Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/18/1988 Business Meeting 4 137 • OCTOBER 18, 1988 •4.•:BUSINESS•MEETING r 1. ROLL CALL The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Mayor Pat Berndt, presiding, Council members Henry Beauchamp, Lynn Buchanan, Lynn Carmichael, and Bernard Sims present on roll. call. City Manager.Zais, City Attorney Vanek, City Clerk Roberts -and Deputy City. Clerk Toney also present. Council member Clarence Barnett present at 2:03 p.m. Council member Jerry Foy absent and excused. • 2. INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Council member Beauchamp. - 3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER Mayor Berndt invited Council members and members of the press to attend an award ceremony at 10:00 a.m., Friday, October 21st at 303 North 9th Street. She said the Office of Housing and Neighborhood Conservation will receive a national award for excellence from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the City's Public /Private Urban Homesteading Program. Mayor Berndt read a proclamation designating the week of October 16 -22, 1988 as "Venture. Week" .,in the .City of Yakima. The • proclamation was accepted by Kelley Buchanan, President of the local Venture Club who commented that Venture Club is only two years old in Yakima and she is hopeful that the club can give more to the community as it continues to grow. Mayor Berndt .read a proclamation designating the week of October 16 -22, 1988 as "National Business Women's Week" in the City of Yakima. The proclamation was accepted by Connie Wilson who • extended an invitation to the City Council to attend a .social hour October 19,• 1988, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. in the breezeway at the Nob Hill Plaza in honor of all working people. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Berndt referred to the items placed on the Consent Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or deletions from either Council members or citizens present. There being no changes requested in the agenda, the City Clerk read the Consent Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances by title. It was MOVED by Carmichael, seconded by Buchanan, that the Consent Agenda, as read, be passed. Unanimously carried by roll call vote. Foy absent. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *) indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one motion without further discussion.) *5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETINGS OF AUGUST 23, 1988 AND SEPTEMBER 6, 1988 . • • The Council minutes -•of August 23 and September 6, 1988 were approved, having been duly certified accurate by two .Council members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly. 6. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION • John Mercer, 4601 Tieton Drive, stated for the last two and one - half years he has enjoyed covering the City Council meetings for KAPP Television. Mr. Mercer stated next week will be the last Council meeting he will cover as he has accepted a position with a television station in Medford, Oregon. On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Berndt wished Mr. Mercer well in his new position, adding that he will be missed and Council has enjoyed working with him as well. • • ff OCTOBER 18, 1988 7. PUBLIC MEETING ON DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT . SPECIAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDS PROGRAM Assistant City Manager Fred Stouder stated this is a continuation of Urban Development Action Grant Application that was submitted following the two public meetings in July. He stated on July 31, 1988, the City submitted an application through the office of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on behalf of .J. I. Haas, Incorporated, to construct a high tech carbon dioxide extract processing plant at 16th Avenue and River Road at a cost of 12 million dollars. Mr. Stouder stated this plant will help maintain the Yakima Valley as the leading hop grower and processor in the world. He reported that this project did. not receive funding through the Urban Development Action Grant Program, however, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development became interested in the project and indicated that office will assist with financing. He stated the amount of funding is unknown at this time. Mr. Stouder'stated the difference between industrial revenue bonds and conventional financing for a project of this nature is almost a half -a- million dollars a year in debt service. He said the Secretary's Discretionary Fund cannot make up that balance, but it appears that through the Secretary's Discretionary Fund and the State Department of Community Development,• that those agencies might be able to provide assistance that would help render the project feasible. Mr. Stouder stated the purpose of today's public meeting is to repeat the July public meetings because this is a different program title by federal description of law. He stated the application objective is to help render this high tech project feasible and work with the industry to secure that investment in the Yakima Urban Area. The project will create forty new jobs and approximately 5,000 peak period agriculture laborers working in the industry. . • Mayor Berndt opened the public meeting for testimony at this time. Richard Wirachowsky, Plant Superintendent, stated the number of employees at the existing plant is about forty. He stated the new positions created by the new•facility will be high tech, production and laboratory employees and office personnel. Mr. Wirachowsky stated J. F. Haas is very much in favor of the annexation and .urged Council to vote favorably upon this issue at the appropriate time. Kevin Bush, 1012 Cornell Avenue, Economic Specialist for the Yakima County Development Association, speaking on behalf of the Yakima County Development Association (YCDA), also known as New Vision, stated they support -.the efforts described` by Mr. Stouder. He stated YCDA feels this is a significant investment to the community and the addition off this new technology could also serve as a magnet for bringing in other food processing facilities. He stated YCDA believes that technology and competitiveness in the agriculture industry is the key to Yakima's growth. He strongly urged Council to support these actions. There being no one else to address this issue, Mayor Berndt closed the public meeting and asked for direction from Council. Council member Carmichael stated Council has gone on the record in the past as being supportive of public /private partnerships and this is an opportunity once again to reaffirm that position and support this application. It was MOVED by Carmichael, seconded by Sims, to authorize staff to submit the Discretionary Grant Application up to $2.5 million dollars. Unanimously carried'by voice vote. Foy absent. 8. PUBLIC HEARING' ON PROPOSED JOHN I. HAAS ANNEXATION VICINITY OF 16TH AVENUE AND RIVER ROAD • This being the time set for the public hearing on the proposed John I. Haas Annexation, Associate Planner Larry Lehman reviewed the staff report stating the City Council approved•initiation of this annexation on June 21, 1988. The Boundary Review Board issued a determination that they will not take jurisdiction and approved the proposed annexation on August 29, 1988. Mr. Lehman stated the estimated total . value of this annexation is approximately $12,898,750. He said state law requires that 75% of the property owners agree to annexation and staff has received 85.2% of • 4 184 OCTOBER :181 18-; 1988 signatures from property. owners willing to annex to the City. He said the purpose for' this public..meeting is to consider the proposed annexation. Referring to the map provided in the Council packet, Council member Carmichael asked how much of the subject property is owned by John I. Haas ? ._Mr. Lehman responded the upper northern portion of the property, above the railroad crossing, is owned by Haas. Mr. Lehman stated basically this was the minimal portion' necessary to meet the needs of this annexation requested by - the John I. Haas Corporation. ,Council member Carmichael 'referred to the map provided in the .Council packet material' and asked about the arrow in the upPer left corner indicating the "proposed rezone" area. She asked if this has anything to do with this annexation? Mr.. „Lehman responded that is incorrect; it should read "proposed annexation." There being no further questions of staff, Mayor Berndt opened the public hearing for testimony, noting that two individuals have commented in favor of the annexation- already. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the annexation, Mayor Berndt asked :for testimony from. those opposing the annexation. Lavonne Lammi, 1907 West J Street, stated she sees no advantage to being annexed into the City; she currently has city water and annexation will only result in higher. taxes. She indicated individual home owners were not notified of the annexation, and that she had learned about it through the Fruitvale Fire Department . who told her that the notice l had-;been posted in the Department of Social and Health Services building on North 16th Avenue. Gertrude Connelly,' 1003 North 20th Avenue, stated she is in agreement with, Mrs. Lammi and inquired if they will have to pay for City. refuse service. .Council member Carmichael responded it will be five years before :the residents are required to change from their current private .refuse hauler to City refuse service. Mrs. Connelly asked if it is possible to..have City sewer service, and if so, how long will. it • take to get it. She stated there would be no advantage to annexing City unless residents will be able to connect to the City sewer lines. Director of • Engineering and Utilities, Dennis. Covell, stated staff can review the situation and give Mrs. Connelly some idea as to the availability of City sewer service. • There being no one else present to address the annexation issue., Mayor Berndt closed the public hearing. • - Council member Beauchamp asked staff to explain- why the individual home owners were not <notified of the proposed annexation. Mr. Lehman said State law simply requires that more than 75% of the assessed property within the area to be annexed.sign the annexation petition. He stated this annexation was not initiated by the City; it was initiated by the John I. Haas Corporation and twelve other businesses who are eager to annex to the City. He reiterated that 85.2% of the total. assessed property value is represented by the signatures on. the ;petition to annex. Mr.; '.Lehman noted that in order to obtain City water services many of the.other property owners had previously. signed Outside ,Utility Agreements. He I/ • said State law did not require that the individual property owners be notified, and because this was not a City initiated annexation, staff followed the process that seemed most reasonable. Council member Beauchamp stated he feels the property owners should have • been given notice and expressed concern that they were not. Mr. Lehman stated the petition to annex was published in the newspaper, and posted at three locations within the .proposed annexation area. Planning Manager Den Skone stated the petition process does not provide much 'of an opportunity for all property owners to be • noticed, however,. staff is in the process of correcting that procedure. He noted that in the case of the- Washington Avenue annexation, which will be discussed following this agenda item, property owners, were noticed. Mr. Skone; stated a neighborhood meeting was held to respond to questions from.property owners and a notice of today's public hearing was mailed by the City Clerk's office notifying residents of the meeting today. He said staff is trying to go beyond that which is required by State law and make certain that. individual property owners are notified in the future of proposed annexations. Council member Carmichael asked if the streets are paved in this proposed area and- Mr. Lehman stated he believes a portion of 20th Avenue has been partially paved, but • 4- I4' OCTOBER 18, 1988 most of the street is on the boundary and the unpaved portion will remain in the County. Council member Carmichael stated the City . has certain obligations as a result of an annexation over a certain- period of time, street lighting, streets, etc., must be brought up to standard. She stated in the future she would like more information in terms of how staff intends for the City to address those obligations. Mrs. Carmichael stated the residents need to know that there are certain benefits that will result from annexation. Mr. Lehman stated -some of those improvements have already been made and the City will continue to work with residents to make future improvements through the L.I.D. process. Ordinance No. 3133 having been read by title, it was MOVED by Beauchamp, seconded by Buchanan, that the ordinance be passed. Unanimously carried by roll call vote. Foy absent. ORDINANCE NO. 3133, AN ORDINANCE annexing property to the City of Yakima and zoning said - property. 9. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 15TH AND WASHINGTON AVENUE ANNEXATION This being the time set for the public hearing on the proposed 15th Avenue and Washington Avenue Annexation, Associate Planner Larry Lehman also reviewed this staff report stating'this annexation was 'initiated by RFB Incorporated and Gaylord Newby and 'the City Council approved this action on January 19, 1988. , On May 25, 1988 the Boundary Review Board notified the City that they approved this annexation. He stated this property consists of approximately 67 acres and 415 residents. Mr. Lehman said of the total $7,273,280 assessed property value, staff has received 81.4% of the signatures supporting the annexation. He 'commented the area is presently served by City sewer and water and is'basically comprised ' of a completed street system. Council member Barnett asked why staff did not'annex the island of County property in the vicinity of 18th Avenue between Grant Street and Prasch Avenue? Mr. Lehman responded State law does not allow for a non.contiguous annexation. He stated he• attempted to do that,towever, research indicated this. , will have to be handled under a separate annexation effort. Council member Carmichael commented that the Local Governance and Study Commission proposed legislation that would have taken care of this type of situation, however, the legislation did not pass. She stated she is hopeful that the same legislation will be presented again this year because there' -other islands surrounded by areas of the City that need to be addressed. Mr. Lehman and Council member Barnett expressed concern about these islands due to the police and fire' protection issues as well as other areas of concern. There being no further questions of staff, Mayor Berndt opened the public hearing for testimony. There being no one present to speak in favor or against the annexation, the public hearing was closed and the ordinance was read by title. It was MOVED by seconded by Beauchamp, that Ordinance No. . 3134 be passed. Unanimously carried by roll, call vote. Foy absent. ORDINANCE NO. 3134, AN ORDINANCE annexing property to'the City of Yakima and zoning said property. • Mr. Skone stated while staff has not yet completed the required census of these two areas, it appears that based on 1980 census information that Yakima is now a city of 50,000. *10. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR STATE HOUSING TRUST FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. D -5517, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City Manager of the City of Yakima to file an application with the Washington State • Department of Community Development for funding special housing needs from the Housing Trust Fund. *11. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SETTING DATE OF HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 22, 1988 ON THE VACATION OF A 'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT REQUESTED BY YAKIMA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION NO. D -5518, A RESOLUTION fixing the time and place for hearing on a petition for vacation of a portion of a public utility LIT OCTOBER.18=,1988 easement.in the vicinity of South 39th and.40th Avenues, south of Tieton Drive, within the :City of Yakima. • • November 22, 1988 was set as the date of. hearing on the vacation of a public utility easement, as petitioned by Yakima Federal Savings and Loan. *12. REPORT FROM ENGINEERING AND. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT REGARDING THIRD QUARTER 1988 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS The report. from the Engineering and Utilities Department regarding the third quarter status of the 1988 capital improvement projects, was accepted. *13. APPROVAL OF THIRD QUARTER' 1988 BUDGET REPORT .The Third Quarter 1988 Budget Report, was accepted. 14. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE PERTAINING: TO. LICENSES AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS PROHIBITING CHILDREN IN GAME ROOMS DURING SCHOOL HOURS • City. Attorney Vanek stated several months ago Council referred a letter to the Legal Department from the School District regarding their concern about high school students frequenting games roans during the school hours. Mr. Vanek said in researching the issue it was discovered that the City licensing code contains a current licensing procedure for regulating video games. He further stated that. the City-of Fife passed an, ordinance regulating the;use of such. facilities during. school hours. He said the ordinance requires the posting. .of a sign notifying students they are not to be on the premises during school hours; it requires_the owner not -to allow the individual to remain there, and it prohibits students from playing video machines during school hours. He stated the reason the ordinance is not broader is that research of the ordinance reveals.that other establishments have video machines in them, and it would be complicated and confusing if the ordinance stated actual presence on the premises is forbidden. He stated that an ordinance as broad as that would raise questions as to what part. of the supermarket a student, could go into and not violate this ,ordinance. Mr. Vanek stated a draft. of the ordinance was provided•to the Police Department and other interested parties for review and discussion.. He. said one pizza parlor proprietor expressed concern that students play video machines while having lunch in his establishment. Another issue that was discussed was prohibiting students from using video parlors within a specified vicinity of public schools during certain hours of the day. Mr. Vanek stated that in reviewing this.aspect of the ordinance there was concern that, if a-. violation occurred, it would have to be proven that the location where the violation occurred was within the restricted radius of the school. He stated a secondary concern by the school officials was that :of . students being in any video parlors within the City when •they had an, obligation under State law to: be in school. Council member Barnett commented it ,appears that. the issue behind this ordinance is truancy and not whether the student is playing video machines during school hours. He also questioned what consideration was given to teacher work days, summer school and private schools that may have different hours .of attendance from that of. School District No. 7? Mr. Barnett stated the City is assuming the duties of a truant .officer and he does not understand the rationale.of the: School District expecting the City to .do this. Mr. -. Vanek stated input.from the School District . was that some of the establishments, were not cooperating or ,trying to get the_studentsback into school and the video machines are a tremendous attraction to students and that is the reason for the ,request to focus on this particular type of establishment. Council member Barnett asked if a person can be asked to present identification proving his /her -age. Mr. Vanek stated the Police Department .would have to be able to, show that the person:is in the age group that is prohibited by this ordinance. Council member Barnett stated this would require police manpower that the City does not have and he cannot. believe this is even being requested. Mayor .Berndt stated there are interested citizens present that would like to speak,,to this:,issue and asked.them to•do so at this time. Jim Hart, 1015 Pitcher Street, owner of Yakima Music • OCTOBER 18, 1988 Company, operator of the Jolly Joker, and other arcades outside the City, stated his contention is basically'the'ordinance says '"games rooms" and he owns equipment in some of the Safeway Stores. He asked how can he expect someone in the store to be responsible for enforcing this? He stated identification would also be a problem for anyone placed in this position. He said there is a truancy law which is supposed to be enforced by a truant officer. Mr. Hart stated he does not agree that an establishment with one or two games should be called a game room or video parlor. He stated he has a policy in his arcade prohibiting loitering and students are confronted about this. He further stated some students attend alternative schools`and have different hours than School District No. 7. Mr. Hart stated he is against the way the ordinance is written because it applies to every video game in the City of Yakima. Council member Beauchamp asked Mr. Hart if he favors keeping truants out of regular video parlors and Mr. Hart responded perhaps Mr. Beauchamp should ask a business that has video' games as a primary business. Council member Beauchamp commented that Mr. Hart'has'several video games in the Eastgate Super - Duper and those machines are heavily used by students, however, he is not aware of how many students are there during school hours. Council member Beauchamp stated if establishments with video games are serving as a' 'gathering place for truant students he believes it is management's responsibility to cooperate with school officials on this matter. Council member Barnett stated he is concerned that the ordinance states any person under the age of 16 and he cannot visualize how this ordinance will be enforced? He asked why pass such an ordinance when it cannot be enforced? He stated the criminal penalties of a $250 fine or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days does not seem justifiable. Mr. Hart stated he is'likely to lose some business if this ordinance is .passed because store managers will not want to be burdened with the 'responsibility of enforcing the ordinance. Mr. Hart stated the ordinance does not address the instance when the child or student is accompanied by a parent. Mr. Hart commented he believes most of the'businesses will be cooperative in this regard, however, he does not believe that a student enters'a'Safeway-Store just to play the video games. John'Borgert, 307 North 21st Avenue, operator of the Country Store at 2111 South 1st Street, stated 'Mr. Barnett's comment about school .days varying from district to district is a valid point and asked what consideration has been given to 'this? Mn. Borgert stated he,' 18 concerned about the issue and method of identification as there is no way to identify whether a student is 16 years of age. He asked if a student is held and turns out to be 17 rather than 16, what kind .of 'hold harmless provision is going to be included for the business owner? He asked if the City has the power to regulate people residing outside the City limits? Mr. Borgert agreed that the ordinance is unclear in 'the area of the penalty, i.e. is the student or the store manager going to be fined? City Attorney Vanek' responded 'to the query about jurisdiction of juveniles residing outside the City' limits, stating once the student is inside the City limits, the ordinance would be applicable. Bob McLaughlin, Davis High School Principal, stated Yakima leads the state in high school drop -outs and he is aware that students leave the 'school grounds every hour of the day. He stated the truant officer had been asked to leave one of the video establishments when he was attempting to persuade a student to return to class. Mr. McLaughlin stated he sees the community's school system as a partnership with the community and stated the School District cannot solve this problem alone. Council member, Carmichael stated the'parents' have a responsibility in this matter as well. Mr. McLaughlin stated in many instances, the students leave the school grounds after being dropped off for school by their-pa Discussion continued with various Council members expressing concern about this'problem. It was the consensus of the • Council that the real issue at hand is truancy. Council members felt it would be impossible to enforce the ordinance as presented and that it should be given further consideration by the Legal Department. It was MOVED by Beauchamp, seconded by Buchanan, to refer this back to staff, the School District and the video .Operators for further consideration to see if an acceptable approach can be found in light of today's discussion. Council member Barnett asked that the opportunity for discussion be given 493 • OCTOBER 1988 to the-establishments with amusement 'devices, or ,that" these` establishments:be notified' when. this issue =will come before the Council Mr. j.McLaughlin' invited Council members to: accompany him• to some • of these. businesses to see the -problemm f irst hand. Mr. ' Hart; owner of the jolly Joker; addressed -the "the issue of 'the truant officer being asked to leave that establishment: He: stated that was a management personality problem and that manager'is no longer employed at" the Jolly Joker: -, Mr. Hart stated. his managers have been = instructed , to cooperate with the truant officer sand, to his " knowledge, they ' are ' doing ' so: • He stated hey - would i be willing. to ;_ meet with the Committee to reconsider thisL'ordinance. City Attorney Vanek stated he will need some guidance from the School District, the operators and the Police :Department as to the substance of the ordinance. Council member Barnett commented the parochial' and - private' {-schools need- to be involved in this discussion' also Council 'member Sims said' the .would ,, like to` see a minimum ' age ' included in' the ordinance :: Mayor Berndt commented it is basically one &business' causing the problem and she "would like -staff. to::consider method forcing them , to cooperate. Council member" Barnett - asked•.why can'twe pass :a broader ordinance the effect that the students can't be anywhere ; but -ink school since truancy is'the' real issue? City Attorney Vanek statedrhe believes there 'is an ordinance of that -nature nature Jalready-'in: the code ; it is . a ;" truancy':- law.. Council, member Barnett - :asked why are we considering a new ordinance-- rather than enforcing what we already have. Council member. Carmichael' stated there is only one truant no facility in which 'to place the 'students -if arrested; Richard Andring, 203 - South 8th'Avenue, stated he is very familiar . with the Davis situation and °. askedUthe:City to investigate the bus loading zone in the middle of the block on Walnut. He stated traffic is backed up in' both- directions making`it impossible for .emergency - vehicles '" to get- through the. area should, . it become - 'necessary.'Mr.:Andring: stated/41e' believes the bus loading zone - would be better -, situated- of , ithe- other of. Walnut. He also • stated there aren't any cross walks at the - intersection -of 7th Avenue. - -& Walnut, creating a dangerous situation for pedestrians trying to cross the street,at this .location. Mayor Berndt noted Transit .!Manager `"Bi11 Schultz lis ,,present and will . be , looking into the situation. The question. was ; called for a vote on the motion. Unanimously carried by voice; vote. Foy absent. *15..- CONSIDERATION. OF AN . ORDINANCE__AMENDING THE 1988 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR COMPLETION OF THE WASTEWATER FACILITY AERATION SYSTEM REHABILITATION PROJECT (SECOND READING) . An,,, .Ordinance.- 'appropri•ating funds - _ for.-- 'the .completion of the Wastewater'Facility Aeration System Rehabilitation.Project,- having been read by title only at the previous meeting, was brought before the Council for a second reading. . ORDINANCE NO. 3135, AN ORDINANCE amending the 1988 budget for the City of Yakima; and making an appropriation of $95,000 in the 478 - Wastewater Facility Fund for expenditure during 1988 for aeration project change orders and completion contract. *16. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1988 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM (FIRST READING) An Ordinance appropriating funds for the Dial -a -Ride Program, having been read by title only at this meeting, was laid on the table for one week, or until October 25, 1988. *17. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1988 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS INTO THE WATER OPERATING BUDGET (FIRST READING) An Ordinance appropriating funds into the Water Operating budget for the purchase of water meters, having been read by title only at this meeting, was laid on the table for one week, or until October 25, 1988. 18. OTHER BUSINESS Assistant City Manger Stouder stated tomorrow morning consultant Ron Kasprisin will present the design element of the Downtown Plan 494 OCTOBER 18, 1988 to various. business groups in the City. He stated next Tuesday at 11:45 a.m, there.will be a luncheon meeting at the Holiday Inn and a presentation will. be given to the City Council regarding this design and plan. He asked Council members to notify Administrative Secretary, Debbie Moore.,__if..they will be_ available to attend this meeting. Council member Beauchamp stated on. the west side of the .intersection of North 6th Street & B Street there is a large evergreen bush obstructing the view of traffic and asked that staff,. look into this.. Information•Items: • Items of information supplied•to Council, were:, Report from Police Department regarding Narcotics Enforcement Update, 10/11/88; Letter to•Menke.& Jackson law firm and Yakima County Prosecutor's Office, regarding •Amendments to Interlocal.,Coalition Agreement. 1012/88; Memo from Transit Manager and.Transit Customer Relations regarding Fair Shuttlebus Report.. :10 /13/88; Agenda for October 19, 1988. Yakima Hearing Examiner meeting; Reports from Personnel Division regarding 1988 Permanent Open Competition Hiring_Status and 1988 Temporary Hiring Status. .October 1988;. Monthly ,.report from Chief of Police_for August 1988; 1988 Community.. Development Block ,Grant .Report for September 1988 and September MBE report; and Agenda for October 19, 1988 Regional Planning Commission meeting and minutes of its September 21, 1988 meeting. 19. ADJOURNMENT 117 OCTOBER 21, 1988 AT 11:00 A.M., COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MEETING WITH'COUNTY COMMISSIONERS It was `MOVED by Carmichael,.. seconded by Buchanan, to move into -• Execution Session for approximately 15_minutes for the purpose of discussing pending litigation and adjourn. inanediately thereafter to 11:45 a.m. at the Holiday Inn on October 28, 1988. Unanimously carried by voice vote. Foy absent./ .1 ' Jodi A ^li READ AND .CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY fa 0 ' ON/ P' ?cc/ qp. CIL 1 1*!:E` 1 D E aai-t/;444 T ATTEST: COUNCI MEMBER DATE .1%/ Q274ieLVO KAREN S. ROBERTS, CMC, CITY CLERK PATRICIA A. B RNDT, MAYOR • • Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk, Barbara J. Toney, CMC. • • • • • • • • • •