Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/1989 Business Meeting DECEMBER 12, 1989 BUSINESS MEETING 1. ROLL CALL The City Council met in session, on this date at 2:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Mayor'Pat Berndt, presiding, Council members Clarence Barnett, Lynn Buchanan, Jerry Foy and Bernard Sims present on roll call. Council member Beauchamp present after 2:03 P.M. City Manager Zais, City Attorney Vanek, City Clerk Roberts and Deputy City Clerk Toney also present. 2. INVOCATION The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council member Buchanan. 3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER . Art Fletcher, Assistant Secretary of the Department''of Labor and President Bush's nominee for Chairman to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, expressed his appreciation to the community for the care and consideration he has received thus far during his prolonged visit to Yakima. Mr. Fletcher came to Yakima to address the Minority Business Enterprise Convention and suffered a heart attack, followed by by -pass heart surgery at St. Elizabeth Medical Center. He indicated he will be recuperating here until after the first of the year. He rated Yakima's heart surgeons and medical technicians among the highest in the United States. Mayor Berndt stated she received a phone call from Rob Talcott yesterday who informed her that he recently held a "Rock Against Drugs" concert and raised $100 to be used for the War On Drugs. Mayor Berndt presented the check for $100 to Frank Glaspey, Director of the Coalition for the War On Drugs. She indicated thank you letters will be mailed to Mr. Talcott and to those who made contributions to this cause. Mayor Berndt requested staff research the feasibility of using County jail inmates to perform some of the maintenance work in City parks and present a report to Council some time in the near future. 4. CONSENT AGENDA • Mayor Berndt referred to the items placed on the Consent Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or deletions from either Council members or citizens present. It was the consensus that Itean No. 8 be removed from the Consent Agenda. The City Clerk then read the Consent Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances by title. It was MOVED BY FOY, SECONDED BY 'BUCHANAN, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA,'AS .READ, BE PASSED..The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *) ••indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one motion without further discussion.) *5. APPROVAL'OF COUNCIL MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 7, 14 AND 18, 1989 The Council minutes of November 7, 14, and 18, 1989 meetings were approved, having been duly certified accurate by two Council members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly. 6. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION • A. SPECIAL PRESENTATION ON FINAL CENTENNIAL REPORT BY JERRY HENDERSON, CITY CENTENNIAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Jerry Henderson, 309 North 35th Avenue, Chairman of the City Centennial Committee, gave a report to the City Council regarding the events that were held commemorating the State Centennial, commenting there were over 50 events held in the City. He presented the Mayor with the certificate received from the State Centennial Commission AD /1 J DECEMBER 12, 1989 and acknowledged the assistance he received from members of the City Centennial Committee and City staff members. Mayor Berndt expressed appreciation to Mr. Henderson and the committee for all of their hard work. Council member Foy indicated that items of interest to be placed in a time capsule have been forwarded to him by students from Davis High School as a result of the forum held there. Mr. Henderson expressed his appreciation to the Sunfair Committee and asked that this be reflected in the minutes of the Council meeting. Council member Beauchamp commented on the Black Centennial that was held in January. He said none of the material concerning the Black Centennial was included in the time capsule, and he will forward items for inclusion. As requested, Mr. Henderson was relieved of his responsibilities as Chairman of the State Centennial Committee since this event has concluded. Charles Kriz, 5708 Bitterroot Lane, stated prior to the meeting today he provided a copy of an article from the December 9, 1989 issue of the Denver Post which lists the states that have received federal funds to fight the War On Drugs. He pointed out that the state of Washington is not mentioned in the article and he has made several requests for the City to seek federal assistance to fight the - War On Drugs. Mayor Berndt reported that she recently met with Senator Brock Adams and Governor Booth Gardner regarding this issue. Director of Community and Economic Development, Glenn Rice, stated as a National Guardsman he is aware of the fact that the State of Washington receives several thousand dollars a year to fight the War On Drugs. Mayor Berndt presented a proclamation designating December 10 -16, 1989 as Drunk and Drug Driving Awareness Week to David Schneider, Coordinator of Yakima Valley Traffic Safety Program. 7. PUBLIC MEETING ON APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION PERTAINING TO REQUEST BY HAROLD LARSON FOR A BARBER SHOP AT 5606 HAVEN WAY Council member Barnett excused himself from hearing the appeal due the appearance of fairness as Mr. Larson has been his personal barber for several years. Director of Planning and Economic Development Glenn Rice stated the decision of the Hearing Examiner to allow the barber shop as a home occupation is being appealed by the neighborhood. Mayor Berndt asked Council to make a declaration as to whether they had been contacted by anyone regarding this issue and no Council member had been. Mayor Berndt opened the public meeting at this time and asked that the opponents address the issue. James Carmody, attorney representing the neighbors, stated that Mr. Larson's home is located at 5606 Haven Way, which is a cul -de -sac, and is surrounded on the west, north and east by residential zoning. The Chalet Mall and ShopKo is located to the south of Mr. Larson's property. He stated many of the property owners have been in this area for 20 -25 years and have seen the land use change from orchards to commercial and have some serious concerns about commercial growth at this point. He said that Code Manager Bob Shampine reviewed the issue and ruled against the request for home occupation, however, the Hearing Examiner approved the request. Mr. Carmody stated residential living atmosphere is paramount to the property owners in that neighborhood, adding that this is one of the criteria listed in the Comprehensive Plan regarding residential zoning. Mr. Carmody stated of the 16 property owners living on Haven Way, 13 are opposed to the operation of a barber shop at 5606 Haven Way. He urged Council to reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and deny the request for a home occupation at this location. Mayor Berndt asked that those wishing to speak in opposition of the appeal address Council at this time. Don Schussler, attorney representing Harold Larson, stated Mr. Larson has been a barber for years in Yakima and has recently suffered a serious back disability. Mr. Schussler commented that this is the best location for a home occupation since the driveway is on the side of the house and the barber shop would be located at the rear of the residence. Mr. Schussler indicated there is parking at the rear of the house, as well as a paved parking area in the front of the home. Mr. Larson's clientele will be virtually undetectable by the #2 X6 DECEMBER 1989 neighbors unless they, monitor his driveway constantly. • Mr. Schussler stated the only argument against the home occupation at this location has been that it will create a significant amount of traffic in the neighborhood, and this is not true. He explained that Mr. Larson's residence is the first driveway on the street and is easily recognizable as such. He stated that Mr. Larson complies with the twelve criteria listed in the Comprehensive Plan for a home occupation. He has recently had back surgery and has had to curtail the number of hours he works, - and . is unable to'pay rent on the commercial property he rents. He urged Council to sustain the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Discussion ensued regarding the amount of traffic that will be generated because of Mr. Larson's home occupation. Mr. Schussler explained that he can only have one client in his shop at a time because he has one chair. There are four parking spaces in front of the house and parking space at the rear of the house where the shop will be located. He emphasized that because Mr. Larson's home is the first driveway on the street, there should not be any significant impact on the neighborhood traffic. Mayor Berndt asked those wishing to speak in opposition to the barber . shop address Council at this time. Elsie Moore, 202 North 56th Avenue, stated she lives on the other corner of 56th Avenue and Haven Way and :it is difficult to get .behind Mr`. Larson's house and back out onto the street. She expressed concern for the children that play in the street because they are not closely watched by their parents and this would create a traffic problem. Mrs: :-Moore expressed that people will park on the street rather than in the driveway and this could possibly interfere with mail delivery. She said she is also concerned that by allowing the barber shop, it will change the character of the neighborhood. Juanita Crane, 5716 Haven Way, testified- that she has lived on the cul -de -sac for twenty -seven years and expressed concern about future property values if the home occupation is allowed. She stated she is opposed to the home occupation. • James Carmody stated this is really a matter of economics for Mr. Larson, and he does not feel that is an appropriate measure by which the issue should be judged. He said parking is more likely to be on the street rather than in the designated parking area. Mr. Carmody concluded his remarks, stating there is no legitimate basis for allowing a barber shop at this location. . Associate Planner _John Elsden reviewed the options Council has regarding this issue. He stated Council may adopt, amend and adopt, reject, reverse, amend and reverse the findings, conclusions, and decision of the Examiner or remand the appeal to the Hearing•Examiner for further consideration. He stated if Council's decision is different from the Hearing Examiner, Council must adopt findings and conclusions. It was MOVED BY - .FOY, :SECONDED': `BY SIMS, TO "" APPROVE: THE: HEARING. EXAMINER'S DECISION" - AND ALLOW THE "::BARBER - SHOP. The motion failed by 3 -2 voice vote. Beauchamp, Berndt and Buchanan voting nay. Council - member Beauchamp stated the majority of the homeowners feel they will be intruded upon by the location of a business in the neighborhood even though it will not generate a tremendous amount of traffic. He said 13 of the 16 property owners do not want the business in the neighborhood and this factor should be taken into consideration and for these reasons he voted against the motion. Mayor Berndt stated she concurred with Council member Beauchamp and believes that with all of the property owners opposing it she was persuaded to vote against the motion. Council member Buchanan stated he shares the opinions of Council members Beauchamp and Berndt. 8. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING' CABLE TV FRANCHISE TRANSFERRAL FROM COOKE CABLE TO TCI CABLEVISION OF WASHINGTON, INC. Ron Bevins, 713 West Yakima Avenue, spoke briefly about the proposed resolution authorizing the transfer of the Cable TV franchise from Cooke Cablevision to TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. Mr. Bevins stated he has been following the Cable TV issue for the past three #3 --5 DECEMBER 12, 1989 years in Yakima and there has been three different owners with consideration of a fourth at this time. Mr. Bevins stated that an increase in rates usually occurs after the transfer has taken place, however, the users do not receive any benefits from that increase. He stated he is bothered by the "less than squeaky clean" reputation of TCI. Following Mr. Bevins comments, Council member Foy stated this is not a public hearing and he is prepared to take action on this item. Resolution No. D -5660 having been read by title, it was MOVED BY BARNETT, SECONDED BY FOY, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. Council member Foy responded to Mr. Bevins comments briefly, indicating that we also have three local channels in this city to watch. Regarding the reputation of TCI management, he stated he believes this is a good management team that believes in the community it will be representing. Cable TV Communications Coordinator Warren stated staff spent an extensive amount of time examining TCI and were aware of the comments made by Mr. Bevins. She further stated staff has had a very high level of cooperation from Mr. Bailey and he is present today to address any questions Council might have. City Manager Zais stated this is a matter of law that was discussed at the time the original franchise was issued to the City of Yakima. The City must sanction the sale and cannot prevent it from happening. To do otherwise might place the City in a position of terminating cable service. The question was called'.for.a vote on.the motion. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. RESOLUTION' NO. D -5660, A RESOLUTION approving the transfer and assignment of the stock of Cooke Cablevision of Yakima, Inc. to TCI Cablevision of Washington, Inc. Mayor Berndt declared a brief recess at this time. The meeting having reconvened, Planning Manager Don Skone asked for clarification on the action taken by Council regarding the Larson matter. City Attorney Vanek stated the vote was to deny the home occupation and the reasons were stated on the record, therefore, a resolution will be prepared to that effect. *9. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH YAKIMA COUNTY AND PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE FOR TRANSPORTATION OF THE ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED CITIZENS RESOLUTION NO. D -5661, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute an agreement with Yakima County and People for People, Inc., relating to transporting elderly and handicapped citizens. *10. APPROVAL OF FINAL CONTRACT PAYMENT FOR 1989 STREET LIGHT PROGRAM, NACHES AVENUE, PHASE A (STANDARD MOTION V -B -- ACCEPT CONTRACT AND APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT) The report from the City Engineer dated December 4, 1989, with respect to the completion of the work on the 1989 Street Light Project, Phase A, Naches Avenue, Chestnut to'Yakima Avenue, performed by Knobel's Electric, Inc., was approved, the work accepted and payment of the final estimates'as therein set forth was authorized. *11. APPROVAL OF THIRD QUARTER 1989 INSURANCE CLAIMS REPORT The Third Quarter 1989 Insurance Claims Report was accepted. *12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SETTING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR JANUARY 3, 1990 ON THE VACATION OF WEST "A" STREET, WEST OF NO. 10TH AVENUE TO THE ALLEY, AS REQUESTED BY SHANNON SMITH • RESOLUTION NO.' D -5662, A RESOLUTION fixing a time for public hearing on a petition to be vacated, West A Street, West of North 10th Avenue to the alley. The Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner was set for January 3, 1990. # 4 DECEMBER 12, 1989 34 *13. SET DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR DECEMBER 19, 1989 ON REZONE OF PROPERTY AT EAST "I" STREET AND NO. 1ST STREET, AS REQUESTED BY MARVIN SWAINSON December 19, 1989 was set as the date of public meeting on the rezone of property at East "I" Street and North 1st Street, as requested by • Marvin Swainson. *14. SET DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR DECEMBER 19, 1989 ON THE APPEAL BY TIGER BIN MINI -MART ON THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DENIAL FOR AN ADDITIONAL FREESTANDING SIGN December 19, 1989 was set as the date of public meeting on the appeal by Tiger Bin Mini -Mart on the Hearing Examiner's denial for an additional freestanding sign. 15. CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION REGARDING "A" STREET VACATION: A. ORDINANCE VACATING PORTION OF "A" STREET, BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND NACHES AVENUE - Larry Lehman, Associate Planner, stated on May 23, 1989 the City Council voted to approve Petition No. 1083 vacating a .portion of right -of -way on "A" Street, immediately north of the Mall facility, and the easterly 17.5 feet of North 4th Street, commonly referred to • as the sidewalk area on North "A" Street. Mr. Lehman stated staff prepared an ordinance which vacates the requested right -of -way and adds some conditions to the actual ordinance that were not included in the May 23rd staff report. Mr. Lehman stated it is staff's belief that these additional items will assure more thorough consideration of any action that might be taken by the applicant in the future. Conditions added to the ordinance include: 1) Conditioning of the vacation upon the actual construction of a 30,000 square foot retail sales facility, rather than upon the issuance of a building permit (Section 2, paragraph 6); 2) Conditions protecting the City's interest (Section 2 paragraph 9 & 10); 3) a sunset clause stipulating that the applicant must complete construction within three years or the vacation will "be of no effect or validity" .(Section 2, paragraph 11); and 4) that the applicant will be responsible for reconstruction of curb cuts and signing related to this action (Section 2, paragraph 12). • Since May 23, 1989 staff has also received an appraisal from the applicant (as was stipulated by the Council) indicating the property in question is valued at $9.75 per'square foot. This appraisal has since been verified and certified by the State Department of Transportation. Mr. Lehman explained that the sunset clause allows a three year time period in which .the proponent must construct a 30,000 square foot retail facility. If the proposed building does not come to fruition, the ordinance would become invalid. Also, staff notes in a concluding paragraph that one of the conditions of approval of this right -of -way vacation is that a second .vacation would have to be considered and approved. Additionally, staff recommended that they. be directed to prepare a resolution to initiate the vacation of the remaining sections of right -of -way, as was indicated at the previous May 23rd meeting. Mr. Lehman referred to a map on the wall depicting the subject area being identified as Parcels A and B. Also, as a condition of the granting of the right - of -way vacation, the applicant is to deed Parcel D to the City, thus creating an alleyway continuation to 4th Street from the existing alleyway coming from the north and south direction. The second vacation would include the area identified on the map as Parcel E and Parcel F. Mr. Lehman stated staff did not want to create through traffic utilizing an alleyway, or. a dead end street or dead end alleyway. Mr. Lehman yielded to questions from Council at this time. Council member Foy expressed concern about the three year. sunset clause, which virtually becomes a sales tool for the Mall Corporation. He also pointed out that this ordinance does not contain a reversionary,clause, as contained in the easement for the mall parking garage ramps. City Attorney Vanek explained the reason he expanded upon Council's directives to prepare legislation indicating a plan had to be submitted for review and a permit issued #5 • 3 6 DECEMBER 12, 1989 before the street vacation is granted. He commented that the issuance of a building permit does not require the actual construction of the building, and a permit can lapse. Mr. Foy asked about sections of this ordinance conflicting with other recent Council directives and existing ordinances, particularly relating to restricting the use of the street vacation payment to a Central Business District Improvement Fund and payment of the relocation • costs for City utilities. He stated the report indicates that because of deterioration of the infrastructure, utilities under "A" Street must be replaced; however, he has been advised otherwise by the Director of Engineering and Utilities. Council member Foy said it should be the responsibility of the Mall Corporation to relocate the infrastructure; not the general public. Mayor Berndt stated there are some areas that staff needs to clarify for Council, i.e., Section 2, No. 2, of the proposed Ordinance, in light of the action taken by the Council on Saturday. She added she would like to have a more complete report from Engineering regarding the infrastructure before a decision is made on the issue. It was 'MOVED: BY BUCHANAN" TO " TABLE °THIS ITEM The motion died for ,_ lack' of:: a second. Council 'member Beauchamp inquired about the rationale on why the City should have to pay for the relocation of the infrastructure if the project' is approved. Council member Foy referenced the small map which includes a portion of 4th Street, stating, the drawing extends into 4th Street and there has been no testimony by the public that says there is not a public need existing for that part of the street. He made reference to Ordinance No. 1126, which granted the original easement for the ramps, and stated he would like the former City Attorney, Fred Andrews, who wrote the ordinance, to give an explanation as to the intent of that document. Mayor Berndt stated there are others wishing to address this issue and asked Larry Mathews to do so at this time. Larry Mathews, 805 South 17th Avenue read into the record the following statement: "I protest condition #8 of Section 2 of the proposed ordinance vacating a portion of East "A" Street, which reads as follows: #8. 'That the City shall bear the cost of any city water, sewer or drainage pipe reconstruction or relocation fran, the area to be vacated by this ordinance. which cost is estimated at $110,697. The City Council finds and declares that its water, sewer and drainage lines which shall be relocated because of the vacation authorized by this ordinance are in such a deteriorated state that replacement at City expense is a direct public benefit to the City's public water, sewer and drainage system'; At the May 23, 1989 Council meeting, the minutes say: Council member Foy commented that the second vacation, requested by the City, was neither requested nor required by the applicant and would not be necessary if the first vacation had not been requested, yet it will cost the City $110,697 in unrecoverable costs. Mr. Lehman responded that the $110, 697 costs are necessitated by the original vacation request and will basically entail reconstruction and relocation of the sewer line, reconstruction of a portion of the City's storm drain system, and of the City water pipe system ". Mr. Mathews stated, "It is my understanding that the State constitution prohibits municipal corporations from making gifts to private individuals. Unless there is direct and public evidence that these utility lines are truly in a deteriorated state, then the cost of these utility lines is a ,gift to a private individual. It would appear from the ' testimony- of Mr. Lehman at the May 23, 1989 Council meeting that the reconstruction and relocation of the utility lines is the direct result of the vacation of "A" Street and not due to the deterioration of those utility lines. As I recall, the long range construction plan of the city does not include the replacement or reconstruction of these utility lines. I would appreciate from the Council some answers to questions that are troubling me. Is there an #6 DECEMBER 12, 1989 3 66, .engineering report prior to the Council action ,regarding the "A" Street vacation indicating that the utility lines in question were deteriorated and in need of replacement? Can the City prove that the language justifying the replacement /relocation of -the utility lines is in fact a true statement of public need? With sewer utility rates due to go up another 16% January 1, 1990, it is not fair to the citizens of Yakima to give away $110,697 to a private developer. I hope the City Council can see in it's collective heart to remove condition #8 from the proposed ordinance and require the benefitting parties to pay the utility costs". Mr. Mathews indicated he would like these concerns included in the official record of the Council meeting. • Stan Pratt, co -owner of the property identified on the map as Lots 6, 7 and 8 of Block 89, directly to the northeast of the area proposed for vacation, voiced his objections to the proposed vacation. Mr. Pratt outlined how "A" Street is utilized to access his property. He said that unless some type of access can be provided to his property, particularly from "A" Street and Yakima Avenue, he would be very much opposed to the closure of the two parcels, E and F on the maps. He stated an alternative might be for the City to cut a turn lane at the end of Naches, such as the one.on the south end in front of the YMCA. Mayor Berndt asked for other questions or comments. It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS., TO TABLE UNTIL WE RECEIVE SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Council member Barnett noted that he raised some questions relating to the Resolution passed in September regarding this ordinance. Mayor Berndt reminded staff that there was the question about the issue approved during the budget session concerning where the funds obtained from street vacations may be utilized, the condition of the infrastructure, and Mr. Pratt's concern about ingress and egress to his office building. Mayor Berndt stated before the issue comes back to the Council, she would like staff to arrange for a walking tour of the area so Council can more clearly understand the situation. Council member Foy stated since he will not be serving on the Council when the issue comes back, he would like the record to show that he is requesting the full text of the documents responding to his inquiries today and any other questions he may have in the future concerning this issue. He asked that these documents be placed in a packet for him. B.. MOTION TO PREPARE LEGISLATION TO INITIATE SECOND "A" STREET VACATION OF ADJACENT ALLEY AND STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY This item was tabled until staff brings in the additional information requested during the discussion of Item 15 -A. 16. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS.'FOR SKYBRIDGES Council member Barnett pointed out that this proposed ordinance on the skybridges does not comply with the Hearing Examiner's process and asked if it could be re- written to incorporate that process. Mr. Skone indicated the ordinance was prepared by Preston Thorgrimson's office, however, it can be rewritten if that is Council's desire. It was MOVED BY FOY,: SECONDED BY BEAUCHAMP, THAT . THE ORDINANCE' BE REWRITTEN:' TAO CONFORM TO ; `:: HEARING'' EXAMINER' S PROCESS. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 17. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGULATING EXCAVATION SITES A brief discussion ensued about the definition of a "stairwell" and "stairway" versus a "passageway." Council member Foy referred to Page 2, section 3, 6.56.215, stating $50 per day does not cover the cost of filling a hole due to the tests that have to be conducted as the level of the earth is brought up••to various grades. Mr: Shampine :stated that past history 'shows that'the judge does moti always rule :that the civil penalty Must be:paid for such a violation,• therefore, he does not anticipate that all of the fines levied will be collected. Ordinance No. 3225, having been read by title, it was #7 3 6° DECEMBER 12, 1989 MOVED BY.:. FOY, .. SECONDED , BY .. SIMS.,: THAT . THE' ° ORDINANCE .: : BE. PASSED. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote. ORDINANCE..N0. - 3225, :. AN ORDINANCE related to nuisances, declaring certain conditions to be abatable nuisances, adding additional and remedial powers; amending Section 6.56.210 and enacting Section 6.56.120 and Section 6.56.215 as new sections, all of the City of Yakima Municipal Code. Mayor Berndt requested that Mr. Shampine check on the house at the corner of Race and Naches Avenue. Mr. Shampine stated staff is aware of that house and the owners have already been given notice. * 18. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS INTO THE HEALTH BENEFIT RESERVE FUND (NO FORMAL ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS MEETING) An Ordinance appropriating funds into the Health Benefit Reserve Fund having been read by title only at this meeting, was laid on the table for one week, or until December 19, 1989. *19. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUND'S INTO THE WAR -ON -DRUGS FUND (NO FORMAL ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS MEETING) An Ordinance 'appropriating funds into the` Coalition for the War on Drugs Fund for drug prevention, education and intervention programs, having been read by title only at this meeting, was laid on the table for one week, or until December 19, 1989. 20. OTHER BUSINESS A. Off Agenda Item GRANT APPLICATION FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MATCHING FUNDS Don Skone stated the Department of Community and Economic Development is proposing to submit a grant application to the Washington State Department of Community Development for local development matching funds in the amount of $25,000. Mr. Skone stated staff would determine if there are collections or aggregations of smaller sites that could be assembled to form a larger industrial site for industrial development. Staff also proposes to establish a local land use and property data base as a part of the City's GDMS system. The overall objective is to respond to the shortage of industrial sites and industrial park sites in the Yakima urban area. Mr. Skone stated staff is asking for Council to authorize the submittal of the grant application. It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY:. SIMS, : 10. : AUTHORIZE' THE. THE GRANT . APPLICATION. - .The motion carried by unanimous'voice vote. Information Items: Items of information supplied to Council were: Memo from AWC regarding Results of Legislative Committee vote on AWC Priority Issues. 12/4/89; Letter from Washington .State Gambling Commission regarding Indian Gaming,Regulatory Act. 12/6/89; Memo fran Director of Works' and Parks'. Recreation Manager regarding 'Official Opening of Chesterley Park. 11/30/89; Memo from City Attorney regarding Damage Claims Referred to Insurance Company. 12/5/89; Yakima Basin Update; November 1989; and Permit Center Report for November 1989. 21. EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE LITIGATION AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING It was MOVED BY BEAUCHAMP , " :.SECONDED '10 '.;MOVE INTO ... EXECUTIVE " SESSION FOR , APPROXIMATELY`' FIFTEEN°'.:_MINUTES FORTHE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING" PROSPECTIVETIGATION. AND'°';ODLLECTIVE" The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote #8 DECEMBER 12, 1989 3 68 22. ADJOURNMENT Following the completion of the Executive Session, the meeting adjourned at the hour of 4:43 P.M. READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY: ���,y i p, �� 0 /9 i / y 9 a CO IL MEMBER DAT ATTEST: 0 I,AiTE C,11 C CITY CLERK MAYOR Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk Barbara J. Toney, CMC. • • • • . .. I .. i e .. •. r. _ 5" C #9