BUDGET $2,275.06
METRO 8
A - Elements
57 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN 'YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZ]E DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.2 Review Existing Physical Plant
TASK LEADER: Clyde Prem
WORK ITEM:
Existing transit capital facilities will be inventoried including equipment and structures. A
field inspection will be performed of all capital facilities.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying capital facilities including age, capacity, condition,
and other significant features.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) City staff to provide summary report of existing capital facilities under Subtask C1.1.
TOTAL BUDGET $1,595.16
METRO 8
A - Elements
58 — 4/15/91
METROP '.ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS' i PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES DATA COLLECTION
SUBTASK: 1.3 Conduct Origin - Destination Surveys
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
In order to identify the area of transit dependency and to create a mathematical model of
potential transit ridership in the Metropolitan area, a transit survey should be conducted.
Our past experience has revealed that in addition to a transit on -board survey, a residence
telephone survey is both economical and time -saving. We will prepare interview
questionnaires, which will take no more than five minutes to complete.
A minimum of 2% - 5% of the total households in the study area proportioned uniformly
throughout all transportation zones will be surveyed. A survey of major employers and
major activity centers will also be conducted in order to determine travel patterns and
travel characteristics of work, shopping and social -recreational travel.
The following level of effort will be performed:
_ Household Survey 2.5% response
Employee Survey 6 major employment centers, includes shopping centers
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing the method of research and summary of results.
ASSUMPTIONS:
The City of Yakima will provide a location from which to conduct the phone survey, and
will assist the consulting team in selecting and contacting major employers to participate
in the survey.
a) Existing survey information developed by the City and other local agencies will be
reviewed and analyzed by the City.
b) Meetings and discussions with agency staff will identify potential transit ridership.
c) Consultant team services would include meetings and discussions with agency staff
and assistance in review and analysis of existing survey information (to extent
possible).
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
59 -- 4/19/91
METROP' UTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSPIE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.1 ]Existing Conditions Analysis
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Existing information developed will be analyzed and summarized into a comprehensive
technical memorandum including transit policies, standards, facilities, staff and
procedures. The analysis will be performed for all modes of public transportation serving
the Yakima area, including fixed route transit, paratransit and electric train.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing existing transit conditions with identification of short-
term deficiencies, needs and opportunities.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,760.03
METRO 8
A - Elements
60 — 4/19^91
METROh.,,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSi JE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
LASK C: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 3.1 Goal Setting
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The analysis of future transit options must incorporate compatibility guidelines developed
as part of the goals of the TRANSIT ELEMENT and the related Elements of the
Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan.
A critical issue to be incorporated into this planning process is the Washington State
Growth Management legislation. The intent of this legislation is the development and
improvement of interconnected and coordinated transit systems serving numerous
jurisdictions. Coordination between local comprehensive plans is required in order to
achieve local and statewide goals. Key tasks to be discussed in the goal setting process and
necessary to satisfy this legislation are:
Develop consensus for land use assumptions.
Prepare complete inventory of existing transit system.
Compared by level of service standards.
Recommended section to improve substandard facilities.
Adopt forecasts based on approved Land Use.
Identify system expansion requirements.
Analyze funding capability and resources.
Develop multi-year financing plan needed to implement system
improvements.
Evaluate funding limitation with Land Use to address funding shortfall.
Intergovernmental Coordination.
Develop Management Strategies.
Concurring Requirements.
- Establish controls locally which define concurring standards based on
system needs and funding resources.
The process for setting goals must be an ongoing element throughout the development of
the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan. It must initially incorporate the
individually generated goals for the agencies included within the Metropolitan area.
These must be reviewed and modified as the project proceeds to mitigate conflicts.
Goals and objectives may encompass both physical performance standards and level of
funding commitment. Fundamental to transit planning is matching supply of transit to
demand and maximizing the efficiency of the transit system in order to serve community
needs.
METRO 8
A - Elements
61 — 4/15/91
Subtask 3.1 Goal Setting
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
Transit goals technical memorandum to be incorporated as part of the LAND USE
ELEMENT, subtask Policy Planning.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Coordinates with Policy Planning.
a) Consultant encourages the City to conduct workshops, once the planning goals have
been developed, to prepare the specific objectives, and very specific decision-making
policies.
c) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in converting planning
goals to specific objectives and very specific decision-making policies.
TOTAL BUDGET $34,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
62 — 4/19/91
1
METROF •,ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS 3 PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 3.2 Evaluation Criteria
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A set of measurable transit service standards will be developed and reviewed, including
cost, convenience, coverage, routing accessibility, travel time, and special services.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing transit service standards to be used in evaluating
alternatives.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Coordinated with Transportation Element Evaluation Criteria.
TOTAL BUDGET $920.17
METRO 8
A • Elements
63 — 4/15/91
METROPuL,ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.1 System Alternatives
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Based upon the findings, goals, and objectives, we will identify the workable and feasible
public transportation modes and operational alternatives suitable for the Metropolitan
area. Advantages and disadvantages of each potential alternative will be briefly reviewed
and discussed. Public transportation experiences in cities of similar size and characteristic
to the Metropolitan area will be examined and discussed. Route modifications and
extensions will be identified. Level -of -service data will be produced for each alternative.
Cost information will also be developed.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing alternatives with applied evaluation criteria from
other Subtasks.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide:
a) Urban area requires a minimum budget of $7,500 which includes Yakima, Union
Gap, Terrace Heights, and the current unincorporated area within the existing Urban
area boundary.
TOTAL BUDGET $7,500.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
64 -- 4/19^91
METRO'. .ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS ? PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.3 Evaluation Matrix
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A preliminary financial analysis and cost -benefit evaluation for public transportation
alternatives will be developed. Alternatives analysis will include an evaluation of the
following items:
Service
Characteristics Revenue Expenditure
Population Served Passenger Fare Annualized Capital Outlay
Transit Service Revenue Per System Mile General/Commercial Expense
Coverage
?oute Length UMTA Funding Scenario Operational Cost
Headway City Funding Level and Maintenance Cost
Commitment
Service Hours --- Marketing Cost
Service Days -- Cost/Mile
Transit Stop Spacings --- Cost/Passenger
Terminal Facilities —
Fleet Size
System Passenger Fare
Category
Generation Rate Per Mile
METRO 8
A - Elements
65-4119/91
Subtask 4.3 Evaluation Matra
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum including evaluation matrix and identification of all service
characteristics, revenue and expenditure criteria.
TOTAL BUDGE. $15,642.12
METRO 8
A - Elements
66 — 4/1 9191
METROF..., LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSi E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: OPERATIONS EVALUATIONS
SUBTASK: 5.1 Operational Assessment
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The operating requirements for transit will be defined.
The recommended transit alternatives will be analyzed in detail. A review of service
characteristics developed in other subtasks and a detailed assessment of capital
improvement needs, facilities, route alignment, transfer facilities, maintenance facilities
and other amenities (location of bus shelters, etc.) will be performed. Service standards
will be established and a revenue structure will be developed.
Guidelines for transit operations will be developed and applied to a selected transit
operation alternative. Assessment will include estimated operations costs and capital
needs.
'RODUCTS:
Technical memorandum providing detailed assessment of capital improvement needs,
facilities, route alignment, transfer facilities, transit operation requirements for selected
alternative with costs and capital needs.
TOTAL BUDGET $8,521.32
METRO 8
A - Elements
67 — 4/15191
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREI HENS] . E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: OPERATIONS EVALUATIONS
SUBTASK: 5.2 Management Systems
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Management issues will be outlined. Recommendations willbe made regarding transit
staff, administrative needs and related equipment needs.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying staff, administrative needs and related equipment
needs for the selected alternative.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,319.97
METRO 8
A - Elements
68 -- 4/19/91
METROI JITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSL E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: OPERATIONS EVALUATIONS
SUBTASK: 5.3 Maintenance Requirements
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The maintenance requirements of the selected transit alternative will be identified.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing maintenance requirements and costs of selected
transit alternatives.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,779.75
INTRO B
A - Elements
69 — 4/19/91
METRO'. JTAN YAKIMA COMPREEIENS: ? PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: OPERATIONS EVALUATIONS
SUBTASK: 5.4 Marketing Plan
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A marketing plan will be developed that relates to the selected alternatiive. Concepts will
be developed and various poteni:ial transit ridership groups will be targeted for transition
promotion and services.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum providing an overview of marketing opportunities will be
developed as it relates to the selected transit alternative.
TOTAL BUDGET $4,,640.37
METRO 8
A - Elements
70 — 4/15/91
METROI LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 6.1 Future Requirements
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A review of future operating plans, and operating and capital funds they will require, will
be performed. Funding needs for the preferred alternative will be investigated and
availability of funds from current and new sources will be estimated. Operating structures,
financial forecasts, and financial planning scenarios will be described. A preliminary
financing plan will be developed.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying future operating plans and operating and capital
^unds.
TOTAL BUDGET $7,281.25
METRO 8
A - Elements
71 -- 4/19/91
METROP,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS., 2. PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 6.2 Assessment of Financial Capacity
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A strategy for funding future transit service will be developed. Funding options such as
federal, state and local funding as well as user fees, privatization, gas tax revenue, etc. will
be investigated.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying strategy for funding future transit service including
federal, state and local funding.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City to develop strategy for funding future transit service including federal, state, and
local funding through such sources as grants, loans, user fees, privatization, gas tax
revenue, employee head tax, and other option taxes and fees.
b) Consultant team services would include meetings with City staff for discussions of
alternate funding and detailed review of selected alternates as applicable to the Urban
area (to the extent possible).
c) Additional Consultant team services would be required in the implementation phase
of the Land Use Plan to develop implementation strategy for alternate funding
sources. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a
later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
72 — 4/19/91
TASK E:
SUBTASK:
TASK LEADER:
METROF LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSA . E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
1.1 Reports, Plans and Records
John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
In conjunction with Subtasks under the LAND USE ELEMENT, copies of all appropriate
plans, reports, EIS, and records that relate to the development of the DRAINAGE
ELEMENT will be obtained and reviewed. Specific information to be sought includes:
Aerial topographical maps, other available mapping, soil information, meteorological
data, hydrologic records, complaint files and pin maps, previous study records, plans and
"as -built" drawings for drainage improvements, etc... Available studies, flooding records,
water quality data, and hydrologic information will be inventoried.
Drainage basin and sub -basin divides will be confirmed from our previous work and our
basin/subbasin development identified in the Comprehensive Plan for Sewerage System.
Ordinances and criteria pertaining to stormwater drainage practices typical of those in and
around Yakima will be surveyed.
Other reports to be supplied by the City of Yakima as they become available from the USGS
as part of the National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) for the Yakima River are:
A Summary of Historical Data from 1920-1985
Sanitary Quality (E. Coli, Fecal Coliform)
Trace Elements, Trace Organics
DO, Isotopes, Major Ions, Suspended Sediments
Nutrients
Summary
PRODUCTS:
(November, 1990)
(November, 1990)
(Fall, 1991)
(Fall, 1992)
(Fall, 1992)
(Winter/Spring, 1993)
Inventory of available information in technical memorandum including overlay maps
for:
Drainage Basin Boundaries
Existing Land Use (LAND USE ELEMENT)
Flood Plains and Wetlands (LAND USE ELEMENT)
Soil Types (LAND USE ELEMENT)
Existing Drainage Facilities
Jurisdictional Boundaries (LAND USE ELEMENT)
METRO 8
A - Elements
97 -- 4/19/91
SUBTASK 1.1 Reports, Plai and Records
Page 2
ASSUMPTIONS:
All plans, maps, and reports (3 copies each) will be provided at no cost.
Consultant team/City of Yakima will perform:
a) City to provide summaries :for background materials for Metropolitan area to include
population considerations; goal statements; implementation statements;
recommendations of capital improvements; scheduling and implementation;
government structure recommendations; and other specific findings of the reports as
may be applicable to this ELEMENT. Summaries will be used by Visioning
committee and Consultant team.
b) Copies of existing study maps will accompany summaries from the appropriate
documents as may be applicable to the ELEMENTS of this study.
c) Consultant team services include those services identified in other Subtasks with the
exception of the above -referenced reviews.
d) See MAPPING ELEMENT for responsibility for background mapping and product
maps to be developed in this Subtask.
e) Summaries to be delivered to Consultant team within 30 days after Consultant notice
to proceed ("start date"). See MAPPING ELEMENT for schedule of maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $13,669.21
METRO 8
A • Elements
98 -- 4/15/91
Subtask 8.1 Community In. Jlvement
Page 2
ASSUMPTIONS:
Informational activities include fact sheets, newsletters and similar handouts; news
releases to local newspapers and radio stations; mailings to community and business
groups; and presentations to local organizations.
Community consultant activities include meetings with the Advisory Committee and/or
Visioning Committee; workshops with interested citizens on specific park and recreation
issues; open house; and presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
a) Consultant team will conduct informational activities.
b) City will conduct community consultation activities with support from Consultant
team.
TOTAL BUDGET $10,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
95 -- 4/19/91
METROI LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
PARKS AND (RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 9.1 Park and Recreation Plan
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
All comments received and incorporated into previous tasks and subtasks, and those
received during the review period will be compiled. All comments will either be
incorporated into the final document or be addressed in writing.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Park and Recreation Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,760.35
METRO 8
A - Elements
96 — 4/19/91
METROI :.ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.1 Implementation Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
The implementation plan will be designed in accordance with State guidelines. A public
lands inventory (completed on IAC forms), and an outline of update procedures will be
prepared. Included as well will be recommendations for phased improvements with items
ranked by priority.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum providing information noted above.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City to prepare public lands inventory and update procedures.
b) Consultant team to prepare recommendations for phased improvements with items
ranked by priority.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,500.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
93 — 4/15/91
METROZ .eLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 8.1 Community Involvement
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Informational activities: Community involvement briefings with project staff to inform
the public about the park and recreation planning process and their role on it. This will be
done through:
Fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts.
_ News releases to local newspapers, radio, and television stations.
Feature articles in the local newspaper.
Mailings to community, business groups, and interested citizens, including
material to be printed in their own newsletter.
_ Staff and consultant presentations to local organizations, with slides as
appropriate.
Community consultation: The second part of the community involvement is
consultation, getting public ideas and opinions about the transportation plan. Many of
these activities will be concurrent with those above. The proposed activities include:
Working with the Advisory 'Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
Workshops involving the most interested citizens in problem -solving sessions
on specific park and recreation issues.
Open houses where people can drop in to see graphics and discuss possibilities
one-on-one with staff and consultants.
Comment forms distributed at all meetings.
Presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
PRODUCTS:
This task will be combined with other comprehensive plan elements as part of an ongoing
process.
METRO 8
A • Elements
94 — 4/15/91
METROF '�ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. G PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: OPERATIONS EVALUATION
SUBTASK: 5.1 Operations
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The operations plan will describe the operational requirements of the recommended
system including organization structure, staffing, maintenance and equipment needs for
the complete park and recreation system.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum including recommendations on operations facilities and
personnel for the selected park and recreation system.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,400.61
METRO 8
A - Elements
91 — 4/19/91
METRO —JLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS ,E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 6.1 Financial Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Available funding mechanisms will be evaluated. Included in this review will be federal,
state, local, public and private sources. The role of public-private joint enterprises, such as
the Yakima River Greenway, will be considered.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying funding alternatives for capital facilities and
operations including federal, state, local, public and private sources.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City to develop strategy for funding future Park and Recreation needs including
Federal, State, Local, Public, and Private funding through such sources as grants,
loans, user fees, privatization, employee head tax, tax increment financing, and other
option taxes and fees.
b) Consultant team services would include meetings with City staff for discussions of
alternate funding and detailed review of selected alternates as applicable to the Urban
area.
c) Additional Consultant team services would be required in the implementation phase
of the Land Use Plan to develop implementation strategy for alternate funding
sources. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a
later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $4,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
92 -- 4/15/91
METROT'LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS- TE PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.3 Image Evaluation
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
An image evaluation will be conducted. Recommendations regarding a consistent design
theme throughout the park system which would provide the area with a strong identity of
place will be provided. This subtask will include an evaluation of the major entryways
into the Metropolitan area and a determination made concerning integration of the
overall theme into the gateways.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum with recommendations regarding park system theme. Entryways
into the Metropolitan area will be evaluated with recommendations regarding possible
modifications to be made to correspond with the overall theme.
ASSUMPTIONS:
TOTAL BUDGET $10,400.42
METRO 8
A - Elements
89 — 4/19/91
METROFOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI JE PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.4 Park and Recreation Programming Plan
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A park and recreation programming plan will be developed. Recommendations for
program improvements will include both actual park facilities and revised services; i.e.,
organized programs, soccer fields, picnic facilities, instructional programs, crafts, etc.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum with recommendations for program improvements for both
parks and recreation facilities.
TOTAL BUDGET 610,400.42
METRO 8
A - Elements
90-4119/91
METROI..LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS, . E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.1 Parks and Recreation Improvement Program
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
In conjunction with the LAND USE ELEMENT, a park and recreation improvement
program will be outlined, including projected land use needs and future facility
improvements. The plan will be developed in concert with IAC requirements since major
funding dollars are made available to local communities through this program. Site
selection recommendations will be made. Future park and recreation land will be selected
from the supply of potential open space identified in the inventory and analysis tasks.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum outlining site selection recommendations.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,010.17
METRO 8
A - Elements
87-4/15/91
METRO' LIT'AN YAKIMA COMPREHENE' 'E PLAN
PARKS AND (RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.2 Concept Plans for Park and Open Space
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Concept alternatives will be presented. Two (2) alternative park and open space concept
plans will be presented as a part of the planning evaluation. Concept alternatives will
include the development of a hierarchical system of parks and connecting linkages.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum and conceptualplans for park and open space alternates.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team will perform:
a) One park and open space concept plan will be presented.
TOTAL BUDGET $8,500.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
88 -- 4/19/91
METROFuLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSY *✓E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 3.1 Goal Setting
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
The analysis of park and recreation conditions must incorporate compatibility guidelines
developed as part of the goals of the PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT and the related
Elements of the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan.
A critical issue to be incorporated into this planning process is the Washington State
Growth Management legislation. The intent of this legislation is the development and
improvement of interconnected and coordinated park and recreation systems serving
numerous jurisdictions. Coordination between local comprehensive plans is required in
order to achieve local and statewide goals. Key tasks necessary to satisfy this legislation are:
Develop consensus for land use assumptions.
Prepare complete inventory of existing system.
Compared by level of service standards.
Recommended section to improve substandard facilities.
Adopt forecasts based on approved Land Use.
- Identify system expansion requirements.
_ Analyze funding capability and resources.
Develop multi-year financing plan needed to implement system
improvements.
- Evaluate funding limitation with Land Use to address funding shortfall.
Intergovernmental Coordination.
Develop Management Strategies
_ Concurring Requirements
Establish controls locally which define concurring standards based on system
needs and funding resources.
The process for setting goals must be an ongoing element throughout the development of
the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan. It must initially incorporate the
individually generated goals for the agencies included within the Metropolitan area.
These must be reviewed and modified as the project proceeds to mitigate conflicts.
METRO 8
A - Elements
85 — 4/15/91
Subtask 3.1 Goal Setting
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
Park and recreation goals technical :memorandum to be incorporated as part of the LAND
USE ELEMENT, Subtask Policy Planning.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Coordinates with Policy Planning.
a) Consultant encourages the City to conduct workshops, once the planning goals have
been developed, to prepare the specific objectives, and very specific decision -:making
policies.
b) Consultant team services would include assisting the City in converting planning
goals to specific objectives and very specific decision -staking policies.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
86 — 4/15/91
METRO} ..LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ . E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ANALYSIS OF PARK AND RECREATION
SUBTASK: 2.2 Recreational Needs
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Local recreational needs will be assessed. Included in this assessment will be a sample
telephone survey of families within the planning area and an intercept survey of both
administrative personnel, instructors, current users, and citizens within neighborhoods
unlikely to be included within the telephone survey or found in local parks. The survey
will be formatted to help determine the importance, role and image that parks and
recreation has within the community.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying survey results of administrative personnel,
.nstructors, current users, and citizens. Current issues, needs and goals will be identified.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) Existing survey information developed by the City and other local agencies will be
reviewed and analyzed.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
83-4/19^91
METRO: LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ANALYSIS OF PARK AND RECREATION
SUBTASK: 2.3 Open Space, Park, and Recreation Needs
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Existing open space, park, and recreation needs will be defined. Discussions with the staff
will be held to determine appropriate ways to satisfy the defined needs. An annual report
to the state agency will be produced in cooperation with the Parks Manager. Short-term
capital and operations problems will be addressed within the context of the long-term
planning process.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing defined needs. Annual report assistance to state
agency. Short-term capital and operational improvements will be identified.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City to prepare annual report to the State agency.
b) Consultant team to prepare open space, park, and recreation needs, and short-term
capital and operational improvements.
REVISED BUDGET $4,300.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
84 — 4/19/91
i•
METRO: LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.3 Legislation
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
State, Local and Federal programs, ordinances, and regulations will be reviewed and
summarized affecting Parks, Recreation and Open Space.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum discussing State, Local and Federal programs, ordinances and
regulations affecting Parks, Recreation and Open Space.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) State, Local and Federal programs, ordinances, and regulations as they affect parks,
recreation and open space will be reviewed by City and summarized.
b) Consultant team services would include added materials for State and Federal
programs for which the City may not be aware.
c) Summaries to be delivered to Consultant team within 60 days after Consultant notice
to proceed ("start date").
METRO 8
A - Elements
81 — 4/19/91
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO) _,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: ANALYSIS OF PARK AND RECREATION
SUBTASK: 2.1 Parks and Recreation
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
Existing Park and Recreation facilities will be analyzed. Existing land and facilities will be
compared in quantity and condition with accepted national and state standards. Both
public and private facilities will be considered.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing quantity and condition of existing lands, programs
and facilities (public and private) compared with national and state standards as well as
area identified needs.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,250.10
METRO 8
A . Elements
82 — 4/15/91
METROI i.ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ E PLAN
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
TASK D: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.1 Field Inventory (Parks and Recreation)
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A field inventory of existing parks and park facilities, and recreation facilities will be
conducted (both public and private). Included in this inventory will be the following
information: park size, location, classification, general character, unique features, standard
of maintenance and condition of facilities and equipment.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum incorporating all information described above. Overlay map of
location of existing parks and park facilities, and recreation facilities.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) Field inventories of parks and park facilities, and recreation and recreation facilities,
for the Metropolitan area will be prepared by City for both public and private
agencies. Included in the inventory are facility size, location, classification, general
character, unique features, standard of maintenance and/or condition of facilities and
equipment.
b) Consultant team services would include site inspections with City staff and (to extent
possible) participate in inventories.
c) To be delivered to Consultant team within 30 days of "start date". See MAPPING
ELEMENT for schedule of maps.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A • Elements
79 — 4/19/91
TASK D:
SUBTASK: 1.2 Field Inventory (Public Lands)
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS, . E PLAN
PARKS AND (RECREATION ELEMENT
REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUiMMARIZE DATABASE
WORK ITEM:
An inventory of existing public lands. Included in this inventory will be the following
information: land area, location, usage, general character and unique features.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum incorporating all information described above.
public lands.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Overlay map of
a) Inventory of public lands will be prepared by City for Metropolitan
land area, location, usage, general character, and unique features.
b) Consultant team services would include site inspections with City
possible) participate in inventory.
c) To be delivered to Consultant team within 30 days of "start date".
ELEMENT for schedule of maps.
METRO 8
A - Elements
80 — 4/19/91
area to include
staff (to extent
See MAPPING
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
Subtask 8.1 Community I: )lvement
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
This task will be combined with other comprehensive plan elements as part of an ongoing
process.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Informational activities include fact sheets, newsletters and similar handouts; news
releases to local newspapers and radio stations; mailings to community and business
groups; and presentations to local organizations.
Community consultant activities include meetings with the Advisory Committee and/or
Visioning Committee; workshops with interested citizens on specific transit issues; open
house; and presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
a) Consultant team will conduct informational activities.
b) City will conduct community consultation activities with support from Consultant
team (to the extent possible).
TOTAL BUDGET $10,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
77 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 9.1 Final Plan
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A final report will describe the data inventory process, transit demand analysis,
improvement recommendations and development plans for the public transportation
development program as developed from the technical memorandums prepared under
each subtask. All comments received during the review period will be compiled. All
comments will either be incorporated into the final document or be addressed in writing.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Transit Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $8,,72:1.03
METRO 8
A - Elements
78-4/1991
METRO.' LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: IMPLEMENTATION
SUBTASK: 7.3 Twenty Year Plan
TASK LEADER Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A long-range transit program will be described. Less specific than either the six or ten year
plan, this implementation schedule will serve as a guide to long-range transportation
improvements.
PRODUCTS:
A technical memorandum identifying actions and improvements for the public
transportation system for a Twenty year period. Recommendations will focus on transit
operations and service, administration and financial requirements, and physical
;mprovements.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City will prepare a twenty-year plan/program along similar lines as the six-year plan.
Identifies actions and improvements and focuses on operations and service,
administration and financial requirements, and physical improvements.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in development of twenty-year
plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
75 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1. E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT & INFORMATION
SUBTASK: 8.1 Community Involvement & Information
TASK LEADER: Steve Lewis
WORK ITEM:
A comprehensive information program will be developed[ and implemented to involve
the community, informing them, and facilitating their input, so it can be used effectively
in designing the transit plan.
Informational activities: Community involvement briefings with project staff to inform
the public about the transit planning process and their role on it. This may be done
through:
Fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts.
_ News releases to local newspapers, radio, and television stations.
Feature articles in the local newspaper.
Mailings to community, business groups, and interested citizens, including
material to be printed in their own newsletter.
Staff and consultant presentations to local organizations.
Community consultation: The second part of the community involvement is
consultation, getting public ideas and opinions about the transportation plan. Many of
these activities will be concurrent with those above. The proposed activities may include:
_ Working with the Advisory Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
_ Workshops involving the most interested citizens in problem -solving sessions
on specific park and recreation issues.
Open houses where people can drop in to see graphics and discuss possibilities
one-on-one with staff and consultants.
_ Comment forms distributed at all meetings.
_ Presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
METRO 8
A - Elements
76--4/19'91
METROL,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 iE PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: IMPLEMENTATION
SUBTASK: 7.1 Six -Year Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Implementation of the transit element will be coordinated with the other comprehensive
plan elements. A detailed six-year capital improvement plan will be developed. Long
range elements will also be described. The implementation options will directly relate to
the assessment of financial capacity. Recommendations on transit government structure
can be identified in this subtask.
PRODUCTS:
A technical memorandum identifying an annual program of actions and improvements
for the public transportation system for a six-year period. The recommendations will focus
on the transit operations and service, administration and financial requirements, and
physical improvements such as equipment and facility needs. Alternate government
:ontrol can be described. Joint agreements can be identified.
TOTAL BUDGET $16,272.91
METRO 8
A - Elements
73 -- 4/19'91
METROI-,>LITAN YA.KIMA COMPREHENS E PLAN
TRANSIT ELEMENT
TASK C: IMPLEMENTATION
SUBTASK: 7.2 Ten -Year Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A ten-year implementation plan will be prepared for the public transportation system
which focuses on similar elements as described in the six-year plan.
PRODUCTS:
A technical memorandum identifying actions and improvements for the public
transportation system for a ten-year period. Recommendations will focus on transit
operations and service, administration and financial requirements, and physical
improvements.
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) City will prepare ten year plan/program along similar lines as the six-year plan.
Identifies actions and improvements and focuses on operations and services,
administration and financial requirements, and physical improvements.
b) Consultant team services would include assistance in development of ten-year plan
(to extent possible).
TOTAL BUDGET $3,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
74 — 4/19/91
METROI ..ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.1 Field Check of Existing Facilities
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A field examination to check general land uses will be used in conjunction with aerial
photography and topographical mapping to establish basin characteristics and boundaries.
The field examination will also investigate existing drainage facilities to generally check
for consistency with drainage facility maps and "as-builts".
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum establishing basin characteristics and boundaries, with
identification of field conditions which appear to be in conflict with existing facility maps.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Detailed survey of channel cross sections, pipe inverts, control structures, and overflow
elevations will be provided by the local agencies.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,441.84
METRO 8
A - Elements
99 -- 4/19^91
METRO: , LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE T PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.2 Sampling and Flow Monitoring
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Assistance will be ;provided to the City in identifying locations for obtaining flow
monitoring and water quality data. The data obtained will be used for model input and/or
calibration. All flow monitoring and water quality data will be summarized in a tabular
format suitable for computer model input and calibration.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing flow monitoring and water quality data.
Information obtained will be used in calibration of the computer model.
ASSUMPTIONS:
The City of Yakima will perform all monitoring and sampling tasks.
City of Yakima will perform:
a) Consultant team services include coordination of flow monitoring and sampling.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,060.27
METRO 8
A - Elements
100 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.3 Computer Model Selection
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A comparative evaluation matrix for model options covering hydrograph development,
facility modeling, and water quality modeling will be prepared. The matrix will be used to
select a computer model for each of these tasks.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying current software available with a comparative
evaluation matrix for Hydraulic Model selection.
kSSUMPTIONS:
It is anticipated that no more than two models will be selected to cover the three tasks.
Cost estimate includes $7,000 for computer hardware. Software would be an additional
cost item to expenses shown.
TOTAL BUDGET $15,354.39
METRO 8
A - Elements
101 -- 4/19/91
METROPoLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.4 Water Quantity Model Development
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A computerized model of the existing and proposed drainage facilities will be prepared.
Hydrographs from 4 selected design storms will be generated from the identified subbasins
for the existing land use as determined from the aerial photography. The same 4 design
storms will be used to generate hydrographs for the consensus land use scenario, as
identified under the LAND USE ELEMENT. Basin areas will be determined from the
aerial photography and topographical. maps. Time of concentration and travel time
calculations will be based on topographical and system facility maps Time of concentration
and travel time calculations will be done for both existing conditions and for the proposed
improvements. Conveyance system and detention facility information will be taken from
facility maps and "as -built" information.
The hydraulic model will be calibrated using historical data, rainfall data from rain gages
in basin areas, and flow monitoring data. All data will be collected by local agencies.
Starting tailwater elevations at discharge locations will be obtained from the flood
Insurance Study and other existing data.
The hydraulic model will model both the existing facilities and proposed improvements to
the existing facilities. No pipes smaller than 15 inch diameter, or the equivalent capacity
channel or ditch, will be modeled. Subbasins will be combined until enough area is
compiled to generate flows to warrant a 15 inch diameter pipe.
PRODUCT'S:
Technical memorandum describing the hydraulic model including a summary of
calibration criteria, design storms, hydrographs, basin characteristics, and other system
parameters.
TOTAL BUDGET $66,615.76
METRO 9
A - Elements
102 — 4/19/91
METROP.,LTTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSr . E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.5 Water Quality Model Development
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A computerized mass balance model of the existing base line water quality and the impacts
of proposed drainage facilities and land uses will be prepared. Runoff data from two of the
selected design storms generated for the hydraulic model will be used.
The water quality model will be adjusted using historic and ongoing monitoring data as
well as loading parameters from similar sites found in literature reviews.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing the mass balance quality model including a summary
of adjusted criteria, water quality background information, and other system parameters.
TOTAL BUDGET $37,759.83
METRO 8
A - Elements
103 — 4/19/91
METROI ,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ , E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.6 Water Quantity Model Summary
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A technical memorandum describing the performance of the existing system and the
proposed improvements for the modeled design storms. The report will identify system
inadequacies and the probable causes for each of the design storms modeled.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum on performance of existing system relating to Storm Water
quantity impacts. The memorandum will identify existing system inadequacies and
probable causes for each. The final technical memorandum from this subtask will become
a chapter in the Drainage Management Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,086.54
METRO 8
A - Elements
104 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUBTASK: 2.7 Water Quality Model Summary
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A technical memorandum describing the performance of the existing system and the
proposed improvements for the modeled design storms will be prepared. The report will
identify water quality deficiencies and the probable sources.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum on performance of existing system relating to Storm Water
quality impacts. The memorandum will identify existing system inadequacies and
lrobable causes for each. The final technical memorandum for this subtask will become a
chapter in the Drainage Management Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $5,086.54
METRO 8
A - Elements
105-4(15191
METROP.,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS... E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 3.1 Impacts
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Existing ordinances will be examined and input to develop various alternatives for
drainage policy will be solicited from the participating agencies. Impacts of proposed
NPDES permitting and WDOE requirements on existing and proposed regulations will be
evaluated. Typical ordinance requirements such as criteria for runoff quantity and quality,
zoning regulation around flood plain areas, permitting and inspection procedures, design
standards and specifications, maintenance practices, and maintenance responsibility will be
investigated.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying impacts of proposed NPDES permitting and WDOE
requirements; evaluation of existing ordinances including conflicts between participating
agencies. Revisions to existing ordinances will be proposed. The final products of this
subtask will become a part of the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual and a part of the
Drainage Management Plan.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct 1 -day workshop with participating agencies.
TOTAL BUDGET $10,872.36
METRO 8
A - Elements
106 — 4/16191
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 v E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 3.2 Goal Setting
TASK LEADER John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
The analysis of existing and future drainage conditions must incorporate compatibility
guidelines developed as part of the goals of the DRAINAGE ELEMENT and the related
Elements of the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan.
A critical issue to be incorporated into this planning process is the Washington State
Growth Management legislation. The intent of this legislation is the development and
improvement of interconnected and coordinated drainage systems serving numerous
jurisdictions. Coordination between local comprehensive plans is required in order to
achieve local and statewide goals. Key tasks necessary to satisfy this legislation are:
Develop consensus for land use assumptions.
Prepare complete inventory of existing drainage system.
Compared by level of service standards.
Recommended section to improve substandard facilities.
Adopt forecasts based on approved Land Use.
- Identify system expansion requirements.
Analyze funding capability and resources.
Develop multi-year financing plan needed to implement system
improvements.
- Evaluate funding limitation with Land Use to address funding shortfall.
Intergovernmental Coordination.
_ Develop Management Strategies
Concurring Requirements
Establish controls locally which define concurring standards based on system
needs and funding resources.
The process for setting goals must be an ongoing element throughout the development of
the Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan. It must initially incorporate the
individually generated goals for the agencies included within the Metropolitan area.
These must be reviewed and modified as the project proceeds to mitigate conflicts.
PRODUCTS:
Drainage goals technical memorandum to be incorporated as part of the LAND USE
2,LEMENT, Subtask Policy Planning.
METRO 8
A - Elements
107 — 4/19/91
Subtask 3.2 Goal Setting
Page 2
ASSUMPTIONS:
a) Consultant encourages the City to conduct workshops, once the planning goals have
been developed, to prepare the specific objectives, and very specific decision-making
policies.
b) Consultant tearn services would include assisting the City in converting planning
goals to specific objectives and very specific decision-making policies.
TOTAL BUDGET' $5,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
ICS -4/19/91
METROPt LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSi v E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.1 System Alternatives
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Based upon the findings, goals, and objectives, we will identify workable and feasible
alternatives to resolve existing problems. A short-term drainage improvement plan
would be based on immediate problems. These improvements would be generally lower
in cost and project development effort. It will be a short-term project phase compatible
with the long range DRAINAGE ELEMENT.
Two days of field investigations will be conducted to identify potential sites for drainage
facility locations.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum listing identified alternative solutions to existing problems
including analysis, alternate evaluation, and priority ranking of the recommended
improvement projects.
TOTAL BUDGET $21,122.90
METRO 8
A - Elements
109 -- 4119/91
METRO} _ TITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. c PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.2 Facility Alternatives
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Based on previous task and subtask evaluations, each :identified Alternative will be
analyzed for feasibility. The facility size requirements and capital cost for each alternative
will be estimated. Each alternative will be evaluated with respect to the following items:
Capacity
_ Operation
Safety
_ System Integration
_ Cost/Benefit
Business and Community Impacts
_ Conformance with Other Plans
Visual and Aesthetic I:mp,acts,
PRODUCTS:
A technical memorandum describing alternatives with site diagrams for each alternative
on an 8.5 x 11 format to schematic level of detail. Capital cost estimate for each alternative
will be identified.
ASSUMPTION:
Budget assumes up to 50 alternatives to be analyzed.
TOTAL BUDGET $32,780.29
METRO a
A - Elements
110 — 4/15/91
METROP....�ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSA .: PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.3 Water Quality Analysis
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Each identified alternative will be analyzed for system water quality impacts and
recommended modifications to improve water quality.
General pollution sources and recommended measures to reduce the discharge of the
pollutants into the storm drainage system will be identified. Recommendations will
include: education, regulation, interception, and treatment.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum of recommended modifications to identified alternatives to
mprove system water quality including measures to reduce pollutant discharge into the
storm drainage system.
TOTAL BUDGET $16,695.63
METRO 8
A - Elements
111 — 4/19/91
METROPuLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 w E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: ALTERNATIVES
SUBTASK: 4.4 Alternative Evaluation
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
The proposed alternatives will be comparatively evaluated for system wide performance,
capital cost, sitting availability, maintenance and timeliness. Solutions for each problem
or problem area will be recommended. The recommended improvements for timeliness
and system wide benefits will be prioritized.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing the alternative evaluation and improvement
selection process. List of recommended improvements ranked by the identified priority.
TOTAL BUDGET $11,902.12
METRO 8
A - Elements
112 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: OPERATIONS EVALUATION
SUBTASK: 5.1 Operations
TASK LEADER John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
A general program for system wide operations and maintenance will be prepared. The
program will include guidelines for types of activities to be performed and frequency of
performance.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum recommending a system wide operations and maintenance
program. The final technical memorandum from this subtask will become a chapter in the
Drainage Management Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $13,556.43
METRO 8
A - Elements
113 — 4/15/91
METROP"LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS,.. E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 6.1 Capital Improvement Plan
TASK LEADER Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) based on the prioritized recommended improvements
will be prepared. The plan will be organized into 4 categories: 1)immediate action (first
year), 2) six year plan, 3) long term needs (thirty-five year plan), and 4) on going operations
and maintenance items
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing a capital improvement plan for recommended
improvements separated into the four categories described above. The final technical
memorandum for this subtask will become a chapter in the Drainage Management Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $7,479.27
METRO 8
A - Elements
114 — 4/19/91
METROI ..ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. c PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: FINANCING
SUBTASK: 6.2 Financial Plan
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Funding and financing mechanisms that relate to drainage issues will be summarized.
The summary will include user charges and development fees to support the proposed
Capital Improvement Plan and Operations and Maintenance requirements. Local, private,
state and federal funding will be incorporated into the analysis.
PRODUCTS:
The financial plan technical memorandum will incorporate an evaluation of funding
sources, a suggested funding program for improvement projects, and a cash flow analysis.
Suggested drainage impact assessments and mitigation system ordinances will be prepared.
The final technical memorandum from this subtask will become a chapter in the Drainage
Management Plan.
TOTAL BUDGET $26,466.45
METRO 8
A - Elements
115 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.1 Storm Water Runoff Quantity and Quality Control
TASK LEADER John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Identify procedures for estimating runoff volumes and peak flows using the Modified
Rational Method and SCS Hyd:rogr. aph Method. Develop Criteria for selecting design
storms, computation methods, and expected facility performance.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying procedures for estimating runoff volume and peak
flows together with the criteria for selecting design storms, computation methods, and
expected facility performance. The final technical memorandum for the subtask will
become a chapter in the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual on Hydrology.
TOTAL BUDGET $13,457.20
METRO 6
A • Elements
116-4/15('31
METROF.,...ITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSJL . E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.2 Design Criteria
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Identify methods for calculating storage requirements and release rates based on the
methods selected for hydrograph generation.
Identify methods for calculating the performance of flow control structures including
weirs and orifices.
Identify methods for calculating the capacity and performance for open channels, ditches
and other facilities utilizing open channel flow.
Identify methods for calculating the capacity and performance of culverts and piped
conveyance systems.
Identify methods to calculate the capacity and performance of street drainage facilities such
as: gutters, small ditches, and inlets.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum presenting and identifying recommended methods to address
the above areas. The final technical memorandum for this subtask will become a chapter
in the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual on Detention/Retention Facilities and also a
chapter in the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual on Conveyance Systems.
TOTAL BUDGET $15,849.36
METRO 8
A - Elements
117-4/16/91
METRO ,JLTTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS.. E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.3 Design Standards and Specifications
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Prepare design standards and general specifications for detention facilities (ponds, tanks,
vaults, and control structures), ditches, culverts, piped storm drains, gutters, inlet facilities,
and other miscellaneous drainage structures. The standards and specifications will be
developed from the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications and the WDOE Stormwater
Management Manualcurrently being planned.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying design standards, and general specifications for the
detention facilities, ditches, culverts, piped storm drains, gutters, inlet facilities, and other
miscellaneous drainage structures. The final technical memorandum from this subtask
will become a chapter in the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual.
TOTAL BUDGET $11,593.54
METRO 8
A - Elements
118 — 4/19/91
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.4 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Practices
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Identify Best Management Practices for: site stabilization, slope protection, drainage way
protection, and sediment retention. Prepare design standards and criteria for the design of
erosion and sediment control facilities.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying design standards and criteria for erosion and
sediment control facilities. The final technical memorandum for this subtask will become
a chapter in the Drainage Criteria and Design Manual.
TOTAL BUDGET $14,147.14
METRO 8
A - Elements
119 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.5 Water Quality Parameters and Practices
TASK LEADER John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
Identify Best Management Practices for maintaining and improving water quality. Identify
parameters to be used when analyzing water quality. Prepare design standards and criteria
for the design of water quality enhancing facilities.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum outlining BMP for maintaining and improving water quality,
identifying parameters to be used when analyzing water quality, and recommending
design standards and criteria for water quality enhancing facilities. The final technical
memorandum for this subtask will become a chapter in the Drainage Criteria and Design
Manual.
REVISED BUDGET $14,247.14
METRO 8
A - Elements
120-4/15/81
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI v E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.6 Draft Drainage Criteria and Design Manual
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
The products from will be compiled into a Draft Drainage Criteria and Design Manual. An
introductory chapter identifying drainage policies and regulations will be included. The
Draft Manual will be for review by agencies and individuals.
A workshop to introduce the draft Drainage Criteria and Design Manual to reviewing staff,
and designated developers, consulting engineers, planners, etc... selected will be conducted.
Selections of workshop participants should be representative of individuals who will use
the manual after it is implemented.
PRODUCTS:
Thirty copies of the draft Drainage Criteria and Design Manual. Workshop materials and
handouts of key Manual items.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct 1 day workshop.
TOTAL BUDGET $12,504.40
METRO 8
A - Elements
121 — 4/19/91
METRO: LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENE E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.7 Institutional Issues
TASK LEADER: Dick Warren
WORK ITEM:
Strategies to enhance public awareness of drainage issues will be developed. The strategies
will include an outline for an educational program on water quality.
The existing government structure within the Metropolitan area with regards to drainage
issues will be reviewed. The review will include department organization and routine
channels of communication for operation and maintenance. The review will also include
procedures to respond to drainage related problems reported by citizens for both emergency
and non -emergency situations. Recomrnendations on drainage government structure can
be identified in this subtask.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum outlining a department organization, channels for
communication for operation and maintenance, and response procedures. The final
technical memorandum for this subtask will become a chapter in the Drainage
Management Plan. Alternate government control can be described. Joint agreements can
be identified.
TOTAL BUDGET $14,120.74
METRO 8
A - Elements
122 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.8 Draft Drainage Management Plan
TASK LEADER John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
The products from Tasks E2, E3, E4, E5, E6 and E7 will be compiled into a draft document
for review by the designated agencies.
A workshop to introduce the Draft Management Plan to the reviewing staff and designated
individuals will be conducted. Selections of workshop participants should be
representative of individuals who will use the plan after it is implemented as well as key
individuals from the Advisory Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
PRODUCTS:
Thirty copies of the Draft Drainage Management Plan. Workshop materials and handouts
- )f key plan items.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct 1 day workshop.
TOTAL BUDGET $12,598.78
INTRO 8
A - Elements
123 — 4/15/91
METROS JLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS._ IE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
SUBTASK: 7.9 Staff Hydraulic Model Training
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
The hydraulic computer models will be loaded onto the City of Yakima computer and a
two day training program will be provided on the use of the hydraulic models used for this
project. One session will be for the facility modeling and one session will be for the water
quality modeling. The training program will be geared to individuals who have prior
experience and are knowledgeable in the use of IBM compatible computers.
PRODUCTS:
Training program for use of computer models with course handouts. Computer :models
developed for this project.
TOTAL BUDGET $6,029.56
METR0 8
A - Elements
124 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI v E PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 8.1 Community Involvement & Information
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Informational activities: Community involvement briefings with project staff to inform
the public about the process and their role on it. This may be done through:
_ Fact sheets, newsletters, and similar handouts.
_ News releases to local newspapers, radio, and television stations.
Feature articles in the local newspaper.
Mailings to community, business groups, and interested citizens, including
material to be printed in their own newsletter.
Staff and consultant presentations to local organizations, with slides as
appropriate.
Community consultation: The second part of the community involvement is
consultation, getting public ideas and opinions about the transportation plan. Many of
these activities will be concurrent with those above. The proposed activities may include:
_ Working with the Advisory Committee and/or Visioning Committee.
Workshops involving the most interested citizens in problem -solving sessions
on specific park and recreation issues.
_ Open houses where people can drop in to see graphics and discuss possibilities
one-on-one with staff and consultants.
Comment forms distributed at all meetings.
_ Presentations to City Council and/or County Commissioners.
METRO 8
A - Elements
125 -- 41121^91
Subtask 8.1 Community 1. 'olvement
Page 2
PRODUCTS:
This task will be combined with other comprehensive plan elements as part of an ongoing
process.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Informational activities include fact sheets, newsletters and similar handouts; news
releases to local newspapers and radio stations; mailings to community and business
groups; and presentations to local organizations.
Community consultant activities include meetings with the Advisory Committee and/or
Visioning Committee; workshop with interested citizens on specific drainage issues; open
houses; and presentations to City Coundl and/or County Commissioners.
a) Consultant team will conduct informational activities.
b) City will conduct community consultation activities with support from Consultant
team.
TOTAL BUDGET $25,000.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
126 — 4/19^91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 9.1 Final Drainage Criteria and Design Manual
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
All comments received, regarding the Draft Drainage Criteria and Design Manual, during
the review period will be compiled. All comments will either be incorporated into the
final document or be addressed in writing.
Two - four hour workshops will be conducted for all potential users of the manual. The
first workshop will be for staff and the second workshop will be open to all interested
parties. The workshop will include an overview of the manual and an example of its use
on a typical development.
PRODUCTS:
' T'echnical memorandum responding to unincorporated comments. Camera ready copy of
the final Drainage Criteria and Design Manual.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Two 4 hour workshops.
TOTAL BUDGET $21,826.90
METRO 8
A - Elements
127 — 4/15191
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
TASK E: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 9.2 Final Drainage Management Plan
TASK LEADER: John Genskow
WORK ITEM:
All comments received, regarding the Draft Drainage Management Plan, during the
review period will be compiled. All comments will either be incorporated into the final
document or be addressed in writing.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum response memo responding to unincorporated comments.
Camera ready copy of the final Drainage Management Plan.
REVISED BUDGET $21,616.83
METRO 8
A . Elements
128-4/19^91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT
TASK F: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
SUBTASK: 1.1 Environmental Background
TASK LEADER: Debby Howe
WORK ITEM:
A background environmental analysis will be prepared for the entire study area which
incorporates information developed in all elements. Existing conditions will generally be
established by research of existing reports, plans, and records, and through conversations
with staff and other local resources. Included in the background analysis are the following:
_ Earth/soils: Soils types and characteristics, sensitive areas (landslide hazard, highly
erodible soils, seismic risk) and contaminated soils.
Air resources: Area climatic characteristics especially air circulation and wind
patterns.
Biological resources: Habitat types with special emphasis given to sensitive habitats
(e.g., salmon rearing and migration, wetlands, etc.); endangered or threatened plant
or animal species (Federal and State criteria); and commercial and sport fishing
grounds.
Water resources: Describe all affected water bodies. Discuss groundwater conditions.
Land use and shoreline: List and describe all applicable land use laws, plans, and
policies (local, state, and Federal); and identify requirements for private property
acquisition.
Recreation: Describe private, public, formal, and informal recreational opportunities.
Transportation: Describe water, vehicular (land), rail, and pedestrian transportation
system.
Noise: Provide general discussion of noise, including pertinent criteria (EPA, local
ordinance) and definitions of descriptors used.
_ Historical/archaeological: Identify known historic and buried cultural resources.
Using available information, identify potential historical and archaeological
resources. (This element is required for compliance with Section 106 of the National
Preservation Act.)
Aesthetics: Identify and characterize view areas.
METRO 8
A - Elements
129 — 4/19,91
Subtask 1.1 Environmental Background
Page 2
WORK ITEM: (CONTINUED)
Energy consumption: Describe sources of energy and identify current capacity Levels
of service.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum containing background information on environmental
conditions within the Metropolitan area for SEPA, EIS, and NEPA environmental
assessments as they exist under current conditions.
ASSUMPTIONS:
All reports (2 copies each) will be provided at no cost.
Consultant team/City of Yakima will perform:
a) The Visioning process includes committees to address specific community issues. As
part of their responsibility, each committee will be summarizing background
materials for the Metropolitan area which impacts environmental conditions as set
forth in Subtask F1.1. Summaries would be prepared by City for this information as
may be applicable to each of the ELEMENTS.
b) Urban area requires a minimum budget of $17,200 which includes Yakima, Union
Gap, Terrace Heights, and the current unincorporated area within the existing Urban
area boundary.
c) To extend the environmental background analysis to the Metropolitan area requires
an increase of total budget to $21,,300 which includes Selah, Moxee, Tieton, Naches,
Wenas, and unincorporated (County) area within the proposed Metropolitan area
boundary.
TOTAL BUDGET $17,200.40
METRO 8
A - Elements
130 — 4/18^91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT
TASK F: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
SUBTASK: 1.2 Environmental Evaluation
TASK LEADER: Debby Howe
WORK ITEM:
Evaluation of the general impacts to background environmental conditions will be
prepared for each element (LAND USE TRANSPORTATION, TRANSIT, PARK and
RECREATION, and DRAINAGE). Project specific impacts are beyond the scope of this
project. The general impact evaluation can be used in completing a SEPA review of the
planning level documents.
PRODUCTS:
live technical memorandums describing general impacts to background environmental
conditions identified in Subtask F1.1.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide services in the implementation phase of the Metropolitan
Phase. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a later
date.
REVISED BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
131 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT
TASK F: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
SUBTASK: 1.3 Agency Assistance
TASK LEADER Debby Howe
WORK ITEM:
Technical assistance will be provided to individual agencies during the development of
the project to identify site specific environmental impacts for the implementation of short-
term improvements which may be initiated. Technical assistance may include completion
of environmental forms, attendance at public hearings, and other services.
PRODUCTS:
Products will be specifically identified during the development of the project by
supplemental written. descriptions.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team to provide services in the implementation phase of the Metropolitan
Plan. The scope of work and costs for the Consultant team will be negotiated at a later date.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METR0 8
A - Elements
132 — 4/15/91
METROK,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSi . E PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: MAPPING
SUBTASK: 1.1 Review Existing System
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Meetings with participating agencies to identify current database and software system being
utilized. Focus of this subtask will be to identify the technical level of completion and
organization of current graphic and tabular data within the Metropolitan area.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying current database and software systems available. A
recommendation on "planning level" mapping will be included. The technical
memorandum will identify all mapping requirements and sequence of activities to be used
Dy the consulting team.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Consultant team will coordinate and discuss all mapping requirements and sequence of
activities to be used by the Consultant team with the City. A technical memorandum will
be prepared for distribution to the City and Consultant team. Consultant team services are
limited to 48 hours ($4,340).
TOTAL BUDGET $4,340.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
133 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI JE PLAN
MAP]PING ELEMENT
TASK G: MAPPING
SUBTASK: 1.2 Mapping
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson, Consultant
City of Ya.ldrma. Management Team
WORK ITEM:
Computer generated (GDMS) "planning level" graphic overlays for each of the
environmental categories listed below will be prepared on the City's base map.
Information for the categories below will be collected from the most current existing maps,
surveys and inventories.
Subsidence areas. Areas to be :included in this category will be fault zones exhibiting
movement within the last one hundred (100) years, unstable slope areas, actively
eroding areas, organic soil areas, artificial fill areas not designed for structural loads.
Contaminated water areas. Areas to be mapped will include those areas of ground
and surface water that have been identified by government agencies to be
contaminated and not potable.
Natural and cultural "high risk" areas. Areas to be included in this category will be
airport clear zones, oil, chemical and explosives storage areas, and other areas where
the risk of natural and human -induced fire is high.
Slope problem areas. Steep areas will be mapped in three (3) categories: 12-20%, 20-
60% and greater than 60% slopes. Areas will be mapped using the most detailed
contour information available.
_ Soil problem areas. Areas included will be rocky areas with depth to bedrock less
than 6 feet, shallow soils with depth to bedrock less than 12 inches, high shrink -swell
soils, impermeable soils, and coarse granular soils.
_ Potential water problem areas. Areas to be mapped include areas with high water
table, water recharge areas, areas within 1,000' of a major domestic surface -water
supply, areas within 500' of a major river or lake, areas within 250' of any stream,
channel, or water body.
Resource areas. Areas to be mapped include the following categories of tillable
agricultural lands: prime farm lands, general to limited farm lands, commercial
farms and local orchards, and pasture lands. Also included as resource areas will be
valuable rock or mineral areas, unique biological areas, unique cultural areas, and
existing and potential recreation areas.
METRO 8
A - Elements
134 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 2
Linkage and circulatory systems. Areas to be mapped included the following
infrastructure categories: waterways, highways and roads and rights-of-way, utility
corridors and rights-of-way, and railroad corridors and rights-of-way.
The following specific figures have been identified in the Metropolitan Plan and will be
developed at the "planning level":
LAND USE ELEMENT
A1.1
Reports, Plans, and Records
_ Study Area Map
_ Existing Land Use
_ Census Area Map - Population
_ Census Area Map - Building permit
Census Area Map - Dwelling Units
Census Area Map - Persons/Household
_ Housing inventory
Developable Land Inventory
A1.2 Area Wide Interviews
_ Natural boundaries
_ Political boundaries
_ Cultural boundaries
_ Planning boundaries
A1.4 Wetland Survey
Soil survey. Include SCS hydrologic groups type A, B, C, and D.
_ River/Open water bodies
_ Riparian corridors
_ Flood prone areas
Wetland areas
A1.5 Resource Lands and Critical Area Mapping
_ Soil problem areas
Slope problem areas
High risk areas
- Airport clear zone
- Oil storage
- Chemical storage
- Explosive storage
Other natural features
Forestry/Woodlands (Includes orchard lands)
Geology/Subsidence areas
_ Mineral resources
Aquifer recharge areas/Contaminated areas
METRO 8
A - Elements
135 -- 4/19/91
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 3
High groundwater areas
Agricultural lands
_ Unique biological areas
_ Resource lands
Critical areas
A1.6 Neighborhood Conservation
Neighborhood boundaries/associations
A1.7 Business, Industry, Commerce and Trade, Central Business District, Tourism,
and Convention Facilities
_ Location of tourism facilities and convention facilities
_ Business District boundaries
_ Industrial District boundaries
Location of Commerce and Trade facilities
A1.8 Police, Fire, Emergency Services, and Public Safety
Boundary of jurisdictions
Location of facilities
A1.9 Schools
_ Localschool district boundaries
(Includes Grade School service boundaries)
A1.10
Utilities (Boundaries)
_ Water utilities
_ Sewer utilities
_ Irrigation utilities
_ Electrical service
_ Natural gas service
Telephone service
TV cable service
A3.2 Urbanization Study
Urban area boundaries (2010)
A4.1 Yakima Urban Area Growth Scenarios
GMA growth scenario
A4.2 Other Growth Scenarios (OPTIONAL)
_ GMA growth scenario
(PER JURISDICTION)
A4.3 Neighborhood Plans (OPTIONAL)
_ Individual neighborhood plans
(PER NEIGHBORHOOD)
METRO 8
A - Elements
136 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 4
A7.1 Community Involvement
_ Various presentation materials
A8.1 Land Use Plan
_ Land Use Plan Map
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
B1.4 Traffic Characteristics
Traffic volume map
_ Traffic route map
_ Transportation facility inventory
(Existing signals and signs)
_ Railroad tracks map
B1.5 Accident Data
_ Accident occurrence map
B1.6 Non -motorized Transportation Modes
_ Bicycle routes
Pedestrian routes
B2.3 Functional Classification
Functional Classification Map
B5.2 Arterial Street System Plan
Arterial street map
B5.3 Traffic Signal System Plan
Traffic signal plan
B5.4 Pedestrian Plan
_ Pedestrian walkway plan
B5.5 Bicycle Plan
Bicycle plan
B10.1 Short Range Transportation Plan
Recommendations plan
B10.2 Long Range Transportation Plan
_ Recommendation plan
METRO 8
A • Elements
137 — 4/19/91
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 5
TRANSIT ELEMENT
(Mapping of street system included in TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT)
_ Transit route map
_ Transit facility inventory
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
D1.2 Field Inventory (Parks and Recreation)
Park lands
Recreation facility location
D1.3 Field Inventory (Public Lands)
Public lands
D1.6 Historical, Cultural, Recreational and Tourism
_ Historical areas
Cultural areas
D2.1 Potential Land Areas
Available land area;;
D4.2 Concept Plans for Park and Open Spaces
Concept Plan alternate 1
D9.1 Park and :Recreation Plan
Final drawings
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
E1.1
Reports, Plans, and Records
Drainage basin/sub-basin boundaries
_ Existing drainage facilities
E4.1 System Alternatives
Short-term drainage improvements
Long-term drainage improvements
E9.2 Final Drainage Management Plan
Final drawings
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT
(Mapping incorporated in other ELEMENTS)
METRO 8
A - Elements
138 -- 4/15/91
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 6
PRODUCTS:
Those overlays as identified above will be available to add to the City's GDMS (ArcInfo)
system in AutoCAD format (digitized at available scale).
ASSUMPTIONS:
Planning level mapping estimate.
MAE QTY CONSULTANT
FTA GIS DATE FTA DATE
LAND USE ELEMENT
Reports, Plans, and Records (Metro unless otherwise indicated)
Study Area Map X 3/31
Existing Land Use X 3/31
Census Area Map - Population X 4/30
Census Area Map - Building Permit X 4/15
Census Area Map - Dwelling Units X 4/30
Census Area Map - Persons/Household X 4/30
Housing Inventory X 3/31
Developable Land Inventory X 5/15
A1.2 Area Wide Interviews
Natural boundaries X 3/1
Political boundaries X 3/1
Cultural boundaries X 3/1
_ Planning boundaries X 3/1
A1.4 Wetland Survey
_ Soil survey
River/Open water bodies X 3/31
Riparian corridors X 3/31
Flood prone areas X 3/31
Wetland areas
X 3/31
X1 5/15
A1.5 Resource Lands and Critical Area Mapping
Other natural features X 4/15
_ Forestry/Woodlands X 4/15
_ Geology X 4/15
Mineral resources X 4/15
_ Aquifer recharge areas X 4/15
Agricultural lands X 4/15
_ Resource lands Xl 5/15
Critical areas X1 5/15
A1.6 Neighborhood Conservation
Neighborhood boundaries/associations
METRO 8
A - Elements
139 — 4/19^91
X 2/8
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 7
MAY CITY CONSULTANT
FTA GIS DATE FTA DATE
A1.7 Business, Industry, Commercial Trade, Central
Business District, Tourism, and Conventional
Facilities
_ Location of Tourism and Convention Facilities X 4/30
Business District boundaries X 4/30
_ Industrial District boundaries X 4/30
Location of Commerce and Trade Facilities X 4/30
A1.8 Police, Fire, Emergency Services, and Public Safety
Boundaries of Jurisdictions X 4/30
Location of Facilities X 4/30
A1.9 Schools
Local School district boundaries X 4/30
(Includes Grade School service boundaries)
A1.10
Utilities (Boundaries)
Water utilities X 3/15
Sewer utilities X 3/15
Irrigation utilities X 3/15
Electrical service X 3/15
Natural gas service X 3/15
Telephone service X 3/15
TV Cable service X 3/15
A3.2 Urbanization Study
Urban area boundaries (2010)
A4.1 Yakima Urban Area Growth Scenarios
GMA growth scenario
A4.2 Other Growth Scenarios (OPTIONAL)
_ GMA growth scenario
(PER JURISDICTION)
A4.3 Neighborhood Plans (OPTIONAL)
_ Individual neighborhood plans
(PER NEIGHBORHOOD)
A7.1 Community Involvement
_ Various presentation materials
A8.1 Land Use Plan
Land Use Plan Map
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
BI.4
Traffic Characteristics
Traffic volume map
Traffic route map
METRO 8
A - Elements
140 -- 4/15/91
X 48 hrs
X 2/15
X 3/1
X 6/15
X1 9/30
X1 10/31
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 8
SAZ
Transportation facility inventory
Airport clear zone
Railroad track map
Existing signals and signs
B1.5 Accident Data
Accident occurrence map
B1.6 Non -motorized Transportation Modes
Bicycle routes
Pedestrian routes
B2.3 Functional Classification
Functional Classification Map
CITY
FTA GIS DATE
X 4/1
X 4/1
X 4/1
X 5/1
X 4/15
X 4/15
X 2/15
CONSULTANT
FTA DATE
X 5/15
B5.2 Arterial Street System Plan
Arterial street map X 1992
B5.3 Traffic Signal System Plan
_ Traffic signal plan X 1992
B5.4 Pedestrian Plan
_ Pedestrian walkway plan X 1992
85.5 Bicycle Plan
_ Bicycle plan X 1992
B10.1 Short Range Transportation Plan
_ Recommendations plan X 1992
B10.2 Long Range Transportation Plan
Recommendation plan X 1992
TRANSIT ELEMENT
(Mapping of street system included in TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT)
_ Transit Route Map X 4/15
_ Transit Facilities Map X 4/15
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
D1.2 Field Inventory (Parks and Recreation)
Park lands
_ Recreation facility location
D1.3 Field Inventory (Public Lands)
Public lands
X
DI.6 Historical, Cultural, Recreational and Tourism
_ Historical areas
Cultural areas
METRO 8
A - Elements
141 — 4/19/91
X 3/1
5/1
X 6/15
X 5/1
X 5/1
Subtask 1.2 Mapping
Page 9
MAE
D2.1 Potential Land Areas
Available land areas X 7/15
CONSULTANT
FTA C �TE.. FTA DATE
D4.2 Concept Plans for Park and Open Spaces
Concept Plan alternate 1
D9.1 Park and Recreation Plan
_ Final drawings
DRAINAGE PLAN ELEMENT
E1.1 Reports, Plans, and Records
_ Drainage basin/sub-basin boundaries
_ Existing drainage facilities
E4.1 System Alternatives
_ Short-term drainage improvements
Long-term drainage improvements
E9.2 Final Drainage :Management Plan
Final drawings
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT
(Mapping incorporated in other ELEMENTS)
METRO B
A - Elements
142 — 4/19/91
X 5/15
X 9/15
X 1992
X 5/1
X 1992
X 1992
X 1992
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METROPL,LITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1. E PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.1 Needs Assessment
TASK LEADER Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
GIS MAPPING will produce "design level" mapping information. Successful GIS projects
require a thorough evaluation of all engineering, operations, and management current
and projected needs. We will assist you with this evaluation, and provide an objective
analysis of the options and compromises to develop a system which provides the greatest
benefits to the organization. Our approach will be to discover what each group wants,
what they think will work, and to resolve any differences in thinking on the basis of "what
is right" or "what is best" versus "who is right".
Based on this approach, we will assist you in establishing overall system control and
definition of future assignments for the project for "design level" mapping information.
A blueprint for the implementation of the system will be developed. Outside users of the
developed system can be identified and contacted to determine support (both physical and
financial) for the system. The management coordination efforts between you and our
project team can be identified, including level of project development by existing staff, new
(permanent or temporary) staff, and our project team.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying the results of the evaluation process including an
analysis of options and compromises, overall system control, definition of future
assignments, implementation outline, and identification of level of interest and financial
participation of outside users.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
143 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.2 Data Gathering
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Local and Federal survey control would be identified. The GIS grid for the study area
would be established for "design level" mapping. Previous aerial control work would be
identified and utilized in establishing control for this project to the maximum degree
possible.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum describing identification of above referenced items and material.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
144 »4119'91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.3 Premarking
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Panel points, drainage features, water valve boxes, manholes, monumentation and other
inventory identifications would be marked in the field for photo identification.
Additional features which could be marked if other agencies participate include: utility
vaults (i.e., electric, telephone, TV cable, etc.); gas valves; irrigation facilities; curb returns;
and others.
PRODUCTS:
Individual features marked in the field for photo identification.
ASSUMPTIONS:
All premarking would be performed by the authority responsible for the facilities to be
included in the "design level" mapping.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
145 — 4/19i91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREIHENSI VE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.4 Survey
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Additional field survey required to establish both horizontal and vertical control for aerial
mapping would be performed in this subtask. Previous aerial control identified in Subtask
G2.2 would be utilized to the maximum degree possible.
PRODUCTS:
Database of x, y, and z coordinates of control points for aerial mapping.
ASSUMPTIONS:
All field survey information would be performed by a surveying company which would be
selected by our project team in conjunction with the City. $50,000 has been included in the
budget for this subtask for field survey services.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
146 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.5 Aerial Photos
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
The entire planning area to be provided with "design level" mapping will be flown at an
appropriate level (i.e., 1"=100' mapping scale, 1"=50' relative scale). Vertical data will be 2'
contours and 10' indexes. All intersections will have a spot elevation _ 0.1. All paved
roads will have profile elevations every 100'_. Building roofs will have gutter line
elevations. In cases of multi-level buildings, the gutters will be identified and spot
elevations for surfaces will be provided. See Subtask 2.7 for horizontal data.
PRODUCTS:
Photos of entire planning area to be provided with "design level" mapping. 9" x 9"
contacts of entire area. Photo negatives with the ability to be enlarged to 1"=40'.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
147 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS.t VE PLAN
MAPIPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.6 Base Map Development
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
A base map of that portion of the :Metropolitan area to be provided with "design level"
mapping would be organized and edited.
PRODUCTS:
Base map for overlays at "design level" will be produced.
(NOTE: Areas outside the "design level" boundary would be mapped as identified in
Task G1).
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
148 -- 4/15191
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 v'E PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.7 GIS Mapping
TASK LEADER: Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Those graphic overlays identified in Subtask G1.3 would be produced at "design level"
quality. Additional overlays that can be produced from this level of effort include:
Contour maps of the area at 1 foot intervals to areas with 5% slope; 2 foot intervals
from 5% to 15%; and 5 foot intervals from 15% and above.
_ Street inventory. Existing width, surfacing, pavement condition, signing, traffic
controls, crosswalks, curbing, sidewalks, and other features.
_ Water system inventory. Existing valving, hydrants, control structures and other
surface features. The underground piping system can be added from as -built records
and other available information.
_ Sewer system inventory. Existing manholes, clean -outs, control structures and other
surface features. The underground piping system can be added from as -built records
and other available information.
Irrigation system inventory. Existing valving, control structures and other surface
features. The underground piping system can be added from as -built records and
other available information.
_ Drainage system inventory. Existing drainage structures, channels and other surface
features. The underground piping system can be added from as -built records and
other available information.
Utility system inventory. Individual utility facilities can be added as separate layers.
Underground facilities can be added from as -built records and other available
information.
PRODUCTS:
Those overlays as identified in Subtask G1.3 and above will be available in "design level"
quality to the City's GIS.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
149 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 VE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.8 Field Checking
TASK LEADER Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
Field checks of inventory data would be made to verify mapping quality.
PRODUCTS:
Identified variances found in the field would be reported on copies of the base map plus
facility for correction of the GIS overlay.
ASSUMPTIONS:
All field checks and overlay corrections would be performed by participating agencies.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A . Elements
150 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSt WJE PLAN
MAPPING ELEMENT
TASK G: GIS MAPPING
SUBTASK: 2.9 Relational Database Development
TASK LEADER Ken Olson
WORK ITEM:
All coding for GIS queries and data access will be developed. An instruction manual will
be prepared which would include examples of queries and access.
PRODUCTS:
Manual of use for GIS queries and data access.
TOTAL BUDGET $0.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
151 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 vE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: REVIEW PREVIOUS STUDIES AND SUMMARIZE DATABASE
SUBTASK: 1.1 Reports, Plans and Records
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Review activities to date in planning and organizing the visioning process, including
County study, projections, etc. Review activities in other communities which are
relevant.
Meetings with staff and committee to discuss/advise on the options available for design
and management of the visioning process.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing activities to date wiithin the Metropolitan area an
establishing the visioning process. Summary reports on meetings with staff and
committee.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
152-4/191 1
METROP .TITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS3 _ E PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.1 Strategies
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Prepare a technical memorandum on recommended design and management strategies
for the visioning process.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum on design and management strategies for the visioning process.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO B
A - Elements
153 — 4/19^91
METROPOLITAN YA.KIMA COMPREHENSI JE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.2 Visioning Workplan
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Prepare workplan for visioning, with strategies, schedule, budget, participant recruitment,
suggested funding mechanisms, etc. Includes description of activities to gather data and
necessary resources.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying the workplan for the visioning process.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
154 — 4/1991
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.3 Workshop Planning
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Design workshops and other interactive activities.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying the workshop, and other interactivities, design.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
155 -- 4115/91
METROPOLITAN YA.KIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.4 Logo
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Develop logo and graphic identity.
PRODUCTS:
Metropolitan Yakima Comprehensive Plan logo and graphic identify. Camera-ready
artwork.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
156 -- 4/15/91
METRO} ..TTAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS_ E PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.5 Reporting/Publications Plan
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Prepare reporting and publications plan.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying the reporting plan which will build toward a final
report, and publications plan for all information materials and activities.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
157 — 4/15/91
METROI .JLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. .E PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.6 Media Strategy
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Prepare detailed media strategy.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying the media relations plan, media list, schedule, etc. in
conjunction with the visioning process.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Strategy will be implemented by City staff, participating agencies, and volunteers, with
some assistance from consultant team.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
158 — 4119/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.7 In -Kind Assistance
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Prepare fact sheet and informational packet for use in soliciting in-kind assistance and
funding. Provide advise to staff on funding solicitation.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum that serves as an introduction to the Metropolitan project and
invites volunteers and sponsors.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct one meeting with staff on funding solicitation. Assume printing 200 copies for
distribution by the City and participating agencies.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
159 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: IMPACTS
SUBTASK: 2.8 Decision-Making/Negotiation
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Providing training program on collaborative decision-snaking/negotiation. Provide
project -specific exercises and case studies. Recruitment brochure.
PRODUCTS:
Two -and -a -half day in -training workshop on negotiation and decision-making for
approximately 80 people.
ASSUMPTIONS:
80 participants at 2-1/2 day workshop. Workbook is $35 per person in addition to costs
shown.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
RETRO 8
A - Elements
160 — 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 3.1 Committee Meetings
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Advise and assist with Steering Committee and Subcommittee meetings with the
visioning process. Provide general advise and counsel as requested.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing each meeting.
ASSUMPTIONS:
kt least one full-time volunteer or paid professional will be provided to assist with
coordination and support. Other volunteers and/or staff will provide logistical support for
workshops and other public events. Printing, duplication, supplies, and daily
communication will be handled by volunteers/staff. The Steering Committee and staff
will solicit in-kind contributions of printing, meeting rooms, etc. Citizen involvement
activities for Comprehensive Plan Program elements (parks and rec, transportation, etc.)
are budgeted separately and most of the activity will occur after the Visioning process.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
161 -- 4115/91
METROI-JLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS. iE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 3.2 Workshops
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Assist with workshop management and facilitation on the visioning process.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum summarizing workshop activities.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Assist with two workshops.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A • Elements
162 — 4/15/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 3.3 Facilitator Training
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Conduct workshops on facilitator training. Each workshop includes take-home work.
Provide general assistance on negotiations and mediation.
PRODUCTS:
Two 1/2 -day in -training workshops on facilitator training.
ASSUMPTIONS:
50 participants at 1/2 -day workshops. Provide 24 hours of general assistance on
negotiations and mediation.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
183 -- 4/19/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 VE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 3.4 Publications/Reporting Formats
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Assistance in establishing publications and reporting formats for the visioning process.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying system and format for reports and publications.
ASSUMPTIONS:
SCHEDULE:
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
164 — 4/19^91
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENS1 iE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUBTASK: 3.5 Media Relations
TASK LEADER Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Assistance with media relations such as implementation of media strategy dealing with
press releases, press conferences, and other media activities.
PRODUCTS:
Technical memorandum identifying media strategy and relations.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
165 — 4/191/91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 4.1 Final Plan
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
The final plan of the visioning process will be prepared in cooperation with the
volunteer/staff managers. We will prepare copy and graphic design for Popular Summary,
in the form of a fold -out poster, brochure or executive summary. The documentation for
the summary will be compiled as the project continues. The process will be designed so
that minutes of meetings and summary reports of public workshops, etc. are building the
record for the vision, goals, objectives, etc. We will edit and compile the final
documentation to support the Popular Summary.
Tentative Table of Contents for Popular Summary:
History
Vision of Our Future
Planning Principals Developed by the Community
Issue by Issue Discussion of Challenges and Proposals
The Next Steps (Implementation and Funding Suggestions)
Credits and Acknowledgements
Opportunities for Leadership and Community -Wide Participation
PRODUCTS:
Final report for the visioning process.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
166 — 4/15/91
Subtask 1.1 Project Manageh.ent Plan
Page 2
Management of Subconsultants—
In a similar fashion, we use cost summaries along with status reports/invoices from
the subcontractors to manage the budget for this contract. Individual account
numbers are assigned to each project task and cost summaries are produced on a
monthly basis which outlines labor, overhead, other direct and individual
subcontractor costs.
_ Communication and Coordination --
We have already established and will continue with an interactive relationship
between our project staff and your staff. Our approach recognizes the need to fully
integrate your technical, policy, and financial experts into the planning and decision-
making process.
_ Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan—
An essential ingredient for the successful completion of any project is a
comprehensive quality assurance/quality control program. This section will define
our approach which incorporates several effective quality control procedures:
_ Project Reviews. Complete project reviews, both technical and fiscal, will be
conducted by our quality assurance officer at project initiation and at 30, 70 and
90 percent completion.
_ Document Review. All technical memoranda, interim reports, and final reports
will be thoroughly reviewed by experienced, senior personnel prior to release.
_
Reporting—
Monthly project status reports will be prepared. These reports will provide the basis
for any needed work plan modifications as well as identification of any potential
impacts to the overall budget or schedule. Of major importance will be cash flow
estimates using project budgets and schedules.
Administrative Procedures --
This section will establish procedures for record keeping, documentation,
communication logs, etc. It will also establish formats for technical memorandum
preparation, correspondence, and invoices.
TOTAL BUDGET $36,644.80
METRO 8
A - Elements
169 — 4/1991
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI VE PLAN
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
TASK J: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SUBTASK: 1.2 Monthly Services
TASK LEADER Tony Krutsch
WORK ITEM:
Monthly services include status report, invoices, work plan modifications to meet budget
and schedule, management of subconsultants, and monthly program manager meetings
with the Technical Resource Group (selected by City).
PRODUCTS:
Monthly status reports, invoices, updates of work plan, and meeting summaries from
monthly Technical Resource Group discussions.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Project will take 28 months to complete.
Consultant team to provide:
a) No Technical Resource Group Meetings include in this Subtask.
TOTAL BUDGET $80,717.60
METRO 8
A • Elements
170 •• 4/19/91
METROPvLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSI VE PLAN
VISIONING ELEMENT
TASK H: FINAL PLAN
SUBTASK: 4.2 Popular Summary
TASK LEADER: Susan Hall
WORK ITEM:
Edit intermediate reports as needed and prepare final documentation. Design the Popular
Summary, including graphics and write draft copy.
PRODUCTS:
Camera-ready Popular Summary.
TOTAL BUDGET As authorized
METRO 8
A - Elements
167 — 4/1991
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
TASK J: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SUBTASK: 1.1 Project Management Plan
TASK LEADER Tony Krutsch
WORK ITEM:
At the outset of the project, we will prepare a comprehensive Project Management Plan to
guide the work. As the project proceeds, this plan will be reviewed periodically and
adjusted as appropriate. The Management Plan will set forth project procedures and will
clearly define individual responsibilities. This will provide the detailed framework
needed to effectively utilize budget, schedule and quality control procedures. The Project
Management Plan will contain the following sections:
_ Project Objectives—
This section will summarize the objectives of the project in a concise form. The
purpose of the section is to clearly define the focus of the project team efforts.
_ Organization and Roles of the Project Team—
This section will identify the key members of the Project Team, define their principal
functions and responsibilities, and list their address and telephone number. Principal
contacts and resource personnel will also be identified. In addition,, a preliminary list
of agencies, organizations, and individuals, which may be affected will be included
with their address and telephone number.
_ Contract Work Plan—
Following negotiations, a final contract work plan will be prepared for incorporation
into the management plan. It is anticipated that this work plan will be similar in
scope and format to the one presented in our proposal.
_ Management Tools and Techniques—
This section will define the process which begins at the project outset when the
overall work plan is broken down into a large number of discrete, manageable tasks.
Each task is assigned a budget, scope, work product description, deadline and
responsible person. A detailed master schedule of all the tasks is then developed.
This master schedule is revised and updated every four weeks showing the actual vs.
projected status for each task. This provides detailed accountability and allows us to
quickly adjust priorities and manpower commitments should obstacles or delays be
encountered.
RETRO 8
A - Elements
168 — 4/19'91
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
TASK J: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SUBTASK: 1.3 Technical Review Panel
TASK LEADER: Tony Krutsch
WORK ITEM:
The Technical Review Panel (TRP) will meet regularly as a group to report project status
and provide a consistency check across all plan elements. These meetings will be
structured in part along the lines of a formal committee meeting and in part like a value
engineering workshop. After status reports are made, the TRP will spend time evaluating
technical memorandum (circulated in advance by the program manager) and offer
suggestions, in a constructive manner, on how the technical memorandum can be
improved.
The first meeting will be held at the outset of the project. Many of the administrative
"housekeeping" chores will be handled at this first meeting (but not in subsequent
meetings as we do not intend to convene this high level group to deal with chores which
be handled at other levels within the team). These items will make up the initial
meeting agenda:
Refine project objectives and decision criteria
Review project issues
_ Review project work plan and schedule
_ Review management plan
_ Identify interrelated project elements
Brainstorm alternative methods to resolving needs
_ Identify short-term and long-term needs
Formulate recommendations for the visioning process
PRODUCTS:
Meeting summaries describing decisions made and actions taken.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Conduct 8 meetings during the course of the project.
Consultant team to provide:
a) Technical Review Panel will be HDR function only.
TOTAL BUDGET
METRO 8
A - Elements
171 — 4119/91
$54,298.60
METROPOLITAN YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
TASK J: PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
SUBTASK: 1.4 Subconsultant Project Administration
TASK LEADER: Tony Krutsch
WORK ITEM:
Each subconsultant will provide the following information on a monthly basis.
_ Project status report for month
Name and classification of personnel performing work
_ Hours worked
Actual hourly salary rate
_ Overhead rate and amount
_ Allowable fixed fee
Itemized direct cost
Percentage complete
PRODUCTS:
Monthly reports from each subconsultant.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Project will take 28 months to complete.
Consultant team to provide:
a) Service provide under general and administrative cost of individual Subconsultants.
b) Approximately 100 hours ($7,700) included for Subconsultants this Subtask.
TOTAL BUDGET $7,700.00
METRO 8
A - Elements
172-4t1991