Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-2007-083 Wardell Architects, P.S., Agreement (re: police dept / crime lab remodel)
A RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. R-2007-83 authorizing and directing the City Manager of the City of Yakima to execute an Agreement for Professional Services with Wardell Architects, P.S., to provide professional assistance to the City of Yakima Police Department for project design and oversight of the remodel of the Yakima Police Department Crime Lab. WHEREAS, public safety is a primary function and responsibility of the City; and WHEREAS, public safety is largely dependent upon the effective investigation and prosecution of criminal activity; and WHEREAS, such investigation can only be fully effective when evidence can be properly processed and tested through up-to-date forensic techniques by technicians using adequate laboratory facilities; and WHEREAS, the existing Yakima Police Department crime lab is of insufficient size and capacity to efficiently accommodate the volume of evidence currently being handled, is too small to allow more than one evidence technician workspace at one time and it Tacks the space to accommodate the addition of desirable forensic investigative equipment; and WHEREAS, one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) has previously been budgeted to accomplish a remodel of space within the police department to provide the facilities necessary to effectively carry out the forensic work required by the Yakima Police Department; and WHEREAS, Wardell Architects, P.S. have the professional and technical skills necessary to design, implement and oversee the work required to remodel the police department for the new Crime Lab and are willing to provide those services to the City in accord with the terms and conditions of the professional services contract attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, Wardell Architects, P.S. has been granted the professional services contract attached hereto and incorporated herin by this reference; and WHEREAS, Stephens and Son Construction Inc. has submitted the low bid for the project; and WHEREAS, the low bid was for one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000); and WHEREAS, sufficient funds to complete the project have been identified; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to complete the execution of the Professional Services Contract with Wardell Architects, P.S., to provide the professional services specified therein; Now, Therefore (jc)res/Wardell-Police Crime Lab 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City Manager of the City of Yakima is hereby authorized to expend the sum of $140,000 to execute the attached and incorporated "AIA Document B151-Abreviated Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect" as amended, with Wardell Architects, P.S. to provide professional technical assistance to the Yakima Police Department during the design, implementation and completion of the Yakima Police Department Crime Lab.' ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 19t :ay of June 2017. ATTEST: City Clerk (jc)res/Wardell-Police Crime Lab 2 avid Edler, Mayor Change Order ocu ment G701' a 2001 PROJECT (Name and address): CHANGEiORDER NUMBER: 001 DATE: October 17, 2007 CofYPoliceLab 200 South 3rd Street Yakima, WA 98902 TO CONTRACTOR (Name and address): Stephens and Sons Construction Inc. 417 South 5 I st Avenue Yakima, WA 98908-3420 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 1052.21 CONTRACT DATE: June 26, 2007 CONTRACT FOR: General Construction OWNER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACTOR: FIELD: ❑ OTHER: 111 THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOLLOWS: (Include, where applicable, any undisputed amount attributable to previously executed Construction Change Directives) See Attachment "A" Total Cost This Change Order: ADD $ 938.84 + WSST @ 8.2% = $ 1,015.82 The original Contract Sum was The net change by previously authorized Change Orders The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was The Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order in the amount of The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ $ 0.00 $ 1,015.82 141,015.82 140,000.00 140,000.00 The Contract Time will be increased by Zero (0 ) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is October 7, 2007. NOTE: This Change Order does not include changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive until the cost and time have been agreed upon by both the Owner and Contractor, in which case a Change Order is executed to supersede the Construction Change Directive. NOT VALID UNTIL SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT, CONTRACTOR AND OWNER. Wardell Architects, P.S. ARCHITECT (Firm name) 509 We heYakima, A 98902 /1 ADD1101 ///// BY/y''lirature) Robert A. Wardell, Principal (Typed name) 10/17/07 DATE I'. Stephens and Sons Construction Inc. CONTRACTOR (Firm name) 417 South 51st Avenue, Yakima, WA 98908-3420 ADDRESS gnature (Typed name) DATE City of Yakima OWNER (Firm name) 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 ESS BY (Signature) (Typed e t.,gnl �v v� DATE CITY CONTRAC f NO. RESOLUTION NO: AIA Document G70111,1— 2001. Copyright © 1979, 1987, 2000 and 2001 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the was produced by AIA software at 15:04:49 on 10/17/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resa User Notes: WARNING: This AIA° Document, or any law. This document Ie. (2441358881) Change Order No. 1 October 17, 2007 Attachment "A" 1. Add service outlet on roof for rooftop mechanical unit, per direction of Architect. Pricing per Stephens and Sons Change Order Proposal No. 1 dated 10/8/07. Cost this Item: ADD $ 281.00 2. Reroute drain line for ductwork in ground, per direction of Architect. Pricing per Stephens and Sons Change Order Proposal No.1 1 dated 10/8/07. Cost this Item: ADD $ 307.85 3. Build shroud cover for rainwater leaders in southeast comer of room, per direction of Architect. Pricing per Stephens and Sons Change Order Proposal No. 1 dated 10/8/07. Cost this Item: ADD $ 280.92 4. Delete supply of disposal (use Owner -furnished unit). Pricing per Stephens and Sons Change Order Proposal No. 1 dated 10/8/07. Cost this Item: DEDUCT $ 75.98 5. Overhead, Profit and Bond: ADD $ 144.20 TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: ADD $ 938.84 • Jo b: Yakima Police Center Crime Lab Change Order Proposal # 1 Stephens & Sons Inc. Project # 1052.21 10/812007 Sheet 1 of 1 Item Cosier' •tlo n Quantity Unit Unit Costs Labor Cost Total Matertat Labor Material Cost Added Service Outlet or Roof & other Electrical work 1 $ 131.85 $ 150.00 $ 281.85 iRe Route Drain line for duct work in ground 1 157.85 $ 150.00 $ 307-85 Bulk! shroud for plumbing out of cabinet material 125.92 $ 155.00 $ 280.92 Delete supplying Disposal $ (75.98) $ _ $ (75.98) , - Sub total $ 794,64 O&P $ 119.20 t Bond $ 25.00 ..---.--.---4 Total ' a c c c 4 c c • • BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. For Meeting Of June 19, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wardell Architects, P.S. for architectural services related to a remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. SUBMITTED BY: Samuel Granato, Chief of Police CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Chief Granato — 575-6211 Lt. Gary Belles — 576-6547 Jeff Cutter -575-6030 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Attached is a resolution authorizing the City Manager to expend the sum of $140,000 in order to execute an existing agreement for architectural services with Wardell Architects, P.S. related to a previously authorized remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. This resolution will authorize the City Manager to expend $40,000 over and above the sum originally budgeted in Resolution 2006-146. This added expenditure is necessary as the result of higher than anticipated machinery costs, associated with ventilation equipment required to safely handle hazardous fumes released during laboratory operations. Resolution Ordinance Other (Specify) Contract Mail to (name and address): Phone: Funding Source APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: Y City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council adopt the resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. R-2007-83 October 18, 2007 Ben Stephens Stephens and Sons Construction 2 North 36th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Re Yakima Police and Legal Center Laboratory Remodel Project No 1052.21 Request for Proposal No. 1 Dear Ben Please prepare a price for the following work: Provide metal tube and corrugated metal siding screens around rooftop mechanical units on the northwest roof, as shown on Drawings AC -1 and -2, dated 10/18/07. Please list the pricing for each fence as a separate item. Do not proceed with this work without further authorization Sincerely Robert A. Ward- I, AIA Principal cc: Lt. Gary Belles NOTES O ALIGN TOP OF SCREEN W/ 0 ALIGN TOP OF SCREEN W/ ADJACENT PARAPET. TOP OF MAU. 21MAU—I SECOND FLOOR ROOF - NW CITY OF YAKIMA POLICE AND LEGAL CENTER 200 S0. SRO STREET YAKIMA. WASHINGTON CRIME LAB RENOVATION ARCHITECT 509 W Chestnut Yakima,WA 98902 phone 509.453.3693 fax 509.453.1336 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 1 Sheet Title OCTOBER 18. 2001 Dates 1052.23 Project No. AC -1 Sheet No. copyright 2007 Wardel Architects, P.S. lhauthortzed use prohdted FOR FENCE HT. SEE SHEET AC -I EXISTING ROOF 1 1 PREFINISHED 24 GA CAP FLASHING 3x3 PAINTED STEEL TUBE PAINT, METAL SIDING AND CAP FLASHING TO MATCH EXISTING GREEN FASCIA PREFINISHED CORRIGATED METAL SIDING 3x3 PAINTED STEEL TUBE ROOFING BOOT APPROVED BY ROOF MFR TYP AT EACH STEEL TUBE PENETRATION STEEL PLATE - PARABOLT TO ROOF DECK II -0" I,_QII / SCREEN WALL SCALE: I" = I' -O" 10/18/01 A C 2 / ARCHITECT .ARC I JJ) 1 'iE C' 1'P� September 10, 2002 Richard Zais, City Manager City of Yakima 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Re• Yakima Convention Center Expansion Project No. 1101 04 Additional Services for Design and Construction Administration Assistance on Temporary Offices Dear Mr. Zais As you are aware, we have been assisting the City in location, modifications to, and construction administration for temporary offices for the Convention Center staff. Work has included the following: • Initial investigation of costs for leasing a temporary mobile office facility; • Investigation of utility requirements, • Research on costs associated with relocation of the City -owned mobile home; • Construction and permit documents for the temporary office, including code and utility research and coordination; • Securing a contractor for location of the mobile home and construction for utilities, ramps and other miscellaneous items; • Coordination and construction administration of the work. This work was unanticipated in our original fee proposal and we are requesting reimbursement for our expenses as an additional service As of this date we have spent a total of $ $2,295 00 and anticipate approximately another $2,000 before construction of the temporary offices is complete We would suggest billing on a time and expense basis not to exceed $4,300 00 without prior authorization If the above is acceptable, please sign and retum one copy of this letter. If you have .. y questions, please do not hesitate to call. Si -`re s Aardell, AIA President cc. Glenn Rice Date: /10 -/S2 -0D - CITY CONTRACT D-/2-aD- 509 W. Chestnut • Yakima • WA • 98902 •h. - i • • • • . I CITYCCNTRACT NO: caOG07-9--3 RESOLUTION NO: p l%1,07 ak Page 1 of 1 Watkins, Linda From: Epperson, Cindy Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 9.55 AM To: Cutter, Jeff Cc: Watkins, Linda Subject: RE Wardell resolution in June 19 Council packet Item 8 Hi Jeff, I figured this out with fresh Monday morning eyes!! The Police Dept intended for this to be the construction contract with Stephens and Sons, (the Whereas' speak to that, and I know they recently had the bid opening), but they did the agenda and the resolution for a contract with Wardell's, although their contract was approved by council last October I pulled the Wardell contract (Res 2006-146). It does not have any "broad" language to authorize CM to do other contracts related to the project. It looks to me like the recent council action should nullified in some way, and the contract with Stephens and Sons executed, but how that happens is definitely your call. I have asked Lois (via e-mail) for a complete project budget, so we can include that in a new agenda statement as well Let me know if you need anything else from me!! and* Eppexoan, From: Cutter, Jeff Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 8:44 AM To: Epperson, Cindy Subject: RE: Wardell resolution in June 19 Council packet Item 8 It very well may Cindy. This information has been coming to me piecemeal, and between questions Linda Watkins has raised, as well as yours Unfortunately, there was apparently no contract or amendment attached to the newest resolution, so I am uncertain of what has taken place previously or what is going on right now with this new resolution. I will try to reach Lois Wardell today to try and clarify what the status is, and then see if we need to re -do something that has recently taken place Thank you. JC Original Message From: Epperson, Cindy Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:56 PM To: Cutter, Jeff Subject: Wardell resolution in June 19 Council packet Item 8 Hi Jeff, I wasn't aware that budget maximums are included in resolutions. It is likely that the total project cost will exceed the $140,000 listed in the resolution, and the $140,000 is not tied to the contract with Wardell, it is the construction contract—the Wardell contract is for $24,000 Do you think this needs a clarification action? Eppenoon 7/2/2007 Page 1 of 2 Watkins, Linda From: Cutter, Jeff Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 12 17 PM To: Watkins, Linda Subject: RE I need help It sounds like what was described to you and I when this started, and then was questioned for lack of the proper documentation attached to the resolution, is not at all what has actually taken place As I recall, the most recent resolution stated that an amendment was being approved to provide the necessary additional funding resulting from increased costs due to the time delay from the original approval of the original contract. That is not what has apparently happened Do I correctly understand that the document he now brought you is another contract for a different scope of work? (ie -construction oversight vs architectural design?) This doesn't sound right, as the contract should have included both. I do wonder what the heck is going on here, and why the additional money is needed. I am going to call Lois and see if she can explain what the gist of this is, whether it was properly described (and explained to you and I) and why a new contract was necessitated I will try to accomplish that today or Monday, and will let you know what I learn Thanks for your efforts I should have taken the time to get this sorted out at the time the resolution was submitted. same old story, and same old ending! Sorry for the hassles Linda Hope the weekend makes up for it. JC Original Message From: Watkins, Linda Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:53 AM To: Cutter, Jeff Subject: I need help Gary Belles was just in here with the Wardell/Crime lab contract thing After much rousting I finally have an understanding (I think) of what he was saying But, I don't know if it's right and proper. Remember after last Council meeting, he had the agenda statement and the resolution written improperly stating that the City Manager was authorized to sign an agreement with Wardell, for an additional $40,000. In the agenda statement he referenced Resolution R-2006-146 for the original $100K. I called him on it because there was 1) no contract attached, and 2) that it sounded like it should be an amendment to the original contract adding the $40K. He went away to get the amendment. Today he comes in with a new contract from Wardell. He said he had asked them for the amendment and she (Lois?) sent him this new contract because they have now gone out to bid and awarded the construction. I asked him if this new contract then replaces the existing contract, rather than adding an amendment to the original one He said no. That was for the architectural phase, this one is for the construction phase. It sounded like two separate issues to me and I was confused about the funding for each. I kept trying to find out what dollars the first contract was for versus the dollars for the second one to make sure Council had approved both. He kept telling me both contracts were for the same money, $100,000 with an increase of $40,000 for a total of $140K. My logical brain could not fathom how you could have two contracts for the same actual dollars without one replacing the other, or being an addendum to. He kept throwing words at me that I couldn't get to relate to my questions, but finally I suggested he was saying that this was a project for $140K and both these documents support the project. He was excited that I finally got it and went away happy. But — now my question to you. Should this second contract from Wardell have been reviewed by you? Should it have gone through council, not just approval for the additional $40K. He bypassed the process and apparently took it Dick himself and got him to sign it, and I think has already given a signed one to Wardell Bottom line, do I just attach this new one to the original contract I had on file and "assume" all is well and good and drop the whole thing? (That would be my best fantasy so I don't have to deal with him on it again) For some reason I feel uncomfortable that it hasn't had the proper care and feeding Your advice, as always, would be appreciated 6/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 Watkins, Linda From: Cutter, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1203 PM To: Watkins, Linda Subject: RE: CC Mtg 6/19 - Contracts No Linda, you are tracking just fine, as usual All of these documents come from Gary Belles I did review the grant documents and the MOU, and it should have been attached for signature, as best as I can recall I had to track Gary down to get him to let me see it originally, and had advised him that all of the documents had to be attached Apparently that fell on deaf ears The grant application was a document I didn't see, but did review the resolution and agenda I have to admit that I assumed that the grant documents had been signed, thus the reference to ratification It is my opinion that the grant documents should go to the City file in both cases, insofar as they dictate the expenditures that the funds are permitted to go toward I would suggest that you send the questions to Gary and request that he provide the documents you are short, as well as obtain any signatures that should rightfully have been placed thereon before Council reviewed, as it appears from the ratification language that that was the intent. JC Original Message From: Watkins, Linda Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:34 AM To: Cutter, Jeff Cc: Belles, Gary; Granato, Sam; Moore, Debbie Subject: CC Mtg 6/19 - Contracts I've got some confusion as I'm trying to process the contracts from last night's Council meeting Item No. 8 — Agenda statement and resolution say.. authorizing CM to execute an agreement.. for architectural services YPD Forensic Lab Yet, attached is an old resolution and a copy of an old contract. Is this really an addendum to the existing contract or will there be another contract? What am I actually supposed to process? Item No. 10 — ratifying a grant application and corresponding interlocal agreement - ratifying means it's already filled out and signed, right? What is attached is an unsigned GMS Application/Interlocal Agreement. Should I use this as an original and get it signed, logged in and send back to PD to get submitted to the County for signatures? Item No. 11, ratifying application for COPS grant funds. ..authorizing required MOU. Nothing was attached but the resolution Is there an MOU somewhere that I need to process for Dick's signature and should there be a copy of the application for grant funds attached for the file? I feel like I must be in a fog and am missing something. Any advice you could give me on the above would be appreciated. I'm sorry if I'm just not tracking here Linda 6/20/2007 Page 1 of 1 Watkins, Linda From: Watkins, Linda Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2.04 PM To: Belles, Gary Subject: FW Wardell Contract FYI From: Cutter, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:40 PM To: Watkins, Linda Subject: RE: Wardell Contract Thanks Linda We would want to assure that the letter or document clearly identifies the contract it is amending (contract number, etc ) and what section of the original is being amended It should also state that all other provisions of the underlying contract shall remain in accord with the original contract. I appreciate your help JC Original Message From: Watkins, Linda Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 1:01 PM To: Belles, Gary Cc: Cutter, Jeff Subject: Wardell Contract As you probably noted, I sent the original e-mail question about these agenda items to Jeff Cutter with a copy to you and Chief Granato Jeffs response, and my further questions to him after you and I talked, led to the conclusion that a resolution is not an adequate addendum to a contract. It is only authorizing legislation There will need to be a document that clearly states it is an addendum to the original contract adding an additional $40,000 and why and have a signature block on it for both Wardell and the City Manager In the past, it has been as simple as an explanatory letter from Wardell with a place for a signature at the bottom I've got a sample if you'd like me to fax it to you Please submit it directly to me and I'll get the proper signature(s) for file Thanks 6/20/2007 Page 1 of 1 Watkins, Linda From: Belles, Gary Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11 57 AM To: Watkins, Linda Subject: RE. CC Mtg 6/19 - Contracts Linda, Item No 8. is simply an authorization to spend $40,000 in additional funds over and above the original (2006) contract. It is an addendum. Item No. 10 is authorization for a JAG grant application The MOU was signed by County Commissioner(s) earlier in the day and was supposed to have been forwarded to the Council by last night. Autumn, over County should be forwarding it to Debbie Moore I sent a copy of the MOU with the Agenda Statement and Resolution, however it was apparently routed to County as the Commissioners' meeting preceded City Council. Item No 11. authorizes the Dick (or his designee) to submit an application for the grant, to accept the grant and to "take all steps and execute all documents and contracts necessary to complete this grant transaction, including but not limited to execution of Interlocal Agreement(s) with any jurisdiction(s) electing to participate " The grant is still being written and the jurisdictions participating have not yet been determined The resolution simply empowers Dick to do whatever he needs to in order to pursue and execute the grant. Nothing needs to be signed by him at this time No additional Council action should be required on this issue Please call if you have any further questions I will be in a meeting from 1330 to 1430 Office 576-6547 Cell 728-3761 Thanks, Gary From: Watkins, Linda Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 11:34 AM To: Cutter, Jeff Cc: Belles, Gary; Granato, Sam; Moore, Debbie Subject: CC Mtg 6/19 - Contracts I've got some confusion as I'm trying to process the contracts from last night's Council meeting Item No. 8 — Agenda statement and resolution say authorizing CM to execute an agreement for architectural services ..YPD Forensic Lab Yet, attached is an old resolution and a copy of an old contract. Is this really an addendum to the existing contract or will there be another contract? What am I actually supposed to process? Item No. 10 — ratifying a grant application and corresponding interlocal agreement - ratifying means it's already filled out and signed, right? What is attached is an unsigned GMS Application/Interlocal Agreement. Should I use this as an original and get it signed, logged in and send back to PD to get submitted to the County for signatures? Item No. 11, ratifying application for COPS grant funds authorizing required MOU Nothing was attached but the resolution. Is there an MOU somewhere that I need to process for Dick's signature and should there be a copy of the application for grant funds attached for the file? I feel like I must be in a fog and am missing something Any advice you could give me on the above would be appreciated I'm sorry if I'm just not tracking here Linda 6/20/2007 RESOLUTION NO. R-2007-105 A RESOLUTION correcting previously approved Resolution No 2007-83; and to ratify the City Manager of the City of Yakima's execution of an AIA Construction Contract with Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc , to provide construction services to the City of Yakima Police Department for the remodel of the Yakima Police Department Crime Lab. WHEREAS, public safety is a primary function and responsibility of the City; and WHEREAS, public safety is largely dependent upon the effective investigation and prosecution of criminal activity; and WHEREAS, such investigation can only be fully effective when evidence can be properly processed and tested through up-to-date forensic techniques by technicians using adequate laboratory facilities; and WHEREAS, the existing Yakima Police Department crime lab is of insufficient size and capacity to efficiently accommodate the volume of evidence currently being handled, is too small to allow more than one evidence technician workspace at one time and it lacks the space to accommodate the addition of desirable forensic investigative equipment and WHEREAS, one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) has previously been budgeted to accomplish the design, project oversight and remodel of space within the police department to provide the facilities necessary to effectively carry out the forensic work required by the Yakima Police Department; and WHEREAS, Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc. was the low bidder for the construction phase of the remodel project and has the expertise and technical skills necessary to perform the work required to remodel the police department for; the new Crime Lab and is willing to provide those services to the City in accord with the terms and conditions of the AIA construction contract attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and WHEREAS, .the low bid for the project was for one hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000.00), an amount in excess of the originally budgeted project cost; and WHEREAS, additional funds in the amount of forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) have been identified to cover most of the shortfall from the originally approved amount; and WHEREAS, the City Council was recently requested to approve a resolution authorizing execution of an architectural contract for the Yakima Police Crime Lab with Wardell Architects, P.S. when the actual contract approval was for the above -referenced (jc)res/Stephens Construction Police Crime Lab 1 contract with Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc., and the City Council wishes to correctly identify the contractor in that regard; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has already executed the attached and incorporated construction contract following the Council's initial approval under Resolution No. 2007-83; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to ratify the execution of the attached AIA Construction Contract with Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc. to provide the construction services specified therein; Now, Therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The attached and incorporated "AIA Document A101 -Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor" as amended, with Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc. to provide remodel construction work to the Yakima Police Department for the completion of the Yakima Police Department Crime Lab, which was previously executed by the City Manager following approval of Resolution No 2007-83 on June 19`h, 2007, is hereby ratified by the Yakima City Council. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of July, 2007. /s/ DAVID EDLER ATTEST - SI Deborah J. Moore City Clerk (jc)res/Stephens Construction Police Crone Lab David Edler, Mayor Certified to be a true and correc coy of the original filed in my office. 7 /6—p7 CITY CLERK //,_1.% By 2 sb ARCHITECT: TRANSMITTAL Date: October 18, 2007 Re Yakima Police and Legal Center Laboratory Remodel Project No. 1052.21 To Lt. Gary Belles Yakima Police Department 200 S 3rd Street Yakima, WA. 98901 :2007- 57 RECEIVED CITY OF YAKIMA OCT 3 J 2007 OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER Enclosed/Attached Herewith: 3 originals Change Order No 1 for signature 1 copy Request for Proposal No 1 (Screen around mechanical units) Comments: Please sign the change orders and return two (our copy and Stephens and Sons's); we will forward theirs to them by. is A. Wardell, AIA Wardell Architects 509 W. Chestnut • Yakima • WA • 98902 phone 509.453.3693 • fax 509.453.1336 • BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 8 For Meeting Of June 19, 2007 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a, Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wardell Architects, P.S. for architectural services related to a remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. SUBMITTED BY: Samuel Granato, Chief of Police CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Chief Granato — 575-6211 Lt. Gary Belles — 576-6547 Jeff Cutter -575-6030 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Attached is a resolution authorizing the City Manager to expend the sum of $140,000 in order to execute an existing agreement for architectural services with Wardell Architects, P.S related to a previously authorized remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. This resolution will authorize the City Manager to expend $40,000 over and above the sum originally budgeted in Resolution 2006-146. This added expenditure is necessary as the result of higher than anticipated machinery costs, associated with ventilation equipment required to safely handle hazardous fumes released during laboratory operations. Resolution Ordinance Other (Specify) Contract Mail to (name and address): Phone: Funding Source APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: �— .Y City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council adopt the resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. R-2007-83 Init. Document A101 -1997 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor where the basis of payment is a STIPULATED SUM AGREEMENT made as of the Twenty-sixth day of June in the year of Two Thousand Seven (In words, indicate day, month and year) BETWEEN the Owner: (Name, address and other information) City of Yakima 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 and the Contractor: (Name, address and other information) Stephens and Sons Construction Inc. 417 South 51st Avenue Yakima, WA 98908-3420 The Project is: (Name and location) City of Yakima Police and Legal Center Crime Lab Renovation 200 South 3rd Street Yakima, WA 98902 The Architect is: (Name, address and other information) Wardell Architects, P.S. 509 West Chestnut Yakima, WA 98902 The Owner and Contractor agree as follows. ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS: The author of this document has added information needed for its completion. The author may also have revised the text of the original AIA standard form. An Additions and Deletions Report that notes added information as well as revisions to the standard form text is available from the author and should be reviewed. A vertical line in the left margin of this document indicates where the author has added necessary information and where the author has added to or deleted from the original AIA text. This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. AIA Document A201-1997, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other general conditions unless this document is modified. This document has been approved and endorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America. AIA Document A101 TM -1997. Copyright ©1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) Init. ARTICLE 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents listed in this Agreement and Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement; these form the Contract, and are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached to this Agreement or repeated herein. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than Modifications, appears in Article 8. ARTICLE 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT The Contractor shall fully execute the Work described in the Contract Documents, except to the extent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of others. ARTICLE 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION § 3.1 The date of commencement of the Work shall be the date of this Agreement unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fixed in a notice to proceed issued by the Owner. (Insert the date of commencement if it differs from the date of this Agreement or, if applicable, state that the date will be frxed in a notice to proceed.) 1 (Paragraphs deleted)The commencement date will be fixed in a notice to proceed. § 3.2 The Contract Time shall be measured from the date of commencement. § 3.3 The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work not later than 90 calendar days from the date of commencement, (Paragraphs deleted) (Table deleted) , subject to adjustments of this Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents. (Paragraphs deleted) For each calendar day after the contracted date fixed for substantial completion of the project, as adjusted by change order, if applicable, that the work remains uncompleted, the Contractor agrees to pay and authorizes the Owner to deduct fromany money due, or coming due to the Contractor the sum of $200.00 as liquidated damages, not as a penalty; provided that nothing contained herein shall preclude Owner from recovering actual damages in a greater amount where the same are proven by a preponderance of the evidence. .1 The time between the date established as Substantial Completion and the date fixed as Final Completion shall not exceed 30 calendar days. .2 The right of the Owner to impose liquidated damages is not affected by partial completion, occupancy, or beneficial occupancy. .3 Liquidated damages do not relieve the Contractor from liability for damages due to other breaches. The Contractor, by submitting its bid, assumes responsibility for liquidated damages and believes them to be reasonable. ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT SUM § 4.1 The Owner shall pay the Contractor the Contract Sum in current funds for the Contractor's performance of the Contract. The Contract Sum shall be One Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($ 140,000.00 ), subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract Documents. This sum is the basic Contract Sum of One Hundred Twenty-nine Thousand Three Hundred Ninty Dollars and No Cents ($129,390.00) plus Washington State Sales Tax at 8.2% of Ten Thousand Six Hundred Ten Dollars and No Cents ($10,610.00). AIA Document A101 TM -1997. Copyright © 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING_ This AIA° Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) § 4.2 The Contract Sum is based upon the following alternates, if any, which are described in the Contract Documents and are hereby accepted by the Owner: (State the numbers or other identification of accepted alternates. !f decisions on other alternates are to be made by the Owner subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, attach a schedule of such other alternates showing the amount for each and the date when that amount expires) None § 4.3 Unit prices, if any, are as follows: Description Units Price ($ 0.00) N/A ARTICLE 5 PAYMENTS § 5.1 PROGRESS PAYMENTS § 5.1.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. § 5.1.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month. § 5.1.3 Provided that an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than the first business day of a month, the Owner shall make payment to the Contractor not later than the 10`s day of the following month. If an Application for Payment is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment shall be made by the Owner not later than forty-five ( 45 ) days after the Architect receives the Application for Payment. § 5.1.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The schedule of values shall allocate the entire Contract Sum among the various portions of the Work. The schedule of values shall be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect may require. This schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor's Applications for Payment. § 5.1.5 Applications for Payment shall indicate the percentage of completion of each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment. § 5.1.6 Subject to other provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress payment shall be computed as follows: .1 Take that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Contract Sum allocated to that portion of the Work in the schedule of values, less retainage of Five percent ( 5.00% ). Pending final determination of cost to the Owner of changes in the Work, amounts not in dispute shall be included as provided in Section 7.3.8 of AIA Document A201-1997; .2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of Five percent ( 5.00% ); .3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and AIA Document A101 TM -1997. Copyright © 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. AU rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and wilt be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) Init. .4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Architect has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Section 9.5 of AIA Document A201-1997. § 5.1.7 The progress payment amount determined in accordance with Section 5.1.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances: .1 Add, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to the full amount of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Architect shall determine for incomplete Work, retainage applicable to such work and unsettled claims; and (Section 9.8.5 of AIA Document A201-1997 requires release of applicable retainage upon Substantial Completion of Work with consent of surety, if any.) .2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereafter materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor, any additional amounts payable in accordance with Section 9.10.3 of AIA Document A201-1997. § 5.1.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows: (If it is intended, prior to Substantial Completion of the entire Work, to reduce or limit the retainage resulting from the percentages inserted in Sections 5.1.6.1 and 5.1.6.2 above, and this is not explained elsewhere in the Contract Documents, insert here provisions for such reduction or limitation.) § 5.1.9 Except with the Owner's prior approval, the Contractor shall not make advance payments to suppliers for materials or equipment which have not been delivered and stored at the site. § 5.2 FINAL PAYMENT § 5.2.1 Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when: .1 the Contractor has fully performed the Contract except for the Contractor's responsibility to correct Work as provided in Section 12.2.2 of AIA Document A201-1997, and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which extend beyond final payment; and .2 a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Architect. § 5.2.2 The Owner's final payment to the Contractor shall be made no later than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect's final Certificate for Payment, or as follows: Retainage shall be paid when the Contractor has submitted, and the Architect approved, a Certificate of Payment for release of retainage and the Owner has received all materials and certifications as required in Section 00800, Article 9, paragraph 9.10.2 of the Specifications. ARTICLE 6 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION § 6.1 The Contract may be terminated by the Owner or the Contractor as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201-1997. § 6.2 The Work may be suspended by the Owner as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201-1997. ARTICLE 7 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS § 7.1 Where reference is made in this Agreement to a provision of AIA Document A201-1997 or another Contract Document, the reference refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A101 TM —1997. Copyright © 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) Init. § 7.2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. (Insert rate of interest agreed upon, if any.) 1 One and one-half percent ( 1.50%) monthly (Usury laws and requirements under the Federal Truth in Lending Act, similar state and local consumer credit laws and other regulations at the Owner's and Contractor's principal places of business, the location of the Project and -elsewhere may affect the validity of this provision. Legal advice should be obtained with respect to deletions or modifications, and also regarding requirements such as written disclosures or waivers.) § 7.3 The Owner's representative is: (Name, address and other information) Robert A. Wardell, AIA, Principal Wardell Architects 509 West Chestnut Yakima, WA 98902 § 7.4 The Contractor's representative is: (Name, address and other information) Ben Stephens, Vice -President Stephens and Sons Construction, Inc. 417 South .51st Avenue Yakima, WA 98908-3420 § 7.5 Neither the Owner's nor the Contractor's representative shall be changed without ten days written notice to the other party. § 7.6 Other provisions: None ARTICLE 8 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS § 8.1 The Contract Documents, except for Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated as follows: § 8.1.1 The Agreement is this executed 1997 edition of the Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor, AIA Document A101-1997. § 8.1.2 The General Conditions are the 1997 edition of the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A201-1997. § 8.1.3 The Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract are those contained in the Project Manual dated March 23, 2007 , and are as follows Document See Attachment No. 1 Title Pages § 8.1.4 The Specifications are those contained in the Project Manual dated as in Section 8.1.3, and are as follows: (Either list the Specifications here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.) Title of Specifications exhibit: Attachment No. 1 AIA Document A10111, —1997. Copyright ® 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) Init I(Table deleted) § 8.1.5 The Drawings are as follows, and are dated March 23, 2007 unless a different date is shown below: (Either list the Drawings here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.) Title of Drawings exhibit: Attachment No. 1 (Table deleted) § 8.1.6 The Addenda, if any, are as follows: Number Date Pages 1 4/5/2007 3 2 4/9/2007 1 3 4/16/2007 2 Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 8. § 8.1.7 Other documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are as follows: (List here any additional documents that are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A201- 1997 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractor's bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.) None This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above and is executed in at least three original copies, of which one is to be delivered to the Contractor, one to the Architec or use in the administration of the Contract, and the remainder to the Owner. OWNER (Signature) R: A: Zais, Jr., City Manager C • TRACTOR"' natur Ben Stephens, Vice President (Printed name and title) (Printed name and title) CITY CONTRAC f NO: aa, 7 -01 RESOLD I ,ON �9 �- 8.5 AIA Document A1017.1— 1997. Copyright ®1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA° Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. This document was produced by AIA software at 09:24:05 on 06/26/2007 under Order No.1000302330_1 which expires on 5/15/2008, and is not for resale. User Notes: (3372299291) Yakima Police and Legal Center Crime Lab Renovation Contract Attachment No. 1 June 26, 2007 Part I BIDDING AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Division 0) 00010 Invitation to Bid 00100 Instruction to Bidders 00200 Bid Form Bidders Check List Non -Collusion Declaration Non -Discrimination Provision Bidders Certification Subcontractor Certification 00500 General Contract (AIA A101 Reference) Performance Bond Form Informational Certificate of Insurance 00700 General Conditions (AIA A201 Reference) 00800 Supplementary General Conditions Certificate of Compliance Form PART II CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS and TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Division 1: Contract Requirements 01010 Summary of the Work 01030 Alternates 01200 Progress Meetings 01300 Submittals 01311 Prevailing Wages 01500 Temporary Facilities 01631 Product Substitutions 01731 Cutting and Patching 01770 Cleanup and Project Closeout Division 2: Sitework 02070 Selective Demolition Division 3: Concrete 03300 Cast in Place Concrete Division 4: No Work Division 5: Metals 05500 Metal Fabrications Division 6: Wood and Plastic 06200 Finish Carpentry and Casework Yakima Police and Legal Center Crime Lab Renovation Contract Attachment No. 1 June 26, 2007 Division 7: Thermal and Moisture Protection 07270 Fire Stopping 07920 Joint Sealants Division 8: Doors and Windows 08331 Overhead Coiling Doors Division 9: Finishes 09255 Gypsum Wallboard Assemblies 09511 Acoustical Panel Ceilings 09650 Resilient Base 09900 Painting Division 10: Specialties 10800 Toilet Accessories Division 11: Equipment 11450 Residential Appliances Division 12 —14: No Work Division 15: Mechanical 15000 Mechanical, General Division 16: Electrical 16010 16100 16900 PART III General Provisions Basic Materials and Methods Low Voltage (Data) Wiring SCHEDULES AND DETAILS Materials List Room Finish Schedule Architectural Details Prevailing Wages DRAWINGS (Bound Separately) A-201 Floor Plan A-202 Reflected Ceiling Plan M0.1 Legends and Schedules M0.2 Schedules and Details M2.1 Plumbing Plan 2 Yakima Police and Legal Center Crime Lab Renovation Contract Attachment No. 1 June 26, 2007 M3.1 HVAC Plan M3.2 Roof Plan E-101 Symbols List E-102 One -line Diagram, Load Summary E-103 Schedules E-201 Floor Plan - Overall E-202 Floor Plan - Demolition E-203 Partial Floor Plan - Lighting E-204 Partial Floor Plan - Power/systems 3 ARCI ir i 1CT s July 27, 2006 Lt. Gary Belles Yakima Police Department 200 S 3rd Street Yakima, WA. 98901 Re: Yakima Police and Legal Center Laboratory Remodel Project No. 1052.21 Dear Lt. Belles As we discussed with you previously, we have been working on the design and construction documents for the Police Lab. In our last meeting with Kristen Drury and Capt. Jeff Schneider, several items were discussed that: have a bearing on the fee for our work. It was decided that to correspond with funds available, the project should be in two phases. The first phase, to be completed this year, would do all or the majority of the demolition activities, such as installing the pass-through between the Lab and Evidence, removal of one wall in the space, and installation of the ventilation system for the Lab. The second phase would complete the work of interior finishes, casework and other items. Because we will be splitting the project in two phases, this will necessitate some additional work on our part to bid and administer the contracts. In addition, since the initial study for the project was completed, we have determined that the mechanical work for the project will be more complex, requiring the services of a mechanical engineer These changes include a more elaborate ventilating system and "make-up air" requirements. Based on the work already performed and the work needing to be performed by our engineering consultants and us, we suggest that our fee be on a time and expense basis not to exceed a total of $24,000. This figure includes the fees already expended for the predesign study ($2,755) and for the design development ($2,640). The increased amount includes our mechanical engineer's fee; he has agreed to perform his work on a not -to -exceed basis as well. If the above meets with your approval, please sign and return one copy of this letter, thereby authorizing us to proceed Lois A. Wardell, AIA President d�fir °+A.M''••F Signed Date • • • BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. *15 For Meeting Of 10/3/06 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wardell Architects, P.S. for architectural services related to a remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. SUBMITTED BY: Samuel Granato, Chief of Police CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Chief Granato — 575-6211 Lt. Gary Belles — 576-6547 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Attached is a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement for architectural services with Wardell Architects, P.S. related to the budgeted remodel of the Yakima Police Department Forensic Laboratory. This resolution will authorize the City Manager to sign agreements and to authorize payments for architectural services through Wardell Architects, P.S. that are necessary to complete a remodel of the Yakima Police Department forensics laboratory, including solicitation of bids, selecting a contractor and arranging payments necessary to complete the remodel which is required to meet current investigative requirements. Resolution xx Ordinance Other (Specify) Contract xx Mail to (name and address): Phone: Funding Source Law & Justice Capital (.3% Sales Tax Funds) APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:'a ' 4 City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council adopt the resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: