HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/24/1989 Business Meeting • OCTOBER 24, 1989
BUSINESS MEETING
1. ROLL CALL
The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 P.M. in the
Council Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Mayor Pat
Berndt, presiding, Council members Clarence Barnett, Henry
Beauchamp, Lynn Buchanan, Lynn Carmichael, Jerry Foy and Bernard
Sims present on roll call. City Manager Zais, City Attorney Vanek,
City Clerk Roberts and Deputy City Clerk Toney also present.
2. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Public Works Director Copeland in
memory of Street and Refuse Superintendent Del Kary. .
3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
Mayor Berndt reported that she and City Manager Zais met with
William Bennett, Federal Drug Director from Washington D.C. She
said Mr. Bennett did not make any promises but he said he would be
looking out for the City of Yakima and the unique problem it ,
has as an illegal drug distribution center. Mr. Zais added that he
was particularly impressed with Mr. Bennett's willingness to come
to Yakima to hear such a strong message from law enforcement,
law and justice personnel, local and state officials, school
district personnel, etc. regarding Yakima's drug problem and the
efforts being made to try to bring the situation under control.
Mr. Zais stated that level of recognition in Washington D.C. is
important to Yakima.
Mayor Pro -Tem Buchanan reported that he attended a recent boxing
match at Perry Trade and accepted a plaque for Mayor Berndt and the
City of Yakima from the Fight For Life Club.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Berndt referred to .the items placed on the Consent Agenda,
questioning whether there were any additions or deletions from
either Council members or citizens present. It was the consensus
of the Council that Items Nos. 8, 9 and 10 be added to the Consent
. Agenda, and Items Nos. 11 and 17 be removed. The City Clerk then
read the Consent Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances
by title. It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY.BUCHANAN,, THAT THE
CONSENT AGENDA,:. AS READ, BE PASSED. The Motion. carried by
unanimous roll call vote. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an
asterisk ( *) indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under
one motion without further discussion.)
*5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 3, 1989
The Council minutes of October 3, 1989 were approved, having been
duly certified accurate by two Council members and no one present
wishing to have said minutes read publicly.
6. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Certificates of appreciation were presented to representatives
from various lending institutions throughout the community who have
• been involved in the Homeownership Program. Those receiving
certificates were: David Arkills of First Federal Savings Bank;
Dick Allen of Pioneer National Bank; Dick Maison of Yakima Valley
Bank; Manny Martinez of First Interstate Bank; Bill Galbraith
of Washington Mutual, Mark Sullivan of Benjamin Franklin Federal
Savings; Larry Marvin of Yakima Federal; Jackie Wishert of Security
Pacific; Danielle Mullen of U.S. Bank, Ann Wentz of Yakima Federal;
Dan Koszczewski of Seattle First National Bank, Paul Regimbal of
Catholic Credit Union. Mayor Berndt expressed appreciation on
AAD /1
S oo
OCTOBER 24, 1989
behalf of the City for the support these individuals and lending
institutions have given to the City's Homeownership Program.
Philip Small, 1006 South 26th Avenue, thanked the Council for the
4 -Way stop sign at 24th Avenue & Bonnie. Doone, stating it has
tremendously reduced the speed of the traffic in the neighborhood.
Mr. Small presented three letters regarding possible violations
related to the development at 24th Avenue and Nob Hill Boulevard,
specifically the parking. Mayor Berndt stated this will be
directed to staff for review.
7. PUBLIC MEETING ON REZONE OF PROPERTY AT 50TH AND SUMMITVIEW
AVENUES, AS REQUESTED BY R. J. HOMER
Joan Davenport, Associate Planner, stated this rezone request was
filed by Richard Homer. The Hearing Examiner conducted a public
meeting regarding the request to rezone five lots located on the
northeast corner of 54th Avenue & Summitview from - R -1 to B -1 to
allow for construction of a professional office building. Mrs.
Davenport briefly summarized the reasons for denial of the request
citing that land use compatibility, concern for the residential
neighborhood and failure to establish the public need for
additional professional office buildings in the neighborhood. On
September 20, 1989 the Hearing Examiner rendered his decision for
denial of the request.
Mayor Berndt opened the public meeting asking those present to
speak in favor of the rezone do so at this time. Dick Homer, 180
McDowell, Selah, stated three of the corners at 54th and Summitview
currently are zoned commercial, the Conover Building is being
constructed across the street to the west, as well as a bank and an
office building. Mr. Homer stated the property is divided into
five lots, therefore a developer could build five structures on
that property and Council would have very little control over the
situation. With regard to his proposal, Mr. Homer. said he is
willing to give up three curb cuts whereas another developer may
decide to utilize all five and this would result in some major
traffic problems. He asked what will become of the property if it
is not rezoned so that it can be utilized? He stated the property
is undesirable for a single family home because no one is ever
going to build a home on Summitview that would be compatible with
the current zoning. He stated there'are much worse structures that
could be built at this location other than a professional office
building. Mr. Homer indicated he has already been approached by
prospective tenants. He suggested that the residents living on
North 50th Avenue cooperate with the City Council regarding the
installation of a traffic signal for the safety of the children in
the area rather than fighting this type of rezone. Mr. Homer
cautioned that the City Council needs to be careful about the
negative messages they are sending out to developers. Council
member Beauchamp asked if Mr. Homer actually intends to build an
office building and Mr. Homer replied that is correct. He said
he is not sure if he has time now to construct the office building
before the prospective tenants' current lease expires.
Donald Martin, owner Kreiger & Associates Real Estate, indicated he
is the listing agent in the transaction with Mr. Homer. He stated
the Council should take into consideration that the seller has
tried to market this property for the past four years and has been
unsuccessful in selling it as residential property. He indicated
that the property consists of two run -down houses and three vacant
lots on an open corner. He stated the property owner is a
disabled, elderly woman who is unable to take care of the property
and would like to sell it. Mr. Martin stated it is not likely
that anyone will want to purchase the property for the purpose of
•building residential dwellings because it is surrounded by
commercial buildings. He stated Mr. Homer is proposing to build an
attractive office building at that location and the property owner
should be given the opportunity to sell.
AAD /2
3l
OCTOBER 24; 1989
There being no one else to speak in favor of the rezone, Mayor
Berndt asked those wishing to speak against the request to do so at
this time.
Cindy Peterson, 306 North 50th Avneue, spoke as a representative of
the neighborhood, stating she is aware that at least one person
attempted to purchase a portion of the,property in question. The
individual was told` that the" asking price of the property was in
excess of $89,000. Mrs. Peterson stated if the owner would lower
the asking price, the property might have a better chance of
selling. She stated that is it ridiculous to say that no one will'
want to build a home on property that abuts Summitview. She added
that that is the impression she had when Tancara was being built,
. however, the homes in that subdivision sold and it has the same
situation with the homes abutting onto Tieton Drive.
Ted Nyberg, 4910 Prestige Court, commented that he does not want
the Council to get the impression that the neighborhood is
discriminating against Mr. Homer's proposal. He said the
neighborhood .will oppose any rezone request for commercial
• development at that particular location because they believe is it
not compatible with the residential area of Prestige Manor. He
pointed out that Mr. Homer's proposal would eliminate three curb
cuts on Summitview but the traffic will be routed onto North 50th
Avenue and through the residential neighborhood and he is opposed
to this.
Council member Beauchamp stated with the commercial development
already in that area, he feels it is unlikely that some type of
business will not be permitted there in the future. He suggested
the residents put sane effort into determining what type of
business they feel might be compatible with the residential
neighborhood. He asked Mr. Nyberg if he attended the public
meetings to offer testimony in opposition to the other businesses
that are being constructed in that immediate area and Mr. Nyberg
indicated he was out of town at that time.
Council member Buchanan pointed out that once the property is
rezoned anything in a B -1 Class can be built at that location.
Mrs. Peterson, 306 North 50th Avenue, commented that the neighbors
in Prestige Manor were not notified of the public meetings,
therefore, none of them were present to offer any input about the
businesses that are currently being constructed.
Betty Warren, 302 North 50th Avenue, also spoke in opposition to
the rezone. She stated that Council member Buchanan is correct
in the statement he made about once the property has been rezoned
anything can be constructed there that meets those particular
zoning requirements. She stated that is exactly what has happened
with the Conover Building and the bank. She said the original
proposal was for a pharmacy and a retirement facility. Mrs. Warren
stated she was informed that when Prestige Manor was developed the
Uthmanns chose not to be a part of the development, opting to wait
a few years and then sell their property at a higher commercial
rate. She reiterated the ,concern about the impact on the traffic
in the neighborhood if the property is rezoned to allow commercial
development.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, Mayor Berndt closed
the public meeting. She asked that Council members declare' any
contact they might have had regarding this rezone request prior to
this meeting. Council members reported none. Mayor Berndt having
asked for Council direction on this matter, it was MOVED BY
CARMICHAEL, SECONDED • BY •SIMS, TO CONCUR WITH THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION AND DENY THE REZONE REQUEST. Under discussion
Council member Beauchamp asked if it is staff's belief that
the only compatible land use for this area is residential?
Associate Planner Davenport indicated staff believes the current
vacant property on Summitview has merit as residential use. She
said staff feels it is best to take a conservative approach to land
use along Summitview and proceed with the review of the Urban Area
•
AAD /3
•
OCTOBER 24, 1989
Plan and the Land Use Plan. Council member Foy stated he believes
the property has potential for commercial development as well
because of the businesses already in that area. Council member
Barnett stated development in that area can't be delayed until the
review is completed. He stated he feels Mr. Homer has a right to
request a rezone for the property, but he will be voting against
the request due to the findings of the Hearing Examiner. The
question was called for a vote on the motion. The motion carried
by unanimous voice vote.
8. CONSIDERATION OF 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET
PROGRAM AND REQUEST FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(SEE RESOLUTION)
Barbara Harris, P.O. Box 812, Yakima, suggested using Community
Development Block Grant Funds to purchase the buildings and pay
.the tenants to rehabilitate the building, thereby increasing the
City's housing stock. She stated a lot of CDBG funds are allocated
to private landlords to improve their rental units when they aren't
really worth the effort. Mrs. Harris stated many cities around
the country are renovating old hotels and providing single
occupancy for the homeless. She asked why the City can't initiate
a program like this instead of giving the money to private
investors to improve their properties. She stated she noticed that
none of the CDBG funds have been allocated for the rehabilitation
of the irrigation lines on the east side of the City. Mrs. Harris
stated she attended the last meeting conducted by the Housing
Manager and there were only two citizens present at that meeting
and only four members of the Community Development Advisory
Committee present. Council member Carmichael commented that she is
not in favor of taking privately owned property off the tax rolls.
Mrs. Harris stated she would rather see the tenants become owners
of the buildings rather than give the money to the landlords.
• Council member Foy stated the rehabilitation program keeps the
property in the rental market and he does not have a problem with
what is being proposed.
George Pechtel, 1112 Swan Avenue, Vice Chairman of the Community
Development Advisory Committee, reported that on September 12, 1989
- a public meeting was held regarding the CDBG budget. He stated
staff has done a tremendous job in stretching the $640,000 to fund
basic programs. He indicated that no new programs are being
implemented. Mr. Pechtel encouraged Council to approve the
application as submitted. Council member Beauchamp asked what kind
of a program does the Committee have in place to make sure
minorities receive a share of the funding? Housing Manager Kracht
stated the program is set up primarily on a first - come - first -serve
basis. She stated about 40% of the contractors and contracts are
awarded to minorities. Mrs. Kracht stated about 60% of the
applications for the Homeownership Program reflect Hispanic
. surnames. She indicated they have about 38 -40% of minority
participation. Council member Beauchamp asked for a report which
shows the minority breakdown of those participating in the programs
and Mrs. Kracht said she will forward that information to him.
This concluded the discussion of the Community Development Block
Grant Budget and Program. Resolution No. D-5649 having been read
by title, it was MOVED BY CARMICHAEL, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, THAT
THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED. The motion carried by unanimous roll •
call vote.
RESOLUTION NO. D -5649, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the
City Manager of the City of Yakima to file an application with the
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for
funding for the 1990 Community Development Block Grant program.
*9. REPORT FROM'YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL REGARDING AIR.PORT'LEASES /FINANCES
The report from the Airport Manager dated October. 24, 1989,
regarding the status of all major leases and finances at the Yakima
Air Terminal was placed on the Consent Agenda and accepted as
submitted.
AAD /4
303
OCTOBER 24, 1989
*10. REPORT FROM TRANSIT DIVISION REGARDING SPECIAL HOLIDAY SERVICE
(AVAILABLE TUESDAY MORNING)
The report from the Public Works Director and the Transit Manager
dated October 24, 1989 regarding the Extended Holiday Transit
;Service was placed on the Consent Agenda and accepted as submitted. •
11. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF FACT SHEET
ON EMS LEVY FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION PURPOSES
Council member Barnett pointed out that the fact sheet refers
to a projected revenue of 1.2 million dollars and is somewhat
higher than the figure of $1,073,494.68 which was quoted in a
report by John Stouffer in June of 1989. Mr. Barnett stated if the
1.2 million dollar figure is correct and Mr. Stouffer still needs
9% to operate his department, this means an increase of almost 12%
over and above the amount he objected to during the public
hearings. Chief Beeson indicated the 9% figure was an estimate by
. Mr. Stouffer at that time, but he believes Mr. Stouffer is now
projecting 8% for the first year of the levy, and after that,
everything must be approved by the Commissioners. Council member
Barnett stated he would like to be assured that this proposal will
not produce the negative ramifications that occurred when this was
proposed with the change in the form of government. City Manager
Zais stated the original submittal prepared by Chief Beeson was
reviewed and edited by City Attorney Vanek who thought this issue
should be presented in the form of a resolution to be acted upon by
the City Council. City Attorney Vanek stated there is no mechanism
in' place in the City of Yakima for dissemination of the fact sheet
and this appears to be a state requirement. Mr. Vanek stated he
has prepared a resolution for Council to act upon if they desire.
He stated staff attempted to remove any wording from the fact sheet
that might sound as though we are trying to sway people one way or
another. Council member Foy objected to the cost of preparing the
fact sheet in this manner because. the same information has already
been provided.in the County's Voter Pamphlet. He stated he will
not support this as it .is a duplication of effort. Discussion
ensued about the manner in which the ' fact sheet . is proposed to be
mailed and Chief Beeson_stated is anticipated that about 7,000-
8;000-citizens.will receive the fact.sheet along with their.utility
billings prior to election day. The resolution was.read by .title
and Council member Barnett asked that the following changes be
made in the text of the resolution: the first paragraph, line five,
delete the word "minor" and the last sentence of the first
paragraph the word "only" be• deleted. He asked.that. under FACT: in
the first paragraph should also refer to the Yakima Fire Department
.:and Fire Districts so people will not think the Fire Districts have
• been deleted. In the very last sentence, : heLasked that the. words
"funding" be deleted and the words "could help fund a portion of a
future advanced communication system such as 9-1 -1" be inserted.
It was MOVED BY FOY, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN,, TO DENY THE: RESOLUTION
AS READ. The motion carried by. unanimous roll call vote.
*12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO YAKIMA CENTER
RULES AND REGULATIONS LICENSE AGREEMENTS
RESOLUTION NO. D- 5651., A. RESOLUTION authorizing the adoption of
Yakima Center Rental Rules, Regulations, and Rates for 1990.
*13. REPORT ON STATUS OF STREET BOND ISSUE /FINANCING
The report on the status of the 1986 Street Bond Issue /Financing,
was accepted.
14. APPROVAL OF OUT-OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR DIXIE KRACHT AND JOAN
DAVENPORT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TO
BEND, OREGON . .
Barbara Harris, P.O. Box 812, Yakima, commented that she thinks
the Bend Housing Housing Authority and the, Board... of . Commissioners
should pay staff's travel expenses since they have requested staff
present a program in Bend, Oregon. Director of Community &
AAD /5
®y
OCTOBER 24, 1989
Economic Development Rice stated he feels the request by the
Housing Staff and Commissioners of Bend, Oregon, speaks well of
City of Yakima staff in that they are being asked to provide
technical assistance to another entity. Mr. Rice stated he does
not feel the travel expenses are out of line and he believes it is
money well spent. It was MOVED BY_.BUCHANAN,,. SECONDED BY FOY, TO
APPROVE. THE "REQUEST FOR TRAVEL. The motion carried by unanimous
voice vote.
*15. SET DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR SUNNYSLOPE ADDITION FINAL PLAT FOR
NOVEMBER 14, 1989
November 14, 1989 was set as the date of public meeting on the
Sunnyslope Addition Final Plat.
16. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RESIDENTIAL PARKING
PERMITS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Customer Services Manager Tabayoyon stated as a result of a citizen
request for parking permits for residents who live in the Central
Business District staff has prepared legislation establishing
residential parking permits. Council member Carmichael asked if
the $12.00 permit fee will cover the City's cost and also asked how
will the permits be enforced? Mr. Tabayoyon responded that the
$12.00 permit will cover the cost involved and the City Parking
Enforcement Officers will be responsible for enforcement of the
ordinance. Council member Barnett stated he does not think a
citizen should have to pay money for the privilege of parking on a
city street in front of his own home. He referred to subsection
(4) stating a person should be able to come in for a renewal if.he
gets a new car. Council member Foy stated he will support the
request, however, he feels paragraph 2 on page one, paragraph 4 on
page two, and paragraph 6 on page three are unnecessary. He stated
the person should be issued a permit for one_ .space if there, is a
space available. Following further discussionand Ordinance No.
3215, having been read by title, it was MOVED BY BUCHANAN,
SECONDED BY. BEAUCHAMP, THAT THE .RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED. It was
MOVED BY BARNET, SECONDED BY.FOY, TO AMEND THE RESOLUTION ON PAGE
2 PARAGRAPH .C,.THE.FIRST SENTENCE. AFTER PARKING PERMIT TO THE
APPLICANT, DELETE "UPON`PAYMENT OF TWELVE DOLLAR NON- REFUNDABLE
FEE TO COVER THE COST OF ADMINISTRATION." . Under discussion,
Council member Buchanan stated we are going out of our way to add
an additional program, therefore, we should receive some kind of
remuneration for this. He said he will vote against the motion.
The question was called for the vote on the amendment. The
amendment failed by 4 -3 roll call vote. Berndt, Buchanan,
Carmichael and Sims voting nay. The question was called for a
vote on the .motion. The motion carried by 5-2. roll call vote.
Carmichael and Sims voting nay. Council member Barnett asked that
the record show that he feels the citizens should not have to`pay
the $12.00 to park on the street in front of their residence.
ORDINANCE N0. 3215, AN ORDINANCE relating to traffic; establishing
a system of residential parking permits in the Central Business
District; and enacting Section 9.50.200 as a new section of the
City of Yakima Municipal Code.
*17. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE FIXING AND LEVYING THE AD VALOREM TAX
FOR 1990
Council member Barnett stated he took this item off of the Consent
Agenda to praise staff. He stated the table on the allocation of
funds is very meaningful as it shows that the majority of the
funding goes to the schools and that the City actually receives a
small portion of the total bill. Ordinance No. 3216 having been
read by title, it was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED. BY CARMICHAEL,
THAT THE ORDINANCE BE PASSED. The motion carried by unanimous roll
call vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 3216, AN ORDINANCE fixing and levying the amount of
ad valorem taxes necessary to balance estimated revenue with
estimated expenditures for the 1990 Budget for the City of Yakima.
AAD /6
OCTOBER 24,:1989 OS
*18. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 BUDGET AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE:)
i �, ._.. • T + • .._ . _ , ..
An Ordinance appropriating funds for computerlhardware, having been •
read by title only at the previous meeting, was brought before the
Council for a second meeting.
ORDINANCE NO. 3217, AN ORDINANCE amending the 1989 budget for the
City of Yakima; and making an appropriation of $200,830 in the Fund
for expenditure during 1989 for computer hardware and software.
*19. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 BUDGET AND
APPROPRIATING FRS FUNDS FOR AIRPORT PROPERTY APPRAISAL
An Ordinance. appropriating funds for Airport property appraisals,
having been read by title at the previous meeting, was brought
before the Council for a second reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 3218, AN ORDINANCE amending the 1989 budget for the
City of Yakima; and making an appropriation of $9,000 in the
Federal Revenue Sharing Fund for expenditure during 1989 for
property appraisal costs at the Yakima Air Terminal.
*20. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 PARKS CAPITAL FUND
AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR ADDITIONAL BOND PROJECTS FUNDED BY
INTEREST DOLLARS
An Ordinance appropriating funds for additional Bond projects
funded by interest dollars, having been read by title only at the
• previous meeting, was brought' before the Council for a second
reading. •
ORDINANCE, NO. 3219, AN ORDINANCE amending the 1989 budget for the
City of Yakima;'and• making an appropriation of $188,503 in the
Parks Capital Fund for expenditure' during 1989 for additional Bond
Project requirements.
21. OTHER BUSINESS.
Mayor Berndt announced that there will not be a Council meeting
next Tuesday as it is the fifth Tuesday of the month. She also
announced that she, Assistant City Manager Stouder and Associate
Planner Davenport will be traveling to Tacoma at the State's
expense to participate in the Governor's Housing Forum on November
7th. She added that Mr. Rice will also be attending but will not be
participating in the forum.
Council member Foy noted that on November 7th Council will start
Budget Review sessions and asked when the Preliminary Budget will
be ready. Secondly, he asked that the surcharge issue be included
in the Preliminary Budget Review process so it can be acted upon
prior to the end of the year. City Manager Zais stated the
Preliminary Budget is still being assimilated and will be
distributed November 3rd. Regarding the surcharge issue, he
stated staff is waiting for the consultant's study to be presented
for review with the County Commissioners prior to discussion at
the Budget Wrap -up session. He stated the revenues have not been
programmed into the budget because we do not know what that
ultimate revenue impact may be.
Council member Barnett asked if the meeting scheduled for the
meeting of November 21st can be rescheduled as he will not be in
attendance. City Manager Zais stated no changes have been made at
this time but if less than five Council members will be in
attendance staff will consider rescheduling the meeting. Council
members Barnett, Carmichael and Sims indicated they will not be in
attendance at the November 21st meeting and Mayor Berndt asked
staff to consider rescheduling that meeting.
AAD /7
-;6 OCTOBER 24, 1989
Executive Session
It was MOVED BY BEAUCHAMP, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE
SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND
PROSPECTIVE LITIGATION.. The motion carried by unanimous voice
vote.
Information Items:
Items of information supplied to Council were: Letter from West
Valley School District No. 208 regarding Application for Extension
of City Sewer to West Valley High School. 10/17/89; Memo from
III
Director of Public Works and Parks Manager regarding 1989 Summer
Youth Program for Disabled Children - Final Report. 10/9/89; Memo
from Director of Public Works and Parks and Recreation Manager
regarding 1989 Summer Playground Final Report. 1/4/89; Letter
from Jo Shafer, Franklin Middle School PTSA, regarding Transit
stops on Tieton Drive. 10/17/89; Memo from City Engineer
regarding Request for Sidewalk at 32nd Avenue at Nob Hill School.
10/9/89; Memo from Director of Public Works:aand.Transit ,Division
regarding Monthly Transit Operations Report for September
1989; and Hiring/Vacancies Status Reports from Personnel Office as
of October 13, 1989
22. ADJOURNMENT
Following the conclusion of the Executive Session, the meeting was
adjourned at the hour of 3:55 P.M. /
li' t
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY / 1 , 1 A / ∎Ik , A , 4J l A A Ae (-27-r9
♦IUNCIL . i :E• DATE
,,(
•
ATTEST: i.!� //1 i',4-2/7--.2r7 COUiCIL MEMBEv ' DATE
III
/<a_ii..- xi 12,9-4-e-}74),c_Joric_ git 44_4,06r
CITY CLERK MAYOR
Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk Barbara J. Toney, CMC.
III
AAD /8