Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/30/1981 Adjourned Meeting I, ADJOURNED MEETING -- URBAN AREA PLAN APRIL 30, 1981 The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 P.M. in the Sanctu- ary Restaurant, Yakima, Washington, with the Yakima County Commission- ers. Council members present were Mayor Betty L. Edmondson, Henry Beauchamp, Lynn Carmichael, Bruce Crest, Shirley Doty and Don Hinman. Council member Lynn Buchanan present after 3:05 P.M. Yakima County Commissioners present were Chuck Klarich, Graham Tollefson, and Jim Whiteside. Also present was Union Gap Mayor John Hodkinson. Commissioner Klarich stated that the County Commissioners had received the City's response to their issues and will discuss Item No. 4 first, according to the City's priorities. ISSUE 4 -- Shall the Wastewater Allocation Plan be adopted by all'sign- ers of the Wastewater Agreement? 11/ Commissioner Klarich stated that the City's response made reference to the Beck study. He stated that Resolution No. D-4284, unilaterally adopted by the City of Yakima, addresses the Wastewater Allocation Plan. He suggested that this could possibly be addressed and the resolution be adopted by the County. Mayor Edmondson stated that she cannot understand the difference, as the Resolution was setting in the City's policy as an interim to administer the Wastewater Facilities as set forth in the Yakima' Wastewater Allocation Plan. Commissioner Tollefson stated that if we agree that the Beck Study is the only allocation plan that exists, then this difference is eliminated. The Beck Study allocates sewer capacity on a geographical basis. The Resolution by the City changes that from a geographical to jurisdictional basis. Mayor Edmondson stated that once the Plant is completed and the capacity is _ known, then we could sit down and come up with a formula on the allocation. Commissioner commented that if we cagree that the only basis that has been agreed on is the Beck Study and if we agree that any changes to that needs to be amended by all parties, then the difference is eliminated. Commissioner Klarich stated that if there are to be any ,changes to be made before the completion of the Plant, then all parties should adopt it. Mayor Edmondson stated that the City of Yakima cannot change the agreement, and she does not think there were any changes involved in that Resolution. Commissioner Tollefson stated that they understood that the Beck Study is not the allocation plan; that this would super- sede it as the basis for allocation. Mayor Edmondson stated that is not right. rCommissioner Klarich commented that they have five suggested changes regarding the Resolution, however if that Resolution does not apply because it was not signed by everyone, then lit need not be discussed. Mayor Edmondson stated that the City did not say that it doesn't apply. She stated that this was to clarify the allocation on number and service area to the existing wholesale users. The potential was also outlined if the County were to become a wholesale user. This does not supersede anything. It was to clarify as a policy different users within an urban geographical boundary. Council member Doty inquired why this issue was brought up. Mayor Edmondson stated that the City of Union Gap and the County Commissioners have written a letter about the allocation plan, and in order to 'clarify policy of intent, using the - Beck Study as a was to define an area of service based on the fact that we still have to wait until it is finished and look at it again. There is nothing changed. The Council can't change the:formula the Beck Study. She stated that this was a policy for the Council as a guideline -for future action. Commissioner Tollefson-stated that this Resolution is a City- policy only, and does'not Laffect the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. It was the general consensus that an agreement on Issue No. 4 has been reached, and a written.statement will be prepared by staff for the next meeting. He stated that upon completion.of an agreement on all 12 issues we would adopt the total agreement. Mayor Edmondson commented that she feels an issue was clarified and that there wasn't any'disagreement. ADJOURNED MEETING -- URBAN AREA PLAN APRIL 30, 1981 ISSUE 5 -- Shall an Urban Area Sewer Study be jointly prepared by the City and the County? Commissioner Klarich stated that instead of an Urban Area Sewer Study there should be a comprehensive sewer plan based on the Beck Study. Discussion followed regarding preparation of the plan, and it was the general consensus that it be done in a manner similar to the drainage study. Commissioner Tollefson commented that the Urban Area Plan doesn't need to have the specifics in it, but it is our goal to have a com- prehensive sewer plan. Mayor Edmondson and Mayor Hodkinson agreed with that statement. ISSUE 6 -- Shall the urban planning boundary be reduced to the urban service boundary? Commissioner Klarich stated that he understands that only 80% II/ of the Urban Service Boundary can be served, and perhaps it should be reduced. Part of the Urban Service Boundary is in the Yakima Indian Nation and maybe that area could be deleted since they have indicated they did not wish to be included. Council member Hinman commented that the City does not want to develop another City limits line, and have another area that may or may not be served by utilities. He stated that we need to have a large enough area where we can continue the develop- ment within a certain area. Referring to three maps which give alternate boundaries, Commissioner Tollefson commented that these maps were discussed at the Regional Planning -Com- mission hearing. The three alternate boundaries were ex- plained: Map 1 excludes the Yakima Indian Nation, Map 3 would have the same boundary as the Urban Service Boundary, and Map 2 is a compromise between Maps 1 and 3, which shows a poten- tial future growth beyond the capabilities of the area we can serve now. Mayor Edmondson commented that she would be wil- ling to look at changing those lines and discussing it, but to bring it back to the service boundary would be defeating the purpose of having an agricultural area, buffer zone service area. There was further discussion regarding the boundary and Council member Hinman stated that he would like staff to examine Alternative No. 2. Commissioner Whiteside stated that there is an area in that Urban Planning Area that is impacted by the Urban Rural Land Use Plan. Mayor Edmondson inquired if the Rural Land Use Plan conflicts with the Urban Planning Area and Commissioner Whiteside stated that it does. (Council member Buchanan present after 3:05 P.M.) Following further discussion about changing the boundaries, it was the general consensus to discuss this again in two weeks after the cities of Yakima and Union Gap have reviewed this proposal and the maps and invite a representative from the Terrace Heights Sewer District to attend the meeting. ISSUE 12 -- Whether Urban Area Zoning should be accomplished by (1) Co- ordinatin: the existing City and County Zoning Ordinance, or (2) Prepar- ing a new Intensity Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Tollefson expressed his concern that the Inten- sity Ordinances would be premature at this time in the pro- cess. He commented that if all the other problems can be worked out, it would be unnecessary to look at a new method. Mayor Edmondson disagreed. She stated that the Urban Area Plan is a policy and goal. She stated that the implementation of this policy and goal are the zoning ordinances, and if we don't adopt the compatible legislation, then this plan doesn't mean anything. Council member Hinman suggested a hearing examiner concept, who would deal in the Urban Area, using County zoning for the County and the City using City zoning. The real energy spent in the next couple of years would be to put together a comprehensive intensity zoning plan. Commis- sioner Klarich stated that he believes the City and County can adopt some ordinances and become compatible in our zoning ordinances immediately, and then if we go with a hearing examiner, everyone will understand. Council member Hinman suggested that staff come back with a report that states where the differences are in the two zoning ordinances, and see if 3 5 ADJOURNED MEETING,-- URBAN AREA PLAN APRIL 30, 1981 we can get them resolved, and then go with a hearing examiner. Commissioner Klarich stated that he would like to adbpt a plan that we want to try to combine this. It was the general consensus to direct staff to bring the information in two weeks on the.differences between existing ordinances as they apply to the Urban Area Plan. Mayor Hodkinson stated that Union Gap should also compare their zoning ordinances to the County's. It was the general consensus to discuss Issues 10 and.11 next week. It was the general consensus to meet.in the Union Gap City Hall meeting room on Thursday, May 7, 1981, at 2:00 P.M. The meeting was adjourned at the hour of 3:50 P.M. , READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY41110 Al AAAA.A... AA— • 1111.f DATE /F/ OUNCIL • BER 6/5 Ati , DATE b6( mow COUNCIL MEMBER . ATTEST: I ii oT %AV CITY gERK MAYOR , - , • , , • • , I • . e • , I I • - , • •