HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/20/1981 Study Session OCTOBER 20, 1981 0, 1
STUDY SESSION
The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 P.M. in the Council
Chanters of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Council members present were
Mayor Betty L. Edmondson, Clarence Barnett, Henry Beauchamp, Lynn
Budhanan, Lynn Carmichael, Shirley Doty and Don Hinman.
1. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE DOD OF THE ORDER
Mayor Edmondson stated that there is a need for an Executive
Session to discuss pending litigation. It was MOVED by
Hinman, seconded by Buchanan to move into Executive Session
for the purpose of discussing pending litigation. Unanimously
1/1 carried by voice vote.
Following the completion of the Executive Session, Mayor
Edmondson commented that in last week's Council packet there
was a letter from the International Institute of Municipal
Clerks regarding the City's agenda manual being printed as a
technical bulletin to be available to their membership. She
stated that Larry Wittenberg and Iris Litzenberger should be
recognized and thanked for their efforts in putting this
manual together.
Mayor Edmondson reported that she has received notification
from the Chamber of Commerce that they have appointed Russ
Ackley to replace Don Emerick on the Airport Advisory
Commission as an ex-officio member.
Mayor Edmondson stated that Catherine Melford has contacted
her regarding the installation of permanent parking
restriction signs on Central Avenue asking when they would be
installed. City Manager Zais stated that staff will be
bringing a report to Council on that shortly.
2. STATUS REPORT RE SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER CODE IMPROVEMENT
REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS
Council members Hinman and Beauchamp excused themselves from
discussion on this item due to possible conflict of interest.
Larry Wright, Acting Director of Community and Econamic
Development, stated that his report is still in draft form and
will be given to Council after it has been finalized. Mayor
Edmondson distributed copies of a letter she had received from
the Yakima Neighborhood Health Services which states their
position against relocation to the Southeast Community Center.
Larry Wright gave some information on the original
construction date and major remodeling and stated the property
is currenLly appraised by the Yakima County Assessor's Office
at $1 million for improvements and $40,000 for the land. He
reported that the previous information given about code
deficiencies that were built in at the time of the
construction was found to be not totally accurate. He stated
there was a provision in the 1976 Building Code that allowed
the chief building inspector to waive the facility being
brought totally up to code under certain circumstances, which,
apparently was done. Council member Carmichael requested that
the items that have code deficiencies be listed separate from
those items that are in or condition because of lack of
maintenance. City Manager Zais stated that it would be
difficult to separate than because some of the items that have
not been maintained are now considered to be a code
deficiency. Larry Wright reviewed the code deficiency and
maintenance problem areas at the Center. He stated staff is
trying to arrive at a method to solve this with CDBG money.
He commented that HUD could require the City to bring the rest
of the facility up to code and we will be using some of our
Community Development money for major maintenance repairs.
Ken Coffin stated that if we don't cane under cumpliance, HUD
will request the grant amount back. Mr. Wright stated that we
can use Community Development monies for some of the work,
002 OCTOBER 20, 1981
however, the other expenditures, unless it has to do with life
safety is not eligible for CDBG funds. He stated that other
than FRS, contingency funds, or public subscription, staff
does not have any suggestions about funding the maintenance
portion of this facility. Mayor Edmondson inquired if the
Southeast Center can operate with the people they have and
some of the agencies contracting space stay open and minimum
programs be continued safely with a limited amount of money
invested. Lou Roederer, Code Manager, stated that if all the
work listed in the bids that was on today were to be
completed, then those areas could be-used. He stated that the
work in the clinic will be minor and is sealed off with no
necessity for off-duty firemen. In the multi-purpose room and
the auditorium, when there is an event there, the fire guard
would still be maintained. He gave a suggestion about the
stage area to reduce the size of the stage by 6 feet in the
rear making the stage 17 feet reduceing it to under 500 square
feet. He stated that when it is above 500 square feet, it
needs to be sprinklered. Council member Buchanan asked who II/
pays for the off-duty firemen when there is a meeting in the
auditorium. Mr. Roederer compared it with a sporting event
held at another facility in which fire -guards are used and
stated that that facility pays for the fire guards. City
Manager Zais stated that Council had wanted to keep the
facility open in any area possible and the facility could not
remain open without the fire guards being stationed there. He
stated it is a Council policy decision as to whether Council
wants to pay to have a fire guard there. Mayor Edmondson
asked about the cost of the fire guard for an event held in
the evening. Fire Chief Carroll stated that is costing about
$700 a week from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, and for functions on the weekend. The evening
function is probably costing about $60 an evening. Council
member Doty expressed concern about paying for the fire guard
for any length of time and asked what would happen if that
facility was not used for two weeks. Bruce Smith, Acting
Director of the Southeast Community Center, stated that they
would be in danger of losing federal grants if they closed
some programs.
3. REPORT FROM CITY MANAGER RE MANAGEMENT OaVENSATION REQUEST FOR
1982
It was the general consensus of the Council to discuss this
item during the regular business meeting.
BUSINESS MEETING
4. ROLL CALL
At 3:30 P.M., the Council members commenced the regular
meeting, Mayor Edmondson presiding, Council members Barnett,
Buchanan, Carmichael, Doty and Hinman and City Manager Zais
and City Attorney Andrews present on roll call. Beauchamp
II/
absent. Mayor Edmondson stated that Council member Beauchamp
had to leave to attend a special meeting and will return as
soon as possible.
5. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Mayor Edmondson.
6. CONSENT AGENLA
Mayor Edmondson referred to the items -placed on the Consent
Agenda questioning whether there were any additions or
deletions from either Council members or citizens present.
Mayor Edmondson stated that a citizen has asked that Items No.
13 and 14 be removed from the Consent Agenda. Council member
Carmichael requested that Item No. 12 be added and Council
member Buchanan requested that Items No. 19 and 20 be added to
003
OCTOBER 20, 1981
the Consent Agenda. It was the general consensus of the
Council that the addition of Items No. 12, 19 and 20 and the
deletion of Items No. 13 and 14, as requested, be made. The
City Clerk then read the Consent Agenda items including
resolutions and ordinances by title. It was MOVED by Doty,
seconded by Buchanan that the Consent Agenda, as read, be
passed. Unanimously carried by roll call vote. Beauchamp
absent. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk (*)
indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one motion
without further discussion.)
*7. MINUTES
The Council minutes of S ep tember 29 and October 6, 1981, were
11/ approved, having been duly certified accurate by two Council
members and no one present wishing to have said minutes read
publicly.
Mayor Edmondson stated there has been a request that Item No.
10 be discussed now, out of sequence of the Agenda. It was
the general consensus of the Council to discuss Item No. 10 at
this time.
10. REPAIRS TO THE SOUTHEAST ODMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING WITHOUT CALLING
FOR BIDS
Council member Hinman excused himself from discussion on this
item due to possible conflict of interest. Ines Rice, 4409
Arlington, stated she is opposed to Council purchasing the
items without going through the bid process. She stated that
the citizens voted against doing this and this is pertinent to
Item No. 13 on the Agenda also. Ken Coffin, CDBG Manager,
stated that the contract was based on the work priority that
was established for the exiting of people out of the building.
The low bid received was for $19,311.56 from Stephens and Sons
Construction. Mayor Edmondson asked hcw much Community
Development money there is available to spend on this project.
Mr. Coffin stated there is $17,700 from the Community Carden
and Clean-up Program from 1981 money. He stated that part of
this money has not yet been received by the City fran the
insurance canpany covering the theft of a piece of equipment
at the Center. There was $20,000 from 1982 funds authorized
for the roof and $10,000 frcm contingency for organizational
development. Mayor Edmondson inquired if Council authorizes
this resolution, would it be obligating 1981 and 1982 funds
for the Center and Mr. Coffin stated that it would.
Resolution No. D-4561, having been read by title, it was MOVED
by Doty, seconded by Carmichael to adept the resolution. It
was MOVED by Carmichael, seconded by Doty that the resolution
be amended to fill in the blanks to include the amount of the
bid, $17,311.56. Unanimously carried by voice vote. Hinman
not voting due to possible conflict of interest. Beauchamp
II/ " absent. The question was called for the vote on the motion,
as amended. Unanimously carried by voice vote. Hinman not
voting due to possible conflict of interest. Beauchamp
absent.
RESOLUTION NO. D-4561, A RESOLUTION authorizing a contract for
work, labor and materials with Stephen & Sons Construction for
rehabilitation work on the Southeast Community Center
Building, without calling for formal bids.
3. REPORT RE MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION REQUEST FOR 1982
City Manager Zais stated that management does not negotiate
for compensation. He stated that the proposal that has been
reviewed and forwarded to Council is to maintain the current
level of benefits and to increase salaries by 5% for 1982. He
stated he thinks that approach demonstrates leadership by the
management in trying to keep the cost dawn for 1982. Mayor
Edmondson commented that this is usually done after all
negotiations have been settled. She stated that the Police
and Fire have two-year contracts and the Police will receive a
10% salary increase for 1982 and the Fire will receive an 8.5%
00 CCTOBER 20, 1981
increase and a reduction of hours. It was MOVED by Hinman,
seconded by Carmidhael' 't6 - aCcept the City Manager's
recommendation of granting the 5% salary increase and include
the City Manager's salary to be increased by 5% for 1982.
Larry Wittenberg, Assistant City Manager, stated that the Fire
is going to receive 8.05% for 1982. The question was called
for the vote on the motion. Unanimously carried by voice
vote. Beauchamp absent.
8. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
Mayor Edmondson presented a special_ certificate of
commendation and appreciation to Police Captain Pleas Green in
honor of his graduation from the.F.B.I. Academy. Police Chief
LaRue commented that Captain Green graduated with a grade
point of 4.0. Captain Green expressed, his appreciation for
being permitted to attend the Academy. Mayor Edmondson stated
there are three Police Officers who invented a portable fire
arms simulator saving the City money, that Council would like
to commend. Council members presented a special certificate
of commendation and appreciation to Reid. Follansbee and Tom
Morey. Police Chief LaRue accepted the certificate on behalf
of Ron Fortier who was unable to attend the meeting. Mayor
Edmondson commented that these are the first Council
appreciation certificates for in-house accomplishments that
Council has presented.
Mayor Edmondson _proclaimed this weekend as "Yakima Mall
Weekend" in celehration of i tenth year birthday.
9. HEARING ON MAYER ODRPORATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 56th AVENUE, AND TILTON DRIVE (TANCARA
SUBDIVISION)
This being the time fixed for - the hearing on the Mayer
Corporation Planned Development request for property located
at 56th .Avenue and Tieton Drive, Council member Buchanan
inquired if notices were mailed to the people interested in
this. Iris Litzenberger, City Clerk, stated that notices were
mailed to the surrounding property owners. Mayor Edmondson
inquired if the lots are sold would there be any
responsibility on the new owners for enforcement of the
corivenants. Larry Wright, Acting Director of Community and
Economic Development, stated that any building would be
reviewed and enforced by the City. He commented that due to
the nature of this request it would he difficult to specify
some of the elements. He stated that.staff is attempting to
.build in, son of the performance type standards that are
wanted in the future. Mayor Edmondson questioned the
statement in the report about underground utilities. Mr.
Wright stated that with the increase of single-family units,
that results from this, there may be difficulty in getting all
the telephone lines. The developers should work with the
telephone company because there might be a potential problem.
Council member Barnett J:eferredto page .3 of the findings on
the recommendation'of and inquired if the words
"should" and "desirable" is meant to be permissive or
mandatory. _Commenting,that due to the nature of the review
they have _to go :through, Mr. Wright stated that it is
_ permissive and not mandatory. Glenn Rice, representing Mayer
Corporation, stated that the reason they applied for the
planned development is because the City does not have any
other vehicle to ,create a single attache d housing situation.
He stated they are proposing something that is really
innovative in housing. He named several magazine articles
about attached single-family units and commented that the
housing market is at a low ebb' because of financing and
interest rates. This would be a rezone in the center area of
Tancara from R-1, single family detached to planned
_ development single family attached. He stated that lot costs
and building costs can be reduced through the use of zero lot
line construction. He distributed a drawing of the kind of
unit he is talking about. To clarify.the telephone issue, he
stated that each lot has two telephone numbers servicing it.
OCTOBER 20, 1981 005
He stated that the subdivision has all the ammenities; street
lights, sidewalks, etc. He stated that this concept is not
entirely new to Yakima and gave examples of Quail Run and the
McCargar units. He stated that their original proposal was to
take 105 lots in the center of the subdivision for
single-family attache d housing. He stated they would like to
build as many of them in the Center of the subdivision as the
market dictates. He stated they have protected neighbors by
leaving single-family detached lots on the sides and to the
north. He stated that this is a FHA/VA qualified subdivision.
He stated that this idea exists in Quail Run at 53rd Avenue
and Tieton, McCargar Addition, 50th Avenue and Tieton, Vardar
Addition, area to the west of the subdivision and High View
Court, 35th Avenue and Englewood, and distributed some
II/ pictures of these developments. He stated that the City
Planning staff and Planning Commission chose not to follow Mr.
Mayer's request for 105 lots, suggesting that the density or
unknown aesthetic value would be jeopardized by this proposal.
He reminded Council that there is an 80 foot street dividing
the subdivision and 60 foot right of ways all the way around
and sidewalks on most of the streets. After mudh discussion,
he stated they reduced the project to 71 lots and outlined
them on that and described the boundaries. The Planning
Commission recommended 30 lots from the negotiated 71 lots
which increases the use of that area by only 15 houses. He
stated that they have spent more money than 15 houses would be
worth and this would not create the innovative lot density mix
or affordable housing. He stated that the side yards for the
small 35 foot lots do not need to be more than five foot close
because there is roam in back and a 20 foot yard in the front
and if you butt those together, you have 10 feet between the
units which is at least equal to single-family. Gene Mayer,
Developer, commented on the price range originally intended
and the impact inflation and interest rates have had on that
price. He stated that he would like to keep these houses in
the $55,000 to $65,000 range. There was further clarification
on the number of lots originally requested for this project
and the process which reduced it to 30. Mr. Rice stated that
they would like to have as many lots approved as the market
would bear. Upon questioning, Mr. Rice clarified the issue on
the side yard requirement stating that the 16 foot required is
more than what is required for single-family housing. Mr.
Rice asked for clarification on -Item #C on page 3 in the memo
of Findings. Larry Wright stated that the residents residing
within the vicinity of this development wants to make sure
that the units being constructed in this area not get into a
similar situation as those at 48th and Tieton. They have
suggested that perhaps one of the neighbors sit on the Design
Review Team the development already has, which was discouraged
by staff. They then suggested that staff be a proponent for
the neighbors which he stated would not be too difficult a
Chore. City Attorney Andrews stated that the committee that
II/ is being discussed has for its primary purpose, the object to
enforce the restrictive covenants in that development. He
stated that by interjecting the staff in that position puts
the City in an area where we have not previously been.
Mt. Mayer commented that if it would only be applicable to
this development, he would not mind. Bill Hayes, Executive
Officer for the Hanebuilders Association, showed an article
from today's Herald-Republic newspaper about housing starts
ebbing towards a 20 year law. He spoke in support of this
planned development, stating that the City needs an incentive
to build and this provides that incentive. He stated that
building in this area has dropped about 80% from last year
which was not a good year. There being no one present wishing
to speak in opposition, the public portion of the hearing was
closed. It was MOVED by Buchanan to approve the development
request with the criteria established by the Planning
Commission. The motion failed for lack of a second. It was
MOVED by Hinman, seconded by Carmidhael to send it back to the
Planning Commission with the camments that they relook at 30
the lot limitation. Mayor Edmondson suggested that a
recommendation of 71 or 105 lots be given to the Planning
Commission. Larry Wright commented that this would set a
006 OCTOBER 20, 1981
precedent_ of a 4,000 square foot lot. He reported that
currently we have 25 to 50 foot Jots in the City now where a
common wall construction can be done., This is a unique thing
because it a subdivision with more standard sized lots that is
being split in half and establishing a precedent for 4,000
square foot lots which is not very big. He commented that
many of those lot sizes of those developments which were
mentioned are 10,000 to 15,000 square foot lots. He stated
this is what the Planning Commission was concerned about and
the neighbors were concerned about the 105 units being put
there. Council member Hinman stated that the development has
a high fence and the single-family houses will buffer it from
the _neighbors. Larry Wright commented that this area already
as storm drainage problems. Council _member Carmichael
commented that there is a huge investment involwd and we are
calling for the private sector to become innovative to come up
with affordable housing with the requirements we want. It was
MOVED by Carmichael seconded by Hinman to amend the motion to
put as many units of this, nature as the market will bear up to
the maximum of 105 which is their original request. Council
member Doty questioned what the Toint.was between the 71 and
the 105 lots. Larry Wright stated that 56th Avenue is
designed to carry a high volume of traffic and if you increase
the number of curb_cuts and the number of vehicles entering
and exiting, then you decrease the loading factor on that
street. He stated that staff suggested that row of lots along
56th Avenue be a barrier which would then put the unit within
that area on each side, within the interior of that
subdivision, bringing the number of, lots down to 71. The
original request was for 105 and a settlement at the Planning
Commission meeting was for 140. He stated that the Planning
Commission was undecided,about having the first 20 units built
and then have the developer came back to the Planning
Commission before building the rest of them. The Planning
Commission couldn't get enough votes to pass the building of
the 40 units and 30 was a _compromise. Council member Doty
asked staff what is so wrong with the 71 and Mr. Wright stated
that nothing was wrong with 71 lots., She then asked the
developer what is wrong with 71 lots and Mr. Mayer and Mr.
Rice stated that nothing is wrong with 71. Mr. Mayer stated
that the. Planning Commission has a letter from Congdon
Orchards saying they have no opposition to the building of
these, units along side his orchard. There was discussion
regarding the number of lots reqUeted_to be built and the
number recommended. Council nember Buchanan commented that
Council is supposed to be protecting some of the streets the
citizens will be paying for and the taxpayers will be paying
for the maintenance of this street and Council should be
_
looking at the traffic being generated onto that street. He
stated that the neighbors' feelings should also be considered.
The question was called for the vote on the motion. Carried
by 4-2 voice vote. Buchanan and Doty voting nay. Beauchamp
absent. The question was called for the vote on the motion
as, amended. Council member Doty stated she would vote no
because 71 was acceptable to the developer and we are ignoring
it and it would make it more acceptable to the neighborhood.
Carried by 4-2 voice vote. Buchanan and Doty voting nay.
Beauchamp absent. -Mayor Edmondson: questioned if there were no
changes to the Findings being recommended and it was the
general consensus of the Council that that is correct.
11. RENEWAL AND EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WITH APWA, I. FOR AIRPORT
PARBING LOT OPERATIONS
Resolution No. D-4562 having been read by title, it was MOVED
by Carmidiael, seconded by Doty that the Resolution be
adopted. Unanimously carried by,roll call vote. Beauchamp
absent.,
RESOLUTION NO. D-4562, A RESOLUTION_ authorizing the City
Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute a
"Renewal and Extension Agreement" with APcOA, Inc. for the
operation and management of parking facilities at the Yakima
Air Terminal.
OCTOBER 20, 1981 007
*12. LEGAL SERVICES FOR 16TH AND LINCOLN AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. D-4563, A RESOLUTION engaging Lyon,
Beaulaiirier, Weigand, Suko and Gustafson to perform legal
services in connection with 16th Avenue and Lincoln Avenue
intersection improvements.
13. EMERGENCY REPAIR OF A WATER INTAKE PUMP WITHOUT CALLING FOR BIDS
Mayor Edmondson commented that this it was removed by a
citizen who is no longer present in the audience. Resolution
No. D-4564, having been read by title, it was MOVED by
Buchanan, seconded by Doty that the Resolution be adopted.
II/ Unanimously carried by roll call vote. Beauchamp absent.
RESOLUTION NO. D-4564, A RESOLUTION authorizing the emergency
repair of a water intake pump without calling for bids.
14. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT INCREASE FOR 05 CONTRACT AT WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT
Mayor Edmondson commented that the citizen who requested that
this item be removed from the Consent Agenda is no longer
present. Resolution No. D-4565, having been read by title, it
was MOVED by Carmidhael, seconded by Hinman that the
Resolution be adopted. Unanimously carried by roll call vote.
Beauchamp absent.
RESOLUTION NO. D-4565, A RESOLUTION authorizing and directing
the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to
States execute an agreement accepting an offer from the United
Environmental Protection Agency for a grant of funds to aid
construction of water pollution control facilities.
*15. FINAL CONTRACT PAYMENT FOR 1981 CD PAVING PROJECT
The report from the Director of Engineering and Utilities
dated 10/20/81 with respect to the completion of the work on
the 1981 Community Development Paving Project performed by
Columbia Asphalt and Gravel was approved, the work accepted
and payment of the final estimates as therein set forth was
authorized.
*16. SET DATE OF HEARING ON MILDRED A. CAHOON ESTATE ANNEXATION
The date of hearing on the Mildred A. Cahoon estate annexation
for property located in the vicinity of No. 48th Avenue and
Webster Road was set for November 3, 1981.
*17. SET DATE OF HEARING ON DENTAN ASSOCIATES REZONE REQUEST
November 3, 1981 was set as the date of hearing on the Dentan
II/ Associates rezone request for property located at 401 So. 13th
Avenue.
18. ORDINANCE RELATING TO SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS FOR THE MAYOR
AND OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS
(Council member Beauchamp present after 5:35 p.m.) Ordinance
No. 2556, having been read by title, it was MOVED by Hinman,
seconded by Buchanan that the Ordinance be passed. Council
member Carmichael spoke about her concerns About the salaries
being paid on a quarterly basis, however, City Attorney
Andrews stated that this is a provision of the City Charter.
There was discussion regarding the proposed salaries for the
Council members and Council member Carmichael brought up her
concerns regarding the establishment of a fund at the Visitors
& Convention Bureau. City Manager Zais stated that it would
not take much time to create a new fund. The question was
called for the vote on the motion. Carried by 4-3 roll call
vote. Barnett, Carmichael and Edmondson voting nay.
00.8
OCTOBER 20, 1981
ORDINANCE NO. 2556, AN ORDINANCE relating to City government
personnel; specifying the salaries and fringe benefits for the
Mayor and other City Council memberS; enacting Section
2.20.094 as a nea section and repealing Sections 2.20.093 and
2.20.095, all of the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
*19. ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE PBIA FUND TO PURCHASE A BUS
SHELTER •-• FIRST READING - -
An Ordinance appropriating funds from the PBIA Fund to
purdhase a bus shelter having been read by title only, was
_laid on the table for one week or until Tuesday, October 27,
1981.
*20. ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND OFFICE
SPACE - FIRST READING
An Ordinance appropriating funds for computer sofeware and
Office space modifications having been read by title only, was
laid on the table for one week or until Tuesday, October 27,
1981.
21. OTHER BUSINESS
INFORMATION ITEMS
Items of information supplied to Council were: Memo from
Acting Dir. of Community & Economic Development re: Ron
Hatfield Utility Request (Sewer). 10/13/81; memo fran
Acting Dir. of Ctmmunity & Economic Development re: Outside
'Utility Request (Sewer) Parcel #191320-32449. 10/6/81;
article fran Wall Street Journal re: "High Rates Pose Big
Problem for Localities' Financing Plans". 10/6/81; articles
from Business Week Magazine dated 10/6/81 and 10/13/81 re:
RepUblic Airlines; letter fran Mrs. George Collins re: Action
Camp at McKinley Grade School. 10/12/81; letter from Ken
Pottenger, President, Yakima Board of Realtors re: loss of
hares due to delinquent irrigation assessments. 10/13/81;
September 28, 1981 Utility Rate Advisory Board meeting
minutes; and COG Newsletter dated October 2, 1981.
22. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council,
the meeting was adjourn the. hour of 5:45 p.m.
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY DATE /1-- /6-4
COUNCIL MEMBER
/41,4 DATE 11 Th
COUNCIL FIBER
ATTEST:
O
CITY r ,MAYOR
. _