HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-12-18 YPC Packet111011119 M DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
11 %Xk� uu:�; Dui k wi
PlOTY 1' YAKIIMA
anning Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning�yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
City of Yakima Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday September 12, 2018
3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
YPC Members:
Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook, Jacob Liddicoat, Robert McCormick,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel, and Philip Ostriem
Council Liaison: Jason White
City Planning Staff:
Joan Davenport (Community Development Director); Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager);
Eric Crowell (Associate Planner); Trevor Martin (Associate Planner);
Colleda Monick (Assistant Planner); Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant);
and Lisa Maxey (Planning Specialist)
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Staff Announcements
IV. Audience Participation
V. Approval of Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2018
VI. Public Hearing - 2018 Text Amendments
Applicant: City of Yakima Planning Division
File Numbers: TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
Site Address: N/A
Request: Amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1, 15, and 16 concerning the sign
code, Rezone criteria, Accessory Dwelling Unit standards, the Modification Chapter, adding a
definition & land use for Taxicab Home Occupation, modifying the district intent statement and
permitted uses in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, and consolidation of Appeals
from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch.16.08.
(Additional Information posted online at: www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning under Quick Links)
VII. Continued Public Hearing - City of Yakima Wastewater Division
Applicant: City of Yakima Wastewater Division
File Numbers: CPA#007-18, RZ#008-18 & SEPA#010-18
Site Address: Vicinity of Highway 24 & S 22nd St
Request: Change the Future Land Use map designation for three parcels from Low-density Residential to
Commercial Mixed -Use and rezone three parcels from Suburban Residential (SR) to General
Commercial (GC) to enable a future proposal for a low -barrier homeless shelter use.
VIII. Study Session: Hotel/Motel & Extended Stay Hotel/Motel Uses & Definitions
IX. Other Business
X. Adjourn
Next Meeting. September 26, 2018
Yakima
IS
094
oma fit XM16
AMA&W
(Ally (0nninKIMA
ag
CITY OF YAIUMA
YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall Council Chambers
SIGN -IN SHEET
HEARING DATE:.. Wednesday September 12, 2018
AWIN a a IL %"%,
,draw,w
pP6
I :)f YAKWA
a n h j n
. . . .......... .................... .... . .... .. _e.__ ........ ... . . ............. .. . ...... .. . .......... . .......... . ...... ..
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CITY PLANNING - 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS (TXT#002-18 & B. CONTINUED HEARING - CITY WASTEWATER DIVISION
SEPA#020-18) (CPA#007-18, RZ#008-18 & SEPA#010-18)
of HiRliway 24 & S 220 St
.......... __ ____w_
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. CITY PLANNING - 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS (TXT#002-18 & B. CONTINUED HEARING - CITY WASTEWATER DIVISION
SEPA#020-18) (CPA#007-18, RZ#008-18 & SEPA#010-18)
bar"."cinify ca. yl ii...v 24 & S 22,,d St
Yakima Planning Commission Sign -In Sheet— 09/12/2018
Meeting Date: 9/12/18
YAKIM'A P
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
Commission.
Name: Za" cam- �--
11
Subject/ Agenda Item Number(s). '°IMS j� M, -C? r "
E-mail:� N �•
Mailing Address*:
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments,.
Meeting Date: 9/12/18
City of 'Yakima
YAKII"A PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC)
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
� I u
Commission..
Name:
Subject/ Agda Item Number(s):
��f
E-mail: b 8
Mailing Address*;
Z
izndll-�t-
*Please provide yourailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you liive inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments
Meeting Date: 9/12/18
City of Yakima
YAKIMMMA PLANNINGCOMMISSION (YPC)
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
Commission.
Name: (�� v ✓�
Subject / Agenda Item Number(s):
Mailing Address*:
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments.
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board prior to addressing the
Committee.
Name: 2 . r
Subject /Agenda Item Number(s):
\( -�L-
E-mail.-
Mailing Address*; % D L1 0
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments.
Meeting Date: 9/12/18
City of Yakima
YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION (YPC)'
Audience Participation Slip (PLEASE PRINT)
Please complete this form for the record and submit it to the Clerk of the board ar/or to addressing the
Committee.
Name: C l o v
Subject /Agenda Item Number(s): J vle i 5 , cc a 4 -
E-mail; 1' � 1 11
c a <
Mailing Address*: ., �.. _ , w; M' ��
.( C
J
*Please provide your mailing address on this form. When addressing the Commission, state your
name and whether you live inside or outside the City limits.
The Commission welcomes input from the public both during "Audience Participation" and during
discussion of regular agenda items. Please note that the Commission meeting is being televised on
Y -PAC, cable channel 194. Profanity, personal attacks, derogatory remarks or other inappropriate
language or behavior are not be permitted.
Thank you for your comments
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Jacob
Liddicoat, Robert McCormick, Leanne Hughes -Mickel,
Philip Ostriem
YPC Members Absent: Bill Cook (excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Trevor Martin,
Associate Planner; Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist
Council Liaison: Jason White, District 2 (absent)
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements - Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun reminded the Commission
of a hearing on various text amendments and a continued hearing for a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment and Rezone (CPA#007-18/RZ#008-18) for property at the wastewater
treatment plant on September 12tH, and a rezone hearing for property located on the
southeast corner of 56th Ave and Summitview Ave on September 26tH.
Audience Participation - None noted.
Approval of Meeting Minutes of August 8, 2018 - It was motioned by Commissioner
Liddicoat and seconded by Vice -Chair Rose to approve the meeting minutes of August
8, 2018. The motion carried unanimously.
2018 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Hearings -
CPA#003-18 & RZ#004-18 - William Almon - Associate Planner Trevor Martin
presented staff's findings of fact, conclusions, and recommendation on this matter. Bill
Hordan of Hordan Planning Services (applicant) restated the reason for this proposal.
No testimony was given by the audience so the public hearing was closed. Hordan
clarified that there is no project at this time and that the driveway approach for this
property would most likely be relocated further to the south on 48tH Ave at the time that
a project is established. It was motioned by Commissioner McCormick and seconded by
Vice -Chair Rose that the Yakima Planning Commission recommend approval of this
amendment request from Low -Density Residential to Community Mixed Use to
accommodate a concurrent rezone from R-1 (Single-family Residential) to B-1
(Professional Business) to the Yakima City Council. The motion carried unanimously.
CPA#004-18 & RZ#005-18 - Riverpointe Landing LLC/Westtowne LLC - Martin
presented staff's findings of fact, conclusions, and recommendation on this matter. Bill
Hordan (applicant) spoke on the expansion of industrial uses in the area and specified
that there is no project at this time. He reported that when a project is approved, it
would likely be subject to sitescreening standards like fencing and landscaping to help
mitigate impacts to surrounding properties. He added that due to a large easement,
development on these parcels would be limited to the eastern portion of the properties.
Hordan mentioned that he received a phone call from Harlan Dunn, a developer of
Lake Aspen who has ownership interest in property located northwest of this proposal,
-1-
with questions about the proposal but no written comments were submitted
subsequently. Hordan stated that the existing residence on one of the subject properties
in the request would become a legal non -conforming use. The Commission had brief
discussion on a previous proposal for a shopping center at this site that did not come to
fruition, as well as how many parcels were reached using a 300 -ft buffer from the
subject parcels for mailing public notice. No testimony was given by the audience so the
public hearing was closed. It was motioned by Commissioner Hughes -Mickel and
seconded by Commissioner McCormick that the Yakima Planning Commission
recommend approval of this amendment request from Regional Commercial to
Industrial to accommodate a concurrent rezone from LCC (Large Convenience Center)
to M-1 (Light Industrial) to the Yakima City Council. The motion carried unanimously.
CPA#005-18 & RZ#006-18 - West Valley Nursing Homes Inc - Martin explained that
the applicant has requested the hearing to be continued to the September 26tH Planning
Commission meeting so the applicant has time to continue negotiations with neighbors
in the area prior to moving forward. No testimony from the audience was submitted so
the Commission had consensus to continue the hearing to September 26th at which time
the staff report would be presented.
CPA#006-18 & RZ#007-18 - Israel Zaragoza - Martin presented staff's findings of fact,
conclusions, and recommendation on this matter. Bill Hordan (applicant) accentuated
the success of the property owner's business to the south (Audio King and Tinting) but
raised concerns with traffic congestion. He reasoned that this proposal would help in
this regard since parking for the business could expand onto this property in the future.
Hordan informed the Commission that the property is now vacant as the house that
was on it has been demolished. He voiced that he does not have an issue with staff's
recommendation to limit any new road approach on 7t" St for this business at the time
of project submittal and said that he expects a sitescreening requirement of a 6 -ft fence
at a minimum on the north property line as there is a single-family residence on the
abutting property. Discussion took place on the noise complaint mentioned in the
comment letter from a neighbor, which Hordan said he did not address. The
Commission requested that city staff respond to the neighbor informing them of what
departments they can direct their complaints to. The Commission discussed their
desires for the subject lot and the lot to the south which has the business on it be
merged together, for the alleyway to be paved, and for new access off of 7t" St to be
prohibited for this business.
Rita Garza, neighbor to the north, spoke on and provided photos of troubles she's had
with this business since it moved into her neighborhood, including traffic congestion,
dust and insulation going onto her property from not watering the area down after the
house demolition, light pollution, contractors removing a pole from her property,
playing loud music and revving engines late at night, tearing up sidewalk in front of
her property, repeatedly driving up and down the street, and causing a tree to fall on
her fence. She added that the land use action sign posted at the site was being covered
by trucks so it was not visible (the applicant addressed this earlier in his testimony,
mentioning that he went to the site to move the sign so it could be seen). Garza
expressed her desire for this lot to remain residential and further explained that the
proposal may reduce traffic congestion but she is still highly concerned with problems
-2-
this business has caused and is therefore opposed to the opportunity for them to
expand. The Commission responded to Garza, explaining that the City Clerk's office
could assist in telling her which departments to contact related to these complaints. Le
Roy Pacheco, Garza's boyfriend, explained that the building for this business extends
almost to the end of the alley rather than using a fence on the property line.
Hordan told the Commission he will follow up with the property owner and inform
him that he is jeopardizing his opportunity for this rezone based on these complaints.
He added that he may speak with staff about putting "no parking' signs at certain areas
near the intersection. Hordan submitted an exhibit showing where the current
driveway approach is to the business.
Pacheco encouraged the Commission and staff not to require paving of the alley due to
cars already speeding through it.
It was motioned by Commissioner Hughes -Mickel and seconded by Commissioner
Rose that the Yakima Planning Commission recommend approval of this amendment
request from Mixed Residential to Commercial Mixed Use to accommodate a
concurrent rezone from R-2 (Two-family Residential) to GC (General Commercial) to
the Yakima City Council, with a modification to require a merger of the subject parcel
with the parcel to the south that the business is on. The motion carried unanimously.
Study Session: Hotel/Motel and Extended Stay Hotel/Motel Uses and Definitions -
Calhoun went over staff's recommendations on draft definitions for hotel, motel, and
extended stay hotel/ motel. John Cooper from Yakima Valley Tourism voiced his
support for the draft hotel/ motel definition and suggested that a high percentage of
rooms for short-term stay be designated in the definition. Cooper said he would ask the
Ledgestone Hotel and report back what percentage of short-term rooms vs. extended -
stay rooms they offer. Calhoun said he will check the building code for a definition of
"kitchen facility" for clarity in case it is placed in the definition of extended -stay.
Cooper confirmed that the Home2 Suites located in Richland, which is considered an
"extended -stay" hotel chain and one of which is being constructed in Yakima, contains
an under-the-counter refrigerator, microwave, sink, and coffeemaker, and possibly a
heating pad in lieu of a stove range in their rooms. Through discussion, Calhoun
defined the objective of this process to be preventing a hotel from converting to
temporary worker housing and providing definitions the code was lacking. Staff and
Commission concluded that stipulating in the definition that lodging would be for a fee
would create a scenario in which temporary worker housing may be excluded from the
extended -stay use. The Commission requested staff to report back on the state and
federal definitions of H -2A and temporary worker housing. The Commission had
consensus to continue discussion on this item at the next meeting.
Other Business - None noted.
Adjourn - A motion to adjourn to September 12, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote.
This meeting adjourned at 5:07 p.m.
Chairwoman Byers Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, planning Specialist.
-3-
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
Yakima Planning Commission
Open :record Public Hearing
September 12, 2018
EXHIBIT LIST
Applicant: City of Yakima Planning Division
File Numbers: TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
Site Address: N/A
Staff Contact: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager
Table of Contents
CHAPTER A Staff Report
CHAPTER B SEPA Checklist
CHAPTER C Application
CHAPTER D Public Notices
CHAPTER E Supplemental Information
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER A
Staff Report
�rl P�
" u'��!'ii;��� IIII 1111111 � IIII�� �I 1111111 � ,
A-1 Staff Report 09/12/2018
........._.�.......................... �......._...._...........................
..._........................... . ..............._. ...........
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
lIYY a�r�` "b°��, IMA Manning Division
mm n i Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2°d Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
Recommendation Regarding Amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance
TO: City of Yakima Planning Commission
FROM: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments — File TXT#002-18
FOR MEETING OF: September 12, 2018
I. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
The City of Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor amendments to the City of
Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1, 15, and 16. The proposed amendments will modify the sign
code, YMC § 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC § 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling
Unit Standards in YMC § 15.09.045 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter in YMC
15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and
15.04.120; modifying the district intent statement and permitted uses in the Regional
Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§ 15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally
consolidation of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch. 16.08.
The Planning Commission held study sessions on these proposed amendments on December
13, 2017; January 10, 2018; March 14, 2018; March 28, 2018; April 11, 2018; May 5, 2018; May
23, 2018; and June 27, 2018.
Proposed Amendment Sections:
The complete track changes text can be found in Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by
reference. A summary of the amendments is as follows:
1. YMC § 15.08.045(7) — Sign Code Exemptions
a. Modifications to Flag size and Flag pole height/location.
Staff Analysis: This standard provides more flexibility for an exemption under the sign chapter.
For example, under the current language a homeowner in the R-1 zone could only have a 10 -ft
tall flag pole.
2. YMC § 15.23.030 — Rezones -Zoning map amendments
a. Requiring a non -project rezone application to submit a non-binding conceptual
site plan.
b. Requiring that any conditions imposed on a Rezone application be incorporated
into a development agreement.
Staff Analysis: Changes as discussed previously from conversation related to a non -project
rezone processed in 2017. The proposal is similar to other cities (Ellensburg, Wenatchee) in the
requirement for a DA when conditions are placed on a Rezone. Requiring a conceptual site plan
with a non -project rezone will provide the notified property owners a visual representation of
what future development could look like, but will not be binding on the applicant.
3. YMC § 15.09.045 —Accessory Dwelling Units
a. Consistency with Table 4-1 related to level of review (Class 2 in SR and R-1)
b. Adding R-2 and R-3 as allowable zoning districts (Class 1 in R-2 and R-3)
c. Clarifying structure type and placement
d. Decreasing the minimum lot size from 0.25 acres to a lot appropriately sized for a
duplex
Staff Analysis: ADU's were added to the Zoning Ordinance in 2010 but have been proposed and
constructed minimally due to the onerous restrictions. Currently they are only permitted in the
SR and R-1 zones and only on parcels 0.25 acres or more. On occasion a customer will inquire
about adding an ADU to a single family home in the R-2 zone and it isn't permitted.
Proposed is to add the remaining residential zones (R-2 and R-3) and abandon the 0.25 acre
requirement and instead rely on the minimum lot size to build a duplex (8, 000 square -feet in SR
and R-1, 7,000 square -feet in R-2 and R-3). Additionally, the restriction that an ADU can only be
attached to the primary dwelling or attached to/above a detached garage has posed issues —
adding the ability to build a stand-alone ADU that meets the accessory structure setbacks will
provide significant flexibility over the current Ordinance. Finally, a cleanup to a conflict between
the text and table — the text indicates a Class (3) where the table lists a Class (2). Since
additional districts are proposed, the change is to remove indication of level of review from the
text and rely on the table.
4. YMC Ch. 15.17 — Modification
a. Multiple changes throughout to allow any existing use which meets the applicable
criteria to go through the Modification process.
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to allow the abbreviated Modification review
process to be applicable to all previously approved uses, including Type 1. Currently, the code
requires a Modification of an existing and approved Type 1 use to go through another Type 1
Review to modify the development. This is contrary the defined purpose of a Modification which
means "any change or alteration to the occupancy, arrangement, placement or construction of
any existing use, structure, or associated site improvement, and any change or alteration of
land. "
5. YMC Ch. 15.02.020 — Definitions and YMC § 15.04.120 — Home Occupations
a. Adding definition for "Home occupation, taxicab operator"
b. Adding Taxicab Operator to Table 4-2
Staff Analysis: These changes were proposed by a member of the public, and will provide sole -
proprietor or family taxi businesses to be operated out of the home as a Home Occupation
rather than out of a commercial establishment, which for many is cost prohibitive.
6. YMC § 15.03.020 — District and map overlay intent statements and YMC Table 4-1 —
Permitted Land Uses
DOC.
INDEX
a. Adding "light manufacturing, processing, research" to the Regional Development
(RD) district intent statement.
b. Adding certain uses and modifying the level of review of certain uses in the RD
zone.
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to provide for additional light manufacturing uses in
the RD zoning district. This district contains several large tracts (Mill Site, Speedway) that could
benefit from a greater number of potential uses above and beyond what is currently allowed in
RD.
7. Various sections — Appeals
a. Revised definition of "Party of Record" in YMC § 15.02.020
b. All appeal language is being consolidated to YMC Ch. 16.08. Modified sections
include:
i. YMC Ch. 1.43 — Hearing Examiner
ii. YMC Ch. 15.16 — Appeals
iii. YMC Ch. 16.08 —Appeals
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to consolidate all Appeal procedures into one place
(YMC Ch. 16.08 Appeals). Currently, there is language in YMC Ch. 1. 43, YMC Ch. 15.16, and
YMC Ch. 16.08. These changes provide consistency throughout all Titles as all appeals now
would be processed under YMC Ch. 16.08. This also streamlines any future text amendments
related to appeals as only YMC Ch. 16.08 would need to be amended.
II. YAKIMA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040
The proposed text amendments are consistent with the following goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan 2040
Goal 2.1: Establish a development pattern consistent with the community's vision.
Policy 2.1.6: Adopt coordinated development regulations that facilitate Yakima's preferred
land use pattern (e.g. allowed density, uses, and site provisions)
• Refine the land use code on an ongoing basis to make it user-friendly by
employing simple language, easy to read charts, and illustrative graphics.
• Monitor and refine the land use code as needed to facilitate the preferred
land use pattern and development character.
• Integrate an appropriate balance of predictability and flexibility when
updating development regulations that allow ease of administration and
interpretation and offer optional ways of meeting requirements when
possible.
Policy 2.3.1(A): Accessory Dwelling Units ADU Allow for attached and detached ADU's in all
residential districts provided size, design, and other provisions are included to
promote compatibility with surrounding uses. Additional considerations may
include:
• Reduce the minimum lot size for lots qualifying for an ADU.
• Allow free-standing ADU's provided lots retain useable open space and
units minimize privacy impacts to adjacent properties.
• Provide an owner occupancy requirement (owner must live in primary home
or ADU).
3 DOCm
INDEX
-
Policy 2.3.3(H):
Allow home occupations that would not generate excessive traffic, create
parking problems, or degrade the livability or appearance of the neighborhood.
Policy 2.5.6(B):
Cascade Mill redevelopment — Promote coordinated development that
integrates a mixture of uses, and the following land use design principles
• Promote and incentivize large-scale industrial park, business park, light
manufacturing or other economic development that integrates with planned
retail and recreation uses.
Goal 5.1:
Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices.
Policy 5.1.6:
Allow accessory dwelling units in single family zones to increase the supply of
affordable housing units to help existing homeowners remain in their homes.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEPA
This project was processed for review under the State Environmental Policy Act as a procedural
action per WAC 197-11-800(19), and a Preliminary Determination of Nonsignificance was
issued on July 20, 2018 (SEPA#020-18). The DNS was retained on August 10, 2018.
IV. PUBLIC NOTICE
Notice of Public Hearing
Legal Ad Publication
July 20, 2018
July 20, 2018
No written comments were submitted prior to the public hearing.
V. CONCLUSIONS
1. No adverse impacts have been identified by the approval of these amendments.
2. The proposed text amendments are supported by the Yakima Comprehensive Plan 2040.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Community Development recommends APPROVAL of these text
amendments.
4
INDEX
A-1
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
Approval:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the Planning Commission draft findings of fact and forward a recommendation of approval
to the Yakima City Council.
Approval with modifications:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the City of Yakima Planning staff modify the draft language to include the changes noted in
the minutes of this afternoon's public hearing, and with these changes move that the Planning
Commission draft findings of fact and forward a recommendation of approval to the Yakima
City Council.
Denial:
Based on the testimony and evidence presented during this afternoon's public hearing, I move
that the Planning Commission reject the proposal to include findings of fact documenting the
reasons for denial, and order the proposal be forwarded to the Yakima City Council with a
recommendation for denial.
61
Exhibit "A"
City of Yakima Planning Division
2018 Text Amendments
1. Sign Code
15.08.045 Exemptions.
The following signs are exempt from the permitting requirements of this chapter:
7. Flags. Any flags.; to the
gLqrr y_ig.stand .rd s:
,a. Residential 7nnMnIdistricts are a.119wed onawwffpg.1f qj gjcj treesfrq!Itgoi.L
t t+t mmmglma @1artmk two L q rm y fig flown on a sr�l,gi�Yowft , moo:
,.......r maximum fla le hi�Y Y�� �1a�If the rMXiMLJG'9'V stru Lu(@ YGel �9� C77� ��i ��14� CGy! .iCpp�G�%
data fmperVi�5 C5 ,
5- 1,
..w
.:..._ ag. glgs mshall meet @M!i able setback standards for ace qs to L�ctLau
g.: ThempxormpLur _;gig -quare foo(p „o ,ram jaq.shall be as follows:
u..__ PoYgwf pYgttt_c f_20 feel: or lasso" `
NL...._. fir Ipt hf.� ts'r.d pn 2t feet to 30-feet:..5'x8'.
jiL _PoYpmmr,�atpwfwkl�w rlww �fp� "x10,
iv, .... g rt..a gYi io�u , fl,a pi Ursa Y e incre sed.. p rLionate to the maximurn a�oP;g
lvigbt,a M.QA 15.1:x,
2. Rezone
15.23.030 Rezones—Zoning map amendments.
B. Application. All rezone applications shall be filed with the planning division. The planning division shall
process the application under the provisions of YMC 15.11.070 and Title 16. The application shall include the
information required in YMC 15.11.020 and the signature of the owner(s) of the property. Edon„-prr'efe,g,,t.
gppl,iuptions shall Wso include anon-birrodnng ggrpr gtr� a imt¢ Tpn tmafow ggr(Yuar_ fN.p�f � rt
F. Develarrarnt araaarnarnk larr4nLiarumirrc? b,s oraam out famrior Ip rottgaRo any tu`inentalweffect the rsoTttt,
hnt pve o,in_u se uarmafafroa tt _in the imirne diato vJci ity u c or�duldogws ufatipQgq,_Oy ,1I1p a wt h4gU bra
an q[pga o tzywwdt olfy rzucn at prlcrdtft 5 p1°rap rk oy p r _u ar k1g
P'foc aftL rp s tm frarthr in f 5 7d1Y 17 _tmhµrou 1s 7( 200..
3. ADU's
15.09.045 Accessory dwelling units.
B. Requirements. An accessory dwelling unit is a permitted Class 1) use, r,om,ths SFS„R j,_R: and R..3 zoning
jistrict ..(agg Yl ,C X151 �t OOfb Ta l ;Wi , secondary to the primary use of a detached single-family dwelling,
subject to all of the following conditions:
1. The accessory dwelling unit may be attached to the primary residence or attached to or above a detached
garage, or be its own stand alone structure,.
DOC.
INDEX
6 t 4c+Arra ADU aQ al hed to the rrc'na,ty structure shall have the same building setbacks as the primary
structure An ADU that„is attached to or bumjit above, a dela hed„garage or a stand alone structure shall have
..
time samet�t�uta9i,ng �ftaa ks as,. ru a�co§§gry structure,
9. ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels/lots a. lIe-ClUafte 04,18, Si?#,4SiZe a',r proal l: dor a d t alis „o
TaWe 5,-2.
10. The primary residence and the ADU shall both be connected to public sewer and water.
a. If the ADU is attached to the primary dwelling unit, the two dwelling units shall share a single
sewer and water connection.
b. If the ADU is attached to, or located above, a detached garage, or os a stand_- lone_strUCtur ,
each unit shall have its own sewer and water connection, with required meters.
15.04.030, Table 4-1. Permitted Land Uses
SR R-1 R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 HB SCC LCC AS I GC CBD I RD M-1 M-2
Accessory Dwelling Unit (*) (See
YMC 15.09.0451 2 2 1 1
4. Modification
Chapter 15.17
MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING OR APPROVED USES OR DEVELOPMENT*
Sections:
15,;17.010 Purpose.
15„.17.020 Modification to permitted development and uses regulated.
15,17,,,03,0, Exemptions.
15.17,040 Review of modifications.
15.17.050 Appeals.
. Prior legislation: Ords. 3106, 93-81 and 95-13.
15.17.010 Purpose.
This chapter establishes provisions for the review of proposed modifications to existing or approved Qa s -( (
ogr..().. uses.
..
C.
INDEX
L
15.17.020 Modification to permitted development and uses regulated.
bl modifk;;boons f ( ifA4rWq or',e,pgrwMd Glrrs (1) UMRS or rf vek)panea t shafl bre reOowed a&-@ -GWs (1)
r Rher•tha ii urudw th r�e Minor changes to existing or approved Class M(2) or (3)
uses or development may qualify for abbreviated review under the provisions in this chapter, if they meet the
criteria listed below,,(�rA"riay,apply-drf3f�,��y,for Overlay districts
shall not increase the level of review for the provisions of this chapter. Modifications not meeting the criteria
below must apply directly for review as a Class, (2) or (3) use or development.
A. The modification will not increase residential density jhpt V9gL ergs gire an dd�o)(onWLevel cifjr vie ;
B. The modification will not increase the amount of parking by more than ten percent or twenty spaces
(whichever is least), except that the amount of parking for controlled atmosphere and cold storage warehouses
may be increased by up to twenty spaces. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous
modifications since the last normal review;
C. Any expansion of use area or structure will not exceed fifty percent of the gross floor area. This limit shall
be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications since the last normal review;
D. The modification will not increase the height of any structure;
E. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications since the last normal review;
F. The modification will not add a drive-thru facility; and
G. The modification does not include hazardous materials.
15.17.030 Exemptions.
For exemptions from the review processes, see YMC 15.01.040(A),
15.17.040 Review of modifications.
A. Submittals. Applications for modification shall follow the submittal requirements for Type (1) review. In
addition, for aq r rd f r s ( l or (.:f a r rfcequ a ,pfqyed use or development, the applicant shall submit
both the site plan previously approved by the reviewing official and a new site plan showing the location, size,
and type of modification proposed by the applicant.
B. Review. Applications for modifications may be administratively and summarily reviewed using the Type (1)
review process, in addition to the following criteria:
1. Any proposed change in the site design or arrangement:
IIa. Will not change or modify any special condition previously imposed under Class JlL(2) or (3)
review;
b. Will not adversely reduce the amount of existing landscaping or the amount or location of
required sitescreening; and
c. In the determination of the planning division, it will not create or materially increase any
adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project.
2. All proposed new structures, site improvements, or structural alterations to existing structures or site
improvements comply with the development standards of YMC Chapters 15.05 through 15.08, except as
approved under the adjustment or variance provisions.
C. Decision and Notification of Decision. The planning division shall issue a written decision on the
modification application using the Type (1) decision process. In addition, any proposed modification that does
not meet all the requirements of this section shall be denied. The division shall mail its decision to the applicant.
Uses or developments denied under this chapter may submit applications for review under the normal review
provisions for the use. (Ord. 2016-029 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2016: Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008).
15.17.050 Appeals.
Decisions by the planning division regarding approval or denial of administrative modifications may be
appealed as prescribed by the applicable review.
S. Taxicab Home Occupation
15.02.020 Definitions
"Home occupation, taxicab operator" means the accessory,use ofmmammdwellin8 as a„n administrative office
for a Taxicab licensed under YMC Ch. 5.78. This use shall be limited to a maximum of two vehicles
operated by_immediate,family members who reside in themmhome..
15.04.120 Home Occupations
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
Zoning District
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
Accountant
1
1
1
1
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
Zoning District
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
Architect
1
1
1
1
Artist, author, arts and crafts
1
1
1
1
Attorney
1
1
1
1
Barbershop,beauty parlor
www_
2
1 2
2
2
Bed and breakfast*
1
2
1
1
Business administration
1
1
1
1
Kabinet, mill work,, carpentry work
2
2
Catering service
2
2
2
2
2
Ceramics and sculpting
2
2r
2
Composer
1
W1
1
Day care, family home*
1
1
1
1
1
Dentist
1
2
2
2
Dog grooming
2
3
3
3
3
Dressmaker, seamstress, tailor
11
1
1
Engineer
1
1
1
1
Food preparation*
i,
1
2
1
1
1
Home contractor*
1
1
1
2
1
Home instruction* 1-5 students
1
1
1
1
1
6-8 students
2
2
2
2
2
Insurance agent
1
1
1
1
Locksmith
1
2
2
1
1
Photographer (not including productions studio)
1
2
2
2
Physician
1
2
2
2
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
6. Regional Development Zoning District
15.03.0 20 District and map o
Zoning District
7SR
R-1
R-2
R-3 B-1
Product assemblage"
1
2
2
2
1
Massage therapy/spa"
1
1
1
1
1
Music teacher
1
1
1
1
Production of small articles by hand without the use of automated or production line
1
2
2
2
equipment
Radio, television and small appliance repair
2
1 2
2
2
Real estate agent
1
1
1
1
Secretarial, phone answering, desktop publishing service"
1
1
1
1
Small engine repair
2
7axucab...Qpe ft��,("
1
.1.
1..
2
1.
Wedding service
2
2
2 1
2 1 2
Unclassified home occupation
See YMC 15.0.120(G)
NOTES:
" Refers to definition in YMC Chapter 15.02
1 = Type (1) Permitted Home Occupation
2 = Type (2) Review and Approval by the Administrative Official Required
3 = Type (3) Review Public Hearing and Approval by the Hearing Examiner Required
X = Not Permitted
6. Regional Development Zoning District
15.03.0 20 District and map o
M. Regional Development District (RD). The purpose of the regional development district is to
provide high visibility from the interstate and state highways of the city of Yakima to provide
regional commerce, office campus, recreation, large-scale retail, culture, igbt rj) � of tli irtg
og��s�a qw q tfC ,_and large multiple mixed uses. This district is characterized by very
intensive development and a variety of land uses including retail sales and service
establishments, high-density residential development, financial institutions, professional office
buildings, hotels, condominiums, and corporation headquarters.
Table 4-1. Permitted Land Uses
SR
R-1
R-2 I R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC CBD
RD
M-1 M-2
AGRICULTURAL (COMMERCIAL)
Agriculture, Horticulture, General Fanning
1
1
1
1
(not feedlots or stockyards) (*)
I
Agricultural Building (*)
1
1
l
l
Agricultural Chemical Sales/Storage
l
1
1
Agricultural Market
Agricultural Stand
Agricultural Related Industries (*)
2
]
1
l
Animal Husbandry (See YMC 15.09,070)
(*)
1
2
1
1
Concentrated Feeding Operation (*)
3
Floriculture, Aquaculture
1
1
1
Fruit Bin Sales/Storage
3
2
1
1
Marijuana Production (**)
l
1
Winery and Brewery—Basic (*)
3
3
1
2
Resort/Destination w/on-site agricultural
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
production (*)
Resort/Destination (*)
2
3
3
1
1
1
3
Retail (*)
1
l
1
1
1
1
2
AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION
Aquatic Center
3
3
3
1
2
Amusement Park (Permanent) (*)
3
3
3
1
3
Bowling Alleys
2
2
2
l
1
2
3
Campground (*)
3
2
Children's Outdoor Recreation Center*
2
2
(More than 500 ft. from abutting residential
and not containing a go-cart track)
Children's Ouldwir Recreation Center*
3
2
(Less than 500 ft, (torn abutting residential)
and/or containing a go-cart track)
Drive -In Theatres
3
2
2
2
IINDEX
—1
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Exercise Facilities
2
1
1
l
1
2
1
1
1
2
Horse Racing Tracks, Speedways
3
3
Game Rooms, Card Rooms, Electronic
3
2
1
2
2
2
Game Rooms (*)
Golf Courses, Clubhouses, Golf Driving
3
3
3
3
2
Ranges
Miniature Golf Courses
3
3
1
1
1
1
Movie Theatres, Auditoriums, Exhibition
3
1
1
1
1
Halls
Parks (*)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
Roller Skating or Ice Skating Rink
2
2
1
1
2
Sports Facility (indoor)
2
2
1
2
1
2
Social Card Rooms (See YMC 15.09,090)
3
3
3
3
State Fair Park
(See YMC 15.04,200)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Cemetery/Crematorium with Funeral Home 3 3 3 3 3 3
Funeral Home not associated with 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2
Cemetery/Crematorium
Churches, Synagogues, and Temples (*)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
Community Center (*) Meeting Halls,
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
Fraternal Organizations
Community Gardens(*) (if accessory to an
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
l
1
1
approved principal use) (See YMC
15.04.060(G))
Community Gardens (*) (with planting area
1
1
i
l
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
of one-quarter acre or less)
Community Gardwis (*') (with planting area
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1 1
2
2
Of more lltan one-quarter and up to one-half
acre)
Community Gardens (*) (with planting area
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
of more than one-half acre up to one acre)
Day Care Facilities (not home occupation);
1
2
2
2
2
1 2
2
2
1
_r
1
1
Family In -Home (*)
I
I
I
Day Care Center(*)
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Public Facility (*)
3
F
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hospital (*) Outside Institutional Overlay
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Correctional Facilities
3
3
3
3
3
3
Libraries
3
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Museums, Art Galleries
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Schools
Elementary and Middle
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
IINDEX
—1
DOC.
INDEX
m
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Senior High School
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Business Schools (*)
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
l
2
2
Community College/University—Inside
(See YMC Chapter 15.31)
Institutional Overlay
Community College/University—Outside
3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 22
Institutional Overlay
Vocational Schools (*)
3
3
3 3
3
2
2
2
1
1
l 2
3
Wastewater Sprayfield (*)
3
3
3
Zoo (*)
3
3 j
3
3
3
HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICE FACILITY
Group Homes (six or fewer), Adult Family
1
1
1
1
l
i
1
1
Home (*)
Treatment Centers for Drug and Alcohol
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Rehabilitation
Boarding House (*)
3
3
3
3
3
l
2
Halfway House (*)
2
3
3
Group Homes (more than six), Convalescent
3
2
2
2
3
3
and Nursing Homes (*)
Mission (*) (with Type (3) review, and
2
2
2
development agreement—see definition)
MANUFACTURING
Agricultural Product Support
2
2
2
1
1
Aircraft Parts
1
2
1
1
Apparel and Accessories
3
2
2
l
1
Bakery Products (wholesale)
2
2
2
2
2
1
l
Beverage Industry (*)
2
2
2
1
l
Canning, Preserving and Packaging Fruits,
32
l
l
Vegetables, and Other Foods
Cement and Concrete Plants
3
1
Chemical's (Industrial Agricultural, Wood,
3
1
etc.)
Concrete, Gypsum and Plaster Products
2
1
l
Confectionery and Related Products
2
2
2
l
l
2
1
1
(wholesale)
Cutlery, Hand Tools and General Hardware
l
3
l
1
Drugs
1
2
2
1
l
Electrical Transmission and Distribution
l
2
3
1
l
Equipment
Electronic Components and Accessories and
1
2
2
3
l
1
Product Assembly
DOC.
INDEX
m
D
INDEX
P
-1
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Engineering, Medical, Optical, Dental,
1
2
1
1
Scientific Instruments and Product
Assembly
Fabricated Structural Metal Products
2
3
3
1
1
Food Processing
2
3
1
1
Furniture
2
3
2
1
l
Glass, Pottery, and Related Products and
2
2
2
l
1
Assembly
Grain Mill Products
3
1
I
Heating Apparatus Wood Stoves
1
1
Leather Products
3
1
l
1
Leather Tanning and Finishing
d
l
1
Machinery and Equipment
l
2
1
1
Marijuana Processing (**)
I
l
Marijuana Research (**)
l
l
Meat, Poultry and Dairy Products
1
1
Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and
3
l
Allied Products
Paperboard Containers and Boxes
1
3
1
1
Plastic Products and Assembly
1
2
l
1
Prefabricated Structural Wood Products and
i
1
l
Containers
Printing, Publishing and Binding
1
3
2
1
l
Printing Trade (service industries)
2
2
2
1
1
2
l
Recycling Processing Center (*)
3
1
Rendering Plants, Slaughter Houses
3
Rubber Products
i
2
1
Sign Manufacturing and Product Assembly
2
1
1
1
l
Sawmills and Planing Mills
2
1
Sheet Metal and Welding Shops
2
1
1
Stone Products (includes finishing of
2
1
2
2
3
l
1
monuments for retail sale)
Transportation Equipment, Including
2 1
1
Trailers and Campers
Woodworking: Cabinets, Shelves, etc
3
l
2
2 i
l
MINING/REFINING/OFF-SITE HAZARDOUS
WASTE
TREATMENT
Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials, Rock 3
3
1
Crushing
D
INDEX
P
-1
DOC.
INDEX
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC LCC
ASGC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Mining Including Sand and Gravel Pits (*)
3
3
3
Stockpiling of Earthen Materials (*)
2
2
2
2
l
1
1
1 l
1
l
l
1
1
Off -Site Hazardous Waste Treatment and
3
3
Storage Facilities (*)
RESIDENTIAL
Accessory Uses (*)
See YMC 15 04,060
Detached Single -Family Dwelling (*)
i
i
l
1
3
_7T
17
3
3
3
3
Accessory Dwelling Unit (*) (See YMC
2
2
15.09.045
Existing or New Detached Single -Family
l
1
1
Dwelling on Existing Lots of 8,000 Square
Feet or Less
Detached Single -Family Dwelling (zero lot
2
2
2
2
3
3
l
3
3
3
3
line) (*) (See YMC 1509.040)
Attached Single -Family Dwelling, Common
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
Wall (*)
Two -Family Dwelling (Duplex) (*)
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
Converted Dwelling (*)
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Multifamily Dwelling (*): 0-7 DU/NRA
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8-12 DU/NRA
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
13+ DU/NRA
3
l
2
2
2
2
1
1 2
2
2
Mixed -Use Building
1 1 1 l i 1 l
Planned Development (*)
See YMC 15,28
Mobile Home Parks (*)
2 2 2
Mobile Home (*) or Manufactured Homes
(*)
See YMC 15.04160
Retirement Homes (*) 2 3 l 3 '', 1 1
Temporary Hardship Units (See YMC 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
15.04.140)
RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE
Adult Business Uses
See YMC 15 09,200
Animal Clinic/Hospital/Veterinarian (*)
3 2 2 2 l 2 l l l
Auction House for Goods (*)
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
Auction House for Livestock (*)
3
2
2
Automotive
Automotive Dealer New and Used Sales
2
2
2
l 1
3
l
1
Weekend Automobile and Recreational
ll
l
i
Vehicle (RV) Sales
Automotive: Car Wash/Detailing
2
1
1
l
1
1
:2:H
DOC.
INDEX
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M -t
M-2
Parking Lots and Garages
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Maintenance and Repair Shops
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
Paint and Body Repair Shops
2
2
1
1
1
2
Parts and Accessories (tires, batteries, etc)
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
Towing Services
l
3
1
1
Wrecking and Dismantling Yard (*) and
3
1
Hulk Haulers (*)
Bail Bonds
Beauty and Barber Shops
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Bed and Breakfast Inn (*)
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Boats and Marine Accessories
2
2
1
1
1
1
Butcher Shop
l
i
l
1
2
2
l
Commercial Services(*)
LL
LI
2
1
l
l
l
1
2
Communication Towers (*)
(See
YMC
Chapter
15.29)
Convenience Store—Closed 10;00 p,m, to
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
600 a,m.
Convenience Store—Open 10:00 p,rn to
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
6:00 a.m.
Pet Day Care/Animal Training (*)
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Fann and Implements, Tools and Heavy
1
2
3
1
1
Construction Equipment
Farm Supplies
2
2
1
1
2
1
Financial Institutions
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
Fuel Oil and Coal Distributors1
2
1
1
Furniture, Home Furnishings, Appliances
l
1
1
1
1
1
1
General Hardware, Garden Equipment, and
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Supplies
General Retail Sales 12,000 sq, ftor less
2
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
3
(not otherwise regulated)(*)
General Retail Sales greater than 12,000 sq
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
ft. (not otherwise regulated) (*)
Heating and Plumbing and Electrical
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Equipment Stores
Heavy Equipment Storage, Maintenance and
l
l
l
Repair
Kennels (*)
2
2
2
Laundries, Laundromats and Dry Cleaning
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Plants
Liquor Stores
2
2
1
1
1
I
Locksmiths and Gunsmiths
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
DOC.
INDEX
I
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC LCC
AS
GC CBD
RD M-1
M-2
Lumber Yards
2 1
l
1
1
Marijuana Retail (**)
1
1 1
l 1
1
Massage Therapy/Spa
i
1 1
1
1 1
l
Mobile Vendor
See
YMC Ch, 5,57
Motels and Hotels
2
1
1
l
1
1
Night Clubs/Dance Establishments
2
l
l
l
1 1
l
Nursery (*)
2
1
l
1
1
l
1
1
Offices and Clinics
3
l
1
1
1 1
l
1
1
1
2
Office Contractor Building and Trade
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
l
1
(Plumbing, Heating, Electrical, and
Painting)
Outdoor Advertising (Billboards)
See
YMC 15
08,130
Pawn Broker
2
l
l
l
2
1
Radio/TV Studio
3
2
2
1
l
1
1
2
Recycling Drop -Off Center (*)
1
2
2
1
l
1
1
Rental: Auto, Truck, Trailer, Fleet Leasing
3
2
1
2
l
2
2
1
2
Services with Storage
Rental: Heavy Equipment (except
l
i
automotive) with Storage
Rental: Heavy Equipment (except
1
2
3
2
automotive) without Storage
Repairs: Small Appliances, TVs, Business
1
2
1
1
1
l
2
1
1
Machines, Watches, etc.
Repairs: Reupholstery and Fumiture
Repairs: Smalt Engine and Garden
2
2
2
9
l
1
2
l
Equipment
Restaurant (*)
2
1
1
1
1
l
l
1
l
Seamstress, Tailor
l
l
1
1
Service Station (*) Closed Between 10:00
2
l
1
l
1
1
1
l
p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (*)
Service Station(*) Open Between 10 00
3
2
2
l
1
2
1
2
p.m. and 6:00 a.m,(*)
Shooting Ranges (indoor)
3
3
3
3
1
Signs, Printed, Painted or Carved
2
2
1
l
2
1
1
Tavems (*) and Bars
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
Technical Equipment Sales (*)
2
l
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
Truck Service Stations and Shops
3
2
1
1
Truck (Large), Manufactured Home and
1
3
l
Travel Trailer Sales
Waste Material Processing and Junk
3
1
Handling (*)
DOC.
INDEX
I
SR R -I R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 HB SCC LCC AS GC CBD RD M-1 M-2
TRANSPORTATION
Bus Terminals
1
1
l
1
1
I
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facilities
1
i
Transportation Brokerage (*) Offices, with
2
2
1
l
Truck Parking
Contract Truck Hauling, Rental of Trucks
l
1
l
with Drivers
Air, Rail, Truck Terminals (for short-term
1
2
l
1
storage, office, etc,)
Railroad Switch Yards, Maintenance and
l
h
Repair Facilities, etc,
I
Taxicab Terminals, Maintenance and
3
3
l
Dispatching Centers, etc,
Airport Landing Field
1
Airport Operations
UTILITIES
Power Generating Facilities
3
2 l
Utility Services (substations, etc)
3
3±3
3 3 3
3
3
3
1 l
WHOLESALE TRADE—STORAGE
Warehouses (*)
3
1
2
2
1
1
Wholesale Trade (*)
2
l
l
2
1
l
l
Storage Facilities, Bulk (*)
1
2
l
1
Storage Facilities Commercial (*) 3 l 2 3 1 1
Residential Mini -Storage (*) 3 3 1 2 3 1 1
* Refers to a definition in YMC Chapter 15 02
** See YMC 15,09,220 for general development requirements for marijuana uses,
= Not Permitted
1 =Class(]) Permitted Use
2 =Class (2) Requires an Administrative Review by the Administrative Official
3 = Class (3) Requires a Public Hearing by the Hearing Examiner
DOC.
INDEX
7. Appeals
15.02.020 Definitions
rTggy of coEd-ne ak tto tii „io
�_d ntifi d by the records avail blefrr�m them Yaki. amm ount eO ssessor ofricea,.Jj thy; leo b' owner
of the sub iectrc.prcape t _int ate)' pgfsoln whotestified at�the ppg
appligabo,a:ndlnr_( ).an _person who, submitted written comments buri(tMOLI trafive review
wijbin the fgguired timeframe) or has submitted written „mcommentsconcernin mthemmapplication at
the o rer;r,.piAbli !"~Near cl i rs_IT_ „ v w nl iww wwwwwwiiwns rwwfom
r___
letters).
Chapter 1.43
HEARING EXAMINER
Sections:
1.43.010
Office established.
1.43.020
Appointment.
1.43.030
Qualifications.
1.43.040
Removal.
1.43.050
Standards of conduct.
1.43.060
Rules.
1.43.070
Time computation.
1.43.080
Duties and powers.
1.43.090
Applications.
1.43.100
Master applications.
1.43.110
Report of department.
1.43.120
Examiner's decision.
1.43.130
Notice of examiner's decision.
1.43.140
Appeal from examiner's decision.
1.43.150
Effect of appeal.
1.43.160
Council action on appeals.
1.43.170
Appeal of decisions made by council.
1.43.180
Annual report.
1.43.010 Office established.
There is established an office of hearing examiner. The office of examiner shall be under the
administrative supervision of the examiner and shall be separate from and not an administrative
part of the department of community and economic development. Unless the context requires
otherwise, the term "examiner" as used herein shall include deputy examiners and examiners
pro tem. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.020 Appointment.
The hearing examiner and any deputy examiners shall be appointed by the city council after
consideration of the recommendation of the joint hearing examiner committee created by and
pursuant to the "Intergovernmental Agreement for the Mutual Use of Hearing Examiner
Services" entered into by and between the city of Yakima and Yakima County, Washington.
Such examiner shall serve an indefinite term of office which shall, however, be reviewed one
year following the date of original appointment and thereafter every four years. The council may
also appoint examiners pro tem to serve in the event of absence or inability to act of the
examiner and deputy examiners. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.030 Qualifications.
Examiners shall be appointed solely with regard to their qualifications for the duties of their
office and will have such training and experience as will qualify them to conduct administrative
or quasi-judicial hearings on regulatory enactments and to discharge the other functions
conferred upon them. Examiners shall hold no other elective or appointive office or position with
the city of Yakima or the county of Yakima. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.040 Removal.
An examiner may be removed from office for cause by a majority vote of the city council after
consideration of a recommendation as to removal or nonremoval from the joint hearing
examiner committee. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.050 Standards of conduct.
(a) No person, including city or county officials, elective or appointive, shall attempt to
influence an examiner in any matter pending before him, except at a public hearing duly called
for such purpose, or to interfere with an examiner in the performance of his duties in any other
way; provided, that an official or employee of the city of Yakima or Yakima County may, in the
performance of his official duties provide information to the examiner when the action is
disclosed at the hearing or meeting; nor, shall this section prohibit rendering of legal services to
the examiner or to the council.
(b) No examiner shall conduct or participate in any hearing or decision in which the examiner
shall have a direct or indirect financial or personal interest or in which such conduct or
participation shall violate any rule of law applicable thereto. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.060 Rules.
The examiner shall implement procedural rules for the conduct of hearings and other procedural
matters related to the duties of his office in accordance with RCW 36.70.970. (Ord. 2948 § 1
(part), 1986).
1.43.070 Time computation.
In computing any period of time prescribed by this chapter, the day of the act from which the
designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so
computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a city legal holiday, in which
event the period runs until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a city
legal holiday. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.080 Duties and powers.
The examiner shall hear, make a record of, and decide matters provided in this chapter or by
other ordinances, including but not limited to the following land use matters:
A. Matters prescribed by the Yakima urban area zoning ordinance, Title 15 of this code
Decisions of the examiner on such matters shall have the legal effect as set forth in the
provisions of said ordinance;
B. Review of preliminary plats and modifications thereto using the procedures and provisions
for review by the planning commission as set forth in RCW Chapter 58.17 and the city of
Yakima subdivision ordinance, Title 14 of this code. The decisions of the examiner on such
matters shall constitute recommendations to the city council;
C. Preliminary plat extension requests pursuant to RCW 58.17.140 and city of Yakima
subdivision ordinance, Title 14 of this code. Decisions of the examiner on such matters shall
constitute final decisions unless appealed to the council pursuant to the provisions of t4i&
4,, a1 t arTitle 16 of the YakimawwMunicipal Codwe;
D. Plat vacations or amendments pursuant to RCW Chapter 58.11, 58.12, or 58.17. Decisions
of the examiner on such matters shall constitute final decisions unless appealed to the council
under the provisions of V4i8-43hR, t -Title 16 of the Yakima Municipal Code;
E. Pedestrian skybridge applications in the manner set forth in YMC 11.65.040(F) and
pedestrian skybridge permit violations as set out in YMC 11.65.070;
F. The examiner may conduct hearings required pursuant to RCW Chapter 43.21 C, State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Chapter 6.88 YMC at the request of the city responsible
official charged with responsibility for holding such a hearing; provided, that the substantive
SEPA decision and the decision on the associated action shall be made by the responsible
official;
G. The examiner may, at the request of the city shoreline administrator, receive and examine
available information, conduct public hearings and prepare records and reports thereof, and
issue recommendations to the council based upon findings and conclusions on applications for
shoreline substantial development permits and conditional use permits;
H. Conduct public hearings on petitions and resolutions to vacate streets and public rights-of-
way pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.79. Decisions of the examiner on such matters shall
constitute a recommendation to the city council.
The provisions of this section designating and assigning to the hearing examiner the duties and
functions listed above shall supersede any and all conflicting provisions of the municipal code of
the city of Yakima. (Ord. 2016-028 § 2, 2016; Ord. 2013-033 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013: Ord. 93-91 § 1,
1993: Ord. 3257 § 1, 1990: Ord. 3224 § 1, 1989: Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.090 Applications.
Applications for permits or approvals subject to review by the examiner shall be made to the city
department of community and economic development (hereinafter referred to as the
"department"). The department shall accept such applications only if applicable filing
requirements are met. The department, in coordination with the hearing examiner, shall be
responsible for assigning a date for and assuring due notice of public hearing for each
application, which date and notice shall be in accordance with the statute or ordinance
governing the application. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.100 Master applications,
Any persons proposing a development or project which requires more than one of the permits or
approvals listed in Section 1.43.080 of this chapter may submit a master application to the
department on forms furnished by the department containing all necessary information. The
master application shall thereafter be processed by the examiner subject to the longest time
limitations applicable to any of the required permits for approval. If any of the required approvals
constitute a recommendation to the legislative body, the decision of the examiner to all such
permits shall constitute a recommendation to the legislative body, otherwise the decision of the
examiner shall be final subject to an appeal to the legislative body pursuant to this chapter, Title
15 and Title 16 YMC. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.110 Report of department.
Where no specific provision for a report of the department is contained in the statute or
ordinance governing the application, the department may coordinate and assemble the reviews
of other county/city departments, other state or local governmental agencies and franchised
public utilities having an interest in the subject application and prepare a report summarizing the
factors involved and the department's findings and recommendations. At least seven calendar
days prior to the scheduled hearing the report shall be filed with the examiner and copies
thereof shall be mailed to the applicant and made available for public inspection. Copies thereof
shall be provided to interested parties upon request. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.120 Examiner's decision.
Within ten working days of the conclusion of a hearing, unless longer period is agreed to in
writing by the applicant, the examiner shall render a written decision which shall include findings
and conclusions based on the record. Except as provided in YMC 1.43.080 and 1.43. 100 and
the decision of the examiner shall be final and conclusive on the fifteenth day after the date of
the decision unless a notice of appeal to the Yakima city council is filed pursuant to
YMC 1.43.140. The examiner's decisions together with his findings, conclusions, and record of
proceedings shall be filed with the department of community and economic development. If the
effect of the decision is a recommendation to the legislative body, the original thereof shall be
transmitted to the legislative body (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.130 Notice of examiner's decision.
Unless different procedures are prescribed by the ordinance or statute governing the
application, the department shall mail copies of the examiner's decision by certified mail to the
applicant and by regular mail to other parties of record not later than three working days
following the filing of a written decision by the examiner.
1=fir pgrpees of this gnats,""Irf Ngr"" crueans()iwatligaut(� tide pq arttax
P2. L( -( r the g�t-app .y as,p sr�tifi .there qr avanl b: re from the Yakima Cognty
assessor's oft'i eLQ1 the 1p @I owner sgbjw l��ope ; 4� �,p r sn rhgmtestttd at tW�e
pcor ub H earin crr l oma la atfan and/or , an arson who submatted written
comments during administrative review within the re wired ti efram .gf has submitted written
coram nt oncewrnir_�h a�lip tion of the on r�sp� ! pu Nac h r r�a� exclu wL , emons who
k v aw�ly s we _pgt tuonLr form Cettsr )�,,
ha a �aghef..ara ttt wr tt n o� r ar t o �r y.. t o° r r proaose tw.a p o w - t a. to v t t o-
rdstrr prvate� tor�trt-urtre of i-��w..�rgrµrnet+rig (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.140 Appeal from examiner's decision.
f p
.ggls from the hqgria amkn r's de inion shall use the aroc,lures oqMf1qd en Chapter
16.08 YMC.
Except-
xc t a
to.,tr r V.. as...,pr"mrvid ira
..ot..Yaktma
Mr�n�otpai ���arte„ Chaf�t�r..:lµ... a trnakdeo�sto�at the artr�°�w�r�av ta�:.apue�,alr�t� tyre c��mr�molt
by-anyj)eF en a99autev �,l .or tay,. �uv rffmoer, tepartr emit„ bollard -„Wer bureau,...of tJ e -,My -affected -)y
the rxanu+rme�..dar�ota,
in t6m�e taftawmnq,rraw:
INDEX
pp
�1-1
°#-wd iidhp.rp�:
ft�nur��..pmo�ccudt�� d~..,.��� ��°����aa-u��.�a�•����a�uudw,m�-�+ d:���e�d-�.m��'o-��...���u.�o�=� Irv.
•.... 1.: a k;e,4A
,��-� r7�����suo�....o:� �,������.��=..st�std..spuµ�a�i�dU•~t���M �d��� �,��`��,=o-�-dor-�,��.���, &����
��i..� •,.��o-�u�,�.,t ��u�f���d r�� . w ���������.�µ..0 a��u�:�r�a�� � ��"���aarKKr�d��u� �-�n,��1�����`��
��.�tsr��st~ste ��..t�.��"�o-��-o����o��=��dC'�u�"�-�`-��e�°�-�o a�~ �w�w�d•-u�=�� .�W��� rs
�����;���mu-...�"����o-oz'y�"�uo-�..����,..���ul�•�� ��•�uw�.,.d�.r�:��=�;�~.,� �����c�..��� �-d��d..�����=��uo-t
trnsl�mdemmtd� ��������amru.•.�t:..u�ewmrvurdeMe ou��t.sd`���i �,_.f�mussert u��...�o-�����-�.� ���t-,��o�u��...to
(d) The-oppettant..oa.. ap --g rt
a 0 te
Ne- wi— en-. rguf-,nen w
or o utd ou uto-e ,.,ur to- a etd r... ,fir o- ' ec d'eW3ePk4&40Row6:.,. P,,* -app lm l t4 u u rd
roa „ ur rld o me oo t r Gausegfant,-wiftUt
a g irr"uermt er m. eu"� eranda u,� � st t r r t r itto d f rovd wd d ,tt�st..t,d,°° re r�bst tr r � tou c� � s u d o- o
the —6ty
whu���tr•w�� roast:.���ot:��.�4er��o-er�..� - . c�dd- • od�� o��•..do�Ft�r� d��d�� rt�:�s�t�r�'rd.,,
�• � rer d u wuutt ... o -c nt
of oGfft
idencr �,aa t..o �t' .d d o rude td e ,. li r.
(e)-Wber,ea40- Iy,-,opp ti....has— �- ��or� ��� -tta �t dda���u-t'��r� ,u��t o w�ttto�u ���� rr rm lr
exarni,ne ...m teoj a ,...the-evddenr; a
before .t8_axmr d r,. rmd rr tter �r r r �r •t � u u rr r dr •a � ro-t�� tt d h ve dee;
rootv�a1'.t�rd� u��9•�%-��•�_1.., t�t~t•tn t.u�t:...�t��g�ttt..�,._t_(p)� t�tff'�;d.
1.43.150 Effect of appeal.
The timely filing of an appeal under this chapter shall stay the effective date of the examiner's
decision until the appeal is adjudicated by the council or until the appeal is withdrawn. (Ord.
2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
asJ-the examifiers de66qo-4ias,b eo-4n- : ~ism -J t t_to_ he_-(A,)anra L,
the Oer -gid, the Gound,d sd�r tl s��twert�.�d o t to d'��u° � cul dur�...u��eetn�a ..try td�o oorara�o� wtaa��tb tir e
the coanoil sh,a oensider the appeal 17he date-ot h pubho..r��
tw r t ..,dr s t dkowdr g tdmo oto td�... rmoil receives -the inform-afior -fromthe deportment.
'
A-
#'I 4 f 141 r to-apprn ,
() .. telt& VJGWS. W =t10 cot; I ICW may- vises Ih p te::
fir o idWJ7
... 986)7
1.43;1.. .. s a y.coun,6h
h*Uoi:4-(4 th ( ,,MCH or i t r eGiSk)A of "the, e p nfw.�...���u
I FffpaFi
any-veFbafim- Gf-t1"*
l os, ot..re r try tt ..s4tt r'lor ata -I-, 421948.§..q...( rt)T4986);,
1.43.180 Annual report.
The examiner shall report in writing to and meet with the city planning commission and city
council at least annually, if requested, for the purpose of reviewing the administration of the
city's land use policies and regulating ordinances. The report shall include a summary of the
hearing examiner's decisions since the prior report. (Ord. 2010-22 § 2, 2010: Ord. 2948 § 1
(part), 1986).
"Party of Record" means: (1) the applicant; (2) the property tax payer for the subject property as
identified by the records available from the Yakima County assessor's office; (3) the legal owner
of the subject property; (4) any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the
application; and/or (5) any person who submitted written comments during administrative review
(within the required timeframe) or has submitted written comments concerning the application at
the open record public hearing (excluding persons who have only signed petitions or form
letters).
Chapter 15.16
APPEALS
Sections:
1 5, 16 0 0 5 _j\_pp�jqLq
---FJt,wpGse-
145-44,0445 —Genflirof
M& 4
44 ,61
1h*,i4e@j6,la#ve-bCA,,V--
444-6,080 EfN a--Gf -appeals,
zip, pealaWe-
z
L�q
procedures to aact undgLL ille 14 Title 15. Tittqm
be found in YMC 16.08.
461-1-&414 Pu-rf>Qs0-.
4*--P+1rP0,S(4-rjf tt,,rjs-o4apter,-4s, to -establish s-oiade-under
nO& Qrd47+1
In Gr-the'-provisjon's. of -1,418
shall -be -filed
pmvide4he, f-eqaired -
all
A, AV a,pp(.)afs appeal -of-, IPA
determ, be
&E4,?A-,-,Ghapter
v rprGvkW-4; Writ vd-hew#*�P
apfx4al erwjfmimefital Per ,,i -it
DOC.
INDEX
A-1
FmI mrmigstrative.and reOe �(Exfn k
4gr..rm� uar rmmarr,...i rra'ur�gdlq rra.�m. mar��r9
°E°q�ror,..dq°°tirq°q.r q°awur�n r qrr.... Nwa
..admr q qon-ofeit'�ll
the, -befig--appealed,.-thoeF ()f4EZ U e(-S�, to..t 4� ki rd, -a ncl - taisi.why, :t 41 cAion
q m t..oc° ns,rst ri-t w r h - the Y rlk,g ma- urban a mr GM J.1 Ffwb n -s a :-. C..)q rap -phi IaOeT..o F
m thei provJ sq �r of, -fir ;
q
q~,.-.... _%(i) ,° ,..d r r q :qur r r �q a r.. r r ... r q am pea�-�
2,---.m.
roper - n,
of ReGwd qe- ft
rnt,
r�:m�r rdm�prmarrruud �rrrd i( ddr
G ...... Action - -the-44eiming-,
y r , r..� iefiorr a ,a rqq µ r r d r..
a orf rrrr.. ..rw a ra m„ k m by, tdre arm-� „ r: m ma.. r w� rm m m a.orw:
etesnjnw,rfm rr....and-to 4hat-rim-1-sha d 4ar . 1d td
tao.r..:.d. n °, i -m mmr- a q� r r r q r r d... q r� r mr r m r rrmir rm" ...m m r .. d e r m dd4 rrmm „ t'he
q r s°ter r m
ing, r rrrr .,. hafl-
13,08-0, 0- fixh,.
16A 6,060 -Appeal -of
A ......... Apfm14,-The-W-14,36s
afjeFlGY-Gf,dl&-Guty ,--aff.ENvAed-by
taw 6,,dQG,jF,4Gwl 41 t1le 4,C) Now r4er"',
2-1"he-rieke ofappeakshafl- spe4*y
body aal-,
-T
4Negal wgtonent,
Naliciax of divisk),raw sballnotify,the-pates,of eco, and
X —Gantent of Wtioe Gf F74*1
th'a fcAlowing -Statememt&, All paffioat" fer"-d-,WiShinq-10- FeSpGr+d--W lhev�- peal- M.- ay
W,giS,[afive-body- Mth4,144fty�-days
-writte -a
4-9 m-- mi, , fq�o*wt,,it
Of-WitteR AFgWFTl(-.At Of- W.)MGr-candufri-7
al The cappea4ant -wany party-43if re,4,,,ql*may file-w4h. thc-division- a writte,;v4w- ,grp : u ol"r
appea�-.
submtat -period-for s4,wb',wiSSiGll-O, t,,QTi)j wr[tten-ar-g iunenland-www,morandurn; the
prqvided, -a V teeq,-4-day rebutkat , pefio d- (staFt ing-on- the-th 4 ty-fif-sAd ay -lemon the da t� o- if
and Memoif-,,widulm,
�X-due.
2, islabve- b(*-,- muay-W�.Wt fuirthef -extefmions-cm-a- flodir4g4)y--the-leg isla4ve,
bedy-of-the -existenGe
D11
oc
INDEX
the
-9877--,QFd, 294
k) all dto braf¢ f lea
l a laV 1 ,
l.a-IGlaaa a r4y-pre1 �� �' ll � 1 ,w � i 1pes
111...1��;•�1w,1:��:a.���:.;��=��-����1.���-���.�1'�.�,�w�ir:-�"�'�� � M-�'���~a���1 �������
aminefm -'id-te -any .,Aeged
..... fa n..on- pp t th e, pub Ii -Ili kig adbpt - endc and opts
s:pa�a aa�ama 'a...a.a° lura, a:aaaaalaa�...a�ll�aaaaanl„aem.r
a....th a rpese f -t along-. ri-Gonsiderirq Ilaw
hies a �aa�r.lga 91,aPa.. 111 aaaa,.ii�aaaa aaa lama.
aca a+'l4r,il : (Ord, 20..141 '9 20 -l -&-Ord, - 08- 6 §-1- (piml),-20W. 4)r ,
1,670- 60),
lm.and
xx-a4ui mfn—#'i date, -a - na1'
a t uns- n- pro api t -W1 )1
ufpo, si - ee va ew 04he acti n takenl:; t e
���m�V-a�-V;�,-�������e��•-e��, �&�.�����n ����r..�ce�� �a ���uw- w�e������a� ���...e��V,.
,11 Ping o a apPeal, -aa-Po (.'Un
e�����e���� ��VV�-V���e��-�V�� ���.,.n���•��������V��������� °�e;���e���V�� �.� m ����� �:..��w°e�V:.
mA-a- es ti
deeisions,of -a o i V sin
or othew
.....„u������w�������-,��..._V"°�������.�°�� a�Va�-���..�����V����-�•�������������•����sVVe�yc����
appeal
Chapter 16.08
APPEALS
Sections:
1 06.IT005m caHity k
16.08.010 Consolidated appeals.
1&08V2aN� _,Atere filed,
16.08.014 m „Burden of proof.
16.08.015 Definitions
16.08,0'18 ._m ;tapgal_of administrative official's decision
16.08.020 Open record appeals subject to review by hearing examiner,
16A0,025 Afapeal of the fe ar, � exI men`s decision
16.08.030 Closed record appeal subject to review by the city council.
16.08.040 Judicial appeals.
.1&0&050 Effect oaf ap ,o 'Is.
16.0 .0.6.0.......... Actions notw,appe l l v
16.08.006 Purpose and A lica! ijlLty,
The pl .(p mm f l w h pm a �s to establush„ 1 epLqcedureswf fapp 1G ,a q i ns wands under
a.. ,LgyIgion of 1i atj 14, Title 15 Title �gnq Chapter 6&.f tau Y in Mu!2!cwpal
p c duras may also used' for any nth r maatt r where therei r'l.aJ�� 6'�...��pu�r q!1i end
date a ura f c h a V o npeo:t oukNin glsewh re ars this Code.
16.08.010 Consolidated appeals.
A. All appeals of project permit application decisions, other than an appeal of SEPA
determination of significance, shall be considered together in a consolidated appeal and shall
not be separated from the substantive matters of the application.
B. Appeals of Determinations of Significance under SEPA, Chapter 6.88 YMC, shall proceed
as provided in that chapter in an open record hearing. The purpose of this early and separate
appeal hearing is to resolve the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) and to permit
administrative and judicial review prior to preparation of an EIS. (Ord. 98-66 § 1 (part), 1998).
.i ►;
Q.88
• r
• • • •
4. The findin conclusions or decisi ared bv the decision -maker are not
�ubstantjal evidence.
16.08.015 Definitions.
Unless the it, !PfinNnrjs in t1 !
i, � i Ali ! � �w i� • „� i •
ROD!
• • • Al i s • • ! !
AI
•
�"". Oro ! • � •� ! � ;• ! � ! !
! • ♦ !
•, l'!I OrIME!
!• • ;ARKMAIIIIJIMI
!•W&ROMMMS! ! !
IRK
MY
of ! cision of
_ppt.tj�qt,_q,ecisiqn to the hg�n( examiner.
!a Appeal. Alwl appeals shall be filed within fourteen Opy ollowmc the mai in oc f the final
ecAswNon tNW e adniiinistrative official ordesignee ans hall„ be filed with the division. If a
. _ .__
final decision does not reo.Ia�re, m fllin.rN�the..appe 1 sfi�all be filed wxt� IITr� fourtne days to lo
the issuance of the final decision.
,, oMeaNs Shall Be.in Writing N'A appeals shmall be in wrrtingrrfnnrus orc��rade .by.the.
caoart an a_n sk aNl be aocora ,panged..b tie re oi.re f �s ..pfcvlded, caths .g _gsfl f� esm should
not be barged to.th I is[gtive body ora division of the city, All ,waa eo.sN�a
al l egLffirc11
the action bein_gw appealed the errors or �ssoef s to be considered and ex Iainyv the action
is not consistent with therovisions of the Yakima urban area cormloreera uye.plan this rme,ITor
otl rim p
jqvisions of law.mmmAap amismmshall alsoincludea „sworn statement that the aopoiler�t has
read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, followed by the appellant's„semnature
D. Notice. The division shall:
1. Seta reasonable time ��place for hearing of the a„ppeal; and
2. Provide a notice of appeal andpublic heari t0 the officialwhosedecision is
being_pppeale C anq..nau ies entitled to notice of the decratgL0, anclu din pq ta,ruc orf
proa,tgy and, ubLmhinc the not e at least tenor .a. digiirto
E. TransferofRecord. The officer from ”whom -the a ea. is.bej[1q..!g1�gL shall' forthwith transmit
to the earinr examiner all the records p riainwn to the decision incap le together with
such madditional written Lepwort as he or shedeems pertinent.
F Staff [L A staff report shall prepared and transmitted to the hearingexaminer lin
with the record in accordance withth s chapter;
G. Action bv the Hearina Examiner, Testimony_given during the ap egIT.ITshall be limited to those
points cited in the appeal application. The hearing exammminer shall render a written decisionon
the appea.l._wlthNmn tern vomr Nr dais frorn, . e onclu�sion o thewhwear�w g wunllesp prarsoer._perto is
utrlai' .agroed Local y tl ewportre tq_tfqq_gppgql_and the ,.examiner, ._ the hearing examiner May
s,ffwrrr7�.orr verse, helNy r..in part r Mod,i y th orter,, rgq,uicenLen,t decision or deteri Oation
a dtothatend shalih ve all1he powersmoeef the officer from�whorn thy” appeal was mta e The
division „shall send copies of the hearing examiner's decision to the appelmlant, throe pastimes roof
recordan ..the official whose decision was a.ppea6e not_tster,tN an three w o,r ing days
�.....
followin the isSUancewofwwthe final ..decision.
H. Decisions b tl e Hearin xar Diner ShaNl be final t ntle s Aagile .__Except as otherwise
preside N teci wa rrb L N earth _p min r shallmmbe finaland
a�rties unless appealed to themmlegisltiv bodyµ urunt to this cha ter.
16.08.020 Open record appeals subject to review by hearing examiner.
A. The hearing examiner shall hear appeals de novo. An applicant or representative shall be
present at the hearing. In the event that the applicant or his or her representative is not present
at the time of the hearing, the hearing shall be canceled and rescheduled by the planning
division with appropriate public notice given in accordance with this title.
B. Notice of an appeal hearing shall be mailed to parties entitled to notice of the decision,
including posting of property and published notice.
C. A staff report shall be prepared, file transmitted to the examiner, and hearing conducted in
the manner described in the appropriate ordinance subject of the appeal and Washington State
law. The hearing examiner shall have ten working days to issue a decision on the appeal. All
decisions of the hearing examiner are subject to appeal to the city council.
D. The applicant or property owner shall remove all land use action signs from the subject
property within thirty days from the date of issuance of the final decision or action on the
underlying land use application. Any signage which is in good condition shall be returned to the
city of Yakima planning division. (Ord. 2016-030 § 15, 2016: Ord. 98-66 § 1 (part), 1998).
16.08.026 Anpeal of the hearin examiner's decision.
WAppeaj . tde decision otml em�uearin examiner shall be final and conclusive unless
app qaiedtothetegisiatt e_loody .y.a.oeqonpgur,e e—d. 4 ,_ oL tec rd far y -,arty aoenn ofi
ft city aftertedmb.Ne.e.at.rr?exemtnor's decsaort in the tcra,Mow,lr, manner:
..�. .:..........___The apaaling ork mist file a ootoNewrittn notice of apeal..with the division
goon forms prescrlhed byy the dgpp entmmand acco pan.led by the appeal fee within
fourteen des from the dateof maifiria1 ct the wenrrrroewaminer s tlnaN decision,
2. ,.The notice mfppal shall self the claimed errorsand issue that the
Iegjsl!afve body is asked oc nsider_on,, .00eat qnd shell o afA,csiily hate all gfnu�nds for
suchmappeeN:._ gssoes or rounds of appeal that are nq!suogntified need not
ITITIT
,omnidefed..-by the leoiislative body.
3............._m ........... .. i �, pp q a sworn statement that thea ell nt has read
The notice o a eat shall pnc a e�mm
the ap,�aeal and bel~leges the contents to tLg true folly thea Nl nt° si. nature.
_..... ............ 4. _._ The. city council shall he r IT_pp als of all decisions of the hearing examiner durLng
q_pubfic meetin, or, a limited- earinp fgLLe eip of r N tlegal a giurrtent„...urlPens o cN uud�e
by law.
B. A „pe, ,l„mProc ures— ot%cewwwof Appeal.
m. 1........_...... Notice of Filed App The lannin� division shall notify the parties of record„
rrd.appellant, that n app 'has been filed mand.that copie ,of the r�ot(pp ole a ce Nw rlq
ars wrltt n roaarr ent or mentor ndumuof„authorities accorr artvrrlg the notice of ape I
gLpy OgLqta(qed from hedivision
Z Content µof Notice of Filedµ „p al. The notice top rkie of rem ord dITIT pp llaw t
E
shall contain f.lr following s aterrter is ... IAITpa tte r arw tedµ inwwtlreoJ all of the hearing
exarniner's decision wr dltn9 to..res pon towthe ap a alWrna rout a �vcwi erg argumpem_It or
memorandum to the geolskat�+� od ..within, thirtw� ayes ��o� µthe date that the notice is
marded and any written arrAime t,or memorandum shall not include.the,prpsqrItgtioq .o
newwwevwidence and shall be basd_on uponITthe facts prsentedwwtowwthew examiner.
nµµµ_C. � Mem ora„ndum..
Submittal of Written Ar ument or Mem ...._.......__..._...__
1. The named p rtie arar t warlt towwthe h arin q miners decision s reo- °.may f
retA rd ma y.filme witj:ti_the division a written a:rq �,r�ignt or r ern ran a ofmauuthority within
thJrty da of he„da e �alwrnailirlgptthe nootice of a,filed a.t?l?e r.[,.
2. _Rebuttal to Written Arqu,ment. and m mora dum. VPqqqMPjqtiqP of tmhewwthmi,rt
d L wm !tqLpp_(1qd foC suomission of,any writte-mmasqLjgjg[lt andµ mmernorWand�n .fhe
parties narned inthe aaN...of the E�earrno exaa fnr era ciarona � t. t th iir
e se ,May btaln co ues o sny sugh.su n)i sio�n�and shall e.pLovivddpolwwa fifteen
ta...rel uttmal rasraodIT hush_starts our th wtwbiLl ,, fuwrstad'a Born tl e lata;,.,o rn�niflo off the
notice theITfiled armealw.
3. _ _µExtension of Time for Written Argument and ,Memoranda.
... a w No written qMumqpt or memorandum of authorities..ma _bemthere fter
SubmittedSUbmitted xnel tmbvlYre leolsle uveml e dr smaorovaf of a writter�w retia est for an
extension for cause, I eg!uests for extension must be made„ no later than the last
date the memoranda would otherwise be due.
b. The legilati,veW bovwwwmwyrant further extensions on a findin by,the
.� ,,,_. ,,,,... !c� mstrrtrve b
_'g od ot,tthe existence of x�t nt�uat� _ oir�oumstances which warrant
such extension(s).
c_, Upon granting an aension, amnotice of extension shall be given to all
parties of re ord and then tuceITms call include statement that "Written
arg.of ents and memoranda shall not include the presentation of any new
evidence and shall be based onl on the facts resented to the examiner."
Transfer_of Record to r.e is!ati�; e BpdyWhen a tirnpl�a o al h been filed n the,
deadline for recetwwof written memoranda and ar ug ments and all extensions have passed the
d'avision shall deliver to the le Nslative body a co s ofITITtl sexsmanera gcr uouI the evidence
presented to the exams icer a reoordung_of iheITheaITrrrwo t etore tN examiners a.rs aru �rri'tterm
ar umen( or mom' ggTqr nndirrLoLf awaathoruty which the division has received.
.n apoel.slel1.be du srnlssed.....bv themcitrpcouncil if..
1, It is filed by a,person without standing„towgpp al,
2. www w _ The city council does not have„jurisdiction to hear the appeal;
3. It is not timed filed
4.. ,,.. The a.,ope.al feesare notm tern ard� andlor
5. It is not mfiled ITITinITITaccordance wwwithwwthewwpwrocedures set forth in these rules,.
All wruatuor?s..tedisnrssadefective shall be filed withnifteemra aLogy
;flNum~uq.d�ate ofwthe eal.
16.08.030 Closed record appeal subject to review by the city council.
A. Settir�q the l learin atf) and Notice of the; ell.
wµµµµ-1. µw ._.....www Hearing Date When the record and the examiner's ....decisions ....have..been
transmitted to, the legislative body,jtalerd motjtp legislative body shaft schedufe a date
for a closed record �app ea,t_b mtho 1pqislatjve body, at. rh?ch timethegegiislativawoil sl�alf
considerthea eat.µ wwThe date of the appa,l should not be later than twenty days
fo LloWing tae date the legislative body ceu�e,Je information from the division,unless o ,
a different date is a Ipp4.uo m!_by heecity gird mthe pa ues to the.appeal
_w 2 w Public Notice, The clerkµ of thewl gill tive Lady hallm mail written notice tthe
pp
pgjlarit,gl ,pgr�ties�n rned in the ap uuea_l of t is iteai Nrirt e ai urrtee 's ecision alloart�es
rt rec mruf' amr i the e am:i mer to ao rise them of the me tin date before thejpgj§ q flve
body.
He do ._._ m_gL
ust pen to the Public." -The city council shall hear appeals of all decisions
by the hearing examiner during a public meeting or a limited hearing for receipt of oral legal
argument.
1=3. A complete appeal application must be submitted prior to the scheduling of the council
meeting or limited hearing.
C. The closed record appeal shall be on the record before the city council, and no new
i iwt"as_part of
evidence shall be presented. The city council may, however, c„ho,o„s„e to do a site
vis
its review. The record shall include all materials received in evidence at any previous stage of
the review, audio/visual tapes of the prior hearing(s), the final order being appealed, and
argument by the parties at the examiner's hearing.
D. The appellants and any respondents to the appeal shall have the opportunity to present
oral and written argument. Oral argument shall be confined to the prior established hearing
examiner record and to any alleged errors in the decision..Part uipglioWn in theme cosed record
earsnp . I,ui~ N ed o ttgtq durl!iai ali st tf� ttie o�icai�� for khe ropo al ubiecct to sp i ,
and thole mesons or entities which.have time nd proper filed com fete written a eal
statements either as appellant.5mnr responderi.s
E. Following the closed record appeal hearing, the gily council may affirm the decision of the
examiner, remand the matter back to the hearing examiner with appropriate directions, or may
reverse or modify the hearing examiner decision tae��ucit s�1rdtits wr�wwt�n ftnti:
arrri�r� i¢sso�tftswoi-If the council determines there is no error in the
examiner's decision, it may adopt the findings of the examiner and accept the decision of the
hearing examiner. If tete -city ro Lq Vwren ers a decision different from the decision ofthe
examiner, the citycowuncil shall r io amended findin s andmconclusions acc inally, (Ord. 98-
66 § 1 (part), 1998).
16.08.040 Judicial appeals.
The city's final decision shall m e final andconclusive unless ren -..air poiy atµ �i� iris y 1
appealed by a party of record with standing to file a land use petition in Yakima County superior
court. Such petition must be filed within twenty-one days of issuance of the decision, and the
proceejjng�shall follow the reauir�ements as provided in Chapter 36.70C RCW. (Ord. 98-66 § 1
(part), 1998).
16.08.050 Effect of appeals.
Ellin f anappea_I,_stavITaiml actions the administrative official or designee on ITping
apAii at"ona�,for _r,-eire9opcvoerit Br its associated with t eITactionITorITwdeciswion_i� N.rt9..af ealed. The
tillri � otw an apoo al wslµt 11 r�o�t to jt the e ctiv esmsm or ITe ectiv dwat w of an etLforc�errrnnent action r
decision for violation of this title minclmU6DA.g nceebla .ons, and revocations of pefuTpil�s rafapcovad �.
r;..
pp,pjKqled under this chap
B. ProcedLjiral Ruhng§,,,,_jjLtp_(fM..pjp
_qg_dgj,al or other rWinq daaFw or
of a review or decisbn
adrnlor other official under this fifle are .... not eq!qdjgjnggp��i
. ppp
p
mm
art_ pf_lh.e Fi.na,I-Jecision or action.
MM 61 Woplim P-9 Lei q IN ORR 151 p
................ ---- .......... . ..... . ..... --
iiJ-
law enforcement action commencf�d by art
......... .. . ......... ....... .... _ _pDy p
DOC.
INDEX
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER B
SEPA Checklist
,..�.. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
VMW STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
P l CITY a n n n g (AS TAKEN FROM WAC 197-11-960)
YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.88
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are
significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation
measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further
.analyze the EroRosal.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question
accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private
consultant for some questions. 'aLqu rr% tease "nttt t iw'1�q b�'e'"ma rww` lc a 1p . 1)1y nl v✓l t y u haat c:j%� lly:.ttW oS not
apl,,jy and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports.
Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to afl p, its is ,yt tardsrlt,paas1, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different
parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help you describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably
related to determining if there maX be significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS
For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A
and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions
that apply and note that the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent,"
and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B —
Environmental Elements — that do not contribute meani2ifully to the anal sis of the Erogosal.
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.)
1. Name Of Proposed Project (If Applicable): City of Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance Amendments 2018,
M
2. Applicant's Name & Phone: City of Yakima Planning
Division, (509) 575-6183
.
3. Applicant's Address: 129 North Second Stree Yakima, t, YaWA 98901
... ... _ _-.-.-.
4 Contact Person & Phone: Joseph Calhoun, 509-575-6042
.. ......------------------------ -
5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Yakima
6. Proposed Timing Or Schedule (Including Phasing, If Applicable): N/A—Non Project Action
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity tivity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain: None at this time
_ „.... _.. ........... n
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal: None known. Per WAC 197-11-315(1)(e), as a non -project proposal, section B ofthe
Environmental Checklist will not be filled out.
9. Do you know whether applications are g .. ....,. ......
pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None Pending
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: SEPA determination,
City of Yakima Planning Commission Public Hearing, and City Council Approval.
Revised 07/2015
Page 14
INDEX
I 1. Give a brief, but complete d.,.,cription of your proposal, including the proN._sed uses and the size of the project
and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.
You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional
specific information on project description.): The City of Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor
amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Title 15. The proposed amendments will modify the sign code, YMC
§ 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC § 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in YMC § 15.09.045 and
15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter in YMC 15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab Home
Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and 15.04.120; modifying the district intent statement and permitted uses in the Regional
Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§ 15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally consolidation of Appeals from
YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch. 16.08.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required
by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist: City Limits
C. SIGNATURE (To be completed by the applicant.)
The above answe °s are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them
to ma its deei of],
Pr aerty Ow a (ir Agent Signature Date Submitted
A L I ) I/1-0- ___ e) ��, 0 cc
Name of Signee Position and Agency/Organization
ID. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (To be completed by theI Space Reserved For
pp
alicant.) (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for uoiect actions) Azencv Comments
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list
of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities that would likely result from the proposal, would affect the item
at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly
and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
The proposed changes will not affect how land uses discharge to water, emissions to the air,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or the production of noise.
ProProposed measures to avoid or
,..� .. .
p reduce such increases are:
None proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The proposed changes will not affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life, as they are regulatory
in nature.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
None proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
Revised 07/2015
Page 15
DOC.
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET rOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (To be comt,ieted by the Space Reserved For
applicaut.1 JIT IS NOT NE ESSARV to use this sheet for Vr2ject actionsl A2ency Comments
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The proposed changes do not involve regulations dealing with energy or natural resources.
_.......... ....
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
None Proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The proposed changes will not change or affect any environmental sensitive areas or regulations.
-------- ---------
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are.
None Proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
No change to shoreline uses are proposed. Depending on future proposals, the level of review
will be dependent on the type of use and zomn district.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
None Proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services
and utilities?
Not likely. The traffic impacts will be examined at the project level.
_ .....
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None Proposed. Any future measures to avoid such increases will be dealt with at the project
level.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
The proposed changes will not conflict with any local, state, or federal laws, or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
Revised 07/2015
Page 16 DOC.
INDEX
j
w
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER C
Application
C-1 Application for Text Amendments 04/12/2018
........................ ....W..................
LAND USE APPLICATION
CITY OF YAKIMA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
° '" YAK imA 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR, YAKIMA, WA 98901
` IPMi n PHONE: (509) 575-6183 FAX: (509) 575-6105
INSTRUCTIONS — PLEASE READ FIRST AND ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS COMPLETELY.
If you have any questions about this form or the application process, please ask to speak with a planner. All necessary attachments and
the filing fee are required upon submittal. Filing fees are not refundable. This application consists of several parts. PART I - GENERAL
INFORMATION, PART II — SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION, and PART III — CERTIFICATION are on this page. PART II, III,
and IV contain additional informationspecific to lour 2ro2osal and MUST be attached to this page to complete the ap2lication.
PART I — GENERAL INFORMATION
Name: City of Yakima Planning Division
1. Applicant's Information: _.. ®..,..::
4 Mailing Address: 129 North Second Street
City : Yakima St WA Zip , 98901 Phone ( 509) 575-6183
E -Mail: ask.planning@yakimawa.gov
2. Applicant's Interest in Other ....L .
ocal
Property: Check One ❑ Owner ❑ AgentI—, T ......... . . . . .......................................... . ........z............... . Purchaser
Government
Name
3. Property Owner's ,
__. . _ _., __... _ .,.,., . ....
........
.....
m
Mailing Address.
than Applicant): City: St: Zip: Phone ( )
Information If other
E -Mail:.
4. Subject Property's Assessor's Parcel Number(s): N/A — Non Project Action
-.... ...
5. Legal Description of Property. (if lengthy, please attach it on a separate document) N/A —Non Project Action
6. Property Address: N/A — Non Project Action
11I7. Pro .--11111-111- ------- __ ______----
perty's Existing Zoning:
® SR N R-1 ® R-2 ® R-3 ® B-1 ® B-2 ® HB N SCC ® LCC ® CBD ® GC ® AS ® RD ® M-1 ® M-2
8. Type Of Application: (Check All That Apply)
❑ Administrative Adjustment ® Environmental Checklist (SEPA Review) ❑ Easement Release
❑ Type (1) Review ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Rezone
❑ Type (2) Review ❑ Transportation Concurrency ❑ Shoreline
❑ Type (3) Review ❑ Non -Conforming Use/Structure ❑ Critical Areas Review
❑ Preliminary Short Plat ❑ Appeal to HE / City Council ❑ Variance
❑ Final Short Plat ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner ❑ Temporary Use Permit
❑ Short Plat Amendment ❑ Modification ❑ Overlay District
❑ Preliminary Long Plat ❑ Home Occupation ❑ Binding Site Plan
❑ Final Long Plat ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text or Map Amendment ❑ Planned Development
❑ Plat Alteration —Long Plat F1Short Plat Exemption; ® Other:
Text Amendment
PART II — SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION — SEPA CHECKLIST
9. Environmental Checklist (see attached forms)
PART III — CERTIFICATION
10. I certify that the information on this application and the required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
.............................................----- ----- —
1'�er� .: C)wAer ig,�aaturu Date
icant's Signature — Date . �" ..............
FILE/APPLICATION(S)# XT4-00a-IS 36PA 4J= —I
DATE FEE PAID: RECEIVED BY: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT NO:
Revised 07/2015 Page 13 INDEX
C, -I
City of Yakima Planning Division
2018 Text Amendments
1. Sign Code
15.08.045 Exemptions.
The following signs are exempt from the permitting requirements of this chapter:
7. Flags. Any flags,, pfevG ed,-, e t tO„ffies ,
frtlr win standards:
a�ftpsG�fenfiall zlnngars are allowed one 'lfpgL
"p�M plan rt fwmtftt� gp,:
t7......,No rno Ic,"i�han two fl x'tai' fliJW , 21 <G_ 4f , I@ t�wc,�'u l �..
to u....., the n, Om i, il,.iole ht :�9"�K�Il be thie maxp muni fi'W'tur°e he, ht raC°the _umrlde3Nytw�
..-Fable.. .'�...
stn'"'tures,
tigg_ALg ftiil..be...as follows:
J,- Pole he4it_of 20 -feet or less; 4'
fl, _Pok'he ht,.prr alar tharn .:fe.et to ,,�0 feet.. 'x8'
than 3 y k -pe 6'x 10'
ry [l. uou a .pt lG ,uot il t rztt may !,)p ,ul uru _KopQ� lig nal��...to fl"ie r���iaxi"nr"rwc;11 lr�wq
IIq,Uq pqa ra'lodifircatiq Lif I(M( A Mz.
Staff Analysis: This standard provides more flexibility for an exemption under the sign chapter. For example,
under the current language a homeowner in the R-1 zone could only have a 10 -ft tall flag pole.
2. Rezone
15.23.030 Rezones—Zoning map amendments.
B. Application. All rezone applications shall be filed with the planning division. The planning division shall
process the application under the provisions of YMC 15.11 "070 and Title 16. The application shall include the
information required in YMC 15.11 .020 and the signature of the owner(s) of the property. J'4,, yip[gj&_ami ,ut lit�aq
p,pplpt tionnps.i_alt also inclaacJpa nona_b4,x.Jart , r�,rnrepatya t sGlo��l--�Ga Ca �l'�o� pG�G.pnfiaB,a�ua urG- use of th .prr a.rty1
%µ Dev,elo aG Gpr ( rlrc algrt. &"rsr�rliNdr tis �xsa. r fau a G�,_tr rGlc ttl,ic (.. Grry rirrrG rGtal ¢ ffr c`ri.the ip7"ra!""r
nr r plI a G G trey 2, �t-Lgfj�ftyern the iirnniedi atpy vicinityr7difi gfv rin�ipf��cf?..��..t}fr�_cit�" shall be
n9nc�rmfmrated in a �9f5��" Nc�pgy,�^}�� ���gGc�r�Gau,ent executed by t°tn it a C��ru1 0 �nprrt,tt- lat�ap
pjgLe, a gree set _forfl"_in V CW 36� 70B 170 Clrrgggn 4)(,, mZQB.200
Staff Analysis: Changes as discussed previously from conversation related to a non -project rezone processed
in 2017. The proposal is similar to other cities (Ellensburg, Wenatchee) in the requirement for a DA when
conditions are placed on a Rezone. Requiring a conceptual site plan with a non -project rezone will provide the
notified property owners a visual representation of what future development could look like, but will not be
binding on the applicant.
3. ADU's
15.09.045 Accessory dwelling units.
B. Requirements. An accessory dwelling unit is a permitted Cai5s (,3)..- use win � e -II _a. R 1 pa�.,2 arae 8L3 11m
secondary to the primary use of a detached single-family dwelling,
subject to all of the following conditions:
1. The accessory dwelling unit may be attached to the primary residence or attached to or above a detached
garage.,_u bt,, it' urwo.p..�Mand alvrlw sh'mu l„aIT� ea
i lure. -4 a1 Al l9., I� I i tojhe )f6T r Itt,a.t.,Ljr �„ shall have the same building setbacks as the primary
structure. An A1,1J that ii fta�hed t�.�ar.,l iiliIT C wrav , a cwJetachedg i aq gr a, tang aloe wstructurei....sh Nl have
the sante @"arAlIsil ejb+acks a an rea ce struOLWQ,
—.
9. ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels/lots one ,.cupruaAe a(m; iwu ,zesize a, pLqarb aluuNy_��au a r� , lt„ , or
larger tjtwl. Vit, .. 1,!'
10. The primary residence and the ADU shall both be connected to public sewer and water.
a. If the ADU is attached to the primary dwelling unit, the two dwelling units shall share a single
sewer and water connection.
b. If the ADU is attached to, or located above, a detached garage, moaµ is 4�m ;�lwid orlon t°,Lict2p„
each unit shall have its own sewer and water connection, with required meters.
15.04.030, Table 4-1. Permitted Land Uses
Staff Analysis: ADU's were added to the Zoning Ordinance in 2010 but have been proposed and constructed
minimally due to the onerous restrictions. Currently they are only permitted in the SR and R-1 zones and only
on parcels 0.25 acres or more. On occasion a customer will inquire about adding an ADU to a single family
home in the R-2 zone and it isn't permitted.
Proposed is to add the remaining residential zones (R-2 and R-3) and abandon the 0.25 acre requirement and
instead rely on the minimum lot size to build a duplex (8,000 square -feet in SR and R-1, 7,000 square -feet in R-
2 and R-3). Additionally, the restriction that an ADU can only be attached to the primary dwelling or attached
to/above a detached garage has posed issues — adding the ability to build a stand-alone ADU that meets the
accessory structure setbacks will provide significant flexibility over the current Ordinance. Finally, a cleanup to
a conflict between the text and table — the text indicates a Class (3) where the table lists a Class (2). Since
additional districts are proposed, the change is to remove indication of level of review from the text and rely on
the table.
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBDJ RD
M-1 M-2
Accessory Dwelling Unit (*) (See
YMC 115.09.t' 45)
2
2
1
1
Staff Analysis: ADU's were added to the Zoning Ordinance in 2010 but have been proposed and constructed
minimally due to the onerous restrictions. Currently they are only permitted in the SR and R-1 zones and only
on parcels 0.25 acres or more. On occasion a customer will inquire about adding an ADU to a single family
home in the R-2 zone and it isn't permitted.
Proposed is to add the remaining residential zones (R-2 and R-3) and abandon the 0.25 acre requirement and
instead rely on the minimum lot size to build a duplex (8,000 square -feet in SR and R-1, 7,000 square -feet in R-
2 and R-3). Additionally, the restriction that an ADU can only be attached to the primary dwelling or attached
to/above a detached garage has posed issues — adding the ability to build a stand-alone ADU that meets the
accessory structure setbacks will provide significant flexibility over the current Ordinance. Finally, a cleanup to
a conflict between the text and table — the text indicates a Class (3) where the table lists a Class (2). Since
additional districts are proposed, the change is to remove indication of level of review from the text and rely on
the table.
4. Modification
Chapter 15.17
MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING OR APPROVED USES OR DEVELOPMENT*
Sections:
1„5;17..010,
Purpose.
15.17.020
Modification to permitted development and uses regulated.
15.17.030
Exemptions.
15.17.040
Review of modifications.
115.17,.050
Appeals.
* Prior legislation: Ords. 3106, 93-81 and 95-13.
15.17.010 Purpose.
This chapter establishes Provisions for the review of proposed modifications to existm9 or t��:��p
ar:.)3-)-uses.
15.17.020 Modification to permitted development and uses regulated.
ti �aa� atilta alp as .r,...ta a � 'ia Ga � fala�u a at q as s,... ase as tilmavaaga to a,ai l s6 ad • , ev a vv a1..es- s64,1 �..adir ra
attnra�3ea�ram1a�•n���wul�odlrr���ra�s Minor changes to existing or approved Class ('L),,,(2) or (3)
uses or development may qualify for abbreviated review under the provisions in this chapter, if they meet the
criteria listed Overlay districts
shall not increase the level of review for the provisions of this chapter. Modifications not meeting the criteria
below must apply directly for review as a Class(p (2) or (3) use or development.
A. The modification will not increase residential density )l a)_ ��a slr)mr gx�drd� ain additional gevell of review;
B. The modification will not increase the amount of parking by more than ten percent or twenty spaces
(whichever is least), except that the amount of parking for controlled atmosphere and cold storage warehouses
may be increased by up to twenty spaces. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous
modifications since the last normal review;
C. Any expansion of use area or structure will not exceed fifty percent of the gross floor area. This limit shall
be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications since the last normal review;
D. The modification will not increase the height of any structure;
E. This limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications since the last normal review;
F. The modification will not add a drive-thru facility; and
INDEX
� , C � �,. .
G. The modification does not include hazardous materials..
15.17.030 Exemptions.
For exemptions from the review processes, see YMC 10.01.040(A).
15.17.040 Review of modifications.
A. Submittals. Applications for modification shall follow the submittal requirements for Type (1) review. In
addition, for, tiPmaaHll wzll�avt cruse or development, the applicant shall submit
both the site plan previously approved by the reviewing official and a new site plan showing the location, size,
and type of modification proposed by the applicant.
B. Review. Applications for modifications may be administratively and summarily reviewed using the Type (1)
review process, in addition to the following criteria:
1. Any proposed change in the site design or arrangement:
a. Will not change or modify any special condition previously imposed under Class ,(w);,),,_(2) or (3)
review;
b. Will not adversely reduce the amount of existing landscaping or the amount or location of
required sitescreening; and
c. In the determination of the planning division, it will not create or materially increase any
adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project.
2. All proposed new structures, site improvements, or structural alterations to existing structures or site
improvements comply with the development standards of YMC Chapters 1 5 i0,15 through '15,0,8, except as
approved under the adjustment or variance provisions.
C. Decision and Notification of Decision. The planning division shall issue a written decision on the
modification application using the Type (1) decision process. In addition, any proposed modification that does
not meet all the requirements of this section shall be denied. The division shall mail its decision to the applicant.
Uses or developments denied under this chapter may submit applications for review under the normal review
provisions for the use. (Ord. 2016-029 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2016: Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008).
15.17.050 Appeals.
Decisions by the planning division regarding approval or denial of administrative modifications may be
appealed as prescribed by the applicable review.
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to allow the abbreviated Modification review process to be
applicable to all previously approved uses, including Type 1. Currently, the code requires a Modification of an
DOC
INDEX
1
existing and approved Type 1 use to go through another Type 1 Review to modify the development This is
contrary the defined purpose of a Modification which means "any change or alteration to the occupancy,
arrangement, placement or construction of any existing use, structure, or associated site improvement, and any
change or alteration of land. "
5. Taxicab Home Occupation
15.02.020 Definitions
"Ijorne (, cc pjq�o taxi ab o ator" means fl ac L
Yj-L Qf-oA�j(,fill g�i�
I L�LqjLqmkflSt�WJVE� OffiCe
for a Taxicab licensed under YMC Ch. 5.78. This use shall be limited to a maximum of two vehicles
. ........ . . .... ...... . ... .. -------
qpg�gt _immediate fam.Hy members who reside in the home.
. . . .........
16.04.120 Home Occupations
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
Doc.,
INDEX
Zoning District
SR] R -I R-2 R-3 B-1
Accountant
1
Architect
1
Artist, author, arts and crafts
1
Attorney
1
1
1
1+1
Barbershop, beauty parlor
2
2
2
2
Bed and breakfast*
1
2
1
1
Business administration
1
1
1
1
Cabinet, mill work, carpentry work
2
2
Catering service
2
2
2
2
2
Ceramics and sculpting
2
22
2
Composer
1
1
1
1
Day care, family home*
1
1
1
1
1
Dentist
1
2
2
2
Dog grooming ............... . .... -
2
3
3
3
3
Doc.,
INDEX
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
INDEX
�II
Zoning District
SR R-1 R-2 R-3 B-1
Dressmaker, seamstress, tailor
1 1 1 1
Engineer
1 1 1 1
Food preparation*
1
2
1
1
1
Home contractor*
1
1
1
2
1
Home instruction* 1-5 students
1
1
1
1
1
6-8 students
2
2
2
2
2
Insurance agent
1
1
1
1
Locksmith
1
2
2
1
1
Photographer (not including productions studio)
1
2
2
2
Physician
1
2
2
2
Product assemblage*
1
2
2
2
1
Massage therapylspa*
1
1
1
1
1
Music teacher
1
1
1
1
rroduction of small articles by hand without the use of automated or production line
1
2
2
2
equipment
Radio„ television and small appliance repair
2
L 2
2
2
Real estate agent
1
1
1
1
Secretarial, phone answering, desktop publishing service*
1
1
1
1
Smalll engine repair
2
F_aJ41Ga,b Q 9aiCk:l�_
II
(Wedding service
2
2
2
2
2
Unclassified home occupation
See
INDEX
�II
Table 4-2. Table of Permitted Home Occupations
Staff Analysis: These changes were proposed by a member of the public, and will provide sole -proprietor or
family taxi businesses to be operated out of the home as a Home Occupation rather than out of a commercial
establishment, which for many is cost prohibitive.
6. Regional Development Zoning District
15.03.020 District and map overlay intent statements.
M. Regional Development District (RD). The purpose of the regional development district is to
provide high visibility from the interstate and state highways of the city of Yakima to provide
regional commerce, office campus, recreation, large-scale retail, culture, ��i � gian! ift.c kLy1
ifoe.esa. + and large multiple mixed uses,,,_,. This district is characterized by very
n� Iq� �1rc��.�_
intensive development and a variety of land uses including retail sales and service
establishments, high-density residential development, financial institutions, professional office
buildings, hotels, condominiums, and corporation headquarters.
Table 4-1. Permitted Land Uses
SR R-1 R -2R-3 B-1 B-2 HB SCC LCC AS GC CBD RD M-1 M-2
AGRICULTURAL (COMMERCIAL)
Agriculture, Horticulture, General Farming
1
l
1
1
(not feedlots or stockyards) (*)
Agricultural Building (*)
1
Agricultural Chemical Sales/Storage
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
FIB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Agricultural Market
Agricultural Stand (*)
Agricultural Related Industries (*)
2
Animal Husbandry (See YMC 15,09 070)
12
l
p
Concentrated Feeding Operation (*)
3
Floriculture, Aquaculture
1
1
1
Fruit Bin Sales/Storage
3
2
l
l
v
Marijuana Production (**)
1
1
Winery and Brewery—Basic (*)
3
3
1
2
ResortJDc,stinatlon w/on-site agricultural
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
production
Resort/Destination (*)
2
3
3
1
l
1
3
Retail (*)
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION
Aquatic Center 3 3 3 l 2
Amusement Park (Permanent) (*)
3
3
3
l
3
Bowling Alleys
2
2
2
1
1
2
3
Campground (*)
3
2
Children's Outdoor Recrea ion Center*
2
(More than 500 ft. fro n abutting residential
and not containing at go -can tlrack)
Children's Outdoor Recreation Center*
3
(Less than 500 ft. from abutting residential
and/or containing a go-cart track)
Drive -In 'IYicatres
3
2
2
2
Exercise Facilities
2
1
1
l
l
2
1
l
1
2
Horse Racing Tracks, Speedways
3
3
Game Rooms, Card Rooms, Electronic
3
2
1
2
2
2
Game Rooms (*)
Golf Courses, Clubhouses, Golf Driving
3
3
3
3
Ranges
Miniature Golf Courses
3
3
1
1
1
l
Movie Theatres, Auditoriums, Exhibition
3
1
1
l
1
Halls
Parks (*)
2
1 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
Roller Skating or Ice Skating Rink
2
2
1
1
2
Sports Facility (indoor)
2
2
1
2
l
2
Social Card Rooms (See YMC 15.09 090)
3
3
3
3
SR R-1 R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 HB SCC LCC AS GC CBD RD M-1 M-2
State Fair Park
(See YMC 15.04200)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Cemetery/Crematorium with Funeral Home
3
3
3
3
3
3
Funeral Home not associated with
3
2
2
2
11
1
2
2
Cemetery/Crematorium
Churches, Synagogues, and Temples (*)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
Community Center (*) Meeting Halls,
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
Fraternal Organizations
Community Gardens (*) (if accessory to an
1
1
1
1
1
l
l
l
1
1
l
1
l
1
i
approved principal use) (See YMC
15.04.060(G))
Community Gardens (*) (with planting area
1
1
1
1
1
l
l
l
1
l
l
1
of one-quarter acre or less)
Community Gardens (*) (with planting area
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
of more than one-quarter and up to one-half
acre)
Community Gardens (*) (with planting area
2
2
2
2
2
22
2
2
2
2
2
of more than one-half acre up to one acre)
Day Care Facilities (not home occupation):
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
l
l
i
Family In-Home (*)
Day Care Center (*)
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Public Facility (*)
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
I
l
1
l
1
1
1
Hospital (*) Outside Institutional Overlay
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Correctional Facilities
3
3
3
3
3
3
Libraries
3
3
3
2
1
2
11
1
1
1
1
Museums, Art Galleries
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
l
l
1
l
1
Schools
Elementary and Middle
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
Senior High School
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Business Schools (*)
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 2
Community College/University—Inside
(See YMC Chapter 1531)
Institutional Overlay
Community College/University—Outside
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
Institutional Overlay
Vocational Schools (*)
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
Wastewater Sprayfield (*)
3
3
3
Zoo (*)
3
3
3
3
3
HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICE FACILITY
Group Homes (six or fewer), Adult Family
l
l
l
11
I
l
1
Home (*)
Treatment Centers for Drug and Alcohol
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Rehabilitation
Marijuana Processing (**
SR
R-1 R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Boarding House (*)
3
3
3
3
3
1
2
Halfway House (*)
2
3
3
Group Homes (more than six), Convalescent
3
2
2
2
3
3
and Nursing Homes (*)
Mission (*) (with Type (3) review, and
2
2
2
development agreement—see definition)
MANUFACTURING
Agricultural Product Support
2
2
2
1
1
Aircraft Parts
1
2
l
1
Apparel and Accessories
3
2
2
1
1
Bakery Products (wholesale)
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Beverage Industry (*)
2
2
2
1
1
Canning, Preserving and Packaging Fruits,
?
l
1
Vegetables, and Other Foods
Cement and Concrete Plants
3
l
Chemicals (Industrial, Agricultural, Wood,
3
1
etc.)
Concrete, Gypsum and Plaster Products
2
l
l
Confectionery and Related Products
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
l
(wholesale)
Cutlery, Hand Tools and General Hardware
1
3
l
1
Drugs
1
2
2
1
1
Electrical Transmission and Distribution
1
2
3
1
1
Equipment
Electronic Components and Accessories and
1
2
2
3
l
1
Product Assembly
1
1
&nginvesi g, vndM1;�I Optical, Dental,
l
2
1
l
Scientific Instruments and Product
Assembly
Fabricated Structural Metal Products
2
3
3
1
1
Food Processing2
I
3
1
l
Furniture
2
3
2
1
1
Glass, Pottery, and Related Products and
2
2
2
1
1
Assembly
Grain Mill Products
3
1
1
Heating Apparatus Wood Stoves
l
l
Leather Products
3
1
1
l
Leather Tanning and Finishing
1
1
Machinery and Equipment
l
2
1
1
Marijuana Processing (**
dll C.
INDEX
#
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Marijuana Research (**)
l
1
Meat, Poultry and Dairy Products
i
L i
Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels and
3
G
Allied Products
Paperboard Containers and Boxes
1
3
l
l
Plastic Products and Assembly
1
2
l
1
Prefabricated Structural Wood Products and
1
l
l
Containers
Printing, Publishing and Binding
1
3
2
l
l
Printing Trade (service industries)
2
2
2
1
1
2
l
Recycling Processing Center (*)
3
1
Rendering Plants, Slaughter Houses
3
Rubber Products
1
2
1
Sign Manufacturing and Product Assembly
21
l
1
1
Sawmills and Planing Mills
2
1
Sheet Metal and Welding Shops
2
1
1
Stone Products (includes finishing of
2
1
2
2
3
1
l
monuments for retail sale)
Transportation Equipment, Including
2
1
l
Trailers and Campers
Woodworking: Cabinets, Shelves, etc. 3 1
2 2 1 l
MINING/REFINING/OFF-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT
Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials, Rock
3
3
1
Crushing
Mining Including Sand and Gravel Pits (*)
3
3
3
Stockpiling of Earthen Materials (*) 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Off -Site Hazardous Waste Treatment and 33
Storage Facilities (*)
RESIDENTIAL
Accessory Uses (*)
See YMC 15,04 060
Detached Single -Family Dwelling (*)
1
l
1
l
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
Accessory Dwelling Unit (*) (See YMC
2
2
15.09.045)
Existing or New Detached Single -Family
1
1
l
Dwelling on Existing Lots of 8,000 Square
Feet or Less
Detached Single -Family Dwelling (zero lot
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
3
line) (*) (See YMC 15.09.040)
Attached Single -Family Dwelling, Common
2
2
l
1
3
3
1
2
2
2
M11
Wall (*)
dll C.
INDEX
#
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B -1B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Two -Family Dwelling (Duplex) (*)
3
3
l
1
2
2
l
2
2
2
2
Converted Dwelling (*)
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
Multifamily Dwelling(*): 0-7 DU/NRA
2
l
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
8-12 DU/NRA
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
13+ DU/NRA
3
l
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mixed -Use Building
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Planned Development (*)
See YMC 1528
Mobile Home Parks (*)
2 2
2
Mobile Home (*) or Manufactured Homes
See YMC 15,04 160
Retirement Homes (*)
2
3
1
3
l
1
�.............. ' ..........1 ,... .............
Temporary Hardship Units (See YMC
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
15.04.140)
1
RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE
Adult Business Uses
See YMC 15.09.200
Animal Clinic/Hospital/Veterinarian (*)
3 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1
Auction House for Goods (*)
3 2 2 2 1 1 2 l 1
Auction House for Livestock (*)
3 2 2
Automotive
Automotive Dealer New and Used Sales
2
2
2
1
3
1
1
Weekend Automobile and Recreational
i
i
1
Vehicle (RV) Sales
Automotive: Car Wash/Detailing
2
1
l
l
1
1
2
Parking Lots and Garages
2
l
1
l
l
1
1
1
l
Maintenance and Repair Shops
2
l
1
2
1
2
l
2
Paint and Body Repair Shops
2
2
1
1
l
2
Parts and Accessories (tires, batteries, etc,)
2
1
l
1
1
2
1
2
Towing Services
1
3
1
l
Wrecking and Dismantling Yard (*) and
3
l
Hulk Haulers (*)
Bail Bonds
Beauty and Barber Shops
2
l
2
l
1
l
l
1
1
2
Bed and Breakfast Inn (*)
2
2
2
2
1 2
2
1
Boats and Marine Accessories
2
2
l
1
1
1
Butcher Shop
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
Commercial Services (*)
2
1
2
1
1
l
1
1
2
SR
R-1 R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HBSCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Communication Towers (*)
(See
YMC
Chapter
15.29)
Convenience Store—Closed 10,00 p,m to
1
2
8
1
l
1
p
1
2
6:00 a.m.
Convenience Store—Open 10:00 p. m, to
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
6:00 a.m.
Pet Day Care/Animal Training (*)
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
Farm and Implements, Tools and Heavy
1
2
3
1
1
Construction Equipment
Farm Supplies
2
2
1
1
2
1
Financial Institutions
i
l
1
l
1
1
l
i
Fuel Oil and Coal Distributors
1
2
1
1
Furniture, Home Furnishings, Appliances
l
1
l
1
l
1
l
General Hardware, Garden Equipment, and
2
1
1
1
1
1
l
l
1
Supplies
General Retail Sales 12,000 sq, ft or less
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
not otherwise regulated) (*)
General Retail Sales greater than 12,000 sq
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
ft. (not otherwise regulated) (*)
Heating and Plumbing and Electrical
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
Equipment Stores
Heavy Equipment Storage, Maintenance and
1
l
l
Repair
Kennels (*)
2
2
�, 2
Laundries, Laundromats and Dry Cleaning
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Plants
Liquor Stores
2
2
l
l
l
1
I
Locksmiths and Gunsmiths
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
Lumber Yards
2
1
1
1
l
Marijuana Retail (**)
1
l
l
1
1
1
Massage Therapy/Spa(*)
Mobile Vendor
See YMC Ch, 5.57
Motels and Hotels
2
1
1
1
1
1
Night Clubs/Dance Establishments
2
1
1
1
1
1
Nursery (*)
2
l
l
l
1
I
1
1
Offices and Clinics
3
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
1
2
Office Contractor Building and Trade
3
1
1
l
l
1
l
d
1
1
(Plumbing, Heating, Electrical, and
Painting)
Outdoor Advertising (Billboards)
See
YMC 15
08,130
Pawn Broker
2
1
1 1
1
2
1
Radio/TV Studio
3
2 2
1 1
1
1
2
DOC.
DE
11�
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Recycling Drop -Off Center (*)
i
2
2
1
1
1
1
Rental; Auto, Truck, Trailer, Fleet Leasing
3
2
l
2
l
2
2
1
2
Services with Storage
llEquipment (except
_T
i
1
automotive) with Storage
E ui P
Rental: Heavy Equipment ment (exce t
l
2
3
2
automotive) without Storage
Repairs: Small Appliances, TVs, Business
1
2
1
l
1
l
2
1
1
Machines, Watches, etc.
Repairs: Reupholstery and Furniture
l
1
1
1
1
]
1
1
Repairs. Small Engine and Garden
2
2
2
1
l
1
2
l
Equipment
Restaurant(*)
2
1
1
1
1
j 1
l
1
1
Seamstress, Tailor
Service Station (*) Closed Between 10,00
2
1
l
1
1
l
1
1
p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (*)
Service Station (*) Open Between 1000
3
2
2
l
1
2
1
2
p.m. and 6:00 a.m. (*)
Shooting Ranges (indoor)
3
3
3
3
1
Signs, Printed, Painted or Carved
2
2
l
1
2
l
1
Taverns (*) and Bars
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Technical Equipment Sales (*)
2
l
2
1
1
l
1
l
1
1
Truck Service Stations and Shops
3
2
1
1
Truck (Large), Manufactured Home and
1
3
1
Travel Trailer Sales
Waste Material Processing and Junk
3
1
Handling (*)
TRANSPORTATION
Bus Terminals
1
1
1
l
l
1
Bus Storage and Maintenance Facilities
l
1
Transportation Brokerage (*) Offices, with
2
2
1
]
Truck Parking
Contract Truck Hauling, Rental of Trucks
1
1
1
with Drivers
Air, Rail, Truck Terminals (for short-term
1
1
2
l
1
storage, office, etc.)
Railroad Switch Yards, Maintenance and
i
l
Repair Facilities, eta
l aNi ah Termunals, Maintenance and
3
3
1
Dispatching Centers, etc.
Airport Landing Field
i
Airport Operations (*) 1
UTILITIES
DOC.
DE
11�
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to provide for additional light manufacturing uses in the RD zoning
district. This district contains several large tracts (Mill Site, Speedway) that could benefit from a greater number
of potential uses above and beyond what is currently allowed in RD.
7. Appeals
15.02.020 Definitions
_w°..�=�..¢�"�""�t;y�wt"w'.r�rrr��.� :���wi�I�����1���1 I� ��1�"I�l-,.��li��1��;•��� ��I�����1��a,� ��ul��ii
r1r Im l�4�o " nie, 1 ....
identified rli- lw ri r�r I IG_,drat..�wP t._I I.. the . _
_;qny_LLqL,5on who tesfified at the o en record p�gtL[Lcjjpcirimlon the
pplicafi rl, 1r L3kgt ..(Q qn r, r mlai (1rt ditto n �arnrTi n is dUr"p_r� irpinjstra n e review
„Lttriwri g giredwtq iefralrin wlr 1s submitted written c4r n,ient mmconceralrrl , the Grp° lut e...
ib alta r rev ,108 1t LInIIt"rL n or_Gr over
SR
R-1
R-2
R-3
B-1
B-2
HB
SCC
LCC
! AS
GC
CBD
RD
M-1
M-2
Power Generating Facilities 3 2
E�I
Utility Services (substations, etc.) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1
WHOLESALE TRADE—STORAGE
Warehouses (*)
3
l
2
2
1
1
Wholesale Trade (*)
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
Storage Facilities, Bulk (*)
1
2
1
1
Storage Facilities Commercial (*)
3
1
2
3
1
1
Residential Mini -Storage (*)
1
1 3
3
1
2
3
1
1
* Refers to a defuution in YNIC 0atper Q 5.422.
** See YMC 15,09 2241 for gencrul develotamepu requirements for marijuana uses,
= Not Perm4tcd
1 =Class (1) Pennimd Use
2 =Class (2) Requires an Administrative Bovie by the Administrative Official
3 =Class (3) Requiires aw l"ubhcc I leaving by ahc 1°lcanng Examiner
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to provide for additional light manufacturing uses in the RD zoning
district. This district contains several large tracts (Mill Site, Speedway) that could benefit from a greater number
of potential uses above and beyond what is currently allowed in RD.
7. Appeals
15.02.020 Definitions
_w°..�=�..¢�"�""�t;y�wt"w'.r�rrr��.� :���wi�I�����1���1 I� ��1�"I�l-,.��li��1��;•��� ��I�����1��a,� ��ul��ii
r1r Im l�4�o " nie, 1 ....
identified rli- lw ri r�r I IG_,drat..�wP t._I I.. the . _
_;qny_LLqL,5on who tesfified at the o en record p�gtL[Lcjjpcirimlon the
pplicafi rl, 1r L3kgt ..(Q qn r, r mlai (1rt ditto n �arnrTi n is dUr"p_r� irpinjstra n e review
„Lttriwri g giredwtq iefralrin wlr 1s submitted written c4r n,ient mmconceralrrl , the Grp° lut e...
ib alta r rev ,108 1t LInIIt"rL n or_Gr over
Chapter 1.43
HEARING EXAMINER
Sections:
1.43.010 Office established.
1.43.020 Appointment.
1.43.030 Qualifications.
1.43.040 Removal.
1.43.050 Standards of conduct.
1.43.060 Rules.
1.43.070 Time computation.
1.43.080 Duties and powers.
1.43.090 Applications.
1.43.100 Master applications.
I .43. I I V Report VI sepal LI I lel It.
1.43.120 Examiner's decision.
1.43.130 Notice of examiner's decision.
1.43.140 Appeal from examiner's decision.
1.43.150 Effect of appeal.
1.43.160 Council action on appeals.
1.43.170 Appeal of decisions made by council.
1.43.180 Annual report.
1.43.010 Office established.
There is established an office of hearing examiner. The office of examiner shall be under the
administrative supervision of the examiner and shall be separate from and not an administrative
part of the department of community and economic development. Unless the context requires
otherwise, the term "examiner" as used herein shall include deputy examiners and examiners
pro tem. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.020 Appointment.
The hearing examiner and any deputy examiners shall be appointed by the city council after
consideration of the recommendation of the joint hearing examiner committee created by and
pursuant to the "Intergovernmental Agreement for the Mutual Use of Hearing Examiner
Services" entered into by and between the city of Yakima and Yakima County, Washington.
Such examiner shall serve an indefinite term of office which shall, however, be reviewed one
year following the date of original appointment and thereafter every four years. The council may
also appoint examiners pro tem to serve in the event of absence or inability to act of the
examiner and deputy examiners. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.030 Qualifications.
Examiners shall be appointed solely with regard to their qualifications for the duties of their
office and will have such training and experience as will qualify them to conduct administrative
or quasi-judicial hearings on regulatory enactments and to discharge the other functions
conferred upon them. Examiners shall hold no other elective or appointive office or position with
the city of Yakima or the county of Yakima. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.040 Removal.
An examiner may be removed from office for cause by a majority vote of the city council after
consideration of a recommendation as to removal or nonremoval from the joint hearing
examiner committee. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.050 Standards of conduct.
(a) No person, including city or county officials, elective or appointive, shall attempt to
influence an examiner in any matter pending before him, except at a public hearing duly called
for such purpose, or to interfere with an examiner in the performance of his duties in any other
way; provided, that an official or employee of the city of Yakima or Yakima County may, in the
performance of his official duties provide information to the examiner when the action is
disclosed at the hearing or meeting; nor, shall this section prohibit rendering of legal services to
the examiner or to the council.
(b) No examiner shall conduct or participate in any hearing or decision in which the examiner
shall have a direct or indirect financial or personal interest or in which such conduct or
participation shall violate any rule of law applicable thereto. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.060 Rules.
The examiner shall implement procedural rules for the conduct of hearings and other procedural
matters related to the duties of his office in accordance with RCW 36.70.970. (Ord. 2948 § 1
(part), 1986).
1.43.070 Time computation.
In computing any period of time prescribed by this chapter, the day of the act from which the
designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so
computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or a city legal holiday, in which
event the period runs until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or a city
legal holiday. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.080 Duties and powers.
The examiner shall hear, make a record of, and decide matters provided in this chapter or by
other ordinances, including but not limited to the following land use matters:
A. Matters prescribed by the Yakima urban area zoning ordinance, Title 15 of this code.
Decisions of the examiner on such matters shall have the legal effect as set forth in the
provisions of said ordinance;
B. Review of preliminary plats and modifications thereto using the procedures and provisions
for review by the planning commission as set forth in RCW Chapter 58.17 and the city of
Yakima subdivision ordinance, Title 14 of this code. The decisions of the examiner on such
matters shall constitute recommendations to the city council;
C. Preliminary plat extension requests pursuant to RCW 58.1714Dand city of Yakima
subdivision ordinance, Title 14ofthis code. Decisions ofthe examiner onsuch matters shall
constitute final decisions unless appealed to the council pursuant to the provisions of N!1�
4_~_ .
C>. Plat vacations oramendments pursuant to F(CVVChapter 58.11. 58.12. or 58.17. Decisions
of the examiner on such matters shall constitute final decisions unless appealed to the council
under the provisions OftW�
E. Pedestrian skybridge applications in the manner set forth in YlVIC 11.65.040(F) and
pedestrian akvbridgepermit violations aoset out inYK8C11.65.O7D;
F. The examiner may conduct hearings required pursuant to RCW Chapter 43.21 C, State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and Chapter 6.88 YIVIC at the request of the city responsible
official charged with responsibility for holding such a hearing; provided, that the substantive
SEPA decision and the decision on the associated action shall be made by the responsible
offic|o|-
G. The examiner may, atthe request mfthe city shoreline administrator, receive and examine
available information, conduct public hearings and prepare records and reports thereof, and
issue recommendations to the council based upon findings and conclusions on applications for
shoreline substantial development permits and conditional use permits;
H. Conduct public hearings on petitions and resolutions to vacate streets and public rights-of-
waypurouanttoRCVVChmpter35.7S.C)ecioionooftheexmnninmronouohnmattenaaho||
constitute arecommendation tothe city council.
The provisions mfthis section designating and assigning tothe hearing examiner the duties and
functions listed above shall supersede any and all conflicting provisions ofthe municipal code of
the city ofYakima. (Ond. 201G-D20§2.2D1G;Ord. 2D13-033§1(Exh.A).2O13:Ord. 83-S1 81.
1993: {]rd. 3257 § 1. 1990: Ord. 3224 G 1, 1989: Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1900\.
1.43.090 Applications.
Applications for permits or approvals subject to review by the examiner shall be made tothe city
department of community and economic development (hereinafter referred to as the
"department"). The department shall accept such applications only |fapplicable filing
requirements are met. The department, in coordination with the hearing examiner, shall be
responsible for assigning a date for and assuring due notice of public hearing for each
application, which date and notice shall bminaccordance with the statute orordinance
governing the application. (Ord. 2948§ 1 (port). 1886).
1.43.100 Master applications.
Any persons proposing adevelopment orproject vvhiohnsquinasmore1hanoneofthmpermibaor
approvals |iobad in Section 1.43.080 of this chapter may submit a master application to the
department on forms furnished by the department containing all necessary information. The
master application shall thereafter be processed by the examiner subject tothe longest time
limitations applicable to any of the required permits for approval. If any of the required approvals
constitute arecommendation tothe legislative body, the decision of the examiner toall such
permits shall constitute a recommendation to the legislative body, otherwise the decision of the
examiner shall be final subject to an appeal to the legislative body pursuant to this chapterl.ifle
DOC.
014DEX
1.43.110 Report of department.
Where no specific provision for a report of the department is contained in the statute or
ordinance governing the application, the department may coordinate and assemble the reviews
of other county/city departments, other state or local governmental agencies and franchised
public utilities having an interest in the subject application and prepare a report summarizing the
factors involved and the department's findings and recommendations. At least seven calendar
days prior to the scheduled hearing the report shall be filed with the examiner and copies
thereof shall be mailed to the applicant and made available for public inspection. Copies thereof
shall be provided to interested parties upon request. (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.120 Examiner's decision.
Within ten working days of the conclusion of a hearing, unless longer period is agreed to in
writing by the applicant, the examiner shall render a written decision which shall include findings
and conclusions based on the record. Except as provided in YMC 1.43.080 and 1.43.100 and
the decision of the examiner shall be final and conclusive on the fifteenth day after the date of
the decision unless a notice of appeal to the Yakima city council is filed pursuant to
YMC 1.43.140. The examiner's decisions together with his findings, conclusions, and record of
proceedings shall be filed with the department of community and economic development. If the
effect of the decision is a recommendation to the legislative body, the original thereof shall be
transmitted to the legislative body (Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.130 Notice of examiner's decision.
Unless different procedures are prescribed by the ordinance or statute governing the
application, the department shall mail copies of the examiner's decision by certified mail to the
applicant and by regular mail to other parties of record not later than three working days
following the filing of a written decision by the examiner.
p i(po mm r t Bio- 1 r � cif l og,ct�J "...r�u a�r� :.(��.�N� �mmq���cr ��.�.���. j �1� �a��°W L
p w tmm ar l t .: rrm t t t o „pe rtw �s icll rrti ie rte l e, records �aw� of ble from rg the Yal�i n c°;rua�u y
ass s r" raj uc ..f I wl sgmm or rub rk c �+ rV' ,° ; _rte fn )rar c> testified at the
ft e*nr Gqr crm€ fa ut Gr _ftp rur aru fljp..1ppV c 4uon-m u / rm sy:_p
.qrson who ubmiht r wwrull r�.
comments during nistrative row�a�ww utir�trµ�@� ����urrm m�ii�n� �r Mc ,or has S,Ubmiitted written
mcornme,rits concerning N. r aha bran �t ''thy ro tin re n d r 1rr he rnr��t..( �tx uruel�per ro �. 1Mne
have.:ownly a n g(.J a tffion"mIT� ITITtar roar n lett r
. fr rrw ,)ser,.-ofthis-c-hopt r other t.�r se�mrs �trr
i° ,ave tti r r srr r rttort rtt� n , rrr rr rrrrt-o wr r.rw.. fa rr., t r �sr�. it n.n...r r I , tr ..,r fry rr f
wit ��trut4rf=rmrr�r-rfar- �r���µf r��r���tior orr�r�i��r��tr�zif r''em�ot'ot �st-ioo o�s� r°t�t�or,.hw rgrr#rrq
s rr�trtrrr...pr�rirt°r�wr�ri...r�rt��� �thtsrr�r��r�.rro�i�.,...(Ord. 2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
1.43.140 Appeal from examiner's decision.
?. As lromiffi ...1ip rwnric� Annimnor s decision wshall use the pr.p�_ " urI'eS OUtlined, n QlaL)te,
10 0' t.
f. oopt...or tri tt os� rlrrorr rrwr-rs....� Orc1 onr lrtr torr rr rr e na 1 fir no to..tt r rr r r ort trr'O ir'u ed4
f orris ifa ri f rrr o, f o t r....t t .o.frnr i m or re r . tr ..tl uo � rr'rtrrr r
may,
fro.. l;npn for tr ..tt e oo sur 11
ret .rr,lra�t��r�rr."
trr�r��,r,..of-tE�r'�it ott'ra�tort..
t1`nr�rerrn'��qurrr�rmrrtee�ir�iorr, u�i� tiwrr foflr�ir�fr�r��rurr�e�r-;.
a.g an "rn' CA We
a,rf,
Iru..u�.ir��������•�,1-�-��1�11 la`rµ�u�V�a.��w�.��a..1���� �;u-�i����a°��,������1~�� �"� .������u�"�����;
..,upon ua NaGb., presented t
No-wFw enarqumeti
f'1JQW&.:"rhe p e4or.... *Aie af..f a �
r. ayrPgU1(i , kl -Wri mq—,,3,n 4t* f)artr 'uen" 1"'lay if' ft- die4 ;,*A4o a of f: fou- atA
wy prjor� i,)oUor ifteen..ri Writton
ould-o he;w a be.. ��.a,,....�..&u � u :.��a�a,��u �iG f-T 1 ... refl
fµp%uµ I. p :a plp 1si ir"Isr q I"birv- *un by--th a��ap't,rn`oil 4,th��" " l �y��a � ��� �py,���5au�����:i.� ,1 irc; n' tifance" y
"�"W" 1,K*II ""S�"'INM'�" p G* "f,:,"M'wa.a'bN "W.' ';N!ae K F#'"N"tl!'ti:.W �"k ..w W°�,"h ti P �Y ..,' "SWT if �" 6" I��F �'4 'W' �.�.. „p h"" ,�,�.m "tl"9^" W 9'� W 'l,"`IP� ,, q Nvvs-of
AAefnoF, an&+;,viajtten.. rgtofi . G-Gwlaf-neftts.M..th-f-,N"' en io n- n"Y-4)(,") a
(e)-- Wi . ,;,I -a
P y�, n,^ _ htl4• bp q �v u�ry�p y .pp ryy�y p yip Wtp X 0.N y�p'y y qp,�r y u� ypp,y I•�p F y+h,, µ" �y •ppry�n+"�
��r�-�' �.Baa""��rr�ri`".-�iu�uo:�.��n�•��."����r���u��"������r��i� ��ro����� ���-���"���i����
"8. W ...1 r'4 Mf8 ,4 .
1.43.150 Effect of appeal.
The timely filing of an appeal under this chapter shall stay the effective date of the examiner's
decision until the appeal is adjudicated by the council or until the appeal is withdrawn. (Ord.
2948 § 1 (part), 1986).
4-43460
"9i,,.4N,hr.l
for by..fi b ooii cA M-,4.14 4inw,
later,: fl.itr
(b) ...... "?ublao- N olo �o a 1`,-,Moohn9-oa ,.A pe ol_ he-ck a� .-ol the a�aa�raia ar„ig...a�ta� l m �q�agi� mlttoaa a�rpma l�.m..���lt
p aataoaa.ral m a as araq t :grad tE a. aroma m a r� w a ul w �.. a q lbo...u..a.. a s lga q beef a 1
Arlt_... ttrAo�ar� a�at ��aualaro��+...�ruwaa*�ral�a-aq�a� �-l�o•a.��� �llN l��r�ll,��1..1a�al�a��-aWa�q�:.la�-�a.���
oma-aaalaaa�aa, to o���:wa�a�aaao.r..aa�1�a�dl a���lll°gaa��l laq�aaa��a���� �a..,raaa�a����a1:� laa aaal�a �a�tta�l�.
lawaa�ga~aq��a�K, l�aaa�a�laaal,,,.,�ga�ll.,�aaa�.. aaaa W�aTa�,�awv�aa.�a�a-a~ra„�a�a�mallul�-��a�aaa�'�a"as,1....m��l�a..a�a�air�au�l
uwa naa..e ::
��,'�.._....olmom"aWaaa~�t�ralaoot "�������aam�aala�� a�a�olaaa��lkl'a��;ma�aa��a�aa �a�a�pl«„ama"aa�m�ua�l a"a�-~amyl'= aa�a�� m
ttur rra at aw la a am l a m a 1 a l °a + a s law n-'- 4l toposp—ol 4a4cia mca f*WeFia~atj no -f a hi l
o m to,auc a tla �m oraagaaraa ..ytl tp o a orarga ll...a aaaata ao a atr qua araa alattoaoot tmorrr t o
dOGi,6,4Dn Gf-#%,
aaa��arlr�amq,�.tl�,�o...a;�a�avaa~ar�il�a��l"arallaalopt...�aw�aaloal tar�dgr�a� aa��l aw�a�alaa��aom�aa�� �a,"�a�omaq�cawlp �a�1- ��.�,.:1
,��ttt .,rratotu.�,f m ..lomoa"a�na�da:a...; arronottw
l:`larwaairat.:l,l�w��r�a��mllmra ����1 a a:��rwlaa�a�a ���a-�,"o�waaaa;a...���m�l la��a
A,airmia ma. g ml,htm ttrgataa.. ter .mt r mar ttr m,..d alo ttla 1., a tlora . ai,;-ardr ra *Ved...Porl ...obtL34F+s sa- 4,1ipF w prl a
wdt. of-judi .,ial reAiiew,for ll a m 1, wpos of, ray «mew—,G tl~asa~a a~ G�t",j*a.a...t,.ale�a rR,. q fgl ., a a appr atm at appeW
ray oltr n mat taa.:l t tra t tua .. apps B4 raalN,14 1. a m arta°las aaa...l r y ton„ Baa ra l u a�,..11auwa.. . Batu o taam p q iarp
oqa .. arl.arataa tmw.amm ara.11 ,.ol praaa r agmaapa as almwmaoat l�aa...lwmrtra x aV pt a of ..l dull .ta a a.aar o mal the
�upaloa a�aa.mrta tlro 1;��atma~�a,.aaa avattaoato ��moaridia rlWtarra..awartao r°r��a�art..r�l tma�wrrtgm�p..,tor
pa.wa pa, a .o art ro uo l tlaar ou apr rlou a o as 1. (tu rd -m ddd....§-t rt e t pap
1.43.180 Annual report.
The examiner shall report in writing to and meet with the city planning commission and city
council at least annuallyifwr�A�aast4 for the purpose of reviewing the administration of the
city's land use policies and regulating ordinances. The report shall include a summary of the
hearing examiner's decisions since the prior report. (Ord. 2010-22 § 2, 2010: Ord. 2948 § 1
(part), 1986).
"Party of Record" means: (1) the applicant; (2) the property tax payer for the subject property as
identified by the records available from the Yakima County assessor's office; (3) the legal owner
of the subject property; (4) any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the
application; and/or (5) any person who submitted written comments during administrative review
(within the required timeframe) or has submitted written comments concerning the application at
the open record public hearing (excluding persons who have only signed petitions or form
letters).
Chapter 15.16
APPEALS
Sections:
4'r 416,440
4,i". war,Viu� ioim.�u muumU ,,
1 6m 16,4005 ..Ap� mqj[§,
LIndei � ifle j p m Uc d q i N m� C cha ,w w 1 U u sRU
. _ _._..aw.y.m
The found un YlMC 16.0&
�::�� ��uu i;�� z��� �i""mu��•����~��o�:..p �� ����n•ut��iu�r.;uU� i4��"��o���m��•���o�mm"�� �"���am�mu��m� �w�m•�°� �m'm,��,m.
heumimm
ix
. �......m•i ""gym,
4u°m i.iu o ot.,�u�..o6'io��u..."UwmU ab ii iU" "oco.....ii
Ail
Aii....Cmr"mm.mrm;°mugmM.u',,.iwi...'wmmi,,mu°mmuumuq
•,r i n � i an appeal hea irig, provdete f-w#o
u ii r i 4 0 ium u• "aM;uuu im uu ¢ mLLo i " m mmr iii 4 �i �; b w. m„i . miu;...Ai
deter4"*nafi Tuve
u of i"e
4., .,..."�.y�Ua��du� oU ���i;m�u�m��m�im��u�a.� �•�i”��u���mu��m����+,v��..w��.4�~�m-���i�.4�'� u;�'R��m�„����;��""i"""i'ir:�,,...iw���U.u.a�����.
��� � � m���� mu:�w97r,•�� �•Ai��� m aur" ����� m ��m�u� iu•��u ur"r�;..."i����u��u I������..m�`�� i�����.��.e�u°� �mu�������
n�, ed,f
���ummNm°m�w��m��m��,.,u`�m�m��.�mmd�mB ,r°.Nm.��mmu � ,��N�a�r�umu°m..� ��md Nwm@�N�. ���m°u• ��"N�� �N�..."m N �Nu�.Nm.
X,........... A,pm U .;ta @ n oo'
�mummmwm-rNwrNN�mNm @ar Nmm� rmNrrrr..N @;k.,N�ammN,mmum ic4al
.......���m�m,N...,m�.@����,�Nm��mmu�NN.,��uml.:��N����N..,�uNNm���m•�m�"��„.N��UN�m�m�N�.fiNm�-m�=��uNm.m.��@m� �'ii�-~m��N
��rrw•l ����rmwrm�m.m..r�m� rm� �mUm�•��NNu�„,�p"� ��NmN'm�u�� s�N�@@��"� ��V�mw@�m�,`�mwmm--�~amu���ummm�wm���:�Nmm"�N
......@ur@ar•��.��m�mNN-wm rm� ���N��rr� ��N"u���m�N��m�N���NN Na��"m,.Nm� wmm�mmmu��.mm•�.�m�,:N�m!u��s�~~mN ��..,N�N•m�'
m�rmm�m'rrmrr4 wrmNr���mmNN•'�M�m�m�um��m�"�mm�uN�N NN�m�mm�m��mµ� ��;...m��~,�,,.��n���������;�.,m�gma�„
N�'m w,mN�Nmmmrm Nrm�m��rr�Nrmm°�rNrmrn�r.,.:�r��.r�mmm�rw•r:rr ir�m�m�m�N�.�,,,,��~�m,�m•��mm�r.y, ammm” m'r�;U��m��...�Rm@N..m.m-��m�m"m
isnot, )nE,'Gf
domrNmm"rr m.mm.N.@m,
N .. Se.m...m�.mmmrwN�Nrm�rrrN �mNmrr...Nmm,..�mmgmm..@m�pr
.... .e . r ..mNr ��N:N mmum m,fl¢m ,@mdm„NNmmm@',@NmN�i�r �m.Nmm
m �Nm Nim u � mNu@ N�wmm m� '.. m m.�N amain Nm m m m an
N, r;m ;;rNm @ r r rmrr mr ...aW w.m @�mm r rm �•• mrv@ N ... mrr mmm r .
V......ir�wW�����...���• N'"��mm..,"N•�m ��;N"m �a�+�m.~'�U�=m��@•�� �Nw��_U��N�am.m�.�m"�.rNmNN��N�>mwNmN=� N�m����'mN
fZ - 4 i N" N m mrt, A stAff 4th
rw,,..,.”�rmrrmr�wN,".,,N@-m��•N"�wm�mm�....w:�N N �mNm�m.��m�. ��mNm"m�-�������mb.�Nmw~mIIN �mmmm�w:- @
Nrho r-nder., lwitt
mNmrwrrrNrmrr NNmrm „.mNmN mr,NN�...mr..@rrm N.,,,:Nrmr NNrrmm:Nmamm..mNm,..Nmm-mmmmN mr
Nr�mm�r r�wrrmmm N, mmrmm�>b;rNN �;mr�mwN Nr«rm N�w..NU.��-rUu�m@„.m~mNrcw"�m�-mrd N.Nmm-.m°mrN�M�m �� N�„..irrmrr�"� �;�r�""rrum��m"
mrrm:m �m���u-m°m�r-rmr-rmmmrr, 'N�"4N gym• Nmr..�m"�,,...r m��°mrm�n �m;�..mN°�.y.,r�mam�'rm°rd�rmrN„o,.Pmrm�Nr�mr;...�:
r :..=kmrm... rmrN rmmmm Nrw @N w r r :rN m m'r h Nwm hrm -examine m N rN mmrm @m Nm w „ NrNm Nrmu , NU m
j w r i s.o reujfd ,,a+id the, offid A- llueia worrk4,19
mrt~Nm..���NNmmww���mm.,..��m N-�wr�mm�umm�r~r m� N~Nmmm,.,NmrrrU�rm�rrr�,..
�-- wrm�ru:.r @ r�-���,mvNrm�;mm�mm4mr�m�.m���m.�N..,m,..�..ummw@ �umNm�mrr� w�-,�;r�m8mm..•.k�.�;rN.� m�• uN�r.rrr'Nmr
�rmM�r�rrN��m�, �� �N..r�n�W�rr Nmw��.N"rrr�NMm�m�rrr�m� ��rmrrm;m�r�..��6wNN_mrrrmN� �mrm� mrmrrNm.r�rrrrm mmr.�.,.UN
�mmr#mrprw�N :°....I� �m��Nm� �r"m...�Nr N�,���Nmmmr'rM�rm'�rNl,.o.rm��m.w"���•,.N�aw.�� �•� M�+��rNm.� N���"� �N I�:.Nm-,
Nmmrrm.:,Nm-rtl:e.N�w..,�r...�"...�;..•wmm 2.94...1mm
o.n
yl I ww
,m-
416,44.060-AppGa I, Of die decAsion.
A.......„dsssds ..: d tsma mtmssss mss mg nm V s m u uu n...mssVsmm kmm s pk s sus ummVu mmsmsmms
applwaler(t is .ttln s Il s mm r .; a HV pm ss mmnn w mssmh�mM mm m mms .m .. a s ed by
dt's.m� mds�mm�lsssrsusums:�ds�m�r�llmmrum.�.,nrrw'mss��;
:, .......p dims w ,s ms Vussap ys ms m amps .. s m s:smrss-appeal..:�
sMdswsssNsss s�sd�sss*n dsmss�s t�ms�n�s�sss��ssu� Vr,� ��ss"m ������m�u�asss�.µssa".� �rr:��ssss��s�sss� 6�,,..�5� �~m��s��sW�sa.��
mm�s� �w mmm m ms cjay-s f M ths& d;,' t
2.......1-spec4f' hmwm 41 e
V, 664419,6s°ss..ttsm smssst f @,@Jp m t tts.m i s h..uss.st mm.dn,d mssdulCds m sac e d i,, *t, m considered,,,d the
V V.tdskllliv , 14Dsrdd ..
11
,., ...., tdss.tdt smssssrs slssVV Vssn...,t.mssds sstsNd stss.tsms d:d dVsms dus�ss,s...s sssassss dsummm s
m:dd,dtsWsssosssrsusssst:sad tssds ams 6smt sad Vsm.stssts,assso°st:
d,:t. Admta�md tssmetsmsm
d._ ... -tsV sdu s mt..V.. V t t t;m sV dtsa t ssu.¢omsa ,dVmsss ssmms..s is sVV ass dad td �s us��� at ss s s�sW(t In
appellws,,ttts, t �ss"ap,trms q, tsas d„ses is e d and-tdsawd ropis Of tds dl 4ss ds m ()t:,a*d and.. iny,.
smdtt�ss m,ds,un's�n.ss�dnw.ss s�s•smms�s:mm�sswsss mt..s"ssnsttss�sr.dt�ss� �`s��s�rs�m�tmro��s..:ttsss�musdts�as m�st-dt���.Va..ss"s-�s dr�
obts, nam tar- -smm-d.wl.s`td ds°
,�. ...t�s�mata~snt,�:rt d~'ti�m �mt...V.�uts�ssV �IlaslFs>~���R. `V V�s�~sus"dms��t�mmmts-rss�t�t�t�sdV�m'�nt sts�sdd.,„�wst�s.tss
tmV-mss V' tV s smm t. wt t s „dt ms :d .. tmn sm� sen., s dssss t`s s s dss ss to dV-1a d slP, s'-Ia
s�a.mtsu��sdt......�a�.dtts�«-su~t��,:mm�ss��t..��sw-ss���sssa,ss°mss°smswsu=�s �-,d�ss-dsttwV�tu�y��rn�,°ssst...d�dm~�ddss'"� dssmsss
ts`s<ss ttmsm s��ts�s.tV�st�ts�mFs�s�dm��m s�s~sssd�ssd, .;ss�r��.d s..sµst��s��sts.sss��s�� s-s�s��wms�ss�m.sms� d°mm.dll
notss�ss��tstt' us,.��smt��ss:ass�� s.ml�ms�sr s�����, ns�sdw��tutd d� Ihssd�d swd�ssttm��t�
d�s�s�stnl ts.~ts�.msmsn��w
27
.......untssttddmsiistds �sas�ssssd.sr�sndss�m�.
s,s. V dssm �sp�sd�sddn.,ms�t s -,sir usss�� t"sn�sst Bpd.,smm��ms,..sms�m�...d��sa�s"t. td�sm-;s-�dss�smmm�~�mmsdtd"mm wu��s,,msm�st �snss
ass sen mss snn .dmsm° t s tks st ..w rs sssm tdssmt .sd m s oV.t+O-d t” s s smdsast ..s t t hs n rmtm t tsdiw d
—f �cwnplotd rs sed'-dh dhdsd da.
ubr°rssttat tms.mrtamsV � u�nt ss ds mm.mss., sd � ss rntt u..,�mmm dt. m.s ,p.ss mssus sr s rs„ td°s
m drda .,Wa nt V 4s6r-e npess s sus sH� �,mt'�t��sss nd sd ssm� apt ems... ss,s sd s. sws �s s�d�mss,�r s� t �dmW�VV d� ,
tsmmts.tmst �-tattsu s.dmtm sGa��stt��sd dims"�su�dus�ss�-ms�st"Jd_.ss�s dd'ss�.�td�sssd��tdsd t dum�s~s�s dss"� mt,d�st
ssw�ddssd-r„m-dh�s� mstns"�s�sm. �aV dsdVd �Vtssd:;.
G.......�msmMss;s ddtms�tsu11.tmwmisssh�sN.Vs...s�9mm�MWsmmsn.;.
.......,, IIsV �csHdSsss ,s°�smm mssd ems....msdssmannsdsmsms,sstmmmddmsn mdsass tags ddmssrvssda s:,nbnm4trs,d
st s s stdm,ss°u r mnfu ~sen d des s u:,s � �sM ns's'dsm .,td u s d ss s en s.. d d s m, m s .s rs is tsps
ss dm �rm mws..mms m t dsms..m ums d.ds srs..r ds t sr th-a the-dai t dat mtVs�� m rsmsmss�s s�nt�� m;ms.mtst mth Ws
�t ...... t�ts ts..dsr�d�dsss�..d�s°asttm sss�^� �u��ssst tsstV�r�"nssnrrs� mmr ��s tsm�t�dmstt��..td��� dsm�td�p�ds
�t mmt tts �sr.ns�t,sm�d��,�...smt�trs<s-��stssm��d.,,s:�ss��sm!ms�t,.msn.;,..ntmsm�d�s �,�ss°s°spud smm.smud"s turds��-
IND XE:
1
..,�
4''e, nfik)n.
rA'Ab,wn -nt-thlat". 4lten (DRITT'),ents- p° aUb
pfe se ntafie,n uo 0.; - t ac;t. -- 8,Cif �U' w l.,.W„411EW
,....m..r,i--c . fe) cr) --p w,(,w,Cl-t,p.O ilglalp -Bdy-, VG,
a�,•ppp��w~a° �w,.�� d��.��Uw�� p�a;���.� w..�....��p-�u����,.����p�w����-��'���w��:�w� �p°�� w�a�w������ ��w����d....k
2 0-1 494
Pubic & ot.Ge..Meetin,
the
ugJsw 4ve
o'l)a "Revie
Vlf k4g[Oative body
ww waw° - .ww'w froii her ccmisidwatien-c)f
the -legis al w w.-A
wN w w wFw r pw� p� w p ��w a llp adopt rnemde... ..c(,,mGlu Www' r;
t'l646, -Appeal r al ur s: c - a .- .. t, h o4e,%wws $a ti b0-,dy,,7
�d�w'mwpw �pw'w-� wa-w-�w wwK w w«� x t
Gbtains UN t
purpose, ose, of mvj&N of the w-ta est ..4R`l appoli t ha 4 Pu *-Je tm�-Payfar uta a; d artnGe,q 4fi
tw;,t of I�ta��;� tta �� � u�a t t t� �Ra�a �u trrvu a wu��R u,a � �tt���tu tau �,�tuuatt�� �uw�ttt u��� R � R, � �u
t. u R u.t t umRt a tb tuu R N;t t .ut tt t y..agire t to...�
996, R . a ra.ie qct„ 14"1
PliRt uP ctf au), -,a pfafaal,u says 4)i
llutN t Ruu tt for
shiJA the-4,aft,
... P'llr exacl'utW�Rtt
a tRtuaRw,tttwwt PaRu:t�Rtw:...Yi trtre,m,t aaataua .,,UM°)unRng
Chapter 16.08
APPEALS
Sections:
16.08.005 )uirpg p....!ad,,Ali. N iiJll
16.08.010 Consolidated appeals.
- ...._..... �q wV .. h.grg...:f.iled..
"1 f� 008.01 Murders of roof,
16.03.015 Definitions
X10 m10118__A ( al of dr k-ij sir tiv of �icilaI' deci On
16.08.020 Open record appeals subject to review by hearing examiner.
1 .05.0 f ww Atl wll a (wtlh awlhn Irk.I ...p p.N ..ner'.s....degUsl.p.N
16.08.030 Closed record appeal subject to review by the city council,
16.08.040 Judicial appeals.
1&0&050 Effect o .�
1 06 Actions wc�f�� �tl~1.t�eaN�i1C
M,0 mm 06_p mri rlfj Li ili!Y
�p �...................._..h .p .__ . � �� . pp � _ m . s made under
Tlhe ur ose ofthis dha ter us to establish the ceiJ uarw�s ora p Nir mmpcisrons made n er
thf-jrr nisi—or rs rpt Gitl'e -14; #I!a- 16, line—1 @..gCLd f, fL
qpter 6,88 of the Yakima Municipgj
:[he Lo rp rna also be used for an other matter where there is an a eal o p rtunit w r1d
thf)r c rti ra gf Surf pai1� set� m fned �is when in this Code,
16.08.010 Consolidated appeals.
A. All appeals of project permit application decisions, other than an appeal of SEPA
determination of significance, shall be considered together in a consolidated appeal and shall
not be separated from the substantive matters of the application.
B. Appeals of Determinations of Significance under SEPA, Chapter 6.88 YMC, shall proceed
as provided in that chapter in an open record hearing. The purpose of this early and separate
appeal hearing is to resolve the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) and to permit
administrative and judicial review prior to preparation of an EIS. (Ord. 98-66 § 1 (part), 1998).
16,.08.012 Appeals—Where filed.
&IIV ppgalls authpri-ed under thpvpIpyi ions of u l L4, I tle L5,, Title 16 andwwghwgpter 6.88 of the
Yakima Municip N ode, e ept�I dii iaN p . lsS h H be filled' wotIl'ti...th divlsuon. The diiyiislon
haul tiru°d°r tbp fllwa tErwpipr�mmtr raii�stcstdy1�wG scldaalr ail..l1�16m�ru�rw.
...- .. ..
pip qde the r quiu.red.,apttflcatjo,n ictd aw -11t i!,1 coi.,1r1p;ie records of all�1� M N�eq irk.. s unless
other itsfor in ttis ChK)Lef.
16.08,014 Burr n cif„�roo
Ihp gppellant.shall bear the burden to a �rnonstrate at least one of thefollowing,
mm_ ....Thi decision-rrrak if s_11:ie ad ini is twiw o is o V orwh�anil,lU:Lxg lwgi f
exceeded hisor her caro ctL tagn_ or Baa„athod
2.,. The deca ion rn kpr failed to follow ap aVwi ghjg �p� duff i mre ,L g the
decision;
3. The decision -maker committed an error of la nd/orW
DOC.
INDEX
Vim.„
w T htnrA on nn k u.r arLgi isions or debsionn pLrc gr IL)y fl,iie decision rnaker are not
1116,08.015 DefiinuitIN u s
N
u
�i .. ..... "contextd ........ ` . n qtr" tVnifigri s urn this is sect ��V V ckN�N ,�„ !NhP ���,mghput ;ti,ii s
�.�;an r the, n nr n r nAn r n .....
a Adrn4ilistirce five official" Irnea ns the.
dull grnar�ir trr A� .n...f Yakun°nun�����lr �� ���rnI�ulrllit.
f state n .,. ,
w��_o ubdivi� ,iron thereof
"Person,. grieved" nA.Nrrn)Li nha rectly
OPProvall denial or worn gLit n(L N°) EwrnmR.,.or,, i erson who is dire�IfLe c to a decision of
ntmm tue f_._otu�__... city..councH.
_..._
rpeans the N u r:rn.rr a r„d� 9 n, Appp'l pq aecli u n made Ilb the dm ---------------a fav f ciaN
.::
Hall'.: trq°n q°nr rnrnn� Mnrn.n�.
° wN,plr rnt' rneansrw_pgElpitnanrima rm Gl rmN kA mttn
YakrMa Mlunicipgl!.megqgIIlpq `N µµ Ii Titie 15 and w,�lln�n o td a owi n ll m � tq n� �un��r�t..Vjn ra omt I� the
autNnonz rac rnN untWttn owner,
r:,
'°wDjL,4!jjig_ '°_gL' II )ivi wwliglrn,” rnpai� �..:th cuts gf Yq ilea j imt...of Cor ............. _ ort,.
u�nlr�u..... � � IIS .........._..
A,A..rn�a B W n r m racN wwr nen rn Wtln�r I' wuunr rw t rnu�rlciL
n _ mm
" � nr a r.......rnea n t nun directorLLo r ornrrnunrnnt u� r�dun f!L(a ntmramr tnlr or her desii ru ,.
d rt fmt r� raruN mea _ 1' nl n ...n li rat t _ n� rt r ..rn n ren r�rr n t r rnrrn: n .
d uanntffied attn n qr r Edd avada bl � from till Yakima Ca nNy �n � ��� � Ann t G� ���t ��Nnr�I 1 owner
of the _ r h A t..A n rn on who testified at the rspgnq � nrN4 n�rN lig n jri ngl p tlj
qpplicatnm?arr,and/rnrIn ..t r nt r ln� submrnlittr ' writte awcoirr n ent ..dUriELq nt�a�unr re Nafiv � review
mm..rr
~�rnth n mgrs Lgq!nnreu m nnrr tr nr nc nu:..ln � mLrb- hitt d written, on"HMIV r ¢,rn� rmlunur act tln nab rinmr to a� M�nt,
_.
rn
na^s r`s rw rear a^ta � n`k"slg .� rum ^�u lr"., V raw^d^�flu � nr^r ,�r�,�r ^,wvUn .ire , rs zxrs, r-�rtiN,� ,,.+r,p wrww �d� u� ws f�r� rr� o"fio M
_.... a . m m_..._. _.._ _,
letters)
°` ersolUn"' ern nuar1� a`N (.��r"D!j�i.�rpK11 ,,nn 11 xzqd.Nejy, finrLn r atnnp OII...
as well s an individuaL a state andall'.t��n�gt�cal urrdivi nr r) of a
uirtn u�n� ar.~�uz��git�kl"nu�r��.
u u trn0-goI rµ qpj ,,.p nt`� �a�rn�� tru nnrom�n r�. ��y�6 is t� orannwrt w� � r rd
gr�rrna,anruITt�a..�c�n_�uAnr��wu,ll,, ._ .
n�lC'rnrt nnnrn there tntmis mndnGnraniq°rn crr°n9 rggr twrn
16 08.01 _ p t@Ill f tghe I urn�liirmlii fur ttve �)f,ficIalll" �i Iii luim,
6., ,Appealto the Heai nu r"niin r ..F a Ttw as of hrwise mArn^w ill q, Prly 'n(l,( r r cin N � .N '.
. w � _ '.�W... m _. � official ren u1 lctnn n
of r r ord,_or r r .. lrrmr 1 nitr to w ? ww a �,r n rat the cqn nnrnr tr atn �K ...
rnnrn, err ar r � N t u, nun yto the he an m r�nrr�nrn rr,
ppm 1 �� ed _ hiiun fourteen day§ fgVjo wrn the u� uuuu� .�G tl� m�uwr41
11.3. II NII sll h�lll � iii wit __
r a Gsic pn icy tkre �:nd Ministnrntinde cia w e n n :" "..._ 1sqhMI The filed with the division. .. If. a
f�n�aG (Jecision does rant r��rli n_nr r n lllung,th�e ap�l _ahaIN be Ned yittaan fculrtoen d)(§���llln Nnnrn
the issuance of the final decision.
... ...
.......
Shaall B in n.uructAl 4 � 4 ,wn Ne c,Nq � rt t� lc r r nrt fatm dry d d :
ff ranmtnrrea k mai!,)d lull lmn an nl hrld i f N1 r uu1r . tr yr(,teed. thq ��pl dMp N t f, .,s, ouldmm
not G w_ lrrrwncnrrN to tllw�" Gd ga G�twtrye bodty or a division mL the..6Ly_1 mlVm )pp"�I� LaLl �twte VlyM u
.......�.. ..� _._... as ale " c. t nmt e considered amm�d�mml:'
tt��n ar tuor� kreinc ptrw"glpr�� �1� of rpd pr � ._..... ...._.._.�
is not mconsistent v ut 6pu r n u ions def the Yaki'rra u!rb rz ur w�c r�rfsud�he u�d�lWw�d Wt�G��c�� n�nITu�IT Iu�le: r
o pE p.. _ � � r w r l d�@N hal Iso am Gn d sworn t t nienYnt i��� I t e �r r dliant has
....tl nd:�n lrpvnuorns of I_.M�
read the aioneaI and believes the cmprntents to be llru,mllllsyya Ib tl� pIGw,g i'adrrtwGwtww.
D. (Notice. the dnvision shalll::
._._.w...,..,.,........w1..w.w...,......._.._....Sretrasorialbebime and pj for rmg....p�...t.S......p.?.!-and
..w._a .
Il1rovWe
a uratic of , L�gbpu hoarirjg tai the ofd cuallwwhos.�"...decision G
d upp r� al d uu li l pnt�r ntutl d tto en, to r f th d cisrc��� qA�r ludi )Cl gscLa Ig dah
pn.p.p n y frnd cnn lmu kmuorarnl tN G gofice t le ns kee n ciay �d c° k k u ap a is a
E Fra.insfor of IlR cor "Phe officer frog nwwhorn fhemappaal. is_b6taken �'WI forthw th transmit
to the h r!`!Lt± exams der all the records s :rtary niwng o; the decisionw bei �er�" kg�td�dr ?Gt
suchhp ftnluonal„written rg rts h or she deernsd��Clrne�at.
F. Staff Rep )E gt pcau L BIgp l 0 tai r1 1 and tr n m tte l tothe whe rin exarni n r all rj
yynth the record in accordance amnce withthii Mgh ler
.tlon_�LiL WI e rang miner, F'estiurn ujy'U rin , tl1 � n.pgaI shall Irµ„lar ited to those
-o"uu1t atedl erm Yn p r d l .paw t ori Tlrt w G wrnr g irnurn u:.. shall render... written decision n
_. _ ... the � g _ �. t_ s
t.tn p eel within ten worlhuu�g days Nii¢�lr� t�sr” pnrl�dursuon,f�f t,h� #�orat"a..�_�ron�� a�_1un�o�u�..p�nupod.Pdmm
rrrrdlte Gly dry d t _Idap..l nnhu tg the ..app aI and the exan liner, 'rhe lnr*ar'"19w nh"n r a w
affirm: or a y rw"f� ,,w hgHy or, AprIle oirrqqcJifykl'°ie oirder..ce lir it rnt deco ponyor, et rminwat'
wnrC to that end, Va IalaaN avpa IG the .prawrd lbw_gf.. �e,oftf cerfroan whomownmthe apl,a� �Gm as taken _.. �h
division shall. send co u ��r�i���ewwhearin.q �xal21inq[s decision nwto the pell„pnt, th,�m Artie of
f
ecord and ..the official) whose, decisioln )t ale mot Ba er ttthanthree w r�dirr��a
td
I!pwirlgi the issuanice ofthe9`angI rtod nsag...
H.mm_..De6sions by.pi�lUn
.u� e.._ tma mITekh rg
proy� n sll p nf �m epe pgrww aytd e lu aarw�.g,..�xarr��nershall be final and conclusive wonmmall
arta wrurll s .ppa Ip 'w crwG np Q pn N trr�d wmbody ur gamur!.Jg.jl is n;
16.08.020 Open record appeals subject to review by hearing examiner.
A. The hearing examiner shall hear appeals de novo. An applicant or representative shall be
present at the hearing. In the event that the applicant or his or her representative is not present
at the time of the hearing, the hearing shall be canceled and rescheduled by the planning
division with appropriate public notice given in accordance with this title.
B. Notice of an appeal hearing shall be mailed to parties entitled to notice of the decision,
including posting of property and published notice.
C. A staff report shall be prepared, file transmitted to the examiner, and hearing conducted in
the manner described in the appropriate ordinance subject of the appeal and Washington State
law. The hearing examiner shall have ten working days to issue a decision on the appeal. All
decisions of the hearing examiner are subject to appeal to the city council.
D. The applicant or property owner shall remove all land use action signs from the subject
property within thirty days from the date of issuance of the final decision or action on the
underlying land use application. Any signage which is in good condition shall be returned to the
city of Yakima planning division. (Ord. 2016-030 § 15, 2016: Ord. 98-66 § 1 (part), 1998).
%0&0 -A eal of the hearinge uiryiiner, s gms_i n,
usnr�im...g glhgay- pariir g9 ��irn� in irmslhallll be fiiirn 11 n con llusiv : uNess
......�� ..pa s,... ..no ec.
,i -f -r -g g tryµ tgno 6ggir a v body LL a ppr nqn, gr r r .tt a..lr n rt izr.y.p
fl .p i iii.green in e w �� _e:...�
hwtrnqurtirnr nnnarnru...iW
f ......w_. IC tie a, q d pun i um n �u IT ull a orad C ! wr t irn n ofice...of..ppp ll u Ih IL M up
uc ai au ii a o ka u�,o a c t rr� w � kni!��mmd. b t tl:.r 3j: j g! .- Lg . withuidi
tsaur n ,.frp�i mtheand toq�mawiLhi� oaf t!l , amarnineir's finall de isk)imµv.
mmm................._...._.._.".._._.._. .... .W...t - ............d errors and issue s that the
m. rnotnce o afsp as s E� s ru of w h gIgi..me.........................�...� .w�_� �L__,� .t e
ggr q i a t..k � u ma d a r rr. urn li n_c p .q.ap d t pglm inp q � tlN tart I1 grpUnd fairy
surto ip -, L_ IC, ui , aam p grn 1 a p al m aupw not s idendfi need not The
ponsudeired by_ be lggislatgve bob
"The notice f_ q sMLunCkjde a sworn statement that _theftp m.Vg0 , hgt3.,rea
the W iu �t i .1nd IbeHe the: ntent t t� mtEm todJq qd �� t��n�� a q�gc��m
._
.. _ _..... .. Cit y_gp nrvn H shM t1par api Is of afl decis�ons oaf„the heann,, m p�mr� r- urtrnc�
p g Grp y nngr... Ni ted a �pg.. r r a r t.. a ngr N qg n i g ra nt, a rttloss pips qu g .
q�mm
a.6f.42Lgaq arc gg.dUire.s .__Nofi(.,,erpt ”
1.aa.._v Noficeof.F:`Red p. � pgannip.9. d��n nc p q�...p �H tqn m p rtie rpt record
crudpt.tn li ui rli n mr ppeae ���c"1�.i.. '�'��i"p....�9fle ,i,1d t�"1cnt....�.. V � tw��l�w�b tr�d'wC�� � w�ii_,�I14�
_. , .�irwrmrrtr�ril: o a^)ernorandur f ut grtip ... orwnp r Cirvg..tlnr�,.noti f pq�eal
nrn n-ittr rr rr -
r1nrt tm ,,pbtaitied from the di sio n�
2 Content of Nook q aped , t k � ..��.gmmo�e�tug f� pp wu�tup �� aha ord and ppellUgir�tr
shatl.i contain the follr rua�ri,��tat��rtgnt�i��gl�artienarned in the �np��c��l e��mm�gnr� �w� w uITri�el
exa rnjui,or�cgrwxi isr orr... jshj a tam re,�3p rid to ttwnwpwp ri T u mlh irnut a wijtten ara ani npunt o
rner°niorMurlrnrn—to ffi( ,i rtu 14 -ye, body,lti am tlnyir r i morin k n a to that n ttnownotice w
it n nn� ".fix. rrnrtm rn w imttt in_r�n qn LLri : r r ui t rnorp,at �rmnc��_ �,d�irnR not ing a (e tq� ,pn ga-,! t
new ievi ernampmmand shaH bbl based or1jy..qra2ar jL�i t�i.(j ptesentgd tp,., 6ae�a g�ffltnie.u:M
%.n SubrriittaV of r r lwc uww u41wL1g4)t oir q ler'nor aridur ,
1 w�... The pian irtig rnripIt rntt to tlhne ll�n ruga , grr qae dec° born u.:...0 r� of
�...f� n��.�tnlg�_t� division r_n.tten ,' _�,�._,n of aunCl r rrt, erthuiut
arr uwritn rbq u�� crn� rnnr n �nr��l nr� ........
Y,hir( ..wd n wrpt l r rtptt r r nr rlrnr�1..ui „ ie nook �...of a Med qpp ..I':.
.. u,., _,.... Rebuttal to Written�Ara��u rrod i�� Itfl u�oir in uirn..... ��am� a grn��don f t1h tlliirt
ter subrnjssson apt�wri t, r rC urnent aril
ray,ILie narn "'d in tl"rpm�uu2LCII eft the I�nearir �p m��m n nnu n r'"; dcci iw ru��tmmr�l FA,,at their
x pmnpp . ?a ..�btainmm ca ue~smr�Finamn sr,uch sqbmissions., and shall bemprQ-Yie ed a mfiftememrn
d� .rpd rtt�al p-.riod which starts on the t.hir — 1�ws� t (;�-I � tr r�lr� �Wtl� date of rnaflAI Iu., L t1g.
Inotice of the _filed appgal.
3. Extension ofT ime" tear Written d�r�ent aiq I eameyrainde.
...
� � authorutl irna g thereafter
«�. e� uvru yin r uu�r�rnt sir meirnu�u�ain uam mm.�
si ubmltted exce ,t Ila the le lslative bcd "s ir�vall of uvirltten re gest fear arr
..._...............................................................................................t�..................................................................................� �......_..............................,
extension for caUS,E> lr e ,rests for exteinsion irn ust be irnade no later thain the hast
date the memoranda woulld otherwise be due.
www awa��. lb lrhe Ilea isll tiivq bead r a „ r Q fufther extensions on a findingjbyj
le e r lmn trve br eam a thexistence of exterruatOR.,circumstances which warrant
such xtensiioiri(s).:. mm......
_...._._.._ g pri [ uLUIrLng_ n extesnsuon a nod e of extension shall b � iver� to H
pki i f record r nd III() gotice shall include the statement that: "Written
ruu` nrnrr rzts rdr1uuirrd shall not �rueil�ue the tuutroer rluur� r�ewr
evidence and shale be based mmmo oni_ kNi"e .f t resentedmITt ITth examiner."
D.Transfer of Record toIT Le ii tatii m Bod . l gEj_gJMp �pq eall has le n Milled and
de a trr e; or use t pf arrlfte rrr nit rr e ratinrfa ur t' urrnuntt rTt w m lw w�lww ten a rrwS ti e . d tI
division shad deliver ;to the Ie i l��tinr dAygtj?y of t 8�ee aptu rer°s Jgg nsa�rr tl re eyrde n
qst tg; to the exanjnLr, are q. dome; raf tti h r iip V.a for tI°7e i-ni ,r uigAi2K .'ott n
LnrquLnj ri!.ar mernoranidum of autho L_ hi h ttie division hmas received.
E,....... _...... missed b th..ut....gouncil if.:.
n a eal shall.be dls.��.�....�..._d.�
_..1 It is,fiilled ll y . it )L vwlthe�uut stairtdiin� tea app?all-
w ?, ww .The city you ncil does_nolt.have url d�ctiion to h ar th lull p
�.._3... It i not time l full;
...........TIh ._ g!.fees remmriotITtlirr�m l ..lfa �d�and/or
_. _ . . ......
e;eaeair. 5. wwiith tllwr .l�f�a� duwlre,� ,:met forth In these rules.
All motions to du`sirnlss a defective pgg2 �h��l�i 4tl t rnthrn tutteera A l ��� lerrd�rn et a? f�rprrr�t�6�
�., .... _ m,�....
fiillin . lte: eaf hi(a� eU.
16.08.030 Closed record appeal subject to review by the city council.
. ,tie*ktirr T t o l arA,Mrnql a Wirralhe tre _.. ,w e A penal
e t :.
1. Fleariina trate. When the record and the examiner's decisions have been
transrnitted ,to the.] -,Sjrsll��t vc- lao ty the clerk of the.l gtu l t d l ..w I rill a 9a ft�ml �w rp t
for a..closed rr ord._..ppp al., Y.flnpw..I g',I try k�, d t, which ,fine theI usWiv ,LLbrad h ll.
consider the„appgq „The date of thaw,appeal ghggld not be later than tvver7t de
fok,Lvin .tile qmg tITf s �dy, � �� _ .. _ u n the divisueaLi crnle�ss
mm._ ��. I r r tatry be�nl to rve s tim e rfute�arr.. - - -r trear.�� .. --V: .i
_....
rrffpwprutdatu r�w„a. e at�e�ca,t tlr LL t cn, wtl�en arta t ttwf� �.fp l.m
_...........w_vr._2, Pu biic....INoticerhe cGerk of the Ge s a bod IhaH irnaH written notice to the
aP_P,_Panl._a.i.G._parte s inarned in t1he arrpaaG u r Ih iriimiru it �iiii µ ir" ecii iiol ..aIIV..J� rfnc
f f rµm qq!� f _gid thaw examiner to _ppj?rJse tttgai of ,...the riieetµrq.r �a�µ mks �ce Lbg, Iiifiv
„ r ear'trµ,� a iiq The city council shall hear appeals of all decisions
. butt ter stn to kGtr t ntd
by the hearing examiner during a public meeting or a limited hearing for receipt of oral legal
argument.
St°.. A complete appeal application must be submitted prior to the scheduling of the council
meeting or limited hearing.
C. The closed record appeal shall be on the record before the city council, and no new
evidence shall be presented The_c ty...aw�Vi a . bpjL ypr..wchoose..to do a site visit�a it, t
i:t review. The record shall include all materials received in evidence at any previous stage of
the review, audio/visual tapes of the prior hearing(s), the final order being appealed, and
argument by the parties at the examiner's hearing.
D. The appellants and any respondents to the appeal shall have the opportunity to present
oral and written argument. Oral argument shall be confined to the prior established hearing
examiner record and to any alleged errors in the decision. Paint tLmu n ffie mc1losedwwwirecoird
Ih rarng�u 9uirxluf f*d to fltr city. iiirjgjud(g .qIl.. tgf tl e. ,icllur aunt for the µ�� ��� ��� µam iectwwto ap_pg at,
and mithos pt uc of or erifities which have
t t r efIt w iQ,,Le,.[ alli apµ �G r� IT r re ran '
E. Following the closed record appeal hearing, the city,council may affirm the decision of the
examiner, remand the matter back to the hearing examiner with appropriate directions, or may
reverse or modify the hearing examiner decision. t teu.rrro-,tl•&6tttaGtsrrf�ufr�irr
anritrr°s a euut�tot utou.If the council determines there is no error in the
examiner's decision, it may adopt the findings of the examiner and accept the decision of the
hearing examiner. t the. circ c rfr it renders..g..deci ion different fromf 'i'n d ci ii irr.....:f the
G .....o._....
._.xamy....cou council shai.p_dc t amended fuindin s and coirncllurusions accordlin. II .Ord. 98-
aouµrncrr t e c.... ....... ...........�,.....__ _.
66 § 1 (part), 1998). �.
The city's final decision si afl be finalandrrciusiy Unless ..rr�,a, uy
,� b
appealed by a party of record with standing to file a land use petition in Yakima County superior
court. Such petition must be filed within twenty-one days of issuance of the decision ,li,µ,d,tht;
ra iru�mm kn tG tt�il n to wee uirerne nt w as provided in Chapter 36.70C RCW. (Ord. 98-66 § 1
(part), 1998).
1 ,,08.060M E f ,ct� f ads•
t iilliiir cµ f uro... 1 m G t r;r 61µ actions....ofm the administrative....offici l off....... ii inep µµdrµ �p n iira
._.... TOV
mm .........._ _.e o �.aw.n , ,I yj �.__._ G)e[rr a enter 111611
t t r' runt asona t to action or,c r iron._.. w.:..9�
..,,.
tiil m cwt µµwµ t�aiw t nYDtreat igy the effectiveness or effctive daite rpt army enforcement a���nen action or
bie r iwoq''i fol�,w� i iatioi,i f tl,-ii n trtl in'ic n irn�mr rrc rml9a sons am1 revocationswlf1)errniits..or � ?rov2L
1'..6.08.0160 Actions 119t anmaGnbt.
0
n aeneral[w _ pr�nymfimrLµ actions, or dedslons of an adrrnnrnli firatnv�twofficial or other official r��. w.i ;
Eqpcis l c�munder thi _c ifgp�� �;�c mm..r�.... �..w
k
Procedural l rw flnci lnitef'i �w. p L p: n�n,�ral rnp_m mther int ns �sm�nn�r� au_�; �� t o reviewo (Je i^ ion
it palcnirn to rn d N�nnstr fuvc�.,.or other r�ffir iW girroder tH �iitlle.are not �rL l lbs e e de„fat as
rt ct lne final „deds n or acflort,.
C. Il:,:iInforcerrnernt Actions. No enforcement action for vlollatuon of Title 1 Y�nlc4na l�' a nrcp rnp r�rl!'e.
.. .................. ���........................ ���...., .
u n m p me vncp �c in YMC..Ch Vit° o ro
�r�nr action �r
, � .j
li i� irp of a arirnuim c� iia r crus uu al cr�a#ucrn Ila B:�n a�mrniiirnn Lr dive offucnall or c lrfler it a a it l m mll
w... . , ,. ,,. y r ..ter_.�. ...._ r'
c�tt�r (.0 „p a a �� � is under t o a p� n� r � rar nKnlN pn� .o �2. tgnder tate aw l rb c of,
?n).
ioir rneiirtfmmmrti irwmmcorrg nernc�ecj p2 gfly..t)aC! 1"n a court f laiw,.
Staff Analysis: These changes are proposed to consolidate all Appeal procedures into one place
(YMC Ch. 16.08 Appeals). Previously, there was language in YMC Ch. 1.43, YMC Ch. 15.16,
and YMC Ch. 16.08. These changes provide for consistency throughout the Titles as all appeals
now would be processed under YMC Ch. 16.08. This also streamlines any future text
amendments as only YMC Ch. 16.08 would need to be amended.
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER D
Notices
D-1 Notice of Application, Preliminary DNS & Public Hearing 07/20/2018
D -la: Legal Notice
D -lb: Press Release and Distribution Email
D -lc: Parties and Agencies Notified
-1d:Affidavit of Mailing
D-2 Notice of Retention of DNS 12/13/2017
D -2a: Parties and Agencies Notified
D -2b: Affidavit of Mailing
D-3 YPC Agenda and Packet Distribution List 09/05/2018
.._..._.................................................. .....
D-4 YPC Agenda 09/12/2018
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
"'AM 11W 1'1�aii-ining Divis�on
aming Joseph Calhoun, Manager
129 North Second Street, 2°d Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
City of Yakima Planning Commission
PUBLIC HEARING
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday September 12, 2018
3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
YPC Members:
Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook, Jacob Liddicoat, Robert McCormick,
Leanne Hughes -Mickel, and Philip Ostriem
Council Liaison: Jason White
i PlanninStaff:
Joan Davenport (Community Development Director); Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager);
Eric Crowell (Associate Planner); Trevor Martin (Associate Planner);
Colleda Monick (Assistant Planner); Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant);
and Lisa Maxey (Planning Specialist)
AGENDA
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Staff Announcements
IV. Audience Participation
V. Approval of Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2018
VI.
Public Hearing - 2018 Text Amendments
Applicant:
City of Yakima Planning Division
File Numbers:
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
Site Address:
N/A
Request:
Amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1, 15, and 16 concerning the sign
code, Rezone criteria, Accessory Dwelling Unit standards, the Modification Chapter, adding a
definition & land use for Taxicab Home Occupation, modifying the district intent statement and
permitted uses in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, and consolidation of Appeals
from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch. 16.08.
(Additional
Information posted online at: www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning under Quick Links)
VII.
Continued Public Hearing - City of Yakima Wastewater Division
Applicant:
City of Yakima Wastewater Division
File Numbers:
CPA#007-18, RZ#008-18 & SEPA#010-18
Site Address:
Vicinity of Highway 24 & S 22nd St
Request:
Change the Future Land Use map designation for three parcels from Low-density Residential to
Commercial Mixed -Use and rezone three parcels from Suburban Residential (SR) to General
Commercial (GC) to enable a future proposal for a low -barrier homeless shelter use.
VIII.
Study Session: Hotel/Motel & Extended Stay Hotel/Motel Uses & Definitions
IX.
Other Business
X.
Adjourn
Next Meeting: September 26, 2018
Yakima
2015
1994
C 2Z.
YPC Staff Report & Packet Distribution List
City Planning — 2018 Text Amendments
TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
YPC PACKET:
Patricia Byers Al Rose Bill Cook
aqLbyers9QL7@MOornSLilvrfx4Q@b�t Cook,@charter,net
_ �mi.new
a a r70_4Q@Rm_a0.-.cQjm
Rob McCormick Jake Liddicoat Leanne Hughes -Mickel
rob@mccormickaircenter.com j4.Kg.@3_dya_1 Limaxom lea tine. rn icke_[@!j�q.,q�rq
Philip Ostriem Jason White (Council Liaison)
Philipo§jE!,em@gm iALl..com JasonWhite@yak maw a,ggLy
_
Date Distributed: q1611
DOC.
INDEX
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
RE: TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
City Planning - 2018 Text Amendments
N/A
I, Lisa Maxey, as an employee of the City of Yakima Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Retention of DNS. A
true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was
addressed to the applicant and all parties of record, that are individually listed
on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were
mailed by me on this 101h day of August 2018.
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
Lisa Maxey
Planning Specialist
Ahtanum Irrigation District
Chamber of Commerce
Department of Agriculture
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
10 North 9th Street
Kelly McLain
10705-B Gilbert Road
Yakima, WA 98901
PO Box 42560
Olympia, WA 98504
Yakima, WA 98903-9203
charnber@yi!kima.01r9
..........
kmclfgn, agrW
. ...... . .........
Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
.
Department of Commerce
.. . ... ........................ ............ . ....
Department of Ecology
Greg Griffith or Gretchen Kaehler, Deputy State
Growth Management Services
Annie Szvetecz, SEPA Policy Lead
Historic Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 42525
P.O. Box 47703
P.O. Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504-2525
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Olympia, WA 98504-8343
seg ra gaster-01pamgoer
sJ?"P.Aq nit@gKy gq-y
. . . . ....... ...........................
Department of Ecology
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Gwen Clear, Regional Coordinator
Eric Bartrand
SEPA Desk
1250 West Alder Street
1701 South 24th Ave
PO Box 43200
Union Gap, WA 98903
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia, WA 98504
!@ga-7v
'
LC.4,mun40 mgspy
KPAde.AKCedfLL.wa.gqyS
tpqytqes
Department of Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Social & Health Services
Kelly Cooper
SEPA Center
Terri Sinclair-Olson
PO Box 47820
PO Box 47015
Operations Support and Services Division
Olympia, WA 98504
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 45848
Olympia, WA 98504
.... . .............
'WtLisnicla Lr-Qlsop LaUtks_. agy
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC
Engineering Division
Nob Hill "Water Association
Stephen Posner, SEPA Officer
Bob Degrosellier and Brett Sheffield, City
BobEngineer BIrving, Engineering Technician
PO Box 43172
129 N 2nd Street
6111 Tieton Drive
Olympia, WA 98504-3172
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98908
dan A Revg@yAkiMAML
............ .......................... .
Office of Rural and Farm Worker Housing
Parks & Recreation Commission
US Army Corps of Engineers
Marty Miller
Jessica Logan
Seattle District
1400 Summitview Ave, Ste# 203
PO Box 42560
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 3755
Mg,rtyn2_@qiPwm
Jessica, IPSAn
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
...............
... ........ . . . .............
1 04.
----- . ..........
Wastewater Division
West Valley School District
WSDOT
Marc Cawley or Dana Kallevig
Angela Watts, Asst. Supt. Of Business &
Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer
2220 East Viola Ave
Operations
2809 Rudkin Road
Yakima, WA 98901
8902 Zier Road
Union Gap, WA 98903
rnarcxawigy'ctYALIR�k
kagqy
Yakima, WA 98908-9299
awa..,gqy
.... . .....
Wait' _Wv� - k
'92 sqkQ -grg
. . . . . ..........
. . . . ...............
WSDOT
WSDOT, Aviation Division
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
South Central Region] Planning Office
Patrick Wright
Rocco Clark, Environmental Coordinator
7702 Terminal St SW
P.O. Box 632
Turnwater, WA 98501
Toppenish, WA 98948
........ . ..... . .........
................
Nlwqs'At� @�'
Yakama Nation Environmental Mgmt Program
Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries Project
Yakima Air Terminal
Elizabeth Sanchey, Environmental Review
John Marvin
Robert Peterson, Airport Asst Manager
Coordinator
760 Pence Road
2400 West Washington Ave
P.O. Box 151
Yakima, WA 98909
Yakima, WA 98903
Toppenish, WA 98948
tq4e_r!-P?!m
m
I
Yakima County Commissioners
. . . ..........
Yakima County Health District
. . . ........... .
I Yakima County Flood Control District
Terry Keenhan & Dianna Woods
Comm i ss ion ers we b @gqyakim a-W
Ryan lbach, Director of Environmental Health
128 North 2"d Street, 41h Floor
. ......
1210 Ahtanum Ridge Dr Ste#200
Yakima, WA 98901
Union Gap, WA 98903
Add5 I
DIa LmyAmm On
Yakima County Planning
Yakima County Public Services
Lynn Deitrick &Jason Earles
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
Vern Redifer, Public Services Director
Yakima Greenway Foundation
Kellie Connaughton, Executive Director
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98901
Ill South 18th Street
velnj-'�P.A' �er&CP_'YAK �AAM�
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakln)ag�,o
ke 14 @)
Century Link
Charter Communications
City of Union Gap
Manager
Kevin Chilcote
Dennis Henne, Development Director
8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304
1005 North 16th Ave
P.O. Box 3008
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98902
Union Gap, WA 98903
Department of Agriculture
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Aviation Administration
Kelly McLain
NEPA Review Unit
2200 W. Washington Ave
P.O. Box 42560
1200 6th Ave #900
Yakima, WA 98903
Olympia, WA 98504
Seattle, WA 98101
Federal Aviation Administration, Seattle
Governor's Office of Indian Affairs
Pacific Power
Airports District office
Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner
PO Box 40909
Mike Paulson
1601 Lind Ave SW
Olympia, WA 98504
500 North Keys Rd
Renton, WA 98055-4056
Yakima, WA 98901
Soil Conservation District
Trolleys
United States Postal Service
Ray Wondercheck
Paul Edmondson
Maintenance Deptartment
1606 Perry Street, Ste. F
313 North 3rd Street
205 W Washington Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98903
WA State Attorney General's Office
Eastern Drinking Water Operations
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102
River View Corporate Center
Superintendent
Yakima, WA 98902
16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500
P.O. Box 632
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakama Indian Nation
Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources
Yakama Indian Nation
Yakima School District
Program
Ruth Jim, Yakima Tribal Council
Dr. Jack Irion, Superintendent
P.O. Box 151
P.O. Box 151
104 North 4th Ave
Toppenish, WA 98948
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima Valley Canal Co
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District
Cascade Natural Gas
Robert Smoot
Sandra Hull
8113 W Grandridge Blvd
1640 Garretson Lane
470 Camp 4 Rd
Kennewick, WA 99336
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98908
Ahtanum Irrigation District
US Army Corps of Engineers
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
Seattle District
10705-B Gilbert Road
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98903
P.O. Box 3755
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
\\Apollo\Shared\Planning\Assignments-Planning\LABELS and FORMS\SEPA REVIEWING AGENCIES updated 7.2.18- Form List.docx
Type of Notice:
File Number: 1
Date of Mailing: K i 10
DOC.
INDEX
—
Parties of Record — City Planning — 2018 Text Amendments
Samuel Cardenas
pwa rr wcafl,zt grir;l V crrrla
arig iia �a iigara wwl„µlt
PO Box 9696
Code Administration
Carolyn f1t 9_- I fin awa.s w
Yakima, WA 98902
Code Administration
�.........._. _.._...__...
G1 ii,n l eririianeyaikrrila,
waagiQAj)r°Vc ibptipaji,coni
__ .....................
Code Administration
Joc ,ariqsg0),yjakrmawat,peri
Luz Gutierrez
i -------------- ..._.....�....W............w_w......
Thomas Sudbury
Cristi Taffolla
22S3 d Ave
213 N 34' Ave
218 N 281h Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98902
..........................
Dan Riddle
_
Engineering
pan&Ice16i)1,ive caul
In -House Distribution E-mail List
Name
Division
E-mail Address
Carolyn Belles
Code Administration
Carolyn f1t 9_- I fin awa.s w
Glenn Denman
Code Administration
�.........._. _.._...__...
G1 ii,n l eririianeyaikrrila,
............................................
Joe Caruso
__ .....................
Code Administration
Joc ,ariqsg0),yjakrmawat,peri
Suzanne DeBusschere
Code Administration
Suzy L�aassch ali,�pin awa. < y
_ rirpc i)a.,_
Vick DeOchoa
Code Administration
Vick,DeOcftoaaa&Y of rin _aw ,,,.,tca
Joan Davenport ...._
uuCommunityWDDevelopment
.laii. Davt.o_aport('"rr>yak'ttnal�+ wy
..........................
Dan Riddle
_
Engineering
--------...----..........------...-_.�
Daa,n.mRida fe{ yell<irn wggo
Mike Shane
Engineering
wSara ('� 3 �a� % _
Wlk Bv a_wA_& „fir„
Pat Reid
Fire Dept _ ......................._............
Pat_f�erd(��ryd�kaaas�awaa gaav
.... ......... . ...__.....
Jeff Cutter
Legal Dept
_ ..................
JeIT, 1 sttert i�y�a#�ir"Ala_wa,,�;a
Sara Watkins
Legal Dept
Sato,,aa VWatkr ,sr yai ��a�aw�►; fay.
Archie Matthews
............
�_6MY§
— ..
/i�cf�re _dv(tt��ewsayakdr��aavar.ov
... ......................_..._
Joseph Calhoun
Planning Division
..
irrsa pita C riN,1lraaiyal 1�'a�Awraayra
......................................................._...............................................
Chief Rizzi
Police Department
liriripralra l tZi@6yakinaaw4 go,:
Scott Schafer
Public Works Dept _W......
Scott_` cli ifeiCt? �akrrn�aw��a. ov
.
— _...
Loretta Zammarchi
Refuse Division
... .........................................................
ra niarcpl,p,r1),N 'irtp,a%,v gr,+,
Randy Layman ITITIT �
Refuse DivisionWWW_____www...w��
l arae y,l rq apt �c ,ywaC rima a gray^
Naeem Kara
mITITmmmm
Transit Division ITITIT�ITITITITITITIT���ITITITITIT�
Nae aa� K�aa,a���y�al�uaa_a�aw�a„p�ov
_ ,__.—
... ._... ............ .�.._.............................. ......
James Dean
Utilities
----------
jani,es„f raan@),yakrg;;r�,-awagr,v,
Dana Kallevig
Wastewater
D4�al,Ia�y�i&)( yat�,ual�p� as �gla�
Randy Meloy
Wastewater
fanny'1a.l'ciydltyal 'r_mawva ggv_r
For the Record/File
................—...................................._._.... _....._._.................. Revised 04/ z...........
018
Type of Notice: t V U1 1`1 o DNS
File Number: �� 0oz
Date of Mailing:
Maxey, Lisa
From:
Maxey, Lisa
Sent:
Friday, August 10, 2018 9:14 AM
To:
Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Calhoun, Joseph; Caruso, Joe; Cutter, Jeff, Davenport,
Joan; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; DeOchoa, Vick; Desgrosellier,
Bob; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Kallevig, Dana; Kara, Naeem; Layman, Randy; Matthews, Archie;
Maxey, Lisa; Meloy, Randy; Reid, Patrick; Riddle, Dan; Rizzi, Dominic; Schafer, Scott;
Shane, Mike; Watkins, Sara; Zammarchi, Loretta; Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann
Brulotte; Cawley, Marc; Chamber of Commerce; Department of Agriculture; Department
of Commerce (CTED) - Review Team; Department of Ecology; Department of Ecology -
Lori White; Department of Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO
Coordinator; Department of Fish and Wildlife; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric
Bartrand; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Scott Downes; Department of Natural
Resources; Department of Social & Health Services; Dept. Archaeology & Historic
Preservation - SEPA Review; Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner;
Nob Hill Water - Bob Irving; Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing - Marty Miller;
Peterson, Robert; Scott Izutsu - Yakima School District; US Army Corps of Engineers -
David Moore; WA State Parks & Recreation Commission; West Valley School District -
Angela Watts; WSDOT - Paul Gonseth; WSDOT - South Central Regional Planning Office;
WSDOT Aviation - Patrick Wright; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark;
Yakama Nation Environmental Management Program - Elizabeth Sanchey; Yakama-
Klickitat Fisheries - John Marvin; Yakima County Building Official - Harold Maclean;
Yakima County Commissioners; Yakima County Flood Control District - Dianna Woods;
Yakima County Flood Control District - Terry Keenhan; Yakima County Health District;
Yakima County Health District - Ryan Ibach; Yakima County Planning - Zoning/Sub -
Jason Earles; Yakima County Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public
Services Director, Vern Redifer; Yakima Greenway Foundation - Kellie Connaughton;
Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency - Hasan Tahat; Yakima Valley Conference of
Governments - Mike Shuttleworth; Yakima Valley Museum - John A. Baule; Yakima
Waste Systems - Keith Kovalenko; Al Rose; Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Jacob
Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel; Patricia Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick; White,
Jason; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net)
Subject:
Notice of Retention of DNS - City Planning - 2018 Text Amendments - TXT#002-18 &
SEPA#020-18
Attachments:
NOTICE OF RETENTION OF DNS -City Planning - 2018 Text Amendments - TXT#00 .... pdf
Attached is a Notice of Retention of Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) regarding the above -
entitled project. If you have any questions about this proposal, please contact assigned planner
Joseph Calhoun at (509) 575-6042 or email to we w < I �. u a u akirn awa.tzov. Thank you!
Lisa Maxey
Planning Specialist I City of Yakima Planning Division
(509) 576-6669 - Us�ew� a nwayN.,,,
Planning Division: (509) 575-6183
129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901
Sam
INDEX
w.a a
DEF TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL MENT
AWN Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
ph Calhoun, Ad= I'VaL Jose
p lho oun, Manager
Plannin g 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
NOTICE OF RETENTION
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
August 10, 2018
File Numbers: SEPA#020-18
The City of Yakima Department of Community Development issued a:
[X] Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS),
[ ] Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS),
[ ] Modified DNS/MDNS,
on July 20, 2018, for this proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and WAC 197-
11-340. This retention concerns a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Review of text
amendments to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance Titles1, 15, and 16. The City of
Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor amendments to the City of Yakima's
Municipal Code Title 15. The proposed amendments will modify the sign code, YMC § 15.08.045
Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC § 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in YMC §
15.09.045 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter in YMC 15.17; Adding a definition and
land use for Taxicab Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and 15.04.120; modifying the district
intent statement and permitted uses in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§
15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally consolidation of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and
YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch. 16.08.
This threshold determination is hereby:
[X] Retained
[ ] Modified. Modifications to this threshold determination include the following:
[ ] Withdrawn. This threshold determination has been withdrawn due to the following:
[ ] Delayed. A final threshold determination has been delayed due to the following:
Summary of Comments and Responses (if applicable): N/A
Responsible official: Joan Daven ort AICP
Position/Title: Communitv Devel'o ment Director/SEPA Res onsiNe Official
Phone: (509) 575-6183
Address: 129 N 2nd Street. Yakima. WA 9819.01
Date: August 10, 2018 Signature:
You may appeal this determination to Joa Davenport, City of Yakima Community Development
Director, at 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98 1, no later than August 24, 2018. You must submit a
completed appeal application form with the $580 application fee. Be prepared to make specific factual
objections. Contact the City of Yakima, Planning Division, for information on appeal procedures.
DOC
INDEX
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF YAKIMA
RE: TXT#002-18. SEPA#020-18
City Planning -2018 Text Amendments
N/A
I, Lisa Maxey, as an employee of the City of Yakima Planning Division, have
dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application,
Preliminary DNS, and Public Hearing. A true and correct copy of which is
enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to interested parties and SEPA
reviewing agencies. And that said notices were mailed by me on the 20th day of
Ly, 2018.
That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the
statements made herein are just and true.
Lia Maxey
Planning Specialist
INDEX
,,I
Ahtanum Irrigation District
Chamber of Commerce
Department of Agriculture
Kelly McLain
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
10 North 9th Street
PO Box 42560
10705-B Gilbert Road
Yakima, WA 98901
Olympia, WA 98504
Yakima, WA 98903-9203
tN�arar,VrryaNaraa meg
I1' r:_. adriP.-A, 4PdA
,gy
Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation
Department of Commerce
Department of Ecology
Greg Griffith or Gretchen Kaehler, Deputy State
Growth Management Services
Annie Szvetecz, SEPA Policy Lead
Historic Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 42525
P.O. Box 47703
P.O. Box 48343
Olympia, WA 98504 2525
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Olympia WA 98504-8343
8
r are rg.-! a vier
sx 8 e .� 1
Ss ma, ?drr,Y� _ ww „t er
...................................... ..._
.m..................... ....................
,wwV�fr7'. CY'W gC}fi ,iwaN�4�-�e,4:'.Y;,mwaf;V
. .......
Department of Ecology
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Gwen Clear, Regional Coordinator
Eric Bartrand
SEPA Desk
1250 West Alder Street
1701 South 24th Ave
PO Box 43200
Union Gap, WA 98903
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia, WA 98504
eros#�cv�rdlrro ��pr�.�s��y �� ��aw
rtrandrdfw sya. ¢a
��N�Adlt sjc�dfw..!�� p�v
Scert�_�
_ ow,n,es wdf w1gq
Department of Health
Department of Natural Resources
Department of Social & Health Services
Kelly Cooper
SEPA Center
Terri Sinclair-Olson
PO Box 47820
PO Box 47015
Operations Support and Services Division
Olympia, WA 98504
Olympia, WA 98504
P.O. Box 45848
j=gooppr&Lq, ,.wa 89'x'
s 4c rrl c rNYaror wry taw,
Olympia,
p 5
errm5inc6WAO985c04 dxirs wa (c ,
4 ...
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC
Engineering Division
Nob Hill Water Association
Stephen Posner, SEPA Officer
Bob Degrosellier and Brett Sheffield, City
Bob Irving, Engineering Technician
PO Box 43172
Engineer
129 N 2nd Street
6111 Tieton Drive
Olympia, WA 98504-3172
Yakima WA 98901
Yakima WA 98908
s�Osner utcmaa Row
darraka I'vCA skim 8cry
LvtaNlr ftrt�st�hatlNDurat�r, �tf
Office of Rural and Farm Worker Housing
Parks & Recreation Commission
US Army Corps of Engineers
Marty Miller
Jessica Logan
Seattle District
1400 Summitview Ave, Ste# 203
PO Box 42560
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98902
Olympia WA 98504
P.O. Box 3755
MArty,�orfP%.,acg
Jesus, gogarr.fa�fks ur&i.,av
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
__...... ._
...... ....................................... _-
Cawrrd-A- Gore sac,pc .rs jI
Wastewater Division
West Valley School District
WSDOT
Marc Cawley or Dana Kallevig
Angela Watts, Asst. Supt. Of Business &
Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer
2220 East Viola Ave
Operations
2809 Rudkin Road
Yakima, WA 98901
8902 Zier Road
Union Gap, WA 98903
marcr4aafYy�Ya,,,9ta nawr�,y
Yakima, WA 98908-9299
4amsaztp,rdobgaa'v
darra,kall 'C'WB ii ,yxNk.gB'Ytl, &Aoai,g_r�W
wltts'a wvs4 :C38.4arg
WSDOT
WSDOT, Aviation Division
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
South Central Region) Planning Office
Patrick Wright
Rocco Clark, Environmental Coordinator
SClannin�wsdot wa J
7702 Terminal St SW
P.O. Box 632
Tumwater, WA 98501
Toppenish, WA 98948
Wru9. PCOM _daC wa.g�rzv
occ4t cla,�r,k ahra'ggy.
Yakama Nation Environmental Mgmt Program
Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries Project
Yakima Air Terminal
Elizabeth Sanchey, Environmental Review
John Marvin
Robert Peterson, Airport Asst Manager
Coordinator
760 Pence Road
2400 West Washington Ave
P.O. Box 151
Yakima, WA 98909
Yakima, WA 98903
To enish, WA 98948
pP
1
jrt�arvVn.Y..aikarrla cora!
rotaert et,a rsr rtl l,2ktlmawa.,:gra,w
��an4;tlaa�ya yakam�a.�o�roa
--------------------
HealthYakima County
Yakima County Control District
Yakima County Commissioners
Director
Ryan Ibch, of Environmental Health
aS& Dianna Woods
Commissioners we C
,m m„a , ;
1210 tanum g Or Ste#200
128 North 2d 4th Floor
Union Gap WA 9890...
akima, WA
Yhq @� Y ak'umawa 4
t"airy Kga� rrrte-rpro ao ytrokirrn tl wa 4ws
t1Nnrua %POCr98 �3c4 emktlm� vv � ups
a
�
ry arv_ aksac�a�ccr..~eaaYclirara w�a_a._aas
......._. ._..
Yakima County Planning
ity Public Services
�
Lynn Detrick &
Ven Redifer,P Public Services Director
Yakima GreeConnanwayFoundation
North 2nd Street 4th Floor
128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor
Kellie Director
Yakima, WA 98901Yakima,
WA 98901
111 South 18th Street
p,yrrrn Delatl rrkrzru yakarrr�7 wa us,Yakima,
V�!rr redafef01%-yakmrra,aw�w aY5'
WA 98901
yt�rr„�arlesCo y' akur'IJa +;wra, ar»r.
- —
Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency
Hasan Tahat, Engineering & Planning Supervisor
329 North 1st Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima Valley Museum
John A. Baule, Director
2105 Tieton Drive
Yakima, WA 98902
Join OhAkAmAMR4, M �qrg
Yakima School District
Scott lzutsu , Associate Superintendent
104 N 41h Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
izuts.u... c—ot MKasc 'o-i
,Arg
----------------
Yakima Waste Systems
Keith Kovalenko, District Manager
2812 1/2 Terrace Heights Dr.
Yakima, WA 98901
kI.e..i.t.ii.k,@wzi.steconpiect'�on,s,co-m
Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
Mike Shuttleworth, Planning Manager
311 North 4th Street, Ste# 202
Yakima, WA 98901
M kg.j
DOC.
INDEX
# 'D- I c'
MM"
Century Link
Charter Communications
City of Union Gap
Manager
Kevin Chilcote
Dennis Henne, Development Director
8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304
1005 North 16th Ave
P.O. Box 3008
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98902
Union Gap, WA 98903
Department of Agriculture
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Aviation Administration
Kelly McLain
NEPA Review Unit
2200 W. Washington Ave
P.O. Box 42560
1200 6th Ave #900
Yakima, WA 98903
Olympia, WA 98504
Seattle, WA 98101
Federal Aviation Administration, Seattle
Governor's Office of Indian Affairs
Pacific Power
Airports District Office
Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner
PO Box 40909
Mike Paulson
1601 Lind Ave SW
Olympia, WA 98504
500 North Keys Rd
Renton, WA 98055-4056
Yakima, WA 98901
Soil Conservation District
Trolleys
United States Postal Service
Ray Wondercheck
Paul Edmondson
Maintenance Deptartment
1606 Perry Street, Ste. F
313 North 3rd Street
205 W Washington Ave
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima, WA 98901
Yakima, WA 98903
WA State Attorney General's Office
Eastern Drinking Water Operations
Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs
1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102
River View Corporate Center
Superintendent
Yakima, WA 98902
16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500
P.O. Box 632
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakama Indian Nation
Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources
Yakama Indian Nation
Yakima School District
Program
Ruth JiYakima Tribal Council
um, ama raounc
Dr. Jack Irion, Superintendent
P.O. Box 151
P.O. Box 151
104 North 4th Ave
Toppenish, WA 98948
Toppenish, WA 98948
Yakima, WA 98902
Yakima Valley Canal Co
Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District
Cascade Natural Gas
Robert Smoot
Sandra Hull
8113 W Grandridge Blvd
1640 Garretson Lane
470 Camp 4 Rd
Kennewick, WA 99336
Yakima, WA 98908
Yakima, WA 98908
Ahtanum Irrigation District
US Army Corps of Engineers
Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant
Seattle District
10705-B Gilbert Road
Regulatory Branch
Yakima, WA 98903
P.O. Box 3755
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
\\Apollo\Shared\Planning\Assignments-Planning\LABELS and FORMS\SEPA REVIEWING AGENCIES _updated 7.2.18 -Form Ust.docx
Type of Notice: 'I
File Number: EgI#' 020-k -1'g 5 f?A—A M ` Ir$
Date of Mailing: -x-20 — -7A
OAA T6U\ G �\ e aNY\b
Parties u. Record - City Planning - 2018 Text Amendments
- m
Samuel Cardenas 8, n erso91 @),.g!jjgH.com an las ffq_((a)&,iTlAal care,
PO Box 9696
Yakima, WA 98902
gurn'�,� "Ir ar),'hotmail .om
Luz Gutierrez Thomas Sudbury
22 S 3rd Ave 213 N 341h Ave
Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98902
In -House Distribution E-mail List
Name
Division
j E-mail Address
Carolyn Belles
Co de Administration
.....
Glenn Denman
Code Administrationlen,at
cyaa)p air, ,yal�tnt�a w g av
.....
Joe Caruso
_..... _
Code Administration
...........
Joe_Camrr
Suzanne DeBusschere
Code Administration
5 aar�a
. aaa��, 1)e.bussdarerclrr7 akimawa. goy
y__.. �.�.
�..
Vick DeOchoa
Code Administration
V.ick,D Ogho@yal; n alwg ggy
Joan Davenport
Community Development
Joara,.,l) rli)pQypl��rlaaawa gpv,
Dan Riddle
Engineering
Daft Riddl Ca,)yakaar).trv�a.g v
�.................
Mike Shane
..............._.......
Engineering
.. ......
M ike , ll�aa1eC(')yakinagwa ,gpy
__...............
Pat Reid
------------
Fire Dept
.............
Pat�.ftidlai yakamq-vka g�L
.. ..__
Jeff Cutter
..... ......
Legal Dept
-.
lc 11 twits akrwa),r a gtaa
.
Sara Watkins.
..
Legal Dept _._.........................
.............w
Saaraa.Wa1kbr'u;Qbyg*jrnatwa_ y
._..........
Archie Matthews
........_.
ONDS
................
Archie.matihe n ydakrJtaaawa g_a
......._
Joseph Calhoun
_
Planning Division
......
ios9Pji Qa lwOAw'r yra_kumaw 99
Chief Rizzi
Police Department
p
� ara;,cay
Doinini _Rizla ra)yal�.i
Scott Schafer
_
Public Works Dept
....... .......................
.&v
Loretta Zammarchi
Refuse Division
1 lal ctta " �raraa c hj@yaktral.awa ,gjy
Rand Layman w
Y Y
� �
Refuse Division _
Rain yml ayNxaaaa e�yakaataawa. gov
.....................
Naeem Kara
....—
Transit Division
....... _._..
Naceni.Kara, ty) rr);►aw a_glty
James Dean
Utilities
Jaaate, l) awa yakarl wa.g y
_ ......................._______________......-
Dana Kallevig
_
Wastewater
Dana, Kai lgyig y<an �,atla+�a. cly
Randy Meloy
Wastewater
Raapdy.Me py@,)ya kinigwa O
For the Record/File 4
018
Type of Notice: N 1
y�IS
+
File Number: - ?nr4��__f(� f JE"oaV—IU,
Date of Mailing:
t'?
Maxey, Lisa
From:
Maxey, Lisa
Sent:
Friday, July 20, 2018 10:23 AM
To:
Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Calhoun, Joseph; Caruso, Joe; Cutter, Jeff; Davenport,
Joan; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; DeOchoa, Vick; Desgrosellier,
Bob; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Kallevig, Dana; Kara, Naeem; Layman, Randy; Matthews, Archie;
Maxey, Lisa; Meloy, Randy; Reid, Patrick; Riddle, Dan; Rizzi, Dominic; Schafer, Scott;
Shane, Mike; Watkins, Sara; Zammarchi, Loretta; Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann
Brulotte; Cawley, Marc; Chamber of Commerce; Department of Agriculture; Department
of Commerce (CTED) - Review Team; Department of Ecology; Department of Ecology -
Lori White; Department of Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO
Coordinator; Department of Fish and Wildlife; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric
Bartrand; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Scott Downes; Department of Natural
Resources; Department of Social & Health Services; Dept. Archaeology & Historic
Preservation - SEPA Review; Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner;
Nob Hill Water - Bob Irving; Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing - Marty Miller;
Peterson, Robert; Scott Izutsu - Yakima School District; US Army Corps of Engineers -
David Moore; WA State Parks & Recreation Commission; West Valley School District -
Angela Watts; WSDOT - Paul Gonseth; WSDOT - South Central Regional Planning Office;
WSDOT Aviation - Patrick Wright; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark;
Yakama Nation Environmental Management Program - Elizabeth Sanchey; Yakama-
Klickitat Fisheries - John Marvin; Yakima County Building Official - Harold Maclean;
Yakima County Commissioners; Yakima County Flood Control District - Dianna Woods;
Yakima County Flood Control District - Terry Keenhan; Yakima County Health District;
Yakima County Health District - Ryan Ibach; Yakima County Planning - Zoning/Sub -
Jason Earles; Yakima County Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public
Services Director, Vern Redifer; Yakima Greenway Foundation - Kellie Connaughton;
Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency - Hasan Tahat; Yakima Valley Conference of
Governments - Mike Shuttleworth; Yakima Valley Museum - John A. Baule; Yakima
Waste Systems - Keith Kovalenko; Associated Press; Bastinelli, Mike; Brown, Michael;
Davido, Sean; El Mundo; EI Sol de Yakima; Fannin, John; Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce; KAPP TV News; KBBO-KRSE Radio - manager, KCJT TV News; KDNA Noticias;
KDNA Radio - Francisco Rios; KEPR TV News; KIMA TV News; KIT News;
KIT/KATS/DMVW/KFFM - Lance Tormey; KNDO TV News; KNDU TV News; KUNW-TV
Univision; KVEW TV News; La Casa Hogar; La Voz; Lozano, Bonnie; NWCN News; NWPR
- Anna King; Randy Luvaas - Yakima Business Times; RCDR - Maria DJ Rodriguez; Reed
C. Pell; Tu Decides; Tu Decides - Albert Torres; Yakima Herald Republic - Mai Hoang;
Yakima Herald Republic Newspaper; Yakima School District - Jack Irion; Yakima Valley
Business Times; Yakima Valley Business Times - George Finch; YPAC - Randy Beehler; Al
Rose; Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Jacob Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel;
Patricia Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick; White, Jason; William Cook
(cook.w@charter.net)
Cc:
Calhoun, Joseph
Subject:
Notice of Application, Preliminary DNS, & YPC Public Hearing - City Planning 2018 Text
Amendments - TXT#002-18 & SEPA#020-18
Attachments:
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING & PRELIMINARY DNS - City Planning ....pdf
Attached is a Notice of Application, Preliminary Determination of Non -Significance (DNS), and
Public Hearing regarding the above -entitled project. If you have any questions about this proposal
DOC.
please contact assigned plann— Joseph Calhoun at (509) 575-604- or email to:
Dc1µu�e�md«,c.
Thank you!
Li IIIWaxey
Planning Specialist I City of Yakima Planning Division
(509) 576-6669 — y LisA M c�,yAkjqjqW"qy
.. - _C
Planning Division: (509) 575-6183
129 N 2n, Street, Yakima, WA 98901
AM, 9 A 9$6 % 'k
"AOI a I
YAKIMA $'j,RA.LD
P,U'B,LIC
i,,,,,
A daily part of your life W Yakima-herald.com
" , I"' 1 1 IV 1
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below.
Please proof read notice carefully to check spelling and run dates,
if you need to make changes
Account #: 110358
Company Name: CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING
Contact: ROSALINDA IBARRA,AP
Address: 129 N 2ND STREET
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2720
Telephone: (509)575-6164
Fax:
Account Rep:
Simon Sizer
Phone #
(509) 577-7740
Email:
ssizer@yakimaherald.com
Ad ID:
827035
Start:
07/20/18
Stop:
07/20/18
Total Cost:
$262.80
Lines:
144.0
# of Inserts:
1
Ad Class:
6021
Run Dates:
Yakima Herald -Republic 07/20/18
DOC.
INDEX
Notice of Application, Environmental Review, and Public
Hearing; Project Location: Citywide
Project Applicant: City of Yakima, Planning Division; File
Numbers: TXT#002-18, SEPA#02018; Date of Applica-
tion: 4/12/18; PROJECT QESCRIPTION; The City of
Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor
amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1,
15, and 16. The proposed amendments will modify the sign
code, YMC § 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC
§ 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in YMC §
15.09.045 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter
in YMC 15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab
Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and 15.04.120;
modifying the district intent statement and permitted uses
in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§
15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally consolidation
of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC
Ch. 16.08. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is
to notify all the public and private agencies with jurisdiction
and environmental expertise that the City of Yakima Planning
Division has been established as the lead agency, pursuant
to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for
the above stated project. The City of Yakima is issuing a
Preliminary Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) on
this project. WAC 197-11-340 is being used. The following
conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate
the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: No
impacts identified.
Required Permits — The following local, state and federal
permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project:
None. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental
Documents: Comprehensive Plan 2040 - Final Supplemen-
tal Environmental Impact Statement (June 13, 2017). Pre-
liminary determination of the development regulations
that will be used for project mitigation and consistency:
Future projects will require compliance with the International
Building Code, City of Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance,
City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan and City of Yakima Title
12 Development Standards. REQUEST FOR WRIT.
COMMENTS The public is encouraged to review and com-
ment on the proposed application. Written comments may be
submitted prior to the public hearing scheduled for 9/12/18 or
at the public hearing. Please send written comments to: Joan
Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director; City
of Yakima, Department of Community Development; 129
North 2nd Street; Yakima, WA 98901; or email comments
to: 0991"LSI NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING This application will require two public hearings;
one before the City of Yakima Planning Commission to be
followed by a public hearing before the Yakima City Council.
The public hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Com-
mission has been scheduled for Wednesday 9/12/18, begin-
ning at 3:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N
2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their
views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or
to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Plan-
ning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. A separate
public notice will be provided for the public hearing
before the Yakima City Council. NOTICE OF RECOM-
MENDATION The Planning Commission's recommendation
and future notices will be sent to anyone who submits com-
ments on this application or request additional notice. The
file containing the complete application is available for public
review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City
Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, and online
at PI W?yIVr�SN:yI111 t
amendments/ If you have any question on this proposal,
please call Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager, at (509) 575-
6042 or e-mail to: j,I,,,,q,yakrn raffia acv.
(827035) July 20, 2018
Courtesy of Yakima Herald -Republic
8B FE3IDAY, JULY *0 2i8
qµy {ryfy2i 94J ,112iti, iii nfs�w, r Ifid� �NMIO ONWh�hr�3�� rwn ,NwdfPR x
Notice of Application, Environmental Review, and Public
Hearing; Project Location: Citywide
Project Applicant: City of Yakima, Planning Division; File
Numbers: TXT#002-18, SEPA#02018; Date of Applica-
tion: 4/12/18; ". j The City of
Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor
amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1,
15, and 16. The proposed amendments will modify the sign
code, YMC § 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC
§ 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in YMC §
15.09.045 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter
in YMC 15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab
Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and 15.04.120;
modifying the district intent statement and permitted uses
in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§
15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally consolidation
of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.10 into YMC
Ch.16.08. 0 1 9 . Q 14E1 (A VIS This is
to notify all the public and private agencies with jurisdiction
and environmental expertise that the City of Yakima Planning
Division has been established as the lead agency, pursuant
to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for
the above stated project. The City of Yakima is issuing a
Preliminary Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) on
this project. WAC 197-11-340 Is being used. The following
conditions have been Identified that may be used to mitigate
the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: No,
impacts identified.
Required Permits — The following local, state and federal
permits/approvals are needed for the proposed project:
None. Required Studies: None Existing Environmental
Documents: Comprehensive Plano 2040 - Final Supplemen-
tai'Environrerrtal lmpact'Statement (June 13,2017). Pro-
Ilminary
3,2017).'Pre-
Iiminaty eiterr tnation of the development regulations
that will be used for project mitigation and consistency:
Future projects will require compliance with the International
Building Code, City of Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance,
City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan and City of Yakima Title
HEARING This application
require two public hearings;
one before the City of Yakima Planning Commission to be
followed by a public hearing before the Yakima City Council.
The public hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Com-
mission has been scheduled for Wednesday 9112/18 begin -
Pi at 3;00� , to the Council Chambers City H�aii„ 129 N
Street, Yakirna, WA. Any person desiring to express their
vWws on this matter is Invited to attend the public hearing or
to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Plan
ning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima„ WA 98901. A separate
public notice will be provided for the public hearing
beforethe Yaklnte Clty Council. N-0-TIC"ERECOMn
MENDATION The Planning Commission's recommendation
and future notices will be sent to anyone who submits com-
ments on this application or request additional notice. The
file containing the complete application is available for public
review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City,
Hall „ 129 North 2nd Street; Yakima, Washington, and online
at httris.,Hwww.yaktmawa.aov/services/rslannino/9-018-text-
cin tnre pro,posat,
Aanacwr, tit (509) 575-
(827035) July 20, 2018
DEP TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEL( YIENT
'AWN A Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
�� h1au�ug��o�ug i::)u�i,�i�ru�
Joseph Calhoun, Manager
Cani ' 0 F Y "(� K I M A 129 North Second Street, 2"d Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
July 20, 2018
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental Review of text amendments to the City of Yakima's
Urban Area Zoning Ordinance Titles1, 15, and 16. The City of Yakima Planning Division is
proposing non -project minor amendments to the City of Yakima's Municipal Code Title 15. The
proposed amendments will modify the sign code, YMC § 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria
in YMC § 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in YMC § 15.09.045 and 15.04.030,
Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter in YMC 15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab
Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and 15.04.120; modifying the district intent statement
and permitted uses in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§ 15.03.020 and
15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally consolidation of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16
into YMC Ch. 16.08.
LOCATION: City Limits
PARCEL NUMBERS: N/A
PROPONENT: City of Yakima Planning Division
PROPERTY OWNERS: N/A
LEAD AGENCY: City of Yakima
FILE NUMBERS: SEPA #020-18 & TXT #002-18
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
® This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340; the lead agency will not act on this proposal for
20 days from the date of this preliminary threshold determination. All comments must be
submitted by 5:00 pm on August 9, 2018.
Responsible Official: Joan Davenport
Position/Title: SEPA Responsible Official
Phone (509) 575-6183
Address: 129, N. 2nd Street. Yakima
Date July 20, 2018 Signature:,
DEPh�TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOeMENT
Joan Davenport, AICP, Director
AfM 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor, Yakima, WA 98901
" ask.planning@yakimawa.gov - www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, AND PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: July 20, 2018
TO: Interested Parties
FROM: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Notice of Application, Environmental Review, and Public Hearing
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
Project Location: Citywide
Project Applicant: City of Yakima, Planning Division
File Numbers: TXT#002-18, SEPA#020-18
Date of Application: April 12, 2018
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Yakima Planning Division is proposing non -project minor amendments to the City of
Yakima's Municipal Code Titles 1, 15, and 16. The proposed amendments will modify the sign
code, YMC § 15.08.045 Exemptions; Rezone criteria in YMC § 15.23.030; Accessory Dwelling
Unit Standards in YMC § 15.09.045 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; the Modification Chapter in YMC
15.17; Adding a definition and land use for Taxicab Home Occupation in YMC §§ 15.02.020 and
15.04.120; modifying the district intent statement and permitted uses in the Regional
Development (RD) zoning district, YMC §§ 15.03.020 and 15.04.030, Table 4-1; and finally
consolidation of Appeals from YMC Ch. 1.43 and YMC § 15.16 into YMC Ch. 16.08.
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This is to notify all the public and private agencies with jurisdiction and environmental expertise
that the City of Yakima Planning Division has been established as the lead agency, pursuant to
the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the above stated project.
The City of Yakima is issuing a Preliminary Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) on
this project. WAC 197-11-340 is being used.
The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse
environmental impacts of the proposal: No impacts identified
Required Permits — The following local, state and federal permits/approvals are needed for the
proposed project: None.
Required Studies: None
Existing Environmental Documents: Comprehensive Plan 2040 - Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (June 13, 2017)
Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project
mitigation and consistency: Future projects will require compliance with the International
Building Code, City of Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, City of Yakima Comprehensive
Plan and City of Yakima Title 12 Development Standards.
DOC.
INDEX
REQUEST FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS
The public is encouraged to review and comment on the proposed application. Written
comments may be submitted prior to the public hearing scheduled for September 12, 2018 or at
the public hearing.
Please send written comments to:
Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
City of Yakima, Department of Community Development
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
or email comments to: ask, Banr� Iraaawa. ov
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
This application will require two public hearings; one before the City of Yakima Planning
Commission to be followed by a public hearing before the Yakima City Council. The public
hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Commission has been scheduled for Wednesday
September 12, 2018, beginning at 3:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd
Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to
attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning
Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. A separate public notice will be provided for
the public hearing before the Yakima City Council.
NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission's recommendation and future notices will be sent to anyone who
submits comments on this application or request additional notice.
The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima
Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington, and online at
its: r knmaw . py/services/p rI j aq -text-amendments/ If you have any question
on this proposal, please call Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager, at (509) 575-6042 or e-mail
to: "ose h"cal'houn akimawa. ov.
Yal ma
DOC'.
him
INDEX
�Ullii
IlQrQa�a
CITY PLANNING — 2018 TEXT AMENDMENTS
TXT#002-18 & SE 'A#020-18
EXHIBIT LIST
CHAPTER E
Supplemental Information
gast
E-1 YPC Minutes — December 13, 2017, Study Session 12/13/2017
W 10 20 ...........St -- 1/ _.
E-2 YPC Minutes — January _ 18, Study Session 01/10/2018
� _ _.
..... _ .........�....- .._..........
._E-3 YPC .....................
Minutes — March 14, 2018, Study Session 03/14/2018
E-4 YPC Minutes — March 28, 2018, Study Session 03/28/2018
E-5 YPC Minutes — April 11 A 20����.�..���������......�.......................���_.......�� .
p 18, Study Session 04/11/2018
E-6...._ WWWWW _ YPCMinutes— May 9, 2018, Study Session 05/09/2018
Studymm m ._.._
YPC Minutes - May 23, 2018, Session
05/23/2018
E-8.......������ _..��...... YPC Minutes — ....___.....��—.................................. ...__
June 27, 2018, Study Session 06/27/2018
_ ............ ........... ......... ....._ ........
E-9 Requests to be Parties of Record 07/02/2018
�... _ .._ _. ....... ................ __........ ._...........
Maxe , Lisa
From: Maxey, Lisa
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 10:25 AM
To: Monick, Colleda
Subject: RE: ADU - Request for updates regarding ADU's
Thank you for providing the email addresses of the interested parties. They will be added to the parties of
record list for the Text Amendment file (TXT#002-18) to receive future notices so they can stay up-to-date on
the proposed change to the accessory dwelling unit regulations.
Luisa II ae
Planning Specialist I City of Yakima Planning Division
(509) 576-6669 - L sa Ma y -@y krn c e v
From: Monick, Colleda
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 10:04 AM
To: Maxey, Lisa <Lisa.Maxey@YAKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: ADU - Request for updates regarding ADU's
-sm cer q f„e maLI. rn
an elasoffe@ mail.com
Colleda Monick
Assistant Planner
City of Yakima
509-576-6772
This email is a public record of the City of Yakima and is subject to public disclosure unless exempt under the Washington Public
Records Act
aai r��
ll ■ "�►„"�1.
T
��wA
RECEIVED
JUL 12 2018
CITY OF YAKIMA
DIV.
c->
WANTS hbv VPDATL- S S
�w����a....
�Nqwi iD pavvecj)�&
,.
DOC.
INDEX
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of June 27, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Jacob Liddicoat, Robert McCormick, Leanne Hughes -Mickel
YPC Members Absent: Peter Marinace (excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist; Sara Watkins, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Council Liaison: Jason White, District 2 (absent)
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun announced that SEPA comments for the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications are due on June 28th. He added that the
Planning Commission public hearings on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be
scheduled for August 8th and August 22nd, and notice will be issued.
Brief discussion took place on feedback from the Planning Short Course that some of
the Planning Commission members and Planning Divisions staff attended.
Calhoun announced that there are still 3 vacancies on the Historic Preservation
Commission.
r�or al + l tJP 1# it ut o Ma 2 20018
It was motioned by Commissioner Rose and seconded by Commissioner McCormick to
approve the minutes of May 23, 2018.
Audience Participation
None noted.
: A _. 002 8 _&tui Session, Comprehensive Plari Atnendmen._tC_PA#001-18 .
CPA#007-18)
CPA#001-18 - Calhoun explained the proposal, gave some background information on
the subject property, and made the Commission aware of one comment received from
the Department of Ecology on the proposal. Discussion took place on an adjacent parcel
which was not included in this request, to which Calhoun replied that staff will
recommend that the parcel be incorporated into this future land use change and rezone
request. Applicant Tom Durant introduced himself and made himself available for any
questions.
CPA#002-18 - Calhoun summarized the request and stated that staff would
recommend that the adjacent parcels which are not currently incorporated in this
request be included. Applicant Bill Hordan made himself available for any questions
and expanded on the reasoning for this proposal while referencing the conceptual site
plan submitted with the application. Hordan added that the owner of the isolated
parcels which were not included in this request was approached and ultimately was not
interested in participating.
CPA#007-18 - Calhoun explained the proposal and provided some background
information on the subject property. Calhoun informed the commission that there has
been interest in establishing a mission at this location which is what has prompted the
request for changing the future land use designation and rezoning the property. He
further clarified that an RFP process would be used to establish who would be
operating the mission. He reiterated from a previous Planning Commission meeting
that if this request is approved, a lot line adjustment would be done so that only the
portions of the property which are outside the floodplain would be used for the
mission. Brief discussion also took place on a swale at this site.
�Conti!ItLedStkkdy Session. Pr o� "ext Amendments
Calhoun presented changes to YMC Chapter 1.43 Hearing Examiner, Chapter 15.02.020
Definitions, Chapter 15.16 Appeals, and Chapter 16.08 Appeals. He identified the main
reason for these amendments as the consolidation of appeal regulations into Title 16. He
added that a hearing will likely be scheduled in September for all of the proposed text
amendments that staff have recently brought to the Commission for study sessions.
Other Business
Calhoun reported that there is no new information on when City Council's study session
will be on the topic of temporary worker housing, and clarified that they are still
searching for participants to be on the Ad Hoc committee for this discussion. Calhoun
informed the commission that Council voted to enact a moratorium on permitting any
new extended -stay hotels. Senior Assistant City Attorney Sara Watkins clarified that the
moratorium will not affect the hotel being built at Nob Hill Blvd and 24f Ave as they
have already received their permits. Calhoun made known that it would be correct
procedure for the issue of creating a definition of hotel/motel to come back to the
Planning Commission so they may make a recommendation to Council.
Calhoun informed the Commission that this was Commissioner Marinace's last Planning
Commission meeting as his term has expired, and that Council has appointed Philip
Ostriem to fill a seat on the Commission beginning in July.
Discussion took place on retention requirements for Planning Commission members'
records, to which Calhoun responded that he will gather information and report back.
Calhoun made known to the Commission that he has reached out to Yakima County staff
regarding setting up a joint meeting for the two planning commissions and that he has
not received a confirmation. Discussion took place on how the Commission can remain
informed on what the County's Planning Commission is working on. Some suggestions
were to review previous agendas and minutes, look at their Comprehensive Plan, view
notices for projects in the county that are adjacent to the city limits, and simply see a list
of people who are currently on the County Planning Commission. Audience member Bill
Hordan informed the Commission of several people who are on the County Planning
Commission. Brief discussion also took place on projected population estimates for
Yakima County in the coming years.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to July 11, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 3:50 p.m.
Cha ° onu,�i,Byers Date
This meeting wds filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
-3-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of May 23, 2018
Call toOrder
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Rob McCormick, Jacob Liddicoat, Leanne Hughes -Mickel
YPC Members Absent: Peter Marinace (excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist
Council Liaison: Jason White, District 2 (absent)
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun announced that the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and concurrent Rezone requests received for this year's amendment cycle
are being reviewed for completeness and will be sent out for public notice in the coming
weeks. He also made known that there are still 3 vacancies on the Historic Preservation
Commission, and that interested persons may apply in the City Clerk's office.
Audience Partici ation
None noted.
Approval of Meetine Minutes of Ma9 :018
It was motioned by Commissioner Rose and seconded by Commissioner Liddicoat to
approve the minutes of May 9, 2018.
Review of Yakima PlanningmmCommission BvIaws
Calhoun presented a draft of proposed changes to the Commission's bylaws. These
changes include a correction from 6 -year terms to 4 -year terms per City Council's
direction (Ordinance 2017-018), correcting the department title from "Department of
Community and Economic Development" to "Department of Community
Development," correcting the meeting time from 3:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. to match current
practices, updating the regular order of business to match current practices, clarifying
the titles of the municipal code which are in the commission's purview, rewording the
language on how the time and location of a Commission meeting may be changed, and
adding language that allows flexibility to setting a date for continued agenda items.
It was motioned by Commissioner Hughes -Mickel and seconded by Commissioner
Rose to approve the draft of the amended bylaws with an additional change to Section 1
(A) to correct another mention of the term limitations, fixing it from 6 years to 4 years.
The motion carried unanimously.
Continued Stuff Session: Proposed Text Amendments to YMC Title 15
Calhoun presented changes to YMC 15.17: Modification to Existing or Approved Uses
or Development. The change would allow modifications to Class 1 uses to be reviewed
under the Modification procedures, granted the criteria for a Modification are met per
the code. In addition to the draft amendments presented, Calhoun verbally included an
additional change to the 15.17.020(B) and (C), to strike out the sentence in both sections
DOC.
INDEX
-7
that states, "this limit shall be calculated cumulatively for all previous modifications
since the last normal review," as this is already established in 15.17.020(E).
Other Business
Calhoun clarified that the Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be sent for public
notice with a 20 -day comment period on the SEPA review. After the comment period, the
SEPA determination will be issued along with notice of Yakima Planning Commission
public hearing.
Calhoun informed the commission that the date for a City Council study session on
temporary worker housing has not been set, and that the commission members will be
notified once it is established.
A question was posed as to whether the conversion of a hotel on North 1st Street to house
temporary workers depends upon the result of the temporary worker housing text
amendment. Calhoun clarified that as long as it is operated as a hotel, it is a permitted
use and does not rely on the text amendment being approved.
Discussion ensued on tracking the outcome of amendments that Planning Conunission
recommends to City Council. Calhoun reported that staff' can create a brief report on the
history text amendments in recent years that have gone to City Council.
Calhoun reminded the commission that the Short Course on Local Planning provided by
the Department of Commerce is scheduled for a date in June and will be held at the Public
Works training room at 2301 Fruitvale Blvd.
The commission suggested that a joint meeting be held with the Yakima County Planning
Commission sometime after the planning short course. Calhoun asked that commission
members send their desired topics of discussion to him and he will coordinate with the
County to form a list of discussion items and schedule the meeting. Discussion took place
on the anticipated gains of having a meeting with the County.
Chairwoman Payers announced that she will be absent for the next commission meeting
on June 13th.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to June 13, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 3:33 p.m.
Chairw6rnan Byers Date
This mve� 1aii was filmed by YPAC, a routes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning 5pdafist.
-2INDEX
-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of May 9, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Rob McCormick, Jacob Liddicoat
YPC Members Absent: Peter Marinace, Leanne Hughes -Mickel (both excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist; Sean Hawkins, Economic Development Manager
Council Liaison: Jason White, District 2 (absent)
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun announced that there are 3 open positions on the
Historic Preservation Commission and that anyone interested may apply at the City
Clerk's office.
Calhoun informed the commission that City Council denied the Planning Commission's
recommendation on text amendments to Yakima Municipal Code (YMC) Title 15
regarding definitions and classifications for "Congregate Living Facility" and
"Motel/ Hotel." He added that council will be scheduling a study session to discuss the
matter of temporary worker housing further, and that Planning Commission members
may watch the video of the council meeting to hear the questions and concerns which
were raised.
Audience Partici,tion
None noted.
Approval of Meetiqg Minutes of _Ari 1.1 2018
It was motioned by Commissioner Rose and seconded by Commissioner McCormick to
approve the minutes of April 11, 2018, with a spelling correction on the first page from
"lager" to "larger." The motion carried unanimously.
Submitted 2018 Coni rehensive Plan Am ndniep Rez,
QLte Appjication Docketing,
Calhoun provided a summary of the 7 comprehensive plan amendment and
accompanying rezone requests which were submitted for this year's amendment cycle.
Brief discussion took place on the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone request
proposed by the city's wastewater division (CPA#007-18/RZ#008-18) relating to 3
parcels in the vicinity of S 22nd St and Highway 24/E Nob Hill Blvd and their relation to
the 100 -year flood plain which would prompt a boundary line adjustment if approved,
as well as the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone request by West Valley
Nursing Homes Inc (CPA#005-18/RZ#006-18) and their association with a
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone from 2012. He explained that study
sessions will be held on all of the docketed comprehensive plan amendments and
rezones.
Continued Sty4y �mSession:wProppsg�LText Amendments to YMC Title 15
Economic Development Manager Sean Hawkins described the need to expand the list of
permitted land uses in the Regional Development (RD) zoning district and lower the
required level of review for some uses to make it easier for businesses to locate there.
He mentioned the interest expressed by a company in Yakima to relocate to the RD
zoning district in order to expand their business, as well as a company that has inquired
about coming to Yakima and would potentially be a good fit in the RD zoning district.
Yakima County Development Association Director Jonathan Smith pointed out some of
the land uses which are currently not permitted in the RD zoning district that the
commission may want to consider recommending to City Council to add, and uses that
are currently allowed but require a high level of review that could potentially be
lowered, including hospitals, post -secondary schools, and some light manufacturing
uses. Smith added that for some of the light manufacturing uses that could be
appropriate in this zone, codes or covenants could be put in place that would ensure
that the buildings mirror the aesthetics of a professional office building.
Calhoun proposed a minor change to the district intent statement in the Yakima
Municipal Code for the RD zoning district. He then went over staffs proposed changes
to the level of review for some of the land uses currently permitted in this zone, as well
as recommendations on which land uses to consider adding as permitted uses in this
zone. He explained that this topic will be researched further and come back to the
commission for another study session. Discussion took place on the importance of
ensuring that these potential uses do not become a deterrent for retail uses in the RD
zoning district. The lack of properties that are currently zoned RD was also briefly
talked about.
Other Business
None noted.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to May 23, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 335p.m.
.�
llai.rw 1,11an Byers
This imvti g was filmed by YPAC.
l9/
Date
for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
DOCO
WDEX
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of April 11, 2018
Call to -Order
Vice -Chair Al Rose called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook, Rob McCormick, Leanne
Hughes -Mickel
YPC Members Absent: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Jacob Liddicoat, Peter Marinace
(all excused)
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist;
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun reminded Commission members that the
application period for the 2018 cycle of Comprehensive Plan amendments is open until
April 30+h. He reported that none have been received thus far but there is an expectation
that some will be submitted prior to the deadline.
Audience Particivation
Audience member Thomas Sudbury addressed the Commission about his desire for the
minimum lot size for accessory dwelling units to be lowered to 8,000 sq ft. The
Commission explained that the regulations for accessory dwelling units will come up
later in the agenda during the study session on proposed text amendments to Title 15
Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (UAZO)
Approval of Meeting Minutes of March 28 2018
It was motioned by Commissioner McCormick and seconded by Commissioner
Hughes -Mickel to approve the minutes of March 28, 2018. The motion carried
unanimously.
Study Sessiop: l rppoed Text Amendment to YMC Title 15 UAZO
Calhoun presented staff's proposal to revise the sign code in relation to the maximum
flag pole height standard and to revise the special development standards chapter to
modify accessory dwelling unit regulations.
Sudbury spoke again in favor of staff's proposed changes to the regulations for
accessory dwelling units and shared how these changes would assist his family's
housing situation. Commission members and staff had consensus to modify the
proposed code section that reads, "ADUs shall only be permitted on parcels/ lots sized
appropriately for a duplex or larger per YMC 15.05.030, Table 5-2" to strike the words
"or larger." Discussion took place between the Commission, staff, and Sudbury on the
existing code language which indicates that both dwelling units (the primary residence
and the ADU) shall have its own sewer and water connection with required meters if
the ADU is attached to or located above a detached garage or is a stand-alone structure.
Calhoun indicated that he will discuss the sewer and water connection requirements
with the building codes and wastewater divisions to see if there is flexibility to modify
these requirements.
-1 - INDEX
6-5
Calhoun described staff's recommended changes to the rezone chapter in accordance
with previous discussions between staff and the Commission to add a requirement for a
conceptual site plan for non -project rezones and add language regarding development
agreements in instances where conditions are imposed on the rezone. Commission
suggested that staff add a definition of development agreement to this chapter or add a
reference to the definition in the RCW.
Calhoun indicated that there will be discussion at a future meeting date regarding
adding more permitted land uses to the Regional Development (RD) zoning district.
Other Business
None noted.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to April 25, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adiour iw,i-at 3:331 m.
Cha
This e
n Byers
05-0
Date
g was filmed by YPA °. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
DOC.
INDEX
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of March 28, 2018
C,all_to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Jacob Liddicoat, Peter Marinace, Rob McCormick, Leanne
Hughes -Mickel
YPC Members Absent:
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist; Sara Watkins, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun introduced Leanne Hughes -Mickel as the new
Planning Commission member. Commissioner Hughes -Mickel shared some
information about herself with the Commission.
Audience Participation
None noted.
Approval of !ltg Minutes of MLipch 14, 2018
It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve
the minutes of March 14, 2018. The motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing - Text Amendment to YMC Title 15 Related to Ternporary Worker
Housing
Calhoun presented the staff recommendation on proposed changes to the Yakima
Urban Area Zoning Ordinance to establish regulations regarding temporary worker
housing, which includes modifying the definition of boardinghouse and adding a
definition of "motel/ hotel," modifying the Table of Permitted Land Uses, and
modifying the Table of Off -Street Parking Standards.
Audience member Charlie Hines advocated for temporary worker housing facilities to
be of high standard if approved.
Audience member Rob Valicoff spoke in favor of the proposal and commented on the
"first-class" nature of these facilities.
Audience member Sandi Belzer spoke in favor of the proposal with the caveat that they
must be well-maintained and monitored.
Audience member Ron Disch expressed his concern of property values potentially
decreasing on account of these facilities locating here. He stated that neighbors should
be notified when there is a proposal for temporary worker housing in their area.
Furthermore, he suggested that the Commission consider letting voters decide if these
facilities should be allowed in the city. Lastly, Disch commented on the lack of cities in
eastern Washington which allow this land use, which could cause many temporary
workers to use sites in Yakima due to lack of availability in their area.
-1-
Audience member Ermelindo Escobedo spoke in favor of the proposal and reiterated
the strict requirements imposed on this housing type by the state and federal
government.
Audience member Lourdes Martinez spoke highly of H -2A workers and commented on
the benefits of having housing for them within the city as well as the benefit of having
the workers contribute to the economy.
The Commission discussed the expectation that these buildings would be in use year-
round due to the staggering of the agricultural seasons. Discussion ensued regarding
other uses which are categorized under the proposed definition of "congregate living
facility," and the possibility of unintended consequences from designating levels of
review in particular zoning districts for "congregate living facilities" with only H -2A
housing in mind and not taking into consideration that other uses outside of H -2A
housing will not be regulated as stringently and are not guaranteed to have on-site
management. The reasoning behind the proposed parking standards were also brought
up in discussion.
It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner McCormick that
the Planning Commission draft findings of fact and forward a recommendation of
approval to the Yakima City Council. The motion carried with 6 votes in favor and 1
vote against.
Calhoun clarified that there is a set date on the April 3rd City Council agenda for a
public hearing on May 1St.
Studv Session:1 Proposed Amendments to YMC 15.04.120 Home Occupations Relating
to Taxicab Businesses
Calhoun shared with the Commission the proposed definition of "home occupation,
taxicab operator," and the proposed addition to YMC 15.04.120 Table 4-2 (Table of
Permitted Home Occupations) which includes a line item for "taxicab operator," and the
proposed level of review for each zoning district.
Senior Assistant City Attorney Sara Watkins reiterated that the criteria which home
occupations must meet prohibits non family members from being employees.
Calhoun explained that there are other potential text amendments that should be
included in the public process for this proposed change to the Home Occupations code
section, and will be scheduled for a study session before the Commission. Chairwoman
Byers reminded the Commission that she will be absent for the next Commission meeting
on April 11f.
Other Business
Commissioner Marinace brought up a comment he made initially during the update
process for the Comprehensive Plan 2040 last year that there is a lack of sidewalks on Zier
Rd. between 751h Ave. and West Valley High School, which in conjunction with the
narrowness of the road creates dangerous walking conditions for kids walking to school.
He spoke of a grant opportunity called Safe Routes to School which could help to fund
putting sidewalks there. Calhoun spoke of the recent improvements that have been made
in that area at Mead Ave. and 72°a Ave. He explained that the engineering division of the
appropriate jurisdiction would need to be part of the discussion on infrastructure, and
-2-
INDEX
#'E, _q..
the school district would need to be a main proponent for encouraging these
improvements in the grant application process. Council liaison Jason White reported that
safe routes to school is in the Council's top 5 priorities for the next few years and
mentioned that some Yakima schools are going through this program currently, while
furthering the point that the lack of sidewalks in areas of the city is a big issue.
Commissioner Marinace confirmed that he will contact the school district to make them
aware of this safety issue and apprise them of this grant opportunity.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to April 11, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 4:21 p.m.
Z
Gl", i Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
..3 DOC.,
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of March 14, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Jacob Liddicoat, Peter Marinate, Rob McCormick
YPC Members Absent:
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist; Sara Watkins, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun announced that the Planning Commission will hold
a public hearing on the proposed text amendments to Yakima Municipal Code (YMC)
Title 15 to establish regulations for temporary worker housing during their next
meeting on March 28th. The City Council public hearing will be scheduled for April 17th.
He also reported that there is still one vacancy on the Planning Commission.
audience Participation
Michael Howe introduced himself as the new government affairs director of the Central
Washington Home Builders Association, replacing Joe Walsh.
of February 28, 2618,
It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner McCormick to
approve the minutes of February 28, 2018. The motion carried unanimously.
Re ort on Taxi Business License Regulations
Calhoun reported that taxi businesses were not a specific use identified within the home
occupations table in the municipal code, but were often permitted under the "business
administration" use in the table until a policy change effectively discontinued the
approval of taxi services as home occupations. He explained that there are 13 conditions
of approval for home occupations that must be met in order to be approved, including a
condition which states, "the home occupation is conducted only by immediate family
members residing in the dwelling," which may be preclude some taxi businesses.
Commission members and staff discussed scenarios in which a home occupation permit
would be applicable, and other scenarios in which a commercial office location would be
required. Senior Assistant City Attorney Sara Watkins explained the difference in
licensing requirements between a taxi service and a transportation network company
(e.g. Uber and Lyft).
Jon Briggs of Bluhawk Taxi requested clarification on what the licensing requirements
would be applicable for his taxi business, to which the Commission and staff responded.
It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner Liddicoat for staff
to draft changes to YMC Title 15 to incorporate a definition for taxi service and add it as
a line item in YMC 15.04.120 Table 4-2 (Table of Permitted Home Occupations), mirroring
the level of review and allowed zoning districts that are dictated for the "home
contractor" line item.
- 1 - DOC.
INDEX
# 6
Other Business
Chairwoman Byers reminded Commission members and staff that she will be out of town
from April 4th to April 14th.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to March 14, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 3:53 p.m.
-
l�tail°wtltl��a�� Byers ,�' M..........._....��.,w Date �......_...... .____.
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
-2-DOC.
INDEX
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of January 10, 2018
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Jacob
Liddicoat, Bill Cook, Peter Marinate
YPC Members Absent: Rob McCormick
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun informed the commission that new FEMA maps for
the Cowiche Creek floodplain are expected to be received within the next month or so.
Calhoun reported that city staff have been attending advisory group meetings for
amendments to the Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plan (CFHMP),
particularly relating to northern Yakima.
He reminded commissioners that they have a public hearing scheduled for February
141h pertaining to a rezone request.
Lastly, Calhoun announced that there is still one vacancy on the Planning Commission.
Election of Chair and Vice -Chair of them Yakima Plannine Commission
It was motioned by Commissioner Cook and seconded by Commissioner Marinate to
retain Patricia Byers as chair of the commission and retain Al Rose as vice -chair. The
motion passed unanimously.
udi�encemP rticioation
None noted.
Approval of Meetin Minutes of Sec m et..t3
..ZQIZ
Vice -Chair Rose noted a grammatical error in the minutes. It was motioned by Vice -Chair
Rose and seconded by Commissioner Liddicoat to approve the minutes of December 13,
2017 with that correction.
Discussion: Op ing of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process
Calhoun summarized the process to open the annual comprehensive plan amendment
cycle, which includes City Council adopting a resolution (planned for the February 6+h
council meeting) and the Planning Commission holding a hearing to officially open the
process (planned for the February 28th commission meeting). Commissioner Cook
inquired about any public interest expressed for amendments this year. Calhoun
responded that there have been about two or three preliminary discussions between staff
and members of the public.
Introduction to Pootte tial�a�, in Code Amendments
Calhoun went over the current list of zoning code amendments that the commission
will be reviewing at a later date, including: updating references to the new Right -of -
Way vacation chapter in Title 14, rewording the sign chapter to address flags in the
-1-
INDEX
residential districts, adding language to the wireless communications chapter to add
standards/ review process for small cell infrastructure and for communication facilities
on utility poles, addressing inconsistencies between the text and the table which dictate
the classification of use of an accessory dwelling unit, broadening the accessory
dwelling unit category to include other concepts like cottage housing or create a new
land use category, adding a new use or modifying an existing use to accommodate
temporary worker housing, and updating the rezone section per the Planning
Commissions recent discussions on non -project rezones.
Discussion took place regarding a public hearing for an interpretation relating to
temporary worker housing which will go before the hearing examiner on January 11th.
The commission and staff had additional discussion on other housing types.
0)Part i y for Cc��r sicrtl r t sous l e its for Additional Reviejv �Considerat on
Commissioner Cook brought up a request from an earlier commission meeting to have
an Open Public Meetings Act training at city hall for the commissioners and to invite
the county's planning commission members as well.
Commissioner Cook requested an overview on annexations. Calhoun mentioned that
an annexation was processed for the northwest corner of South 64th Ave. and Ahtanum
Rd., which has been forwarded to the boundary review board. Additional discussion
took place on annexations.
Other Business
Calhoun announced that Councilman Brad Hill was appointed to serve as the council
liaison to the Planning Commission but that due to scheduling conflicts the liaison may
be reassigned.
Council members discussed the lack of audience member turnout and their desire to
bring in more people to these meetings and hearings. As part of this effort, commissioners
had consensus to work towards hosting an open house for members of the public to
provide feedback to the commission and planning staff and ask questions, and host a
similar event for developers in the community. This topic will be revisited at a future
meeting in order to work out the details.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to January 24, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at.4,00 p.m.
Chair W )n����n Byers � � Date
This ai(w prole, was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist,
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of December 13, 2017
Call to Order
Chairwoman Patricia Byers called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairwoman Patricia Byers, Vice -Chair Al Rose, Jacob
Liddicoat, Bill Cook, Rob McCormick
YPC Members Absent: Peter Marinace
Staff Present: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager; Lisa Maxey, Planning
Specialist; Sara Watkins, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Others: Sign -in sheet in file
Staff Announcements
Planning Manager Joseph Calhoun informed the commission that City Council
approved the proposed revisions to Yakima Municipal Code Title 14 that the Planning
Commission recommended to them, which allows final long plats to be approved
administratively. The ordinance will become effective December 24, 2017.
Calhoun reported that staff is looking at potential text amendments to take through the
public hearing process in the upcoming year.
Audience Partici ation
None noted.
Approval of Meeting Minutes of November &2017
It was motioned by Vice -Chair Rose and seconded by Commissioner Liddicoat to
approve the minutes of November 8, 2017.
Discussion: Conditions for Rezones & Processing Rezone AppligAfi2M
Calhoun explained the reasoning for this discussion item (i.e. discussions from a recent
public hearing on a non -project rezone). Calhoun provided commission members with
the City of Yakima's code language pertaining to processing rezone applications, along
with code language from some other cities. He highlighted that one of the cities requires
a conceptual site plan to be submitted with the rezone application, and that some cities
require a development agreement to be entered into if there are conditions imposed on
the rezone.
Commission members discussed the pros and cons of requiring a conceptual site plan
and development agreement, and the idea of requiring SEPA review at the time of
development regardless of whether SEPA thresholds are exceeded.
*Commissioner McCormick arrived to the meeting at approximately 3:30 p.m.
The Commission had consensus to direct staff to draft language for the code that would
require a conceptual site plan to be submitted with a rezone application, indicate that
conditions imposed would need to be included in a development agreement, and allow
the Planning Commission to require SEPA review regardless of whether thresholds are
exceeded.
-1-
INDEX
Other Business
Commissioner ner Cook reminded staff and the commission about previous discussions
where staff was asked to have someone from Yakima County come to a Planning
Commission meeting to discuss flooding concerns. Calhoun confirmed that this will be
arranged after the new flood maps from FEMA are received, which will likely be at the
beginning of the year.
The commission had consensus to cancel the next regularly scheduled meeting of
December 27, 2017.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to January 10, 2018 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 3:50 p.m.
.......�_.........� www ...............
Chair Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Planning Specialist.
-2-
709 S 15'h Ave, Yakima, WA 989w
5og-961-947 5
Id e 3ftimaiLcom,
09/10/2018
7o: Planning Commission and Department of Community Development
Re: YMC 15.09.045—Accessory Dwelling Units
I am writing to ask for a variance on the lot size requirement in the R2 zoning area. My
home at 709 5 15`h Ave. is smaller than your new proposal is looking at but is otherwise
ideally suited for an Accessory Dwelling.
I have a 500 -square foot detached garage that is already wired for electricity and has a
cement floor. It also already has its owned fenced (RV) parking right next to it which
means it would not take away any other parking in the neighborhood. My backyard is
fenced and private which negates any privacy issues for the neighboring houses.
My home is located just one block from Yakima Valley College and just a short distance
from both Virginia Mason and Astria Regional Hospitals ... an area in great need of
affordable rental housing.
In addition to providing affordable housing to an area in need I'm also looking to
improve my own property and future. For now; this could very well be extra income but
as I age this may be the mother-in-law home that I live in. I appreciate your careful
thought and consideration.
Warm regards,
Clarice Dyer
a
2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS
CHAPTER C
CITY OF YAKIMA WASTEWATER DIVISION
CPA#007-18, RZ#008-18 & SEPA#010-18
C-1
Applications for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and
Rezone (with narratives)
04/30/2018
C-2
SEPA Environmental Checklist
04/30/2018
C-3
Map Submitted with Applications
04/30/2018
C-4
Vicinity Map
05/01/2018
C-5
Email Comments from Lynn Serrata
05/15/2018
C-6
Determination of Application Completeness
05/29/2018
C-7
Land Use Action Installation Certificate
06/01/2018
C-8
Notice of Application and Environmental Review
C -8a: Postcard Notice
C -8b: Parties and Agencies Notified
C -8c: Affidavit of Mailing
06/08/2018
C-9
Comment Letter from WA State Dept of Transportation
06/27/2018
C-10
Notice of Public Hearing & Determination of Non Significance
C -10a: Legal Ad
C -10b: Press Release & Distribution Email
C -10c: Parties and Agencies Notified
C -10d: Affidavit of Mailing
07/05/2018
C-11
Email Comments from Katy Weatherley
07/10/2018
C-12
Development Services Team (DST) Comments
C -12a: Mike Shane, Water/Irrigation Engineer
C -12b: Carolyn Belles, Permit Project Coordinator
C -12c: Dana Kallevig, Utility Project Manager
07/31/2018
C-13
Comment Letter from Yakima Greenway Foundation
08/02/2018
C-14
Yakima Planning Commission Agenda & Distribution List
08/03/2018
C-15
Staff Report
08/08/2018
C-16
Yakima Greenway Master Plan Update 1995
09/12/2018
C-17
Memo from Community Development Director Joan
Davenport
09/12/2018
MEMORANDUM
To: Yakima City Planning Commission
From: Joan Davenport, Community Development Director
Date: September 4, 2018
Subject: Additional Background Requested for Proposed City Rezone (CPA #007-18)
At the August 8, 2018 Comprehensive Plan Amendment public hearing, the Yakima City Planning
Commission requested some additional information about the history, context and intent of the rezone
project.
History of City of Yakima involvement with locating Homeless Encampment -
• April 2016: tent camping and occupation of the sidewalk area in the vicinity of East Chestnut Street
& S. 6th Street without sanitation or safety measures. Neighborhood demands City remove
encampment due to illegal activity and lack of sanitation.
• July 11, 2016: City opens encampment in the parking lot at South 3rd Street and Walnut, after
attempting to find community sponsor to accommodate homeless encampment.
• November 15, 2016 to March 15, 2017: Walnut Street encampment closes. Winter shelters held in
area churches, run by volunteers. For 11 years the City allowed churches to operate sleeping
shelters without fire sprinklers.
• March 2017: City enters into lease with Transform Yakima Together (TYT) of Wastewater plant site
until December 2020.
• November 21, 2017: TYT opens winter shelter at 1702 Englewood Ave.
• May 2018: TYT closes winter shelter due to neighborhood opposition.
• May 2018 to present: TYT moves back to Camp Hope at Wastewater Plant site.
• City of Yakima works with YVCOG to secure funds to extend water and sewer service to
encampment site. Eventually, utilities could be extended north to rezone site.
Other sites considered for Homeless Encampment —
The City Council spent significant time (beginning in April 2016) discussing options for potential locations
and community partners to host and manage a homeless encampment. Washington State law has
special entitlements for faith based organizations to host temporary homeless encampments. Finally,
Transform Yakima Together (TYT) stepped into the role of hosting and managing the encampment.
Site selection was challenging in the determination of a camp location. Criteria for review were: city
ownership (or other public entity), access to services/utilities, minimize neighborhood impact, minimum
size of 0.5 acres, current zoning. After review by the City Council "Neighborhood and Community
Building Committee" (NCBC), the full Council reviewed a report on January 10, 2017 which listed 10
locations:
1. Tiger Mart (1808 N 1St St)
2. Race Street Park at South 3 d Street
3. Fair Ave & 1-82 Ramp area
4. Bravo Co Blvd near the roundabout
5. Wastewater Plant Field area
6. South 3rd Street & Walnut Street parking lot
7. Fire Station 95 unused area, Fair Avenue frontage
8. Unused building at 1216 Race Street
9. 12th Avenue & Yakima Avenue (Portia Park)
10. WSDOT property on the north side of Nob Hill Blvd, adjacent to SB off -ramp
11. Fruitvale Boulevard, south of Public works complex*
The recommendation from NCBC to the full Council was the North 1st Street Tiger Mart (item "a"
above). The Council rejected this location after considerable testimony at the January 10, 2017 meeting.
Following the January 10, 2017 Council meeting, one additional site was suggested on the (* location 11)
south side of Fruitvale Blvd, in an unused triangle of street right of way. This site was also withdrawn
from consideration after significant neighborhood opposition during a public meeting to discuss the site.
In an effort to find a permanent location for a low barrier homeless shelter M shared at least 5
locations with the City staff. Each site was also rejected after opposition from respective neighborhoods,
Acquisition of private land would need to be paid by either a grant or fundraising by M. The City of
Yakima is fiscally not able to purchase and donate land for a homeless shelter since no funding source
has been identified for use by the city. The sites TYT examined were:
1. The Shiloh Center (West Peirce Street)
2. 1507S36 th Ave
3. 10 East Washington
4. 522 S 1st Street
5. 1702 Englewood
After much deliberation, the City Council approved a three year lease for the existing location of Camp
Hope adjacent to the City Wastewater Plant. The current site of Camp Hope has long been identified as
reserved for future expansion of the wastewater plant facility. No specific date or facility plan is known
at this time related to when the expansion may occur, but the City is obligated to retain the area to be
used as needed.
Proposed Rezone Site CPA #007-18
The proposed rezone is approximately 2.6 acres located outside of the 100 -year flood plain. This area
had been used as part of the spray field for semi -treated water especially from the industrial line that
carried fruit -cannery discharge. This practice was discontinued in approximately 2000.
As low density land without utilities but good street access, the land is valued at approximately $1 per
square foot or less. The current value of this land, if available for development would be $113,000.
If rezoned to General Commercial, GC zoning district with utilities, the land would have a market value
of approximately $5 to $8 a square foot. The land may have a value of between $560,000 and $900,000.
DOC.
INDEX
Purpose and Intent of Rezone
This is a non -project rezone. The City of Yakima does not have a specific use or site plan for the site at
this time. A rezone of 2.6 acres to General Commercial would be consistent with the zoning directly
west of this site, now occupied by the U -Haul Dealership and formerly the K -Mart property.
However, the stated intent of this rezone is to provide land that could be used to accommodate a
permanent location for a facility that may include components for a low barrier shelter, transitional
housing and affordable housing. The Yakima City Council will need to articulate their vision for the
future project and craft a Request for Proposals/Request for Qualifications (RFP/RFQ). Through the
RFP/RFQ process, the City will seek a community partner to develop the site and manage the facility. If
the future project includes a "mission" type use (low barrier shelter), it will require a Class 2 Review.
Transitional housing and affordable housing would also require a Class 2 Review.
If no community partner is found, the City may choose a different option for the land. A 2.6 acre site
with GC zoning would allow development of a wide variety of land uses including (but not limited to)
schools, public facilities, day care, light manufacturing, retail, offices, hotel and many others.
r
,ry
y
n tu
r
.
RP. P
o
Planning History
P
,
The"original Master Plan of the Yakima Greenway
was developed in.. 1976 by Jones and Jones,
landscapes/environmenfal _ planning/,urban
design architects, of Seattle. Its purpose was to
provide a . planning base for efforts to protect
what was then known as the Yakima River
Regional Greenway; from Selah Gap to Union
Gap. The plan was updated for the first time M-
1986 by the Plannhiig Committee of the Yakima
Greenaway Foundation. The next update was
V°
,
accomplished in 1591 by a YakimaGreenway
M
Foundation,
on boardtask
_ force. Itwas adopted by
the Board of Directors on December 1.6, 1991. .
The lastest update, presented in this document,
was accomplished in :1995' and adopted by the
Board of Directors on September 18, 1995. Its
purpose 'is to modify the 1991 Design Standards.
as well as acknowlege the growth of the Greenway
since that Time and new directions antic' atedby
-the board. This document is very similar in
appearance td the 1991 update and recognizes`
the work ' of that task force. It 'also includes a
.status report on the."Findings" and "Recomxmn-,
dations" of the 1976 Master Plan plus a new set
of recommendations for the next 15 years.
ewn ase 4Z""semi
r
r�
Yakima Greenway Foundation
Master Plan Update
Contents
Master Plan Update
Intrarluction
Page
1
I. Why a Greenway?
Page
3
II. 1976 Master Plan Findings and
Recommendations Status Report
Page
4
III. Greenway Corridor
Map
Page
7
Text
Page
9
IV. land Use Policy
Page
21
V. Vision for the Future
Page
23
Appendix I
Design Standards
Page
24
Appendix II
"Vision for the Future" Illustrations
Page
31
INDEX
— La
1995 Master Plan Update
Introduction 0
Our River Resource
The citizens of Yakima have realized over
the last few decades that the Yakima and Naches
rivers are our community's most important natu-
ral assets. Consequently, the community has
taken steps to preserve and reclaim these river
corridors. One of the most important steps was
the creation of the Yakima Greenway Founda-
tion in 1980.
The stated purpose of the Yakima Greenway
Foundation is to conserve, enhance and main-
tain the Yakima Greenway as a continuing,
living resource for future generations. Since its
inception, the Foundation has been guided by
the Yakima Greenway Master Plan, developed
in 1976 by Jones and Jones, Seattle. The plan
was adopted by the State of Washington, the
City of Yakima and Yakima County in 1976.
Greenway Progress
Nearly 20 years have elapsed since the Mas-
ter PIan was written. These 20 years have
brought many changes to the Yakima Valley,
and to the Greenway corridor in particular.
Major changes have occurred in the Greenway
with the completion of several highly visible
projects including 10 miles of asphalt pathway
adjacent to the rivers; four river access parks; a
fishing lake with facilities for the disabled; a
large multi -use park; a smaller, more pastoral
park; and a large children's playground.
Successful completion of these projects has
led to a growing appreciation for the Greenway
concept, as reflected in Greenway Foundation
membership growth from a handful of mem-
bers in 1980 to over 1500 today. Now there is
strong support in the community to extend the
Greenway toward population centers in the
western part of the Valley and north of Selah
Gap.
r
Another change is increased pressure for
use of land along the Yakima River and adjacent
to the Greenway corridor. This is a result of
both population growth in the Valley and the
fact that I-82 is a major transportation corridor.
Yakima has limited resources in our river
corridors. The Greenway Foundation board of
directors, as well as city and county governing
bodies, recognize that there are competing in-
terests in the use of these resources. No matter
what the use, it must be kept in mind that the
natural habitat and visual quality of the river
corridors will be affected with each new devel-
opment. Therefore, it is vitally important to
apply aesthetic consideration when contem-
plating any new development with a visual or
functional relationship to the Greenway:
Finally, the successful execution of so many
aspects of the Greenway plan has brought abou
a change in the focus of our community. The
Yakima River corridor, once the shame of
Yakima, is now the pride of the community.
Long-term vision, traditionally framed without
consideration of the river as a natural and recre-
ation resource, has shifted to include and, in-
deed, focus on the river and its future impor-
tance to the community.
1995 Master Plan Update
The 1995 update of the Yakima Greenway
Master Plan addresses each of these issues and
refers bac to the 1976 plan. Section t an addi-
tion with this 1995 update, answers the ques-
tion, "Why a Greenway?" Section II provides a
status report on the 1976 Findings and Recom-
mendations. Section III describes the Greenway
corridor, including existing facilities, plans for
future development and land use and shows
two areas for expansion added in 1986 and
1991. The areas are the Naches River corridor
*
Di
MINDEX
lwy n W F•
�g tri
lir [ 9 u
..� Ico
:.
(to link with the Cowiche Canyon Conser-
vancy project) and the area north of Selah Gap
•(along the Yakima River corridor adjacent to
the City of Seiah) to the southern border of the
Yakima River canyon.
Land Use Policy & Design Standards
Section IV addresses land use policy within
the Greenway corridor, including the use of
design standards for commercial development.
These standards were written for the 1991 up-
date and have been revised for this update to be
somewhat more flexible for developers' com-
pliance. This section also outlines land uses
and activities that are not compatible in the
Greenway corridor.
The success of the Greenway project and
implementation of development standards
within the Greenway corridor will change the
way that Yakima views the river corridor. Based
upon the experiences of many other greenway
projects in communities across the nation, we
•believe that this area will become a preferred
place to live and to do business. With plan-
ning, development along the Greenway corri-
dor could both enrich the corridor and be
enriched by it.
Vision for the Future
The principles forming the foundation of
the Greenway should not be limited to the
Greenway corridor. Plans should be drafted
by Yakima County and City of Union Gap to
extend a greenbelt west, perhaps along
Ahtanum Creek or Ahtanum Road, and then
north to connect with Cowiche Canyon.
In Section V we offer a long-term vision of
growth for the Yakima River corridor that capi-
talizes on the Greenway project to create scenic
entrances to our community and a hospitable
environment for new tourist and recreation
0 -
facilities.
We also offer a plan for a greenbelt that
would connect the Greenway trail system to a
new trail located along creeks, roads, canals or
railbeds to connect with with the Cowiche Can-
yon, completing a loop around much of the
Upper Valley. These visions are fluid concepts
rather than set plans and intended to allow room
for dreaming, which is what the Greenway has
always been about.
The Dream Continues
The 1995 revision is a continuation and ex-
pansion
xpension of that original dream, recognizing what
has been accomplished and what possiblities
exist.
The Greenway today is not a result of the
1976 Master Plan. Rather, it is the result of
broad-based community support as demon-
strated by hundreds of volunteers and donors, a
committed board of directors, a dedicated pro-
fessional staff and enthusiastic civil servants
and elected officials. The true success of the
Greenway is not so much the physical facilities
and programs, but the magnificent partnership
that created them.
The entire Yakima community, at all -levels,
has worked toward a common goal. It is this
partnership that has won the Greenway acco-
lades across the country, including being se-
lected a Point of Light in 1991 by President
George Bush and the pathway system being
named a National Recreation Trail in 1992. The
1976 Master Plan served primarily to give direc-
tion and a common vision to this partnership.
Similarly, the intent of the 1995 update is not
to be a manual of instruction governing devel-
opment. of the Greenway for the next 15 years
Instead, its intent is to clarify long-term vision
so that the dedicated Yakima Greenway Foun-
dation, and the community, can continue to
achieve success by working toward the same
goal,
e2
INDEX
s' �
1. Why a Greenway?
The 1976 Master Plan included a section titled "Maximization Studies" which discussed three •
concepts or approaches that are integral to the development of the riverscape. In 1995, we know
that these three concepts are really the purpose for developing our Greenway. While the primary
purpose of the Greenway is for recreation and conservation, it must also reflect the values of our
community. These values are represented in the maximization studies concepts: stewardship,
recreation and community image and tourism. How the Greenway reflects the values of our
community in these areas today and in the future is key to its success.
Stewardship
Care of the land in the Greenway is a serious responsibility. Sensitive riparian areas and wildlife
habitat must be protected. The needs of people must also be considered. To properly care for the
land, a management plan must be created. To create a management plan, we must become
fanuliar with our resources. Therefore, inventories of plant and animal life must be conducted;
gap analysis of missing species is recommended; wetlands should be identified. Reclamation of
degraded areas should continue. Interpretive signing, viewing platforms and trails can be added.
Access should be limited in extremely sensitive areas. The success of stewardship will depend
in large part on the involvement of the community as well as state and local regulatory agencies.
Regulatory agencies include Yakima. County, cities of Yakima, Union Gap' and Selah; Washington
state departments of Ecology, Natural Resouces, Transportation and Fish and Wildlife; and the
Yakama Indian Nation.
Recreation
With the awareness of the need for physical fitness and stress reduction in an over -stimulated
society, active and passive recreation along a beautiful river meets the needs of many people. The
Greenway currently provides a wide range of recreational opportunities including walking,
running, biking, skating, fishing, bird -watching, lawn games (Frisbee, volleyball, etc.), picnicking
and boating (canoe, kayak, raft, drift boat, etc.). Greenway programs and events, such as the Gap -
to -Gap Relay, EAGLE Earth Day and Winter Walk, also showcase these natural and recreation
resources. Other opportunities abound and should be considered and planned for in the future.
For example, a primitive group camp for day or overnight use on an island off the Jewett Pathway
is being studied and could be operational by 1996. Other ideas include: skate park, BMX bike
course, putting green, unpaved nature trails, lawn bowling, horseshoe pits, a children's maze,
basketball courts ---the possibilities are endless, but each use must be appropriate and harmonious
with the riparian corridor.
Community Image and Tourism
The river corridor is the gateway to the greater Yakima urban area; people want to have an
inviting, aesthetically pleasing entrance to their home town. A park -like, well-maintained
appearance along the river, clearly being enjoyed by many, shows a sense of community pride to
residents and visitors alike. Therefore, riverside lands must be kept clean and development
appropriate. Providing river access for recreation and enjoyment of the natural environment
benefits both image and tourism. The addition of interpretive facilities providing education and
information on river systems, geology, riparian care, plant and animal life and historical and
cultural perspectives complements the image and tourism goals and should be a priority. Proper
stewardship of the river corridor while providing recreational opportunities is the Greenway's
ultimate contribution to a strong community image which, in turn, enhances t
INDEX
1
•
•
Il. 1976 Master Plan Findings and Reoommendations Status Report
The 1476 Master Plan included a list of nine findings and recommendations. The 15th anniversary of the
Yakima Greenway Foundation in 1995 is an excellent time to revisit these and note where we are today in regard
to each and create a new set of recommendations for the next 15 years.
1976 Finding #1:' A continuous open -space, park and natural -area corridor between Selah Gap and Union Gap
is feasible and desirable, and there is an evident public need for a continuous greenway in that area.
1976Recommendation: The state, county, and local municipalities should adopt and implement a roaster pian
for the Yakima River Regional Greenway, recognizing the need for a continuous river -related greenway from
Selah Gap to Union Gap; appropriate agencies should introduce a bill into the state legislature formally
rocognizitig the greenway as a*conservation area; of statewide significance.
1995 Status: The 1976 Jones and Jam tester Plan was adopted bythe City and County of Yakima. The state
legislature created the Yakima River Conservation Area, 3600 acres also known as the Greenway Overlay
District. The Greenway is developed and operated by the private, nonprofit Yakima. Greenway Foundation
(originally incorporated as the Yakima River Regional Greenway Foundation).
the future. The Foundation should work to add the Naches River corridor and southeast section of the
Greenway corridor to the Conservation Area. Ultimately, the section of the Yakima River from the Selah Gap
to the Yakima Canyon should also be so protected.
1976 Finding #2: The study area contains uniquely valuable wetland areas of unusual size and richness for
an and locale.
1976 Recommendation: Valuable wetlands should be preserved in their natural state. w
1995 Status: A number of wetlands are protected by virtue of state and local laws, ownership and accessibility.
Federal, state and local regulations also affect wetland access and development. The Foundation has not taken
an active role in protecting specific wetlands.
The future: A wetland inventory should be taken within the Yakima and Naches river corridors with the goal
of identifying valuable wetland locations. Then a wetland management plan should be created and implemented.
4 Wetlands serve a wide variety of crucial natural functions including water quality maintenance, wildlife
habitat, erosion and flood control and recharge of groundwater. In addition they are valuable areas for
recreation, education and scientific study.
1976 Finding #3: The study area is being surrounded by the Yakima Urban Area, and is therefore threatened.
1976Recommendatton: The greenway should be protected against further incompatible development, new
gravel mining, and other adverse actions; public land and/or easement acquisition should take precedence over
facility development.
1995 Status: Urban development continues and most has been compatible, if not always attractive. Greenway
facility development has taken precedence over land acquisition (current facilities include 3 parks, 4 river
landings, 10 miles of pathway and natural areas with trails) in order to facilitate fundraising and to take
advantage of opportunities (usually in the form of funding) that became available. Gravel mining is no longer
considered an activity to be avoided at all costs, especially if it can provide enhancements to the river such as
salman overwintering habitat.
7Wf future: The Foundation should complete a careful study of the corridor to determine plant and animal
species presets identify land for protection and/or acquisition and create a management plan to ensure the
corridor is used and protected as appropriate.
DOC. Page 4
IND
`�lU
1976 Frnding #4. The study arca is part of an important north -south State Trails corridor: water trail--
Kittitas Valley to the Columbia; foot/horse trail—Kittitas Valley to Yakima; bicycle trail—Kittitas Valley
to the Columbia.
1976 Reconunenda&n: A continuous bicycletfoot trail should be developed from the City of Selah to
Union Gap.
1995 Status: Trail in place from Selah Gap to Valley Mau Blvd.
T7ee future: Work with City of Union Gap, DOT and private land owners to continue pathway to the Union
Gap, over the river and connect to the Lower Valley Pathway.
1976 Finding MS: There is potential for connecting this reach to the Yakima Canyon reach to form a
continuous conservation and recreation corridor.
1976Re wmnwndation: This reach should become part of a recreational trail corridor extending fromthe
Kittitas Valley to the Columbia River.
1995 Status: Land owners in the Selah Gap to Yakima Canyon area were contacted by the Foundation in
1991. At that time, they had no interest in seeing their land developed as pathway or brought into the
Conservation Area. They generally felt that they were doing an acceptable job of protecting the land and
that they did not want it open to the public.
The future: The Foundation should continue to be a resource for information and engage in ongoing
communication with interested landowners. Expandingthe Conservation Area and providing public access
via pathways and river landings can be accomplished only with the cooperation of all affected parties.
1976 Finding #6: There is enthusiastic public support for a river park in the study area.
1976Reconumendation: Citizen groups should continue to promote the greenway.
1995 Status: Three parks have been developed with different focuses serving unique functions. Sarg
Hubbard Riverside Park, 28 acres, now sits in the center ofthe Greenway at the former site o£ the city landfill
and is the Greenway's showpiece. Sherman Memorial Park, 10 acres, lies one mile to the south at the end
of the Nod Pathway. Sunrise Rotary Park was developed in 1994 and features the McGuire Community
Playground. Built at the southern tip of the Boise Cascade property, this is an outstanding example of what
the Greenway is all about: 2000 volunteers put the whole park and playground together in just five days.
The future: Because of the popularity of the parks and all Greenway facilities and activities, parking is
woefully inadequate. The Greenway must work with the city and private land owners in the area to develop
adequate parking. All parks must continue to be maintained to the highest standards.
1976 Fording #7: A significant part of the reach is publicly owned (City ofYakima., Washington State,
Yakima County); thus there is great opportunity for cementing and expanding public ownership to protect
the entire reach.
1976 Recommendation: Land -managing public agencies should seek to consolidate and connect their
holdings, and cooperatively manage them for conservation and recreation purposes. A Yakima River
Greenway Commission should be formed to coordinate public -agency actions.
1995 Status: The Greenway enjoys a remarkable relationship with city, county and state agencies which
own land in the corridor. Greenway facilities have been developed on land owned by all of these and
management agreeznents have been created and successfully operated. Because of the extent and variety
of Greenway development in the corridor, coordination between public agencies has been excellent. It is
not necessary for the Greenway to actually own the land, as the cooperative agreements have worked well.
The future:. The Greenway will continue to work with these agencies to develop and protect public land.
Consolidation of holdings may not be necessary, especially ifthe Greenway is the coordinating organization.
•
1976 rinding #8: There is an unparalleled opportunity for the social and environmental enhancement of the
Yakima Urban Area through the formation of a greenway.
1976Rrcommendation: The Yakima Urban Area should view the greenway as: an urban shaping area, a
regional and metropolitan park corridor, a regional and urban trail corridor, a pleasing gateway to the upper
Yakima Valley, a close -in natural education area, an enhancement to the riverside communities and a link in
a regional open -space system.
1995 Status: The Yakima Greenway is definitely considered to -be all of the above and has received national
recognition for its accomplishments. In 1991, Greenway volunteers were named a "Point ofLight" by President
Goorge Bush. In 1992, the Greenway path system was designated aNational Recreation Trail. The Greenways
environmental education program (EAGLE) reaches over 1000 students each year with Earth Day activities
and free curricula provided to educators. The Greenway is fondly called "the Jewel ofYakine by its citizens.
The future: The Greenway should continue to be a place for active recreation (organized programs) as well
as passive. Community involvement will continue to develop opportunites for growth of facilities, fundraising
ability and environmental awareness.
1976 F"mirmg #9: The study area is suitable for a wide range of recreational uses (including lake boating,
bicycle trails, foot trails, river floating, fishing, picnicking, group camping, field games, and indoor recreation)
and conservation programs (including a natural -studies center, interpretive nature trails, viewing platforms,
school programs, interpretive signing and displays and wildlife management).
1976 Recommendation: Appropriate parts of the greenway should be deveJoped for recreational use, as
recommended; valuable natural areas should be protected and used for interpretiveleducational purposes.
1995 Status: The Greenway has done an excellent job of developing recreational areas including parks,
pathways, and boat landings. An environmental educationprogram (EAGLE) has also been created, using the
Greenway as a natural lab. Some natural areas have been protected but are not actively used for interpretive/
educational purposes.
Thefuture: An extensive system ofinterpretivesigns shouldbecreated andaddedtothefewthatcunrntlyexist.
Sarg Hubbard Park could be the site of a Greenway office/recreation and nature studies center. Recreational
use of the developed areas could be expanded with the addition of an active recreation program. Natural areas
need to be identified and a management plan created and implemented. This plan would include use of these
areas for educational purposes.
Additional recommendations for the future of the Greenway
All land owners in the corridor should be contacted and kept apprised of Greenway activities and plans. They
should be informed about conservation options and encouraged to work with the Greenway to ensure that all
Ind along the Yakima and Naches rivers are managed for the future.
Vandalism, including gang graffiti is a nation-wide reality and has become a serious problem throughout
Yakima; the Greenway is no exception. Parking lots are especially vulnerable to break-ins and car prowls. The
Yakima. and Union Gap b&c patrols do an excellent Job ofpatrolling the pathway during the warn season and
patrol cars from these departments and the Sheriff regularly cruise through the Greenway facilities. The
Foundation added a golf can "Courtesy Carl" operated by volunteers to patrol the pathway. Still, the problem
grows and pathway users can feel unsafe and exposed. This is a social problem facing the entire community,
but especially serious for the Greenway, as it results in declining usership which causes reduced financial
support. A solution which includes increased activities, people and presence throughout the Greenway must
be found.
Fundraising for capital expenses and ongoing maintenance and operations will continue to challenge the
Foundation, especially as the Greenway grows and competing needs in the community increase. The creation
of new facilities and programs should always include a linkage to fundraising and recruiting volunteer help.
Page 6
*SPECIAL THANKS TO KCM FOR ALLOWING USE OF THIS MAP PREPARED
YAKIMA COUNTY'S FLOOD HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN I N ® EX
MAP LEGEND
0,t* V
Gr way Landings
/ " Roads
i l ng Pathway
A�,,�P°"o Pathway
Rivers
Master Ran Designations
Greenway Desi gnati ons
Conservation
./ry I<tural
�.
Recreation
" Actual routes of proposed
pathways not determined.
YAKIMA GREENWAY PATH SYSTEM
40F7,77-;, i
P-1 Hoel Pathway Existing
P-2 Yakima Greenway Path Existing
P-3 Jewett Pathway Existing
P-4 Plath Pathway Existing
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED
IN MASTER PLAN
This Master Plan Update refers to seven areas—either recreation, conservation and natural—in the Greenway
corridor. This chart illustrates how those areas have evolved since the original 1976 Master Plan was written.
1976 1986 1221,1995
Selah Recreation
Resthaven Natural Selah Gap Recreation Selah Gap Recreation
Naches Natural Naches Natural
Roza Conservation Terrace Heights Conservation Terrace Heights Conservation
Riverside Recreation Riverside Recreation Riverside Recreation .
Sportsman's Conservation Sportman's Island Conservation ` (Included in Riverside Recreation)
Ibi-verside Conservation Riverside Conservation Riverside Conservation
Riverside Natural Union Gap Natural Union Gap Conservation
DOC.
INDEX
C 16
1
Pulbright Park (Onion Gap)
Existinq
2
Natural Area
Proposed
3
Vallev Mall Comm. Center
Proposed
4
Northwest SeCtion
Existin
5
JGCOOMway Ial. Group Camp
Proposed
6
Riverside Group Camp
Proposed
7Nob
Hi 11 Autowrecking
Proposed
B
KdA Campground
Existing
9
'Yakilm Sportsman St. Pk.
Existing
10
Shelman Memorial Park
Existing
11
Yakima Area Arboretum
Existing
12
Park Lake Area
Proposed
13
Kiwanis Park (City of Yakima)
Existing
14
Sacg Hubbard Park i Landing
lExisting
15
Hartford Property
Ptopoeed
16
Rovetto Property
Proposed
VA
Sunrise Rtry Pk./McGuice 9gd
Existing
'17B
Boise Cascade Property
Proposed
18
Rota Lake
Existia
19
Berglund Lake
Proposed
20
Smith Property
P[o osed
21
Gravel PLt Ponds
Proposed
22
Myron Lake
Proposed
L-1
Harlan Landing
Existing
L-2
Robertson Landing
Existing
L-3
Century Landing
Existing
This Master Plan Update refers to seven areas—either recreation, conservation and natural—in the Greenway
corridor. This chart illustrates how those areas have evolved since the original 1976 Master Plan was written.
1976 1986 1221,1995
Selah Recreation
Resthaven Natural Selah Gap Recreation Selah Gap Recreation
Naches Natural Naches Natural
Roza Conservation Terrace Heights Conservation Terrace Heights Conservation
Riverside Recreation Riverside Recreation Riverside Recreation .
Sportsman's Conservation Sportman's Island Conservation ` (Included in Riverside Recreation)
Ibi-verside Conservation Riverside Conservation Riverside Conservation
Riverside Natural Union Gap Natural Union Gap Conservation
DOC.
INDEX
C 16
1I1'. Greenway Corridor
r Plan, six areas (and two potential ones) were defined within the 3,600 -acre
Master Plan Update identified seven areas which included one addition an
several name changes to better define the type of property and its most appropriate use. The 199W
update also identified seven areas with one addition and one area combined with another. This
1995 update references the same areas as the 1991 Master Plan Update.
Areas are defined as natural, conservation or recreation.
A natural area has paramount natural value. Recreational use would be incidental to the goals
of preservation, enhancement and reclamation.
A conservation area has a lower natural value, _ a higher need for reclamation and enhance-
ment or a greater suitability for recreational use. Conservation areas may contain both natural
segments and recreational -use segments.
A recreation area may have natural segments, but its suitability for recreational use outweighs
its other aspects. (* = projects which are completed or in progress.) .
SELAH RECREATION AREA
(1991 Addition to 1976 Master Plan)
This area, north of Selah Crap, was added because excellent recreation opportunities exist here.
There is potential for connecting the north end of the Greenway path system with proposed paths
through the City of Selah, then linking the paths to the series of lakes between I-82 and Selah.
The boundaries of this area are the entrance to the Yakima River Canyon on the north and Selah
Gap (Harlan Landing) on the south. It is important to note that all extensions and additions to
the Greenway will be done only with the coordination between both affected land owners and
relevant government entities. is
Greenway rgtb Gralgi. P'i Pond S" l h Boat Landing
Location Both sides of
river where land forms and
water course are most suitable.
Purpose Multi -use, recre-
ational pathway.
Elements Asphalt pathway
10 -feet -wide, turnouts at sce-
nic areas, picnic tables, benches,
vaulted pit toilets.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, State of
Washington, Yakima County,
City of Selah, private landown-
ers.
Comments Incorporation of
this area into the Greenway
Overlay District will require
expansion of the Washington
State Yakima River Conserva-
tion Area, as defined by the
Washington State Legislature
in 1977.
Location North of Elks
Golf Course, south of Harrison
Road on west side of river.
Purpose Boating, canoe-
ing, fishing and swimming.
Elements Series of con-
nected ponds, boat launch
pads, vaulted pit to gar-
bage cans, parking.
Action Privately owned.
Yakima Greenway Foundation,
private landowners, Washing-
ton State Legislature, Yakima
County, City of Selah.
Comments Project would
depend on successful negotia-
tions with private land own-
ers.
Location At Harrison
Road.
Purpose To serve as north-
ernmost river access in
Greenway corridor.
Elements Boat ramp, pic-
nic facilities, parking,
restrooms.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, private
landowners, Yakima County,
City of Selah.
[Pictured at right: Harlan Lan
Ing, at the north end of th
Greenway, In the Selah Gap.]
Doc.
INDEX
SELAH GAP RECREATION AREA
(Referred to as Resthaven Natural Area in 1976 Master Plan)
This area was previously defined as a natural area. However, the area has had an increase in
recreation use since the original Master Plan and several recreational opportunities within this
area suggest that it ,is better suited as a recreation area. It is one of only three defined recreation
.areas in the Greenway corridor, two of which have been. developed.
The boundaries of this area extend from Harlan Landing on the north, to the southern end of
Rotary Lake on the south, and from the western side of Bergland (Gordon) Lake on the west, to
Resthaven Road on the east.
Existing development within the area is very limited, with a mobile home park adjacent to
Bergland Lake and a few isolated residences as the only significant developments. Railroad lines
cross the Naches River west of Bergland Lake enroute to Selah.
t.'
Location Directly in Selah Gap, with access
off Resthaven Road.
Purpose River access, picnic area and
trailhead for the Greenway path system.
Elements Nature trails, paved trails, float
launch, picnic tables, restrooms, fishing piers,
barbecue grills, volleyball court. Park -like area
around northern pond with grass and picnic
ftrp
Jandn air
Location Pond wedged between 1-82, High-
way 12 and Naches River. Access from Sixth
Avenue, and from North 1st Street on Tamarack
and Gordon . Avenues, from Harlan Landing
and from pathway system.
Purpose Natural swimming pond with ap-
propriate support facilities; possible fishing.
Elements Restroom, picnic areas, swimming
docks within pond,
circulation fountain,
garbage cans, land-
scaping improve-
ments, commercial
(vendor) structures,
pathway, links to
Selah/Noel Path-
way/Plath Pathway,
trolley stop, parking.
Action Yakima
Greenway Founda-
tion, private land-
owner, Dept. of Wild-
life, Yakima County,
City of Yakima.
Comments Project dependent on negotiations
with private landowner, trolley association, and
others. Major clean-up and continuing mainte-
nance would be expensive. Pathway currently
runs along north and west edges of lake and
links with Plath Pathway.
Page 10
DOC.
INDEX
# CI(P
... .moi: - -
" Rotary Lake
Location East of I-82, south of Naches River
confluence, west of Yakima River.
Purpose Primarily fishing lake with spe-
cial facilities for access by the disabled.
Elements Disabled -access fishing piers,
bridge over Boise Cascade intake stream, picnic
areas, restroom, path at shoreline from bridge
to piers and link to Noel Pathway. Parking lot
located about 1/4 mile south; access via 4th and
R Streets.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,.
Yakima Rotary Club grant, Washington State
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation.
Comments Could add more fishing docks
and paths if use warrants. Name has been
officially changed from Freeway to Rotary Lake
by State Geographic Board. Department of
Wildlife stocks lake annually. This facility was
dedicated in 1989.
NACHES NATURAL AREA
(1986 Addition to the 1976 Master Plan)
Adding the Naches River corridor to. the Greenway corridor "officially" will. require state
designation of this segment of the Naches as a State Conservation Area. This includes the natural
area adjacent to the Naches River before its confluence with the Yakima River.
The boundaries of this area are the mouth of Cowiche Canyon to. the west and Bergland Lake
to the east. Northern and southern boundaries will be determined by pathway locations on both
sides of Naches River.
Greenway Patlmwa°
Location Between 40th Avenue and
Cowiche Canyon Road (east end of Cowiche
Canyon Trail). Actual course to be determined.
Purpose Paved connection to existing
Greenway path system to tie in 40th Avenue,
Naches Valley, Powerhouse Canal Pathway and
Cowiche Canyon (Cowiche Canyon trail to re-
main unpaved).
Elements 10 -to -12 -feet -wide paved path,
garbage cans, benches, picnic areas, parking.
Could have additional unpaved path.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,
Yakima County, City of Yakima, private land-
owners, Department of Transportation, Cowiche
Canyon Conservancy. Possible state grants.
Comments -Some phases of project dependent
on negotiations with' private landowners. May
require expansion of the Washington State
Yakima River Conservation Area, defined by
the State Legislature in 1977.
" flath,Pathwgy
Location Between 6th Avenue and 40th Av-
enue/Fruitvale Blvd. along the Naches River, Lake
Aspen, Willow Lake and Myron Lake.
Purpose Paved transportation/recreationroute
providing connection to existing Greenway path sys-
tem from the west side of town
.dements 12 -feet wide, 3 -mile long paved path;
interpretive signage; garbage cans; benches; picnic
areas; fishing access; parking.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation, Plath
Family, Yakima County, City ofYakima, Department
ofTransportation (ISTEAgrant, DOT right-of-way),
Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Central Rail-
road, Yakama Indian Nation, private landowners.
Comments Construction began in October of
1995; dedication to follow spring 1996 completion.
0
[Pictured at right: The McGuire Playgroup 01
at Sunrise Rotary Park was built by 2000
volunteers in just five days.]
00C. .
INDEX
C- I (
TERRACE HEIGHTS CONSERVATION AREA
(Referred to as Roza Conservation Area in 1976 Master Plan)
• This area fits well into the description of a conservation area, with many natural qualities along
with a great need for reclamation and enhancement. The area includes 88 acres of open area on
the east side of I-82 across from the Boise Cascade mill. Several previously existing ponds on the
property are now filled with wood chips and plant debris.
The boundaries of this area extend from Rotary Lake on the north to the Terrace Heights Bridge
on the south. I-82 forms the west border of the area, and several roads, dikes and canals define
the east border. Little development of any kind is in the area, except an area of housing off
Hartford and Butterfield roads.
"
BobQjcadt Pr e
Location Between I-82 and Yakima River,
south of Rotary Lake, north of Terrace Heights
interchange (approximately 88 acres).
Purpose Open -space area with river ac-
cess, parks and pond fishing.
Elements Sun-
rise Rotary Park,
nature trails,
Yakima Greenway
•Pathway, picnic
sites, pond fishing.
Possible urban for-
estation project,
small parks or earth
work sculpture site.
Action Yakima
Greenway Founda-
tion, Boise Cascade,
Yakima - County,
possible Washing-
ton State Inter-
agency Committee
for Outdoor Recre-
ation grant, service
clubs (Sunrise Ro-
tary Club has ex-
pressed interest in
further developing the property north of Sun-
rise Rotary Park/McGuire Playground).
Comments Formerly owned by Boise Cas-
* Sogrist,,11otary ParknLeguire C" MMunitj
Playaround
Location Southern tip of Boise Cascase prop-
erty just west of the pathway,
Purpose Bark -fill reclamation, children's play-
ground, picnic and
rest area.
Elements Large
wooden Robert
Leathers play-
ground, vaulted pit
toilet, drinkingfoun-
tain, benches, picnic
tables, bike racks.
Action Yakima
Greenway Founda-
tion, Sunrise Rotary
Club, McGuireLum-
ber Co., 2000 volun-
teers and hundreds of
businesses who do-
nated labor and ma-
terials to make this
$250,000 park and
playground possible.
Comments B u i l t
in just five days in
May 1994 with vol-
unteer labor, this project is a source of great commu-
nity pride and the epitome ofwhat the Greenway is all
about.
iscade and used as wood and bark chip fill area,
donated to the Yakima Greenway Foundation
in 1987. Master Plan being developed by a
board committee.
ge 12
INDEX
9M5MasterPImLodAs
Res havers Road),- 5milh if rmerl Dawson * YakiMa GrreenwalPat
Pronerty
Location 25-28 acres located south and west
of Resthaven Road between the Yakima River
and Department of Wildlife property around
what used to be Resthaven Lake, which became
part of the river channel due to 1990 flood.
Purpose Natural habitat, river access.
Elements Nature trails, fishing.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,
possible Department of Natural Resources
ALEA grant, private landowner, Department
of Wildlife.
Comments Yakima Greenway Foundation
should acquire privately -owned land adjacent
to Department of Wildlife property around
former Resthaven Lake. Best used as Iimited
access area for fishing, educational purposes.
Hartford Proaerty
Location East side of river, south of Hart-
ford Road and Washington Central Railroad
trestle. North of Terrace Heights Road and
Department of Transportation property. West
of houses that line Roza Canal. About 65 acres.
Purpose Possible income-producing prop-
erty if developed for commercial purpose. Pos-
sible equestrian trails or center.
Elements Would depend on purpose.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation.
Comments Much of the property is owned by
Yakima Greenway Foundation, plus small, pri-
vately held parcels and a large parcel owned by
Department of Transportation. Greenway prop-
erty could be used as a match for state grant to
acquire other property in Greenway corridor.
Previous owner purchased property to use for
gravel mining but couldn't get the necessary
permits. City of Yakima has expressed interest
in the area for constructing ball fields.
Location Three -mile -long path on di
from Terrace Heights Drive to Harlan Landing
in Selah Gap; named National Recreation Trail
in 1992 by U.S. Dept. of the Interior.
Purpose Multi -use pathway.
Elements 10 -feet -wide, paved path with
gravel shoulders, picnic tables, benches,
restrooms and parking.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,
Yakima County, City of Yakima, Washington
State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Rec-
reation grant and Fort Simcoe IUOE Job Corps
Program. This facility is in place, dedicated in
1989.
Comments Addition of McGuire Playground
has created parking/access problems. Need to
seek additional parking and a way to handle
pathway congestion between Sarg Hubbard
Park and the playground.
u
0
RIVERSIDE RECREATION AREA
•This is the primary recreation area of the Greenway corridor. The main features are Sarg
Hubbard Riverside Park, Sherman Memorial Park, Robertson Landing, Sportsman State Park and
the Noel Pathway. "Park Lake, will be a key feature in the future. In addition to these recreation
areas, the Yakima Area Arboretum serves as an educational facility and "tree museum" and the
Sportsman Island Natural Area provides habitat for wildlife.
A large number of landowners share this central section of the Greenway, including the
county, city and state. The largest parcels include the "Park Lake" area (private) and Yakima
Sportsman State Park Existing development has had its greatest impact in this area. Several sites
would require extensive reclamation, including the auto wrecking ' yards and a 60 -acre gravel pit.
Extreme caution must be exercised in acquiring land on or near these potentially -contaminated
sites.
The boundaries of this area extend from Yakima Avenue/Terrace Heights Drive on the north
to Nob Hill Blvd./H'ighway 24 on the south. The freeway forms the western boundary, and Keys
Road and the dike form the boundary on the east.
Location West side of river just south of
Terrace Heights Drive; approximately 28 acres.
Purpose Multi -use park and recreation
grounds; reclamation of former city land fill.
Elements Picnic shelter, restroom facilities,
is
paved parking, paved pathways, Junior League
tot lot play area, Bill and Ted Robertson
Amphitheatre with bleacher seating, fountain
and island stage, fit-
ness course, Zonta pe-
destrian bridge,
Soroptomist observa-
tion platform and 'Sarg
Hubbard Natural Area
funded by Washington
Beef Site- of mainte-
nance shop . and office.
Possible future
Greenway office/visi-
tors center.
Action Yakima
Greenway Founda-
tion, Washington State
,Interagency Commit-
tee for Outdoor Recre-
ation ' grant, Fort
•
Simcoe TUOE Job Corps Program, 'City and
County of Yakima and numerous service clubs,
businesses and individuals. .
Comments City -owned land managed by
Yakima Greenway Foundation; developed in
two phases, dedicated in 1987 and 1994. Re-
quires high level of maintenance. Bus service
from downtown to park. Used as site for
Greenway fund-' and
fun -raising events in-
cluding Winter Walk,
EAGLE Earth Day,
Gap -to -Gap Relay, con-
cert series, A Case of
the Blues festival and
Great Yakima Duck
Race festival. Because
of popularity of events
and Greenway facili-
ties, additional park-
ing is desperately
needed. One possiblity
is city -owned land cur-
rently occupied by Su-
perior Asphalt (who
will be vacating winter
UL 1996-97).
Sara Hubbard Park features amenities such as these
picnic facilities that enjoy a view of the Yakima River.
Page 14
INDEX
r!
-..
LS-aLS-arg Rubbard Jap,ding
Location. West side of
river, south of Terrace Heights
Drive, adjacent to Sarg
Hubbard Park.
Purpose Provides access
to the Yakima River for non -
motorized boats.
Elements Float -launch and
picnic area.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Wash-
ington Fruit, Washington State
Department of Natural Re-
sources ALEA grant, Yakima
County.
Comments This facility was
completed in 1987.
LKiwani ' Ar (C"hyofYakhm)
Location West of Interstate
82 on East Maple and Fair Av-
enue.
Purpose Family picnic
area and team sports facilities
for recreational use.
Elements Picnic area,
tables, restrooms, softball dia-
monds.
Action Yakima City
Parks, Yakima Kiwanis Club.
Comments Although across
I-82 from the Yakima
Greenway corridor, this park
is readily accessible via the
Beech Street underpass and the
proposed Conference of Gov-
ernments trail plan that would
link the Central Washington
State Fair grounds, and areas
in between, to the Noel Path-
way. This park is managed by
City of Yakima Parks Depart-
ment.
�Egrlk ;Cake area
Location 60 -acre gravel pit
south of Sarg Hubbard Park,
west of river and pathway.
Purpose Non -motorized
boating and water -related park
uses plus commercial develop-
ment and recreational activi-
ties; e.g., open air restaurant,
boat rental, motel facilities, of-
fices.
Elements Reclaim gravel
pit including grading, reveg-
etationi, enhancement and sta-
bilization of lake area. Con-
struction of docks, floats, mo-
tels, restaurant, paved parking
and paths.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, City of
Yakima, private landowner,
Central Pre -Mix.
Comments Central feature
south of Sarg Hubbard Park.
Requires continued negotia-
tions with property owner for
possible future acquisition of
lake area. Community task
force led by the Foundation is
studying best use of entire area
from standpoint of landowner,
Central Pre -Mix and commu-
nity. Gravel mining permit
with Department of Natural Re-.
sources requires reclamation of
pit for use as recreation area,
with 3:1 slopes above and be-
low water level. Mniing should
be complete in 1996, according
to Central Pre -Mix.
* Yakima Ar as Arbor n�a
Location West side of the
river south of "Park Lake" area
and north of Highway 24 adja-
cent to interstate 82; approxi-
mately 35 acres. -
Purpose Regional arbor
tum.
Elements Study collec-
tions, ornamental displays, spe-
cial shows and programs, park
nursery, trails, Jewett Interpre-
tive Center, Plath Solarium.
Action Yakima Area Ar-
boretum and City of Yakima.
Comments Managed by
separate non-profit foundation,
Yakima Area Arboretum. Land
owned by City of Yakima.
* Sherman Memorial Park;
Location West side of
river, north - of Highway 24,
adjacent to Yakima Area Arbo-
retum; approximately 6 acres.
Pwpose Park, picnic area,
pathway connection.
Elements Fred Westberg
Memorial Picnic Pavilion, bar-
becues, natural areas, paved
parking, tot play area, south-
ern terminus of Noel Pathway.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, City of
Yakima, Yakima Kiwanis Club.
Comments This facility was
dedicated in 1984. The land is
owned by the City of Yakima
and" managed by Yakima
Greenway Foundation. In 1992,
the "Shields Addition" of the
park (5 acres in the southwest
comer) was donated to the Ar-
boretum. In 1994 the Westberg
picnic shelter and additional
parking were added, a gift of
the Yakima Kiwanis Club. Park
could be improved with
plantings, especially along the
Arboretum fence line.
DOC.
* >El; harts n In
Wocation
West side of
river, north of Highway 24,
south of West Birchfield Road.
Purpose Float access to
river and recreation facilities.
Elements Picnic areas with
barbecues, paved nature trails,
paved parking, restroom facili-
ties, river float launch area.
Northern terminus for Jewett
Pathway. • • Future connecting
point for Noel Pathway and
Jewett Pathway if easement can
be acquired from private land
owner (center section of dike
between Robertson Landing
and place where pathway
drops off dike into Arboretum
area).
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway foundation,
*obertson Charitable Trust,
akima County, Washington
State Department of Natural
Resources ALEA grant.
Comments Floods fre-
quently (in 1990 boat ramp was
washed away; in 1995, ramp
was covered with gravel and
extensive damage occurred).
Should be maintained as natu-
ral area for low .maintenance.
This facility was completed in
1997. In 1995, mining project
was begun by the Yakima
County Diking Improvement
District. This three-phase
project will result in salmon
overwintering ponds, provide
gravel to raise the dike on the
east side of the river and create
a swimming pond and beach
r Greenway users. Project
xpected to be completed in
1996.
T otbrwid a CE2M1i11g
Location Old Moxee
bridge crossing at West
Birchfield Road. (Now part of
Robertson Landing.)
Purpose To provide foot
and bicycle traffic access be-
tween park areas on east and
west sides of river.
Elements Glue lam arch
bridge or suspension bridge
suitable for foot and bicycle
traffic.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation,
Washington State Parks.
Department.
Comments Department of
Transportation has created
plans to include dedicated pe-
destrian/bicycle access as an
element of reconfiguring the
present Highway 24 bridge
over the river. Date of actual
construction is unknown due
to funding constraints.. This
would make development of
the footbridge a lower priority,
as there would be a safe river
crossing to connect the west -
and east -side pathways and
parks.
Yalcirna Svorftman alteplark
Location - East side of river,
Terrace Heights Drive to West
Birchfield Road. Large natural
island in river is part of park-
Purpose
arkPurpose Washington
state park with extensive facili-
ties for overnight camping,
day -use picnic and recreational
activities and natural areas.
Elements Overnight camp-
ing, RV parking with utility
services, day -use picnic area,
child play areas, paved park-
ing, nature trails. Sportsman
Island has high natural value
and provides good wildlife
habitat.
Action Washington
State Parks, Yakima Greenway
Foundation.
Comments Camping facili-
ties and natural areas should
be expanded. State Parks De-
partment has been purchasing
property north of park, up to
Terrace Heights Drive so they
can control land from dike to
river. They ultimately plan to
work with Yakima Greenway
Foundation to put a path on the
dike between Highway 24 and
Terrace Heights Drive.
®®CPage 16
INDEX
C-l(o
1995 MasterPlanUpdale
Location East side of the
river adjacent to Highway 24..
Purpose Commercial
overnight RV Park.
Elements Extensive RV
park with utility hookups, play-
grounds, cabins, recreation fa-
cilities, convenience store, RV
services.
Action Private owner-
ship.
Comments A compatible use
of land within the Greenway.
* Greenway Path
Location East and west
side of the river on dike system
between Terrace Heights Drive
and Nob Hill Blvd.
Purpose A multi -use,
paved pathway for recreational
use would provide a path loop
in central section of Greenway.
Elements A - 10 -feet -wide
paved pathway for bicycling
and foot traffic ultimately to
run the length of the park sys-
tem. Possible future expan-
sion to link with state fair
grounds and Conference of
Governments -designated
Yakima Valley bike routes.
Action Yakima County,
Yakima Greenway Foundation,
Washington State Parks De-
partment, Washington State
Interagency Committee for
Outdoor Recreation grant.
Comments The 1.6 -mile
Noel Pathway from the
Terrace Heights Drive under-
pass to Sherman Memorial Park
was completed in 1984. Link-
ing Noel Pathway to Jewett
Pathway at Robertson Land-
ing will require obtaining ease-
ments on dike from two pri-
vate landowners (one of whom
is willing, the other not).
Na Hill Jo &reS1U"pg and
Hicks ProAerty
Location North of
Robertson Landing (Birchfield
Road dead end) and east of
Sherman Park/Arboretum
area.
Purpose Need easements
from these private landowners
for path on dike.
Elements Pathway connec-
tion between Noel Pathway,
Robertson Landing and Jewett
Pathway.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway, Foundation, Yakima
County and private landown-
ers. .
Comments Hazardous
waste liability laws will prob-
ably keep Yakima Greenway
Foundation' from acquiring t
property due to high cost fa
reclamation.
RIVERSIDE CONSERVATION AREA
This area has strong natural value, but could also blend in a group camping area as an
*important recreation element. Several gravel pit ponds exist and require reclamation.
Most properties are large holdings, including several parcels owned by the Yakima Greenway
Foundation. The greatest impact on the east side of the river now comes from grazing, which has
weakened the stability of the edges and reduced its quality as a habitat area, and an operating
gravel pit which limits river access. On the west side, the greatest impacts are commercial
developments and the City of Yakima Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Although several features of this area (addressed below) could be developed, the major section
of this region will be maintained as a conservation area with the specific goal of providing a
natural border to the river. Another goal will be to develop a riverside pathway, in addition the
the Jewett Pathway, where feasible.
The boundaries of this area are Nob Hill Boulevard/Highway 24 on the north and Valley Mall
Boulevard (and the area directly across the river from Valley Mall Boulevard) on the south. Like
the other conservation areas, the freeway determines the western boundary, and Birchfield,
Thorp and Riverside Roads form the eastern boundary.
Location West side of river from Robertson
Landing to Valley Mall Boulevard.
Purpose Multi -use pathway for recre-
ational use, connecting with the Noel Pathway.
Elements An 8- to N -feet -wide, multi -use,
paved pathway; turnouts for benches and pic-
nic tables; parking; and restrooms.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,
Don and Helen. Jewett, Yakima County, City of
Yakima, Dept. of Transportation, Washington
State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Rec-
ceation grant, private landowners.
Comments This 1.8 -mile section of path was
built in 1993 and dedicated in July. It is the first
pathway built by the Greenway that is not
entirely on top of dike, as it leaves the city -
owned dike just south of the spray fields and
travels across DOT and private property. Trees
were planted on the city property in spring of
1995 as an Eagle Scout project to screen the
pathway from the spray fields (both visual
screening and to keep spray off pathway). Just
west of the path at the south end of the city
property is a settling pond that will be the site of
•a bird viewing station built in partnership with
the city and ' Audubon Society.
GreenWal, Island g on m
Location Large island in the river off the
Jewett Pathway just north of the Mer property.
Northern tip owned by City of Yakima,' south-
ern tip owned by Central Pre Mix, balance
owned by DOT.
Purpose Primitive youth day and over-
night camp, environmental education center.
Elements No permanent structures except
possible vaulted pit toilets and potable water
stations. Camping to be restricted to certain
areas, pond for canoeing, fishing, nature trails.
Action Yakima Greenway Foundation,
Dept. of Tansportation, City of Yakima, private
land owner, Boy Scouts, YMCA, Camp Fire and
other youth -oriented organizations.
Comments DOT has given Greenway per-
mission to begin studying the area for this use.
Greenway would manage reservations, other
organizations would provide insurance, main-
tenance and security. Area to be studied for one
or two years beginning summer of 1995 before
decision made as to ultimate use of island.
DOC Page 18
INDEX
Locotion East side of river, south of High-
way 24; privately owned, currently being mined
by Central Pre -Mix. Includes several man-
made ponds.
Purpose Ideal regional, youth group camp
and retreat upon termination of mining. Owner
has considered building a private campground.
Elements If developed as youth camp, ele-
ments . could include pole building, a primitive
camping area with "Adirondack" shelters, a
fire circle meeting area and natural play area.
Its primary purpose would be for youth organi-
zations and visiting groups.
Action Private owner, City and County
of Yakima, Yakima Greenway Foundation.
School districts, YMCA, YWCA, youth and
church groups and civic organizations could
also become involved.
Comments There is a need for a youth camp-
ing retreat facility closer to Yakima. This would
be a good opportunity to use volunteer labor of
youth and church groups and civic organiza-
tions. Private campground would also be a
compatible use. (If the Greenway Island Camp
works out, other plaits could be, made for this
area.) Action contingent on land owner's inter-
ests and plans.
" Northwest Section
Location West side of river (west of dike
and Jewett Pathway), south of Highway 24 to
southern edge of city spray field.
Purpose Commercial development and
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Action City of Yakima, conservation
groups, Yakima Greenway Foundation, and
private landowners.
Comments Encourage future commercial de-
velopment to adhere to Greenway design stan-
dards. Existing commercial development and
Wastewater Treatment Plant should be screened
from I-82 and Jewett Pathway with additional
plantings.
Valley Mall Interchanze _Cornourclal Cluster
Loc on East side of I-82 at Valley Me
Interchange, currently in private ownership.
Purpose To meet recreation- and tourist -
oriented commercial needs and to provide con-
venient public access to southern terminus of
the Jewett Pathway.
Elements • Parking lot and vaulted pit toilet
for Jewett Pathway, southern terminus of Jewett
Pathway, future commercial development of
high ground west of Spring Creek; lower inten-
sity uses such as overnight camping.
Action Private landowners, Yakima
County, City of Union Gap, DOT, Yakima
Greenway Foundation.
Comments Property is situated within the
City of Union Gap. Land owner is interested in
allowing the area to be mined (5 -year project);
resulting ponds would become salmon over-
wintering site and possibly swimming areas.
Agreement between landowner (Edler), Co-
lumbia Ready Mix and Foundation states tha
ponds and adjacent areas will be turned over t
Greenway for use as park/open space. Owner
is interested in some commercial development
east of Spring Creek and west of the ponds;
acreage and type of development to be deter-
mined at future date. Agreement states that
proper buffers will be provided between Spring
Creek and ponds and development will adhere
to. Greenway design standards.
•
UNION GAP CONSERVATION AREA
(Referred to as Riverside Natural Area in 1976 Master Plan, changed to Union Gap Natural
Area in 1986 Update, changed to Union Gap Conservation Area in 1991 Update)
The most lush and natural part of the entire Greenway, this area remains as it does today
primarily because it has never been diked. The result is a widely braided river with many
channels of varying size and volume. With the exception of two carefully placed projects, the area
is to remain largely undeveloped.,
The northem boundary of this area is Valley Mall Boulevard on the west side of the river and
corresponding points on the east side of the river, the Union Gap is the southern boundary; I-82
and SR 97 form the western boundary; Thorp and Birchfield Roads form the eastern boundary.
Natural Area
w -Century Landine
Location East side of river
in Union Cap at bend of river
where it flows under I-82.
Purpose River -float boat
launch and removal facility.
Elements Picnic areas with
barbecues, nature trails, paved
parking, restroom facilities and
river float ramp.
Actions Y a k 1 m a
Greenway Foundation,
Woman's Century Club Jun-
iors, Yakima County, State De-
partment of Natural Resources
ALEA grant.
Comments This facility was
completed in 1987. Because of
its isolated location, it is the
target of severe vandalism and
dumping. This problem needs
to be addressed.
Greenway, Path
Location East and west
sides of river at Union Gap.
Purpose To provide trail
connections to lower Yakima
Valley.
Elements Pedestrian/bi-
cycle trail connecting the Jewett
Pathway to points south, in-
cluding Lower Valley Pathway.
Action . Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Yakima
County and State Department
of Transportation City of Union
Gap.
Comments Providing access
to the Parker/Buena area will
require construction of a river
crossing. An alternative is to
cantilever a bike path on the
I-82 bridge. --Department of
Transportation, Yakima
County and the City of Union
Gap should be encouraged to
include bike/pedestrian path-
ways throughout the area in
their transportation master
plans.
Eullbri ht Park uth Aclivi.
jiesdark Iran Li k
Location South end of
Greenway near site of former
Union Gap Sewage Treatment
Plant.
Purpose To link west side
river trails to Union Gap's
Fullbright Park and the
county's Youth Activities Park.
Elements Pedestrian, bi-
cycle and equestrian trails; river
access; and trailhead parking
at the mouth of Ahtanum
Creek.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Yakima
County and City of Union Gap,
Department of Transportation.
Page 20
DOC.
INDEX
# C-
Location East side of river
to Riverside Road and its ex-
tension south to Thorp Road
within the flood "plain, exclud-
ing existing residential devel-
opment.
Purpose A natural buffer
zone between any develop-
• ment and the river to' protect
the riparian habitat.
Elements Wildlife habitat,
protected area.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Yakima
County, private land owners.
Comments. Little develop-
ment has taken place in the
area and, currently, gazing has
had the only significant impact.
This land needs more protec-
tion than it currently has. It is
not covered by Greenway
Overlay District provisions of
the Yakima Urban Area Zon-
ing Ordinance because it is
outside the Urban Area bound-
aries. It is desirable for the
Yakima Greenway Foundation
to acquire this land (or conser-
vation easements on it) for long-
•
term management as a wildlife
refuge.
.
w -Century Landine
Location East side of river
in Union Cap at bend of river
where it flows under I-82.
Purpose River -float boat
launch and removal facility.
Elements Picnic areas with
barbecues, nature trails, paved
parking, restroom facilities and
river float ramp.
Actions Y a k 1 m a
Greenway Foundation,
Woman's Century Club Jun-
iors, Yakima County, State De-
partment of Natural Resources
ALEA grant.
Comments This facility was
completed in 1987. Because of
its isolated location, it is the
target of severe vandalism and
dumping. This problem needs
to be addressed.
Greenway, Path
Location East and west
sides of river at Union Gap.
Purpose To provide trail
connections to lower Yakima
Valley.
Elements Pedestrian/bi-
cycle trail connecting the Jewett
Pathway to points south, in-
cluding Lower Valley Pathway.
Action . Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Yakima
County and State Department
of Transportation City of Union
Gap.
Comments Providing access
to the Parker/Buena area will
require construction of a river
crossing. An alternative is to
cantilever a bike path on the
I-82 bridge. --Department of
Transportation, Yakima
County and the City of Union
Gap should be encouraged to
include bike/pedestrian path-
ways throughout the area in
their transportation master
plans.
Eullbri ht Park uth Aclivi.
jiesdark Iran Li k
Location South end of
Greenway near site of former
Union Gap Sewage Treatment
Plant.
Purpose To link west side
river trails to Union Gap's
Fullbright Park and the
county's Youth Activities Park.
Elements Pedestrian, bi-
cycle and equestrian trails; river
access; and trailhead parking
at the mouth of Ahtanum
Creek.
Action Y a k i m a
Greenway Foundation, Yakima
County and City of Union Gap,
Department of Transportation.
Page 20
DOC.
INDEX
# C-
199510asterPlanUpdate
-1V. band Use Policy
Initial policies to protect and
preserve the Yakima Greenway
were adopted by the Board
County Commissioners in the
1974 Yakima County Shoreline
Master Program. The County
Shoreline Master Program was
written to implement the Shorelines Management Act which was
approved by state voters three years earlier. The purpose of the
Yakima County Masser Program
is to promote the reasonable use of Yakima County shorelines, preserve and • protect fragile natural
shoreline resources and increase public access to publicly owned shorelines where higher use
levels are desirable.
The Yakima River shoreline
Two years later, Yakima
not been river- or recreation -
from Selah Gap to Union Gap
County and the City of Yakima
oriented and, for the most part,
was singled out as a uniquely
adopted the Yakima Urban
does not enhance the Greenway
valuable recreation, conserva-
Area Comprehensive Plan to
'corridor. Protection for the
tion and scenic resource when
guide growth and develop-
Greenway corridor, referred to
�.
the state legislature created the
ment within the city and the
so optimistically in the 1986
d
Washington State Yakima River
unincorporated area surround-
Master Plan Update, has
Conservation Area in 1977.
ing it. Included in the plan was
proven to be. inadequate. For
`
This legislation defined the
a policy statement that the cit-
this reason, the Yakima
boundaries of the Greenway
ies of Yakima and Union Gap
Greenway . Foundation Board
corridor and authorized the
and Yakima County would co-
advocates the application of
Yakima County Commission-
ordinate the acquisition and
design standards, such as those
ers to coordinate the acquisi-
development of the Greenway.
outlined: in Appendix I, to all
tion and development of land
This policy was implemented
commercial and recreation
within the Greenway for con-
in 1986 when the City of Yakima
development within the orig�
servation, park and parkway
and Yakima County jointly
nal 3600 -acre Greenway corri-
purposes.
adopted a single zoning ordi-
dor.
In August, 1979, the Board
nance for the Yakima urban
These design standards
of Yakima County Commis-
area.
were adopted by the board of
sinners adopted a resolution
The "Urban Area Zoning
directors as part 'of the 1991
clarifying county policy with
Ordinance" includes a
update. They were taken to the
a.
regard to further commercial
Greenway Overlay District to
Yakima Urban Area Regional
and industrial development
coordinate the provisions of the
Planning Commission as part
r,+
within the Greenway corridor.
zoning ordinance with the
of the adoption process. At a
Under this policy, areas previ-
more detailed policies adopted
public hearing, the design stan-
ously zoned for commercial
in this plan. Under terms of the
dards received no negative
and industrial uses were rec-
Overlay District, all develop-
comments, but numerous pri-
k'i°
ognized and retained. How-
meet, except single family
vate land owners were alarmed
ever, developers were "encour-
dwellings and duplexes, re-
by language in the update re -
aged to design structures and
quires a higher level of admin-
lating to use of firearms and
landscaping for maximum
istrative review and approval
gravel mining. As a result of
compatibility with the
in order to ensure that the
the opposition stated at the
C
Greenway Master Plan." In
Yakima Greenway is protected
hearing, the 1991 Master Plan
=
addition, requests to rezone
as a natural resource for all to
Update was not adopted but is
additional land within the
Greenway corridor for com-
enjoy.
Unfortunately, some com-
to be used as a .reference docu
went by planners..
_.
mercial or industrial uses were
mercial development subse-
Subsequently, a number of
discouraged.
quent to the 1986 update has
developments have occurred
p
DOC.
•
•
in the Greenway corridor, our
design standards were pre-
sented to the developers and
they were requested to develop
accordingly. Some complied
(Oxford Suites, Washington
Fruit Commission) and one did
not (Wal-Mart) because the
City had not adopted them.
This experience has resulted in
the current update and the re-
newed commitment to have
this update and design stan-
dards adopted by the cities and
county.
Unsuitable Uses:
Discharge of Firearms in
and around the urbanized ar-
eas poses a severe hazard to
Greenway users. Yakima
County should coordinate with
Department of Fish and Wild-
life to set regulations and pos-
sibly establish the entire
Greenway corridor as a game
refuge, off limits to firearms.
Private hunting clubs and pri-
vate lands that allow hunting
exist in the southern section of
the Greenway corridor. This
area will be excluded from this
prohibition until the land own-
ers discontinue that use.
Trapping should be moni-
tored and controlled by the
Dept. of Fish and . Wildlife.
Ultimately, this Master Plan
update must be adopted by the
cities of Yakima and Union Gap
and Yakima County. Further-
more, the Greenway Founda-
tion must work to incorporate
this Master Plan into
Greenway Overlay District pro-
visions in the Urban Area Zon-
ing Ordinance and should seek
to have the county apply the
standards to the southeastern
area of the Greenway corridor,
the area that lies outside the
boundaries of the Urban Area
Zoning Ordinance. Ideally,
Off-road motorized ve-
hicles are not compatible with
recreational, multi -use path-
way or conservation areas.
Gravel Mining should not
be allowed except in areas
where zoning and Deparment
of Natural Resource mining
permits with acceptable recla-
mation plans are granted. The
Greenway may support short-
term projects that will result in
improvements to the river (such
as salmon overwintering habi-
tat and protected open space).
The Greenway corridor follows
the Yakima River and should
be left primarily as a river -ori-
ented corridor. Several lakes
created by gravel mining exist
within- the corridor and are, or
will be, developed for recre-
ation or reclaimed for "natural
habitat areas".
these design standards would
eventually apply to the two
new sections (the Naches River
corridor and the Yakima River
corridor north to the Yakima
River Canyon). But adoption
of design standards applicable
to the existing Greenway corri-
dor should not necessarily be
tied to legislation resulting in
expansion of the Greenway.
The application of the design
standards to the two new sec-
tions should be negotiated
separately with the appropri-
ate governmental agency.
Compatible Uses:
Commercial development
is important to the overall goal
of blending the. vital elements
of community image and tour-
ism, recreation and steward-
ship. However, commercial de-
velopment must be placed in
the Greenway with a great deal
of planning and consideration
for the other needs of the
Greenway. For this reason,
commercial development has
been encouraged only in those
areas already zoned or devel-
oped commercially. All devel-
opment should comply with
Greenway design standards in
order to maintain the integrity
of the Greenway and a park-
like appearance'throughout the
corridor.
This Yaldma Greenway 1995 Master Plan Update includes design standards which should
be observed by all new development within the Greenway corridor in order to demon-
strate compliance with the Master Plan. (See Appendix I for Design Standards.)
DOC. Page 22
INDEX
C -, L
I
r
V. Vision For'The Future
The success of the Greenway concept in Yakima has visually enhanced our Valley and greatly
improved our duality of life. Strong community support has led the Foundation to draft a vision
of our Valley in the future, one with the Greenway concept applied beyond the Greenway corridor
boundaries.
The Foundation's vision of Yakima in the future includes a scenic parkway on the eastern
border of the Greenway corridor connecting Yakima Valley Highway and the scenic Yakima River
Canyon Highway. Enterprises related to tourism and recreation could be located between the
Greenway and the parkway, with industrial parks and residential communities located on the
eastern edge.
F
As development occurs between downtown Yakima and the Greenway, urban design and
P planning decisions should be made to leverage the attributes of the Greenway to the benefit of
these new developments. Dynamic, enticing circulation routes between downtown and the
Greenway ` could greatly enhance the allure of the area.
F Designation of 66th Avenue, or 72nd Avenue and Ahtanum Road, or, Ahtanum Creek as
'a greenbelt areas with provisions for paths and trails, would provide a green border and inviting
circulation route around the Upper Valley. Extensions of the trail system to Naches, Selah, Moxee,
w,4 West Valley and the Lower Valley along corridors historically used for railroads'and canals, etc.,
will create a significant bicycle commuter network for locals as well as a nationally -know
showcase for tourists.
1 !Mending the Greenway corridor to encompass the Plath Pathway and Naches River will lead
' to a trail system connecting the present pathway to the Cowiche Canyon Conservancy. ' Finally,
extension of the Greenway corridor north along the Yakima River through Selah, to the Yakima
River canyon (and ultimately connected with the Mountains to Sound Greenway via the Iron
Horse State Park Trail), could lead to a trail system through scenic land currently inaccessible to
the public and would serve as a valuable link between the cities of Yakima and Selah.
The purpose of this vision is not to dictate land use, but rather dream of possibilities and
suggest alternatives. It will be up to the people of our Valley to decide if this vision is
reasonable and attainable and if so, to make the dream a reality --just like the -Yakima
Greenway today! (See Appendix II for related drawings.)
0
At
Design Standards
Introduction •
In 1960, Kevin Lynch produced a book called Image of the City. He defines imageability as "that
quality in a physical object which gives it a high probability of evoking a strong image in any given
observer".
The city of Venice, Italy ' is a good example of a highly imageable public environment with its
waterways and gondolas. The city of Leavenworth is another example. When you think of
Leavenworth, you immediately picture the image of a Bavarian Village.
Our Yakima River and our Greenway also
have great potential for evoking a strong image
among observers. To accomplish this we must
ensure that the Greenway corridor is distinct
and remarkable. It should invite the eye and the
emotions to greater attention and participation.
The purpose of the Yakima Greenway Foun-
dation is to conserve, enhance and maintain the
Yakima Greenway as a continuing, living re-
source for future generations. Since the Yakima
Greenway Master Plan was written and adopted
by the state and county in 1976, there has been
a need to establish development standards to
secure the implementation of this plan. Devel-
opment standards can help preserve the river's
riparian environment and, at the same time,
create a waterfront with a distinct image that
will benefit landowners, Greenway users and
the community.
The Yakima Greenway has emerged as a
model for private river conservation. However,
the strength of the private foundation would be
greatly enhanced if local governments adopted
standards to guide development within the
Greenway corridor.
The Design Standards Task Force for the
Yakima Greenway Foundation has contem-
plated design standards for the Greenway and,
in the process, has reviewed approaches by
cities such as Tempe, Arizona; Chico, Califor-
nia; Scottsdale, Arizona; Leavenworth; and
Winthrop. These cities established their respec-
tive standards to create a certain image, encour-
age tourism or to simply increase the value of
their environment. In each case, the result was
not only increased revenue but a tremendous
increase in community enthusiasm, pride and
use of their resource.
Yakima has a limited resource in our Yakima
River corridor, the area designated as the Yakima
Greenway. There are different -opinions on
how to use this resource. Because of population
growth, and I-82 as the western border of the
Greenway, we are experiencing pressure from
people desiring to use land along the river. The
visual quality of the Yakima River corridor will
be affected with each new development. We
must apply aesthetic consideration when co
templati�ng any new developments with. a vi
sual or functional relationship to the Greenway.
This can be accomplished through the adoption
and implementation of design standards.
The design standards adopted by the Foun-
dation as part of the 1991 update were modified
in 1995 in a number of areas. The changes
address signs (Section 101 I.), buildings (Sec-
tion 102 D.), landscaping (Section 104 A. and B.)
and off-street parking setbacks (Section 105)
and landscaping (Section 106 B.) These changes
make the standards easier for developers' com-
pliance, yet maintain the park -like appearance
of the development for acceptable compatiblity
with the Greenway.
The Yakima Greenway is our most impor-
tant natural asset. It is worth preserving for the
benefit of all Yakima citizens. The community
has taken the initial steps to make the Greenway
a very special place. We need to take the next
step now to ensure that it will be a very speciae
place for future generations.
•
100 Design 5Jgndard1,,,- gSn r l
The Yakima Greenway Foundation is con-
cerned about the appearance of the developed
environment in the Greenway corridor. It is
important that new development have the ap-
pearance of quality architectural and landscape
variation that will ensure compatibility with its
location in the Greenway. Projects character-
ized by a lack of architectural interest, intense
site development with inadequate open space,
and incomplete site or building design do not
conform to Greenway community values.
The design standards set forth below are
intended to reflect these Greenway community
values and to ensure that high standards of
design are evident in all development. It is the
objective of the design standards to:
A. Preserve the characteristics of the exist-
ing Yakima River riparian environment;
B. Maintain design compatibility between
existing and new development including, but
not limited to, style, scale and building materi-
als;
C. Provide variety in building and site de-
sign for allowed uses emphasizing variations in
setbacks, height, elevation and transition;
D. Apply an overall design and landscap-
ing scheme to all elevations and sides of a
project; and
E. Emphasize the use of landscaping, par-
ticularly using large shade and street trees.
101 Desi nd - Site
The site should be designed to create a devel-
opment which is pleasant in character, human
in scale and facilitates on-site circulation. The
design should demonstrate compatibility with
existing or desired character of the surrounding
area.
A. Proposed grading should blend with the
contours of adjacent properties.
B. Existing natural features such as trees,
other native vegetation, natural ground forms,
water and view should be retained to the maxi-
mum extent feasible.
C. Minimize the visual impact and pres-
ence of . vehicles by generally siting parking
areas to the rear or side of the property rather
than along street frontages, and screening park-
ing areas from view, both interior and exterior,
to the site.
D. Separate facilities for vehicle and pedes-
trian traffic.
E.Screen exterior trash and storage areas,
service yards, loading docks and utility services
from view of all nearby streets and adjacent
structures in a manner that is compatible with
building and site design.
F. All exterior lighting should be functional,
subtle and architecturally integrated with the
site and building design. All exterior lighting
should be directed onto the site and away from
adjacent residential properties.
G. A portion of each of the common, open
spaces in a project should be designed to pro-
vide opportunity for recreational use, rather
than used only to meet setback requirements
and to landscape otherwise usable spaces.
H. Where appropriate, provide bicycle park-
ing with access from adjacent streets, drive-
ways or paths.
I. All freestanding signs shall be of a monu-
ment type, except those located along arterial
streets.
Page 26
DOC.
Sections
100
Design Standards - General
•101
Design Standards - Site
102
Design Standards - Building
103
Design Standards - Landscaping
104
Design Standards - Landscaped
Open Space
105
Off -Street Parking - Location
106
Off -Street Parking - Landscaping
107
Improvements to be provided by the
Developer
•
100 Design 5Jgndard1,,,- gSn r l
The Yakima Greenway Foundation is con-
cerned about the appearance of the developed
environment in the Greenway corridor. It is
important that new development have the ap-
pearance of quality architectural and landscape
variation that will ensure compatibility with its
location in the Greenway. Projects character-
ized by a lack of architectural interest, intense
site development with inadequate open space,
and incomplete site or building design do not
conform to Greenway community values.
The design standards set forth below are
intended to reflect these Greenway community
values and to ensure that high standards of
design are evident in all development. It is the
objective of the design standards to:
A. Preserve the characteristics of the exist-
ing Yakima River riparian environment;
B. Maintain design compatibility between
existing and new development including, but
not limited to, style, scale and building materi-
als;
C. Provide variety in building and site de-
sign for allowed uses emphasizing variations in
setbacks, height, elevation and transition;
D. Apply an overall design and landscap-
ing scheme to all elevations and sides of a
project; and
E. Emphasize the use of landscaping, par-
ticularly using large shade and street trees.
101 Desi nd - Site
The site should be designed to create a devel-
opment which is pleasant in character, human
in scale and facilitates on-site circulation. The
design should demonstrate compatibility with
existing or desired character of the surrounding
area.
A. Proposed grading should blend with the
contours of adjacent properties.
B. Existing natural features such as trees,
other native vegetation, natural ground forms,
water and view should be retained to the maxi-
mum extent feasible.
C. Minimize the visual impact and pres-
ence of . vehicles by generally siting parking
areas to the rear or side of the property rather
than along street frontages, and screening park-
ing areas from view, both interior and exterior,
to the site.
D. Separate facilities for vehicle and pedes-
trian traffic.
E.Screen exterior trash and storage areas,
service yards, loading docks and utility services
from view of all nearby streets and adjacent
structures in a manner that is compatible with
building and site design.
F. All exterior lighting should be functional,
subtle and architecturally integrated with the
site and building design. All exterior lighting
should be directed onto the site and away from
adjacent residential properties.
G. A portion of each of the common, open
spaces in a project should be designed to pro-
vide opportunity for recreational use, rather
than used only to meet setback requirements
and to landscape otherwise usable spaces.
H. Where appropriate, provide bicycle park-
ing with access from adjacent streets, drive-
ways or paths.
I. All freestanding signs shall be of a monu-
ment type, except those located along arterial
streets.
Page 26
DOC.
LO -21 &LsIgg allgdlrdl,- lgil4ing
There is no single design theme for the
Greenway. Good design should reflect a com-
patibility with the character of the area. Design
compatibility is a particularly sensitive consid-
eration. Compatibility includes building style,
size, setback, form, color and material consider-
ations.
A. A consistent color scheme, or a variety of
compatible color schemes, should be used
throughout a project and the scheme(s) should
not contrast negatively with the character of the
area.
B. The design of projects containing many
buildings should provide variety in building
size and grouping. A mixture of single- and
multi -story buildings should be used.
C. The building design should exhibit vari-
ety by providing relief achieved through the
use of functional architectural features. Variety
is not achieved solely through the use of differ-
ent contrasting exterior materials.
D. Trademark types of buildings should be
discouraged in the Greenway. Boxlike or trade-
mark buildings may be allowed if additional
site screening and shade trees are provided to
soften the building exterior.
E. The architectural scheme (form, materi-
als, color and detailing) of a building should be
carried throughout all exterior elevations to
achieve design, harmony and continuity. Ap-
plied ornamentation (materials or details ap-
plied without relation to architectural function
or feature) and false -front buildings are not
acceptable.
F. The roof shape, color and texture should
be coordinated with the, overall building de-
sign.
G. Rooftop mechanical and electrical equip-
ment should be designed or screened to become
an integral part of the building design. Ground -
or interior -mounted mechanical equipment is
strongly recommended.
H. Ducts, pipes, vents and similar items
extending through the roof should be painted a
color closely resembling that of the roofing
material.
I. Building entries should be protected and
offer a sense of entry and focus.
L Unvaried building elevations and un-
sightly features or uses should not be placed
adjacent to the freeway.
K. Buildings with box -like appearances,
lacking architectural variation on all elevations,
should not be approved. Architectural varia-
tion can be achieved through a variety of design
techniques, including but not limited to:
1. offsetting or varying building setbacks
2. providing covered porches, balconies
and entries;
3. combining single story and two story
construction in a single building with single
story nearest property lines; and
4. altering roof lines, height and type.
Architectural variation is generally achieved
through the use of three-dimensional design
and variations, rather than through variation of
a surface treatment.
0
Landscaping should be included in any
project design to create a pleasing appearance.
Site landscaping should be utilized to promote
the character of the Yakima Valley, particularly
by using large shade trees.
A. Native and mature trees and vegetation
should be retained and integrated.
B. Landscaping should be planned as an
integral -part of the project, and not simply
located in left -over space after the siting of
parking and buildings.
C. Landscape planting should include all
of adjacent, public right-of-way including
planter strips, not improved with street im-
provements.
D. Trees from a Greenway -recommended
list should be installed.
E. Properties along the freeway and other
"mited-access routes should not rely on land -
caping in the public right-of-way to meet the
purposes of this section.
F. Landscaping should be proportional to
the building elevations.
G. Dense landscaping should be provided
to screen unattractive views and features such
as storage areas, trash enclosures, freeway struc-
tures, transformers, generators and other ele-
ments which do not contribute to the enhance-
ment of the surroundings.
H. Landscaping should not be utilized to
screen from view an otherwise unacceptable
building.
•
I. Landscaping should be located within,
and adjacent to, parking areas to screen vehicles
from view and minimize the expansive appear-
ance of parking areas. This landscaping should
include shade trees which will shade fifty per-
cent of the parking area at maturity.
I Landscape plantings should be those
which grow well in Yakima's climate without
extensive irrigation.
K. Deciduous trees should be planted along
south and west building exposures.
L. Ground cover should be of live plant
material. Gravel, colored rock, bark and similar
materials are generally not acceptable. Bark,
when used, should be used as mulch. Brick,
cobblestone, textured concrete and similar hard
materials are acceptable when they relate posi-
tively to the architectural components and ma-
terials used on the building.
M. Landscaping should be designed to per-
mit adequate sight distance for motorists and
pedestrians entering and exiting the site.
N. All landscape plantings should be of
sufficient size and intensity so that a mature
appearance can be attained in a reasonable time
period (5 years).
U. A permanent irrigation system should
be provided where necessary.
P. Landscaping adjacent to driveways and
parking should be protected from vehicle dam-
age through the use of curbs, bumpers or other
approved features.
Page 28
D®C.
l C�
104 "Ya nd - rids n 106 f'l.S :r t. Parkin _-JA,ndsSj1inX
Space
Landscaped open space should meet the
following standards, except where greater open
space standards are specifically set forth in the
regulations for a zoning district:
A. For any development within the
Greenway Overlay District, a minimum of 206/6
of the lot should be landscaped and kept in open
space. Required interior parking lot landscap-
ing may be included to meet the landscaped,
open space requirement, provided the 50% shade
factor described in Section 106 C. is met.
B. Open space may be reduced to 10% of the
site if tree canopy (as described in Section 106
Q covers at least 20% of the site.
C. The surface area of a permanent swim-
ming pool or spa, or uncovered patio may be
included to meet the open space requirements.
105 ff- ret P rkln - Location
In all districts and uses, a setback of 15 feet
from the primary street of access and 10 feet
from any secondary street should be required
for all parking from the front or street property
line. The area between the parking and the
street paving should be fully landscaped, ex-
cept to provide access. Street trees should be
placed within this perimeter area planted be-
tween 30- and 40 -foot centers.
A. Landscaping should be provided in 1W
buffer' areas required between property lines
and parking areas.
B. Not less than five percent (5%) of the
interior of a parking lot should be landscaped
unless a lesser amount is determined to be
compatible with the surrounding area and gen-
eral objectives of the design review process.
C. Trees should be planted and- maintained
in planters or Iandscape areas in alt off-street
parking areas so that at tree maturity, fifty
percent (50•/) of the parking area is shaded at
sotar noon on June 21. This requirement should
not apply to the development of single-family
residences.
D. - Physical barriers, such as curbing,
bumpers or components of the landscape plan,
should be installed to prevent vehicular dam-
age to adjacent landscape areas.
107 )im r vements to bProvided b the
Developer - 0
A. Underground Utilities: All utilities in-
cluding electric power, telephone, television
cable, etc, should be underground.
B. All normal improvements required by
city or county for street right of way.
C. Sidewalk and/or bike path treatments,
street lights, street signs, street furniture, cross-
walk and intersection details as specified on file
in the Public Works Department.
D. Improvements must be perpetually
maintained.
E
Illustration shows general effect
M difteinn ntandarvir,
Do&ge 30
INDE,X
#
Appendk II
vision for the Future
Iffustrations
•
YAKIMA GREENWAY 1
Urban Design Influence
She Yal�fma River is an outstanding resource within the Yak*na urban area. Since the
earriest settlements, the significance of its impact on our quality of Ctfe has been clearly
recognized.
DOC.,
INDEX
YAKIMA GREENWAY 2.
Urban Design,
She earliest devefopment occuredin areas as close to the river as was considered.a safe
distance from potential ffooding.
YAKIMA GREENWAY
Urban Development
H
Urban development has continually increased the density of man-made structures and
pavedsurfaces. Tie contrast&tween the river's riparian environment andthemetropol'itan
area is becoming more, evident.,
DOC.
INDEX
YAKIMA GREENWAY 4 ."
New Development
r�
Since I-82 was built and the Greenway established, there has been increasing pressure to
locate businesses near the river. Freeway access, Cess costly land, tourUtn, availability to •
public activities and regional needs far industriaCpar!s are among the reasons.
IND
EX
L`
•
Eastside
the area ad scent to the Greenway on the east should& consideredasa part o f the Greenway
• Overlay District andpromotedandplanned fortourrsm, recreation andindustria(develop-
ment uses. sensitive reclamation ofgravel pits into a series of waterways and Tates would
inspire recreational and commercial improvements
®OC.
" ASI A, GREEN AY
Parkway
•
A parkway to the east of the Greenwaywoufdserve to Crnk theYa-kirca NalleyH ffrhwayV*fi
the scene Yak'na Yak'River Canyon A hhway. Between the Greenway and the parkway,
enterprises related to tourism and recreation _eoufd be located. Industr 4f parts and.
resident al"eommunxties would e fo atedeast of the parkvay.
®®C.
INDEX
# 1 (0
•
. YAKIMA GRFENWA'Y
Recreational Tral�l
An extension of the Greenway along the Npahes ?liver could lead to a recreational trail
through a portion of the Cowiche Canyon. A turn south at 66th Avenue and east arong
Ahtan.um Road would complete an outer circulation loop.
®OC.
®EX
YAKIMA GREENWAY 8
Downtown
As redevelopment occurs between downtown }akw= and the Greenway, urban design and
planning decisions shoufdbe made to leverage the quality o f li fe attributes o f the Greenway
to the benefit of the new developments. Greenway Design Standards, alone with dynamic
enticing circulation routes Between downtown and the Gneenway, couldgreatly enhance
the allure of the area.
DOC.
INDEX
# C. -t
I
W
1995 Board of Directors,
�
Jim Sackmann, President
w.
Charlie Eglin, Vice President and committee member
Steve Sundquist; Secretary
Paul Schaake, Treasurer
Sheila Burns
^
.Alan Cottl - "
Joan Davenport, Chair, Master Plan Update Committee
Phill Fossum
Blaine Gibson
Phil Hoge.
z
Jolene Jewett
Wayne Kalbfleisch
. Jeff Loudon, committee member:
Doug McIntyre
Craig Mendenhall
Dick Myers, committee member
Peters, committee member
JDoug
imRussi, committee member .
Esther Schrader; committee member
Tyler Schultz.
Other, cormmiftee members•
Rod Knipper.„
Cecilia Vogt, Executive Director,
1991 Master Plan Update Task Force
i
Dick Maison, Chair
Val Finlayson
Hamilton richt, President of Board of Directors, 19 91
Rod lnipper
Doug Peters
Jim Smith
.
Mark Uhlman
Barbara Feasey, Executive Director
m.
0 3 South Third Street
Yakima, A 98901
(509) 453-8280 Printed on
Recycled Paper
®C.
Maxey, Lisa
From: Maxey, Lisa
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 11:00 AM
To: Al Rose; Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Calhoun, Joseph; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Jacob
Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel; Patricia Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick;
Watkins, Sara; White, Jason; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net)
Subject: FW: Nob Hill/22nd Street
Please see below a public comment received regarding CPA#007-18 — City Wastewater Division. I will distribute
printed copies of the email to you at the meeting on 9/12.
576-6669
From: Calhoun, Joseph
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 10:45 AM
To: Katy Weatherley <katyweatherley@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxey, Lisa <Lisa.Maxey@YAKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: RE: Nob Hill/22nd Street
Thank you, Katy.
s
City of Yakima
509-575-6042
]()S I,I,C lllounO�� ,akimav�a, ;ov
I
P rd ni n" i 'n
From: Katy Weatherley [mailto:8aty+eathertlewmrcr] crru]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 10:39 AM
To: Calhoun, Joseph <Jo�seseph�Ca.lhqun(c AKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: Nob Hill/22nd Street
Yakima Planning Commission:
I believe I will be unable to make the September 12th meeting which has on the agenda the proposed change of
22"d Street for a low barrier homeless shelter. So, I would like to give you some of my thoughts regarding this proposed
change.
The first and most important is that I don't disagree that a long term plan is needed to help the homeless. But this isn't a
Yakima or a Yakima County thing, this is a national issue. To fix this on a local level really only brings more and more
homeless to our area which is evident when you talk to many of these out of town homeless people. I spoke to one lady
on the Greenway last week. She told me she was here not because of family or job possibility but because it is easy to be
homeless in Yakima. They come to Yakima because we cater to the homeless population. That isn't something we should
be known for. Charitable yes, able to get our own people into affordable housing, yes but for people to come to Yakima
simply because we cater to them being homeless, no.
The next thing is that the more I thought about Mrs. Byers standing up and stating that she doesn't have an interest or
that her interest was not conflicted due to her affiliation with Transform Yakima Together; the more that I think about
that, the more I believe Mrs. Byers has no business being part of the vote for this issue. This all comes back to Transform
Yakima Together as the more than likely recipient of the land in question to build a low barrier homeless shelter.
Although the Yakima Valley Conference of Governments says no one organization is picked to be the recipient of the
land, TYT and Camp Hope are the organizations mentioned numerous times. Mrs. Byers should absolutely not be Part
of this vote.
Mrs. Byers over and over said there was no project. Repeatedly. Why are we wasting our time on a planning change with
nothing behind it? Why did all the last planning meeting informational paperwork state "low barrier homeless shelter"?
It's because there is a plan. There is something in the works. In fact, The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
thanks the City of Yakima for re-zoning the land at 22nd for a homeless shelter in their meeting minutes from May 211t,
2018. Link here - haps °wtirWa g.oMZw-L t u L.� aw9c x!2018 06/EC-052.11.8-MINUTF5,p of
I also have an email from Kathy Coffey telling me the City of Yakima has no choice on the placement of this homeless
shelter. We have a choice. There is always a choice!
The Yakima Valley Conference of Governments in their meeting minutes from July 16th, 2018 shows a motion and
approval for $250,000.00 for water and utilities to go to a new homeless shelter referencing the sight from the May
211t meeting. How is this not a plan?M Link here - hITI p . uvww:.. 0 .or- wp-content/uploads/2OJ 8/08 EC ITI IN-
07161.pdf
Why on Earth is the City, County and the Council of Governments trying to push all this through without the taxpayers of
Yakima knowing about it? Because people don't want it!!! Because every time Camp Hope tries to move into another
spot in the City, the people around that site rise up and say "no"! If the City of Yakima Planning commission votes yes on
this, all we will see is a gift of land to Transform Yakima Together which will give a free pass for them to do as they
please.
The City of Yakima is more in need of low income housing. A low barrier homeless shelter with all the services and
burdens it places on the vicinity around it is not the answer to low income/affordable housing. We currently have
empty beds at homeless shelters in town and more coming in the near future. The fact that these are not consistently at
capacity tells you that another homeless shelter is not the answer. The Union Gospel Mission has 243 beds and they
average 140-180 beds filled at night. The Yakima Housing Authority is trying to open beds at the old Armory.
Neighborhood Health is actively working to open the old Roy's Market. Yakima has the beds it needs for Yakima's
homeless. What it needs is the Planning Commission to tell the City this isn't the right way to get things done. It will also
remind Mike Leita and the Yakima Valley Conference of Governments they still work for the taxpayers.
Also, please think about the repercussions to the users of the Greenway. If this were Franklin, Kissel, Randall or any
other park in Yakima, this idea wouldn't be on the table. Give the Greenway as much respect as you would those
spaces.
Please say no to the re-zone on 22"d Street near Nob Hill. A zoning change without a proper plan or project behind it
means a loss for the taxpayers and citizens of both the City of Yakima and the County of Yakima.
Thank you,
Katy Weatherley
Maxey, Lisa
From: Maxey, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:02 AM
To: Al Rose; Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); Calhoun, Joseph; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Jacob
Liddicoat; Leanne Hughes -Mickel; Patricia Byers; Philip Ostriem; Rob McCormick;
Watkins, Sara; White, Jason; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net)
Subject: FW: Zoning change for homeless shelter at Nob Hill/Hyw 24
Please see another comment below regarding CPA#007-18 - City Wastewater Division... I'll print and distribute
copies at the meeting tomorrow.
Lisa Maxey
Planning Specialist I City of Yakima Planning Division
(509) 576-6669 — Lisa.Maxey@yakimawa.gov
-----Original Message -----
From: Calhoun, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 7:46 AM
To: Maxey, Lisa <Lisa.Maxey@YAKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: FW: Zoning change for homeless shelter at Nob Hill/Hyw 24
Joseph Calhoun
-----Original Message -----
From: Zach Randolph [mailto:randolph2005@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2018 11:35 AM
To: Calhoun, Joseph <Joseph.Calhoun@YAKIMAWA.GOV>
Subject: Zoning change for homeless shelter at Nob Hill/Hyw 24
Hello,
My name is Zach Randolph and I live on Mieras Rd. between Birchfield and Ekelman.
I am writing to express my disagreement with allowing another permanent homeless shelter to be built at the
entrance to our community.
There are plenty of other places that are already established to help the homeless and they are all adding more
beds.
From my perspective, it seems that a big part of the homeless choose not to use these facilities anyways
because they do not care to follow the rules put in place by these facilities. It is NOT our responsibility as a
community to pay for and build additional structures and services for people who will not help themselves by
abiding by the requirements and rules of other places that have space for them already.
Please do not allow the rezoning of this property and DO NOT allow the city to use more of my tax money to
build another homeless shelter in this area.
Thank you for your time.
Zach Randolph
September 12, 1018
City of Yakima Planning Commission
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Attention: Joan Davenport, Community Development Director
Subject: City of Yakima Wastewater Division — Homeless Shelter
RZ#008-18,SEPA 010-18, CPA#007-18
The Board of Directors of the Yakima Area Arboretum non-profit organization has reviewed the
proposed rezone of the property located at S. 22nd St and SR 24 to a General Commercial District. We
have been told the purpose of the rezone is the eventual establishment of a permanent homeless
encampment/facility. In line with our mission, at this time we are opposing the rezone to commercial
use because we believe the location should remain as open/green space along the Yakima River
corridor.
As a property of the City of Yakima, the Yakima Area Arboretum (YAA) consists of 46 acres, 32 of which
are developed with collections of trees, shrubs, botanical gardens and 14 acres of natural riparian
woodland and historical floodplain of the Yakima River. The YAA, long recognized as a regional asset, is
adjacent to and crosses the Yakima River Regional Greenway corridor to the river shoreline.
As a bit of background, the YAA was developed 51 years ago and has been continuously managed by the
non-profit YAA organization. In its management agreement with the City of Yakima, the YAA is
responsible for all costs associated with the maintenance and care of the trees, gardens and buildings
with the exception of assistance from the City of Yakima mowing the grass. The organization receives
no additional public funding.
The YAA seeks to meet the standards for park operations as outlined in the Yakima Parks and Recreation
Division 2017-2020 Comprehensive Plan as follows:
"PARK OPERATIONS
3.0.0 Goal: Maintain existing parks and recreation facilities at a level that meets the public's desire
for safe, clean, and enjoyable parks."
Since we are primarily privately supported, our ability to care of this wonderful community asset is
dependent on our business plan which includes renting the Jewett Center facility and the grounds for a
variety of functions including weddings, family celebrations, memorial services, business meetings,
public events, and educational classes. Our unique Nature Day Camp attracts 200+ children every
summer to explore and learn about the wonders of nature. Additionally, we have an active program
planting memorial trees and plants and installing benches for families to remember their loved ones. As
responsible stewards of memorials, we strive to maintain a high degree of care.
In line with the P&R Comprehensive Plan 2017-2022, the YAA is now in the process of preparing a new
Master Plan that will seek to meet the needs of our ever growing, diverse community.
"PARK OPERATIONS
3.0.2 Goal: Establish and implement a long-range plan for the development of parks, open space,
green belts and pathways within the City of Yakima and the greater urban growth area.
We now must take into consideration the potential impact of additional commercial
development/permanent homeless encampment into our plans.
As a public facility, the YAA has always been accessible to the general public and we welcome all visitors
to enjoy the grounds and facilities within a framework of a few simple rules for its use.
Over time our encounters with the homeless population have been managed by direct interactions with
our staff and caretaker. Since the establishment of Camp Hope in 2017, we have experienced an
increase in negative interactions that include use of our restrooms for bathing, daytime sheltering in the
buildings from the heat and smoke, use of our electrical outlets, intrusions into private events, increased
drug use and public urination. We also have safety concerns for our staff, rental customers, Nature Day
Camp campers and general visitors.
We have been in contact with Transform Yakima Together (TYT), the current concessionaire, to voice
our concerns and we understand their intent to be good neighbors. We hope to continue our dialogue
with TYT but also recognize that TYT may not always be the concessionaire.
In conclusion, we believe the rezone of the property to a General Commercial District would
substantially impair the ability of the YAA to generate the financial resources necessary to maintain the
grounds and buildings to the desired level. Our goal is to maintain the YAA as a dynamic green space, a
unique outdoor experience, and a hub for environmental education in an atmosphere of beauty,
tranquility and relaxation that is welcoming to all.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions, you may
contact our Co -Executive Director, Jheri Ketcham of the Yakima Area Arboretum at (509) 248-7337.
Sincerely,
Leslie J. Wahl
President, Yakima Area Arboretum Board of Directors
Yakima Area Arboretum Mission Statement
To inspire people of all ages to discover and connect with nature through a diverse collection of trees and
shrubs hardy to the Inland Northwest.
Greenway Overlay — YMC Title 15
15.03.020 District and map overlay intent statements.
....... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... .........
The district intent statements define the specific purpose of each district and/or zoning
map overlay. They shall reflect the policies of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan;
serve as a guide for determining the appropriate location of uses; help determine appropriate
conditions for development; and help the administrative official interpret the standards and
provisions.
R. Greenway Overlay (GO). The Yakima River Regional Greenway Plan was adopted to
preserve and maintain the Yakima River as a natural resource for all citizens to enjoy.
The greenway corridor extends from Yakima Canyon to Union Gap. Greenway boundaries were
originally defined in 1977 by the State Legislature with the creation of the Washington State
Yakima River Conservation Area.
15.09.020 Special development standards for the district overlays.
....... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... .........
A. Project Review in an Overlay Not Separately Established. In order to assure the
appropriate standards are applied, all Class (1) uses in an overlay which is not separately
established unless otherwise specified shall be subject to Type (2) review (YMC Chapter 15.14).
All Class (2) uses shall be subject to Type (2) review and Class (3) uses in an overlay district
shall be subject to Type (3) review. The administrative official may condition or deny approval of
any use, development, or modification thereto in an overlay based on the provisions set forth
and adopted by this section.
B. Special Development Standards in the Greenway Overlay. All development in the
greenway overlay shall conform to the requirements and standards of the underlying zoning
district and the policies and intent of the Yakima River Regional Greenway Plan
C. Special Development Standards in the Floodplain Overlay. All development in the
floodplain overlay shall conform to the requirements and standards of the underlying zoning
district, and the City of Yakima's adopted Critical Area (YMC 15.27) and Shoreline Master
Program (YMC Title 17) ordinances.
City of Yakima Planning Commission
September 12, 2018
Definitions for Hotel, Motel, Extended Stay
Moratorium
Council Motion: That this matter be sent to the Planning Commission for research and
evaluation, and that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to Council proposing
definitions for the following terms: Hotel; Motel; and Extended stay; and make recommendations
regarding what zones are appropriate for those uses and at what level of review.
Draft Definitions for Consideration and Discussion:
"Hotel" means a lodging use located in a structure, or structures, where rooms are usually
accessed by means of common interior hallways, and which more than 90% of the rooms are
provided to transient visitors for a fee on a daily or short-term basis. For purposes of this
definition, "daily or short term" means 30 or fewer consecutive days.
"Motel" means a lodging use located in a structure, or structures, where rooms are usually
accessed by means of exterior corridors, and which more than 90% of the rooms are provided
to transient visitors for a fee on a daily or short-term basis. For purposes of this definition, "daily
or short term" means 30 or fewer consecutive days.
Extended Stay options
1. "Extend Stay Hotel/Motel" means a lodging use in a structure, or structure, where more
than 10% of the rooms are provided or made available to the public for a fee for
extended stays. The length of stay can be up to or exceed 30 consecutive days. Rooms
designated for extended stay use may include kitchen facilities. This definition does not
include other defined uses including, but not limited to, a boarding house or multi -family
dwelling.
2. "Extended Stay Hotel/Motel" means a hotel or motel that rents rooms to the public for
longer stays, which are more than 30 consecutive days. This definition does not include
other defined uses including, but not limited to, a boarding house or multi -family
dwelling.
Existing Zoning Districts:
SRS R-1 R-2 R- B-1 B-2 IHE SCC ILCC AS GC CED IRO M-1 M-2
Motels and IHIote,lls 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Extended Stay Hotel/Motel
U.S. Department of Labor
Wage and Hour Division
77211,r:
Fact Sheet #26e Section H -2A of the Immigration and Nationality Act
This tact sheet provides getier al itmror retie' t, collcel,llieig tite aiiiilicatiot, or time II 2 .
req till ireilCuts to time agriceulteural itidtistry ror 11 2A a pplicatiotis stibmitted ou or after March 1.5,
2011.01.
Introduction
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) authorizes the lawful admission of temporary,
nonimmigrant workers (H -2A workers) to perform agricultural labor or services of a temporary or
seasonal nature. The Department of Labor's regulations governing the H -2A Program also apply to the
employment of U.S. workers by an employer of H -2A workers in any work included in the ETA -
approved job order or in any agricultural work performed by the H -2A workers during the period of the
job order. Such U.S. workers are engaged in corresponding employment.
Overview of Employer Contractual Obligations
Recruitment of U.S. Workers: In order for the Department of Labor to certify that there are not
sufficient U.S. workers qualified and available to perform the labor involved in the petition and that the
employment of the foreign worker will not have an adverse effect on the wages and working conditions
of similarly employed U.S. workers, employers must demonstrate the need for a specific number of H -
2A workers. In addition to contacting certain former U.S. employees and coordinating recruitment
activities through the appropriate State Workforce Agency, employers are required to engage in positive
recruitment of U.S. workers. H -2A employers must provide employment to any qualified, eligible U.S.
worker who applies for the job opportunity until 50 percent of the period of the work contract has
elapsed. Employers must offer U.S. workers terms and working conditions which are not less favorable
than those offered to H -2A workers.
Termination of Workers: Employers are prohibited from hiring H -2A workers if the employer laid off
U.S. workers within 60 days of the date of need, unless the laid -off U.S. workers were offered and
rejected the agricultural job opportunities for which the H -2A workers were sought. A layoff of U.S.
workers in corresponding employment is permissible only if all H -2A workers are laid off first.
Employers may only reject eligible U.S. workers for lawful, job-related reasons.
In order to negate a continuing liability for wages and benefits for a worker who is terminated or
voluntarily abandons the position, employers are required to notify the Department of Labor (DOL), and
in the case of an H -2A worker the Department of Homeland Security, no later than two working days
after the termination or abandonment.
Rates of Pay: The employer must pay all covered workers at least the highest of the following
applicable wage rates in effect at the time work is performed: the adverse effect wage rate (AEWR), the
FS 26
applicable prevailing wage, the agreed-upon collective bargaining rate, or the Federal or State statutory
minimum wage.
Wages may be calculated on the basis of hourly or "piece" rates of pay. The piece rate must be no less
than the piece rate prevailing for the activity in the area of intended employment and on a pay period
basis must average no less than the highest required hourly wage rate.
Written Disclosure: No later than the time at which an H -2A worker applies for a visa and no later than
on the first (1st) day of work for workers in corresponding employment, the employer must provide each
worker a copy of the work contract — in a language understood by the worker — which describes the
terms and conditions of employment. In the absence of a separate written work contract, the employer
must provide each worker with a copy of the job order that was submitted to and approved by DOL.
The work contract must include:
• the beginning and ending dates of the contract period as well as the location(s) of work;
• any and all significant conditions of employment, including payment for transportation expenses
incurred, housing and meals to be provided (and related charges), specific days workers are not
required to work (i.e., Sabbath, Federal holidays);
• the hours per day and the days per week each worker will be expected to work;
• the crop(s) to be worked and/or each job to be performed;
• the applicable rate(s) for each crop/job;
• that any required tools, supplies, and equipment will be provided at no charge;
• that workers' compensation insurance will be provided at no charge; and
• any deductions not otherwise required by law. All deductions must be reasonable. Any
deduction not specified is not permissible.
Guarantees to All Workers: H -2A employers must guarantee to offer each covered worker
employment for a total number of hours equal to at least 75% of the workdays in the contract period —
called the "three-fourths guarantee." For example, if a contract is for a 10 -week period, during which a
normal workweek is specified as 6 days a week, 8 hours per day, the worker would need to be
guaranteed employment for at least 360 hours (e.g., 10 weeks x 48 hours/week = 480 hours x 75% _
360).
If during the total work contract period the employer does not offer sufficient workdays to the H -2A or
corresponding workers to reach the total amount required to meet the three-fourths guarantee, the
employer must pay such workers the amount they would have earned had they actually worked for the
guaranteed number of workdays. Wages for the guaranteed 75% period will be calculated at no less
than the rate stated in the work contract.
Housing: Employers must provide housing at no cost to H -2A workers and to workers in corresponding
employment who are not reasonably able to return to their residence within the same day. If the
employer elects to secure rental (public) accommodations for such workers, the employer is required to
pay all housing -related charges directly to the housing's management.
In addition, employers are required to either provide each covered worker with three meals per day, at
no more than a DOL -specified cost, or to furnish free and convenient cooking and kitchen facilities
where workers can prepare their own meals.
Employer-provided or secured housing must meet all applicable safety standards.
2
Transportation: Employers must provide daily transportation between the workers' living quarters and
the employer's worksite at no cost to covered workers living in employer-provided housing. Employer-
provided transportation must meet all applicable safety standards, be properly insured, and be operated
by licensed drivers.
Inbound & Outbound Expenses: If not previously advanced or otherwise provided, the employer must
reimburse workers for reasonable costs incurred for inbound transportation and subsistence costs once
the worker completes 50% of the work contract period. Note: the FLSA applies independently of H -2A
and prohibits covered employees from incurring costs that are primarily for the benefit of the employer
if such costs take the employee's wages below the FLSA minimum wage. Upon completion of the work
contract, the employer must either provide or pay for the covered worker's return transportation and
daily subsistence.
Records Required: Employers must keep accurate records of the number of hours of work offered each
day by the employer and the hours actually worked each day by the worker.
On or before each payday (which must be at least twice monthly), each worker must be given an hours
and earnings statement showing hours offered, hours actually worked, hourly rate and/or piece rate of
pay, and if piece rates are used, the units produced daily. The hours and earnings statement must also
indicate total earnings for the pay period and all deductions from wages.
Additional Assurances and Obligations: Employers must comply with all applicable laws and
regulations, including the prohibition against holding or confiscating workers' passports or other
immigration documents. In addition, employers must not seek or receive payment of any kind from
workers for anything related to obtaining the H -2A labor certification, including the employer's attorney
or agent fees, the application fees, or the recruitment costs. Employers must also assure that there is no
strike or lockout in the course of a labor dispute at the worksite for the H -2A certification which the
employer is seeking. In addition, employers cannot discriminate against — or discharge without just
cause — any person who has filed a complaint, consulted with an attorney or an employee of a legal
assistance program, testified, or in any manner, exercised or asserted on behalf of himself/herself
or others any right or protection afforded by sec. 218 of the INA or the H -2A regulations.
H -2A Labor Contractors
An H-2ALC is a person who meets the definition of an "employer" under the H -2A Program and does
not otherwise qualify as a fixed -site employer or an agricultural association (or an employee of a fixed -
site employer or agricultural association) and who is engaged in any one of the following activities in
regards to any worker subject to the H -2A regulations: recruiting, soliciting, hiring, employing,
furnishing, housing, or transporting.
While H -2A does not require labor contractors to register as such with the Department, any person who
is subject to MSPA as a Farm Labor Contractor (FLC) must register with the Department and be issued
an FLC Certificate of Registration prior to engaging in any farm labor contracting activity. In their H -
2A applications, H-2ALCs required to be registered under MSPA are obligated to provide their
respective MSPA FLC Certificate of Registration number and to identify the farm labor contracting
activities they are authorized to perform.
3
In addition to meeting the same assurances and obligations as any other H -2A employer,
H-2ALCs must fulfill the following requirements:
• list the name and location of each fixed -site agricultural business to which they expect to provide
H -2A workers, the dates of each employment opportunity, and a description of the crops and
activities the workers are expected to perform at each area of intended employment;
• submit a copy of each work contract agreement between the H-2ALC and the agricultural
business to which they expect to provide workers;
• provide proof that all housing and transportation if provided or secured by the fixed -site
employer complies with applicable safety and health standards; and
• obtain and submit the original surety bond with the H -2A Application.
Surety Bond: The surety bond must be written to cover liability incurred during the term of the work
contract period listed on the H -2A Application and must remain in effect for a period of at least 2 years
from the expiration date of the labor certification. H-2ALCs must obtain the surety bond in the
following amounts:
• $5,000 for a labor certification with fewer than 25 employees;
• $10,000 for a labor certification with 25 to 49 employees;
• $20,000 for a labor certification with 50 to 74 employees;
• $50,000 for a labor certification with 75 to 99 employees; and
• $75,000 for a labor certification with 100 or more employees.
The bond must be payable to the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 5-3502, Washington, DC 20210.
Where to Obtain Additional Information
This publication is for general information and is not to be considered in the same light as official
statements of position contained in the regulations.
For additional information, visit our Wage and Hour Division Website:
http://www.wagehour.dol.gov and/or call our toll-free information and helpline, available
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in your time zone, 1-866-4US-WAGE (1-866-487-9243).
U.S. Department of Labor
Frances Perkins Building
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210
1-866-4-USWAGE
TTY: 1-866-487-9243
11
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
Chapter 11. Istiling I 111CW 111CIG liisllposliitliioins
Chapter 70 114 . RCW
TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
Sections
70.114A.010
Findings—Intent.
70,114 „020
Definitions.
70„114 „030
Application of chapter.
70„114 „040
Responsibilities of department.
70.114A.045
Housing operation standards—Departments' agreement—Enforcement.
70„114 „050
Housing on rural worksites.
70„114 „050
Inspection of housing.
70„114 „055
Licensing, operation, and inspection—Rules.
70.114A.070
Technical assistance.
70„114 081 Temporary worker building code—Rules—Guidelines—Exceptions—Enforcement—
Variations.
70„114 „100 Rules—Compliance with federal act.
70„114 „110 Cherry harvest temporary labor camps—Rule making—Definition—Conditions for
occupatio nApplication.
70 114A 901 Effective date -1995 c 220.
70.114A.010
Findings—Intent.
The legislature finds that there is an inadequate supply of temporary and permanent housing for
migrant and seasonal workers in this state. The legislature also finds that unclear, complex regulations
related to the development, construction, and permitting of worker housing inhibit the development of this
much needed housing. The legislature further finds that as a result, many workers are forced to obtain
housing that is unsafe and unsanitary.
Therefore, it is the intent of the legislature to encourage the development of temporary and
permanent housing for workers that is safe and sanitary by: Establishing a clear and concise set of
regulations for temporary housing; establishing a streamlined permitting and administrative process that
will be locally administered and encourage the development of such housing; and by providing technical
assistance to organizations or individuals interested in the development of worker housing.
[ 1995 c 220 § 1 „]
70.114A.020
Definitions.
The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.
(1) "Agricultural employee” means any person who renders personal services to, or under the
direction of, an agricultural employer in connection with the employer's agricultural activity.
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 1/6
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
(2) "Agricultural employer" means any person engaged in agricultural activity, including the
growing, producing, or harvesting of farm or nursery products, or engaged in the forestation or
reforestation of lands, which includes but is not limited to the planting, transplanting, tubing,
precommercial thinning, and thinning of trees and seedlings, the clearing, piling, and disposal of brush
and slash, the harvest of Christmas trees, and other related activities.
(3) "Department" means the department of health.
(4) "Dwelling unit" means a shelter, building, or portion of a building, that may include cooking
and eating facilities, that is:
(a) Provided and designated by the operator as either a sleeping area, living area, or both, for
occupants; and
(b) Physically separated from other sleeping and common -use areas.
(5) "Enforcement" and "enforcement actions" include the authority to levy and collect fines.
(6) "Facility" means a sleeping place, drinking water, toilet, sewage disposal, food handling
installation, or other installations required for compliance with this chapter.
(7) "Occupant" means a temporary worker or a person who resides with a temporary worker at
the housing site.
(8) "Operator" means a person holding legal title to the land on which temporary worker housing
is located. However, if the legal title and the right to possession are in different persons, 'operator"
means a person having the lawful control or supervision over the temporary worker housing under a
lease or other arrangement.
(9) "Temporary worker" means an agricultural employee employed intermittently and not residing
year-round at the same site.
(10) "Temporary worker housing" means a place, area, or piece of land where sleeping places or
housing sites are provided by an agricultural employer for his or her agricultural employees or by another
person, including a temporary worker housing operator, who is providing such accommodations for
employees, for temporary, seasonal occupancy.
[ 1999 c 374 § 6; 1995 c 220 § 2 „]
70.114A.030
Application of chapter.
Chapter 220, Laws of 1995, applies to temporary worker housing that consists of five or more
dwelling units, or any combination of dwelling units, dormitories, or spaces that house ten or more
occupants.
[ 1995 c 226 § 3 „]
70.114A.040
Responsibilities of department.
The department is designated the single state agency responsible for encouraging the
development of additional temporary worker housing, and shall be responsible for coordinating the
activities of the various state and local agencies to assure a seamless, nonduplicative system for the
development and operation of temporary worker housing.
[ 1995 c 226 § 4„]
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 2/6
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
7O.114A.O45
Housing operation standards—Departments' agreement—Enforcement.
By December 1, 1999, the department and the department of labor and industries shall jointly
establish a formal agreement that identifies the roles of each of the two agencies with respect to the
enforcement of temporary worker housing operation standards.
The agreement shall, to the extent feasible, provide for inspection and enforcement actions by a
single agency, and shall include measures to avoid multiple citations for the same violation.
[ 1999 c 374 § 5„]
7O.114A.O5O
Housing on rural worksites.
Temporary worker housing located on a rural worksite, and used for workers employed on the
worksite, shall be considered a permitted use at the rural worksite for the purposes of zoning or other
land use review processes, subject only to height, setback, and road access requirements of the
underlying zone.
[ 1995 c 220 § 5.„]
7O.114A.O6O
Inspection of housing.
The secretary of the department or authorized representative may inspect housing covered by
chapter 220, Laws of 1995, to enforce temporary worker housing rules adopted by the state board of
health prior to July 25, 1999, or the department, or when the secretary or representative has reasonable
cause to believe that a violation of temporary worker housing rules adopted by the state board of health
prior to July 25, 1999, or the department is occurring or is being maintained. If the buildings or premises
are occupied as a residence, a reasonable effort shall be made to obtain permission from the resident. If
the premises or building is unoccupied, a reasonable effort shall be made to locate the owner or other
person having charge or control of the building or premises and request entry. If consent for entry is not
obtained, for whatever reason, the secretary or representative shall have recourse to every remedy
provided by law to secure entry.
[ 1999 c 374 § 7 1995 c 220 § 6„]
7O.114A.O65
Licensing, operation, and inspection—Rules.
The department and the department of labor and industries shall adopt joint rules for the
licensing, operation, and inspection of temporary worker housing, and the enforcement thereof. These
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 3/6
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
rules shall establish standards that are as effective as the standards developed under the Washington
industrial safety and health act, chapter 49.17 RCW.
[ 1999 c 374 § 1 „]
70.114A.070
Technical assistance.
The *department of community, trade, and economic development shall contract with private,
nonprofit corporations to provide technical assistance to any private individual or nonprofit organization
wishing to construct temporary or permanent worker housing. The assistance may include information on
state and local application and approval procedures, information or assistance in applying for federal,
state, or local financial assistance, including tax incentives, information on cost-effective housing
designs, or any other assistance the *department of community, trade, and economic development may
deem helpful in obtaining the active participation of private individuals or groups in constructing or
operating temporary or permanent worker housing.
[ 1995 c 220 § 7 „]
NOTES:
*Reviser's note: The "department of community, trade, and economic development" was
renamed the "department of commerce" by 2009 c 565.
70.114A.081
Temporary worker building code—Rules—Guidelines—Exceptions—Enforcement
—Variations.
(1) The department shall adopt by rule a temporary worker building code in conformance with the
temporary worker housing standards developed under the Washington industrial safety and health act,
chapter 49..17 RCW, and the following guidelines:
(a) The temporary worker building code shall provide construction standards for shelter and
associated facilities that are safe, secure, and capable of withstanding the stresses and loads associated
with their designated use, and to which they are likely to be subjected by the elements;
(b) The temporary worker building code shall permit and facilitate designs and formats that allow
for maximum affordability, consistent with the provision of decent, safe, and sanitary housing;
(c) In developing the temporary worker building code the department of health shall consider:
(i) The need for dormitory type housing for groups of unrelated individuals; and
(ii) The need for housing to accommodate families;
(d) The temporary worker building code shall incorporate the opportunity for the use of
construction alternatives and the use of new technologies that meet the performance standards required
by law;
(e) The temporary worker building code shall include standards for heating and insulation
appropriate to the type of structure and length and season of occupancy;
(f) The temporary worker building code shall include standards for temporary worker housing that
are to be used only during periods when no auxiliary heat is required; and
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 4/6
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
(g) The temporary worker building code shall provide that persons operating temporary worker
housing consisting of four or fewer dwelling units or combinations of dwelling units, dormitories, or
spaces that house nine or fewer occupants may elect to comply with the provisions of the temporary
worker building code, and that unless the election is made, such housing is subject to the codes adopted
under RCW 19 „27..031.
(2) In adopting the temporary worker building code, the department shall make exceptions to the
codes listed in RCW 19 „2'7„031 and chapter 19 ..2” RCW, in keeping with the guidelines set forth in this
section. The initial temporary worker building code adopted by the department shall be substantially
equivalent with the temporary worker building code developed by the state building code council as
directed by section 8, chapter 220, Laws of 1995.
(3) The temporary worker building code authorized and required by this section shall be enforced
by the department.
The department shall have the authority to allow minor variations from the temporary worker
building code that do not compromise the health or safety of workers. Procedures for requesting
variations and guidelines for granting such requests shall be included in the rules adopted under this
section.
[ 1999 c 37 ; 1998 c 37 § 2„]
70.114A.100
Rules—Compliance with federal act.
Any rules adopted under chapter 220, Laws of 1995, pertaining to an employer who is subject to
the migrant and seasonal agricultural worker protection act (96 Stat. 2583; 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1801 et seq.),
must comply with the housing provisions of that federal act.
[ 1995 c 220 § 10.„]
70.114A.110
Cherry harvest temporary labor camps—Rule making—Definition—Conditions for
occupation—Application.
(1) The department and the department of labor and industries are directed to engage in joint rule
making to establish standards for cherry harvest temporary labor camps. These standards may include
some variation from standards that are necessary for longer occupancies, provided they are as effective
as the standards adopted under the Washington industrial safety and health act, chapter 49..17 RCW. As
used in this section "cherry harvest temporary labor camp” means a place where housing and related
facilities are provided to agricultural employees by agricultural employers for their use while employed for
the harvest of cherries. The housing and facilities may be occupied by agricultural employees for a
period not to exceed one week before the commencement through one week following the conclusion of
the cherry crop harvest within the state.
(2) Facilities licensed under rules adopted under this section may not be used to provide housing
for agricultural employees who are nonimmigrant aliens admitted to the United States for agricultural
labor or services of a temporary or seasonal nature under section 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the immigration
and nationality act (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a)).
(3) This section has no application to temporary worker housing constructed in conformance with
codes listed in RCW 19 „2'7„031 or'70„114 081.
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 5/6
9/4/2018 Chapter 70.114A RCW: TEMPORARY WORKER HOUSING—HEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATION
[ 2002 c 23 § 1 1999 c 37 5„]
70.114A.901
Effective date -1995 c 220.
This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or
support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately
[May 3, 1995].
[ 1995 c 220 § 1„]
http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=70.114A&full=true 6/6