HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/03/1994 Study Session / Business Meeting 264
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
MAY 3, 1994
BUSINESS MEETING /STUDY SESSION
•
1. ROLL CALL
The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Mayor Pat Berndt,
presiding, Council Members Clarence Barnett, Henry
Beauchamp, Ernie Berger, Bill Brado, Lynn Buchanan, and
Bernard Sims present on roll call. City Manager Zais,
Assistant City Attorney Peterson, and City Clerk Roberts
also present.
2. INVOCATION /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Invocation was given by Council Member Beauchamp.
3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
•
A. PROCLAMATIONS (IF APPLICABLE)
Mayor Berndt read a proclamation declaring May 8 -14, 1994 as
Nursing Home Week and invited citizens to visit facilities
where they will benefit from the knowledge and experience of
their staff, residents, family members, and volunteers. Ward
Tappero, Administrator of Yakima Convalescent Center,
accepted the proclamation and described activities scheduled
for the event.
Mayor Berndt read a proclamation declaring May 2 -6, 1994 as
Cinco de Mayo Week. Juan Orozco, Dan Enriquez, Lupita
Guiterrez- Parker, and Luz Guiterrez accepted the proclamation
and briefly described some of the local activities planned
for the traditional Hispanic holiday celebration.
Mayor Berndt congratulated Mr. Enriquez and recognized his
accomplishments as he ends his year as the first President of
the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.
B. REPORT FROM MAYOR ON TRIP TO CHINA
Mayor Berndt narrated a slide presentation of her recent trip
to China, which included visits to Shanghai, Beijing,
Hong Kong, and other cities. She described the warm welcome
the delegation received during their visit. Michelle Bogard
of TRADEC and Sheila Kleeman, an Ag Showcase sponsor, also
reported on the trip describing this area's growing
import /export agribusiness market opportunities and the
-
MAY =i'•3; 19 9 4
265:
potential economic •benefit - - that can result from this
Washington State Agricultural Showcase recruitment mission.
•
4. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Berndt referred to the items placed on the Consent
Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or
deletions from either Council members or citizens present.
It was the general consensus to remove Items Nos. 9 and 12
•
from the Consent Agenda. The City Clerk then read the
Consent Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances
by title. It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN,
THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS AMENDED, BE ADOPTED. The
motion carried by 6 -0 roll call vote; Beauchamp temporarily
absent. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *)
indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one
motion without further discussion.)
*5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 22 1994 ADJOURNED
MEETING
The of the February 22, 1994 Adjourned meeting, was
approved, having been duly certified accurate by two Council .
members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read
publicly.
6. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
A poem by Angie Geptuch in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King
was read and presented to the Council.
•
Jay Bagwell, President of the local National Air Traffic
Controllers Association at the Yakima Control Tower, stated
he wanted toh,raise some issues from a controller's point of
view concerning the FAA's consolidation plans to remote the
approach control functions from Yakima across the state to
Pasco. He urged Council to lobby the Congressional
representatives to keep the radar tower in Yakima because the
original reasons and rationale from 1983 for this
consolidation no longer holds true. The FAA is not looking
at what is best for Yakima. After providing background
information about this issue, Mr. Bagwell further explained
that it was hard for him to believe the cost figures to build
two microwave towers, where radar information is then remoted
to Pasco and computerized data is sent back to Yakima, would
cost less than just sending it across the runways to the
existing tower. If Yakima loses its approach control
services to Pasco, Yakima Tower will be downgraded to a Level
One VFR Tower and will be contracted out to a private non -FAA
tower service within the next two to four years. He also
2
266 MAY 3, 1994
described several negative aspects if that were to happen and
then provided explanation as to how that would impact the
Yakima control tower operation.
Council Member Beauchamp commented that was a well - presented
argument concerning the issue. He requested a videotape of
this Council meeting be made available to Congressman
Jay Inslee and to Senator
ncluded on some of Mayor the business
suggested Mr.Bagwell be
agendas around to as well.
7. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1994 IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL
This being the time set for the public hearing for Council
consideration of the 1994 Irrigation. Maintenance Assessment
Roll, Dueane Calvin, Acting Irrigation Superintendent,
presented an informational video which illustrated specific
factors concerning the irrigation system process and the
maintenance assessment roll billing procedure. Council
Member Barnett was impressed with the expenditure breakout
for systems showing increases. However, the Council only
receives this type of information if there is an increase.
Some time ago, a summary for every irrigation district was
supplied to Council, which was very helpful when responding
to constituents who personally contact Council members about
these issues. He requested a meeting with staff be scheduled
at some later date to review and establish next year's format
for irrigation assessment information. Because of the
significant amount, Council Member Barnett also suggested
listing separately the City Service Charge and the In -Lieu
of -Tax.
Mayor Berndt opened the public hearing and asked for anyone
wishing to comment.
Margaret Kreutzman, District #858, stated her assessment was
$692,560 and she wasn't going to pay those prices. Staff was
directed to respond to the error and determine the correct
assessment amount.
James Stewart, 1415 Jefferson, a 24 -year resident who has
several properties in District #308, stated the water
pressure is so low that there barely is enough water to run
out of the hose. Even with blowing out the irrigation pipe,
there is still no pressure. Additionally, Mr. Stewart also
explained he was unable to locate the tap to connect to
irrigation water on some of his other parcels. Council
Member Beauchamp explained the valve should be located at the
alley's edge and then is stubbed over to the property line
where the property owner then connects to the stub -out.
Council Member Beauchamp then directed the irrigation staff
3
26 7
MAY 3, 1994
to help Mr. Stewart find where it,..is because the valves are
located at every property.
Council Member Sims explained District #308 is the oldest
district in the system. A comprehensive irrigation study was
I/ done two or three years ago that indicated a complete
rehabilitation of District #308's system was needed. The
estimated cost was approximately $6 million. Because of that
tremendous cost, the Council has been wrestling with what
action to take with District #308, whether to reinvest in
that, create a new LID to rebuild that system, or to have
those residents bib over to City domestic water. Other
problems include a lawsuit called the Aquavella case, which
restricts the City from using or transferring water rights
used for irrigation back to City domestic water use. That is
the reason why Council hasn't acted on either creating a new
LID or asking the property owners to convert to City water.
That case may not be resolved in the relatively near future.
Mr. Stuart explained he had called the City Irrigation
Department and City Water Department every year for the last
24 years. The last five years, they have blown out the
pipes, but it did not help the situation. He stated it is
time to install new pipes; he's tired of paying for something
he's not getting., Council Member Barnett asked whether those
pipes are on Mr.Stewart's property or are the pipes carrying
the water. Mr. Stewart answered they are the pipes coming
from the irrigation pipe. Because he thought the problems
might have been with his pipes, he explained all new plastic
pipes were installed on. -his, property two years ago; the water
only comes up just about an inch with a sprinkler on it.
Council Member Buchanan explained the cost to convert and use
domestic water. Right now, the irrigation systems are the
most economical way of getting water to yards, trees and that
sort of thing. There was continued discussion concerning
ways to increase water pressure.
John Klingele, 1312 West Walnut, directed Councils' attention
to the Irrigation Maintenance Assessment Roll where he
indicated District #342 Loma Vista was identified as a
subdistrict of #259 Capitol Hill. He stated the information
is incorrect. Loma Vista was established as a separate
irrigation district in 1922 and has been operated in that
fashion since then. Although #259 Capitol Hill system is
adjacent to #342 Loma Vista, the only thing in common is the
place of diversion from the canal at 18th and Chestnut. If
there is any system that Loma Vista should become a
subdistrict of, it would'be MaClaren where there are four
places of interconnection. Then Mr. Klingele referred to the
1993 Irrigation Maintenance Assessment Roll and disagreed
with the .00805 rate; he stated the rate should be .00488.
Mayor Berndt directed staff to determine the correct
information and to find answers to Mr. Klingele's questions.
Mr. Klingele also requested the rate not be changed from last
4
266
MAY 3, 1994
year. Mr. Calvin provided explanation as to how and why the
rate was determined; however, he indicated he will verify the
irrigation rate.
Betty Gaudette, 701 North 6th Street, also described the
condition of #308 system, the increased maintenance costs,
and decreased water delivery. She indicated new lines might
increase pressure, because there was a great increase in
water pressure after new lines were installed in an alley by
4th Street, also in the #308 district. She also disagreed
that domestic water should be used for irrigation because of
the large amount of tenant /landlord property in this area.
Landlords won't want to pay domestic water rates for lawn
irrigation; neither will low - income property owners. Other
areas Ms. Gaudette disagreed with include the exemption from
irrigation rates under certain circumstances and subsidizing,
through her water rate payments, the irrigation of schools
and parks. She also mentioned the fact that even though the
rest of the City may not live in the #308 area, the tourists
walk in the neighborhood when they are attending an event at
the Convention Center.
Larry Mathews, 805 South 17th Avenue, stated he would like to
direct his comments to Council Members Berger and Brado
because they are new to the Council since he last spoke on
this issue. He urged Council to be consistent and fair to
maintain creditability. Although he was not referring to his
irrigation district's assessment, Mr. Mathews explained his
remarks pertain to all irrigation users. He started with the
issue of fairness and asked if it is fair to remove property
from the assessment roll because the property owners declined
irrigation water; the assessment for the exempt property will
be passed on to the other property owners. Referencing a
recent court decision, Mr. Mathews asked that all property be
assessed in any irrigation district even if the owners
decline water. Mr. Mathews also spoke about the matter of
consistency. He compared the collection of garbage fees to
the irrigation exemption process. He stated if property
owners are allowed to decline irrigation water, then
residents should be allowed to decline garbage service.
Council Member Barnett stated it bothers him every time the
irrigation system square footage is reduced because it means
that somebody else eventually will have to pay those costs.
Jan Lowry, a Yakima rental property owner, stated they pay
I/
for the irrigation assessments to make sure their renters
keep their lawns watered. Irrigation water is very
beneficial to property owners within the City limits, and it
is important to make whatever improvements necessary to
maintain the irrigation systems independent of the domestic
water system. There would be a lot more brown lawns if
people had to depend on domestic water even though there are
subsidized rates for irrigation use for domestic water. Then
5
269
MAY 3 , 1994
Ms. Lowry offered suggestions to overcome insufficient
pressure. She also . stated that' "even if higher assessment
fees are assessed to maintain badly needed improvements to
these irrigation systems, it is worth the extra cost.
I/ Mary Ramierz, 401 South 8th Street, described the low water
pressure she has even after the pipes have been blown out.
She is unable to plant a garden without irrigation water.
She explained she hopes for improvements every year; she
doesn't know what is the matter. She asked if this could be
fixed. Mayor Berndt asked Mr. Calvin to look into this
situation.
Referring to her earlier testimony, Betty Gaudette explained
her intent was not to downgrade landlords concerning the
current irrigation system. She is also a landlord, and if
irrigation water was being metered at domestic rates, she
would not provide irrigation water under those circumstances
because of the cost and no control. She emphasized that the
issue is not the irrigation system, but rather the question
of domestic rates.
Mayor Berndt asked if anyone else wished to speak regarding
irrigation assessments. There being no one, the public
hearing was closed.
Council Member Berger asked when the decision was made where
property owners could be granted an exemption from the
irrigation assessment if they paved their property. Denny
Covell, Director of Engineering and Utilities, explained it
is included in a section of the Municipal Code that's been in
place for many years. If a piece of property in an
irrigation district is totally covered with buildings,
asphalt, and concrete, a property owner can petition the City
to be removed from the irrigation assessment roll. That
decision is made by the Water Superintendent. In response to
a question from Council Member•Berger, Mr. Covell explained
the established property review procedure used when there is
a petition filed. Council Member Sims asked if consideration
is given as to how the irrigation district is impacted if
there is lotline to lotline development. Mr. Covell
explained that has not been a condition of development at
this point in time, but it could be included. He suggested
if the Council wants to stop these exemptions, the Municipal
I/ Code should be amended to remove the provision. There was
discussion, comments, and questions among Council members and
staff concerning the responsibility to maintain and operate
irrigation systems. There was additional discussion
concerning the inability under state law to maintain a
reserve fund for the purpose of replacing a system. However,
there is some thinking that perhaps this issue could be
revisited with the possibility of changing state law to allow
that type of program. Another issue included in Council
discussion is the possibility of having just one large system
6
270
MAY 3, 1994
instead of the 65 systems currently in place. It was
suggested this issue possibly could be reevaluated and
included in the Water Comprehensive Plan Update.
Ordinance No. 94 -18 having been read by title, it was MOVED
BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, TO ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE. The motion carried by 6 -1 roll call vote;
Barnett voting nay.
ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 18, AN ORDINANCE confirming the I/
irrigation maintenance assessment roll of the City of Yakima
for the calendar year 1994 and levying irrigation maintenance
assessments according to said roll.
8. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING NORTHWEST CABLE PETITION
ON CABLE TAX ORDINANCE NO. 94 -13
Assistant City Attorney Peterson stated Northwest Cable
missed the deadline to file their referendum petitions to
rescind Ordinance No. 94 -13. He reiterated legal explanation
and analysis from the report and emphasized the importance of
the finality of legislation. Mr. Peterson also described
some problems that could be created if legislation
reconsideration were given to this issue. He also advised
Council as to under what circumstances they might act
differently. Council Member Barnett disagreed with the City
Attorney's argument because he has a legal opinion which
disagrees. There were additional questions and comments from
Council Member Barnett about the referendum process and what
steps in the legal process Northwest Cable could take.
It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO ACCEPT
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. The motion carried by a 4 -
roll call vote; Berger, Barnett, and Brado voting nay.
9. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR BUSINESS INCUBATOR FOR
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY
Council Member Brado requested this item be removed from the
Consent Agenda so he could asked what makes this consultant
an expert to provide these services. Glenn Valenzuela,
Director of Community and Economic Development, explained the
consultant's experience as it relates to successful business
incubators being established in other communities. The
I/
consultant will provide an analysis determining whether there
is an appropriate market to put together a successful
incubator before application is made to the Federal
Government. Council Member Brado asked whether these will be
the only outside consultant fees as far as this project is
concerned. Mr. Valenzuela explained that originally it was
7
MAY 3 . 1994 2 " 1
planned to spend approximately $,20,000 on this incubator
project, but actually` only - $6 -, 000 is being requested.
Council Member Brado asked if that meant the difference will
be available as part of the UDAG money and will be available
for other phases or projects. Resolution No. R -94 -52 having
I/ been read by title, it was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY
BEAUCHAMP, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. The motion carried
by unanimous roll call vote.
RESOLUTION NO. R 94 - 52, A RESOLUTION authorizing the
City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute
a professional services agreement between the City of Yakima
and the Argus Group.
*10. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF SALE
OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT FOR YAKIMA CENTER
RESOLUTION NO. R 94 - 53, A RESOLUTION declaring one used
Geni Lift to be surplus and authorizing its sale.
*11. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY IN
VICINITY OF POWERHOUSE ROAD, REQUESTED BY DEL MATTHEWS
(STANDARD MOTIONS A AND B)
May 3, 1994 was set as the time of a meeting with the
initiating party who signed a Notice of Intent to Commence
Annexation Proceedings, the initiating party being Del
Matthews. The annexation proposed by the above party was
accepted by the City of Yakima, and the area to be annexed
was required to assume its share of the City's existing
indebtedness, and staff was directed to file a' Notice of
Intent to Annex with the Yakima County Boundary Review Board.
12. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY IN THE
VICINITY OF CASTLEVALE ROAD (CASTLEVALE COURT), REQUESTED BY
SANDRA RONNING (STANDARD MOTIONS A AND B)
Council Member Barnett asked if Castlevale Court is an
island. Bruce Benson, Associate Planner, explained it is a
mobile home park that is 'currently separated from the City
1/ Limits by about 500 feet. In February a Notice of Intent to
initiate annexation of. the parcel immediately to the west,
which is also a mobile home park, was filed. The petition
for that annexation has been filed and it's currently being
considered by the Boundary Review Board. It is expected to
be completed some time within the next month. That would
make a contiguous boundary for this parcel being considered
today. Council Member Barnett stated he thought our policy
was to be contiguous. Mr. Benson explained it is also state
law, but it is expected the property would be contiguous by
the time it could come back to Council as a finished
•
8
272
MAY 3, 1994
petition. If the other annexation does not go through, this
annexation can't be done.
It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, TO ACCEPT
STANDARD MOTIONS A & B AS THEY PERTAIN TO
ANNEXATIONS. STANDARD MOTION "A" READS AS FOLLOWS:
I MOVE THAT TODAY, MAY 3, 1994 BE SET AS THE TIME OF
A MEETING WITH THE INITIATING PARTY WHO SIGNED A
NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS,
I/
THE INITIATING PARTY BEING SANDRA RONNING. STANDARD
MOTION "B" READS AS FOLLOWS: I MOVE THAT THE
ANNEXATION PROPOSED BY THE ABOVE PARTY WAS ACCEPTED
BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA, AND THE AREA TO BE ANNEXED WAS
REQUIRED TO ASSUME ITS SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING
INDEBTEDNESS, AND DIRECT STAFF TO FILE A NOTICE OF
INTENT TO ANNEX WITH THE YAKIMA COUNTY BOUNDARY
REVIEW BOARD. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
13. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF IMMINENT
DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS FOR THE POLICE STATION /LEGAL CENTER
PROJECT
Ordinance No. 94 -19 having been read by title only, it was
MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO PASS THE
ORDINANCE. The motion passed by a 6 -1 roll call vote;
Brado voting nay. Council Member Brado stated he doesn't
think the process used in this matter has been in the best
interest of taxpayers. Council Member Sims explained this is
a friendly condemnation.
ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 19, AN ORDINANCE authorizing and
directing the institution and prosecution of legal
proceedings for the condemnation and acquisition of real
property for the Yakima Police Station /Legal Center to be
located on South Third Street and for public facilities
thereto; providing for the condemnation and taking of such
real property and declaring the condemnation and taking
thereof to be necessary for the public use required by the
public interests; directing that compensation for such taking
be paid from fund number 333 - Law & Justice Capital Fund of
the City of Yakima.
14. PRESENTATION OF DRAFT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
I/
Denny Covell, Director of Engineering & Utilities, provided
background information about Clean Water Act requirements
which led to current stormwater management program
implementation requirements. The Growth Management Act also
requires storm drainage be addressed. An agreement, between
the City of Yakima and the Department of Ecology, contains a
requirement to develop the. Comprehensive Storm Water
9
273
MAY 3, 1994
Management Plan to protect water quality, control runoff, and
prevent flooding. Mr. Covell indicated the City must address
this issue by October 1994; however, pending legislation
could extend that date as well as make the requirements'more
stringent. After providing informational handouts to Council
I/ which referenced the implementation dates of the program, Mr.
Covell introduced the Consultants selected to do the study.
Tony Krutsch, HDR Engineering, described potential
implementation regulations as they relate to the stormwater
drainage utility approach. He compared the NPDES permit
process for wastewater to one that would be implemented for
stormwater drainage discharged to surface water. He also
described additional state rules regarding impacts to the
groundwater from contaminants from surface water supplies.
Mr. Krutsch also explained the existing infrastructure system
that needs to be enhanced and described the need for future
operations and maintenance funding. He also indicated the
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan needs to be
implemented to comply with the Growth Management Act.
John Genskow, HDR Engineering, explained this project was
designed to meet two specific goals. The first was to
develop an interactive tool to analyze growth impacts,, from
which evolved a draft Design Criteria Manual. The second
goal was to prepare a plan of action to meet water quality
requirements, from which evolved a draft Comprehensive Plan.
At this point Mr. Genskow explained in detail some of the
plan recommendations, including Operations and Maintenance;
Public Education and Involvement; and Capital Improvements.
Referring to the Public Education and Involvement component,
Council Member Barnett expressed concern that the public
hearing process is not a very good public education setting.
There needs to be an opportunity for public education before
the public hearing process begins, otherwise the public will
not be informed. Mr. Covell explained that public education
is part of the cost of the total program once the program is
in place initially. The environmental process is tcq get
review and comment on the document that lays out what the
Stormwater Program is going to be, with education being a
major component of it. Referencing Alternative. No. 4 with
respect to improvements to the downtown core, Council Member
Barnett also expressed concern about the approximate $83 a
year assessment on single- family residences to pay for an
1/ improvement from which they will see no benefit.
Dick Warren, Kato & Warren, explained the specifics of what
it would take to implement the program. Obviously,
priorities need to be set and decisions will have to be made
by Council. He suggested that, initially, a program be
started to respond to DOE and EPA criteria to try to address
the pollutant problem in the local streams and rivers
resulting from stormwater drainage. He also suggested to
start with a smaller capital program and build up as the need
10
272
MAY 3, 1994
became more focused and the priorities were there. As to the
education issue that Council Member Barnett asked about,
Mr. Warren explained the requirement pertains to continually
working with the public after plan implementation, not prior
to any action on Council's part. He also explained how the
billing rate per unit is figured. There was a considerable
amount of discussion concerning equitable billing units.
Council Member Beauchamp expressed concern about the lack of
federal grants to help fund stormwater drainage systems
I/
because this expense would be a major burden for citizens.
There was additional discussion concerning this issue.
Council Member Buchanan expressed concern that the plan does
not address the needs of those who live downtown or drive
downtown during heavy rainstorms. There was additional
discussion concerning the extension of the timeline to
October 1997 if the Clean Water Act amendments are adopted.
Chris Waarvick, Wastewater Superintendent, explained his
experience during his recent trip to Washington, D.C. where
key staffers lectured him about unfunded mandates.
Mr. Waarvick also explained how stormwater drainage pollutes
receiving streams even though it seldom rains in this area.
City Manager Zais described his lobbying efforts to seek
changes, amendments, delays, and extensions to The Clean
Water Act and The Safe Drinking Water Act regulations. He
also explained how the lobbying process works, and the lack
of funding for mandates. Council Member Buchanan described
areas in the city where there are serious drainage problems
when there is heavy rainfall. Council Member Barnett stated
that Alternative No. 4 doesn't address those areas. Mayor
Berndt stated there should be local determination of problems
so they can be resolved, instead of a set of generic
guidelines. There was additional discussion concerning who
should have lead agency status and the need for a joint
meeting to discuss a water quality based stormdrainage plan
in the area.
15. OTHER BUSINESS
There was discussion concerning inaccurate information
published in the Yakima Herald - Republic regarding Yakima's
participation in a grant application by the Airport. Mayor
Berndt requested more information about this issue. She
indicated her understanding that Yakima County also has not
received any information about this and suggested the City
and the County meet to discuss this topic.
I/
Information Items:
Items of information provided to Council were: Notice of
"kick -off" May 2, 1994 informational meeting via
teleconference video regarding formation of local networks
11
275
MAY 3, 1994
to plan and deliver coordinated . community based services and
supports for families and children (E2SHB2319); Notice of
Ki -Yak Board of directors and Annual Council May 3, 1994
meeting (agenda); Agenda for May 4, 1994 Yakima Valley
Public Transportation Benefit Area Board of Directors
I/ meeting; Agenda for May 5, 1994 Yakima Valley RTPO TAC
meeting; Monthly Annexation Status Report for April 1994;
City of Yakima Rebound Plus Monthly Report for April 1994;
Monthly Office of Housing and Neighborhood Conservation
Report for April 1994; Legal Department Monthly Report for
March 1994; Assignments Pending in Office of Environmental
Planning as of May 3, 1994; Minutes of the April 11, 1994
Yakima Youth Commission Meeting; and Agenda for the April
28, 1994 Yakima Air Terminal Board meeting and minutes of
its March 24, 1994 meeting.
16. ADJOURNMENT TO MAY 10, 1994 ADJOURNED MEETING AT 7:00 A.M.
FOR INFORMAL DISCUSSION AMONG COUNCIL MEMBERS AT THE YAKIMA
CENTER
Mayor Berndt announced the Adjourned Meeting scheduled for
May 10 has been rescheduled to May 17. It was MOVED BY
BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT
4 :55 p.m. The motion carried.
Af
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY: I -1111 II a... Pi t I i1. . Z a
ttr� r * ' ' 4i: R ' .I /BATE
_ J 0
OUNC L M ' 2 I: E ' DATE
ATTEST:
[i p "IP Y i
CITY CLERK MAYOR /. e1. j60a77
Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk Skovald. An audio and video tape of this meeting are
available in the City Clerk's Office.
12