HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/09/2012 02 Jail Issues C'''
n
f it :C 111 r 1116 ` , -. BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.
For Meeting of: October 9, 2012
ITEM TITLE: Discussion regarding Jail Issues.
SUBMITTED BY: Tony O'Rourke, City Manager
CONTACT
PERSON/TELEPHONE:
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Presentation and discussion by Chief Rizzi and Captain Copeland (see attached
information), and presentation and discussion by Yakima County Jail Operations Director Ed
Campbell, Yakima County Financial Services Director Craig Warner, and Yakima County
Court Administration Consultant Harold Delia (information to be provided at the meeting).
Resolution Ordinance Other
(specify)
Contract: Mail to:
Contract Term: Amount: Expiration Date:
Insurance Required? No
Funding
Source: Phone:
APPROVED FOR
SUBMITTAL: &EL.._ City Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BOARD /COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Click to download
D summary
Ei LCA report
City of Yakima %= �
20 0 S. .3 Street
Police Department Yakima, Washington 98901 ys�
Dominic Rizzi, Chief of Police Telephone (509)575 -6200 Fax (509)575 -6007
nr
To: City Manager Tony O'Rourke
Chief Dominic Rizzi
From: Captain Greg Copeland
Date: October 2, 2012
RE: Summary of LCA Needs Assessment Report
As you know, the City recently contracted with LCA architectural firm to provide the
City of Yakima with information and analysis in support of our efforts to house the
City's prisoners in the most efficient manner possible.
The City Council requested to have the work done by LCA in a "phased" manner.
The "Needs Assessment" report (attached) represents fulfillment of the first phase of
the City's contract with LCA. Further work performed by LCA will take additional
Council action. If the Council elects to move forward with LCA, the next step would
involve preliminary design for facility expansion of the City's current jail. When that
is completed and staffing levels for the expansion have been estimated, LCA will
compare the costs of operating an expanded YPD facility to our existing contract
with the County Jail and ultimately assist us in determining if we should expand our
current jail or continue with the status quo.
A few things to point out regarding the report:
1. We currently have a contract with the County Jail through the end of 2013.
The contract calls for a flat rate (excluding medical costs, which are extra) of
$2,200,000 per year for 110 beds. In the past, we would house inmates in lower
valley jails (indicated on page 2 of the report). We no longer house inmates in the
lower valley jails.
2. We pay housing costs only for misdemeanor and mixed misdemeanor /felony
prisoners at the County Jail. We do not have to pay housing costs for felony
prisoners; however, we do have to pay medical costs for the felony prisoners until
they are convicted.
3. All of our female prisoners go to the County Jail, as we have no means to
house them at the City Jail.
4. There is a marked disparity with regards to medical costs incurred at the City
Jail vs. those much higher costs incurred at the County Jail. The most significant
reason is this: The City is able to provide medical services by having a nurse
(operating under orders from a Physician) visit the jail on a daily or almost daily
basis. If an inmate has severe physical or mental issues, we normally send those
inmates to the County as they are better prepared to deal with severe issues. The
County utilizes a private contractor to provide medical services and incurs greater
expense, at least in part due to the additional capabilities of the contractor.
5. There is also a marked difference in the average length of stay between the
City jail and the County Jail. There are a couple of reasons for this. Many of our
inmates have "mixed" misdemeanor and felony charges and we have to pay for the
housing of these inmates. It typically takes much longer to resolve a felony case
than it does a misdemeanor case, and the defense attorneys will usually want to
obtain multiple resettings for the misdemeanor case as they hope to resolve all
charges at once. Further (as noted above), we send prisoners with severe mental
conditions to the County Jail. Often the Court will order these inmates to Eastern
State Hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. There is usually a long wait for the
evaluations and a prisoner can wait for months before they have an opportunity to
go.
6. There is also a difference between the length of stay between the City Jail
and the Toppenish and Sunnyside Jails. When we were using Lower Valley jails
(through the end of 2011), we would send sentenced inmates to the Toppenish and
Sunnyside Jails to complete their jail terms. Sentenced inmates have already been
through the court process and do not usually have any more court appearances to
make. By shifting these inmates to lower valley jails, we were able to keep City Jail
beds available so that unsentenced inmates would be accessible to Municipal Court
without long transports. The Wapato Jail was the least expensive of the lower
valley jails and we used it to house a variety of inmates. It is also much closer to
Yakima than the other jails, so transport issues were not as significant.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
FOR
Yakima City Detention Facility
LCA ARCHITECTS
LCA A_- "
in association with
stallalialalla ROCKY MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONS
FINAL DRAFT September 17, 2012
PHASE 1 SERVICES
LCA Architects and Rocky Mountain Corrections were contracted to conduct a
feasibility study for a jail expansion of the Yakima City Detention Facility
PRE - PLANNING WORKSHOP
We conducted a project initiation meeting with key stakeholders to develop an under-
standing of relevant issues, to gather information and to help us become more familiar
with your current situation and your primary objectives and investigate city population
growth projections through a number of different sources and collect past information
on jail operations This will ensure that we get a full understanding of the kind of growth
expected, and the demographics
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
We worked together with department heads and line staff (transition team) to develop
criminal justice system scenarios using present and future average length of stays, present
and future jail admissions, admission rates, peaking factors and classifications and build
a forecasting model for the Jail that will give projected bed need estimates for the next
twenty years
We also did a cost analysis of housing your inmates in other jurisdictions compared to
housing inmates in your facility This analysis has identified issues that will need special
attention in the next phase of our study
1
JAIL COST ANALYSIS
The historical inmate population statistics along with the cost analysis and budget impact
to the City ofYakima show a significant increase that may not be sustainable in the
future if it continues to grow at the same rate as it has the past 8 years The analysis shows
that the City ofYakima Detention Facility runs a very efficient operation, but contracting
inmates out to other jurisdictions is very costly
From 2004 to 2011 the City misdemeanor jail population grew by 48 %, but the overall jail
cost grew by 90% During this same time period, the Yakima City Jail budget grew by only
23% This shows that you can control your own cost if you have an adequate facility and
lose that control when housing your inmates to outside facilities
Year Yakima Wapato Toppenish Sunnyside Yakima City Total Jail
County Jail Budget Expenditures
2004 $766,474 $65,826 $21,910 $12,250 $1,034,897 1,901,013
2005 $984,095 $23,851 $14,623 $0 � I $1,101,200 2,123,771
2006 $1,255,852 $31,488 $16,687 $15,26 I$2,489,280
2007 $1,535,896 $86,885 $41,281 $42,605 $1,231,05([ $2,937,718
2008 $1,541,813 $216,267 $59,497 $64,203 11,274,1821 1$3,155,964
2009 $1,950,819 $239,753 $139,321 $123,005 L1,350,247 ][ $3,803,147
2010 $1,367,006 $248,612 $59,044 ir6,788 ji ,323,897 3,OO5,349
2011 $2,035,581 $238,592 $72,788 11 $13,914 J � $1,277,551 D3,624,513
YAKIMA COUNTY /CITY COST ANALYSIS
This next chart shows a side by side comparison of housing cost at the Yakima City Jail
compared to the Yakima County Jail The statistics show that the cost is significantly
higher to hold an inmate at the county jail compared to the city Breaking these costs
down further shows it is the medical cost charged by the county that is driving up the
cost per day This needs extensive study, because in the past five years it has cost the
City an additional $1,000,000 in medical costs to house its prisoners in the County
Detention Facility
YAKIMA CITY
Year Bookings City Misdemeanor Medical cost Total City Cost
Jail Days
2007 3072 23,948 1.$72,761_ $1,231,077
2008 3340 24,773 A73, $1,274,182
2009 3283 25,644 AN$78,107 ii $1,350,521
2010 2964 23,487 .$79,299 AP $1,323,897
2011 2987 23,579 1111185,11M $1,277,551
YAKIMA COUNTY
Bookings County Misdemeanor Medical cost r Total County
Jail days Cost
2007 1786 23,410 $335,514 $1,535,896
2008 1562 22,601 $269,8741 $1,541,813
2009 1618 25,947 $348,916111 $1,950,819
2010 1087 15,780 $277,851 $1,367,006
2011 1114 19,083 $247,295 $2,035,581
AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY
The average length of stay (ALS) is another critical factor in determining the amount of
beds that you may need in the future It is interesting that the Yakima city jail average
length of stay is very consistent at 7 5 days per inmate, where the contract facilities are
double that amount ranging from 9 to 17 average length of stay Analyzing the ALS
differences show a few possible reasons
Yakima City Detention Facility lacks proper classification beds, so they must
send inmates that have more of a serious charge to the County Jail along
with mental holds, both these types of inmates have a longer length of stay
■ Another factor could be that some inmates charged as felons may also have
a misdemeanor charge as well, which will have a longer sentence
Because of the wide range in length of stay, I have proposed three different Justice Models
for your review
25
20
15 - - 11111.11-171.- -12010 ■ 2007
2008
2009
10
7 2011
5
0
Yakima City Yakima County \Napato Toppenish Sunnyside
4
INMATE BOOKINGS
Yakima City followed a national trend during the years of 2004 to 2009 of incarceration
growth before a slowdown in growth starting in 2010 Many areas have started to see
that growth increase again in the final quarter of 2011 and continuing into 2012 So far
in 2012, Yakima City has not experienced that growth and is continuing to stay in the line
with 2011 numbers Once again, these numbers are taken into consideration in building
our Justice Models for the future in Yakima
5,000
5,575 5,536
5,043
4,658 4,748
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
5
TOTAL INMATE DAYS
This chart shows the amount of inmates charged with a misdemeanor and incarcerated
by the City of Yakima By dividing these numbers by 365 days in a year you have your
average daily population For the most part, you average 150 inmates a day but spiked
to 174 inmates a day in 2009 The City detention facility will average between 23,000 to
25,000 inmate days a year So, for budgetary purposes, everything above 25,000 inmate
days, the city will be charged a daily rate plus medical to the county As you look to the
future with the Justice Models, you can predict what lies ahead for incarceration cost
70,000
60,000 63,690
50,000 52,828 55,444 54,932
■ 46,534
40,000 '
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
MISDEMEANOR ADMISSION RATE
The Historical Admission Rates shows us what percentage of the city population gets ar-
rested and charged with a misdemeanor only As you can see by the graph about 6% of
the city population gets arrested on misdemeanor charges, which we will use in project-
ing your future needs As your city population grows what incarceration rate you use to
predict the future is critical in determining your future bed needs As you study this chart,
you do not want to ignore the high admission rates of 2008 and 2009, but you do not
want to base your future predictions on 2 very high years In the Justice Models submit-
ted for review, I have used a low admission rate and medium admission rate with a 2%
growth every 5 years to predict the future bed needs This somewhat conservative ap-
proach keeps from overbuilding your detention facility
7 00% 1
6 00% 6.46% 6.24%
° 16.01% ■
5 00 /0
■ ■ ■5.11 %■5.16%
4 00%
3 00
2 00%
1 00/0
0 00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
7
MALE /FEMALE INMATE DAYS
This chart breaks down the gender of inmates that come into your system Knowing the
average length of stay, we can predict the amount of beds needed for the future which
will assist the Architect in the next phase of the study in the preliminary design of the
detention facility
5,000
4,500 4,256 4 460
3,972
4,000 3,660 3,725
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500 1,319
1,071 1,076 998 1,023
1,000
500 i n 0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Male Inmate Bookings Female Inmate Bookings
JUSTICE MODELS
Three Justice Models have been developed to assist in looking into the future of what lies
ahead for the City ofYakima as far as
Incarceration numbers
Cost of housing
Budget impact
How many beds needed
over the next 20 years if it is decided to expand the city detention facility The following
Justice Models are for Misdemeanor charges only
9
JUSTICE MODEL ONE
Based on Average Admission Rate for 2007 to 2011
Admission Rate Increase .002
Cap - 20%
In Justice Model One, a conservative approach was taken with the admission rate of 58 %, average length of
stay of 10, and a population growth of 1% a year until 2020 and a 2% growth a year until 2030 The CAP rate is
classification and peaking factor, which means that you need at least 6 levels of classification, the most obvi-
ous being male and female separation, high risk /low risk and medical beds Never is each classification full, so
you may be at capacity at 85% The peaking factor is during certain times of the year your inmate population
spikes, in agricultural counties it could be from the increase in the work force during the summer months
This model shows a total of 55,512 prisoner days or an average of 152 a day by 2015 and growing to an average
of 185 inmates a day by 2020 The past statistic shows that you have already been averaging 150 inmates a day
since 2008, so this model would be no growth over the next three years For this model to work, the city would
have to be in complete control over all of its inmates and implement strategies to insure an average length of
stay of 10 days stay
2015 2020
Admission Rate 058 Admission Rate 060
Population 95,712 Population 100,900
Bookings 5,551 Bookings 6,054
ALS 10 ALS 10
Beds 152 Beds 166
CAP 30 CAP 33
Total Beds 182 Total Beds 199
Rental Beds 82 Rental Beds 96
Prisoner Days 55,512 Prisoner Days 67,392
2025 2030
Admission Rate 062 Admission Rate 064
Population 108,657 Population 117,096
Bookings 6,739 Bookings 7,494
ALS 10 ALS 10
Beds 185 Beds 205
CAP 37 CAP 41
Total Beds 222 Total Beds 246
Rental Beds 115 Rental Beds 135 10
Prisoner Days 67,392 Prisoner Days 74,941
JUSTICE MODEL TWO
Based on Average Admission Rate for 2007 to 2011
Average Length of Stay of 11
Cap -20%
Justice Model Two has the average admissions rate of 6% with an average length of stay of
11, which depicts your historical ALS over the past 5 years Under model 2, you can expect
an average daily population of 173, which is Just below your 2009 level and growing to an
average of 188 by 2020 Feedback from the Yakima City jail staff feel that this model best
predicts the future for planning purposes
2015 2020
Admission Rate 060 Admission Rate 062
Population 95,7121 Population 100,900
Bookings • 43 Bookings 6,25
ALS 11 - I ALS 11
Beds 173 A Beds 188
CAP 35 CAP 38
Total Beds 208 Total Beds 226 .
Rental Beds 103 II Rental Beds 118A
Prisoner Days 63,173. Prisoner Days 68,814
2025 i ll 2030
Admission Rate 064 Admission Rate 066
Population 108,657 Population 117,096
Bookings 6,957 Bookings 7,728 i ll
ALS 11 ALS 11 1
Beds 210 Beds 233A
CAP 42 CAP 47 MI
Total Beds 252 Total Beds 280
Rental Beds 140 Rental Beds 163
Prisoner Days 76,527 Prisoner Days 85,011
11
JUSTICE MODEL THREE
Based on Historical ALS Data Yakima County
Average Length of Stay of 14
Justice Model Three has the average admissions rate of 6 %, but uses the average length
of stay of 14, which is what is currently occurring in the County Detention Facility This
model can best be used to predict what lies ahead for budget purposes if everything stays
as is since 2007 Model 3 shows 80,402 prisoner days by 2015 and growing to 87,581 by
2020 Knowing that your detention facility is full at 25,000 prisoner days, you can expect to
pay for 50,000 plus prisoner days by 2015 As we study the cost analysis, the city paid over
$2,000,000 for 19,000 prisoner days in 2011, and could be looking at twice that amount
over the next 5 years
2015 2020
Admission Rate 060 Admission Rate 062 1
Population 95,712 Population 100,900
Bookings 5,743 Bookings 6,246
ALS 14 ALS 14 III
Beds 220 Beds 240 J.
CAP 44 CAP 48=
Total Beds 264 1 Total Beds 288
Rental Beds 150 1 Rental Beds 170
Prisoner Days 80,402 Prisoner Days _ 87,581
2025 III 2030
Admission Rate 064 MI Admission Rate 066
Population 108,657' Population 117,096
Bookings 6,954 Bookings 7,728 mi l
ALS �1111. ALS 14
Beds 267 1 Beds 296
CAP CAP 59 _MINIM
Total Beds WI= Total Beds 355
Rental Beds Rental Beds 226
Prisoner Days 97,ign Prisoner Days 108,196
12
YAKIMA CITY FELONY INMATES
This chart shows the amount of Felony inmates charged by the City that are being held
by the County There is also a category named mixed, which are City inmates that are
charged with a felony, but also have a misdemeanor charge attached as well Because of
the misdemeanor charge, the County is charging the city a daily rate for these inmates
We recommend that this category of inmate needs additional study to determine who
is actually responsible for the housing cost and what policies can be put into place to
reduce these costs to the city
Year Felons Mixed Felons & Total Inmates Held
Misdemeanors
2007 119 a day 42 a day 161 a day
2008 121 a day 37 a day 158 a day
2009 107 a day 36 a day 143 a day
2010 149 a day 21 a day 170 a day
2011 164 a day 31 a day 195 a day
13
TOTAL MISDEMEANORS HELD BY JURISDICTION
We broke down by each year the amount of misdemeanors being held in the different
jurisdictions for the city The first total category shows the average daily population for
inmates charged with a misdemeanor only The mixed category shows the amount of
inmates held daily that are charged with a felony and misdemeanor Since the county
is charging the city for this category of inmate, they should be included in the total bed
count for planning purposes of a new jail
Year City Jail County Jail Other Jails Total Mixed Mixed Total
2007 66 64 12 142 42 _MEd
2008 68 1 -_ I 23 15
2009 [ 31 172 36 2081
2010 64 1 [ 18 125 21 146 7
2011 69 j -_ [ 17 138 31 169
14
HOW DOES YAKIMA COMPARE WITH NATIONAL INCARCERATION RATES?
The 2011 statistics show nationally, jails incarcerated 236 inmates per 100,000 population
Nationally 61% of inmates were not convicted, but in jail awaiting court action and 39% of
inmates were sentenced offenders
In 2011,Yakima City had 364 inmates incarcerated with a population of 91,930 which
is over 54% higher than the national average The 364 inmates included felons, mixed,
which is inmates charged with a felony and misdemeanor and misdemeanor only charges
In the State of Washington the crime rate for 2010 was 25% higher than the national
average Property crimes accounted for 92% of the crime rate which is about 30% higher
than the national average
National Yakima City
236
!► 364
per 100,000 per 91,930
Yakima City:
54 A
higher than the
national average
15
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS
We added a cost analysis of housing your inmates in other jail facilities in phase 1 of this
study to better understand the entire correctional needs for the city This analysis brought
forward the need for immediate attention to the cost being charged to the city for
medical services for its inmates As outlined in the cost analysis chart the city has paid an
extra million dollars in medical cost to the county over the past 5 years and can expect
that figure to climb with the inmate population projections
It is our recommendation that we add to the second phase of the study a complete
analysis of the medical services provided by the county, identify strategies to lower
medical cost and put together a team to negotiate a contract for services
At the same time, we recommend that the city adopt Justice Model 2 and move forward
with programming layout and preliminary design for the facility expansion by providing
graphic block "space diagrams" indicating various options for expansion Develop options
as to the best approach to adding on to your existing facility and prepare an opinion of
probably construction cost, including site development and associated soft cost,
producing a total project budget
An operational analysis needs to be completed for the expanded facility This will entail
developing a staffing plan, operational cost estimates along with an operational
pro -forma This pro -forma can be compared to your existing housing contract with the
county to provide a direct comparison to outsourcing your inmates compared to housing
your own inmates
FINAL DOCUMENT PLAN
At the conclusion of the study, we will also provide an analysis of options for capital fund-
ing sources for the project We will present the summary report to the designated
representatives of the Client clearly outlining "what to do next "and answering questions
that may arise We will then provide copies of the final report for your use
16
Distributed at the he
Meeting I C7'
Department of Corrections _.. _____----.,_ 4 - '
Felonies by Agency
Agency Inmates %
WA Dept of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) 2 0.6
Grandview (GVP) 14 3.9
LEAD (LEAD) 4 1.1
Mabton (MAB) 1 0.3
Moxee (MOX) 3 0.8
Out of County (OOC) 7 1.9
Selah (SEL) 6 1.7
Sunnyside (SSD) 26 7.2
Toppenish (TOP) 10 2.8
Union Gap (UGP) 10 2.8
Wapato (WPP) 10 2.8
WA State Patrol (WSP) 12 3.3
Yakima Co Juvenile (YCJV) 4 1.1
Yakima Co Prosecutor (YCPA) 2 0.6
Yakima Co Sheriff (YCSO) 71 19.6
Yakima (YPD) 180 49.6
Zillah (ZPD) 1 0.3
363 100.0
I
..ormTv.w
, -.. z . -.1...,-..,%,-*'.4t,
"' '-,1;!",'",V ';'',-C,T-34t-4;',.:ViP:k4r1.,k4,'.-74'',Z,Niakt,110
' ' ,-,, ,,,';:knigi-YeY.'i,n0;bt.L4610,„A.Ls ti
'..'-,.;;,..,-,:4, 'ikekk ; ' , 1';CV.4;0$01 . trg
. \ , , ,,,4 , 4
-!: ''''', ..!..1,..kow,:oviie.,..,•444,,eig.ittowAktg
vi'
: ' -t.i•,..-i lw ,7.4 . , • 0„, .twit•?. , .I.,,i,f,hip
M - i:,,,
• - ' .'''''',,' tPfl.4iltittiVIWW401.1U%
s -4114..
.
.,'''',4,,., , :k.'"41'-i''''.4 , . ' "'''4. '` `, ' ", 1 4i . • ' -'• ''' 0
' .,, , '," ,'„:(-",=‘-k'N:`,A4,4,;,t,A,'9,-414 loite •
co • •''qit
Z • -,,,•-„,. ' . ,,,, ,a
, J -.-., 3..,,,;z,-,,,,..-,,,:ey,N1,•,F4.="t4-44,4440,14,,,,,9\,,,,,r,1
" • ..,,,c,,::,,,,,:,.....,4,,,,er44,44ztt,14.,.-".;4 ,314,,,,I,Tk'a,
I a) ' ' .•,'; : .,,
co
1 c . • ., :ir,:
.0
k Iv
I .
0
Lp„...
, ' d.'' ,-,,;1,et„,,,,i•3444 414-4 4, - t,.'
. i
,W.
P1414, AAk .,1" :-.
• paid
mmtZ'V '',', ,P•wotky,Z.:*404Aft,hik,..'1!;,•N•g.
1 i• .,,,„:
lifte ' ' ....'•:'..-..,,.'..ztcs,,,,,,..'„1",J11-ojkPmito#0.-,,
"4/0t)
d . .
in
1 111
" .h. ,..,
' ' %,-,,,;:,,•,',;,,.;;;:,;',„„;-,wAl.,-,''''-041,4,,,','
.
. ,;,,,,,,,. , v, ,,•-,:,
- ,
161 t 1 1$
: - - 1:,::" ,75:4.,,,,,, „,,,,,,,*,;,,,.
;. ',;,,,:q.;.; ,:.,1.,:::%-,Ti:,,,,.!:-'1t-g"41,,e4,,, 2.0,,,,,,,54.4,-.110
- '.: „.-:.;,':,,',y,-:`,,L;1',,,%.?4,".7-'44rl'A,
''''' .4' -41•71 kAttV 3 ,r - ;,-_',,:..'-',ffei-S:1
/
:
, :„. ..•,••• -,.....,...„,q,..,„..,,,,,,,,,,,,„ . , ..,.,
0
al; z
,,,...„:„.„.,..v,:,,?:.,..04,1v....,t • , 1401
.
_ ,
. ,. '''' T..' !,,,'”-
, ,
FirTA
4
imiti MO filiZ/111 .. ,
, .;. .,,, -,,,,,...:,:,:,,,,,,,.!,,":,;,!!:,:!..4::=4!!!..:,7414,:t.,-,,,,,N,,,,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,it::.,,!..,i,,,:.7,;,-,:...
. 4
m,,w
, ,,-i -
0
, , ‘,.,, - , 4,-,.0 ,,,,-' .:,*71•*,,,,,,,.'4.446A4-',-*:10,
v,
.., ., --,..i--,-
• 1.,J
•
roma vilZ til • :,.,-
0.w., =4,47:„4,101:
, ," :„ .! , , ,:: , ,, ,,: j -, vp",4#0,1v,ITA,t.Vv-4410
a)
_4•Iiiik,,,,4,,,,7w4,,.. ,=!vt$35,04„„pkiNAW ,,,,,,,-,7
' c.vAi. ■
.._
' ' ,, ok , e; ,,,-,,,- ..1,1
• •:-A;.t.6 ?
Z qa
, ;!:Qt ,.,;',.;i:46060k$1.:•*, ,,..,,A4t.,6,.
''''''' '':'-1::--„':',74,-,,..,-,441-45-.i.o.,...vrs:,...4,--,''nog,..47-•,.•
4
' '''' ''''''' ,,, - - - - .A..; , ,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,...e. ,, ,„,„ : „. 4 ,, ,..„.
411111
.-..,.. ......., ....,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?.-.,,,-,,,v.,,I,,,,; ;',.,.zek,...,-
.., ,, . , , „. , .. :;,...,.4"...„‘...,,,m,....ifor,--,A, *-.,.''. 0..
, , '''';',,','...f.::-.,;,,-^,l','i,4§,,,f,i,:,,f.,,,N41,-;,14.41v1-::,,,,,AI„;,,,,-ft0, -„: 4
Z , ',,„
-
-,4t,.:1,',14,-&et;Ffs,rpz-d-w- -..-'axf,-...1...;..
AttsigAtkr
t:$
s.
0
(::$,„:,,:„,.,,,:,„,,,,,,,„,,,..:::„,„,,.,„,
...,,,,.., • paid • puma
- .
1-,,, ...":0• , ,, ,, f,,, , ,
-1,:-..,•,:;:„'
,,,1
ro ,,,4. 1.7,f ,,,;,,. ! I till) 0 ill■r 144 ,_,,,,,,....,,,,,,-:,..,_::,,,,;:.,v,;1::,,.,,,,o,,,iy,,,,11..gigtitfi ttorthRis
• pew
Ste
Y 4
C
.. , . , . .,,,,, ''',..V %,,,,„,4 . - ' , Pg, , ,,, .,- ••■,' , ',' ..:
"Aiy
C CZN 1111111111111111C11111111111111111Nimi
41 / 11 1111i
iLleil iiiI4
t_ :,.-:' .....L,...T... .:.,,,,.4.41,;.":-,,, 04*..>,,,,:,,,-"A:,.,A0
"tIIiiiiui ....y,,,,t,:',,,,W ;'-e4-2,4C.4::.A7,-
.... ,, ,....„.. .„ ...,,,,.-,* ,-.. r: . .t.,, •.-,
-
'Ftifil i III
. . „.., ..., .....
.. ,.... ,..
. r , ,• ' ,
ktPe0A I
0
iteMa i
■
IAN* ii
ialTe
4 ' ,,,,,,--4.11 r ,l i‘igp , - , .40„.it.;: , -^,: ; -_
,,,,,
. ,. „ ,,ATh4,,t,i,,,,,-1,:tir;;;;::::::{6:•,t,:::
POI \ ' 0 0
C co , ',fl '1,41#07.44-0,-,,,,,,,al
.,.,..,
:,,,''..' :`, Ii C
'''``':',6•544144,44PAr
0 0
Pt:An:0
. 1 11111:111111 1 t ill )
,
,. , .,.,
Fth *: . RN,Rte'r,
imm. i ' '• .., ... -!,,' '.' '',,,,;''',,' . `..pgiCki, _ :;;; P .,, s - SKLO,L,-r,,?'+',,' , '":& , ..1',...e. '
N11942 .44'
Oil.) #) 'tri
.....0_
. .,,•:„..,,..:...,,,.,,i,,, .,447,0:tuv,,,,c,,.ii2,,-43„._,,i
,,,:,,.,„.„,.„.,..,,„„ ,,,,I.:,..L,.„,,,,,,,,,,„,,,„.„.,.:,,,..„,,.,...,„,.
,t.,:..zq,,,,,m,,.,_0tt
0
, ,....,„,,,,..:,..,,:.:,,,,,,,,,,I.44,10.12, 4 ",#, 715 ,„ 1 ,.„ :s0
•
‘
,, ,.,.,„. -;,,,,,p,,,,,=;1 :klo.k
'
00114.14:W,
,..
. , ,- • ,,,,' , , ,, . .,,:pp„1,,Iii;."1,9 ner,RWAR* : Y. 7 . ? ^,., ':
,, NAi,,,..7,....;'N'w,
k.i.
,, A , 4',..li,,,,, ir .,,,e uv ,,
l411 tige . ,
T...- 4T . V „ CASWVil>.- p
;.-
igV&Z ....
,,,
v °Gnu _ ;� t• i ti U� �,,,�g.,°"�,
°i '+!, r d ° "hi lsy rr e a .
O'' gun S�
' 'ms' v ?.: =: a 4 , i ?� ks o..i 'h xli
1 ? „,, r ,• hn� , ` � S 1 N 7 5 ' aK V
O S
Gin GA
3 °' < < W
CA
Cid W W , `` `,six ` ��� '�`
C m aki ^a�y
N c N La; et sx �, y, i ,�i s I , �y� % .� � y a g m , } � b� •
c' e *„1:14:,,, t is � h &�' x4 7
p
t. • • ? ,r Au.
yy'
4 u T
� a k T *AP "a ' , a� 4 /.g i
; v � r a t�
i :' Y 1 L y r r a y �p yf5 4
a n
I
I
Iaa § y t r rR F
PO C7N 1=1
r }1'Y r^ , r �- ▪ �, "stn' ;t,
w ® p . n a zr x , , , :w.j, " , '3
CA
{
E ,
C CA r*
x .?' � b - o , . '
r-i CU
-, k • l G } rxti. ' , &41s ' - y y � a,'T' z�, '� 4 i tt rg1 4� ' g s "' ° ° ° ,
' '� ifE �i*- . roc; cy\ , >d�' {�4
CU c4MM4
- „� , kt W* 3 ^s' 7'yiv k X i
weAvoi
� � ® 0 ' "tkY , n �s ' P is
g ilmi
yryov, 1'
ill) 011 Z
�V 4: bF4
Itokigi
I d� S'eti I , jf I4'V '..',44',04.4f0 ^'4i1�ifrY,� RA
�1Y ' ta i` \ yJ `x',�� ,T 'Y F
+k d d 4.A. "o-1 '%,
-Y,,r' @ 111 tn� },�.�, °'t' +' -
in i..4
cn
olve
ik,,SZA , , _ (if) gimi : , , ;.;„ „,,.:',Atbroi;.ikta.,gre4,3NekeT0043,M
,„,,,,:,,.„,„0„2„,
l y in p rn • �z � � is ?�y ..,.,„4.,.,,,.,,,...".1-E_
.,.. ,. „.. •, ,.,*erAv,:`,A%..,,,...,,,,,. .. - 1...., OA: *V
,,..:,,co,,„,...„.„,..,,,r.„,,,I,..,„,„..,4,,...0.„,..,,..... -,,
CU CLJ
o0 e ,34 �J Geri= S cN
i i a g , =r # r. L sr , ,,, , �rr t '� � "�k;; sty"yy
, ; , T 't�'+ " #i 5,, 7 7 Lf {' i k r t{ `+°FP 'tp ,
I S £ a r x fie,
q , � � � i' I ' i ” . v }g„LM 2 l F�+�` > '4:
,r
1i{ ;. 4 n;a -;q r � �'�°'
¢f :, , a ,t 4 Ars ki � p , �''v' f jam`
6.;,. +. z z,1' 0 t •� k4� S .j , ,,,,wr y� it')
■ ' , �i�.
■
, .F I N ,,,ta; : i , f : ;::
'k, prtw� L #&.
v
�ff,, tat , ` ,a'41 � ` .
al)
+ Nk. a S w „ Sn x, � r {
,,_ i 77 -5 ,_5„. . i , , ,i0 E
. ......,....,,swq.,,,,,,,afmtAlz-, U) a)� A, ; G O r s
, � q tom �+a4
1? ., K am . T 'S ck * ' ,y
rl
A?G.,! t ' § , ma ,,
�� � 4 w
.,?., ,„..,,,,,,,„,,
„„.,,e,:t.:.,,,,,,,.:4,4,„.,,:„..:Apio,:o
...,., ._,,,:t.,,,:v,:c,,,42.,m44.,T,44.10n,„1,,,„;,p,„
,.,,,,,t,,,..„,,
rci ,. ,..,,_•_ :„.:..4,,,ktik,„,,,,,,,mato,,,„,v,.,,,,i,„,,,,_,,„0
,...,.1.,..., WV'
C �� 2 a s 11k € €�d .4;t� r are T'
j
p1;41 ! a)
, _,,„,:_,,,,_.,..„:4,„:4:,:_;,;,n-.;106.4-,,,,,,i• .4 , mA.., rhM
tki)
Y �''�JtC , ' ' "' a - -,, t a .� � ,,,,, , p,„ `5�.,,, ad°�1L', y„- .e i. , , �-', , t 'F' .
i,l` `.�..',; - ',1 . r o M 4w ' +[t^ ` . M ' C i,.. �i lC - limil
(
� j , ,zk,,r k t �,, f: s 1 „ y v .
F a ",F
• f ' t 4u A -ii{t- i k „,. �'#
0,i.- �t is s?, ) f CD � t Sl is v. 4 Ry
gig ® • ^ E`u =`,� u't, 4%'',d�$ �, " >n,"'� . a
Cil
iR - CD n sx tgr €w 4 fa "z'' i � .s � '
n ` l a tr , i ,} . a € �' 'Ua fr"R �} " :,,,4,,&.,,k .ra+ {.�,a� qT, �+'ft ':'
i L 4 X vy C I R , ,
i o k "
/,
C1J .,...,,„--1,.,,,p 1.:.r.iiiii,..i,
i Attk CU r n t , i � L
3'.v
4 �' +4a7 _I S W x 4,g F , 4 11 3, G � I ,4F a k � x
, y. „ /
" d m x r a � { r, „ F�
n 7 , a sh s 3� 7 9i' +a
a)
i ds d i 'tc r o-nm; a
1 F15,� s r tr t i .' c) ? a t � y d r �q 'd � e
�,Wa , 4 ;: r fee)
Distributed at We
Meeting (0 • 'ill/
2010 2013
Actual Projected
Category
Amount I Beds Amount I Beds Rate
Bed Rentals:
Federal $2,990,260 108.22 $1,696,538 55.00 $84.51
City of Yakima $1,087,993 35.74 $2,200,000 110.00 $54.79
Yakima County Cities $567,679 20.34 $251,485 10.60 $65.00
State DOC $4,746,424 157.47 $1,085,875 35.00 $85.00
Other Agencies $10,905,607 291.92 $0 0.00
Total Bed Rentals $20,297,963 613.69 $5,233,898 210.60
Yakima County
General Fund $11,181,685 442.04 $13,376,022 447.00 $81.98
County Road $0 $2,878,200
Total Yakima County $11,181,685 442.04 $16,254,222 447.00
Grants $172,234 $75,000
Sales of Merchandise $346,312 $150,000
Housing /Monitoring of Prisoners $512,947 $400,000
Juvenile Meals $0 $140,000
Investment Interest $23,889 $0
Miscellaneous Revenue $192,743 $77,000
Other Miscellaneous Revenue:
Inmate Telephone $503,629 $250,000
Medical Reimburse $1,300,259 $350,000
Total Other Miscellaneous Revenue $1,803,888 $600,000
Total Revenue $34,531,661 $22,930,120
10/9/2012 Page 1
Department of Corrections
Expense
2010 2013
Actual Projected
Category
Amount Amount
Salaries FTE - 251 $11,694,259 FTE - 154 $8,309,896
Benefits $5,165,457 $3,809,914
Supplies $1,256,007 $690,900
RX $567,598 $233,700
Operating Supplies $560,761 $348,250
Printing $62,453 $18,000
Other $65,195 $90,950
Other Services $11,035,946 $7,174,672
Medical $3,641,022 $1,925,845
Mental Health $459,898 $93,000
Food Service $1,940,181 $1,576,000
Indirect Cost $974,934 $686,401
Purchasing Service $33,321 $41,210
Technology Service $603,055 $552,139
GIS $0 $1,124
Facilities Service $2,217,844 $1,699,074
Liability Insurance $360,795 $149,678
Professional Services $242,674 $257,800
Communications $61,464 $49,441
Operating Rentals $298,717 $100,700
Capital Projects $110,026 $0
Other $92,015 $42,260
Debt $2,381,208 $2,692,833
RC $328,196 $273,570
YCCC $ 2,053,012 $1,913,625
Remodel $0 $505,638
Total Expense $31,532,877 $22,678,215
Beginning Balance $1,254,071 $58,312
Revenue $34,531,661 $22,930,120
Expense $31,532,877 $22,678,215
Ending Balance $4,252,855 $310,217
10/9/2012 Page 2
2013 Yakima County 2013 City of Yakima
Projected Projected
Category
Amount Amount Rate
Salaries FTE - 154 $8,309,896 FTE - 16 $857,000
Benefits $3,809,914 $411,893
Supplies $690,900 $34,521
RX $233,700 $5,250
Operating Supplies $348,250 $28,271
Printing $18,000 $1,000
Other $90,950
Other Services $7,174,672 $267,779
Medical $1,925,845 $69,750
Mental Health $93,000 ?
Food Service $1,576,000 $138,029
Indirect Cost $686,401 ?
Purchasing Service $41,210 ?
Technology Service $552,139 ?
GIS $1,124 ?
Facilities Service $1,699,074 ?
Liability Insurance $149,678 ?
Professional Services $257,800 $60,000
Communications $49,441 ?
Operating Rentals $100,700 ?
Other $42,260 ?
Debt $2,692,833 ? $0
Total Expense $22,678,215 $1,571,193 $57.40
10/9/2012 Page 3
Distributed at the
Meeting /D °9 - /a—
Price, Cally
From: Copeland, Greg
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 8 58 AM
To: Rizzi, Dominic; O'Rourke, Tony
Cc: Price, Cally
Subject: LCA Costs
Thus far we have paid LCA $15,000 for "Phase 1" of the study (Pre - Planning and Needs Assessment) "Phase 2" is
another $35,000, broken down as follows
Programming $10,000
Concept Design $10,000
Operational Analysis $10,000
Final Document Plan $5,000
1