HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/19/1976 Business Meeting 1
April 19, 1976
The City Council met in,session •at 6:30 P.M. on this date in the
Conference Room at Yakima City Hall.
I Councilmen present at the meeting were Jean Allard, Mayor Betty
I L. Edmondson, Ralph Holbrook, W. K. "Pete" Moore, Dr. Bill
1 Simmons, Nadine Walker and Gordon Wonder.
1
1 The Council entered into some discussion regarding the
proposed retreat set for May 21. Mr. Wonder reiterated
! his concern about being able to attend and stated that
he did not believe that it was necessary for the retreat
to be held away from City Hall. Mr. Allard indicated that
1 he did not intend to attend the retreat. Other Council
members expressed interest in the retreat plans and that
1 it should be held as scheduled, however, the Mayor pointed
out that she may have a conflict the evening of the 20th
and would not be able to attend all of the sessions. Reconsider-
! ation was given to setting a new time for the retreat and
June 5 was mentioned as a possibility. The matter was
left unresolved and awaited further considerations by Council.
The Council was apprised of the visit to the Southeast
Recycling Center Project scheduled for this coming Monday's
study session. The suggestion was made by Councilman Allard
that Council also see the project improvement site at 16th
and Tieton. A visit to that site will also be included
in study session plans.
The City Manager next reported on the letter to Mrs. Parsley
outlining the reasons and background concerning the issuance
of a citation to her and her subsequent arrest. Council
members were in agreement with the letter as proposed.
; The City Manager indicated that it would be sent out the
following day.
1 The City Manager and Administrative Assistant next reported'
on the survey of vehicle assignments and use. It was
pointed out that this represented the results of a survey
conducted in February 1976. By way of summarization, a
total of 134 vehicles are assigned to employees for use
on City business during the day. Of this amount, 43 vehicles
are permitted to be taken home overnight by City employees.
The Council was informed that vehicle assignments have
been made to employees generally as a privilege of employment.
and to those on 24 hour call, subject to frequent call
back as a part of the job or for emergency purposes; and
that employees working at a variety of field locations
and carrying special equipment have been assigned a vehicle.
Assignment policies in effect for several years include
a distance limitation to and from work for those assigned
a vehicle overnight (two miles from City Limits). Further, it
has been stipulated in past City Manager Bulletins that
City vehicles are to be used only for the conduct of official
business whether taken home or used during. the day.
In considering the subject, Council expressed concern about
being able to make qualified judgments on the necessity
I for each assignment. Several Council members, Gordon Wonder,,
Mr. Jean Allard and Ralph Holbrook indicated that inasmuch
as vehicles constitute a fringe benefit for some, the value
of those vehicles as a benefit should be clearly identified
I and tied in with salary and compensation packages.
I Administrative Assistant Dick Zais indicated that new criteria
was being considered upon which to evaluate the necessity
I for the assignments, which include an elimination of privilege
I of employment and that secondly, emergency use would be
redefined to mean a case in which an immediate response
would be required to save lives or prevent property damage.
The City would pay equitable mileage allowance to those
employees called out for other types of emergencies and must
1
174
APRIL 19, 1976
use their own vehicle. After further consideration, the
Council consensus was for the management to reevaluate
the survey results, set new criteria for assignments where
appropriate, and reduce overnight assignments where possible,
then report back to the Council. Some consideration also was
given to the necessity of uniform marking for all City
vehicles with decals or other identification.
Next, John Kincheloe, Supervisor of Utility Accounts, reported
on the financial condition of the Water-Sewer Utility. In
discussion of this report, Mr. Kincheloe pointed out that
the rate increase implemented this past January enabled the
department to avoid a financial deficit for 1977, and insured
a healthy financial situation for the utility.
11/
At 8:00 P.M., the Council members moved into the Council
Chambers for the balance of the meeting, Mayor Edmondson
presiding, Councilmen Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker
and Wonder, City Manager McMicken and City Attorney Andrews
present on roll call. Councilman Jean Allard temporarily
absent and present after 8:25 P.M..
The Invocation was given by City Attorney Andrews.
The minutes of the previous meeting of April 12, 1976 having
been read by two Councilmen and no one present wishing
to have said minutes read publicly, Mayor Edmondson declared
said minutes approved with corrections.
This being the time set for a hearing on the proposed removal
of on-street parking along Nob Hill Boulevard from Rock
Avenue to 16th Avenue, Traffic Engineer Bill Stark reviewed
his Memo on this subject dated April 16, 1976. By way
of review, Mr. Stark explained that Ordinance No. 2321,
passed on July 19, 1971 provided for the removal of on-
street parking between Rock and 16th, but was not implemented
due to a law suit filed by Billington Builders and parking
was not removed at that time. In December, 1975-, the case
was settled in favor of the City. Mr. Stark reviewed
the results of a parking survey conducted April 6, 7, 9
and 10, 1976 and noted the results of that survey as detailed
in his report. He indicated that the survey was conducted
for 11 hours on week days and for 3 hours on Saturday. The
results of the survey indicated a total parking space useage
of 11.5 percent and explained that most of the parking occurs
near Yakima Valley College between 12th and 14th Avenues.
The results of this survey compare with 2.9 percent useage
indicated by a survey conducted in 1970. Mr. Stark explained
that the actual traffic volume along Nob Hill peaked in
1972 and shows some decline through 1975; however, the
accidents have increased 57 percent over the last five
years. The major types of accidents are left turn and
rear-end accidents. Mr. Stark explained the purpose of
the proposed continuous two-way left turn lane to provide
storage for left turning vehicles. The present situation I/
does not provide a continuous left-turn storage lane, forcing
motorists to use the inside lane for turning left, while
traffic is forced to overload the outside lane for through
traffic. In addition, the center lane is often blocked by
vehicles waiting to make a turn, contributing to the number
of rear-end accidents. Mr. Stark explained it is the recommend-
ation of the Traffic Division that the City install a continuous
two-way left turn lane along Nob Hill Boulevard between
Rock Avenue and 16th Avenue and further, the Traffic Staff
APRIL 19, 1976
.... ..... ..... _------
'feels there is adequate off-street parking provided by the
;businesses. It is the recommendation of the Traffic Division
that the City go ahead and implement the Ordinance prohibiting
on-street. parking in this area. Mr. Stark explained that
in response to the Notice of Public Hearing dated April 9,
4 976, which was mailed to property owners along the area
question, the following responses were received by telephone:
Charlene Hennessy and Glenn Peterson, 1019 So. Pleasant:
favor continuous left turn lane.
Herbert D. Cohn, 719 West Nob Hill Blvd.: definately
in favor of left turn lane and removing parking.
Maude Masters, 1020 Queen Avenue: no objection unless
those parking on Nob Hill Blvd. move in front of her
home. Traffic Engineer indicated it would be looked
at if problems develop.
Elaine A. DeGooyer, 715 West Nob Hill Blvd.: highly
in favor of a left turn lane on Nob Hill Blvd.
First Edition Fashions, 301-1/2 West Nob Hill Blvd:
think it is a very good idea and would like to say "go
ahead".
Electro Mart, Inc., 603 West Nob Hill Blvd.: very much
in favor of a two-way left turn lane on Nob Hill Blvd.
from Rock to 16th Avenue.
Merle Marshall, 1019 Queen Avenue: in favor of the
Nob Hill proposal, but worried about a parking spot
in front of his home.
Reesman's Dairy Mart: in agreement with the proposal.
Leon White, 1206 West Nob Hill Blvd.: opposed to traffic
lane closer to the curb; does not want to lose on-street
parking - feels it will make it more difficult to back
out of driveways onto the street.
Mr. Stark also explained a petition was received on this date,
tiled by 30 persons, all in favor of the proposed left turn
lane on Nob Hill Blvd. It was noted that a letter was received
from Mr. and Mrs. J. Stanley Easter, 1128 West Nob Hill Blvd.
Idated April 10, 1976, opposing the'restriping and implementation
of a left turn lane, feeling it will create a hazardous condition
with narrow lanes being used by buses and trucks. They suggested
Ileft-turmlanes designated at certain intersections only.
!Councilman Holbrook questioned what commitment, if any, was
I/ [made back in approximately 1964 in connection with the Lenox
!Avenue Local Improvement District to provide off-street parking
should the parking in front of businesses be taken away.
City Attorney Andrews explained he was not aware of any such
commitment and explained that a notice was sent to affected
property owners at that time informing them of the City's
plans to remove the on-street parking and explaining the
'scope of the proposed project. (Councilman Allard present
after 8:25 p.m.) Councilman Holbrook asked questions regarding
what consideration was given to the time the survey was taken
on Saturday and- if the results were unusual on Saturday compared
with the other 3 week days the survey was conducted. Mr.
Stark indicated the vehicle space useage was higher between
11:00 and 4:00. As a matter of information, it was noted
1
1_75
APRIL 19, 1976
that UAB funds are now used for these improvements whereas the
charge was previously assessed to abutting property owners.
Councilman Wonder asked questions regarding the feasibility
of putting a center divider down the street. Mr. Stark indicated
it is the Staff's feeling that it would not be fair to prohibit
left turns at this time under present traffic volumes, noting the
recommendation presented is felt to be the best under present
conditions. Councilman Allard asked the status of plans for
overlaying the street. Mr. Stark indicated the City was held
up because of the law suit, but now plans to go ahead, explaining
that the City will remove the parking, seal coat Nob Hill to
preserve paving and cover existing stripes, then stripe for
four lanes and a center two-way left turn lane from Rock to
16th. Councilman Allard discussed possible problems encountered
with 14th Avenue being blocked off (street vacation) 12th Avenue,
15th and with cars turning left onto 16th Avenue. Mr. L. B.
Christensen, 706 West Nob Hill, being present, indicated that
if this proposal goes through, it will be necessary for him
to park approximately a half block away from his home. He explained
that he has a driveway, but because of the parking along this
area, he has to park at least a half block away. He has the
whole length of his lot for parking allowing space for 3 or
4 cars. The driveway can hold three cars, but explained he
works for the City Irrigation Dept. and has a service truck
parked in the driveway. Mr. Henry Schreindl, 802 West Nob Hill,
being present, indicated-he has observed many rear-end accidents
in front of his home and indicated a problem exists when backing
out into traffic which will be worse if cars will be traveling
closer to the curb. He would like to see this become a one-
way street and asked that the City consider the safety factor.
Marguerite Hackett, 304 N. 37th Avenue and owner of properties
along Nob Hill Blvd., spoke to the need for closer supervison
of the speed limit on Nob Hill and more police patrol. She
indicated she was not opposed to the left turn proposal. Also
present and speaking to this matter was Mr. Ken Reesman, Reesman's
Dairy, who noted a problem with persons trying to enter and
exit from their business near the overpass, indicating they
are very much in favor of the proposal. Mr. Scott Wilson, Fanny
Fitters and A-1 Signs, 806-810 West Nob Hill, asked that the
City go ahead and take the on-street parking away if a critical
problem exists, but indicated a need to find out whether such
is the case. He indicated Saturday is the biggest traffic
volume day experienced by their business and passed around to
Councilmen pictures taken on March 20th (Saturday), noting that
as shown in the picture, the parking lane has not been striped
for some time. He indicated their heaviest business is done
in August, September and December, which would not show up in
the parking survey conducted. Mr. Wilson spoke to problems
encountered by his business with this proposal, to include losing
the first two stalls in their business parking lot, noting it
will be difficult to pull out into traffic because there will
be poor visibility. Also, the business will lose 5 on-street
-- I/
parking spaces in addition to the 2 in the lot for a total of
7 spaces. He indicated that his back yard was paved to provide
more parking. He asked whether the buses would be stopping
on the outside lane and noted the problem of rear-end collisions.
He indicated that the property values should not be decreased
if parking is not provided and the owner should be compensated
or the City should participate in providing parking. He indicated
that the on-street parking was given back in approximately 1963
or 1964 when the LID was formed. Mr. Wilson indicated their
business uses the on-street parking, explaining they use a total
of 23 spaces (18 Lot, 5 on-street). Councilman Holbrook spoke
to the need for parking as to whether it was outweighed by the
traffic problems created on that street and commented that there
was no definate commitment at the time of the LID. Councilman
Simmons felt there to be a safety factor involved for people
using left turn lanes and the added benefit to people traveling
west and turning into businesses. Councilman Holbrook asked
that the bus stops be considered. Mr. Stark indicated that
the bus will make turn-outs similiar to Tieton and Lincoln.
1:77
APRIL 19, 1976
;Mr. Dennis Fluegge, Attorney representing Billington Builders,
= being present, referred to the traffic volume for 1970 compared
with 1976, noting it has actually decreased along Nob Hill.
However, he noted an increase in the left-turn accidents
and rear-end collisions indicating he would seriously question
whether a left turn lane would largely decrease the percentage
' of collisions along Nob Hill. He sited this in view of
those who would be backing into traffic if the parking is removed.
Mr. Stark indicated that, in fact, the traffic had decreased
some, but that the accidents had increased. Mr. Fluegge
noted a problem created by moving the traffic right
1 next to the businesses. For the Council's information,
he handed out copies of the LID notice used at the time
of the Lenox Avenue Local Improvement District in 1964.
1 Councilman Allard indicated that the 10th Avenue stop light
does not stop the traffic long enough along Nob Hill, so there
is a problem with those trying to cross Nob Hill from the
side street. Mr. Allard was in favor of the left turn lane
proposal, but felt it was questionable as to whether it
would eliminate a great number of accidents. Councilman
Wonder also spoke to the number of increased accidents, noting
the proposal may hurt some, but noting other affected property
owners are in favor of the proposal. Councilman Holbrook felt
that the accident report indicates that there is something
in the character of the street which is causing a great
number of accidents. Attorney Dennis Fluegge also indicated
a concern for pedestrians who would be near the lane of
traffic adjacent to the businesses. After due discussion,
it was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Simmons that the City
accept the plan for the removal of parking and restriping‘
1 of Nob Hill Blvd. from Rock Avenue to 16th Avenue: carried,
1 ' Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting
aye by voice vote. Allard voting nay by voice vote.
City Manager McMicken reviewed the Lions Park Tennis Court
Bid Analysis and Staff Recommendation dated April 15, 1976,
1 noting that the bids were high compared with what was budgeted.
1 The Parks Commission has reviewed the bids and given their
recommendation. He explained some discussion was made re
reducing the cost of the low bid; however, the project cost
is still in excess. Mr. McMicken indicated a total of $35,000
budgeted; the contract for the paving is $18,000 with $17,000
left as make-up costs on the tennis courts. YVC has pledged
$16,000 which still requires $5,000 from the Parks Fund
assigned to Contingency. He noted they are deleting the
Miller Park court area and spray pools, which items will
be restudied and brought back later in accordance with budget
costs. Director of Parks and Recreation Bill Hutsinpiller
explained that the spray pools were bid as one item so. that
all four need to be accepted or rejected. The plan calls
1 for 15 tennis courts, 12 at Lions and 3 at Franklin Park.
He explained that the spray pools were over the budget and
, would amount to approximately $81,000 and were so high that
the Parks Commission could not recommend them until they
could get the cost down. He indicated that they would be
working on this right away. He reported they also had deleted
12 nets and will use the nets they already have until others
can be secured. He briefly explained the fees involved,
1 to include engineering costs for preparation of plans and
specifications. Councilman Holbrook urged that the project
be done as soon as possible. Mayor Edmondson expressed
1 a concern regarding the deletion of spray pools. Mr. Hutsinpiller
explained that the Miller Court area is a multiple use playcourt
area rather than a strict tennis court area. After due
discussion, it was MOVED by Moore, seconded by Walker that
; the bid for the Lions Park tennis courts be awarded to Yakima
Asphalt in the amount of $119,721 and that the City Manager
be authorized to enter into contract with said contractor
upon the filing of the proper bond and insurance: carried,
Allard, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and
Wonder voting aye by voice vote.
178
APRIL 19, 1976
City Manager McMicken referred to the request for award of
bid for Bicentennial Pavilion furniture, recommended by the
Bicentennial Pavilion Advisory Board, as follows:
Schedule I (1,000 chairs) Rosser & Sutton $27,510.00
Schedule II (1 ea 18 x 96 tables added) Sico $18,917.02
Schedule III Sico $ 6,330.24
Schedule IV (unchanged) Sico $17,474.77
Schedule V (unchanged) Sico 703.96
Velcro Option Sico • $ 1,648.50
$72,584.49
The Purchasing Agent and Pavilion Advisory Board re
' that the bids be awarded as indicated in the above, it was
MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Holbrook that the bid be awarded
to those specified by the Bicentennial Pavilion Advisory Board:
carried, Allard, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker
and Wonder voting aye by voice vote.
City Manager McMicken requested authorization to execute an
agreement with Yakima County Federal Programs Authority to
convert some CETA VI positions to CETA II positions for which
a new contract is required. Funding will carry all positions
through June 30, 1976. It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by
Simmons that Resolution No. D-3509, authorizing the execution
of said agreement, be passed: carried, Allard, Edmondson,
Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll
call.
RESOLUTION NO. D-3509, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing
the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute
an agreement with the Yakima County Federal Programs Authority
regarding administration of the local Comprehensive Employment
and Training Act Program.
City Manager McMicken requested authorization to offer at auction
sale surplus City property consisting of seven residential
properties acquired for the Bicentennial Pavilion Parking Lots.
It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Moore that Resolution No.
D-3510, declaring said property to be surplus and authorizing
sale at auction, be passed: carried, Allard, Edmondson, Holbrook,
Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll call.
RESOLUTION NO. D-3510, A RESOLUTION declaring property to be
surplus and authorizing and directing its sale at public auction.
City Manager McMicken related the outside utility request for
property owned by Doris Preston at 1714 Cornell Avenue, explaining
she requests water service to that address. An 8-inch line
is accessible to her property at a connection charge of approximately
$412.24. The property is contiguous; however, annexation is
not feasible at this time. The staff recommends approval of
the request. It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Simmons that
the request of Doris Preston for water service to property
at 1714 Cornell Avenue, be granted: carried, Allard, Edmondson,
Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye by voice
vote.
Director of Public Works Dave Vargas reported on the request
for a Right-of-way Use Permit by Mr. Don Garrett for property
at 725 West Yakima Avenue, explaining he wishes to utilize
an existing sign pole base in the City right-of-way for placement
of a commercial sign. The staff has recommended against the
permit and felt this may set a precedent for other requests,
feeling he has adequate space on his own property. Should it
have to be relocated, the City would have to pay. Mr. Vargas
cited a possible traffic visibility problem because of the
large number of lights and signs already on Yakima Avenue.
He indicated the applicant has been advised of this recommendation.
APRIL 19, 1976
Mr. Vargas asked that if the permit is approved that should
the sign be relocated, it be without cost to the City.
i Mr. Don Garrett, being present, explained again that the existing
base has been there for approximately 17 years and passed
around pictures and a description of the relationship between
the sign placement and City property. The pole is 8 inches
wide and Mr. Garrett did not feel that it would be a traffic
1 hazard. Also, that it would not interfere with the stop
! lights going west on Yakima since there is no light until
16th Avenue. He indicated the base projects approximately
12 inches .into the City right-of-way. The sign is approximately
10 feet above the ground. He spoke to the three objections
cited by City staff, to include that of setting a precedent,
but felt a precedent has already been set since the base
has been there for many years. Secondly, the feeling that
it would conflict with future requirements, but explained there
are no plans at present for relocation, but was in agreement
that should that be necessary, it would be done at his
! own expense and thirdly, was in agreement that he has enough
space, but objected to the expense of moving the post approximately
14 inches at a cost of $1600. After discussion, it was
I MOVED by Moore, seconded by Holbrook that the right-of-
! way use permit request for an existing standard on the
property at 725 West Yakima Avenue be granted with the
provision that in case of street widening or relocation,. the
owner will move the pole at his own expense: carried,
Allard, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and
1 Wonder voting aye by voice vote.
1 At 11:00 p.m., it was MOVED by Allard that the meeting be
I adjourned. The Motion lost for want of a second. Councilman
Allard absent after 11:00 P.M.
In accordance with action taken in the Executive Session
held last week, it was MOVED by Holbrook, seconded by Moore
1 that Resolution No. D-3511, authorizing settlement of the
City of Yakima vs. Margaret Pearne regarding sale of a
parcel of property to the City for the Bicentennial Pavilion
, Parking Lot site, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Holbrook,
Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll call.
Allard absent.
RESOLUTION NO. D-3511, A RESOLUTION authorizing settlement
of the City of Yakima, Plaintiff, vs. Margaret Pearne,
1 Defendant, Yakima County Superior Court Cause No. 59103.
In accordance with action taken at last week's Executive
1 Session, it was MOVED by Holbrook, seconded by Simmons
that Resolution No. D-3512, authorizing the settlement
of the City of Yakima vs. Roy A. Marshall regarding the
sale of property to the City for the Bicentennial Pavilion
Parking Lot site, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Holbrook,
Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll call.
■ Allard absent.
!
RESOLUTION NO. D-3512, A RESOLUTION authorizing settlement
of the City of Yakima, Plaintiff, vs. Roy A. Marshall,
Defendant, Yakima County Superior Court Cause No. 59102.
It was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Holbrook that Resolution
No. D-3513, requiring the abatement of weed hazards on
property at 611 So. 38th Avenue, be passed: carried, Edmondson,
Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye
on roll call. Allard absent. City Manager McMicken explained
the problem involves dry tumble weeds. Councilman Holbrook
asked whether it would be possible to obtain pictures of
some of these properties being abated.
RESOLUTION NO. D-35,13, A RESOLUTION requiring the abatement
of fire hazards on certain property, directing notice to
property owners to abate such hazards and, in the alternative,
411thorizing abatement by the Fire Marshal.,
ILV)
_ April 191 1976
An Ordinance appropriating $12,000 in the Water-Sewer Fund,
having been read by title only at the previous meeting and being
again read by title only at this meeting, it was MOVED by
Wonder, seconded by Simmons that Ordinance No. 1939, providing
for said appropriation, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Holbrook,
Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll call.
Allard absent. City Manager McMicken explained this appropriation ,
covers payment to the City Garage for a 1968 dozer which
can be used by the Water-Sewer Division.
ORDINANCE NO. 1939, AN ORDINANCE appropriating the amount of $12,006
from unappropriated money in 473-Water-Sewer Fund to appropriate
accounts within that fund for expenditures as 1976 appropriations
for 473-Water-Sewer Fund.
In accordance with action taken April 5, 1976, requesting
a redraft of the proposed ordinance creating M-3 Airport
Industrial Zone, it was MOVED by Moore, seconded by Wonder
that Ordinance No. 1940, providing for said amendment to
the City Zoning Ordinance and creating the M-3, Airport Industrial
Zone, be passed: carried, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons,
Walker and Wonder voting aye on roll call. Allard absent.
Present and asking questions on this Ordinance was John Klingele,
402 So. 13th Avenue.
]
ORDINANCE NO. 1940, AN ORDINANCE relating to zoning; repealing
existing Chapter 12.48 "M-3, Airport Industrial Zone", of
the City of Yakima Municipal Code, and enacting a new Chapter
12.48, "M-3, Airport Industrial Zone", and various sections
thereof, of the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
It was MOVED by Moore, seconded by Wonder that Ordinance
No. 1941, fixing the time of delinquency and providing for
the issuance of bonds for the payment of the unpaid portion
of L.I.D. No. 1003, North 62nd Avenue Sewer District, be
passed: carrried, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker
and Wonder voting aye on roll call. Allard absent.
ORDINANCE NO. 1941, AN ORDINANCE fixing the time of delinquency
of installments of assessments levied for the payment of
the cost of the improvement in Local Improvement District
No. 1003, and providing for the issuance of bonds with coupons
attached for the payment of the unpaid portion thereof.
* Associate Planner Glenn Rice reviewed the request for outside
utility service to a multiple-family dwelling at 909, 915,
911 and 915 So. 48th Avenue. He indicated these properties
are located on the east side of South 48th Avenue and request
sewer service due to increased sewer problems. The property
involves three multiple-family and one single-family home.
The City Limits are just east of the property. A 15-inch
line is available, which was recently constructed. The City's
plan calls for low density, but the existing homes have been
there for some time. All are willing to annex when feasible.
He explained a public easement must be provided for the inside
parcel and the City Engineer recommends dedication of a 20
j foot easement. The Planning Staff recommends approval with
the following conditions:
1. That the applicants provide as required all appropriate
utility easements.
2. Applicants pay all connection charges as determined by
the City Engineer for the utilization of his utility.
3. That all work and construction be accomplished in accord-
ance with appropriate City Codes and under the direction
of the Office of City Engineer and Office of Code
Administration.
I &l
APRIL 19, 1976
It was MOVED by Moore, seconded by Wonder that the request
' for outside utility service to the above properties be
approved in accordance with the recommendations of the
Planning Commission with the conditions, as stated:
carried, Allard, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons,
1 Walker and Wonder voting aye by voice vote.
*! Administrative Assistant Dick Zais reviewed his report
to the City Manager dated April 15, 1976 regarding the
911 Emergency Telephone Number implementation in Yakima.
Mr. Zais gave a history of the efforts of the 911 Steering
Committee throughout the past year and a half and his work
as chairman of that committee. He explained that legislation
is being considered to nationally implement the 911 Emergency
Telephone Number by which emergency agencies may be reached,
such as police, fire, sheriff, ambulance, state patrol,
hospital and emergency services. He indicated that the
agency representatives have participated in the Committee
' which has also worked with Pacific Northwest Bell on the
i recommendations for implementation. Mr. Zais proceeded
to explain the alternatives of operations which are being
considered, to include centralized dispatch, explaining
i that most agencies have expressed a desire to remain autonomous
and not combine dispatching from one location. He also
explained the call transfer system which adds operators
! and uses the transfer method, explaining that they would
recommend this be operatd out of the City's Fire Alarm
i
; Center located at 101 So. 7th Avenue. Initial; equipment
cost would amount to approximately $20,000 explaining Pacific
Northwest Bell has equipment they can move into the system.
Mr. Zais briefly explained the possibilities for funding
the operation, to include an application with the Law Enforcement
Assistance Administration, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
or Department of Health, Education and Welfare; He indicated
that a local match of 5 percent would be required for the
L.E.A.A. application to be shared by the State and sponsoring
agencies. Costs not funded by grant sources would be proportioned
i among benefiting jurisdictions:based upon both assessed
valuation and per capita distribution. Under this arrangement,
the City's share for the first year would be approximately 50
percent of the balance of costs or approximately $46,500,
should LEAA be the only grant received. It is likely that
after the first three years, the grants would lapse and
participating agencies would be the responsible for assuming
all cost of operation. Under this arrangement, the County's
share would be approximately 42 percent or $39,000 the
1st year. Mr. Zais explained that the grant application
to LEAA should be made by May 1, 1976 and indicated the
1 recommendations of the Emergency Medical Services Advisory
Council for consideration by the Council and County Commissioners
as follows:
1., Agree upon the elements and design of the
911 system proposed.
,
i 2. Agree to be joint sponsors of 911 grants-in-aid
1 and (1) authorize a preliminary application to LEAA
on May 1, 1976 for 1/3 of 911 costs for 1977; and
(2) authorize applications to other grant sources
that may allocate funds for this purpose.
3. Designate the Yakima Police Department and Yakima
, County Sheriff's Office as joint agencies responsible
i for the program and the preparation and administration
of all grants.
i
182
APRIL 19, 1976
4. Satisfy the grant matching requirements for LEAA and assume
together with other benefiting jurisdictions, a proportionate
share of the costs for 911 not funded from grant sources;
provided that local funds available.
Mr. Zais indicated that the 4th recommendation would not necessarily
need to be endorsed at this time for preliminary application
to LEAA. In response to a question from Councilman Simmons
regarding funding for this year, Mr. Zais explained it would
include 50Ipercent of the unfunded costs that are not picked
up by grants-in-aid. explaining the only source looks like LEAA
which would leave the City's share for the 1st year at $46,500
and approximately $40,000 the second year with a decrease each
year thereafter. In response to a question from Councilman
= Holbrook, Dr. Robert Atwood of the Yakima County Health District
proceeded to explain some of the benefits of the 911 System
which are not realized at this time Councilman Moore expressed
a desire to consider the consolidated operation, and did not
feel that the proposed plan goes far enough. Mr. Bruce Belfield,
Alarm Supervisor, being present, explained that operators may
handle up to 3 and 4 calls per minute and that space is available
at the present alarm facility. Councilman Allard and Simmons
spoke to the personnel cost and Councilman Allard felt existing
personnel should be used rather than additional hiring. Mayor
Edmondson suggested that the matter be referred to staff to
consider possibilities for funding. Councilman Allard was against
increased personnel and Councilman Wonder questioned whether
public input should be received on this matter. Councilman
Holbrook indicated the desire to take more time to consider
the report before taking further action. After due discussion,
it was MOVED by Moore, seconded by Walker that the Council refer'
the request to City staff to pursue financing aspects and possible
funding alternatives. It was subsequently MOVED by Simmons,
seconded by Walker that the Motion be amended to include the
first three recommendations as stated in the report: carried,
Moore, Simmons and Walker voting aye by voice vote; Allard,
Edmondson, Holbrook and Wonder voting nay by voice vote. The
amendment lost for want a majority vote. The original Motion then
carried with Edmondson, HolbroOk, Moore, and Wonder voting aye
by voice vote; Allard, Simmons and Walker voting nay by voice
vote. Mayor Edmondson indicated that she approved the whole
concept, but did not feel the Council should go ahead until
funding possibilities are considered. Councilman Allard felt
that it was a good plan if existing manpower could be utilized.
City Manager McMicken indicated that in considering financial '
aspects of the program, it would be considered along with other
budgetary items and within the scope of other funding requests
made to the City.
With reference to the Recommendation of the Human Relations
Commission regarding the John Taylor Complaint as described
in the report from the Human Relations Commission, City Manager
McMicken indicated that further information will be coming to
the Council regarding the field investigation of contractors'
compliance.
Petition No. 880, Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation
Proceedings having been filed with the City Clerk on April 13,
1976 by Floy Elliott, requesting annexation of property between
N. 2nd Street and Buwalda Lane south of "N" Street, it was MOVED
by Simmons, seconded by Moore that today be set as the time
for a meeting with the initiating party who signed the Notice
of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings dated April
13, 1976, that initiating party being Floy Elliott: carried,
• Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting
aye by voice vote. Allard absent. Attorney Harold Amos, Attorney-
, in-fact for Floy Elliott, being present and indicating that
she is willing to accept her share of the City's existing indebted-
ness, it was duly MOVED, seconded and passed that the annexation
1 . , -i_',
APRIL 19, 1976
!proposed by Petition No. 880 (Notice of Intention to Commence
jAnnexation Proceedings) be accepted by the City of Yakima and
1 that the area sought to be annexed be required to_assume the ,
1City's existing indebtedness, and that a Notice of Intention
to Annex be filed with the Yakima County Boundary Review Board.
The above Motion was made by Simmons, seconded by Holbrook
and carried, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore, Simmons, Walker and
Wonder voting aye by voice vote. Allard absent. Associate
Planner Glenn Rice reviewed the particulars of this request.
1Associate Planner Glenn Rice reviewed the annexation request
1 occasioned by Petition No. 881 for 36.3 acres for property
I i valued in excess of $3 million noting that representatives
from the proposed area were present. Petition No. 881, Notice
1 of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings, having been
! filed with the City Clerk on April 14, 1976 by Thomas Dietzen
1 and others (Shelton-Parsons), requesting annexation of property
i in the Midvale Road vicinity to Summitview from 65th to 67th
Avenues, it was MOVED by Simmons, seconded by Moore that today
be set as the time-for a meeting with the initiating parties
1 who signed the Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceed-
,
ings dated April 14, 1976, those initiating parties being Thomas
'
A. Dietzen and others: carried, Edmondson, Holbrook, Moore,
Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye by voice. Allard absent.
Representative property owners from the area in question being
present and indicating that they are willing to accept their
share of the City's existing indebtedness, it was duly MOVED,
I seconded and passed that the annexation proposed by Petition
No. 881 (Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings)
be accepted by the City of Yakima and that the area sought
to be annexed be required to assume the City's existing indebtedness,
and that a Notice of Intention to Annex be filed with the Yakima
County Boundary Review Board. The above Motion was made by
Simmons, seconded by Walker and carried, Edmondson, Holbrook,
Moore, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting aye by voice vote.
Allard absent.
1
Councilman Walker asked that staff be requested to look into
the legality of having Councilmen excused during the meetings.
There was discussion among the Council members regarding the
upcoming Council retreat and the possible date for the retreat.
After some discussion, it was the consensus of the Council
j that the retreat be scheduled for June .5 and be held for one
day only.
There being no further business to come before the Council,
it was MOVED by Wonder, seconded by Moore that this meeting
be adjourned at 11:30 P.M., to Thursday, April 22, 1976 at
1 the hour of 12:00 Noon, to then meet in the Thunderbird Restaurant:
i 1 carried, Edmondson, Holbrook, Simmons, Walker and Wonder voting
aye by voice vote. Allard absent."
i .
A „
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY 4r, .,,,./ 4, _ / j ,, DATE
. Co N 7 i - / 4 .
I .
' I
, . \ . .• ._ . „ , .„..... , DATE 1 '
„ 4 , ■ i
\ COUNC"LMAN ' -
1 _
ATTEST: \
1 , „
,4 g \ Alf
t.P\-- • ' ., e __ .._,.,.-.._. , ' „_„,..A.Z .I■e
'
1 -
CITY C 4'12K / MAYOR
i
Indicates items considered earlier in the meeting, at which time
1 Councilman Allard was present.
1 .
1
1
1