HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/14/2004 Business Meeting 458
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
BUSINESS MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 14, 2004 - 2:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CITY HALL
1. Roll Cali
Present:
Council: Mayor Paul George, presiding, Council Members Ron Bonlender,
Dave Edler, Neil McClure, Mary Place, and Bernard Sims
Staff: City Manager Zais, City Attorney Paolella and City Clerk Roberts
Absent: Council Member Susan Whitman (excused)
2. Invocation /Pledge of Allegiance
Council Member Edler gave an Invocation, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by
Council Member McClure.
3. Open Discussion for the Good of The Order /Special Presentations
Bill Cook, Director of Community and Economic Development, announced that at a
recent annual Government Economic Development Conference, the City of
Yakima received awards for three programs: 1) design and construction of the
Gateway to Wine Visitors Center; 2) Washington Avenue Improvement Project;
and 3) Yakima Business Incentive Program (including renewal community and
deduction program). He circulated the plaques for Council to see.
A. Proclamations - none
B. Appointments to Boards and Commissions (if any) — none
C. Status report on prior meeting's citizen service request (if any)
• Daniel Campeau
Joe Caruso reported on the status of the conflict between Daniel Campeau and
James Roush relating to building code complaints. The garage in question was
constructed in 1980 at which time there was a letter between the then current
owners agreeing to the property line being depicted by the fence. He circulated
pictures. We have another letter that says the fence does not depict the property
line. We have a 1980 survey, but the pins are not in the ground to verify the
property line. Based on a complaint filed by Mr. Campeau, Mr. Roush cut back a
patio cover that was attached to the garage to five feet from the purported property
line to comply with building codes. Mr. Campeau should be held to the same
building code standard. Council Member Place asked if they could take this to civil
459
DECEMBER 14, 2004
court to determine where the property line is. Assistant City Attorney McMurray
reported that, generally, a property line dispute is between the two property
owners. Mr. Roush says the garage is on his property; however, Mr. Campeau told
us it was within his property. It is difficult for the City to enforce the five -foot set
back before the property line is verified. The two property owners could split the
cost of a survey, or either one could pay to have it done. He stated he would like to
see a formal document to determine the property line if they can agree on a
boundary. We are also looking at when the garage was constructed. We have a
letter from Ms. Roush that it was constructed in 1980. We could try to get that
information from the previous owners. If we had information on when the garage
was built, it would help us determine what the codes were at that time. We believe
the building permit and five -foot setback was in place in 1975. Council Member
McClure asked about the suggestion that the garage remain, but that the required
firewall would have to be added. Doug Maples agreed that if the garage were
allowed to remain, and the fence line was determined to be the property line, we
could require them to fire rate the wall. Mr. McMurray added that if the wall were
fire - rated, it might be that an administrative adjustment could solve some of the
problems. Doug Maples interjected that we made the next -door neighbor move his
structure and suggested that we require Mr. Campeau to the same standard as
Mr. Roush. Mr. Caruso stated that the County archives records indicate that no
permits were issued for building the garage in 1980. Mr. McMurray recommended
we hold off enforcement action until we tie down-a few things, particularly the
property line, which is in the hands of the two property owners. Regarding the code
enforcement complaint against Mr. Roush, he subscribed that was probably a
good idea anyway from a fire safety viewpoint. EDLER MOVED AND PLACE
SECONDED TO FOLLOW THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO NOT
PROCEED FURTHER WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT UNTIL THE PROPERTY
LINE HAS BEEN DETERMINED. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote;
Whitman absent. Council Member Place asked that Council be advised in a few
months as to whether or not a determination has been made on the property line.
4. Consent Agenda
Mayor George referred to the items placed on the Consent Agenda, questioning
whether there were any additions or deletions from either Council members or
citizens present. Item No. 21A was added to the Consent Agenda, and Item No.
19 was removed from the Consent Agenda. The City Clerk read the Consent
Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances by title. SIMS MOVED AND
PLACE SECONDED TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS READ. The
motion carried by unanimous roll call vote, Whitman absent. (Subsequent
paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *) indicate items on the Consent Agenda
handled under one motion without further discussion.)
5. Audience Participation
Willie Boston, 1402 Landon, summarized suggested ways to increase revenue he
recently sent in a letter to the City. The City could charge adjacent property
owners the cost of cleaning up alleys if they don't do it themselves. He also
suggested changes for refuse drivers' safety that could save the City money.
2
460
DECEMBER 14, 2004
NON QUASI - JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. Public Hearing to consider amendment of the 6 -Year Transportation
Improvement Program for the period of 2005 -2010 to include additional transit
and roadway projects (See Resolution adopting amendment)
Kay Adams, City Engineer, stated that the Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program adopted last July needs to be amended to include five additional projects:
1) transit service to Selah and to the Department of Transportation office in Union
Gap; 2) 1 Street and Washington Avenue improvements; 3) Tieton Drive and S.
5th Avenue roundabout; and 4) Widen S. 48 Avenue, from Summitview to Nob Hill
Blvd., to three lanes, and 5) Washington Avenue from S. 52 Avenue to S. 57
Avenue (which did not make the printing of the packet).
• Mayor George opened the public hearing
Norma Howell, 619 S. 69 Avenue, asked questions about the Nob Hill Blvd., 68
— 80 Avenues, project. Kay Adams stated that is a street - widening project the City
inherited from the County. Funding is already in place.
Wilma Koski asked what would happen on Nob Hill Blvd. and 64 and Tieton
Drive. Mr. Adams responded that the Nob Hill Blvd. project, between 52 and 58
Avenues has been submitted to the Transportation Improvement Board and
federal government for funding; it is on our Six -Year Plan. 64 Avenue, between
Nob Hill Blvd. and Tieton is on the Plan, but no funding source has been identified.
He reported that a traffic signal for Washington and 64 Avenue intersection is
also on the Plan.
Mike Murphy referenced an article in the latest issue of the Puget Sound Business
Journal, quoting that the number one problem is transportation. Referencing the
scuttlebutt about increasing gas taxes, he asked Council to check their crystal ball
to see what kind of reception we will get if Rossi becomes governor. Council
members responded that the City does not get any money from the nickel tax, and
that there was also talk about tollbooths making up the lost revenue.
• Mayor George closed the public hearing
The City Clerk read the resolution by title only. PLACE MOVED AND McCLURE
SECONDED TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. The motion carried by unanimous
roll call vote; Whitman absent.
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -192, A RESOLUTION to amend the Six -year
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for the period of 2005 through 2010
to include projects affecting the City's Transportation Plan.
3
461
DECEMBER 14, 2004
7. Open Record Public Hearing to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation on a right -of -way vacation of a portion of Quince Street,
between 5 and 6 Avenues, requested by Frank Stewart and Elton Young
Bruce Benson, Supervising Planner, provided the following facts:
• The Hearing Examiner Pro Tem held an open record public hearing and
concluded that all criteria required for the vacation of a public street had been
met and issued his written recommendation for approval on November 12, •
2004.
• Under City Resolution No. D -5630, compensation of the vacated property is
required, and based on the $51,000 appraisal plus $3,100 in improvements,
the applicant would pay $27,050.
• Mayor George opened the public hearing
No citizen came forward to present testimony.
• Mayor George closed the public hearing
PLACE MOVED AND McCLURE SECONDED TO ACCEPT THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF QUINCE
STREET WITH $27,050 IN COMPENSATION AND DIRECT LEGAL TO PREPARE
THE APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION. Council Member Bonlender asked about the
division between the two applicants. Mark Bonson, attorney for Frank Stewart,
responded that if the street were vacated, one -half of the street would go to one
property and one -half to the other. The question was called for a vote on the
motion. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote; Whitman absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
*8. Consideration of Resolution authorizing the 2004 allocations for Commercial
Revitalization Deduction
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -193, A RESOLUTION approving projects for the 2004
allocation of the federal Renewal Community Commercial Revitalization Deduction,
and directing the City Manager to submit the list of approved projects to the
Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development
(CTED) for ratification and commitment.
*9. Consideration of Resolution authorizing execution of a contract to Sell Real
Property to the State Department of Justice for property adjacent to the
Federal Courthouse (16 S. 4th Street)
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -194, A RESOLUTION directing and authorizing the City
Manager of the City of Yakima, or his designee, to execute a Contract to Sell Real
Property with the United States of America regarding the sale of certain property
commonly known as 16 South 4 Street, Yakima, Washington, the legal descriptions
of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit "A ", for
use by the United States of America and to take any additional actions that may be
4
4 6.2
DECEMBER 14, 2004
necessary or appropriate to give full force and effect to the basic terms and intent of
the Contract to Sell Real Property and to execute any and all other documents
relating to the sale of said property.
*10. Consideration of Resolutions authorizing the write -off of non - collectible
accounts for:
A. Central Receivable accounts
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -195, A RESOLUTION authorizing the write -off of certain
uncollectable accounts due to various funds of the City of Yakima.
B. Utility accounts
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -196, A RESOLUTION authorizing the write -off of certain
uncollectable accounts receivable by the utility funds of the City of Yakima.
*11. Consideration of execution of amendment to the professional services
agreement with Rod Yarger to provide firearms services to the Police
Department
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -197, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City
Manager to execute a professional services agreement between the City of Yakima
and Rod Yarger for the provision of professional firearms training and related
services.
*12. Consideration of Resolution authorizing execution of amendments to the
Yakima Youth Center Operating Agreement with Yakima Valley Farm Workers
Clinic relating to insurance coverage
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -198, A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager of
the City of Yakima to execute a revised Operating Agreement with the Yakima
Valley Farm Workers Clinic for the purposes of operating the former Yakima Senior
Center located at 602 North Fourth Street, Yakima, Washington, as a neighborhood
facility to meet the needs of youth and families in the greater Yakima area.
*13. Consideration of Resolution authorizing execution of Quit Claim Deed in favor
of Gary Carnevali d /b /a G. C. II, LLC to complete a property exchange
transaction
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -199, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City
Manager and the City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute a quit claim deed to
G.C. II, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, as part of a property exchange
in the vicinity of Ranchrite Road and E. Nob Hill Blvd. in the City of Yakima,
Washington.
5
4 6 3
DECEMBER 14, 2004
*14. Consideration of Resolution authorizing petty cash drawers at Tahoma
Cemetery, Municipal Court, and Animal Control
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -200, A RESOLUTION amending Resolution No. R-
2004 -79, adopted May 18, 2004 and authorizing the existence of Change Funds,
and other Petty Cash Funds, within the various Funds of the City of Yakima.
11 *15. Consideration of Resolution initiating street vacation proceedings and fixing
date of open record public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on January 1-3
6, 2005 to vacate a portion of Pierce Street and South 18 Avenue, requested
by D. H. Construction and Development, Inc.
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -201, A RESOLUTION initiating street vacation
proceedings and fixing a time for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner on
January 6, 2005 to vacate a portion of Pierce Street and South 18 Avenue.
*16. Accept Third Quarter 2004 Treasurer's Report
The Third Quarter 2004 Treasurer's Report was accepted.
ORDINANCES
17. Consideration of Ordinance adopting a budget for the year 2005
The City Clerk read the ordinance by title only. SIMS MOVED AND PLACE
SECONDED TO PASS THE ORDINANCE. City Manager Zais reported that the final
budget ordinance incorporates all the budget policy decisions made last week. The
budget totals $146,486,000, of which $49,374,000 is for the General Fund. The 2%
increase in the General Fund is attributed to the policy decisions, and the .3%
criminal justice tax that will take effect April 1, 2005. He also noted changes in the
budget relating to the reduction in the stormwater utility, water improvement projects,
library expenditures, and spoke about the increased costs due to the 72 Avenue
annexation that added nine firefighters in 2004. The question was called for a vote
on the motion. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Whitman absent. •
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -78, AN ORDINANCE adopting a budget for the City of
Yakima, Washington, for the year 2005; and making appropriations for estimated
expenditures.
*18. Consideration of Legislation amending the Yakima Municipal Code relating to
I 2005 budget policy issues:
A. Resolution adopting the Parks and Recreation Fee Schedule
RESOLUTION NO. R- 2004 -202, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the
Parks and Recreation Division Manager to implement the 2005 Parks and
Recreation Fee Schedule for program facilities use and activities participation.
6
46.4
DECEMBER 14, 2004
B. Ordinance adjusting Tahoma Cemetery rates and fees
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -79, AN ORDINANCE relating to rules and regulations for
Tahoma Cemetery; increasing and amending fees; adding provisions relating to
responsibility for damage to headstones; clarifying use of flat markers in section M;
amending terms relating to installment contracts; and amending section 7.04.090 of
the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
C. Ordinance adjusting the refuse rates
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-80, AN ORDINANCE relating to health and sanitation;
concerning containers for and storage of garbage and yard waste for collection by
the City of Yakima, and amending Section 4.16.140 of the City of Yakima Municipal,
Code accordingly.
D. Ordinance adjusting the water rates
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -81, AN ORDINANCE establishing rates, charges, terms and
conditions for domestic water system service; amending portions of Chapter 7.68 of
the Yakima Municipal Code; deleting section 7.68.255 and Chapter 7.75 of the
Yakima Municipal Code; and providing for an effective date.
E. Ordinance amending the cable taxes
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -82, AN ORDINANCE relating to the license fees or taxes
upon persons in the business of furnishing cable television service; increasing the
license fee or tax levied upon persons providing cable television services from five
percent (5 %) to six percent (6 %); amending Section 5.50.065 of Chapter 5.50 of the
City of Yakima Municipal Code to reflect said license fee and tax increase; and
providing for related matters.
F. Ordinance amending the building fees
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -83, AN ORDINANCE relating to building codes and related
regulation; increasing building permit and plan review fees for the City of Yakima;
providing for an automatic annual adjustment of building permit and plan review fees
based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle area; and amending
Section 11.04.107.2 and Section 11.04.107.2.1 of Chapter 11.04 of the City of
Yakima Municipal Code accordingly.
G. Ordinance amending the plumbing fees
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -84, AN ORDINANCE relating to the plumbing code and
related regulations; increasing plumbing permit and plan review fees for the City of
Yakima; providing for an automatic annual adjustment of the plumbing permit and
plan review fees based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle area; and
amending Section 11.44.040 of Chapter 11.44 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
7
.4 6 5
DECEMBER 14, 2004
H. Ordinance amending the mechanical fees
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -85, AN ORDINANCE relating to the mechanical code and
related regulation;. increasing mechanical permit and plan review fees for the City of
Yakima; providing for an automatic annual adjustment of mechanical permit and
plan review fees based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Seattle area; and
amending Section 11.32.080 of Chapter 11.32 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code
accordingly.
19. Consideration of Ordinance amending the classification and compensation
plan for certain city employees pursuant to collective bargaining agreements
Council Member Edler questioned the longevity pay, asking who gets it, and what
exactly is it. City Manager Zais responded that it is a benefit authorized in another
ordinance. The aggregate is what is included for labor contracts negotiated and the
management group, which is determined as the average of all the groups
represented. We have not yet settled with the AFSCME group. He stated he
provided the Budget Strategy Team (BST) with a comprehensive packet of
information on the City's personnel benefits, including longevity. The City has had a
practice of paying longevity for forty years, which is tiered based on years of service.
It is a key provision of attracting and maintaining city staff throughout the workforce.
He commented that no one benefit should be looked at separately because it is
negotiated within the total benefit and wage packages. Council Member Edler
requested a copy of the memo that was provided to the BST. Council Member
McClure stated he would like a breakdown of longevity for the different groups. The
City Clerk read the ordinance by title. SIMS MOVED AND EDLER SECONDED TO
PASS THE ORDINANCE. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Whitman
absent.
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-86, AN ORDINANCE adopting a classification and
compensation plan for City employees to be effective January 16, 2005; amending
Subsections 2.20.100 A, 2.20.100 B, 2.20.110 A, 2.20.110 B, 2.20.110 D, and
2.20.110 G all of the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
*20. Second reading of ordinance appropriating funds into the Real Estate Excise
Tax 2 Funds Account
An Ordinance amending the 2004 budget and appropriating funds to provide
for the 2004 gravel street paving program and Arterial Street maintenance
program, previously having been read by title only, was brought before the
Council for a second reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -87, AN ORDINANCE amending the 2004 budget for
the City of Yakima; and making an appropriation of $50,000 in the Real Estate
Excise Tax 2 (REET 2) Capital Fund for expenditure during 2004 to provide for
the 2004 gravel street paving program and Arterial Street maintenance
program.
8
4 6.6
DECEMBER 14, 2004
21. Other Business
*A. Set Date for a Closed Record Public Hearing for January 4, 2005 to
consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation for a public
agency and utility exception to the City of Yakima's Critical Area
Ordinance on SR 24 Bridge project
January 4, 2005 was set as the date of a Closed Record Public Hearing to
consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation for a public agency and
utility exception to the City of Yakima's Critical Area Ordinance on SR 24
Bridge project.
Following up on the suggestions provided by Willie Boston, a former Refuse
worker, Council established a committee consisting of Council Members
Bonlender and McClure, Nancy Fortier, Refuse Division Manager, and Randy
Layman, Refuse Supervisor, to meet with Mr. Boston to discuss his ideas,
particularly those involving safety issues.
• Information Items
Items of information provided to Council were: Agenda for the December 15, 2004 City
Council Transit Committee meeting and minutes of its November 17, 2004 meeting;
Agenda for the December 15, 2004 Community review Board meeting; Agenda for the
December 13, 2004 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting; 12/7/04 Memorandum
from Lt. Merryman re: Post Verified Response Report; 3rd Quarter 2004 Municipal Court /
Probation Office Statistics; and Planning Division Assignments Pending as of December 14,
2004
QUASI- JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING
22. Public Hearing to consider ordinance repealing Yakima Ordinance No. 2001 -56
and Congdon, Inc.'s 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, and reenacting
the 2001 Sutliff, Morton, and Koverman Comprehensive Plan Amendments
• Staff and Attorney Comments
City Manager Zais reviewed the ordinance:
• The Ordinance is presented pursuant to the Eastern Washington Growth
Management Board's direction to the City to repeal the ordinance that
accepted Congdon's 2001 Comprehensive Plan amendment
• The Ordinance would reenact the Sutfliff, Morton and Koverman amendments
• The City's eligibility for Public Works Trust Funds would be restored if the
ordinance is passed
• The Congdon rezone ordinance is a separate issue from the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment.
9
467
DECEMBER 14, 2004
Terry Danysh consulting attorney, reiterated Mr. Zais' comments:
• The action today does not consider the Congdon rezone or their renewed
Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, nor the Wal -Mart rezone request or
EIS.
• If passed, the Comprehensive Plan map would be changed.
• The other applications approved in Ordinance No. 2001 -56 would be reenacted
because they were never challenged.
Bill Cook, Community and Economic Development Director, stated that if this
ordinance passes, the three parcels owned by Congdon Orchard would revert to
high density residential, neighborhood commercial, and medium density residential.
• Mayor George opened the public hearing
• Mike Shinn, attorney representing Congdon Orchards, made the following points:
• Congdon Orchards has spent a great deal of time and money on these three
parcels.
• Nowhere throughout the process have the merits on those applications been
ruled against them.
• Although the Eastern Washington Growth Management Board addressed the
process; they do not have any authority or jurisdiction to tell the City what to
do.
• The Board ordered the repeal of this ordinance, even though Congdon
Orchards was trying to comply with the Board's ruling and is in the SEPA
process for a new Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
• His opinion is that Council has some discretion on whether or not to repeal this
ordinance.
• If the ordinance is passed, he stated the effective clause in the ordinance
should follow the requirements in the City Charter, which is 30 days, and not
be effective retroactively.
After concluding these comments, he responded to Council's questions.
Teresa Knight, neighbor of Rick Harpel, read a letter from Mr. Harpel that
requested Council to state its reasons if they) vote to maintain the ordinance. The
ordinance violated the rights of people.
Shane Smith, 305 N. 70 Avenue, urged Council to pass this ordinance, stating that
just because Congdon is challenging this does not prevent Council from passing this
ordinance. He took issue with the statement made by Mr. Shinn regarding
prospective only, which implies that you can vacate the ordinance and they still have
the right to do what they want on that property. If this does not revert back, we go
back to where we were. The order was to go back retroactively.
t Jamie Carmody, attorney for Neighbors for Responsible Development, commented
that they support the repeal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment because the
10
46.6
DECEMBER 14, 2004
public never had opportunity to participate in the dialogue. He also pointed out the
following:
• Without this Comprehensive Plan amendment, the rezone could not have
occurred, and without that, the Wal-Mart application would not have occurred.
In his comments, Mr. Shinn was preserving his argument that the City
breached its contract with Congdon.
• Referencing the language on page two of the ordinance, he believes the City
is protecting themselves from claims Congdon could make or from vested
rights claimed by Wal Mart.
• The development agreement provides protection for the City from a claim by
Congdon Orchard because it allows Council to take action when funding
options are compromised.
• He disagreed with the recital that the Growth Management Act (GMA)
contemplates invalidity prospectively only. If the process is invalid, it is invalid
from the beginning.
• The responsibility of the City under GMA is to come into compliance; the Board
gave the City the option to come into compliance or repeal this ordinance 25
months ago.
He asked that consideration be given to repeal this ordinance and establish an open
process for discussion.
• Mayor George.closed the public hearing.
The City Clerk read the ordinance by title. PLACE MOVED AND BONLENDER
SECONDED TO PASS THE ORDINANCE. Council Member Edler stated that after
hearing Mr. Carmody's comments, he asked Mr. Zais and Mr. Danysh to affirm that
we should pass this ordinance. Terry Danysh stated that the City's attorneys and
he spent a lot of time evaluating the situation and the ordinance. Mr. Carmody is
saying that his client has a concern about how this issue may play out over the long
haul. This is not the end of it, but the first step in terms of resolution. With respect to
the recitation of the ordinance, the language that was referred to by Mr. Carmody is
done because of state law. This doesn't have anything to do with property rights.
The ordinance does the best possible job to protect the City. Will that change
depending on court decisions? It might. City Manager Zais stated we are near the
end of the deadline set by the Board in their order to rescind the ordinance.
Congdon Orchards could have chosen to put a stop on this action through the
court, but they did not do that. It is a petition for review and does not imperil this
decision. He still recommends passage of the ordinance. The question was called
for a vote on the motion. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Whitman
absent.
ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -88, AN ORDINANCE concerning land use regulation
and comprehensive planning; repealing City of Yakima Ordinance No. 2001-
56; reaffirming and reenacting the reclassification of five parcels located at 424
South 49 Avenue (Parcel No. 181321-44482), 423 South 50 Avenue (Parcel
No. 181321- 44407), 424 South 50 Avenue (Parcel No. 181321-44408), and
5015 Tieton Drive (Parcel Nos. 181321-44420 and 181321- 44421) from
Medium Density Residential and Light Industrial to Neighborhood Commercial
on the Future Land Use Map; reaffirming and reenacting the reclassification of
11
DECEMBER 14 2004 4 6 9
fourteen parcels (Parcels Nos. 191329-31453, 191329 - 31457, 191329 -31459
(just eastern half of parcel), 1 91 329 -31 562 (just eastern half of parcel),
191329 - 31477, 191329-31478, 191329 - 31479, 191329-31480, 191329- 31558,
191329- 31560, 191329-31566, 191329- 31569, 191329-31571, and 191329 -
31572) located between 1416 South 18 Street and 1514 South 18 Street
from Medium Density Residential to Arterial Commercial on the Future Land
III Use Map; and reaffirming and reenacting the reclassification of five parcels
i located at 904 Central Avenue (Parcel No. 191330-14460), 906 Central
Avenue (Parcel No. 191330-14459), 1302 South Fair Avenue (Parcel No.
191330-14450), 1304 South Fair Avenue (Parcel No. 191330-14451), and
1306 South Fair Avenue (Parcel No. 191330-14452) from Medium Density
Residential to Arterial Commercial on the Future Land Use Map; and amending
the Future Land Use Map of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan to
reflect the repeal of City of Yakima Ordinance No. 2001 -56 and the
reaffirmation and reenactment of said reclassifications.
23. Adjournment
PLACE MOVED AND SIMS SECONDED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT
4:17 P.M. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote; Whitman absent.
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY . , , �� 3--
a � ~ � j
OUP � MEMBER DATE
3-24--05
-zq- 5
COUNCIL MEMBE DATE
ATTEST:
1
6 J„.._„-_ , ,2 14,--64,1/4- 0 w , ..„ 74(I
CITY CLERK PAUL P. G ORGE, MAYOR
Minutes prepared by Karen Roberts. An audio and video tape of this meeting are available in the City Clerk's
Office
c
12