The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/03/2014 10 Indoor Pool Facility ProposalBUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 10. For Meeting of: June 03, 2014 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ITEM TITLE: Consideration and direction from City Council for a proposed Indoor Pool Facility. SUBMITTED BY: Scott Schafer, Public Works Director, 576- 6411 Ken Wilkinson, Parks & Recreation Manager SUMMARY EXPLANATION: The proposal for an Indoor Pool Facility with the possibility for a public-private partnership with a non-profit organization to jointly construct and share in the operation costs was previously made to City Council at the April 8th Study Session. Staff requests further direction from City Council for the following: 1. Request for authority to pursue the proposed Indoor Pool Facility project. 2. Request for authority to pursue partnerships with the Yakima School District and to be determined non-profit organization for the proposed project. To maintain current services, investing in our Parks & Recreation facilities for repair and replacement is crucial for an aging infrastructure. This has become more apparent with the vast improvements required at both Franklin and Lions Pools. Most recently, problems plaguing Chesterly Park can be directly contributed to an aging infrastructure that is heavily utilized, but financially neglected. Much of the same is expected to continue City-wide until adequate funding is made available to address capital replacement. Attached for your review is an Aquatic Center Cost Comparison Memo Exhibit "A" — Comparison of Amenities and Costs (2008 vs. 2014 Aquatic Center Proposals) Exhibit "B" — Property Site Pros & Cons Resolution: Ordinance: Other (Specify): Memo Contract: Start Date: Item Budgeted: Funding Source/Fiscal Impact: Strategic Priority: Insurance Required? No Mail to: Phone: APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: RECOMMENDATION: Contract Term: End Date: Amount: N/A Improve the Built Environment City Manager Staff respectfully requests further direction from City Council regarding the proposed Indoor Pool Facility. ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo - Aquatic Center Comparison Exhibit "K - Comparison of Amenities & Costs Exhibit "B" - Property Site Pros & Cons Upload Date 5/27/2014 5/10/2014 5/10/2014 Type Cover Memo Date: May 7, 2014 To: Tony O'Rourke, City Manager From: Scott Schafer, Public Works Director Ken Wilkinson, Parks & Recreation Manager Subject: Aquatic Center Comparison and Costs At the April 8th Study Session, staff presented a proposal for an Indoor Pool Facility with the desire for a centralized location for the ease of travel; formed as a possible public- private partnership with a non-profit organization to jointly construct and share in the operation costs. This would add a great benefit to our community. However, we must first clearly delineate and distinguish the differences between this proposed Indoor Pool Facility project and that of the 2008 Aquatic Center proposal. 2008 Aquatic Center The 2008 Aquatic Center proposal was intended to be a Regional Indoor/Outdoor Water Theme Park funded and operated by the City of Yakima, City of Union Gap, and the City of Selah to provide a leisure aquatic facility that would serve the recreational interests of the community. This proposal was based upon the closure of three swimming pools in 2005 and assumed that both Franklin and Lions Pools would also be closed and that the existing water playgrounds at Miller and MLK would remain operational. Outdoor Amenities: • Lazy River (500' LF x 18' VV) • Zero -Depth Activity Pool • Water Slide Complex • Wave Pool Indoor Amenities: • Small Activity Pool • Water Play Features • 8 lane 25 -yd x 25-m Lap Pool The project also included a sand volleyball court, shade structures, spectator's area, concessions/kitchen, fitness & event rooms, lockers, showers, and office space. Estimated total cost of the venture was $19,979,000. This would have been in addition to the cost of land acquisition. Indoor Pool Facility The City's current proposal is for an Indoor Pool Facility to ultimately replace Lions Pool. The City's existing swimming facilities are aging and have a limited lifespan unless capital repairs and replacements are conducted. It is projected that over the next twenty years, Franklin and Lions Pools will cost approximately $2.2 and 3.0 million respectively to maintain the current functions of the facilities. The intent of this Indoor Pool Facility is to first and foremost provide fitness opportunities for our senior citizens, while offering year round recreational swimming of all ages. Indoor Amenities: • 6 lane 25 -yd x 25-m Lap Pool • Lazy River (500' LF x 8') — Therapeutic • Water Play Area This project would also include a locker room, showers, and office space. The estimated cost for construction is $8,150,000. This would be in addition to the cost of land acquisition, which could range between $1.5 and $2.0 million dollars. The City is currently incurring an annual operational and maintenance cost of $461,100 at Lions Pool. Over the next fifteen to twenty years, the following list of upgrades has been identified to keep the in addition to the annual O&M: 2015 — Replace pump $50,000 2016 — Replace shower boiler $50,000 Engineer's evaluate of structure $300,000 2017 — Convert to sand filter system $150,000 2018 — Replace bulkhead $80,000 2019 — Install new glass door/windows $250,000 2020 — Renovate front area/restrooms $400,000 2024 — Replace boiler (water/air heater) $200,000 2030 — Renovate pool tank $1,500,000 Staff would consider the closure or sale of Lions Pool should a new indoor pool facility be built. Proposed sites include: • N. 16th Avenue • Congdon Orchards 64th Avenue • Fisher Park Golf Course • 38th Avenue & Nob Hill • 44th Avenue & Nob Hill Market research conducted by a non-profit organization has indicated that such a proposed project would need to be centrally- located to better serve the community. Exhibit A Aquatic Center Proposal 2008 Indoor Pool Proposal 2014 OVERALL PROJECT COSTS Site Development 10.25 acres General Site Work Site Improvements Parking Spaces — 445 Shade Structures Sand Volleyball Court Decks, Walkways, Lighting, etc Fence Contingency $2,200,000 OUTDOOR Water slides $430,000 Zero -Depth Pool $658,000 Wave Pool $1,780,000 Lazy River 500' LF x 18' W $1,990,000 Permits, General Conditions, etc. $2,050,000 iubl;ol:a➢I INDOOR INDOOR 25 M x 25 Yard 8 Lane Lap Pool $1,310,000 Site Development w/ 200 Parking Spaces $1 050 000 Water Play Structures $233,000 25 Yard 6 Lane Lap Pool $1,200,000 Water Play System $76,000 Lazy River 500' LF x 8' $2,000,000 Recreational Pool $3,515,000 Water Play Area $300,000 Drop Slide $650,000 Locker Room, Showers Space $500,000 Locker Rooms, Showers, Office Space $850,000 Office & Storage Space $300,000 Fitness & Event Rooms $289,000 Site Acquisition $1,400,000 Concessions/Kitchen $190,000 Permits, General Conditions, $250,000 Spectator Area $208,000 Contingency $500,000 Permits, General Conditions, etc. $2,050,000 A/E, Furnishings, Equipment $650,000 A/E, Furnishings, Equipment $1,500,000 Siubl.ol.al SIl ,8 1,000 Project Total $19,979,000 Project Total $8,150,000, Property Analysis - Pro/Con Chart Property N. 16th Avenue Acres 6.74 acres PROS CONS Close to Hwy 12 and I - 82 New entrance needed from N. 16th with possible stoplight Good location for regional events Less than the optimal 10 acres Close to movie theater Cost to acquire property (Total Assessed Value = $874,000) Easy access from Naches and Selah Owner to consider partial donation of property City of Yakima - Geographic Information Services Area: 6.72 ac Perimeter. 2,452 ft 345fl Yakirtia GIS 1 City of Yakima, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, TomTom, US... cm MED BY• esri Copyright 2013 City of Yakima, Washington. All rights reserved. Created: Friday, Apr. 25, 2014 at 9:19 AM Map Disclaimer Information shown on this map is for punning a'e rnunrnmn purposot only The City of Yakima assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or for eny acne ukeo or WWI not taken by the user in reliance upon any maps or information provided herein Property Analysis - Pro/Con Chart Property: Congdon Acres: 11 .21 PROS CONS Located on the Westside YMCA presents on both East and West sides of the City Cost to acquire property (Total Assessed Value = $1,700,500) Close to retail - Walmart New residential growth area Owner to consider possible donation of part of the property City of Yakima - Geographic Information Services isi:Prasch _ - _ S ..- .T,qm Avor-_-_ •• i ( •J. . --1 . , t... _1 ../- - -. ..-\ - . !Levi, Avd .) 952 if Areall 21 ac Perimeter 3,C85t. ri jj 241.m W M1A _ I .01111 1 3 Yakima Gr51 Cif y of Yakima, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, DaLorm6--,Tnterma-VTomTor-TUS... Copyright 2013 City ofYakima, Washington. All rights reserved. Created: Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2014 at 1:11 PM Map Disclalmer. Information shown an this map is For planning and Illustration purposes only The City of Yakima assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or for any action taken, or action not taken by the user In reliance upon any maps or Information provided herein Property Analysis - Pro/Con Chart Property: Fisher Park Golf Course Acres: 17 PROS CONS City owned property Traffic congestion — possible need for a traffic light Centrally located No other Par 3 golf course in the area Near large residential area Displaced golfers Alternative golf voucher at Westwood Along an arterial City of Yakima - Geographic Information Services 1 LI E iserihmter High School -7 1 1 I]-]' Li 1 J :a LV ¶J u 456 -j • _ 1 t I . . LjU 1,1•1 Werb$ter Ave ---ChurtlertoI Laly Saints U - • g _c1 A_ W Arlington sr \72.; '1 gi 1 klAtbi- Ave 7 4. ?Tr 1 1 - ' -ZSm _ BOON De-en-e7Na.=: 7,7 EffiLjC,,Zi .11 5 ncit„,41 r-' "4 .7 F_trivikak_:Pt±1% .:I"-:53701.Ar. : .. — ,..., I I I t a iza,1 KeslC jr-Tr 111 I .44 e " 31=3)Ij ' — I 1 , - IYakima GTS-I-Ciii of Yakima, Esri:Car6efa,iFsli, HERE, DaLorrns. Intermgp TamTom, US .. j. 1 Copyright 2013 City of Yakima, Washington. All rights reserved. Created: Wednesday, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:09 PM Map Disclaimer: Information shown on this map is for planning and illustration purposes only The City of Yakima assumes no liability for any errors, omissions. or inaccuracies in the information provided or for any action taken, or action not taken by the user in reliance upon any maps or information provided herein Property Analysis - Pro/Con Chart Property: 38th Nob Hill Acres: 9.15 PROS CONS Along a major arterial Not optimal 10 acres Centrally located Traffic congestion — possible need for a traffic light Near large residential area Cost to acquire property (Total Assessed Value = $1,653,400) Near retail City of Yakima - Geographic Information Services LI 11, • ..0 • 41. •I- < .c • 65 fq• I 61 s •f4 : _ : tial \--..,_.:, , - . \* Lwza ,..,...,— ,... faripiTI, • .„--T=-1,:j1 'cm- i • • r'l ri .:7 . — ' • 1 3 C WINcitilli I IliB WINb1HI1BI1 it rL I 0 .. j -..,i LJ . ! .,,,,,,•1,:j.L1- 7:71'—j0q.011.-jj a. 61 I"). ..• - _ •-•-•.... Li" " • • r___' _.- -- -',=- -1'4116!jr!a-v14_'::• - 'Iil .. l'-[ — -viritionvy.-7- " :-.,___I • :2 CinlnWyi _ Copyright 2013 City of Yakima, Washington. All rights reserved. Created: Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM 323 ft - .. .._. --- - -. 1L:j •:... j ! Lj! .2;i V V Pri_a7, 71.-ct 6- _ _._1,•__=_,Iz,_r ' 7 1.- .—. . vr __J1__,I—i :,g,-- ...) •-, ,-1 0 , 4,1 I • & - -:--"-- J rx1 C•T_LI j1=T1-11, :_jj 1 1 :::-) • - "I ---1 I ' I - — 1 .I -I Yakima GIS I City ;4•Yakimari Cari-Agi, Eri-4RE--- .doe • ' • I . Chntdifvvy tefrioap, TomTa 0,1.1. - : Map Disclaimer Information shown on this map is for planning and illustration purposes only The Crty of Yakima assumes no liability for any errors. omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or for any action taken. or action not taken by the user in reliance upon any maps or information provided herein Property Analysis - Pro/Con Chart Property: 44th Nob Hill Acres: 9.93 PROS CONS Along a major arterial Traffic congestion — possible need for a traffic light Centrally located Cost to acquire property (Total Assessed Value = $2,097,600) Near large residential area Near retail City of Yakima - Geographic Information Services _J ,/ _1 a° T WiNob1111111/31(id .,__ ,,._ ____J "---CifnTid eri PI • - * il .0 : :_ 1--.---) r_,- —__ II Lri 4g.' -. 71. Cr Prrd %sift 591 it E9 Area:10.29 ac Perimeter 2,685 ft 50 it 1.= Zr 3r - r 1_3 F mho GOI •;t --1 WiNobiti ri ism d .Lt; --.;i it -r - i ---11 Jr <61- ci 1 H ...). 1,-,-1:Aliel -4—__. , ._,_i --.., w. Prasch AV* --I ----i. L7' lor61,1[1iTT 1 . 1=1 7 - , ___,— aiarm GiSi City of lakima, Ei6firCandria, Esri5ERcljitr - Intermap:uieriforri Copyright 2013 City of Yakima, Washington. All rights reserved. Created: Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 1:39 PM Map Disclaimer Information shown on this map is f r planning and illustration pur oses only The City of Yakima assumes no liability or any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or f r any action taken, or action n t taken by the user in reliance upon any maps or in ormahon provided herein