HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-09-19 YPC Packet111011119 M DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
11
PlOTY I° YAKIIMA
anning Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning�yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
City of Yakima Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday January 9, 2019
3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
YPC MPmhPrc-
Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook, Jacob Liddicoat, Robert McCormick,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel, and Philip Ostriem
Council Liaison: Jason White (District 2)
City Planning Staff:
Joan Davenport (Community Development Director), Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager),
Eric Crowell (Associate Planner), Trevor Martin (Associate Planner),
Colleda Monick (Assistant Planner), Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant),
and Lisa Maxey (Planning Specialist)
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Staff Announcements
IV. Election of Chair and Vice -Chair of the Yakima Planning Commission
V. Audience Participation
VI. Approval of Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2018
VII. Public Hearing - Non -Project Rezone
Applicant: Hordan Planning Services on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co
File Numbers: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Site Address: 5231 Powerhouse Rd
Request: Non -project rezone consisting of three parcels totaling approximately 43 acres
from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multi -Family Residential (R-3).
VIII. Other Business
IX. Adjourn
Next Meeting: January 23, 2019
MIS
094
M
"I
,a�nni�nig SIGN -IN SHEET' Pran�ning
City of Yakima Planning Commission
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday January 9, 2019
Beginning at 3:00 p.m.
Public Meeting
*PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY'
IMMEM Nw=1ww
VI/ 4
..�
Page 1 01/09/2019 YPC Public Meeting
Meeting Date: 01/09/19
City of Yakima
YAKII' A PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC)
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
Commission.
Name: ,1, _. l 9,LL- •--1U
Subject/ Agenda Item Number(s): Q d
E-mail:
Mailing Address*:
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments.
Meeting Date: 01/09/19
City of Yakima
YAKII A PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC)
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
Commission.
Name:
Subject/ Agenda Item Number(s):
E-mail:
Mailing Address*;
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments.
January 4, 2019
YAKIMA VALLEY
CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTS- --
311 North 4th Street, Suite 202 • Yakima, Washington 98901
509-574-1550 • FAX 574-1551
website: www.yvcog.org
Re: H2A Worker Housing Forum Invitation
Dear Sir or Madam:
The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments and the Yakima City Council invite you to attend
a forum on H2A Worker Housing on Wednesday January 30, 2019 at the Yakima Convention
Center in Yakima.
The purpose of the forum is to determine if this issue is a concern of other cities in the Yakima
Valley, and to explore a regional approach to locating H2A worker housing. A key question for
your consideration prior to the forum is, "What are the potential impacts of expanded H2A housing
in the Valley, and what might be suitable mitigation for any adverse impacts?" The forum will be
moderated by the Yakima Valley Conference of Governments.
The forum will begin at 10:00 a.m. on January 30, 2019; we plan to conclude no later than noon.
The forum will take place in Room F at the Yakima Convention Center located at 10 North 8'h
Street, Yakima, WA.
Sincerely,
Lauris (Larry) C. Mattson
Executive Director
Enclosure: Agenda
MEMBER JURISDICTIONS
Grandview • Granger • Harrah • Mabton • Moxee • Naches • Selah
Sunnyside • Tieton • Toppenish • Union Gap • Wapato • Yakima • Yakima County • Zillah
Yakima Valley H2A Worker Housing Forum
Agenda
January , 2019; 10 am — Noon
Room F, Yakima Convention Center
Purpose: To explore a re i hall approach to locating112A worker hou ing anc
this is a, concern of other cities inthe 'Valley. Discuss the p+ teutial impacts, a
expanded H2 . housing.
1. Welcome and introductions
2. Purpose & format of forum; agree on ground rules
3. One -minute `shares'
4. Summary of existing status/challenges of housing agricultural workers
a. Mike Gempler, Washington Growers League
b. Marty Miller, Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing
c. Michele Thomas, Washington Low -Income Housing Alliance
5. Observations and concerns from other valley representatives
6. Summary & next steps
7. Adjourn
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) Meeting Minutes
City Hall Council Chambers
December 12, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel
YPC Members Absent: Robert McCormick, Philip Ostriem, Jacob Liddicoat (all excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist
Council Liaison: Jason White, District 2 (absent)
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements — None noted.
Audience Participation - None noted.
Approval of Meeting Minutes of November 14, 2018 — Vice -Chair Rose asked if the survey
was done for the land by the Wastewater Treatment Plant site as required for the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and concurrent Rezone. Calhoun confirmed the survey was
completed. It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner Hughes -Mickel
to approve the meeting minutes of November 14, 2018. The motion carried unanimously with
Commissioner Cook abstaining.
Recap of Planning Commission Items for 2018 — Calhoun announced that the Commission
held 19 meetings in 2018, 7 of which included public hearings. He reminded the Commission
that a non -project rezone is scheduled for their January 9th meeting and that the rezone will not
be affected by the recently approved text amendment pertaining to new requirements for
rezones. He briefly touched on the text amendments, rezones, and Comprehensive Plan
Amendments the Commission reviewed this year and reported when ordinances for those
requests will become effective. Vice -Chair Rose requested to see the new map showing the
land affected by the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and concurrent Rezone near the
Wastewater Treatment Plant site. Calhoun indicated he can provide the map.
Calhoun passed around a printout of an Affordable Housing Report PowerPoint which
Community Development Director Joan Davenport prepared to present to City Council. Calhoun
explained that in the upcoming year the Commission may review alternative housing options,
including townhouses and small -lot single-family houses, and how those would correspond to
the Subdivision Ordinance. He made it known that City Council budget sessions proposed a
new analysis of zoning and subdivision fees to capture 100% of the cost to process those
applications. He explained that the Planning Commission would need to be involved in this
regard as the fee schedule is dictated by the Zoning Ordinance.
Calhoun added that the topic of codifying a definition for "congregant living facility" may
resurface during affordable housing discussions. He explained that the text amendment initiated
in 2017 for revising the "multi -family dwelling" definition accommodates development of tiny
homes, which may return as a topic of discussion as proposals are made for that type of
housing. Discussion ensued on the definition of tiny homes and how they are distinguished from
other housing types. Calhoun further clarified that with the revision of the multi -family definition,
multiple residences can be put on a large lot in a "clustered" fashion with common amenities.
-1-
Commissioner Cook stated his interest in seeing the 2018 statistics for housing permits.
Calhoun retrieved a building permit statistics report from the Code Administration webpage and
read aloud the number of single-family, duplexes, and multi -family structures permitted this year
(up to November) in comparison to last year, highlighting that many more permits have been
issued this year.
Other Business — Vice -Chair Rose asked if there are any Comprehensive Plan Amendment
requests anticipated for next year, to which Calhoun replied that he's not aware of any at this
point in time. Vice -Chair Rose then asked what outreach process is performed. Calhoun
answered that formal notice is only provided once the process is officially open, but that he can
inquire those who frequently submit requests on behalf of property owners around the city.
Commissioner Cook brought up the County's plan to divert Shaw Creek to alleviate flooding
problems and asked if someone from Yakima County can report to the Commission on that topic.
Calhoun replied that he is meeting with Yakima County next week to discuss having joint meetings
and can bring up this issue.
Commissioner Cook asked if there are any potential annexations that staff is aware of to which
Calhoun replied no.
Adjourn - A motion to adjourn to January 9, 2019 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 3:24 p.m.
Chairwoman Byers
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
-2-
SQUIRE-ING SAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Yakima Planning Commission
Open Record Public Bearing
January 9, 2019
EXIIBIT LIST
Applicant: Hordan Planning Services for Squire -Ingham Co
File Numbers: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Site Address: 5231 Powerhouse Rd
Staff Contact: Trevor Martin, Associate Planner
Table of Contents
CHAPTER A Staff Report
CHAPTER B Vicinity Map
CHAPTER C Site Plan
CHAPTER D SEPA Checklist
CHAPTER E Application
CHAPTER F Public/Agency Comments
CHAPTER G Public Notices
SQUIRE-INGAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER A
Staff Report
A-1 Staff Report 01/09/2019
......... ..................._�._..__
N A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AM,
�� r, Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
PlannCITY OF YAKIMA
ing Planning Division
n n i n g Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2°d Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
CITY OF YAKIMA
FINDINGS of FACT, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATION
for
REQUEST FOR REZONE
File Numbers: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
APPLICANT:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
PROJECT LOCATION:
TAX PARCEL NUMBER:
DATE OF REQUEST:
DATE OF COMPLETE:
DATE OF RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF CONTACT:
Hordan Planning Services for Squire -Ingham Co..
410 N. 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901
5231 Powerhouse Rd.
181309-41006, -44003, & -44009
October 19, 2018
November 8, 2018
January 9, 2019
Trevor Martin, Associate Planner
I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
On October 19, 2018, the City of Yakima Planning Division received an application from
Hordan Planning Services, on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co., for a non -project rezone of
three parcels, totaling approximately 43 acres, from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to
Multi -Family Residential (R-3).
II. SUMMARY OF DECISION:
The Administrative Official recommends approval of the Rezone, subject to conditions.
III. FACTS:
A. Processing
1. The application for a Rezone and Environmental Review was received on
October 19, 2018.
2. The application was deemed complete for processing on November 8, 2018,
3. The application is being processed under YMC Ch. 15.23 for Rezone Review,
4. Pursuant to YMC Ch. 1.42 and YMC § 15.23.030, the Planning Commission has
the authority to hold a public hearing and provide a recommendation to the City
Council on a Rezone request.
5. Public Notice: In accordance with YMC § 15.11.090 and YMC § 16.05.010,
notice was provided for this application as follows:
a. The subject property was posted with a land use action sign on November
14, 2018.
b. A Notice of Application, Environmental Review, and Public Hearing was sent
to the applicant, SEPA agencies, and adjoining property owners within 300
feet of the subject property on November 15, 2018.
c. The 20 -day public comment period for the Environmental Review ended on
December 5, 2018. Three comments were received.
B. Environmental Review. A Notice of Application and SEPA Environmental Review
was mailed to SEPA agencies, the applicant, and adjoining property owners within
300 feet of the subject property on November 15, 2018. A SEPA Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on December 13, 2018. No appeals have been
filed with the City of Yakima Planning Division.
C. Current Zoning and Land Use.
1. The subject property is approximately 43 acres in size and is zoned Two -Family
Residential (R-2). All three parcels are currently vacant.
2. The surrounding properties contain uses and zoning as follows:
Direction Zoning
North None
South
East
West
R-2
Land Use
City Limits / Highway 12
Powerhouse Rd. / Vacant
R -2/R-3 Single Family Homes / Mobile Home Park
R-2 Residential
3. Existing Infrastructure
a. The property is currently accessed by W. Powerhouse Rd., which is a
Collector Arterial.
b. The property is served by City of Yakima water.
c. The site is capable of being served by City of Yakima sewer, but will need to
be extended to the site prior to any project being constructed.
D. Statement of Cause — Rezone:
Pursuant to YMC Ch. 15.23, the applicant provided the following paraphrased
statements explaining their reasons for the proposed Rezone:
1. How is the subject property suitable for uses permitted under the proposed
zoning?
The property is well suited for all residential uses permitted under the proposed
zoning Multi -family Residential (R-3) zoning district. The property is relatively flat
with a gentle northerly slope between West Powerhouse Road and State Route
12. Those portions of the property that lie south of West Powerhouse Road are
too steep for development purposes.
The property is served with domestic water by a 24 -inch water line that lies along
the right-of-way of West Powerhouse Road as it passes through the property.
The nearest sanitary sewer line is 15 -inches in diameter and is located
2
approximately 600 feet southeasterly of the subject property also within the right-
of-way of West Powerhouse Road. Due to the large size of the total property
(approximately 43 acres), a 600 foot sanitary sewer line extension would be
reasonable in this case. The subject properties all front on, or have access to,
West Powerhouse Road, an urban arterial roadway, which can easily be widened
along the properties frontage.
The property also is located in a mixed-use land use area that consists of a state
highway, manufactured home park, agricultural area and pockets of single-family
uses, which are generally suitable and compatible with the proposed R-3 zoning
district
The above circumstances make the property suitable for the permitted land uses
of the multi -family zoning district.
What is the status of the existing land use?
The subject property consists of three parcels totaling approximately 43 acres.
The site contains 1 single-family residence, miscellaneous agricultural
outbuildings, orchard and vacant land. All urban services and facilities are
available to the property, or can easily be extended to the property, as needed.
Domestic water (24 -inch main) and sewer lines (15 -inch main) are located along
West Powerhouse Road or within easy extension distance to the property. The
property has direct and indirect access to West Powerhouse Road, an urban
arterial. Electricity and telephone are currently located on-site and the property is
protected by the Yakima Fire Department and Police Department.
2. How is the rezone request in compliance with and/or how does the request
deviate from the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan?
The rezone request is in compliance with the City of Yakima Comprehensive
Plan 2040 because the proposed rezone meets the intent of the Mixed
Residential land use designation at 2.2.2 of the comprehensive plan by its
compliance with the following statement in the Comprehensive Plan: "The
proposal meets the locational criteria of the comprehensive plan because the
subject property is located within established low density residential communities
and in other parts of the City that are inappropriate for more intensive urban
development due to the topography or other land suitability challenges and/or the
desire to create lower intensity transitional areas between the City and the
surrounding unincorporated rural pasture, foothills and agricultural land".
The Mixed Residential land use designation is to provide for areas with a mixture
of housing types and densities. This proposal better implements the following
goals and policies:
Goal 2.1— Establish a development pattern consistent with the communit 's
vision.
Policy 2.1.7: Allow new development only where adequate public services can be
provided.
3
Policy 2.1.10: Require properties to assume zoning consistent with the City's
Future Land Use Plan, as adopted or amended where appropriate.
Goal 2.3 - Residential Uses. Preserve and enhance the quality, character and
function of Yakima's residential nei hborhoods.
Policy 2.3.1 - Provide for a wide variety of housing types within the city to meet
the full range of housing needs for Yakima's evolving population..
Policy 2.3.2 - Preserve and enhance established residential neighborhoods.
Specifically (as applicable):
A. Ensure that new development is compatible in scale, style, density and
aesthetic quality to an established neighborhood.
E. Carefully review proposed land use designation changes to more intensive
residential designations, mixed-use or industrial. Specifically.-
--
pecifically.-- Proposals should conform to locational criteria set forth for the desired
designation in the applicable policies under Goal 2.2.
-- Is the site physically suited for the proposed designation?
-- Is the desired zone one of the implementing zones of the land use designation
(per applicable policies under Goal 2.2)?
-- Avoid spot zones or similar changes that may create instability with the
surrounding neighborhood.
a11
r . ..M
Poky, 5.4.2. - Use transitional densities, design and landscape standards to
ensure housing is compatible with existing character and planned goals.
Proponent nent Comment This proposal implements the comprehensive plan better
because it will provide an opportunity for a variety of housing types to occur. Just
because a property is designated and zoned for multi -family residential purposes
doesn't mean that multi -family apartment -type units will be constructed. The R-3
zoning district permits single-family, duplex and multi -family development or a
combination of all three residential uses.
The property adjoins R-3 zoning along the northeast corner of the proposal and a
manufactured home park is located within that zoning district. Surrounding
properties to the west and east are currently zoned R-2, which permits a mixture
of housing types, with limited densities. The site can accommodate multi -family
residential development, as well as other types of residential development and is
physically suited for the proposed zoning district. Multi -family Residential Zoning
R-3, would implement the Mixed Residential land use designation as suggested
by the comprehensive plan.
For the above reasons, this proposal implements compliance with
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
4
3. Are there adequate public facilities, such as traffic capacity, sewer
services, potable water, stormwater drainage, schools, fire and police
services, and other public services and infrastructure existing on and
around the subject property?
All urban services and facilities are available to the property, or can easily be
extended to the property, as needed. The subject property is served with
domestic water (24 -inch main) and a 15 -inch sewer line is located approximately
600 feet southeast of the subject property which can accommodate multi -family
type development. The property has direct and indirect access to West
Powerhouse Road and easy access to North 40<h Avenue and State Route 12.
Electricity and telephone are currently located on-site and the property is
protected by the Yakima Fire Department and Police Department.
Are the existing public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive
use of the new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are
going to be implemented to address any short falls in public services that
may exist?
Yes, this property can be served with the existing facilities capable of supporting
the most intensive uses, as the site is served by a 15 -inch sanitary sewer main
and 24 -inch water main. If any service or facility deficiency exists in the delivery
of services to this property, necessary mitigation will take place by the developer
to ensure adequate public services and facilities are in place at the developer's
expense through future SEPA review and land use concurrency requirements,
upon the development of the property.
4. How is the proposed zone change compatible with the existing neighboring
uses?
The proposed zone change is compatible with existing neighboring land uses
because of the unique characteristics of the property. The property abuts a state
highway on the north, and beyond that agricultural lands planted in orchard.
Properties to the east consist of an existing manufactured home park and a small
strip of single-family residences, and beyond that commercial activities. Property
to the south rises substantially in elevation and mainly consists of single-family
residences on acreage size lots. Property to the west consists of single-family
residences, an indoor shooting range and fruit warehouses.
This proposed zone change will be compatible with existing neighboring land
uses because there are physical barriers, topography (different elevations) and
existing mixed land uses in the area that are compatible with the R-3 zoning
district. Due to the large size of the subject property, once a project is approved,
adequate buffering can be imposed to ensure compatibility.
What mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as
sitescreening, buffering building design, open space, traffic flow alteration,
etc.?
No mitigation is proposed as part of this rezone request. However, appropriate
mitigation is built into the SEPA and zoning codes through regular site plan
5
approval once a specific project is proposed. Required mitigation to address
compatibility would be implemented at that time.
5. What is the public need for the proposed change?
The public need arises from the fact that there is a documented need for
additional multifamily development in Yakima. In fact, the City of Yakima, has a
serious deficiency in multi -family zoned property. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan
states, "The Runstad Center for Real Estate Research has noted that in 2016
that in the previous year "... Yakima County has recorded the greatest decrease
in vacancy rate with a considerable drop of 5.8 percent (from 7.8% to 1.7%). " If
supply does not keep up with demand, it is likely that rental rates will increase. "
Since this study there have been additional reports published showing Yakima's
rental vacancies under 1 %. The subject site should specifically be used for
housing purposes, and other forms of potentially permitted uses within the R-3
zoning district, such as residential mini -storage, be prohibited on the site.
Additionally, the City has provided the necessary infrastructure for this specific
type of development (i.e. major arterial roadways, easy access to the
transportation network, adequate water and waste water lines). The public
expects a variety of housing types and multi -family zoning provides that variety
by permitting single-family, two-family and multi -family within a single zoning
district (R-3). This rezone meets that public need and perspective, while using
the infrastructure provided for residential development to locate at this location.
Based on the above, a public need exists for additional multi -family residential
zoning in the City of Yakima.
IV. FINDINGS
A. Rezone Approval Criteria: In accordance with the provisions of YMC § 15.23.030
(D) (1-7), recommendations to approve or deny proposed rezones shall include the
following consideration:
The testimony at the public hearing:
A Notice of Application was mailed to SEPA agencies and all property owners
within 300 feet of the subject properties on November 15, 2018, wherein the
public was invited to submit written and/or oral comments at the public hearing
on this proposed rezone.
The first comment was from the Washington State Department of Transportation
which states:
US 12 is part of the National Highway System and borders the parcels along the
northerly property line. US 12 is a fully -controlled limited access facility with a
posted speed limit of 60 m.p.h. No access to US 12 will be allowed. The
applicant should be aware that WSDOT has long-range plans to restrict turning
movements at the US 12/Ackley Road intersection to right-in/right-out only and
ultimately close the intersection. These plans are only preliminary. No decisions
have been made and no funding has been procured. It is important to note, US
12 will continue to serve the site via the US 12/40th Avenue Interchange and the
US 12/Powerhouse Road intersection.
r,.
1.1
The proposal could result in doubling the potential residential units on the site.
We recommend that the City require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) be done at
this time by a licensed traffic engineer at the proponent's expense, and submitted
to the City and the WSDOT for review and comment. We request that the TIA
analyze the impacts to US 12/40thAvenue interchange and the US 12/Ackley
Road intersection. Mitigation to offset the impacts for this proposal should be
identified in the traffic study. We also request that the City assess a pro rata
share contribution from the developer for improvements to US 12 in proportion to
their impacts to the interchange and/or intersection.
Stormwater and surface runoff generated by this project must be retained and
treated on site in accordance with regulating agencies' standards and not be
allowed to flow onto WSDOT rights-of-way. US 12 is an existing facility. The
proponent should be aware that they are proposing development in an area with
traffic noise. They should also expect that traffic noise may continue to grow into
the future, and, as an essential public facility, US 12 may need to be expanded to
accommodate future traffic growth. If the proponent is concerned with traffic
noise affecting this development, it is the developer's responsibility to dampen or
deflect any traffic noise.
Any proposed lighting should be directed down towards the site, and away from
US 12.
Staff Response: Any proposed development that is expected to generate traffic
will be required to, at a minimum, submit a traffic concurrency application. Any
form of housing development that may be eventually proposed at this location will
be required to submit a traffic study to the City of Yakima.
The second comment was received from the Washington Department of Ecology
and states:
Based upon the historical agricultural use of the land, there is a possibility the soil
contains residual concentrations of pesticides, Ecology recommends that the soil
be sampled and analyzed for lead and arsenic, and for organochlorine
pesticides. If these contaminants are found at concentrations above the Model
Toxics Control Act cleanup levels, Ecology recommends that the potential buyers
be notified of their occurrence.
Staff Response "The site is currently vacant and the floodplain maps for the area
are proposed to change in 2019. In the near future the site will be included in
portions of the 100 -year floodplain, meaning that any new use on the site will be
required to complete a SEPA Environmental and Critical Area Review during a
proposed project action of the site. See attached exhibits "A" and "B."
The final comment was received form Phil Hoge which states:
This rezone will likely adversely impact traffic safety; and therefore I urge you to
issue the SEPA threshold determination with a mitigating condition requiring
dedication of right-of-way along W. Powerhouse Rd. per YMC 12.06.020
7INDEX
��I
standards (i.e., 80 feet of width for a Collector),
I believe that the Determination of Consistency in the Notice of Application is
inappropriate in stating that "the subject property is able to be served by public
facilities." The following needed and planned street attributes cannot currently be
provided on W. Powerhouse Rd. because the existing right-of-way width is
inadequate to provide:
• 3 lanes per Fig. 4-5 of 2040 Transportation Systems Plan (TSP).
• Sidewalks per Fig. 4-6 of TSP.
• Bike Lanes per Fig. 4-8 of TSP and Complete Network Map in the
Bicycle Master Plan (Nov. 2017).
The probable adverse impact to traffic safety is based on the question in
Supplemental Application For REZONES, Part IV - NARRATIVE, C ("Are the
exiting public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive use of the new
(requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are going to be implemented
to address any short falls in public services that may exist?") I submit, for your
consideration, that the existing right-of-way width is inadequate to support the
most intensive use in the requested R-3 zone.
Staff Response: As proposed, the project submitted is a non -project rezone
action, the action of requesting to change a zoning designation does not afford a
reasonable nexus to require the applicant to dedicate and install full frontage
improvements. The City has communicated with the applicant that during a
proposed land use development action to the site, the City will require site,
frontage, right-of-way improvements, and likely right-of-way dedication.
Any testimony at the hearing can be considered by the Planning Commission.
2. The suitability of the property in question for uses permitted under the
proposed zoning:
The subject property is suitable for uses permitted in the R-3 zoning district.
3. The recommendation from interested agencies and departments:
No agencies or departments have registered any opposition to this rezone.
Comments from interested parties can be found above.
4. The extent to which the proposed amendments are in compliance with
and/or deviate from the goals and policies as adopted in the Yakima Urban
Area Comprehensive Plan and the intent of this title:
The proposed R-3 zoning district is an implementing zone of the Comprehensive
Plan 2040 designation of Mixed Residential and is compatible with the following
goals and policies:
• Goal 2.1: Establish a development pattern consistent with the
community's vision.
o Policy 2.1.4: Manage and maintain the City's Official Zoning Map to
ensure continued consistency with the Future Land Use Map.
9
C.
INDEX
-A-L�
o Policy 2.1.5. Implement land use designations through a clear
regulatory process that ensures transparency, fairness and
predictability in the land development process.
o Policy 2.1.7. Allow new development only where adequate public
services can be provided.
o Policy 2.1.10 Require properties to assume zoning consistent with the
City's Future Land Use Plan, as adopted or as amended where
appropriate.
Goal 2.2: provide a mix of land use designations consistent with the
community's vision.
o Policy 2.2.2. Mixed Residential:
• A. Purpose: This designation provides for areas with a mixture of
housing types and densities.
■ B. Locational criteria: Intended for areas now characterized by,
and/or appropriate for, a mixture of housing types with a close
proximity to commercial services, transit access, and/or parks and
other public recreational amenities. This designation often creates
a transition from commercial and mixed-use areas to low density
residential areas.
C. Principal uses & density: A mixture of single-family, duplex, and
multifamily dwelling units. The permitted maximum density is up to
or above 13 net dwelling units per acre, depending on the
underlying zoning district and neighborhood context. For
developments electing to conform to site and building design
standards promoting pedestrian -oriented development, density is
primarily limited by allowable building height, integration of
required parking, market conditions, and conformance with
applicable site and building design provisions. Specifying the
maximum number of dwelling units in one building may be
appropriate in some areas to ensure compatibility and to limit
building massing and density.
D. Implementing zoning districts: R-2 & R-3.
• Goal 2.3. Residential uses. Preserve and enhance the quality, character
and function of Yakima's residential neighborhoods.
o Policy 2.3.1. Provide for a wide variety of housing types within the city
to meet the full range of housing needs for Yakima's evolving
population.
• Goal 5.1. Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices.
o Policy 5.1.12. Participate in efforts to secure land available for
affordable housing.
5. The adequacy of public facilities, such as roads, sewer, water and other
required public services:
9INDEX
A�1
Along W Powerhouse Rd. there are various utilities which are available to serve
the property including: City of Yakima sewer, which would need to be extended
to the site during the project phase of an application; City of Yakima Water;
Pacific Power electricity; Cascade natural gas; CenturyLink telephone; Charter
cable TV; and City of Yakima garbage collection services. City of Yakima Fire
and Police departments also serve this area.
This property is served by all public utilities necessary to support future
development. Additionally, frontage improvements, including, but not limited to
the dedication of additional right-of-way and the installation of curb, gutter, and
sidewalk will be required during a proposed project of the subject site.
6. The compatibility of the proposed zone change and associated uses with
neighboring land uses:
The rezone proposal to R-3 will allow the subject property to be redeveloped to
allow for higher density residential uses of the subject property. There is an R-3
zoned mobile home park just to the east of the subject site. Rezoning the
property would promote contiguous zoning districts along with a density pattern
similar to that already found within the area.
7. The public need for the proposed change:
The public need for this proposed change will bring the property into
conformance with its future land use category of Mixed Residential and will allow
the site to be developed into higher density residential housing. The City of
Yakima currently has a housing vacancy rate under 5%, the creation of more
land available for multifamily housing would help alleviate the burden on the
current vacancy rate.
B. Development Services Team (DST) Review
On October 2, 2018, a DST meeting was held, with the applicant, to discuss the
possible impacts of this rezone. Due to the fact that the subject rezone is a non -
project action, no site or frontage improvements are required at this time. Once a
project for the site is received by the City of Yakima, additional DST meetings will be
held to discuss the required frontage improvements.
V. CONCLUSIONS
A. The Planning Commission has jurisdiction to issue a recommendation on this
application to the City Council.
B. The proposed Rezone is consistent with the goals and policies of the Yakima
Comprehensive Plan 2040.
C. SEPA review resulted in the issuance of a DNS on December 13, 2018 - No appeals
were filed.
D. No adverse impacts have been identified from granting this approval that cannot be
mitigated at the time of future development.
10
E. Public notice for this hearing was provided in accordance with zoning ordinance
requirements.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
The Community Development Department recommends approval of this non -project
Rezone request from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multifamily Residential (R-3).
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
Approval:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the Planning Commission draft findings of fact and forward a recommendation of approval
to the Yakima City Council.
Approval with modifications:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the City of Yakima Planning staff modify the draft language to include the changes noted in
the minutes of this afternoon's public hearing, and with these changes move that the Planning
Commission draft findings of fact and forward a recommendation of approval to the Yakima
City Council.
Denial:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the Planning Commission reject the proposal to include findings of fact documenting the
reasons for denial, and order the proposal be forwarded to the Yakima City Council with a
recommendation for denial.
11
DOC.
INDEX
Uky-y-mf Ooodp/airL zan(fS
Exhi ►�' �
NEW ' 000dplaiq Zore-S4ra019
DOC.INDEX#-�/�- L�
SQUIRE-INGHAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER B
Vicinity Map
VICINITY MAP
File Number: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Project Name: SQUIRE-INGHAM CO
Site Address: 5231 POWERHOUSE RD
Proposal: Non -project rezone consisting of three parcels totaling approximately 43 acres from Two -Family
Residential (R-2) to Multi -Family Residential (R-3).
Contact the City of Yakima Planning Division at (509) 575-6183
Map Disclaimer: Information shown on this map is for planning and illustration purposes only. The City of Yakima
assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided or for any action taken, o�
or action not taken by the user in reliance upon any maps or information provided herein.
Date Created: 10/22/2018
INDEX
SQUI .E-INGHAM CO
1.Z#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER C
Site Plan
C-1 Site Plan (for discussion purposes only) 09/27/2018
_ .............................www _ __ .. ................... _....
_________............. __..._...............
.....
DOC
IN
# c --)
SQUIRE-INGIAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER
SE:PA Checklist
aaa ENVIRONMENTAL NTAL CHECKL ST
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
MA
ar a_aa (" (AS TAKEN FROM WAC 197-11-960)
�J YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.88
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are
significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation
measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further
aanaNze the orotiosal..
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each
question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or
private consultant for some questions. Y -0 -LI 11i_g aJs "slot a flicable" or "does not a17p taa�Ey ��liat, ,yr�tl ma aat,t �J�IIT<lr��m wrrht
sloes not apl lan(l po'1 whep the aiiswer isLmknowra. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies
reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the
decision-making process.
The checklist questions apply to :all ha is t)f yoawa pro osa I, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different
parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help you describe your proposal or its environmental effects.
The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information
reasonably related to deteroniaaiaa,a if there may be s4wificant adverse iamxact.
For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections
A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all
questions that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in
Part B — Environmental Elements — that do not contribute meanona rally to the analvsis of the oronoml.
1. Name Of Proposed Project (If Applicable): Not applicable
2. Applicant's Name & Phone:
Hordan Planning Services — 509-249-1919
3. Applicant's Address
410 North Second Street, Yakima, WA 98901
.
4._.. Con ., ,.—
tact Person & Phone:
Bill Hordan — 509-249-1919
5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Yakima
6. Proposed Timing Or Schedule (Including Phasing, If Applicable):
No project is proposed as part of this rezone request.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain: RENJOVED
Not at this time.
CITY OF YAKIMA
Revised 02/2018 INDU" 8
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal:
No other known environmental information has been prepared which is directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain:
No other applications are known to be pending.
p
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known:
Minor Rezone application.
11. Give a brief, but complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project
and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your
proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on project description.):
The proposal is a non -project Minor Rezone request to change the zoning on 3 parcels that total approximately 43 acres
from Two -Family Residential to (R-2) to Multi -family Residential (R-3).
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required
by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist:
The properties lie on the north side of West Powerhouse Road, approximately'/4 miles west of North 40' Avenue, within
the City Limits of Yakima, Washington. The properties are located within the 5200 block of West Powerhouse Road
(5231 West Powerhouse Road). The Yakima County Assessor's Parcel Numbers for the properties are 181309-41006,
44003 and 44009.
Revised 02/2018
RiEGEHED
OCT i n 2018
CrrY OF YAKIMA
'V
Revised 02/2018 m { 10
-1
Nil I
Ian=
r I
a.
General description of the site (✓ one):
X flat ❑ rolling ❑ hilly ❑ steep slopes ❑ mountainous ❑ other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Approximately 15 percent.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal
results in removing any of these soils.
The property is bisected by West Powerhouse Road, which is also a defining line of the two
soil types that occupy the subject properties. A small portion of the properties lie south of
West Powerhouse Road and according to the Soil Survey of Yakima County Area
Washington, the soil type is Star -buck -rock outcrop complex, 45 to 60 percent slopes and is
not prime farmland. The majority of the property lies north of West Powerhouse Road and
is according to the Soil Survey of Yakima County Area Washington, the soil type is
Yakima Silt Loam and is designated as prime farmland. No soil will be removed from the
site as part of this Minor Rezone application.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected
area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No fill or grading is proposed as part of this Minor Rezone application.
f.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe.
Not as part of this Minor Rezone application.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
No impervious surface is proposed at this time. No project is proposed as part of this
Minor Rezone application.
h.
Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
h1 E `+E Vif ED
a.
What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during
Uc r i
construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
CITY OF YAKIMA
None as part of this Minor Rezone application.
Revised 02/2018 m { 10
-1
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If
so, generally describe.
None known by property owner or proponent.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
a. ,`Surface, Water
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. if appropriate, state what stream or river it
flows into.
The Naches-Cowiche ditch bisects the portion of property about halfway between
West Powerhouse Road and State Route 12. The south boundary of the property abuts
the Yakima Valley Canal which is higher in elevation than the subject property. The
Naches River lies approximately 1,500 feet north of the subject properties and the
Cowiche Creek lies approximately 500 feet west of the suNect property.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Not applicable, there is no project proposed on the property.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable, there is no project and no fill or dredging is proposed.
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Not applicable, there is no project and no surface water withdrawals or diversions are
proposed as part of this Minor Rezone application.
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
No.
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If
so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No project is proposed as part of this Minor Rezone application.
b. Ground Water
1. Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other
��**g �q
R' EC;EO� ED
purposes? if so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and
approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to
OCT LUIS
groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if
known.
OfTY OF YAKIMA
No groundwater will be withdrawn as part of this Minor Rezone application.
Revised 02/2018 1 1
��1
2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,
the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or
the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Not applicable, this is a non -project Minor Rezone request and no waste material will be discharged
into the ground.
1, Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Not applicable, there is no project proposed which would generate storm water..
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Not applicable.
3,. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the
site? If so, describe.
Not applicable, this Minor Rezone request will not affect drainage patterns, as no
project is proposed.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and
drainage pattern impacts, if any:
None needed, none proposed
a. Check (✓) types of vegetation found on the site:
Deciduous Tree: ❑ Alder
❑ Maple
❑ Aspen
X Other
Evergreen Green: ❑ Fir
❑ Cedar
❑ Pine
❑ Other
❑ Shrubs
❑ Grass
❑ Pasture
❑ Crop Or Grain
x Orchards,
vineyards, or other
permanent
Wet Soil Plants: ❑ Cattail
❑Buttercup
❑ Bullrush
❑Skunk Cabbag
crops
❑ Other
Water Plants: ❑ Milfoil
❑ Eelgrass
❑ Water Lily
❑Other
X Other types of vegetation - Weeds
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
No vegetation will be removed or altered as part of this Minor Rezone application.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known by the property owner or proponent.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
Revised 02/2018
U-CENED
OCT 7 n 2uj8
;'ITY OF YAKIMA
e.
List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
No noxious or invasive species have been observed on or near the site by the property
owner or proponent.
ir�Gtt�N
a.
List any birds or other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: QUAIL, WATERFOWL
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known by property owner or proponent.
c.
Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
No.
d.
Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
The property owner has not observed any invasive animal species on or near the site,
a.
What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
No energy is needed as part of this Minor Rezone application.
b.
Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If
so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None needed as there is no project.
a.
Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
! �' EEE ED
proposal? If so, describe.
No.
OCT 2018
1.
Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past
CITY OF YAKIMA
uses.
No known contamination from present or past uses is known to exist.
Revised 02/2018 p 3
2. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project
development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity.
Not applicable, there are no known hazardous/conditions which might affect this
Minor Rezone application.
3. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or
produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during
the operating life of the project.
Not applicable, there are no known hazardous chemicals proposed to be stored or
produced as part of this Minor Rezone application.
4. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services are required for this Minor Rezone application.
5. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None needed, none eroposed.
L What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
No known noise exists in the area which would affect this application.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
The Minor Rezone will not create any noise.
1 Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:.
None needed, none proposed.
itu l�rar`
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect
current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The site is currently used for residential and agricultural purposes. Adjacent properties to
the south, east and west are generally residential in nature. Property directly to the north is
State Route 12 and beyond that is agriculture. The proposed Minor Rezone will not affect
current land uses, as no project is proposed.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so,
describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance
will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands
�.����®
have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will
be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use?
OCT i 9 &18
The subject property has been used and is currently being used as working farmlands.
However, the property is located within the City Limits of Yakima, Washington, a designated
MY OF YAKIMA
urban area and the properties are not designated as resource lands of long-term commercial!'
4
significance.
Revised 02/2018 % 14
Revised 02/2018 mftk5
�1
1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land
normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of
pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No, the property lies within the Yakima City Limits which is a designated urban area..
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The site contains 1 single-family residence and several miscellaneous agricultural
outbuildings.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No structures will be demolished as part of this application.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Two- family Residential
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Mixed Resdential
g.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so,
specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Not applicable, there is no project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Not applicable, there is no project.
k.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
None needed, none proposed.
1.
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
G ` Qq,
Compliance with 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, as applicable to this
application.
OCT 2Ui8
m.
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and
C." OF YAKIMA
forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
r
Not applicable, there are no nearby resource lands as this property lies within the City
Limits of Yakima, Washington.
Revised 02/2018 mftk5
�1
',',
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
Not applicable, no new housing is being provided.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
Not applicable, no housing is being eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Not applicable, no new structures are being proposed as part of this application.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No known views in the immediate area will be altered or obstructed as part of this application
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
No light or glare will be produced as part of this application.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
Not applicable, there is no project proposed.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
There are no known sources of off-site light or glare which would affect this proposal.
CiZGEIVED
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
A J CT 1 ?" 0 i
IV.
Revised 02/2018
6
w u
Revised 02/2018
,
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Chesterly Park lies approximately 1/4's of a mile east of the project site and the Naches Trail
lies approximately 150 feet north of the site.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No recreational opportunities will be displaced as part of this Minor Rezone application.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None needed, none proposed.
>lfir ll 1't �1
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over
45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation
registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe.
To the property owner's knowledge there are no structures on or near site that are eligible
for historical or cultural preservation.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or
occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any
material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please
list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources.
The property owner has no knowledge of landmarks, features or other evidence of Indian or
historic use or occupation on this site. An area commonly known as "Painted Rocks" lies
approximately 2,000 feet west of the subject properties.
c. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and
disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may
be required.
None proposed, no disturbance to cultural resources will occur as part of this Non -project
Minor Rezone application.
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is currently served by West Powerhouse Road, which extends between North 401h
Avenue on the east and Ackley Road on the west. Both North 40" Avenue and Ackley Road
connect to State Route 12 and other urban arterials in the immediate area.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so,
generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
RECEIVED
The nearest known transit stop is near the intersection of North 4011 Avenue and River
Road. The approximate distance is 1/4's of a mile east of the site.
OCT 19 [O1B
CITY OF YAKIMA
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have?
How many would the project or proposal eliminate?"Lai:®'e
6''3' i 11%1 .
No parkinE spaces are 2rogosed or eliminated as art of this Minor Rezone a lication.
w u
Revised 02/2018
,
d.
Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets,
pedestrian bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so,
generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
None needed, none proposed, as there is no proposed project.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or
proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of
the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What
data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?
Not applicable, no project is proposed.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural
and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe:
Not applicable, there is no project.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not applicable, there is no project.
l le
a.
Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe:
Not applicable, there is no project.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
Not applicable, there is no project.
a.
Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity
which might be needed.
``
rRiECEVED
Not applicable, there is no project.
OCT i ZW8
CITY OF YAKIMA
Revised 02/2018
8
OCT 1 v 2018
OITY OF YAKIMA
Revised 02/2018
Page 119
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 -understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make its decision.
®
Property Owner or Agent Signature Date S��bmltted
V u j y 'r r
Name of Signee Posit' nand gencv/Organization
RECENE®
OCT 2 g 2018
CITY OF V AKIM#--
'�.v`��?�:: Cly
Revised 02/2018 19
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list
of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities that would likely result from the proposal, would affect the item
at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly
and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
No increased discharge to water, emissions to air, or toxic/or hazardous substances are
proposed. No increase in noise levels are anticipated by rezoning the y ...
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
If applicable, complete an additional SEPA checklist once a project has been proposed.
2. How would the proposal be likely
to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The proposal will have no effect to plants, animals, fish or marine life.
.. _ z _ _. ._W,,,.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Conservation of these issues would be reviewed through additional SEPA review and
implementation of rules and regulations of the Critical Areas Ordinance, if determined
necessary.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not applicable, no natural resources are been exploited through this application.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
None needed, none proposed.
4. How would the�.
proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
This is a non -project rezone and does not affect environmentally sensitive areas.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Compliance with local, state and federal environmental ordinances will ensure protection
occurs
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
This proposal will not affect shorelines, as there is none affected. Future land use development
of the property will be dictated by local state and federal ordinances 1-1-111 ''__Jr R ry
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Compliance with local, state and federal shoreline and land use ordinances will ensure
protection occurs to these features.
Revised 02/2018
OCT t 9 2018
CITY
rr OF YAKIMA
oL: 6 k�2 Y
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
New development would likely increase traffic on local and state highways. A minor demand
in public services and utilities would likely occur as the property is developed.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
All new development would be required to meet transportation and service/utility concurrency
requirements prior to development occurring.
w ....... ...
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
No conflicts are anticipated.
RECEIVED
OCT 19 2018
WY OF YAKIMA
F'LA'- bNG DIV.
Revised 02/2018 2
SQUIRE-INGAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER E
Application
=MEMO=_ Emmi
E-1 Application for Rezone 10/19/2018
RECEVED
LAND USE APPLICATION OCT 1 9 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF YAKIMA
MA
aii'oi'i'
s 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR, YAKIMA, WA 98901
PHONE: (509) 575-6183 EMAIL: ask,plauningLyakinlawa.gov
)t#STR C'TIONS", 1"R�I1ASF READ FIRST- Plis set rs or rant our answers clearly. _
Answer all questions completely, If you hive any questions about this form or the application process, please ask a Planner, Renecnrbcr
to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an
application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable.
This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV - CERTIFICATION are on this page.
PART R ttnd III contain additional infottustlon s teeifte To Yom jwogosal and MUST be attested to this p!Le to conN)I to the a r alivatiou,
PAR'�`�i° CNEPAL'M ATION7
.
Name: Hordan Planning Services
1. Applicant's ._ ..._-. _ ^ ..m w -.. .._...-_. �....m..,..w.
Information: Mailing Address 410 N 2nd St _
Ci Yakima St WA jz'P i ^8901 „Phone (509^
ryima �...... )249-1919
E -Mail:
2 s
Interest in Property: Check One ner [6 Agent ElPurchaser [ Other Planner
Applicant
Name: Squire -Ingham Co
3.
Info Applicant):
(If other rty W _.�
Property y Mailing Address
C' St. Zrla Phone �()
thaE-Mail: _
4. Subject Property's Assessor's Parcel Number(s):ITIT
181309A 1006, 44003, 44009
S."Le alDescri tionof-Property. if1 __ ......-,__c_.--d_m-...._
g 'p(' engthy, please attach it on a separate document)
See attached
6. Property Address:
5231 W Powerhouse Rd, Yakima, WA 98908
..�.. .-..... _� m __....�.�.._� . ._ ..
7. Property's Existing Zoning:
❑ SR ❑ R -I M R-2 ❑ R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CRD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
Type Of Application: (Check All That Apply)
Rezone ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text or Map Environmental Checklist (SEPA
Amendment Review)
❑ Transportation Concurrency ❑ Other: W, _www__ ,•,_. _._ ❑ Gutter
Master Application
❑ (select if submitting two or more
applications under Title I5
" ° PARS 111 ltl3C 1 R A"i�"ACAM NK"A 'AI 7TIM -�'1�•A A
Ar - .'Ali APP1;ATIll71v,
9. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS
Ito 70N,
10.1 certify that the information on this application and the required attachments are true and correct to the hest cif my knowledge,
rptAA 10117
Property OWnar a Slgn rate Date
ilei
w e"
App ttt:
an s Signature llu
4
Rev W cid O812017..e' #p Page
LAND USE APPLICATION
RECEWED
OCT 2 g 2018
CITY OF YAKIM.A, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTWY Of Y/lyj(W,N
129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR, YAKIMA, WA 98901 �� a' Y � �_� IV
1 PHONE: (509) 575-6183 EMAIL: ask.planning@yakimawa.gov
INSTRUCTIONS — PLEASE READ FIRST Please c or print your answers clearly,
Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process, please ask a Planner. Remember
to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an
application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable.
This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART 1V — CERTIFICATION are on this page.
PART II and III contain additional infigmation MN11ecilic to Xour tr<t .tosal and MUST be attached to this page to cpm Icle the a . lication.
PART I'— CaEI ERAT. INFORMATION
7. Property's Existing Zoning;
❑ SR ❑ R-1 R-2 ❑ R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
8. Type Of Application: (Check All That Apply) _.......... -. .a
. �.
Iffi
Rezone ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text or Map Environmental Checklist (SEPA
Amendment � y, w Review)
C] p Concurrency Other:w_ _ Other.—
.-
Master Application
❑ (select if submitting two or more
a)lications under Title 15
PART TI — SUPPLEMENTAL AiPPLI "AyI"ICN, PARI' III — RE tUMM) ATTACHMENTS, & PART ,I V — NARRATIVE
9. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS
PART V — CERTIFICATIO
10. I certify that the information on this application and the required auachmonts are true ars irrect 0 the best of my knowledge_
Property Owner's Signature Date
pp gnature Date
FILFJAPPLICA'I tON(S)#
Revised 08/2017 a Page 13
Supplemental Application For:
REZONES
YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 15.23
YAKIMA
PAHT IC -APPLICATION MO RMATIO N'
I. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
❑ SR ❑ R -I ® R-2 ❑ R-3 ❑ B -I ❑ B-2 ❑ IIB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
2. DESIRED ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
❑ SR ❑ R-1 ❑ R-2 91 R-3 [113-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
3. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY (check all that apply):
(� SR ❑ R -I fN R-2 [§ R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M -I ❑ M-2
4. EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:
❑ Low Density Residential L% Mixed Residential ❑ CommunityMixed-Use ❑ Commercial Mixed -Use
❑ CBD Commercial Core ❑ Regional Commercial ❑ Industrial
5. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:
Is there a proposed change to the Future Land Use Map? None proposed
If so what is the proposed future land use designation?
❑ Low Density Residential ❑ Mixed Residential ❑ Community Mixed -Use ❑ Commercial Mixed -Use
❑ CBD Commercial Core ❑ Regional Commercial ❑ Industrial
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES AVAILABLE:
Transportation ® Rights -Of --Way IN Police And Fire Protection 11' Parks And Trails JjSchools
Water INSewer INStorm Drainage MElectricity Natural Gas tpTeleplione Cable TV
PAIiIT-InI w 9,UI CIRF,D ATTACUMC- NT
7, WRITTEN NARRATIVE (required): (stating the reason for the request for the rezone, explaining how the proposed
amendment meets the proposed rorone rec uest)
8. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (required):
9. TRAFFIC........_.. �...._._�_.�_. .._.._ . .-...-_. ..m._..w..m_m-.....-.... ..�......�
CONCURRENCY (may be required):
10. SITE PLAN (required if the rezone is associated with land use development).
11. AUTHORIZATION:
I hereby authorize the submiltal of this Rezone....
or Text Amendment Application to the City ofY... � -�
Yakima for review.
Property Owner Slguatore roll lred) Date
Note: if you have any questions about this process, please contact us City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N. 2nd St.,
Yakima, WA or 509-575-6183
ECENED
OCT 1D 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
Revised 08/2017 Page 14
DOC.
INDEX
M& Supplemental Applicationplication For:
"S
r;ayTZN
t„ tf l y�4titA YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 15.23 OCT 2
,�I� 9 201
CITY
PART R - APPLICATION INFORMATION OV
1. EXISTING ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
❑ SR ❑ R-1 X R-2 ❑ R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
2. DESIRED ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY;
❑ SR ❑ R-1 ❑ R-2 R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS ❑ RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
3. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY (check all that apply);;
X SR ❑ R-1 Lq R-2 R-3 ❑ B-1 ❑ B-2 ❑ HB ❑ SCC ❑ LCC ❑ CBD ❑ GC ❑ AS []RD ❑ M-1 ❑ M-2
4. EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION,-
E]
ESIGNATION„❑ Low Density Residential Mixed Residential ❑ Community Mixed -Use ❑ Commercial Mixed -Use
❑ CBD Commercial Core ❑ Regional Commercial ❑ Industrial
5. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:
Is there a proposed change to the Future Land Use Map? None proposed
If so what is the proposed future land use designation?
❑ Low Density Residential ❑ Mixed Residential ❑ Community Mixed -Use ❑ Commercial Mixed -Use
❑ CBD Commercial Core ❑ Regional Commercial ❑ Industrial
6. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES AVAILABLE:
Transportation Rights -Of -Way Police And Fire Protection IM Parks And Trails MSchools
Water M Sewer X Storm Drainage NElectricity Natural Gas Telephone XCableTV
PART In - REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS
7. WRITTEN NARRATIVE (required): (stating the reason for the request for the rezone, explaining how the proposed
amendment meets the ro ost d rezone r'c ucst
8. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (required):
9 TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY (may be required):
10. SITE PLAN (required if the rezone is associated with land use development):
11. AUT14ORIZATTON:
I herebye the submitta
authorize � 1 of this Rezone or Text Amendment Application to the City of Yqktna
.for review.
Proltert Owner Signature (required) Date
Note: if you have any questions about this process, please contact us City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N. 2nd St.,
Yakima, WA or 509-575-6183
Revised 08/2017 DoMage 14
SEX I
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OCT 19 2018
CoITY OF YAKIMA
181309-44009- THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 656 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18, E.W.M., LYING
NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE NACHES-COWICHE CANAL, EXCEPT
THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
STATE HIGHWAY SR -12,
AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9 WITH
THE NORTH LINE OF THE NACHES-COWICHE CANAL;
THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 9 A DISTANCE OF 252 FEET;
THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A
DISTANCE OF 110 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT OF THE NORTH LINE
OF THE NACHES-CANAL, SAID POINT BEING 200 FEET NORTHWESTERLY FROM
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NACHES-COWICHE
CANAL 200 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AND APPURTENANCES OF
RECORD.
SITUATE IN YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
181309-44403- ALL THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18, E.W.M., DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION;
THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 351 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 0°20' EAST TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE NACHES &
COWICHE DITCH CO'S CANAL;
THENCE NORTH 52°20' WEST 408.60 FEET TO AN IRON PIN;
THENCE SOUTH 19°40' WEST 672 FEET TO AN IRON PIN;
THENCE SOUTH 0°10' WEAST TO THE YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL CO.'S CANAL;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CANAL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST
HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH ALONG
SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE NACHES & COWICHE DITCH
COMPANY.
AND EXCEPT;
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP
13 NORTH, RANGE 18, E.W.M., AND THE CONCRETE LINE FO THE NACHES AND
COWICHE CANAL ON THE SOUTH SIDE THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 123 FEET;
THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE
OF 105 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION
TO THE SAID CONCRETE LINER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SAID
CONCRETE LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND EXCEPT;
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
THE SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18, E.W.M., DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9 AT A
POINT 123 FEET SOUTH OF THE LINER OF THE NACHES-COWICHE CANAL;
THENCE WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, A
DISTANCE OF 105 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF THE YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY FOR COUNTY ROAD (POWERHOUSE ROAD).
RECEIVED
OCT t 9 2018
MY OF YAKIMA
PARCEL NUMBER 181309-41006
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M., 351.0 FEET WEST OF THE EAST
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION, THENCE SOUTH 0° 20' EAST TO A POINT IN THE
NORTHERLY BANK OF THE NATCHES AND COWICHEE DITCH COMPANY'S CANAL,
THENCE NORTH 520 20' WEST 408.6 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, THENCE SOUTH 190 40' WEST
672 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, THENCE SOUTH 00 10' WEST TO THE YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL
COMPANY'S CANAL, THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CANAL TO THE WEST
LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, THENCE
NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, THENCE EAST ON SAID
NORTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALSO: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M., LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF
THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL COMPANY'S CANAL,
EXCEPT BEGINNING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9, AT A POINT 37.5 FEET SOUTHERLY,
MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE TRACK OF THE
NACHES BRANCH OF THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, SAID POINT BEING 423.4 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 9, THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE
310.2 FEET, THENCE EAST 290 FEET, THENCE NORTH 140.5 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE AFORESAID RAILWAY, THENCE NORTH 59° 40' WEST ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY 336 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF YAKIMA FOR RESERVOIR,
EXCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD NO. 5,
EXCEPT COUNTY ROADS AS SAID ROADS NOW -EXIST,
EXCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY 75 FEET IN WIDTH CONVEYED TO THE NORTH YAKIMA &
VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY,
EXCEPT ANY PORTION IN THE EAST 656 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION, AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF S.R.-12.
CBCT I D 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
_'!V
INDEX
s� ���
Supplemental Application For:
REZONES
IMIL
CITY WA YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 15.23
r
PART 1V - NAATII 'l
A. How is the subject property suitable for uses permitted under the proposed zoning?
SEE ATTACHED WRITTEN NARRATIVE FOR ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS ON THIS APPLICATION
What is the status of existing land use?
B. How is the rezone request in compliance with and/or how does the request deviate from the Yakima Urban Area
Comprehensive Plan?
C. Are there adequare public facilities, such as traffic capacity, sewer services, potable water, stormwater drainage,
schools, fire and police services, and other public services and infrastructure existing on and around the subject
property?
Are the existing public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive use of the new (requested) zone? If not,
what mitigating measures are going to be implemented to address any short falls in public services that may exist?
D. How is the proposed zone change compatible with the existing neighboring uses?
What mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as sitescreening, buffering building
design, open space traffic flow alteration, etc.?
REGENED
E. What is the public need for the proposed change? OCT rt n 2018
a 4
CITY OF YAKIM A
Note: if you have any questions about this process, please contact us City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N. 2nd St.,
Yakima, WA or 509-575-6183
Revised 08/2017 DOC -Page 1 5
PART IV - REZONE NARRATIVE
A. flow is the subject properly suitable for rises permitted under the proposed
zoning?
The property is well suited for all residential uses permitted under the proposed zoning
Multi -family Residential (R-3) zoning district. The property is relatively flat with a
gentle northerly slope between West Powerhouse Road and State Route 12. Those
portions of the property that lie south of West Powerhouse Road are too steep for
development purposes.
The property is served with domestic water by a 24 -inch water line that lies along the
right-of-way of West Powerhouse Road as it passes through the property. The nearest
sanitary sewer line is 15 -inches in diameter and is located approximately 600 feet
southeasterly of the subject property also within the right-of-way of West Powerhouse
Road. Due to the large size of the total property (approximately 43 acres), a 600 foot
sanitary sewer line extension would be reasonable in this case. The subject properties all
front on, or have access to, West Powerhouse Road, an urban arterial roadway, which can
easily be widened along the properties frontage.
The property also is located in a mixed-use land use area that consists of a state highway,
manufactured home park, agricultural area and pockets of single-family uses, which are
generally suitable and compatible with the proposed R-3 zoning district.
The above circumstances make the property suitable for the permitted land uses of the
multi -family zoning district.
What is the status of the existing land use?
The subject property consists of three parcels totaling approximately 43 acres. The site
contains 1 single-family residence, miscellaneous agricultural outbuildings, orchard and
vacant land. All urban services and facilities are available to the property, or can easily
be extended to the property, as needed. Domestic water (24 -inch main) and sewer lines
(15 -inch main) are located along West Powerhouse Road or within easy extension
distance to the property. The property has direct and indirect access to West Powerhouse
Road, an urban arterial. Electricity and telephone are currently located on-site and the
property is protected by the Yakima Fire Department and Police Department.
RECEIVED
OCT t .4 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
1 .'.....�..w.�. -'!V'
INDEX
C`1
B. How is the rezone request in coni liance with and/or how does the request
deviate from the Yakima tJr pan Area Com rehensive Plan?
The rezone request is in compliance with the City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan 2040
because the proposed rezone meets the intent of the Mixed Residential land use
designation at 2.2.2 of the comprehensive plan by its compliance with the following
statement in the Comprehensive Plan: "The proposal meets the locational criteria of
the co wehensivc Plan because the subject Vropetjj is located within established
low densiy residential communities and in other parts of the City that are
ina pro riate for more intensive urban development dere to the topography or other
land suitability challenges and/or the desire to create lower intensitV transitional
areas between the Cily and the surrounding unincorporated rural pasture foothills
andap,ricullural land".
The Mixed Residential land use designation is to provide for areas with a mixture of
housing types and densities. This proposal better implements the following goals and
policies:
Goal 2.1 -- Establish a develo ment pattern consistence with Communi 's Vision.
Policy 2.1.7.: Allow new development only where adequate public services can be
provided.
Policy 2.1.10.: Require properties to assume zoning consistent with the City's Future
Land Use Plan, as adopted or amended where appropriate.
Goal 2.2 — Provide a mix of land use designations consistent with the communi 's
vision.
Polic 2.2.2.13: Mixed lesideajtia location criteria. -- Intended for areas now
characterized by, and/or appropriate for, a mixture of housing types with a close
proximity to commercial services, transit access, and/or parks and other public
recreational amenities. This designation often creates a transition from commercial
and mixed-use areas to low density residential areas.
Goal 2.3 — Residential Uses. Preserve and enhance the quality,character and
function of Yakima's residential neighborhoods.
Policy 2.3.1 — Provide for a wide variety of housing types within the city to meet the full
range of housing needs for Yakima's evolving population. REGENED
# 1�
CITY OF YAKIMA
Policy 2.3.2 — Preserve and enhance established residential neighborhoods. Specifically
(as applicable):
A. Ensure that new development is compatible in scale, style, density and aesthetic
quality to an established neighborhood.
E. Carefully review proposed land use designation changes to more intensive
residential designations, mixed-use or industrial. Specifically:
-- Proposals should conform to locational criteria set forth for the desired designation in
the applicable policies under Goal 2.2.
-- Is the site physically suited for the proposed designation?
-- Is the desired zone one of the implementing zones of the land use designation (per
applicable policies under Goal 2.2)?
-- Avoid spot zones or similar changes that may create instability with the surrounding
neighborhood.
Goal 5.1 Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices.
Policy 5.4.2. -- Use transitional densities, design and landscape standards to ensure
housing is compatible with existing character and planned goals.
Proponent Comment — This proposal implements the comprehensive plan better
because it will provide an opportunity for a variety of housing types to occur. Just
because a property is designated and zoned for multi -family residential purposes doesn't
mean that multi -family apartment -type units will be constructed. The R-3 zoning district
permits single-family, duplex and multi -family development or a combination of all three
residential uses.
The property adjoins R-3 zoning along the northeast corner of the proposal and a
manufactured home park is located within that zoning district. Surrounding properties to
the west and east are currently zoned R-2, which permits a mixture of housing types, with
limited densities. The site can accommodate multi -family residential development, as
well as other types of residential development and is physically suited for the proposed
zoning district. Multi -family Residential Zoning R-3, would implement the Mixed
Residential land use designation as suggested by the comprehensive plan.
For the above reasons, this proposal implements compliance with Comprehensive Plan
goals and policies.
OCT "1 2018
3T" OF YAKIMA.
a
C. Are there adec nate public facilities such as traffic ca aci sewer set -vices
potable water, stormwater drainage, schools fire and police services and other
public services and infrastructure existing on the and around the subject pro : ert ?
All urban services and facilities are available to the property, or can easily be extended to
the property, as needed. The subject property is served with domestic water (24 -inch
main) and a 15 -inch sewer line is located approximately 600 feet southeast of the subject
property which can accommodate multi -family type development. The property has
direct and indirect access to West Powerhouse Road and easy access to North 401h
Avenue and State Route 12. Electricity and telephone are currently located on-site and
the property is protected by the Yakima Fire Department and Police Department.
Are the existing public facilities capable of supporting the most intensive use of the
new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating measures are going to be
implemented to address any short falls in public services that may exist?
Yes, this property can be served with the existing facilities capable of supporting the
most intensive uses, as the site is served by a 15 -inch sanitary sewer main and 24 -inch
water main. If any service or facility deficiency exists in the delivery of services to this
property, necessary mitigation will take place by the developer to ensure adequate public
services and facilities are in place at the developer's expense through future SEPA review
and land use concurrency requirements, upon the development of the property.
D. How is the proposed zone chap a compatible with the existing nei hborin
uses?
The proposed zone change is compatible with existing neighboring land uses because of
the unique characteristics of the property. The property abuts a state highway on the
north, and beyond that agricultural lands planted in orchard. Properties to the east consist
of an existing manufactured home park and a small strip of single-family residences, and
beyond that commercial activities. Property to the south rises substantially in elevation
and mainly consists of single-family residences on acreage size lots. Property to the west
consists of single-family residences, an indoor shooting range and fruit warehouses.
This proposed zone change will be compatible with existing neighboring land uses
because there are physical barriers, topography (different elevations) and existing mixed
land uses in the area that are compatible with the R-3 zoning district. Due to the large
size of the subject property, once a project is approved, adequate buffering can be
imposed to ensure compatibility.
REGE ` ED
OCT i n 20 B
CITY OF YAKIMA
What mitigating measures are planned to address incompatibility, such as
sitescreening, buffering building design, open space, traffic flow alteration, etc.?
No mitigation is proposed as part of this rezone request. However, appropriate mitigation
is built into the SEPA and zoning codes through regular site plan approval once a specific
project is proposed. Required mitigation to address compatibility would be implemented
at that time.
E1. What is the public need for the proposed change?
The public need arises from the fact that there is a documented need for additional multi-
family development in Yakima. In fact, the City of Yakima, has a serious deficiency in
multi -family zoned property. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan states, "The Runstad Center
for Real Estate Research has noted that in 2016 that in the previous year "...Yakima
County has recorded the greatest decrease in vacancy rate with a considerable drop of 5.8
percent (from 7.8% to 1.7%)." If supply does not keep up with demand, it is likely that
rental rates will increase." Since this study there have been additional reports published
showing Yakima's rental vacancies under 1%. The subject site should specifically be
used for housing purposes, and other forms of potentially permitted uses within the R-3
zoning district, such as residential mini -storage, be prohibited on the site.
Additionally, the City has provided the necessary infrastructure for this specific type of
development (i.e. major arterial roadways, easy access to the transportation network,
adequate water and waste water lines). The public expects a variety of housing types and
multi -family zoning provides that variety by permitting single-family, two-family and
multi -family within a single zoning district (R-3). This rezone meets that public need and
perspective, while using the infrastructure provided for residential development to locate
at this location.
Based on the above, a public need exists for additional multi -family residential zoning in
the City of Yakima.
OCT t n 2018
C6TY OF YAKIMA
I �''...:.... .:'V.
SQUIIIE-INGHAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER F
Public/Agency Comments
I=
F-1Comment Letter from WSDOT 11/28/2018
F-2 Comment Letter from Department of Ecology 11/30/2018
F-3 Email Comments from Phil Hoge, Yakima Bikes & Walks ..............12/05/2018
��............................ .................... _.......................�_.. ......�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�...���............................. L�.....................__..w� m.�
Maxey, Lisa
From: Maxey, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 4:28 PM
To: 'Yakima Bikes and Walks!'
Subject: RE: Comments on RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18 (Hordan/Squire-Ingham Co)
Lisa xe
0 Planning Specialist
Planning Division
p: 509.576.6669
129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, 98901
From: Yakima Bikes and Walks! [mailto:yakima.bikes@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 4:27 PM
To: Maxey, Lisa <Lisa.Maxey@YAKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: Fwd: Comments on RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18 (Hordan/Squire-Ingham Co)
Lisa, please confirm receipt. Thanks!
---Phil Hoge
Yakima Bikes and Walks!
haps,. /facebook,cot'n,/Yak Jml a 3ik s.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Yakima Bikes and Walks!" < a� . ik�e,s
Date: December 5, 2018 at 4:05:40 PM PST
To.- Joan Davenport < gan.d t alar°cam rk�t aw gc , trevor.ma.rtip y k.i.¢iIawti,,
Subject: Comments on RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18 (Hordan/Squire-Ingham Co)
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
Dept. of Community Development
129 N. 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Dear Joan:
This rezone will likely adversely impact traffic safety; and therefore I urge you to issue the
SEPA threshhold determination with a mitigating condition requiring dedication of right-of-way
along W. Powerhouse Rd. per YMC 12.06.020 standards (i.e., 80 feet of width for a Collector).
I believe that the Determination of Consistency in the Notice of Application is inappropriate in
stating that "the subject property is able to be served by public facilities." The following needed
and planned street attributes cannot currently be provided on W. Powerhouse Rd. because the
existing right-of-way width is inadequate to provide:
• 3 lanes per Fig. 4 ,,f 2040 Transportation Systems Plan (..,P).
Sidewalks per Fig. 4-6 of TSP.
• Bike Lanes per Fig. 4-8 of TSP and Complete Network Map in the Bicycle Master Plan
(Nov. 2017).
The probable adverse impact to traffic safety is based on the question in Supplemental
Application For REZONES, Part IV - NARRATIVE, C ("Are the exiting public facilities
capable of supporting the most intensive use of the new (requested) zone? If not, what mitigating
measures are going to be implemented to address any short falls in public services that may
exist?") I submit, for your consideration, that the existing right-of-way width is inadequate
to support the most intensive use in the requested R-3 zone.
Phil Hoge
Yakima Bikes and Walks!
11ti s /d v 1xm al_aa.ok coni/Yakip aBike
111 PAS FN/1 1, N Ii X 16 II 1,t. IY_0 (; Y
U'50 0 W AI der St - I Inion Gap,, WA 98903-4009 v tl"`u'09) ;/,, '2490
November 30, 2018
Trevor Martin
Community Development
City of Yakima
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Re: RZ#010-18, SEPA#027-18
Dear Trevor Martin:
Thank you for the opportunity to continent during the optional determination of nonsignificance
process for the rezone of approximately 43 acres from Two -Family Residential to Multifamily
Residential zoning district, proposed by Squire -Ingham Company. We have reviewed the
documents and have the following comments.
TOXICS CLEAN-UP
Based upon the historical agricultural use of this land, there is a possibility the soil contains
residual concentrations of pesticides. Ecology recommends that the soils be sampled and
analyzed for lead and arsenic, and for organochlorine pesticides. If these contaminants are found
at concentrations above the Model Toxics Control Act cleanup levels Ecology recommends that
potential buyers be notified of their occurrence.
If you have any questions or would like to respond to these Toxics Clean-up continents, please
contact Valerie Bound at (509) 454-7886 or email at gg .
Sincerely,
Gwen Clear
Environmental Review Coordinator
Central Regional Office
(509) 575-2012
Yv<. t.,qy
201806410
HEGEi` ED
NOV 3 0 2018
MY OF YAKIMA
MWashingtoin State South Centrall Reglion
oom Dellpartiment of Transportation 2809 RUdlkm Road
L.➢reuon G> 1p, WA 98903-1648
509- 577-1600 / F AX 509-57T 1603
t...3..Y p ..800..8 33..6388
mAN w wwsdowewa gov
November 27, 2018
City of Yakima
129 North 2nd Street REGE ED
Yakima, Washington 98901
Attention: Joan Davenport, Community Development Director NOV 2 8 2018
MY OF YAKIMA
Subject: RZ#010-18, SEPA027-18
Squire Ingham Co., US 12 / Powerhouse Road
The Washington State Department of Transportation has reviewed the proposed rezone of approximately
three parcels totaling 43 acres from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multi -family Residential (R-3).
US 12 is part of the National Highway System and borders the parcels along the northerly property line.
US 12 is a fully -controlled limited access facility with a posted speed limit of 60 m.p.h. No access to
US 12 will be allowed. The applicant should be aware that WSDOT has long-range plans to restrict
turning movements at the US 12/Ackley Road intersection to right-in/right-out only and ultimately close
the intersection. These plans are only preliminary. No decisions have been made and no funding has
been procured. It is important to note, US 12 will continue to serve the site via the US 12/40th Avenue
Interchange and the US 12/Powerhouse Road intersection.
The proposal could result in doubling the potential residential units on the site. We recommend that the
City require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) be done at this time by a licensed traffic engineer at the
proponent's expense, and submitted to the City and the WSDOT for review and comment. We request
that the TIA analyze the impacts to US 12/40th Avenue interchange and the US 12/Ackley Road
intersection. Mitigation to offset the impacts for this proposal should be identified in the traffic study.
We also request that the City assess a pro rata share contribution from the developer for improvements
to US 12 in proportion to their impacts to the interchange and/or intersection.
Stormwater and surface runoff generated by this project must be retained and treated on site in
accordance with regulating agencies' standards and not be allowed to flow onto WSDOT rights-of-way.
1,
US 12 is an existing facility. The proponent should be aware that they are proposing development in an
area with traffic noise. They should also expect that traffic noise may continue to grow into the future,
and, as an essential public facility, US 12 may need to be expanded to accommodate future traffic
growth. If the proponent is concerned with traffic noise affecting this development, it is the developer's
responsibility to dampen or deflect any traffic noise.
Any proposed lighting should be directed down towards the site, and away from US 12.
P:\459005\DEV REV\SR12\Ya kimaCity_US12Powerhouse Rezone.docx
City of Yakima
Squire Ingham Co.
Page 2
This residential subdivision adjacent to US 12 increases the likelihood of safety concerns with children
and pets. Similar to previous residential developments, the proponent will need to construct a minimum
six-foot tall solid barrier fence on the property boundary of US 12. Fencing along US 12 right of way
typically lies one -foot inside the right-of-way line.
Future development will be subject to review for their impacts to the WSDOT system as would any
other subsequent development proposed in the R3 zoning district. Impacts that are determined to be
significant will require mitigation, and it is anticipated that all costs will be borne by the development(s).
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have any questions
regarding our comments, please contact John Gruber at (509) 577-1636.
Sincerely""
aul Gonseth, P.E.
Planning Engineer
PG: jg/df
cc: SR 12, File #2018-10
Les Tumley, Area 2 Maintenance Superintendent
NOV 2 8 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
SQUIRE-INGHAM CO
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER G
Public Notices
G -I
Determination of Application Completeness
11/08/2018
G-2
Land Use Action Installation Certificate
11/14/2018
G-3
Notice of Application, SEPA & Public Hearing
G -3a: Legal Notice
G -3b: Corrected Legal Notice
G -3c: Press Release and Distribution Email
G -3d: Parties and Agencies Notified
G -3e: Affidavit of Mailing
11/15/2018
G-4
Notice of Determination of Non -Significance
G -4a: Parties and Agencies Notified
G -4b: Affidavit of Mailing
12/13/2018
G-5
YPC Agenda and Packet Distribution List
01/02/2019
G-6
YPC Agenda
01/09/2019
"an a U DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
cap cap I Planning Division
Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2,d Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
City of Yakima Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday January 9, 2019
3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
YPC Members:
Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook, Jacob Liddicoat, Robert McCormick,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel, and Philip Ostriem
Council Liaison: Jason White (District 2)
City Planning Staff:
Joan Davenport (Community Development Director), Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager),
Eric Crowell (Associate Planner), Trevor Martin (Associate Planner),
Colleda Monick (Assistant Planner), Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant),
and Lisa Maxey (Planning Specialist)
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Staff Announcements
IV. Election of Chair and Vice -Chair of the Yakima Planning Commission
V. Audience Participation
VI. Approval of Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2018
VII. Public Hearing - Non -Project Rezone
Applicant: Hordan Planning Services on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co
File Numbers: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Site Address: 5231 Powerhouse Rd
Request: Non -project rezone consisting of three parcels totaling approximately 43 acres
from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multi -Family Residential (R-3).
VIII. Other Business
IX. Adjourn
Next Meeting: January 23, 2019
YPC Staff Report & Packet Distribution List
Squire -Ingham Co
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
YPC PACKET:
Patricia Byers
Path ers907@ms ,c rn
Rob McCormick
rob mccorrrrickaircenter.com
Philip Ostriem
Philioostriem@iVl.c rr7
AGENDA & STAFF REPORT ONLY:
Squire -Ingham Co
901 Summitview Ave #250
Yakima, WA 98902
Al Rose
Silvrfx40I mLnet
aar7040@ , maml=cora
Jake Liddicoat
jake@3dyakirna.co.m.....
Hordan Planning Services
410 N 2nd St
Yakima, WA 98901
hordanplannisigseryice,s@outlook.com
Squire -Ingham Co
5231 Powerhouse Rd
Yakima, WA 98908
Date Distributed:
Bill Cook
ook.w?cha rter<net,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel
leaniie.niickel@nle.com
anrtie.mMckel
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
RE: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
wire -Ingham Co
5231 Powerhouse Rd
I, Lisa Maxey, as an employee of the City of Yakima Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of DNS. A true
and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to
the applicant, parties of record, listed SEPA agencies and all property owners of
record within a radius of 300 feet of subject property, that said property owners
are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and
that said notices were mailed by me on this 131h day of December2018.
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
Lisa Maxey
Planning Specialist
18130942004 18130942010 18131033001
C M HOLTZINGER FRUIT CO LLC LLOYD GARRETSON CO POWERHOUSE ROAD MOBILE COURT LLC
PO BOX 169 1191 NACHES HEIGHTS RD 901 SUMMITVIEW # 250
YAKIMA, WA 98907 YAKIMA, WA 98908 YAKIMA, WA 98902
............
18130941006
SQUIRE -INGHAM CO
5231 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130941009
QLII
-INGHAM __
5231 W P�WJ,1IIOUSE RD
YAK II A, WA 98908'`'"'--
18130944009
UIRI INGHAM CO
5231 W P0lWl:RMO SE RD
,_YAKIM ,yWA 989b) .- ._
181,611400
YAK IM -C TY
129 N 1h D
YAKIMA, WA 9891rv.
....._
18130944004
BRAD & TISHA BUSEY
1312 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130944008
ELICIA D ZALESNY
4811 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130943006
JOHN J & DENISE L FILLIOL
1507 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
1-81309143403
JOHN J `& DENISE L FILLICI�
1507 CITY RtStRV `iR RD
YAIMA, WA 9�I38
18130943404
KENNETH B & LORRAINE M GUNDERSON
1408 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
181,x'0941006
SQUIRE -44 aHAM CO
5231 W POW ,'RIS! USCRD
YA 'I MA, WA 98908 `., _
18,0944003
SQ%J'IRt---I•I 'HAM CO
5231 W PO'WtWU5-E80_'_.'_
YAKIMA; WA 9890''
18-131,032002
SQUIRE -l"N'OHAM CO
5231 W POWER] ID:
YAKIMA,"W 989
08
18130942017
YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL CO
1640 GARRETSON LN
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131522003
CRAIG J & AMY MARIE POULIN
1215 PECKS CANYON RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130944008
EI[ICIAD.ALESNY
4811 W PO ERHOUS RD
: YAKIMA µW"A 9890'"-�,
........ __.....
18131943007 &
JOHN J 'E°NIE L FILLIOL
1507 CITY RESER �QI-RD�
YAKIMA' J'A —9-8-9668'
8908
18131033006
JOSE & JOSEFINA CASTILLO
4705 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131033004
MURLIN D & LORI A NEFF
4807 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
1.8130941008
SQUIRE"" -IN HAM CO
5231 W PWFIOU'
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130944003
SQ,VIRE -INGHAM CO
5231 W -P 'WERHOU,"
48130941003
Y� kflVIA.CIT
129 N 2ND
YCIMA�' A 98901
7
YAKIMA"VAJ_� Y CANAL CO
1640 GARRE Q lN,z,,w
YAKIM","WA 98908
18131033005
DENNIS A & MILDRED C WEISS
4711 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131033007
FRED DILLS
PO BOX 901
MOXEE, WA 98936
18130943402
JOHN-JkDENISE L FILLICI
1507 CITYRRVOTR RD
YAKIMA, WA 9890I ""11
18131522006
JOSE LUIS & MARIA GUADALUPE BUSTOS
PO BOX 10205
YAKIMA, WA 98909
18130944006
OLIVIA & ARMANDO 0 JUAREZ
4819 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA
18130944007
TRENT & KATHRYN M FUEHRER
4815 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
Hordan Planning Services
410N2nd St
Yakima, WA 98901
31
Total Parcels - Squire -Ingham Co -
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
N'44c of t�NS
A2#k010-t8 SE�.#1c�7-18
SSI- 1a 13�8
Squire -Ingham Co
901 Summitview Ave #250
Yakima, WA 98902
Ahtanum Irrigation District
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
Cascade Natural Gas
Century Link
10705-B Gilbert Road
8113 W Grandridge Blvd
Manager
Yakima, WA 98903-9203
Kennewick, WA 99336
8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304
beth, @aP anurq npt
Yakima, WA 98902
Charter Communications
City of Union Gap
Chamber of Commerce
Kevin Chilcote
Dennis Henne, Development Director
10 North 9th Street
1005 North 16th Ave
P.O. Box 3008
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98902
Union Gap, WA 98903
chamb E@yakama.or
Department of Agriculture
Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
................ .._
Department of Commerce
Kelly McLain
Greg Griffith or Gretchen Kaehler, Deputy
PO Box 42560
State Historic Preservation Officer
Growth Management Services
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 48343
P.O. Box 42525
krrscla�n�a r.wa,, rqy
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
Olympia, WA 98504-2525
?#t�8v
......
Kt��+u�wkeam a cowrum ELe, a"boy.
Department of Ecology
....__................... ...........
Department of Ecology
..... �....._ �._.. _.. ._...
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Annie Szvetecz, SEPA PolicyLead
Gwen Clear, Regional Coordinator
Eric d
P.O. Box 47703
WA 98504 7703
Olympia,Yakima
1250 West Alder Street
1701 South 24th Ave
South
se p.(r gtstnr wa ec gov
Union Gap, WA 98903
WA 9890 2
J atr nrJ ALA ov
��_
1e anann't ec wa ov for white e wa.
_9? . g _. _. , m.�...
:cos wa,�oordin��Or c .w , qu
1 @. 1" e,.�g.
Si.y.
c tt,Downes@.df +rw+�wg caw
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Health
Department of Natural Resources
SEPA Desk
Kelly Cooper
SEPA Center
PO Box 43200
PO Box 47820
PO Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504
Olympia, WA 98504
Olympia, WA 98504
5EPAdesk e df'w:wq.gca
C 1'1."L to r@rQLW_U0
Set on r rpr.w__ r
Department of Social & Health Services
Terri Sinclair -Olson
Environmental Protection Agency
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC
Operations Support and Services Division
NEPA Review Unit
Stephen Posner, SEPA Officer
F.O. Box 45848
1200 6th Ave #900
PO Box 43172
Olympia, WA 98504
Seattle, WA 98101
Olympia, WA 98504-3172
Tcrr� Sdrn��kanr Olsxarl,d�8ts,�w��vgp+�
5,gpry��Ttntc a�.gt�v
Engineering Division
�..
............... ............... .
Bob Degrosellier and Brett Sheffield
Federal Aviation Administration,
129 N 2nd Street
Federal Aviation Administration
Seattle Airports District Office
Yakima, WA 98901
2200 W. Washington Ave
Cayla Morgan, Environmental Specialist
.ds rosseia,t, aklrnawa. ov,
Yakima, WA 98903
2200 S 216th St
brett wswheff ael .YakWwg4w@.g_Qy
Des Moines WA 98198
Nob Hill Water Association
Office of Rural and Farm Worker Housing
Governor's Office of Indian Affairs
Bob Irving, Engineering Technician
Marty Miller
PO Box 40909
6111 Tieton Drive
1400 Summitview Ave, Ste# 203
Olympia, WA 98504
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98902
bake.@nob6,i11vvatgr
7Vdartym_mr . PAc ,,,,cr
Pacific Power
Parks & Recreation Commission
Soil Conservation District
Mike Paulson
es
Jessica Logan
esRay
Wondercheck
500 North Keys Rd
PO Box 42560
56 98504
Olympia
1606 Perry Street, Ste. F
Yakima, WA 98901
,
Jessica a„ o:)pp k,s,wa gpv
Yakima, WA 98902
-------------
Trolleys
Y
United States Postal Service
US Army Corps of Engineers
Paul Edmondson
Maintenance Department
Seattle District, Re ulator Branch
g Y l
313 North 3rd Street
205 W Washington Ave
Box 3A
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98903
Seattle,P.O.
9
W
t9augd�l r ares na;��e a5_frl. r1Ji,.q
WA State Dept of Health,
Wastewater Division
WA State Attorney General's Office
Office of Drinking Water
Marc Cawley or Dana Kallevig
1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102
Christine Collins
2220 East Viola Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500
Yakima, WA 98901
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
grarc.caw1gyirgA "a.g'cry
M.... ........�...... �....� _.....
dana k all w±u okJmaw gqv
West Valley School District
_ _..�
Angela Watts, Asst. Supt. Of Business &
WSDOT
Operations
Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer
WSDOT
8902 Zier Road
2809 Rudkin Road
South Central Regionl Planning Office
Yakima, WA 98908-9299
Union Gap, WA 98903
Siamnri,in wsot„ day
urratts wvsd208.rat
_. wjA
!2 et ..�^�sdot v
WSDOT, Aviation Division
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
Yakama Nation Environmental Mgmt Program
Patrick Wright
Rocco Clark, Environmental Coordinator
Elizabeth Sanchey, Environmental Review
7702 Terminal St SW
P.O. Box 632
Coordinator
Tumwater, WA 98501
Toppenish, WA 98948
P.O. Box 151
'�w!ruf;h�iP w�drak.w�±'.�v
e�p�.ti64�lt@&a�l�e�
Toppenish, WA 98948
Siarsel7a.yr�Y�.�4q�i�a ��9'm
Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries Project
Yakima Air Terminal
Yakima County Building Department
John Marvin
Robert Peterson, Airport Asst Manager
Harold Maclean
760 Pence Road
2400 West Washington Ave
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
Yakima, WA 98909
Yakima, WA 98903
Yakima, WA 98901
ar rin, yajsag nacoMrob
[ .peter!((I) � a�kgr��a r . q wr
I tl rold. c9c-ap,@� a wim w us.
�.......
Yakima County Health District
�.._ _....u�_
Yakima County Flood Control District
Ryan Ibach, Director of Environmental Health
Terry Keenhan & Dianna Woods
Yakima County Commissioners
1210 Ahtanum Ridge Dr Ste#200
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
rrogrrims nofL_ @Ka2,y k Tjaa yHkjs
Union Gap, WA 98903
Yakima, WA 98901
yf1djc9.yykkM .w«ra,us
Te rYJ eenBA ar apo w,ra 'irro a t
ry ;¢ .ibach r c�akjma w as
_
N�ranna Woq ds s ctz y Cnu a r+4 u�
un
un
Yakima County Planning
�.�._...�._._
Lyn n De & Jason Earles
L128 ynNorth
Yakima County Public Services
Yakima CountyWater Resources Division
2nd Street, 4th Floor
Vern Redifer, Public Services Director
Brian Morgenroth
Yakima, WA 98901
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
aar� Degtrit„k r: akima r wus
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98901
JC7w N. m� VgES�i) yc .WU . 4-s
1i fa . d N e & yr9 4q kir YAt g1
t rir 7i ili¢ P1fq :I„ to, r� t9f�� gM1us,
Yakima Greenway Foundation
Yakama Indian Nation
Kellie Connaughton, Executive Director
Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources
Yakama Indian Nation
111 South 18th Street
Program
Ruth Jim, Yakima Tribal Council
Yakima, WA 98901
P.O. Box 151
P.O. Box 151
lle aksrn g!?,Q, a " _,g
Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakama Indian
Toppenish, WA 98948
_.. _.._...
Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency
_ ....
_...... _ _..,.......�...
Hasan Tahat, Engineering & Planning
Yakima School District
Yakima School District
Supervisor
Dr. Jack Irion, Superintendent
Scott Izutsu , Associate Superintendent
329 North 1st Street
104 North 4th Ave
104 N 4th Ave
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98902
aSaq"9 6C' [caa.^ p^
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District
Yakima Valley Canal Co
Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
Sandra Hull
Robert Smoot
Mike Shuttleworth, Planning Manager
470 Camp 4 Rd
1640 Garretson Lane
311 North 4th Street, Ste# 202
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98901
iGke s1larttle�waaptb@y po ,or,
Yakima Valley Museum
..
Yakima Waste Systems
.. _ _............ _._. _..
John A. Baule, Director
Keith Kovalenko, District Manager
2105 Drive
2812 1/2 Terrace Heights Dr.
WAton
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98901
DOC.
jt qn y iq , the rrgr seulrm.
k—gil k@vr tpgorunections cq.
Ahtanum Irrigation District
Century Link
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
Cascade Natural Gas
Manager
10705-B Gilbert Road
8113 W Gran Blvd
8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304
Yakima, WA 98903
KennewickWA 99
99
, 336
Yakima, WA 98902
Charter Communications
City of Union Gap
Department of Agriculture
Kevin Chilcote
Dennis Henne, Development Director
Kelly McLain
1005 North 16th Ave
P.O. Box 3008
P.O. Box 42560
Yakima, WA 98902
Union Gap, WA 98903
Olympia, WA 98504
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Aviation Administration, Seattle
NEPA Review Unit
Federal Aviation Administration
Airports District Office
1200 6th Ave #900
2200 W. Washington Ave
Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner
Seattle, WA 98101
Yakima, WA 98903
1601 Lind Ave SW
Renton, WA 98055-4056
Governor's Office of Indian Affairs
Pacific Power
Soil Conservation District
PO Box 40909
Mike Paulson
Ray Wondercheck
Olympia, WA 98504
500 North Keys Rd
1606 Perry Street, Ste. F
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98902
Trolleys
Y
United States Postal Service
US Army Corps of Engineers
Paul Edmondson
Maintenance Deptartment
Seattle District
313 North 3rd Street
205 W Washington Ave
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98903
P.O. Box 37 55
37
Seattle, 98124-3755
WA State Dept of Health,
WA State Attorney General's Office
Office of Drinking Water
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102
Christine Collins
Superintendent
Yakima, WA 98902
16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500
P.O. Box 632
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakama Indian Nation
Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources I
Yakama Indian Nation
Yakima School District
Program
Ruth Jim, Yakima Tribal Council
Dr. Jack Irion, Superintendent
P.O. Box 151
P.O. Box 151
104 North 4th Ave
Toppenish, WA 98948
...._. _ _.. ...
Toppenish, WA 98948
....... ......... . ..._ __. ® ....
Yakima, WA 98902
.... -..___
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District
Yakima Valley Canal Co
� ..
Sandra Hull
Robert Smoot
470 Camp 4 Rd
1640 Garretson Lane
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98908
\\Apollo\Shared\Planning\Assignments-Planning\LABELS and FORMS\SEPA REVIEWING AGENCIES updated 11.16.18 -Form List.docx
Type of Notice: TU 0
File Number:
Date of Mailing:
DNS
Parties of &-%;ord - Squire -Ingham Co - RZ#010-18 & —TA027-18
Hordan Planning Services
Squire -Ingham Co
Squire -Ingham Co
410 N 2°d St
901 Summitview Ave #250
5231 Powerhouse Rd
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98908
��firi�n�t,I�9aa�►trrg�grvtc,e��,a�alt;&ca�adc �al_�x
Code Administration
Joe. Carus rx)y klaw Pov
Yakima Bikes and Walks
Department of Ecology�
p
y -
WA State Dept of Transportation
c/o Phil Hoge
Attn: Gwen Clear
South Centra Region
yakinia, ikes@gin4r.,1�crim
1250 W Alder St
Attn: Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer
John Zabell
Union Gap, WA 98903
2809 Rudkin Rd
...- _ ....
Pedro Contreras
....
........__
Code Administration
Union Gap, WA 98903
In -House Distribution E-mail List
Name
Division
E-mail Address
....... _..
Carolyn Belles
........
Code Administrationarolyn
11pitep l)y tllaw4,,,gr v
_.....W
Glenn Denman
_._...
Code Administration
61 �,-
Joe Caruso
Code Administration
Joe. Carus rx)y klaw Pov
Suzanne DeBusschere
Code Administration
SuratW v
lakAr ywvar
Vick DeOchoa
Code Administration
„nnnnnnnnnn
Vick.DcOc& oa ovwa,,g
Linda Rossignol
Code Administration
Li,nda,l(oss�loldy itljllg �a gqy
John Zabell
- .............__
Code Administration
A ..-...... -
John. Zabell c7 ttkirnaw�, °atw
..._ y -__ . _v
...- _ ....
Pedro Contreras
....
........__
Code Administration
Pedro- -eras gov
Kelli Horton
Code Administration
..... _.......
KelmIi LL(j tqr ygtml nttt gpy
Joan Davenport
Community Development
Moan, av npfrrt ))y ,l rtnayv iv;
Dan Riddle
Engineering
Daiwt RiddleL�yakrniµa;wa goy
Mike Shane
Engineering
ik Shan yakijr4_ ,.gt�
.........._
Pat Reid
Fire Dept
Pail ci0 irbahimaw y
...............- .... ....
Jeff Cutter
_M ......
Legal Dept
......
J 1T.Cuter yakrn awn. ov
Sara Watkins
Legal Dept
Sara,4ratkrt��S@yA_W:".gvy.
w- .......
Archie Matthews
......
ONDS
Archy�wlatl,hew�„ ariyakrmgwjgi v
JoCalhoun
seph
Planning Division
t_�Mlottnc� akrtlrirwi goy,
Scott Schafer
...........
....
Public Works Dept
Scott. cliafet�, i ya tt awa rr
__.....M
Loretta Zammarchi
.......__
Refuse Division
_
1 rctlif Tail rii4r h ikrr i, w r giay
_._._..M _
Randy Layman
_ ...... _............ _ -
Refuse Division
-.
Randy 1 a�ywl,��n ��yakimawa_ggy
.......
Naeem Kara
..._._
................
Transit Division
__ .......
Nam n Karig riyatkijjt,nwa gqy
James Dean
Utilities
jartis,1,) a i.,aw,!�iga�v
Dana Kallevig
-
Wastewater
-_
lnawi aklrna4gciw
__..m.�ally_ g,y
Randy Meloy
Wastewater
r�ANy Meloy@N?ktmawa gov
For the Record/File --
�.___
- Revised � _ /
sed 12/2018
Type of Notice:
File Number:.
Date of Mailing:
Maxey, Lisa
From:
Maxey, Lisa
Sent:
Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:41 AM
To:
Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Calhoun, Joseph; Caruso, Joe; Contreras, Pedro; Cutter,
Jeff; Davenport, Joan; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; DeOchoa,
Vick; Desgrosellier, Bob; Horton, Kelli; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Kallevig, Dana; Kara, Naeem;
Layman, Randy; Matthews, Archie; Maxey, Lisa; Meloy, Randy; Reid, Patrick; Riddle, Dan;
Rossignol, Linda; Schafer, Scott; Shane, Mike; Watkins, Sara; Zabell, John; Zammarchi,
Loretta; Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann Brulotte; Cawley, Marc; Chamber of
Commerce; Department of Agriculture; Department of Commerce (CTED) - Review
Team; Department of Ecology; Department of Ecology - Lori White; Department of
Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO Coordinator; Department of Fish
and Wildlife; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric Bartrand; Department of Fish and
Wildlife - Scott Downes; Department of Natural Resources; Department of Social &
Health Services; Dept. Archaeology & Historic Preservation - SEPA Review; Energy
Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner; Nob Hill Water - Bob Irving; Office of
Rural & Farmworker Housing - Marty Miller, Peterson, Robert; Scott Izutsu - Yakima
School District; Sheffield, Brett; US Army Corps of Engineers - David Moore; WA State
Parks & Recreation Commission; West Valley School District - Angela Watts; WSDOT -
Paul Gonseth; WSDOT - South Central Regional Planning Office; WSDOT Aviation -
Patrick Wright; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark; Yakama Nation
Environmental Management Program - Elizabeth Sanchey; Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries -
John Marvin; Yakima County Building Official - Harold Maclean; Yakima County
Commissioners; Yakima County Flood Control District - Dianna Woods; Yakima County
Flood Control District - Terry Keenhan; Yakima County Health District; Yakima County
Health District - Ryan Ibach; Yakima County Planning - Zoning/Sub - Jason Earles;
Yakima County Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public Services
Director, Vern Redifer; Yakima County Water Resources Division - Brian Morgenroth;
Yakima Greenway Foundation - Kellie Connaughton; Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency
- Hasan Tahat; Yakima Valley Conference of Governments - Mike Shuttleworth; Yakima
Valley Museum - John A. Baule; Yakima Waste Systems - Keith Kovalenko; Al Rose;
Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Jacob Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel; Patricia
Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick; White, Jason; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net)
Cc:
Martin, Trevor
Subject:
Notice of DNS - Squire -Ingham Co - RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Attachments:
NOTICE OF DNS_Squire-Ingham Co - RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18.pdf
Attached is a Notice of Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) regarding the above -entitled project. If you
have any questions about this proposal, please contact assigned planner Trevor Martin at (509) 575-6162 or
email to: trevor,martin akima ra. ov. Thank you!
Lisa
Planning Specialist
Planning Division
p: 509.576.6669
129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, 98901
DEF TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL MENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
Nanning Division
4: I VW Joseph Calhoun, Manager
A� n u� Y � mN F M A K f a A129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901 anning
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
December 13, 2018
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant has proposed a non -project rezone consisting of three
parcels, totaling approximately 43 acres, from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multifamily (R-3).
LOCATION:
5231 W Powerhouse Rd.
PARCEL NUMBER:
181309-41006, -44003, & -44009
PROPONENT:
Hordan Planning Services
PROPERTY OWNER:
Squire -Ingram Co.
LEAD AGENCY:
City of Yakima
FILE NUMBERS: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
® This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355.
There is no further comment period on the DNS.
Responsible Official: Joan Davenport
Position/Title: SEPA Responsible Official
Phone (509) 575-6183
Address: 129 N. 2nd Street, Yakima WA 98901
Date: December 13 2018 Signature
® You may appeal this determination to: Joan Davenport, AICP, Director of Community
Development, at 129 N. 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901.
No later than: December 27, 2018.
By method: Complete appeal application form and payment of 580.00 appeal fee.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the City of Yakima Planning
Division to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
RE: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
Squire -Ingham Co
5231 W Powerhouse Rd
I, Lisa Maxey, as an employee of the City of Yakima Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application,
Environmental Review, and Public Hearing. A true and correct copy of which
is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the property owner and
applicant, SEPA reviewing agencies, and all property owners of record within a
radius of 300 feet of the subject property; that said are individually listed on the
mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed
by me on the 15th day of November, 2018.
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
r
Lisa Maxey
Planning Specialist
18130942004 18130942010 18131033001
C M HOLTZINGER FRUIT CO LLC LLOYD GARRETSON CO POWERHOUSE ROAD MOBILE COURT LLC
PO BOX 169 1191 NACHES HEIGHTS RD 901 SUMMITVIEW # 250
YAKIMA, WA 98907 YAKIMA, WA 98908 YAKIMA, WA 98902
18130941006
SQUIRE -INGHAM CO
5231 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130941009
SQU-IR,-INGHAM CO,. '
5231 W ISOUi°OSE RD
YAKIMA; 98"§,08,..
.� ........
18130944009
SU1RJm.-,INM,,.00: N
5231 Wp RHOUSE RD
YAM”, WA 989 }8ww., m
18131611400
__YAKIMA"" CITY
129 N 2PgO
18130944004
BRAD & TISHA BUSEY
1312 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130944008
ELICIA D ZALESNY
4811 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
_........_.._ �. ..............
18130943006
JOHN J & DENISE L FILLIOL
1507 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18130943403
)`OftJ & DENISE L FILLIOL
1507 3;TY RESER
........................
18130943404
KENNETH B & LORRAINE M GUNDERSON
1408 CITY RESERVOIR RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
Z130941006
-INGHAM CO
5231 W µPOWER H Sr
YAKI MA„-,�A°9`'908.
8/30944003
SQU'IRE,lNGHAM,-CO
5231 W_P86HOUSE RD
YAAA6, WA 98918,,,
1131032002
SQUIR&zINGHAM C F,...
5231 W PV OUSE RD
Y;KiM, WA 98903`
18130942017
YAKIMA VALLEY CANAL CO
1640 GARRETSON LN
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131522003
CRAIG J & AMY MARIE POULIN
1215 PECKS CANYON RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
15130944008
ELICIA -Z"A` ES Y
4811 W ROWE'R14 0S R.
—YAKi"OA, WA 98908 "
1§130943007
JOIN J,. DENISE L FILLIOL
1507 CliY_R� RVOT RO"
"A -KIM, WA 9890'.4
18131033006
JOSE & JOSEFINA CASTILLO
4705 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131033004
MURLIN D & LORI A NEFF
4807 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
8130941008
SQUIRE-,,-,I,N,GHAM CO
5231 W POW,EF 1OUI
Y"KI MA� VtfA 989C�8'�
18130944003
SQUIRE—INGHAM Dw "
5231 W P -OW HO, E RD
,,Y:AKiM�, WA 98908
18130941003
YAKII" ,A CITY
129 N 2NOT
YAKIMA, WA 9840' „
...- ........ —
18130942017
YAI`IMA,'VALL_E� � d°Attti µ_"_..,
164.J5A S , LN
--V4KIMA, WA 9890 "
18131033005
DENNIS A & MILDRED C WEISS
4711 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
18131033007
FRED DILLS
PO BOX 901
MOXEE, WA 98936
JOHN J &-RENISE L FILLIOL
15_07 w' R9i mOTRlRD'-
AKIMA, WA 98908----,,
18131522006
JOSE LUIS & MARIA GUADALUPE BUSTOS
PO BOX 10205
YAKIMA, WA 98909
18130944006
OLIVIA & ARMANDO 0 JUAREZ
4819 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA
:
18130944007
TRENT & KATHRYN M FUEHRER
4815 W POWERHOUSE RD
YAKIMA, WA 98908
Hordan Planning Services
410N2nd St
Yakima, WA 98901
31
Total Parcels - Squire -Ingham Co -
RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
M
Squire -Ingham Co
901 Summitview Ave #250
Yakima, WA 98902
IPamIF
Ahtanum Irrigation District
Chamber of Commerce
Department of Agriculture
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
10 North 9th Street
Kelly McLain
425
10705-B Gilbert Road
Yakima, WA 98901
Olympia,Box
WA 98504
Yakima, WA 98903-9203
m
clic .µ_be ... �Yd�srfrra erg
ararlam
betNab�w�lN�t"�q"uura�,.w"a�;N,
Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Department of Commerce
Department of Ecology
Greg Griffith or Gretchen Kaehler, Deputy State
Growth Management Services
Annie Szvetecz, SEPA Policy Lead
Historic Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 42525
P.O. Box 47703
P.O. Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504-2525
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Olympia,
Olympia, A 9850v 8343
r� r.om
revge � eaw"n rnerrce.w,�otr
par0grst, r�ecy wa ov
P�'�_�• �..
W
----
.._.._.._-_..._�.���_.._
�Paur�gta=C�rdua.d��cavloel,+,+�,9roFt�?tmy�rvra�wgca,ar
—_
Department of Ecology
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Gwen Clear, Regional Coordinator
Eric Bartrand
SEPA Desk
1250 West Alder Street
1701 South 24th Ave
PO Box 43200
Union Gap, WA 98903
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia, WA 98504
Ciryrk54��.d7Wrdan�a.4raremY.,Saa.,,g,pw
Erac BJlrtrart�dir7dFw a.p
.._ ...._.
EPAdG., ki9fW"y,qKa•U'
h�ktt_;CJ'4twi"tl� S��iifw,MW��.,g,{7V
Department of Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Social & Health Services
Kelly Cooper
SEPA Center
Terri Sinclair -Olson
PO Box 47820
PO Box 47015
Operations Support and Services Division
Olympia, WA 98504
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 45848
KeNpy taacrlrer7do. va, u�;
car wa favOlympia,
WA 98504
Terri 5rncl:ai 01�z�c�� shw wr t.g�a
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC
Engineering Division
Nob Hill Water Association
Stephen Posner, SEPA Officer
Bob Degrosellier and Brett Sheffield, City
Bob Irving, Engineering Technician
PO Box 43172
Engineer
129 N 2nd Street
6111 Tieton Drive
Olympia, WA 98504-3172
Yakima WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98908
spona,rutc w,.gtar
dna kxNNevi
. I u - k@ya ima %vq.& ,
taa�mrceNjJrNNvraRrr.re:
Office of Rural and Farm Worker Housing
Parks & Recreation Commission
US Army Corps of Engineers
Marty Miller
Jessica Logan
Seattle District
1400 Summitview Ave, Ste# 203
PO Box 42560
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 3755
N4Nap yrore �omN t,awg
JexsmpnwJm Nof;4pt c S�rkxw .J;ov
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
&vi LN..j.rnw re'.,tvNsa CC' adrn..y,!'nPl
Wastewater Division
West Valley School District
WSDOT
Marc Cawley or Dana Kallevig
Angela Watts, Asst. Supt. Of Business &
Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer
2220 East Viola Ave
Operations
2809 Rudkin Road
Yakima, WA 98901
8902 Zier Road
Union Gap, WA 98903
marc,caw ey'@y4kpmavra,8 w
Yakima, WA 98908-9299
gocpspkp wwn do .
dAna k41Btgvi kigy a;, ,av
wat sa�wvst m
WSDOT
WSDOT, Aviation Division
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
South Central Region) Planning Office
Patrick Wright
Rocco Clark, Environmental Coordinator
SCPtlanninwsd0t wa rsv
g
7702 Terminal St SW
P.O. Box 632
Tumwater, WA 98501
To ppenish, WA 98948
_....... ----- .
Wr 9h01@ws_eq! wa.8<ay'
Rgcca t' r ? Lra�
_.............. ... ...... ....... ...............
Yakama Nation Environmental Mgmt Program
Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries Project
Yakima Air Terminal
Elizabeth Sanchey, Environmental Review
John Marvin
Robert Peterson, Airport Asst Manager
Coordinator
760 Pence Road
2400 West Washington Ave
P.O. Box 151
Yakima, WA 98909
Yakima, WA 98903
Toppenish, WA 98948
Jma1Yjq@'y4Ncatl
u
-..
www-------- —
Yakima County Health District
._.-. .._._--- ....-.--- ..�.._.. --.-------
Yakima County Flood Control District
YakimITIT�._._-
Yakima County Commissioners
Ryan Ibach, Director of Environmental Health
Terry Keenhan & Dianna Woods
CO
128 North 2^d Street, 4t^ Floor
1210 Ahtanum Ridge Dr Ste#200
Yakima, WA 98901
Union Gap, WA 98903
1feriry fGgr„nh �riCE my"' kgma,wa,ui5 '
N��4Y akam
Ytd@•• y r', wv i rus
uihanrq s vt aods�ca,y,kPnra wags
y„aktre"Xa wa 9a*s
r ,A k7 GaC.h rMGS�_.
....................................
Yakima County Planning
........ _.........
Yakima County Public Services
..
Yakima County Water Resources Division
Lynn Deitrick & Jason Earles
Vern Redifer, Public Services Director
Brian Morgenroth
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
128 North 2nd Street, 41h Floor !
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98901
Nyrrga Darrrck a?co y&Lm1
-Vern. redfer, ro �im4.w.us
aanmti(mmott.coy kinna wa,uak
JasanXareur,a yaka� a4mw �s
—
Yakima Greenway Foundation
Kellie Connaughton, Executive Director
111 South 18th Street
Yakima, WA 98901
k�gft(ftpk�njagEe
, _ _ _p9Aty,.qL(S
Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
Mike Shuttleworth, Planning Manager
311 North 4th Street, Ste# 202
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency
Hasan Tahat, Engineering & Planning Supervisor
329 North 1st Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima Valley Museum
John A. Baule, Director
2105 Tieton Drive
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima School District
Scott lzutsu , Associate Superintendent
104 N 4th Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
jzutSYAcotta
Yakima Waste Systems
Keith Kovalenko, District Manager
2812 1/2 Terrace Heights Dr.
Yakima, WA 98901
ke t O)w conq tjpfj�x
I 'kL4�4� --om--
IND X
4� -�` 3��
Century Link
Charter Communications
City of Union Gap
Manager
Kevin Chilcote
Dennis Henne, Development Director
8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304
1005 North 16th Ave
P.O. Box 3008
Yakima, WA 98902
. ........
Yakima, WA 98902
_ ....... ..
Union Gap, WA 98903
Department of Agriculture
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Aviation Administration
Kelly McLain
NEPA Review Unit
2200 W. Washington Ave
P.O. Box 42560
1200 6th Ave #900
Yakima, WA 98903
Olympia, WA 98504
Seattle, WA 98101
Federal Aviation Administration, Seattle
Governor's Office of Indian Affairs
Pacific Power
Airports District Office
Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner
PO Box 40909
Mike Paulson
1601 Lind Ave SW
Olympia, WA 98504
500 North Keys Rd
Renton, WA 98055-4056
Yakima, WA 98901
Soil Conservation District
Trolleys
United States Postal Service
Ray Wondercheck
Paul Edmondson
Maintenance Deptartment
1606 Perry Street, Ste. F
313 North 3rd Street
205 W Washington Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98903
WA State Attorney General's Office
Eastern Drinking Water Operations
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102
River View Corporate Center
Superintendent
Yakima, WA 98902
16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500
P.O. Box 632
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Toppenish, WA 98948
......... _...... _ ........ ......._.......... ......_
Yakama Indian Nation
Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources
_.. ............... _.
Yakama Indian Nation
.......
Yakima School District
Program
Ruth Jim, Yakima Tribal Council
Dr. Jack Irion, Superintendent
P.O. Box 151
P.O. Box 151
104 North 4th Ave
Toppenish, WA 98948
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima Valley Canal Co
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District
Cascade Natural Gas
Robert Smoot
Sandra Hull
8113 W Grandridge Blvd
1640 Garretson Lane
470 Camp 4 Rd
Kennewick, WA 99336
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98908
Ahtanum Irrigation District
US Army Corps of Engineers
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
Seattle District
10705-B Gilbert Road
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98903
P.O. Box 3755
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
\\Apollo\Shared\Planning\Assignments-Planning\LABELS and FORMS\SEPA REVIEWING AGENCIES _updated 10.29.18 - Form List.doa
Type of Notice:)' i
, ��-�;
File Number: 1)1)2-: _ A r) —
Date of Mail
INDEX
*MIL.
.............................. ..._._..._...__.._
In -House Distribution E-mail List
Name
Division
E-mail Address
Carolyn Belles
Code Administration
C arolyrO ll s CJ y I� ian yv a gray I
Glenn Denman
Code Administration
G1 ii# Denniar� ca k,�lxl ryrt gpy:
.....................
Joe Caruso
_......
Code Administration
...— .._.._.._........ ...... _.....
Joe.Cap rakiinavwa gnyw
Suzanne DeBusschere
Code Administration
�+tnc 1_lrrc#�arcry<lkoramwagaw
Vick DeOchoa
Code Administration
Vick.DcOch &y kin gtl?r
Linda Rossignol
Code Administration __.......
1 ind 1ossinrlalwrya�ya.goy
.._....
John Zabell
..............W
Code Administration
---._._ .........
Jolie zab 11, yakn ra m gp ,
Pedro Contreras
_._. __.ry
Code Administration
..................
Pcdraa (ont�N eras ti y jl i pavva g
Kelli Horton
__
Code Administration
..
Kelli lo�r_lqn@ y k
Joan Davenport
Community Development
Joan.iaveiilacattCyakrntawa
Dan Riddle
g. g
En meenn
fJaii �'K�le �� awrrr�r�� gay
..._m__ y m - m
Mike Shane
._.....W_ ._.......
Engineering
G #r_ , Shanc C yakl#rra! n pv
_..
Pat Reid
Fire Dept
..
li t Reid@ya�krr ywa ga w„
Jeff Cutter ...������.��
__.
Legal Dept
� � m g.....v .___..
#ef"t".� utter t�y��iiawa, ro
Sara Watkins
Legal Dept
Sara.Watkins(a�
Archie Matthews
ONDS
. .......... ..... .._
,,ra mi G'�^l�atthew. Zi) krrnavra ov
Joseph Calhoun
Division
.. ..............
Jn l ,h.Calla wrmr r yakiniawa g My
Chief Rizzi
rPlanning
Department
Pgn1 rlrq„ m r r� ,y mina lz,gn.........._.__._
Schafer
Works Dept
_ ....._Scott
Scott S l al r ry kria gwya ga y
Loretta Zammarchi _Refuse
Division
# iaretia Zainl"rrar chi _aki�ar,a.ga��w
Randy Layman
Refuse Division
k ar r.ly ,Lay r�ian�r yakrmavya &C
_ .
Naeem Kara
...........
Transit Divlslon
_ ........
1�9ac, nnr Kar i 04411rr�yytin:.g y
_...0
James Dean_
.._.._.M ........
Utilities
#a 1aiaryaktr,.111 awra.gov
Dana Kallevig
Wastewater
Dana.K�allearr C yalciin wa..ggy
Randy Meloy
.........0
Wastewater
_.........._
Randy, 1"�/lel�ay ct�y kitna ya.ggy
For the Record/File
_._ .__M ....
_ _.. _..... _.
�......_
Binder Copy
..._.......
.... _....
Revised 10/2018
Type of Notice•,.�n1#"'
•
:..
File Number(s):
Date of Mailing:
Maxe , Lisa
From:
Maxey, Lisa
Sent:
Thursday, November 15, 2018 10:08 AM
To:
Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Calhoun, Joseph; Caruso, Joe; Contreras, Pedro; Cutter,
Jeff; Davenport, Joan; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; DeOchoa,
Vick; Desgrosellier, Bob; Horton, Kelli; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Kallevig, Dana; Kara, Naeem;
Layman, Randy; Matthews, Archie; Maxey, Lisa; Meloy, Randy; Reid, Patrick; Riddle, Dan;
Rizzi, Dominic; Rossignol, Linda; Schafer, Scott; Shane, Mike; Watkins, Sara; Zabell, John;
Zammarchi, Loretta; Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann Brulotte; Cawley, Marc;
Chamber of Commerce; Department of Agriculture; Department of Commerce (CTED) -
Review Team; Department of Ecology; Department of Ecology - Lori White; Department
of Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO Coordinator; Department of
Fish and Wildlife; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric Bartrand; Department of Fish
and Wildlife - Scott Downes; Department of Natural Resources; Department of Social &
Health Services; Dept. Archaeology & Historic Preservation - SEPA Review; Energy
Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner; Nob Hill Water - Bob Irving; Office of
Rural & Farmworker Housing - Marty Miller; Peterson, Robert; Scott Izutsu - Yakima
School District; US Army Corps of Engineers - David Moore; WA State Parks &
Recreation Commission; West Valley School District - Angela Watts; WSDOT - Paul
Gonseth; WSDOT - South Central Regional Planning Office; WSDOT Aviation - Patrick
Wright; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark; Yakama Nation Environmental
Management Program - Elizabeth Sanchey; Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries - John Marvin;
Yakima County Building Official - Harold Maclean; Yakima County Commissioners;
Yakima County Flood Control District - Dianna Woods; Yakima County Flood Control
District - Terry Keenhan; Yakima County Health District; Yakima County Health District -
Ryan Ibach; Yakima County Planning - Zoning/Sub - Jason Earles; Yakima County
Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public Services Director, Vern Redifer;
Yakima County Water Resources Division - Brian Morgenroth; Yakima Greenway
Foundation - Kellie Connaughton; Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency - Hasan Tahat;
Yakima Valley Conference of Governments - Mike Shuttleworth; Yakima Valley Museum
- John A. Baule; Yakima Waste Systems - Keith Kovalenko; Associated Press; Bastinelli,
Mike; Brown, Michael; Davido, Sean; EI Mundo; EI Sol de Yakima; Fannin, John; Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce; KAPP TV News; KBBO-KRSE Radio - manager; KCJT TV News;
KDNA Noticias; KDNA Radio - Francisco Rios; KEPR TV News; KIMA TV News; KIT News;
KIT/KATS/DMVW/KFFM - Lance Tormey; KNDO TV News; KNDU TV News; KUNW-TV
Univision; KVEW TV News; La Casa Hogar; La Voz; Lozano, Bonnie; NWCN News; NWPR
- Anna King; Randy Luvaas - Yakima Business Times; RCDR - Maria DJ Rodriguez; Reed
C. Pell; Tu Decides; Tu Decides - Albert Torres; Yakima Herald Republic - Mai Hoang;
Yakima Herald Republic Newspaper; Yakima School District - Jack Irion; Yakima Valley
Business Times; Yakima Valley Business Times - George Finch; Beehler, Randy; Al Rose;
Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Jacob Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel; Patricia
Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick; White, Jason; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net)
Cc:
Martin, Trevor
Subject:
Notice of Application, SEPA & YPC Public Hearing - Squire -Ingham Co - RZ#010-18 &
SEPA#027-18
Attachments:
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, SEPA & HEARING - Squire -Ingham Co - RZ SEPA.PDF
Attached is a Notice of Application, SEPA Environmental Review, and Public Hearing regarding the above -
entitled project. If you have any questions about this proposal, please contact assigned planner Trevor Martin
at (509) 575-6162 or email to: tNovor,mart _ ak,iiriavAgo�. Thank you!
C
Lisa y
Planning Specialist
" Planning Division
p: 509.576.6669
129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, 98901
INDEX
—.w2- G—
'LIC
YAKIMA, fi jRA1j'
PIU"B'
gao�,e, r
1
�I
k
A daily part of your life ����;,�� yakima-herald,com
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below.
Please proof read notice carefully to check spelling and run dates,
if you need to make changes
Date: 11/15/18
Account #: 110358
Company Name:
CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING
Contact:
ROSALINDA IBARRA,AP
Address:
129 N 2ND STREET
Ad ID:
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2720
Telephone:
(509) 575-6164
Fax:
11/19/18
Account Rep:
Simon Sizer
Phone #
(509) 577-7740
Email:
ssizer@yakimaherald.com
Ad ID:
852927
Start:
11/19/18
Stop:
11/19/18
Total Cost:
$321.20
Lines:
176.0
# of Inserts:
1
Ad Class:
6021
Yakima Herald -Republic 11/19/18
CITY OF YAKIMA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,
& PUBLIC HEARING
(REVISED FROM THE 11/15/18 LEGAL AD TO CORRECT
THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE)
DATE; 11/1512018; r'RQ.J,E,CTM_Cfl1 T),R N Non -project
rezone proposal to rezone three (;3) parcels, approxi-
mate] 43 acres In size, from Two -Family Residential '(8-2)
to=ufampty Residential (R-3); APPLICANT; Hordan
Planning Services on behalf of Squire -Ingham Cc; FILE
NUMBER: RZ#010.10& SEPA#027-18; LOCATION: 5231
Powerhouse Rd; TAX'. PARCEL NUMEER(S).181309-41006,
•44003, and -44009„ DATE OF APPLICATION: 10119/2018;
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 11/8/2018; DETERMINATION
Of,_,CQ
N-STEN.t Pursuant to YMC § 16.06 020(A), the
project considerations are determined to be consistent with
applicable development regulations, as foflowss 1) The type
of land use: Non -project Rezone and SEPA Environmental
Review; 2) Level of Development: Non project Rezone„ No
significant development has been proposed as par I of lire
Rezone; 3) Infrastructure and public facititles. The subject
property is able to be served by public streets, water, sewer,
garbage collection, etc; and 4) Characteristics of develop-
ment: The proposal shall adhere to all Title 12 and Title 15
development standards; Pursuant to YMC § 16,06D20(13),
tNroedeuuePopnlent regulaffons and comprehensive pian con.
sideration's are found to be consistent, as follows: 1) T'he
type of land use. Rezone and SEPA Environmental Review;
2) Density of Developmerw The Mullifamliy zoning district
allow for 13.1. dweling units per Not Residential Acre, and 3)
Availability' and adequacy of infrastructure and public utillfies:
The subject property Is able to be served by public facilities;
tiCTIMC;F'. 'NV:II . N ENTAL BEY"t; This is to noldy
agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise and
the public that the City of Yakima, Planning Division, has been
established as the lead agency,. under WAC § 197.11.928 for
this project. The Clty of Yakime has reviewed the proposed
project for probable adverse environmental impacts and
expects to isstw a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
per WAC § 197.11.355. The proposal may include mitigation
measures under applicable codes and the project review pro»
cess may' incorporate or require mitigation measures regard.
loss of whether an EIS Is prepared. A copy of the subsequent
SEPA threshold determination will be mailed to parties of
record and entities who were provided this nolrce and may be
appealed pursuant to YMC;§ 6.88.170; Required Permits.
The following local, state, and federal permits/approavals may
or wilt be needed for this project: NIA; Required Studies:
NIA; Existing Environmental Documents: Noneu Develop-
ment Regulations for Project Mitigation and Consistency
Include: the State Environmental Policy Act, the Yakima
Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title f2—Development
Slandards, .and the Yakima urban Area Comprehensive
Plan, BEQUE,. T-FW..NN1fT N-QQMM N.T.ANP—N"I OTJC ,..
ER LI...:NCA M, Agencies, tribes, and the public
are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed
project and its probable environmental imparts There is a.
20 -day comment period for this review This may be your only
opportunity to comment. All written comments received by
5.00 pmi,. on December 5, 2018„ will be considered prior to
issuing the final NEPA determinatlon, This request requires
that. the Planning Commission hold an open record public
hearing, which is scheduled for January 9, 2019 at 3:00
p.m., in the City of Yakima Council Chambers, City Hail, 129
N. 2nd SL, Yakima, WA, Any person desiring to express their
views on the mailer is invited toattend the hearing to provide
testimony. Please reference file numbers (RZ#0t0-18, 0
SEPA#027-18) and applicant's name (Squire -Ingham Co)
In any correspondence you submit. You can mail your com-
ments to. Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Develop-
ment Director; City of Yakima, Department of Community
Development; 129 N. 2nd St,.; Yakima, Wit 98901„NOTICE
RE C.MM'.EN AT.I ; Following the public hearing„ the
Planning Commission will issue Its recornmendaldota within
ten (10) business days. When available, a copy of the recom-
mendation will be mailed to parties of record and entities who
were entitled to receive this notice by mail once it is rendered.
The file containing the complete application is available for
public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, City Hall
-2nd Floor, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, if you
have questions regarding this proposal, please call Trevor
Martin, Associate Planner, at (509) 575-6162, or e-mail to
trevor,martin@yakimawa.gov.
(852927) November 19, 2018
Courtesy of Yakima Herald -Republic
CITY OF YAKIMA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,
& PUBLIC HEARING
(REVISED FROM THE 11/15/18 LEGAL AD TO CORR=CT
THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE)
DATE: 11/15/2018;CTJg$CR.
1 , Non -project
rezone proposal to rezone three (3) parcels, approxi-
mately 43 acres in size, from Two -Family Residential (R-2)
to Multifamily Residential (R-3); APPLICANT: Hordan
Planning Services' on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co; FILE
NUMBER: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18; LOCATION: 5231
Powerhouse Rd; TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):181309-41006,
-44003, and -44009; DATE OF APPLICATION: 10/19/2018;
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 11/8/2018; DETERMINATION
OF CONSISTENCY: Pursuant to YMC § 16.06.020(A), the
project considerations are determined to be consistent with
applicable development regulations, as follows: 1) The type
of land use: Non -project Rezone and SEPA Environmental
Review; 2) Level of Development: Non -project Rezone, No
significant development has been proposed as part of the
Rezone; 3) Infrastructure and public facilities: The subject
property is able to be served by public streets, water, sewer,
garbage collection, etc; and 4) Characteristics of develop-
ment: The proposal shall adhere to all Title 12 and Title 15
development standards; Pursuant to YMC § 16.06.020(B),
the development regulations and comprehensive plan con-
siderations are found to be consistent, as follows: 1) The
type of land use: Rezone and SEPA Environmental Review;
2) Density of Development: The Multifamily zoning district
allow for 13+ dwelling units per Net Residential Acre; and 3)
Availability and adequacy of infrastructure and public utilities:
The subject property is able to be served by public facilities;
This is to notify
agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise and
the public that the City of Yakima, Planning Division, has been
established as the lead agency, under WAC § 197-11-928 for
this project. The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed
project for probable adverse environmental impacts and
expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
per WAC § 197-11-355. The proposal may include mitigation
measures under applicable codes and the -project review pro--
cess
ro-cess may incorporate or require mitigation measures regard-
less of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent
SEPA threshold determination will be mailed to parties of
record and entities who were provided this notice and may be
appealed pursuant to YMC § 6.88.170; Required Permits:
The following local, state, and federal permits/approvals may
or will be needed for this project: N/A; Required Studies:
N/A; Existing Environmental Documents: None; Develop-
ment Regulations for Project Mitigation and Consistency
Include: the State Environmental Policy, Act, the Yakima
Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 12—Development
Standards, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive
Plan;
F P LNC 1; -Agencies, tribes, and the public
are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed
project and its probable environmental impacts. There is a
20 -day comment period for this review. This may be your only
opportunity to comment. All written comments received by
5:00 p.m. on December 5, 2018, will be considered prior to
issuing the final SEPA determination. This request requires
that the Planning Commission hold an open record public
hearing, which is scheduled for January 9, 2019 at 3:00
p.m., in the City of Yakima Council Chambers, City Hall, 129
N. 2nd St., Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their
views on the matter is invited to attend the hearing to provide
testimony. Please reference file numbers (RZ#.010-18 &
SEPA#027-18) and applicant's name (Squire -Ingham Cc)
in any correspondence you submit. You can mail your com-
ments to: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Develop-
ment Director; City of Yakima, Department of Community
Development; 129 N. 2nd St.; Yakima, WA 98901; NOTICE
F REdOMMEN Following the public hearing, the
Planning Commission will issue its recommendation within
ten (10) business days. When available, a copy of the recom-
mendation will be mailed to parties of record and entities who
were entitled to receive this notice by mail once it is rendered.
The file containing the complete application`is available for
public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, City Hall
- 2nd Floor, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima,.Washington. If you
have questions regarding this proposal, please call Trevor
Martin, Associate Planner, at (509) 575-6162, or e-mail to
trevor.martin@yakimawa.gov.
(852927) November 19, 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW,
& PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: 11/15/2018;"JT. DN)P_T,(',, Non project
rezone proposal to rezone three (3) parcels, approxi-
mately 43 acres in size, from Two -Family Residential (R-2)
to Multifamily Residential (R-3); APPLICANT: Horden
Planning Services on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co; FILE
NUMBER: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18; LOCATION: 5231
Powerhouse Rd; TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):181309-41006,
-44003, and -44009; DATE OF APPLICATION: 10/19/2018;
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: 11/8/2018; DETERMINATION
OF CONSISTENCY: Pursuant to YMC § 16„06.020(A), the
project considerations are determined to be consistent with
applicable development regulations, as follows: 1) The type
of land use: Non -project Rezone and SEPA Environmental
Review; 2) Level of Development: Non -project Rezone, No
significant development has been proposed as part of the
Rezone; 3) Infrastructure and public facilities: The subject
property is able to be served by public streets, water, sewer,
garbage collection, etc; and 4) Characteristics of develop-
ment: The proposal shall adhere to all Title 12 and Title 15
development standards; Pursuant to YMC § 16.06.020(8),
the development regulations and comprehensive plan con-
siderations are found to be consistent, as follows: 1) The
type of land use: Rezone and SEPA Environmental Review;
2) Density of Development: The Multifamily zoning district
allow for 13+ dwelling units per Net Residential Acre; and 3)
Availability and adequacy of infrastructure and public utilities:
The subject property is able to be served by public facilities;
i t T:N E+ :F NMVNM BEVTEW; This is to notify
agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise and
the public that the City of Yakima, Planning Division, has been
established as the lead agency, under WAC § 197-11-928 for
this project. The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed
project for probable adverse environmental impacts and
expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
per WAC § 197-11-355. The proposal may include mitigation
measures under applicable codes and the project review pro-
cess may incorporate or require mitigation measures regard-
less of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent
SEPA threshold determination will be mailed to parties of
record and entities who were provided this notice and may be
appealed pursuant to YMC § 6.88.170; Required Permits:
The following local, state, and federal permits/approvals may
or will be needed for this project: N/A; Required Studies:
N/A; Existing Environmental Documents: None; Develop-
ment Regulations for Project Mitigation and Consistency
Include: the State Environmental Policy Act, the Yakima
Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 12—Development
Standards, and the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive
Plan;9.WEST F 91 -NEI ” ENtC. i NT ANAPTI'Q _
SIP PUBLIC HEARING,; Agencies, tribes, and the public
are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed
project and I't$ probable environmental impacts. There is a
20 -day comment period for this review. This may be your only
opportunity to comment. All written comments received by
5:00 p.m. on December 5, 2018, will be considered prior to
issuing the final SEPA determination. This retluest requires
that the Planning Commission hold an open record public
hearing„ which Is scheduled for January 9, 2018 at 3:00
p.m., In the City of Yakima Council Chambers, City Bali, 129
N. 2nd St., Yakima, WA, Any person desiring to express their
views on the matter is invited to attend the hearing to provide
testimony. Please reference file numbers (RZ#010-18 &
SEPA#027-18) and applicant's name (Squire -Ingham Co)
in any correspondence you submit. You can mail your com-
ments to: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Develop-
ment Director; City of Yakima, Department of Community
Development; 129 N. 2nd St.; Yakima, WA 98901; NOTICE
F RECOMMENDATION; Following the public hearing, the
Planning Commission will issue its recommendation within
ten (10) business days, When available, a copy of the recom-
mendation will be mailed to parties of record and entities who
were entitled to receive this notice by mail once it is rendered.
The file containing the complete application is available for
public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, City Hall
–2nd Floor„ 129 North 2nd Streel, Yakima, Washington. If you
have questions regarding this proposal, please call Trevor
Martin, Associate Planner, at (509) 575-6162, or e-mail to
trevor.martin @ yakimawa,gov.
(852549) November 15, 2018
Courtesy of Yakima Herald -Republic
DEPF "TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELO"MENT
AWN a a Joan - venport, AICP, Director
"AIMPlanningi�iVp�a�4?lm
ouuu�uuuu0 TY OF YAKIMA Joseph Calhoun, Manager
�lanininIg 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, & PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: November 15, 2018
TO: SEPA Reviewing Agencies, Applicant, and Adjoining Property Owners
FROM: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
APPLICANT: Hordan Planning Services on behalf of Squire -Ingham Co
FILE NUMBER: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
LOCATION: 5231 Powerhouse Rd.
TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 181309-41006, -44003, and -44009
DATE OF APPLICATION: October 19, 2018
DATE OF COMPLETENESS: November 8, 2018
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Non -project rezone proposal to rezone three (3) parcels, approximately 43 acres
in size, from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Multifamily Residential (R-3).
DETERMINATION OF CONSISTENCY Pursuant to YMC § 16.06.020(A), the project considerations are
determined to be consistent with applicable development regulations, as follows:
1. The type of land use: Non -project Rezone and SEPA Environmental Review
2. Level of Development: Non -project Rezone, No significant development has been proposed as part
of the Rezone.
3. Infrastructure and public facilities: The subject property is able to be served by public streets, water,
sewer, garbage collection, etc.
4. Characteristics of development: The proposal shall adhere to all Title 12 and Title 15 development
standards.
Pursuant to YMC § 16.06.020(B), the development regulations and comprehensive plan considerations are
found to be consistent, as follows:
1. The type of land use: Rezone and SEPA Environmental Review
2. Density of Development: The Multifamily zoning district allow for 13+ dwelling units per Net
Residential Acre.
3. Availability and adequacy of infrastructure and public utilities: The subject property is able to be
served by public facilities.
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is to notify agencies with jurisdiction and environmental
expertise and the public that the City of Yakima, Planning Division, has been established as the lead
agency, under WAC § 197-11-928 for this project. The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project
for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
per WAC § 197-11-355. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes and the
project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is
prepared. A copy of the subsequent SEPA threshold determination will be mailed to parties of record and
entities who were provided this notice and may be appealed pursuant to YMC § 6.88.170.
Required Permits: The following local, state, and federal permits/approvals may or will be needed for this
project: N/A
Required Studies: N/A
Existing Environmental Documents: None
Development Regulations for Project Mitigation and Consistency Include: the State Environmental
Policy Act, the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, YMC Title 12—Development Standards, and the
Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan.
INDEX000. Yikima
haw
REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENT AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Agencies, tribes, and the
public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental
impacts. There is a 20 -day comment period for this review. This may be your only opportunity to comment.
All written comments received by 5:00 p.m. on December 5, 2018, will be considered prior to issuing the
final SEPA determination. This request requires that the Planning Commission hold an open record public
hearing, which is scheduled for January 9, 2018 at 3:00 p.m., in the City of Yakima Council Chambers,
City Hall, 129 N. 2nd St., Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on the matter is invited
to attend the hearing to provide testimony. Please reference file numbers (RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18)
and applicant's name (Squire -Ingham Co) in any correspondence you submit. You can mail your comments
to:
Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
City of Yakima, Department of Community Development
129 N. 2nd St.; Yakima, WA 98901
NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will issue its
recommendation within ten (10) business days. When available, a copy of the recommendation will be
mailed to parties of record and entities who were provided this notice once it is rendered.
The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning
Division, City Hall — 2nd Floor, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have questions regarding
this proposal, please call Trevor Martin, Associate Planner, at (509) 575-6162, or e-mail to
trevor.martin@yakimawa.gov.
Enclosed: Narratives, Project Descriptions, SEPA Checklist, Site Plan, and Vicinity Map
DEP,' "TMENTO DE DESARROLLO COMT"TITARIO
Joan L.Avenport, AICP, Directora
Division ale Planitloaei6n
AgiJoseph Calhoun, Gerente
:vs � 129 Norte Calle 2a, 2° Piso, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • w tw, t ir vy _V/.L, ci wj lad,mn u n.g
AVISO DE APLICACION, REVISION AMBIENTAL, Y AUDIENCIA POBLICA
EI Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario de la Ciudad de Yakima ha recibido una aplicaci6n por parte
de un propietario/solicitante y este es un aviso sobre esa solicitud. Informaci6n sobre la ubicaci6n de la
propiedad en cuesti6n y la solicitud es la siguiente:
FECHA OTORGADA: 15 de noviembre, 2018
PARA: Agencias de Revisi6n Ambiental, Solicitante y Propietarios Adyacentes
DE: Joan Davenport, AICP, Directora de Desarrollo Comunitario
SOLICITANTE: Hordan Planning Services por parte de Squire -Ingham Co
No. DE ARCHIVO: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
UBICACION: 5231 Powerhouse Rd.
No. DE PARCELA(S): 181309-41006, -44003, and -44009
FECHA DE APLICACION: 19 de octubre, 2,018
FECHA DE APLICACION COMPLETA: 8 de noviembre, 2018
DESCRIPCION DEL PROYECTO: EI solicitante propone una rezonificaci6n sin proyecto para tres
parceles, de aproximadamente 43 acres, de la zona R-2 (Residencia de Dos Familias) a R-3 (Residencia
Multifamiliar).
DETERMNNACION DE L.A CONSISTENCIA Conforme al C6digo Municipal YMC §16.06.020(A), las
consideraciones del proyecto se determinan consistentes con las siguientes normas aplicables:
1. EI tipo de use terrenal: Rezonificaci6n sin proyecto y Revisi6n Ambiental (SEPA)
2. Nivel de desarrollo: Rezonificaci6n sin proyecto. No se ha propuesto ningun desarrollo significativo
como parte de la rezonificaci6n.
3. Infraestructura a instalaciones publicas: La propiedad puede ser servida por calles publicas, agua,
drenaje, recolecci6n de basura, etc.
4. Caracteristicas del desarrollo: La propuesta se adherir6 a todas las normas de desarrollo del titulo
12 y del titulo 15.
Conforme al C6digo Municipal YMC §16.06.020(B), los reglamentos de desarrollo y las consideraciones
del plan comprehensivo son coherentes, de la siguiente manera:
1. EI tipo del use terrenal: Rezonificaci6n y Revisi6n Ambiental (SEPA)
2. Densidad del desarrollo: EI distrito de zonificaci6n Multifamiliar (R-3) permite 13 o mas unidades
de vivienda por acre residencial neto.
3. Disponibilidad y adecuaci6n de infraestructura y servicios publicos: La propiedad puede ser servida
por instalaciones publicas.
AVISO DE REVISION AMBIENTAL: Esto es para notificar a las agencias con jurisdicci6n y experiencia
ambiental y al publico que la Ciudad de Yakima, Division de Planificaci6n, se establece como la agencia
principal, de acuerdo con la Ley Estatal de Politica Ambiental de Washington (SEPA) bajo WAC §197-11-928
para la revisi6n de este proyecto. La Ciudad de Yakima ha revisado el proyecto propuesto para posibles
impactos ambientales adversos y espera emitir una Determinaci6n de No-Significancia (DNS) para este
proyecto. EI proceso DNS opcional en WAC § 197-11-355 se esta utilizando. La propuesta puede incluir
medidas de mitigaci6n bajo los c6digos aplicables y el proceso de revisi6n del proyecto puede incorporar o
requerir medidas de mitigaci6n independientemente de si se prepara un EIS (Declaraci6n de Impacto
Ambiental). Una copia de la determinaci6n de umbral posterior se enviara a las personas y agencias que
comentaron y que recibieron este aviso, y se puede apelar de acuerdo con el C6digo Municipal de Yakima
YMC § 6.88.170.
INDEX 1111"r
cc=
2015
B �d4r6
Permisos Requeridos: Los siguientes permisos/aprobaciones locales, estatales, y federales pueden o seran
necesarios para este proyecto: N/A
Estudios Requeridos: N/A
Documentos Ambientales Existentes: Ninguno
Los Reglamentos de Desarrollo para la Mitigac16n y Consistencia de Proyectos Incluyen: La Ley Estatal
de Politica Ambiental de Washington, La Ordenanza de Zonificaci6n del Area Urbana de Yakima, Los
Estndares de Desarrollo del Titlo 12, y el Plan Integral del Area Urbana de Yakima.
SOLICITUD DE COMENTARI'+OS ESCRIiTOS Y AVISO DE AUDIENCIA POBLICA: Se anima a las
agencias, tribus, y el publico a revisar y comentar sobre el proyecto y sobre sus probables impactos
ambientales. Habra un periodo de veinte dias para hacer sus comentarios. Este podria ser su unica
oportunidad para comentar. Todos los comentarios recibidos por escrito antes de las 5:00 p.m. el 5 de
diciembre de 2018 ser6n considerados antes de emitir la decisi6n final sobre esta solicitud. Esta propuesta
requiere una audiencia publica con registro abierto con la Comisi6n de Planificaci6n de Yakima. Por to
tanto, una audiencia publica se Ilevara a cabo el miercoles, 9 de enero 2019 comenzando a las 3:00 p.m.
en el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Yakima ubicado en el 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Se le invita a
cualquier persona que desee expresar sus opiniones sobre este caso a asistir a la audiencia publica o a
presentar comentarios por escrito. Por favor de hacer referencia al numero de archivo (RZ#010-18 &
SEPA#027-18) o al nombre del solicitante (Squire -Ingham Co) en cualquier correspondencia que envie.
Por favor de enviar sus comentarios sobre esta propuesta a:
Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
City of Yakima, Department of Community Development
129 N. 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901
"ISO DE LA RECOMENDACIuIN (FINAL: Despues de la audiencia publica, la Comisi6n de Planificaci6n
emitir6 su recomendaci6n dentro de diez (10) dias h6biles. Cuando la decisi6n final sea emitida, una Copia
sera enviada a las personas que mandaron comentarios o que recibieron este aviso.
EI archivo que contiene la aplicaci6n completa est6 disponible para inspecci6n publica en la Oficina de
Planificaci6n de la Ciudad de Yakima en el 129 al Norte la Calle 2da, Yakima, WA.
Si tiene cualquier pregunta sobre esta propuesta, puede contactar a la Oficina de Planificaci6n al (509)
575-6183 o por correo electr6nico al: ITskk.&n�yyakuma gta�v
Adjuntes: Narrativo, Descripci6n del Proyecto, Lista de SEPA, Plan de Sitio, Mapa
Applicant/Project Name:
Site Address:
Date of Posting:
40,,IcU l lG.
-)9-
Location of Installation (Check One):
Land Use Action Sign is installed per standards described in YMC § 15.11.080(C),
Land Use Action Sign is installed in an alternate location on the site.
Note: this alternate location (if not pre -approved by the Planning Manager) may not be acceptable by the
Planning Division and is subject to relocation (at the owner's expense) to a more visible site on the property.
The alternative location is:
The required notice of application will be sent to the applicant and property owners within a 300 -foot
radius after the Planning Division has received this Land Use Action Installation Certification. Failure
to post a Land Use Action sign and return this form signed in a timely manner may cause a delay in
the application review process.
I hereby testify that the installed sign fully complies with the Land Use Action sign installation
standards (see pg. 2), that the sign will be maintained until a decision has been rendered, and that the
sign will be returned within 30 days from the date the final decision is issued.
.. lt�S" 10.w!; ., .. Date
Applicant Name (Please Print) Applicant's Phone Number
Please remit the above certification and deliver to the City of Yakima Planning Division via email to
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov or in person/by mail to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 North 211 Street,
Yakima, WA 98901.
Page - 1
Re p II
AM M a IL �� REQUh _ _AENTS FOR POSTING OF PRIVATI :OPERTY FOR
LAND USE ACTION
.,, City of Yakima Community Development Department, Planning Division
129 N 2°d St, Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6183 ak.ljla in g_grnawa.ggy
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Land Use Action posted signage shall serve as a method of notification to the public that a land
use application has been submitted to the City for a proposed change to the property. The Land Use
Action sign shall be known in this section as the "sign" referred to in YMC §15.11.080(C) as the
official signage for application of the following land use matters:
o Class 3 Public Hearings;
o Preliminary Long Subdivisions;
o Rezones;
o Right -of -Way Vacations;
o Appeals;
o Interpretation (if required)
o Comprehensive Plan Amendments as indicated in YMC Ch. 16.10;
o Environmental Review, except for a categorically exempt application; and,
o Annexation of property by the City.
For the above land use matters it is required to post one sign and in some cases more than one sign on
the site or in a location immediately adjacent to the site that provides visibility to motorists using
adjacent streets. The Planning Manager has established standards for size, color, layout, design, and
wording of the signs which the Planning Division will supply to the applicant. The Planning Division
sends out letters quarterly to property owners who have had a land use action proposal on their property
that requires posting the property, reminding them to remove the sign(s) and return them to the
Planning Division if they have not already done so.
SIGNAGE INSTALLATION
The applicant shall install the Land Use Action sign(s) in accordance with these provisions:
o Signs shall be located at the midpoint on the street frontage from which the site is addressed or
as otherwise directed by the Planning staff;
o Signs shall be located 10 feet back from the property line;
o Signs structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback
requirement, provided that no sign is located further than 10 feet from the property line without
written approval from Planning staff;
o The top of the signs shall be positioned between 5 and 6 feet above grade;
o Signs shall be posted on the subject property so as to be clearly seen from each right-of-way
providing primary vehicular access to the subject property as stated in YMC §15.11.080(C);
and
o The sign can be easily read from the adjacent street and/or sidewalk.
Page — 2
DEF TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL" VIENT
Joan Lavenport, AICP, Director
WPAML ��
HY OF YAKIM a Planning Division
Joseph Calhoun, Manager apn
129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
November 8, 2018
FILE NUMBER: RZ#010-18 & SEPA#027-18
APPLICANT: Hordan Planning Services
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
PROJECT LOCATION:
TAX PARCEL NO:
DATE OF REQUEST:
SUBJECT:
To Whom It May Concern,
410 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA 98901
5231 W Powerhouse Rd.
181309-41006, -44003, and -44009
October 19, 2018
Notice of Complete Application
The application for your Rezone (RZ#010-18) for 5231 W Powerhouse Rd., was received on
October 19, 2018. As of November 8, 2018, your application is considered complete as
required by the City of Yakima's Municipal Code (YMC) and site plan checklist, as referenced in
YMC § 15.14.030.
Continued processing of your request will include, but is not limited to the following actions:
1. The Development Services Team will meet to review your project.
2. A Notice of Application will be mail out to properties within 300 feet on November 13,
2018.
3. A public Hearing will be conducted with the City of Yakima Planning Commission on
January 9, 2018.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please call me at (509) 575-6162..
Sincerely,
Trevor Martin
Associate Planner
Yakima
IIS
DOC. W
24115
IND X 1994