Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/22/1994 Business Meeting 15 6 CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON FEBRUARY 22, 1994 BUSINESS MEETING 1. ROLL CALL The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 p.m., I/ in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Mayor Pat Berndt, presiding, Council Members Clarence Barnett, Henry Beauchamp, Ernie Berger, Lynn Buchanan, and Bernard Sims present on roll call. Council Member Bill Brado was absent and excused. City Manager Zais, City Attorney Paolella, and Deputy City Clerk Skovald also present. 2. INVOCATION /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Invocation was given by Council Member Beauchamp. 3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER A. PROCLAMATIONS (IF APPLICABLE) Glenn Valenzuela, Director of Community & Economic Development, introduced Norma Torres and Shelley Schlief, students from Davis High School who are participating in the LIFT program. City Attorney Paolella introduced Larry Peterson as a new Assistant City Attorney. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Berndt referred to the items placed on the Consent Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or deletions from either Council members or citizens present. It was the general consensus of the Council to remove Items Nos. 11, 15, and 19 from the Consent Agenda. The Deputy City Clerk then read the Consent Agenda items, including resolutions and ordinances by title. It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS AMENDED, BE ADOPTED. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Brado absent. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *) indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one motion without further discussion.) *5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 8, 1994 ADJOURNED MEETING AND FEBRUARY 16, 1994 BUSINESS MEETING The minutes of the February 8, 1994 Adjourned Meeting and February 16, 1994 Business Meeting were approved, having been duly certified accurate by two Council members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly. ;;r.x a%Fr 157 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 6. PRESENTATION TO VARIOUS BUSINESSES /ORGANIZATIONS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE REBOUND PLUS PROGRAM Irene Guiterrez, Rebound Administrator, presented a plaque to Pioneer Bank to show appreciation for their contribution to the Rebound Program. She also recognized the Yakima Rotary Club and the Yakima Teachers Association for their contributions. 7. PRESENTATION BY COG ON PTBA DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESS Lon Wyrick, Director of the Yakima Valley Council of Governments (YVCOG), reported the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA) Board has been formed. Members from the City of Yakima include Council Members Beauchamp, Berger, and Sims, with alternates being Council Members Barnett, Brado, and Buchanan. Mr. Wyrick outlined planning activities for this valley -wide transit system, including community presentations and upcoming public meetings. From these meetings, service needs of each community will be determined, and the PTBA Board will take them into consideration when designing the transit system. He invited Council members to attend the upcoming public meetings and provided a phone number for citizens to ask questions. Referencing a handout in addition to information in the Council packet, Mr. Wyrick explained that with the motor vehicle excise tax and utilizing a 0.3% rate, approximately $11.5 to $12 million a year will be available to the PTBA Board to provide services to the communities up and down the Valley. In answer to budget questions from Council Member Barnett, Mr. Wyrick explained the ADA r as they refer to public facilities, will all be included in the cost factor. The revenue side of the question is all that is available right now. After public hearings have been held and it is determined how many buses or vans will be needed, then those amounts will be specified. All requirements of ADA will be met, particularly since federal and state money will be used in this project. Council Member Barnett commented that it seems that this figure, whatever it turns out to be, will gradually grow. Bill Schultz, Transit Manager, has had a lot of experience in that regard, and he will be developing those figures. In answer to an inquiry from Council Member Beauchamp, Mr. Wyrick explained that the revenue projection is the total amount of funds, excluding any Section 8 funds or any federal grants that might be received. It will . 1/ include all maintenance, operation, and capital improvements. Council Member Barnett commented that this issue will be voted countywide. Assuming it is a 0.30, the citizens are really voting for the same amount, not an additional amount. Mr. Wyrick concurred; the citizens in the City of Yakima would still be taxed at 0.30 (if that amount remains the same); however, the revenue would be directed towards the PTBA. 2 158 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 8. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Richard Andring, 203 South 8th Avenue, commented that teenagers need a place for activities and suggested they support it through different fund raisers. He also expressed his opinion that the legislature should change laws to give parents more authority. A. PRESENTATION. FROM KENNETH JOHNSEN, YAKIMA INTERURBAN LINES ASSOCIATION., REGARDING REQUEST FOR CAPITAL GRANT Kenneth Johnsen, Yakima Interurban Lines Association (YILA), described the declining status of the YVT railroad. YILA would like to embark on a capital improvement project to restore the YVT railroad facility to a first - class museum and tourist attraction. The first part of this project is to develop a master plan for the railroad. He reviewed the goals for this master plan that will include, not only discussion with the City of Yakima and the City of Union Gap, but also with the community through public meetings. Mr. Johnsen requested the City of Yakima be the lead agency for their application to the ISTEA grant program. He indicated the cost for the study to be approximately $55,000 and requested $7,150 from the Trolley Fund to be used as matching funds. Council Member Barnett indicated the State Historic Preservation Office has encouraged this project. Lon Wyrick provided explanation concerning various enhancement funds available through ISTEA. Mayor Berndt stated since there will not be an adequate pedestrian /bicycle access from downtown to the Greenway in the first stage of the Gateway Project, the City of Yakima is hoping to apply for an ISTEA grant to tie that together. She expressed concern about the possibility of Mr. Johnsen's request interfering with the City's ability to do that. Mr. Wyrick provided explanation about enhancement funds set aside specifically for alternative forms of transportation and historic preservation. It would not conflict with YVT's capital facilities aspect, but would compete with other projects, such as the Canal Pathway project, if there is a second phase to that. In reply to an inquiry by Council Member Beauchamp concerning system enhancement development funding, Mr. Johnsen expressed optimism that future ISTEA funding will be available; however, they are also pursuing other funding sources. Mr. Johnsen also explained their intention to not use the money in the Trolley Fund directly for projects of rehabilitation, but instead use those funds as seed money or as matching funds for grants. After further discussion among Council members about this request, it was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BEAUCHAMP, THAT THE CITY OF YAKIMA BECOME THE LEAD AGENCY FOR THE ISTEA GRANT ON BEHALF OF THE TROLLEY ASSOCIATION, AND UPON SUCCESSFUL ACTUAL GRANTING, THAT THE APPROPRIATE DOLLARS ARE ALLOCATED TOWARDS THE TROLLEY FUND. The motion passed by a 5 -1 voice vote, Berndt voting nay; Brado absent. 3 159 FEBRUARY r 22, 1994 9. STATUS REPORT ON CONSOLIDATED SAFETY DISPATCHING City Manager Zais presented background information about the public safety dispatching consolidation issue. In -a major study completed last year, two options were recommended: I/ (1) a SUNCOM operated center, or (2) a center operated by the City of Yakima. Since that time, events have occurred which seem to eliminate these options. Some agencies have withdrawn from any form of consolidation, while others have expressed a desire to continue existing service arrangements with the City of Yakima. Due to this chain of events, it appears as though the best approach would be to establish an Upper Valley Metro Law Enforcement dispatch arrangement for police dispatching. Mr. Zais listed the fire dispatching operations that have expressed a desire to maintain the current dispatch arrangement with the City of Yakima, where consolidation has really been in effect since 1955. Because of these requests, two options for fire dispatching have been presented. Mr. Zais described Option 2a, which would allow the City Fire Dispatch Center to continue and phase in the consolidation plan. The other option includes unification under SUNCOM, with no dissolution or diminishment of services to the citizens of Yakima. There would be assurances concerning other conditions also, including labor issues and administrative control and operation of the SUNCOM board. Mr. Zais emphasized that the deadline is fast approaching for making, declaration to the State of Washington for funding Consolidation should proceed; however, it should include a slower, phased approach. Wayne Wantland, Communications Electronics Supervisor for the Fire Department, explained his involvement in the consolidated dispatch effort from its beginning. Three years ago when this issue went to a vote of the people, there was a concerted effort to separate the related issues of consolidated dispatch and the 911 phone system; the tax of fifty cents is strictly for the 911 phone system. He described how an E911 call is handled and what takes place from that point forward. He emphasized the only difference between the Option 2a (Yakima Fire Dispatch) and the SUNCOM alternative is one momentary transfer of fire /EMS calls to I/ the fire dispatcher; however, due to the efficiency of Yakima's computer enhancements, Option 2a would be a smoother operation. Mr. Wantland also indicated that one transfer will be eliminated when the Yakima Fire Dispatch moves to the Police Station /Legal Center once it is built. Referring to the Analysis of Users Based on Calls for Service handout, he provided background information and explanation concerning the percentage of calls for the various areas. He recommended a phased approach to the ultimate consolidation of public safety dispatching. The issues of service and economics need to be clearly defined and understood by all. Mr. Wantland also explained the 4 16.0 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 Operations Board concept where fire districts have a voice in decisions and specific needs for their district. Larry Mathews, 805 South 17th Avenue, urged Council to carefully consider this proposal and not rush into any decision. Mark Kimm, Assistant Fire Chief for Fire District No. 5, described the location of and provided information about his district that dispatches for all Lower Valley fire entities. He urged consolidation take place as soon as possible. He stated there was a majority vote of the Fire Districts, the Fire Chiefs Association, and the Yakima County Fire District Commissioners Association to stay with SUNCOM as a county- wide operation. He was sure SUNCOM could propose the same operation using currently employed dispatchers if all agencies work together and pooled their resources to provide the service, including the City of Yakima's computer aided dispatch equipment. Lower Valley agency employees will have to travel considerably farther to work than the City dispatchers, who will only have a very short distance to travel. The original concept was to consolidate now, implement it, and then transfer the dispatching operations when the new facility was built. Citizens have been waiting to call one phone number to reach a consolidated public safety dispatch. Assistant Fire Chief Kimm described the intent of Yakima County to implement a county -wide emergency service system through Mutual Aid agreements to achieve excellent fire protection and EMS services. Council Member Berger emphasized the fact that the Yakima Fire Department has had central fire dispatching services in place since 1955; it seems a base could have been built from that instead of adding another government agency. In response to a question from Mayor Berndt, there was a considerable amount of discussion concerning anticipated 911 funding, which is determined by the SUNCOM Administrative Board. Council Member Sims and Assistant Fire Chief Kimm discussed District No. 5's current 911 system, including how SUNCOM could enhance its capability. Assistant Fire Chief Kimm indicated the need to eliminate call transferring. Council Member Sims and Assistant Chief Kimm also discussed switching equipment to enable the Lower Valley to receive calls directly and not go through SUNCOM at all. He described the limited capacity of District No. 5's current facility, which only handles fire dispatching. Council Member Sims stated that it seems as though the technology is there that once it's determined whether the call is for fire, police, or EMS, that it can be switched to the I/ appropriate entity based on the telephone number. There was continued discussion between Council Member Sims and Assistant Fire Chief Kimm concerning enhanced 911 capabilities and procedures. Doug Blair, Yakima County Sheriff and Chairman of the SUNCOM Operations Board, provided background information about the 911 phone system and consolidated dispatch, along with 5 161 FEBRUARY„ 22, 1994 explanation concerning countywide representation of all entities. SUNCOM has been to provide enhanced 911 services since October 1993. The City of Yakima was asked to participate in an effort to consolidate services in conjunction with SUNCOM. Sheriff Blair explained the issues of votes on the board and which dispatch was going to be I/ used have already been discussed, and it has always been agreed that the City system would be used. Each entity has a single vote in SUNCOM 911 services, but the board has never been formed for communications or consolidated dispatch issues. The issue of the number of votes has never been discussed. However, the City system is far advanced in fire from what is available at the County. The City Fire Department has a tremendous number of resources that would benefit all citizens in Yakima County. Actually at this point, only the degree of participation when forming the consolidated dispatch system needs to be established by each agency that provides emergency services. He listed the entities that have expressed an interest in consolidated dispatch. Mayor Berndt stated the number of dispatching agencies throughout the county will have been reduced significantly from what they were a few years ago. Sheriff Blair stated it will, but urged the Council to consider that if Yakima Fire elects to participate, there will be a county -wide consolidated dispatch for fire. Mayor Berndt referred to the number of votes outnumbering Yakima's one vote, and how will the City of Yakima continue forward in providing the same level of service. There was continued discussion concerning the voting issue; and that a different board will be set up for consolidated dispatch because it is a separate issue from"the.911 telephone system. Chris O'Dell, Fire District No. 9 in Naches Heights, described the exceptional level of service received from the City Fire dispatchers since 1950 and requested it be kept that way. He briefly explained their switching equipment and pointed out examples of possible problems from a dispatcher's point of view that could arise during an emergency call. It was MOVED BY BARNETT, SECONDED BY BERGER, TO APPROVE NUMBER 1, OPTIONS 2A, AND NUMBER 3 LISTED IN THE MEMORANDUM THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE AGENDA, THE BOTTOM OF SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION. Mayor Berndt clarified the motion by stating it is to approve a Metro Law Enforcement Dispatching Center, Yakima Fire Dispatch and requesting reimbursement for required E911 receiving equipment. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote; Brado absent. *10. REPORT FROM CITY ATTORNEY AND LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING CLAIMS SETTLEMENT POLICY The report and staff recommendation was accepted. 6 162 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 11. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF APPLICATION FOR 1994 HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Larry Mathews, 805 South 17th Avenue, requested this item be removed from the Consent Agenda to ask how the City participates in this program, who gets the benefits, and how it is handled. Dixie Kracht, Block Grant Manager, explained how the City qualifies to receive the block of funds. The use of the funds primarily replaces the old rental rehab program and offers money in partnership to public and private through lenders and investors to repair low income housing units. Ms. Kracht also explained other qualifier entitlement areas, including the qualifier requirement to provide 15% of the money to Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO). There are two registered CHDOs in the city, the Homeless Coalition and the Housing Foundation. Administration money will be included with the program and Block Grant administrative money will not be obligated to this program. Mr. Mathews expressed concern about how the federal expenditures would be used. He also questioned the rental rehabilitation program involving private investors and others and whether the program is monitored. Mayor Berndt explained they have taken several bus tours, and the Housing Foundation also monitors the program. Ms. Kracht further addressed this issue by providing additional information concerning how the money is allocated in these types of programs to primarily low and moderate income persons. Council Member Beauchamp asked how the program is monitored. Ms. Kracht explained the monitoring procedure of participants in the program, including the covenants placed on the property, the rental surveys, and random checks of the units. Resolution No. R -94 -16 having been read by title, it was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Brado absent. RESOLUTION NO. R 94 - 16, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing the City Manager of the City of Yakima to file an application with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for funding of the 1994 HOME Entitlement Grant. *12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH OIC FOR FIRE CADET PROGRAM RESOLUTION NO. R 94 - 17, A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute a Recruit Class Agreement Between The City Of Yakima and The Yakima Valley Opportunities Industrialization Center for a Recruit Training Class for Cadets enrolled in the Yakima Valley Opportunities Industrialization Center (YVOIC) Fire Fighter Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program. 7 163 FEBRUARY, 22, 1994 *13. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CENTENNIAL CLEAN. WATER GRANT FOR WASTEWATER PLANNING ACTIVITIES RESOLUTION NO. R- 94 -18, A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager to sign all applications, grant agreements and amendments, and other documents relating to wastewater comprehensive planning for the Centennial Clean Water Fund Outcome Funding grant program. *14. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND RATIFICATION OF AIRPORT FAA GRANT APPLICATION RESOLUTION NO. R- 94 -19, A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA AND YAKIMA COUNTY authorizing, ratifying, and adopting a Project Application, Standard DOT Title VI Assurances, Certificate of Sponsor's Attorney, and Grant Agreement for Federal Assistance, between the Federal Aviation Administration and the Yakima Air Terminal Board for project number 3 -53- 0089 -14. 15. SET DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 15, 1994 ON SEPA APPEAL AND HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION FOR KPFF RETAIL CENTER Council Member Barnett requested this item be removed from the consent agenda to discuss whether SEPA appeals should go before the Hearing Examiner. It is difficult to separate SEPA issues from project issues. He asked whether the KPFF Retail Center public hearing could be referred to the Hearing Examiner and whether Council is interested in having all SEPA appeals appear before the Hearing Examiner with a recommendation to the Council. City Attorney Paolella explained that under the current ordinance, it would be technically possible for the Hearing Examiner to consider SEPA appeals, including the KPFF Retail Center, if all parties agree. It would take an ordinance change to make all appeals go directly to the Hearing Examiner. Mr. Paolella explained the options available. The ordinance could be changed so that all SEPA appeals go directly to the Hearing Examiner as a recommendation to the full City Council only, or it could be changed to direct all of them to the Hearing Examiner for a final decision, subject to further appeal to the City Council. However, it is fundamental that no final decisions can be made on the project until the SEPA process is completed. There was further discussion among Council members and staff concerning this issue. Since Assistant Mayor Barnett will chair the Council Meeting on March 15, he requested there be separate agenda items for the SEPA environmental appeal and the project issues for KPFF. Glenn Valenzuela, Director of Community & Economic Development, stated the SEPA issue should be heard before the Hearing Examiner's recommendation is considered. There was further discussion concerning whether to consider changing the ordinance. Council Member Barnett requested staff determine whether the two issues can be separated, SEPA and 8 164 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 project, which issue should come first, and if /how the SEPA appeal decision will affect the project; he requested this be in layman's terms. Mayor Berndt asked if there was a consensus among Council members to direct staff to determine the possibility of having the Hearing Examiner consider the SEPA appeals with only an appeal process; thereby considering his decision a final one unless it is appealed to the City Council. Council Member Barnett requested a list of pros and cons of the issue to be brought to Council for discussion. Mr. Valenzuela suggested submitting the draft ordinance to the committee reviewing the development standards process to provide a recommendation. After continued discussion, it was MOVED BY BARNETT, SECONDED BY BUCHANAN, TO SET THE DATE OF HEARING FOR MARCH 15, 1994. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote; Brado absent. 16. CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION REGARDING FEES FOR CABLE TELEVISION COMMUNICATION SERVICES Council Member Barnett requested this item be deferred so Northwest Cable has adequate opportunity to review the issue and determine how it might impact their business. City Manager Zais explained staff was asked by Council to come back with this legislation to deal with the equity issue. In regard to the issue of how much revenue it will provide or what other companies may be impacted, it cannot be determined at this time. The Council did not direct whether these funds should go into the bond debt service schedule for the police station or whether it ought to be for some other purpose. Concerning the proposed fee, there appeared to be a consensus that more information is needed and some issues need to be clarified. Mayor Berndt asked staff if there is a mechanism for that information. Robert Wheeler, Accounting Manager, explained it is difficult to determine basic revenue in this instance because sales tax is not charged on services provided. Dan Arnett, with the Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce, described the broad nature of this proposed new ordinance and emphasized the need for more information about this issue. John Hanson, Director of Finance and Budget, explained the proposed legislation is intended to address the equity issue with any other company that might compete with TCI Cable. It would also affect subscriber- driven type service, as it does hard line cable TV companies. There were additional comments expressed by Council members and staff concerning Council's intent to establish a sunset clause tying it to when the bonds are paid off or the same time frame as the newly created tax on TCI Cable. Council Member Barnett requested Northwest Cable be notified about this issue, including the date and a copy of the new agenda item. It was MOVED BY BARNETT, SECONDED BY BEAUCHAMP, TO DEFER THIS ISSUE 9 165 FEBRUARY ; 1994 FOR TWO WEEKS, UNTIL MARCH 8, 1994. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote; Brado. absent. 17. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING PLAN APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE Don Skone, Planning Manager, explained this proposed ordinance would amend land development application fees based on a three percent cost of living index this past year. He referred to a 1990 agreement with the development community for this process. This proposed ordinance also includes a new fee for SEPA appeals. There was discussion and comments from Council members concerning the need for the SEPA appeal fee. Council Member Buchanan stated he would like to know how much it costs to conduct a SEPA hearing including staff time to prepare it. Council Member Barnett discussed the waiver of fee issue if a person cannot afford the fee. Mayor Berndt opened the public meeting and asked for any comments concerning the proposed fee schedule. There being no one wishing to comment, the public meeting was closed. Ordinance No. 94 -7 having been read by title, it was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Brado absent. ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 7, AN ORDINANCE relating to zoning and land use; increasing land development fees; and amending Section 15.26.010B of the City of Yakima Municipal Code. *18. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT FINANCING ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 8, AN ORDINANCE relating to Community Redevelopment Financing; amending an exhibit to Ordinance No. 93 -117 with respect to the boundaries of an apportionment district. 19. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE PROGRAM FOR CITY EMPLOYEES Larry Mathews, 805 South 17th Avenue, requested this be removed from the consent agenda to ask questions about the self funded insurance plan administration. After providing explanation to Mr. Mathews' questions, John Hanson introduced the Benefit Program Committee members. It was MOVED BY I/ BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote; Brado absent. ORDINANCE NO. 94 - 9, AN ORDINANCE relating to employee benefits; adopting an Employees' Welfare Benefit Program; approving Participation Agreements with certain groups of employees represented by collective bargaining agents; adding a new section to Chapter 2.04 of the Yakima Municipal Code amending Section 2.20.094D and Chapter 3.10 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; repealing Chapter 3.09 of the Yakima Municipal Code; and providing for related matters. 10 • 166 FEBRUARY 22, 1994 20. OTHER BUSINESS City Manager Zais advisedCouncil of a proposed cruising ordinance and combined curfew /parental responsibility ordinance to be presented for Council consideration next week. Council Member Barnett expressed his concern about having complex issues and hearings on the agenda following a three - day holiday weekend. It doesn't allow time to get any additional information from staff prior to the Council meeting. Mayor Berndt was authorized to travel to Washington, DC, as part of a delegation from Washington state, to talk about the impacts of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Information Items: Items of information supplied to Council were: Memorandum from Code Administration Manager regarding 1993 Annual Report; Monthly Report of the Chief of Police for January 1994; Assignments Pending in Office of Environmental Planning as of February 22, 1994; Memorandum from State Department of Labor and Industries regarding Revised Prevailing Wages for Public Works. 2/1/94; :Natibn's Weekly, February 7, 1994; National Council- for Urban Economic Development Legislative Buld etin, February 1994; Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce Yakima County 1994 Business Forecast and Trends Report; and Minutes of the November 4, 1993 and December 9, 1993 Community Development Advisory Committee meetings. 21. EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PROPERTY ACQUISITION It was MOVED BY BEAUCHAMP, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PROPERTY ACQUISITION, WITH IMMEDIATE ADJOURNMENT THEREAFTER TO FEBRUARY 25, 1994, AT 7:30 AM AT THE WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS FACILITY FOR COUNCIL .STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. I/ 11 167 FEBRUARY';;; 22, 1994 22. ADJOURNMENT TO FEBRUARY 25, 1994 AT 7:30 A.M., WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS FACILITY, FOR COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT After completion of the 'Executive Session, the meeting adjourned at 4 :30 p.m. READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY: _ Oir��� COUNS L MEMBER ` ; +! ATE wr COUNCIL MEMBER DATE ATTEST: ACTING ITY CLERK MAYOR Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk Skovald. An audio and video tape of this meeting are available in the City Clerk's office. • 12