HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1990-D5783 B & D Development / Class 2RESOLUTION NO. 1) 578-3
A RESOLUTION remanding the Hearing Examiner's decision, Exami-
ner No. 190-1-26 concerning a Class 2 application
by B & D Development in the vicinity of 2309 West
Nob Hill Blvd.
WHEREAS, on April 18, 1990, tbe Hearing Examiner held a
hearing concerning an application made by B & D Development
for a proposed retail and fast food development to be located
in the vicinity of 2309 West Nob Hill Blvd., Yakima, Washing-
ton; and
WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner issued his Examiner's
Decision, City No. UAZO CL(3) *4-90, Examiner No. 190-1-26 on
May 8, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the notification of Hearing Examiner decision
was mailed on May 10, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Nob Hill Neighborhood Coalition filed a
timely appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision and paid the
appeal fee on May 24, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at a public meeting on July 17,
1990 reviewed the record from the Hearing Examiner's hearing,
the appeal of the Nob Hill Neighborhood Coalition and listened
to argument for and against such appeal; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
This application is remanded to the Hearing Examiner and
the Hearing Examiner is directed to specifically consider and
discuss in a supplemental decision each of the first 21 con-
cerns addressed by the Nob Hill Neighborhood Coalition in
their appeal filed on May 23, 1990 a copy of which list is
attached and incorporated. In addition, the Hearing Examiner
is to consider and report in his supplemental decision his
(res/remand)
recommendations concerning fencing of the proposed construc-
tion site during the construction phase of the project.
ti
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this Zi,Lday of
1990.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(res/remand)
Mayor
TOR TME ADJACENT
RESIDENTIAAL
REIGN30RNOOD
WMo RESPONDED TO
MITIGATION NEEDS
IGNORED
ADDRESSED
NOT MITIGATED
REARING-
EXAMINER RITIGATED DNS
PLANNING
DEVELOP
letter access
Ines' generated
diverting into residential
on Mob Rill to keep
traffic from
area..t.
.:''=
'a.
- -..
`='=`-=
2. Deter business generated
traffic frost diverting north on'=
S. 23rd Ave. into residential area.
3.Cospatible, freestanding sign
__,..1.:-.7: '---
*watt= dello 24 Noun o
_
.
'i.0if site drainage/watershed
=_1. _= `
; K
(c
�.,��-. -rte
4.WWeep duapsters away from homes
?.Restrict delivery traffic
through residential area
�-
---:---.2t,-.
A V-
$.tiant large,ner fres barrier
5.Lat level, low height lights
!or parking lot and buildings.,
,•+. .
-
•
IftRasonry wall artensien .sputh - .
ri_ +�G.
.
11.Pattinq stall ratio
,..�`... is- ...=-
12.Construction fencing_:'
..e.:: -
13.Dust control
14. Limit construction hours
`e3::T
'K=ter"`
1S.Proride delivery areas
"-2.4.
z
�-
Monitor trash Waite
-tan.
•
_
AIWA
a�.ufhe machinery
:.s:---
�.Autosatie irrigation system
12.Mo wall or roof signs
visible in residential area
:_S; .
w- '-"'ik=`
-jr.-:
20.Pedestrian access
-� -- ._..--M:,.r. • - .
21. Saving nature trees
i -----=
22.Rsmove star itosinq wells safelyc:.''`
�'4-'"_..--
-��
23.Sidewait closures,schools and
pedestrians
__ -- -.--.-4-...-•e.
nal
24.Rasonry wall across north
25.20% permeable land
-.._ ��•
24.110 curb cut on S. 24th Ave.
pgaofF
'