HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/14/2011 00 Wastewater Rate Study 1110 City Council Study Session
Transmittal Memo
June 14, 2011
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Dick Zais, City Manager
Chris Waarvick, Public Works Director
Scott Schafer, Wastewater Division Manager
Subject: Wastewater Rate Study, Wastewater Connection Charge Revision, and
Stormwater Rate Study
This memorandum transmits the accompanying Wastewater Rate Study and Wastewater
Connection Charge (WCC) revision conducted by Financial Consulting Solutions Group,
Inc (FCS Group). In addition, this memorandum also addresses the Stormwater Rate
Study conducted by City staff.
Background
• The City of Yakima operates Wastewater treatment and collection facilities serving a
population of nearly 120,000 residents and associated business and commercial activity.
The performance criteria for this operation can be found in the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology) in accord with the provisions found in Public Law 92-
500 and its amendments, otherwise known as the Clean Water Act (CWA). This permit
is renewed every 5 years.
The performance and discharge requirements have grown increasingly more stringent as
anticipated in the framework for environmental protection passed by Congress in 1972.
The Environmental Protection Agency was created at this same time to provide national
oversight and enforcement of the Clean Water Act. Many states, including Washington
State, had their own clean water and environmental statutes in place prior to 1972 and
elected to exercise "primacy" with respect to enforcing the requirements of the "federal"
NPDES permits.
Yakima has had an early and long history with respect to wastewater management. Some
of Yakima's first community debt was incurred to pipe its waste stream away from the
City directly to the Yakima River. Rudimentary treatment processes were followed by
more advanced treatment over the years even prior to PL 92 -500. Today, in response to
needs identified to protect the health and safety of our residents, the Yakima River and
economic development potential, the City manages a facility and collection system with a
• replacement value estimated at nearly $500 million. This high value asset, despite
constant maintenance attention, requires periodic replacement. New discharge limits
require additional or different facilities to be constructed in order to achieve permit
compliance. The City's Stormwater and Pretreatment Programs are a result of the roll out
• of requirements of the CWA and its amendments. Compliance is not optional nor does
the Clean Water Act allow expense as a justification for lack of permit compliance. (List
of increasing environmental regulatory mandates has been enclosed within this packet).
The City's Wastewater Division has demonstrated a high standard of performance with
numerous awards for unblemished permit compliance. The staffing to achieve this
performance is at a very conservative level. This rate study examines the adequacy of our
charges, proposes a limited number of policy changes which will affect cost allocations
(subsidies), recommends changes to the connection charge program for ease of
implementation, and puts forth rate recommendations for a series of charges necessary to
comply with the maintenance, program and capital needs of the division.
Presentation of the Rate Study at this time is necessary to allow adequate review,
deliberation, amendment and ultimate adoption of the Study and passage of the resultant
rates for the year 2012 and beyond.
Wastewater Rate Study
In order to provide an unbiased comprehensive analysis of the Wastewater Division's
financial needs, the City contracted with FCS Group to conduct a rate study over a ten -
year period (2012- 2021). Such services provide the City with an honest in -depth look as
to what proper funding levels are really required to ensure the citizens of Yakima of
wastewater services now, and in the future; while remaining compliant with all of the
• federal and state rules and regulations. In addition, both federal and state environmental
regulators require such an analysis of utility rates not to exceed a two -year time period.
By complying with this, participation in funding acquisition programs remains a viable
option for the City.
The City of Yakima's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) dates back to 1936. The
infrastructure is aging and in desperate need of repair and upgrades to comply with health
and environmental mandates. As the infrastructure ages and the useful life of the
installed equipment (pumps, valves, clarifiers, segment of pipes, etc.) begin to fail, it
becomes more imperative for municipalities to engage in "Asset Management." The life
expectancy of such equipment needs to be tracked and replaced prior to failures to avoid
major catastrophes that could directly affect the community. Reinvesting back into the
infrastructure to ensure current and future services of wastewater is a priority. The 2004
Facility Plan identified and prioritized the processes in need of attention. Many of these
projects have since been completed with additional required improvements being
implemented. Wastewater staff is currently updating its Facility Plan to incorporate
many regulatory and environmental issues not identified within the 2004 Facility Plan.
Construction costs will impact our ability to finance all of the capital improvements
projects (CIP). Over ninety percent (90 %) of the projects identified since the 2004
Facility Plan are mandated renewal or regulatory projects as outlined in our NPDES
permit with Ecology. The updated Facility Plan will also address new regulatory and
environmental issues on the horizon. New issues include the Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) Study to be conducted by Ecology on the Yakima River to reduce the loading of
both phosphorous and nitrogen. Another issue is the Gap -to -Gap Levee Set Back Project.
This project will have a direct impact on the City's ability to continue discharging up to
• 13 million gallons of treated effluent to the river each day. Staff continues its due
diligence in addressing different alternatives and a comprehensive approach to both of
these issues.
To assist in meeting regulatory requirements, the 2011 budget approved by City Council
included $12,000,000 in funding through the acquisition of a combination of bonds
and /or loans. An existing major bond will expire later this year, unlocking debt service
capacity for about half the $12,000,000 in revenue bond or loans approved for the 2011
WWTP budget. When the existing bond is paid off, a new bond will be immediately
secured with the first payments due in 2012. Additional funding to this new bond will be
required as previously stated. In total, the Wastewater Division is looking to increase its
debt service by approximately $400,000 per year without the need for a rate increase.
However, to maintain pace with all the other regulatory compliance issues identified over
the next ten years, rates ultimately need to be increased. Should rates not be increased,
the only alternative would be to significantly increase the Division's debt service;
reducing its available cash and cash transfers in order to meet regulatory mandates; thus
avoiding penalties and potential third party lawsuits. The current debt service is
approximately 19% of the Division's current budget; with the maximum allowed to be
25 %.
Projects identified through 2021 were originally estimated at over $81,000,000.
Currently, both the domestic and industrial waste streams are commingled and treated
together increasing treatment costs and tying up capacity for future development. When
industries of "high strength" discharge to the WWTP, the result is a significant organic
loading to the WWTP. This directly impacts how effectively and /or efficiently the plant
can treat the process wastewater and limits the available capacity for future growth.
To help defer operational and capital project costs, the Wastewater Division decided to
treat high strength wastewater from local industrial fruit processors utilizing an anaerobic
bio- reactor at the WWTP. By separating the high strength industrial loading from the
rest of the domestic sanitary sewer, significant capacity is immediately restored for future
users, while being able to treat both processes far more cost effectively. Conveniently,
Yakima has a separate industrial waste (IW) pipeline that can serve high strength
industrial dischargers. With the installation of additional IW collection pipes, existing
high strength users can be connected and treated by the anaerobic bio- reactor. Separating
the industrial waste from domestic wastes remains strategic to the overall savings and
deferment of approximately $10,000,000 in operational and capital costs over the next
ten -years as previously identified in the 2004 Facility Plan reducing the overall cost to
$71,000,000.
It should be noted, that the $71,000,000 in capital improvements over the next ten -year
period does not include costs associated with any unanticipated emergency repairs that
could reside in the million - dollar range, or even the upcoming regulatory issues of the
TMDL study and the Gap -to -Gap Levee Setback Project. Both such projects are
• projected to be multi - million dollar projects and will definitely cause a significant
financial impact to the WWTP over the next 5 to 10 years. A conservative estimate of
these costs could be $30 to 60 million dollars over the estimated $71,000,000 cost for
maintaining compliance to current regulations.
• Due to the rate study conducted by FCS Group, a ten -year review of the Wastewater
Division's regulatory requirements for both the WWTP and the sanitary sewer collection
system indicates funding is needed for approximately $71,000,000. FCS Group also
identified the need to eliminate the 25% subsidy of the Pretreatment Program currently
being provided from wastewater user rates. This will require a change of philosophy as
this has been a long standing policy implemented by City Council. Based on regulatory
requirements, replacement costs, and current funding levels, FCS Group is proposing an
annual rate increase of 5.1% for the next eight - years, followed by a 3.0% and 0%
respectively in the final two years of the ten -year period to provide the Wastewater
Division with proper funding levels.
Staff recommends that the rates be set for the next three years (2012, 2013, and 2014)
based on FCS Group's recommendation. Prior to 2014, the Wastewater Division's
financial needs will be required to be re- evaluated to take into consideration any changes
due to possible operational savings and /or any changes with regulatory obligations.
Deferment of adequate rate increases will only serve to significantly increase the
financial needs and immediate costs of the City's largest asset; while placing the entire
infrastructure in immediate jeopardy. Having an appropriate rate structure and available
funding to support the maintenance, repair, and replacement of the infrastructure is
crucial in protecting public health and promoting economic development.
Wastewater Connection Charge Revision
The City is authorized by Title 35 RCW to acquire, construct, own, operate, and provide
financing for waterworks and systems of sewerage, and to establish rates, fees, and
charges. As such, the City calculates and collects wastewater connection charges
(WCCs) for new construction projects which are allocated to the new customers in
accordance with §7.58 of the YMC. WCCs are required to properly finance the
operation, growth and replacement of both the infrastructure of the collection system and
the wastewater treatment plant. Council has had a long standing policy that existing
ratepayers pay for capital improvements driven by regulations, renewal, and safety while
minimizing its subsidy for growth.
A clear, concise methodology for calculating the City's WCCs is needed for the
Wastewater Division. The WCC process should be easily administered, transparent and
predictable by prospective users. We know the current methodology is overly complex,
burdensome, and extremely difficult for prospective investors to understand or rely upon
and are frequently questioned by the contractors and /or developers. FCS Group clearly
determined early in the study that the City's current process is far too complicated as
compared to other municipalities. The City's wastewater system serves as an engine to
our local economy. Unfortunately these difficulties can serve to limit the interest of
developers to our community.
It is therefore the goal and desire of the Wastewater Division to simplify the entire WCC
• process; allowing multiple benefits for the City and prospective investors. Simplifying
the process will not compromise the financial needs of the sanitary collection system or
• the wastewater treatment plant. Many other municipalities utilizing a simpler process
have found much success.
The proposed methodology for calculating wastewater connection charges will be based
on water meter size or treatment demand. The use of zones will be simplified to "Inside
City" and "Outside City."
Enclosed within this packet is the current methodology for calculating the WCC, current
Ordinance 7.58, and proposed draft language addressing the revisions to the WCC
process.
Stormwater Rate Study
The Stormwater Rate Study was conducted by City staff to ensure proper funding levels
exist in meeting water quality regulations pertaining to both the Stormwater and
Underground Injection Control (UIC) Programs. Such activities include the stringent
obligations and requirements for the collection, transportation, and treatment of surface
water in accordance with the Stormwater Program, as well as implementing the mandated
responsibilities and regulations in the protection of groundwater with the UIC Program.
Since its inception, the City's Stormwater Program has been under the directive of both
the Regional Stormwater Policy Group (RSPG) and the City Council for "minimal
• compliance." This simply means achieving compliance with the stormwater permit
requirements while being minimally funded. However, past City Council approval has
allowed the City to address very specific areas of localized flooding and safety hazards.
Currently, the rate of $43 per equivalent residential unit (ERU) is being assessed.
The Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit with the Department of
Ecology (Ecology) is set to expire on February 15, 2012. Ecology has already indicated
an approximate 6 -month delay in renewing the next five -year stormwater permit for years
2012 -2017. As a partner of the RSPG, the City's efforts along with the other partners
have been coordinated under an Inter - Governmental Local Agreement (ILA) for
stormwater compliance activities in accordance with the stormwater permit. An
extension of the current ILA for Years 4 and 5 was necessary due to the delay in permit
issuance.
It is our recommendation due to the delay in the issuance of the second stormwater
permit by Ecology for years 2012 — 2017 and its unknown compliance requirements, that
the current rate of $43 per ERU also be assessed for 2012. Transfers to Stormwater
Capital Fund 442 will be significantly reduced to absorb the increased costs of fuel and
materials and to maintain minimal compliance with both the NPDES (as .
requirements ramp up) and UIC regulations, including mandates of increased
housekeeping, UIC assessment, project review, inspection, and the mandated
enforcement elements, as well as fund a continued effort to address flooding and safety
1111 issues per Councils previous directive.
�^ ,
' City of Yakima,
® f Ti, 4
rv�~ �- Washington
1 f
'ui - g
\ - Final Report
. ` ', w,
�.
\1, r : y . ,, , , -
� S• s
• ==1 = 1' WASTEWATER
, a,�.. .
_`�--� RATES A N D
: y „. r \ . � 4 ' -w CONNECTION
® ' - �. � CHARGE
P. , 4. . 41,, 3
. Ak
}
:x. STUDY
Y
J W " , ...� 1 f .
, rif tit , .. ,,
1 N ,x
� � , v „
Consulting Services Provided by: June 2, 2011
•FCS GROUP
Solutions - Oriented Consulting
7525 166th Avenue NE, Suite D -215
Redmond, WA 98052
T: 425.867.1802 I F: 425- 867 -1937
• This entire report is made of readily recyclable materials,
including the bronze wire binding and the front and back www.fcsgroup. eom
cover, which are made from post- consumer recycled
plastic bottles.
FCS GROUP
June 2, 2011
Mr. David Schneider
Assistant Manager Wastewater Division
City of Yakima
2220 East Viola
Yakima, WA 98901
Transmittal of Final Report:
Wastewater Rate and Connection Charge Study
Dear Mr. Schneider:
FCS GROUP is pleased to submit our report describing our assumptions, findings and
recommendations of the Wastewater Rate and Connection Charge study prepared for the City of
Yakima.
Please distribute copies of this document to other City staff and management, as you deem
appropriate. A CD -ROM will be submitted under separate cover containing an electronic version
• of the spreadsheet model and a pdf version of the study report.
We greatly appreciate the efforts and support of City staff throughout this study process. It has
been our pleasure working with you and other City staff and management on this effort. We look
forward to assisting you with your future financial / management needs. Any questions or
commentary regarding this report can be directed to me at 425- 867 -1802, ext. 241, or
karvnj(a fcsgroup.com.
Sincerely,
Karyn Johnson
Principal
•
•
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. STUDY FRAMEWORK 1
A. Introduction 1
B. Methodology 1
C. Report Organization 2
2. POLICY DEVELOPMENT 3
A. Fund Accounting 3
B. System Reinvestment Funding 5
C. Debt Service Coverage Requirements 7
D. Use of Connection Charges for Debt Service 7
E. Capital Program Funding / Debt Management 8
F. Cumulative Impact of Fiscal Policies 9
3. CONNECTION CHARGES 10
A. Methodology 11
B. Results 16
• 4. CONTRACTED SERVICES RATES 19
A. Methodology 19
B. Results 19
5. OTHER SERVICE CHARGES
A. Pretreatment Program Charges 23
B. Inside City Strong Waste Charges 24
C. Outside City Strong Waste Charges 26
D. Septage Charges 27
6. RETAIL REVENUE REQUIREMENTS 29
A. Methodology 29
B. Results 31
7. RETAIL COST OF SERVICE / RATE STRUCTURE EVALUATION 37
Technical Appendix
• • • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rate and Connection Charge Study
Table of Contents -1
•
• SECTION 1
STUDY FRAMEWORK
A. INTRODUCTION
In 2009, the City of Yakima (City) authorized FCS GROUP to complete a Rate and Charge
study for its wastewater system. The purpose of this comprehensive study was to assist the City
in maintaining a financially stable wastewater utility and to promote a fair and equitable
allocation of wastewater system costs to its customers. The scope of this study included the
following major elements:
• Financial policies evaluation
• Connection charge update
• Contracted services rate review and update (Terrace Heights and Union Gap)
• Other service charges review and update, including pretreatment program charges, strong
waste charges, and septage charges
(Note that the laboratory fees review was deferred until such time as City staff collects
necessary data)
• Revenue requirements forecast
• • Retail cost of service / rate structure evaluation
These scope elements are addressed throughout each section of this report.
B. METHODOLOGY
The methods used to complete our work are based on analytical principals that are generally
accepted and widely followed throughout the industry — rates and charges must generate enough
revenue to maintain self - supporting and financially viable utilities without undue discrimination
toward or against any customer.
Throughout this study, we worked closely with the City to establish financial policies and arrive
at rate and charge conclusions that meet forecasted utility financial obligations, achieve City
• equity and pricing goals, and adhere to industry best practices. This report documents our
assumptions, findings and recommendations resulting from the study.
This study process involved several iterations of data analyses and the development of scenarios
for rate and charge adjustment strategies. Meetings were held with City staff to validate input
parameters, review interim findings, and receive policy direction. Presentation of final study
results to City Council is scheduled for June 14, 2011.
• •: FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 1
• C. REPORT ORGANIZATION
The remainder of this report provides separate sections for Policy Development (Section 2),
Connection Charges (Section 3); Contracted Service Rates (Section 4); Other Service Charges
(Section 5); Retail Revenue Requirements (Section 6); and Retail Cost of Service /Rate Structure
Evaluation (Section 7). The technical appendix contains the analytical detail supporting the
analyses for each section.
•
• '%> FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 2
• SECTION 2
POLICY DEVELOPMENT
The purpose of establishing financial policies for the City's utility enterprise is to promote the
financial integrity and stability of the utility and to provide for the sustainability of essential
services. These policies form the foundation of utility management and, with routine
application, can act as overarching guidelines for consistent decision making.
Some financial policies are literally imposed by outside influence (minimum debt service
coverage, bond reserves, and regulatory compliance) while other policies are specific to the
utility (discretionary reserve levels, reinvestment protocols, use of debt). In an attempt to
provide consistency to rates and the rate setting process in the future, our study provides
recommended policies that should help the City achieve financial and rate stability from year -to-
year. In developing the wastewater revenue requirement forecast presented in Section 6, we
have incorporated the financial policy recommendations documented in this section.
A. FUND ACCOUNTING
From an industry and financial management perspective, cash balances are a necessary and
appropriate part of prudent utility management practices. Within each utility enterprise,
appropriate segregation of monies should be established and maintained to provide adequate
• controls as to the sources and uses of funds. This practice helps to ensure that funds raised are
applied to the appropriate purposes, and that equity attained through rate and charge structures is
maintained in application. Above all, the City should establish and maintain a financial structure
that provides for adequate and predictable revenues to meet the forecasted needs and operational,
legal, and policy objectives of the wastewater system.
The City maintains a separate set of funds for its wastewater utility and segregates account
balances for operating activities, capital activities, and restricted debt reserves. The City
maintains the following portfolio of funds in the management of its wastewater utility:
• Operations - Operations reserve (473)
• Operations (debt service) - Water /Wastewater Revenue Bond Redemption (484)
• Capital — Sewer Facilities Capital Reserve (472)
• Capital — Wastewater Construction (476)
• Capital — Wastewater Facility Projects (478)
• Debt Reserve — 1996 Sewer Revenue Bond (483)
• Debt Reserve — 2008 Wastewater Revenue Bond (488)
• Debt Reserve — Water /Sewer Revenue Bond (489)
• Debt Reserve — 2003 Sewer Revenue Bond (494)
• • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 3
The rate management strategy presented in this study presumes the utility will continue to
operate as a self - supporting enterprise fund. This means specific rates and charges have been
designed to recover the forecasted costs and financial obligations of the wastewater utility —
without subsidy from other City utilities or City general fund revenue sources, such as property
taxes.
1. Operating Reserves
An operating reserve is designed to provide a liquidity cushion to support financial viability of
the utility despite short-term variability in revenues and expenses, primarily caused by seasonal
fluctuations in billings and receipts, unanticipated cash operating expenses, or lower than
expected revenue collections. Target funding levels are generally expressed in number of days'
operating and maintenance (O &M) expenses, with the minimum requirement varying with the
expected risk of unanticipated needs or revenue volatility. Industry practice ranges from 30 days
to 90 days of O &M, with the lower end more appropriate for utilities with very stable revenue
streams and the higher end more appropriate for utilities with significant seasonal variations.
Consistent with general industry guidelines, this study established a wastewater utility reserve at
45 to 60 days of O &M.
The operating reserve target should be as of December 31' of each calendar year, with the
balance expected to vary during the course of the year. Generally, in any year where operating
reserves exceed the maximum target, we recommend using the excess cash to help pay for
capital projects. This can be accomplished by calculating the target balance at year end (e.g.
60/365 x actual O &M expense for the year) and comparing it against the actual ending cash
111111 balance. If the actual balance is greater than the target, the difference is transferred to the utility
capital account.
Based on the City's financial records, the 2010 beginning balance in the combined operating
accounts was $1.4 million and includes balances for funds 473 and 484' (about 48 days). This
balance is forecasted to increase to $2.6 million by the end of the 2020 study period (about 60
days).
2. Capital Contingency Reserves
A capital contingency reserve is an amount of cash set aside in case of an emergency, should a
major piece of equipment or a portion of the utility's infrastructure fail unexpectedly.
Additionally, the reserve could be used for other unanticipated capital needs or capital cost
overruns. These reserves are not intended to cover the cost of system -wide failures resulting
from catastrophic events; a more common practice is to carry property and casualty insurance for
such purposes. The capital account holds debt proceeds, connection charge revenues, system
reinvestment funding from rates, and any transfers of cash reserves from the operating account.
Common industry practice is to maintain a minimum balance in the capital account equal to 1%
to 2% of system fixed assets. Based on City direction, a minimum balance of $3 million was
established ($1 million for each of the three capital accounts), which falls in line with industry
practice. For this study, we assume that cash from rates for system reinvestment funding and
' Reflects allocable balance to the wastewater utility based on discussions with City finance.
• •: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 4
surplus cash from the operating account (not being used to buy -down rates) will be transferred to
the capital account at year's end and become available for capital use in subsequent years. The
capital reserve does not have a direct impact on rates. It is essentially "nested" with connection
charge revenue collections and the policy to fund annual system reinvestment from rates.
The 2010 beginning cash balance in the combined capital accounts totaled $8.5 million and
includes balances for funds 472, 476 and 478 Based on estimated annual contributions from
connection charges, interest earnings, system reinvestment funding, and planned capital
expenditures, the capital account balance is forecasted to reach $9.8 million by 2020.
3. Restricted Debt Reserves
When issuing revenue bonds (and some other types of debt), underwriters require the
municipality to establish and maintain a restricted cash reserve through the term of debt
repayment. The purpose of a debt reserve is to provide one safeguard for bondholders, in the
event the utility has insufficient funds to meet annual debt service (i.e., scheduled principal and
interest payments). This reserve is generally equal to one year's debt service payment for each
bond issue. The reserve can be used to fund the last year's debt service payment for each issue.
As an alternative, insurance bonds are sometimes issued in lieu of establishing a bond reserve
account.
The City historically has issued revenue bonds and taken out Public Works Trust Fund loans to
finance utility system capital needs. The rate management strategy presented in this study
conservatively presumes that the City will use revenue bonds for future debt - financing needs.
• Additional reserves have been incorporated for each future bond issue (assumed to be funded
with debt proceeds equal to one year's principal and interest payment). The City will continue to
pursue low -cost loans to reduce future bond financing costs.
Revenue bonds are a more secure financing mechanism for utility needs and commonly used to
fund utility capital improvements. The debt is secured by the revenues of the issuing utility (or
combined utilities) and the debt obligation does not extend to the City's other revenue sources.
With this limited commitment, revenue bonds typically bear higher interest rates than GO bonds
and also require security conditions related to the maintenance of dedicated reserves and
financial performance (added bond debt service coverage). Revenue bonds can be issued in
Washington without a public vote. There is no bonding limit, except perhaps the practical limit
of the utility's ability to generate sufficient revenue to repay the debt and provide coverage. In
some cases, poor credit might make issuing bonds problematic.
Beginning 2010 wastewater restricted debt reserve cash totaled $2.3 million and includes
balances for funds 483, 489, and 494 This balance is forecasted to increase to $4.7 million by
2020.
B. SYSTEM REINVESTMENT FUNDING
Utilities generally require high levels of capital investment in infrastructure. By providing
municipal utility service, the City establishes an ongoing duty to provide service. In order to
2 Debt reserves are assumed for use in the final annual debt service payments for outstanding revenue bonds. ,
• •: FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 5
fulfill this continuing obligation, the City will need to provide for replacement of system
facilities. The cost of such replacements is quite high in comparison to the original facilities due
to inflation, construction conditions, and the absence of grant or developer support. Given the
integrated nature of system assets, it is likely that multiple assets will have to be replaced
concurrently. This further exacerbates the issue of capital investment "spikes ". It is prudent to
develop a long -term replacement funding strategy to mitigate the impacts to ratepayers during
these periods of substantial system investment.
System reinvestment funding specifically addresses the concept of funding repair and
replacements (R &R) through a regular and predictable rate provision. By establishing a steady
funding mechanism, a system reinvestment funding program can then be structured, which takes
into account the defined funding source, accumulation of funds when funding exceeds near term
needs, and augmentation of funds (for example through debt) when R &R needs exceed available
cash resources. A common approach of municipal utilities is to establish a policy of system
reinvestment funding through rates using depreciation expense as the benchmark for the
appropriate level of funding. Depreciation is a commonly used accounting measure of the decline
in asset value attributable to the wear and tear associated with routine use. Depreciation expense
is recorded as a system expense for purposes of financial reporting. However, because
depreciation expense is a non -cash expense, it generally does not appear in cash -based budgets,
thus potentially disguising a very real and accumulating cost of the system.
Depreciation expense is calculated as the original cost of each asset divided by its estimated
useful life, usually derived from published accounting tables by type of asset. Fully funding
depreciation expense avoids the decline in system asset value (financial integrity) by replacing
physical assets with cash assets. Collecting the amount of annual depreciation expense through
rates provides a stable funding source for capital expenditures, especially those related to repair
and replacement of existing utility plant. Further, funding depreciation through rates promotes
rate equity by providing the mechanism for existing ratepayers to pay for the use of the assets
serving them, with the cash flow funding at least a portion of the eventual replacement of those
assets. It is important to note that depreciation is not equal to the future replacement cost of the
utility system, but serves simply as a starting point for addressing long -term replacement needs.
As noted previously, actual system replacement costs will be significantly higher than the cost
originally incurred to build the system.
As an alternative to full depreciation funding, depreciation funding net of outstanding debt
principal is sometimes used as a relatively moderate replacement funding strategy. This approach
recognizes that the utility improves its financial condition through reducing liabilities, such as
debt, and augments this through the incremental difference to full depreciation funding. This
method most directly relates to a financial "break- even" in terms of profit or loss, mitigates the
rate impacts of replacement funding, and avoids overly burdening existing ratepayers with the
payment of debt and funding for future asset replacement at the same time.
The City has not historically set rates at a level sufficient to provide funding for system
reinvestment. Many federal and state grant and loan programs are now requiring utilities to fund
some level of system reinvestment as a requirement for eligibility. Furthermore, bond
underwriters consider an agency's policy for system reinvestment funding as part of their
• •%) FCS GROUP 1 CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 6
•
• assessment of the utility's ability to sustain operations, provide reasonable rates to customers,
and repay the bonds.
The rate management strategy developed for this study incorporates system reinvestment funding
from rates using the "net debt" funding approach beginning in 2011. Annual funding is assumed
to be transferred from the operating account to the capital account at year -end, and available to
help pay for capital expenditures in the following year. Annual depreciation expense is estimated
at $3.3 million in 2011, reaching $7.4 million by the end of 2020. Subtracting debt principal
payments reduces this obligation to $822,000 in 2011, reaching $4.1 million in 2020. The
forecasted annual funding requirement is discussed in Section 6 - Revenue Requirements.
C. DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
When a municipality issues revenue bonds (and other types of debt instruments), it agrees to
certain terms and conditions related to the repayment of those bonds. One of those terms is
referred to as bond coverage. Simply put, the agency agrees to collect enough in annual system
revenues to meet all operating expenses (net of internal utility taxes) and not only pay debt
service, but actually collect an additional multiple of that debt service. Bond coverage ratios
typically range from 1.10 to 2.0, meaning that the agency would collect expenses plus 1.10 to 2.0
times revenue bond debt service as a minimum legal level of revenues. The stated coverage
factor is a minimum requirement — meaning anything less than this level would be a technical
default of the bond covenant.
The rate management strategy presented for this rate study applies the City's higher internal
• policy coverage test of 2.0 times the annual revenue bond debt service. Revenue generated
above cash needs to comply with coverage requirements may be used for capital purposes, and
thus reduce future borrowing needs. Note that the cash needs of the wastewater utility drive the
indicated rate increases. No incremental funding for debt coverage is required for the study
period.
D. USE OF CONNECTION CHARGES FOR DEBT SERVICE
Connection charges are charges assessed on new development rather than from the existing
customer base. Because of the variability in customer growth from year to year, the annual
revenue stream can be unreliable and subject to wide fluctuations. The City should estimate and
budget connection charge revenues based on long -term growth estimates, recent growth
experience, and the scale of known development planned or underway. The purpose is to
establish a reasonable and conservative estimate of potential connection charge revenue
collections.
Connection charge revenue should be deposited in the capital account and made available for
capital purposes only. Connection charges can legally be used in two ways — they can be applied
to capital project costs directly (reducing the amount of debt issued), or they can be applied
toward annual debt service payments. FCS GROUP recommends that, as a general policy,
3 A coverage ratio of 2.0 is consistent with the City's internal 2007 cost of service study.
• • +�) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 7
connection charge revenues be used to directly fund capital expenditures. This practice serves to
mitigate the risk of relying on this volatile revenue source to pay debt obligations.
E. CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDING / DEBT MANAGEMENT
In conjunction with establishing or planning its capital program, the City should develop a
corresponding capital - financing plan that supports execution of that program. This program
should incorporate system replacement and rehabilitation, system upgrade and improvement, and
system expansion. The policy intent is to establish an integrated capital funding strategy that
considers best management practices for debt management.
1. Capital Funding
Utilities can typically draw funds for capital projects from a variety of sources:
▪ Grants
▪ Developer contributions
m Connection charges
▪ System reinvestment funding
▪ Direct funding from rates
▪ Other capital revenues
▪ Debt
• Given all of these potential funding sources, utilities often find themselves having to choose
between funding sources when establishing a capital financing plan. While grants and developer
contributions would logically be applied to project costs first, the next choice in the funding
"hierarchy" is not necessarily apparent.
The specific decision regarding whether to fund projects by cash or debt is an important policy
decision that will likely be driven by a number of considerations. Cash funding might be cheaper
in the long -run because there is no interest, but debt funding could be the more practical option
since it allows for the payment of project costs over an extended period of time. In addition,
using debt to spread the cost over time will help ensure that future customers pay for their fair
share of system costs.
Finding the appropriate balance of cash / debt financing requires an evaluation of debt
management policies discussed below.
2. Debt Management
Historically, the City has funded capital projects through a combination of "pay -as- you -go" cash
funding (cash reserves, connection charges, rates) and debt issuance. Excessive use of debt is
unfavorable for a utility, and can damage the utility's credit rating, reducing its ability to acquire
low -cost debt in the future. On the other hand, "pay -as- you -go" funding might create excessive
burdens for existing customers, raising questions of practicality and equity between current and
future customers.
4110 •: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 8
1111 Industry best practices (and bond underwriter's preference) suggest that municipalities should
maintain a debt -to- equity ratio (total debt divided by the sum of total debt and equity) of no
greater than 50% debt and 50% equity (cash). The wastewater utility current debt -to- equity ratio
is 34% debt / 66% equity affording capacity to fund near -term capital projects through debt
instruments. The City has an internal policy to maintain annual debt service at no greater than
25% of the total operating budget.
The rate management strategy presented for this study presumes the City will fund its capital
program first, with available capital cash resources (connection charges, system reinvestment
funding) and next with the use of debt. As a point of reference, the wastewater capital program
is forecasted to be funded over the study period 47% debt / 53% cash. While the current CIP is
relatively heavier debt - financed as compared to the current debt to equity ratio, the utility is
expected to remain well within the industry guidelines over the study period.
F. CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF FISCAL POLICIES
Satisfying all of these policy objectives might seem daunting at first, but the outcome is that
multiple benchmarks overlap, resulting in the simultaneous achievement of multiple objectives
within the same level of rates. For example, the policy for system reinvestment funding through
rates serves several beneficial purposes: it provides a cash resource to the capital account that
helps maintain the recommended capital contingency reserve; it contributes to the cash funding
of capital, helping to maintain a healthy debt -to- equity ratio; and it may help to provide the
additional level of rate revenues necessary to meet the incremental debt service coverage
• requirement.
Each criterion provides a different perspective on how much revenue is appropriate, and
satisfying them all generally results in a higher rate than if only a single standard is considered.
However, this approach reduces financial risk and increases financial stability — any near term
increases that result will help to promote more stable, and lower, long -term rates.
4 Sum of current and long -term portions of outstanding debt divided by total of debt and net assets; per 2008
financial statements.
•> FCS GROUP CITY of YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 9
ID SECTION 3
CONNECTION CHARGES
A connection charge, provided for by RCW 35.92.025, is a charge imposed on new development
as a condition of connection to the utility system or when increasing the capacity of an existing
connection. In general, the purpose of a connection charge is to mitigate the impact of growth on
the utility system, or to compensate for investments already made to provide available capacity
to serve future growth. The City's current wastewater connection charges and charge
methodology are established under YMC 7.58, and summarized in Exhibit 3 -1.
Exhibit 3 -1: Existing Connection Charge Structure
"Treatment Plant Charge Zone 1A , Zone 1R Zone 2 . . Zone 3
Domestic Charge per Single Dwelling Unit:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $265.85 $265.85 $265.85 $616.60
Actual (Future Facilities) $548.08 $548.08 $548.08 $548.08
Total $813.94 $813.94 $813.94 $1,164.68
Non - Domestic Flow Charge per gpd:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $0.201 $0.201 $0.201 $0.466
Actual (Future Facilities) $0.414 $0.414 $0.414 $0.414
Total $0.615 $0.615 $0.615 $0.880
Non - Domestic BOD Charge per lb/day:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $173.637 $173.637 $173.637 $402.833
Actual (Future Facilities) $288.060 $288.060 $288.060 $288.060
III
Total $461.698 $461.698 $461.698 $690.893
Non - Domestic TSS Charge per lb /day:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $195.525 ' $195.525 $195.525 $453.612
Actual (Future Facilities) $294.765 $294.765 $294.765 $294.765
Total $490.290 $490.290 $490.290 $748.377
Trunk/InterccptorCharge I . Zone IA Zone 111 . , /one 2 Zone • .
Parcel Charge per sf of Lot Area:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $0.007 $0.014 $0.010 $0.038
Actual (Future Facilities) $0.002 $0.019 $0.085 $0.113
Total $0.009 $0.033 $0.095 $0.151
Flow Charge per gpd:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $0.203 $0.386 $0.533 $2.001
Actual (Future Facilities) $0.259 $1.105 $5.252 $6.962
Total $0.462 $1.491 $5.785 $8.963
Colleciion;Pipe Charge , . Zone IA Zone 113 Zone 2 * Zone 3
Parcel Charge per sf of Lot Area:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $0.027 $0.042 $0.020 $0.004
Actual (Future Facilities) $0.383 $0.383 $0.383 $0.383
Total $0.410 $0.425 $0.403 $0.387
Flow Charge per gpd:
Historic (Existing Facilities) $0.846 $1.075 $0.627 $0.126
Actual (Future Facilities) $13.019 $13.019 $13.019 $13.019
Total $13.865 $14.094 $13.646 $13.145
[a] - In addition to the above charges, the City applies a service charge of 6% and utility tax of 14% to the total
charge, plus a $50 administrative charge.
III •.;> •• FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 10
While the City's existing wastewater connection charge methodology is a valid approach, the
existing schedule of charges is quite complex, both in terms of applying it to new connections
and in updating it to remain consistent with current infrastructure costs. For this reason, the City
requested the development of a simpler methodology that is legally defensible and recovers an
equitable share of system costs from new connections.
A. METHODOLOGY
There are several documented approaches used in the industry to establish connection charges.
Within the range of legally defensible approaches, the choice of costs the City targets is a matter
of policy. It is important, however, that the City follow a methodical and rational approach to
consistently determine and implement cost -based charges. To that end, the approach used for this
study combines elements of the "equity" method and "incremental" method for calculating the
charge (described in the American Water Works Association Rates and Charges, M1 Manual). In
short, this approach is based on the original cost of non - contributed plant investment, plus
planned capital improvement projects (excluding replacements), spread over the total customer
base (existing and future). This approach meets the City's objectives in that it recovers a fair
share of system costs from new customers and is relatively simple to calculate, administer, and
explain to customers.
The City's service contracts with Terrace Heights and Union Gap merit a degree of complexity
in the connection charge calculation. Because the City shares treatment capacity with Terrace
Heights and Union Gap, the connection charge should be separated into collection and treatment
411 components to accurately represent the unit cost of capacity in the City's treatment and
conveyance system. The collection portion of the charge is exclusively flow - based; the treatment
portion consists of both a flow -based component and a strength -based component. The strength -
based component is imposed based on loadings of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total
suspended solids (TSS).
The components of the connection charge calculation are discussed in greater detail below.
1. Existing Cost Basis
Utilities most often design and build infrastructure with the capacity to serve more customers
than are currently connected to the system. The existing cost basis component of the connection
charge is intended to recover an equitable share of the current system. Legal interpretations of
connection charge statues have provided guidelines, which suggest that such charges should
reflect the actual original cost of the utility system and can include interest on that cost. This cost
is net of donated facilities and non - utility cash payments, whether from grants, developers or
through Local Improvement District assessments. This method most accurately reflects what
utility customers paid for the system. Until future customers connect to the system existing
customers will have to cover the costs of "excess capacity" available to serve growth. This
obligation essentially represents a loan from existing customers to future customers. Given this,
it is reasonable to expect that future customers will pay for their share of costs when they
connect to the system, plus interest.
• •• CITY OF YAKIMA
•.;D FCS GROUP
Wastewater. Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 11
ci
• Though not required, municipalities often deduct outstanding debt principal from plant -in-
service in recognition that some assets were debt financed. Cash should be netted against the
outstanding debt liability for this calculation since cash is an asset generated by existing
customers that could be used to buy down existing debt on the system, and thereby reduce debt
service payments for all customers. This "net debt" deduction serves to reduce the charge to
better reflect "equity" in the system, and to avoid double charging since new customers will pay
their share of debt service through user rates.
The existing cost basis is established using 2009 fixed asset records, allocated between the
collection and treatment service functions. The allocation percentage assigned to flow, BOD and
TSS are based on general industry standards. Exhibit 3 -2 summarizes the existing asset base.
Exhibit 3 -2: Existing Plant -In- Service
i � C 1 • Collection Treatment General
Allocation of,Rlant -In Su vice Tol:;l
Flow .: :- Flow... ;:BOD TSS' ;.. .As' All Other
Collection $ 52,719,038 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Treatment 64,435,637 0% 40% 30% 30% 0%
General 1,909,009 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Customer 1,303,480 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
Total $120,367,165 $52,719,038 $25,774,255 $19,330,691 $19,330,691 $3,212,489
Reallocation of "As All Other" - 1,445,605 706,754 530,065 530,065 (3,212,489
Reallocated 'IMal $120,367,165 $54,164;642 $26,481,009 $19,860.757 ' -, $19,860,757 $ -
The above cost basis is then adjusted to reflect the following considerations:
• Grant - Funded and Contributed Assets: The cost basis is reduced to account for assets that the
• utility did not pay for with its own resources. Based on the information available, this is
separated into two parts:
— Pre -2002: The 2007 Cost -of- Service Study prepared by the City indicates that the City
received about $37 million in grant funding and private contributions between 1945 and
2001. The collection share of this offset ($6.3 million per Table 12 -P of the Study) is
fully allocated to collection; the treatment share ($30.6 million per Table 2 of the Study)
is allocated between flow, BOD, and TSS based on the allocation of treatment assets
shown in Exhibit 3 -2 (40% flow, 30% BOD, 30% TSS).
— 2002 through 2009: The City's financial statements have identified contributions in aid of
construction (CIAC) since 2002, indicating a cumulative total of $7.7 million. Absent
detail regarding whether these contributions were related to collection or treatment, this
adjustment is allocated between functions using the functional allocation shown in
Exhibit 3 -2.
• Interest on Non - Contributed Plant: RCW 35.92.025 enables the City to include a provision
for interest accrual on assets included in the connection charge calculation. For any given
asset, this provision is calculated based on the asset's effective age (limited by statute to a
maximum of 10 years) and the interest rate that prevailed when the asset was constructed or
otherwise acquired (limited by statute to a maximum interest rate of 10 %). Based on the
City's fixed asset schedules and historical interest rates from the Bond Buyers' Index, the
existing cost basis includes a total of $36.7 million in interest. Because the calculation of
interest is based on a detailed record of asset costs, and acquisition dates, interest is allocated
between functions of service based on the allocation of the underlying fixed assets.
• FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 12
• • Construction Work In Progress (CWIP): The existing cost basis includes $7.1 million in
construction work in progress that, while not yet booked as fixed assets, represents an
investment that the City has made in infrastructure. Absent a detailed breakdown of
construction work in progress by project, CWIP is allocated between functions of service
based on the allocation of existing assets.
• Net Outstanding Debt Principal: To recognize that new customers will bear a proportionate
• share of debt service costs associated with existing assets through user rates, the connection
charge calculation deducts net outstanding debt principal from the existing cost basis. Since
the utility typically has cash resources that are not included in the system cost basis, the "net"
debt load is defined as total debt minus outstanding cash and investments. The net offset for
outstanding debt principal is allocated between functions of service in proportion to existing
assets.
With these adjustments, Exhibit 3 -3 summarizes the existing cost basis.
Exhibit 3 -3: Summary of Existing Cost Basis
Collection Treatment
Existir►g, Basis Flow Flow.. .-','BOD , v - . ` .._' TSS. Total
Utility Capital Assets $54,164,642 $26,481,009 $19,860,757 $19,860,757 $120,367,165
Less: Grants & Contributions
Pre -2002 (6,333,178) (12,247,454) (9,185,590) (9,185,590) (36,951,812)
2002 -2009 (3,468,286) (1,695,640) (1,271,730) (1,271,730) (7,707,385)
Plus: Interest on Utility - Funded Assets 15,253,555 8,583,436 6,437,577 6,437,577 36,712,145
Plus: Construction in Progress 3,184,643 1,556,967 1,167,725 1,167,725 7,077,061
Less: Net Outstandin: Debt Princi sal (6,517,143) (3,186,221) (2,389,666) (2,389,666) (14,482,696)
III Total,Exis"ting Cost Basis $56,284,•33 $19,492,098 $14,619,074'`.. $14,619,074 • 5105 ;014 ;478
2. Future Cost Basis
The future cost basis component of the charge is intended to recover a fair share of the costs of
planned future capital facilities that will serve new customers. Legal interpretations also suggest
that the "cost of the system" can include a component for future capital costs to serve growth, as
well as regulatory system improvements planned for construction and indentified in
comprehensive system planning documents. Projects directly funded by grants, developer
contributions or assessments are not included in the calculation. Repair and replacement projects
are most often excluded from the calculation unless needed to upgrade or increase the size of the
system. The original cost of those assets is already included in the existing cost basis. Further, as
a new customer connects and becomes an existing customer, they will pay for their share of
repair and replacement project costs through user rates. Double charging would occur if those
costs were also recovered in the future cost basis.
In the absence of specific regulation for cities, the planning horizon for the capital program to be
used in the calculation is debatable. The key consideration in determining an appropriate
planning horizon is to maintain consistency between the capital construction (and related costs)
that will be incurred and the system capacity that will be available to serve growth
commensurate with that construction. The wastewater system capital program through 2024 was
used for this calculation. Exhibit 3-4 summarizes the future cost basis.
0 ii) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
. Study Report - 13
11111 Exhibit 3 -4: Summary of Future Cost Basis
Future Cost Basis Collection Treatment.
. Flow. . Flow' BOD . TSS. Total
Wastewater Treatment Plant CIP $ - $21,056,049 $15,792,036 $15,792,036 $52,640,121
Collection System CIP 23,999,553 - - - 23,999,553
Less: Repair & Replacement Pro'ects (3,200,000) (6,857,500) (5,143,125) (5,143,125) (20,343,749)
Total' Future Cost Basis 1 ;. $20,799,553 $14,198,549 $10,648,912 $10,648,912.. $56,295,925
Note that in Exhibit 3-4, the treatment CIP is allocated between functions based on the allocation
of treatment assets shown in Exhibit 3 -2 (40% to flow, 30% to BOD, 30% to TSS).
3. Customer Base / System Capacity
In general, a key objective in defining the customer base is to provide an equitable allocation of
costs through the connection charge. Toward this end, the metrics used to recover unit of service
or capacity -based costs should be related to potential demand and provide proportionality that
relates to system use or capacity requirements. The customer base is defined in terms of the
existing connected customer base and planned future customer base. The standard "unit of
measurement" for the customer base is the equivalent residential unit (ERU), which for planning
purposes has an assumed level of flows and loadings.
The existing customer base in ERUs is computed based on a calculation of adjusted meter
capacity equivalents from an inventory of customers by meter size. Exhibit 3 -5 summarizes this
information, converting meters to meter equivalents using standard flow factors developed by the
American Water Works Association (AWWA).
• Exhibit 3 -5: Calculation of Existing ERUs
Estimated Number of • • Number of Meter
Meter Size Meter Equivalency Ratio .
Accounts (2010) , Eq'ui�xalents (2010)
3/4" 22,598 1.00 22,598
1" 1,039 1.67 1,735
1-1/2" 277 3.33 923
2" 251 5.33 1,340
3" 68 10.67 728
4" 33 16.67 558
6" 4 33.33 138
8" 3 53.33 150
10" 1 76.67 76
Total 24,274 28,245
Note that the inventory of accounts shown in the above exhibit is based on actual 2009 customer
counts, adjusted downward by 1.58% to reconcile with 2009 reported revenues and upward by
1.00% to account for projected 2010 growth.
City staff provided estimates of current flows and loadings as a percentage of its allotted
capacity, which provides the basis for estimating unit flows and loadings for the Yakima
customer base as shown in Exhibit 3 -6.
• •:;> FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 14
• Exhibit 3 -6: Estimate of Unit Demands
Treatment
Estimate of Unit .Flow &Loadings Flow BOD TSS .,.
Existing Treatment Plant Capacity 21.50 mgd 53,400 lbs /day 38,600 lbs /day
Yakima Share of Existing Capacity 87.9% 87.9% 87.9%
Existing Capacity — City of Yakima 18.90 mgd 46,939 lbs /day 33,929 lbs /day
Estimated Utilization of Existing Capacity 53.8% 50.4% 62.3%
Existing Demands — City of Yakima 10.17 mgd 23,657 lbs /day 21,138 lbs /day
Existing ERUs — Cit of Yakima 28,245 28,245 28,245
Unit Demands' — City of Yakima ' 360 gpd' 0.8376 lbs/day 0.7484 lbs/day
Note that the capacities shown are expressed in terms of "average daily capacity during the
maximum month," and exclude Terrace Heights and Union Gap. This exclusion is made to
derive unit demands using a consistent set of data specific to the City of Yakima, given that
meter counts for Terrace Heights and Union Gap were not available. This analysis assumes that
Terrace Heights and Union Gap customers exhibit consistent demands on a per -unit basis.
The future customer base is defined in a manner consistent with the adopted CIP used. Table 7
and Table 9 of the City's 2007 Connection Fee Study indicate that with the planned
improvements, system capacity would accommodate 25.99 million gallons per day (mgd) in
flows, 67,259 pounds (lbs) per day in BOD loadings, and 49,624 lbs. per day in TSS loadings
from Yakima, Terrace Heights, and Union Gap. As previously noted, the collection portion of
the connection charge excludes costs and capacity associated with Terrace Heights and Union
Gap in order to accurately reflect the fact that they do not use capacity in the City's collection
S system. Adding the expansion capacity allocated to Yakima to the City's share of the existing
capacity produces a Yakima -only flow capacity estimate of 22.85 mgd. Given these future
capacity estimates, the unit demands shown in Exhibit 3 -6 provide a basis for estimating system
ERU capacity (flows and loadings).
4. Calculation of Charges
The sum of the existing cost basis and the future cost basis by function is divided by the total
customer base by function to determine the connection charge by functional component. The
calculated charges represent the maximum allowable charge — the City may choose to implement
a charge at any level up to the calculated charge.
It is important to note that the calculated connection charges are expressed in terms of current
dollars. In other words, the calculated charges will only recover an equitable share of costs from
new customers connecting to the system in the first year of implementation. A customer
connecting in the following year should pay a charge that reflects the cumulative system
investment at the time they connect. This would include:
▪ Assets added to the system during the current year
▪ An extra year of interest accrued
o Updated costs for the capital improvement program
Given these considerations, the calculated charges would not recover a fair share of costs from
customers connecting in subsequent years. The City could address this concern in several ways:
41) •: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 15
• • Recalculate the charges annually,
• Build a provision for inflation into the connection charges, or
• Compute the charges in current dollars and adjust annually for inflation (recommended)
Calculating the connection charges annually is the most accurate method, but might not be
practical given the amount of effort required. FCS GROUP recommends that the City update its
charges commensurate with updates to its comprehensive system plan. In between updates, we
suggest adopting a policy for annual inflationary adjustments to the charges, based on established
sources, such as the Engineering News Record's "Construction Cost Index" (ENR CCI). This
practice facilitates both appropriate cost recovery and increased equity.
B. RESULTS
1. Connection Charge Calculation
Exhibit 3 -7 shows the updated connection charge calculation, given the costs and customer base
discussed above.
Exhibit 3 -7: Wastewater Connection Charge Calculation
Connection Fee Calculation Collection • . Treatment Total
Flow - Flow . .BOD _ , . :: ; ' :TSS ' :.
Existing Cost Basis $56,284,233 $19,492,098 $14,619,074 $14,619,074 $105,014,478
• Future Cost Basis 20,799,553 14,198,549 10,648,912 10,648,912 56,295,925
Total Cost Basis $77,083,786 $33,690,647 $25,267,985 $25,267,985 $161,310,403
® 2024 Des': Ca.acit 22 m:d 25.99 m d 67,259 lbs/day 49,624 lbs/day
Connection Eec'per Unit $3.37/gpd $1'.30 /gpd $175.68/Ib -day S509.19/Ib - da■
Connection Fec per ERU $1,215 $467.' , $315. • $381, $2,377
Exhibit 3 -8 provides two alternative connection fee schedules based on the calculated charges
shown in Exhibit 3 -7.
Exhibit 3 -8: Updated Wastewater Connection Charges
{ Meter- Based Charges Demand -Based Charges
=:` Connection -Fee : InsideyCi "
Meter. Size. Demand-Component
Inside City Outside City, Charaeeper -Unit
3/4" $2,377 $3,565 Flow (gpd) $4.67
1" $3,969 $5,954 BOD (lbs /day) $375.68
1 -1/2" $7,915 $11,873 TSS (lbs /day) $509.19
2" $12,669 $19,004
3" $25,362 $38,043 ;... .
.. ° ' � . , . ' : :Outside City
4" $39,624 $59,435 Demand Component; :;Char
0 per Unit:
6" $79,223 $118,835 Flow (gpd) r,. .. $7.01
8" $126,762 $190,143 BOD (lbs/day) $563.52
10" $182,240 $273,359 TSS (lbs /day) $763.78
[a] Above charges exclude the City service charge of 6 %, utility tax of 14 %, and administrative charge of $50.
• • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 16
• As shown in Exhibit 3 -8, the connection charge can be expressed in two ways. The meter -based
structure, shown as $2,377 per ERU would simply be applied to customers based on the size of
their meter. The demand -based structure would be applied to customers based on their estimated
flows and loadings. The charge per gallons per day of flow includes both the collection and
treatment charges shown in Exhibit 3 -7.
The City should consider using a combination of these two alternatives. For simplicity, the meter
size schedule could be established as the standard connection charge schedule, with the demand -
based structure imposed for new customers with wastewater characteristics falling outside the
normal standards. Specific code language would need to be crafted to address use of the two
approaches.
Customers with meters larger than 2 inches are more likely to have unique demand patterns that
could merit the demand -based structure. In cases where a customer pays a connection charge
based on estimated demands, it would be prudent for the City to develop a policy for addressing
instances where the customer exceeds their estimated demand. For example, the City could
impose a surcharge for using additional capacity based on an amortization of the connection
charge per unit of demand.
It is also commonly found that applying a meter -based charge structure for multi- family
customers can, in some circumstances, undercharge for these customers. As an alternative, the
City could charge multi - family customers based on a reduced percentage of the 3 % -inch meter
charge, applied on a "per dwelling unit" basis. For example, 75% of the 3 / -inch meter charge of
$2,377 would result in a charge of $1,783 per dwelling unit.
• 2. Analysis of Impacts
Given that the proposed wastewater connection fee structure is significantly different from the
existing structure, the City has expressed an interest in assessing how the proposed structure
would impact different types of customers.
Exhibit 3 -9 provides a summary of impacts for sample customers provided by the City. Note that
the sample charge impacts presented below incorporate the City's service charge of 6 %, utility
tax of 14 %, and administrative charge of $50 for all structure options.
As noted previously, FCS GROUP recommends adjusting the connection charges annually
consistent with published construction costs adjustments (ENR CCI).
411 4 • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 17
• Exhibit 3 -9: Sample Connection Charge Impacts
Commercial & Industrial Customer A Customer B Customer C Customer D
Meter Size 2" 3" 1" 1 -1/2"
Projected Demands:
Flow 33,667 gpd 27,327 gpd 1,066 gpd 1,300 gpd •
BOD Loadings 99.7 lbs /day 93.71 lbs /day 2.87 lbs /day 3.50 Ibs /day
TSS Loadings
•
81.1 Ibs /day 54.94 lbs /day 2.87 lbs /day 3.50 lbs /day
Wastewater Connection Charge:
Existing Structure $236,016 $149,512 $10,488 $11,272
Meter -Based Structure $15,253 $30,484 $4,813 $9,548
Difference From Existing Structure ($220,763) ($119,028) ($5,675) ($1,724)
Demand -Based Structure $283,221 $229,006 $9,071 $11,052
Difference. From Existing Structure $47,205 $79,494 ($1,417) ($221)
Residential 1 Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer. 3 Customer 4
,
Type Single - Family Single - Family Multi- Family Multi - Family
Location Zone 1 A Zone 1B (N /A) (N /A)
Parcel Size 12,000 sf 11,761 sf 50,000 sf 26,368
Meter Size 3/4" 3/4" 1" • 1 -1/2"
Number of Meters 1 1 3 5
III Wastewater Connection Charge:
Existing Structure $1,961 $2,901 $31,914 $47,537
Meter -Based Structure $2,902 $2,902 $14,338 $47,540
Difference From Existing Structure $941 $1 ($17,575) $3
The above exhibit shows a wide variety of impacts under the new structures suggesting that in
general, the meter -based structure undercharges industrial customers because standard meter
flow capacity ratios do not adequately represent the demands that these customers place on the
system. With respect to residential customers, the simplification of the connection charge
structure results in a structure based only on meter size that is uniform across zones.
,
•
411 • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 18
•
SECTION 4
CONTRACTED SERVICES RATES
In 1997 the City of Yakima and the neighboring communities of Terrace Heights (TH) and
Union Gap (UG) entered into a revised agreement (Agreement) for the management and
treatment of wastewater collected by the City from Terrace Heights and Union Gap. This section
summarizes the update of these charges consistent with the parameters of the Agreement.
A. METHODOLOGY
The Agreement describes the methodology for establishing wastewater charges assessed to these
communities within the following three areas of operations:
1) Allocation of treatment plant expenses (O &M and debt service) to Terrace Heights and
Union Gap
2) Allocation of Rudkin Road pump station O &M expenses to Union Gap
3) Allocation of unmetered flow O &M expenses to Union Gap
The prescribed methodology for determining charges for the above areas of operation is
discussed below.
• B. RESULTS
1. Allocation of Treatment Plant Expenses
Treatment plant expenses (O &M and debt service) are allocated to the wholesale contract
customers based on their pro -rata share of flow as measured in volume; biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) as measured in mass; and suspended solids (SS) as measured in mass.
Based on data provided by City staff, total treatment plant shares of flow, BOD, and TSS for
contracted customers are assigned as follows:
▪ Terrace Heights: Flow = 6.15 %; BOD = 3.75 %; and TSS = 3.74%
▪ Union Gap: Flow = 4.98 %; BOD = 3.87 %; and TSS = 2.81%
Treatment plant expenses are allocated 20% to Flow; 40% to BOD; and 40% to TSS Applying
these percentage allocations derives an overall weighted treatment expense allocation of 4.23%
for Terrace Heights and 3.67% for Union Gap. Exhibit 4 -1 summarizes the allocations to Terrace
Heights and Union Gap.
•
5 Agreement section 3.2 through 3.4.
• 4) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 19
• Exhibit 4 -1: Treatment Plant Influent Flow and Loadings
2010 Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Total
. Terrace -Total-(before ( (including Del
• - Heights `; ' Union Gap Del Monte) Del Monte Monte)
Wastewater Flow (MG)
Metered 218.44 167.48 3,522.75 18.23 3,540.98
Un- metered - 9.50 9.50 - 9.50
Total 218.44 176.98 3,532.25 18.23 3,550.48
% of Total 6.15% 4.98% 99.49% 0.51% 100.00%
Tested BOD (ppm) 214.2 272.5 327.0 5,068.0 5,395.0
Calculated Ibs of BOD 390,227 402,214 9,633,082 770,530 10,403,611
% of Total 3.75% 3.87% 92.59% 7.41% 100.00%
Tested SS (ppm) 172.9 160.5 284.0 350.0 350.0
Calculated Ibs of BOD 314,987 236,900 8,366,346 53,213 8,419,559
% of Total 3.74% 2.81% 99.37% 0.63% 100.00%
Weighted Allocation 4.23% 3.67%
Total flow includes City of Yakima flow of 3,136.8mg.
Weighted allocation based on Agreement section 3.2.
2011 allocable treatment plant O &M expenses total $8.8 million and include expenses for SU232
(treatment plant O &M), annual debt service for existing and new debt, and annual debt coverage
of $1.0 million. Based on discussions with City staff, annual debt coverage and debt service for
existing debt is allocated 4.0% to TH and 8.1% to UG. All other expenses are allocated based on
the weighted allocation described above. Per City direction, no allocation of system reinvestment
funding is provided.
Applying the allocations as summarized above to the total expenses of $8.8 million results in
allocated costs to TH and UG of $364,339 and $449,021, respectively. This compares to 2010
payments by TH and UG of $327,399 and $419,292, respectively. Exhibit 4 -2 summarizes the
treatment plant charges.
Exhibit 4 -2: Calculated Treatment Plant Charges
Allocation Terrace
Base Heights Union Gap
Treatment Plant O&M Expenses $ 5,498,458 $ 232,505 $ 201,799
EAsting Debt Service 1,869,309 74,772 151,414
New Debt Service 403,478 17,061 14,808
Total Annual Debt Coverage Allocation 1,000,000 40,000 81,000
Total Allocation Base and Calculated Charges $ 8,771,245 $ 364,339 $ 449,021
6 Based on discussions with City staff, the annual debt coverage of $1.0 million is allocated to TH and UG, 4.0%
and 8.1% as established during the 2007 cost of service study. City staff directed that the amount and allocations
was to remain unchanged for this update.
•: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 20
2. Allocation of Rudkin Road Pump Station O &M to Union Gap
Operating and maintenance expenses for the Rudkin Road pump station are allocated to Union
Gap based on a pro -rata share of contributed flow'. Based on the City's records, in 2011, the
Rudkin Road pump station is expected to receive 653.4 million gallons of flow, with UG
accounting for 178.7, or 27.3 %.
2011 Rudkin Road O &M expenses total $81;726. Based on total flow of 653.4mg, this equates
to $125.07/mg. The resulting cost share of $22,357 is derived by applying UG's share of Rudkin
Road flow to the total expenses. This compares to the UG payment in 2010 of $20,938. Exhibit
4 -3 summarizes the Rudkin Road O &M charges.
Exhibit 4 -3: Calculated Rudkin Road Charges to Union Gap
Rudkin Road
Allocation Base
Pump Station O &M Expenses $ 81,726
Pump Station Flow (mg) 653.4
Calculated O &M Unit Cost $ 125.07
Estimated UG Flow 178.7
Calculated Charges UG Share $ 22,357
3. Allocation of Treatment Plant Expenses Due to Unmetered UG Flows
The Agreement recognizes that UG discharges unmeasured wastewater from certain areas in UG
to the City's wastewater treatment plant. The Agreement provides that UG pays the City 50% of
the unit cost of annual treatment plant O &M and 50% of the unit cost of annual Rudkin Road
pump station O &M expenses based on the flow information for all accounts that contribute to
unmetered flow from UG Unmetered flow charges will continue to be assessed until such time
as UG installs a wastewater flow meter at the point of discharge of any unmetered flow into the
Yakima system
2011 treatment plant O &M expenses total $5.5 million. Rudkin Road expenses were identified
above ($81,726). Based on total flow of 3,585.8/mg for the treatment plant, the unit cost of
treatment plant O &M is equal to $1,533.40/mg. The Rudkin Road Pump Station O &M expense
per unit as previously determined is $125.07/mg.
2011 unmetered flow for UG totals 9.6mg, based on information provided by City staff.
Applying the allocation parameters as outlined results in a calculated charge to UG of $7,957 in
2011. This compares to the UG payment of $7,738 in 2010. Exhibit 4 -4 summarizes the
calculated unmetered flow charges to UG.
Agreement section 3.5.
8 Agreement section 3.7.1 and 3.7.2.
9 Agreement section 3.7.3.
• FCS GROUP CITY OF YAx1MA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 21
•
Exhibit 4 -4: Calculated Unmetered Flow Charges to Union Gap
I'reatmcnt Rudkin Road
• ' Allocation Ilase Allocation Base - Total
O &M Expenses $ 5,498,458 $ 81,726
Divided by: Flow (mg) 3,585.8 653.4
Calculated O &M Unit Cost $ 1,533.40 $ 125.07 $ 1,658
Multiply by: Estunated UGumnetered Flow (mg) 9.6
Total cost ofunmetered flow • 15,913.0
Multiply by: Adjustment per Agreement 55>
CalculatedUnmeteredFlowCharges UGShare $ 7,957
Exhibit 4 -5 summarizes the results of the updated wholesale charge components for 2011, and
compares the change from 2010 charges.
Exhibit 4 -5: Summary of Wholesale Charges
Terrace IIeiglrts Union Gap Total
Cost Components 2010. 2011 2010' 2011 . Ch /05: 2010 2011. %
Chane . .. an a .: . • Chan le •
Treatment Plant Expenses $327,399 $364,339 11.3% $419,292 $449,021 7.1% $746,691 $813,360 8.9%
Rudkin Road PS O &M 0 0 0% $20,938 $22,357 6.8% $20,938 $22,357 6.8%
Unmetered Flow 0 0 0% $7,738 $7,957 2.8% $7,738 $7,737 2.8%
Total
8327,399 $364,339 11.3% 8447,968 $479,335 7.0% $775,367 $843,674 8.8%
Wholesale charges are forecast to increase on average about 2.0 % over the remaining years of
the study period (2012- 2020). The retail revenue requirement analysis and resulting rates assume
• implementation of updated wholesale charges over the study period. Implementation of charges
lower than this forecast would result in increases for retail rates above those presented in Section
6 — Retail Revenue Requirements.
• •: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 22
•
SECTION 5
OTHER SERVICE CHARGES
This section of the report presents the consolidated results of updated charges for several areas of
the City's wastewater portfolio of services. These include: pre- treatment program charges, strong
waste charges, and septage charges.
A. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM CHARGES
The City's pre- treatment program was formed in 1988 for the purpose of regulating non -
domestic strength wastewater discharge. Charges are established under YMC 7.60.105. Revenue
collected from these charges is used to administer and enforce pre- treatment regulations as
established under YMC 7.65.
The City categorizes pretreatment program customers as: (1) significant industrial users (SIU)
and (2) minor industrial users (MIU). SIU customers are assessed 90% of the rates established
by the State of Washington as codified under WAC 173.224.040 Within the MIU
classification, customers are categorized as either inside City or outside City. The current full
cost MIU monthly base fee of $102.32 is assessed to outside City customers. The owner
discounted rate of $62.45 is assessed to inside City customers, representing 61% of the full
• cost. The City's current practice is to subsidize 25% of the owner rate through retail user rates
and another 36% through a cost share with inside City strong waste customers. Per City
direction, this study eliminates both subsidies and develops a charge to recover full costs from
owner customers. Thus, the same charge will apply to all MIU customers regardless of location
inside or outside of City limits.
1. Methodology
The calculation of updated pre - treatment charges is based on a forecast of the number of customers
served by the City and the projected annual program costs.
Based on discussions with City staff, the City has 26 SIUs, 2 outside City MIUs and 496 inside City
MIUs. SIU customers generated about $215,000 in annual revenues in 2010 from charges as
prescribed under the WAC. The calculated annual revenue under existing rates for MIU customers is
estimated at $2,456 for outside City customers and $371,702 for inside City customers.
Annual expenditures for the program are estimated at $881,000 in 2011, increasing to $1.2 million by
2020. Per discussions with City staff, this study conservatively assumed no change in the number of
10 YMC 7.60.105(C).
1 ` YMC 7.60.105(D).
12 YMC 7.60.105(D). The current in -city monthly MIU charge reflects a 25% subsidy by City wastewater service
charges. This subsidy was instituted in 1996 as part of the City's internal cost of service study. For this evaluation,
City staff directed FCS GROUP to eliminate this subsidy.
110 • :> FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 23
•
customers served or the annual level of revenues generated from SIU discharge permits. This
analysis calculates an updated charge for MIU customers to recover the remaining costs.
2. Results
Based on these assumptions, the forecasted annual revenue requirement to be recovered by MIU
customers is $666,000 in 2011 increasing to $1.0 million by 2020. This revenue requirement is
divided by the number of forecasted MIU's and results in a calculated unit charge (per MIU) of
$111.46 per month in 2011 increasing to $ per month in 2020. As noted previously, this rate
assumes full cost recovery, eliminating the current 25% subsidy from retail user rates and 36% cost
share with inside city strong waste customers. The updated rates represent about a 9% increase to
outside City customers and a 78% increase to inside City customers from year 2010 to 2011, then
averaging about 4% increases per year over the remaining study period (2012- 2020).
Exhibit 5 -1 summarizes the annual revenue requirement for the pre- treatment program and the
calculated monthly MIU fees required to fully fund projected net expenditures.
Exhibit 5 -1: Pretreatment Program Annual Revenue Requirements
•
•
T_rtareapnenl frog ram 2011 2012 2013 2013 2015 2016 2017 2018 , 2019 2020
Forecasted Program Etquenses $ 881,066 $ 910,635 $ 941,337 $ 973,218 $ 1,013,156 $ 1,054,900 $ 1,098,536 $ 1,144,154 $ 1,191,850 $ 1,241,721
Less: SlU Revenues 215,000 215,000 215.000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000
Net Annual Rewnue Requirement $ 666,066 $ 695,635 $ 726,337 $ 758,218 $ 798,156 $ 839,900 $ 883,536 $ 929,154 $ 976,850 $ 1,026,721
Divided by Total number ofMlUs 498 503 508 513 518 523 529 534 539 545
• Monthly Unit Charge per MIU $ 111.46 $ 115.25 $ 119.15 $ 123.15 $ 12835 $ 133.72 $ 139.28 $ 145.02 $ 150.95 $ 157.09
The retail revenue requirement analysis and resulting rates assumes implementation of updated
pretreatment charges as presented above. Implementation of charges lower than this forecast
would result in increases for retail rates above those presented in Section 6 — Retail Revenue
Requirements.
B. INSIDE CITY STRONG WASTE CHARGES
For customers that discharge wastewater that is greater than domestic strength (defined by the City as
300 ppm per pound of BOD and/or TSS), the City assesses a strong waste surcharge in addition to
the domestic wastewater ready to serve and volume charges The current surcharge for inside City
customers is $0.407 per pound of BOD, $0.415 per pound of TSS, and $0.276 per pound of FOG.
1. Methodology
Calculation of updated strong waste charges is based on forecasted treatment plant loadings,
forecasted treatment operating expenses, existing and new debt service, and development of unit
costs based on forecasted loading levels.
13 YMC 7.60.020(A).
• • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 24
Treatment plant flow and loadings include influent (mg), BOD (lbs), TSS (lbs) and FOG (lbs)
and are forecasted based on discussions with City staff and increased by forecasted customer
growth of 1 % /yr Exhibit 5 -2 summarizes, treatment plant data used in the analysis.
Exhibit 5 -2: Forecasted Treatment Plant Flow and Loadings
' 2011 _ 2012 _2013 2014 2015 2016 '2017 2018 2019 • 2 020
Flow (mg) 3,586 3,621 3,658 3,694 3,731 3,768 3,805 3,843 3,881 4,328
BOD( @s) 10,499,942 10,597,236 10,695 503 10,794,753 10,894,995 10,996,240 11,098,497 11,201,777 11,306,089 12 524,721)
TSS(Ibs) 8,503,223 8,587.723 8,673,068 8,759,267 8,846,327 8.934,258 9,023.069 9.112367 9,203,363 10261,746
FOG(lbs) 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708 152,708
Forecasted expenses include SU232 (Treatment Plant Operations), existing and new debt service
and utility taxes. In addition, 10% of expenses for SU211 (Treatment Collections) is included
for consistency with the approach used by the City for the 2007 cost of service study. Exhibit 5-
3 summarizes the forecasted expenses used in the analysis.
Exhibit 5 -3: Forecasted Treatment Plant Expenses
. .. 2011, 2013 2614 ,2015 . 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
SU232 $ 5,399.411 $ 5,575597 $ 5,758.021 $ 5,946,921 $ 6,169,384 $ 6,400,894 $ 6,641,846 $ 6,892,656 $ 7,153,757 $ 7,425,602
Debt Service 3,636,989 4,461,143 4,911,847 4,946,698 4,931,491 4,984,993 5, 050,717 5,053,389 5,052,811 5,051,158
Utility Tax 1,265,096 1,405,144 1,493,782 1,525,107 1,554,122 1,594,024 1,636,959 ' 1,672,446 1,708,920 1,746,747
10% ofSU211 311,833 321612 331,743 342,239 354,749 367,780 381,355 395,497 410234 425,590
Total $ 10,613,328 $ 11,763,496 $ 12,495,393 $ 12,760,965 $ 13,009,746 $ 13, 47,691 $ 13,710,878 $ 14,013,989 $ 14,325,722 $ 14,649,097
•
Based on discussions with City staff, treatment plant expenses are allocated to flow, BOD, TSS
. and FOG as follows: 20 %, 43 %, 35 %, and 2 %, respectively. These allocations are consistent
with the City's 2007 cost of service study.
2. Results
The above allocation percentages are applied to the forecasted expenses to derive costs by
treatment plant component. Costs by component are then divided by the forecasted flow and
loadings to generate the unit cost of service. Exhibit 5 -4 summarizes the calculated unit costs.
14 Forecast consistent with updated calculations used for Terrace Heights and Union Gap charges. Per direction from
City staff, FOG loadings remain unchanged over study period.
• • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 25
Exhibit 5 -4: Inside City Strong Waste Surcharge Forecasted Unit Costs
I i ; L .2011 2012 2013 21114 201 2 016. 2 21117 2018 21119 2
Calculated Charges
BOD $ 11.407 S 11422 S 11464 5 (6489 $ 11495 $ (1.499 S 11508 $ 0.516 5 0.523 5 (1529 $ 0.536
TSS S 11.415 S 11.424 5 (1.466 $ 11491 5 0.496 S 0.5(11 5 11508 5 (1517 5 (1523 $ ((.529 S 11536
FOG S (1276 S 11276 5 11276 S 0.276 $ 0276 $ 0.276 S 0276 $ 0.276 $ (1276 5 11.276 $ ((.276
Per City direction, proposed rates for the study are equal to the greater of current rates or the
calculated charges for BOD and TSS, with no change to FOG charges. Calculated BOD and
TSS unit costs are greater than existing costs, increasing on average about 3% per year.
C. OUTSIDE CITY STRONG WASTE CHARGES
Similar to inside City customers, outside City customers that discharge wastewater greater than
domestic strength (defined by the City as 300 ppm of BOD and /or TSS), are assessed a strong
waste surcharge in addition to the domestic wastewater ready to serve and volume charges
The current charge for outside City customers is $0.470 per pound of BOD and $0.467 per pound
of TSS. No FOG charges are assessed to outside city customers.
1. Methodology
Consistent with the 2007 rate study, the methodology used to calculate outside City strong waste
charges differs from that used to determine inside City charges in that depreciation expense and a
rate of return is used in lieu of debt service. This is referred to as the "utility rate basis" approach
S to rate setting as compared to the "cash basis" approach, which was used for inside City
customers.
Treatment plant flow and loadings include influent (mg), BOD (lbs), and TSS (lbs), and are
forecasted based on discussions with City staff and increased by forecasted customer growth of
1 % /yr
Forecasted expenses include SU232 (Treatment Plant Operations), depreciation expense, return
on investment and utility taxes. Exhibit 5 -5 summarizes the forecasted expenses used in the
analysis.
Exhibit 5 -5: Forecasted Expenses Utility Rate Bases
• - 2011 • 2012 2013 2014, 2015 2016 • 2017 2018 ,2019 • 2020
SU232 5 4,788,059 S 4.931,701 S 5,079,652 $ 5,232,041 S 5,389,003 $ 5,550,673 5 5,717,193 S 5,888,709 5 6,065,370 $ 6,247,331
Debt Service 3,061,072 2,558,483 2,492,484 2,315,985 2,268,836 2,088,226 2,086,148 2,088,820 2,088,242 2,086,589
Retum on Investment 572,917 1,902,660 2,419,363 2,630,713 2,662,655 2,896,767 2,964,569 2.964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569
Utility Tax 1,179,507 1,314,998 1,398,810 I ,425,024 1,444,869 1,474,993 1,507,507 1,531,894 1,556,545 1,581,789
Total S 9,604,554 $ 10,707,842 S 11,390,309 S 11,603,763 S 11,765,363 S 12,010,659 S 12,275,418 $ 12,473,992 S 12,674,727 S 12,880,278
Treatment plant expenses are allocated to flow, BOD, and TSS in the following proportions:
20 %, 44 %, and 36 %, respectively, consistent with the City's 2007 cost of service study.
15 7.60.025(B).
16 Forecast consistent with updated calculations used for Terrace Heights and Union Gap charges. Per direction from
City staff, FOG loadings remain unchanged over study period.
• • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 26
2. Results
The above allocation percentages are applied to the forecasted expenses to derive costs by
treatment plant component. Costs by component are then divided by the forecasted flow and
loadings to generate the unit cost of service. Exhibit 5 -6 summarizes the calculated unit costs.
Exhibit 5 -6: Outside City Strong Waste Surcharge Forecasted Unit Costs
failing' 21111 ,21112 201 21114 21115 21116 0017 21119 21119 211211
Calculated Charge,
13UU 0 11441 S 0 402 S 0 445 0 0.469 0 0 477 S 0 475 S 0 481 S 0 487 S 0 490 S 0 493 S 0 497
TSS S 0 467 0 0.92 0 0 449 S 0.47 S 0 477 0 0 479 5 0 484 9 9490 0 0 497 S 0 496 S (1499
Updated Charge, for Approwl
13(31) S 0 470 5 11470 0 0470 8 0.477 0 0475 5 0.481 S 0487 S 04991 S ((491 0 0,497
TSS S 0.467 S 0 407 $ 0473 S 0477 S 0 479 S 11484 0 0490 0 0493 0 0.490 0 11.499
Per City direction, proposed rates for the study are equal to the greater of current rates or the
calculated charges for BOD and TSS. Existing charges are greater than calculated unit costs
• through 2013 for BOD and through 2012 for TSS. Annual adjustments average less than 1% per
year over the study period for both components.
It is important to note that the updated outside City strong waste charges, as calculated under
the current "utility basis" methodology, result in charges lower than inside city customers
(Exhibit 5 -4). In addition FOG charges are not assessed to outside city customer. FCS
GROUP recommends an alternative approach of charging outside city strong waste customers
• using the rate multiplier approach, consistent with the approach used to establish outside city
user rates. Under this approach, outside city strong waste surcharges would be established at
1.5 times the inside city strong waste surcharges presented in Exhibit 5 -4.
D. SEPTAGE CHARGES
The City collects septage wastewater for treatment. Based on discussions with City staff, due to
past rate increases, the amount of septage received has decreased dramatically and does not
represent a significant source of influent to the treatment plant today. The current charge for
septage is $.381 /gallon
1. Methodology
The methodology used to develop septage charges in the City's 2007 cost of service study was
reviewed and maintained for this update. Calculation of updated charges involved converting the
septage loadings to gallons multiplied by the calculated inside City strong waste charges. Exhibit
5 -7 summarizes treatment plant data used for the analysis.
17 YMC 7.60.035(A).
• •: • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
•
• Study Report - 27
• Exhibit 5 -7: Forecasted Septage Loadings
L 2 1111 2012 2013 2014 2015 21116 2017 2018 2014 2020
BOD(ppm) 7,500 7,5011 7,5011 7,5110 7,51111 7,5110 7,50(1 7,51(1) 7,51(1) 7,5011
TSS(ppin) 25,9110 25,91111 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,900 25,9110
2. Results
Loading data was converted to equivalent pounds and multiplied by the calculated inside City
strong waste charges. During the City's 2007 cost of service study, the City included a $.25
surcharge to represent the dedicated cost for receiving each gallon of septage. Based on
discussions with City staff, this surcharge is maintained and escalated to reflect general inflation
as assumed in this study (3 % /yr). Exhibit 5 -8 summarizes the updated surcharge, plus the
updated unit cost for receiving and processing each gallon of septage:
Exhibit 5 -8: Forecasted Septage Unit Charge
i I. I:ei�lin - " • 21111 • 2012 201? 21114 21115 "21118 21117 2018 2019 20211
Calculated Septage Charge, (per gal)
BOD S 0.0264 S 0.0290 5 0.0306 $ 0.0309 0 00312 $ 0.0317 $ 003 0 0.0327 0 00331 $ 00335
TSS 110916 010117 01000 0107 0108 0.1098 ((.1117 0.1130 111143 0.1157
('dy dodicaled charge 0.2814 0.2896 0 2985 0.3075 03167 0 3262 0 3360 0 3461 11 3564 0.3671
Total Charge /Gallon $ 0.3810 0 0.3994 $ 0.4196 $ 0.4351 0 0.4456 $ 0.4561 $ 0.4678 $ 0.4800 S 0.4917 $ 0.5039 $ 0.5163
Annual adjustments average about 3% per year over the study period.
•
18 Conversion formula = loading data/1,000,000 x 8.34gals /lb of water x strong waste charge
4111 • FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 28
• SECTION 6
RETAIL REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
The revenue requirement analysis forms the basis for a long -range financial plan and multi -year
rate management strategy for the wastewater utility. It also forms the basis for the City to set
utility rate structures that are rooted in the "cost -of- service" and which fully recover the total
costs of operating the system: capital improvement and replacement, operations, maintenance,
general administration, and fiscal policy attainment. Linking utility rate levels to a financial plan
such as this helps to enable not only sound financial performance for the City's utility enterprise,
but also, a clear and reasonable relationship between the costs imposed on utility customers and
the costs incurred to provide them the service.
A. METHODOLOGY
The financial plan includes the following core elements, which together, form a complete
portrayal of the wastewater utility's financial obligations:
• Capital Funding Analysis — Defines a strategy for funding the utility system capital
improvement program including an analysis of available resources from rate revenues,
connection charges, debt financing, and any special resources (e.g., grants, developer
participation, etc.).
• Operating Forecast — Identifies future annual non - capital costs associated with the operation,
maintenance, and administration of the utility system.
• Sufficiency Testing — Evaluates the sufficiency of utility revenues in meeting all obligations,
including cash uses such as operating expenses, debt service, capital outlays, and reserve
contributions, as well as any coverage requirements associated with long -term debt.
• Rate Strategy Development — Designs a forward- looking strategy for adjusting utility
resources to fully fund all utility obligations on an annual or periodic basis over the forecast
period.
• Reserve Analysis — Forecasts cash flow and fund balance activity in utility reserves. Tests for
satisfaction of recommended minimum fund balance policies (as discussed in Section 2 —
Policy Development).
From this foundation, utility rate structures can be adjusted to meet the defined annual and long-
term funding targets, as well as the City's pricing objectives.
The financial plan was developed for the 10 -yer planning horizon —2011 through 2020, using
2010 as the baseline year.
The approach used for each core element of the financial •plan is described below.
• •:) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 29
1. Capital Projects and Funding
The capital funding analysis aims to identify the costs of capital projects and summarizes
funding sources available, to help meet those costs. In other words, total sources of funds must at
least equal capital expenditures and provide for the targeted level of capital reserve funding.
The first step is to estimate current day costs of capital improvements and replacement needs
over the study period. City staff provided a listing of annual capital improvements and
replacement needs over the study period. These capital projects were provided in current day
dollars and escalated to year of construction using an annual inflation factor of 4.0% (based on
2005 -2010 average annual inflation as measured by the construction cost index as published by
Engineering News Record).
With the system's capital needs defined, the next step is to identify the sources of funding
available to help the City meet those needs. Potential sources include grants, developer
contributions, and capital reserves (including connection charge revenues and system
reinvestment funding). Debt can be issued to cover any costs not met by these other funding
sources.
The capital financing strategy developed for this rate study utilizes the following hierarchy of
funding sources:
• Capital projects are first funded with available grants, developer contributions and/or other
outside sources.
• Capital needs are next funded with . available capital cash resources generated from
connection charges, system reinvestment funding from rates, transfers from the operating
account, and interest earnings on capital account balances.
• Capital needs not met from the above cash resources will be funded with debt. The City will
regularly pursue low -cost state loans, but unless loan approval is reasonably expected, the
financing strategy assumes the issuance of revenue bonds.
Debt service payments are assumed to begin in the year debt is issued. Current financing terms
for revenue bonds assume a 20 -year repayment period; 4.0% rate of interest (escalating to 5.0%
by 2012); 2.0% issuance cost; and debt service coverage of 2.00.
2. Operating Forecast
The operating forecast focuses on annual expenses incurred to operate, maintain, and manage the
utility system and annual revenue collections to meet those expenses. The baseline for this
forecast is the 2010 operating budget, adjusted for future years to incorporate cost escalation,
growth, and known or anticipated future expenditures. Operating and maintenance (O &M) costs
generally go up over time due to inflation. For this study, an annual general inflation rate of 3.0%
was used. Salary cost escalation is assumed at 3.0% per year and employee benefits are
escalated at a slightly higher rate of 5.5% to recognize historical cost increases above the rate of
general inflation.
19 Inflation (CPI -U) for the Seattle metropolitan area averaged approximately 3.0% between 2005 and 2009.
4 ) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 30
Operating revenues are forecasted based on a combination of customer growth, interest earnings
rates and general inflation. Customer growth is estimated at 1.0% per year. Cash balances are
assumed to earn interest at a rate of 1.0% in 2011 increasing to 2.0% by 2013.
3. Revenue Needs Assessment
After forecasting the complete array of obligations facing the utility, those costs are compared to
forecasted revenues — comprised primarily by rate revenues — at their current levels. Rate
revenues are increased over the forecast period by the incremental revenues presumed to be
generated from estimated customer growth.
When comparing utility obligations with available resources, we have examined sufficiency from
two perspectives: cash sufficiency and debt coverage sufficiency.
• The "Cash Test" focuses on cash resources compared to cash obligations. Cash resources in
this test include rate revenue, miscellaneous operating revenue, and interest earnings in the
operating account. Cash obligations include operating expenses, debt service, system
reinvestment funding from rates, and any contributions to the operating account to achieve
minimum balance thresholds. If these cash obligations exceed resources available, a rate
increase is required to fully fund the needs of the utility.
• The "Coverage Test" refers to the ability of the utility to meet debt covenants (or established
internal policies) which require utility revenue streams to satisfy a specific margin. The
coverage test evaluates revenues and expenses somewhat differently than under the cash test.
For the coverage test, obligations include operating expenses (net of internal utility taxes),
• revenue bond debt service, and incremental debt service coverage (2.0 times annual revenue
bond debt service). In addition to the revenues included in the cash test, the coverage test
allows for the inclusion of interest earnings from all utility accounts (operating account,
capital account, and any restricted reserve accounts), and allows for annual connection
charge revenues. This test does not allow for the use of cash reserves in meeting annual
coverage obligations.
In determining the revenue requirements, both the cash and coverage sufficiency tests must be
met. If a rate revenue deficiency exists under both tests, the analysis adds the greatest deficiency
to the forecasted rate revenue. This yields the total rate revenue requirement for any given year.
The analysis uses the revenue requirement to indicate system -wide annual rate revenue
adjustments.
B. RESULTS
Results of the revenue requirement analysis are summarized in this section. Additional detail can
be viewed in the technical appendices (e.g., detailed listings of capital projects, budgeted revenue
and expense line items, inflows and outflows of fund balances, etc.).
The wastewater utility financial plan includes a capital funding strategy, operating forecast,
revenue needs assessment, rate management strategy, and reserve analysis.
• ': FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 31
• 1. Capital Funding Strategy
Over the 2010 -2020 planning period, the wastewater system faces a total of $71.2 million
(escalated) in capital program costs. Of this total, 26% is for replacement projects and 74% for
system improvements, upgrades, and /or expansion. Major projects include NPDES
improvements ($9.0 million), New IW UASB ($6.5 million); Class A biosolids ($2.35 million);
New boilers ($1.8 million); and Professional engineering services ($12.7 million).
The capital funding plan presumes that the capital program will be funded through a combination
of cash resources and debt issuance. Based on our analysis, 53% ($37.7 million) of the total
capital program can be funded with cash resources with the remaining 47% funded from revenue
bonds ($33.5 million). Exhibit 6 -1 summarizes the annual planned capital expenditures and
Exhibit 6 -2 summarized assumed funding sources.
Exhibit 6 -1: Annual Capital Spending Plan
City of Yakima
2010 -2020 Wastewater CIP
518 --
$16 $16.4
411 $14
$12
c $10 $10.5 •
$8 —
$7.8
$6 $6.4 - .
$6.0
$4 $5.0 $5.3
$4S
$2 $3S $3.L—
$2.6
$0 ..
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
• ': FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 32
• Exhibit 6 -2: Capital Plan Funding Sources
Capital Funding 2010 -2020
Capital Projects (inflated) $ 71,202,990
Revenue Bond Proceeds $ 33,548,019
Use of Capital Fund Balance $ 37,654,970
Total Funding Sources $ 71,202,990
It should be emphasized that this capital funding strategy presumes implementation of the system
reinvestment funding policy at the level described in Section 2 — Policy Development.
Forecasted revenues from connection charges were based on current revenue levels, forecasted at
$650,000 per year, consistent with recent historical performance. Any changes from these
sources or changes in the amount of planned annual capital expenditures could impact this
capital funding strategy and resulting rate impacts.
2. Operating Forecast
EXPENSES
Wastewater utility total operating expenditures are forecasted to increase from $16.8 million to
• $24.8 million per year (inclusive of O &M, debt service and system reinvestment funding from
rates) by the end of the study period. The annual forecast is provided in Exhibit 6 -3. In addition
to O &M expenditures, existing and new annual debt service payments are forecasted over the
planning horizon. Existing debt service payment schedules were provided by City staff. Future
years' debt service incorporates impacts of the capital funding strategy. Incremental debt service
incurred to finance the capital program will begin in 2011 at about $573,000 and reaching $3.0
million by the end of the study period.
REVENUES
Wastewater operating revenues are categorized as retail rate revenues and other operating
revenues. The revenue forecast relied on a combination of historical expenditures, budgeted line
items, customer growth, and cost escalation. In summary:
RETAIL RATE REVENUES UNDER EXISTING RATES:
•
The forecast of retail rate revenues under the existing level of rates reflects actual 2009 financial
records and estimated customer growth over the study period.
20 Capital program cash funding sources include capital fund cash, system reinvestment funding, connection charge
revenues, and scheduled transfers from the operating fund.
• • :) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 33
OTHER OPERATING REVENUES:
Major sources of other revenue include pre- treatment program charges, strong waste charges,
septage charges and wholesale payments from Terrace Heights and Union Gap. Note that these
revenues are incorporated at the updated level of charges as presented in previous sections of this
report. Other non -rate revenue sources include claim settlement funds, scheduled interfund
transfers from the stormwater management utility, Del -Monte contributions, and miscellaneous
revenues.
3. Revenue Needs Assessment
The wastewater utility faces $228.6 million in total cash obligations over the study period,
including operating expenses, existing and new debt service, and system reinvestment funding.
Total revenues (excluding cash reserves) are forecasted at $199.0 million over the same time
period - yielding a deficit of $29.6 million over the study period. The analysis indicates that
overall retail user rate revenues will need to increase 5.1% each year starting 2012 through
2018, followed by a 3.0% increase in 2019. No increase is needed in 2020. The annual forecast
is provided in Exhibit 6 -3.
4. Reserve Analysis
A presumed interest earning rate is applied to annual beginning cash balances in the operating
and capital accounts. Operating interest is used to help pay annual operating expenditures, while
capital interest is used to offset annual capital expenditures. The cash balance in the operating
account is projected to end 2020 with about $2.6 million (60 days of O &M). Resources in
excess of this policy are maintained in the operating fund through the year 2014 to mitigate rate
increases. No transfer of excess reserves is expected up through 2018 with a minimal transfer
($73,000) over the last two years of the study period. The capital account balance is projected to
increase to $9.9 million by year end 2020 (well within the recommended reserve target). Exhibit
6 -3 provides a summary of annual ending account balances over the study period.
Aik
4 FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 34
• Exhibit 6 -3: Revenue Requirements and Reserves Analysis
Revenue Re•uiramenl 1 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Revenues
Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,219,957 $ 14,362,157 $ 14,505,779 $ 14,650,836 $ 14,797,345 $ 14,945,318 $ 15,094,771 $ 15,245,719 $ 15,398,176
Non Rate Revenues 3,056,027 a2ts22 3,298,934 3,391,611 3,493,844 3,380,035 3,431,050 3,498,829 3,567,122 3,641,149 3,722,334
Total Revenues $ 16,995,795 $ 17,395,560 $ 17,518,882 S 17,753,768 $ 17,999,623 $ 18,030,871 $ 18,228,395 $ 18,444,147 S 18,661,894 $ 18,886,868 $ 19,120,510
Expenses
Cash Operating E9e00e0 $ 13,776,823 $ 12,012,222 $ 12,316,408 $ 12,660,300 $ 13,269,878 $ 13,389,218 $ 13,795,646 $ 14,243,489 $ 14,708,696 $ 15,192,634 $ 15,696,134
Exstng Debt Service 3,067,013 2,564,303 2,558,483 2,492,484 2,051,741 2,268,836 2,088,226 2,086,148 2,088,820 2,088,242 2,086,589
New Debt Service - 572,917 1,902,660 2,419,363 2,630,713 2,662,655 2,896,767 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569
Rate Funded System Reinvestment - 821,753 1,220,515 1,810 2,316,102 2,579,463 2.945,421 3,443,040 3,932,342 4,000,329 4,081,524
Total Expenses $ 16,843,836 $ 15,971,1 $ 17,998,066 $ 19,382,749 9 20,268,435 $ 20,900,172 9 21,726,060 $ 22,737,247 $ 23,694,428 $ 24,245,774 6 24,828,817
Annual Surplus / (Deficiency) $ 151,959 $ 1,424,3175 $ (479,174) $ (1,628,981) $ (2,268,812) $ (2,869,301) $ (3,497,666) $ (4,293,100) $ (5,032,534) $ (5,358,806) $ (5,708,307) .
Net Revenue from Rate Increases - - 595,752 1,234,106 1,917,743 2,649,507 3,432,420 4,269,689 5,164,720 5,748,580 5.806,066 •
Net Surplus/(Deficiency) 151,859 1,424,365 116,578 (394,875) (351,069) (219,794) (65,248) (23,410) 132,186 389,874 97,759
Annual Rate Adjustment (0 $9 % ` ( ` 0:00% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 6.10% 5.10% 3.00% 0.00%
Cumulative Rate Adjustment .c6,# i -610% . 10.46%_.. 1609% .. 28.24% 34.78%. 41.65% 45.90% 45.00%
No. of Days of Cash Operating Expense 48 91 92 78 66 58 54 52 54 60 60
Coverage Ratio After Rate Increase 3.48 2 80 2.31 2.20 2 27 2 38 2 42 2.56 2.75 2.86 2.83
Endin. Fund Balances I 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Operating Fund $ 1,518,270 $ 2,942,634 $ 3,059,212 $ 2,664,338 $ 2,313,268 $ 2,093,474 $ 2,028,228 $ 2,004,818 $ 2,137,004 $ 2,475,745 $ 2,551,522
Capital Fund 5,007,680 2,894,822 3,450,929 4,144,232 4,713,414 5,023,198 5,455,557 6,007,248 8,241,304 10,107,956 9,866,592
Debt Reserve 2,260,088 2,336,405 3,666,148 4.182,851 4,394,201 4,426,143 4,660,255 4,728,057 4,728,057 4,728,057 4,728,057
Total $ 8,786,038 5 8,173,881 $ 10,176,290 6 10,981,421 $ 11,420,883 5 11,542,815 $ 12,144,040 $ 12,740,124 $ 15,106,368 5 17,311,759 5 17,146,172
Combined Minimum Target Balance $ 5,416,458 $ 5,654,825 0 7,196,406 $ 7,852,719 $ 8,170,652 $ 8,300,688 $ 8,659,893 $ 8,852,876 $ 8,955,351 $ 9,066,215 $ 9.195,281
5. Rate Forecast
Exhibit 6 -4 shows rate increases and proposed rates for the study period 2011 through 2020.
2010 reflects current rates in effect. All retail rate increases have been applied across - the -board
11111 to the existing rate structure. Consistent with current practice, outside city customers are assessed
a multiplier of 1.5 times inside City rates.
Exhibit 6 -4 a -d: Comparison of Existing and Proposed Retail Wastewater Rates
a. Minimum charges
YMC 7.60.020.4 - lnride City
5110/1010 Charge. 211111 rrapo..'d
Charge 21111 21112 21113 21114 2015 2111E 71117 21118 21119 211211
Monthly Muumuu charge 5 1479 $ 1479 S 15.54 S 16.34 S 1717 5 1805 S 1897 0 199.3 $ 20.95 $ 21.58 S 2158
Ua • char • $ 11.486 S 0 4862 8 0.5110 5 0.5371 $ 0.5644 5 0.5932 5 0.6235 5 0 6553 5 0.6887 $ 0.7094 $ 0.7094 j
memo. 5316 change 00% 51% 5.1% 5.1°6 5.1% 51% 5.114 51;5 3.0% 00;0
YMC 7.60.025.4 - Outside at
M ininium ('hmor s 211111 I'mpn.eA
Charge 21111 21112 21113 21114 21115 21111. 21117 2016 21119 211211
Mrmdlly Minium n charge S 2 22210 5 22.10 $ 23.23 $ 24.41 $ 25.(6 0 26.97 5 28 34 5 29.79 $ 31.30 5 32.24 $ 32.24
1)0&8, Oar •0 S 07266 5 0.7256 S 07637 0 0.8026 $ 08435 $ 0.8866 0 09318 $ 0.9793 $ 1.0 $ 1.0601 5 1 0601
memo: 09590 change 0.0% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 51% 5.1% 5.1% 3.0% 0.0:6
•
• •:> FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 35
•
• b. Ready To Serve Service Charges
1'MC 7.60.020.A.145- Inside City
All (:nstnmers Classes loth, than Multiple l nil Residential) ,
5Ionhlyl Ready to 0 me Charge , . 2010 Proposed. • -
,walrr.M 1 Sirelinchesr - .Charge. 2111 21112, 2013 .2014 ' - '2015 2016.... 2017, , - 2018 .2010 1020
0.75 5 14.79 5 14.79 S 15.54 S 16 34 S 17.17 $ 18 05 S 18 97 S 19.93 S 20.95 9 21 58 5 21 58
1 0 5 18.78 9 18.78 S 19.74 9 21/ 74 5 21811 S 22.91 $ 24.08 $ 25.31 S 26611 S 27.40 S 2740
1 50 S 24.20 1 5 24 26 $ 25 50 S 26 80 S 28.16 5 29 60 S 31 11 S 32 70 S 34 36 5 35.41) S 35 40
2.(8) 5 39.1)5) 5 39.05 5 41.1)4 5 43 13 $ 45 33 5 - 47.65 5 5(1.118 $ 52 63 5 55.31 5 56.97 S 56.97
3.181 5 147911 5 14790 S 15544 S 16337 $ 17170 $ 181)46 5 189.66 5 199.34 5 209 50 5 215.79 S 215.79
4.181 5 1158 28 ' 5 188 28 5 197.88 5 207,97 S 218.58 5 229.73 5 241.44 S 253 76 $ 266 70 5 274.70 S 274.711
6.18) S 282.49 $ 282.49 S 296.90 S 312.04 5 327 95 S 344 68 5 362 26 5 380.73 5 4181.15 5 412.15 5 412.15
8 911 S 389.89 I $ 389 89 5 409.77 S 43)167 $ 452 64 5 475.72 5 499.98 S 525 48 5 552.28 9 568.85 5 568.85
10.00 5 779.73 5 779.73 5 819.50 5 86129 5 90522 9 95158 5 999.90 5 1,059,911 S 1.104.49 $ 1,137.63 5 1.13763
mnno'y -y %change 0.0% 5,1% 5.1% 5 I% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 3,9% 0.0%
YMC 7,60.025.A.I.3 - Outside City
All C shnners 4 Iulher than Mull i p13. 1 1•
11siden) 11 ' - '•
•
:Slonlhl1' Ready to 1ers,e1Charge 20111 - - Proposed .
55'ater' Meter 5i'8c: linehe5) ' . 'CI g0.' 4 2011 . ' 2912 ..21113 21114 2015 •2016 2917 I 21118 21119 111211
(175 S 22.10 3 22 10 5 23.23 5 24 41 S 25 66 5 26 97 5 28.34 5 29.79 S 31 30 5 32 24 $ 32 24
■
1.181 5 2807 S 2807 9 29,511 5 31.01 S 3259 5 3425 5 36 00 5 3783 5 39.76 S 4095 S 40.95
1.50 S 36.24 5 3624 5 38)19 5 41(03 $ 4207 5 4422 S 46.47 S 4884 S 51.33 $ 52.87 $ 52,87
2.)X) 5 5834 5 58.34 5 61.32 5 6444 S 6773 S 7118 $ 7481 $ 7863 5 8264 5 8512 S 8512
3119 0 221 00 5 221 011 5 232 27 S 244 12 $ 256 57 $ 269,65 $ 283,41 $ 297 86 $ 313 05 $ 322.44 5 322.44
4 0 5 281.33 $ 28133 5 29568 S 31)176 5 32661 S 343.26 5 360.77 $ 379.17 5 398.51 5 410 46 $ 410.46
6181 5 422.11 5 422.11 $ 443.64 5 466 26 9 49004 9 515 03 5 541 31) $ 568 91 9 597.92 5 615.86 5 615 86
80) 5 582.56 ■ $ 582 56 S 612 27 0 643 50 S 676.31 S 710.81 5 747 06 S 785.16 5 825 20 1 849.96 5 849.96
1000 5 1,165.11 5 1.165 11 S 1,22453 $ 1,28698 9 1,352.62 5 1,421.60 S 1.49410 $ 1.57030 5 1,650.39 5 1,699.90 9 1,699.90
mono. y. % changy 0.0% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 5 1% 5I% 51% 5 I% 30% 00%
III c. Multifamily Residential Customers
YAU 7.60.020.4.1.a - Inside City _ _ 31111914 14 11ni1, 16 d I 1 ('usl
1 . 211111 1'rnI -
SIo Ih1316e04 1 ti - - Charg ", - Charge 1011 ■ 21112' , 21111 21114 • :21)19 21116 p 2017, • 2018 2014 211211
Per Autumn S 7 69 $ 7 69 5 8 08 $ 8 49 $ 8.93 5 9.38 $ 9.86 S 19 36 S 10 89 $ 11.22 S 11.22
Pa Unit S 7.111 $ 7.111 5 7.46 $ 7.84 $ 824 S 866 S 9.10 $ 9.57 S 1006 $ 10.36 5 1036
memo.y,y %dmlg• 00% 5.1% 5,1% 5 1% 5.1% 5 l% 51% 5.1% 30% 0.0%
1314C 7.60.025.A.1.a - Outside 0
5l 11)1 :.1)nir 11 c5idenllal (:nsl -. (1uISi4e.6 1 •
�. 2)11(1 - - 1:r0
51 IIIoI.Rrarh' loSane Charge - '' Clar)j' % 1011 .21111 .21111 .2(114 2015 21116 ' '21117 2)118 21119 20211
Per Account $ 11.49 5 11.49 S 1208 $ 12.69 $ 1334 $ 1402 S 1473 S 1549 S 1628 S 1676 S 16.76
Per Unit 5 1001 5 1061 $ 1I15 S 1172 9 1232 5 12.95 $ 13.61 S 1430 S 1503 $ 1548 S 15.48
mono y9' %change 00% 51% 5.1% 5 1% 51% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 3)1% 00%
d. Volume Charges
' YMC 7.60.020.A.I.b- Inside Cif,
Vol 1 Charge 511 ('nslo : - I 20111 -- Proposed '1:
21114 21119 2 21117 2)110 21119 211211
Charge per CCF $ 2.59 $ 2.59 9 2.72 S 2.86 5 301 $ 316 9 3.32 $ 3.49 S 367 S 3.78 S 3.78
mono: yly %change 00% 5 1% 5.1% 51% 51% 5.1% 5.1% 51% 3A% 00%
YMC 7.60.025.a.1b- Outside City
.,.. 5' .
5'0l i ie.Charg MI Custo tr . 2010 . Proposed '
i - .l Charge, .2411' - 2012 2013 -2014 . 21119 21116 2017 21118 2019 211211
Charge per CCF $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 414 $ 4,35 S 4 57 S 4 81 $ 505 $ 5.31 $ 558 S 5.75 S 5.75
mono. yry %dwtge 0.0% 5.1% 5 l% 5 1% 51% 5.1% 5.1% 5 1% 30% 11.0%
■
• • :> FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 36
SECTION
RETAIL COST OF SERVICE /
RATE STRUCTURE EVALUATION
The purpose of a cost of service evaluation is to provide a rational basis for distributing the full
cost of utility service to each class of customer in proportion to the distinct demands they place'
on the system, and to recover those costs from customers in a fair manner. The rate design
focuses on pricing objectives regarding rate stability, affordability and equity.
An evaluation of customer class service requirements was performed to determine if existing
customer classes remain valid or if revisions are warranted to better group "like" customers.
Given that the retail customer base contributes only domestic level strength, there is no need to
incorporate a strength differential in the user rate structure. For each customer class, we
evaluated monthly water usage patterns (e.g., average annual, summer, and winter usage) to
determine if varying service requirements existed for wastewater contribution (flow). The
analysis indicates that there is no clear distinction in usage patterns among single family
residential, multi - family residential or commercial customers. Therefore, it was determined that
there was no clear cost -based rational for changing the current customer classes. Based on these
findings and discussions with City staff, it was determined that the existing rate structure remains
valid in meeting the City's pricing objectives.
11111 • %) FCS GROUP CITY OF YAKIMA
Wastewater Rates and Connection Charge Study
Study Report - 37
0
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
0
0
el 0 •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Summary
C apital Funding :Plan " y li, - - - . ' _ •
• (projects esclated to year cf construction) - •• 2010 • • - 2011 '2012 _ - .2013 - 2014 . - 2015 :2016. . 2017 • 2018 - - ' '2019 '2020' .Total'
__FIT Fund 478 Projects ____ __ 7440
!!! - 0000 7404 ___.._._�- 0004_. _ -.�._. 74_74._
Professional en meerin services ` 7474 - - " 7--' 42 7474 - 56I32-5--_-_-_-.. 1480 244 12 682 ,053
___.�_.__. ....._. _.�_. - .9._ 200,000 624,000 - - - 1, - 406,080_ 7474 1,124,864 350,958 1 21 2,53 26 _ 547,428 - 1,480,244 12,682
0074 - 4074 40 0_ 0 044_ 740 0__. __ .._.__.. ..i._.._.. - - 74 0 44 74 4474 _ - 4040. - 4044 744 00.._
SCADAim 735,000 . 220000 00,0
- ____.._._._...___ . -_ -._� __.�_.- 4400- .___.__._._s_- �.�3.._ 00 _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 . 2 5 5 . 0 _
Re lace sec da scum um s ' "' "74'74 "_ ""' ----- - ' - "` - 7474 " -- ` ----
�._____ °_^ ..�...___!'. -1? _ _ _ 134 ..____..__.___
4074.. 7444 ___..__.____�__._�. - _.__._ ____�_� _.. _- __.�.__..- _...__.- 4474.__._:__._.._ ___._.._.-_._._____.._.:...__-_._-.:_._-....-.__...._._.._.-.__.__.- ..�..._.- .._.___._.___...__. -� 224 4`984
RAS pump improvement_ - - - - 973
__._._. _.----- _._ ____._.- 4400_- ____....-- _.___�__.._._.- __.�_..�___._._.._- 0000__-
Refurbish second -
00.74 00_74- ._._.._.__._ -. -
_ _.__. - 31,200
Second slucl nfier spry nozz installation 3-0 Ea - -
.._ ,�__ -. -_ -___.- .___..__._...__ _. ..-_ __-_-..___._..-__-__.-_-.-__.-._..-_-...____-.._.._____.___._.._-__-_.....-_..__ _�._ ._._..�.- _- ._._..,._._ 4404_. -_.__ 7440_
. Pnmary slutlgepump replacement - 130 000 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 130 000
._..___. 004 _ __..__ ____.__.._-._.__ .- ._.__- ._...____- .._.____._..- 4074 4000.. - 4400_. 74.74__
Retrofit - primary split boz _ _ - - - 562.432 -- - -
562,432
.__-_.-.__ _ __.-.- __..__.- ..�._.__._.- ._.._..__. 0474 4474.- 40.74 400 800,000
,000 200.000 0004_ 7440 �. __._.._._.__._.__- 0074 . - 4474._.___._ 4044 -- 4004 7404-._
Stmctural rep_aus to aeration asins 81 00 200 - - 200 - - -
_.___._._ 74 40. .... -_- 40 -. ___ - 200,0 ____. 7444_._ _._....- -
Re ce seco s ndlarifier skmmer meth. /scum 7422-- -
._._._.___la c ____. ..- . .- ...____._� .- ___... -- 4004- .___.______ 7404-_ __.;.._._._.�._____ 0474 526.436 - _ _ _ _ _ 526.436
New secon a clarifier
-�_.__ .� 0440_- -r._ 7440._
830
..
Primary_digestor bldg lighang�lacment 0000 - - 64,6 _ _ _ _
4004._- _.,_,_ -...-_.__.___.__.._______-__-_____..-___ . 89 ..__ - ____.._._. .__�_.__ -_- 4404_.- .- ._.____._
- - _ 64,696
Refurbish daft air compressor pipelines - - 97 - ._.. __.__- .- ._..___.._._.____._...- 4040_ - 4040__ -_ 7400._. _- __.__..___ ,
9734 4
- 0474 4004- __.___._. 74.74. 4400_ -__«.� 74_74__. 0004 7404_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 97 34
Raise intermediate de dt wil _ -..- .-- . .._...__. - -. - _ - . - ... - .__.____..__._. - .... - .._._. - .____._.._____. - 4040 _____.
.-_ _.__.._._..9! er _._c_._.___a._._.._.. 7400.__ - 270.400 _ _ _ _ _ - 7474 - . ._____._._ -- .__._.__ 270,400_
__ ______. __._- ..__- .- _- __.- __.._74. -_.... - - - - 7
- 40 40- .- .._.....____._..- ___. - --
Netnfuge to replace existing unit 04 7400- _ 7474 -. 7474 0-, __ _ - 1,403,830 - - ,401,
______Now w cen_._.._._ 0 441,63
___.___ _______.._.._.-..__-._.-..______._. _._.._.._- ...__.-
63
e is pnmary_ririfier drives end bulear 7474 - 104 00 108_160 7474. 112,486 _ .- __ ..... 116_986 4000 7474 7440
.._- _.___._._._._ __.- .�_. -. 4444 .__.._..- . _... - 0404 7404_ - "___ - 2
ator/ nstrumentation 74 - - 108 - - - 126 532_ .._._._....._.__ 148.024 04.74 , - 4174 - . 382,716
.._.._..00..
NPDE or S I TMD Si 0Mm 2013 -15�er D Zabel!, - -_ 1,000,000 520,000 540,800 1,124,864 1,16985_ 0740 _1 216,653 _ _ 632,660 _ 657.966 68428571 .666____ 740 _ __ _998.863
Struvite Farming Process _ 600 000 _ - _ - - - _ _ - 600 000
0040 ._._ 000
. - . - _2_____ aynesium ._ Tank Relocate _._..____.____ 4 000._ - 4440 ._ __ 50 : 000 ______...... - _ 04 74 ._._....... -.- 0004 0404 0474._ - - - _ _ _ 50,
...._...-._...._.___ ........_- ._..._.- .._.____.. 0474- _._ -._ _.._.......- _....._- .__..- __....__..__. - - - - 00_74._.__.._..___._
Grade Se Pro A bV S Scbal 80,000 83 86,528 69,989 93,589 97.332 - - - - - 530,638
__. -. ___ ......................-.__.._..._.__..__.___..-._.._.-_. _.._...___..._..___..- ._._
Security /Safety LighOn.9__.._._- �.__._ 200,000 44 74 0474 4004 - 4040 - 0040___ _ _ _ _ ______ __..- .._0000_ - 200,000
..-- ._._..____ - __.___.._.- ._..._.
Pary sludge pumping Density_flow m terse - - _ 7474 _ 711,656 711,656
.._ ._ 74rim
4 - 40 7440._ _ _ _ _ -
Cla A Bo 0074 44.74 .7474 _______. -___ _- ..._._.-.- ..- ._.__- .__. -. 2,350,000
7474_
- . �2i350,000._ - ..._.. .___..___..___.- .._..._.__. -_ 00 40. -- _ 7474 _ - 4404._ - 0040.. 7440___
_.- ..- __..__ss - 00.i74 . ______._- _.._____ -r._ 7440.- _ ,J
New Aeration Basin ' 7474 - 2 2742 """ _ -' °' - -
_..._.__.__- .__.___._�___- 0000_.- ___.__- 4004 -. _._.__.__ -.- 4474. ._ 3 - _-..__ _ � �-..__.._.._.-. : -._._._..._..__._-.--_-._...-- �..____.__- . 740 0___- 0074- ._.__.__- .. _�._ __..�__
Headw__ improvement___ - - 433 306 2,000,000 - - - - 2,433306
0004.- .__.._._..__.__ - .-.___-._.._.._._...__..-..._. :-
Membranfg12!!!o roesses_- 0740_ 7474 _ _ _ _
- _.______- __ -e__ _.-- .._.-_-_-__.-.--..__.__..__._- ..- .___..____ 0440._. -_ - - -
_ _ 74_.�_ _
�.- 0000-- _. -_
Air emission/odor control - _ _ _ _ - 1 _- 00
, Ji9 - - - 1480 -_-
2 _ 745, 563
New I W UASB _ � 7474 2,500,000_ 4 000 000 - - - - '
-. D4ven 6,500,000
S2S rYClanfi Drives and Bull Gears - - 150,000 150 000 _ _ _ _ - 300
4400. -._. ener .____- ..__.___._- .__- _._. �.- __.�.__.- 00_74 0474 4444 -.- 0044 - 0000._ �.._..- 00_74 -__. 7444___
Cogeneration 7474.0474 --_ 04.74 _..__. -- 4040__ - 0000 -_.. 7440_
..... _.-.._-._-_-._._ __.,.._..__..- __- ._- ._._- .___._ 4000- __..____.__- 4004 - 0040__ --_ _.._._-.-._____.__ -
_. 7440. _
Grease receving station - 416,000 - - - - _ _ _ _ - 416,000
- 0744.__
..-..._...__.-___.___..___-__._._. _.___.___�__.__.�.- _- _.__._.._. 7440_ -.
Ne primary digestor ___._.__.___- _.__��._.- _.____. : _.._._..._....._ _
4404_. 0404_w _ 0400 - 0474 -�.__ 74_74 _ _
__ - -- eE acemento wastes are -- - - -� -_. - - 86,528 - - - _ _ 86,528
.. ._....__ -_ __ .__�_ �_._.._. -_. _ 7440___ 004__.0
New Boilers - 400,000 1,400,000 - - - - _ _ _ - 1,800,000
Subtotal 2,865,000 6,228,400 880884'#884 888 5,862,051 3,811,657 2,530,638 4,755,148 3,489,829 1,231,712 1,992,637 3,848,635 47,230,150
Fund 4 lEr2jests _
4474 . - 40.74__ ___ ._._.- __...______.- ..______ - 4 2 0 0,200 _.- ___..____ - -_. -__ .-.__ _._.___......--- _._..__._ -_ -.__ 7404_. _-_____.____.__ -- 4004 7404_
Sewer Sy stem Evaluation 2 00,000 208, - _ _ _ _ 7474 7474 _ - -� 7474 _ _ - ^ -_ -V 408,000_
444_.0 - .. - _ -__ 004_.0 -__ -_ _.___. __ __. . _..__ - -1 74 _- _ -_..- 0.74 __4044._ ..__. _ _____
Constiuc6on Proj - _ 7474- 200,000 208,000 216,320 224,973 233,972 243,337 253,064 218 273,714 284 ,662 296,04 2 ,6
40_74___.__.___.._.._ ._.._.-.. - __. --_ ___ .-._ _ .__.._..._.__. _._. -.._ 0 404. 00
. 0 404_ 0004 . .._._. 0474 _- .- ..__.._.- 9 0044 - 00.74 4074 97,270
___
Congdon Sewer Mein -_� _ -_ _ _ 750,000 - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 750000
4440_ 4000_ _____._ ._. ._ -. - -__ ___. 0044__ -4000. -___ 7440__
Neighborhood WW Improvement _, -_ - -� _- 300,000 - 216 320 - 233,972 - 253,064 - 273,714 - 90,0_49______15 18
....
- _____ . __ .- A)!tomat ed M eter Reeding_ 7400 _____ __ -- _1,300_000_2,704,000 __ -- .74
_ _ _ _
...__..__. 740- _ _ . __ _
_._ 0044. ___ay/R__ Street Interceptor _._ .___._.__._ 0 74 0 74 _2,080.000 _: _.__..._._._- 0400.- _- .- .______. 0074 4000__ 7444_..0400__- 0744__. 2. 930.000 ..
00 _ 74 _ Cow7che Basin _ _ I _ - 420 848,640 - _ - _ _ - - - - 1,268,640
-_- 4 __ .__.__. 5
__...____.-._--..-._.....__._-._. ._.__- _._- __..____.__- .- _._.___ 0074 . - .74 4,012 - .._.._..- 4000 7444_
O Collection System m�vements 7474 _ 000 0000- 52,000 0040_ _ 54.080 -7474 566 ^ 243 63,266 65,797 628 71,166 _ _._ 58,493 60,833 8,4 71 74,012 674,318_
. __. Oilier _ -sewerd _.. 50,
4744. -_ 06 0,2 _6564. _ 7400
Ifill f e e _ _ -- - -_ - 520 000 540.800 562,432 584,929 606 326 632 660 657,966 _ 7474 684,285 711,656 _ 176
740,122 6,243
.. -.�_ -_ �...___.__. - as 4044__ _...��__ .- 04_74y_ 74_.. .____.. .._. 0400 ,002 _._ _- __
New IW Lines - - 00 1,000 000 1,000,000 - _ _ _ � - - 2,000,000
Subtotal 3,520,000 5,216,640 4,731,520 1,843,648 1,111,366 912,490 1,202,053 986,949 1,300,141 1,067,484 1,406,232 23,298,522
472 Protec ROT;
-519-L-1 __ _. 7444_.0044_- 0074 00.74 -_.. 74_74_ _ - _.�.. 40 54,000 000 - ._. 30_74 - 0004._ - ..___ ._.- ...._.- .-__- .- �____._.__- __ ,428 .-.- 44 .- __..__._ 74,012 074 4044_. 74_3.8
- - - R6M Contractors - 50,000 i 52,000 54,080 5 6,243 58,493 60,63) 63,266 65,797 68,428 71,166 71,012 674,318
Subtotal 50,000 52,000 54,080 56,243 58,493 60,833 63,266 65,797 68,428 71,166 74,012 674,318
s Total Capital Projects _ $ 6,435,000 $ 10,497 `4
0 $ 16,400,042 $ 7761,942 4,981,516 $ 3,503960 $ 6,020,467 $ 4,542,575 $ 2,600281 S _3 131,286 $ 5,328,879 S 7102,990
- - - `7'
6,435,000 10,497,040 16.400.044 $ 2 7,761.942 4,981,516 3.503.960 6,020.467 4.542.575 2.600,281 3.131,286 5,328,679 71,202,990
CIP Fundng, Sources 0074_ -- ..._.___._____. M..-_____-..._ _.- .__.- .-- ._._...._._.- .__._.- 4040. - 04.74._,.._-- .- .- ______. -_
4004 0474.____i__. __._.__.__.- ______._
Other Outside Sources - - "- "- " -"""' 7422_ 4044_._ 0474.___...__._. _ _ _ - -
..._. ____......__. -_- 0444 - -- 4074 - 0404._-
Other Debt Proceeds ---------- - - - - -- 7400- 7474
_..___... _ 0044 7474. --___� ._.--__..__._.__...__-_. _- .-- 00_74�__�____.�_- ._____.-__ ______._________ ._ 7400__ - ____.___.;. __..-___.____
CityBudgeted Tra_fers from Fund 473 2,246,850 731850 131550 131,850 731,850 - 7474 131,850 _ _____ ._..__._- 6..__._._
Revenue Bond Prods __ - 6,730,502_ 14,910,363 5,793,775 2,369,860_ 358,163 _____6_50_000 . ____ 2,625,091 760,265 0000 - _ - 7474 - __ 33,540019
_ Use of System Development Charges 74 74 _ _ 650,000 650,000 7474 00
650,000 650,0 650,000 _ 650,000 _ 650,000 650,000 650,000 -_ 650 OD0 7400 7 150,000_
Use of C pital Fund Balance _- __ -_�__� 3,538,150 2,98 a 4 688 707.829 1 186 317 1,829,805 - 2,363 . .9 . 47__ 2,613,526 3 000,460 1,818,431 74 74 " 4,547,029 26,939,62
Direct Rate Funding _ -' " _ " 7474 ' 74 _ 7474" - " _ _ __2,349,436 _ 74 _
Total Funding Sources $ 6,435,000 $ 10,4 $ 16,400,042 $ 7,761,942 $ 4,981 $ 3,503,960 $ 6,020,467 S 4,542,575 $ 2,600,281 $ 3,131,286 $ 5,36,87
29 $ 71,202,990
... - 20004. .. _ ..
of 09.14 CIP debt financ
__ _ _ - _ 67.1%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC.
(425) 867 -1802 YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Summary
6/2/2011 1 2:42 PM Page 1 of 88
ID ® •
City of Yakima .
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Summary
Revenue Requir a,^ I.. • - 2010 .2011 2012 . 2013 " 2014 • 2015 • :2016 2017 2018 .2019 2020
Revenues
Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,219,957 $ 14,362,157 $ 14,505,779 $ 14,650,836 $ 14,797,345 $ 14,945,318 $ 15,094,771 $ 15,246,719 $ 15,398,176
. Non -Rate Revenues
Pre- Treatment Program
Rate revenues 456,000 666,066 695,635 726,337 758,218 798,156 839,900 883,536 929.154 976.850 1,026,721
Wastewater discharge permits 216,000 . 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 _ 215,000 215,000 215.000 215,000
Total Pretreatment Program 672,000 881,066 910,635 941,337 973,218 1,013,156 1,054,900 1,098,536 1,144,154 1,191,850 1,241,721
Other Non -Rate Revenues •
Strong Waste Revenue 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1.100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100.000 1,100,000 1,100,000
Terrace Heights 327,399 364,339 388,110 411,175 441,856 462,695 472.862 485,147 496,023 507,211 518,815
Union Gap 447,967 479,335 478,707 499,669 546,297 577,682 580,086 592,104 603,177 614,430 626,061 •
Claim Settlement 100,000 100,000 -
SWMTransfer -In 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - - - - - -
Del Monte Contribution 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177 78,177
Miscellaneous 116,821 98,296 99,165 100,069 101,009 102,059 103,156 104,300 105,495 106,742 108.044
Interest Earnings 13,663 15,183 _ 44,140 61,184 53,287 46,265 41,869 40,565 40,096 42,740 49,515
Total Other Non -Rate Revenues 2,384,027 2,435,129 2,388,299 2,450,274 2,520,626 2,366,879 2,376,150 2,400,293 2 2,449,300 2,480,612
Non -Rate Revenues 3,056,027 3,316,394 3,298,934 3,391,611 3, 493,8 44 3311 ,035 3,431,050 3,498,829 3,567,122 3,641,149 3,722,334
Total Revenues $ 16,995,795 $ 17,395,560 $ 17,518,892 $ 17,753,768 $ 17,999,623 $ 18,030,871 $ 18,228,395 $ 18,444,147 $ 18,661,894 $ 18,886,868 $ 19,120,510
Expenses
Cash Operating Expenses
Wastewater collections 0 3,023.924 $ 3,118,328 $ 3,216,119 $ 3,317.427 $ 3,422,390 $ 3,547.494 0 3,677,802 $ 3,813,548 $ 3,954,974 $ 4,102,336 $ 4,255.899
Rudkin Road Pump Station 79,243 81,726 84.293 86,945 89,686 92,777 95,984 99,310 102,761 106,342 110.058
Wastrewater Treatment 5,229,231 5,399,411 5,575,597 5,758,021 5,946,921 6,169,384 6,400,894 6,641,846 6,892,656 7,153,757 7.425.602
Pretreatment Program 721,476 746,461 772.399 799,331 827,296 862,330 898.948 937.225 977,241 . 1,019,079 1,062,826
Tales (Exorse, 880 and Utility) 2,433,583 2,488,761 2,510,509 2,541,085 2,561,849 212 2,590,168 2,619.710 2,649,214 2,679,271 2,709,899
Total Cash Op Expenses 11,487,457 11,834,687 12,158,917 12,502,809 12,848,143 13,231,727 13,663,796 14,111,639 14,576,846 15,060,784 15,564,284
City Scheduled Transfers
•
Operably transfer to CIP (fund 478) 979,000 - - - - - - - - - _
Operating transfer to CIP (fund 476) 1,136,000 - - - - - - - - - -
Residual Equity Transfers 42,516 42,516 25,641 25,641 25,641 25,641 - - - - -
Trans( to Sewer Trt Plant Resv -Fund 472 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131.850
Terrace fits Debt Coverage - Trans( to Fund 478 (per Contr
Union Gap Debt Coverage - Tr to Fund 478 (per Contract) - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Transfers to CIP - City scheduled 2,289,366 174,366 157,491 157,491 157,491 157,491 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850
Direct Rate Funding of Capital - - - - - - - - - - -
Existing Debt Service
Revenue Bonds 2,256,969 1,760,319 1,760.869 1,763,205 1,497,763 1,760,163 1,757,063 1,756,563 1,760,813 1,761,813 1,761.738
Public Works Trust Fund Loans 810,044 803,984 797.614 729,279 553,978 508,673 331,163 329,585 328,007 326,429 324,851
Total Existing Debt Service 3,067,013 2,564,303 2,558,483 2,492,484 2,051,741 2,268,836 2,088,226 2,086,148 2,088,820 2,088,242 2,086,589
New Debt Service - 572,917 1,902,660 2,419,363 2,630,713 2,662,655 2,896,767 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569
Rate Funded Debt Reserve - 3,169 0 - 264,244 - - 0 - -
Rate Funded System Reinvestment - 821,753 1,220,515 1,810,602 2,316,102 2,679,463 2,945,421 3,443,040 3,932,342 4,000,329 4,081,524
Additions to Operating Reserve - Total Expenses $ 16,843,836 $ 15,971,195 6 17,998,066 $ 19,382,749 $ 20,268,435 $ 20,900,172 $ 21,726,060 $ 22,737,247 6 23,694,428 $ 24,245,774 $ 24,828,817
Annual Surplus / (Deficiency) $ 151,959 $ 1,424,365 $ (479,174) $ (1,628,981) $ (2,268,812) $ (2,869,301) $ (3,497,666) $ (4,293,100) $ (5,032,534) $ (5,358,906) $ (5,708,307)
Net Revenue from Rate Increases - - 595,752 1,234,106 1,917,743 2,649,507 3,432,420 4,269,689 5,164,720 5,748,580 5,806,066
Net Surplus / (Deficiency) $ 151,959 6___ 424,365 $ 116,578 $ (394,875) $ (361,069) $ (21 $ (65,246) 9 (23,410) $ 132,186 $ 389,674 $ 97,759
Annual Rate Adjustment required
Cumulative Annual Rate Adjustment
Memo:
Revenue yield / point of rate adjustment - 116,814 117,982 119,162 120,354 121,557 122,773 124.001 125,241 126,493
Days of O&M (target: 45 to 60) 48 91 92 78 66 58 54 52 54 60 60
Coverage After Rate Increases - ind SDCs (target: at least 2.0) 3.48 2.80 2.31 2.20 2.27 2.38 2.42 2.56 2.75 2.86 2.83
System Reinvestment Phasing 0% 100% t00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC.
(425) 867 -1802 YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Summary
6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 2 of 88
•
® ® •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Assumptions
Economic & Financial Factors 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 • 1 General Cost Inflation CPI-U 5 year hist avg (2005-09 =3.03 %) - ' 3.0094 • 3:00% 3.00% - - , -3.00% - '3.00% • ' 1.00% 3.00% -• 3-00% .. • -3.00% '3.00%
' 2 Construcson Cost Inflation r ENR 5 year hist avg (2005 -09 = 3.81 %) ' . ____,.....0.00%,_ 4.00% _ 4.00% . 4.00% 4.00% - • 480% 4.0056 4.00% - -4.0076 , -4.00% - 4-00%
3 Lebor.Cost Inflation Confirmed w/ Yakima I See City -I 3.00%', 3:0014' • s 3.00% - , 3.00% 4.00%
4 Benefit Cost Inflation Confirmed w/ Yakima budget data 5.50% - 5.5016' 5.50% s 5.50 %. 6.00% , , 8.0016 8.00% 8.00% - 8.00% 6.00%
5 General Inflation plus Growth 1.00% 4.03% 4.03% 4.03% 4,03% 4.03% 4.03% 4.03% 4.03% 4.03% 4.03%
6 [Other] _ .. - ..
7 No Escalation 0,00% 0,00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
• 8 CALCULATED
Fund Earnings Confirmed w/ Yakima 1.00% - 1.00% - , 1.50% ' ' 200% 2,00% , 2.00%' . 200% • 200%' . 200% - 200!8 : ';'2.00%
9 Composite Revenue Growth Confirmed w/ Yakima .1.001 . - 1.00% '. 1.00• - , - - 1.001. - 1.00% = . , -. 1.00 %. :1.00% - 1.0016-- ^ ' • 1.0096 - 7. . - .1.0076' - -- :1.00"% •
. Cumulative Growth 1.00% . 2.01% 3.03% 4.06% 5.10% 6.15% 7.21% 8.29% 9.37% ' 10.46% 11.57%
•
Sewer System Allocation (For Excise Tax Purposes)
Collec0on Percentage Split per City - Y2,80% 22.80 %' 22.80% 22.80% • 22601' • 22.60%. • 2260% 2260% "2260% 2260% 22.8014
Treatment & Transmission Percentage 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77.40% 77,40% 77.40% 77.40%
Composite Tax Rate 2.26% 2.26% 2.26% 2.26% 2.03% 2.03% 2.03% 2.03% 2.03% 2.03% 2.03% • State Excise tax - public utility rate 3.852% 3.852% 3.852% - - 3.85216 - 3.852%• • - 3.852% 3.852% - 3.852% r 3.852% 3-852% 3.852%
State B0O tax - service fate - , 1.600% • 1.800% 1.800% 1.8001' 1.500% 1.50014' 1.500% 1:500% 1.500% 1- 50016, 1 -500%
City Utility tax - public sewer utility rate ' 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% . 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% 14.000% 14.000%
Select City Utility Tax Rate
1 - Existing Rate ' ' 14,00%., per YMC 7.64
2- Proposed Rate _ ,16.00%' -' `Increase per City -
3- Proposed Rate .1L00%" ' Increase per City-
4 - Proposed Rate ~,24,00%" . Increase per City •
Accounting Assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 - 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
FISCAL POLICY RESTRICTIONS • Min, Op. Fund Balance Target (days of 08M expense) 45 .45 . 45 - 45 . 45 - • 45 , 45 45 - 45, 45
Max. Op. Fund Balance (days of O&M expense) - 80 60' 60 80, 80 ' 60 60 60 60 , - 60 - . W
Minimum Capital Fund Balance Target
Select Minimum Capital Fund Balance Target 1 - 1 J Defined as % of Plant
1 - Defined as % of Plant. '
Plant-in-Service in 2009 I $ 120,367,165 I • Minimum Capital Fund Balance - % of plant assets - 1.00% • - 1.00% • - - 1.00%; 1.00%' 1.00% 1 .0 01 , 1.00% ' :1.00% 1.00% :1.00%- , . - 1.00%
2 - Amount it Right =_e - - - - - -
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Assumptions
(425) 867 -1802 62/2011 12 PM
Page 3 of 88
® • ® •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Assumptions
RATE FUNDED SYSTEM REINVESTMENT
Select Reinvestment Funding Strategy I, - . 2.,, • Equal to Annual Depreciation Expense less Annual Debt Principal Payments
Amount of Annual Cash Funding from Rates
1 - Equal to Annual Depreciation Expense 0% 0% 0%- 0% "0%' 0% 0 6 "" O% 0% 0% 0%
2 - Equal to Annual Depreciation Expense less Annual Debt Principal Payments 096 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% '100% 10016,- • 100%
3 - Equal to Amount at Right =_= $ • - $ - $ - $ - $ - S - '5 - $- - S 4 - Do Not Fund System Reinvestment
Pre - Treatment Program Assumptions 2010 2011 - 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
•
Select Program Revenue Assumption -
Select PT Program Revenue Alternative + •.2 . '
•
1 - Budgeted Levels $ 456,000 _
2 - Calculated Levels (See MIU Wksht) .
Forecasted Pre - Treatment Program Revenues
Based on budgeted levels with growth . 5 • -• 456,000 460,560 465,166 469,817 474,515 479,261 484,053 488.894 493.783 498.720 503,708
Based on calculated revised fees S .. 458,000 666,066 695,635 726,337 758,218 798,156 839,900 883.536 929.154 976,850 1,026,721
•
Capital Financing Assumptions 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Wastewater Connection Charge .
Select Connection Charge Alternative .S' ' ' Budgeted Revenue is in use
1 - User Input (Current Charge) $ -
2 - Calculated Charge $ 2,377 0.56% = Avg Annual growth rate of ERUs between 2020 and 2010, per 2004 Comp plan.
3 - Budgeted Revenue 's 850,800 memo: 2010 ERUS= 96,500; 2020 ERUS= 102,000: Source page 3.2, 2004 Sewer Cone Plan.
Number of ERUs (2010 per WW comp plan, p3.2, table 3-la) ' - 98,500 97,036 97,576 98,118 98,663 99,212 99,763 100,318 100,875 101,436 '- 1t12,00D;
Annual change in ERUs 536 539 542 545 548 551 "555 558 561 564
Tot 1 Connecuon Charge Revenues memo: 2009A =IrS. : 875;1711 $ 650,000 .$ 650,000 $ 650.000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 S 650,000 S 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650000 S 950,000
Percent available for debt service 0% 0% . 0% 0% ' , - 0% r.. 0% ' 0% 0% - O% O54 ' .016
Connection Charge revenues available to pay debt service $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - s - $ - $ -
REVENUE BONDS
Tenn (years) 20 20 20 ' 20 20 20' . . 20 • ' • 20 •
Interest Cost .'.4.00%. 4,50% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% -5.00% '5.00% 5.00% '5.00% • 'soots
Issuance Cost 2,00X' ' 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% • -2.00% 2,0010 ' '2.00% ' -2.00% 2.00% -200% 2.00%
Bond Coverage Requirement '2.00
Note City's 2007 COS study used a 2.0 coverage ratio (see study Sec 4, p3).
OTHER LOAN THIS IS NOTPWTF SECTION"
Term (years) 20 20 :20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Interest Cost , - 2,50% 2.50% 2.50% -2.50% • 2.50% , , 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% .25016 • . - 2.50% - ..2.50%
- - Issuance Cost 0.00 %' 0,00% - • 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 %' 0.00%. 0,00% 0,00% 0,00% ' 0. 0t)% 1E00%
• •
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Assumptions
(425) 867 -1802 6/22011 12'42 PM Page 4 of 88
0 -
0
0
•
•
City of Yakima •
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Operating Revenue and Expenditure Forecast
Budget Estimated Budget 9/51369498 Protection Projection Projection Protection Projection Protection Projec 08
FORECAST BASIS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
• Revenues
SEWER UTILITY OPERATORS
RATE REVENUES Note; 2010 inked to one year Mats
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SERVICE UNIT 8211
1rn5e0170Pe!4.r9 Revenues (1077 - No1CM - 8 C06.390s0e Revenue Groth 13,836,723 13974,080 14,113,821 14,254,959 14,397,508 14,541,484 14,686698 14833767 14,982.105 15.131 926 15,263,245
Merle CM Operating Revenues (IOP)• -City . 5 Composite Revenue Grov4h 66690 67,255 67,928 - 68,607 69,293 69,986 70686 71,393 72,107 72,828 73,556
Ouseie GM opc9aa09 rever0es(009) ,5 Composes Revenue Gr608h 37,456 37,830 38,206 38,591 33,977 39,367 39,760 40,158 40,559 40,965 41,375
90131• Service Unit 8211 $ 13,939,768 S 14,079,166 f 14.219.957 S 14,362,157 s 14.505,779 S 14,650,936 s 14,797,345 8 14,946318 S 15.094.771 S 15.245.719 f 15,398,176
Other Revenues
7 No Escalaion - - - - - _ - - . - - - •
7 .No9304 lion 3 - . . -
Total. Service Unit 8232 - f - s • 3 - 5 • f - s - S - S - s - S • $ -
TOTAL RATE REVENUES S 13935768 - 5 14 079 166 $ 14215957 3 14362,157 5 14,505.779 $ 14,650,836 >I 14,797,345 S 1494/318 2 15,094,771 5 15245,719 S 15,398,176 -
10055 100% 9.00% 1.00% 100% 1 00% 1 00% 100% 100%
OTHER REVENUES •
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SERVICE UNIT 1211
Sale of Matenals (MAT) 7 No Escalation $ 1,000 • 1,000 1.000 _ _ 1,000 1,000 1000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,008 1000
Clam Settl ement Agreement. End in 2012 pei.M. 5 100.000 100000 -
Persanel Semmes (PER) 7 No Escalation 9 %, .35,003 35,000 35920 35000 35,000 35,1315 35000 35000 35.000 35,000
Sept29e Waste Disposal (SWO) .7 No Escalation . 16 -5 5 5 5000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,200 5,000 5.000
Interest train Investments (INT) CALCULATED SEPARATELY S _ _ -
To9a1- Servke Unit 6211 S 141,000 S 141,000 S 41,000 5 41,000 f 41,000 s 41,000 S 41,000 s 41,000 5 41,000 f 41.000 3 41,000
RU01ON ROAD PUMP STATOR SERVICE UNIT 1215
Union Gep- RUdbn Road (1.103; 4 PARTY AGREEMENT) CALCULATED• SEE WHOLESALE TAB 3 23280 22,357 23,226 24,130 25070 26,1A 27.217 28,361 29,556 30,803 32,105
7 No ES0alabox - - •
7 No EscabOon _ _ -
Total. Servke Unit 8215 • S 23.280 f 22357 $ 23,226 $ 24,130 8 25.070 $ 25,120 5 27.217 f 28,361 3 29.556 5 30,803 3 32105
• WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SERVICE UNIT 4219 __
- . e,8c _ ..______
"-gpage ___- ___.___. _
Was Wastewater vn
Carecbm (WW
C) (W C) 7 No EscaEscalation <onnectnon charges s included uded in in ClP frnanrnanun - - - _ -
7 No Escalation _ - - - -
Total -Servke Unit 11218 5 • 5 • 3 - 5 - S - f - f - S - S - S - f -
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICE U9171232
Sl1w9 Waste Re0e161e(SWR) 7 No ESC44Nn 1,100.003 1100,000 1,100,00 1,19,000 1,100.000 1.100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,120,000 1,100000 1.100,000
Personnel Semces (PER) 7 No Escalation 2,000 2,90 2,09 2,000 2,90 2.09 2.90 2.000 2,09 2,000 2,000
Del Morse 6368066606 - ends2021 per CM 18,177 78,177 74177 78.177 75,177 - 778,177 75,177 78.177 ' 714177. 74777 78.177
Union Gap
Wholesale Sewer (UG1; 4 PARTY AGREEMENT) CALCULATED - SEE WHOLESALE TAB 186,612 201,799 204,700 211,468 218.479 226,726 235,311 244,248 253,553 263,242 273,331
Existing Debt Service(UG4) CALCULATED - SEE WHOLESALE TAB 151,69 151.414 112.584 112.309 145,308 166,315 152.716 152,626 152,922 152,954 152.899
Ens*g Debt Cowin. (0G6) CALCULATED - SEE WHOLESALE TAB 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,000 81,09 81,003 81,000 81,09 81,90 81600 51,90
New Debt Service CALCULATED -SEE VMOLESALE TAB - 14,808 48194 62,575 69,064 68,913 74997 76777 76,802 76,826 76,851
System Reinvestment _ NO COST SHARING - - _
80468 Road Volume Charge 20,936 22,357 23,226 24,130 25,070 26.120 27217 28,361 29.556 30.803 32.105
Surcharge(UG2) CALCULATED - SEE WHOLESALE TAB 7,738 7,957 8,003 8,188 8,377 8,607 8.845 9,091 9,344 9.96 9,876
Terrace Heights '
Whole343 Sever (761, 4 PARTY AGREEMENT) CALCULATED -SEE WHOLESALE TAB 212,495 232,505 235836 243.624 251,689 261,179 271.057 281,340 292,045 39.192 314,800
' Existing Debt Service (7112) CALCULATED -SEE WHOLESALE TAB 74,904 74772 55597 55.461 71,757 82,131 75,415 75,371 75,517 75.533 75505
Emig Debt Coverage (TH3) CALCULATED -SEE WHOLESALE TAB 40,90 40,200 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,020 40,000 40,000 40,000 4009 40.360 ,
New DebtSmtce CALCULATED• SEE WHOLESALE TAB - 17,061 56,677 72,090 78,410 79.385 86,390 88.437 88,461 88,485 88,510
SWteln Reinvestment NO COST SHARING
806656s Nitrogen CashVitue (B5 N) - zero 4N 02011 per CM 5100 - - • - - • - - . • - .
Spray Grass Sale (905) -zero Out n 2011 per City .
yy - - •
• 70t34- Service Unit 6232 6 1,934,743 5 2,023,850 3 2044.994 S 2091,021 3 2168,331 3 2.220,554 f 2233,125 5 2,257,428 5 2.279.377 S 2391.818 3 2325,053
PREPARED BY PCS GRCUP, 940. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 cum
(425)867 -1802
62/2011 12:42 PM Page 5 0188
•
ill ® 0
City of Yakima
•
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Operating Revenue and Expenditure Forecast
Budget Estimated Budget Projection Projection Projection Projection Projection Projection Projection Projector
FORECAST BASIS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2020
PRETREATMENT SERVICE UNIT 5233
Wastewater Pretreatment (SPT)- Linked tonnngaa page CALCULATED - SEE PRETREATMENT TAB 456. 000 666.066 695035 726,337 758,218 798,156 839,900 083,536 929,154 976,850 1.026.721
Wastewater Discharge Permits (WDP) - for S(U no growth per city 7 No Escalation 215,000 215,000 215,E 215,030 215,930 2151030 215,000 215.000 215000 _ 215000 215,000
Wastewater Specie/ Per. (WSP) 1,000 _ _
•
Total• Service Unit 5233 8 672,000 S 891,066 2 910,635 $ 941,337 $ 573,218 $ 1.013,156 3 1,054,900 $ 1.058,536 8 1,144,154 0 1,191,850 S 1,241,721
memo Inside CM Discount Not Applied
WASTEWATER INTERFUND SERVICE UNIT 5305
Cubcnflen Swlmrn&161h Ao 476 (SA0 -Zen out in 2011 per Coy _ - _ - _ _ ,
Cubcrattere Swmnln 8' 16th AY 476 (SAP) - zero oLLN2011 per ON 3,ttl - - - - - - - •
•
Res1Ual Equity Transfer- fiom3Ater for PWTF- Ends 2020. 7 No E302081 n 32,939 32,939 32.939 32,939 32,939 32.939 32,939 32,939 32,939 32,939 32,939
Operating Transfer In- tram SWM ends 2014 per CM 7 No Escalation 200,1100 "200 310,1100 200,000 263,000
•
r Total -Service Unit #693 3 233,641 S 232,939 $ 232,339 f 232,939 3 232.333 8 32.933 3 32,935 S 32.536 S 32,333 $ 32,333 3 32,333
WASTEWATER CEREAL REVENUES SERVICE UNIT 3699
Interest from contracts 0NC)- Zeroout in 2011 Per Ce1 7 No Escalation 1.530 - .
Sale o /Salvage (101) -Zero cut m2011 per CO , No Escalation 1,000 _ . - _ - -
-
-
141.55 f n aneo a Revenues (MIS) -Zero o 2011 per CM 7 No Escalation 200 _ _ -
- -
T No Escalation _ _ _
-
_ -
-
Total -Servlu llnit 11699 S 2.700 S - S - S - S - 3 - i - f - f - f - S -
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES J__]042 lt. i 3,3 01212_.8 3,25,795 8 3,330,427 S 3,440,557 3 3,333,770 S 3,389,181 8 3,458,264 5____527 026 6 1,538 409 8 ]67, 819
-141% 232% 331% -3 10% 166% . 204% 199% 2024 207%
TOTAL REVENUES S 16,982,132 S 17,380,377 S 17.474,752 $ 17,692,584 8 17,946,336 3 17,984,606 3 18,186,525 6 18,403,583 8 18,621,757 3 18,844,123 S 15,070,335
Source CM of Yakma Line tem budget as prowled by Yakima Rnance Dept 054% 7 25% 7 43% 0 21% 1 12% 1 19% 1 19% 110% 1 20%
Recgx6fion
Budget 17,249,214
Difference 267,082
Reconcifallon of Difference
.
Budgeted Rate revenue n t pneeo revenue (395,768)
Interest earnings (exclude - 02101 ed separately) 2,000
Connection fen (Included in CIP financing page) 650,000
Total 256.232 ,
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC VAKIMA MODEL - June 2.2011 065*
(425) 567 -1502 6/20011 1242 PM Page 6 of 88
" n ry n ry ^ " ry ry rn Et
0 .
.t§.t§ 'A A,AA"A.A ;A "sAA.an.RAA.'AA.$Ae "A.A.A..eAAs :$AAA
4 "ss`o n s , .EE53A 5 E5 Es 3EA5"w5m m55A § §5 §Im5m § " §x §,me1 " a4s "m
`' ry - r. R g " " S « " -
^_ 3,s° §cam" §= 3 as: §a35E. "^ °5 §E. 3 §< " aa A:E §m.�A. " §5 §, " N5EAE.
""i Vk : 2 4 2"�8i "" rv. - 4g "' gam -„ " _ _ "" g s 5 '2 §5A 3 n ^
•
oes ^s g� " �e ANAr E§§§ 3$ e§ a §E3m „E535.5 §5ENsea�a3sE, §,i' a "� EN AAA
°a° ^ m E $3 §QRS 'gmEE5E3ma5ae5 §3�3E5 §3 "„x35A5 ” §E §. .3 §4s. a
Em Adm
-s .r E. E. A. sa s
3. E. E.m§ AE.A. _c_A. AAA8$A.A. AAAA. mAAA.AAAAA AAAA,A, saAg A. E. ^sai 5
0 •
LV-
0�ve Fts 1 1 § o.amE.F.vwRQ0 ,A� §.eR1R& §k$tp @ §e.i g § §l$ §'.§. §!§ §.b § � 1A..1NN
2 ° 5 5 111111111-5 1111 1 1Y13 IEE o II
ligff
LL 3 3 9 9 9 9 3 m rX ffi ffi ffi£€ E 5 w . £ £ 5 6 z E€ g.
u u u o u z u u z z ° a u u u 3 9 9 9 I
I
0
.LL
BA l B L F
a u 1 ° ' 6 F_ 3 i s 8 5 g f 6 y a 1' ` B D E s Fs E
15 i � d n g `i t 11 i i i 111111 ill l l 0 . I 4 .9 1“/ 1 I
Y P a u . "" 6 r & ! -- y i �` , = - - �e �e 'e �' / " § Et p '& R & y L S 5P 1A . S . -e - i g F F y 99 y �yy55 o . i
l0 m n 10 N N 1" x t, g l u N" S d d E E E E : 1- 8 F Y o a t a d < e 8 a X l i E E a E 3 2
fir,' K 8 d a g 5 5 : 1 8 8 8 > o o °a u " a rc ^ rc i d y e rc rc ? ? b o e w d d h
° ,
0 0.-1
O W
i'' i
.
,t., G.
•
E
® " » ° e ° a
� �7" AAPAAAAAAAAA55 A m#1 as ° a F, '' A.A,Q5AA'5.Am
^^ mom smge ^g� ° sgg .a� ^ § ° °m s
5Eka 2 ' 2 APAP.AAAAa ° s.5A55 g A.= m,AA Ae55A551WAa1AAAA5 A53A
$osA ,AA?mo.§1E.e15,EA s AAA, A1555555EAmEmEAsAgsslAFe1R1ARAAEAE
j -- 2 '=i'A? A"A a.goa', t; s.g n,g. 5Ag5 gggg'<gm.gag.c.mggg"mg °�aa_gg ga`
1=sas"1 s "§1e,§ 1 k. A5A. A5REAAAERAigE _1EMEEFRAAEARms$5A,APA
§= �3 r- $o3^s^ » _ A•AAA • m55EAaAAEA5 V A "s°ePA5xAAA PA
e ^_ -. - " - ^ g ge ts s "s , g *r ^5a " ^u, . ^ ^
•
5EAAnsA5A A A El ig$m =ogg1n , rzi Aar
• a s A AA= _ ^ m ?oas ^ o51•Q 5,AgoA AA
E. A' ^m5 gagggom IAAA
.. g
0 El1se 'F''''',',1..22-,`T,''''''.4".!''''''':.'`:'," » m .° aea: $ !11as�!m x��!1m4 11 1 S
S n f
m „IPAn$aRa 61 1.$$A1R1BIP.55 1. 6. RA L1115E118A111111111 11!IP1.11A111111
g x 9AV se ^ §gR ^g s < 8gn le_ ^g•g" ^ go
1 a€ €ill ii Q a9Q ...SEE jiEFj ji €�iiillii 111!11111
E
?333333333 , 15S1� i.. g 1 - g a 333333,33333333 3 3 33 333 3 1 33 3 3 33 3 33
t 1 1egeelI lw ii "11111 Y 1`ee`e 1 a q iiiiii iii €diii iiii
e Y d ll A m 1 1 1 u u u o z z o 93335 ) at A A 1 1 1 1 1 ffi 3 u u y u u z u
N
i
0
O
T LL
ve
y 'e t 3 o' t
RR u p q 88
W 6 S y 1 p . t F 2 g s Fp s y 4 —
O 9 ge g } fig ', ' , 3 e; L% E [ kj 2 1 x' '. � y � y L' R ," y
(6 G m + gg S ; 6 g i i t P & < `�, 1 g •' ; e 1 f Y C° 5 F l A E E N i .: E L & '
N 5 a f g ?€ 3 F F & m n 5 et I
s e e I 4, . z g$ 4° 8 V 15 Y
R = d a § � g i$ ! t 1 ,PE a `i tl it; g N �i iI m i!Q a .1as /apRR "s
}'S C ° ' F 5 5 s x 8 5 8 3 ° e ' g E d b w F 5 s E 8 8 > > 5 u b 3 a 3 4
w rn S
al C
I
U m o
i. .V
•
® 0 e .
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Operating Revenue and Expenditure Forecast
Budget Estimated Budget Protection Projection Projection Projection Projection Projection Protection - Protection
FORECAST BASIS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2011 2020
Miscellaneous Expense 1 General Cost InlaOon $ 5,500 6695 6,896 7,103 7.316 7,535 7761 7,994 8,234 8,481 8,735
Dues and SUb,cnpters ' 1 General Costinllaton 1 ' 8,030 8,240 8,487 '8,742 9,004 9,274 9,552 9.839 10,134 10.438 10,751
Recruiting Expense 1 General Cost lnl*on 3 2,300 2.063 2,122 2,185 2,251 2,319 2,338 2,460 2.534 2.610 2.688
DOE WIN DOChege Permit Fee 1 General Cost bdlMon 3 98,700 86271 90 919 93,647 96,456 99350 102,330 105400 108,562 111,819 115,174
State / County Taxes and Assessments .3 CALCULATED 9
Rentals /M6O Garage 7 No Escalation 3 03.105 50, 105 50, 105 50. 105 50, 105 50, 105 50 ,105 50105 50,105 50,105 50.105
Rentals l Replicemenl - Garage 7 No Escalation 3 50,600 50000 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 50,000 50,093 50,000 50,000 50,093 50,000
Operating Equipment 7 General Call In3Mon 3 10,030 10,300 10,609 10,927 11,255 11,593 11,941 12,299 12,668 13.048 13439
PERS Prior Somme 4. Benefit Costlnllahon 3 3,200 3,376 3,562 3,758 3,964 4,202 4,454 4,721 5,005 5.305 5,623
InterNnd Charges -Insurance 7 General Cost Intl.. $ ' 288,731 305,633 314802 324,246 333973 343,953 354,312 360,942 375,890 387.167 398,782
Interlurd Changes • CM Services 1 General Coat gelation 3 579,240 596,617 614,516 632951 651,940 671,498 691,643 712,392 733,764 755.777 778,450
Total - Service Unit 6232 S 5.229,231 9 5,399,411 $ 5,575,597 35.768,021 35,946,921 36.169,384 96,400,894 96,641,846 56,892.656 • 37,153.757 37,425,602
5,229,232
3% 3% 327% 328% 374% 375% 376% 3 7876 37976 3 8096
•
WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT (UNIT 4233)
Interfu d in-Lieu of T. 9 CALCULATED 3
Interfurd Charges - Iwirme 1 General Cost Inflation $ 3,451 3,555 3,661 3,771 3,884 4,001 4,121 4244 4,372 4,503 4,638
IMerlund Charges -CM Semmes 1 General Cost 0138on 3 49,437 50,920 52,448 54,021 55,642 57,311 59,030 60,801 62.625 64,500 66,439
1760/164 Charges - Customer Services 1 General Cwt 811406 3 15.000 15,450 15,914 16,391 16,883 17,389 17,911 18,448 19,002 19572 20,159
Salaries - Permanent 3 148a Cost Inflation 3 422,763 435,453 448,517 461,972 475,831 494,865 514,659 535,246 556,655 578,922. 602,078
Logeuty 3 Labor Cost Inflation 3 14,444 14,877 15,324 15,783 16,257 16,937 17,583 18,287 19.018 19,779 20570
Delarred Corp 5 Labor Cost Inflation 3 , 12096 13,048 13,439 13,643 14258 14828 15,421 16,038 16,680 17,347 18941
Overarm 3 labor Cost Inflation 3 . 900 824 849 874 900 936 974 1,013 1.053 1,095 1,139
Some! Secunty .4 Benefit Cost Inflation '9 34207 36,068 38.073 40,167 42,376 44,919 47,614 50,471 53,499 56,709 60,112
PERS 4 Benefit Cwt Inflation 3 733,799 25,108 26,489 27,946 29,483 31252 33,127 35,114 37.271 39,455 01,822
hduatnalhrcvace . Benefit C90716,712601106 3 14,503 15,301 16,142 17,030 17,957 19,045 20,187 21.399 22.683 24,043 25,486
Lire Immense • 4 Benefit Cwt ln8Mon $ 987 1,041 1,099 1,159 1,223 1,296 1,374 1,456 1,544 1,636 1,734
Lee Insurance- Management ' 4 Benefit Cwt Inflation 9 • 349 368 388 410 432 458 486 515 546 579 613
Medeel Insurance '- _ 4 ' Benefit Cwt MlMbon 3 18,015 50.656 53,442 56,381 59,482 63,051 66,834 70,844 75,095 79,601 84377
Med6al lnsuraice - Management 4 Benef5 Costl8lahm 3 15,124 15,956 16633 17,759 18,736 19560 21,052 22,315 23,654 25,073 26,577
Dental Insurance 4 Benefit Cost Inlbhon 3 8,853 7,229 7,626 8,046 8,488 8,998 9,538 10,110 10,716 11,359 12,041
Dentdlnsurance - Management '4 Benefit Costlnflaticn 3 52 55 58 61 64 68 72 77 81 86 91
Centel Insurance - Exempt 4 Bene0 Cost Inflation 9 2,798 2,952 3,114 3286 3,466 3,674 3,895 4,128 4,376 4839 4,917
Unemolminent 0401 4 Benefit Cwt Inflation $ 1,390 1,466 1,547 1,632 1,722 1,825 1.935 2,051 2,174 2,304 2.443
Unita - nu / Ck3149 1 General Cost Inflation 3 830. 618 637 656 675 696 716 738 760 783 606
Office and Operating Sipe &e '1 General Cost Inflation 9' 5500 5,665 5,835 6,010 6,190 6.376 6,567 6.764 6,967 7,176 7,392
Ope46og S9p9es - Fuel 7 General Cost Inflaton $ 5.000 8,240 8,487 8,742 9,004 9,274 9,552 9.839 10,134 10,438 10,751
Small Tads and Mesa Equepmmt - 1 , General Cast gelation ' 5 270 258 265 273 281 290 299 307 317 325 336
Chemi0ale 1 General Cost Inflation 3 250 258 265 273 281 290 299 307 317 326 336
Professional Semmes , 1 - General Costlnt8tion 3 15030 15,450 15,910 16,391 16,883 17,389 17,911 18,448 19,002 19,572 20,159
Telephone 7 . General Cwt Inflation 3 ' 332 342 352 363 374 385 396 408 421 433 446
Postage 1 General Cost Udalon 5 535 551 568 585 602 620 639 658 678 698 719
CM Phone ' - 1 General Cost In 496n 3. 1.579 1,625 1,674 1,724 1,776 1.829 1,884 1,941 1,999 2,059 2,121
Trenepodatcn 7'- General CostlnflMOn 3 1,300 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 1,159 1,190 1.230 1,257 1,305 1,344
Adveit8ir3 1 General Cwt O,Bation 3 2.000 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 2.319 2.388 2.400 2,534 2,610 2,688
R&M /Contlactes .1 General Cost Inflation 3 759 773 796 820 844 869 896 922 950 979 1,008
- Mxe6aneow Expense 1 Gerard Costgel1On 3 1.000 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 1,159 1,194 1,230 1.267 1,305 1,344
Cues and 010698431976 ' 1 General Cost Mallon $ 1,000 1,0330 1,031 1093 1.126 1,159 1,194 1,230 1,267 1,305 1.344
Recruiting Expense 1 General Cost InflMon 3 - - - - - - - - - ' -
SUM / County Taxes and Assessments 0 CALCULATED 9 - - - - - - - - - - -
Rentala 71440 Garage
7 Ne Escalation 3 3.091 3091 3,091 3,091 3,091 3,091 3091 3.091 3,091 3,091 3,091
Rentals /Replacennents - Garage 7' No Escalation 8 8.944 8,944 8,944 8,944 8.944 8,944 8,944 8,944 8.944 8,944 8,944
Operating E9uprnent 1 General Cost ln8Mon 3 8,030 5,150 5305 5,464 5,628 5,736 5,970 6,149 6,334 6524 6,720
Total -Service Unit 6233 3 721,476 3 746,461 9 772,399 3799,331 3827,296 9962.330 3893,948 5937,225 3977,241 31,019,079 31,062.826
721,477
FINANCIAL MODEL TAX CALCULATIONS
960 and State Excise Team (excludes vhdes4le rem per CM 00&y) Ca1c4ated vale S 181.705 $ 166031 9 167,324 3 199.416 S 163,688 3 163,132 5 165.063 $ 166,923 6 168,776 S 170,667 9 172,597
City 01419 Taxw( Excldes MOksale reverses, per Cdy parley) Calculated value 9 2,271.879 5 2,322.730 $ 2,343,184 5 2.371,675 5 2,398,162 $ 2396,611 S 2,425,105 6 2,452,787 $ 2,480.438 5 2,508604 6 2.537,302
TOTAL SERVICES 3 2.433.583 3 2.489.761 3 2,510,503 2,541,005 2561,849 2.559.742 2,590,168 2,613,710 2.649.214 2,679,271 2.709.699
Nam. Taxes 031 sealed t0 xteks4e revenues, per 4-pady agreement lath Upon Gap end Terrace Na9MS (see Sec 9.1) 2% I% 1 22% 0 92% .008% 7.19% 714% 1.73% 1,13% I l4%
TOTAL - WATER U111J79 (BEFORE CIP 08M) S 11,487,457 S 11,834,687 6 12199 917 6 12,502,309 6 1284,143 S 13,231,727 6 13,643,796 6 14,111,639 6 14,574,944 $ 15.090,784 9 15,564,294
PREPARED BY K5 GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 osm
(425) 967 -1907 6/2/2011 12'42 PM
Page 9 0188
•
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Operating Revenue and Expenditure Forecast
Budget Estimated Budget Projection Protection Protection Projection Projection Prolechon Projection Projection
• • FORECAST BASIS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
302% 27416 1 83% 276% 299% 3,2716 3 28% 3 30% 3 32% 3 34% '
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
. 1 2 IUae Ma?, CIPTrasler47 (155, 2 =N) 3% 3% 349% 350% 423% 425% 4 25% 4 27% 428% 4,29%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS (UNIT /645) '
Operating transfer to fund 476 7' No Escalation -
S 6733160 - _ • - _ _
Operaang transfer to fund 476 7 No Escalation $ 1.136.00 _ _ - ._ - - - -
Residual equity transfer - to Streets PWTF- ends 2011 per City 7 No 0.0.0080 1 16675 3 16,575 - _ _ _ . •
- • .
Residual entity transter - to Streets PWTF -ends 2015 Per 06 7 7 Na Eseahta0 $ 25,641 25641 25641 25,641 25,641 25,641 _ . _ - • - • -
TranaltoSeverTd Fun! 472 (pa City Po4cy) ' 7' No Escalation 3- 131,856 131.850 131,850 131,959 131650 131,650 131.8 131,850 131,850 131,850 _ 131,650
Terrace hits Debt Coverage -Trans? to Fund 478 (per Contract) Exclude. reflected In existing debt lab 7 _ _ - _ - - _ -
Union Gap Debt Coverage - Tr to Fund 478 (per CCmract) Exe3Jds. reflected In existing debt lab 3 _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - -
.7 No Escabdion - - - - - - - - -
Total . Service Unit p645 _ $ 7,289,366 8 174.396 $ 157,491 8157,491 9157,491 5157,491 $131,850 9131,850 9131,850 $131,850 5131,850
-92% -10% 000% 000% 000% _1628% 000% 0,0074 000% 000% •
•
Add) 069 from CIP 1 Conduction Cost)nllala0 $
•
Tetal Cash 08M Expendotures S 13,776,823 8 12,005,053 $ 12,316,409 S 12,650,300 $ 13605,636 $ 13,389,218 8 13,795,646 8 14,243,489 5 14,708,696 0 15,192.634 $ 15,634,134
Budget 17,556,966
D0lererce 3,760,143 ,
Reconc090u6 of Difference
IMedund Transfers (Debt Source end CIP sccaa6ed Inc eeparatey In model) 3,637,123
Deference m Taxes (56, 983) Ddf: Due to budgeted vs price-out revenues
Total 3,760,140
dAemce 131
SYSTEM REINVESTMENT FUNDING 2010 2011 2012 2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Depreciation Expense n' 2009 $ - ' 2,755,730
Depreciation Expense Leaiaees plus annual additions horn Cr $ 2,932,657 $ 3.259,907 $ 3,723137 $ 4523,162 $ 5.025.534 $ 5,354,067 S 5,740,476 5 6,383,135 5 7006.360 $ 7,211645 $ 7,433,682
debtpindpel payments (2,153,126) (2,438,153) (2,503,322) (2,712,580) _ (2,709,432) (2,774604) (2,795,055) (2,940,095) (3,074.018) (3,211 3161 (3,352,157)
System Relna0men0 F.. 3rg $ 779,531 $ 021783 $ 1,220,515 S 1,610,602 $ 2316.102 $ 2679,463 S 2,945.421 $ 3,443,040 S 3,932,342 $ 4,00E329 $ 4061,524
Memo: Breasdevm of system reinvestment funding • Wahr Utility
Deprecation expense $ 2,755,730 S 2.932,657 $ 3,259.907 $ 3,723,837 5 4523,162 $ 5,025,534 $ 5,354,067 $ 5,740,476 $ 6,383,135 $ 7,006,360 $ 7.211,645
Deprecation CWIP 176,927
Depreciation pawns yeses CIP 0 $ 327,250 $ 463,930 9 799,326 $ 502,372 $ 328,533 5______1_,__86 409 5___6_02 660 623.224 $ 205,285 1___22 037
Subtotal $ 2,932.657 0 3,259,907 $ 3,723837 9 4,523,162 $ 5.025.534 $ 5354,067 $ 5,740.476 $ 6,383,135 $ 7,00.360 $ 7.211,645 S 7,433,682
Lees' Annual Debt entwine'
(2,19,126) (2,438,153) (2,503,322) (2,712 560) _ (2,709,432) {2,]]4,604) (2,795,055) (2,940,095) (3,074018) (3,211116) (3,352,157)
Total' Calculated System reinvestment funding • E 779,531 S 821,753 $ 1,220,515 S 1,810,602 9 2.316.102 $ 2,579,463 $ 2,945,421 $ , 3,443,040 $ 3932,342 S 4,00,329 S 4,01524
Phase In strategy for system reinvestment funding 0% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10096 10% 10% 100% 10% 1014
, ,5ystaln reinvestment fulling plan (including enacts of phasing) , . .. r ., • - ., • ' S _ n., • f ' 521.753'2 /,220,515' 9 - 1,6104102 9. ' 2.316,102. 8. 2.579.453 S. , 2,345421' 8 3443.040, S ,3,932,342 „S., -4,000.329 3 4.081.5241
•
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. 04C. YAKIMA MODEL - Jule 2_2011 095
(425)467 -1602
62201112 42 PM Page 10 07 85
I D 0 •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Existing Debt Input
Existing Debt Service - Revenue Bonds 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Fund 484 Water /Sewer Redemption 1991 Bonds - SU232 [a)
Annual Interest Payment $ 36,962 $ 18.081 $ - $ - S - S - S - $ - $ - S - $ -
Annual Principal Payment 458,750 481.688 - - - - - - - - -
Total Annual Payment $ 495,712 $ 499,769 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service - 499,769 - - - - - - - -
(a] note: 91.75% allocation to sewr; 8.25% allocation to water, per City of Yakima Finance; Cost share: Terrace Heights: 4.0 %: Union Gap: 8.1%
Fund 488 2008 Sewer Revenue Bonds SU232 '
Annual Interest Payment $ 214,613 $ 206,613 $ 198,413 S 189,813 S 180,813 $ 171.413 $ 161.813 $ 151.813 S 138.813 S 125,063 $ 112,738
Annual Principal Payment 200.000 205.000 215.000 225.000 235.000 240.000 250.000 260.000 275.000 290.000 300.000
Total Annual Payment $ 414,613 $ 411,613 $ 413,413 $ 414,813 $ 415,813 $ 411,413 $ 411,813 $ 411,813 $ 413.813 $ 415,063 $ 412,738
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service - - - - - - - - - - -
Cost share: Terrace Heights: 4.0 %; Union Gap: 8.1%
Fund 493 2003 Sewer Redemption Bonds - Series B SU232
Annual Interest Payment $ 501,950 $ 501,950 $ 501,950 $ 501,950 $ 501,950 $ 478.750 S 435.250 $ 389.750 $ 342.000 $ 291;750 $ 239.000
Annual Principal Payment - - ' - - 580.000 870.000 910.000 955.000 1.005.000 1.055.000 1.110.000
Total Annual Payment $ 501,950 $ 501,950 $. 501,950 $ 501,950 $ 1,081,950 $ 1,348,750 $ 1,345,250 $ 1,344,750 $ 1,347,0 $ 1,346,750 $ 1,349,000
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service - - - - - - - - - - -
Cost share: Terrace Heights. 4.0 %; Union Gap: 8.1%
SIED (Supporting Investments In Economic Development) Revenue Bonds
Annual Interest Payment $ 236 $ • - $ - $ - $ - S - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Annual Principal Payment ' 5.466 - - - - - - - - - •
Total Annual Payment $ 5,702 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service 5,702 - - - - - - - - - -
•
Fund 493 2003 Sewer Redemption Bonds - Series A SU232
Annual Interest Payment . $ 119,694 $ 96,756 $ 70,506 _ $ 41,442 $ 9,244 $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ - S -
Annual Principal Payment • 725.000 750,000 775.000 805.000 255.000 - _ - - - -
Total Annual Payment $ 844,694 $ 846,756 $ 845,506 $ 846,442 $ 264,244 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service - - - - 264,244 - - - - - -
TOTAL REVENUE BONDS
Annual Interest Payment $ 873,455 $ 823,400 $ 770,869 $ 733,205 $ 692,007 $ 650,163 $ 597.063 $ 541,563 $ 480,813 $ 416,813 $ 351,738
Annual Principal Payment 1.389.216 1.436.688 990,000 1 030 000 1 070 000 1 110 000 1 160 000 1 215 000 1 280 000 1,345,000 1.410.000
Total Annual Payment $ 2,262,671 $ 2,260,088 $ 1,760,869 $ 1,763,205 $ 1,762,007 $ 1,760,163 $ 1,757,063 $ 1,756,563 $ 1,760,813 $ 1,761,813 $ 1,761,738
Use of Debt reserve for Debt Service 5,702 499,769 - - 264,244 - - - - - -
Annual Debt Reserve Target on Existing Revenue Bonds $ 2,260,088 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763.488 $ 1,763,488 $ 1,763,488
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Existing Debt
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 11 of 88
III 0 III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Existing Debt Input •
•
Existing Debt Service - Other Loans 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
•
PWTF Loan #1556 (Treatment Plant)
Annual Interest Payment $ 6,820 $ 5;115 $ 3,410 $ ' 853 5 -- $ - 5 - $ - - $ - $ - 5: -
Annual Principal Payment . 170.508' 170.50Q • 170.506 - 170,506 - - _ _ - _ -
Total Annual Payment $ 177,326 $ 175,621 $ 173,916 $ 171,359 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
. Cost share' Terrace Heights: 4.0 %: Union Gap: 8.1%
PWTF Loan
Annual Interest Payment $ 1.853 $ 1,236 $ 309 $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ -
Annual Principal Payment 61.731 61.731 61.731 - - - ' - - - _ -
. Total Annual Payment $ 63,584 $ 62,967 $ 62,040 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
PWTF Loan
Annual Interest Payment $ 2,045 5. 1,636 $ 1,227 $ 818 $ . 205 $ - $ - ,$ - -.5 - $ ' - $ -
Annual Principal Payment : 40.899 40.899 40.899 40.899 40.899 - - _ - -
Total Annual Payment $ 42.944 $ 42,535 $ 42.126 $ 41.717 $ 41.104 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ _
PWTF Loan #1638 (Treatment Plant)
Annual Interest Payment '5 9,800 $ 8,166 5- 6.532 $ 4,898 - 5 3,264. $ - 815 -$ : -, $ $ - $ . - $"
Annual Principal Payment • ' 183,374 - • 163.374 - 163 :374 " 163.374 • 163.374 ' 183.374 ' - _ _ .. -
Totat Annual Payment $ 173.174 $ 171.540 $ 169,906 $ 168,272 $ 166,638 $ 164,189 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Cost share: Terrace Heights: 4 0 %: Union Gap: 8.1%
PWTF Loan
Annual Interest Payment $ 700 $ 583 5. 466 $ 349 $ -232 .5 58 $ - $ - 5' - $ - $ -
Annual Principal Payment 1105 11.685 11.685 11.685 ' 11.685 11.685- - - - •_ -
TotalAnnualPayment $ 12,385 $ 12,268 $ 12,151 $ 12,034 $ 11,917 $ 11,743 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ _
PWTF Loan
Annual Interest Payment $ 4,658 5 4,270 5 ' .3,882 $ • 3,494 $ 3,106 $ . 2,718 $ 2,330 $ ' '1,942 5' . 1,554 5 1,166 5 778
Annual Principal Payment 77.625 77.625 77.625 • 77.625 77.625 77.625 • 77.625 ' 77.625 77625 - 77.625 77.625
Total Annual Payment $ 82,283 $ 81.895 $ 81,507 $ 81,119 $ 80,731 $ 80,343 $ 79,955 $ 79,567 $ 79,179 $ 78,791 $ 78,403
PWTF Loan
Annual Interest Payment $ 9,363 $ 8.778 $ 8,193 $ 7,608 $ 7.023 $ '6,438 5 5,853 $ 5,268 $ 4,683 $' - 4.098 $ 3.513
AnnualPnncipalPayment 117,037 117.037 117 037 - 117.037 117.037 _ 117.037 117.037 117.037 117.037 117.037 117.037
Total Annual Payment $ 126,400 $ 125,815 $ 125,230 $ 124,645 $ 124,060 $ 123,475 $ 122,890 $ 122,305 $ 121,720 $ 121,135 $ 120,550
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Existing Debt
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 12 of 88
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Existing Debt Input
PWTF Loan #2182
Annual Interest Payment $ 10:895' $ 10,290.5 9,885 $ 9,080 $ 8,475 $' 7,870 $ • 7,265 5 8,660 $ 6,055 $ 5,450 - 5 '4,845
Annual Principal Payment 121.053 121 053 - 121.053 121.053. 121.053 121,053 121.053 121.053 121.053 121.053 121.053
Total Annual Payment $ 131,948 $ 131,343 $ 130,738 $ 130,133 $ 129,528 $ 128,923 $ 128,318 $ 127,713 $ 127,108 $ 126.503 $ 125,898
Cost share: Terrace Heights' 4.0 %; Union Gap. 8.1%
TOTAL OTHER LOANS
Annual Interest Payment $ 46,134 $ 40,074 $ 33,704 $ 27.100 $ 22,305 $ 17,899 $ 15,448 $ 13.870 $ 12,292 $ 10,714 $ 9,136
Annual Principal Payment 763.910 763.910 763,910 702,179 531,673 490,774 315,715 315,715 315,715 315,715 315.715
Total Annual Payment $ 810,044 $ 803.984 $ 797,614 $ 729,279 $ 553,978 $ 508,673 $ 331,163 $ 329,585 $ 328,007 $ 326,429 $ 324,851
•
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Existing Debt
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 13 of 88
III 110 III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Project Costs and O &M Impacts in: 2010
Include Cogeneratation Project [1 =Y; 2 =N) • 1
Mandatory(regul
atory (new) and '
renewal '
Growth (new) (replacement))
For Conn Charge Calculation
Annual O &M Allocation to % Upgrade /
Fx Sewer Protect Description [a] Current Cost [b] Year Impact Life In Years Terrace Heights Function Expansion % R &R
and Union Gap
' • • ' Professlonal,engineeringservices 200,000 - '2010 5 100% • -Treatment 34% 66%
Professional engineering seMces ' 600.000 2011 5 100% Treatment 34% 66%
• Professional engineering seMces 1,300,000 2012 - 5 - 100% Treatment 34% 66%
Professional engineering seMces 1,000,000 2013 5 • 100% Treatment 34% 66%
• • . Professlonal,engineering seMces - 300,000 2014 5 100% Treatment 34% 66%
Professional engineering seMces • 1;000,000 2015 •. - 5 - 100% Treatment 34% " 66%
•.; . . -
i " Professional engineeitrg,aeMces 2,000,000 2018 . , • , 5 100 %, Treatment - 34% 66% - .
Professional engineering seMces . , 2,000,000 2017 5' 100% Treatment 34% 66 %'
,. Professional engineering seMces . . • • 400,000 • .2018 - 5 . " 100% Treatment . 34% •
. Profeeslonal engineering seMces • 400,000 ' 2019 ' . • . • 5 100% Treatment 34% 66 %'
Professlonalengineertngservices 1,000.000 2020. 5 100% , Treatment 34% 66%
. Professional engineering seMces 1,000,000 .2021 . • 5 100 % - Treatment 34 %' - 66% ..
• Professional engineering seMces 1;500,000 2022 5 100% Treatment 34% 66%
', Professional engineering,seMces 400,000 , 2023 • 5 - 100% . Treatment . 34% ' - ' 66% .
ProfesslonalengIneeringservices 2,500,000 2024, 5 100% Treatment , 34% 66% •
• SCADA system replacement:. - 735,000 2010 . 20 ' ' . • 100% Treatment _ 0% •- • 100%
. SCADA.sy cem . • .
stemreplaent• • ' 211,538 • 2011 20 - 100% '. Treatment. 0% 100%
SCADA s ' ystem replacement - e277,387 2012 , 20• 100% ' . ' Treatment 0% • , 100%
SCADA system replacement • ' - 2013 - 20 ' - 100% ' ' Treatment 0% 100% •
' : SCADA sy_ stem replacement, , . . - ' -2014 • 20 100% .Treatment 0% 100% . .
• - - stem
Y. .PI SCADA s re acement ' - 2015 20 100% Treatment 0% • 100%
SCADA system replacement -- - 2016 20 100% Treatment • . 0% 100%
i
SCADA a stem re laeement 2017 20 100% Treatment 0% 00%
Y P
SCADA system'replacement
•
_ 2018 20 100% Treatment 0% 100% •
• SCADA system replacement ' - - 2019 -20 100% Treatment 0% 100% • • - • ' SCADA system replacement - - - 2020 .20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
SCADA system replacement - 2021 20 100% Treatment 0% 100% -
: • SCADA system replacement - 2022 20 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
SCADA system replacement - 2023 • 20 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
SCADA system replacement - 2024 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
. Replace secondary scum pumps - 2010 15 100% Treatment 0% 100%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 14 of 88
• 1111 •
City of Yakima -
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
R secondary scum pumps - 2011 15 - 100% Treatment . • 0% . 100%
Replace-secondary scum pumps - 2012 - '15 100% Treatment . 0 % 100:%
' Replaca;secondaryscum pumps . ' 120,000 2013 15 100% Treatment 0% • 100%
Replace secondary scum pumps - 2 014 15 100% Treatment .0% 100%
. , Replace secondary_ scum pumps. - ' 2015 15 100% Treatment • 0%. 100%
Replace secondary scum pumps. - 2016 15 100% Treatment . "0% 100%
Replace :secondary scum pumps , - - • 2017 ' . 15- 100% . Treatment • - . 0% ' - . • 100%
., t : Replace secondary-scum pumps- ' - .. 2018 15 • 100%. Treatment 0% 100%
- : i Replace secondary scum puns - - 2019 - 15 - 100% Treatment • - 0%- . - 100%
. Replace secondary scum pumps - - 2020 15 100% .Treatment • 0% . 100% .
' Replace secondary scum puns - 2021 15 100% . Treatment 0% 100% • .
' Replace'secondary scum purnps ' ' - '2022 " ' - ' 15 - - ' - - 100 %' 'Treatment' . 0% • - 100%'
. Replace secondary scumpumps. 2023 - ' 15 100% Treatment - 0% - 100%
. Replace secondary scum puns - 2024 .15 100% Treatment . - "0% 100%
•
i : - RAS pun Improvements - 2010 ' 15 100% Treatment 1110% 0%
. RAS pun Improvements ' ' - 2011 15 100% , ' Treatment 100% 0%
' RAS pump improvements - 2012 . 15 - 100% Treatment 100% 0%
• , RAS pump improvements . - .100,000- 2013 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
RAS pump improvements 2014. 15 100% - Treatment 100% • 0%
•
RAS pump improvements . - _2015. 15 100% - Treatment 100% _ . 0% '
. RAS pump Improvements - - - 2016 " 15 100% ' Treatment - 100% 0%
. ' RAS•pump improvements - - - - 2017 _ 15 100% - Treatment ' • 100% - - ,0% '
. RASpump Improvements - . . . - 2018 15 100% - Treatment 100% 0%
' - RAS pump - ients - 2019 . ' ' 15 ' 100% - Treatment . 100% 0%
r . RAS pump Improvements . - 2020' - 15 100% Treatment • 100% 0%
RAS.pump improvements 2021 - 15 100% • Treatment 100 %. - 0%
RAS pump Improvements - - 2022 ' . 15 100% • Treatment 100% 0%
R■Spump improvements - 2023- 15 - 100% Treatment • 100% 0%
m ', ; RAS pump improvements ' ' . , - 2024 - 15 100% • Treatment 100% 0%
; Refurbish secondary,
fie launders' - 2010 . . . 15 - 100% . . - Treatment - - • .0% 100%
: Refurbist secondary.dart8er launders - 2011 . . • 15 100% ' Treatment ' 0 %. - . 100% .
' ; Refurbish -secondary derifier launders - 2012 - 15 - 100% - - Treatment _ - 0 %. ' ' 100%
' _ _. l- Ref urbish secondary, clarifier launders . 300,000 2013 - 15 100% • Treatment 0% 100%
4 . ; . ry•
RefurbIsh•secondaderifier launders - -2014 - 15 - 100% Treatment 0% .100%
Refurbish secondary Clarifier er launrs - 2015 • 15 100% Treatment 0% -
_ 100%
- Refurbish' secondary clarifier launders - - 2016- 15 100% Treatment ' 0% - 100%
.1 ! Refurbish secondary 2017 15 . 100% Treatment .0% 100%
_ : - Refurbish secondary'dari8erlaunders - ' 2018" 15 100% Treatment 0% 100%
: Refurbish'secordary darifler launders - 2019 15 - 100% Treatment. ' 0% 100%
Refurbish secondary (*rifler launders 2020 15 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
•
- ' .. ; ' Refurbish secondary clarifier launders ' . - 2021 15 100% - Treatment 0% 100%
' Refurbish secondary ifarifler launders - - - - - 2022• 15- 100% Treatment 0% 100% •
Refurbish secondary clarifier launders 2023 15' 100% Treatment 0% 100%
Refurbish secondary 'clarifier launders 2024 - 15 100% ' . Treatment - 0% 100%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 15 of 88
III
1111 .
• City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Secondary clarifier spray nozzle Installation 2010 10 ' • 100% Treatment 0% 100%
• . Secondary,darifier spray norzle,installation 30,000 2011 10 . 100% -- Treatment' 0% 100%
' Secondary clarifier spray nozzle Installation 2012 10 100% Treatment - 0% . ' 100%
Sedondary clarifier spray nozzle installation . - 2013 10 100 %' Treatment 0% 100%
• ' Secondary clarifier spray nozzle Installation - 2014 . 10 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
Secondary clarifier spray nozzleinstallatlon - 2015 10' . 100% • Treatment 0% `, - 100%
.. - - Secondary clarifier spray nozzle installation ' 2016 10 .. 100% - Treatment 0% - 100% •
. , Secondary darifienspray nozzle Installation 2017 10 100% Treatment 0% • - 10094
Secondary darifier spray nozzle installation -- - 2018 . ' 10 100% Treatment 0% .100%
,; Secondary dadfier spray nozzle Installation 2019 10 - - 100 %. Treatment ., i 0%, _ 100% - - •
Secondary-darlfier spray nozzle installation ' ' 2020 - 10 • 100% Treatment - - 0%• 100%
' - Secondary clarifier spray nozzle Installation ' - 2021- ' ' - - - - 10' ' ` - 100% Treatment ' ''096 - - ` - 100% -
Secondary deniter.spray nozzle installation • - 2022 , 10 . 100% Treatment 0% - 100%
• ' Secondary darifler'spray nozzle installation 2023 , ' 10 100% ' - Treatment 0% - 100%
' Secondary clarifier spray nozzle installation '2024 ' 10 ' 100% Treatment . 0% 100%
, . Primary sludge pump replacement 2010 10 - 100% Treatment 0% 100%
•
..' Primary sludge pump replacement 125,000 2011 10 100% Treatment 0% 100%
Primary"sludge pump replacement 2012 • 10 • 100 %. Treatment 0% 100%
.. Primary sludge pump replacement ., - ' 2013 10 100% - Treatment 0% - ' _ 100% •
. Primary sludge pump replacement 2014 '10 100% Treatment . 0% - 100% -
Primary sludge pump replacement - 2015. • • - '10 10 100% • Treatment 0% 100%
' Primary sludge purr replacement .' . - 2016 10 ' 100% • Treatment 0% • 100%.
Prlmary •pump replacement 2017 10 % 100% Treatrrent .0 100%
- !finery siudgepump replacement 2018 10 . 100% Treatment 0% 100%
- Primary sludge pump,replacement 2019' 10 100% ' Treatment 0% 100%
, , r I. . ; Printery sludge pump replacement 2020 10 100% Treatment 0% 100%
- • . Prirnary-studge pump replacement . 2021 10 100% Treatment _ 0% 100%
• Primary sludge purrs replacement' - - 2022 10 • 100% Treatment • '0% - .10046"
Primary sludge pump.replacament 2023 _ 10 100% Treatment , 094 100%
• ' , Primary'sludge pump replacement' 2024 10 100% ' Treatment 0% 100% '
' ' ', Retrofit'primary'splitbox " - 2010 - - 20 .' 100% -- Treatment '- ' .100% • • 0% " -
Retrofit,prtrnary split box . - 2011 20 ' 100% . Treatment- 100% 0%
' Retrofit primary split box 2012 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
C.: Retrofit primary split box - - ' - .506000: 2013 : . 20 100% Treatment . . : 100%
' Retrofit primary split box - - . 2014 •20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Retrofit primary split box 2015' 20 100% Treatment 100% 016
,, Retrofit primary split box,' 2016 . - 20' • 100 %. Treatment 100% 0%
;. . Retrofit primary. split box " - , 2017, 20 100% Treatment 10096 0%
' ' , Retrofit primary, split box • - 2018 • • 20 100% Treatment 100% • 096
' Retrofit primary'split box . . ' 2019 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
• Retrofit primary split box 2020 20 100% Treatment 100% 0% •
Retrofit primary split box 2021 . • 20 100% Treatment 100% ' 0%
' Retrofit primary split box 2022 20 • 100% - Treatment 100% 0%
• ' Retrofit primary split box - 2023 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Retrofit primary split box - 2024 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 16 of 88
III III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Structural repairs to"aeratfon basins #13 .. 2010 20 100% Treatment . 36% - 64%
Structurel'repairs to aeration basins #13 192308 2011 20, 100% Treatment" 3696 64% •
Structural.repairs,to aeration basins #13 184,911 2012 20 100% Treatment ,36% 64% '
`. Stnictural repairs to aeration basins 41-3 - • 2013 - 20 - 100% r Treatment 36% - . ' . 64%
. Structural repairs to aeration basins 413 2014 20 100% Treatment 36% 64%
Structural repairs io aeration basins #13 2015 • . 20 100 %. Treatment 36% -. 6496
' Structural repalrsto aeration basins 41-3 .158,063 2016 20 100% " Treatment
-" Stricture! repairs to aeration basins #13 ' 151;984 2017 ' 20 . ' 100% Treatment 36% _ ' 64% .
Structural ,repairs t
o aeration basins #13 " 2018 . 20 100% - Treatment ' 36% 64%
Structural repairs to aeration basins #13 , 2019 20. -100% Treatment 36 %. • 64%
• : ' "' . Structural repairs #13 • - 2020' - 20 100 %' Treatment 36% 64 %
• ' . : Structural repairs to aeration basins #13 2021 20 100% Treatment, 36% . 64% ' . • '' . , Stnutiural repairs to aeration basins #1-3 - 2022 20 100% Treatment e 36% • 64 %.
,, Structural repairs t� aeration basins 41-3 2023 20 100% Treatment 36% 64%
. Structural repairs to aeration basins 41-3 "2024 - 20 100% Treatment 36% .64%
Replace secondary clarifier skimmer mech ./ , 2010 15 ' 100 % - Treatment . 0% 100%
Replace secondary clarifier skimmer mach,/ , 2011. 15 100% Treatment 0% ' 100%
'. .' Replace secondary clarifier skimmer meth /s .2012 . 15 • 100% Treatment . 0% , 100%
' ' ' . Replace secondary darifler skiriirner mach. /s, . 2013 15 • 100% _ Treatment 0% 100% r. Replace secondary clarifier skimmer meth, /s 450,000 2014 15 10096 Treatment . 096 100%
I. Replace.secondery.darlfier skimmer mech./5 "2015 15' 100% , - Treatment _ 0% - 100%
Replace secondary clarifier skimmer rnedt/s, 2016 15 100% - Treatment ' 0% ' • 10096
' ' ' Replace secondary clarifier skimmer mech. /s 2017 - 15 100 %" Treatment 0 %, ' 10096
r' Replace`secondaryclerifier skimmer, mechJs. 2018 15 ' 100% Treatment 0% , , 10016
Replace secondary dadfier skimmer mechJ . 2019 • , 15 100% Treatment 0%" • 100%
- ,.,.••
eplace secondary clarifier skimmer mech./ , 2020 • 15 . 100% Treatment 0% . 10096
' • : Replace secondary clarifier skimmer mech./ .. , 2021 ' , 15 100% 'Treatment ' 0% • 100%
- ' Replace secondary clarifier skimmer mech./s...„ 2022 . 15 100% . Treatment . 0% - • ,100%
.: i Replace secondaryolarifier skimmer niech, /s 2023 15 100% Treatment 0% . 100% '
' ,' ; Replace secondary daiffierskimmer.medr,/ , 2024 15 100% Treatment • • 0 %• • 100% '
- New secondary clarifier, . - 2010 50 100% Treatment ' 10096 % • •.0 -'''
' ( Newseconda'rydarifier ' 2011 , 50 100% Treatment .. '100% 046
' New secondary darifler : 2012' 50: - 100% - " • Treatment 100 96' , .. . 0%
I i , New secondary darifier'- - 2013 . . • ' _ 50 100% Treatment • 100% • ' 0%. .
' , New secondary darilter 2014 50 100% Treatment " 100% 0%
New,secondary darifler - 2015 50 100% Treatment 100% 0% '
. - - . ' New secondary clarifier 2016 50 100% Treatment 10096 0%
- : • New secondary darifler 2017.. . '50 - 100% " Treatment ent 10096 0 '
' • New secondary dertfier - 2018 50 100% Treatment - 10016 _ 0%
. New secondary darf ier 2019- 50 100% - Treatment 10016 0%
New secondary clarifier - 2020 50 100% - Treatment 10051; 0%
. • : New secondary darifier . • - - 2021 ' 50 - 100%• Treatment ' . - 10096 0%
New secondary derifier - 2022 50 • 100% ' Treatment • 100% ' ' 0%
' . New secondary clarifier ' _ ' ' - 2023 50 100% Treatment 100% - 0% '
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 17 of 88
III
4111 •
City of Yakima .
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
New secondary darifier -- 2024 - 50 100% Treatment 100% '0%
Retrofit grit storage hopper - 2010 15 100% Treatment 50% 50%
Retrofit grit' storage trapper . - 2011 15 • 100% Treatment 50% • 50%
Retrofit grii storage hopper 150,000 2012 • 15 _ 100% Treatment 50%' 50%
Retrofit grit storage hopper " • 2013 15 ' 100% Treatment - '50% - 50%
Retrofit grit storage hopper . , • - 2014 15 . 100% , Treatment 50% • ' " . 50% ,
Retrofit gilt storage hopper 2015 15 100% Treatment, 50% 50%
' - Retrofit grit storage hopper - 2016 . - 15 .- .- 100% Treatment 50% • • 50%.
Retro grit storage hopper ,
fit - 2017 15 100% - Treatment 50% - • 50%
, . - ; Retrofit grit storage hopper - 2018 15 100% Treatment .50% . 50%
-. - ,- -. Retrofit grit storage trapper - - - 7 ° - - 2019- - - - - - • -- 15 - ' - 100% - ' - - Treatment° ' - - -- '50% - ' 50% ° - •
r' Retrofit grit storage hopper - 2020 15 100% Treatment -- . . 50% 5096 '
' Retrofit grit storage hopper 2021 15. 100% - Treatment 50% ' 50%
Retrofit grit storage hopper- - 2022 15 100% Treatment 50 %' _ 50% '
. , , ' Retrofit grit storage hopper - 2023 15 100% Treatment 50% 5095
' Retrofit'grit'storagehopper • - 2024 ' 15 100% Treatment 50% 5016 •
- 1 Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement - 2010 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
- i ' ,- Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement - 2011 20 100% - Treatment 0% 100%
Primary, dgestor bldg lighting reptacement , 60,000 2012 " 20 100% Treatment' 0 %. 10096
Primary- digestor bldg lighting replacement 2013 20 100% _Treatment 0%" 100%
Primary,digeator bldg lighting replacement _ 2014 20 • 100% Treatment 0% 100% • • • ' r. :' Primary digestor bldglighting replacement ., - . - 2015 • . 20 :: • 100% Treatment 0% . 100%
: Primary digestor-bldg lighting replacement "2016 20 ' . 100% 'Treatment 0% 100%
' '• - %i Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement • - 2017 20 100% Treatment - 0% "100%
.
Rririiary dlgestor bldg lighting replacement' 2018 20- . 100% Treatment . 0% • ' 100%
.,• Prinsary ,dlgestorbldglightingreplacement - 2019 20 . 100% Treatment 0% 100%
• ' Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement - 2020 20 100% ' . - Treatment 0% 100%
`; Primary digestor placeme - bldg llghting.rent ' - 2021 20 100% .- Treatment 0%, 100% ,
_i1 Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement ' - -2022 20 100 %' Treatment 0% • 100%
' ' . .. •' Primary digestor bldg lighting replacement 2023 20 ' 100% . Treatment . .0% 100%
;r Prlmary,digestorbldg lighting replacement . - - 2024 - 20 - 100% .Treatment • 0%. - 10096
" Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines - 2010 - • 20 100 %" Treatment 0% • 100% ,
': Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines . " - 2011 20 100% Treatment • • 0% 100%-
• Refurbish deft air compressor / pipelines 90,000 2012 - 20 100 % - - Treatment - . 096 - 100%
,:. Refurblshdaft air compressor / pipelines ' _ - 2013 - ' 20 • - 100% Treatment 0% . . 100%
... Refurbish daft compressor / pipelines .. 2014 - - 20 _ - 100% Treatment 0% 100%
' Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines - 2015 - . ' 20 ` 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
' . _ Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines - - 2016. 20 - 100% . ' . Treatment 0% 100%
• Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines , - . 2017 - 20 • l00% Treatment , 0% 10056
, Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines - - 2018 20 100% Treatment' 0% 100%
Refurbish daft alr compressor / pipelines - - 2019 20 . • 100% Treatment 0 %' . 100%
• : .' Refurbish daft'alr compressor / pipelines. 2020 20 100% Treatment 0% 10046
Refurbish daf - aircompressor / pipelines - 2021 - 20 100% Treatment 0% 10096
, " : Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines 2022 20 100% - " Treatment 0% 100%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 18 of 88
III .
III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Refurbish daft air compressor / pipelines ' - 2023 20 100% - Treatment. 0% 100% ,
Refurbish:daft air compressor/ pipelines - - 2024 . 20 100% Treatment - 0% ' 100%
Raise intermediate degrttter center wall - 2010 20 100% Treatment 100%
' - Raise Irrtemiedate degrttter center wail " - 2011 - 20 100% Treatment . 100% 0% '
. - Raise iiitennediate degrttter center wall. , . 250,000 2012 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Raise_ iritermediatedegtittercenter.wall 2, - 2013 20 100% ,Treatment - 100% - - , , - 0% '
Raise intermediate degrttter-center wall - 2014 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Raise intermediate degrttter center Well - 2015 20 - , 100% Treatment . 10096- 0%
Raise intermediate center.wall 2016 20 100% Treatment 100% " 0%
Raise Intermediate degrttter center wall' ' - 2017 20 -100% • _Treatment 100% 0%
-° -, °':" Raise interrtiedlate degrttter Winter well ` - - - ' - _ - - ` 2018 - _ - - 20 - - "- - 100% - - -- Treatment " . - 100% ' - " - 0% '
. Raise degrttter center wall . . 2019 - 20 100% Treatment 100% 0% •
Raise intermediate degd . _ tter center wall 2020 ' 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
; . - .
' ' Raise intermediate degrttter center wall - - 2021 20 - 100% Treatment 100% . ' . 0%
' Raise intermediate degrttter center well -- 2022 20 100% Treatment • 100% - 0%
Raise intermediate degrtter center well - • - 2023 _ ' - - 20 100% _ ' Treatment 10096 . 0%
Raise intermediate degritteccenter wall - 2024 20 ' - '100% Treatment 100% 0%
' a New centrifuge to replace exsting unit - 2010 20 ' 100% Treatment. 0% 100%
New centrifuge to unit . - . - 2011 . . _ 20 : 100% Treatment 0% 100%
New,centrifuge to.replace existing unit. - . 2012 • 20 ' - 100% ' Treatment ' 0% 100%
New centrifuge to existing unit 2013 - ' . .
. . 100% Treatment 0% - 100%
. ' : r " New centrifuge to replace existing unit , . 1,200,000 2014 - . 20 , .100% Treatment ' - 0% 100%
r ¢ New centrifuge to replace existing unit - - 2015 20 - 100% . . "Treatment 096 100% .
New centrifuge to replace.existing unit.' ' - 2016 - 20 100% . "Treatment • 0% ' 100%
, New centrlfuge`to replace existing unit ' - 2017 ' 20 100% Treatment ' 0% 100%
New centrifuge to replace existing :unit • - - 2018 20 . 100% , Treatment' 0% - ' • 100%
New centrifuge"to'replace existing unit • - 2019 20 - 100% . Treatment • 0% 1001/4
, ' , - '. New centrifuge to replace extstingunit - 2020 - 20 100% _ Treatment 0% 100%
m ' New centrifuge to replace existing unit • • ' 2021 20' 100% ' Treatment 0% . 100%
. : t New centrltuge,to replace existing unit ' . - 2022 _ 20 ' , 100 %• Treatment ' 0% • 100%
New centrfuge to replace existing unit - 2023 , 20 • , 1001/4' Treatment ' - . 0 %. 100% '
New centrifuge to existing unit 2024. 20 100% Treatment 0% , ' 100% '
"' Refurbish,primary,darifier drives and bull ' - - 2010 15 100% • . Treatment ' 0% - 100%
. ,, Refurbish primary Clarifier drtves and bulge: 100,000 2011 15 ., 100% Treatment . . 0% 100% .
' Refurbish .prtriary.darifier - drtves and bull gea .' : 100000 2012 15 100% Treatment 0% , 100% •
') Refiiibisti.primary cleiifier drives and bull ga. 100000 2013 15 100% _ Treatment - 0% 100%
. , - ,. Refurbish primary clarifier'ddves and bull ge: 100,000 2014 15' 100% ' ' Treatment 0% 100% . .
r,.' Refurbish primary dallier drives and bull ge. . - . 2015 15 100% 'Treatment 0% _ 100%
' :-- Refurbish,primary darifler drtves and bulfge: - 2016 - 15 • 100% Treatment 0% 100% '
'“ Refurbish primary danfler drives and bull ge= - - 2017 15 . 100% -Treatment 0% 100% - • ' Refurbish primary clarifier drives and bull gea - - 2018 15 100% Treatment 0 %. " 100%
5' Refurbish primary dart}ier drives and bull ge. - 2019 15 100% - Treatment 0% 100%
' • • RefurbIsh primary clarifier drives and bull gea . - 2020 ' _ 15 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
Refurbish primary darifler drives and bull gea - 2021 15 100% Treatment 0% 100%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 19 of 88
III III III
. .
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Refurbish primary clarifier drives and bull ge 2022 15 100% Treatment 0% 100%
, Refurbish primary clarifier drives and bull gee
•
- 2023 15 100% . Treatment 0% 100%
Refurbish primary clarifier drives and bull gee - 2024 15 100% Treatment 0% 100%,
. ' , La boratoryInstrumentetion. . . - 2010 100% Treatment 50% 50%-
'`, Laboratory Instrumentation - 2011 . 10 100% Treatment ' *50% 50%
• " 1 , , Laboratory Instrumentation , ' 100,000 2012 _ 10 10056 Treatment 50% 50% .
Laboratory Instrumentatlori 2013 10 100%. Treatment 50 %. 50%
. Labor Instrumentation 2014 10 _ 100% Treatment . - 50% 50%
Laboratory Instrvmentatton - 2015 10 100% Treatment 50% 50%
Laboratory Instrumentation . 100,000 2016 10 100% 'Treatment . 50% 50%
` ' Laboratory'Instnmrentatlon— • - - • _ - 2017- ' - - ` '-10' - - 100% — — "Treatment - - S0 %' °' - '50% '
' • Laboratory Instrumentation - - 2018 10 100% Treatment 50% 50% .
Laboratory Instrumentation . " 2019 10 100% Treatment - 50% 50%
Laboratory lnstrmentatlon * ' 100,000 2020 - -
u 10 . ' 100% Treatment '50% • 50%
, •.. Laboratory Instrumentation ' - 2021 ' 10 100% Treatment 50% 50%
. Laboratory instrumentation 2022 10 100% Treatment 50% 50%
•; Laboratory Instrumentation . - 2023 10 100% Treatment 5096 • 50%
' Laboratory I nstriimeritation, 2024 10 100% Treatment • 50% 50%
' NPDES /, 1.000,000 2010 TMDL 1.000 10 100% Treatment 100% 0%
NPDES /TMDL - 500,000 2011 10 • 100% Treatment - 100% 0%
NPDES /TMDL' 500,000 2012 10 10054 Treatment 10056 - 0% '
, NPDES /JMDL 1;000,000 2013 10 100% Treatment 100% 0%
'` NPDES . 1;000.000 2014 10 100 %, Treatment 10096 0%
? '' NPDES' /TMDL 1,000,000 • 2015 10 100% Treatment. , 100% 0% .
NPDES / TMDL 500,000 2018 10 100% Treatment 10096 s 0%
NPDES / TMDL 500,000 . 2017 - 10 100% Treatment '100% • 0%
NPDES'/TMDL, .' 500,000 2018• '' 10 -. 100 %, Treatment 100% 056 .
' • • ' NPDES; /TMDL 500,000. 2019 10 100 %. " " Treatment 100%. • . 0% "
'.. r , i NPDES'/ TMDL 500,000 • 2020 -10' . 100% Treatment 100% ' , 0% '
' '. NPDES / TMDL - - 500,000 2021 10 100% , Treatment • ' 100%
• t " NPDES /TMDL ' 500,000 2022 10 - 100% Treatment 100% - 0% "
NPDES / TMDL ' • 500.000 2023 10 100% Treatment' .100% , 0%
NPDES / TMDL 500,000 ' 2024, 10 100% Treatment ' 10096 - 09
•
' Stnrvite Fanning Process , ' 600,000 . 2010 15 , 10096 . Treatment „ 100% ' 0%
Strwite Ferr ng Process - 2011 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Struvite Farming Process - - 2 012 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
• Sinrv:t - Farming Process - 2013 15 100% Treatment 100% - 0%
' StruviteFarming Process " - 2014 15 100% . Treatment 100% 0%
Struvite Fanning Process - " • 2015 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
' ' Struvite Fanning Process 2016 15 100% , Treatment 100% 0%
• ' Struvite Fing Process
arm - 2017 15 10096 Treatment 100% • 0%
•
StnMte Fermi
arming Process - 2018 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
• Stnrvite'FarrningProcess - 2019 15 • 100% Treatment 10096 0%
Struvite Farming Process " . - 2020 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 - 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 20 of 88
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
- Stnrvite Fanning Process . 2021 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
, . • Struvite Farming Process • ' - 2022 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Stnrvlte' Fanning Process , 2023 - 15 100% Treatment 100% 0%
SMarite Farming Process 2024 15 100% Treatment 100% - • 0%
Magnesium•TankRelocate ' . • '50.000 2010 - 10 100% Treatment 0% 100%
•` Magnesium Tank Relocate 2011 - 10 , 100% Treatment
Magnesium Tank Relocate 2012 - 10 100% Treatment 0% 10096 -
MagnesiumTankRelocate 2013 10 100% Tmeatuient .' 0% • 100%
Magnesium Tank Relocate . 2014 10 100% Treatment : - 0% • - Magnesium Tank Relocate • 2015 10 - 100% Treatment 0% 100% . •- , `= Magnesium Tank 'Relocate - - _ - - - "2016' - - 10 -- - 100% Tree {rrient - 0% - - 100%
Magnesium Tank Relocate . 2017 -10 . 100% . Treatment . • ' '0% 100%
- Magnesium Tank Relocate 2018 10 100% Treatment 0% - - . . 100%
. Magnesium Tank Relocate 2019 10 ' - 100% • • Treatment - 0% 100% •
.. Magnesium Tank Relocate 2020 10 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
' • is Magnesium Tank Relocate _ • 2021 - 10 _ 100% Treatment 0% 100%
' Magnesium Tank Relocate . 2022 10 100% Treatment 0% 100%
• - • . : Magnesium Tank Relocate - - 2023 •' 10 100% . _ . Treatment - 0% : 100%
• . ' Magnesium Tank Relocate • , 2024 10 . .100% Treatment 0% 100%
Grade; SeparationProJect • 80.000 2010 50 , - - . 0% Treatment - 100% . 0% • '• Grade Separation Project 80:000 2011 50 0% Treatment 100% . _ 0%.
Grade Separation Project • ' 80,000. 2012 50 0% , Treatment '100% 0% ' •
' • • r i" Grade Separation Project ; 80,000 - 2013 50 0% Treatment. 100% 0%
r Grade Separetion,Project 80,000, • • '2014 50 . 0% Treatment .10096 096
Grade Separatlon.Project . - ' • '80,000 2015 50 0% Treatment 100% 0%
- ' , I. , Grade Separation Project: '2016 - 50- 0% Treatment 100% 0% •
- Grade Separation Project 2017 50 0% Treatment 100% 0% •
> Grade Separation Project - • _ 2018 50 .0% Treatment 100% - 0%
• i Grade Separation Protect - 2019 50 - • - • 0% • Treatment • 100% 0%
r Grade Separation Protect - 2020. .. '50 0% Treatment - 100% 0%
'. Grade Separation Project - . , 60 - - , .0% . - Treatment , • 100% 0% - . •
Grade Separation Protect • - 2022 • 50 0 %' Treatment ' . 100% • ' 0% •
• Grade Separation Project ' 2023 50 0% Treatment 100% 096
Grade Project ` " 2024 • 50 0% - Treatment 100% 0%
• • ; Security/Safety Lighting 200,000 2010 50 100% - Treatment 100% 096
. - Security/Safety Lighting • • 2011 50 100% Treatment - 100% 0% .
Security/Safety Lighting 2012 50 100% • • Treatment 100% 0%
Security/Safety Lighting , 2013 50 • 100% Treatment 100% 0%
' Security/Safety Lighting - - • 2014 . 50 100% Treatment 100% • 0%
•
' , Secunty/Safety Lighting - 2015 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Security/Safety Lighting 2016 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
•
Security/Safety Lighting 2017 50 100% . Treatment 100% 0%
': Security/Safety Lighting 2018 50 • 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Security/Safety.Lighting 2019 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 21 of 88
88 10 ZZ abed wd Z4 :Z1. L L0Z/Z /9 - z09I -L98 (s t')
d13 L LOZ Z eunf - 1300 141 VININVA 'DNI 'dfOBJ Sad A8 038Vd38d
- %0 %001 • Wev42J1 %OOL 09 81.0Z - - u!se8 uoneley meN '
960 %001 Wewieail %OOL 09 LLOZ - • u!see- uo!LeJeymeN
%0 96001 - Weu losul %001 09 9L0Z - - - twee uonaieV AaN '
%0 - %001 luewlea+l %00l 09 91. 0Z . - u! se8uolieieyaAaN .
96096001 Wewlea . • %00, OS 4LOZ - ' ' : uses uonereymeN -
' %0 _ %00I, We114aeJ1 %001 09 £10Z - - u!see uoneJey ; •. , . .
960 %001 tuewleeil %001 09 Z,OZ • uIra uollarBV !AeN .
• %0 %001 LuewteaJl %001 09 110Z . - • ulse8 009eJey aeN 2 , .
960 %001 Wewleail %OOl OS ' OW . . -• u!seg uoRBJay•meN , : ,
•
960 %OO. Weu4eau. . %001 - is • . . - 4Z0Z cp! iso!3 y asap . -
960 %OOL Weuiesul %001 OS £ZOZ - ' - 'sPlWSo 8 y ssep , i _ - • _ _
• 960 %001 Weu4eail -• . %001 OS. ZZOZ
sPIWso18 V'ssela
960 95061. Wawjea+t . .
%OOj OS LZOZ _sPll�ol9 V ssep
960 . %%O01 W8W 2601 %001. :0S 0ZOZ .. . . sp!pso!g y ssep i + ,..
960. • %001. Lueu4aeJJ. %OOt 09 . 610Z - • : . . - . sPlOSO$8 y ssep ,','
9 a • %OM. Lueu4eeJ1 ' %001 ' 05 _ '81.0Z • sP!N�!E V U .
. %0 - . %OOM' ' luew48a41 %001 09 : L1.01.' - ' ' - .. - sp!p ssep 1, , - -
%0 %061 - • ' Wewlee�l . - %001. OS - 910Z - • - - - ,. " spipso!8 V sselD ( . '
• %0. . %004 Weu4ee=1 %001 • 09 - 910Z ' - . . - . splps019 V. ssep '1'. , . .
960 96001 iuewiealj %001 09 VW - - sp!loso!aNessep ' -
' 9s0 96001 'Wewiesil %OOL 09 ' ' . £LOZ' - - e - . sP!ese!8.yssep ;;.
%0 - %001 Luawleail %001 09 ZLOZ LOL'ZL,'Z - `sp!loso!g.V ssep : - _
960 %001 • WeWiee/l. . %OOL 09 110Z - sP!pso!e.y s -
960 • %001 _ luewleeN. . . - %OOM ' ' 010Z - 'OS' s o V .: ' ' -
•
" Plea i j[1.V, ssep : '
. 950 • • %001 Wewteari• %001 • 09 4ZOZ - sielew mog Li!suea 6Uldwnd e6Pnls'.(iewud ,r _
• %0 %901 ' .W eil %OOL OS - £ZOZ - sraleui mog Apsuea 60!duind e6phis Aiewud , i' '
%0 %001. - Wewleeul %001 05 • ZZOZ - - . srelew mog /gsuea 6uidwnd ebpnic /iewlid , I ..,. - •
960 %OMOM - iuewleail .96001., _ OS 1ZOZ , - sew mog Il4sueQ 6u![9und ebpnis'I(iewud .
960 %O0, . luewieau, %001 - OS OZOZ - . &Jaiew mog /q!suea 6u!dwnd e6pnis I(iewud : , '
%0. %001 Wewiea- j %001 09 ' 610Z 000'009 'sielaw meg A4!suea 6u!itund ebpnis '
960 - %001 luewlesil , • %001 ' OS eLte - $JelaW mog Lllsuea 6u!dwnd e6ph!s fuew!id • - - .
• 960 - ' s%001. Wewleail %001 ' OS . LLOZ - - - sJelew mo �l!su 6u '
g eQ ldwnd a6pnis'tiewud
960 . %001 Luewieeii, %O0l - _ OS ' ' 910Z " - sJelew mom Nisuea 6L9dwnd e6pn!s tiewud , .
: %0 _ . - _ %001. • 14awlea?1 - - .. '36001 ' .OS _ - - _ S 10Z sielew MOB AlsuaO 6u!diund e6pn!s Aiewud ,.- , -'.. ..
%0 - %001. : - 1118448ai1 . .%001 OS 010Z - .steteui mog Al!sueQ 6u!dwnd e6pnis luewud , ° .
960. %001 - Wa1149e4 _ %OOl ' - OS £ la - w Siale moji-/q!suea 6L9dwrid e6pnis' iew!id .
960 96001 Wawieeil, 96001 OS . ' ZLOZ - • sLeiew mog q!sitea 6u!dwnci e6pnis tiaui!d . .
960 - - %001 LueueeaiL %00I • 09. 110Z - , sielew mog A!sueo 60160ind,e6pn!s tiewud :. - •
• 960 %O1 . We114ea4 %00, OS 010Z' - ' sielew mollIl !sueQ;6u!dwnde6pn!s'Aiewud y • •
%0 %001 WewieeJl %001 .05 P 0Z - - - _ ' '' ,6 u94 6 11'4eoss/ALUnoeS . ' .
. %0 9600' Luewieail %001 OS •£Z0Z • _ . - 6ug46!1 44lBS/IqunoeS -':,
- 960 %001 - WawteaJj %001 09 ZZOZ - • 6094611 ke1eS/LWrioe9 •
960 . 96001' WeuWeail - %OOL - 09 - LZOZ - - - •6094611 galespqiinoeS .. '
. , 960 96001 WewIee&L OL %O _ 09 OZOZ - - 6 u94 6 !1 lie4eS/!4ProeS •
wei6ord Zuewanordwi le ;ides
Apn3S Nell OLOZ A3!IRfl James
• ewiMeA Jo Aim
•
111/ • •
• III •
City -of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
-. . NewAeration Basin - 2019 50 - ' 100% Treatment 100%' 0%.
New Aeration Basin . - 2020 ' 50" 100% - Treatment 100% ' 0%
New Aeration Basin - 2021 50 100 %. Treatment 100%. 7 0%
New Aeration Basin, - 2022 50 100% Treatment , 100% 0%
New Aeration Basin '• - 2023 50 ' 100% . Treatment '. . .100% 0%
. NewAeration Basin - - 4,000.000: 2024 50 ' • 100% ' • . Treatment 100% 0%
' Headworks improvements - 2010 50 100% , Treatment - .100% , 0%
, •.: Headworks improvements . - 2011 50 100% Treatment • 100% .: 0% .
• • ' Headworks Improvements. ' . 400,616 . 2012 • - 50 100% 'Treatment 100% 0%.
Headworks improyernents . 1,777,993 2013 50 -- . 100% Treatment . '100 % - . 0%
' - --`'° Headworks m
improveents • - _ ' - - - 2014 - ° '- - - 50 -_ - 100% Treatment 100% 0%' -
' . - "•i . Headworks improvements. - 2015 - 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
' " • Headworks'Improvements 2016 50 100% . ,' Treatment 100% - .. 0%
Headworks inprovements • - 2017 50 • 100% Treatment • 7 100% 0%
. - Headworks impro4ements " - - 2018 50 100% Treatment - 100 %. . • 0%
. • ' Headworks.improvements - 2019 50 100% Treatment 100% 0% .
',; Headwcrks Improvements , . 2020 • 50 - 100% Treatment , • - 100% 0%
' Headworks Improvements - - 2021 50 • 100% Treatment 100% • - 0%
. , Headworks - 2022 50 100% • Treatment 100% 0%
'; works improvements • Head - - 2023 . - 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. , Headworks Improvements - _ 2024' - - 50- - ' 100% Treatment 100 %'
' - Membrane filtration processes . - - 2010 50 100% Treatment 100% '0% -
• ! Membrane filtration processes ' . 2011 • 50 100% Treatment . 100% 0%
' ; I Membrane filtration processes . '' - - 2012 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%• •
' i . Membrane filtration processes . - . - 2013 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. Membrane filtration processes 2014 50 100% Treatment 100% - 0%
y • ,' Membrane filtration processes - 2015 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. ..'i ; Membrane filtration processes • 2016: 50 100% • Treatment 100% 0% •
Membrane filtration processes ,2017 50 100% 'Treatment 100% . 0%
- • Membrane filtration processes _ 2018 50 100% Treatment'. ' 100 %' 0% '
:. Membrane filtration processes .. - . 2019 50 100% ' : Treatment' - • 100% 0%
'. ; ` ' r ' : Membrane filtration processes ' - _ 2020 50 100% - Treatment - 100% • 096
' ' Membrane filtration processes - 2021 50 100% • Treatment :'100% 0% . .
'''._ '. :' Membrane filtration processes. 2022' ' 50 - . 100% - Treatment 100%- 0%
:: Membrane filtration processes _ - 2023 50 100% - Treatment 100% . ' 0%
. -
Membrane filtration processes 2024 50 100% . Treatment 100% - - 0%
Air emission /odor control - - - 2010 50 - 100% . Treatment -100% 0% •
• Air emission /odor control- - . - • .2011 . 50 100% Treatment • . 100% 0%
. Alr enlssion/odor control 0 - 2012 - 50 100% - Treatment .100% 0% -
' . • Air emission /odor control - - 2013 50 100% Treatment- 100% 0%
_
, Air ertdssion/oddr.control . ' - 2014 50 100% - Treatment 100% . 0%
Air emission/odor control • - 2015 50 100% Treatment - .100% . 0%
Alr errdssion/odor control 1,000.000 2016 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Air emission/odor control' 2017 50 100% . Treatment 100% 0%
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 23 of 88
. II) II/
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study •
Capital Improvement Program
• ' ' Air emission/odor control. - _ 2018 50 100% Treatment '100% 0%
•, Air emission/odorcontrol ' 2019 50 100% Treatment 100% 0% '
. •• Air endssion/odor control' ' 1,000,0 2020. 50 100% . Treatment 5. 100% 0%
- Air emission /odor control' - . 2021 ., 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
• Air emission/odor control - - -. - - 2022 50 • 100% Treatment _ 100% 0%
Aireniisslon/odor control f , - 2023 • - 50 . 100 %, Treatment 100%
Air emission/oder control ' 2024 , 50 100% Treatment. - - - 100% ' 0%
NewIW 2010 50 100 %. Treatment 100% ' 0%
. New IW UASB - , • . 2,403,846 '. 2011 50 100% Treatment" 100% 0%
`, New.IW UASB . - 3,698,225 2012 - - 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
--- ',- New IW UASB - _ . ' ' ' - -- • _ 2d13 - 50 — 100 %` - Treatment ° " 100% 0%
• New IWUASB - 2014 50' - • 100 %. ' Treat nent 100% 0%
. , . New.I W .UASB - 2015 , 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
New IW UASB - - 2016 50 100 %. Treatment '100% 0%
New IWUASB - 2017 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
New IVY UASB - 2018 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
NewIWUASB - 2019 50 100% Treatment - 100% ' 0% '
• ,- New IW UASB . - 2020 50 100% Treatment -100% 0%
' New IW UASB 2021. 50 . 100% Treatment 100% 054
New I W UASB 2022 - 50 100% - ' Treatment . , - 100% 0%
' NewIW UASB' ' • . - . 2023 - 50. • ' 100% , - Treatment- ' 100% 0%. .
New IW UASB .. 2024 _ 50, 100% ' Treatment _ , 100% • . _ 096 -
Secondary Ciarlfier'Drtves and Bun Gears - 2010 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
` Secondary Clarifier Drivee and Bull Gears - 2011 50 100 % - Treatment 100% ' 0% '
Seconndary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears - 2012 . ' 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Secondary Clarfier. Drives and Bull Gears 133;349. 2013 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. . - , . Secondary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears ' 128,221 2014 50 .100% Treatment 100% • 0%
, :; • Secondary Clarifier Drives and,Bull Gears - - 2015 50 100%' Treatment 100% • 0% ,
• Secondary Clarifier,Drlves and Bull Gearo', - 2016 50 • '100% Treatment - 100% 0% .
' i Secondary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears . ' - - 2017 50 • . 100% Treatment ,100% ' - 0%
i Seconday Clarifier "Drives and Bull Gears ' ' 2018 ' _ 50 100% . ' Treatment .' . 100% 0% .
' Secondary: Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears - 2019 • 50 ., 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Secondary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears ' 2020 50 , 100% Treatment 100% ' 0%
- - ■ ' ' Secondary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears - 2021 50 100% ' Treatment . - - 100% . 0%
,- ', Secondary ClerifierDrives and Bull Gears - 2022 50 100% Treatment , 100% 0%
' Secondary Clarifier Drives and Bull Gears , - • 2023 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
.'''''‘• I i Secondary Clarifier-Drives and Bull Gears - 2024 50 100% Treatment . 100% 0%
" 'Cogeneration " . . ' • • . . _ 2010 50 100% Treatment 100% 096
' ' ;' Cogeneration , - 2011 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
-
' Cogeneration - 2012 50 100% Treatment 100% 096
• Cogeneration- -• 2013 50 - 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Cogeneration - - 2014 50 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Cogeneration - " - 2015 • 50 100% Treatment 10096 • 0%
Cogeneration ' - ' 2018- 50 100% Treatment 100% 096
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 24 of 88
III III
City of Yakima
• Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
" Cogeneration; • - 2017 50 - 100% Treatment . 100% 0% •
• Cogeneraton 2018 50: 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. • Cogeneration - - 2019 50 100% • Treatment 100% 0% • Cogeneration : • . - 2020 50 100% Treatment 100% - . 0%
Cage
ogeneration - • . - 2021 50 - • 100% Treatment 100% 0%
Cogeneration - 2022 50' • 100% Treatment 100%
_ - . Cogeneration - 2023 '50 - 100% Treatment 100%- 0%
Cogeneration • -• - 2024 _ 50 100% Treatment .100% 0%
' ' Grease receving station - - • - ' • 2010 _ 20 . • 100% - Treatment-. - 100% . . . ,0%
Grease receving station 400,000 _ ' 2011 20 100% Treatment 100% 096 • ' -' Grease recevingstation ' 2012 - ' 20 100% Treatment i00% 0%
Grease receving station - 2013 20 100% • ,. ' Treatment 100% • ' 0%
G }ease receving station • . - 2014 20 • 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. : Grease receving station . • - 2015 20 - 100% - Treatrnent - 100% 0% • -
Grease receving station - - - 2016 - 20 100% - Treatment 100% 0%
Grease receving station - 2017 • 20 100% Treatment 100% 0S6
Grease receving station - - 2018 20 100% • - .Treatment 100% ' 0%
• `' Grease receving station - - 2019 - 20 100% Treatment 100% 0%
. " Greaseleceving station - - 2020. ' 20 100% . - Treatment - 100% 0%
•
• • ' . i Grease receving station ` - - 2021 20 100% Treatment. 100% , - 0%
. ' Grease receving station - 2022 20 100% Treatment 100% - 0%
. .... '' Grease receving station . . - 2023: 20 100% Treatment - 700% , 0%
.• i, Grease;receving,station - .. - 2024 • 20 100% Treatment 100% 0 •
:: Newprimary.digestor - • 2010 - . 50 100% 'Treatment 100% - 0%
New ' . ' . - 2011 • 50 100% Treatment 100% 0% • New digestor • ' - - 2012 50 100% • Treatment 100% 0%
p rimary dig
New estor „ - 2013 50 • 100% Treatment • 100%' . . 0%
' New primary digestor . - - ' - 2014 50 . 100% Treatment . 100% 0% . •
New primary digestor 2015 50 100% ' - Treatment 100% • - 0% .,
" New primary digestor ' • 2016 - 50 '100% Treatment 100% 0%
. - . ; ' .. Newprtmary digestor. -- _ .. - 2017 50 • _ - 100% Treatment - 100 %.
New primary digestor - 2018 50 100% • • Treatment . 100% ' _ 0%
)' New primary:digestor - -- 2019 , , • 50 ` ' 100% Treatment - 100% _ - 0%
.: Ne•priinary:digestor 2020 • 50 100% Treatrnent 100% . O% r
New prtmary'dtgestor - 2021 , 50 100% Treatment' - 100% 0%
• New primary digestor • - 2022 50 - 100% Treatment 100% 0% ,
• New primary digestor • • - 2023 50 100% Treatment 1 00% 0 % •
N
• • ew primary - digestor - - 2024 • • 50 , . 100% - , Treatment 100% 0% •
Replacement of waste gas flare • - - -- 2010 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
', Replacement of waste gas flare . • - 2011 - 20 • 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
- _ • Replacement . of waste gas flare 80,000, 2012 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
Replacement of •waste gas flare - 2013 20 - . 100% Treatment 0% 100%
' Replacement of waste gas flare - 2014 20 100% Treatment - 0% 100%
'' . Reptacerrient of waste gas flare • - 2015 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
-
• PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 25 of 88
. 0
III •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
, . " . Replacement of waste gas flare - 2016 20 100% Treatment 0% • ,100% .
Replacement of weste'gas flare - 2017 20 _ 100% • Treatment ,0% 100%
. ' Replacement of waste gas flare . . - - 2018 20 ' 100% Treatment 0% 100% - -
Replacement of waste gas flare - 2019 , 20 100% . Treatment 0% 100% -
•' , Replacement of waste'gas flare 2020 20 100% Treatment - 0% - 100% ' •
' ' • Replacem e,g • ent of wastas flare , - 2021 20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
. ' Replacement of waste gas flare -. 2022 - 20 100% • Treatment 0% 100% . . •
Replacement of waste gas flare - 2023 • ' 20 '100% - Treatment . 0% 100%
i Replacement of waste gas flare - 2024 20 , - 100% Treatment 0% - 100%
" , • New Boilers - 2010 20 100% Treatment ' 0% 100%
i a • :`"' New'Boiiers -' - - - 384.615' • 2011 • .. 20 100% . Treatment • 0% " - -100%. -- • r New Boilers - 1,294,379 2012 20 100 %• Treatment • 0% 100%'
' New Bolters . • , • - 2013 20 100% , Treatment 0% " 100%
' New Boilers - ' - 2014 _ 20 _ 100% Treatment 0% . 100%
• ' New, Balers - . . - - 2015 20 ' 100% • Treatment 0% _ 100%
New'Boilers - 2016 .20 100% Treatment 0% 100%
New Boilers•'' - - 2017 20 100% •• Treatment 0% 100% • New Boilers . • .- 2018 20' ' 100% Treatment 0% • 100% '
' New Boilers - . - 2019 ' 20 100% Treatment 0% .100%
_. New Bolters , ' - 2020 20 100% Treatment • 0% 100%
New Bolters . ` - 2021 20 100% Treatment : 0% 100%
New,Bolters• _ ' 2022 20 100% Treatment 0%' • 100%
• . •' ' . ; • New Boilers ' • . . _ - 2023 • 20 ' 100% • Treatment 0% 100%
4 New'Boilers .. . 2024 . 20 100% . - Treatment - 0% .100% '
Sewer System Evaluation 200.000 2010 • 20 0% • Collection 50% 50%
•: Sewer System Evaluation 200,000 2011 20. _ 0% Collection 50% 5096
• ' Sewer System Evaluation - 2012 20 0% - Collection 50% 50% •
, .•• Sewer System Evaluation - -. 2013 20 - 0% • . Co lection - • - " 50% 50% .
•,' Sewer System Evaluation . - 2014. .20 . - 0% ' • • Collection 5096 50% • - , ' Sewer System Evaluation ; • - 2 015 20 . • 0% Collection 50% . • 50% •
" , Sewer, System Evaluation - - 2016 • "20 0% Collection ' .50% 50% '
: Sewer System Evaluation 2017 ' 20 . : 0% Collection 50% • • 50%
Sewer System Evaluation 2018 20 0% Collection 50% - - 5096 • ••'' Sewer System Evaluatloi1 - 2019 20 096 • Collection 50% . 5016
'' Sewer System Evaluation . • - 2020 _ 20 0%: - Collection • 50% 5096
' ' ,+' SewerSystern Evaluation • - 2021 ' .20 0% 'Collection 50% • 50%
•
Sewer System Evaluation • - • 2022' - 20 0% Collection 50% - 50%
' . Sewer System Evaluation - 2023 • 20 • 0% Collection 50% • . 50%
•
,, Sewer System Evaluation - 2024 20 • 0% Collection 50% 50%
.
Construction Prefects (repair) • 200,000 . 2010 50 0% Collection 0% 100%
, Constriction Projects (repair) 200,000 2011 50 . 0% Collection 0% _ 10096
Construction Projects (repair) 200.000 2012 50 0% Collection 0% 100%
•
Constriction Projects (repair) • 200,000 2013 - 50 096 Collection 0% 100%
' ' • . ' Construction Projects (repair) 200.000 ' 2014 50 • 0% Collection • 0% 10016
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867-1802 6/2/2011 12'42 PM Page 26 of 88
• III ••
City of Yakima S
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study"
Capital Improvement Program
Construction Projects (rep" air) - 200,000 2015 • - 50 0% Collection 0% - 100%
' Constnictjon Projects (repair) "200,000 2016" 50 0% Collection 0% 100%
Constnution Projects (repair) 200,000 2017 ' - 50 _ 0% Collection 0% 10056
. .. ' I Construction Projects (repair) 200,000 2018 50 0% Collection 0% 100%
Constraction Projects.(repair) 200,000 2019 • 50 0% Collection • 0% 100%
Construction Protects (repair) '200,000 2020 50 0% Collection 0% 100% ' •
ConstnictfonProjects,(repair)": - 200,000, 2021 50 • 0% Collection • 0% 100%
. Construction Projects (repair) 200,000 2022 50 0% Collection 0% 100%
; ' Construction Projects (repair) " 200,000 , 2023 • 50 0% Collection 056 10056
, - Construct
onstruction Projects (repair) , ,200 .2024 .. 50 0% Collection
. .
' - - ;- Congdon Sewer Main - - . - - ' - - 750,000 2010 ' - 50 0% Collection 100% 0% • Congdon Sewer Mein , - '2011 50 0% Collection 100% - 0%
Congdon Sewer Main - 2012' 50 ' 0 %, - Collection 100% . 0%
- - '. CongdonSeweiMain- • - • 2013 ' • 50 ,0% Collection' 100% 096
Congdon Sewer Main - 2014 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
, Congdon Sewer Main - 2015 , • 50' 0% , Collection '100% 0%
Congdon Sewer Main - . 2016 50 0% Collection 100% '. 0% •
. • . Congdon Sewer Main -- 2017 50 0% • " Collection 100% 0% '
' Congdon Sewer Main " . ' - 2018 50 0 %, Collection 100% 0% •
Congdon Sewer Main 2019 50 0% _ Collection 100% 0%
, , Congdon Sewer Mein . - 2020 50 , ' 0 %. Collection • 100% .. ' . 0%
Congdon'Sewer Main - 2021 : 50 .. 0% ' Collection 100% 0%'
- ', ' Congdon Sewer Main . - 2022 50 0% Collection ' 100% 0%
CongdonSewer Main . - 2023 50 0% Collection 100% • - 0%,
' Congdon Sewer Main , ' , -. ' " 2024 • 50 0% Collection 100% 056
- i • Neighborhood WW,Improvements . " - - 300,000 2010 50 0% ' • Collection 100%
' Neighborhood W W Improvements, - . 2011 50 • ' 0% ' Collection 100% 0%
Neighborhood )NW Improvements'- ' " - " 200,000 ' 2012 50 0 %, " Collection " - -100% 0%' • Neighborhood W W Improvements - • 2013 • • 50 0% _ . Collection 10096 ' • '0% ' • Neighborhood WW Improvements 200000- . 2014 ' 50 ` ;0% ' - "Collection 100% 0%
Neighborhood' W W Improvements • : ' - 2015 - "50 - • 0% - Collection 100% - 0% ' • ' Neighborhood WW Improvements - 200,000 2016 50 0% ' ' ' Collection 10045 0% "
Neighborhood W Improvements, , - . 2017 50' 0% • _ Collection 100% 0%
. • - + W Neighborhood WW lrnprovements ' ' - • . 200,000 2018 ' 50 • 096 Collection 100% , 036
Neighborhood WW Improvemeids ' " • - 2019 , 50 0% ' Collection 100% - 0%
a Neighborhood.WW,Improvements 200,000 2020 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
' - '" Neighborhood WW improvements- . - 2021 50 0% Collection 100% 0%'
Neighborhood WW Improvements 200.000 , 2022 50 • 0% Collection 100% 096 , .
Neighborhood WW improvements • - 2023 50 0% Collection - .100%. 0%
Neighborhood WW improvernents _200,000 • - 2024 50 0% 'Collection 100% 0%
Automated Meter Reading 750,000 2010 20 - 0% Collection 100% 0%
' Automated - Meter Reading 1,250,000 2011 - 20 0% Collection 100% 0%
' Automated Meter Reading'" • 2,500,000 2012 20 0% Collection 100% 0%
Automated Meter Reading - '2013 - 20 • 0% Collection 10096 096
-
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 27 of 88
III 4111) •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Automated Meter Reading - 2014 - 20 0% Collection 100% 0%
Automated Meter Reading - 2015 20 0% Collection 100% - 0%
Automated Meter Reading 2016 20 0% Collection 100% 0%
Automated Meter Reading - 2017 .20 0% Collection 100% 0%
Automated Meter Reading , , - 2018 20 - 0% -Collection 100% 0%
Autorriated Meter Reading 2019 20 0% Collection '100% 0%
. . ' r Automated Meter Reeding, - - - 2020 20 0% Collection 100 %, • ` 0%
• Automated, Meter Reading - - 2021 - 20 0 %' . 'Collection 100% - 0%'
' - Automated Meter Reading . - 2022. , 20 - . 0% Collection 10096 096
Automated Meter Reading 2023 20 0% - Collection
' Automated Meter Reading • - 2024 - - 20 0% Collection 100% 0%
'' Speedway/Race Street Interceptor . 850,000 2010 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
' Speedway/Race Street Interceptor 2,000;000 2011 50 0% • Collection - 100% 0%
' - Speedway/Race Street Interceptor . _ 2012 - - 50 - 0% Collection - 100% 0%
. Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - - - 2013 50 _ 0% Collection 100% - 096
, Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - . - 2014 50 _ - 0% Collection 100 %. .0%
A'•', Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - - 2015 50 0% Collection .100% 0% '
Speedway/Race Street Interceptor' - 2016 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
. ; Speedway/Race Street Interceptor 2017 - 50 0% Collection 100 %• 0%
'. " Spe Street Interceptor' . - , • - - 2018 50 0% . Collection ' 100 % 0% •
i . Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - . 2019 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
. Speedily/12
peedway/Race Street Interceptor - - 2020 . 5o " . 0% - - Collection , ' 100 %. - • 0% , . •
' ' Speedway/Race Street Interceptor . . 2021 50 0% Collection - 100% - ' 0%
. - - ' Speedway/Race Street'Interceptor • - .2022 50 0% Collection- 100% 0%
i -, Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - 2023 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
' , Speedway/Race Street Interceptor - 2024 50 0% Collection. 100% 0%
' Cowtche'Basin: • • ' 420,000 2010 ' 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
• Coeiche Basin ' ' . . - • • 816;000 2011 • • 50 0% Collection' 100% ' 0%
r i Cowiche Basin-' ." 2012 • 50 - 0% Collection 10096 0% .
Cowiche Basin 2013 50'- 0% - • ' Collection 100 %• 0%
?` t''. Cowtche Basin' - 2014 .. 50 _ 0% Collection ' " 10096 0%
Cowiche Ba p. 2015 50 0% . ' Collection 100% '0%• . .,
Cowidie Basin = 2016 • 50 0% • Collection • • 100% 0%
- ` Cowictie Basin . - 2017 . . 50 0% Collection 100% . . .096 -
• ;. Cowlche -Basin - . - 2018 • _ - 50 0% Collection • - 100% 0% -
- Coetohe Basin - . - 2019 50 0% Collection 100% 0% -
Cowtche Basin - . 2020 • ' • - 50 - 0% Collection 100% 096
Cowlche Basin '= - _ - 2021 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
CowldteBasin 2022 - '50 0% Collection '100%0%
Cowiche Basin '. - 2023 50 0% Collection 100% 0%
' Cowtctie Basin - 2024 - SO 0% Collection 100% - 0%
- - . Other Collection System Irpoevements 50,000 2010 50 0 %' Collection 100%' _ 0%
• Other-Collection System Improvements - 50,000 2011 50 0% Collodion - 100% 096
' - .- Other.Cotlection System Improvements 50,000 2012 50 0% Collection 100% 096
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 • CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 28 of 88
1111) III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
Other Collection System Improvements 50,000 2013 50 0% Collection 100% . 0%
Other'Co lection System Improvements' . - 50,000 2014 50 ' 0% • Collection 100% , 0%
' Other Collection System Improvements . ' r • 50,000 2015 50 • 0% . Collection 100% 0%
Other Collection System Improvements 50,000 2016- 50 ' 0% Collection 100% 096
: i Other System Improvements , ' 50,000 ' 2017 50 - 0% Collection 100% 0%
Other Collection, System Improvements • , ' 50,000 2018 • • 50 r - 0% Collection 100% 0% -
Other Collection System Improvements 50,000 ' 2019 50: • 0% - -- ' Collection 100% , 0%
Other Collection System imp rovernents - 50.000 2020 50- o% Collection . . 100% O% .
Other Collection- System improvements' • - -- 50,000. ' ' 2021 • Collection 100%
• Other.Collection System Improvemerds - . 50,000 ' 2022 . . so - o% • Collection • 100% 0% • ' ' . Other Collection System Improvements • 50,000 .2023 . 50 • •o% ' Collection 10014 0% •
- - - OlherCollectionSystemImprovements - '-- - - -50,000: - - 2024 - -- ` - - - - - -` - 50 - : -< -' - '0% • - Collection 100% . - -` '. -' — 0% - - .
Infill of non- sewered areas - - - . 2010 50 0% Collection • 100% . 0%
Infitl of nonsewered areas 500,000 2011 • • 50 ' 0% Collection ' 100% ' 0%
. '. Infili'of non- sewered areas 500 2012 ' . ' 50 0% Collection • 100%• 0%
. • InfitI s
of nonewered areas -• - • • 500,000 2013 50 0% ' Collection 100% - 0%
In ill of non: severed areas 500,000 2014 50 0% Collection - 100% 0% .
. , Infill of,non= sewered areas 500,000 2015 50 0% Collection- 100% 0%
• . Infili of nonsewered elves • ' '500,000 2016 , 50 0% Collection 100% - 0% . •
, • : i ' Infill of nonsewered areas - • • 500,000 . 2017 • 50 . • - 0% Cofection . ' 100% 0%.
:: iniilf of non- sewered'areas 500,000 2018 • . . 50 • 0% Collection 10014 0%
Infili,of non areas 500,000' - 2019 ' 50 0% , Collection . . -100% ' .. %' • 0 .
' lnfill01nonseweredareas ' - •500,000 2020 50• . 0% Collection -, •100% - , 0% • . ; IMO of non- sewered areas 500,000 2021 50 0% .. Coon 10
llecti 0% • ' Infifl of non- sewered areas 500,000' 2022. • 50 0% ' Collection 100% 0 • • Infill of non - severed areas 500,000 2023 50 0% Collection 100% 096
I Infiil of nonsewered areas- . . 500,000 2024 50 0% -. Collection • .100% 0%
New IW Lines ..2010 50 • 100% Collection' . ' 100% • 0% .
New IW Unes 201.1 50, 100% Collection 100% 0% •
New IW Lines ' • 924,556 • 2012: 50 100% . Collection • 100% .. 0%
. New IW Lines . , ' 888,998 . 2013 50 -100 %' Collec 100%' D%
+, ' New ivy Un es' - - ` - . 2014 5 100% Collection , .,100% 096
'r, New.IW Lines - - • ' - - . 2015 - .50 100% . Collection 100% 0%
L: New.IW Lines - . • - - - 2016 • 5 0' 100% Collection - 10016 0%
' New IW Lines . - - 2017 50 100% Collection 100% 0%
•' . New IW Lines - - - • ,2018 ' ' 50 100% Collection 100% . - 0% :
a New,IW Lines - 2019 . 50 - 100% Collection 100% 0% -
'' NewIW,Llnes., , - 2020 . 50 - 100% Collection 100% . 0% •
- • • • New IW Lines . • - 2021 50 100% Collection 100% 0% .
. - ' New IW Lines - ' . - ' 2022 50 100 % - Collection 10096 . 0%
. - • New IWUnes - 2023 50 100% Collection 100% 0%
' New IW Lines - 2024 50 100% . Collection 100% 0%
• - R&M Contractors . • 50,000' 2010 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
. • ' R8M Contractors 50,000 2011 ' ' 50 100% Treatment 5096 50%
• PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 29 of 88
III 1111 III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Improvement Program
R &M Contractors 50,000 2012 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
R &M Contractors ' 50,000 2013 50 100% Treatment. 50% 50%
R &M Contractors 50,000 2014 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
R &M Contractors - 50,000 2015 50 - 100% Treatment 50% 50%
. R &M Contractors ':• . 50,000 2016 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
' • R &M Contractors .= ' 50,000 2017 50 100% Treatment. 5096 50%
R &M'Contractors 50,000 2018 50 100% Treatment 5096 50%
R &M Contractors 50,000 2019 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
• R &M Contractors 50,000 2020. 50 -100% Treatment -50% 50%
R &M Contractors - - 50,000 2021 '50 - 100% Treatment 50% . 50%
- R &M Contractors 50,000 2022 50 100% Treatment 50% 50%
- R &M Contractors ' ' _ -, , -- 50,000 2023 50 10096: ' Treatment 50% 5096
R &M Contractors 50,000 2024 50 100% Treatment , 50% ' ' 5096
Total Capital Projects $ 76,639,674 $ - 70% 73% 27%
Total Upgrade /Expansion Projects
Total R &R Projects
Projects by Grants / Developer Donations -
Projects by Enterpnse Fund 76
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 CIP
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 30 of 88
• 0 •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Capital Funding Analysis
Summary of Expenditures 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Improvement Upgrades 8 Expansions $ 5,193,000 $ 8,734,000 $ 12,908,541 $ 6,181,508 $ 2,439,413 $ 2,427,223 $ 3,874,284 $ 2,381,460 $ 1,931,051 $ 2,435,287 $ 3,944,851
Repairs and Replacements • 1,242,000 1,763,040 3,491,501 1,580,434 2,542,103 1,076,738 2,146,184 2,161,115 669,230 695,999 1,384,028
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $ 6,435,000 $ 10,497,040 $ 16,400,042 $ 7,761,942 $ 4,981,516 $ 3,503,960 $ 6,020,467 $ 4,542,575 $ 2,600,281 $ 3,131,286 $ 5,328,879
•
Capital Financing Plan 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Project- Specific Grants / Developer Donations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Costs Remaining to be Funded 6,435,000 10,497,040 16,400,042 7,761,942 4,981,516 3,503,960 . 6,020,467 4,542,575 2,600,281 3,131,286 5,328,879
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES [NOTE A]
Outside Funding Sources •
Other Loan Proceeds .
Budgeted Transfers from Operations 2,246,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850
Capital Fund Balance 4,188,150 3,634,688 1,357,829 1,836,317 2,479,805 3,013,947 3,263,526 3,650,460 2,468,431 2,999,436 5,197,029
Revenue Bond Proceeds [Note B] - 6,730,502 14,910,363 - 5,793,775 2,369,860 358,163 2,625,091 760,265 - - -
Rates - - - - - - - - - - -
Total $ 6,435,000 $ 10,497,040 $ 16,400,042 $ 7,761,942 $ 4,981,516 $ 3,503,960 $ 6,020,467 $ 4,542,575 $ 2,600,281 $ 3,131,286 $ 5,328,879
TOTAL CAPITAL RESOURCES $ 6,435,000 $ 10,497,040 $ 16,400,042 $ 7,761,942 $ 4,981,516 $ 3,503,960 $ 6,020,467 $ 4,542,575 $ 2,600,281 $ 3,131,286 $ 5,328,879
Info: Capital Contingency Deficit - - - - - - - - - - -
Capital Fund Ba lance tested to 1% of plant -in- service
Info: Percentage of 2010 -20 CIP funded by Debt I 47.1
NOTE A: SELECTION OF FUNDING SOURCE FOR REMAINING CAPITAL FUNDING NEEDS -
I Select the Residual Funding Source 1;' 1 . I Bond Proceeds
1 - Revenue Bond Proceeds
2 - Rates
NOTE B: USER INPUT FOR REVENUE BOND PROCEEDS
-- I Select Amount of Bond Proceeds ( 2 I Calculated by the Model
1 - Amounts at Right ==> -
2 - Calculated by the Model memo: City planned bond proceeds: 2011 $7.OM; 2015 $6.OM
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Capital Funding
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 31 of 88
•
0 • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
•
Capital Funding Analysis
New Debt Computations 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
REVENUE BONDS
Amount to Fund $ - $ 6,730,502 $ 14,910,363 $ 5,793,775 $ 2,369,860 $ 358,163 $ 2,625,091 $ 760,265 $ - $ - $ -
Issuance Costs - 149,049 331,431 128,785 52,678 7,961 58,351 16,899 - • - -
Reserve Required - 572,917 1,329,743 516.703 211,350 31,942 234,112 67.802 - - -
Amount of Debt Issue $ - $ 7,452,468 $ 16,571,536 $ 6,439,263 $ 2,633,888 $ 398,066 $ 2,917,554 $ 844,967 $ - $ - $ -
OTHER LOANS
Amount to Fund $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Issuance Costs - - - - - - - - - - -
Amount of Debt Issue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Debt Service Summary 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
EXISTING DEBT SERVICE
Annual Interest Payments $ 919,589 $ 863,474 $ 804,573 $ 760,305 $ 714,312 $ 668,062 $ 612,511 $ 555,433 $ 493,105 $ 427,527 $ 360,874
Annual Principal Payments 2,153,126 2,200,598 1,753,910 1,732,179 1,601,673 1,600,774 1,475,715 1,530,715 1,595,715 1,660.715 1,725,715
Total Debt Service Payments $ 3,072,715 $ 3,064,072 $ 2,558,483 $ 2,492,484 $ 2,315,985 $ 2,268,836 $ 2,088,226 $ 2,086,148 $ 2,088,820 $ 2,088,242 $ 2,066,589
Revenue Bond Payments Only 2,262,671 2,260,088 1,760,869 1,763,205 1,762,007 1,760,163 1,757,063 1,756,563 1,760,813 1,761,813 1,761,738
NEW DEBT SERVICE
Annual Interest Payments $ - $ 335,361 $ 1,153,248 $ 1,438,982 $ 1,522,954 $ 1,488,825 $ 1,577,428 $ 1,555,189 $ 1,486,267 $ 1,413,968 $ 1,338,127 •
Annual Principal Payments • - 237,556 749.412 980,381 1,107,759 1,173,830 1,319,340 1,409,380 1.478,303 1,550,601 1.626.442
Total Debt Service Payments $ - $ 572,917 $ 1,902,660 $ 2,419,363 $ 2,630,713 $ 2,662,655 $ 2,896,767 $ 2,964,569 $ 2,964,569 $ 2,964,569 $ 2,964,569
Revenue Bond Payments Only - 572,917 1,902,660 2,419,363 2,630,713 2,662,655 2,896,767 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS $ 3,072,715 $ 3,636,989 $ 4,461,143 $ 4,911,847 $ 4,946,698 $ 4,931,491 $ 4,984,993 $ 5,050,717 $ 5,053,389 $ 5,052,811 $ 5,051,158
Total Interest Payments 919,589 1,198,835 1,957,821 2,199,287 2,237,266 2,156,887 2,189,939 2,110,622 1,979,372 1,841,495 1,699,001
. Total Principal Payments 2,153,126 2,438,153 2,503,322 2,712,560 2,709,432 2,774,604 2,795,055 2,940,095 3,074,018 3,211,316 3,352,157
Total Revenue Bond Payments Only 2,262,671 2,833,005 3,663,529 4,182;568 4,392,720 4,422,818 4,653,830 4,721,132 4,725,382 . 4,726,382 4,726,307
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Capital Funding
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 32 of 88
•
Cityofa 0 •
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Revenue Requirements Analysis
Cash Flow Sufficiency Test 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
EXPENSES
Cash Operating Expenses (including CIP O &M) $ 11,487,457 $ 11,834,687 $ 12,158,917 $ 12,502,809 $ 12,848,143 $ 13,231,727 $ 13,663,796 $ 14,111,639 $ 14,576,846 $ 15,060,784 $ 15,564,284
Operating Transfers (excluded from Coverage and Days of Reserve Calc) 2,289,366 174,366 157,491 157,491 157,491 157,491 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850
Existing Debt Service 3,067,013 2,564,303 2,558,483 2,492,484 2,051,741 2,268,836 2,088,226 2,086,148 2,088,820 2,088,242 2,086,589
New Debt Service - 572,917 1,902,660 2,419,363 2,630,713 2,662,655 2,896,767 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569 2,964,569
Rate - Funded CIP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Rate - Funded Debt Reserve - 3,169 0 - 264,244 - - 0 - - -
Rate - Funded System Reinvestment - 821,753 1,220515 1,810,602 2,316,102 2,579,463 2,945,421 3.443,040 3,932,342 4,000,329 4,081,524
Additions Required to Meet Minimum Op. Fund Balance - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
Total Expenses ' $ 16,843,836 $ 15,971,195 $ 17,998.066 $ 19,382,749 $ 20,268,435 $ 20,900,172 $ 21.726,060 $ 22,737,247 $ 23.694.428 $ 24,245,774 $ 24,828,817
REVENUES
Rate Revenue $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,219,957 $ 14,362,157 $ 14,505,779 $ 14,650,836 $ 14,797,345 $ 14,945,318 $ 15,094,771 $ 15,245.719 $ 15,398,176
Other Revenue 3,042,364 3,301,212 3,254,795 3,330,427 3,440,557 3,333.770 3,389,181 3,458,264 3,527,026 3,598,409 3,672,819
Use of SDC's for Debt Service
Operating Fund Interest Earnings 13,663 15,183 44.140 61.184 53,287 46.265 41,869 40,565 40,096 42.740 49,515
Total Revenue $ 16,995,795 $ 17,395,560 $ 17,518,892 $ 17,753,768 $ 17,999,623 $ 18,030,871 $ 18,228,395 $ 18,444,147 $ 18,661,894 $ 18,886,868 $ 19,120,510
USE OF OPERATING RESERVES $ , - $ - ' $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ . - $ . - $ - .
NET CASH FLOW (DEFICIENCY) $ 151,959 $ 1,424,365 $ (479,174) $ (1,628,981) $ (2,268,812) $ (2,869,301) $ (3,497,666) $ (4,293,100) $ (5,032,534) $ (5,358,906) $ (5,708,307)
check sdc terminiology
Coverage Sufficiency Test 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Coverage Test - Include Connection Charges Revenues (1 =Y; 0 =N)? 0
EXPENSES
Cash Operating Expenses (excludes City utility tax payments) $ 9,215,579 $ 9,511,957 $ 9,815,733 $ 10,131,134 $ 10,449,982' $ 10,835,117 $ 11,238,691 $ 11,658,852 $ 12,096,408 $ 12,552,180 $ 13.026.983
Revenue Bond Debt Service 2,262.671 2,833,005 3.663,529 4,182,568 4,392,720 4,422,818 4,653.830 4,721,132 4,725,382 4,726,382 4,726,307
Revenue Bond Coverage Requirement 2,262,671 2,833,005 3,663,529 4,182,568 4,392,720 4,422,818 4,653,830 4,721,132 4,725,382 4,726,382 4,726,307
Total Expenses $ 13,740,921 $ 15,177,967 $ 17,142,790 $ 18,496,270 $ 19,235,422 $ 19,680.753 $ 20,546,351 $ 21.101,117 $ 21,547,173 $ 22,004,945 $ 22,479.598
ALLOWABLE REVENUES
Rate Revenue $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,219,957 $ 14,362,157 $ 14,505,779 $ 14,650,836 $ 14,797,345 $ 14,945,318 $ 15,094,771 $ 15,245,719 $ 15,398,176
Connection Charge Revenue - - - _ _ _ _ _ -
•
Other Revenue 3,042,364 3,301,212 3.254,795 3,330,427 3,440,557 3,333,770 3,389,181 3,458,264 3,527,026 3,598,409 3,672,819
Interest Earnings - All Funds 98,275 65,259 87,562 130,203 136,171 140,534 142,333 149,676 160,241 207,566 251,674
Total Revenue $ 17,080,408 $ 17,445,637 $ 17,562,314 $ 17,822,786 $ 18,082,507 $ 18,125,140 $ 18,328,859 $ 18,553,258 $ 18,782,039 $ 19,051,694 $ 19,322,669
Coverage Realized • 3.48 2.80 2.11 1.84 1.74 1.65 1.52 1.46 1.41 1.38 1.33
COVERAGE SURPLUS (DEFICIENCY) $ 3,339,486 $ 2,267,670 $ 419,523 $ (673,484) 5 (1,152,914) $ (1,555,613) $ (2,217,492) $ (2,547,859) $ (2,765,134) $ (2,953,250) $ (3,156,928)
memo: minimum coverage required $ 2,262,671 $ 2,833,005 $ 3,663,529 $ 4,182,568 $ 4,392,720 $ 4,422,818 $ 4,653,830 $ 4,721,132 $ 4,725,382 $ 4,726,382 $ 4,726.307
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Tests
(425) 967 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 33 of 88
City oAlma III III
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Revenue Requirements Analysis
Maximum Revenue Deficiency 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Sufficiency Test Driving the Deficiency None None Cash ' Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash
Maximum Deficiency From Tests $ - $ - $ 479,174 $ 1,628,981 $ 2,268,812 $ 2,869,301 $ 3,497,666 $ 4,293,100 $ 5,032.534 $ 5,358,906 $ 5,708,307
less: Net Revenue From Prior Rate Increases - - - (601,709) (1,246,447) (1,936,920) (2,676,002) (3,466,744) (4,312,386
) ( (4,312,386) (5,216,368) (5,806,066)
Total Revenue Deficiency (before taxes) $ - $ - $ 479,174 $ 1,027,271 $ 1,022,365 $ 932,381 $ 821,664 $ 826,356 $ 720,148 $ 142,538 $ -
Additional Taxes from Revenue Deficiency - - 104,132 223,242 222,175 202,620 178,560 179,580 156,499 30,976 -
Total Revenue Deficiency (after taxes) $ - $ - $ 583,306 $ 1,250,513 $ 1,244,540 $ 1,135,001 $ 1,000,224 $ 1,005,935 $ 876,647 $ 173,514 $ -
Rate Increases 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Rate Revenue with no Increase $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,219,957 $ 14,362,157 $ 14,505,779 $ 14,650,836 $ 14,797,345 $ 14,945,318 $ 15,094,771 $ 15,245,719 $ 15,398,176
Revenues from Prior Rate Increases - - - 732,470 1,517,319 2,357,842 3,257,537 4,220,120 5,249,533 - 6,349,963 7,067,812
Rate Revenue Before Rate Increase (Incl. previous increases) 13,939,768 14,079,166 14,219,957 15.094,627 16,023,098 17,008,678 18,054,882 19,165,438 20,344,304 21,595,682 22,465,988
Required Annual Rate Increase 0.00% 0.00% 4.10% 8.28% 7.77% 6.67% 5.54% 5.25% -. 4.31% 0.80% 0.00%
Number of Months New Rates Wig Be In Effect ' 12 .12 12 • 12 12 12 . 12 12 . 12 12 12
Info: Percentage Increase to Generate Required Revenue 0.00% 0.00% 4,10% 8.28% 7.77% 6.67% 5.54% 5.25% 4.31% 0.80% 0.00%
Policy Induced Rate Increases 0.00% 0.00% 5.10% 5.10% 5.1096 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 3.00% - 0.00%
ANNUAL RATE INCREASE . 0.00% 0.00% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 5.10% 3.00% 0.00%
CUMULATIVE RATE INCREASE 0.00% 0.00% 5.10% 10.46% 16.09% 22.01% 28.24% 34.78% 41.65% 45.90% 45.90%
memo only: No of days of reserves 48 91 92 78 66 ' 58 54 52 54 60 60
memo only: min number of days of reserves 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45
memo only: max number of days of reserves 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
memo only. system reinvestment funding 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% '
memo only Annual CIP $ 6,435000 $ 10,497,040 $ 16,400,042 $ 7,761,942 $ 4.981,516 $ 3,503.960 $ 6.020,467 $ 4,542,575 $ 2.600,281 $ 3,131,286 $ 5,328,879.
Impacts of Rate Increases 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Rate Revenues After Rate Increase $ 13,939,768 $ 14,079,166 $ 14,945,175 $ 15,864,453 $ 16,840,275 $ 17,876,121 $ 18,975,681 $ 20,142,875 $ 21,381,863 $ 22,243,553 $ 22,465,988
Fug Year Rate Revenues After Rate Increase 13,939,768 14,079,166 14,945,175 15,864,453 16,840,275 17,876,121 18,975,681 20,142,875 21,381,863 22,243,553 22,465,988
Additional Taxes Due to Rate Increases - - . 129,466 268,190 416,754 575,778 745,917 927,868 1,122,372 1,249,253 1,261,746
TOTAL RATE REVENUE 13,939,768 14,079,166 14,945,175 15,864,453 16,840,275 17,876,121 18,975,681 20,142,875 21,381,863 22,243,553 22,465,988
Net Cash FlowAfter Rate Increase 151,959 1,424,365 116,578 (394,875) (351,069) (219,794) (65,246) (23,410) 132,186 389,674 97,759
. Coverage After Rate Increase 3.48 2.80 2.31 2.20 2.27 2.38 2.42 2.56 2.75 - 2.86 2.83
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Tests
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 34 of 88
• • 0
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Fund Activity
Funds 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
OPERATING FUND (FUND 473)
Beginning Balance [a] $ 1,388,311 $ 1,518,270 $ 2,942,634 $ 3,059,212 $ 2,664,338 $ 2,313,268 $ 2,093,474 $ 2,028.228 $ 2,004,818 $ 2,137,004 $ 2,475,745
plus: Net Cash Flow after Rate Increase 151.959 1,424,365 116,578 (394,875) (351,069) (219,794) (65,246) (23,410) 132,186 389,674 97,759
less: Transfer of Surplus to Capital Fund - - - - - - - - - (50,933) (21,982)
Ending Balance $ 1,518,270 $ 2,942,634 $ 3,059,212 $ 2,664,338 $ 2,313,268 $ 2,093,474 $ 2,028,228 $ 2,004,818 $ 2,137,004 $ 2,475,745 $ 2,551,522
Minimum Target Balance 1,416,262 1,459, 071 1,494, 949 1,541, 442 1,584,018 1,631,309 1,679,975 1,739,791 1,797,145 1,856,809 1,913,642
•
Maximum Funds to be Kept as Operating Reserves 1,888,349 1,945,428 1,993,265 2,055,256 2,112,024 2,175,078 2,239,967 2,319,722 2,396,194 2,475,745 2,551,522
Info_ No of Days of Cash Operating Expenses 48 91 92 78 66 58 54 52 54 60 60
CAPITAL FUND - ROLLUP
Beginning Balance [a] 8 8 ;461,218 $ 5,007,680 $ 2,894,822 $ 3,450,929 $ 4,144,232 $ 4,713,414 $ 5,023.198 $ 5,455,557 $ 6,007,248 $ 8,241 304 $ 10,107,956
plus: Budgeted Transfer from operations 2.246,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850 131,850
plus: Rate - Funded System Reinvestment - 821,753 1,220,515 1,810.602 2,316,102 2,579,463 2,945,421 3,443,040 3,932,342 4,000,329 4,081,524
plus: Grants / Developer Donations / Other Outside Sources - -
- _ _ -
_ _ _ - -
plus: Connection Charges 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650.000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000
' plus: Net Debt Proceeds Available for Projects - 6,730,502 14,910,363 5,793,775 2,369,860 358,163 2,625,091 760,265 - - -
plus: Direct Rate Funding - _ _ - - _ - _ _ - -
plus: Interest Earnings 84,612 50,077 43,422 69.019 82,885 94,268 100,464 109,111 120,145 164,826 202,159
plus: Transfer of Surplus from Operating Fund - - - - - _ _ - -
50,933 21,982
less: Use of Connection Charge Revenue for Debt Service - - - - - _ _ _ -
_ -
less Capital Expenditures (6.435,000) (10.497.040) (16.400.042) (7.761,942) (4,981,516) (3,503,960) (6.020.467) (4 542,575) (2,600,281) (3.131.286) (5,328.879)
Ending Balance $ 5.007,680 $ 2,894,822 $ 3.450,929 $ 4,144,232 $ 4,713,414 $ 5,023,198 $ 5,455,557 $ 6,007,248 $ 8,241,304 $ 10,107,956 $ 9.866,592
•
Minimum Target Balance $ 1,268,022 $ 1,372.992 $ 1,536,992 $ 1,614,612 $ 1.664,427 $ 1,699,467 $ 1,759,671 $ 1,805,097 $ 1,831,100 $ 1,862,413 $ 1,915,702
DEBT RESERVE
Beginning Balance [a] $ • 2,285,790 $ 2,260,088 $ 2,336,405 $ 3,666,148 $ 4,182,851 $ 4,394,201 $ 4,426,143 $ 4,660,255 $ 4,728,057 $ 4,728,057 $ 4,728,057
plus: Reserve Funding from Rates - 3,169 0 - 264,244 - - 0 - - -
plus: Reserve Funding from New Debt - 572,917 1,329.743 516,703 211,350 31,942 234,112 67,802 - - -
less: Use of Reserves for Debt Service (5,702) (499,769) - - (264,244) - - - - - -
Ending Balance $ 2,260,088 $ 2,336,405 $ 3,666,148 $ 4,182,851 $ 4,394,201 $ 4,426.143 $ 4,660,255 $ 4,728,057 $ 4,728,057 $ 4,728,057 $ 4,728,057
Minimum Target Balance 2,260,088 2,336,405 3,666,148 4,182,851 4,394,201 4,426,143 4,660,255 4,728,057 4,728,057 4,728,057 4,728,057
[a] 2009 Beginning fund balances per City records as follows:
Operations - includes fund #473 AND 484 (ww Rev Bond Redemption).
CIP - includes fund 472 (Swer Facility Cap Reserve); 476 (Wastewater Construction); 478 (Wastewater Facility Project)
Debt - includes funds 483 (1996 Sewr Revenue Bond Reserve); 488 (2008 WW Revenue
Bond); 489 (W /S Revenue Bond Reserve): and 494 (2003 Sewer Revenue Bond
Reserve. Funds 484 and 489 split 91.75% WW and 8.25% Water. per Yakima Finance.
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Funds
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 35 of 88
III III II
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of: 2009
Fx2 DescA lion Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
P Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
Total,Contributlons- in•Aid (CIAC) , . . $ (7,707,385) 100% - $ (7,707,385)
610 - Land ' . - $ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
2 , .Sanitary S e w age Treatment Plant - • ' - 1939 .5 11,923 100% $ 11,923 $ (763) 10.00 2.37% $ 2,647
• 1 . Sanitary Sewer Trans PInt -Land 8 L and Rights - 1957 '' :$ 97,583 - 100% $ 97,563 $ (6,247) 10.00 3.33% $ 30,431
3 - Land S Land Rights - - - 1959 1$ 1,595: .100% $ 1,595 $ (102) 10.00 3.63% $ 542
1 ' Sanitary Sewer Trens..Plant- Land/Land Rights , ' 1988 $ 390,375 100% $ 390,375 $ (24,997) 10.00 8.03% $ 293,455
3 Land &Land Rights . ' 1990 '5- 4,153 100% ' $ 4,153 $ (266) 10.00 7.53% $ 2,928
:3 Land 8 an
Ld Rights - 1990 _ $ 77,682 100% $ 77,662 $ (4,973) 10.00 7.53% $ 54,763
- $ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
620 - Buildings ' $ $ N/A N/A N/A
3 Structures/lmprovements . . . 1959 -$ 21,147 100% $ 21,147 $ (1,354) 10.00 3.63% $ 7,185
1, Rudlon'ROad Lift Station - Access Tunnel ' 1965 5 8,375 100% $ 8,375 $ (536) 10.00 3.31 % $ 2,596
3 , SWCturas & Imp rovements ' . ' 1966 . $ 221,950 100% $ 221,950 $ (14,212) 10.00 3.90% $ 81,011
. -3 . Structures 8 Irrrprovements • . . 1987 5 36,051 100% ' ' $ 36,051 $ (2,308) 10.00 4.04% $ 13.627
'3 . :Structures . Improvements - 1987- 5' . 22,170 100% $ 22,170 $ (1,420) 10.00 4.04% $ 8,380
• 3 - '. Structures' &Improvements' 1968. $ 28,858 100% $ 28,858 $ (1,848) 10.00 4.58% $ 12,382
1 -'; Sewage 'DiaposalSystem- Irnprovements. - - . 1970 •5- • 2,617 100% $ 2,617 $ (168) 10.00 6.61% $ 1,619 - •
'1 - 'Rudkin,RoaO Lrft Staton: - 1981 .'E 238,460 100 $ 236,460 $ (15,269) 10.00 10.00 % $ 223,191
:1 Rudldn Road Lift Sin - W.O. 5710 1981. $ 106,400 100% $ 106,400 $ (6,813) 10.00 10.00% $ 99,587
.
2 .Sewage Disposal SystemStructuresMlpr. 1981 $ 8,050,985 ' 100% $ 8,050,985 $ (515,523) 10.00 10.00% • $ 7,535.462
. ' 2 . SewegeDisposal Systern- Structures & Irnpr, 1981 $ 4,386,825 100% $ 4,386,825 $ (280,898) 10.00 10.00% $ 4105,927
- 2 'Sewage Disposal System -Eq. _ 1981 . $ 349,334 100% $ 349,334 $ (22,369) 10.00 10.00% $ 326,965
-2 Sewage Disposal System Equlpm . - . . ent" 1981 $ . 232,372 ' - 100% - $ 232,372 $ (14.879) 10.00 10.00% $ 217,493
2 .. .' Sewage Disposal System-Eq. 1981 $ ' . ' 454.665 100 %' $ 454,665 $ (29,113) 10.00 10.00% $ 425,552
• 2 Sewega Disposal Systerr;Eq, . • 1981 ' $ 248,878' 100% ' $ 248,878 $ (15,936) 10.00 10.00% $ 232,942
-2 - Sewage DlsposalSystem- Equiprent . - 1981 $ 199,862 100% • $ 199,862 $ (12,798) 10.00 10.00% $ 187,064
2 ' Sewage DlsposeISystem -Eq . • . 1981, $ 77,945 . 100% $ 77,945 $ (4,991) 10.00 10.00% $ 72,954
. 2 . .Sewage Dlspo 'SystemStructures'& Irrupt: 1985 $ 123.691 100% - $ 123,691 $ (7,920) 10.00 9.56% $ 110.688
2 Sewage Disposal SystemStructures 81mpr. 1985 ' $ 221,264 100% ' $ 221264 $ (14,168) 10.00 9.56% $ 198.004 -
, 2 , - Sewage Disposal Systemlmprom
veents '' . ' 1985 ' $ 6,773.968 100% $ 6,773,968 $ (433,753) 10.00 9.56% $ 6.061,855
2 Sewage Disposal System - Improvements' 1985 _ $ 1,849,685 100% $ 1,849,685 $ (118,440) 10.00 9.56% $ 1,655237
. 2 .. Sewage Disposal System- in�'overilents 1985 -$. 1,450,688 100% $ 1,450,668 $ (92,890) 10.00 9.56% $ 1,298,167 • 2 . Sewage Disposal System - Equipment 1985 $ 105,032. 100% $ 105,032 $ (6,725) 10.00 9.56% $ 93,991
2 ' Sewage Disposal System- Bldgs, & Grds. 1987 $ ' 8,348 100% - $ 8,348 $ (535) 10.00 8.04% $ 6,278
. ' .2 Sewage Disposal System- Improiements - - ' - 1989 $ 422,642 100% - $ 422,642 $ (27,063) 10.00 7.51% $ 297,133
2 : Sewage Dlsposal'Systern-Bldgs, Fixtures & Grda - 1989 $ 703,700 100% $ 703,700 $ (45,060) 10.00 7.51% $ 494,728
2 Sewage Disposal "System - Equipment - 1989 $ 763,011 100% $ 763,011 $ (48,857) 10.00 7.51% $ 536,426
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. • YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 36 of 88
•
•
•
City of Yakima .
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of: 2009 I -
Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total ClAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost '
' ' 3 - Structures'& Improvements 1990 $ 14,814 100% $ 14,814 $ (949) 10.00 7.53% $ 10,446 •3 Strudure s, 8 improvements' . ' .1990 -$ 63,349 100% $ 63,349 $ (4,056) 10.00 7.53% $ 44,670
- 2 ' Sewage Disposal System,Bldgs, Fixtures 8 Grds - 1991 $ 7.410 100% $ 7,410 $ (474) 10.00 7.11% $ 4,932
,2 Seviage Disposal System- Bldgs, Fixtures'8 Grds -.1992 $ 63.549 ' 100% $ 63,549 $ (4,069) 10.00 6.59% $ 39,209
2 1 ewage Disposal System • 1995 ' , •$ . . 148,800 100% $ 148,800 $ (9,528) 10.00 6.20% $ 86.408
2 •' S ewageDisposalSystems- Bldgs,FixL.BGrds • . 1995 $ 614,055 100 % __ $ 614,055 $ (39,319) 10.00 6.20% $ 356,579
1 •TricldingFilter`Mechanisms . - - '', - 1995 • $ - - 78721 100% $ 75,721 $ (4,849) 10.00 6.20% $ 43,971
' - 2 Compost Turner , 1995 S _ 69.817 100% $ 69,817 $ (4,471) 10.00 6.20% $ 40,542 • 3 Interior Flnishing/Landscaping 8 Fence ' - 1995. $ 90,705 100% - $ 90,705 $ (5,808) 10.00 620% $ 52,672
...1 _ 'Sanitary Sewer Trans, Plant Equipment ' • - . 1995 .$ 289,838 100% $ 289,638 $ (18,546) 10.00 6.20% $ 168,192 .
,. Project ,1300 _ 1995- $ .671,650 - 100% $ 671,650 $ (43,007) 10.00 6.20% $ 390,024
2 Project 1300 " . ' 1995 • $ 56,311 100% $ 56,311 $
(3,606) 10.00 6.20% $ 32,700
2 - TricktingFilterPump - . 1995 $ 4,366,722 , 100% $ 4,366,722 $ (279,611) 10.00 6.20% $ 2,535,738
. 2 . Trickling Filter Pump • ,, .. , , ' 1995 • ' $ 2,004.444' 100% , $ 2,004,444 $ (128,349) 10.00 6.20% $ 1,163,973
2 ' ,Trickling Fiftei Pump . • . 1995 - $ 6,788,679 . 10096 $ 6,788,679 $ (434,695) 10.00 6.20% $ 3,942,158
°1 •'Sanitary.Sewer Trans; PlantStruct:/Irnpr` ' - _ , • 1995- $ .630,569 100% $ 630,569 $ (40,377) 10,00 6.20% $ 366,169
r',2 Food Processing Spreyfield- Flood Drag. Repair' 1999 $. . 1,379,087 100% $ 1,379,087 $ (88,306) 10,00 5.65% $ 729,341
`•2 r•aWWTP Rehabilitation Phase11 -- - - 1999 - S - 260,831 100% $ 260,631 $ (16,689) 10.00 5.65% $ 137,837
2 - Nead■orks/Dtgester. (Lagoon) Modification 1999 $ 2,825,433 100% $ 2,825,433 $ (180,919) 10.00 5.65% $ 1,494,252
2 , r Headworks/Digester (Lagoon) Modification - 1999 $ 2,488,180 100% $ 2,488,180 $ (159,324) 10.00 5.65% _$ 1,315,893
>2 • ' Roadworks /Dige di
ster(Lagoon)Mofication. - • '1999- '' $ 2,180,905, 100% $ 2,180,905 $ (139,648) 10.00 5.65% $ 1,153,388
' : 2 :Class BiosotidsImprovements • . - 1999 $ . . 12,685 .100% $ 12,685 $ (812) 10.00 5.65% $ 6,709
• 2. WWTP ,Fadlity.RehabfTrk'Fitr/SCMVAC, - . 1999 'S' - 188,309 - 100 %' - $ 188,309 $ (12,058) 10.00 5.65% $ 99,589
3 Fac lities Update ' - ' ' , - 2002 $ 556,574 - -100% $ 556,574 $ (36639) 7.00 5.37% $ 195,806
•
3 'Comprehensive Pien Update ..2002 . $ • 379,577 :10096 $ ' 379,577 $ (24,305) 7.00 5.37% $ 133,537
.2 . Industrtel Sprayfietd,, - 2002 $. 460,447 100% $ 460447 $ (29,483) 7.00 5.37% $ 161,988
- . ; 2 Aeration Basin' Rehab • , 2005 $ 149,198 ' ; 100% $ 149,196 $ (9,553) 4.00 4.96% $ 27,711
• '2 - Wastewater Faailty Project - 2008 $ 608,424 100% $ 608,424 $ (38,959) 3.00 4.99% $ 85,246
. ' • .- $ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
.. 8$0: Imp'rovementa . . . . $ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
' 'Trunks -•:" - - - - 1956- - $ - ' 154,398 100 % $ 154,398 $ (9,886) 10.00 2.77% $ 40,092
1 _. Trunks - 1956 $ 26,131 100% $ 26,131 $ (1,673) 10.00 3.20% $ 7,833
.' 1 'Trunks" 1959 $ _ 202,291 100% $ 202,291 $ (12,953) 10.00 3.63% $ 68.729
1 i Waste's Trans, Trunks• • . ' , , 1959 S - 237,905 100% $ 237,905 $ (15,234) 10.00 3.63% $ 80,829
-. 1 ' Trunks' " 1961 $ 792 100% $ 792 $
• (51) 10.00 3.52% $ 261
1 • Sanitary'Sewer Transmission- Laterals. . 1961 $ 7,530 100% $ 7,530 $ (482) 10.00 3.52% $ 2,479
1 Trunks - 1962 $ 1,282 100% $ 1,282 $
(82) 10.00 3.20% $ 383
• 1 • 'Senitary'Sewer Trans.-Laterals 1962 $ 459 100% $ 459 $
(29) 10.00 3.20% $ 137
PREPARED 8Y FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 37 of 88
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study .
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of:1 , 2009
Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAO Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
1 Trunks . 1963 $ 191,519 100% $ 191,519 $ (12,263) 10.00 3.21% $ 57.601
1 • Sanitary, Sewers- Undassified - 1963 '•E 1,571,146 100% $ 1,571,146 $ (100,604) 10.00 3.21% $ 472,533
.1 Trunks ' - . ' 1963 E' ' 3.658 100% $ 3,658 $ (234) 10.00 3.21% $ 1,100
1 '8" Concrete Pipe 8-Manholes- ' 1963 $ • 24,594 ' "100% $ 24,594 $ (1,575) 10.00 3.21% $ 7,397
' 1 8' Cortcrete'Pipe 8 Manholes . • , 1964 , .5 7,621 100% • $ 7,621 $ (488) 10.00 3.25% $ 2,320
,. 1 - Trunks_ ; , , : _ 4 .. "- -- - - -_ , 1965 _ -$ -- 2,312 _ 100% _ $ 2,312 $ (148) 10.00 3.31% $ 716
' 1 - Trunks ' 1965 $ .11,102 '100% . $ 11,102 $ (711) 10.00 3.31% $ 3,440
1 Wastes Trans.-Trunks - • ' • .1965 - $ 790 • '100 %• ' $ 790 $ (51) 10.00 3.31% $ 245
1 ,' Concrete Pipes & Manholes • ' ' - ' . - . 1965. 5. 41,098 100% $ 41,098 $ (2,632) 10.00 3.31% $ 12,736
1 Trunks h 1 . ' . .1966 $ 23,586. 100% $ 23,586 $ (1,510) 10.00 3.90% $ 8,609
4 _ .Side Sewer - Connections - 1966 _ 5 1,585 , 100% $ 1,585 $ (101) 10.00 3.90% $ 579
'1966 $ 6,774 100% $ 6,774 $ (434) 10.00 3.90% $ 2,473
' <- 1 - . Manholes &Concrete Pipe : - - 1966 $ 139,999 • 10056 $ 139,999 $ (8,964) 10.00 3.90% $ 51,099
. 1 .Trunks' F. , - • ' _ - .1969 $ 48,394 100% $ 48,394 $ (3,099) 10.00 5.95% $ 26,949
4 = SldeSewerConnectioris".". ' - • . 1989 $ 1,860 • 100% $ 1,860 $ (119) 10.00 5.95% $ 1,036
1 Trunks'",
• 1969 $ 2,712 100% $ 2,712 $ (174) 10.00 5.95% $ 1.510
. - .Trunks' , • '1969- $ 12,520 ' 100% • $ 12,520 $ (802) 10.00 5.95% $ 6,972
.. :1 .Sanitary S'ewer'Transmission- Laterals - - ' - , 1969 - $ , 87,539 _ 10055 $ 87,539 $ (5.605) 10.00 5.95% $ 48,748
'' 1 SanitarySewer' 'Transmission - Laterals . - 1969 $ 81,053 100% $ 81,053 $ (5,190) 10.00 5.95% $ 45,136
1 San itary,Sewer:Transmisslon- Laterals 1970., $ 177,224 ' 100% • $ 177,224 $ (11,348) 10.00 6.61% $ 109,614
-1 _.' Trunks; '' - 1970 $ 53,380 100% $ 53,380 $ (3,418) 10.00 6.61% $ 33,016
4 Side Seeier Conecti
nons 1970 $ 13,000 - 100% • $ 13,000 $ (832) 10.00 6.61% $ 8,041
4 , .Laterals 1 , 1970 .$ 2,347 ,100% $ 2,347 $ (150) 10.00 6.61 % $ 1,452 • •
'1 - Trunks . ,. -, - - .. . 1970 -$ 52,621 100% $ 52,621 $ (3,369) 10.00 6.61% $ 32,547
1 ,. 'Sanitary.SewerTransmissior Laterals' _ ' - '1970 • 5, 172,952 _ 10056 $ 172,952 $ (11,075) 10.00 6.61% $ 106,972
1 Trunks. •;' ` .. -. , ", ' 1971 _ $ . .34,079' .. 10056" • $ 34,079 $ (2,182) 10.00 5.69% $ 18.151
'4 '_Side Sewer`'Connecllons • • ' • _ 1971 $ 4,514 . 10056 $ 4,514 $ (289) 10.00 5.69% $ 2,404
17runks' - - - 1971 '5 12,563 • 100% , $ 12,563 $ (804) 10.00 5.69% $ 6,691
1 '. SanitarySewerTransmission- Laterals • . • - 1971 . $ 141,635 100% - $ 141,635 $ (9,069) 10.00 5.69% $ 75,440
1 Trunks' ' . . • 1972 $ 96,485 100% • $ 96,485 $ (6,178) 10.00 5.46% $ 49,287
4 .. Side Sewer Connections - . - - - 1972 " _•$ 16,115 100% $ 16,115 $ (1,032) 10.00 5.46% $ 8,232
1 ' " Sanitary Sewers Undassified , • • - . - 1972 5. 43,639 100% $ 43,639 $ (2,794) 10.00 5.46% $ 22,292
• 4 Laterals , , - 1972 $ ' 1,039 100% $ 1,039 $ (67) 10.00 5.46% $ 531
• 1 ; Trunks _ . , 1972 $ 5,552 100% $ 5,552 $ (356) 10.00 5.46% $ 2,836
• 1 Trunks - .1972 - $ 1,674 100% $ 1,674 $ (107) 10.00 5.46% $ 855
. .1 ,Sanitary Sewer Tranamiasiori-Laterals . • ° 1972 $' 315,790 100% $ 315,790 $ (20,221) 10.00 $.46% $ 161,315 •
4 ' - Side SeWef Corine - - 1974 $ 849. 100% $ 849 $ (54) 10.00 6.44% $ 512
4 - Laterals , - 1974 $ • 19,655 100% $ 19,655 $ (1,259) 10.00 6.44% $ 11,852
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 38 of 88
• • 110
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study .
Plant -in- Service
Assets as oft . 2009 1 '
Fx2 Descrl lion Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
P Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
' 1 ' Sanitary;SewerTransmission- laterals . , 1974 $ ' 52,227 100% $ 52,227 $ (3,344) 10.00 6.44% $ 31,492 Trunks ' r' - - - - 1975 '5 55,493 100% $ 55,493 $ (3,553) 10.00 7.39% $ 38,362
•1 . Sanitary SewerTransmission- Laterals 1975 $ 112,851 100% $ 112,851 $ (7,226) 10.00 7.39% $ 78,014
• 1 • Sanitary S .Transmission = Laterals - 1975 $ 116,576 100% $ 116,576 $ (7,465) 10.00 7.39% $ 80,589
1 Sanitary Sewe•7ran$missio'i .Laterals, 1975 ' -5 19,073 100% • $ 19,073 $ (1,221) 10,00 7.39% $ 13,185
1 • >Sanitary Sevier Transmission- Laterals - 1975 _ $ _ 71,144 _ 100% _ $ 71,144 $ _ _(4,556) _10.00 7.39% $ 49,182
1 Sanitary Sewer Transmission - Laterals - . ' - 1975 $ 85,263 100% . $ 65,263 $ (4,179) 10.00 7.39% $ 45,116
1 • Senifa 'ySewerTrerumissloM.aterals _ ' . ' ; 1975 $ 126,839 100% $ 126,839 $ (8,122) 10.00 7.39% $ 87,684
4 _ Side Sewer Connections -.. _ . 1976 $ 5;283 100% • , $ 5,263 $ (337) 10.00 6.95% $ 3,422
4 Later - - '' 1978 '$ • - 46,324 , 100 % - $ 46,324 $ (2,966) 10.00 6.95% $ 30,117
1 Trunks ,' • '' . 1970 5 43,135 10094 $ 43,135 $ (2,762) 10.00 6.95% $ 28,043
1 - Sanitary .Sewer:Transmisslon.Leterals - '1976' • -S 44,137. 100% $ 44,137 $ (2,826) 10.00 6.95% $ 28,694
. .:1 .. :Sanitary Sewer Transmission- Laterals - 1976 $ ,67,580 100% • $ 67,580 $ (4,327) 10.00 6.95% $ 43,935
, 1 . , Sanitary Sewer Transmission - Laterals .. . 1976 . ' 5 •' 166,726 100% $ 166,726 $ (10,676) 10.00 6.95% $ 108,392
,1 ' Sanitar Sewer Transmission -Laterals• - '1977 $ • , 58.204 100% $ 58,204 $ (3,727) 10.00 5.91% $ 32,222
' '1 - Sanitar' SewerTransmission- Laterals - '1977 ' $ 120,275 100% $ 120.275 $ (7,701) 10.00 5.91% $ 66,584
1 Interceptors :WV,' 1978 $ 3;661,042 100% $ 3,661,042 $ (234,425) 10.00 6.35% $ 2,177,493
'� 1 , Intere S: eptors Frulfvale 8 Ri ver Rd. - - ., - 1978' '$ • 1,150,028 - 100% $ 1,150,028 $ (73,639) 10.00 6.35% $ 684,007
1 ' ';_sewer Retiabllitatiorr. •• _ - : , -1978 ' $ 257;864 100% $ 257,864 $ (16,512) 10.00 6.35% $ 153,371
4 ' • •Side Sewer Connactions. '.,_ - 1978'- $ 128,700- - , 100% - $ 128,700 $ (8,241) 10.00 6.35% $ 76,548
4 Laterals • ` , - 1978 -'$ , 24,362 100% , $ 24,362 $
(1,560) 10.00 6.35% $ 14,490
- 1 . Sanitary Sewer Transmission Laterals _ , 1978 $ - 201,054 100% $ 201,054 $ (12,874) 10.00 6,35% $ 119,582
1 -- 'Sanitary Sewer Transmission- Laterals 1978 $ 209,792 100% $ 209,792 $ (13,433) 10.00 6.35% $ 124,779
1 . Sanitary Sewer Transmission- Laterals '.1978... $ 249,081 100% $ 249,081 $ (15,949) 10.00 6.35% $ 148,147
1 - 'Inteicepto FalrviewSurnmac . - - ' 1979 , $ . 342 :418 100%. $ 342,418 $ (21,926) 10.00 7.90% $ 253,317
4 . Laterals':
- 1980 .$ - 9;969 • 100 %• $ 9,969 $ . (638) • 10.00 9.44% $ 8,810
- 1 Sanitary Sewe r..Transmisslon- Laterals „ , - 1980, $ 26,717 100% $ 26,717 $ (1,711) 10.00 9.4494 $ 23,610
- 1 Trunk - - 1981 .$ 3,075 , 100% • $ 3,075 $ (197) 10.00 10.00% $ 2,878
1 . Trunks ' ,. F _ " • • 1981. . - $ ' ' 48,383' - 100 %' $ 48,383 $ (3,098) 10.00 10.00% $ 45,285
1 Trunks.83rd 1981 - $ - 36,159 100% $ 36,159 $ (2.315) 10.00 10.00 % $ 33,844
1 Trunks- 72nd . • , - - - 1981 • - $ • 78;922 100% ' $ 78.922 $ (5,054) 10.00 10.00% $ 73,868
4 Side SewerConnectione, - 1981 5• 285,112 . 100 %. ' ' $ 285,112 $ (18,256) 10.00 10.00% $ 266,856
4 L aterals _ - - 1981 $ 9,286 100% $ 9,286 $ (595) 10.00 10.00% $ 8,692
, 1 - • Sanitaiy,Sewer Transmissions- Laterals' 1981 $ 1,513,456 100% ' $ 1,513,456 $ (96,910) 10.00 10.00% $ 1,416,546
1 Sanitary Sewer Transmission- Laterals - 1981 $ - 87,131 ' 100% $ 87,131 $ (5,579) 10.00 10.00% $ 81,552
1 Sanitary_Serier Transmission- Laterals 1981 $ .110,038 , 100% $ 110.038 $ (7,046) 10.00 10.00% $ 102,992
' - Laterals - . 1983 $ 14,000 100% $ 14,000 $ (896) 10.00 10.00% $ 13,104
4 Side Sewer Connections 1985 $ 25,370 100% $ 25,370 $ (1,625) 10.00 9.56% $ 22,703
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 39 of 88
• • r
City of Yakima -
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
- Assets as of:1 2009
Fx2 Descri lion Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
P Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total MAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
•
• 1 ' Sanitary :SewerTransmission;Laterals - ' - 1985 5• - 338,556+' 100% $ 338,556 $ (21,679) 10.00 9.56% $ 302,966
4 - Side Sevier • Connectiens' -, - 1986 $ 8,460 ' 100% $ • 8,460 $ (542) 10.00 7.76% $ 6,145
1 Sanitary ,wer
SeTransmisslon•Laterals. 1987$ 800;300 100% $ 800,300 $ (51,245) 10.00 8.04% $ 601,880
4 • Side,SeaerConnections - . 1988 $ - 128,177 ' 100% • $ 128.1177 $ (8,207) 10.00 8.03% $ 96,354
•, '4 •.• Side Sevier Connections • . - 1988 • ,$ 6,635 .100% $ 6,635 $ (425) 10.00 8.03% $ 4.987
1 Trunks: -` - - 1988'' $ 46,936 - 100% _ $ 46,936 $ (3,005) 10.00 8.03% $ 35,283
1 ' Sanitary Sawer:Transmission Laterals 1988 - $' 720,681 100% $ 720,681 $ (46,147) 10.00 8.03% $ 541,755
- .1 Sani Se Transmissions- Laterals • . . . 1988 S ' 52,293 100% $ 52,293 $ (3,348) 10.00 8.03% $ 39,310
4 :" Side Sewer, Connections - . - • - 1989 $ 13,953 - 100% $ 13,953 $ (893) 10.00 7.51% $ 9,810
. ' 4 Side Sew Connections ' . - . 1989 - $ - 80,595 ' 100% $ 80,595 $ (5,161) 10.00 7.51% $ 56,661 •
1 Sanitary .Sewer :Transmission- Lafarals , . 1989 $ 608,467 100% $ 606.467 $ (38,833) 10.00 7.51% $ 426,369
' 4 'SideSewer Connection§ • 1990 • $ 36;860_ 100% $ 36,860 $ (2,360) . 10.00 7.53% $ 25,992
1 .- SaniterySewerTransmiss ion - Laterals ' - 1990 $ 236,380 100% $ 236,380 $ (15,136) 10.00 7.53% $ 166,682
1 • Interceptors-eOth Ave. - . . 1992 $ 166;937 100% $ 166,937 $ (10,689) 10.00 6.59% $ 103.000
4 - Slde,SewerConnecfions• - ' ' - • • 1992 . $ ' 122,759- .100% $ 122,759 $ (7,861) 10.00 6.59% $ 75,742
. • '1 .- Sanitary SewerTransmissions- Laterals . - 1992 $ ' 298,971 100% $ 298,971 $ (19,144) 10.00 6.59% $ 184,464
' • 1 ," Sanitary Sewer Transmissions L aterals 1993 $ 156,460 • 100% $ 156,460 $ (10,018) 10.00 5.82% $ 85,195
1 . Sanitary ,Sewer Transmissions -Laterals .. - 1994 $ ' 377,140 - 100% - - $ 377,140 $ (24,149) 10.00 6.45% $ 227,672
1 Michelsenlnd'.' 1995 S. 25,575 100% $ 25,575 $ ( 1,638) 10.00 6.20% $ 14,851
1 San .Sewei.Trans. -Yak' WorkRelease; • 1995 $ ' 72,508 ' 100% $ 72.508 $ (4,643) 10.00 6.20% $ 42,105
. ` 1 San; Sevier Trans: Yakima Work Release . . ' . 1995 • $ 196,485 100% $ 196,485 $ (12,581) 10.00 6.20% $ 114,098
1 S an. ComerstoneApts. 1995 - $ 30,057' , 100 %, $ 30,057 $ (1,925) 10.00 6.20% $ 17,454 • 1 • San. Se ve(Trans,- Lincoln Estates - - 1995 $ '24,000 100% - • $ 24,000 $ (1,537) 10.00 6.20% $ 13,937
. -1 - San.-'SewerTmns:-Woodwlnds West .. 1995 . $ 138,166 100% ' $ 138,166 $ (8,847) 10.00 6.20% $ 80,232
. 4 San: Sewer Trans- Hochrein • . - . , - ' '.1995 $ .. . 41,950 100% $ 41,950 $ (2,686) 10.00 6.20% $ 24,360
1 San.`SewerTrans- Yak.Cnty Fair WS Extension ' ' 1995' - $ - - 9,030,, 100% ' . $ 9,030 $ (578) 10.00 6.20% $ 5,244
1 - San Sewer•Trena,- Chestnut Grove . • : 1995 , $ ' 55,905 - 100% $ 55.905 $ (3,580) 10.00 6.20% $ 32,464
1 • San, SewerTrans- Mt..OliveLutheran _ - ..,1995 . .$ -. ' 45,743 , 100 % - $ 45,743 $ (2,929) 10.00 6.20 % $ 26,563
1 ' San..',Sewer Trans.: Manhole at 44th Ave . , - • - - 1995 S • 2,613, 100% $ 2,613 $ (167) 10.00 6.20% $ 1,517
1 'San: Sewer Trans.-Manhoie-0ek St. . ' • - - . 1996 $ . • 11,792 100% ' $ 11,792 $ (755) 10.00 6.01% $ 6,635
- - 1 '-'San.'Sewer;Mantioles- 27th &'.Tahoma = ... 1996. $' 36, 100% $ 36,133 $ (2,314) 10.00 6.01% $ 20,330
' ' 1 '' Sanitary Sewai- Manholes -88t1.& Yakima' 1998 • , • $ 7,498. 100% $ 7,498 $ (480) 10.00 • 6.01% $ 4,219
.1 : `SanitarySewer- Manholes- 74tNLogarnMola 1998 . $ • - 2,125 . 100% $ 2,125 $ (136) 10.00 6.01% $ 1,195
' 1 : Sewer- Manholes -22nd& Viola . .1996 . $ 4,064 100% . $ 4,064 $ (260) 10.00 6.01% $ 2,286
' 9 ;' San Sewer- Manholes- 72nd & Washington • 1996. S 377,092 .100% , $ 377.092 $ (24,146) 10.00 6.01% $ 212.168
-'1 ' San. Sewef- Manholes -8th & Hathaway. . • . - 1996 $ .39.434 100%. • $ 39.4:34 $ (2,525) 10.00 6.01% $ 22,187
- - 1 - San. Sewer -M anhotaa-1-82/Target - - _ - 4 1996 $ . 78,000 100% $ 78,000 $ (4,995) 10.00 6.01% $ 43,886
. 1 ' San. Sewer- Manholes- Tieton & 74th. - 1998 $' 34,500 100% ' $ 34,500 $ (2.209) 10.00 6.01% $ 19,411
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 - Plant -in- Seance
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 40 Of 88
III III ID
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service .
Assets as of:l 2009
Fx2 Description Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
'1 San. Sewer- Menho(es34th & Nob Hill .. 1998- . $ . 12,574 100% $ 12,574 $ (805) 10.00 6.01% $ 7,074
, : 1 - San. Sewer- Manholes -8th 8 J'Street - " ' - - 1997 $ - ' 49,030 • 100% $ 49,030 $ (3,140) 10.00 5.78% $ 26,506
'.1 San. Sewer - Manholes -N 881h/Alpine Court • . - 1997 , $ - 74,840 100% $ 74.840 $ (4,792) 10,00 5.78% $ 40,458
.1 • ` Sen ..Sewer -Mash oles -70th & Lindgren • , 1997 • , $ 115,714 100% $ 115.714 $ (7,409) 10.00 5.78% $ 62,555
1 • Sen. Sewer - Mariholes - Wash. & Longfitxe, • • - -- 1997 '5 17,748 100% $ 17,748 $ (1,136) 10.00 5.78% $ 9,594
1 - San. Sewer - Manholes - Englewood Hts. • - - _ _ 1997 $ . - 15:549 . 100% - $ 15,549 $ (9 10.00 5.78% $ 8,406
- 1 ' San. Sewer- Manhetes- Madison & 8th Ave - - 1997 ' $ . 105,133 100% $ 105,133 $ (6,732) 10.00 5.78% $ 56,835
.4 , Side Sewer Connections' - - 1998 - 5' '.45,037 100% $ 45,037 $ (2,884) 10.00 5.32% $ 22,426
_ 1 - :'San.SewerTrans- VeriousProjects ' '1998. $ 441,736- . - 100% . $ 441,736 $ (28,285) 10.00 5.32% $ 219,963
1 ' North First St Interceptor . , , , . 1999 • , $ 910,213, 100% $ 910,213 $ (58,283) 10.00 5.65% $ 481,373
1 ' , Airport/Armory Interceptor. ' - .- - , 1999 , 5 79,436 100% $ 7 9,436 $
- (5,086) 10.00 5.65% $ 42,010
7 . SewertJneReplacement - 1999 $ 1,830,709 100% $ 1,830,709 $ (117,224) 10.00 555% $ 968,184
• . _Sewer Line - Pierce Ave.` • , -- - - 1999 $ 386,864 100% ' $ 386,864 $ (24,772) 10.00 5.65% $ 204,596
- - 4 ' `SideSewerConnecions 1999 $ 113,063 100% $ 113,063 $ (7,240) 10.00 5.65% $ 59,794 .
' 1 + Montessori - Menholes&aterals ' 1999 $ 11,476 100% $ 11,476 $ (735) 10.00 5.65% $ 6,069
.1 Wide Hollow Manholes - 1999$ 32,080 100% $ 32,080 $ (2,054) 10.00 5.65% $ 16,966 • 1 Lantrip- Laterels/Mantioles : • . 1999 $ 19,963. 100% , $ 19,963 $ (1,278) 10.00 555% $ 10,558
. - 1 , ;'Stonehedge=Laterels/Manholes' ?. - ' • -1999" - $ 14,430 • 100 % - $ 14,430 $ (924) 10,00 555% $ 7,631
1 San, Sewar'Trans,Svendseri . -. 1999 5 . 15,675 '100% $ 15,675 $ (1,004) 10.00 5.65% $ 8,290
'1 HIgn.Valley- Laterals/Manholes. . - • 1999 - -S - 86,696 :100% $ 86,696 $ (5,551) 10.00 5.65% $ 45,850
1 ';.. ' Laterals/Mantloles ` ' • . 1999 $ 75,628 ' 100% $ 75528 $ (4,843) 10.00 555% $ 39,996
' 1 Scenic Drive- Laterals/Manholes '` • _ - 1999 $ . 160,399 100% $ 160,399 $ (10,271) 10.00 5.65% $ 84,828
- 1 . C-esllevele-- Laterals/Manholes • • - 1999 -$ 33,370 .100% $ 33,370 $ (2,137) 10.00 5.65% $ 17,648
,1 '"Snotdst= iLaterela/Manholes - - 1999 '5 18,740 100% • $ 16,740 $ (1,072) 10.00 5.65% $ 8,853
' 1 ' - Yakima Housing'- :Laterels/Manholes 1999 $ ' . '8,038 100% $ - 6,038 $ (387) 10.00 555 $ 3,193
" ` - 1 ;Maintain ' S hadows- L - 1999 $ 56,300 100% $ 56,300 $ (3,605) 10.00 5.65% $ 29,775
1 '• V•ista.Del ∎ Rey -Later is /Manholes 1999 $ 49,494 • 100% , $ 49,494 $ (3,169) 10.00 5.65% $ 26,175
'1 . Thompson Tralls=Laterals/Manholes - - '1999 $ 58,083 100% $ 58,083 $ (3,719) 10.00 5.65% $ 30,717
• 1 • EPIC Plebe - Laterals/Manholes ' ' ' - 1999 $ . 53,550 100% $ 53,550 $ (3,429) 10.00 5.65% $ 28,320
1 Orchard Estates- L'aterale/Menholes. •' '' 1999 $ 39,218 100 %' $ 39,218 $ (2,511) 10.00 5.65% 5 .20,740
'. 1 ' GeheE ension - ' • • • 1999 $ 12,967 100% $ 12,967 $ (830) 10.00 5.65% $ 6,858
1 . San.`Sewer Trans: =Anna Gardens . . . - '1999 $ - 19.875 100% $ 19,875 $ (1,273) 10.00 5.65% $ 10,511
` 1 Castleyale Condos - laterals/Manholes 1999 . $ 7,875 100% $ 7,875 $ • (504) 10.00 5.65% $ 4,165
1 San, Sewer Trans -53rd & 1999 $ 73,385 .100% $ 73,385 $ (4,699) 10.00 5.65% $ 38,810
' .1 San'. Sewer Trans :438th & Summitview ' ' 1999 $ 451,087 100% $ 451,087 $ (28,884) 10.00 5.65% $ 238,561
- 1 1 -Sen. Sewer Trans.40ng Street - 1999 $ 332,054 100% $ 332,054 $ (21,262) 10.00 5,65% $ 175,609
1 - San. Sewer ,Trans, -E. Mead - 1999 $ 486,589 100% $ 486,589 $ (31,157) 10.00 5.65% $ 257,336
1 San -Sewer Trans,- ZahlerSewer 1999 $ 1,940 100% $ 1,940 $ (124) 10.00 5.65% $ 1.026
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC.
YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 41 of 88
• •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of. J 2009
Allocation to Allocated Original Total CIAC Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost
Utility Cost Asset Age Interest Rate Cost •
1 - Trunks - Various Pro)ects 2000 S' , 10,457 ' 100 % • $ 10,457 $ (670) 9.00 5.95% $ 5,243
-4 r ' Side 'Sewer Connedions. - . ' 2000 $ - 87,370 100% $ 87,370 $ (5,594) 9.00 5.95% $ 43,803
.1 • San. _Sewer - "RS SCSewer Imps, 2000 $ 9,504. , 100% • $ 9,504 $ (609) 9.00 5.95% $ 4,765
1 72nd & Spokane= Laterals/Manholes - • • , 2000 $ 15,723 - 100% $ 15,723 $ (1,007) 9.00 5.95% 5 7,883
1 • - MIdvale Court- Laterals/Manhotes' • 2000 $ ' 55,545 • 100% . $ 55,545 $ (3,557) 9.00 5.95% $ 27,847
• 1 HlllsIde,Vlew- Leterats/Manholes 2000 $ 41,916 100% $ 41,916 $
_ _ (2,684) 9.00 5.95% $ 21,014 _
- 1 ' ButterManey - Laterals/Manholes ' - • ' ` " ' ` ' • : • ' `2000 • - $ . 9,188 • -100% _ ' $ 9,188 $ (588) 9.00 5.95% $ 4,606
1 OrchatdPointe - Laterals/Manholes . . ' 2000 -. S 91,350' • 100% $ 91.350 $ (5,849) 9.00 5.95% $ 45,798
1 90th Street- Laterals/Manholes 2000 S 18,191 10096 $ 18,191 $ (1,165) 9.00 5.95% $ 9,120
' 1 Sierra Estates- Laterals/Manholes 2000 $ 116,760 - 100% $ 116,760 $ (7,476) 9.00 5.95% $ • 58,537
1 ,, Cascade Molding - Flush Ends . • - . ' 2000 $ 386 ' 100% $ 386 $ (25) 9.00 5.95% $ 193
1 Parkwood lits Phase I1- Laterals/Manholes. ' 2000 •$ 44,058 • .100% $ 44,058 $ (2,821) 9.00 5.95% $ 22,088
• 4 Side Sewer Connections , - ' 2001 $ 4,713 • 100% $ 4,713 $ (302) 8.00 5.44% $ 1,921
1 Home Depot = Latereis/Manholes 2001 • $ 14,308 100% $ 14,308 $ (916) 8.00 5.44% $ - 5,833
1 r Living Care= ,Laterals/Manhoes • - ' 2001 $ 40,875 100% $ 40,8 $
(2,617) 8.00 5.44% $ 16.665
1,
1 ' Gabbard Sewer - Laterals/Manhoes - . ' . - 2001 $ 29,788 100% $ 29,788 $ (1,907) 8.00 5.44% $ 12,145
1 . Sears Project'- Laterals/Menholes _ • • 2001 ' $ 9,425 • 100% • $ 9,425 $ (604) 8.00 5.44% $ 3,843
1 ' (3 K Mechanical = Laterals/Mantoles 2001 $ , . 12,267 100% $ 12.267 $ (785) 8.00 5.44% $ 5,001 -
• 1 Gateway , Laterals/Manholes: - ' 2001 $ 249,107 100% $ 249,107 $
(15,951) 8.00 5.44% $ 101,561
'1 • Laterals/Manholea . ' 2001 $ 17,779 100% ' $ 17,779 $ (1,138) 8.00 5.44% $ 7,249
, .1 . Laterals - Various Projects - 2002 S 108,591 100% $ 108,591 '$ (6,953) 7.00 5,37% $ 38,203
'1 .72nd &, ,. - . - , - • _ . 2002 S 305,768 100% $ 305,768 $ (19,579) 7.00 5.37% $ 107,571
•1 - 28th& Tie -Pipe Repair _ , 2002 $ . 20,400 - 100% • $ 20,400 $ (1,306) 7.00 5.37% $ 7,177
1 Trunks - Various Projects 2002 - $ 35,253- 100% $ 35,253 $ (2,257) 7.00 5.37% $ 12,402
• - 4 rSideSewerConnedions • - - 2002 ' $ 1,040 100% . $ 1,040 $ (67) 7.00 5.37% $ 366
1 N1.72nd Sideline Extension • ' 2002 • ' • $ . 22,262 100% • $ 22,262 $ (1,426) 7.00 5.37% $ 7,832
• 1 . Viola Sewer Svc Conneation, 2002 $ • . '22,989 100 %' ' $ 22,989 $ (1,472) 7.00 5.37% $ 8,088
1 • Sewer Lateral; - 8" PVC 2003 • $ 8,684 100% $ 8,684 $ (556) 6.00 5.15% $ 2,511
1 Manholes - Concrete - 2003 $ 2,316, 100% $ 2,316 $ (148) 6.00 5.15% $ 669
1 Sewer Laterals 8" PVC . , • - - 2003 _, . S . 10,751 100% $ 10,751 $ (688) 6.00 5.15% $ 3,108
- - - - . '4 "' Side Sewers -4 =. .- • - • - - • '2003 • ' -$ -' 4,893' 100% $ 4,893 $ (313) 6.00 5.15% $ 1,415
- 1 Manhoes'- 48" Concrete • $ • .2;479 100% $ 2,479 $ (159) 6.00 5.15% $ 717
1 :- SewecLiterals 2003 ,S 56,051 • 100% $ 56,051 $ (3,589) 6.00 5.15% $ 16,204
1 Sewer Laterals -4 "PVC -• , - -2003- $ 25,663' 100% $ 25,663 $ (1,643) 6.00 5.15% $ 7,419
,. 1 Manholes -'48" . . 2003 .$ 21,767 100% $ 21,767 $ (1,394) 6.00 5.15% $ 6,293
1 * SewerLeterals - 8 ' PVC , . - - 2003 . $ 20,775 100% $ 20,775 $ (1,330) 6.00 5.15% $ 6,006
• 4 SldeSewers =4 "PVC • . . 2003 '5 22,153 10096 $ 22,153 $ (1,419) 6.00 5.15% $ 6,404
1 Manholes -,48" Concrete - - 2003 $ 11,021 100% $ 11,021 $ (706) 6.00 5.15% $ 3,186
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 • - 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 42 of 88
•
1111 III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of:I • 2009
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost Allocation to Allocated Original Total CIAC Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Utility Cost Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
.'' ..1 Sewer Laterals :43" PV,C . - . ' 2003 $ 8,472 106s . $ 8,472 $ (543) 6.00 5.15% $ 2,449
4''SIde -4 "PVC • 2003 - "$ - 1,501 100 %' $ 1,501 $ (96) 6.00 5.15% $ 434
. - 1 :'Manholes - 48 " Concrete - 2003 E 5,002 100% $ 5,002 $ (320) 6.00 5.15% $ 1,446
'' 1 Yakima Armory . Manholes . - - ' 2003 "S 98,233 100% $ 98,233 $ (6,290) 6.00 5.15% $ 28,399
1 Yakfma Armory =Sewer Main . - . 2003 ' - . $ 831,350 : 100% $ 831,350 $ (53,233) 6.00 5.15% $ 240,341
1 Collection Improyenienta (MH) ', . . , 2004 $ 88,387 .100% $ 88,387 $ (5,660) 5.00 5.09% $ 21,068 .
- - - "1 • EXT.Lateral - ' - ' - - - • 2004 $ - 109,081 - 10056 $ 109,081 $ (6,985) 5.00 5.09% $ 26,001
• :1 Athanum Interceptor EXT r Trunk.. - 2004 . $ 942,655 - 100% $ 942,655 $ (60,360) 5.00 5.09% $ 224,697
' ' •1 . Fndtvale Water/SewerMairi- Lateral 2004 . S 1,017,618 100% . $ 1,017,618 $ (65,160) 5.00 5.09% $ . 242,565
' 1 ',Tieton Drive Improvement Sewer Main , - . 2604 ' 'S - 73,926 100% $ 73,926 $ (4,734) 5.00 5.09% $ 17,621
- 1 Valley Mall Blvd Sewer Trunk - ' . 2004 E ' 1,183.410 .100% $ 1,163,410 $ (74,496) 5.00 5.09% $ 277,317
1 . SewerLaterals .10" ' 2004 5 39,479 100% $ 39,479 $ (2,528) 5.00 5.09% $ 9,410
4 , 'SldeSe -4" PVC , . . - ' 2004 . $ 10,862 100% $ 10,862 $ (696) 5.00 5.09% $ 2,589
1 Manholes - 60" Concrete , 2004 . $ 13,064 100% $ 13,064 $ (837) 5.00 5.09% $ 3,114
1 Sewer Laterals - 10" . . ' 2004 $ 184,325' 100% $ 184,325 $ (11,803) 5.00 5.09% $ 43,937
1 . Sewer. Laterals - "PVC _ • 2004 $ 40,248 100% $ 40,248 $
(2,577) 5.00 5.09% $ 9,594
' .;1 ..Side Sewers - 4" PVC 2004 $' 44,098 100% $ 44,098 $ (2,824) 5.00 5.09% $ 10,511
.1 . Manholes ,60" Concrete. - . . .. ' 2004 . $ . , • '7,700 . 100% • $ 7,700 $ (493) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,835
,' 1 Manholes 48 Concrete . - - 2004 •$ 58,331. 100% $ 58,331 $ (3,735) 5.00 5.09% $ 13,904
1 ., ■ Flush•Ends,' -8" PVC 2004 .$ 15,399' 100% $ 15,399 $ (986) 5.00 5:09% $ 3,671
1 . ' Sewer Laterals 4'8" PVC - 2004 . $ 9,776 100% . $ 9,776 $ (626) 5.00 5.09% $ 2,330
4 Side Sewers - 6 "PVC . 2004 - $ . 3,245 -100 %, $ 3,245 $ (208) 5.00 5.09% $ 773
. 1 Manholes;48 "boncrete.• 2004 • $ • - 2,334 100% ' $ 2,334 $ (149) 5.00 5.09% $ 556
1 Sewer 2004 $ 8,167 100% $ 8,167 $ (523) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,947 •
' 1 "Sew =4 "PVC - '. ' ' 2004 $ 1.964 . 100%' .. $ 1,964 $ (126) 5.00 5.09% $ 468
1 : Manhole4 48" Concrete' - 2004 $ 2,494 10096 - $ 2,494 $ (160) 5.00 5.09 % $ 594
" ".1 ; - Sewer Listerels }8 "PVC 2004 '$. ' : 27;939, 100% , ' $ 27,939 $ (1,789) 5.00 5.09% $ 6,660
- Side'Sewers -4 ",PVC' - - 2004 'S 2,814 100% ' $ 2,814 $ (180) 5.00 5.09% $ 671
:.. 1 -Manholes - 48 "'Concrete - • - ' 2004 '. '•. $ -, • 14,113 ,100% $ 14,113 $ (904) 5.00 5.09% $ 3,364
1 .- Sewgr Laterals= 8":PVC - 2004 .$ 8,529 100% $ 8,529 $ (546) 5.00 5.09% $ 2,033
. 1 , Manholes; - Concrete - 2004 . $ 2,321 100% $ 2,321 $ (149) 5.00 5.09% $ 553
1 'Sew .
er Laterals : 2004 S - 5,019 `100% $ 5,019 $ (321) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,196 •
8" PVC -�� •
' ' ' 1 .: Manholes- '48"'Concrete- - ;2004 $ .4,998 100% $ 4,998 $ (320) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,191
_ 1.SewerLaterals -8 "PVC•' • - 2004 $ _ 5,516 100% $ 5,516 $ (353) 5,00 5.09% $ 1,315
1 ' Side Sewers -4 ",PVC.. . 2004 S 112 - 100% $ 112 $ (7) 5.00 5.09% $ 27
1 - Manholes -48 "Concrete -. 2004 •S '4,986 100% $ 4,986 $ (319) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,189
1 . 8"'PVC - 2005 - $ 58,425 - 100% $ 58,425 $ (3,741) 4.00 4.96% $ 10,851
- 1 , 4" PVC;Side Sewers . 2005 S 57,040 100% $ 57,040 $ (3,652) 4.00 • 4.96% $ 10,594
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867.1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 43 of 88
• • •
City of Yakima .
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
•
Assets as of.l 2009
Fx2 Descri lion Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
P Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAC Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
'1 48" Concrete Manholes " . _ 2005 $ 42,000 100% $ 42,000 $ (2,689) 4.00 4.96% $ 7,801
1 . 8" PVC Sewer Laterals - .. .2005 , $ - 7;900. 100% • $ 7,900 $ (506) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,467
1 I 6" PVC Sewer Laterals' -- • 2005 . $ 3,100 _100% $ 3,100 $ (199) 4.00 4.96% $ 576
' -1 ','48" Concrete Manholes- _ _ .. 2005 $ : ' 4,000 . 100% $ 4,000 $ (256) 4.00 4.96 % $ 743 •
.1 • 10" PVC Sewer Laterala.. - - . ' 2005 $ • 16,625 100% $ 16,625 $ (1,065) 4.00 4.96% $ 3,088 .
. -1 8 ", PVC Sewe Laterals 2005 - $ 38,675' ' - 100 %• $ 3 6,675 $ (2,348) 4.00 4.96% $ 6,812
. - "4" PVC Side , Sewers' ' '" ' -" ' -' r' 2005 . - ` $ - 22,570 _ - 100% $ 22,570 $ (1,445) 4.00 4.96 % $ 4,192
'1 48' Concrete , . . '' 2005• $ 14,000 : . 100% $ 14,000 $ (896) 4.00 4.96% $ 2,600
. 1 - 8 "PVCFlusti,Ends' . • 2005 $' - 800' 100% $ 800 $ (51) 4.00 4.96 % $ 149
1 ,, 8" PVC Sewer Laterals- . , • - 2005 .8 31,250 100% $ 31,250 $ (2,001) 4.00 4.96% $ 5,804
1 ..,6 "PVC Side Sewers. 2005 - S • 11,000 100% $ 11,000 $ (704) 4.00 4.96% $ 2,043
• ' ' 1 48 Concrete Manbotes . ' 2005 $ 12,000 100% $ 12,000 $ (768) 4.00 4.96% $ 2,229
.1 '8",PVC'Flush Ends " 2005 $ 350 100% $ 350 $ (22) 4.00 4.96% $ 65 • • '1 ' 8" PVC Sewer Laterals ' - • • - 2005 S. 7,625 100% ' $ 7,625 $ (488) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,416
' '1 r • 48" Co Manholes - . . 2005 S. ' 4,000 100% $ 4000 $
(256) 4.00 4.96% $ 743
, .1 '.8" P.VC Sewer Laterals. ' ' 2005' ' $ ' . 26,064 100% $ 26,064 $ (1,669) 4.00 4.96% $ 4,841
1 6 "-PVC Side Sewers 2005 $ 9,040 100% . $ 9,040 $ (579) • 4.00 4.96% • $ 1,679'
'1 48" Concrete Manholes ' 2005. 1$ 8,798 • 100% ' $ 8,798 $ (563) 4.00 4.96% $ 1534
. • ' •8".PVC Sewer Laterals' , „ - - 2005 • $ 9,675 100% $ 9575 $ (620) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,797
'1 6" PVC SewerLaterais ' ' - 2005 _ $ , 2,300. ' 100% $ 2,300 $ (147) 4.00 4.96% $ 427
1 48" Con6rete.Manholes ' 2005 $ 4,000 100%
$ 4,000 $
(256) 4.00 4.96% $. 743
" 1 . Laterals= Collection Plant" ' • ' , 2005 $ 67,169 100% . $ 67.169 $ (4,301) 4.00 4.96% $ 12.475
•1 "'Project 2092 -LID 1057Addi00ns,. . , 2005 'S - 321;856 100% $ 321,856 $ (20,609) 4,00 4.96% $ 59,779
' Pro)ect2093 -LID, 1058,Addillons . 2005 $ 181,174 100% $ 181,174 $ (11,601) 4.00 4.96% $ 33550
: 1 . TletonD,1ve Sewer : prof 2033 - 2006 ' $ 219,288 - 100 %` $ 219,288 $ (14,041) 3.00 4.99% $ 30,724
1 ' ' WA MT,- 40th -52nd Ave Sewer,Eid 2006 . $ ' 1,235;163 ,. 100% $ 1,235,163 $ (79,090) 3.00 499% $ 173,057
' 1 'WA Ave'- 52nd -72nd Aye Sewer Ext • : 2006 : $ 1,599,289 100% $ 1,599,289 $ (102,406) 350 4.99% $ 224,075
. '1 WA 'Ave. -'52nd-62nd Ave - , • - 2006. . '8 543,574 , 100 %' $ 543,574 $ (34,806) 3.00 4.99% $ 76,160
1 . . 2006 $ 642,174, . .100% $ 642,174 $ (41,120) 3.00 499% $ 89,974
1 Culligan /Fruitvale'Sewer _ 2006 ,$ , ' ' 75,978 100% $ 75,978 $ (4,865) 3.00 4.99% $ 10,645 •
- 1 Sauc ? ran k s, , ' 2007 $ • 480,263 100% $ 480,263 $ (30,752) 2.00 4,64% $ 41,697 • 1 Sewer , . . 2008 $. _ 15,046 , ,100% $ 15,046 $ (963) 150 5.32% $ 750
1 :. Sewer,Leterals '. - • - • 2008 $ 21,898 100% $ 21.898 $ (1,402) 1.00 5.32% $ 1,091
' 1 '' Front St Sewer lmpr- ,Piojed'2136. • - - 2008 .. $ 112,244 . 100% $ 112,244 $ (7,187) 1.00 5,32% $ 5,594
r9 ; ProJed2.190 +Pacific &'Bth.SewerMain ' .2008 , • 1 $ •82,311 100% $ 62.311 $ (3,990) 1.00 5.32% $ 3,105
$ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. • YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867.1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM
Page 44 of 88
ill III •
City of Yakima -
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of:1 2009
Allocation to Allocated Original Total CIAO Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest •
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost
Utility Cost Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
840 r Equipment _ - . . $ - $ - N/A N/A N/A
1 Sewage Disposal 'System Equlprtient 1939 $ 32,527 100% $ 32,527 $ (2,083) 10.00 2.37% $ 7,221
.1 Sewage Disposal System- Equipment - • - . , ' 1943 $ 3,099 100% $ 3,099 $ (198) 10,00 2.37% $ 688
- '1 , Sewage Disposei System - Equipment , , 1945. $ 454 100% $ 454 $ (29) 10.00 2.37% $ 101
1 Other• Lift Station Equipment 1965 r $ 18,570 100% $ 18,570 $ (1,189) 10.00 3.31% $ 5,755
_ ' 1 . Culvert Pipe Equipment 1967 $ 533 _ 100 %. - $ 533 $ (34) 10.00 4.04% $ 201
1 'Sewage Dispose) System- Equlpmenl - 1967 $ ' 1,021,896 100% $ 1,021,896 $ (65,434) 10.00 4.04% $ 386,269
• 1 - ^ Pumping Station Equipment - . ' 1968 $ 1,222 '100% $ 1,222 $ (78) 10.00 4.58% $ 525
, 1 • Other Llft Station Equipment - 1972 $ 10,141 100% - $ 10,141 $ (649) 10.00 5.46% $ 5,180
' 3 .'Tools, Shop & Garage Equipment.: • - - . ' 1983 $ 2,668 100% $ 2,668 $ (171) 10.00 10.00% $ 2,497
3 Tools, Strop & Garage Equipment . • . 1985 $ 7,798 100% $ 7,798 $ (499) 10.00 9.56% $ 6,978
3 'Power Operated Equipment 1985 $ 7,639 100% $ 7,639 $ (489) 10.00 9.56% $ • 6,836
3 •M)soellarieotis - 1985 $ 2,985 100% $ 2,985 $ (191) 10.00 9.56% $ 2,672
3 - Laboratory Equlpment' _ - ' 1986 $ 3,302 100% $ 3,302 $ (211) 10.00 7.76% $ 2,399
3 =. Tools, Shop Garage Equipment - ' . 1987 $ 3,071 100% $ 3,071 $ (197) 10.00 8.04% $ 2,310
3 Tolls, Shop &;Garage Equipment , _ - 1987 - 5, - 2,024 100% $ 2,024 $ (130) 10.00 8.04% $ 1,522
' '2 : Sewage Dispos System - Equipment ' ,' - 1987 5 .6,527 100 % $ 6,527 $ (418) 10.00 8.04% $ 4,909
'3 Miscellaireous Equipment.. , 9989 $ 12,517 100% $ 12,517 $ (801) 10.00 7.51% $ 8,800
3 r Tools, Shop`& Gerage,Equipment - - . 1989 $ 1,724 100% $ 1,724 $ (110) 10.00 7.51% $ 1,212
3 Tools, Shop & Garage Equipment . ' 1990 $ -7,544 100% $ 7.544 $ (483) 10.00 7.53% $ 5,319
3 Communications Equipment - 1990 ' 5 4,844 100% $ 4,844 $ (310) 10.00 7.53% $ 3,416
3 ' Equipment 1990 , .$ 9,702. 100% $ 9,702 $ (621) 10.00 7.53% $ 6,841
• 1 Pumping Station_Eq'ulpment - . . .1991 ; 5 .31,001 100% $ 31,001 $ (1,985) 10.00 7.11% $ 20,632
3 'Miscellaneous Equpment' 1991 $ ' . 3,440 100% $ 3,440 $ (220) 10,00 7.11% $ 2,289
• 3 'Tools, Shop & Garage. Equipment 1991 . ' $ .1,629' 100% $ 1,629 $ (104) 10.00 7.11% $ 1,084
3 Laboratory ' Equipment' -1991 ' $ .16,239 100% $ 16,239 $ (1,040) 10.00 7.11% $ 10,808
3 ''Cortmiunications';Equipment ' ; - 1991 $ 8,355 100% - $ 8,355 $ (535) 10,00 7.11% $ 5,561
2 i
'Sewage�DisposaISy stern - Equpment ' 199 5. 61,487 100% $ 61,487 $
z (3,937) 10.00 7.11% $ 40,921
.3 . Laboratory Equipment " . . 1992 $ 8,574 100% . $ 8.574 $ (549) 10.00 6.59% $ 5,290
3 ,• ' Office Fur &'Equipment, ' - ' - ' 1993 '5 4;224 10096 $ 4,224 $ (270) 10.00 5.82% $ 2,300
`3` Communications Equipment 1993 $ 19,646 100% $ 19,646 $ (1,258) 10.00 5.82% $ 10,698
3 • MiscellaneousE 1993 '$ 3,976 100% $ 3,976 $ (255) 10.00 5.82% $ 2,165
j Ind. Waste Flow Meters 1995 .5 19,229 100% $ 19,229 $ (1,231) 10.00 6.20% $ 11,166
2 . Sp rayfieldMonitoting 1995 $ 108,073' 100% $ 108,073 $ (6,920) 10.00 6.20% $ 62,758
. 1 Sar! p er 6b00' &Accessories,..' - 1995 $ 7,408 100% $ 7,406 $ (474) 10.00 6.20% $ 4.301
.3 . Yamaha TimbervioH4Wheeter 1995 $ 3,881 100% $ 3,881 $ (249) 10.00 6.20% $ 2,254
' 3 Solid Waste Cutter... • " - 1995 $ 4,828 100% $ 4,826 $ (309) 10.00 6.20% $ 2,802
3 'Forage,Wegon' 1998 $ 6,468 100% $ 6,468 $ (414) 10.00 6.01% $ 3,639
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 45 of 88
• III 11111
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant -in- Service
Assets as of. J 2009
Allocation to Allocated Original Total CIAO Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
Fx2 Description Year Purchased Original Cost
Utility Cost Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
• .'3 ` Graphite F.umaoe ' ' 1996 $ • 25,108 ' . 100% $ 25,1C8 $ (1,608) 10.00 6.01% $ 14.127
3 Enviro track IV Into 1996 $ 5,223 100% _ $ 5,223 $ (334) 10.00 6.01% $ 2,939
''3 , ..3710 Sampler .. , , • 1996 $ 4,197 100% $ 4,197 ' $ (269) 10.00 6.01% $ 2,361
2 ' HVAC System - Mechanical linplovements 9998 $ 135,965 .900% $ 135,965 $ (6,706) 10.00 6.01% $ 76,500
• 2 HVACSysternlmprovemems ' • 1996 , ,5 ', 342,503 100% $ 342,503 $ (21,931) 10.00 6.01% $ 192,707
• 2 HVAC System improvements • _ • - - 1996 .8..... :. 60;410 . _• -100% $ 60,410 $ (3,868) 10.00 6.01% $ 33,989
2 Auto Cleve Pressure Cookery Sterilizer.. '' 1997 $ - 6,171 100% $ 6,171 $ (395) 10.00 5.78% $ 3,336
- .:;1 . Sewage Disposal SysterrfEqulpment, , ' 1997 $ s 4,147 100% $ 4,147 $ (266) 10.00 5.78% $ 2,242
:2 Metal Analyzer ; . 1998 S ' 2,718 100% $ 2,718 $ (174) 10.00 5.32% $ 1,353
1 • SCADA System Improvements 1998 • $ 330,326 900% $ 330,326 $
(21,152) 10.00 5.32% $ 164,487
• 3 Compressor . , , _ _ . • , 1998 $ 4,963, 100% $ 4,963 $ (318) 10.00 5.32% $ 2,472
3 Dltt wastier 1999 • $ 8,350 100% $ 8,350 $ (535) 10.00 5.65 $ 4,416
2 • Sampler , - , - • • . . . . , , -1999 $ 5,197 100% $ 5,197 $ (333) 10.00 5.65 % $ 2,748
2 .Sampler , _ 1999 $ 4,882 100% $ 4,882 $ (313) 10.00 5.65% $ 2,582
1 ' ,,Lift Stn. Equipment -Race, St Lift.st. Rehab , 1999 , $ 431,367 100% $ 431,367 $
� p _ � (27,621) 10.00 5.65% $ 228,132
• 1 . Lift Stn Equipment - Tamarack Litt Station • .. : •• . 1999 $ 610923 '100% $ 610,923 $ (39,119) 10.00 5.65% $ 323,091
1 ' 1 Ground Weter Tailing g Machine '• . : • 2000 $ 6,321 100% $ 6,321 $
s -. •. - (405) 9.00 5.95% $ 3,169
3 - ..OnanEmerald III Generator' '- .. ' _ • ' • '2001 $ ' 3,848 100% $ 3,648 $ (234) 8.00 5.44 % $ 1,487
- 2 ; DlssolJedOgen'Analyzer. , • ' 2001 $ 11,798 100% $ 11,79B $ (755) 8.00 5.44% $ 4,810
'.1 - 12 CK Closed Coupled Puinp. 2001 $ 5,808 100% $ 5,808 $ (372) 8.00 5.44% $ 2,368
'1 Semp .. h)ne' 2002 $ 5,228 100% $ 5,228 $ (335) 7.00 5.37% $ 1,839
1 `MoynoPump: ". 2002 'S - 10,675 100% $ 10,675 $ (684) 7.00 5.37% $ 3.755
r 3 , BloWer Cainiitessor Unit _ • 2003 • . $ - 14,540 100% $ 14,540 $ (931) 6.00 5.15% $ 4.204 .
3 Digital Copier:DL550 • - 2003 • ' $ ' 10,251 100 % $ 10,251 $ (656) 6.00 5.15% $ 2,963
3 ; ArrowDesicant Dryer,18RH2O6 • • '' • 2003 ,$" - 4046. 100% • $ 4,046 $ (259) 6.00 5.15% $ 1.170
1 Krol(ne Magneticlnductive- Flowmeter . • 2003 $ 2,921 ' 100% $ . 2,921 $ (187) 6.00 5.15% $ 844
1 • _Mode1,3710RSannller.Equ)pment .- , . 2004 '$ 8,093 100% $ 8,093 $ (518) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,929
" GLS'Sempler. ' , - : " ' 2004 $ 8,348 ' 100% . $ 8,349 $ (535) 5.00 5.09% $ 1,990
3 Ingersoll -Rand 30 HP Compressor. • '. 2004
,, 8 '9,161 - 100% $ 9,161 $ (587) 5.00 5.09% $ 2,184
'1 1998 Rehab Proj- Upgrade-to SCADA , - 2004 $ 218,563 100% ' $ 218,563 $ (13,995) 5.00 5.09% $ 52,098
2 CenMfuge Rehab., 2004 $ 25,847 10096 $ 25,847 $ (1,655) 5.00 5.09% $ 6,161
1 .Werrico To que -Flow Pump '2005' $ 13,040 100% $ 13,040 $ (835) 4.00 4.96% $ 2,422
'3 .'Trane Air Hendier o(iditioner ' _ ' 2005 $ 8,530 100% $ 8,530 $ (546) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,584
3 Trene'AlrHandler/Condltioner. -. - • - 2005 $ 8,530 100% $ 8,530 $ (546) 4.00 4.96% $ 1.584
,3 Conveyor Beefing Kit' . •' ' 2005 $ 9,451 100% $ 9,451 $ (605) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,755
3 John Deere Lawn Mower : . 2005 $ 7:561 100% $ 7,561 $ (484) 4.00 4.96% $ 1,404
1 TriddingFllter Clarifier Pump Station . 2005 $ 1,531,887 100% $ 1,531,887 $ (98,090) 4.00 4.96% $ 284,521
1 BeechStreet Lift Station Pump • 2005 $ 165,306 100% $ 165,306 $ (10,585) 4.00 4.96 % $ 30,703
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011
Plant-in-Service
(425) 867 -1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 46 of 88
el
411 0
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Plant-in-Service
Assets as of:I 2009
Fx2 Descrl tfon Allocation to Allocated Original Applicable Applicable Allocable Interest
P Year Purchased Original Cost Utility Cost Total CIAO Asset Age Interest Rate Cost
1 30004TGrinder,;, 2008 ' '5 8,157 100% $ 6,157 $ (394) 3.00 4.99% $ 863
1 * Gtin'der- . 30004T-0012 • 2006 - $ 8,146 100% . $ 6,146 $ (394) 3.00 4.99% $ 861
3 D1010,AIP -E nd W QN Q Serles Rebuilt Compressor 2006 $ • 5,302 100% $ 5,302 $ (339) 3.00 4.99% $ 743
.3 ' ' Wermo•Torque -Flow Pump 2008 $ ' 21,512 100% $ 21,512 $ (1.377) 3.00 4.99% $ 3,014
.3 'Manhole Cutter .2007 s 13,428 - 100% $ 13,428 $ (860) 2.00 4.64% $ 1,166
3 . Imagistics Model CM5520 Color Co pier 2008 $ 14,807 _ _ 100% $ 14,607 $ (935) 1.00 5.32% $ 728
3 ' Model JAJ600TH Easement Machine • 2008 $ 41,270 100% $ 41,270 $ (2,643) 1.00 5.32% $ 2,057
3 'Bustihog Cutter - Model3210 . ' 2008. -5 5,825 - -100% • $ 5,825 $
(373) 1.00 5.32% $ 290
3 Miele t .ab Dishwasher w/Injector'Basket - • 2008 :$ 9,477 •100% $ 9,477 $ (607) 1.00 5.32% $ 472
2 Solids Handling Building improvement . 20 $ 11,884,530 100% $ 11,884,530 $ (760,994) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 Contributed Capital -8 ° laterals ' . • - • 2009 ,$ 15,675 '.100% . $ 15,675 $ (1,004) 0.00 5.45% $ -
' 1 Contrbuted 'capital:- manholes'• . 2009 S 10,000 ' 100% $ 10,000 $ (640) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 Speedway - 2009 '$ ' 1,535,993 100% $ 1,535.993 $ (98,353) 0.00 5.45% $ -
' 1 River, road s • - . . 2009 . $ 2,995,583 100% $ 2,995,583 $ (191,814) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 40th and Fruitvele sewer sleeve - - , _ ' _ . 2009 •. , $ 152,714 100% ' $ 152,714 $ (9,779) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 Citywide drainage Improvement • - '. . • 2009 $ 37,647 100% $ 37,647 $ (2,411) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 Conveyo ,system ■ , - , y ' - 2009 $' 233:436 100% $ 233.436 $ (14,947) 0.00 5.45% $ -
.,1 Blower building blowers;',..," - • '2009 $ 2, 100% $ 2,213,203 $ (141,716) 0.00 5.45% $ -
1 Blower building generators', . - 2009 $ 359,133' 100% $ 359,133 $ (22,996) 0.00 5.45% $ -
. 2 - Solids handling building centritige ' • - • 2009 'S 1,436,532 . 100% $ 1,436,532 $ (91,984) 0.00 5.45% $ - ,
1 Solids handling building equipment' 2009 $ 841,578 100% $ 841,578 $ (53,888) 0.00 5.45% $ -
Total Plant-In- Service $ 120,367,165 100% $ 120,367,165 $ (7,707,385) 7.44 6.65% $ 59,570,513
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. - YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 Plant -in- Service
(425) 867.1802 6/2/2011 12:42 PM Page 47 of 88
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Wastewater Connection Charge Calculations
Allocation of Plant -in- Service Total Collection Flow BOD SS As All Other
Collection $ 52,719,038 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Treatment $ 64,435,637 0.00% 40.00% 30.00% 30.00% 0.00%
General Plant $ 1,909,009 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Customer $ 1,303,480 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Total $ 120,367,165 $ 52,719,038 $ 25,774,255 $ 19,330,691 $ 19,330,691 $ 3,212,489
Reallocation of "As All Other" $ - $ 1,445,605 $ 706,754 $ 530,065 $ 530,065 $ (3,212,489)
Reallocated Total $ 120,367,165 .$ 54,164.642 $ 26,481.009 $ 19,860,757 $ 19,860,757 $ -
Allocation of Interest (Net of CIAC) Total Collection Flow BOD SS As All Other
Collection $ 19,805,599 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Treatment $ 38,096,501 0.00% 40.00% 30.00% 30.00% 0.00%
General Plant $ 772,750 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Customer $ 895,664 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Total $ 59,570,513 $ 19,805,599 $ 15,238,600 $ 11,428,950 $ 11,428,950 $ 1,668,414
Reallocation of "As All Other" $ - $ 750,778 $ 367,054 $ 275,291 $ 275,291 $ (1,668,414)
Reallocated Total $ 59,570,513 $ 20,556,377 $ 15,605,655 $ 11,704,241 $ 11,704,241 $ -
Interest on Grants Total Collection Flow BOD SS
1945 -1975 $ 138,562 $ - $ 55,425 $ 41,569 $ 41,569
1976 -1989 $ 18,447,912 $ 4,297,608 $ 5,660,122 $ 4,245,091 $ 4,245,091
1993 $ 3,266,679 $ - $ 1,306,672 $ 980,004 $ 980,004
1995 $ 121,904 $ 121,904 $ - $ - $ -
1998 $ 452,216 $ 452,216 $ - $ - $ -
2001 $ 431,094 $ 431,094 $ - $ - $ -
Total $ 22,858,368 $ 5,302,823 $ 7,022,218 $ 5,266,664 $ 5,266,664
Allocation of CIP
Total Collection Flow BOO SS As All Other
Collection $ 23,999,553 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Treatment $ 52,640,121 0.00% 40.00% 30.00% 30.00% 0.00%
General Plant $ - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Customer $ - 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00%
Total $ 76,639,674 $ 23,999,553 $ 21,056,049 $ 15,792,036 $ 15,792,036 $ -
Reallocation of "As All Other" - - - - - -
Reallocated Total $ 76,639,674 $ 23,999,553 $ 21,056,049 $ 15,792,036 $ 15,792,036 $ -
Total Expansion R &R
Collection $ 23,999,553 $ 20,799,553 $ 3,200,000
Treatment $ 52,640,121 $ 35,496,372 $ 17,143,749
General Plant $ - $ - $ -
Customer $ - $ - $ -
Total $ 76,639,674 $ 56,295,925 $ 20,343,749
Allocation of R &R Projects Total Collection Flow BOD SS
Collection $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ - $ - $ -
Treatment $ 17,143,749 $ - $ 6,857,500 $ 5,143,125 $ 5,143,125
General Plant $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Customer $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total $ 20,343,749 $ 3,200,000 $ 6,857,500 $ 5,143,125 $ 5,143,125
III ill
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Wastewater Connection Charge
Collection Treatment
Existing Cost Basis Total FLOW BOO' TS3• 1 TotaIl ! Notes.
PLANT4NSERVICE -
Utility Capital Assets $ 54,164,642 $ 26,481,0091 E' 195601757 $ 19;880;757' 5. 120;367;165, Original'coat'oflplant5n -service as 012009•
plus: Construction Work -In- Progress (a] 3.164,643 0,556,967 1,167,725 11167,725 7;07,7 :0611 1 2009 -End Construction •Work -In- Progress NI
less Grant - Funded Assets (6.333,178) (92247;454) (9;105,590) (5185:590) (36)9511812) I Pre -2002 Grento &.Contebubons penTable 21of the 2007 COS'Study
less. Contributions in Aid of Capital (3463286) (1,695,640), (11.271,730)1 (12711730
(7;707;385) CIAC, Grants; andothercomnbuted /spinal/
plus: Interest on Non - Contributed Plant 15,253,555 8,583,436 6,437.57,7 - 6437;577 36712 :1456 Intereston assets up to a•maximum•10= yeanpenod,
Existing Cash Balances $ 12,093519
Beglnnmgcashbalances for12010
less' Debt Principal Outstanding (26,576,015) I Totanpdncipal'outetending for.the existing debt'
less: Net Debt Principal Outstanding (6,517,143) 1 (5086;221). (2:389;666)• (2:3891666) I5 (.14)482:696) Debt pnncipanoutstandmg, nat'of' cash reserves:
TOTAL EXISTING COST BASIS $ 56,284,233 i S 10492,098 S 04',899:074 $• 14(819;0741 IS 105914(478'
IaJ Source City of Yakima Financial Statements, Statement of Net Assets
•
Future Cost Basis i Notes;
2010 -2020 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Total Future Projects 5 23,999,553 S 211,056,049 S 15792,036 S 15,792;036 ! 51 76.6356741 ToteilCIP 2009 -2020:
less: Identified Repair& Replacement Projects (3200,000). (5857)500). (5145125) (5:143)125) ; (201343 :749) RSR projects are notetigible for,Connection Charge
less: Contributed Future Upgrade & Expansion Assets - Notehgible for:recovery.through•Connection Charge•
TOTAL FUTURE COST BASIS • ' $ 20,799,553 $ 04,998',549 $. 10848;912 S 10 :840912' j5 58/298;925/
I
TOTAL COST BASIS
" $77,083,766 i $• 33,690847' 329,267;985• 324y267;985i 3 163,316;4034
Customer Base
I
Existing Plant Capacity 21.50 mgd' 21;50 mil 53,6006xsndey 38,6009bs/da1 I ! PerTable'7.(Flow) and.Table 9 (BOD /SS) of the 2007.COS Study
Yakima Share of Capacity 87.9 %' 87.96 87,935 87,3 11I PerAgreement,Wih,Terrace Heights &'Union Gap•
Existn Plant Capacity Yakima 98.90
9 P ly- ingd 118:90 mgdl 46,939•bs/day 33;929'Ibs /dey I
Current Utilization of Yakima Capacity 53.896 53.8% 80A% '52,391 Pen Document fled ;WastewetnnTreatment Plent'Aotivitiee (Dated Decembee2009)
Estimated Demands (2010) 10.17 rngd 10:117 rngdi 23 :657 Ibs /day 211138:Ibs /day , Yakima 'Only(Excludes.Terrace•Heights &Union Gap) PerrTable 52 of 2007,COS "Stud/,'
Number of Meter Capacity Equivalents (2010) i 281245 Yakima'Only.(Exdudes:Terrace Heights"8'.Union Gap), Per.Ut,Iity,Billing Inventory.of Customers By.Meter Size,
Average Demand per ERU 360gpd 360igpd1 08376.Ibs /day. 57484 I Esnmated,DemandsDivided By.Existing ERUs
Design Capacity (2024) 22.8Smgd : 25.99 mad 672591bstday 439248as/ee$ Teble•7 ( Flow)', &.Table 9 (000 /SS) of:2007• COSStudy, Collection Component Excludes:Terrece Heights" &'Union•Gep:
Estimated ERU Capacity 63,465 72;2011 80 )304 66;309' j ! Design Cepec'ry.Divided By.Un,t•Demends"
Resulting Charge i Notes:
Connection Charge Structure Based on Unit Demands:
Charge per gpd $ 3.37 t S. 1.30 S 4:67/
Charge per lb /day $. 375,68' 5 5091191 s 884:87/ I
•Charge. - per ERU 5 1,214,59 5 466.62 S 314.65 S 381.06 5 2,376.93 Maximum Allowable Charge per ERU ,
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. -- YAKIMA,MODEL- June 220111 Conn Charger
(425) 867 -1802 612/2011111242'PM' Page:481of188 :1
• •
•
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Wastewater Connection Charge
Schedule of Charges
Proposed Proposed
Charges By Meter Size Meter Capacity Charge Charge Charges: ED Unit of Capacity;
Ratio
per ERR per ERU
t...O.:w. ta... '
Charge per, gpd:
0.75 1,00 $ 2,377 $ 3,566: ISoide City. $4167'
1 1.67 $ 3969 $ 5,954 Outside•City 57:01'
1.5 3.33 $ 7,915 $ 11,873
2 533 $ 12,669 $ 19,004 ;Charge - per, biday 8013:
3 80.67 $ 25,362 $ 38,043. I Inslde'l65
$375'.68
4 16.67 $ 39,624 $ 59,43• ' Outside 5563:52
6 33.33 $ 79223 $ 188,835
8 53.33 $ 126,762 $ 190,143 (Charge per. IbIday
10 7667 $ 182,240 $ 273,358 • reside City $509:19
Outside -City- 576378.
Outside City Mu1Rplierl;. _ `,;b' ; :150 %i
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA,MOOEI! - Jane-220141 Conn Charge:
(425) 867 -1802 62201,1112 :42'PMI Page:50 :ot1883
• . •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Treatment Plant Flow and Loadings Vaseline: Data
FLOW FORECAST Forecast- year:.201'01
Treatment Plant Flow (MG)
Union Gap 178.9E Per. M:. L • ihd'enl.based €on:20l0)actuals:
Terrace Heights 21B_84 PerMi .Lindeni.basedlom2010)actuals:
City 3,136:'63 PerMi. L•indeni.basedion:20901actuals:
Total - Treatment Plant Flow (MGk St532:25i
Rudkin Road Pump Station Flow (MG)
Union Gap
Metered 78748 Pen M: .Lindent.basedlon:2010iactuals:
Unrnetered 9.50 Per M!.Lindeni basediont20101actuats:
Total • Union Gap 126.98
City 474:66 Per M.Lindem.basedion:2010;actuals:
Total - Rudkin Road PS now (MG) 6571
ALLOCATION OF TREATMENT EXPENSES - PER 4 PARRY AGREEMENT
WHOLESALE SHARE OF TREATMENT EXPENSES
Flow 20% •
BOD 40%
SS 4-0%
a. Wholesale percentage• share of reatment expenses: per4 (see:Section,3t2):.
As strong waste treatment costs are indUdedl as part: of`this; cost share: arrangement;, not Wholesale:
strong waste fee is assessed.
TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS (PPM) FORECAST
TREATMENT PLANT LOADS
BOD (ppm) :8874130
TSS (ppm) 2.84.20
DEL MONTE LOADS
Influent . 1823
BOD (ppm) SWUM
•
TSS (ppm) 35O.130
UNION GAP
Influent 176.98
BOD (ppm) 27LSD
TSS (ppm) 1 1450,80
TERRACE HEIGHTS
Influent 2111.84
BOD (ppm) 214.20
TSS (ppm) 172 SD
SEPTAGE
BOD (ppm) 7,500
TSS (ppm) 25,900
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA \MODEL• - A ne:220111! TreatmentlP.IUAssumptions;
(425) 867 -1802 6/21201111112:42'PM1
Page�551; off88?
■
•
•
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Union Gap and Terrace Heights Treatment Facility O&M Charges
FLOW FORECAST FORECAST BASIS 2010 20111 2012' 20131 2014! 2015. 2016: 2017 2018: 2019+ 20201
Treatment Plant Flow (MG)
Union Gap 9 Composite Revenue Growth, 176.98. 178.75 180:54: 182 341 184:17: 186.011 187.87- 189.75' 191.64: 193.56. 195:50.
Terrace Heights 9 Composite Revenue Growth 218.44' 220.62' 222'83 225.06. 227.311 22958 231188: 23420' 238.541 238.90' 241.29.
City 9 Composite Revenue Growth 3113483. 3,168:20' 3;19988 3,231:88 6264320' 3:296.841 3,329.811 3,363.11' 3,396.741 3;430.70' 3,465101'_
Total • Tr66tment Plant Flew (MG)
653225; 33567:57' 6603:251 68391281 6875.67' 67.1246 3;744,55. 3;787.05'' 3,824921 3;863.17. 3.9013301
Source data 2008 flows [M. Linden]
Rudkin Road Pump Station Flow (MG)
Union Gap
Metered 9 Composite Revenue Growth 187:46' 16615' 170:85 172.55. 174!28 176.02, 177:78 179.56, 181.36- 18317. 185:00"
Unmetered 9 Composite Revenue'Growth 9:50' 9.60' 969' 9:79■ 9.89. 9.98 10.08 10 10.29, 10.39' 10:49'
10(41. Union Gep 176198' 178175: 1802541 1821341 184117, 186:01' 187:87• 189.75; 191:641 193:56 195150'
City 9 - Composite Revenue Growth, 474:69 47943 484122' 489.06' 483:95 498.89. 503.88' 508.92' 514.01: 519.15 524.34'_
Total - Rudldn Road PS Flow (MG) 851166. 658318: 684376: 87,13411 678212' 684390' 6912753 698:67 70565'. 712.711 719:845
Source data. Final 2008 Rudbn Road volume Charge computations [M Linden)
ALLOCATION OF TREATMENT EXPENSES • PER 4 PARTY AGREEMENT
WHOLESALE SHARE OF TREATMENT EXPENSES
Flow 2064
BOD 4Dx
SS <0%
a Wholesale percentage share of treatment expenses per 4-Party Agreement (see Section 3.2).
As strong waste treatment costs are included as part of this cost -share arrangement no Wholesale
strong waste lee is assessed.
TREATMENT PLANT LOADING FORECAST 2010' 2011' 2012' 20131 20141 2015: 20161 20171 20181 2019' 20201_
Weight of one gallon of water gbs)gap yy
•
TREATMENT PLANT LOADS
Influent
Flow(MG; exdu4ng Del Monte) Growth i,caded already n.MTe't 3.53225 3,567,57' 3,603,25• 3.639.28 3,675,67' 3,7.12.43. 3;740.55' 3;787.05 3,824923 3.863:17 3,901:80'
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Tested BOO (PPM) 322.00 327.00: 327.00' 327:001 327 :00' 327.001 327:00 327.00) 327.110' 327.00; 327..00?
Calculated total Its 000 (PPM x Flow xwt of one gal of water) 9;633,082' 9;729,412' 93826.706' 9,92439741 10,024 :223' 10,124 :466 10225,7,10' 183276673 10 :431:247i 10,535559' 10,640.915'
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Tested TSS (PPM) 28400' 28400: 284100' 2843001 204:00' 2843001
2841001 286:001 280.001 284.00 284.90'
Calculated total lbs TS5 8.366,346 8,450,010 8,534;510' 8,619.855. 8;706,353 8,793 :1141 8,881 :045 8,969,855' 9,059,5541 9,150;149' 9,241,6511
DEL MONTE LOADS
Influent
Flow(gallons) 1821 18:23: 181231 181231 182231 18323: 18:23• 18231 18.23; 18:231 181231
Biological Oxygen Demand
Tested 800 (PPM) 6088.0 5,088100: 5,068100' 5,088;001 5,068.001 5,068.001 5,068:001 5:068.501 5,068.00' 6968.001 '5.068:001
Calculated total lbs BOD 770:530 770,530' 770 :530'' 770,530' 770 :5301 770,530' 770,530, 770,5301 770,530' 770,5303 770,530
Total Suspended Solids
Tested TSS (PPM) 350:00, 350.00' 350:00: 350:00'
750.001 350:00' 3501)01 350.001 360.001 350:00 350.001
Calculated total lbs TSS 56213 53,213 53;213' 56213, 53;216 53;213' 53;273: 53,213' 53,213. 53,2131 ) 53,2133 ,
TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS
Influent (MG) 3,560' 31508. 338211 33658'. 3;6941 6731! 31768) 3;806 3:8431 3;8811 3;9201
Biological Oxygen Demand 10;403:61.1' 10;499;942' 10,597 3236' 10;695,5031 10;79417531 186943995: 10,9963240' 1130983497: 1132012)771 111306,089 13,41134405
Toted Suspended Solids 6.416559' 8 :503223: 6587;723: 8;673:068' 817583267; 8;846;327; 8,9342581 9,023,0691 9;116767 9;203;3631 91294,884
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2L20111
(425) 867 -1802 50001di 12,42'PMi Whdesab -SNUG Treatment O4M'
Rage:52iO4'8K
• ID III
•
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Union Gap and Terrace Heights Treatment Facility O&M Charges
UNION GAP AND TERRACE HEIGHTS LOADING FORECAST 2010' 20111 2012' 2013! 2014! 2015: 2018 20171 2018' 2019' 2020'
UMON GAP
Influent
Flow(MG) 9 Composite Revenue Growth. 176.98 178:75. 180154' 1821341 184117 186.01: 187977 189 :75; 19194! 193:565 19050'
Biological Oxygen Demand
Tested BOD (PPM) 27299 27250' 272150: 27250' 27250' 27250' 27150) 27250: 272.50' 27290 27250'
Calculated total lbs 800 402,213:60' 406,235.73 410,298.09 414A01:07 418545.08' 422,730:53 426.95784: 431;227:42, 435,539.69 439,895:09' 444,294.041
Total Suspended Solids
Tested TSS (PPM) 18090 18090: 160150: 180150' 180:50: 180:50' 180 :501 180 :50' 160.50: 160:501 160:50
Celcuatetl total lbs TSS 236,900:12 23926912' 241;661181' 24407893: 246,519.21: 248,984:41' 251;47425' 253,988.99' 256,528.88. 259,094.17' 201,685 :11:
Union Gap Percentage of Total Plant Flow and Loading
Influent
Biological Oxygen Demand 4 . 98 %. 4198% 4199%. 4:99% - . 4:99 %, 4.99%7
4,88 % • 499%'. 3.89%:, 3.89%3 3.99 %
3167%. 7:87%'. 3:87% 3:87%. 3:88%'. 3:88%'. 3.88%'• 3.89%; 3x88 %'. 3.89%; 3.89%:
Total Suspended Solids 281 %. 2810. 281 %. 281%, 281% 281 % 281 % 281.1 2.824:, 282 %' 2.820.:
WTD AVG - UNION GAP PERCENTAGE OF TREATMENT EXPENSE 187%, 3:67 %. 3:87/, 3:670. 3:67%'. 3:88 %, 3.68 % 3.88 %, 3:68 %3 3.68%'. 3:68•/.5 .
TERRACE HEIGHTS
Influent
Flow (MG) 9 Composite Revenue Growth 218.40 220:82' 22283: 225.08: 227:31 229158: 231:881 234 :20` 236:54' 238.901 241.29`
Biological Oxygen Demand
Tested 800 (PPM) 21220 214120' 21420: 214120: 21420' 214201 21420' 2141201 21420' 21420 214.201
Calculated total lbs BOD 3901227 3941130' 398.071' 40Z052. 406,072: 410;133' 41412341 418 :377: 422,5601 426386 431;0541
Total Suspended Solids
Tested TSS (PPM) 17290' 17290 17190' 172 17290' 17290' 172.90' 172901 172901 172.90 17290'
Calculated total lbs TSS 3141987 318,137 321:319' 324532: 327,777; 331;055' 334;365' 337,709' 341:086' 3441497: 347,9421
Terrace Heights Percentage of Total Plaid Flow and Loading
Influent 8.15%. 6.15%. 8115/.. 6:16/.. 6:151.'. 61150., 6:150., 6:150'.' 6:15%1. 6:18 %) 6:16%'
Biological Oxygen Demand 3:75 %. 3:75%. 3:78 %. 3178 %, 3:76%, 3:78%, 3.77%', 3.77/.: 3.7714: 3 :77%', 3:78.0.:
Total Suspended Solids 3174%. 3:74 %. 3:74°6'. 3:74 %, 3:74% 3:74 % 3:74°%'. 3:74%', 3.74%. 3.74 %3 3:74%
WTD AVG. - TERRACE NTS PERCENTAGE OF TREATMENT EXPENSE (C23 %. 4123%. 4423 %. 4123 %. 4123% 4:23% 423001 4:24%: 424 %1. 424%'. 4.24%,
ALLOCABLE OPERATING EXPENSES 2010 2011: 2012: 20131 2014: 2015 20161 20177 20181 2019' 20201
WHOLESALE TREATMENT O&M EXPENSES (5U 232)
Treatment Plant 08M ? $, 3'4,963,520...3,.__..5,460,458, 3' 5;575,597; $ 5;758,0211 5. 5.9465211 5' 6,169,384: 5, 6,400,8941 $. 6,640846, 5 6,892,656' 5" 71153,757; 5: 7,425,602"
Existing Debt Service
Revenue Debt Service ' 1,380,689 ''11 9110441 915,363 916,763 1:497;763: 0760,163' 11757063 0756,563' 1,760,813. 0760813' 1,761738'
PWTF Loans '- 482,611 1 `478;285• 474;560' 469:7641 296•166' 291.1 128518' 127.7.13; 127,108 126,503 125898'
Total - Existing Debt Service 1' 11869 :309 11389,923' 0386,527 11793.929' 2,053,275: 1 :885.381' 1:884,2761 1;887921' 1;888,316: 1:887,636'
New Debt Seance 12) - 403,478' 1;339953' 1;703,842. 0852,686 11875;1811 2,040,055 2,007,805 2,087,805 2,087,805: 2,087,805:
System Reinvestment Funding [b]
Total - Treatment f. &818,.120' 31 5. f• 7.x71;24 813081473! f 8)848;3911 f: 9;593)5381 8 ' 10;097;8401 8 10;326;3301 f! 10513,9283 8: 10,86813825 8 10129,8783 63 11;401043;
(a] Based upon the weighted average of allocable total GP (74 %), includes issuance costs and' Debt coverage. See CIP tab tor. calculation,
(bI Based on a proportionate share of Treatment Assets relative tot /clef Plann.n service (53%).
WHOLESALE RUDKIN ROAD PUMP STA1ON EXPENSES (5U 215)
Operations and Maintenance i,*s, ,__ 77,795. ! $ 811726 5 84 :293' $ 86,945 $ - -
89,686: 5 92,777' $ 95,9841 5 99,3101 5' 102,7611 5 106,342: 3' 110
Exot :ng Debt Service (no outstanding debt service for Radian Road) -
New Debt Service (no new debt service idenafid for ROdlo, Road) _ - _ - _ - _ _ - _ .
. Total - Rudldn Roil. f 77995 $. 811720 51 841293: 91 86,945: 51 89,8861 8' 02777' 81 95,9841 5 99 :3101 0 101761! 51 106;3421 51 110,05827
•
PREPARED BY 105 GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - JUne 2_20111 whdeak - THUG Treatment 060;
(425) 667 - 1602
622011112•42R MI Bage:53'at 88= '
• • 0
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Union Gap and Terrace Heights Treatment Facility O&M Charges
CALCULATED TERRACE HEIGHTS AND UNION GAP COST SHARE 2010. 2011: 2012' 2013' 2014' 2016 2016: 2017: 20181 20197 2020:
ALLOCATION FACTORS
UMON GAP VYTD SHARE OF TREATMENT EXPS 3;67 3:67% 3:67°N. 31871 3.67%. 3:68% 3.68 %, 3.68 % 3.68%: 3.6814) 3.68
SHARE OF EXISTING DEBT COVERAGE (PER 4 PARTY AGRT) 8.1% 8.116 21% ESl% `9.156 .9.136 1 8.1% :8:114 )9)1% +8:186 28:1%
TERRACE HEIGHTS VVTD SHARE OF TREATMENT EXPS 4.23 %. 4 :23 %'. 4:23% 4:23 %. 4:23 %' 423 % 4`23 %7 424147 4:2414: 4.24 %'. 4.24 %
SHARE OF EXISTING DEBT COVERAGE (PER 4 PARTY AGRT) 4,0% 4,0% 41116 .4;0% '4.0% '8:0% 410% 4.l14 .4.054 .4:0S [42pµ
Total Annual Debt Coverage Alioca5 on (Per 4 Party Agrtj $ 1,003000 $ 5,003900 1 5;006400 3 1;8004000 5 14800.000 S 5;0037000 :1 10000, 060 4 113:147,13013 .2 :1',000.000 4 703200,,300 SS 2203O00
Include new debt service (1 =1; 2=957 1 COST SHARING; OF NEIN:DEBT SERVICE INCLUDED'
CALCULATED SHARE OF TREATMENT EXPENSES _ 2010'PER BUDGET
UNION GAP . , -
Treatment Plant OSM 186,612 201,799 204.700' 211:460 278,47 226.726 236,3111 244,248' 253.553; 283.242' 273,331'
RudlOn Road O&M ' •
Ensbng Debt Service 151,690 151,414 112.584' 112.309, 145'.308: 166;315 152.716, _ 152,626; 1 152.954,. _ _ 152,999'
- . Exlsbng Debt Coverage Cash Payment -- - - - 81,000 81 :000- ' ' 81:00(: - 81:000' ' '' 81:0001 81:000+ 81:000: 81.005 81:0001 81,000' 81.000' '
•
New Debt Service [al - 14 7808. - 49,194: 62575; 68.0647 689131 74,997' 76,777' 76,802. 76,826; 76,851'
System Reinvestment Fundng (b] NO COST SHARING - - _ _ ,- - - -
Total ANNUM. $ 419.292 S. 4497021 S. 44774781 9. 467;35Z f; 5128511 Si 542,955; Si 544,024: fi 554052? Si 5644771 f; 574,022? Si 584,0611
' • MONTHLY S 344941, 8 37.415 S. 37;2901 - 0. 387948, 1. 4567381 87 45,246. Si 45,335; Sc 48,221? St 47.0231 5 41,8351 St 48.6733
_ TERRACE HEIGHTS' - 4NNU6L '.
Treatment Plant O&M 212425 232.505 235,836 243.624' 25,11689- 261:179 271:057' 281:340'• 292.045 303,192: 314,800)
Existing Debt Service 74,901 74,772 55,597' 55.461' 71:757' 821311 75.415; 75,371' 75.517' 75.533' 75,505:
' Edseng Debt Coverage Cash Payment 40,103 40,000; 40,000. 40.0001 40'000; 40.0001 40,000; 40,000E 40,0001 40.000) 40,000.:
New Debt SeMee(a] - 17.061) 56,677 _ 72.0901 78,410+ 79,385 86,390+ 88,437: 88,461' 88,486: 88,5107
- 'System Reinvestment Funcbng (b] NO COST SHARING _ _ - _ - ._ _ ' _ .- _-
Tefal ANNtfAL S 327,399' 1 364439' 1 388;110: I. 4117175 Si 4417854; Si 482895, 9' 472,882? Si 485,1477 0' 498,0232 SF 507,2111 Se 518,815;
MONTHLY $ 27283, S. 30.382' 5. 347343' Si 344265, Si. 36 Si 384581 5; 397405i Si 40,429? Si 4173353 S. 42,2685 $1 43;2357
TOTAL WHOLESALE TREATMENT REVENUES (ANNUAL) (41 0- 748,691' 0 8131388) f. 838,588 5' 870427' f'- 964;707,' Si 1;008,850) 6' 1;010888; 8? 1,039;799 0 1;060;3007 Si 1,7081432? S; 1:102,8963
8:9% 2.7 %. 5.1% 8.72' 53 %' 1:1% 23 %. 20 %, 2.0 % 2.02'
[al ok,4atm,nethedekgr Per Ierm,b prawn.) n 344444 3.4 dea'46y 4 .P 90O*...a0.Meen C194 . 3 4 . G +naiT.,r.celM9hn
a.
PREPARED 87 FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA,MODEL - JUne 2_20111 ?Mdeeak -THUG Treatment VIM 7.
(425)867.1802 6/2/201.1112:42'PMI
Rege:54'oY88i
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Rudkin Road Pump Station Charges ("Pumping" O&M Charges)
FLOW FORECAST 2010 20111 2012: 2013' 20141 2016' 2016 2017! 2018' 2019' 2020'
Rudkin Road Flow (MG)
Union Gap
Metered 167.48 369,95 170185. 172155 144 ;28! 176102: 177:781 179:56; 181:36, 183 :17: 185.001
Unmetered 4.50 9.60 9 169 9179? 9189 9198! 101051 10 :19' 10129' 1099' 10
Total - Union Gap 17638 178.75 110154 182:34' 184117 1863011 157:871 189:75; 1911641 193:56: 195 :501
City .
474.68 474.68; 474.65 4741681 474168' 4741681 4741681 474:681 474168: 474:681 474:61: _
Total - Rudkin Road Flow (MG) 653.66 655143' 655 122 657 :02! 658186 6601691 662155: 664 6661322 668 1241 670 :18;
Union Gap Share of Total Rudkin Road Flow 27.167. 27.36%, 27:55%'• 2775%• 27 :96%• 28:15 %', 281363/4: 28156 %', 28 28[979.1. 29)17%
ALLOCABLE OPERATING EXPENSES 2010 201111 2012' 2013 20141 2015 2016 20171 2018'. 2019? 2020'
WHOLESALE RUDKIN ROAD PUMP STATION EXPENSES (SU 215)
Operations and Maintenance 77,095 811,726 84 86;945 89;688' 92:777; 95;9841 99310) 102 :761: 106;342` 110,058'
Existing Debt Service - -
NewDebt Service
- - - - -- -- -- -- --
--
-
-
--
System Reinvestment Funding _ _ -
_ - _• __
Total - Rudkin Road 77,095 81,726• 84'293' 861945 89688; 921777' 959841 99,310) 102:7611 106:342? 110758)
CALCULATED UNIT COST (5/MG) 2090 2011 2012 2013; 2014; 2015! 2016; 20171 2018: 2519) 2020:
Calculated Rudkin Road O&MIMG S 118.31 S 525,07 $ 128:85, S• 1 5 138:13: 0' 140143: $' 144187; 9' 149:477 Y 154 :222 5' 1592141 5' 164:221
CALCULATED UNION GAP'S SHARE OF RUDKIN ROAD PUMP STATION 2010 201111 2012' 2013: 20141 2015 2016; 2017! 2018: 2019) 20201
Union Gap Flow 176.95 178.75 180154 183.34: 1841177 186:01) 1871871 189175; 1911641 1933563 195150'
Calculated Union Gap Billing (a) S 25,935 S 22;337 3. 25;226; 5 24(130) 5 25;0701 5 28 ;120; 31 27)2177 $' 28)3611 9! 29;556; 3' 30;803) 3! 32;1051
check 27.16% 27.36% 27:55 3. 27175 % 27195 % 28:15% 28:36% 28158 %. 28176 %. 28297% 29:17%
tai calculation methodology per Formula prescnbed in section 3.5 of eosar34•Party Agreement beteeen City of Volume, Unon Gap and,TeneeeNe,ghts.
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA,MODEll - June -2' 20131
(425) 867 -1802 — Wholesale - UG Rudkin Rd P5=
6f2)201tl112:42'PMI Peye355-- 01'88;
• 111 •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Unmetered Union Gap Flow Revenue and Rate Calculations
FLOW FORECAST 2010 2011! 2012' 2013' 20141 2015 2016! 20171 2018' 2019' 2020'
Union Gap Unmetered Flow (MG)
Union Gap
Unmetered 9.50 9;60 9:60 9:60' 9:601 9 :60` 9:60) 9601 9:601 9:60: 9:601
Total - Union Gap 9.50 9.60 9.60 9160' 91601 9160' 9:60' 9:60` 9:60' 9:60: 9:60
CALCULATED UNIT COST (58110) 2010 20111 20121 2013' 2014! 20157 2016: 2017! 2010. 20191 20207
Treahnent Plant O8M (SU 232) $ 4,943,520 5 5,491k450. 5. 51579597' 5: 5;759021! 55 5)946 ;927 0: 6(1653841 5 6(400:8941 $5 6;641546? 0? 6 :892,656' $) 7:153:757' St 7;425;6022
Rudkin Road Flow (MG)
Union Gap
Metered 567.48 169:1,5 170185. 172:55; 174128: 176102! 177:781 179:56: 181:36! 183:17; 165.00)
Unmetered '9.50 9:60 9.691 91791 9:89 9 :98: 10 :083 10 :191 10291 10 :39? 10.49? _
Total - Union 065 _ 176.98 17975 180154' 152341 184:17' 186 :01! 187:87,' 189:751 191:64: 193:56: 195501
City 474.68 47943 481.22 489:06; 493 :95 - 498 :89 5031881
508:92? 514:011 599:155 5 241.344
Total - Rudkin Road Flow (MG) 651.66 658:181 664.76' 671.411 678 :12! 684 :901 691:75; 698 :677 705.65: 7.12 :781 7.19541
Treatment Plant Flow (MG)
Union Gap 1176.98. 1178.75 180 :54' 182:341 184:17,' 186:011 187:87; 189)75! 1911641 193:563 195:50)
Terrace Fieights 21644 22062 222:83' 225106 227:311 229158 231188' 234120) 236:54 238:901 241129:
City 3,736,83 31168.201 311.991881 31231188; 312641201 3129664! 31329:811 3 ;363 :111 3396:741 31430:701 3:465:011
Del Monte 78.23 78 123' 18123' 18:23: 18:23' 18:23' 18:23' 18:23? 18:23; 18123? 18 :231
Total Flow 3,55048 3,685.90 8621)48' 316674511 3)693:98! 3173965 3(767:781 3:805;281 31843:151 3;881:401 3;920:031
Unit Cost (Treatment) $ 1,392.35 $ 1,53350, 5 1;539:50 5: 1;574130 5 1 :6091931 $: 1 :653:70' 8' 11698 :85 51 11745 :431 3 11793:49: 9! 11840:091 5' 11894 :27;
Rudkin Road O8M (SU 215) $ 77,095 5 87,726 5 844293' 5 85945, 5: 89686; 9' 92;777' 5 999841 5 99 ;310: 51 102;761!! 5' 106(342) 5? 1105581
Rudkin Road Flow (MG)
Union Gap 1176,98. 578.75. 180154' 182341 184117: 186:011 187.87,' 189,75! 191:64! 193:563 195:50)
City 474.681 474168 474 474168' 474168: 474168' 474168: 4741681 47468' 4741889 47468 _
Total Flow 651.66 663148 655.221 657 102: 668:86, 660 :691 662:55 6641433 666:321 668241 670181
Unit Cost $ 118.31 8. 112657' f 128166 5: 13233! 5 136 :131 8 140143: 5! 144187; 5 149 :477 8) 1541222 81 159:141 9? 164222
. Total Unit Cost (Treatment and Rudkin Road) 1 0,510.66 5. 1,658:47 5 8,868124' 8, 1;708:631 5' 11746:055 S: 11794:12! $ 11843:72? S: 11894:901 51 11947:71! 51.. 2 :002:225 55 2058:49)
CALCULATED UNION GAP'S COST OF UNMETERED FLOW 2010 2011 2012! 2013' 2014! 2015! 2016: 2017; 20181 2019' 2020
Unmetered Flow Adjustment Factor (a)
Total UG Billable Flow (MG) 9:50. 9:60 9 :601 9:60' 9:601 9160) 9:60) 9.60) 9.601 9.607 9.601
Multiply by:
Total Unit Cost (Treatment) $ 11392.35 $ 1 5 1 $: 1 5, 1,609 :93: $• 1'653:701 $• 1:698:85: 5' 11745:43: 5! 11793:49' 5 1)843:091 $t 11894:277
Plus: Total Unit Cost (Rudkin Rd Flow) $ 118.311 8 125 :07 5 1281651 $, 132:33' 5. 136:13: $: 140:43: $: 144187i 5: 149:47i 5! 1541222 5 159 :14'11 5; 164:22'
Total $ 1,570.66 $ 11,65847 $ 7,668124) 5'. 11706:63; 5. 8748105' 5! 1,794112: 9- 1;843172: 5' 11894190 5 11947,711 5' 2.002:22' S 2:058:49'
Multiply by flow adjustment factor 50% 50% 50% 50 %, 50 %. 50% 55 %. 50 %' 50 %', 50 % 50 %..
Equals: Unmetered Flow Charge $ 7,738 $. 2557 5. 8:003. 5: 0(155 9, 85777 $: 5607' 5! 8 ;845: 5. 9991; $: 95441 S. 9;606: 5? 9;876-
•
Unmetered Flow Charges (a) • . $ 7,738 $ 7,957 5 84003' $; 8;158' 5, 8577' 6t 8:607/ 9- 0 :845i $- 9 ;0911 $i 95441 9) 9505 5: 918761
(a1 cela4tun methodology per lomsda pescnted In seder, 3.7 of easOng4Poty Agreement teh,,een Cq of Yeldina, Umon Gap amt Terrace Ref J1n.
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. '1AKIMA,MODEL -.JUne2_20101 Wholesale —US Unm etered Flow:
(4255867 -1802
6220111112:42'PMI Rege :56iof'863
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Allocation of Plant -in- Service
1 FUNCTIONS OP-Sff R.
WESERVICE� i
I_._._-_____.__— ______ - i
TOTAL I ASIALL.
PLANT-IN- SERVICE COS TS I C USTOMER' FLOW' TREATMENT' O; (HERS; i TOTAL. 1 AIILOCA4'IONIBASISI
Collection 3 52,719,038' 25.00% 75,00 %_ ' 100100% 125P %-Customerf75 %181?
Treatment $ 64,435,637 100:00% ; 100300% 1 Allito,Treatmentt
General Plant • $ 1,909,009 100.00 %� 100)00% 1 As= AlliOther
Customer $ 1 , 3 03,480 100.00% ! 100100% I AIIIto;Customer
— 1
Total Existing Utility Plant $ 120,367,165 $ 1'4,483',240' 1 39;539;278 1, 64!435;637 5. 11,909 ;009) I $' 1
Sewer Service Functions I 12231' 33:38 % 54140%' I 100:00 %
Allocation of "As All Others"
1 1 235 $. 637,1941 • $' 11,038;41311 $, (1 {$; -- I
I I !
TOTAL S 120,367,565 I S 14;718044 S 40076472 1 65;474(045i 3 -. I S ;36741681 I
Allocation Percentages T00.00%) 1221% 33:38% 54t40 %,; 3• -. 1 100100%' I
check plant in service total 120,367,165
Allocation of Operating Expenses
2010 '
TOTAL } I FUNCTIONS OF WA\TERiSERVICE. ASIALL I
OPERA TING EXPENSE COSTS 1 CUSTOMER'' FLOW! TREATMENT OTHERS I TOTAL. ALLUCATIONIBASIS;
SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS ,
WASTEWATER COLLECTION (UNIT #211)
Salaries - Permanent $ 1,097,311 i Q00 % 000 %' 0:00% '0.001/ 0100 % I As:CollectioruPiantt
Salaries - Temporary $ 11,141'' 0,00% 0.00 % 01001 '0100% 0100% As:Collection:Plant:
Longevity $ 44,3551 0.00 % 0,00 % 1100% 0:00 %; 0)00% As:CollectiomPlantt
Deferred Comp 3 32,972 i 0.00% 0.'00 %' 0:00 %' '0:00 % I 0)00% As ;GollectioniPlantt
Overtime 3 12,0001 0.00% 0.00 %, 0 0.00 % 06:00 %I 0'00% As;CollectiomPlant;
i
Special pay $ 19,700 1 0.001/' 0.0011 '0300 581 '0:00 % 0)00;% As:CollectiomPlantt
Special pay - staff ' $ 396 ' Q00 % '0.00% 0 000 % 0100 %I 0:00% As:CollectioniPlantt
Retirement/termination cash out 3 8,722 j 0.00 % 0.00% UIDD% '000 %1 0;00% As;CollectioniPlantt
Social security $ 89649 I 0.00 %; 0.00 % 0:00 %, ;O M %I 0)00% I As:C011ectiomPlantt
PERS $ 62,1601 0.00 %, '0.'00 %• '0.OD % '6.0D %I 0100% As;CollectiomPtantt
Industrial Insurance S 45,3751 0.00 %' 0.00% '0.0081 '0.0D% 0100 % As:CollectloniPlantt
Life Insurance $ 2,756 i 0.00 % 'ADD% Q00% 0000% 0100P /o As:CollectiomPlantt
Life Insurance - Management $ 835 ; 0.00 %`; 0.00 %' 0:00 % 660 %1 0I00% As
Medical Insurance $ 159,878 ' 0.00% 0.00 %' •0.00% '0.00%1 0)00% A's:CollectiomPlant;
Medical Insurance - Management 3 20,523 j 0.00%, 0.60% O:OD %' '0100% 0100% 1 As:CollectiomPlantt
Dental Insurance $ 19,134 , 0.00% D.00% D.DD% '0:00%, 0)00% As;CollectloniPlantl
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAI4IMA,MODEL- June:2' 201111 6/2/20111 12:42'P,MI
(425) 867 -1802 outside'City'Strong:Waste•Alloc: Page :57fof:88',
• III ID
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Dental Insurance - Management $ 732 j 0.00 %' 0.00% 0!00% 1 0;00 s 0:00% i As:CollectioniPlanh I
Dental Insurance - Exempt
P $ 2,245 ; 400% 0.00 %` 1100% IMO i 0!00 % 1 As:CollectiomPlantt I
Unemployment Compensation $ 3,666 0.00% 0.00% 0;00 % . 0.00 0!00 % i As:CollectiomPlantt
Uniforms / Clothing $ 1,500 0.00% 0.00% OAD% 0!00 0700 %'j As:CollectiomPlantt j
Office and operating supplies ! $ 40,000 0.00 %I 0,00% 0.00% two i (n0% ' As:C011ectiomPlanft 1
Operating supplies - fuel l
$ 5 0,000 0.00 %; O,OD% A:DO %' •A!DD. { 0!00:/ As:CoflectlomPlanb j
Small tools and minor equipment ;. $ 2,500 0.210 % 0.00% 0;00 % 01013. 0]00% As:CollectionmP.lant:
Grouting chemicals 1 S 20.000 0.00 %: 010 % 0!00% '0:00' 0:00% AllttoiTreatmentt I
Professional services • 5 6.000 i 0,00 %' D.00% 0.00% 0 :.. • M00% 1 As;CollectiomPlantt j
Telephone $ 1,651 I 0.00%, 0:00 % 0:00% •0:00' j 0700°/ As :C0tlection1Ptant1 I
Cell phone $ 5,301 0,00% 0;00 %' 0:00% 0;00' 0!00% As :CollectiomPlant: j
Data communications - 5 408 , 0.00 %' 0,00 %' 0:00 % "T,0D' !! 0 :00% As:CollectiomPlanti f
Transportation . $ 1,800 0,00%. 0,00% 0,'00% 0.00' f 0:00% I As:C0tlectron:Plantl i
Advertising $ 200 0.00 %. 0.00% 21.00% O.n• 0 :00% I AIIIto:Customerr j
Rentals - outside $ 2,000 000% 0.00 %' 0.00 %' ADD. As:CollectioniPlant I
Pacific power and Tight $ 15,482 ; 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % '0:00' 0:00% AsiC•llectfon :Plant,
Cascade natural gas $ 13,622 : 0.00 % 0.00% 0:00 % 0.(•• 0700 % , As:CollectiomPlanti
Sewer 5 964 0,00% 0.00% , 0:00% 0i0D°. 0!00% l As:CollectiomPlantt I
Water $ 2,427. • 0,00°,51 GOBS 29.E % 0;DD' 0 : :00% As:CollectiomPlantt
Refuse $ 2,200 ; • 0.00% 0 10
,00 % .00%' 000° 0!00% I As ;CbtlectiomPlantt i
Stormwater S 620 ' 0.00 % t00% 0.00 %' 0.00' - . 0 :00 %! A's.CollectiornPlantt
R&M / Contractors 5 16,000 0.00% 0,00 %; 0!00. 0!00? i 0:00% Ae
Miscellaneous expenses ' 1
Pe 3 2,500 ; 0.00 %; O.OD% D!OD %' �0!DD'. 0700% � A's:CollectiomRla
Dues and subscriptions $ 100 (1.00 % . 0:00 %' 0:00 %; '0.00 ?' k 0100% I As:CollectioniPlantt ■
• Recruiting expense $ 500 0.00%! 0,00% 0:00% '0:00" ! 0!00% As'C0llection,Plantt
State / County taxes and assessments $ 0,00 %) '0.00 % 0:00 %' 6:D0° 0700 % As:CollectiomPlantt
Rentals / M&O Garage $ 39,428 0.00 %{ 0.00% 0:00 %' °.000° j 0!00% As;CollectioniPlantt
Rentals /replacement - garage $ 139,000 0.00 %. 000 %: D:OD% 'ODD: 0700% A's:CollectioniPlantt I
Rentals / M&O Radios $ 2,256 ' 0.00 % 0.00% 0:00% 000 0 00% As;C011ection,Plant■ I
• Operating equipment $ 30,000 i 0.00 % 77 0.00 %' D:DD %' 0.00' . 0:00% As:Collection,Plantt 111E
Interfund in lieu of tax 5- - I 0.00 %l . 0.00 % 0:00 %; 0 :00' . 0 ?OOP /° As:CollectiomPlent: I
Interfund charges - insurance services $ 338,135 co* 43.00 % .0,O0% '0:8.:. 0:00% As•C0llection,Planti
Interfund charges - city services $ 181,270 ! 0.00% 0,00 % M00% i0 :D0° 0 :00 % AllitoiCustomerr j
Interfund char es - customer services 7
9 $ 475,100 0.00 %' 0:00 %� D!DD %' •0100 M00% AllltoCustomerr I
RUDKIN ROAD PUMP STATION (UNIT 0215) l r i j
I ■
Salaries - peanent -'5 16,496 0.10%• 400 %' D:DD %
permanent D:DO' i 0700 % As;C0llectlon :Plantt i
Longevity -$ 1,011 '0.00% 000% 0:10 4 '0:0 i 0:00% I As,Collection'Plant: j
Deferred comp . $ 469 0.00% 0 - 00% 0:00 % ` 0...' 0700 %1 As:CollectiomPtantt
Overtime $ 1,600 0.00 100 %1 0 :00% 0.00: 0!00 % As;Cotlectlon,Planh
Social security $ 1,369 0.00%: 0.00 %' 0.00% 0!00' 0 :00% As:C0llectioniPlantt j
PERS ' $ 950 f 0.00% 0,00% 0:00% ADD ' • 0!00% As,C011ectiomPlantt
Industrial Insurance $ 767 ; 0.00 %' 0,00 %' 0.'00 % 0...' • j M00% 1 As:CollectiomPlantt
Life Insurance $ 38 ' 0,00%l 0.00% '0.00% 0:•.'. 0700% I As;Coltectton,Plantt
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA,MODEI1.- -June :2201111 6/2/20111 12:42:PM1
(425) 867 -1802 OutsideiCity'Strong :Waste :Allot.
Bage'58 °of'88?
111 111111 III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Life Insurance - Management $ 12 400% 000% 0'00 %', '0 . 0100% I As;COIIectioniPlant, I
Medical Insurance $ 2,043 0.00 %} 0.00% 0:00 %• 000° M00% As+CollectioniPlantt
Medical Insurance - Management $ 521 0.00 %' 0.00% '0.00% 0.00' i 0100% I As;Cotlection'Plantt
Dental Insurance $ 263 ' 0,00 %' 0.00% '400 %' 0:00' ; 0)00% As;CoIlectlonlPlantt I
Dental Insurance - Exempt $ 104 j 0.00 %, 0,310 %` 000% 0100' 0100% A's CollectioniPlantt
Unemployment Compens
$ 55' 0.00 % 0,00% 1 0:00 % • 000> ! 0!00 % A'sCollectiomPlant:
Office and Operating Supplies ! $ 2,500 0.00% 000 % 0.00 %' 0:00' . 0100% I As ;CollectlomPtant; j .
Operating Supplies - Fuel $ 1,820 0.00% 0.00 %' 0:00% 0:00' 0100% 1 As.CollectioniPlantt I
Telephone ,_$ 332 0,00% 0.00 %' 0:00 %; '000' 0100% As;CollectiomPlanti I
Pacific Power and Light $ 18,128 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0:00' { 0;00% As:Collection1PIant: I
Water $ 890 0,00 %. 0,00% 000 % 0(00''. 0100% {� As:CollectioniPlantt
R&M / Contractors $ 500 0.00 % 0.00 % 13.00 % •0:e': 0 /00% (`( AsiCollection•:Plant' I
Rentals / Replacements - M&O - Garage , $ 1,030 ' 0.00 %1 0.00% 1 0.00%1 0100• 0!00% As CollectioniPlant
Rentals / Replacements - Garage $ 537 0.00% 00015 1 0:00 % 0.1•' 0!00% As:CollectioniPiant;
Interfund Charges - Insurance services
9 $ 13,801 j 400%, 0;00% 0100% �O;DD °, i O:OD%' As;CollectiomPlanC i
Interfund Charges - City services $ ' 14,007 j 0.00% 1100% 000% X0100• i 0'00 % AIIIto,Customer.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (UNIT (1232) ( E • ;
Salaries - Permanent $ 1,821,203 0.181 % 1300 % 100:00 % 000 ', 100)00% ( Allito +Treatment[ {
Salaries - Temporary $ - 0.00 %' 0.130 %, 100.0D% 0110' • 100100 %' Allito>Treatmentt I
Longevity $ 83,021 0.00 %' 0[00 %• 100:00% 09X7'. 10000% AIIito +Treatmentt I
Deferred Comp • S 54,225 0.00%l 41313% T00.00 % ( OM' 100100%' All lto>Treatmentr
Overtime $ 65,000 0.00% 0,00 % 10409 % +0:00' I 100100 %' AilIto,Treatment
Retirement / Termination Cash Out $ - 0.00% 0070% 100:00% 1000: j 100:00%' AIIIto,Treatmentt
Social Security `$ 148,425 0.00%1 • allow 109.00 , O )DD•. 100;00:/ AllltoiTreatmentt
PERS '$ 103.603 ' • 0,00 %. '0100 % 100100 %1 X0100:.1 100700% AllitmTreatmentt I
Industrial Insurance $ 74,296' 000 % O.OD% '100!00% 0!001 100!00:/ AIIItmTreatmentt f
Life Insurance $ 3,868 ' 0.00 %t 0100 % 100100 %t "0.00: ! 100'00 %' Allito>Treatmenti
Life Insurance - Management $ 2,021 0.00% - A'00% 100,00% (0100• 100 )00% Allito>Treatmentt 1
Medical lnsurance $ 206,676 0.00% 11.0D % 100. 10/00 I 100!00% AllIto +Treatment I
Medical Insurance - Management 5 69,599 0,00 % 000 % 1'00100 % WO. 100100% AIIUo>Treatmentt
Dental Insurance . $ 26,861 000 % 11,1X)% 10000 % 000. • 100'00% Alllto>T'reatment: I`
Dental Insurance - Management t '$ 420 0,00% 000 % 1170:00 % 000 :. 100100 %'( Alhto>Treatmentt I
Dental Insurance - $ 10,814 000 % 0.00% 100:00 15' 00100' 100!00% Allito•Treatmentt
Unemployment Compensation $ 6052 i 0.00 % 0.100% 100:09% 0:1317 100100% Allito>Treatmentt i
Uniforms / Clothing : $ 3,300 000 % 40085 109:00% 0100 :. t 100100% Alllto>Treatmentt
Office and Operating Supplies • $ 200.000 1 0,00 % 000% 10000% 0:00•' 100100% All /to +Treatment
Office Supplies - Fuel $ 30,000 0.00%" 0,00 % 100:00% '0:00' I 100100% AII!toiTreatmentt I
Small Tools and Minor Equipment . $ ' 10,000 0,00 % 000% 100.00% 1 D:'r' 7 100100% Allito,Treatmentt I
Bioxide Chemical $ 60,000 , 0.00 % 000% 10000% , 0330 °. 100100% Alllto>Treatmentt
Chemicals $ 140.000 0.00% 0.00% 10400 %: 011X1: 100!00% Alf :to'Treatmentt I
Liquid Chlorine $ 5,000 ' 0.00 %, 0.00 %, 100.00 %' '0.00: 100)00% AIIRoiTreatmentt I
Professional Services $ 25,0001 0.00% 000% 10400 % 0:00•, 100!00% 1 Alltto>Treatmentt 1
Telephone S 11,539 0,00 %I 000% 100!00 %' 0:00: i 100700% I AllttoiTreatment
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. Y:AIWMA.M00EE - June:2' 201111 6/2/20111 12:42'PMII
(425) 867 -1802 outside•City•Strong;Waste:Alloc: P.age:59of�883
• III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Postage $ 890 ; 10000 % 000% 1.00% 0.00• 100100% 1 AII•.to ;Customer,
Cell Phone ' $ 3,296 0.00% 0013 %' 100:0% 0,00' j 100100% I All'to
Transportation , $ 5,000 0,00% 0.00 %' . 10000 % 11011 . 100100% I AllitcuTreatmentt
Advertising 3 500 j 10000% 0.009' 1:00% O.00 100)00% ' All:to:Customerr
Rentals - Outside 5 3,000 000 % 0.00% 100:00 % 0100' 100:00% AII'to
Operating Rentals and Leases , S 300,000 1 0.009 0:00% 10000 %' ADD • 100:00% I Alllto:Treatmentt
Pacific Power and Light . $ 395.000 ! 0.009' 0.00% 10000% 0100• ! 100100% I Altito+Treatment; I!
Water $ - 18,921 0.00 % 0100% '100,00% 0:00' ! 10400% I Allito)Treatment
Refuse $ 3,675 j 0.00% 0.00% 100:00 % 0 :0044 100100% AII1to :Treatmentt
Yakima County Landfill $ 3,400 0.00% • 0.00% 100:00% 0:00' 100;00% AIlito'Treatmenti
Ditch Charges ' 5 - 6,500 0.00% 0.00% 100,00% '000' • 100 :00% I AIIIto,Treatmentl
Wastewater Treatment Biosolids $ 200,000 ' 000% 000% 100:00 % 0.00' 100:00% All :to:Treatmentt
Stormwater $ 6,650 0.00* 0.00%, 100.00% 0100' 10400% I AIllto,Treatmenll
R&M / Contractors $ 30,000 0.00 % 010% 10000 % 0:00' . 100:00% I AIIlto,Treatment:
Miscellaneous Expense $ 6,500 000% 000% 100:00% 000'. 10400 % I All:to:Treatmenl'
Dues and Subscriptions $ 8,000 000 % - 0A09' 10000% 21:011 10400% I A1llto,Treatmentt
Recruiting Expense ' $ 2,000 , 000 %I 0.00 %' 100.00% 1:00:. i 10400P/ 1 All'to,Treatmentt
DOE WW Discharge Permit Fee 5 85,700 000 % ODD % 100.10 %' '000•. 100:00% I AILto,Trea[mentt
State / County Taxes and Assessments 5 - 0.00 %' 0.00% 100:00 % 0 :00' • 100:00% I AII•.to,Treatmentt
Rentals / M&O Garage $ 50,105 ; 0.00% 000% 100.00% 000' 100:00%1 AllitoiTreatmentt
Rentals / Replacement - Garage $ ' 50,000 1 ' 0.00 %, 0.10 % 100.00 %` 000' • j 100100% 1 Allitoirreatmentt
Operating Equipment $ 10,000 0 -00 % 0.00% 100013% 0 :00 °. j 10400% j AIl!to'Treatment
i
PERS Prior Service $. 3,200 0.00 %; - 0.'00 % 100.00 % 0100' 100:00% Alllto,Treatmentt
Interfund Charges - Insurance $ 296,731 ! 0.00% 0:00% 100!013%i 1100" 10400% AllltcuTreatmentt
Interfund Charges - City Services $ 579,240 100.00%' 0.00 %t D00 %' 1100• [ 100:00 %' AII!to:Customer,
WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT (UNIT 8233) i I l
Interfund In -Lieu of Tax $ - 000 % 0.00 %; 000 % 0:00° 1 400%' Allito,Treatmentt
Interfund Charges - Insurance $ 3,451: 000 %! '0.00%. 0 :00% _1/00' 400% Alllto,Treatmentt
Interfund Charges - City Services
9 N $ 49,437 000 %' 0.00% 0 :130 % DIDD:. 0100% Alllto,Treatmentt
Interfund Charges - Customer Services $ 15,000 000 %; 0
0,'100 %' 010'1 % ,00• t 01009/0' All:to:Customerr
Salaries - Permanent $ 422,770 0.00 %! 0.00 %' O:DD% 40:. °: 0.00 % Alllto,Treatmentt
Longevity $ 14,444 • 000 % 000 % 0,00 % 0.,,', 400% AlIitmTreatmentt
Deferred Comp S 12.668 ; 0.00 %i 000 %' 0100% '0D0° f 0:00% ' All1to,Treatmentt
Overtime $ 800 0.00 %' 0.00 %' 0:O0 % 0100 °.! 0100 %' Anito :Treatmentt
Social Security
Y $ 34,207 0.00% 0100% ADO %' 0:00° I 400 % I All•.lo,Treatmentt
PERS $ 23,799 j 0.00% 000% 13:03% '0:00° 0100% All 1to,Treatmentt
Industrial Insurance $ 14,503 000 % '0.a0% 0 :00% 0100° 400% AU!to :Treatmentt
Life ln surance $ 987 0.00 % 1.10 % 0:00% 1100 °. 0100% AIllto,Treatmentl
Life Insurance - Management $ 349 0.00% 0:00 % 0%' 0.'
:00 00 °. 400% Alllto,Treatmentt
Medical Insurance $ 48,015 0.00 % 13.00% 0.'009' 0 0 :00° 400% Alllto
Medical lnsurance - Management $ 15,124 0.00% 0.00% 0100 % :000' ' 400% Allito)Treatmentt
Dental lnsurance
S 6,852 0,00% '0.013% '0.00 % O :OO . 0100% Alfto,Treatmentt
Dental Insurance - Management $ 52 ' 0,00 %. 0.00% '0:00% 0:00: i 0100% AIUto,Treatmentr
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA.MODEI!.- June2' 201111
- 6/2120117 1 Mi
(425) 867 -1802
Outside. City Sirortgi Waste :Allot:
P.age.60;of�88't
III . .
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Dental Insurance - Exempt ` $ 2,798 : 0.00 % 0,00% 0:00 % MOO %; 0700% 1 AlI to •
Unemployment Compensation $ 1,390.1 0.00% 0,00 %! D:W ?7°' D:00%1 0700 ? /o ! AllstoiTreatmentt
Uniforms 1 Clothing - $ 600 0.00 % 0.00 %4 '0.00% t0i00% 0!00 % I All:to,Treatmentt
Office and Operating Supplies $ 5,500 i 0.00 % 0.00% 1100 % 000%1 0700% i Aifto f � f
Operating Supplies - Fuel ; $ 8,000: • 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00% •0100 %t 0!OO 1 Allito
Small Tools and Minor Equipment • $ 250 1 0.00% 0.00 %. 0:00 % •0,00 %� OIOD %' All7toiTreatmentt
Chemicals , $ 250 I 0,00 %' 1100% 0.00% D:D0% 0!00 % Alllto)Treatment:
Professional Services $ 15.000 j 0.00 %, 0.0D% 0130% 00O %f 0700 % i All!to ;Treatment!
Telephone $ 332 1 0.00 %y 0.00% 0.00 % 0:00 %1 0!00% I AllttoiTreatmentt
Postage $ 535 ! 0.00%; 0.0D% 0:00 %" 01009(1 0100% 1 Alllto)Treatmentt
Cell Phone 1 $ 1,578 i 0.00% 0.00 % 10,'0051 •0300 %j M00%1 Alllto,Treatmentt
Transportation . $ 1,000 ; 0.00% 0.00 %' '0.0O% (0.0094 i - 0?00% Al lito
Advertising ' $ 2,000 I 0,00% '11.00%; 0.00 %' :D ;000 1 0:00% AllIto■Treatmenu
R &M 1 Contractors 7 $ 750 a 0.00 %'_ 1).010% 1'1.'00 %' 1'1.'00 %' 1 000%1 M00% i Alllto >Treatment:
Miscellaneous Expense I $ 1,000 ': 0.00 % 0,00%, 9:00% O:OD% I 0700% E Alltto>Treatmentt
Dues and Subscriptions ' 5 1,000 ) 0.00 % W %' 0 (0
', 0. 00% 0 % 0700% All!togreatmentt
Recruiting Expense ' $ 0,00% 13.00% •0.W% 0,00 %1 0!00% AllttoiTreatmentl
State / County Taxes and Assessments $ t o.00% 0.00% 0.00 %' ImD% I 0!0o % ' Ail!toiTreatmentt
Rentals / M &O Garage $ 3.091 I 0.00 % - 0.00% Di00% 0:00% 0!00% AllIto+Treatment.
Rentals / Replacements 9 lacements - Garage $ 8 1
,944 � 0.00 %; lAW %' 0.00% . •0100 %! 0!OD ?Jo AllttoiTreatmenti
Operating Equipment $ 5,000 . 0.00 % i 0.00 % 0;00 % 000%1 Ot00% 1 AII!to'Treatmentt
•
FINANCIAL MODEL TAX CALCULATIONS . 1 ■ E
B &O and State Excise Taxes (excludes wholesale revs, per City policy) ) 5 161,705 I . 0.00 % 0,00 O.OD% alkov 1 0!00 % As
City Utility Taxes (Excludes wholesale revenues, per City policy) • $ 2,271,879 1 0,00% 43,00% 0300% •O:DD %I 0!OD% As
1
Add'I O &M from CIP ; $. ; 0.00,%! 000% '000 1‘ W0541 0!00% All!tojContributedlFlaw' E €
I i II
Total O eratin Ex nses - '� • ___...W • .___.��__.___ ^` �~ i 4 1
P 9 Pe 1 $. 5,229 1 5 58016301 $. - $t 4164815071 $; - $; 51229;23.1! I
Sewer Service Functions 1 1111..10% 0700;/; 88190 % 100!00%
• Allocation of "As All Others" 5 - 5 - $, - $, 1
1
■ I
TOTAL $ 5,229,23/ $ 580,630 • 5 -- $ 4,648/6017 5 -• I $, 5;22912311 j •
Allocation Percentages i S4.10 %. 0:00% 88:90?%; 0:00 %• 1 100/009/' I i
check total operating expenses
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA• - June•220111; 6/2/20111 12:42 :RM4
(425) 867 -1802 Outside•City•Strong,Waste:Alloc: P.age.611of-883
• • .
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Outside City Strong Waste
Functional Allocation of Costs to Outside City Customers
Allocation of System Operating and Maintenance Expenses (511232)
System Functional:Allocation:
Revenue
Requirement Allocation Allocation basis AllocabI6Costi: CUSTOMER. FL'OW.' SOD' TSS As:All:Other, ii Total!
Customer $ 580,630 ' 0,00% Net Allocable 0. - 100% .0% 0% •0% 0%11 100%
Flow $ - 0,00%' Not Allocable $ - 11 0% 900% '0% - 10% '0941 100%
Treatment $ 4,648,601 • 100.00% Alt allbcable $ 4,648',60111 0% 0% 50% 30% l55. 100 %'
Total 5 5229,231 9. 416481605 E 5. - Y -, 5 7432413011 5 2;324;3011 5 11 5 1 41648;6011
Sewer Service Functions 0100% 8100 %, 50:00% 50:00 %' 100:00%
Allocation of As All Other is $ - 5 -. 5 5 -• 5 -: 1 .15 1 --
Total _ _ .. 64
5 4,8,80'5 6 -- $ - 5 1,324301{ $• 2:324;381! 5 - S• 4;648;6011
check to revenue requirements 5,229,231
Allocation of System Annual Depreciation
PunctionallAllocatiom
System Annual Total)
Depreciation Allocation Allocation basis A1lbcablaCostr CUSTOMER FLOW: BOD) TSB A0A010therr 1 ABocatlom .
. 1
Collection $ 1,054,381 50.00% Assume 50% allocable 5 527,190 I 25,00% 750096 ' 0;00% :0000% 100094 100%
Treatment $ 1,288,713 .100.00% A3. a0ocabte $ 11,288,7113' : 10.00 %' • • 40096 .50100% 30:80% 0100% 100 %'
General Plant $ 38,160 100,00%' Not Allocable 5. 38,1'80 ! ' - 0:00% ', 0000% ' !000% • 101313% ' «Y001001i1 100°
Customer $ 26.070 • ' 0.00%. Nbt Allocable $ - i i ' '10000% ' ' 0,'00% ' 000% '0100% 10!0041 100%
1.
Total $ 2,407,343 S 1,854(083.41,$ 131;7981 5' 395;3931 5 84413581 5 6441358 5 381180; 1185410831
Sewer Service Functions 7:26% 2117,7 %, 35:48 %• 35 %�I 100%
Allocation of As AB Other 115 2:7711 $- 853131 5 1315481 5 10;548' 5 (3111180)H5 -•
Total 6 0,554,083 $ •241569 5 4091708 $ 857;905. 5 657;9941 $1 — 5 1 185420831
check to calculated depreciation $ 2,407,343
Allocation of System Net Plant
I. FuncttonailAllbeatlon:
System Net 11 ii Totals
• Plant Allocation Allocation basis Allocable Cost:{ CUSTOMER: FL'0W1 BOOT 1 As:A1110ther: Allbcatlom '
L I
Collection $ 37,321,254 , • • 50,0096 Assume 50% allocable $ 18:660)827 F - 25;00%. 75,00% • ' '0:00% '0100% - 101009 100%
I' i
Treatment $ 44,442,247 .,100,00% All allocable 5. 44',442;247 0.017% 0.0096 $41;00% '50:00% :0:009; 100%
I .
General Plant $ 1,327,035 100.00% Not Allocable 5. 1.327,035 L • 0.00% 0;00% 0:00% -'0100% 100330% 100%
11 1
Customer $ 730,791 0.0016 Not Altocable $. - 100.0056 0100% '0100% '0:00% . 10;00% 100%
Total $ 83,821,327 $ 6414291909 : . 5 4,689115T 5 13;995;470: 5 2212210241 51 22122111241 5 1 132740374115 641429)9093
Sewer Service Functions 7.39 %. 22:18 %, 35:21 %% 35:21 % 11 100%
Allocation of As All Other E 1 98;,107,' $1 29413211 5 487;3041 5 467;3041 5 (1;3271035)1;5 --
f :;
Total 5 64,429;903115 41769,2641 5, 14;28917911 5 2216881428' 5 22)688;4281 5 -• 1i$1 64142919091
check to plant in service $ - 7 :39% 22:18%. 35:21%. 35121 %, 0:00 % 11
1
Construction work in progress 5 7.707,385.1 5 5691802: 5 1;709)407; 5. 21714088' 5 2)714)0881 5 -.
• III III
•
(allocated per total plant) 50%, of CWIP' 9 284 S 8545703+ S 1;357,0441 S 1!3574044'' 5 -• • .•
•
Assumed) Rate of Return 5.00% 5.0096 S100% '5:00% '51088 '
Add: t '0
Adjustmerrtfor R1skFactor ..8% 'D.25% 1311, X0.25% '0.2594;
Total, 5.25% 515% 5.25",6 '5,25% 315
Return on Rate Base
i 5 26S)029' S 795 t_ 1;262387 5 7,263:387 0. - L F 315841889)
Utility Basis Rate Components
Allocated Cost of Service
CUSTOMER: FLOW' BOD' T85; ( Tota0
O&M 8 -• $, -• 9: 2132453011 T 2532413011 9) 4164856011 i
Depreciation Expense $1 1944569' 9 403!708; S 657;9041 53 6575904: (f; 1!854!0831
Return on Rate Base I
Total f 266;029' 51 795;0881 S: 7;262;3871 $: 1;262;3877 - -- -- - - F 3;584;BBT I
L 399;891 f• 1;1955792 5; 412441592'. S• 41244)592: IS 15508715735
TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS 2010' 201111 2012! 2013; 20141 20155 2016 20177 20101 20191 2020)
TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS
• Influent(Flow; MG) 3550 3,586 3',621, 31656: 316941 3:7311 3:7681 3805' 31843' 3 :8811 3;9203
Biological Oxygen Demand (IBS OF BOD) 10403,6111 10,4991942' 101597236 101895503, 1057945753' 138941995 159961240' 111098497 1112071777; 11130610895 11;41114455
Total Suspended Solids (IBS Of TSS) 8,4191559 8,503123' 815877231 816731068; 5755267; 85845327. 8;93412581 9.0231069' 9:112767i 9,2031363' 91294864'
Fats, Oils, Grease (LBS OF FOG) 152,708 752,708 152,708 152,708, 1521708 1527081 1517091 152706, 153:7001 1527001 15252001
TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS
Flow ;20%
BOD .44%
TSS 36% •
Total 100%
ALLOCABLE TREATMENT PLANT EXPENSES 20770. 20111+ 2011 2013: 20141 2015' 2016; 2017! 20181 20181 2020:_
Allocated Operating Expenses $ 4,6481601' $ 4,788,059' $• 4 5 5079;652: $• 52320411 $: 51389,003: 5• 51550:6731 5' 5;737 :193: $: 5188817097 S. 5065 ;3701 $' 6:247;3311
Annual Depreciation - Treatment 1,854,083 3,064072 2558:483: 2492484/ 2,3151985: 22681835 208812281 2;085148! 2065820 2.0885242: 2086589:
Return on investment 3',584.883 5721992 15902;663 241953637 2:630;7,131 2662655; 2895767: 219641569.' 296415691 2;964;569' 2:9645569'
Utility Tax at 14% 14412;260' 1%1;79;507,' 1 +,31419981 1,398;810 1 114445869' 114741993: 11507;501 1153118941 1155655455 1 :581;7895
Total Treatment Plant Expenses 9 11',499834 $- 99045584 9 10 :707;842'. 5: 155390,309 5 11560317635 S. 1117555383) 5 1210101659' $, 12127554185 $• 12547319925 5 1267417277 51 17,880278'
Cost Component Factors
Flow S 212995967 $ 11,920;91111 0; 2141 51 21275062' $• 253201753; $• 23535073: 5- 2 :402 :132', 5- 2 455084' 5: 1494 1798' 5' 2,5341945 5) 2,576:056'
BOD 5,069;927 42250041 4!7111!4501 5501357361 5110516561 511761760 52841690+ 5 :40111841 54855563 55765880) 5;66753221
TSS 4,139:940 3,4575640' 358541823; 4!100151)11 4117,75355; 4123555311 41323 ;837i 41419;1501 41493637: 4156219021 46365900 "1
Subtotal 10,4995834 9914,854 184707,842 11139013091 11560317631 1317653631 12;0101659: 1252754181 12547319925 12;67417277 128801785
CALCULATED STRONG WASTE CHARGES Current 2010 20:715 20121 2013, 20147 2015; 2016 20177 2018' 2019.'. 2020',
Calculation of Rates
BOD (Mb) S 0,470 $ 0;486 5. 0 :402: 5'' 01445' $• 0)469' 5• 054731 $. 014755 5' ' 0:4811 5: 0 :487; S; 0:4905 $• 0 :493, $ 0:497)
TSS (9,I9) 0' - - 0,487 $ 01492' $1 05407' $. 0)449' 5• 44731 $: 0547,7' 5. 0:4791 5: 0:4841 5: 0 :490) 5i 0:493' $; 0:496? $; 0:499)
memo: FOG rate maintained at current levels„ consistent'with12007'COS
Rates for approval
BOD (Mb) 0 0:4701 0:470' 01470+ '014731 014755 014811 . - 0:487! ' 0 4905 ' 0:4931 . 04971
TSS ($17,) • • 01492' 01487' 0:487' 014731 0:477' 01479) 054841 914903 914933 7,4965 0:499
memo: Inside City strong waste rates maintained) at larger offcurrenttlevels; on calculatedimtes ; pendiscussion, h,Clty.staff!. •
•
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Inside City Strong Waste
TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS 2010 20111+ 2012' 2013: 2014+ 2015. 2016; 2017 2018 2019; 20207
TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT LOADINGS
Influent (Flow; MG) 3,550 3',586• 3,6211 31658 316941 3;7311 3;7681 33805; 31843; 338811 3;920)
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (LBS OF BOD) 10,403,61111 101499•,942' 10 1597;236: 1016951503 1017943753; 10 38941995; 10199632401 1110981497! 11 120.11777,' 111306;0891 111411/445
Total Suspended Solids (LBS OF TSS) 6,419,559 65033223' 3587 :723 8;673068 8;7591267," 7)846 ;3271 839341253 9;023;069' 9)1123767; 9;203;363' 9;2948641
Fats, Oils, Grease (LBS OF FOG) 552.708 152,708 152,708' 152708'1 1'52:708: 152708: 152;708` 152.708; 152: _
7)161 152:7081 1547081
TREATMENT PLANT COST COMPONENTS
Flow , . 20%
800 4345
TSS
FOG 2%
Total 100
ALLOCABLE TREATMENT PLANT EXPENSES 201:0 2011 2012: 2013, 2014' 2015. 2016: 2017i 2018 20181 2020)
Treatment Operations (SO 232) $ 5,2293231 $ 5;399;411111 3 3575,597' 5 3758:0211 $' 519463921 $ 63169;3841 54 634001394 5'. 6 ;64118461 $1 6;8926561 5 7053757; 5 7;426602'
Debt Service - Existing 3,0721715• 3064107,2' 215583483+ 2 :492)4841 233153985' 212683836; 2083226; 2 :0863148: 230883820/ 210883242' 2308635891
Debt Service - New - 572:9117 1190216601 23419)363'' 2;6301743; 23662655+ 2;89617677 2;9641569' 2;9643569+ 2964 15691 23964565)
Utility Tax at 14% 1,162272 142653096, 11,405;1'44 1,4933782' 115251107' 135543122: 115941024 1+1636;959` 1 1672 :4461 1 +708;9201 1 174637471 _
Total Treatment Plant Expenses $ 9,464,218 S 103301,4951 S. 44,4114884' 9' 12,18318501 9 51 12;41837,28 St 121654;9972 St 12 :979;9111 31 13;329;5231 91 13261814922 .5 1339.1514882 S: 14;2231507'
Cost Component Factors
Flow $ 1,832.844 9 2;0601299 9' 2288137.7' $. 21432;730+ 5' 234833745 9; 23530;999' 5; 21595;982 5 236653905; 5 237236981 $; 2 ;78330983 9 2384437011
800 4,069:614 4,429;643. 419201010! 5;2301369 533401052: 34411649' 5;58113623 537311695 5385519521 5)983660) 61176)1083
TSS 3,342,477 3605•,523 4,004,659' 4 4334615541 434293249' 41542;9693 4)665;3333 4176634723 4 1870 ;4211 439783228)
FOG (includes 10% of Treatment Coleclions (311211)) 4911677 5.47;863 550;450 575;016. 5906141 60218493 6273378] 647• ; 945 6673867' 68835431 7,10;0601
Subtotal 9,766,615 10;613;328 115,793;496. 17)499,393 12;7801988" 131009;747' 13134716911 131710;878; 14101339891 14132537211 14 :649;097'
Add: Dedicated annual FOG program
data to come from lab fee- modell
CALCULATED STRONG WASTE CHARGES Current 2010' 20914 2012: 2013: 20141 2015 2016 20177 20184 20191 2020?
Calculation of Rates
BOD (0115) $ • 0,407 9 0.3911 5. 01422' 9. 014643 5. 01489 9; 0)495' 5 01499' 51 015081 5, 01516; 53 03523: 3: 03529 51 0:536;
TSS ($Ab) 3 0.415 9 0.393 $ , 01424 3- 0)466. 5. 014911 5 013961 3 0150,11 5• 01508' 51 0:517; 5' 0 :523: 51 035292 51 0:536:
FOG ($Sb) .3 " 0276 3 ' 0276 S 0276 $ '027.6.9 '0278" - 3 '0:276 1 3 - 10276 :3 30275 3 - 10:276 3' 10:275 3 . 10:276 `s" 4027'0
menlo: FOG rate ),,, ;,,teinedl at current levels, consistent with, 2007 COS study:.
Rates for approval
BCD (5nb) - 0:407 - 01422 • • 0w64! 01489+ 014951 0;4993. 0;508 , 01516) . 0:523? ' . 0:529 ?' - 0:536)
•
TSS ($/lb) , 0:416 .01424 • - 01466+ 014911 0 :4961 - 075011 0 35081 • 0'517' 0 :5231 . 02528? ' . 0)5361
FOG ($!Ib) 0.276 • 0.278 1 •0278 1 0276 11276 +0.'275 - 20276 103275 10 1270 - .113.1P6 •
memo: Inside City strong, waste rates maintalnedlat larger, oficurrent;levels:on calculatedlrates ;,pen discusswmwith,Clty,'stal0
Ili ® 0
. City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Septage Rates
2010 201:11 2012' 2013' 20.141 2015; 2016' 20177 2018; 2019. 2020)
Septage Concentrations
BOD ppm 7500 7500 7;500 7500' 75001 75001 75001 735003 715001 MOO) 500 7500:
TSS ppm 25,900 25;900 25;900 25;9001 25;900: 25;900' 25;9001 2539001 25;9001 25;900) 25;9001
BOD Ibs
TSS Ibs
Strong Waste treatment rates
BOD calculated treatment rates 5 00911 5. 0,422' 5. 014641 5. 0:489' 5' 01495 $, 0:499' 5 0:5083 53 01516; 51 0:5231 5'. 0:5291 5; 0:5361
TSS calculated treatment rates $ 0393. 5. 01424' $' 01466. 5 014911 $. 01496. 51 015011 51 0;5081 5) 0:51Z $' 0:523'. $) 0:5291 $7 0:5361.
(see strong waste rates as calculated(
Weight of one gallon of water &34
Calculated Septage Rates / Gallon
BOD $ 00245 5. 00264' 5. 0302901 5. 00306, 5' 010309' 5. 0)03121 5 0:03171 5'. 0:0323: 5 0:03271 $) 0:03311 $: 0103353
TSS 010850 00916. 0:1007' 0110601 011072: 0/1082 011098 0)1117/ 071130 0 :11433 0:1157:
City dedicated cost for receiving average gallon of septage 0!2732 012814' 0:2898) 0:2985• 0130751 0:3167 0:3262 0 ?33601 0:34611 0:35641 0 :36711 _
• Total 02826 0139941 0)4196. 0143511 0:4456' 0 :45611 0:4678) 0:48001 0 :4917' 0:5039) 0151631
$ .0.250 <- This charge represents the City's current practice ofindlydingt afee' ofc$1 25pergallbn, offseptage ,. Basediomdiscussions:with,City: staff ,`.charge:is'escalated.to'20101
based on inflation and adjusted for inflation moving forward!.
2010 .2011 '2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
BOD(ppm) 7,500 7,500' 75001 75007 715001 745001 71,5001 71500) 7;5001 7300) 7500) tt
TSS(ppm) 25 25,900 25,9001 25,900) 253900 2519001 25;900) 259001 25;9001 251900) 25;900)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 • 2019 2020
Calculated Septage Charges (per gala
BOD $ 010245. 5' 0)0264 5. 0102901 5. 0103061 5 0103091 5; 0:0312: 5; 010317' 51 010323; 5 0 103271 5; 0:03311 5; 0:03351
TSS 030850 010916' 01007 01.10601 03.10721 01.1082: 011098 011117i 0 ?11301 0)11433 0:11571
City dedicated charge 02732' 012814 012898; 0129851 03075 013167 032621 0:33601 0 :34611 0135641 0:36711
Total Charge/Gallon. 5 0.3826 5 0.3994 5 0143961 E' 0143511 E 014456; Et 0145611 E 0146703 5• 074800) $! 0:49.17/ 53 015039? Et 0351631
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Allocation of Plant-in-Service
•
___ _ FUNCT10NS:OE.SEWER'SERVICE.___
TOTAL
PLANT COsrs I FLOW HOD TSS-
A9:AL'I: OTHER9: TOTAL ALLOCATION BASIS'
Collection $ 52,715,538 100.00%' 100'00% All to Flow
Treatment 5 64,435,637 40.00% 30,0015 .30:0016 100.00% Treatment Plant Loadings
General Plant I $ 1,909,909 - 100.0054 100.00% As'AI1:Other'
Customer I $ 1,303480 + 190:80% 100.00% As All :Other:
Total Existing Utility Plant $ 120,367,165 IS- 781493,293 $ 19;330,691: $ 19;330.6911 $ 3:212489 $ 120,367;165"
Sewer Service Functions 67.00%, 16.50%" 16:50%' 100.00%
Allocation of "As All Others- I '5 2,152;359- $ 530;065. $ 530:065' $ (3,212,489) 5. -.
I
'
TOTAL I S. 120,367,165. S 801845,6511 S. 19 :860 :757/ 1, 191880;757/ 5: -, 0: 120 :367;1651
A8ocaton Percentages 100 :00% I 87:0056- 16:50%', 16:5076. 5 -. 100.00%
I
check plant in senate total 120;367,165
Allocation of Operating Expenses
Test Year ea- 1 3099
TOTAL ____ _ FUN_C_7iON8:OF.WATER:SER_VIC_E: ___
OPERATING EXPENSE COSTS. F � ` BOD TSS' AS:ALL OTHERS: TOTAL. ALLOCATION BASIS:
SEWER UTILITY OPERATORS '
WASTEWATER COLLECTION (UNIT 021'1)
Salaries - Permanent I 1,130,230 105.00 % 5:08% 0:00% '0:0010 100.00% As Collection Plant
Salaries - Temporary
I 3 19,475 100,000. 0.00%' '0.00% 0:0011 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Longevity S 45,685 100.00% 0:00% '0.110%, '0:00% 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Deferred Comp I $ 33.061 100801.' '0!0014' '$.00P4 , 000% 100:00% As Collection Plant•
Overtime 1 S 12,360 10500% , 117310% , 0.00% 030%' 100.00% As Collection Plant.
Special pay j 20,291 100.09'5 '000%' $10016' '0.0011 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Special pay - staff I0 408 100.05X' '0.11014 '0:00%' :0.9010 100.00 % As Collection Plant
.
Rehrementttermtnaaon cash o4 3 81984 100.00% 0!00X .wools' '030% 100.00% As Collection Plant
Social security I $ 93.947 100.0016 0.9016' 0:0016 :0,00% 100.00% As Collection Plant'
PERS 3 • 65,579 700.0016' '0:0014 9:0016 '0350% 100:00% As Collection Plant;
Industnal Insurance S 47.871 10000% 11,001' 00:0016 '0:0016 100.00% As Collection Plant;
Life Insurance 3 2.969 100OD% 11:00% 0:0016' !0001) 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Life Insurance - Management S 681 100.0% ''01
000X' '0:00% 01001 10000% As Collection Plant: -
Medical Insurance 5 168,671 100100 1/4' '0100% '0:00%' '0100% 100.00% As Collection Plant,
Medical Insurance - Management 1 S 21,652 100.00% 0.001 D 0016 11.001( 100.00% I As Collection Plant'
Dental Insurance IS 20,196 700100%' 0,00% , 0:00% , 0:00% 100:00% As Collection Plant:
Dental Insurance - Management I S 772 100.110% :0330% '0.00% '0.001, 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Dental Insurance - Exempl I 2,366 10000°F.' '0:00% '0.0016 8.00% 10000% As Collection Plant:
•
Unemployment Compensation I $ 3,776 100:0014' '0.11016 '0:0016 '0.0011 100:00% As Collection Plant:
Uniforms! ClotIng 15 1,545 100,00% 0.00% 0,0014 ;030 %1 100.00 %) As Collection Plant;
Office and operating supplies I $ 41,200 105.0016' '0.00% '0,0016 '0.901/ 1 100.00% ; As Collection Plant;
Operating supplies - fuel ' E 51,500 1100 % '0.000. 0,00% '0:801 • 100.00% i As Collection Plant!
Small tools and minor show-nerd S 2,575 100.•00% 010076. 0.0016 0.00% i 100:00% As Collection Plant:
Grouting chemicals S 20,600 105.00% 0:00% '0.00% '0.00%1 100.00% As- Collection Plant•
Professional services 3 6,150 10000% 0.00% :0.0011 '0,001'; 100100% As Collection Plant,
Telephone I S 1,711 100.00% 0.90% 9.0054 0:001) 100.00% As.Collection Plant'
Ce0 phone I $ 5.460 1000011 0.00%. 0:0014 9.001 I 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Data communications ! $ 420 105.0016 113014 0:0016 0.00%! 100100% As Collection Plant:
Transportation S 1,954 100.00% 0.00 % 0,0011 0.00%: 100.00% AS Collection Plant;
Advertising , S 206 100,00% 0:00% '0.00% '0.901! 100.00% As Collection Plant;
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC. YAKIMA MODEL -June 2_201,1' 622011112 PM •
(425) 867 -1802 Retail:Allocation Page 66 01,88'
• 1111 ill
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Rentals - outside S 2,000 130,03 %' 0:0016 '0,0014 '4.. r! 100.00% As Collection Plant; •
Pacific power and fight 0 15,946 1 100.00% 0,01)% 'ODD% 'O.. . • 100.00% As Plant'
Cascade natural gas s 14,031 100.0066 050%' '6.0076 010. +' 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Sewer E 993 100.00% 340% 3,03% 0:.. + 100.00% As Collection Plant;
Water i 0 2,559 100,30% 0:0076 .00016 D.O. e! 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Refuse ' S 2,266 100.110% 0:0016' 0.00% '➢D. 100.00% As Collection Plant
Stormwater S 0)39 1000016' 0.00% . DV"' D... , I 10000% As Collection Plant:
R&M /Contractors E 16,480 1110.00%' 0:5016' 0100% '0:0 . - 10000% As Collection Plant'
Miscellaneous expenses $ 2,575 100.0066 0.00% 0,011% 'D,'. 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Dues and subscriptions S 103 10033014 0 :0016 0,0014 To ! 100.00% As Collection Plant
Recrw4ng expense 1 $ 515 130,008. 5:00 %' 000% 3:0. , 100:00% As Collection Plant;
State / County taxes and assessments I - 10 13:0014 '0 DD0% , OD• 100.00% As Collection Plant:
• Rentals / M &O Garage S 39,420 _ _ 105.00 %' '0:00% . _ 3.0060 '0.! r 100.00% A0-Collection Plant:
Rentals /replacement - garage s 139.000 100.0016 030% '000% '0.. < 100:00% As Collection Plant
Rentals / M &O Rados Is 2.206 100,00% 0:00% IDDD %' !0,0. ! 100 :00% As Collection Plant •
Operating equipment 1 E 35,000 • 10030% 0.00% 0:0016 :0:.. + 100:00 % As Collechon Plant:
Interund in lieu of tax 1 0 _ 10000 x: 030% 000% '0;! . ! 100.00% As Collection Plant
Inteduntl Merges - Insurance services .E 348279 100.00 %' TOM, 500% '00.' 100.00% As Collection Plant.
Intedund charges - say services S 186.708 100,0016 '0.0016' 0:0014 130. 100.00% As Collection Plant'
Intedund charges - customer services $ 489,353 100.00% '0:03% 3,0016' '05071 100:00% As Collection Plant
.
RUDKIN ROAD PUMP STATION (UNIT 9215) '
Salaries - permanent ;$ 156901 100,00% 5.0016 3,00% '0:.'. 100,00 % As Collection Plant:
Longevity S 1,301 100.0066 0:0016 '0.00%! 13.0. , 100'00% As Collection Plant:
Deferred comb I 0 483 I 100 :03 % 0.80% '0.0014 i0 • ! 100:00% As Collection Plant'
Overtime 5 1,648 100.006.' 0.0010 '03D% 0:•. ' 10300% As Collection Plant'
Social security s 1,444 100.0014 '0:00% 03D% '0.0' < 100.00% ; As Collection Plant' •
PERS E 1,002 100,00% 0.00% '0,0066 0: . 100.00% ' As Collection Plant;
Industrial Insurance :0 809 100,00% '93591' ' '0330% '0,•.+ 100.00 %1 As Collection Plant:
Life Insurance S 4D 100.0015' 0:0011: '0.001: :D:.. 100.00% ' As Collection Plant
Life Insurance - Management $ 13 '100,00 % 0.001S '5:00% , 0:.. 100.00% As Collection Plant;
Medical Insurance I $ 2.155 100,00 % 3 0,00% 0.03% 3:0. ' 100.00% As Collection Plant;
Medical Insurance - Management Is SSD 100.00% 0,00% '0.03% 0,0• 100:00% As Collection Plant:
Dental Insurance 1 0 277 1300016' 0:00% '0300% :0:0. ! 100.00% A0'Collecti,n Plant:
Dental Insurance - Exempt
0 110 100.00%' ODD% :033016' DD. ' 100:00% As Collection Plant; Unemployment Compens 1 0 08 100,00% 000% :0:0010 . :0,0. 100,00% As Collechon Plantr
Office and Operating Supplies I E 2,575 105.3016' 00014 '0,5064 , 0.' . ! 100.00% As Collection Plant:
ODerahng Supplies - Fuel I $ 1.079 105.0011.' '0,0(16, ,0,00%' 0,'. ' 100.00% As Collechon Plant;
Telephone S 302 100.00 56' 0:00% '0,00% '0.. ! 100:00% As Collection Plant;
Pacific Power and Light 1 $ 1$672 100:05 66' 0010% 13:013% '0'+. ! 100:00% As Collection Plant;
Water I 0 917 100:00% .0:00% 0:004 '0,0. • 100.00% As Collection Plant;
R &M / Contractors S 015 15410, 0
0300% '0,0064 1 'O. 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Rentals /Replacements - M &O - Garage $ 7,030 100.00%` 0:00% 03001 '0' 100.00% As Collection Plant:
Rentals /Replacements - Garage 10 537 100.0016 '0,00% 3:00% '0:0. i 100:00% An- Collection Plant;
Intedund Charges- Insurance sennces 0 14,2151 100.0094' 0.0018 '00056 'D:.,' 100.0066 Ad Collection Plant
Intedund Charges - City serv.ces 1s 15,427 101203% 0,00% '0:00% '0! 100.00% As.Collechon Plant;
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (UNIT 0232)
Salaries - Permanent $ 1,875,839 40.0016' 3030% 10.00% '0... 10000% As_Treatment Plant:
Salaries - Temporary S - 40:00% 300016 30:00% :9,. ■ 100.00% 1 As,Treatment Plant:
Longevity $ 85,512 4000 %' 30.00% 3033% 1),.'. , r 100:00 %! As :Treatment Plant:
Deferred Comp E 55,952 40,00 % 30.00% 30:08% '0.0. ' 100.00% ! As.Trealmen/ Plant;
Overtime
! S 66,950 40.0066 3030% 30,00% 333 ' 100.00% • As Plant.
Retirement / Ternxnabon Cash Oul ' I - 40.00% 33,30% 300014, '04.' 100:00% As.Treatment Plant:
Social Security S 156,588 40,00% 30,30% 30:00%' D,'. ■ 100:00% As.Treatment Plant:
PERS S 109,3131 40,00%', 30.00% - 35:001S '0.'. ' 100.00% As :Treatment Planti
Industnallnsurance S 78,382 40,00% '30:0016' 30,00% '0,00 !! 100.00% As_Treatmen/ Plant:
Life Insurance I E 4,081 440066 30.00% 30.00%' 0.0. 100.00% As-Treatment Plant;
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. VAKIMA.MODEO - JUne.2' 201,11
(425) 867 -1802 RetaIllMOCatlanr 6/2/201111Z42 PM'
Page 67bt 8&'
• 11111 11111
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Life Insurance - Management I S 2,133 40.0016 30:0016 '30:0014 5 0.. t '• 10050% As Treatment Plant'
Medical Insurance 'IS 218:043 40,05%' 300014 '3055% 'O.O 10000% As- Treatment Plant'
Medical Insurance - Management r 73.427 40:00% 30,0% .30:0014 0," . 100.00% A0- Treatment Plant;
Dental Insurance I E 20,338 4050% 35:0016 '301130%' :05 7 100.00% 1 As:Treatment Plant:
Dental Insurance - Management I3 443 -450016 30,23016' 30.00% '0.0" 100:00% i As:Treatment Plant.
Dental Insurance - Exempt jS 11,4339 405014" 30335% 30!0016 '0,0" 100.0014 As- Treatment Plant;
Unemployment Compensation S 6305 40:051,6 .3500% 30.00% '5:0. ! 100.00% As- Treatment Plant:
Undo one /Clothing $ 3,399 40.05 1' 30.016' 350016 0:. 100.00% As:Treatment Plant;
Office and Operating Supphes I $ 206,550 40390% 30.0014 .70.014 'DA" - 100.00% As:Treatment Plant:
Office Supplies -Fuel
1 $ 30,950 45.00% 3005 % 30:0016 '0.07 - 100.00% As:Treatment Plant'
Small Tools and Mtnor Equipment $ 15;305 40,001'' 30'00% '300014 '0. "t 100.00% As Plant;
B,oede Chemical IS 61,900 4550,5 30:50% 30
3516 •557. 100.00% As:Treatment Plant:
Chemicals I3 144,200 40:00% 30,05% ,30,9014 'S."t •! 100.006 As:Treatment Plant:
Liquid Chlorine • I S 5,155 40,00% 70,009( 0.5
'3076 0."t 100.00% As:Treatment Plant;
Professional Senores S 25,755 40.00%' 30.0016' '30,00% .0:07 100.00% As Treatment Plant•
Telephone $ 11,885 1 40.0096' '30.00% . 35.05% '007 100.00% As:Treatment Plant;
Postage S 917 40130% 30:00% 30.004 '0:001 100.00% As :Treatment Plant:
Cell Phone 3 3,305 40.50% 30.00% 35.0014 '0.". + 100.00% As :Treatment Plant•
Transportation S 5,150 4550% 30.33075 .30.0014 '0.. r 100.00% As :Treatment Plant"
Advertism9 S 515 40,00 %'" .30013% 30..00% :5059 100.00% I As:Treatment Plant,
Rentals - Outside S 3,900 40.50% 30:05% 35:0016 '0.'. + 100:00 % As:Treatment Plant;
Operating Rentals and Leases 0 359,550 45.014 309016 3000% 15,' . " 100.00% As:Treatment Plant'
Pacd"c Power and Light $ 406,8501 4005% 35 :05% 30'0016 '0:0. 100.00% As,Treatment Plant.
Water 5 19,4891 40.0096 30,0516 303)016 '0.D.. 10000% As. Treatment Plant:
Refuse S 3.785 40,01 3005 30:0516 0,.1" 100:00% As :Treatment Plant,
Yek!ma County Landfill I %' S 3552 45,05% 30.50% 3505% '5," 100,00% AsTreatment Plant:
Ditch Charges :5 • 6,595 .45.0% .30:0076 3500% '335" 100,00% As.Treatment Plant:
Wastewater Treatment ...de I S 205000 400014 30.00% 3010014 30," 7 t 100.00% As:Treatment Plant;
Stormwater 0 8,555 45:016' 30,5014 35,00% '0;.. ' 100.00% As :Treatment Plant
' R&M / Contractors $ 35,955 40.00 % 30:5016' .30,5016 0:0. 100.00% : As:Treatment Plant:
Miscellaneous Expense S 6,6-'05 4500% 30.5576 30,00% '0: +. 100,00% As Plant!
Dues and Subscnpbons 3 9,24D 40,0% 30.00E 350014 -0:" . ' 100.00% As:Treatment Plant'
Recruiting Expense $ 2,560 ' 45.016 3031016 .30:01 :507 100.0014 As:Treatment Plant:
DOE WW Discharge Permit Fee S 00 :271 40.006 .30,0916 30100X' '0.0. • 100:00% As :Treatment Plant.
State /County Taxes and Assessments S - 40.0016 90.5014 30506 5:5r ' 100.00% As:Treatment Plant t
Rentals / M6O Garage ' S 50,1135 45.00.6' 30:0 % .30:00% '0:.. ' 100,00% As:Treatment Plant:
Rentals /Replacement - Garage 5 50,005 40.0076" 35:00%' 300% '0.'' 100.00% As :Treatment Plant:
Operating Equipment IS '10,30 40 :0 % 30.551 30,0016 0:5 '. 100.00% AsTreatment Plant:
PERS Prior Service I 3,376 450076 30!201 30.0014 ;0. "•.3 100:00% As Treatment Plant:
tnterfund Charges- Insurance I 0. 305,633 -40.0016 30:0014' .355014 "0..'" ! 100.00% As:Treatment Plant!
Intedund Charges - City Services S 596,617 40.00% 305016 .30:00% '0.5' 4 100.00% As :Treatment Plant.
WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT (UNIT 1233) 7
"
' Intedund In-Lieu of Tax $ - 40.00%, 30:0014 .3510% 5.0511: 10050% As Plant
Intedund Charges - lr"sutance - 0 3,555 40355% 30.40% 30,016 '0:0" " I 100.00% AroTreatment Plant:
Intedund Charges - CM Services S 00,920 40.5596 3000% 35.00% '0.0. !. 100,00% As- Treatment Plant:
Intedund Charges- Customer Sero,oan S 15,450 45.50 %' 300516 30;0016 0:"'" ' i 100.00% As:Treatment Plant:
Salaries - Permanent . 435453 40:0016 30:0514 3000% '0:". "I 100.00% As- Treatment Plant:
Longevity I0 14,877 40.0%' 30.55% 30..0% ;0:07'; 100.00 As•7reatment Plant•
Deferred Comp 0 13 : 0481 80.00% 35,00% 30:0016 '507 'I 100.00% As .Treatment Plant,
Overtone IS 824 1 40..40% '35:00% 38.00% '0.'. 100.0014 As:Treatment Plant'
Social Security S 36085 40.00% 305014 30.0016' i0:'. 100.00% As Plant,
PERS 5 25.100 40;00% .30,00% 30.00% 'S0. 100.0014 As :Treatment Plant:
Industrial Insurance I S 15,301 45:0597. 30,00% 30.014 0;•. E 100:00% As:Treatment Plant'
Life Insurance S 1,041 40,0% 30,0% '35.0076, 50.'1 100.00% As:Treatment Plant:
Ide Insurance - Managernent IS 369 40.5014 350016 35:0016 0;". 100.00% As:Treatment Plant;
Medical Insurance I$ 556561 45.014 300 %, 30,50% '0,... 100:00% As Treatment Plant:
Medical Insurance - Management : $ 15,9561 40.00% 30.00% 35.0014 0501; 100.00% As Plant:
PREPARED 87 FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June:2' 20113 62/2011112,42 PM'
(425) 867 -1802 Rete!IldOsuetiom Page 68 03.88'
• II •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Dental Insurance S 7,229 1 40.00% 30:00% .300016' 0.001(1 100.00% As Plant'
Dentallmurarrce - Management I$ SS 400016' 30.00%' 30.00%' 0.0041 100.00% AsTreatmenl Plant
Dental Insurance - Exempt IS 2952 45,00% 3 0,0015 1 -30,00% •5904 100.00% AsTreatmenl Plant:
• Unemployment Compensation 1S 1,466 45,0074' 30.00% 30.00% :0:001( 10600% AsTreatment Plant'
Uniforms /Clothing ' 5 618 40,00% 3010011; .35,00% •0:0011 100:00% AsTreatment Plant
Office and Operating Supplies ! 5 5,665 4400% 30,00% 303/016 •0:00% 100:00% As Treatment Plant:
Operatng Supplies - Fuel I S 8,240 40,00 % 38:00% 30.00% '00011 100.00% As-Treatment Plant;
Small Tools and Minor Equipment I $ 258 ' 40:00 30'00% 30.00% '0:0054 100.0014 As-Treatment Plant:
Chemicals 5 259 45,50% 30.00% 30.00% '0 :001( 10000% As Treatment Plant;
Professional Services $ 15,450 '400054 30:05% 30:0015 '0:05111 100.00% AsTreatmenl Plant:
Telephone j 342 40.00.14 .305014 308015 +01004: 100.00% AsTreatment Plant:
Postage 0 551 40.0014' 30,00% 30:00% 08541 100.00% AsTreatment Plant;
Ceti Phone IS 1,6251 40 :5510 - .300014 35.0014 '010014 100.00% AsTreatment Plant
Transportation $ 1,030 40,50 %` 30110% 30.5015 8:50
' 4! 100.00 % As- Treatment Plant;
Advemsing I I S 2,060 49,5714 30.00 %' 300014 '0901( 100.00% AsTreatment Plant'
R &M /Contractors 0 779 60.0015 50.001E 3080% •0904 100:00% AsTreatment Plant:
Miscellaneous Expense 10 1,090 40:00% 30.00% 35.00% '0904 100.00% As- Treatment Plant:
Dues and Sutncnpeons IS 1,030 40.00% ' 30.50% 30,50% 0:0114 100.00% A6:Treatment Plant;
Recruiting Expense S 40,00% •30.00% 3000%' '0:0041 100.00% As- Treatment Plant:
State / County Taxes and Assessments 0 - 40.00% •30:9014 30:0015 '0,004 100.00% As-Treatment Plant:
Rentals /M&0 Garage 1 $ 3,091 40.05554' 90.0054 3120014 113104 ! 100.00% AsTreatment Plant'
Rentals /Replacements - Garage I S 8,944 40:00% 30:00% '30.00% 0321% 100,00% I As-Treatment Plant;
Operating Equipment 10 5,150 40,00% .30'05% .308014 13.054! 100,00%, As Plant;
FINANCIAL MODEL TAX CALCULATIONS I i
840 and State Exase Taxes (excludes wholesale revs, per City policy) 1 S 166,031 0,0054' 0.00%' 000% 300,004 100'00% As all'Otheri
City Utility Taxes (Excludes wholesale revenues, per Gay policy) I $ 2.325,730 0.0014 5:09 %` '0.0015 100.0041 100.00% As all'OtherI
:
Addl O&M from GP I S - 0,0014' 0.00% '0.00% 100.004 1 100.00% As alliOther i
Total Operating Expenses IS 1:1,834',667 0 5,659 :403 0; 1 + 0; 1,8431762' 0' 2,48817611 Is. 11 :834:087i I
Sealer Service Functions 60:54%. 19,73 %, 19 73% 1 100.00%
Allocation of "AS A2 Others" $ 1',506;797" 0, 4901952:. 0. 4901992: :0' (2,4881761) 1i 0, -. I
•
TOTAL S 110,934•887 S. 71165,200+ 5; 24338;7441: S. 21334;7441; 8' -• i 5' 1118301871
A$ort Bon Percentages 80154 °h': 19:73 %') 19:734.', 0.00% 100:00%
check total 090005ng expenses 11111334'.687
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP. INC.
YAKIMA MODEL -June 2_2011;
(425) 867 -1802 RetadlMocaaon, 622011112.42,PM:
Page 69 of•88'
• • •
• City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Functional Allocations
Allocation of Revenue Requirement
Design cares For 201'71
FUNCTONBEOFWATER'SERVICE
TOTAL F - -. -� .- - _____.
REVENUE REQUIREMENT 1 COSTS FLOW' HOD. TSS' AS;A111 OTHERS; TOTAL. 1 ALLOCATION BASIS= •
OPERATING AND CAPITAL EXPENSES I ,
Cash Operating Expenses $ 11'.8341687 I 60:54/ 19:73% 1E73% 0.00% 100.00% As OEM Expense:
Operating Transfers 8. 174(366. 60.54% 19.73 %. 19:73%' 0.00% 100.00% As OBM.Expense •
Existing Debt Service $ 2.5641303' 67.00% 16:50 %'. 16:50 % 0.00% 100:00% As Plant:
New Debt Service $ 572,917 67:00% 16.50 %. 16:50%': 0.00% 100.00% As Plant'
Rate - Funded CIP $ - I 67.00 %' 16.50 %1 16.50 %. 0.00% 100.00% As Plant:
Rate - Funded Debt Reserve S. 3,169. i 67.00 %: 16:50 %' 16.50% 0.00% 100.00% As Plant'
Rate Funded System Reinvestment $ 821',753: 67.00% 16.50%: 16.50 %• 0.00% 10000% As Plant:
TotaO Expenses 0. 15:971;105, 62:15 %'• 18:93 %. 18:93 %, 0:00% 100.00%
OTHER REVENUES AND ADJUSTMENTS
Less: Other Revenues $. (3,301(212) 60:54% 19:73%' 19:73 %'. 0.00% 100.00% As O8M Expense
Less: Connection charges used for Debt Service $ - 67.00 %' 16:50% 16 50 %. 0.00% 100.00% As Plant.
•
Less' Operating Fund Interest Earnings $ (15,183) 1 60:54% 1973% 19:73%: 0.00% 100.00% As OBM Expense:
Plus Addmonal SL Exose and Intertund U5Sty Tax 1 $ I 0.00% 'D:DO% 0.00% .100.0514 10E00% As All Other:
Plus: Net Cash Flow after Rate Increase $ 1',424',365.I 0.00% 0.00% 0,.00% 100.0014 100.00% As'All'Olher.
Plus Ad for Partial Year Increase $
1 - I 0.00% 0 DO °bEOM 100.0014 100.00% As All Other •
f
Rate Revenue Requirement $ 14',079;166 $ 7,917513: $ 2,368;6441.0'._ 2,368,644 $' 1;424)385: IS' 14;0791166:
Sewer Service Funcbora 62571/4' 18:72 %' 18.72 %' -' 100.00%
Allocation of "As AO Others' $ 891,158' $ 266,603' $ 266,603': $ (1(4241365) IS --
Rate Revenue Requirement 0 1410791188: $, 8,80818701 $: 2830 :2481, $: 29835;2481 $: -. i$1 14;0791166;
Allocation Percentages 8257%:' 18:72%'. 18:72 %1 0.00% 100.00%
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP, INC. YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_201:1: 62/2011112.42 PM '
(425) 867 -1802 Rete:700ocation:
Page.70 of.88-
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Customer Statistics Priceout - 2009 Customer Statistics.
Inside City Rates in effect Customer 5tatistics:PerCity,'Record5: 1 2009:Caltulated!Charger
Volume Monthly Meter ! Number. of Number, of '
Monthly RTS charge Unit Customer Size Meter Monthlhy• Monthl.lnits. 2009'Billedl
Charge (perccf) charge Class Code Size Factor MCEs. 1 Accounts.Billedl Billed) BillediUsage'(ccf), Amount Ready,to•Serve: Unit; Volume Total!
7453
$' "'1. 14:29' x$ 7 23 - 6 77 $ Vil6 1 3/4 .,•^ [, i / 1.00 20�,3frF ' 201352' P,S1H;843; $' • 7;130)941 $. 3;489;9611 $, 3'814;398' $' 71304;359) -
'$,•y "',"`.18:15;, _ 2 1.0 1.5 3.33 7 1.67 449• 26 9' 75,549 1191003! 583588: 57337/ 11519263
!'$' '' '23.44v 3 1.. 2' 4671
!r "'" 7,- a 96561 I 6091
1;123 1;732
}3+'$ ;,. 4 2.0 533 5. ; 1 801 6541 453: _ 293.
f$'t,,,'14290 -5 5 3.0 10.67 - -
$, ;'S 181:91, in 6 4.0 16.67 t
i
dl
bas
ri
summ
durin
s
-
• 7 6.0 33.33 _..__.__ __._._________..___ .. __...__..._.__ _- ______.__ __. _
L s; 272:94 _ _
'S g. g ;es.eoniwner, aye rageaOan /MaeorD F
ec /eb; de endin on bill' 'cycle: size includes'. _
. ;,3)6.68' N 8 8.0 53.33 Note: SFR:biilin
- P g, cy -
C7 1313unmeteredlaccounts• andlassumes•22ccf /ino'waten consumption:. _ _
(s$3��_ � 9 10.0 76.67 - .__.__ ._.... ._.....__ ._.._.. _.. .._. __
Multifamily InCity Rates in effect Total 20;624' 1 $894;925 9; 74250)2541 14 3)549)6111 191 3;8731151! 5) 7;422)762?
t,._., ,n -;t' 43':g '251 1 3/4 1.00 1
_", v ."� $ S / ,165 1,165 4;072' 275,4611 5 90653245 15: 10338421 51 335;234 5, 656 289: 9) 1309513653
v 2 1.0 1.67 5713 i 346. 11654 126,208: 45 9,020) 1 30 1879' 1361185• 2811006: 448;0701
a 3 33 3.33 336• 101 1,273; 86,5741 3223474) i 91005 1041780' 208 ;6811 322;4663
c 4 2.0 533 327 61 1,176. 941681 336;482 5;468' 96,836'. 2211682' 3233986'
re 5 3.0 10.67 007. 101 547' 25;525. 104;3081 1 8921 45;029• 62 3245; 1081166:
f 6 4.0 I6.67 133 81 820 98;866. 3993895 1 713; 67;502' 170;570' 238;7851
7 6.0 3333 - - - - _ i _. _- -.
8 8.0 5333 - - - _ - -. --
in
9 10.0 76.67 - - - _, - --
Total 1,691 91543' 707;3151 4 21671,4241 $1 150)799! 5 9) 7851566; 6 9) 9600 34741 6; 2;536;8391
Outside City Rates in effect a 1 3/4 1.00 1,148'. 1,148; 243;783; $ 832 ;7391 j 5: 196;830) 5: 6311398: $) 828;228?
$° t_': 22.10`, ^$`''4,3 73'7, ,,715.03_; _ 2 1.0 1.67 694 ' 4 199778; 42933441 i 99)5321 3411305 43138371
;,,.. 2 _ 3 1.5 3.33 547 164 1'46;1'47/ 41435881 j 4632241 378;5211 42437441
3'$ _ 36.24 a 4 2.0 5.33 908' 170' 231 658)023 i 7,71201 599)279' 6761400?
+$;_• 'r5 E u 5 3.0 I0.67 455 ; 4 1 4063251! 73 31653 324)7011 39738653
1$'";.'221 :00 6 6 4.0 16.67 278' ; 171 873049' 261;894! 36,382' 225;457/ 261;839?
6'• - .4'211 . 1:31 , 1 . ° r 7 6.0 33.33. 139' 41 21,405'. 608499' 13;647/ 513439' 6510863
+ �$' . .'' , 422:/1,' 8 8.0 53.33 251 3 81,556. 205;571 123807/ 2111230' 2241037.'
p$;: '1682 .66 '^ 9 I0.0 7647 77' 1 1 2 :253 8;9301 1 930401 53835 14;876)
'$};:T 165,11 t
Total 9966 9070;7201 51 33280)8183 !4 55537481 9; 23773;165; 5) 3732819133
1 3/4 1.00. 3 3: ! 14;747/ 6 9) 39,576 I4 5141 5: 38)195 63 3817091
2 1 0 1.67 2' , 1 133;
6771 ! 218; 4741 6921
E. 3 14 3.33 - - - _. _. _.
To 4 29 5.33 21 : 4 - 5,969' 183793' ! 1;8131 15;460' 172713
l' u 5 30 10.67 11 ' 1 1 63070' I 1;745 4 34941 6)2083
E
6 4.0 16.67 -
7 6.0 33.33 - - - _. _-
w 8 8.0 53.33 - ' - _ - -__ _. --
9 10.0 76.67 - - _. _. --
Total ' 9! 22 4 69,1191 9) 412583 51 58 3922; 5) 62;880)
t
• • •
Inside City Rates in effect Customer Statistics Per City Records 2009 Calculated Charges
Volume Monthly Meter Number Of Number of
Monthly RT5 charge Unit Customer Size Meter Monthlhy Monthly Units 2009 Billed
Charge (per cc() charge Class Code Size Factor MCEs Accounts Billed - Billed Billed Usage (ccf) Amount Ready to Serve Unit Volume Total
e 1 3/4 1.00 9 9 - -" 9,377 $ 26,509 $ 1,543 $ 24,286 $ 25,830
E 2 1.0 1.67 10 6 9,922 27,373 1,307 25,698 27,005
3 1.5 3.33 23 7 6,001 20,140 1,969 15,541 17,510
m 4 2 0 5.33 32 6 - 5,663 19,232 2,717 14,667 17,384
c 5 3.0 10.67 139 13 72,806 227,483 22,292 168,568 210,860
V
A > 6 4.0 16.67 100 6 - 30,283 101,114 13,098 78,433 91,530
7 6 0 33 33 - -
e 8 8.0 53.33 - - - -
9 10.0 76.67 - - - - -
- - -
Total 47 -- - - - -- - - - 134,052 $ 421,850 $ 42,926 -- - - - -- 5 347,193 $ 390,119
1 3/4 1.00 8 8 - 817 $ 3,365 $ 1,315 $ 2,116 $ 3,431
.. 2 1 0 1.67 10 6 1,889 6,048 1,307 4,893 6,199
E 3 1.5 3.33 14 4 3,261 3,634 1,219 8,446 9,665
L
3 4 2.0 5.33 - 54 10 9,379 27,695 4,603 24,292 28,895
d 0 5 3.0 10.67 21 2 908 5,709 3,430 2,352 5,781
a, .c 6 4.0 16.67 50 3 2,250 11,692 6,549 5,828 12,376
7 6.0 33 33 - -
8 8.0 53.33 - - - - - -
'^ 9 10.0 76.67 - -
- - -
Total 33 18,504 $ 58,143 $ 18,422 5 47,925 $ 66,347
1 3/4 1.00 45 45 4,264 $ 24,330 $ 11,890 $ 15,905 $ 27,795
Ca 2 1.0 1 67 - - _
m 3 1.5 3.33 - - -
Oi 4 2.0 5.33 - - - _
p' 5 3.0 10.67 - - -
LL 6 4.0 16.67 - - -
•
7 6.0 33.33 - - -
iv 8 8.0 53.33 - - -
to
9 10.0 76.67 - - -
Total 45 4,264 5 24,330 $ 11,890 $ 15,905 5 27,795
1 3/4 1.00 3 3 242 5 1,657 $ 796 $ 903 $ 1,698
2 1.0 1.67 2 1 4 334 337 15 352
a k 3 1.5 3.33 - - -
E 4 2.0 5.33 - - -
6 a 5 3.0 10.67 - - -
V'�' 6 4.0 16.67 - - -
N O 7 6.0 33.33 - - -
in 8 8.0 53.33 - - -
9 10.0 76.67 - - -
Total 4 246 5 1,991 $ 1,132 $ 918 5 2,050
•
• r •
Inside City Rates in effect Customer. Statistics:Per. CltyfRecords 2009'GalculMed :Charges;
Volume Monthly Meter Number of. Number, of, -
Monthly RTS charge Unit Customer Size Meter Month!hy Monthly Units. 20091101ed!
Charge (per cd) charge Class Code Size Factor MCEs i Accounts,Billedl Billed' BilledlUsage.(ccf)V Amount; Ready teServe• Unitt Volume Total! _
1 3/4 I.00. 2 : 2' - - - - 5,959' $1 2;810) $, 5301
$: 7;307' $> 7;837.t
f ., 2 1.0 1.67 - - _
3 1.5 3.33 -
E v 4 2.0 5.33 - - - .. - _ - -
00 5 3.0 10.67 - - -.
t., s 6 4.0 16.67 - 1 - -
e 0 7 6.0 33.33 - - __
us 8 8.0 53.33 - - -
9 10.0 76.67 - - -
Total t --- - - - - -- 1;9591 $ 7;810 $t 530) - -- -- - -- $: 7;3071 $> 78377
Calculated12009 Revenues.
$: 131743{602: InsideSity, $s 13;807;860)
27,966. $: 34',131 OutsideCity; $: 37;682)
5+ 131777/,7337 Totals 9 133845 ;542t
2009'Pen City,Budgett (estld'actua ls.for4009)1 13;626;2093
• Difference 219;333) _
Statistical'adjustrnenu 1:58% •
AdjustiStatistics ? Y;2 =N) 1_ 1 -. -
Statisticsal'AUjustment I - 1:58 % -
•
•
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
- Customer Statistics Priceout. - Base Year (26 10)) Customer S'tatt istics
Stat ;Yrto,BBse:Yrcustomerrgrowth 1100 %;
Stat: YrtolBase:Yrpriceoutiad)ustment - 1'58 %3
Current (2010) Rates in Effect
2010 rate adjustment I`) fi )), Meter 2(1)10 Customee5tati "sties: 20107[ aIculbted'Chargess
Volume
charge Unit Customer Size Meter Number of Teta!' Number of.
•
RTS Charge (per ccf) charge Class Code Size Factor MCEs Accouots.Biliedl Units:Billedl BillediU"sage:(eef)) ' Ready Unit, Vbiume: Total!
$ 14.79 $ 2.59 $ 6.86 1 3/4 1.00 20 ;230 20 1,807/,930) 15 31590)4011 5; 31791)512'. $+ 7;38119131
$ 18.78 L' 2 1.0 1.67 447 ' 267 75)088 I 60)2581 - - 56)9931 117;252)
$ 24.26 y 3 1.5 3.33 7 2' 4581 627/ 1',1163 1;7431
$ 39.05 • °- 4 2.0 5.33 5 1. 801 466; 4663
$ 147.90 5 3.0 10.67 - - -.
$ 188.28 ,- 6 4.0 16.67 - - -- - -- -,
$ 282.49 7 6.0 33.33 - - -. -. -_ --
$ 389.89 H 8 8.0 53.33 - - _. -. -- --
$ 779.73 9 10.0 76.67 - - -- -. --
Multifamily InCity Rates in effect Total 2035001 1,883;558; j $ 3)651 $S 3;849;6221 $; 7/501/3741 1 ?06%1
$ 7.69 $ 2.59 $ 7.10 1 3/4 1.00 1,158 ' 1,158 4;0481 223)8081 ! 5; 106)831 5; 344)881, 5; 652)352? 5; 1;104;063
CI 2 1.0 1.67 575 ] 344 1,6441 125)451) 31 140)1041 279)320 45111911
✓ 3 1.5 3.33 334 100, 1,263, 86)055; 9)2641 102)2951 207;4391 324489?
c 4 2.0 5.33 325 ; 61 1,169 94)1131 5)6-26; 99)622' 220;352_ 325)6001
cc 5 3.0 10.67 106 10 544' 253732! i 917 46)325 6118722 109)1141
u.
f 6 4.0 16.67 133' 81 815. 98)2731 7341 69)445' 169;5463 239)725)
E 7 6.0 33.33 - -. - - -. -. -- -- •
' ". 1 8 8.0 53.33 - - - - -. -. -- --
,n 9 10.0 76.67 - - - - _. - - --
Total 1,6811 9)486; 703)0711 I 5; 155440; 53 8080.711 $ 11590)8711 5; 2;554)182? 0;68 %1
I I
Outside City Rates in effect v 1 3/4 1.00 1,141 1,141 242,320 i $: 202;495; $; 6271610) $,> 830)1053
$ 22.10 $ 3.73 $ 5.03 '_ 2 1.0 1.67 6901 413 1301987' i 93;1!13; 339)2577 432)370)
$ 28.07 - 3 1.5 3.33 544 1631 145)220) 47/,5541 376)250 423)8031
r3
$ 36.24 o 4 2.0 5.33 902' 1 169) 229)994) ; 79)339) 595)6841 675)0231
$ 58.34 E v 5 3.0 1567 453 42! 124,615; 75)270) 322;752'. 398)0231
$ 221.00 E 6 4.0 1667 276 j 17' 86)527/ 37/,430 224)1041 26115341
$ 281.33 v 7 6.0 33.33 138 j 4 2127,7/ 140401 55)1063 69)146;
$ 422.11 e., 8 8.0 5333 150 i 3 81,067' 113)1711/ 209)963 22311391
$ 582.56 '^ 9 150 76.67 76 ! 1
. $ 1,165.11 2;239) 9,301- 5j800i 15)101)
. Total 1,954 - - 1,064)296 8 571 s; 2;756)5263 $ 3)328)2455 -0:02 3i
•
• • •
1 3/4 1.00 3 3 -:'�" 14,659 $ 529
$ 37,966 $ 38,495
2 1.0 1.67 2 1 - 182 224 471 695
3 1.5 3.33 - _ - - - -
N 4 2.0 5.33 21 4 5,933 1, 863 - 15,367 17,230
5 3.0 10. 67 11 1 = = 1,725 1,764 • - 4,467 6,231
c 6 4.0 16.67 - _ _ - _ - _ _
7 6.0 33.33 -
h 8 8.0 53.33 - _ - -
9 10.0 76.67 - - _ :_ ^r=„ - -. -• _ __
Total 9 . tl „ 22,498 $ 4,381 - $ 58,270 $ 62,651 -0.36%
v 1 3/4 1.00 9 9 9,321 $ 1,588 - _ $ 24,141 $ 25,728
c 2 1.0 1.67 10 6 - - _ -_ - 9,862 1,344 • 25,544 26,888
C. 3 1.5 3.33 23 7 - - 5,964 2,02 15,448 17,474
4 2.0 5.33 32 6 5,629 2,795 14,579 17,374
E , 5
E 10.67 138 13 72,369 22,934 •_ • 187,436 210,370
> 6 4.0 16.67 99 6 r = 30,101 13475 77,962 91,437
t 7 6.0 33.33 -
.
v.
8 8.0 53.33 - _ .--'• - . - - - -
.+ 9 10.0 76.67 - - - _ - -
Total 47 133,247 $ 44,161 $ 345,110 $ 389,271 -0.22%
To 1 3/4 1.00 8 8 812 $ 1,353 . $ 2,103 $ 3,456
d 2 1.0 1.67 10 6 - 1,878 1,344 4,863 6,207
r « 3 1.5 3.33 14 4 - 3,241 1,254 • 8,395 9,649
c u 4 2.0 5.33 54 10 9,323 4,736 _. 24,146 28,881
5 3.0 10.67 21 2
MI v _ _ 903 3,528 - 2,338 5,866
w ` 6 4.0 16.67 50 3 2,237 6,737 5,793 12,530
7 6.0 33.33 - - -
• lfi 8 8.0 53.33 - - - - - -
'^ 9 10.0 76.67 - - _ -- - . . - -
Total 33 18,393 $ 18,952 $ 47,638 $ 66,590 0.37%
1 3/4 1.00 45 45 4,238 $ 11,818 $ 15,809 $ 27,628
C., 2 1.0 1.67 - - - - -
v 3 1.5 3.33 - - - -__ - _ - -
4 2.0 5.33 - - - -
p
- - -
5 3.0 10.67 - _ _ - - - - -
m 6 4.0 16.67 - ' . _ - -
LL
O 7 6.0 33.33 - - _ -
ni 8 8 . 0 53.33 - - _ - - - - -
9 10.0 76.67 - _- .. _ - - _ - - -
Total 45 - ;• • - - _ - 4,238 $ 11,818 - - • - $ 15,809 $ 27,628 -0.60%
• • •
1 3/4 1.00 3 3 . 241 $ 791 $ 897 $ 1,688
2 1.0 1.67 2 1 4 335 15 350
> 3 1.5 3.33 -
E u 4 2.0 5.33 - - - _ -
E o a 5 3.0 10.67 - _ _ _
�? N 6 4.0 16.67
IN 0 7 6.0 33.33 - -
H 8 8.0 53.33 - - -- - - - - _ - . - _ _ .. __ - -
9 10.0 76.67 - - - - - - - -
•
Total 4 . ' " 245 $ 1,126 $ 912 $ 2,038 -0.60%
1 3/4 1.00 2 2 -__ __- 1,947 $ 527 -- -- - $ 7,263 $ 7,790
Z 2 1.0 1.67 - - _ . - -
E r 3 1.5 3.33 - - - - - -
E u 4 2.0 5.33 - - -. - - _ •
c 5 3.0 10.6 7 - - - -
to s 6 4.0 16.67 - - - -
•
N O 7 6.0 33 - - - - - - • '^ 8 8.0 53.33 - - - - - . - -
9 10.0 76.67 - _ _
Total 2 1,947 $ 527 $ 7,263 $ 7,790 -0.60%
Total Calculated Revenues
Inside City $ 13,902,312
Outside City $ 37,456
Total $ 13,939,768
% change from Price Out calculated revenue 0.68%
•
•
• • •
City of Yakima
• Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Customer Statistics Priceout - Test Year (2011) Statistics
Test Year 2011
Base Year to Test Year customer growth 1.00%
Current Rates in Effect
Volume 2010 Customer Statistics 2010 Calculated Charges 1
Meter
charge Unit Customer Size Meter Number of Total Number of
RTS Charge (per ccf) charge Class Code Size Factor MCEs Accounts Billed Units Billed Billed Usage (ccf) Ready to Serve Unit Volume Total
$ 14.79 $ 2.59 $ 6.86 1 3/4 1.00 20,432 20,432 1,826,010 $ 3,626,305 -_ $ 3,829,427 $ 7,455,732
$ 18.78 2 1.0 1.67 451 270 _ 75,839 60,861 57,563 118,424
$ 24.26 3 1.5 3.33 7 2 463 633 1,127 1,760
$ 39.05 in 4 2.0 5.33 5 1 80 470 470
$ 147.90 E 5 3.0 10.67 - - - - - -
$ 188.28 N 6 4.0 16.67 - - .. •
- - - -
$ 282.49 7 6.0 33.33 - - - -
$ 389.89 v,, 8 8.0 53.33 - - . . - - -
$ 779.73 9 10.0 76.67 - - , • - -
Multifamily InCity Rates in effect Total 20,705 1,902,391 $ 3,688,270 $ 3,888,118 $ 7,576,387
$ 7.69 $ 2.59 $ 7.10 ,., 1 3/4 1.00 1,169 1,169 4,088 276,546 $ 107,899 $ 348,330 $ 658,875 $ 1,115,104
u 2 1.0 1.67 581 348 1,661 126,705 32,086 141,505 282,113 455,703
o 3 1.5 3.33 338 101 1,278 86,915 9,357 108,873 209,504 327,733
v
4 2.0 5.33 328 62 1,181 95,054 5,682 100,618 222,555 328,856
cc LL 5 3.0 10.67 107 10 549 25,626 926 46,788 62,491 110,205
'i 6 4.0 16.67 134 8 823 99,256 741 70,139 171,242 242,122
E 7 6.0 33.33 - - - - _ - - _
,'". 8 8.0 53.33
v' 9 10.0 76.67 - - - - - - - -
Total 1,698 9,580 710,102 $ 156,691 $ 816,253 $ 1,606,780 $ 2,579,724
Outside City Rates in effect y 1 3/4 1.00 1,152 1,152 . - 244,744 $ 204,520 • $ 633,886 $ 838,406
$ 22.10 $ 3.73, $ 5.03 c 2 1.0 1.67 697 417 • - 132,297 94,044 342,650 436,694
$ 28.07 - 3 1.5 3.33 549 165 .. - • - 146,723 48,029 380,012 428,041
$ 36.24 ` > 4 2.0 5.33 911 171 - 232,294 80,133 . 601,641 681,773
$ 58.34 E ,., 5 3.0 10.67 457 43 • 125,861 76,023 325,980 402,003
$ 221.00 0 6 4.0 16.67 279 17 - 87,392 37,804 226,345 264,150
$ 281.33 u 7 6.0 33.33 139 4 _ 21,489 14,180 55,657 69,838
$ 422.11 ni 8 8.0 53.33 152 3 81,877 13,308 - 212,062 225,371
$ 582.56 '^ 9 10.0 76.67 77 1 • 2,262 9,394 • 5,858 15,252
$ 1,165.11 = - -
Total 1,973 1,074,939 $ 577,436 - $ 2,784,092 $ 3,361,527
• • i
1 3/4 1.00 3 3 - = 14,805 $ 535 ...., $ 38,345 $ 38,880
v 2 1.0 1.67 2 1 i 184 226 476 702
E 3 1.5 3.33 k _ _
To 4 2.0 5.33 21 4 5,993 1,882 _ _ - 15,521 17,402
3.0 10.67 11 1
v 4. 5 - v ' 5 1,742 1 4,511 6,293
6 4.0 16.67
E
t _
7 6.0 33.33 - , s .
.-' 8 8.0 53.33
9 10.0 76.67 - , - ---"
Total 9 22,723 $ 4,424 - $ 58,853 $ 63,277
m 1 3/4 1.00 9 9 - -= -- -- - =t 9,414 $ 1,604 "--_' •.._ -- _. $ 24,382 $ 25,986
v _
C 2 1.0 1.67 10 6 9,961 1,357 25,799 27,157
3 1.5 3.33 23 7 - - 6,024 2,046 _ 15,603 17,648
C
4 2.0 5.33 32 6 5,685 2,823 _ 14,725 17,548
E C,1 5 3.0 10.67 139 13 73,093 23,163 189,311 212,474
0 6 4.0 16.67 100 6 30,402 13,610 _ 78,742 92,352
l7 7 6.0 33.33 - - - _ - - _ _ - - - • e 8 8.0 53.33 - - - _
v) 9 10.0 76.67 - _ _ _
Total 47 = -? 134,580 $ 44,603 . $ 348,561 $ 393,164
To 1 3/4 1.00 8 8 ' <_r' 820 $ 1,366 = $ 2,124 $ 3,490
w 2 1.0 1.67 10 6 1,896 1,357 - 4,912 6,269
E T 3 1.5 3.33 14 4 _ - - _ - • 3,274 1 _ 8,479 9,746
a v 4 2.0 5.33 54 10 9,416 4,783 24,387 29,170
. , 5 3.0 10.67 21 2 _ 912 3564 2,361 5,925
c 6 4.0 16.67 50 3 Z 5 `' 2,259 6,805 5,850 12,655
c 7 6.0 33.33 - - - - - -
O 8 8.0 53.33 P ;`.: - - -
'^ 9 10.0 76.67 - _ _
Total 33 18,577 $ 19,141 - $ 48,114 $ 67,255
1 3/4 1.00 45 45 ' _- = 4,281 $ 11,937 $ 15,967 $ 27,904
2 1.0 1.67 - - -
✓ 3 1.5 3.33 =
4 2.0 5.33 -
0
cc • 5 3.0 10.67 - - _ _ - - _
LL 6 4.0 16.67 - - _ -
7 6.0 33.33 - - - _ ,
...4 8 8.0 53.33 - - -- _ --- - . - -
9 10.0 76.67 - •
Total 45 = ' 4,281 $ 11,937 - . $ 15,967 $ 27,904
• • •
1 3/4 1.00 3 3 243 $ 799 $ 906 $ 1,705
To
2 1.0 1.67 2 1 ; 4 338 • - 15 353
• a 3 1.5 3.33 - -
-
E v 4 2.0 5.33
-
-
E a 5 3.0 10.67 - - _ - " -
6 4.0 16.67 - - _
•
N O 7 6.0 33.33 - - -
8 8.0 53.33 - -
-
9 10.0 76.67 - - -
Total 4 247 $ 1,137 • $ 921 $ 2,058
1 3/4 1.00 2 2 ; - y 1,967 $ 532 ` - --. - = $ 7,336 $ 7,868
2 1.0 1.67 - _
E 3 1.5 3.33 - -
u 4 2.0 5.33 - - -
c v 5 3.0 10.67 - - -
t7 6 4.0 16.67 - - _ - .
v O • 7 6.0 33.33 - - - - . -
N
^ 8 8.0 53.33 - _
•
9 10.0 76.67 - - -
Total 2 1,967 $ 532 - . $ 7,336 $ 7,868
Totals 24,517 9,580 3,869,806 4,504,171 816,253 8,758,742 14,079,166
21,604
700 Calculated Revenues
179 Inside City $ 14,041,335
192 Outside City $ 37,830
59 Total $ 14,079,166
• 26 % change from Base Year calculated revenue 1.00%
•
• ® •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Test Year Customer Data Summary
Assumed % of Low Income 01a4Rying SFR (6ntde Cuy) Customers) .' CAC Note_ US Census estimates 22.4% of CO of Yakima pop Mes al'or, below the poveM.fine.
Assumed IL of Low Income Qualifying SFR (Outside Cdyq Customers •. ; 6AIL .. .. ._.. .._._ _ .._ _ .. . _ .. .. . _ _ ._ _. _._. .
Low income discount prpwded for. connection charges only as follows (YMC 20): Low - or. 0derate- 'ncomet/
Average usage MCP) per month per Low Ou:omecmfomer, ! - owner' means a personwh0 owns. single - family residential facility and whose ose annual income is 5 at nr below eighty percent
lief.. Fiord m.o.*/%.,;' 64212•' of,the medlantncome of the Yakima metropolitan statispcalarea. Where more than one person has an ownershi 0terest'
SFRLRe6tse ifoMnDn4atgt(%k - :, esdenbatfacillry,Me terrerefers t0.thosepersonswhose d'annual 'ncome mighty percent of the
D @side C 2y WeighO "'"k 1'41{ median d etermn e db referemeto rata, published combine
' United States Department Yak,s at onbelow ima metropolitan D eve l pment' '
! shall be determined W reference to tlataipubllshed by the Un Red States Department OeHOUSmg and Urban Development
Test Year Customer Data __.. ......_.. _ _ - - - ..._... _ . _ _ - -
Meters' 344 r 1 112 - r r ' 4e 1 lr 1 r 1 ler
MSE,ACE Code' 1 2 3 4 6 6. 1 7 I 8: 1 5■
Meter Servrx EprrvaMMS OASES)' ..r r . TOTAL
Meter Capacity EnmabMS(MCEC)" w -1.00 - .3.67 '' ,233 .533 - 1067.` 1287 . - 39.33 " - '- - 63 '. 1 .75197'
S11 • SFR Inside CM 20,432 270 2 1 0 0 0! 0' 01 20705
511L -SFR Inside CM- Lowlncome MEW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y,elghtetl for low income cry multiplier.
Slim - MFR Inside CM- Accounts 1,169 348 101 62 10' ) 8 ! 0' ' Or' Ot 1',698
S11m- MFR 'node CM- DweOmg Units 4,088 1,661 1,278 1;181 549 I 823 0: 0' 0 9,580
S12- Commercial laude City 1,152 467 165 171 43 17 4 3 1! 7973'
S13- Industrial Insde City 3 t 0 . 4 1 0' 0
0 0! 9•
S14- Govemmentlnede City 9 6 7 i 6 13 6. 0' 0' 0` 47:
515- InterdepartMal Inside City 8 6 4 10 2 3 0' 0 0' 33• -
Interdepartmental
521- SFR Wade CM ' 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0., 68 ,ghfed forovls,de city mulOpher
S21L -SFR Outside Cdy - Low Income(NEW) 0 0 0 0' 0 0 O I 0 I 0 1 0 Ighted for l00wncome/ 0utsde afynrulhpher •
522 -Cone/wool Outside Cdy 5 2 Cr 0 0 ' 0 1 0! I o' 0' 6, ,ghfed foray/side afymulopher
524 - Govemmenl Outside CM 3 0 O 0 0 I 0 1 0' I 0' 0' 3 ,ghfed foroulude city mWOdler
TOTAL 24.537 2,710 1.666 6,426 616. I 367 I 4, I 3'. 11 1 3411231 12878
r 24' :517: Dd8erence due to weighonq a /accounts
Represents Cdy's def of winter, per UB -> -tanI Fein p p(rc Mayj Juni JWI lglI SePI OolI ovl
S_lararwr snsalrall' Constmgbnby, Menusl eefl.Weighted _tsaOrOraJNl
Jan Feb Mar AM May I Jun-1 ea I Aug 1 Sep 1 Oct 1 Nov 1 Dec 1 Total
511 - SFR Inside CM 134,698 131,795 117,634 127,626 138.400 199,295 1 222,144 209,939 190,2751 147,945: 148,045,1 1 134195• 119020911
Sill -SFR Inside Cdy - Low Income )NEW) ,0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0
5110- MFR Ina M de C - Accounts 50,200 55,428 51,195 50,216 52.638 67,669 ' 73,819. 64,950' 63,267 - 65537; 63,932' 511251; 7,101102`
512 - Commercial Inside City 68,782 71,221 76,889 68,557 72020' i 95,342 I 107.670' 1141153, 1,19,2741 106,395 92.8341 811803' 1;074039
513 - Industnal Inside City 2,352 1955 3,989 2,014 1.317 1455.. 2,174 1 21162 11977' 1'9441 11553 10311 22,723!
514- GovemmentInside CM 6,896 7,000 7,095 7,304 10596 13,206 ' 16,419. 19,343. 16,0401 12.116, 10,2441 6,320! 134/5501
515 - Interdepartmental Inside City 1,502 1,363 910 1026 1'.138 1,652 I 1,860', 2.1,101 2,182' 7875, 1,696; 7,2601 15,677;
S21 -SFR Outside CM 440 431 423 464 476 , 727 ) 7211 643 652• 488', 4961 459' 5421! weightedloroufvde ay mvlopher
521L- SFR Outside CM- Low Income (NEW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 yelghted for l0w-mcome /Outside afy mul0pher
522 - Comnerc,l OUIuda Cdy 31 26 28 30 22 26 27' 26. 38: 38' 39- 39.1 370) I lo .,ghfed foroutsde 4ty muldpl,er
524 - Government Outsde City 319 279 279 275 275 286 286 166. 166: 1511 1511 319 2. 960 )s eig8Ied for outuds
TOTAL 265,219 251,499 256,441 257314 275422 379;10 4251201 410493, 3031672' 33814861 3111962, 271;177; I 2.673,0541
4,036530 .
Design MFR Rates by Meter S)de7 (10Y, 206) I- 2 l IMPORTANT!!' SFR NEEDS TO BE ALLOCATED ON WINTER AVG USAGE: EVERONE ELSE ON ANNUAL AVG
Accounts veigMed for. MCES to generate rate by meter see ADD IN WINTER AVG UNIT
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP YA1(IMA MODEL -June 2' 20111 CbstomerSUmmary
(425)867 -1802
612201111242 P66 Page 80 of 88'
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Test Year Customer Data Summary
Assumed % oI Low lissome Cluaiyirg SFR Onside City) Customers: .. '8211 Note- U5 Census estimates 22.4 % 4f CM of Velema pop Fees at or below the poverty Me.
Assnred9. of Low Income Ouhlying 8F0 IOtds4Fe COy)CUSfaowa, . • . ._'.— _.. . -- _ - -- 58 Average usage (CCF) per month per Lowb,cone custamen • �` 7 py' Low e m eds p a. w row n a si nechanche ,es, 0nly Il ,r C7 eannu income , ncoe,isa o r . b elmcomelacdrty
neP means ncome o o
Um Y o aki s a metropolitan resdennal area. y and whose annual e person n at * n own eighty percent'
Lifeline Reed Daeoudf%); - 9SS -• o/ themedlan , ncomeofineyakima,38lwpolital zlatndcalaree. whoremoreihan one 6,1800000 an Ownersh,pinterest.
SFRLyefilt*VaWn.D''''''' Mt ' e qp;'' ' s,dentialfa lbeterclers totho bine
com ann23l inomes abonbelow eighty percen the
OWSi
medl e imomeo M Yakima rm � c e t opot a,p s t a n Pe sucal ans r ea w40 Th e dState in alth lo and ' u ltzn Devel l 01 ir CAy wegNbg FaspeC 'I N'4' shall be determined by reference to tlata�pubinhetl�by the UmtedStates Department p /Housing -and Urban Development
Customer Counts NNeigMMISbSSe:al, I WaterConsanptionCltarecteri stIc.(ocf� weighted slatls00s.
Current Customer Classes Proposed Customer Classes Fritter of um
Nber. oh tm
j NOerct Summer. Wader, Total! ' Summer: - winter• Abnuall
Annul Avg'
Averse Avere usage
0caotmh owelOng Uoth j MCES. Usage' Usage. Usage Usage• UsaUsage. Usage• acount: pe Owe Vg g Unit' • I%'aIMF. usage/DU to,
(ring Unit: 5F' AVG VJINTERUSAGE PER ACCOUNT.
SI, - SFR Insid.City 1'>.' Seale Famy ReadenOaI 20,705 201898 ' 0,501',503' 400;888 1',902,3911 166,834 133,629• 158,533' I 77:
(_Y -- 00% 6.40. 84%
511E -SFR Inside CM - Low Income (NEW) ,' ° ,! Seale Fends• Remdmaad - - - 00%
SI1m -MFR Inside City - Accounts .•' :7,•.'? MuUfamdy Resitlmba1 1 ' 102]8 553,223 156,8]9 710,102: 61',469' - 52,293 59,1]5 ;' 34 6 60.]% 464; 13%
512 - CommereulInside Cty ' -- ',,±. A Cmo,., 1,973 4;414 853,133' 221,806. 11 94',793 73,935. 805786 1 45.4: -. 0,0% I 1675 37%
513 - Industrial InsideCy • , 3� -,, Commercial , 9 37 18,585 6,1386 22.723' 11843 2,046. 11894' 209.6- -• 00% 55591 27 %',
m
S14- Govementlnsde Cty ;r' ., Commercial 47 3141 112;363 22,217. 134,580' 12.485: 7;406 11;215' 237.7; 0.0% 23.56' 10%
515 - InterdepartmentalIns,de City 'vv6 / Y om
Cercoi 33 158 144516 41126. 18,577' 5606 1,375 1,548' 46,5'I -• 0.0 % 8.69^ 19%
521 - 5FR Outside City - -e, 1.: ! .4 Say* Fandy Resdentlal 68 68 5,092' 1,329' 60211 566' 4436 535' 7.9 -- 00% ! 6.56' 83 %
521L - SFR Outset, CFy- Low Income (NEW) r .'1 •, 3' SageFem.* Residential •
0.0%
522 - Commercial Outside City 31 ; -S; ^ 3 Cmarercal 6 7 274 961 370 30,E 32' 311 5.11 -' 0.0% 4,57: 89%
024 - Government Outside City s ,r , . S •4•, 4 yy Commercial 3 3' 2,034:1 91661 2,950: 225 I 305 24611 81.6 -- 0.0% 101.42_ 124 %'
dal Summer average average over annual average. �'� 9,9r0 37.170 60119,659. 914t396 311733054• :I 3]8;88111 371,430 I ]22.764, I I
Summary of Test Year Customer Data with Proposed Rate Classes 1
Crammer Ceara. U tterg water ConsimPtim , eheracterimas(epgiweighted■ I Ayerage'USege fed) per I
Reno:. 1
Number of Number of Number M tamme
Sr Water mn
Total Suer. Manton Annual! Suer, MNnter, I Annual! I wino :Am,ul•
Accm.& Peeling Units NICE. Usage Usage I Usage. Average Average. Average. Usage Usage• Usage- I Usage. I
1 Sbgb FUMY ReaMen6a1 20,773 - 20,963 1,506,595 402.217 0,908,813 167,399. 134,072' 159,068: 8,11 65. 84% This proves that there is no dfferentobon belxeen customer classes.
2 MtMen,3y 0. 4,00.3 ' 1.698 9,580 18.278 553,223 156,879 710,02 60,469' 52,293' 50175 382' 30 34,0' 88% Ih,s analyst bears fhsis out and therefore rate Met t
3 • Cogmrdal' 2,072 - 4,934 998,840 255,29g∎ 0,2543130. 110,982' 85,100, 104,512' 53.6. 41111 50,41 81% ' should he applied moss the board.
+
TOTAL 24.343 6550 37,95 3,066559 114,31E 1 I 3473,084 3361811 I 2713485 3223754 132: 11111 13,211 14%
[al Summer average aver annual average.
•
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP VAKIMA MODEL -June 212010 Customer Summary
(425)867 -1802 6/2/201,1312'42 701- •
Page 81 of 88'
•
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Test Year Customer Data Summary
Assumed % of Low Income Qualifying SFR (8uide City) Customers: • OAS ' Note. US Census estimates 22.4% of Crly 01Yakima pop Wes at or, below the poverty, kne
Assumed % of Loy/Income Qualifying SFR (Outside CM) Cusm
toers: ' , taw income discount provided for tonne -- - - r __ _ - - - - - - - - -
Average usage (CC0)p.. month per Low 11 <bffa
Income ja11 e means a perspnwh
1121 only as CYNIC Law- onmoderate-incomelacdge
o owns a single_famdy reidennal facility and whose annual income is at or below eighty percent' Limb., Le F'ved OLScousR '•W%" of themediart, income of the Yaki ma metropolitanstens brat area. Where more than one person has an ownership interest'
in 11YA esldentialffacdM, the term refers tothose persons whose combined' annual income is at or, below eighty percentof the •
SFRLifeOrc Winne 0/100304 f+:k
Outside City Weigh �FxW tOpry medlartrocome.or the Yakima metropolitan statrshcal area The median Income of�the Yakima metropolitan statistical area
' shaltbe determined by reference to data.publlshed by the United States Department of:Housing and Urban Development:
Meters 314' r 8 Sr 1 r r 4- I 0' j r' i 10T'
Meter Service EWlyalenls(MSES). 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' 1 0,0' 00, i 0.0' I TOTAL.
Meter Capcay Equivalents (MCEs). 1.0 1.7 3.3 5.3 10.7 1 18.7 I 33.3 1 53.3' I 76.7
Single Farrah Residential 20,507 276 7 it' 2 3 ' 01 0■ I 0' I 20,806•
MUbla 7y Residential 1,169 348 101 62 ' 10. 8 1 01 01 0] 1 1'.698
Commercial 5,257 2087 8,450 1,382 1 606 ( 846 I 3' 11 1 11
O 0 0 0 0 0' 0' 0' 0' 0] 0.
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0i
O 0 0 0' ' 0 0 0' 0• 0' 0 01
O 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0' 01 0 01
O 0 0 0 0 01 1 P 0 0' 0 01
O 0 0 Cr 0 0 I 0 1 011 0' 0' 0'
TOTAL 25,334 2.710 7,550 1,475 0111 1 MT 4 I T I 11 I 341120`
d
check 26.937 2.710 1,558 1,435 618 857 4' 3' 1' 34:123
•
•
PREPARED 6Y FCS GROUP YAKIMA - June 2' 20111
(425)867 -1802
6112011112:42 PM • Customer Summary,
Page 82 of 88:
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Current and Revised Rate Schedules
Test year: I 2011
Rate Schedule
YMC 7.60.020.A - Inside C'
Minimum Charges 2010 Proposed
Charge 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Monthly Miniumum charge $ 14.79 $ 14.79 $ 15.54 $ 116.34 $- 117.17 $ 116.05 $ 118:97 $; 119193 $; 20957 $; 211583 5 24 583
Daily charge $ 0.4862 $ 0.4862 $ M5110 $ 01..5311 $ 01.5644 $ 015932 $ 0162351 $ 016553 $ 0 168877 $3 0170941 5 0)7094)
memo: yty % change 0.0% 5..1 %• 5.11%. 571%. 50➢% 51191'• 511 %'• 5:.19', 3)0%' 0 :01C•
YMC 7.60.025.A - Outside C
Minimum Charges 2010 Proposed
Charge 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Monthly Miniumum charge $ 22.10 $ 22.10 $ 23.23 $ 24.411 $ 2'5.66 $ 26:.97 $ 2334. $; 29.79 $; 3111.30) $= 32241 $ 327.241
Daily charge $ 0.7266 $ 0.7266 $ 0.7637 $ 0.8026 $ 0.6435 $ 01.8866; $ 01931118; $ 0197933 $; 11.0292 $; 11.06011 5 11060/1/
memo: yty % change - 0.0% 5:1% 5•..11 %• 53.1 : %. 51.1%, 5)1 %t 5:1%'• 511%" 3 0 :0 %'.
YMC 7.60.020.A.1.a - Inside Ci
All Customers Classes (other than Multiple Unit Residential)
Monthly Ready to Serve Charge 2010 Proposed
Water Meter Size (inches) Charge 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
0.75 $ 14.79 $ 14.79 $ 15.54 $ 116.34 $ 117'117' $ 118105 6 1!8:9.71 $; 119191 $1 201953 $; 211583 5 211583
1.00 $ 18.78 $ 18.78 $ 19.74 $ 2074 . - 6 2.11.80 $ 221911 $ 241081 6 2513711 $; 26661 $; 27140) 5 27'.40)
1.50 $ 24.26 $ 24.26 $ 25.50 $ 26.80 $ 26,.116 $ 20601 6 311.1111 $; 32701 $; 341365 $; 351407 $: 351407
2.00 $ 39.05 $ 39.05 $ 411.04 $ 43.13. $ 45,.33 $ 47468, $; 501081 $; 52.1631 $; 5533311 $; 56197/ 6 5597.7
3.00 $ 147.90 $ 147.90 $ 15544 $ 1163.37 6 1171110 $; 1180146; 6 1189166; 6 11991341 $; 209150) $; 21.1579) $; 215791
4.00 $ 188.28 $ 188.28 $ 197.88 $ 207.97 6) 2118.581 6) 229173; 6 2411.44 $; 253376; 6 266170) 6 274170) 6) 274170)
6.00 $ 282.49 $ 282.49 $ 296.90 $ 3112.04 6) 327.95; 6) 344168; $ 362261 6 3801731 $; 4001157 6; 412.115i 5 412.1151
8.00 $ 389.89 $ 389.89 6 409_77 $ 430.67 $ 452.64 $ 475 6 4991981 6 52546 6 5521281 6 568/1853 6 5681851
10.00 $ 779.73 $ 779.73 $ 819.50 $ 8611.29 6) 905.22 $ 9511.38: $1 999190 611,05019M 6;11,1104140 $ 17,137%.633 511,137463 I
memo: y/y % change 0.0%. 5-.11%, 5:.1 %. 571■%, 57.1 531 %S 5'191' 5319'. 31091 0:0 %,
Prepared by FCS GROUP YAKIMA MODEL - .June2 207111 672720;1111 \12:42 ?PM1
(425) 867 -1802 Rate Schedule: Pagel833of'`883
• III III
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Current and Revised Rate Schedules
Test year: 1 2011 1
YMC 7.60.025.A.1.a - Outside C'
All Customers Classes (other than Multiple Unit Residential) _.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Monthly Ready to Serve Charge 2010 Proposed
---- Wate - fM•dt4TSize (inches) Charge 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
0.75 $ 22.10 $ 22.10 $ 2323 $ 24.411 $ 25166 $ 26.97 $ 281314 $ 29179) $1 311.30) $ 32:24 $ 321241
1.00 $ 28.07 $ 28.07 $ 29.50 $ 31.011 $ 32159 $; 34.25 $ 36100) $ 37.831 $ 391761 $ 401951 $ 40195
1.50 $ 36.24 $ 36.24 $ 38.09 $ 40.031 $; 4207 $ 44.22: $ 46147' $; 481.841 V 511.33 $ 5287.' $ 52
2.00 $ 58.34 $ 58.34 $ 61_32 $, 64.44 $ 6733; $1 711.116 $ 74811 $ 78163 $ 8264 $; 8512 $ 85112
3.00 $ 221.00 $ 221.00 $ 232.77 $ 24412 $ 2561.67' $ 2691.65 $ 283.49 $ 297486 $i 3131.05 $ 322441 $ 322441
4.00 $ 281.33 $ 281.33 $ 295.68. $ 310176 $ 3261.611 $ 3431.26 $ 360177i $ 3791117' $ 3981511 $ 41101465 $ 4101463
6.00 $ 422.11 $ 422..11 $ 443.64 $ 466.26 $ 49004 $ 51151.031 $ 5411.30 $ 568191! $ 597/.92 $1 61686 $1 615853
8.00 - $ 582.56 $ 582.56 $ 61227 $ 643.50 $ 676.311 $ 7101.81! $ 747:00 $ 78516 $ 8251.20) $5 8491963 $ 8491963
10.00 $ 1,165.11 $ 1,165.11 $ 1,224.53 $ 1,286.90 $ 11,35262 $; 11,4211.60 $; 11,494101 $ 11,570130) $ 11,650139) $ 11,699190) $11,69990)
memo: y/y % change 0.0% 5,1%, 5.1%. 5.1%, 5:1%. 5:1% 51.1% 5:1%', 330%'• 0:0W
YMC 7.60.020.A.1.a - Inside Ci
• -
Multiple Unit Residential Customers
• - •
-
' •
, 2010 Proposed
•
.
Monthly Ready to Serve Charge Charge 2011 - 2012 2013 - 2014. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Per Account $ 7.69 $ 7.69 $ 8.08 $ 6.49 $ 81.93 $ 9.381 $ 9)86; $ 110136 $ 10189 $i 111 $: 1111.22:
Per Unit $ 7.10 $ 7.10 $ 7146 $ 7.844 $ - 6124 $ 8166 $ 91.110 $; 9157/ $ 1:01063 $ 101363 $ 101363
memo: y/y % change 0.0%, 5.1%, 5,1%. 51%. 5:1% 511%, 511%. 5:1% 310%' 0:0%'
YMC 7.60.025.A.1.a - Outside C'
Multiple Unit Residential Customers Outside City
2010 • Proposed
Monthly Ready to Serve Charge Charge- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Per Account $ 11.49 $ 11.49 $ 12.08 $ 12.69 $ 113134 $ 114021 $ 114731 $ 115149 $3 161.281 $ 181.763 $ 16376
Per Unit $ 10.61 $ 10.61 $ 11.15 $ 11.72. $ 112.32: $ 12196 $; 113611 $; 141.301 $3 161033 $: 1'5:483 V 1'51483
memo: y/y % change 0.0% 5.1i%. 5.1%1 5,1.% 5)i1'/�. 50% 5:1%', 5:1%' 3:0%'. 0:0%;
Prepared by FCS GROUP YAKIMA MODEIL.-Jiarte 2 201111 612/201111\1242PM1
(425) 867-1802 Rate Schedde Page:84off883
0 0 0
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Current and Revised Rate Schedules
Test year: I 2011
YMC 7.60.020.A.1.b - Inside Ci
Volumetric Charge - All Customers 2010 • Proposed
Charge- --201 - 2012 2013 20 2015 --2016- 2017 2018 2019 2020— - -
Charge per CCF $ 2.59 $ 2.59 $ 2..72 $ 286 $ 3.011 $; 1.116; $ 3132 $; 3149) $; 31671 $; 3178) V 31783
memo: y/y % change MO% 5i.1%. , 51%. .1,%. 5:1%, 51%, 5:1%; 5:1PN, 10%; 0:0%;
YMC 7.60.025.a.1.b - Outside Ci
Voluirietric All Customers - 2010 . Proposed
Charge 2011 2012 2013 2014 , 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Charge per CCF $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 4.14 $ 4.35 $ 4 $ 4811 $ 5105) $1 5311 $3 5)581 $ 5;755 $1 55755
memo: y/y % change 0.0% 5-.:1%. '/%. 51%. 5:1% 5:1P/d. 5:1% 5:1%; 10%; 0:0%;
Calculated SFR Billing @ 8ccf/mo $ 35.51 $ 35.51 $ 37.32 $ 39.22 $ 41.22 $ 43.33 $ 4554 $ 47.86 $ 50136 $ 511.611 $ 31 ig
YMC 7.60.020.B & 7.60.025.B
Strong Waste Surcharge 2010 Charge l Proposed Proposed Proposed! Proposed Proposed! Proposed Proposed! Proposed! Proposed! Proposed!
Inside City 2011 Z0112 20111 2014 20115 2016; 20137/ 20183 2019) 2020)
Unit cost per pound for BOD $ 0.407 $ 0.422 $ 0.464 $ 0.489 $ 0.495; $ 6490 $ 01505 $ 015116; $; 01520. $; 015291 $ 1315363
Unit cost per pound for TSS $ 0.415 $ 0.424 $ 0.466 $ 0.4911 $ 0.496 $ 015011 Ty; 015081 $ 015117i $ 015233 $ 015291 $ 015.363
Unit cost per pound for FOG $ 0.276 $ 0.276 $ 0.276 $ 0.276 $ 6.276 $ 01276i $ 01276 $ 01216; $ 01276; $ 012765 $ 012763
memo: y/y % change 17% MI% 52%. 12%. 1i.0%. 1165/d, 1:7P/d. 1:2% V.2%
memo: current outside City charges presented
under Utility Basis. Revised charges are presented
under Cash Basis per City direction. Septage rate
•
maintained at current levels, consistent with 2007
Prepared by FCS GROUP YAKRVTA MODEL - jure 2 201111 6/2/261111 \12-:42;!PM1
(425) 867-1802 Rate Schedule Page386off883
i
•
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Current and Revised Rate Schedules
Test year: I 2011
YMC 7.60.035
Septage and Exceptional waste Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
2010
Charges 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Unit cost per gallon of septage $ 0.381 $ 0.399 $ 0.420 $ 0.435 $ 0.446 $ 0.456 $ 0.468 $ 0.480 $ 0.492 $ 0.504 $ 0.516
memo: y/y % change 4.8% 5.1% 3.7% 2.4% 2.4% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
`MC 7.60.105
Base Fee for Minor Industrial Users Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed
2010
Charges 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
MIU Base Fee (Full Cost Fee) $ 102.32 $ 111.46 $ 115.25 $ 119.15 $ 123.15 $ 128.35 $ 133.72 $ 139.28 $ 145.02 $ 150.95 $ 157.09
Owner (Inside City) Discounted Rate $ 62.45 $ 111.46 $ 115.25 $ 119.15 $ 123.15 $ 128.35 $ 133.72 $ 139.28 $ 145.02 $ 150.95 $ 157.09
memo: y/y % change 8.9% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1%
memo: Current in -city subsidy eliminated under
revised charges, as per City direction.
•
•
•
Prepared by FCS GROUP YAKIMA MODEL - June 2_2011 6/2/2011 \12:42 PM
(425) 867 -1802 Rate Schedule Page 86 of 88
• • •
City of Yakima
Sewer Utility 2010 Rate Study
Pre - Treatment Program
2009 Customer Statistics Priceout
2009
Number of MIU and SIU Accounts Customer Scats Notes
Number of Milts to be served (Outside Cf - at- ;:4 SPTO
Number of MIU's to be served (Inside Cit1;=° ^ ,1, SPT
Number of SIU's to be served (Inside Cie 11'_ • ,26 0 7 SIU does 'rot pay base ON pretreatment fees. They instead pay Wastewater, Discharge-Fees.
per YMC 7.60.105(D).
2009
City Pre Treatment Rates T p Rates
MIU Base Fee (monthly) $ 102.32 -
Owner at 75% $ 62,46 IReixesents 25% of caleutated COS, per 2007 City'study.
Calculated Revenues
MIU Base Fee $ 2456
Owner at 75% 371,702
$ 374,158
2009 Actual Revenue (per city financial n 436,751
Difference (62,593)
• % Difference (priceout adjustment factor) -16.7%
Program Budget Detail for Pre- Treatment Service Unit (8233)
Test Year i:'i-i2011`
Program line item 2011 2012 2043 2014 20151 2016 2017' 20181 2019' 2020:
Interfund In -Lieu of Tax 134,605 138,236 142,006 145,922 159826 155953' 161 166;9141 172;77,11 1781896,
Interfund Charges - Insurance 3,555 3,661 3,771 3,884 4,0011 41211 412441 4)372: 41503: 41638
Interfund Charges - City Services 50,920 52,448 54,021 55,642 57,31111 59;0301 6018011 62:625+ 6415041 66439;
Interfund Charges - Customer Services 15,450 15,914 16,391. 16,883. 17,389' 17,9111 18:448, 19;0021 191572 20)159'
Salaries - Permanent 435,453 448,517 461,972 475,830 494,866. 51'4659 5352461 5561655 576922 602;0781
Longevity 14,877 15,324 95,783 16,257 19,907 117;583 18;287' 199181 1917,79 20;5701
Deferred Comp 13,048 13,439 13,843 14,258 14,828 15,421, 16;038 16,6801 17347' 199411
Overtime 824 849 874 902 936. 974' 110131 1,0531 110951 11139'
Social Security 36,088 38,073 40,167 42,376 44,919 47;6141 50;4711 53',499 561709 6011112'
PERS 25,108 26,489 27,946 29,483 311,252' 31,127 3511114' 37;2211 394551 411822:
Industnel Insurance 15,301 16,142 17,030 17,967 19045. 201187' 211399' 22683' 241043' 254861
Life insurance 1,041 1,099 1,159 5,223 11,296 11374 114561 1 1 117341
Life Insurance - Management 368 388 410 432 4581 486' 515. 546 579' 613.
Medical Insurance 50,656 53,442 56,381 59;482 610511 661834 7018441 759951 796011 84137'
Medical Insurance - Management 15,956 16,831 17,759 08,736 19;8601 211,052' 22;315 23:654' 2510731 26;57,7
Dental Insurance 7,229 7,626 6,046 6,488 89981 6538. 1011101 1017.16, 1,1 12:0411
Dental Insurance - Management 55 58 61 64 681 72' 77' 811 86 911
Dental Insurance - Exempt 2,952 3,184 3,286 3,466 6674 1895 41128' 413761 41839 419171
Unemployment Compensation 1,466 1,547 1,632 1,722 11825. 1,935 2;0511 2;11741 2:3041 2:443:
Uniforms /Clothing 618 637 656 675 696 716 738' 7601 . 783; 806,
Office and Operehng Supplies 5,665 5,835 6.010 6,1:90 6,376 6;567, 6,7641 6;967, 7 :176 71392
Operating Supplies - Fuel 8,240 8,487 8,742 9.004 9 ;274 9;552' 9;839' 10;1341 10;438' 1017511
Small Tools and Minor Equipment 258 265 273 2811 290' 299' 307 3117' 326, 338
Chemicals 258 265 273 281' 290' 299 307 3117, 326 336;
Professional Services 15,450 15,914 16,391 16,883 117,389 1791111 18,448 19902' 191572 29159'
Telephone 342 352 353 374 385. 396. 406. 4211 4331 4461
Postage 551 568 585 602 620, 639 6581 678; 698' 7,19'
Cell Phone 1,625 1,674 9.724 0,776 1,829' 1,884' 19411 11,999 2;059' 2;1211
Transportation 1,030 1.065 9,093 1,126 1,159' 1,194' 11230' 112671 11305; 113441
Advertising 2,060 2,122 2,085 2.251' 2319' 2388 214601 2;534' ' 26101 2688
R &M / Contractors 773 796 820 844 869' 896, 9221 950, 979• 1)0081
Miscellaneous Expense 1,030 1,061 1.093 11,126 11,159 1194 1 1 11305 113441
Dues and Subscriptions 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 11,159' 11194 1 11,267, 11305) 11344'
Recruiting Expense - _ _ _ _ _. _ _.
State / County Taxes and Assessments - - - - - _ - -. _.
Rentals / M &0 Garage 3,091 3,091 3.091 3,091, 3,0911 1 39911 3:0911 39911 3991,
Rentals / Replacements - Garage 8,944 8,944 8,944 9,944 8,9441 8,944' 6944' 8;9441 8:9441 8:9441
Operating Equipment 5,150 5,305 5,464 5629 5,796. 59701 611491 63341 65241 617201
Total - Service Unit 8233 Program Eap. 881,066 910,635 941,237 973,216 1611156 14064000 1;098)536, 1044,164 1;191850' 1',241;7211
•
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP YAKIMA MODEL - Jun9 2_201;11 MIU Piogram'Fees:
(425)867 -1802 612/20111112:421PM1 Page 8T01 88:
• . III
•
Other MIU Program Revenues
Wastewater Discharge Permits (WDP) -f"- 216',000.'" 7. 11000 „ 215,000.'„ 1 . - :218,000:;.: . 218000 21EOX00, 211,000 21Em00 ,2$8 88 2$EJOODr
Total: Offsetting Revenues 215,000 214000 215,000 - � 215,000 215000 2 215000' ` - 215000 215;000 215;000'' -- 215 ;000'
Net - Service Unit 0233 Annual Revenu 666 ,066 69S 635 _ 726 7 - 218 798;058; 839 900' 882536; 929;154'. 976,850; 1;026721!
(a( Calculated by model, based upon estimated revenues and other MIU revenues,
Calculation of Minor Industrial User Unit Charge
Number of MIU and S1U Accounts 2011 2012 2013 2004 2015 2016 2017' 20181 2019 20201
Number of MIU's to be served (Outside C ;
:, '� .2.1 2 2 2 2 2 2' 2: 2'
2:
Number of MIU's to be served (Inside Cite,,, _, _,4981 501 506 511' 516 5211 527 532' 5377 542:
Total number of MIUs 498 503 508 513 518. 522 520 534 5291 545
Net - Service Unit 0233 Annual Revenu 666,066 I 695,635 1 726,337 1 758,218 F 798,t56 Ji 835;9001p 883;538:1) 929;154' (1 9781850 JI 1 ;0261721;
MIU Base Fee (monthly) Idl( $ 111.46 $ 115.25 $ 119115 5 52515 1 $. 128135.) 5 133:72' 15 13938' 15 145:07113 150195; 1$ 157:09: '
Owner (d) $ 111.46 I $ 115.25 19 119.15 F $ 12315 I1$. 128235 15 133:72' II 8 139128 II S 145,02; I $' 150195; 1$' 157:09'
Owner Base Fee Discount assumed 1 Inside City Disc.. Not Applied
Mena: Current Authorized Rate / Mo (Base Fee)
Current Authorized Rate / Mo (Owner at 75 %)
IN Based on City Customer Billing Database; Number of accounts in class code SP1' and S*TO. Assumes 11 % /yr growth.,
(c1 Based on City Customer Billing Database; Number of accounts in class code 5802 through SOUS. Assumes. 1 % /ye growth,
(d1 2010 full cost charges per YMC 7.60.105.C. inside City castomers. recv a 25% dlscoont.
MIU Program Financial Plan
2011 2012 2013 2614 2013 2016; 2017/ 2018 20191 2020
Program Revenues
MIU Rates
Outside City 5 2,675 $ 2,794 $ 2,917 $ 31045-$ 3,205 $ 31373; $, 31548; 5 3;732' $ 3;923; 5. 41123'
Inside City 663,391 692,842 723,420 755,172 794,9511 830,527 8759881 9251423; 972926. 1,022;598'
Total - MIU Rate Revenues 666,066 695,635 726,337 755,218 7981156. 8391900' 883;536; 9291154' 9761850 1,02617211
Other Revenues 215,000 215,000 255,000 215,000 21150050 215,000 21510001 2151008 215350' 215;000)
Total Revenues $ 885,966 $ 950,635 $ 949,337 $ 973,218 5 1,0130 5 1,584 5 l', 5 11641154: S 1,191;850' 3. 1;241;7211
2010 Actual Revenue
Program Expenses 9 881,066 $ 910,635 $ 941,337 $ 973,218 5 11,0133156 5 1050900 5 1 ;098 ;530 5 111441154: 3 1 Y 1',241;7211_
Difference: Surplus /(Subsidy from rate $ - $ - $ - 9 - 5 - 5 -- 5 - 5; -. $; -• 5; -•
Re • ort Table for Pre - Treatment Prot. am
PreTreatment Program _ 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018. 2019 2020
Forecasted Program Expenses S. 881,066 $ 910,635 $ 941,337 $. 973,215 $ 11,0113,156; $. 11,054,900 $. 11,095538. 6; 111441194 $; 11191050 $; 1',24117211
Less: SIU Revenues 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,0001 215000 2151000 2151000 1
Net Annual Revenue Requirement $ 666,066 $ 695,635 5 726,337 $ 758,218 $ 793,156 S. 830900; 5 883038; $'. 929;1541 5; 9781850 Y 1 ;0207211
Divided by Total number of MIUs 498 503 508 513. 515 523. 529' 534) 539' 545;
Equals Monthly Unit Charge per MIU $ 111.46 $ 115.25 $ 119115 $ 123.05 $ 128.35 1 133:721 5 13928' 5 149.02' $; 150)95; $; 157,:091
PREPARED BY FCS GROUP YAKIMA,MODEL- June'2 201171 MIU .Pro r mrFeess
(425)867 -1802 621201;1I 12:42:PM1 Page,88'of 88'
• Current
Wastewater Connection Charge Process
The WCC is comprised of two parts which contribute to the Wastewater revenue:
1) The equitable share of existing facilities ( "Historic Cost ") element of the charge is
partial reimbursement to the City for prior investments made to construct existing
wastewater facilities to be used by new customers.
2) The "Actual Cost" is the revenue necessary to construct new wastewater facilities
required to accommodate the additional waste loading from new customers.
Wastewater Connection Charge Determination
The WCCs are segregated into the following categories:
• Non Domestic
• Non Residential Domestic
• Residential Domestic
Each category is further broken out into four zones affecting the applied rates:
1. Zone 1A — area within City limits lying east of 40 Avenue.
2. Zone 1B — area within City limits Tying west of 40 Avenue.
3. Zone.2 — area within the urban area established by the 1976 Agreement for
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service, as amended, excluding Zone 1.
4. Zone 3 — area outside Zone 1 and Zone 2 but within the Yakima urban growth
area boundary.
Cost can vary from one project to the next based on flows, square footage of parcel and
other variables which correlates to the generation of wastewater. WCCs are in addition
to monthly service and usage fees and must be paid prior to connection to the system.
WCCs consist of three elements: Treatment, Trunkage and Collection. Each element is
comprised of two components, "historic" and "actual" costs. Currently, all of these
elements are utilized in calculating connection costs.
Treatment costs = the cost to treat wastewater to meet regulatory standards
Historic cost = equitable share of existing plant capacity to treat wastewater
Actual cost = estimate of actual cost to treat wastewater
Trunkage costs = the cost to install wastewater trunk lines (greater than 12 "); used to
receive wastewater from collection pipes
Historic cost = equitable share of the cost of existing trunks /interceptors
Actual cost = estimate of actual cost to connect to trunk
•
• Collection costs = the cost to install collection wastewater lines (less than 12 "); used to
collect wastewater from adjacent properties building sewers.
Historic cost = equitable share of the cost of existing collection pipes
Actual cost = estimate of actual cost to connect to collection pipes (including
costs associated with expanding the collection pipe system)
The actual cost of Trunkage and /or Collection elements of the WCC may be waived in its
entirety or in portion at the discretion of the Wastewater Manager. Each
project/development is reviewed and determined on a case per case basis and must
meet the requirements of Title 12 Section 12.03.020 of the Yakima Municipal Code.
Trunkage - owner or developer extends a trunk from an existing trunk through or
along the entire length of the lot/development and is compatible with the City of
Yakima's Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
Collection - owner or developer meets one of the following conditions:
(a) the lot is served by a collection pipe system installed by the developer of the
lot;
(b) the lot owner extends a collection pipe from an existing collection system
through or along the entire length of the lot;
(c) the lot is connected to a collection system originally financed by local
improvement district assessments to which contribution was made for the lot;
(d) within Zone 1, the lot is served by an existing collection pipe system installed
• by the City or other governmental agency and is within City of Yakima
Census tract: 01, 02, 03, 05, 06, 07, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17.
If an existing facility is changing business practices such as a bookstore to a restaurant,
and /or an increase in capacity loading, the City must research its historic usage which
may include volume, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids
(TSS) loading and subtract that from its proposed usage.
•
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 1 of 11
• Chapter 7.58
WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE
( Sections:
I 7.58.010 Purpose of chapter.
7.58.020 Definitions.
7.58.030 Connection to the wastewater system— Connection charge imposed.
7.58.040 Calculation of the wastewater connection charge.
7.58.050 Base treatment plant charge.
7.58.060 Base trunks /interceptors charge.
7.58.070 Base collection pipes charge.
7.58.075 Maximum lot size.
7.58.080 Time of payments— Lien — Suspension of service.
7.58.085 Alternative, periodic payment method.
7.58.090 Recalculation of charges.
7.58.095 Reimbursable agreements.
7.58.100 Money to be credited to wastewater operating fund.
7.58.010 Purpose of chapter.
The purpose of this chapter is to allocate an equitable share of the cost of the existing
wastewater system ( "historic cost "), and a reasonable estimate of the actual cost of
connection (including costs associated with expanding the wastewater system) ( "actual
cost "), to persons who connect facilities to the wastewater system. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 1,
2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 1, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 1, 2004: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.020 Definitions.
Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of terms in this
chapter shall be as follows:
1. "Collection pipes" mean those wastewater system pipes less than twelve inches in
diameter used to collect wastewater from adjacent properties' building sewers.
2. "Collection pipe system" means a series of collection pipes extending from a
common connection point to a trunk /interceptor.
3. "Discharge authorization" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65.
4. " Discharger — industrial discharger or user" shall have the same meaning as in
Chapter 7.65.
5. "Domestic discharger or user" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65.
6. "Domestic wastewater" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65.
7. "LID waiver" means a waiver of the entire wastewater connection charge for the
first residential connection (SDU or equivalent flow) per parcel for pre- existing residences
in an LID. Other new connectors (pre- existing multiple - residential or pre - existing
industrial /commercial) pay treatment, trunkage, and collection for authorized discharges
greater than an SDU. However, in the case of other new connectors, the entire actual
collection (lot size) element would be waived.
8. "Lot" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 15.02.
9. "Lot area" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 15.02.
10. "Low- or moderate - income facility owner" means a person who owns a single-
family residential facility and whose annual income is at or below eighty percent of the
j median income of the Yakima metropolitan statistical area. Where more than one person
has an ownership interest in a residential facility, the term refers to those persons whose
• combined annual income is at or below eighty percent of the median income of the
Yakima metropolitan statistical area. The median income of the Yakima metropolitan
statistical area shall be determined by reference to data published by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development.
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07/Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 2 of 11
11. "Parcel" shall have the same meaning as "lot."
12. "Parcel area" shall have the same meaning as "lot area."
• 13. "Sewer" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65.
14. "SDU," "single dwelling unit," "SFD" or "single- family dwelling" shall all have the
same meaning as "dwelling, single - family" or "single- family dwelling" in Chapter 15.02.
15. "Trunks /interceptors" mean those wastewater system pipes twelve inches or
greater in diameter, and related conduits, used to receive wastewater from collection
pipes and transport it to the wastewater treatment plant.
16. "Wastewater" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65. For purposes of
'this chapter, "wastewater" does not include "food processing wastewater" defined in
Chapter 7.12.
17. "Wastewater system" shall have the same meaning as "POTW" or "publicly
owned treatment works" in Chapter 7.65 and includes all sewers, pipes, and wastewater
treatment plants. For purposes of this chapter, "wastewater system" does not include
"food processing wastewater system" defined in Chapter 7.12.
18. "Wastewater treatment plant" shall have the same meaning as in Chapter 7.65.
For purposes of this chapter, "wastewater treatment plant" does not include "food
processing wastewater treatment plant" defined in Chapter 7.12.
19. "Water meter size" shall be determined by reference to the criteria in the Uniform
Plumbing Code or Uniform Building Code as the city may adopt from time to time;
provided, that any facility not served by the city water division shall determine "water
meter size" by the criteria established in AWWA Manual M 22 Sizing Water Service Lines
and Meters.
20. "Zone 1A" means the area within the city limits of the city of Yakima Tying east of
40th Avenue at the time the connection charge established by this chapter is paid.
21. "Zone 1 B" means the area within the city limits of the city of Yakima Tying west of
40th Avenue at the time the connection charge established by this chapter is paid.
22. "Zone 2" means the area within the urban area established by the 1976
Agreement for Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service, as amended, excluding
Zone 1.
23. "Zone 3" means the area outside Zone 1 and Zone 2 but within the Yakima urban
growth area boundary, established by the 1997 Yakima urban area comprehensive plan,
as that boundary may be revised from time to time. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 2, 2007: Ord. 2005-
; 22 § 2, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 2, 2004: Ord. 99 -17 § 1, 1999: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.030 Connection to the wastewater system— Connection charge imposed.
A. A connection charge is imposed on the owner of any facility to be connected to the
wastewater system when the owner of the facility to be so connected has not paid a
wastewater connection charge for connecting such facility to the wastewater system,
subject to the provisions below. Payment of the connection charge does not convey any
ownership interest in the wastewater system. Payment of the connection charge
authorizes connection only to the designated lot and is not transferable to any other lot
except as provided in YMC 7.58.090(D).
B. The wastewater connection charge for any facility located on a lot that has
participated in a local improvement district (LID) for wastewater facilities and has fully
executed an outside utility agreement, if applicable, shall not exceed that in effect at the
time the preliminary assessment roll was passed, provided the wastewater connection
charge is fully paid within one year of time the final assessment roll was passed; provided
however,
C. Within Zone 1A or 1B (inside city) the entire wastewater connection charge shall
be waived (see LID waiver) for any single residential unit located on a parcel that has
• participated in a local improvement district (LID) for wastewater facilities for which the
final assessment roll was passed after May 3, 2005, or the LID was initiated after May 3,
2005, and prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section. The owners
of such parcels remain obligated for all LID charges.
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 3 of 11
D. In order to preserve their right to an LID waiver, all parcels that participate in a
• local improvement district (LID) for wastewater facilities initiated after the effective date of
the ordinance codified in this section must, within one year from the recording of the final
assessment roll of such LID, either (1) connect a facility on the parcel to the wastewater
system for purposes of regular wastewater service; or (2) have a "placeholder"
wastewater account established for the parcel. Customers with a "placeholder" account
shall be billed at a flat rate of ten dollars per month (twenty dollars bimonthly). In the
event that an owner fails to make timely payments on a placeholder account, the parcel
shall become permanently ineligible for a LID waiver for that parcel.
E. Any participants of an LID that is initiated after the effective date of the ordinance
codified in this section that fail to commence either an active or "placeholder" wastewater
account within the time requirement set forth shall, when paying their connection charge,
enjoy only a waiver of the parcel size and one SDU equivalent flow toward their actual
collection element.
F. Parcels that participate in an LID for wastewater facilities either (1) outside of the
city limits (Zones 2 and 3); or (2) within the city limits (Zones 1A and 1 B) for which the
final assessment roll was passed prior to May 3, 2005, shall enjoy only a waiver of the
parcel size and one SDU equivalent flow toward their actual collection element.
G. The "actual cost" collection element of the wastewater connection charge for any
facility located on a lot within the boundaries of a local improvement district for
wastewater facilities that does not participate in said local improvement district shall be
the greater of the wastewater connection charge established by the applicable provision
of the municipal code or the final assessment of the LID plus interest. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 3,
2007: Ord. 2007 -16 § 1, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 3, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 3, 2004: Ord. 98-
42 § 1 (part), 1998: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
• 7.58.040 Calculation of the wastewater connection charge.
A. The wastewater connection charge within Zones 1A, 1B, 2, and 3 shall be
calculated based on information and rates existing at the time when payment will be
made pursuant to YMC 7.58.080 or when a local improvement district final assessment is
authorized by the city council. The connection charge within Zones 1A, 1 B, 2, and 3 shall
be equal to the sum of the following elements:
1. Base treatment plant charge (calculated pursuant to YMC 7.58.050);
2. Base trunks /interceptors charge (calculated pursuant to YMC 7.58.060);
3. Base collection pipes charge (calculated pursuant to YMC 7.58.070);
4. City services charge in the amount of six percent assessed on the sum of the first
three elements;
5. Administration charge in the amount of fifty dollars per lot, in addition to any
required inspection, permit, or plan review fees; and
6. Wastewater tax, and any other applicable tax, assessed on the sum of the first
three elements (pursuant to Chapter 7.64).
B. Charges to Be Published. The city code administration and planning manager
shall maintain a schedule of current charges within Zones 1A, 1 B, 2, and 3, shall post
such schedule conspicuously, and shall make copies available to interested persons.
C. Initial Base Charges. Commencing on the effective date of the ordinance codified
in this chapter and until amended pursuant to subsection D of this section, wastewater
connection charges shall be based upon charges set by this chapter.
D. Amendment of Base Charges. The base charges set forth in this chapter may be
amended by ordinance of the city council. Such amendments shall become effective no
earlier than thirty days after publication.
E. Connection Charge for Properties Not Within Zones 1A, 1 B, 2, or 3. Any person
wishing to connect facilities located on property outside Zones 1A, 1 B, 2, or 3 shall
contact the wastewater manager. Such properties may be connected only upon the
written approval of the city manager, and only upon payment of a connection fee
established in an amount sufficient to allocate to the applicant an equitable share of the
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 4 of 11
cost of the existing wastewater system and a reasonable estimate of the actual cost of
• connection (including costs associated with expanding the system). (Ord. 2007 -66 § 4,
2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 4, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 4, 2004: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.050 Base treatment plant charge.
A. The base treatment plant charge includes both an equitable share of the cost of
the existing wastewater treatment plant ( "historic cost ") and a reasonable estimate of the
actual cost of connection to the wastewater treatment plant (including costs associated
with expanding the plant) ( "actual cost ").
B. For accounts discharging "domestic wastewater," the amount of this charge is a
function of the amount of water flowing to the facility to be connected and the zone in
which the facility is located. The treatment plant charge for single dwelling units (SDUs) is
uniform within each zone. The treatment plant charge for nonresidential accounts shall
be determined by applying the unit cost listed below to the customer's authorized
discharge flow. No charge shall be imposed for any water meter installed for the sole
purpose of irrigation or fire flows. The base treatment plant charge for a particular facility
shall be determined by reference to the following chart:
SDU Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $193.02 $193.02 $193.02 $487.89
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $533.18 $533.18 $533.18 $533.18
Total $726.20 $726.20 $726.20 $1,021.07
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $258.11 $258.11 $258.11 $598.64
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $532.12 $532.12 $532.12 $532.12
• Total $790.23 $790.23 $790.23 $1,130.76
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $265.85 $265.85 $265.85 $616.60
Actual $548.08 $548.08 $548.08 $548.08
Total $813.94 $813.94 $813.94 $1,164.68
C. The charge for multi -unit housing on a single parcel shall be converted to "single
dwelling units" or SDUs by the following scale:
2 -4 units per parcel = 0.8 SDU per unit.
5 or more units per parcel = 0.64 SDUs per unit.
Multi -unit includes trailer park spaces on single parcels.
Nonresidential Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.728 $0.728 $0.728 $1.840
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $2.012 . $2.012 $2.012 $2.012
Total $2.740 $2.740 $2.740 $3.852
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $0.974 $0.974 $0.974 $2.259
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $2.008 $2.008 $2.008 $2.008
Total $2.982 $2.982 $2.982 $4.267
• Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $1.003 $1.003 $1.003 $2.327
Actual $2.068 $2.068 $2.068 $2.068
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 5 of 11
Total $3.071 $3.071 $3.071 $4.395
41, D. For nonresidential domestic wastewater customers, the base treatment plant
charges shall be established by the wastewater manager using the unit price listed above
and the amount of water (hydraulic flow) discharged by the facility as allowed by its
discharge authorization. Refer to YMC 7.65.
E. For nondomestic discharger accounts, the amount of this charge is a function of
the amount of water (hydraulic flow), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and total
suspended solids (TSS) discharged by the facility as allowed by its discharge
authorization. Refer to YMC 7.65.
Nondomestic Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
Hydraulic
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.142 $0.142 $0.142 $0.356
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $0.385 $0.385 $0.385 $0.385
Total $0.527 $0.527 $0.527 $0.741
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $0.195 $0.195 $0.195 $0.452
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $0.402 $0.402 ,$0.402 $0.402
Total $0.597 $0.597 $0.597 $0.854
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $0.201 $0.201 $0.201 $0.466
Actual $0.414 $0.414 $0.414 $0.414
Total $0.615 $0.615 $0.615 $0.880
Nondomestic BOD Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $132.540 $132.540 $132.540 $337.800
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $302.235 $302.235 $302.235 $302.235
Total $434.775 $434.775 $434.775 $640.035
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $168.580 $168.580 $168.580 $391.100
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $279.670 $279.670 $279.670 $279.670
Total $448.250 $448.250 $448.250 $670.770
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $173.637 $173.637 $173.637 $402.833
Actual $288.060 $288.060 $288.060 $288.060
Total $461.698 $461.698 $461.698 $690.893
Nondomestic TSS Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $137.305 $137.305 $137.305 $345.170
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $272.740 $272.740 $272.740 $272.740
Total $410.045 $410.045 $410.045 $617.910
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $189.830 $189.830. $189.830 $440.400
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $286.180 $286.180 $286.180 $286.180
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 6 of 11
Total $476.110 $476.110 $476.110 $726.580
411 Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $195.525 $195.525 $195.525 $453.612
Actual $294.765 $294.765 $294.765 $294.765
Total $490.290 $490.290 $490.290 $748.377
(Ord. 2007 -66 § 5, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 5, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 5, 2004: Ord. 98 -42 § 1
(part), 1998: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.060 Base trunks /interceptors charge.
A. The base trunks /interceptors charge includes both an equitable share of the cost
of the existing trunks /interceptors ( "historic cost ") and a reasonable estimate of the actual
cost of connection to the trunks /interceptors (including costs associated with expanding
the trunks /interceptors system) ( "actual cost "). This charge is the sum of two separate
calculations. The first calculation is a function of the size of the lot to be connected. The
"parcel size" portion of the base trunks /interceptors charge shall be determined by
multiplying the lot area (measured in square feet (sf)) by the rate given in Table A-
(Trunk /parcel size) for the zone in which the lot is located. The second calculation is a
function of the flow from each connection. The "flow" portion of the base
trunks /interceptors charge shall be determined by multiplying the customer's authorized
flow (measured in gallons per day (gpd)) by the rate given in Table B- (Trunk /flow) for
the zone in which the lot is located.
B. The wastewater manager may waive the actual cost element of the base
trunks /interceptors charge if the lot owner or developer extends a trunk/interceptor from
the existing trunk/interceptor through or along the entire length of the lot as required by
• the sewer comprehensive planning analysis for the area.
Table A- (Trunk /parcel size)Times square feet
Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.007 $0.010 $0.011 $0.029
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $0.013 $0.021 $0.090 $0.126
Total $0.020 $0.031 $0.101 $0.155
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $0.007 $0.014 $0.010 $0.037
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $0.002 $0.018 $0.083 $0.110
Total $0.009 $0.032 $0.093 $0.147
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $0.007 $0.014 $0.010 $0.038
Actual $0.002 $0.019 $0.085 $0.113
Total $0.009 $0.033 $0.095 $0.151
Table B- (Trunk/flow)Times gallons per day
Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.190 $0.279 $0.383 $1.160
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $0.578 $0.989 $4.835 $7.068
1111 Total $0.768 $1.268 $5.218 $8.228
Historic. $0.197 $0.375 $0.517 $1.943
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima!Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 7 of 11
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Actual $0.251 $1.073 $5.099 $6.759
Dec. 31, 2009 Total $0.448 $1.448 $5.616 $8.702
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $0.203 $0.386 $0.533 $2.001
Actual $0.259 $1.105 $5.252 $6.962
Total $0.462 $1.491 $5.785 $8.963
(Ord. 2007 -66 § 6, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 6, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 6, 2004: Ord. 98 -42 § 1
(part), 1999: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.070 Base collection pipes charge.
A. The base collection pipes charge includes both an equitable share of the cost of
the existing collection pipes ( "historic cost ") and a reasonable estimate of the actual cost
of connection to the collection pipes (including costs associated with expanding the
collection pipes system) ( "actual cost "). This charge is the sum of two separate
calculations. The first calculation is a function of the size of the lot to be connected. The
"parcel size" portion of the collection pipe charge shall be determined by multiplying the
lot area (measured in square feet (sf)) by the rate given in Table C- (Collection /parcel
size) for the zone in which the lot is located. The second calculation is a function of the
flow from each connection. The "flow" portion of the base collection pipe charge shall be
determined by multiplying the customer's authorized flow (measured in gallons per day
(gpd)) by the rate given in Table D- (Collection /flow) for the zone in which the lot is
located.
B. The wastewater manager may waive all or a portion of the actual cost element of
the base collection pipes charge if: (1) the lot is served by a collection pipe system
• installed and paid for by the developer of the lot; (2) the lot owner extends a collection
pipe from the existing collection pipe system through or along the entire length of the lot
as required by the sewer comprehensive planning analysis for the area; (3) the lot is
connected to a collection pipe system originally financed by local improvement district
assessments to which contribution was made for the lot; or (4) within Zone 1A or 1 B, the
lot is served by an existing collection pipe system installed by the city or other
governmental agency and is within city of Yakima census tract: 01, 02, 03, 05, 06, 07, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16 or 17.
C. Within Zone 1A or 1 B, the wastewater manager may waive fifty percent of the
actual cost element of the base collection pipes charge if the lot is served by a collection
pipe system installed and paid for by a developer other than the developer of the lot.
Table C- (Collection /parcel size)Times square feet
Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.030 $0.038 $0.018 $0.003
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $0.351 $0.351 $0.351 $0.351
Total $0.381 $0.389 $0.369 $0.354
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $0.026 $0.041 $0.019 $0.004
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $0.372 $0.372 $0.372 $0.372
Total $0.398 $0.413 $0.391 $0.376
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $0.027 $0.042 $0.020 $0.004
Actual $0.383 $0.383 $0.383 $0.383
Total $0.410 $0.425 $0.403 $0.387
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ YakimalYakima07/Yakima0758.html
•
5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 8 of 11
Table D- (Collection /flow)Times gallons per day
• Zone 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3
From Jan. 14, 2008, Historic $0.976 $1.087 $0.493 $0.081
to Dec. 31, 2008 Actual $11.813 $11.813 $11.813 $11.813
Total $12.789 $12.900 $12.306 $11.894
From Jan. 1, 2009, to Historic $0.821 $1.044 $0.609 $0.122
Dec. 31, 2009 Actual $12.640 $12.640 $12.640 $12.640
Total $13.461 $13.684 $13.249 $12.762
Effective Jan. 1, 2010 Historic $0.846 $1.075 $0.627 $0.126
Actual $13.019 $13.019 $13.019 $13.019
Total $13.865 $14.094 $13.646 $13.145
(Ord. 2007 -66 § 7, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 7, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 7, 2004: Ord. 98 -42 § 1
(part), 1999: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.075 Maximum lot size.
A. For single dwelling units, a maximum parcel size of twelve thousand square feet
shall be utilized in calculating charges under YMC 7.58.060 and 7.58.070.
B. For facilities other than single dwelling units (i.e., multi -unit residential, industrial or
commercial facilities), the maximum parcel size utilized in calculating charges under YMC
7.58.060 and 7.58.070 shall be the greater of fifty thousand square feet or one hundred
• ten percent of the footprint of the connected buildings. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 8, 2007: Ord.
2005 -22 § 8, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 8, 2004: Ord. 98 -42 § 1 (part), 1998: Ord. 97 -38 § 3
(part), 1997).
7.58.080 Time of payments- Lien - Suspension of service.
A. For domestic dischargers, wastewater connection charges shall be paid in full at
or before the time a side sewer permit is obtained.
B. For nondomestic dischargers, wastewater connection charges, based upon their
initial discharge authorization, shall be paid in full at or before the time a side sewer
permit is obtained. Any fees due from recalculation of charges (YMC 7.58.090) shall be
paid within thirty days of receiving notice. Unpaid charges shall constitute a lien against
the connected property. Such lien shall be prior to all liens and encumbrances filed
subsequent to its filing with the county auditor, except the lien of general taxes and local
improvement assessments whether levied prior or subsequent thereto. (Ord. 2007 -66
§ 9, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 9, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 9, 2004: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.085 Alternative, periodic payment method.
A. At any time prior to connection of a facility to the wastewater system, the owner of
that facility may apply to the code administration and planning division for periodic
payment of the applicable connection charge; provided, that: (1) the facility owner is a
low- or moderate - income facility owner; (2) the facility is the facility owner's primary and
legal residence; (3) a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the facility and that
certificate remains valid; (4) the facility is connected to a private septic system or some
system of sewerage other than the wastewater system; and (5) the connection charge
applicable to the facility is equal to or greater than one thousand dollars. This periodic
• payment method shall be an alternative to payment of the full connection charge prior to
connection pursuant to YMC 7.58.080(A).
B. To apply for the periodic payment method provided by this section, the facility
owner must execute a request form to be provided by the code administration and
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 9 of 11
planning division. The request form shall be in the form of a contract between the facility
• owner and the city, and the general form of the request form shall be approved by the city
attorney and city manager.
C. At the time of delivery to the facility owner, the request form shall state the amount
of the applicable connection charge and the number and amount of quarterly payments.
The code administration and planning division shall determine the amount of the
connection charge by reference to YMC 7.58.040 through 7.58.090. The code
administration and planning division shall also calculate a substantially equal, quarterly
payment amount sufficient to pay the entire principal amount of the connection charge,
together with interest thereon at an annual interest rate equal to the prime rate as quoted
in the Wall Street Journal on the last business day of the month preceding preparation
and delivery of the request form to the facility owner, within three years of the date of
connection if the applicable connection charge is less than or equal to five thousand
dollars, or within five years of the date of connection if the applicable connection charge
is more than five thousand dollars. The first quarterly payment shall be due three months
after the date of connection.
D. The facility owner shall provide the remaining information required by the request
form and execute the request form.
E. The city shall not accept or execute the original or any updated request form
unless: (1) the facility owner qualifies as a low- or moderate - income facility owner; (2) the
form is first executed by the facility owner; (3) the applicable connection charge has not
changed from that stated on the request form; (4) the prime rate as quoted in the Wall
Street Journal on the last business day of the month preceding presentation of the
executed request form by the facility owner has not changed; and (5) the facility owner
has paid a one - hundred - dollar administrative fee for processing the request form and
administering the installment payment program.
• F. If either the applicable connection charge or the prime rate as quoted in the Wall
Street Journal on the last business day of the month preceding presentation of the
executed request form by the facility owner has changed, the city code administration
and planning manager shall revise the terms and quarterly payment amount to reflect
such changes, and shall return an updated request form to the facility owner, who may
execute the updated request form and return it to the city code administration and
planning manager for acceptance and execution by the city.
G. Once the city has executed the request form, the connection charge, interest rate,
and periodic payments applicable to the subject property shall not be changed from that
amount stated in the request form for a period of ninety days from the date of final
execution by the city. In the event that the facility owner fails to complete the connection
within ninety days from the date of final execution by the city, the facility owner must
request, complete, and submit a new request form, which shall be subject to the
requirements of this section.
H. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the city's authority to collect any
delinquent connection charge payment or payments, including the city's authority to
impose a lien or shut off water service as provided in Chapter 35.67 RCW. For purposes
of a hen imposed pursuant to Chapter 35.67 RCW, any delinquency of four quarterly
payments shall constitute a delinquency of one year's charges subject to a sewerage lien
and that lien shall be effective without the necessity of any writing or recording of the lien.
(Ord. 2007 -66 § 10, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 10, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 10, 2004: Ord. 2000-
12 § 1, 2000: Ord. 99 -17 § 2, 1999).
7.58.090 Recalculation of charges.
A. Improvement, Change in Use. In the event any domestic facility, lot, tract or parcel
11111 is improved, or the use thereof or discharge therefrom is changed or intensified, then the
amount of the connection charge is subject to recalculation and increase according to
YMC 7.58.040 through 7.58.075. Credit shall be allowed for the previously established
flow; provided, that in no case shall the credit exceed the cost of the charge. Any such
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07/Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 10 of 11
increase shall be paid in the time and manner specified by YMC 7.58.080. A parcel for
• which the capital cost recovery charge (CCRC) has been paid or that has participated in
an LID but has not yet connected to the wastewater system shall be credited with the
current value of a single dwelling unit (SDU) connection.
B. Additional Subdivision of Lots. At such time that any existing lot connected to the
wastewater system is subdivided, a wastewater connection charge shall be assessed
against each new lot formed. No additional charge shall be imposed upon the lot where
the facilities that were originally connected are located, unless an increase in flow or
intensity of use is involved. Any additional charges due as a result of subdivision shall be
determined as set forth in subsection A of this section and shall be paid in the time and
manner specified in YMC 7.58.080.
C. Altered Discharge. In the event discharge from any nondomestic facility, lot, tract
or parcel is altered, or the use thereof is changed or intensified, then the amount of the
applicable wastewater connection charge is subject to recalculation according to YMC
7.58.040 through 7.58.075. Credit shall be allowed for the facility's existing authorized or
permitted discharge; provided, that in no case shall the credit exceed the cost of the
recalculated charge. Any such increase shall be paid in the time and manner specified by
YMC 7.58.080(B). As an additional and concurrent method of collection of any such
delinquent wastewater connection charges, the customer service manager may suspend
the water service or supply to the premises under the same authority provided in YMC
7.60.100.
D. Relocation of Public Facility. In the event that an existing, governmentally owned,
public facility, as defined by RCW 36.70A.030, is moved from one lot to another adjacent
or nearby lot, the wastewater manager may in his discretion provide a credit against the
wastewater connection charge due at the new lot as follows.
1. A determination of the flow and intensity of wastewater historically used prior to
• January 2005, or for which a connection charge has already been paid at the current
location of the facility.
2. A determination of the flow and intensity of wastewater that is expected to remain
being discharged at the current location of the facility after the facility has been moved to
the new lot.
3. A determination of the flow and intensity of wastewater that is expected to be
discharged at the new location of the facility.
4. The difference between subsections (D)(1) and (D)(2) of this section determines
what flow /loading may be available for transfer to the new lot.
5. The connection charge shall be determined by utilizing the difference between the
flow /loading for the new lot as found by subsection (D)(3) of this section and that
transferred from the current lot as found by subsection (D)(4) of this section.
The division manager may require, as a condition precedent to the issuance of any
credit, that the discharger and the owners of the current lot and the new lot execute,
acknowledge and record a notice of wastewater connection fees specifying the terms and
conditions upon which additional charges may be due. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 11, 2007: Ord.
2007 -16 § 2, 2007: Ord. 2005 -22 § 11, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 11, 2004: Ord. 98 -42 § 1
(part), 1999: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
7.58.095 Reimbursable agreements.
Wastewater reimbursable agreements may be available to an owner of newly
connecting wastewater facilities when such owner, as determined by the city engineer,
builds collection and /or trunks /interceptors infrastructure that both conforms to the
wastewater comprehensive plan and also provides collection and /or trunks /interceptor
facilities that are in excess of the facilities required to serve the owner's facilities.
• Reimbursable agreements shall provide for payment to the owner of a fair pro rata share
of the cost of facilities that are in excess of the facilities needed to serve the owner's
facilities. Any such payment will be derived from connection fees paid by any owner of
real estate who did not contribute to the initial owner's original cost of such wastewater
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
Chapter 7.58 WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE Page 11 of 11
facilities but who subsequently taps into or uses such facilities. The terms and conditions
• of any proposed reimbursable agreement must be established prior to the construction of
• a project and are subject to review and approval by the city council. The duration of a
reimbursable agreement shall not exceed fifteen years. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 12, 2007: Ord.
2005 -22 § 12, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 12, 2004).
7.58.100 Money to be credited to wastewater operating fund.
All moneys collected pursuant to this chapter shall be paid into and credited to the
wastewater operating fund as provided in Chapter 3.101. (Ord. 2007 -66 § 13, 2007: Ord.
2005 -22 § 13, 2005: Ord. 2004 -69 § 13, 2004: Ord. 97 -38 § 3 (part), 1997).
This page of the Yakima Municipal Code is current through City Website: http: / /www.ci.yakima.wa.us/
Ordinance 2010 -55, passed December 14, 2010. (http: / /www.ci.yakima.wa.us /)
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the City Telephone: (509) 575 -6037
Yakima Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's Code Publishing Company
Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited
above. ( http: / /www.codepublishing.com /)
Click here to link to recently enacted ordinances not vet codified
( http: / /www.ci.yakima .wa.us /citycode /recentord /) .
•
•
http:// www. codepublishing. com/ WA/ Yakima/Yakima07 /Yakima0758.html 5/23/2011
• PROPOSED
WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGE
REVISIONS
• Required sewer extension prior to connection
Prior to the connection of any property to the City sanitary sewer system, the
sanitary sewer system main lines must be extended to the subject property's
furthest property line by way of public right -of -way or recorded utility easement
in accordance with Title 12 to provide future extensions. The sanitary sewer
extension is subject to the following:
1. Using the City's sanitary sewer comprehensive plan and sound engineering
judgment, the City Engineer shall determine the length and number of sanitary
sewer extensions required of the subject property to satisfy Title 12 when
applying for connection.
2. The sanitary sewer must traverse along or through the subject property within a
right -of -way or recorded utility easement unless the City Engineer has determined
• that such an extension is not necessary because the subject property is the last
property to be served or that an extension would not serve other property.
3. The City Engineer may determine that a property proposed for connection be
required to extend more than one sanitary sewer line along or through the subject
property.
4. If the property proposed for connection has a sanitary sewer main fronting the
property and the sewer main extends to the furthest property line, and no other
sanitary sewer extensions are required, then the applicant may connect with a
side -sewer under the conditions of this title in accordance with City standards and
specifications.
•
•
• Calculation of the wastewater connection charge
A. The wastewater connection charge for Inside City and Outside City shall be
calculated based on information and rates existing at the time when payment will
be made pursuant to YMC 7.58.080 or when a local improvement district final
assessment is authorized by the City Council. The connection charge for Inside
City and Outside City shall be based on the following schedule:
Water Meter Size Inside City Outside City
(inch) per ERU per ERU
0.75 $ 2,377 $ 3,565
1 $ 3,969 $ 5,954
1.5 $ 7,915 $ 11,873
2 $ 12,669 $ 19,004
3 $ 25,362 $ 38,043
4 $ 39,624 $ 59,435
6 $ 79,223 $ 118,835
8 $ 126,762 $ 190,143
10 $ 182,240 $ 273,359
B. Multi- family Dwellings- connection charge based on the number of units
multiplied by a "Per Dwelling Unit ". The Per Dwelling Unit represents 75% of
the 3 % -inch meter charge
Inside City Per Dwelling Unit = $1,783.00
Outside City Per Dwelling Unit = $2,674.00
C. High Impact Facilities - Facilities with 1.5 inch meter(s) or larger and /or may
discharge "strong waste" to the WWTP; may at the City's discretion, be applied a
Demand Component for Flow /BOD /TSS in lieu of meter size schedule to
calculate the wastewater connection charge due to potential loading to the
WWTP.
Inside City Outside City
Demand Charge per Charge per
Component ERU ERU
Flow (gpd) ' $ 4.67 $ 7.01
BOD (Ibs /day) $ 375.68. $ 563.52
TSS (Ibs /day) $ 509.19 $ 763.78
• • Local Improvement Districts
If a property owner participated within a local improvement district (LID) and
remains current or has previously paid in full the amount owed to the City, at the
time of connection, the property owner receives credit for one single - family
dwelling equal to the assessed charge for a 3 / -inch meter. If at any time, the
property owner proposes a connection of multiple dwellings, multi - family, and /or
commercial /industrial facilities on the parcel which participated in a LID, the cost
of the connection charge shall be based on the amount determined by section
(Calculation of the wastewater connection charge) at the time of connection,
minus the credit determined for a single - family dwelling.
•
City Council Study Session
Stormwater Program Update and Discussion
June 14, 2011
This report is intended to provide the City Council with an update and analysis of the
City of Yakima's Stormwater Program and to gain direction and feedback from Council
with respect to program, goals, objectives, and rates for 2012. Authorization of a 2012
rate schedule by mid -July will satisfy timelines for the development of the City's 2012
Stormwater Budget and meet the requirements of the Yakima County Assessor for
billing purposes. Table One provides a summary of actual expenditures and revenues
for 2010, estimated expenditures and revenues for 2011 and proposed expenditures,
revenues and rates for 2012.
The proposed rate for 2012 does not include in -lieu tax, an increase in funding of street
maintenance operations, nor increased expenditure impacts associated with the second
NPDES permit. The contribution toward capital projects has been reduced in order to
maintain rates at the 2011 level and meet increasing fuel costs and the addition of
construction and post- construction regulations being handled by the City's Community
and Economic Development Division, specifically, the Codes /Planning Division.
• The proposed rate for 2012 is $43 per ERU per year. This is the same rate as was
collected in 2011. This proposal maintains the current rate as we are unsure of permit
requirements for the 2012 to 2017 due to the delay in the issuance of the second
NPDES permit from Department of Ecology.
BACKGROUND — MANDATED PLAN
The two primary objectives of the City's Stormwater Program are to meet the
responsibilities and obligations set forth by the National. Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Eastern Washington Phase II Permit and the state mandated
Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program (WAC 173 -218).
The City's mandated obligations and responsibilities under the NPDES permit include
collecting, transporting, and treating surface water (stormwater). Beyond field operation
tasks encompassed in three regulations; Illicit Discharge Ordinance related to illicit
discharge prohibition; Construction and Post - Construction Ordinances related to water
pollution elimination during and after the construction of private property. Additionally,
the City is required to review, inspect, and enforce water quality issues for construction
and redevelopment activities to ensure the projects meet the specified criteria as set
forth in the permit.
• The City's mandated obligations and responsibilities under the UIC Program required
the registration of all UIC devices by February 2011. A UIC is commonly referred to as
a "dry well ". The assessment of the City's existing UICs must be completed by
® February 2013 and may reveal that treatment or pretreatment to a significant number of
these facilities will be necessary to meet water quality regulations. The City of Yakima
was successful in securing a one -time Department of Ecology (DOE) Grant for
$210,000 to provide financial assistance to comply with the UIC Regulations.
The stormwater utility rates must cover the cost of the Regional Stormwater fee
assessed to each member of the RSPG and the day to day cost of meeting the
regulations directed at each component of the system.
The City's stormwater collection system includes over 5,400 catch basins, 630
underground injection wells, 800 manholes, 90 miles of stormwater drain pipes and
several more miles of roadside ditches and 50 swales which are used to treat and /or
convey stormwater. City stormwater crews must maintain the system to meet the
requirements of both the NPDES and UIC programs. NPDES requirements that began
in year three (2009) include the implementation of pollution prevention and good
housekeeping (best management practices) for municipal operations that has "...the
ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations."
(NPDES Permit S5B6)
REGIONAL STORMWATER POLICY GROUP —RSPG
Yakima County and the cities of Union Gap, Sunnyside, and Yakima have formed a
110 Regional Stormwater Policy Group to facilitate a regional approach to address water
quality regulations and to work collectively where practical to reduce the overall costs of
implementing the stormwater programs.
The engineering firm of HDR completed a Stormwater Regional Analysis for the
Regional Stormwater Policy Group in December 2006. Since that time the participating
agencies have gained considerable experience, and have taken steps to coordinate and
even combine efforts where beneficial. Not surprisingly the agencies through further
analysis and coordination determined that some of the assumptions made in the HDR
study with respect to centralized operations were not the most practical or efficient
alternative. Most notably, the agencies agreed that maintaining individual control over
development review, ordinance enforcement and housekeeping, and operation and
maintenance of conveyance infrastructure was more efficient than attempting to create
a centralized independent layer of government that operated independent of the
agencies.
While decentralization of operations has proven to be the right path, a more centralized
approach to tasks such as, staff training, public education, ordinance development,
annual reports to Department of Ecology has served the RSPG participants well and
saved resources. Yakima County was designated as the lead for these functions.
As mentioned above, each agency is responsible for the maintenance, operation, •
• housekeeping measures, and capital projects associated with their respective
infrastructure. The City of Yakima has the largest stormwater inventory with over 6,800
individual stormwater devices (such as catch basins, manholes, drywells or UICs) and
2
90 miles of pipe. As a comparison, Yakima County is the second largest utility with an
• estimated 1,047 devices and 11 miles of pipe, about a tenth the City of Yakima system.
It should be noted that the RSPG ILA does not cover all of the regulations and
requirements of the UIC program. This stems from the fact that there are relatively few
of these particular devices in the other jurisdictions. The ILA for Years 4 and 5 was
extended due to the delay in permit issuance.
MINIMAL COMPLIANCE
Regional and local policy directives have resulted in the creation of a NPDES program
having "minimal compliance" as its primary goal. The City of Yakima must also take into
consideration the regulations in the UIC Program. The Program requires the
assessment and actions to address any UICs which are determined to be a high threat
to the ground water. Here too, Council policy direction has been to maintain a minimal
program.
SAFETY AND LIABILITY NEEDS
The stormwater utility fee has addressed very specific areas of localized flooding, when
associated project and costs have been approved by City Council. In addition, minor
repairs have been made by the wastewater utility crew to remedy tripping hazards,
vehicle hazards and illicit connections.
RATE HISTORY AND GRANT SUBSIDY
The stormwater utility rates were developed to adequately fund the activities necessary
to meet the following City Council objectives:
1. Meet the minimum requirements of the NPDES permit
2. Meet the minimum requirements of the UIC regulations
3. Address through system rehabilitation and minor expansion immediate safety
needs such as flooding and hazardous conditions encountered
4. Repay the Wastewater Utility and Street Fund for previous expenditures
An annual rate of $22 per equivalent residential unit (ERU) was established for 2008,
$35 per ERU for 2009, $40 per ERU for 2010 and $43 per ERU for 2011. The City has
received four grants from the Department of Ecology. The first grant ($131,512) was
used to pay the City's share of the first two years of the RSPG and creation of the
Regional Stormwater Manual. Funds from this grant were expended for the City of
Yakima early in 2009. The second grant ($372,000) was a stormwater mapping
implementation grant that reimbursed a portion of the cost of the inventory of the City's
stormwater infrastructure between January 31, 2008 and June 30, 2011. The third
grant is a one -time Department of Ecology Pass -Thru Grant of $294,794 in June 2010.
The funds from this grant are programmed to be used during 2011 and the first half of
2012. Funds may be directed toward activities required under the NPDES permit. The
• fourth is a $210,000 DOE grant to assess and retrofit UIC wells. This grant requires a
3
$70,000 local match. The assessment/retrofit is programmed to begin in 2012, when
• complete inventory data is available.
The level of activity required to maintain compliance with the mandated programs has
and will continue to ramp up over time. This mandated expansion in activities requires
that additional resources be applied to the program.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHEDULED OBLIGATIONS
NPDES RELATED OPERATIONS - In 2012 the City will be in year one of the Second
NPDES permit. The City of Yakima has not reviewed the second permit at this time,
due to Ecology's difficulty in reissuing the permit in a timely basis and the one -year
extension of the current permits granted by the Legislature. However, the significant
obligations are expected to continue for stormwater system operations to provide
pollution prevention and good housekeeping for municipal operations (S5B6 of Permit)
for listed operations such as:
• Stormwater collection and conveyance systems
• Street maintenance, repair and construction
• Parking lot maintenance and repair
The most costly operational impacts being the cleaning of all stormwater collection and
conveyance systems and efficient street sweeping where and when appropriate to
minimize the contamination of stormwater.
In addition, it is expected that some level of monitoring requirements and Low Impact
Development will be included in the next NPDES permit. What and how, will depend on
the language in the second permit. A draft Second NPDES Permit document for years
2012 to 2017 is expected in May 2011 from DOE.
UIC RELATED OPERATIONS — The Underground Injection Control Program requires
the City to assess and address potential ground water pollution. This activity will involve
additional analysis support from Wastewater and Community and Economic
Development Department (CED). Tasks will pollutant screening and identification, a
determination of actions to eliminate pollutants by pre- treatment, treatment, or
developing alternatives to addressing stormwater run -off that would avoid the use of a
UIC. Capital and operational costs associated with this component may be high and will
require careful review e.g. an item such as a drywell filter would require an initial capital
costs estimated at $7,000 to $10,000 (keep in mind there are approximately 600 of
them), and also require a corresponding increase in annual program maintenance costs
for supplies and required staffing levels per unit.
PLANNING — City Council approved updating the 1993 Stormwater Comprehensive
Stormwater Management Plan during the adoption of the 2010 budget. The update will
provide valuable information resulting in less overall cost to the ratepayers than
4
proceeding forward with limited information and planning. Comprehensive planning is
common practice with respect to the City's water, irrigation and wastewater utilities. A
strategic planning approach will include an evaluation of the current system,
identification of long range capital projects necessary to meet future permit
requirements, address future water quality and retention /detention strategies, identify
efficiencies and where they can be duplicated in other areas, and assist the City in
developing a rate strategy that will provide predictable rates sufficient to support
mandated improvements and activities. As proposed, Wastewater Manager Scott
Schafer and Utility Engineer Shelley Willson would lead the comprehensive planning
effort with outside assistance in areas requiring specialized professional expertise. To
the extent possible, the 1993 Comprehensive Plan will be used as the foundation for the
proposed Plan Update. This approach will limit the scope and cost of the update.
•
RATE SUMMARY AND BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Table 1 provides a summary of projected expenditures, revenues and rates necessary
to support a minimal NPDES and UIC compliance program for 2012. In addition to the
operational and capital issues discussed above, the proposed rates are designed to
cover the costs associated with development and redevelopment review, inspection,
and enforcement. The same ERU system and applicable discounts as authorized in the
ordinance adopted by City Council on November 20, 2007 is proposed to continue in
• 2012.
Assumptions for 2012:
• Continue Regional Stormwater approach per the Inter -Local Agreement
• Continue maintenance program geared to meet the minimum requirements of
the first NPDES permit
• Continue maintenance program geared to meet the minimum requirement of
the UIC regulations
• Take appropriate action through rehabilitation and minor expansion of the
current system to increase safety to the public, and reduce liability to the City
by addressing known safety concerns such as flooding and hazardous
conditions
• Continued repayment of the Wastewater Utility and Street Fund for previous
expenditures
• Minimize FTE's funded by the utility through the utilization of personnel from
wastewater and other divisions on a time only basis
• • Review, inspect, and enforce stormwater regulations within the City limits
5
0 TABLE 1
ao
ADeielii • l l , 4, 1 .;''' v4 ' 101;0'Aeinal - 2014:' t ..Buitieffidy aoir. lon4peoixii r
,...
.tvit...7-7',1.-n t ;,..,.,1„4,-,....,-- ,c; w y - NA .ii„,,...,.., RI ,f4,2
■''°1 . ' :i 5:45 * •554. it-45 ''' 6'.' ; ',1, ' -- ' "ial . - us Lurel V ,itti ,-,,," sikr, , ;11, e ,- 2 4 , - ,, , n. toice
Stormwater Salaries and
Benefits
Wasteate if • 4IMIS tS'A8'. Pti:NVVAt'' ;.,- Willa: SVAPzlIffilW1 t ' Mtf$558 IOC
CED Support 1.21 1.65 1.75 $163,914
VV-aterarrii7afithuSibbbi,i ;',. tetrA PP141,44VP11 :::',!:";;-.47:1 If44i,a4:67rtfA''j it.
Total FTE/Salary and 7.69 $628,430 8.84 $713,505 8.94 $722,088
Benefits '
GiiintY,'Ecoli4"pl Cro0 ;' . 8,833, ''. ';^; 'x', ?ff $27512472
'F nl'its ",:. tailt:mk ag.: it‹!; , . 5., 'IWT 1 ,444 - 4 , e,fP
Equipment, Fuel and $127,677 $171,939 , $183,510
.
Supplies
it'..f;--'16 .ftftikelg: ,14.M, A. K-'.: .417:4 ` : ''' 6 000 .11:". .! ; ' $
Inter-fund St/ROW $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
Maintenance
' ;tef4tiik.' tailiiviiiie: 74f ''', 5 V1.0 ; :.,, .).s. $3-50,000 . :1'7„..',',.-,'-• -, .' ,.... - $ 50, 00
g _ ,.., N ,,0:,. ':,' , ' ' , ' , - + , , „ • '
10 Repayment Wastewater. , .
$200000 ,, $200 $200,000
4, .t SfieeiTZWA.,. , r,,,, , „r, .., , ,, , t 1 ,47 - y,:k. $40 000; i: ''4 ; ' 1 ',', .te'-f‘::: 6,',4' 48 08.'5
Inter— fund Codes ; $50,000
Inspection
- -
Itkit,...;i\Alt elniii L: ':: ',', .-gf:.q.: i 4521 ',,ti-Y ' , ,T,"'ve9'0&8 A; "..) -7.'., !,- 7:,',,, ''' .•$11 30 0 0 a
,... , -.„. .,,..t.:, .,, -., ..,,- ,•,%„,,,,,,,,,-„, --. ,,,,-,,. . ,„,,, . rl•r" '."' , - .-". .1” ! ,,. . ■ ' '
T. .:1 is
- . ,
Total Expenditure , _$1,78.7,809 , : ' 2,219,804 " 2 , 020 , 258
. ._.
f16 iiiiii,€'' Iiit:;,
DOE-mappnig grant . ; $111,234 $76,500 0
. .
-4 00;
DOE ; 0 - ; . , - 0 $90 000
. - - , ,
._,..-,- . , s 4 -, ---„-:,:.,..,-"A, ,- .r.ivm si
„. ' t;4:41,4„ ', , t',..!' ",'■ d .. Pritiltt*,7 r,;' ',..:',.,,,,:, .. - v, .4- rg , .. 4 '4 ,...,,-
,. ,,, . - - - , , - , ,, • , - . , , . ,,...,
Ufility fee collected 7 . $1,991,025 -, 1 ,,., -$2,020,000 , $2,020,000
; II:AK ,:., yklt ' $4 = 1tius '
— — a 1 ■ ' .' 6 :Nkt,;" 4,-A 4' , W ' , ,- ' p + , + , 5 5 ' r ' ' 5 7, 4 h:t' ' ) '• "q r '5 ,,' ' , - . S' ■., ' ' '''. '''" ' ' ' , ' '
1, /mon .) ,tr,..,„„,, i ,,,... i .,.. 3 ‘ : non i „ :- ,f,•$ itt
+; ,,($8:58
11 .i...1' ., ,i1,;;r; 4 ''44-4,- 1 :44 . Ci i ,,,n,z--,,:.2. ,,,,.:1,k 4 ,4:, , -, - ;',..,; .01,1,1 ,,, ..,, ,..,.- ,,-:.:
114. .t.:_trY , ''.---. . '''",..,''' :‘±.(' if-'1 , 4 f; }.41 'ic; ,';''.., : V-
III
6
EXPLANATION OF BUDGET LINES
Stormwater Salaries and Benefits
Technically, a Stormwater Division does not exist within the City of Yakima. Fees
collected for the utility are dispersed to those divisions that perform stormwater utility
tasks to comply with the NPDES permit and UIC regulations. The City of Yakima chose
this approach to keep utility fees collected at a minimum for the citizens of Yakima.
Wastewater Support
Support from the Wastewater Division is estimated at 7.19 full -time equivalent
employees. The tasks included in this area are necessary to meet the mandates of the
NPDES and UIC regulations. The cleaning of the storm drain system will continue in
2012 using four full -time employees. Both the NPDES and UIC regulations stipulate
ongoing inspections and cleaning of the collection system. Additional tasks include Illicit
Discharge Ordinance administration, lab work, UIC assessment, smoke testing of pipe
lines, public meetings, data entry, outfall analysis, administration, and Vactor waste
handling and disposal. Two additional tasks that are included in this area, and are
outside of "minimal compliance" with mandated regulations are grant applications and
minor repair work. Grant awards expedite implementation of the capital program for
retrofitting UICs and construction of treatment or pre- treatment facilities required to
meet water quality standards. Minor repair work completed by the Wastewater Utility
Repair crew addresses potential safety hazards and localized flooding. The
• Wastewater Division's proposed total full -time equivalent support is projected at
$558,174 in 2012.
It should be noted that the wastewater division's laboratory personnel are assisting the
Regional Stormwater Program by providing laboratory testing through an Inter -local
Agreement. This task can be provided at a savings to the community in the same
manner that the County has provided the lead role for many of the stormwater
administrative functions.
CED Support
The Community and Economic Development Department (CED) will provide the support
services that are necessary for new. UIC well review and the implementation of
ordinances targeting construction and post- construction. The mandated tasks include
plan and field review, inspection and enforcement, and response to citizen complaints
regarding stormwater issues. CED will also assist with grant applications, capital project
design, and administration. An estimated 1.75 full -time equivalents are funded for 2012.
Costs are estimated at $163,914 in 2012. In addition $50,000 is proposed to cover
program activities now being undertaken by the Codes and Planning Divisions. These
include project inspections required under the Construction and Post - construction
Ordinances specific to private property development.
Water /Irrigation Support
The Water and Irrigation Division currently supplies the support service of a utility
locator to respond to the "Call Before You Dig" program. The 2012 rates include a
7
contribution equivalent to 0.05 of this position's salary. There are several locations in
• the City where existing stormwater pipes have been crushed, removed, or filled due to
their appearance as an abandoned pipe. This service reduces costly damage and
provides the City with the mechanism of requiring repairs for pipelines damaged from
those doing the damage rather than the ratepayers. The "Call Before You Dig" program
is a mandated program for all underground utilities. The cost was not previously
contained in the utility rate. New regulations may require that any side line connections
from private property stormwater runoff be marked in addition to City of Yakima
infrastructure. Costs are estimated at $3,500 for 2012.
County, Ecology Fees /Assessments
The stormwater utility includes payments to Yakima County for Regional Stormwater
Program Coordination and billing. Also included are payments to the Department of
Ecology for permits and state and county utility tax assessments. These items cover
mandated permit requirements. The costs were included in the existing utility rates.
Costs are estimated at $271,351 for 2012.
Equipment, Fuel and Supplies
The stormwater utility continues program costs shown in the existing budget for items
such as power, fleet service, and minimal supplies necessary to make safety related
repairs to the system. Minimal inflation factors were used to cover potential increases.
Repair and maintenance by contractor and recruiting were eliminated as cost
• containment measures. In the future the cost of filters for UICs would be included in this
area. Retrofitting each UIC is estimated at $7,000 to $10,000 per unit and filter
replacement costs have been estimated at $250 to $1,000 each. Staff expects the
increase in this area to be significant over time. The estimated costs are $183,510 for
2012.
Professional Services
This option includes a line item of $75,000 for professional services. This covers costs
for legal and consulting services if required. As noted above, the Stormwater
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan update is also funded from this line.
Inter -fund for street sweeping and ROW maintenance
A direct transfer of $200,000 to the Street and Traffic Operations Division supports the
mandated "good housekeeping" activities performed by the Street Division. These
activities will include enhanced sweeping and right -of -way maintenance programs, such
as mowing and litter removal. These tasks are noted in the Eastern Washington
Stormwater Manual as Housekeeping for both the NPDES and UIC Programs with the
goal of reducing pollutants before they reach surface and ground waters. This is a
substantial increase to the existing program, and is reflective of the ramp up of activities
prescribed in the NPDES permit.
8
Inter -fund Stormwater Capital
110 Inter -fund payments will pay for capital projects. Capital program projects include
mandatory elements such as retrofitting of UIC's as required to meet state /federal
compliance for water quality, and non - mandated projects such as addressing localized
flooding and safety repairs that are beyond the scope of the wastewater utility crew.
The flooding and safety repair rates were contemplated as part of the City Council's
policy directive in addressing such problems. Estimated costs are $150,000 for 2012
down from the $350,000 to maintain the current rate per ERU.
Repayment Wastewater
A multi -year repayment of funds used by the Wastewater Division for stormwater
activities completed in 2005 through 2007 was directed by City Council. The repayment
is continued per the schedule previously established by Council at $200,000 for 2012.
The debt will be paid off in 2014.
Repayment Streets
A multi -year repayment of funds used by the Street and Traffic Operations Division for
stormwater activities completed in 2005 through 2007 was directed by City Council.
The repayment is continued per the schedule previously established by Council at
$38,308.45 for 2012. This is the last debt payment to the street fund.
City Service Charges and Insurance Services
The Inter -fund payment is for services received from other divisions within the City such
as legal, finance and administrative support. This category also includes $41,200 to
cover insurance associated with private claims brought against the stormwater utility.
Estimated costs are $130,000 for 2012.
PROPOSED REVENUE
Estimated expenditure for 2012 is $2,120,258, being a new utility with no significant
reserves, revenue requirements will need to match expenditures.
The City of Yakima currently has an estimated 50,000 ERUs in the City of Yakima. In
determining the proposed utility rate, a 4% reduction was used; this takes into
consideration delinquent accounts, and credits that are available through the use of
stormwater practices as noted in YMC 7.80.120. The Department of Ecology's Pass -
Thru Grant will provide $125,000 in revenue for 2012. The UIC Grant will provide
$90,000 in 2012.
The proposed annual rate per ERU is $43 ($3.58 per month) for 2012. This will
maintain the rates at the 2011 level. The utility rates as proposed would provide an
estimated $2,020,000 in 2012 in revenue to the stormwater utility. These amounts
coupled with the DOE grant will meet revenue requirements for the utility as proposed.
9
The rates proposed are necessary to maintain minimal compliance with both the
® NPDES Permit (as requirements ramp up) and UIC Regulations, including mandates of
increased housekeeping, UIC assessment, project review, inspection, and the
mandated enforcement elements, as well as fund a continued effort to address flooding
and safety issues per Councils previous directive.
•
•
10
• .
US Environmental Law
1
I
i I I % ✓ . � 120
i
— •
'.
j
- -_ — - r - �.J 100
I -- -;
I i
/ (60
—
I
0
I
I 120
�' I '- --
—` I I ! i ... _, 01,...":._ " x.11 - ' - 1990 ' 1990
1970 1980
' 1990 1950
I _ j . — e T ' ' 1920 1 Year
--- ;,,.. 'JU�, - _ -----F— ' 1900 1910
Si ._ . -- 1880 1890
1870
•
. Increase in Environmental Regulations in the United States
•
• . .
1
List of Total Maximum Daily Loads Completed, In Progress and Proposed in the Yakima River Watershed by
the Department of Ecology
Completed
Lower Yakima River Suspended Sediment and DDT TMDL
Upper Yakima River Watershed TSS and OCP TMDL
Teanaway River Watershed Temperature TMDL
Wilson Creek Bacteria TMDL*
Selah Ditch TMDL*
Granger Drain TMDL
Upper Naches River and Cowiche Creek Temperature TMDL*
In Progress
•
Upper Yakima River Tributaries Temperature TMDL*
PP P
Yakima Area Creeks Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDL*
•
Yakima River Toxics TMDL*
Proposed
Yakima River Temperature TMDL"
Yakima River pH and Dissolved Oxygen TMDL*
•
*Will include stormwater and wastewater limits
2
• Federal Environmental Laws On EPA Website
• Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
• Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act
• Clean Air Act (CAA)
• Clean Water Act (CWA) (original title: Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments of 1972)
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund)
• Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act (EPCRA)
. • Endangered Species Act (ESA)
• Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)
• Energy Policy Act
• EO 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-
Income Populations
• EO 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
• EO 1 321 1 : Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use
• Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
• Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
• Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments - See Clean Water Act
• Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) - See FFDCA and FIFRA
• Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA, also known as the Ocean Dumping Act)
• • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
• National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
• . Noise Control Act
• Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA)
• Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA)
• Ocean Dumping Act - See Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act
• Oil Pollution Act (OPA)
• Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA) - See FIFRA
• Pollution Prevention Act (PPA)
• Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
• Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
• Shore Protection Act (SPA)
• Superfund - See Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
• Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) - See Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
• • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
•
3
• State Environmental Laws and Rules
• Ch. 15.54 RCW - Fertilizers, minerals, and Limes
• Ch. 15.58 RCW - Washington pesticide control act
• Ch. 15.110 RCW - Energy freedom program
• Ch. 18.104 RCW - Water well construction
• Ch. 19.27 RCW Enemy related building standards
• Ch. 19.27A RCW - Energy related building standards
• Ch. 19.122 RCW - Underground utilities
• Ch. 34.05 RCW - Administrative procedure act
• Ch. 35.21 RCW - Miscellaneous provisions affecting all cities and towns
• Ch. 35.63 RCW - Planning commission
• Ch. 35A.63 RCW - Planning and zoning in code cities
• Ch. 35.67 RCW - Sewerage systems— Refuse collection and disposal
• Ch. 35.92 RCW - Municipal utilities
• Ch. 36.36 RCW - Aquifer protection areas
• Ch. 36.58 RCW - Solid waste disposal
• Ch. 36.61 RCW - Lake management districts
• Ch. 36.70 RCW - Planning enabling act
• Ch. 36.70A RCW - Growth management planning by selected counties and cities
• Ch. 36.93 RCW - Local government organization - Boundaries - Review board
• Ch. 36.94 RCW - Sewerage, water and drainage systems
• Ch. 38.52 RCW - Emergency management
• Ch. 39.04 RCW - Public works
• Ch. 39.34 RCW - Interlocal cooperation act
• Ch. 40.07 RCW - Management and control of state publications
• Ch. 41.06 RCW - State civil service law
• Ch. 41.45 RCW - Actuarial funding of state retirement systems
• Ch. 42.17 RCW - Disclosure, campaign finances lobbying, records
• Ch. 42.30 RCW - Open public meeting act
• Ch. 42.56 RCW - Public records
• Ch. 43.21A RCW - Department of Ecology
4
• Ch. 43.21B RCW - Environmental hearings office - Pollution control hearings
board
• Ch. 43.27A RCW - Department of water resources
• Ch. 43.31 RCW - Community, trade, and economic development
• Ch. 43.21C RCW - State environmental policy
Ch. 64.44 RCW Contaminated properties
• Ch. 70.05 RCW - Local health department boards - Officers regulations
• Ch.70.76 RCW - Polybrominated diphenyl ethers — flame retardants
• Ch. 70.93 RCW - Waste reduction, recycling and model litter control act
• Ch. 70.94 RCW - Washington clean air act
o Get information about the updated law.
• Ch. 70.95 RCW - Solid waste management reduction and recycle
• Ch. 70.95A RCW - Pollution control - Municipal bonding
• Ch. 70.95B RCW - Domestic waste treatment plants
• • Ch. 70.95C RCW - Waste reduction
• Ch. 70.95D RCW - Solid waste incinerator
• Ch. 70.95E RCW - Hazardous waste fees
• Ch. 70.95F RCW - Labeling of plastics
• Ch. 70.95G RCW - Packages containing metals
• Ch. 70.95H RCW - Clean washington center
• Ch. 70.95I RCW - Used oil recycling
• Ch. 70.953 RCW - Municipal sewage sludge - Biosolids
• Ch. 70.95K RCW - Biomedical waste
• Ch. 70.95L RCW - Detergent phosphorus content
• Ch. 70.95M RCW - Mercury
• Chapter 70.95N RCW - Electronic product recycling
• Ch. 70.98 RCW - Nuclear energy and radiation
• Ch. 70.102 RCW - Hazardous substance information
• Ch. 70.103 RCW - Lead -based paint
• Ch. 70.104 RCW - Pesticide - Health hazards
• Ch. 70.105 RCW - Hazardous waste management
5
• Ch. 70.105A RCW - Hazardous waste fees
• Ch. 70.105D RCW - Hazardous waste cleanup -- Model toxics control act.
• Ch. 70.107 RCW - Noise control
• Ch. 70.118 RCW - On -site sewage disposal systems
• Ch. 70.118A RCW - On -site sewage disposal systems — marine recovery
areas
• Ch. 70.120 RCW - Motor vehicle emission control
• Ch. 70.120A RCW - Motor vehicle emission standards
• Ch. 70.132 RCW - Beverage containers
• Ch. 70.136 RCW - Hazardous materials incidents
• ' Ch. 70.138 RCW - Incinerator ash residue
• Ch. 70.146 RCW - Water pollution control facilities financing
• Ch. 70.148 RCW - Underground petroleum storage tanks
• Ch. 70.149 RCW - Heating oil pollution liability protection act
• Ch. 70.150 RCW - Water quality joint development act
• Ch. 70.190 RCW - Family policy council
• Ch. 70.235 RCW - Limiting greenhouse gas emissions
• Ch. 70.240 RCW - Children's safe products
• Ch. 70.270 RCW - Replacement of lead wheel weights
• Ch. 70.270 RCW - Mercury- containing lights — proper disposal
• Ch. 70.280 RCW - Bisphenol a — restrictions on sale
• Ch. 70.285 RCW - Brake friction material
• Ch. 72.09 RCW - Department of Corrections
• Ch. 72.11 RCW - Offenders' responsibility for legal financial obligations
• Ch. 76.13 RCW - Stewardship of non - industrial forests and woodlands
• Ch. 76.04 RCW - Forest protection
• Ch. 76.06 RCW Forest insect and disease control
• Ch. 76.09 RCW - Forest practices
• Ch. 76.42 RCW - Wood debris -- Removal from navigable waters
• Ch. 77.04 RCW - Department of fish and wildlife
• ulic
Ch. 77.55 RCW - Construction projects in state waters (Hydras Code)
• Ch. 77.85 RCW - Salmon recovery
6
•
• Ch. 78.44 RCW - Surface mining
• Ch. 78.52 RCW - Oil and gas conservation
• Ch. 78.56 RCW - Metals mining and milling operations
• Ch. 79.01 RCW - Public lands act
• Ch. 79A.25 RCW - Interagency committee for outdoor recreation
• Ch. 79.24 RCW - Capitol building lands
• Ch. 79.70 RCW - Natural area preserves
• Ch. 79.76 RCW = Geothermal resources
• Ch. 79.90 RCW - Aquatic lands - In general
• Ch. 79.92 RCW - Aquatic lands - Harbor areas
• Ch. 79.94 RCW - Aquatic lands - Tidelands and shorelands
• Ch. 79.95 RCW - Aquatic lands - Beds of navigable waters
• Ch. 79A.15 RCW - Acquisition of habitat conservation and outdoor recreation
lands
•• Ch. 80.01 RCW - Utilities and transportation commission
• Ch. 80.28 RCW - Gas, electrical and water companies
• Ch. 80.50 RCW - Energy facilities - Site locations
• Ch 80.70 RCW - Carbon dioxide mitigation
• Ch. 80.80 RCW - Greenhouse gases emissions — baseload electric generation
performance standard
• Ch. 81.24 RCW - Regulatory Fees (Transportation)
• Ch. 82.34 RCW - Pollution control facilities tax exemptions and credit
• Ch. 81.77 RCW - Solid waste collection companies
• Ch. 84.33 RCW - Timber and forest lands
• Ch. 84.34 RCW - Open space, agriculture, and timber lands
• Ch. 84.36 RCW - Exemptions
• Ch. 85.05 RCW - Diking districts
• Ch. 85.06 RCW - Drainage district and miscellaneous drainage provisions
• • Ch. 85.07 RCW - Diking, drainage and sewerage improvement districts
• Ch. 85.08 RCW - Diking, drainage and sewerage improvement districts
7
• • Ch. 85.12 RCW - Federal aid to diking, drainage and sewerage improvement
districts
• Ch. 85.15 RCW - Diking, drainage and sewerage improvement districts
• Ch. 85.16 RCW - Maintenance costs and levies diking, drainage and
sewerage improvement districts
• Ch. 85.18 RCW - Levy for continuous benefits
• Ch. 85.20 RCW - Reorganization for districts into improvement district 1917
act
• Ch. 85.22 RCW - Reorganization for districts into improvement district 1917
act
• Ch. 85.24 RCW - Diking and drainage districts in two on more counties
• Ch. 85.28 RCW - Private ditches and drains
• Ch. 85.32 RCW - Drainage district revenue act of 1961
• Ch. 85.36 RCW - Consolidation of districts (drainage, dikes)
• Ch. 85.38 RCW - Special district creation and operation
•
• Ch. 86.05 RCW - Flood control district 1935 act
• Ch. 86.09 RCW - Flood control district 1937 act
• Ch. 86.12 RCW - Flood control by counties
• Ch. 86.13 RCW - Flood control by Counties (jointly)
• Ch. 86.15 RCW - Flood control zone districts
• Ch. 86.16 RCW - Flood Plain Management
• Ch. 86.18 RCW - Flood control contribution fund
• Ch. 86.24 RCW - Flood control by state in cooperation with federal agencies, etc.
• Ch. 86.26 RCW - State participation in flood control maintenance
• Ch. 87.03 RCW - Irrigation districts generally
• Ch. 87.25 RCW - Certification on bonds
• Ch. 87.64 RCW - Adjustments of irrigation, diking and drainage district
indebtedness
• • Ch. 87.80 RCW - Joint control of irrigation districts I�
8
• Ch. 87.84 RCW - Irrigation and rehabilitation districts
• Ch. 88.16 RCW - Pilotage act
• Ch. 88.32 RCW - River and harbor improvements
• Ch. 88.40 RCW - Transport of petroleum products - Financial responsibility
• Ch. 88.46 RCW - Vessel oil spill prevention and response
• Ch. 89.08 RCW - Conservation districts
• Ch. 89.12 RCW - Reclamation and irrigation districts in U.S. reclamation areas
• Ch. 89.16 RCW - Reclamation by state
• Ch. 90.03 RCW - Water code - 1917 act
• Ch. 90.08 RCW - Stream patrolmen
• Ch. 90.14 RCW - Water rights registration waive and relinquishment, etc.
• Ch. 90.16 RCW - Appropriation of water for public and industrial purposes
• Ch. 90.22 RCW - Minimum water flows and levels
• Ch. 90.24 RCW - Regulation of outflow of lakes
• Ch. 90.28 RCW - Miscellaneous rights and duties
• Ch. 90.36 RCW - Artesian wells
• Ch. 90.38 RCW - Yakima river basin water rights
• Ch. 90.40 RCW - Water rights of U.S.
• Ch. 90.42 RCW - Water resources management
• Ch. 90.44 RCW - Regulation of public ground waters
• Ch. 90.46 RCW - Reclaimed water use
• Ch. 90.48 RCW - Water pollution control
• Ch. 90.50 RCW - Water pollution facilities
• Ch. 90.50A RCW - Water pollution control facilities federal capitalization grants
• Ch. 90.52 RCW - Pollution disclosure act of 1971
• Ch. 90.54 RCW - Water resources act 1971
• Ch. 90.56 RCW - Oil and hazardous substance spill prevention and response
• Ch. 90.58 RCW - Shoreline management act of 1971
• Ch. 90.64 RCW - Dairy nutrient management
• Ch. 90.66 RCW - Family farm water act
• • Ch. 90.71 RCW - Puget sound water quality protection
• Ch. 90.72 RCW - Shellfish protection district
9
• Ch. 90.74 RCW - Aquatic resource mitigation
• Ch. 90.76 RCW - Underground storage tanks
o See Ecology's easy to read version. - Temporarily available until the
State Code Reviser codifies the federal changes into the law.
o See Focus sheet - Explains the new federal legislation.
• Ch. 90.78 RCW - Highway - related storm water management
• Ch. 90.80 RCW - Water conservancy boards
• Ch. 90.82 RCW - Watershed planning
• Ch. 90.84 RCW - Wetlands mitigation banking
• Ch. 90.90 RCW - Columbia river basin water supply
• Ch. 90.92 RCW - Pilot local water management program
•
•
10
Index of Rules
• Chapter 173 -03 WAC - Public records
• Chapter 173 -04 WAC - Practice and procedure - Hearings board
• Chapter 173 -06 WAC - Delegation of power
Air Quality
• Chapter 173 -400 WAC - General regulation for air pollution sources
o View current rule making
o View current rule making NEW
• Chapter 173 -401 WAC - Operating permit regulation
o View current rule making NEW!
• Chapter 173 -405 WAC - Kraft pulping mills
• Chapter 173 -406 WAC - Acid rain regulation
• • Chapter 173 -407 WAC - Carbon dioxide mitigation program for fossil - fueled
thermal electric generating facilities
• Chapter 173 -410 WAC - Sulfite pulping mills
• Chapter 173 -415 WAC - Primary aluminum plants
• Chapter 173 -420 WAC - Conformity of transportation activities to air quality
Implementation Plans
• Chapter 173 -421 WAC - Motor vehicle emission control systems
• Chapter 173 -422 WAC - Motor vehicle emission inspection
• New rule - Chapter 173 -422A WAC - Motor vehicle emission inspection
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -423 WAC - Low emission vehicles
o View current rule making NEW!
• Chapter 173 -425 WAC - Outdoor burning
• • Chapter 173 -430 WAC - Agricultural burning
• Chapter 173 -433 WAC - Solid fuel burning devices
11
• Chapter 173 -434 WAC - Solid waste incinerator facilities
• Chapter 173 -435 WAC - Emergency episode plan
• Chapter 173 -441 WAC- Reporting of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases
• Chapter 173 -450 WAC - Establishing requirements for the receipt of financial
aid
• Chapter 173 -455 WAC - Air quality fee rule
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -460 WAC - Controls for new sources of toxic air pollutants
• Chapter 173 -470 WAC - Ambient air quality standards for particulate matter
• Chapter 173 -474 WAC - Ambient air quality standards for sulfur oxides
• Chapter 173 -475 WAC - Ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide,
ozone, and nitrogen dioxide
• Chapter 173 -480 WAC - Ambient air quality standards and emission limits for
radionuclides
• • Chapter 173 -481 WAC - Ambient air quality and environmental standards for
fluorides
• Chapter 173 -490 WAC - Emissions standards and controls for sources
emitting volatile organic compounds (VOC)
• Chapter 173 -491 WAC - Emission sandards and controls for sources emitting
gasoline vapors
• Chapter 173 -492 WAC - Motor fuel specifications for oxygenated gasoline
• Chapter 173 -495 WAC - Weather modification
Solid Waste
• Chapter 173 -312 WAC - Coordinated prevention grants
• Chapter 173 -313 WAC - Local solid waste enforcement grant regulation
• Chapter 173 -321 WAC - Public participation grants
• Chapter 173 -322 WAC - Remedial action grants
12
• Water Quality
• Chapter 173 -80 WAC - Limitations on use of Referendum 39 grant funds
water pollution abatement
• Chapter 173 -95A WAC - Uses and limitations of the centennial clean water
fund
• Chapter 173 -98 WAC - Uses and limitations of the water pollution control
state revolving fund
• Chapter 173 -255 WAC - Limitations on use of Referendum 26 grant funds for
water pollution abatement
Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction
• Chapter 173 -303 WAC - Dangerous waste regulations
• Chapter 173 -305 WAC - Hazardous waste fee regulation
• Chapter 173 -307 WAC - [Pollution prevention] plans
• • Chapter 173 -333 WAC - Persistent biocumulative toxic substances rule
• New rule - Chapter 173 -901 WAC, Better brakes
o View current rule making
Environmental Assessment
• Chapter 173 -50 WAC - Accreditation of environmental laboratories
Noise
• Chapter 173 -58 WAC - Sound level measurement procedures
• Chapter 173 -60 WAC - Maximum environmental noise levels
• Chapter 173 -62 WAC - Motor vehicle noise performance standards
•
13
•
•
Office of Columbia River
• Chapter 508 -14 WAC - Columbia Basin Project — Ground Waters
o View current rulemaking
SEPA
• Chapter 173 -802 WAC - SEPA procedures
• Chapter 173 -806 WAC - Model ordinance
• Chapter 197 -11 WAC - SEPA Rules
Shorelands and Environmental Assistance
• Chapter 173 -15 WAC - Permits for oil or natural gas exploration activities
conducted from state marine waters
• Chapter 173 -18 WAC - Shoreline management act — streams and rivers
constituting shorelines of the state
• Chapter 173 -20 WAC - Shoreline management act — lakes constituting
shorelines of the state
• Chapter 173 -22 WAC - Adoption of designations of shorelands and wetlands
associated with shorelines of the state
• Chapter 173 -26 WAC - State master program approval \amendment
procedures and master program guidelines
o View current rule - makinq
• Chapter 173 -27 WAC - Shoreline management permit and enforcement
procedures
• Chapter 173 -145 WAC - Administration of the flood control assistance
• account program
• Chapter 173 -158 WAC -
Floodplain management
14
• Chapter 173 -700 WAC - Wetland mitigation bank certification
Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response
• Chapter 173 -180 WAC - Facility oil handling standards
• Chapter 173 -182 WAC - Oil spill contingency planning
• Chapter 173 -183 WAC - Pre - assessment screening and oil spill compensation
schedule regulations
• Chapter 173 -184 WAC - Vessel oil transfer advance notice and containment
requirements
• Chapter 317 -05 WAC - Definitions [Office of Marine Safety]
• Chapter 317 -31 WAC - Cargo and passenger vessels - Substantial risk
• Chapter 317 -40 WAC - Bunkering operations
• Chapter 317 -50 WAC - Financial responsibility for small tank barges and oil
spill response barges
Toxics Cleanup and Sediments
• Chapter 173 -204 WAC - Sediment management standards
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -340 WAC - Model Toxics Control Act [MTCA] cleanup
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -342 WAC - Additional taxable hazardous substance list
• Chapter 173 -360 WAC - Underground storage tank regulations
o View current rule making
15
O Toxic Hazards
• Chapter 173 -333 WAC - Persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances (PBTs)
• New rule - Chapter 173 -901 WAC, Better brakes
o View current rule making
Waste 2 Resources
• Chapter 173 -24 WAC - Tax exemptions and credits for pollution control
facilities
• Chapter 173 -300 WAC - Certification of operators of solid waste incinerator
and landfill facilities
• Chapter 173 -304 WAC - Minimum functional standards for solid waste
handling
Note: WAC 173 -304 now only applies to landfills that closed under this regulation,
providing continuing requirements for their post - closure activities, groundwater
monitoring, financial assurance, and permit renewals. Please see WAC 173 -350
for handling standards at currently- operating or proposed solid waste facilities.
• Chapter 173 -306 WAC - Special incinerator ash management standards
• Chapter 173 -308 WAC - Biosolids management
• Chapter 173 -310 WAC - Litter receptacles
• Chapter 173 -312 WAC - Coordinated prevention grants
• Chapter 173 -313 WAC - Local solid waste enforcement grant regulation
• Chapter 173 -321 WAC - Public participation grants
• Chapter 173 -322 WAC - Remedial action grants
• Chapter 173 -330 WAC - Used automobile oil recycling sign requirement for
automobile oil sellers
• Chapter 173 -331 WAC - Vehicle battery recycling
• Chapter 173 -333 WAC - Persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances (PBTs)
Chapter 173 -334 WAC - Children's Safe Products - Reporting Rule (New Rule
o View current rule activity
16
• Chapter 173 -345 WAC - Recyclable Materials - Transporter and Facility
Requirements
• Chapter 173 -350 WAC - Solid waste handling standards
o View current rule activity
• Chapter 173 -351 WAC - Criteria for municipal solid waste landfills
o View current rule activity
• Chapter 173 -900 WAC - Electronic product recycling program
Water Quality
• Chapter 173 -40 WAC - Pollution Disclosure
• Chapter 173 -80 WAC - Limitations on use of Referendum 39 grant funds
water pollution abatement
• Chapter 173 -95A WAC - Uses and limitations of the centennial clean water
fund
• o View current rule activity NEW
• Chapter 173 -98 WAC - Uses and limitations of the water pollution control
state revolving fund
o View current rule activity NEW
• Chapter 173 -200 WAC - Water quality standards for ground waters of the
state of Washington
• Chapter 173 -201A WAC - Water quality standards for surface waters of the
state of Washington
o View current rule activity
Chapter 173 -204 WAC - Sediment management standards
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -205 WAC - Whole effluent toxicity testing and limits
• Chapter 173 -208 WAC - Grant of authority sewerage systems
• • Chapter 173 -216 WAC - State waste discharge permit program
• Chapter 173 -218 WAC - Underground injection control program
17
• • Chapter 173 -219 WAC - Reclaimed water use
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -220 WAC - National pollutant discharge elimination system
permit program
• Chapter 173 -221 WAC - Discharge standards and procedures for determining
effluent limitations for domestic wastewater facilities
• Chapter 173 -221A WAC - Wastewater discharge standards and effluent
limitations
• Chapter 173 -224 WAC - Wastewater discharge permit fees
o View current rule making NEW!
• Chapter 173 -225 WAC - FWPCA — establishment of implementation
procedures of application for certification
• Chapter 173 -226 WAC - Waste discharge general permit program
• Chapter 173 -230 WAC - Certification of operators of wastewater treatment
plants
• Chapter 173 -240 WAC - Submission of plans and reports for construction of
wastewater facilities
• Chapter 173 -245 WAC - Submission of plans and reports for construction and
operation of combined sewer overflow reduction facilities
• Chapter 173 -255 WAC - Limitations on use of Referendum 26 grant funds for
water pollution abatement
• Chapter 173 -270 WAC - Puget sound highway runoff program
• Chapter 372 -36 WAC - Columbia Basin Irrigation Area — sewage and waste
• Chapter 372 -52 WAC - Water districts requests for approvals and
certifications of necessity to operate sewer districts
• Chapter 372 -68 WAC - Water pollution control and abatement plans for
sewage drainage basins
•
Water Resources
18
• New rule - Certified water rights examiners
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -100 WAC - Ground water management areas and programs
• Chapter 173 -136 WAC - Establishment of a system of authorizing the
withdrawal of artificially stored ground water embodied in an approved declaration
under RCW 90.44.130 which are co- mingled with public ground waters in ground
water areas subareas, and zones established under 90.44.130.
• Chapter 173 -150 WAC - Protection of withdrawal facilities associated with
ground water rights
• Chapter 173 -152 WAC - Water rights
• Chapter 173 -153 WAC - Water conservancy boards
• Chapter 173 -154 WAC - Protection of upper aquifer zones
• Chapter 173 -157 WAC - Underground artificial storage and recovery
• Chapter 173 -166 WAC - Emergency drought relief
• Chapter 173 -170 WAC - Agricultural water supply facilities
• Chapter 173 -173 WAC - Requirements for measuring and reporting water use
• Chapter 173 -175 WAC - Dam safety
o View current rule making
• Chapter 173 -500 WAC - Water resources management program established
pursuant to the Water Resources Act of 1971
• (New rule) Chapter 173 -518 WAC - Water Resources Management program
for the Dungeness portion of the Elwha- Dungeness - Water Resources Inventory
Area (WRIA 18)
o View current rule making
• Chapter 508 -12 WAC - Administration of surface and ground water codes
• Chapter 508 -14 WAC - Columbia Basin Project — ground waters
o View current rulemakinq
• Well Drilling
19
• Chapter 173 -160 WAC - Minimum standards for construction and
maintenance of wells
• Chapter 173 -162 WAC - Regulation and licensing of water well contractors
and operators
•
20