The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-23-15 YPC PacketCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OMEN" DEPART ENT" loan Davenport, AICP, Director Planning Division 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 9 901 Phone (509) 575.4483 - Fax (509) 57j-,6105 City of Yakima Planning Commission STUDY SESSION City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday September 23, 2015 3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. YPC Members: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson, Carmen Mendez J4WC0 11D ! FILE City Planning Staff: Joan Davenport (Community Development Director/Planning Manager); Jeff Peters (Supervising Planner); Valerie Smith (Senior Planner); Robbie Aaron and Trevor Martin (Assistant Planners); Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant); and Lisa Maxey (Department Assistant) Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Staff Announcements IV. Audience Participation V. Consideration of a Special Public Hearing Date for the Preliminary Long Plat of "Summit View" (PLP#003-15) VI. City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan Presentation VII. Other Business VIII. Adjourn Next Meeting: October 14, 2015 SIGN - SIGN -IN SHEET City of Yakima Planning Commission City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday September 23, 2015 Beginning at 3:30 p.m. Study Session Page 1 09/23/2015 YPC Hearing Building a Disaster Resilient Community 001, taNN/ 'SAA An Annex to the Yakima County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Authority Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. 5165, as amended by the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA) (P.L. 106-390), provides for States, Tribes, and local governments to undertake a risk-based approach to reducing risks to natural hazards through mitigation planning. The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4001 etseq, reinforced the need and requirement for mitigation plans, linking flood mitigation assistance programs to State, Tribal and Local Mitigation Plans. After a presidential major disaster declaration, mitigation funding becomes available. The amount is based on a percentage of the total federal grants awarded under the Public Assistance and Individuals and Households Programs for the entire disaster. Projects are funded with a combination of federal, state, and local funds. Information on this program and application process is disseminated at public briefings and by other means. Section 322 of the amended Stafford Act essentially states that as a condition of receiving a disaster loan or grant: "The state and local government(s) shall agree that natural hazards in the areas affected shall be evaluated and appropriate action taken to mitigate such hazards, including safe land -use and construction practices. For disasters declared after November 1, 2004, all potential applicants (sub -grantees) must have either their own, or be included in a regional, locally adopted and FEMA approved all hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible to apply for mitigation grant funds." The regulations governing the mitigation planning requirements for local mitigation plans are published under 44 CFR §201.6. Under 44 CFR §201.6, local governments must have a FEMA -approved Local Mitigation Plan in order to apply for and/or receive project grants under the following hazard mitigation assistance programs: ➢ Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) provides funds to States, Territories, Indian Tribal governments, local governments, and eligible private non -profits (PNPs) following a Presidential major disaster declaration. ➢ Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) ➢ Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) The Pre -Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Program and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) programs provide funds annually to States, Territories, Indian Tribal governments, and local governments. Although the statutory origins of the programs differ, both share the common goal of reducing the risk of loss of life and property due to natural hazards. RATIONALE The Yakima County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan includes resources and information to assist county residents, public and private sector organizations, and others interested in participating in planning for natural and technological hazards. The mitigation plan provides a list of activities that may assist Yakima County in reducing risk and preventing loss from future hazard events. The action items address multi -hazard issues, as well as activities forflood, landslide, severe winter storm, windstorm, wildfire, earthquake, volcanic eruption and Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 hazardous materials. Yakima County referenced the 2013 Washington State Enhanced State Hazard Mitigation Plan for state-wide hazards. The City of Yakima has developed this specific attachment to the Yakima County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City will adopt the county -wide HMP as both a reference and information guide. For purposes of the City of Yakima HMP, these are identified threats and hazards: Drought Earthquakes (6.5 or greater) Extreme Temperatures Floods (River and Streams) Severe Wind Storms Severe Winter Storms Tornadoes Volcanic Eruptions Wildland Fires What is the Plan Mission? The mission of the City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan is to promote sound public policy designed to protect citizens, critical facilities, infrastructure, private property, and the environment from natural and technological hazards. This can be achieved by increasing public awareness, documenting the resources for risk reduction and loss -prevention, and identifying activities to guide the city towards building a safer, more sustainable community. What are the Plan Goals? The plan goals describe the overall direction that Yakima County jurisdictions, organizations, and citizens can take to work toward mitigating risk from natural and technological hazards. The goals represent stepping -stones between the broad direction of the mission statement and the specific recommendations outlined in the action items. 1. Protect Life, Property and Public Welfare ➢ Implement activities that assist in protecting lives by making homes, businesses, infrastructure, critical facilities, and other property more resistant to losses from natural and technological hazards. ➢ Reduce losses and repetitive damages for chronic hazard events while promoting insurance coverage for catastrophic hazards. Improve hazard assessment information to make recommendations for discouraging new development and encouraging preventive measures for existing development in areas vulnerable to natural and technological hazards. Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 2. Public Awareness Develop and implement education and outreach programs to increase public awareness of the risks associated with natural and technological hazards. ➢ Provide information on tools, partnership opportunities, and funding resources to assist in implementing mitigation activities. 3. Natural Systems ➢ Encourage development of acquisition and management strategies to preserve open space. 4. Partnerships and Implementation ➢ Strengthen communication and coordinate participation among and within public agencies, citizens, non- profit organizations, business, and industry to gain a vested interest in implementation. ➢ Encourage leadership within public and private sector organizations to prioritize and implement local, county, and regional hazard mitigation activities. S. Emergency Services ➢ Establish policy to ensure mitigation projects for critical facilities, services, and infrastructure. Strengthen emergency operations by increasing collaboration and coordination among public agencies, non-profit organizations, business, and industry. ➢ Coordinate and integrate natural and technological mitigation activities, where appropriate, with emergency operations plans and procedures. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 3 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Table of Contents 1. Participants and Level of Participation 2. Community Profile City of Yakima Profile Yakima County Population Density (Map) Yakima County Publicly Owned Land (Map) City of Yakima Transportation Infrastructure 3. Risk Assessment Profile Risk Assessment (Tool and Chart) Hazard Impact on Critical/Essential Service Infrastructure Flood Maps « City of Yakima Flood Impact Area (Map) •Cowiche Canyon Stream FiCi�d Impact Area #1 (Map) o Cowiche Canyon Stream Flood Impact Area #2 (Map) o West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area # 1 (Map) r West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area # 2 (Map) • Ahtanum Stream Flood Impact Area Other Hazard Maps • Yakima County Urban Wildlands • Geologic Hazards + Cascade Range Volcanoes • Potential Sources of Hazardous Materials o Yakima County Tornadoes Reported 2000-2013 • Yakima County Earthquakes, Faults and Folds • Yakima County Two -Percent Probability of Exceedance in 50 years of Peak Ground Acceleration 4. National Flood Insurance Program 5. Hazard -Specific Action Items 2010-2014 Action Items/Status/Summary 2015-2020 Hazard -Specific Action Items 2015-2020 Hazard -Specific Action Items Annual Review and Progress Building a Disaster Resilient Community 5 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 1 EM ,,. Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 AN 1. Participants and Level of Participation City Manager, Emergency Preparedness Director, City Attorney, Fire Chief, Police Chief, Public Works Director, Code Enforcement. Plannine Yakima Valley Office of Emergency Management's Senior Program Analyst provided the Emergency Preparedness Director changes/updates to the 2015 Yakima County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan as reviewed by the WaState Hazard Mitigation Strategist. The City's 2015 Hazard Mitigation Plan is consistent with this update. Roof Snow Loadnew code version International Building Codes Chapter 16—Structural Design Continue until 6/1/16- 2012 International Codes All current ...... by State and City Wind 6/1/13 Earthquake Design Data Flood Design Data Chapter Protection Systems • . •• Program (SMP)—amended same •0• Growth Management Act --current Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan ... •. October 17, 2014 The Yakima Valley Office of Emergency Management distributed a survey on October 17, 2014, requesting input from a wide -range of stakeholders. The YVOEM utilized its Email distribution list. The survey form distribution within the City of Yakima included city officials, Fire Department, Police Department, Schools and the general public. Responses validated the city's list of hazards and recommendations. Major emphasis focused on increased education through a variety of social media. The city will incorporate existing social media outlets with disaster planning and mitigation. City of Yakima Planning Commission City of Yakima City Council meeting which allowed public comment Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 10 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 3. Risk Assessment Profile Risk Assessment (Tool and Chart) Hazard Impact on Critical/Essential Service Infrastructure Flood Maps • City of Yakima Flood Impact Area (Map) • Cowiche Canyon Stream Flood Impact Area #1 (Map) • Cowiche Canyon Stream Flood Impact Area #2 (Map) • West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area # 1 (Map) • West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area # 2 (Map) • Ahtanum Stream Flood Impact Area Other Hazard Maps • Yakima County Urban Wildlands • Geologic Hazards • Cascade Range Volcanoes • Potential Sources of Hazardous Materials • Yakima County Tornadoes Reported 2000-2013 • Yakima County Earthquakes, Faults and Folds • Yakima County Two -Percent Probability of Exceedance in 50 years of Peak Ground Acceleration Building a Disaster Resilient Community 11 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 r Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 12 3. Risk Assessment Profile City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Risk Assessment Tool The City of Yakima Risk Assessment tool is an Excel spreadsheet, which is designed to measure the city's risk from the effects of various hazards. The tool is based on a formula that weighs the probability and severity of potential impacts against preparations in place which are intended to minimize these impacts. Using a simple 1 to 5 scale, the probability of occurrence and the impact potential are tabulated along with mitigation efforts and the resources available to respond to the hazard. The score is based on a formula that weighs risk heavily but provides credit for mitigation and response and recovery resources. The higher the score, the higher the jurisdiction's risk from the hazard. Scoring Guidelines. There are eight risk assessment factors contained in the spreadsheet. All factor scoring is done on a scale of 1-5. The formula contained in the spreadsheet calculates higher scores in the occurrence and impact columns as increasing risks, while higher scores in the mitigation and resource categories lower the overall risk score giving credit for steps taken to reduce the likely impact. Based your scoring on a "worst-case scenario." The following guidelines will assist you in scoring each hazard. Historical Occurrence (Frequency): Based on the number of occurrences: At least one occurrence every 1-4 years = 5; At least one occurrence every 5-10 years = 4; At least one occurrence every 11-50 years = 3; At least one occurrence ice every 51-100 years = 2; Has not occurred, but for planning purposes should be evaluated =1. Probability of Occurrence: Based on the statistical probability of the hazard occurring in a given year. This may be obtained by scientific research or may simply be an educated guess. The higher the probability, the higher the score. Use the following guideline in determining you score. If less than 5% score 1, if 5% to 10% score 2, if 10% to 20% score 3, if 20% to 40% score 4, and score 5 if greater than 40% probability. Human Impact: Score based on greatest possible impact should worst-case event occur within the jurisdiction. Consider the likely number of fatalities, injuries, homeless, etc. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Property Impact: Score based on the economic costs of the event, including both direct and indirect property damage from the hazard. Minor damage would be a 1 while a total loss should be a 5. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Business Impact: Score based on factors such as service impact, lost wages, revenues, and taxes. Consider cost of relocation, permanent damage to valuable resources, etc. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Mitigation Activities: Based on steps taken to mitigate the hazard such as structural and redundant technical systems. The more mitigation measures taken, the higher the score. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 13 ' City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Internal Resources: Base your score on the internal response and recovery resources. High scores should be given when there are a formal on-site response teams, or recovery teams. Score 1 low - 5 highest. External Resources: Base your score on the external resources that would be immediately available. This would include the local jurisdictions. Give higher scores if there are specialized equipment and responders available or if contractor support such as specialized equipment, is immediately available. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Understanding the Scores Based on the weighted scoring formula hazards that are relatively high will score 3.5 or higher. The spreadsheet is programmed to change colors based on the score as follows: Red II°fi h Risk Greater thai ni 3. Green Low Risk Less than 2.0 These scores are based on subjective judgments but, nonetheless, they provide a means to quickly rate the jurisdiction's risk from various hazards. Based on this risk scoring, priorities for increased mitigation and preparedness activities can be determined. , �� iii ,,,, x�ii frts ,,iY%�� , � � i, iii, �i.,:,,i... , ,x,,;1144 acf ,>, ��ilG(t« ,,,,,,, .....Ml�.Ji#n , / � • �/ M15/0 % i� /%i// i ii , „ / ✓�i,�ii��ai/i/,,,,,�.,,iamac.,,,,� � � a. � .. TECHNOLOGICAL .. i Hazardous Materials Analysis Results High Risk: Greater than 3.5 Medium Risk: 0. 3.5 Building a Disaster Resilient Community 14 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Hazard Impact on Critical/Essential Service Infrastructure Generally, a catastrophic incident will demand extraordinary actions from state agencies and local jurisdictions - actions for which we are not currently well prepared. The City of Yakima is vulnerable to technological and natural hazards with the potential to cause significant casualties and infrastructure damage. Disasters labeled 'major' are not uncommon and the Yakima County Comprehensive Emergency Management Program (CEMP) addresses the response requirements of floods, earthquakes, hazardous materials and wildfires. These incidents cause injuries, loss of life and damage in a relatively limited area. Current procedures provide response and recovery for these incidents including terrorist incidents. In contrast a catastrophic incident impacts a large area or across many societal sectors. Mitigation efforts reduce impacts and current mitigation efforts are focused on many of the catastrophic scenarios in the City of Yakima; however a catastrophic incident is one that. overwhelms. The nature and extent of damage; number, location and severity of personal injuries; type, availability and condition of surviving resources and the damages to critical infrastructure all are likely to be in the extreme range. Warning may or may not be available. 1. Streets/roads Yakima II':Aire Depau°tment Arterially debris, power lines, water North to South Fair Avenue (East Lincoln to East Mead) 1St Street (city limit to city limit) 6th Street (Nob Hill to East Yakima) 3`d Avenue (West "D" Street to West Washington) 16th Avenue (city limit to city limit) 24th Avenue (West Washington to Nob Hill) 32°d Avenue (Englewood to West Mead/West King) 40th Avenue (SR -12 to West Washington) 48th Avenue (Summitview to West Washington) 56th Avenue (Englewood to Arlington) 64th Avenue (Tieton to Washington) 72nd Avenue (Summitview to West Washington) 80th Avenue (Tieton to Zier Rd) ll:::ast to West; Washington Avenue (181h Street to West City Limits) Mead Avenue (18th Street to West City Limits) Nob Hill Blvd (city limits to city limits) Tieton Drive (5th Avenue to West City Limits) Walnut Avenue (Union Street to 11th Avenue) Yakima Avenue (East City Limits to West City Limits) Summitview Avenue (Yakima Avenue to West City Limits) "B" Street (loth Street to Pierce/7th Avenue) Lincoln Avenue (Fair Avenue to West City Limits) Fruitvale Blvd. (5th Avenue to 40th Avenue/SR-12) t°i Igihiway/If::reeway 1-82: From Rest Haven Road to the Valley Mall Blvd. exit all mile post and exit numbers Hwy 12: From 1-82 to Ackley Road, all mile post and exit numbers. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 15 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Building a Disaster Resilient Community 16 Union Galla Arterials North/South Rudkin Road From Viola Ave. to Valley Mall Blvd. S 18th St. From Rainier PI. to Mead Ave Main St. From Old town Rd. to Leisure Hill Dr. Lon fiber From W. Washington Ave to W. Ahtanum Rd. Goodman Rd. From Ahtanum to Meadowbrook Rd. S. 3rd. Ave From Mead Ave. to Ahtanum S. 16th Ave From W. Washington Ave. to Gilbert Rd. lHast/West Mead Ave. From Rudkin Rd. to s. 1st St. Washington Ave. From S. 18th St. to S. 16th Ave. Valley Mall Blvd. from 1-82 to S. 16th Ave. E. Ahtanum W. A t anurn A,htangm From Main St. to S. 42nd Ave. Meadowbrook Rd. From Goodman Rd. to S. 11th Ave. McCullough Rd. From S. 18th Ave to S. 42nd Ave. 2. Utilities City of Yakima Wa'telr/Iririga't'ion power lines, water mains Naches River WTP 6390 Highway 12 Naches River -River Intake Structure Wastewater Plant 2220 East Viola 3. Health/medical Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center health/medical care facilities 110 S 9th Avenue Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital 2811 Tieton Dr. 4. Emergency response Yakima 1,1re Department fire, police, ambulance Station 91-401 North Front Street (Fire Administration) Fire Station 92-7707 Tieton Drive Fire Station 93-511 North 40th Avenue Fire Station 94-2404 West Washington Avenue Fire Station 95-807 East Nob Hill Blvd Fire Station 96-107 West Ahtanum Road, Union Gap Yalkhrna I' Oice IDepart.inmernt 200 South Third Street milt Mance Services American Medical Response -229 S 2nd Avenue Advanced Life Systems -2106 W Washington Avenue S. Communications SunComm-9 1-1 Communications and Public Safety Dispatch landlines,cell phones, radio linkages ................. .................................... °-°'............................................................................................ ................. ..... ............................ .......... ..................... _ fi...Continuityof government City of Yakima CityHall day-to-day business 129 North Second Street Legal Department/Municipal Court 200 South Third Street Public Works Administration Transit Division; Streets/Traffic; Water & Irrigation; Refuse 2301 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima Convention Center 10 North 81h Street 7. Private -sector business Grainger Industrial normal business activities 905 %z S fist Street Building a Disaster Resilient Community 16 r City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 1 AFM The City of Yakima is subject to the following hazards and their impacts. (Keyed to Table) Building a Disaster Resilient Community 17 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 AEM Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 18 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Repetitive Loss Properties The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines a repetitive loss property as, ".. those [properties] for which two or more losses of at least $1,000 each have been paid under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) within any 10 -year since 1978." A property is defined as a "severe repetitive loss property" when it meets one of these conditions: 1. Four or more separate flood claim payments have been made and each claim payment exceeds $5,000; or 2. At least two flood claim payments have been made and the cumulative payments exceed the value of the property. NFIP Repetitive Losses Building ryNMI, a /////%�,,,,� ��%/ a„..._; .�,��,,,,,, �„i„ Sunnyside, City • ��• ��• Wa pato, City of : U M . MINIMUM - Building a Disaster Resilient Community 20 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Hazard -Specific Action Items 2010-2014 Action Items/Status/Summary rrrrrr /,,,,,,,,,,, rr rr /tiiaio/��iii�ii/rr��.//„iGi,,,,,aoi/////////// riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii/ii ,ri!ri,,% C / ,�,,, r rir �<r%/// '��r., r/ iiiirric ,/i��! , ii////i ,,,,,r ,,,,,.. rrrrr / � ri �:; r ., / . / /i ii//�/ ��aaaiii /� , t�,; ,,, ,,, / rr /i,/ rrrrr i rrr rr r/ rrrrrrraar raa / c,;,,,,, ,�,,, r ",,,,,,,, a/iiii0000ca r / a a rr r ,p �/ ��/ra ,/%„ (;,,✓IIIc „ii/ /%/�/�,r ra rrr i �,i ;,,/,,,,/�i ��%,,,,,, � % �� / i / i/;�, ' � :L� �� i, aiii �,,,,,/ as � � ' ��a ✓ arrrrrrrrrr ai ra _ r„Gar/ The City of be ••• 11' International Building•• by •. -• date of 1 1 *Status --Completed The City of Yakima building inspectors all have within their vehicles a packet to placard buildings after assessing damages forstability. • •• • City will continue be a part of the National Flood Insurance Program and regulate floodplain construction. • •• • City of Yakima participates in the County Flood Control Zone District. Projects identified as FCZD include mitigation encompassing the city's impact area for floods. • •• • Landslide Not applicable—the City of Yakima is not * dpntified in Landslide impact area Yakima will review landslide -related information as disseminated by the Office of Emergency Management. • •• • Wild . Fire City of •t in a high wildfire impact *Status—City will include wildfire into their 2015-2020 update Yakima will review wildland fire -related information as disseminated by the Office of Emergency Management On-going/Unchanged Severe Winter Storm of be ••• 119 International Building•• by - mandated date of 1 1 • • - -• The City of Yakima building inspectors all have within their vehicles a packet to placard buildings after assessing damages forstability. • •• -• Wind Storm The City of be ••• 11' International Building•• by •. -• date of 1 1 *Status --Completed The City of Yakima building inspectors all have within their vehicles a packet to placard buildings after assessing damages forstability. • • • �- City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Earthquake The City of Yakima will be adopting the 2009 International Building Codes by the mandated date of July 2010. *Status --Completed The City of Yakima Building Inspectors all have within their vehicles a packet to placard buildings after assessing damages for their structural stability. *Status—On-going/Unchanged Volcano Continue to develop plans to remove ash fall from critical infrastructures, i.e., waste water treatment, major arterials, water supply; etc. *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Improve emergency service support through alert and warning, emergency operations center, and other direction and control facilities *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Improve emergency public information on clean-up and removal of ashfall *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Hazardous Materials—Fixed and Transportation 2009 International Fire Code dictates issues dealing with chemical regulations established by state and federal programs, i.e., Ecology, EPA, OSHA, etc. *Status --Completed Yakima Fire Department continues to update response equipment and training. *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Yakima Fire Department continues to conduct hazard assessments on chemical facilities. *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Yakima Fire Department continues to use risk mapping and technologies *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Yakima Fire Department continues to participate in the county LEPC. *Status-- On-going/Unchanged Building a Disaster Resilient Community 22 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 2015-2020 Hazard -Specific Action Items i j Short -Range (less than 2 years); Mid -Range (2-5 years); Long -Range (more 0"t, VOR than 5 years); Ongoing Actual; i (Ji Estima responsibility..action item response. addressing"The City's priority; timeline; funding source and estimated costs for opportunistic and. Ite s *Lead **Priority "Funding ResponsibilityAction preparednessEmergency • :.Local (in-kind) programseducation .. Director Drills, exercises in homes, — -------- F; 7erg7��y• •.Local (in-kind) workplaces,.. Director .' • •.Local (in-kind) Management Director Hazari. "safety fairs." Emergency• •.Local (in-kind) Management Director Hazard awareness weeks. Emergency• •.Local (in-kind) Director Preparedness handbooks, Emergency Ongoing Local (in-kind) brochures;Management weather guides, etc. Director newspapersevere Regular Ongoing Local (in-kind) Management Director Utility bill inserts. Emergency. •. .) Director DROUGHT/HEATManagement Items Lead **Priority "Funding . . . ........... ResponsibilityAction 'IT Assess Vulnerability o Drought EmergencyLocal (in-kind) City of Yakima Hazard MitigationPlan 2015 1 EM ,,,�� ///// /iii ii „n �/ ,,,,,,;e✓// ,�� .,/rrrr////// /ir%/ ./ / ,, / /, rrrrrrrrrri%/ ,,..... � � �� ' �/ ,,, ��jj//// ��/�� a rr � ,,,r//(/ rrrrrr ,,; � !i, ,� i ;� / ,,,d � � ;;_; //% , / �� „ �//�� ;...I'll- �,,,,i � n �// r ......... / � r "✓i „ :�� ,;,;i . / ;;;; / / PHorfty� Short -Range (less than 2 years); Mid -Range (2-S years); Long -Range (more r a, than S years); Ongoing i (Low I�J Monitor Water SupplyP - • •• • • for Drought Local (in-kind) Require Water Conservation Water Department Local (in-kind) DroughtPlan During • • • Educate Residents on Water Water Department Local (in-kind) SavingTechniques EARTHQUAKE Action Items *Lead **P iority "Funding •. and Enforce Building Code Local (in-kind) CodesAdopt Administration Earthquake Emergency Local (in-kind) MitigationIncorporate • Local Planning Management Director • and Assess Community• •• • Vulnerability• Seismic Department Hazards Conduct Inspections of Building Code Local (in-kind) Safety Administration Critical Facilities and Local (in-kind) Infrastructure Implementrotect • • _ •I • Mitigation• EarthquakeIncrease • •• _ • cal (in-kind) Awareness Management I Director :(in-:k:ind) Conduct Outreach to Builders, Code Local Architects, Engineers, • Administration Inspectors Provide Information on Code Local (in-kind) Structural • • Administration Retrofitting EXTREME TEMPERATURES Action Items *Lead ,"Funding pl Ir Responsibility Increase Awareness of • •• • • Temperature• Sajfety Management Director Assist Vulnerable Populations Emergency LocalItio Management Director City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM s � s e e t ® ® ® a m m m Fid@9tVYUP.'q�» short-Range (less than 2 years); Mid-Range (2-5 years); Long-Range (moreFu �p� dMg Sou�u ce" Cost: &.g (High); IIS (Medium); L Local, State; FEMA; than 5 years); Ongoing Actual; (Low Private; Other Estimated Educate Property Owners Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) About Freezing Pipes Management Director FLOOD (RIVER AND STREAMS) Action Items *Lead **Priority **Timeline **Funding **Estimated Responsibility Cost Incorporate Flood Mitigation in Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Local Planning Management Director ...... p.................pp................._.............................................................................. Form Partnershi s to Su ort Planning Division H Ongoing _ Local (in-kind) Floodplain Management Limit or Restrict Development Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) in Floodplain Areas Department Adopt and Enforce Building Code H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Codes and Development Administration Standards _________ Improve Stormwater . _ .............. ..w......... Engineering H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Management Planning Department Adopt Polices to Reduce Engineering H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Stormwater Runoff _ Department Improve Flood Risk Assessment Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Management Director ..� p y Manage the Floodplain Beyond Planning _.........................H-- g .................. .. Ongoing Local (in-kind) Minimum Requirements Department Conduct Regular Maintenance Engineering H Ongoing Local (in-kind) for Drainage Systems and Flood Department Control Structures �WW Protect Infrastructure Public Works H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Protect Critical Facilities Engineering H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Department Construct Flood Control Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Measures Department Preserve Floodplains as Open Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Space Department Increase Awareness of Flood Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Risk and Safety Management Director Educate Property Owners Planning H Ongoing Local (n-kind) about Flood Mitigation Department Techniques Building a Disaster Resilient Community 25 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 • .......... i l ,, Mork Estima un ngSmA '1111 H i h M Short -Ra nge less than years); �Alcl-Rang (2- ars); Long -Range (more cost� j, Local; State; FEMA; than 5 yea, oln Private; her Accitual; I� STORMEstimated71SEVERE WIND Action Items *Lead "Priority �1 � Responsibility Adopt. Enforce 6t'�4�• ••-• •. • : Co-desAdministration or Require Site and Code Local (in-kind) StandardsPromote Building Design Administration Minimize . Damage to Severe Emergency - Management Director Increase Severe Wind Risk EmergencyLocal • •. (in-kind) Awareness Management DirectorWind SEVERE WINTER STORMS/FREEZES Action Items _1 *Lead **Pri�ority i "Funding "Estimated Responsibility Cost Adopt and Enforce Building Code Local (in-kind CodesAdministration Protect Buildings and ••- • •.Local (in-kind) Infrastructure A. • Impacts to Roadways Public Works 111109 11191119 ConductReduce I k . Awareness Activities Management Director Assist Vulnerable Populations• •. Local (in-kind) • --------------- TORNADO Action Items .I "Priority "Funding IIResponsibility ,*Lead. , Require •-Resistant Code Local • —Building Techniques Administration VOLCANIC• Items *Lead "Priority "Funding "Estimated ResponsibilityAction ' Maintain ash removal plans WILDLAND FIRE Action Items ad "Priority "Funding "Estimatedn ReS.. Si • and Assess Vulnerability• •• • • to Wildfire Department Building a Disaster Resilient Community 26 f City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM A 6 t l ® ® 1 p i ne lnee l�n"ir�u°l��o Short-Range (less than 2 years), Mid-Range (2-5 years); Dong-Range (more H (Hight; V(Mediuml; Lthan l"uagvatuuv5 Source. Local, State; FEMA; Est nated r,"ogtd (Low ( 5 years); Ongoing Private; Other Actual; Estimated Reduce Risk through Land Use Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Planning _ Department Encourage residents to assess Yakima Fire H Ongoing Local (in-kind) and improve accessibility to Department their property. Increase Wildfire Risk Yakima Fire H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Awareness Department Educate Property Owners Yakima Fire H Ongoing Local (in-kind) about Wildfire Mitigation Department Techniques MULTIPLE HAZARDS Action Items *Lead **Priority **Timeline **Funding **Estimated Responsibility Cost Assess Community Risk Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Management Director Map Community Risk Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Management Director Prevent Development Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) in Hazard Areas Department Adopt Development Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Regulations in Hazard Areas .._ _ .._____ ____ _._.______W........_...... Department ________................. Integrate Mitigation into Local Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Planning Management �._... ..... �_____ Director Strengthen Land Use Planning H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Regulations Department Adopt and Enforce Building Code H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Codes Administration Monitor Mitigation Plan Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Implementation Management ._.. .............. Director Protect Structures Code Ongoing Local (in-kind) Administration Increase Hazard Education and Emergency H Ongoing �_..._.___________ Local (in-kind) Risk Awareness Management Director Improve Household Disaster _.. ..... Emergency H Ongoing Local (in-kind) Preparedness Management Director Building a Disaster Resilient Community 27 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 28 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 2015-2020 Hazard -Specific Action Items Annual Review and Progress Summary Plan monitoring means tracking the implementation of the plan over time. The plan should identify how, when, and by whom the plan will be monitored. For example, the plan may describe a monitoring system for tracking the status of the identified mitigation actions and reporting this information on an annual basis. The responsible agency assigned to each mitigation action should be responsible for tracking and reporting on each of their actions. Page 33 illustrates the report form for reporting progress on a mitigation action. Step One: Identify mitigation actions that your planning team has identified for the annual review. The planning team has the option to address ALL action items, or only those that should be acted on during this first year cycle of review. Step Two: Complete a form as illustrated on page 32 for each Mitigation Action identified in Hazard Specific tables on pages 23-27. Step Three: Insert the letter indicated in the Action Status onto the following Annual Review and Summary table. Step Four: Submit the completed form(s) to the City's Emergency Management Office. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 29 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EM Building a Disaster Resilient Community 30 �,: i„ /i 70, , ta jus" (hna On+'/fin serf L TT g"j' %i1CJf,'CI Plan /%i...�/ iii iiiiiii� forDrought /i0000i��i Require• •n During Drou g h t C • n • i tions Educate• on • New Action Items if Applicable EARTHQUAKEAdd Adopt and Enforce Building Codesi Incorporate Earthquake• • Local • and Assess Community• • Seismic Hazards Conduct Inspectionsof • Protect• Infrastructure Implement11,111, 11,11,111—•Techniques ,--Increase_Earthquake Risk Awareness Conduct Outreach to Builders,and Inspectors Provide Information on Structural and Non -Structural Retrofitting Add New Action Items if Applicable EXTREME TEMPERATURES Actions Increase Awareness of • and Safety ,,-Assis,t,-V,.u,,I,,,n,e,r,a,ble Populations Educate•• Owners About Freezing Pipes FLOOD (RIVER AND STREAMS) Form Partnerships to Support Floodplain Management Limit or •• Floodplain and Enforce Building Codes and Development Standards —Aclopt Improve Stormwater_ Adopt Polices to Reduce StormwaterRunoff —improve Flood Risk Assessment FloodplainManage the • • Minimum Requirements Conduct Regular Maintenance for Drainage Systems and Flood Control Structures • • IL - Protect Critical Facilities Construct••• Control Building a Disaster Resilient Community 30 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Preserve Floodplains as Open Space Increase Awareness of Flood Risk and Safety Educate Property Owners about Flood Mitigation Techniques Add New Action Items if Applicable SEVERE WIND STORM Actions Adopt and Enforce Building Codes Promote or Require Site and Building Design Standards to Minimize Wind D Assess Vulnerability to Severe Wind Increase Severe Wind Risk Awareness Add New Action Items ifAoalicable SEVERE WINTER Actions Adopt and Enforce Building Codes ...... g __....._ Protect Buildings and Infrastructure Reduce Impacts to Roadways Conduct Winter Weather Risk Awareness Activities Assist Vulnerable Populations Add New Action Items if Applicable Require Wind -Resistant Buildi Add New Action Items ifAoali Maintain ash -removal plans Add New Action Items if ADI Map and Assess Vulnerability to Wildfire Reduce Risk through Land Use Planning Encourage residents to assess and impro Increase Wildfire Risk Awareness Educate Property Owners about Wildfire Add New Action Items if Applicable Assess Community Risk ues Status Status TORNADO Actions Status VOLCANIC ERUPTION Actions WILDLAND FIRE Actions ve accessibility to their property. _. Mitigation Techniques MULTIPLE HAZARDS Actions Building a Disaster Resilient Community 31 Status Status Status City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Building a Disaster Resilient Community 32 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 2015-2020 Hazard -Specific Action Items Annual Review Progress Report Form. ® . Progress Report Period From Date: To Date: Action Item Responsible Agency Contact Name Contact Phone/Email ................ A. Completed Action Status B. In Progress (on Schedule) Anticipated completion date: C. In Progress (delayed) Explain: D. Delayed Until Funding Available E. Cancelled SUMMARY OF ACTION PROGRESS FOR THIS REPORT PERIOD What was accomplished for this Action during this reporting period? What obstacles, problem, or delays did the Action encounter? If uncompleted, is the Action still relevant? Should the Action be changed or revised? Other comments Building a Disaster Resilient Community 33 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 EN Blank Intentionally. Building a Disaster Resilient Community 34 City of Yakima Hazard Mitigation Plan Attachments Maps 1. Yakima County Population Density 2. City of Yakima Flood Impact Area 3. Cowiche Canyon Stream Flood Impact Area 4. Cowiche Canyon Stream Flood (with city limits outlined) 5. Yakima County Public Owned Land 6. City of Yakima Transportation Infrastructure 7. Yakima County Urban Wildlands Fire Potential 8. Ahtanum Stream Flood Impact Area 9. West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area 10. West Valley Stream Flood Impact Area (with city limits outlined) 11. Yakima County Geologic Hazards 12. Cascade Range Volcanoes 13. Yakima County Tornados Reported 2000 to 2013 14. Yakima County Two -percent probability of exceedance in 50 years map of peak ground acceleration 15. Yakima County Facilities that are Potential Sources of Hazardous Material 16. Yakima County Earthquakes, Faults and Folds Other Documents 1. Yakima Community Profile YAKIMA COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SERVICES 3 Yakima County 90 " Population Density a. �. iECiift ' •� t x '� . v f` E ' g �i414R S(! g - ° = x � _ a_ _ Yakima County i 4.1_ � � 6 �t Hn Hazard Mitigation Pla rang r tiz Map Inset _ 0 3.5 -1 _ 1 in = 9.4 miles t EGA, h: '✓A L LE' Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derved from several databases. The ' County cannot accept respons bitity for any errors -- mens Path *�.e ws • .e; n 'mm n..A°baa ��,.,i pir „' _a .€ .mxd -` _. ,. E– _ — _ --.. _ _... _ -._ – – Therefore there are no warranties for this product Date' September 18 2014 YAKIM AUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFur(MATION SERVICES City of Yakima Flood Impact Area FLOOD WAY 100 Year Streams Perennial Stream Lake or Pond Aquaduct Canal or Ditch -- Intermittent Stream — Siphon City Limits 2013 Yakima County Orthophotos Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset 0 0 375 0.75 1. 1 in = 1 miles BE Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases. The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors - Therefore, there are no vrarranfies for this product Date: Sept 26, 2014 Document Path: �s arca R. YAKIM AUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INt—MATION SERVICES _ 4 t = t Cowiche Canyon t Stream Flood Impact Area - , i.' y r t _ s _ I z L-" FLOODWAY 100 Year City Limits Streams Perennial Stream Lake or Pond Aquaduct Canal or Ditch --- Intermittent Stream Siphon State & Fed Roads -- All Roads Ln Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset { g a 1,75A 3,5M 7,0Q0 Feet �e 1 inch = 4,700 feet W� E S Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County - - Scertcw = This map was derived from several databases.. The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors. ' Yakima Therefore there are no warranties for this product- _ Date: Sept 24 2009 U) LU 0 r_ 0-0 LU 0 Tm (n E E Z z 0 0 U) cu o 42 4.0 a D 0 0 c 0 E V s co E 2 it -K C) U) Q 0 CL Iwo O co 0 LU (VOU .... . . . .. ......... 41" 4,4 1,6 rz, JI P 11-H K T, "PH j �Ng, An loe . . . ....... .. .... .... 'Ib ."0 .. ................. . W II V PUN pa lv War T ..... ...... -IJ 71 .. ...... gy oil oi-""ifl pw- V-1 al Z lV PUN lv War T .�V46i, 7t'0 ....... . . . . ..... ...... -IJ 71 .. ...... gy oil oi-""ifl pw- V-1 al Z lV Document Path: R:ldisk_5\projects\county\emerman\Miligaticn2015\MapDocs\public_ownermsd HE Njches_,.--.-,-_,, E Yakima �tclinp MoxtiJ -`+ 02 — � � MOM 1 i -,Pat alit IL -r--. t1 ALE R 4 �' :. a M; YAKIM RUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INF�..MATION SERVICES Yakima County Public Owned Land City Limits Public Owned Land US Bureau of Land Mgmt US Bureau of Reclamation US Dept of Defense US Dept of Fish and Wildlife j US Forest Service: National Forest ��. US Forest Service: Wildemess Area Yakama Nation WA State Dept of Agriculture WA State Dept of Fish and Wildlife WA Dept of Natural Resources WA State Dept of Transportation WA State Parks and Rec Commission MWO_ Yakima County Local Government Port Districts Fire Districts Irrigation Districts School Districts/Educational, YVCC Other Federal Agencies Other State Agencies Cowiche Canyon Conservancy Snow Mountain Ranch Other Conservation Agencies Grant County Private; ROW Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset 0 3-5 7 1lriles 1 in = 9.4 miles Ad N .. — W E > Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors. Therefore, there are no warranties for this product Date: September 16, 2014 � oy w„ ev"%k& Wi M �„✓, qd aeooa� w� , bob" n� �: M''V13'fiM4dr dwti9 .AV W99 N Mp e v WBS S �a r � 4w E a avi " Bq f0 N N a+w ddawi vl I Q O O 6Ji o o A i�s E a s d i¢ U p o c c� m r v 2 S in LL Od (0 in a o — I}� ax*+yww �V mrAwSJX A&Pow�iS x'YY' t I +w '� WIMw UY: , 5 aur,w�u,Wwm6d y , rwmv omgN q�, ( u, � rI�N5'd1 d�. Ro:u Cunnl,_�fd e 6,G�IIDvr^rw«� reed "'"'"'n ,,w Im ^w}MMrPt, Iba y 8" ,. 44 wMN Ig4PIV"Itl ,,. "gar6ui�r1 Pa e'maleeW - �� 3 .AV W99 N Mp e v WBS S �a r � 4w (N avi " Bq �"on " a+w ddawi vl I � ew wv6s � q4m 1�,� _ ,, a5 � awvlm4xml Wlutt�'rw wuwwrke lw � el;l M�wi «w�� 1 fNfVllI�PM�! ovwvm , ax*+yww uN mrAwSJX A&Pow�iS x'YY' t m Y 0619Pg.W +w '� WIMw UY: , 5 aur,w�u,Wwm6d y , rwmv omgN q�, ( u, � rI�N5'd1 d�. Ro:u Cunnl,_�fd e 6,G�IIDvr^rw«� reed "'"'"'n ,,w Im ^w}MMrPt, Iba �h9Vf dt'",N�"� �fPbwlPli 8" PMW@PW y fiA' 44 wMN Ig4PIV"Itl ,,. "gar6ui�r1 uN titih nyw drwdFV�HwIu '� P,a 64ak wSeua�-„ i wny yuboMN , � u ,1w �1 �Pv'IVImV Ptl f bCA wWVMIp SelBh i61 P>:ee ,rr,.. „ r E c F U F o w w x Pa e'maleeW - �� 3 .AV W99 N Mp e v WBS S �a r � 4w (N avi " +Pro'W,uB. �"on " a+w ddawi vl I ew wv6s � q4m 1�,� _ ,, a5 � awvlm4xml Wlutt�'rw wuwwrke lw � el;l M�wi «w�� NPaBMJ,Ap tlW4W1 wiP fNfVllI�PM�! ovwvm , ax*+yww uN mrAwSJX A&Pow�iS x'YY' �nM.�S*�d m Y 0619Pg.W w {� �hAW MWl{1w SN WIMw UY: , �49u� �' •, y , rwmv omgN q�, ( u, � rI�N5'd1 d�. w � mr+mtl� Im ^w}MMrPt, Iba �h9Vf dt'",N�"� �fPbwlPli 8" PMW@PW y fiA' 44 wMN Ig4PIV"Itl ,,. unvw9Bs � SK,'s,moray WVPa �. titih nyw N waw w9b• ," , OWAU !•, v dw'Ama , : .. "�,1°"a'w I74troeW 64ak wSeua�-„ i wny yuboMN , � u ,1w �1 �Pv'IVImV Ptl f bCA wWVMIp m1x 4M1�iw 9 IV W9VN vVleb4., e nv 41092 .fPantl WBSN "S 991R ry9Mr Mpvl'M' , ^fNI Mi v' 3dha �w' � lwid.m� ' S 4 v mrnv 7kPLwAq .Rv Pies xwi �x 9 .AV W99 N Mp e v WBS S �a r � 4w (N avi " V 41 68 N _ ," aRNwd -IV 4199 a �"on Me�wwPrP , MI 103 A wa ma gh" a5 � awvlm4xml a:m+lsl vt N� Id aPef v «a 6F Psn7+Pmk ae �^PMd GP �fif�m�.m I. ivaV"" IV WIN N,Axp6CR 1� A� '�S ^ S'W� ^II ✓ y6 ORlf fW4.wW+l4i f NbMW {M� %1l urdP �� ' ti ^H 4198 I '. Pa,aN3 unvw9Bs � ;, anv woes . wWei N � Ohl xx4 xawwti , ymrAd �" .. "�,1°"a'w I74troeW 9 i 9 �a (N avi �"on C) 1� in pE u3 n I I ��. l anv 46113'.,Illtlae,amappaM'� ,rr,.. „ r E c F U F o w w x "Ohh �a I I ��. l anv 46113'.,Illtlae,amappaM'� ,rr,.. x! �M I II , r Y 4 w l wry 'Pum wwtmb >I. YAKIM RUNTY 4verg�n Ridge GEOGRAPHIC INFot<MATION SERVICES Yakima County -T,4S VALLEY Urban Wildlands Fire Potential AM —�-- Urban Wildlands - Risk Low Medium w High Extreme 01L, IRWIN Sam 7777 City Limits W Rivers - - - - - - - - - iff-7 LState & Federal Roads N— Yakima r" R - "all wx" ten G ap 0 11-2 ga—MI-11 Al \A1 VMS& X -WiIlKl- . 31-0 1W to Nh WIN- Harnrah Yakima County 7� W -N Hazard Mitigation Plan toppenish qv 4 'z - Granger R-- - - - - OMap Inset 27- N M V Cran 21— V 0 35 7 - - - - - - - - - - - M51& ANN 1MV —00-3 mabcvn= I in = 9.4 miles q No & - R S r "k,I A 6- all_;�-- "A j W A AN NA- W E 46, Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases, The County cannot accept responsibility for any errom Therefore, them are no warranties for this product W, P.M: Date: September 26, 2014 In U � uicn }LU E % Z Z E O p � m O E �� ria } E J v Q a Q L E } O 16 o L Z50 III LU (U I m C� I.� " fi� rvymJ v , me, i'hn vN�ia G. a w&`i nr. . 4u { i ` v wn�M +rpr� ri uka m wN,narrrn�tl M' 14'W bPk Ms, I C5 6 .v WWI= 2➢ E % E � m y p'° O } E J v n c E a c a w 3Q t 6) 0 o` �_ E o U (%] " ) �o Q 16 o L Z50 III I m C� I.� N i l I C5 6 .v WWI= 2➢ % `o 16 o L Z50 m C� v� L2 o It z � c� U3ov N Env II��II � F U F 9 1 p IIIIIIII wN ii-ij p W' } 7 r b{i 1 ik- { r r' r B �r �r 1'� P J P 3 E I w � 1° l m U 0 n, 0 y o i Redtail Rd Gook Hill Rd - �'-�-' f M .-..--------------- M ---z----- .s3 FLOODWAY -_' 100 Year Streams Perennial Stream Lake or Pond Aquaduct Canal or Ditch --- Intermittent Stream Siphon ---- All Roads Rd Yakima County YAKIM RUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFL)HMATION SERVICES W-- w .West Valley Stream Flood -� Impact Area .r FLOODWAY -_' 100 Year Streams Perennial Stream Lake or Pond Aquaduct Canal or Ditch --- Intermittent Stream Siphon ---- All Roads Rd Yakima County W-- - Hazard Mitigation Plan � r`4 - �- Map Inset T - - - 0 0.375 0-75 1 1 in = 1 miles N 1 wE I 6 S #• Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County ? This map was derived from several databases. The `k1 If County cannot accept responsibility for any errors.. l ( t Therefore, there e are no warranfies for this product. - ( Date: Sept 25, 2014 `._ h YAKIM -)UNTY - P€ GEOGRAPHIC Rd INFO„idATION SERVICES u$ _. -_ West Valley _ Stream Flood —— t- y. - d Impact Area a �> a E F1 1 --d !an Rd, LFi i y r --- �m—.yam q � _' Rd - -- Rd ` F i { f r �f 1G' ��i 5vee`�t�� &mertnan�M=.-a3�30,1,�6i�0t=f�o8 Yv`ri1.�nsd•• FLOODWAY 100 Year City Limits Streams --- Perennial Stream Lake or Pond Aquaduct Canal or Ditch --- Intermittent Stream Siphon ------ All Roads Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan 4 i Map Inset _ z $t0 0.375 0.75 1 in = 1 miles N W E d S Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases_ The ` County cannot accept responsibility for any errors. Therefore, there are no warranties for this product. Date: Sept 25, 2014 YAKIM WNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFumMATION SERVICES Yakima County Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards OEarthquake Intermediate Risk Earthquake High Risk Landslide Intermediate Risk Landslide High Risk City Limits State 8 Federal Roads — County Roads 0 3-5 7 1 :n 1 in = 9 4 miles t; W+E 1 90— S Copyright(C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors. Therefore, there are no warranties for this product. Date: September 26, 2014 W �o � 0) LU Z O I.L n 5 C E 2."v C LL w�t Im Q 'I E u ; E / d' C7 U) LLI UjE %/% / F, 07 �r 444 wrote j' a a 7ymm x f r Al 1i A w<•r wy A »L i 1,j iJt�� 3f r m d l Po U V s. tjwf r, YIr-� // 1 �l Hi� �w! ^��'� Y Rl" r Po �/�/fin, / Y p %Y �Il11f/% a r i 1.r ; r / %� , /r /r ; d m / / //// M E �, o r �/ Y, � �,i "s, P w r �r r % G�// l /r IVI , J , / y `, 1)!YI '" r lJi / / r9/r 6 ✓% �� V„P fruo ,r �o / �/ m 1/4 , 1, i % /�i/ / �'P / x r�+ 7` � // 1�j �f, w z /!Mg i ✓' f �, // / / / / /'... /i i / 0 � 11I r✓ � r �"'W” l r � / ' a✓ � � �.. i ; ` Ih , / Ar / Y j ✓ / / ✓ V / / ' r ✓ /// p� N rI� �Iy12,�w ,�i9i>h 1 if` ifgg6x / % 1 D� / l ff %/°� ��/�✓ m r 1V,.. gq, i il'=; jJ rc q ,� '1U 'M H/;,, l "u ✓,, / q F7 y✓� '� rYr,y' I f� lul(� Plop ww XI, r, w ,wap �y''' d I / yr "xr�, " n> f ✓ // ?x.. a yQi' a"� ll m� wl' ' r /r, 1% If i Al 'iIX,rrr / r ro i Fi 11 /1 �, a a +w k rVV ae iy, /I ., f ' , a u rry f ((` e // YI,"YI l 4 6r d V �i0 la, w, tv :IF irk q / / ' y e- lr M w 0 1 d 5f Af » Qf oe w �r r ,a � ✓� n mh^ I /i r� r` v W� r/'� / rfbF fwrr'rw 'fir 4 Al 9 w-yrID r h J rlry r Z / m ycwi m A tW wl% a r 8�IIY IJ 2"�,Y Aa vi1f��G �rr�p� Y. ''Y'Y06, 9 r / / / 4••� P M � 1� ni / / c, it ✓ , r, � � of A 7 M. r 3 , , x . n I r , Fn Q y U92' y ry Em E 2."v 'I E u ; E U v a y U n v v N E� LLI UjE %/% / F, 07 �r 444 wrote j' a a 7ymm x f r Al 1i A w<•r wy A »L i 1,j iJt�� 3f r m d l Po U V s. tjwf r, YIr-� // 1 �l Hi� �w! ^��'� Y Rl" r Po �/�/fin, / Y p %Y �Il11f/% a r i 1.r ; r / %� , /r /r ; d m / / //// M E �, o r �/ Y, � �,i "s, P w r �r r % G�// l /r IVI , J , / y `, 1)!YI '" r lJi / / r9/r 6 ✓% �� V„P fruo ,r �o / �/ m 1/4 , 1, i % /�i/ / �'P / x r�+ 7` � // 1�j �f, w z /!Mg i ✓' f �, // / / / / /'... /i i / 0 � 11I r✓ � r �"'W” l r � / ' a✓ � � �.. i ; ` Ih , / Ar / Y j ✓ / / ✓ V / / ' r ✓ /// p� N rI� �Iy12,�w ,�i9i>h 1 if` ifgg6x / % 1 D� / l ff %/°� ��/�✓ m r 1V,.. gq, i il'=; jJ rc q ,� '1U 'M H/;,, l "u ✓,, / q F7 y✓� '� rYr,y' I f� lul(� Plop ww XI, r, w ,wap �y''' d I / yr "xr�, " n> f ✓ // ?x.. a yQi' a"� ll m� wl' ' r /r, 1% If i Al 'iIX,rrr / r ro i Fi 11 /1 �, a a +w k rVV ae iy, /I ., f ' , a u rry f ((` e // YI,"YI l 4 6r d V �i0 la, w, tv :IF irk q / / ' y e- lr M w 0 1 d 5f Af » Qf oe w �r r ,a � ✓� n mh^ I /i r� r` v W� r/'� / rfbF fwrr'rw 'fir 4 Al 9 w-yrID r h J rlry r Z / m ycwi m A tW wl% a r 8�IIY IJ 2"�,Y Aa vi1f��G �rr�p� Y. ''Y'Y06, 9 r / / / 4••� P M � 1� ni / / c, it ✓ , r, � � of A 7 M. r 3 , , x . n I r , _7 r -ADAMS C E D A R V A L L E Y Document Path: R:\disk_5\projects\county\emerman\Mitigabon2015Wag�D '" nada=mxd Center Tieto 61 F 5/9/2005 4/7/08,, = Mo .. 8 UutiDn Cap s _ 24 i 5/1$/200p NN3P D — Ha `fah �dlsf� M.. SunnAsidi 4/2312005, PIT YAKIM UNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFLARMATION SERVICES Yakima County Tornados Reported 2000 to 2013 Tornado City Limits NOAH- Severe Weather Database 2013, Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset 0 3.5 7 1 IIs 1 in = 9.4 miles t MrssoDrr : , _ Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases. The County cannot accept responsibility for any emors- Therefore, there are no warranties for this product. -- - - Date: September 1 0, 2014 N _7 r -ADAMS C E D A R V A L L E Y Document Path: R:\disk_5\projects\county\emerman\Mitigabon2015Wag�D '" nada=mxd Center Tieto 61 F 5/9/2005 4/7/08,, = Mo .. 8 UutiDn Cap s _ 24 i 5/1$/200p NN3P D — Ha `fah �dlsf� M.. SunnAsidi 4/2312005, PIT YAKIM UNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFLARMATION SERVICES Yakima County Tornados Reported 2000 to 2013 Tornado City Limits NOAH- Severe Weather Database 2013, Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset 0 3.5 7 1 IIs 1 in = 9.4 miles t MrssoDrr : , _ Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases. The County cannot accept responsibility for any emors- Therefore, there are no warranties for this product. -- - - Date: September 1 0, 2014 31 NAes Ti�� ASS 5 YAKIM RUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFuKMATION SERVICES Yakima County Two -percent probability of exceedance in 50 years map of peak ground acceleration = City Limits Peak Acceleration, Expressed as a Fraction of Standard Gravity (9) 18 .20 .3 .4 Petersen, MD,, Moschetti, M,P., Powers, P.M„ Mueller, C,S., Haller, K.M., Frankel, &D: Zang, Yueh ua, Rezaeian, Sanaz, Harmsen, S.C„ Boyd, QS„ Field, Ned, Chen, Rui, Rukstales, K,S., Luca, Nico, Wheeler, R -L., Williams, R,A,, and Olsen, A -H_, 2014, Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 2014-1091, 243 P:, http //dx: doi,org110 3133/ofr20141091, Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset ` 0 3,5 1 Mab n 1 in = 9.4 miles N W + E S Copyrght(C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases.. The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors Therefore there are no warranties for this product. Date: September 18. 2014 yfik31nll Union G4Mize. Wap o Ha rah Zill" Ao l ... . . YAKIM RUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFuKMATION SERVICES Yakima County Two -percent probability of exceedance in 50 years map of peak ground acceleration = City Limits Peak Acceleration, Expressed as a Fraction of Standard Gravity (9) 18 .20 .3 .4 Petersen, MD,, Moschetti, M,P., Powers, P.M„ Mueller, C,S., Haller, K.M., Frankel, &D: Zang, Yueh ua, Rezaeian, Sanaz, Harmsen, S.C„ Boyd, QS„ Field, Ned, Chen, Rui, Rukstales, K,S., Luca, Nico, Wheeler, R -L., Williams, R,A,, and Olsen, A -H_, 2014, Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report 2014-1091, 243 P:, http //dx: doi,org110 3133/ofr20141091, Yakima County Hazard Mitigation Plan Map Inset ` 0 3,5 1 Mab n 1 in = 9.4 miles N W + E S Copyrght(C) 2014 Yakima County This map was derived from several databases.. The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors Therefore there are no warranties for this product. Date: September 18. 2014 k NTY GEOGRAPHIC INFumMATI TION SERVICES Yakima County DY Facilities that are T Potential Sources of e� m _ Hazardous Materials e a a City Limits akima State Clean-up Sites Nactie a f = Center Facility �- IK p a A� w� 3 \ �.: e Was hington State Department of Ecology - - \ - Publication_Date:20120629 Facility/Ske Database _ http://w ..ecy.wa. gov/services/gis/data/data htm#F - t --\ \ Downloaded on September 26, 2014 3 - \, s. Air Yakima County Tt_ Hazard Mitigation Plan ,.� S¢nnste �. A Map Inset .\i v= '17 P9Rkt�Yl 3.5 7 15 .,"\ vv^iba r 1 in = 9.4 miles W + E `€ ! Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County § '•' \ This map was derived from several databases_ The � U z County cannot accept responsibility for any errors. there are no warranties for this product. Document Path k,'3se€;-tenon€�5:sn2@i:7€pf3clftdasdoystSatenalsmxd T �- - -'3 _ -- - - - ---- -- - - - Date: September 16,2014 g Rion Gap —S 24 2.1 e ` - _ Washington State Department of Natural Resources t Division of Geology and Earth Resources Ae .� G SFj93A — December of Washin o 9t n State cembe 3 s H1-- h Ziff, ORYakima County T�=fir Hazard Mitigation Plan !� Map Inset GrandiEt — .,- - - - . _ 3.5 7 1- res p _ NIA 1 in = 9-4 miles t t VF tw Copyright (C) 2014 Yakima County t This map was derived from several databases The County cannot accept responsibility for any errors- -- Therefore, there are no warranfies for this product �– _ Date: September 18,2014 Document Path �c.dsk `f;7�slso�niy�rrxs:ma M a�.c�ns0t�.�aap�css��n.�a,T��€s.msd - � .._may..,. --` _. =- P Community Profile Yakima, Washint►n Yakima 12 ,i Yakima Cou tv. WA LOCATION Yakima is located in South Central Washington where the Naches and Yakima rivers join. It is centrally located on the 1-82 corridor; 140 miles from Seattle, 188 miles from Portland and 196 miles to Spokane. POPULATION City of Yakima - 91,067 Within 15 Miles - 168,741 Within 30 Miles - 229,456 CITY GOVERNMENT 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509) 575-6000 -rww ct.yakkn1 ww ua Form: Council/Manager. The seven -person council is elected by the citizens of Yakima to four year terms. The council elects the mayor to a two year term. MUSEUMS There are three museums within Yakima's city limits, they are the Yakirr)@,.yg#qy.IxJNt s ur , the McAllister Museurn of Aviation, and the YpKrna Valley,Trolle t�q rn. Visit their websites for detailed information. LIBRARIES The city of Yakima is served by three locations; Downtown (main branch), Southeast, and Summitview Ave. For more information on the Yakima Valley Regional Library loca- tions and hours of operation, click here TOP AREA EMPLOYERS Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Yakima School District Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center Walmart Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic Yakima County SCHOOLS: The Greater Yakima area is served by three school dis- tricts, Yakima, West Valley, and East Valley. Combined QUALITY OF LIFE they educate over 22,000 students, (see pages 4-6 for The city of Yakima has 17 major parks with numerous soc- more detailed profiles). Yakima also has a community col- cer, baseball, and softball fields, tennis courts, ponds, and lege, a private technical institute, and an osteopathic playgrounds. There are two city pools, two water play- medical university. grounds, and two skateboard parks. Yakima is also home to the Capitol Theatre, Symphony Orchestra, numerous There are two private high schools complemented by a art galleries, two professional and one semi -pro sports number of private elementary and preschools. For more teams, and the Yakima SunDome featuring many events. detailed private school listings, click here. To learn about local events and activities, click here Childcare and preschool information on page three. 41 a. 5�1� kO*:11111 A�'p Y a � -« uirf9"iTl-1 v;ew AveSurnmityie"w a °mond <'be°1, u ra . er �t� T Yakima ti, essay LOCATION Yakima is located in South Central Washington where the Naches and Yakima rivers join. It is centrally located on the 1-82 corridor; 140 miles from Seattle, 188 miles from Portland and 196 miles to Spokane. POPULATION City of Yakima - 91,067 Within 15 Miles - 168,741 Within 30 Miles - 229,456 CITY GOVERNMENT 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509) 575-6000 -rww ct.yakkn1 ww ua Form: Council/Manager. The seven -person council is elected by the citizens of Yakima to four year terms. The council elects the mayor to a two year term. MUSEUMS There are three museums within Yakima's city limits, they are the Yakirr)@,.yg#qy.IxJNt s ur , the McAllister Museurn of Aviation, and the YpKrna Valley,Trolle t�q rn. Visit their websites for detailed information. LIBRARIES The city of Yakima is served by three locations; Downtown (main branch), Southeast, and Summitview Ave. For more information on the Yakima Valley Regional Library loca- tions and hours of operation, click here TOP AREA EMPLOYERS Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Yakima School District Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center Walmart Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic Yakima County SCHOOLS: The Greater Yakima area is served by three school dis- tricts, Yakima, West Valley, and East Valley. Combined QUALITY OF LIFE they educate over 22,000 students, (see pages 4-6 for The city of Yakima has 17 major parks with numerous soc- more detailed profiles). Yakima also has a community col- cer, baseball, and softball fields, tennis courts, ponds, and lege, a private technical institute, and an osteopathic playgrounds. There are two city pools, two water play- medical university. grounds, and two skateboard parks. Yakima is also home to the Capitol Theatre, Symphony Orchestra, numerous There are two private high schools complemented by a art galleries, two professional and one semi -pro sports number of private elementary and preschools. For more teams, and the Yakima SunDome featuring many events. detailed private school listings, click here. To learn about local events and activities, click here Childcare and preschool information on page three. 5�1� kO*:11111 A�'p Y a � uirf9"iTl-1 v;ew AveSurnmityie"w Avfr u ra 1/ .. } dR Ei'k Park A' flt1�:%flf li l�l'a`s pl Dr 'ides 1,ralidy F` !Iur1 Or ,,rdaP 12 6� ti" r��r`t. g�dl ri A(GP 0. 5 VV Nob 1101 BM.,! NOb HO F 31%, U��w � r `f r k � Q KJ are 97 x d,o � ' FiIn 'a C,n pp t r Ston %P i/1 0 a�GT C�t,Iwdro Rd YAkir►i Air Sour, efoa way D Tarri'�af,l I4�,„ 7 ural R `J ��o , ��(;71 C�Cf,i 0 yw �YFriMIMXNXIXF LOCATION Yakima is located in South Central Washington where the Naches and Yakima rivers join. It is centrally located on the 1-82 corridor; 140 miles from Seattle, 188 miles from Portland and 196 miles to Spokane. POPULATION City of Yakima - 91,067 Within 15 Miles - 168,741 Within 30 Miles - 229,456 CITY GOVERNMENT 129 North 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Phone: (509) 575-6000 -rww ct.yakkn1 ww ua Form: Council/Manager. The seven -person council is elected by the citizens of Yakima to four year terms. The council elects the mayor to a two year term. MUSEUMS There are three museums within Yakima's city limits, they are the Yakirr)@,.yg#qy.IxJNt s ur , the McAllister Museurn of Aviation, and the YpKrna Valley,Trolle t�q rn. Visit their websites for detailed information. LIBRARIES The city of Yakima is served by three locations; Downtown (main branch), Southeast, and Summitview Ave. For more information on the Yakima Valley Regional Library loca- tions and hours of operation, click here TOP AREA EMPLOYERS Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Yakima School District Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center Walmart Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic Yakima County SCHOOLS: The Greater Yakima area is served by three school dis- tricts, Yakima, West Valley, and East Valley. Combined QUALITY OF LIFE they educate over 22,000 students, (see pages 4-6 for The city of Yakima has 17 major parks with numerous soc- more detailed profiles). Yakima also has a community col- cer, baseball, and softball fields, tennis courts, ponds, and lege, a private technical institute, and an osteopathic playgrounds. There are two city pools, two water play- medical university. grounds, and two skateboard parks. Yakima is also home to the Capitol Theatre, Symphony Orchestra, numerous There are two private high schools complemented by a art galleries, two professional and one semi -pro sports number of private elementary and preschools. For more teams, and the Yakima SunDome featuring many events. detailed private school listings, click here. To learn about local events and activities, click here Childcare and preschool information on page three. Yakima Community Pages RELOCATION INFORMATION Phone Service: Centuryl-ink Communications (866) 642-0444 Electric Service: Pacific Power (888) 221-7070 Natural Gas Service: Cascade Natural Gas (888) 522-1130 City Utilities: City of Yakima (509) 575-6080 Voter Registration: Yakima County (800) 833-0569; online registration click here Vehicle Registration: Yakima County (509) 574-1370; online information click here Rental Housing: Click here to search local newspaper classified listings OTHER KEY COMMUNITY LINKS Greater Yakima Chamber of Cornimerce We,qLVglley School P:_ Contirall, Washington Hispanic Chamber Yakima li Yakima LREqLionkl Medical & Cardiac Center El SoIll de Yakima WorkSource Yakima Local Churches CHILDCARE AND PRESCHOOL OPTIONS Happy Daze Daycare Phone: (509) 834-0532 The Greater Yakima area has a large se- 1810 Parsons Loop lection of childcare and preschool options. Below is a sampling of them. To view the Yellow Pages for childcare, click h.e.f. ;. Apple Valley Child Care Phone: (509) 457-3591 1020 S 26th Ave Country Kids Child Development Centers Phone: (509) 453-4462 909 N 21 st Ave Phone: (509) 453-8688 641 N Keys Rd Carroll Children's Center Phone: (509) 965-7104 5301 Tieton Drive KinderCare Learning Centers Phone: (509) 494-8933 5110 Summitview Ave La Petite Early Learning Center Phone: (509) 452-8648 1216 S 24th Ave Mount Olive Child Care Phone: (509) 965-8671 7805 Tieton Drive Ramirez Child Care Center Phone: (509) 469-3184 305 W Lincoln Ave YAKIMA SCHOOL DISTRICT PROFILE 104 North 4th Avenue, Yakima 98902 Phone: 509.573.7000 Fax: 509.573.7189 Website:w. . i asc p is®„o Superintendent: Elaine Beraza 1 509.573.7001 1 eraza.etajn ��yq is p� rg Business Hours 7:30 am -4:30 pm OVERVIEW: The Yakima School District is located primarily within the boundaries of the city of Yakima. Serving a diverse population of nearly 15,000 students, Yakima is the 18th largest district in Washington, the second Larg- est in Eastern Washington, and the largest Latino -majority district in the state. Every elementary school in the district provides all -day, every day kindergarten classes; seven magnet programs are offered with concentrations in science and communication, international studies, and the arts. SPECIAL PROGRAMS OR INITIATIVES: International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement programs at two high schools attract students from out of district; an already strong vocational program is growing every date with a new state-of-the-art skills center in the construction phase; and alternative offerings include a School of the Arts, Yakima Online!, and the Yakima Home School Partnership. May 2012 Student Count 1 - 4,8531 Reading Math Writing Science Male Female American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Two or More Races Classroom Teachers Average Years of Teacher Experience Teachers w/ at least a Master's Degree # Teachers in core academic classes Total number of core academic classes % of classes taught by teachers meet- ing ESEA highly qualified (HQ) defini- tion 98.3% On -Time Graduation Rate (2012) 65.9% Extended Graduation Rate (2012) 68.8% District Revenue Per Student $10,384 Note: The Measurement of Student Progress (MSP) and High School Proficiency Exams (HSPE) are a series of tests designed to assess and drive academic performance within the state's K-12 system. MSP exams are administered for grades 3-8, HSPE exams are for 9-12. Information Sources: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction w.w.nr...k.12,1.w. ,., s,,. Educational Service District 105 wuwn�ra.esdI05.org, and Yakima County School Districts 3rd 51.0% Grade 44.6% 38.8% 49.0% 4th ImGrade 48.6% 34.8% 49.0% 1.0% 5th Grade 46.2% 36.7% 33.1% 0.5% 6th 0.6% Grade 47.1% 32.2% 1.0% 7th 74.0% Grade 55.4% 43.4% 63.5% 20.7% 8th 53.9% 36.3% 41.6% Grade 2.8% 10th Grade 73.3% 73.0%" 82.6% 24.7% 857 *Score reflects all End of Class (EOC) results in Year 2 12.9 63.9% Reading Math Writing 654 457 462 443 3,299 98.3% On -Time Graduation Rate (2012) 65.9% Extended Graduation Rate (2012) 68.8% District Revenue Per Student $10,384 Note: The Measurement of Student Progress (MSP) and High School Proficiency Exams (HSPE) are a series of tests designed to assess and drive academic performance within the state's K-12 system. MSP exams are administered for grades 3-8, HSPE exams are for 9-12. Information Sources: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction w.w.nr...k.12,1.w. ,., s,,. Educational Service District 105 wuwn�ra.esdI05.org, and Yakima County School Districts WEST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROFILE 8902 Zier Road, Yakima 98908-9299 Phone: 509.972.6000 Fax: 509.972.6001 Website:2 .o __.......m... _w..._ .._..._._..w...w ..._....., Business Hours 7:30 am -4:30 pm Superintendent: Mike Brophy I 509.972.6005 I kpi;llywm r OVERVIEW: The West Valley School District serves students in six neighborhood elementary schools, a middle school, a junior high school, and the newly constructed West Valley High School. The Dis- trict, a vital partner in a proud and caring community, has a mission to ensure that all students achieve their highest level of knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to be responsible, productive citizens, effective communicators, creative problem -solvers and life-long learners. Through mutual support and the combined efforts of their families, schools, and community, they will provide a safe, high quality learning environment in which each student experiences success every day. May 2012 Student Count 4,866 Grade Reading Math Writing Science Level Male 52.7% 3rd Grade 74.8% 72.3% Female 47.3% 4th Grade 78.5% 69.8% 78.5% American Indian/Alaskan Native 1.0% 5th Asian A 2.5% Grade 72.2% 65.1 % 70.1 Pacific Islander 0.1% 6th 70.0% 60.0% Grade Asian/Pacific Islander 2.6% Black 1.1% Grade 73.1% 60.9% 74.1% Hispanic 22.1% 8th W White 71.1 % Grade 65.4% 57.5% 71.7% 10th Grade 84.8% 78.5%" 90.2% 53.6% Classroom Teachers 242 *Score reflects all End of Class (EOC) results in Year 2 Average Years of Teacher Experience 13.1 UNININESSEENEM Teachers w/ at least a Master's Degree 69.4% Reading Math Writing # Teachers in core academic classes 225 428 462 428 Total number of core academic classes 1,071 % of classes taught by teachers meet- On -Time Graduation Rate (2012) 81.7% ing ESEA highly qualified (HQ) defini- 98.8% tion Extended Graduation Rate (2012) 86.0% District Revenue Per Student $8,883 Note: The Measurement of Student Progress (MSP) and High School Proficiency Exams (HSPE) are a series of tests designed to assess and drive academic performance within the state's K-12 system. MSP exams are administered for grades 3-8, HSPE exams are for 9-12. Information Sources: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction wywv...k12,wa,.ua.s.,., Educational Service District 105 e_sd19 u,org, and Yakima County School Districts EAST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROFILE 2002 Beaudry Road, Yakima 98901 Phone: 509.573.7300 Fax: 509.573.7340 Website: www.evsd90.org Business Hours 7:30 am - 4:30 pm Superintendent: John Schieche 1 509.573.7320 s m i .e.jp , evsd9 , wed n tw®, w OVERVIEW: The East Valley School District serves nearly 3,000 students in three elementary schools, a middle school, and a high school. The District is a vital partner in a highly involved and caring com- munity. The district mission is to empower and inspire all in the pursuit of excellence. The district focus is for all students to achieve their highest level of knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to succeed and be responsible, productive citizens. The East Valley community has a long history of be- ing highly involved in supporting student achievement in well-established school programs and activi- ties. Over the past 13 years the community has supported new construction of four of the five school facilities. Through mutual support and the combined efforts of families, schools, and community, our students are provided a safe, high quality learning environment where our students experiences suc- cess every day. May 2012 Student Count Male Female American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Pacific Islander Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Classroom Teachers Average Years of Teacher Experience Teachers w/ at least a Master's Degree # Teachers in core academic classes Total number of core academic classes % of classes taught by teachers meet- ing ESEA highly qualified (HQ) defini- tion 2,923 Grade Level 52.2°/ Grade 47.8% Reading Math 67.6% 54.9% Writing Science 4th Grade 60.7% 52.7% 54.0% 5th Grade 63.5% 56.3% 6th Grade 46.8% 25.0% 54.7% 100% On -Time Graduation Rate (2011) 71.0% Extended Graduation Rate (2011) 86.8% District Revenue Per Student $9,470 1 Annual Dropout Rate (2009-10) 3.1% Note: The Measurement of Student Progress (MSP) and High School Proficiency Exams (HSPE) are a series of tests designed to assess and drive academic performance within the state's K-12 system. MSP exams are administered for grades 3-8, HSPE exams are for 9-12. Information Sources: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction wwwvww„Ikt owwdx.LM, Educational Service District 105 wl a� .e s.41. QD5.a,a irg,. and Yakima County School Districts. 7thGrade 1.2% 63.3% 33.8% 76.7% 41.0% 8th ° 54.9% Grade 49.8% 21.3% 48.9% 10th Grade 84.8% 81.0%* 87.1% 158 *Score reflects all End of Class (ECIC) results in Year 2 12.9 NOWNEEMENNOMM 67.7% Reading 448 Math 462 142 Writing 428 495 100% On -Time Graduation Rate (2011) 71.0% Extended Graduation Rate (2011) 86.8% District Revenue Per Student $9,470 1 Annual Dropout Rate (2009-10) 3.1% Note: The Measurement of Student Progress (MSP) and High School Proficiency Exams (HSPE) are a series of tests designed to assess and drive academic performance within the state's K-12 system. MSP exams are administered for grades 3-8, HSPE exams are for 9-12. Information Sources: Washington State Office of Superintendent for Public Instruction wwwvww„Ikt owwdx.LM, Educational Service District 105 wl a� .e s.41. QD5.a,a irg,. and Yakima County School Districts. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. NW,, SECTION 19 nI T.13N., R.1 BE., W.M. . ..... . . .. lH_L_A IQ R- R d YWW,WA9890 2 w lluibegLse,LounanAssociates Int Fp5-66" 8. Civil ifoeffinq--m land SumeyinpPlauning —hlamil.m PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "SUMMIT (A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, NORTHWEST 1/4, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 18 EAST, W.M.) CITY OF YAKIMA:_RESIDENTIAL SECTION —1— j�oMlq-AoI Wi DEVELOPER ENGINEERISURVEYOR, SUMW — MNST-11N,I —S. 4jWS_WEWAVE_TE RRO IW NC --111111TIN-2 T PARCEL NO. 181319-24019 SUMMIT CREST CONSTRUCTION PLAT OF SUMMIT VIEW 1 CITY OF YAKIMA, YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINTON m PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 RFIIL"—�B,Y �FIH/El' L� fE ED "If PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 11SUMMIT II J, ;Lorin rc ioT 19 ��"LOT20 LOT 21 ��"LOT 2Y? �LOT2$ LOT 24- L✓)t2j .I Ltir 29," Lor 2�Z n� 4, --- s10, r f� (A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 114, NORTHWEST 1(4, �4P� fil ply qIx (f SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, RANGE 1$ EAST, W.M.} 314 f 1404±±x( a539 f 1.a53] f 4s3j r 45S4tai_ 430e sr 1410]± � 4,895±31 ( .7�I t I �e LOT Legend EXISTING NEW ftL O ._ ...._ ' ., � 6 118±sf r � ` � � "k ��✓�� q Y J RIVE f yryp{*/ % 6t Y p N ki vrrn nuw. g LOT 15 .512T fr' LOr30 �,� LOT JT g ,LOT 38 4� LOT 95(k S+101'3h � lOT&3 5� ^y l 82 f �� L / s i5 A91 Bf I A910 f� 4Dt6t fs� 4916, to 4VIftsf tll 4d3 i LOT 14 f \ I �I ,R i s i" I € ) l m— AX 51ir± f tip ism t ri E. �I.."� 1 1+ v LOT a2 rl9 Loa rc 111v - ' 92403 ^0812 Y1, S xc ' SLOT 3 9 ( LOT 3Y 1P740 LOT41 - r LOT Q2 s LOT 43 4� LOT44 s 5,431 sr� L4y16t f 49163 $t _4) 491'6 [., 4,916 f ( 537J±SfI Lor -in it �� 1 v�1",'JIj lin�r{a s,�. wRVF TAB LE LOT 4 .r as a u� oT- w"3,383 �t a� w,�"rwr N. ,e�. �„ w, (,v nF' nw+WAGE r f cTn di mcsee xiw ... t1hL s 338a r I fl sr s RA LGT fv&6xs LOT10 LOT2 YAIaG4auE Pox L 9,401±0 2_... i I LOT f LOT I R W Is 61702 fNV E 9 c 1� 1 LOT 6 �v.l I I h LOTS P // f 069 / 9393± f 7._ 1 10465±LOT± N II1 r sf n✓ uwi } k{— us eM T 1yi U LOT6 016± f .. _.._. ITGIw nV NUE //% ';j /, PARCEL N0 181319-24019 / i HLA ""°`R °° SUMMIT CREST CONSTRUCTION " — — —xFmnt96m� / a o n PLAT A SUMMIT VIEW 2 Pluibre�tse,LoumanAssoaiates, Inc._ xarzsoyyssseoo ` / "� CITY OF YAKIMA, YAKIMA COUNTY, WRSHINTON of Civil Engineeringoland SnrveyingaPlanliing k„,, -' PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 ncv,.inn, nn e� ENTERLU 13Y. NF City of Yakimaf "Oar Emergency a e t V:. Program Earliest k n references i i iii n.. . predictable"'Government must plan for the prepare unpredictable" i: "What plagues and what portents, what mutiny, what raging of the sea, shaking of the earth, commotion in the winds, frights, changes, horrors, divert and crack, rend and deracinate the unity and married calm of states:' William Shakespeare "Prepare and prevent, rather than repair and repent!" Snowshoe Thompson, 1856 Modern definition ... "Activities that eliminate or reduce the occurrence of future disasters. It consists of efforts undertaken in an orderly and planned fashion to accomplish the long-term prevention, avoidance or reduction of hazards in society." air wr i ii ,r o�io�/i/ p .< : : <�:y:> v x r=� >...�. . City � A \a � \ \. Threat/Hazard \ / \ ai R \« \. :uNing .|S «r. S)(rnt mmunit 1 THREATS AND HAZARDS OF CONCERN TO THE COMMUNITY Natural Technological/Human-Caused Resulting from acts of nature Involves accidents or the failures of systems and structures Drought "Earthquake (6.5 or greater) "Extreme Temperatures "Flood, riverine/stream (100 yr) Severe Wind Storms Severe Winter Storms "Tornado "Volcanic Eruptions "Wildland Fires "Listed under FEMA's Mitigation Ideas, January 2013, might be eligible for FEMA disaster grants and loans. Air pollution Business interruption Critical infrastructure (building/structure) collapse Critical infrastructure (building/structure) fire/explosion Cyber attack Ecological terrorism Economic emergency Energy emergency Fuel shortage HM accident, fixed facility (EPA -regulated chemicals) HM accident, transportation routes (Roadways, Railroads, Pipelines) Power outage Riot/demonstrations/violent protest/illegal assembly Transportation accident, aircraft Weapons of mass destruction: CBRNE/aircraft Workplace violence: business/industry and schools Page 1 � R 1 Natural: Resulting from Acts of Nature DROUGHT • Moderate Drought (131): Some damage to crops/pastures; Streams, reservoirs, or wells low. EPIDEMIC, HUMAN • Outbreak with 0.1 to 0.5% case fatality rate( excess fatality rate of 30 to 150 per population of 100,000); Similar to the 1957 influenza pandemic DAM/LEVEE FAILURE Significant inundation of structures and roads and streams or rivers; causing moderate to severe infrastructural damage; Significant property damage; Mandatory evacuations necessary of people and transfer of moveable property to higher elevations ; Dam failure result of improper operation of the impounding structure or complete structural damage EARTHQUAKE • Moderate — Richter magnitude 5.0 — 5.9; Damage negligible in building of good design / construction; Slight to moderate damage in well-built ordinary structures; Considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures FIRE, RURAL/URBAN • Extreme (Conflagration) — Large and destructive fire; Typically aggravated by strong winds that carry burning debris over natural or artificial barriers; Weather conditions not favorable to fire control (sustained strong winds and dry air). FLOOD, FLASH Minor inundation of structures and roads, especially near streams or rivers, Minor property damage; Some evacuations necessary of people and / transfer of property to higher elevations FLOOD, RIVERINE/STREAM • Significant inundation of structures and roads near streams or rivers, causing moderate to severe infrastructural damage; Significant property damage; Mandatory evacuation of people and transfer of movable property to higher elevations FLOOD, URBAN • Minimal property damage; Some public threat and / or inconvenience; No associated evacuations Page 2 HEAT, EXTREME • Heat index 90 —105 for more than one day; Sunstroke, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion may result from prolonged exposure and/or physical activity LANDSLIDE • Potential to damage or destroy small structures, derail trains, and bury vehicles; Entails 35,000 cubic feet of displaced debris; Peak discharge rates up to 1,000 cubic feet/second for rocks/boulders (100 cubic feet/second for sand /pebbles); Impacted areas up to 20,000 square feet for rocks/boulders (200,000 square feet for sand/pebbles) THUNDERSTORM Type 2- Moderate thunderstorm; Rainfall rate per hour .10 inches to .25 inches; Maximum wind gust less than 25 mph to 40 mph; Occasional lightning with 1 to 10 strikes every five minutes; Moderately dark outside TORNADO • 65-85 mph (105-137 km/h) Light damage. Peels surface off some roofs;; some damage to gutters or siding; branches broken off trees; shallow -rooted trees pushed over. VOLCANO • Volcano Explosively Index (VEI) 1-2- Gentle to explosive, with a 100m to 5km plume; Mildly explosive eruptions, occasionally with much larger eruptions (e.g., landslide); Greater potential for speed of ash and gas to affect health of nearby populations WATER SHORTAGE • Water shortages common; Water restrictions Imposed WILDFIRE, FOREST • Moderate — sized Wildfire — Ground fire that burns on or below the forest floor through the root system; Low — intensity burn rate; Spreads rapidly across large geographic area; Some short — distance spotting occurs; Weather conditions challenging to fire control ( sustained light winds and dry air) WILDFIRE, RANGE • High impact - Spreads rapidly across large geographic area; Weather conditions challenging to fire control (sustained moderate winds and dry air) WIND • 39 to 54 mph (63 to 88 km/h) Twigs break off trees; wind generally impedes progress. Page:3 WINTER STORMS Blizzards • Sustained winds or frequent gusts of 35 mph (56 km/h) or greater, considerable falling, and/or blowing snow reducing visibility frequently to 1/4 mile (0.4 km) or less for a period of three hours or more are possible generally within the next 36 hours. Snow and/or Freezing Rain #, Hazardous winter weather conditions including significant accumulations of snow and/or freezing rain and/or sleet are possible generally within 36 hours Ice Storm 0 Accumulations range from 1/4 to 1/2 inch (6 to 12 mm) or more of freezing rain. Sleet • Heavy sleet accumulations of 2 inches (5 cm) or more in 12 hours or less are imminent. Technolo ical Human -Caused: Involves accidents or the failures of s stems and structures. AIR POLLUTION "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups" AQI is 101- 150. Although general public is not likely to be affected at this AQI range, people with lung disease, older adults and children are at a greater risk from exposure to ozone, whereas persons with heart and lung disease, older adults and children are at greater risk from the presence of particles in the air. BUSINESS INTERRUPTION • Customer's loss potential is high due to service inability CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (BUILDING/STRUCTURE) COLLAPSE Is Significant infrastructure damage; major relocation of service. CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (BUILDING/STRUCTURE) FIRE/EXPLOSION • Significant infrastructure damage; major relocation of service. CYBER ATTACK • Criminal Activity- Use of cyberspace violates national or international law; Motivated by profit ECOLOGICAL TERRORISM • Behavior civil -no instances of property destruction, violence, or illegal behavior Page 4 ECONOMIC EMERGENCY • Behavior civil -no instances of property destruction, violence, or illegal behavior ENERGY EMERGENCY • Minor interruptions to energy supplies. A crisis could possibly emerge after infrastructure damage from severe weather. FUEL SHORTAGE 0 Long term decline in the available supply of petroleum. Most significant will be the availability and price of liquid fuel for transportation.. HM ACCIDENT, FIXED FACILITY (EPA -regulated chemicals) • Release of large concentration of chemical with high toxicity; Highly reactive/Combustibility to surrounding environment; Contamination large area; Exposed persons exhibit serious, long-lasting acute health effects- Serious environmental effects could linger for months HM ACCIDENT, TRANSPORTATION ROUTES (Roadways, Railroad, Pipelines)) Release of enormous concentration of chemical with very high toxicity; Extremely reactive/Combustibility to surrounding environment; Contaminated area very large and dispersed; Exposed persons exhibit major, acute health effects- Permanent disability and /or death; Very damaging environmental effects could be long-lasting (years) or permanent POWER OUTAGE. The outage must affect at least 1,000 people and last at least one hour. RIOT/DEMONSTRATIONS/VIOLENT PROTEST/ILLEGAL ASSEMBLY Large group of protesters or demonstrators with significant overflow into surrounding areas; Group mostly loud, aggressive, and disruptive; Property destruction, violence, and illegal behavior prevalent TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT, AIRCRAFT 0 Indicates an aircraft has been involved in an accident on or within 5 miles of the airport during an operation incident to flight. WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: CBRNE--Chemical, Biological, Radiological„ Nuclear, Explosive RDD/Nuclear Attack Small Radiological Dispersal Device -Small, unsophisticated device containing up to 100 Curies of gamma -emitting isotope (such as 60Co or 137Cs) is dispersed by less kg of high explosive; Any "no entry zone" (if necessary) very localized Biological Attack (non food) • Somewhat effectively weaponized biological agent released in an outdoor public space; Somewhat contagious; Moderately virulent; Has low mortality Page 5 Biological/Chemical Food Contamination Several small clusters of biological/chemical food contamination; Source of contamination known; Affected products can be identified and removed from the market; Exposed persons may exhibit few acute health effects -not debilitating or permanent Chemical Attack (non-food) • Moderately effective release/dispersal of non -lethal irritant or vomiting agent over a small area; Exposed persons exhibit a few acute, but not debilitating, health effects; Some negative environmental affects could persist for a few weeks Explosive Devices • Single improvised explosive device (IED) (Such as package -type IED or IED attached to suicide bomber) containing less than 500 pounds of explosives; Lethal air blast range less than 100 feet; Falling glass hazard less than 1,250 feet Aircraft as a Weapon Small propeller plane (e.g., Cessna Stationair, 6 passenger, 850 max fuel, 200 mph max speed) hits small buildings in immediate area are not affected WORKPLACE VIOLENCE: BUSINESS/INDUSTRY AND SCHOOLS Armed Assault Coordinated attack by multiple shooters using semiautomatic or automatic firearm(s), Location of shooter(s) are uncertain; Shooters has access to more victims Page 6 PYRTITMITTwim Page 7 0 Natural Resulting from acts of mature Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises DROUGHT Plans/annexes are currently in progress All (100%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure conducted exists j Planning Organization j Equipment Training Exercises EPIDEMIC, HUMAN Plans/annexes are currently in progress None (0%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been (Yakima Health District) i organizational structure ;conducted exists. 3 Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises DAM/LEVEE ii [ j FAILURE Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required All personnel, including many Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional elements organizational structure [ equipment exists; private sector reps/citizens have exercise demonstrated capability [ exists sustainment needs only completed relevant training success; plans validated E (See: Floods, E Riverine/Streams) Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises EARTHQUAKE Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure equipment exists; l 75%) have completed relevant i conducted j � exists ;sustainment needs only training i Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises FIRE, RURAL/URBAN Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists sustainment needs only training Page 7 Page 8 Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises FLOOD, FLASH Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required ` All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure exist 6 equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant conducted sustainment needs only training Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises FLOOD, RIVERINE/STREAM Plans/annexes are complete and up to date All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional organizational structure equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant exercise demonstrated capability exists sustainment needs only training success; plans validated Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises FLOOD, URBAN Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Most relevant personnel (76 — No recent exercises have been validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure equipment exists; 99%) have completed relevant conducted exists sustainment needs only training Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises HEAT, EXTREME Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure conducted i exists Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises I LANDSLIDE (Mud/debris slides) Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required Most (76-99%) of the No training has been completed No recent exercises have been j elements organizational structure required equipment exists conducted 1 exists l Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises THUNDERSTORM 1 Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure equipment exists; conducted exists sustainment needs only Planning Organization Equipment Training ! Exercises TORNADO Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure exist equipment exists; conducted sustainment needs only Planning Organization Equipment i Training Exercises j VOLCANO 3 Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required 1 No training has been completed No recent exercises have been 1 elements organizational structure equipment exists; conducted exists sustainment needs only Page 8 �0 Planning Organization i Equipment Training Exercises WATER SHORTAGE i Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required Most (76-99%) of the No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure required equipment exists conducted jI i exists Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises WILDFIRE, FOREST Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists sustainment needs only training Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises WILDFIRE, RANGE Plans/annexes are complete and up to date All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been organizational structure equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists sustainment needs only training Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises WIND Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required Most (76 — 99%) of the No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure required equipment exists conducted exists Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises WINTER STORMS Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required Most (76 — 99%) of the Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure required equipment exists 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists training Technological/ Human -Caused Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises AIR POLLUTION Plans/annexes are currently in progress None (0%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed _ No recent exercises have been organizational structure i conducted exists. Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises BUSINESS INTERRUPTION Plans/annexes are currently in progress All (100%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure conducted exists l Page 9 City of Yakima THIRA-C Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required Most (76-99%) of the Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been (BUILDING/STRUC- validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure required equipment exists 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists training TURE) COLLAPSE Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been (BUILDING/STRUC- validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure equipment exists; 75%) have completed relevant conducted exists sustainment needs only training TURE) FIRE/EXPLOSION 1 Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises CYBER ATTACK I ;Plans/annexes are currently in progress Much (51- 75%) of the Most (76 — 99%) of the Many relevant personnel (51— No recent exercises have been required organizational required equipment exists j 75%) have completed relevant conducted structure exists training i Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises E ECOLOGICAL TERRORISM No plans/annexes exist None (0%) of the required ; None (0%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure 1 equipment exists 3 conducted exists. I Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises ECONOMIC EMERGENCY Plans/annexes are currently in progress All (100%) of the required Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure conducted exists i Planning Organization Equipment Training F Exercises ENERGY EMERGENCY Plans/annexes are currently in progress All (100%) of the required ( Not Applicable No training has been completed [ No recent exercises have been organizational structure conducted E exists F I Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises FUEL SHORTAGE Plans/annexes are currently in progress I Most (76 - 99%) of the i Not Applicable No training has been completed No recent exercises have been j required organizational conducted Planning ' Organization Equipment Training Exercises HM ACCIDENT, Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required Most (76-99%) of the Many relevant personnel (51— Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional Page 10 City of Yakima THIRA-C FIXED FACILITY validated by exercises/ operations ? organizational structure required equipment exists 75%) have completed relevant exercise demonstrated capability (EPA -regulated 1 3 exists I training g success; plans validated chemicals) ' I j Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises HM ACCIDENT, 1 TRANSPORTATION Plans/annexes are complete and u to date; P up - All (100%) of the required Most (76-99%) of the E Many relevant personnel (51- Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure required equipment exists 75%) have completed relevant exercise demonstrated capability Routes (Roadways, exists training success; plans validated Railroads, Pipelines) Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises POWER OUTAGE Plans/annexes exist, but lack some required All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required 3 No training has been completed No recent exercises have been elements organizational structure 'equipment exists; :conducted exists ;sustainment needs only I Planning Organization 3 Equipment E Training Exercises RIOT/DEMONSTRA- TIONS/VIOLENT Plans/annexes are complete and up to date Required organizational Required equipment exists; i Most relevant personnel (76— Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional structure exists sustainment needs only 99%) have completed relevant exercise demonstrated capability PROTEST/ILLEGAL i training success; plans validated ASSEMBLY I TRANSPORTATION Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises ACCIDENT, Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the requiredMost relevant personnel (76- Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional :AIRCRAFT validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure equipment exists; 99%) of the required equipment exercise demonstrated capability exists sustainment needs only exists WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: CBRNE/AIRCRAFT RDD/Nuclear Attack Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises i No plans/annexes exist None (0%) of the required None (0%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure equipment exists conducted exists. Page Ill City of Yakima THIRA-C Biological Attack Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises (non food) = No plans/annexes exist None (0%) of the required None (0%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure equipment exists conducted ? exists. Biological/ Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises Chemical Food Contamination No plans/annexes exist None (0%) of the required None (0%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure equipment exists conducted exists. Explosive Devices Planning Organization Equipment Training ! Exercises Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required Most relevant personnel (76— No recent exercises have been validated by exercises/ operations organizational structure equipment exists; 99%) have completed relevant I conducted existssustainment needs only training Aircraft As A Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises Weapon No plans/annexes exist All (100%) of the required All (100%) of the required No training has been completed No recent exercises have been organizational structure equipment exists; conducted exists sustainment needs only WORKPLACE VIOLENCE: BUSINESS/ INDUSTRY AND SCHOOLS Armed Assault Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises Plans/annexes are complete and up-to-date; Required organizational Required equipment exists, Most relevant personnel (76— Recent multi-discipline/jurisdictional validated by exercises/ operations structure exist sustainment needs only 99%) have completed relevant exercise demonstrated capability training success; plans validated Page 12 Risk Assessment Tool The City of Yakima Risk Assessment tool is an Excel spreadsheet, which is designed to measure the city's risk from the effects of various hazards. The tool is based on a formula that weighs the probability and severity of potential impacts against preparations in place which are intended to minimize these impacts. Using a simple 1 to 5 scale, the probability of occurrence and the impact potential are tabulated along with mitigation efforts and the resources available to respond to the hazard. The score is based on a formula that weighs risk heavily but provides credit for mitigation and response and recovery resources. The higher the score, the higher the jurisdiction's risk from the hazard. Scoring Guidelines. There are eight risk assessment factors contained in the spreadsheet. All factor scoring is done on a scale of 1-5. The formula contained in the spreadsheet calculates higher scores in the occurrence and impact columns as increasing risks, while higher scores in the mitigation and resource categories lower the overall risk score giving credit for steps taken to reduce the likely impact. Based your scoring on a "worst-case scenario." The following guidelines will assist you in scoring each hazard. Historical Occurrence (Frequency): Based on the number of occurrences: At least one occurrence every 1-4 years := 5; At least one occurrence every 5-10 years = 4; At least one occurrence every 11-50 years = 3; At least one occurrence every 51-100 years = 2; Has not occurred, but for planning purposes should be evaluated =1. Probability of Occurrence: Based on the statistical probability of the hazard occurring in a given year. This may be obtained by scientific research or may simply be an educated guess. The higher the probability, the higher the score. Use the following guideline in determining you score. If less than 5% score 1, if 5% to 10% score 2, if 10% to 20% score 3, if 20% to 40% score 4, and score 5 if greater than 40% probability. Human Impact: Score based on greatest possible impact should worst-case event occur within the jurisdiction. Consider the likely number of fatalities, injuries, homeless, etc. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Property Impact: Score based on the economic costs of the event, including both direct and indirect property damage from the hazard. Minor damage would be a 1 while a total loss should be a 5. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Business Impact: Score based on factors such as service impact, lost wages, revenues, and taxes. Consider cost of relocation, permanent damage to valuable resources, etc. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Page 13 Mitigation Activities: Based on steps taken to mitigate the hazard such as structural and redundant technical systems. The more mitigation measures taken, the higher the score. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Internal Resources: Base your score on the internal response and recovery resources. High scores should be given when there are a formal on-site response teams, or recovery teams. Score 1 low - 5 highest. External Resources: Base your score on the external resources that would be immediately available. This would include the local jurisdictions. Give higher scores if there are specialized equipment and responders available or if contractor support such as specialized equipment, is immediately available. Score 1 low - 5 highest. Understanding the Scores Based on the weighted scoring formula hazards that are relatively high will score 3.5 or higher. The spreadsheet is programmed to change colors based on the score as follows: Red High Risk Greater than 3.5 Yellow Medium Risk From 2.0 to 3.5 Green Low Risk Less than 2.0 These scores are based on subjective judgments but, nonetheless, they provide a means to quickly rate the jurisdiction's risk from various hazards. Based on this risk scoring, priorities for increased mitigation and preparedness activities can be determined. Page 14 Drought Earthquake Extreme Temps Floods (River) 43 4 1 2 2 4 3 3 2.7 Floods (Streams) Severe Wind Storms 2 2 1 1 1 1 Severe Winter Storms 4 4 2 1 2 1 1 1 3.4 Tornadoes Volcanic Eruptions 2 2 2 1 4 5 Wildland Fire, I 4 4 2 3 2 2 1 2 4 5 2.8 TECHNOLOGICAL 1 Hazardous 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 1.9 Materials (Fixed Facility) Hazardous Materials (Transit) Transportation 5 1 3 2 2 4 4 4 j 2.2 Accident -- Aircraft i Analysis Results High Risk: Greater than 3.5 Medium Risk: 2.0 to 3.5 Low Risk: Less than 2 Page 15 ORIMEMMEtumm Page 17 rOTH11111fifri 011ri C' 114 - Generally, a catastrophic incident will demand extraordinary actions from state agencies and local jurisdictions - actions for which we are not currently well prepared. The City of Yakima is vulnerable to technological and natural hazards with the potential to cause significant casualties and infrastructure damage. Disasters labeled 'major' are not uncommon and the City of Yakima Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) addresses the response requirements of floods, earthquakes, hazardous materials, etc. These incidents cause injuries, loss of life and damage in a relatively limited area. Current procedures provide response and recovery for these incidents including terrorist incidents. In contrast a catastrophic incident impacts a large area or across many societal sectors. Mitigation efforts reduce impacts and current mitigation efforts are focused on many of the catastrophic scenarios in the City; however a catastrophic incident is one that overwhelms. The nature and extent of damage; number, location and severity of personal injuries; type, availability and condition of surviving resources and the damages to critical infrastructure are likely to be in the extreme range. Warning may or may not be available. Hazard Impact on Critical/Essential Service Infrastructure 1, Streets/roads Yakima Fire Deoament Arterials debris, power lines, water North to South Fair Avenue (East Lincoln to East Mead) 11t Street (city limit to city limit) 6th Street (Nob Hill to East Yakima) 3'd Avenue (West "D" Street to West Washington) 16th Avenue (city limit to city limit) 24th Avenue (West Washington to Nob Hill) 32nd Avenue (Englewood to West Mead/West King) 40th Avenue (SR -12 to West Washington) 48th Avenue (Summitview to West Washington) 56th Avenue (Englewood to Arlington) 64th Avenue (Tieton to Washington) 72"d Avenue (Summitview to West Washington) 80th Avenue (Tieton to Zier Rd) East to West Washington Avenue (181h Street to West City Limits) Mead Avenue (18th Street to West Citv Limits) Page 18 Nob Hill Blvd (city limits to city limits) Tieton Drive (5th Avenue to West City Limits) Walnut Avenue (Union Street to 11th Avenue) Yakima Avenue (East City Limits to West City Limits) Summitview Avenue (Yakima Avenue to West City Limits) "B" Street (10th Street to Pierce/7th Avenue) Lincoln Avenue (Fair Avenue to West: City Limits) Fruitvale Blvd. (5th Avenue to 40th Avenue/SR-12) Highway/Freeway 1-82: From Rest Haven Road to the Valley Mall Blvd. exit all mile post and exit numbers Hwy 12: From 1-82 to Ackley Road, all mile post and exit numbers. Union Gap Arterials North; South f Rudkin Road From Viola Ave. to Valley Mall Blvd. S 18th St. From Rainier Pl. to Mead Ave Main St. From Old town Rd. to Leisure Hill Dr. Lon fiber From W. Washington Ave to W. Ahtanum Rd. Goodman Rd. From Ahtanum to Meadowbrook Rd. S. 3rd. Ave From Mead Ave. to Ahtanum S. 16th Ave From W. Washington Ave. to Gilbert Rd. East/West Mead Ave. From Rudkin Rd. to s. 1st St. Washington Ave. From S. 18th St. to S. 16th Ave. Valley Mall Blvd. from 1-82 to S. 16th Ave. E. Ahtanum/W. Ahtanum/Ahtanum From Main St. to S. 42nd Ave. Meadowbrook Rd. From Goodman Rd. to S. 11th Ave. McCullough Rd. From S. 18th Ave to S. 42nd Ave. 2. Utilities City of Yakima Water/Irrigation power lines, water mains Naches River WTP 6390 Highway 12 Naches River -River Intake Structure Wastewater Plant 2220 East Viola 3. Health/medical Yakima Regional Medical & Cardiac Center health/medical care facilities 110 S 9th Avenue Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital i 2811 Tieton Dr. 4. Emergency responsei Yakima Fire Deoartment Page 19 City of Yakima THIRA-C fire, police, ambulance Station 91-401 North Front Street (Fire Administration) Fire Station 92-7707 Tieton Drive Fire Station 93-511 North 40`h Avenue Fire Station 94-2404 West Washington Avenue Fire Station 95-807 East Nob Hill Blvd Fire Station 96-107 West Ahtanum Road, Union Gap Yakima Police Department s 200 South Third Street Ambulance Services American Medical Response-229 S 2"d Avenue I Advanced Life Systems-2106 W Washington Avenue S. Communications SunComm-9-1-1 Communications and Public Safety Dispatch landlines, cell phones, radio linkages 6. Continuity of government City of Yakima City Hall P day-to-day business 129 North Second Street Legal Department/Municipal Court 200 South Third Street Public Works Administration Transit Division; Streets/Traffic; Water &Irrigation; Refuse 2301 Fruitvale Blvd :Yakima Convention Center . 10 North 8`h Street 7. Private-sector business £Grainger Industrial � normal business activities 905 %: S 1St Street 3 Page 20 The City of Yakima is subject to the following hazards and their impacts. (Keyed to Table) Impacts—Disruptions Threats and Hazards of Concern (Reference: THIRA-C, page 1) 3 4 6 7 Natural—Resulting from acts of nature x • Epidemic, human T Dam/Levee failure • x x x x x Fire,•. ••• flash e/strearn x x x .•• •. Heat, extreme x x Landsli•- • • edersto Tornado Volcano Water • Wildfire, • Wildfire, range Wind Winter • Technological/Human-Caused (involves accidents or the failures of systems and structures) !-Air •• T Business interruption Page 21 � A A A ..• • . . •- Int m -. .. . • Page 22 Page 2 3 City ofkhrn Ernergency Management @°°off ra r City of Yakima Whole Commuto nity Outreach Framework Building ia Resilient Community Resilience is the ability to prepare and plan for, absorb, recover from, and more successfully adapt to adverse events. Enhanced resilience allows better anticipation of disasters and better planning to reduce disaster losses—rather than waiting for an event to occur and paying for it afterward. Disaster's sty° is Impacts Community 1. City of Yakima's Infrastructure (Critical/Essential Services) ➢ Street/road disruptions, e.g., debris, power lines, water; ➢ Utility—line disruptions, e.g., power lines, water mains, etc.; ➢ Health/medical concerns, e.g., health/medical care facilities, ➢ Emergency response disruptions, e.g. fire, police, ambulance, ➢ Communication disruptions, e.g. landlines, cell phones, radio linkages. ➢ Contrnucty of government service intorrijntorf o g any_+n_dny hl,cinn S; �.. uu �u u uuan1 2, Business Continuity ➢ Physical damage to a building/buildings ➢ Damage to or breakdown of machinery, systems or equipment ➢ Restricted access to a site or building ➢ Interruption of the supply chain including failure of a supplier or disruption of transportation of goods from the supplier ➢ Utility outage (e.g., electrical power outage) ➢ Damage to, loss or corruption of information technology including voice and data communications, servers, computers, operating systems, applications, and data ➢ Absenteeism of essential employees —--------- ........... Ih elle omwrirm�u pity �utreaclh� Fir mmroe ark Page 1 Preface "As a concept, Whole Community is a means by which residents, emergency management practitioners, organizational and community leaders, and government officials can collectively understand and assess the needs of their respective communities and determine the best ways to organize and strengthen their assets, capacities, and interests. By doing so, a more effective path to societal security and resilience is built. In a sense, Whole Community is a philosophical approach on how to think about conducting emergency management." FEMA The effectiveness of the city's response to disaster needs is dependent upon the activities that have taken place before the incident occurs. Mitigation includes any activities that will eliminate or reduce the probability (chance) of occurrence of emergency/disaster, and/or activities designed to postpone, dissipate, or lessen the effects of a disastrous incident. Preparedness is undertaken because mitigation activities cannot eliminate the occurrence of incidents. Preparedness is planning how to respond should an emergency or disaster occur, and working to increase local resources and their ability to respond effectively. Preparedness activities are designed to help save lives and minimize damage by preparing people to respond appropriately when disaster is imminent. Proper response requires a current plan, trained personnel, available resources, communications/ -warning, etc. Preparedness activities include planning to ensure the most effective, efficient response; efforts to minimize damages, such as forecasting and warning systems, and laying the groundwork for response operations such as stockpiling supplies. Response activities immediately follow the occurrence of a disaster and will save life and property. The Yakima Emergency Operations Center (EOC) provides for overall policy, direction, and control of the emergency response and recovery efforts. During the activation and operational phases of the EOC, local officials should utilize their respective Job Aid to guide them during a response. The Job Aids are not intended to include every task that may need to be completed common sense and the scale of the event may dictate what needs to be done. Whole Community ni Outreach Framework Page Recovery activities attempt to return the community to normal. Recovery continues until community systems and services return to normal, or near normal. Short-term recovery returns vital life support systems to minimum operating standards. Long-term recovery from a disaster may go on for years until the entire disaster area is completely redeveloped, or utilized for a new purpose. Recovery planning should include a review of ways to avoid future emergencies. Overview "We need to move away from the mindset that Federal and State governments are always in the lead, and build upon the strengths of our local communities and, more importantly, our citizens. We must treat individuals and communities as key assets rather than liabilities." FEMA The objectives of the City of Yakima Emergency Management Program are to protect public health and safety and prevent loss of life, to preserve property and the environment; to assure continuity of government and government operations, to restore the community to normal; to mitigate/prevent the causes of damage, and prepare the community in advance of an emergency. Specifically, the City endeavors to: Dolle Community Outreach Framework IPage This primary objective includes undertaking efforts to save human life; Protect Public Health and rescue endangered people, treat the injured, warn the public to avoid .safety and Prevent Loss of further casualties, evacuate people from impacted area, direct people to Life shelter and mass care, ensure provision of necessary medications and vaccinations, monitor and regulate sources of food and water, and, save animals. Preserve Property and the This secondary objective includes measures to save property from destruction, prevent further loss, provide security for property, especially in Environment evacuated areas, and, prevent contamination to the environment. Assure Continuity of This objective provides for lines of succession for elected and appointed Government and officials, and, assures that critical functions of government can be Government Operationsreconstituted and conducted with minimal interruption. Restore the Community to This objective aims to restore essential infrastructure, including utilities, as Normal well as the economic basis of the community. Mitigate/Prevent the Causes This objective aims to prevent damage from a similar emergency that may of Damage occur in the future. This objective includes developing action plans on how to respond to and Prepare the City in Advance recover from emergencies, training staff on how to perform the duties and of an Emergency responsibilities, exercising the plans and modifying the plans based on the experiences. Dolle Community Outreach Framework IPage Community Principles 1, Saving and sustaining lives is our number one priority, no matter the scale and magnitude of the crisis. We must stabilize the event within the first 72 hours. Our Locus must shit ftm incidents to individuals and from processes to products. 2. A disaster event requires that we are prepared to respond in non-traditional ways, well beyond current local planning. 3. Time is our bi gest enemy; and our approach must focus on preparing and fully empowering impacted communities, survivors, and society -NGOs, social & fraternal organizations. 4. Our citizens are Lorce multi tiers. Individuals and communities are the most critical response and recovery assets present during the initial hours and days following an event. We need greater inclusion paths designed into our participatory planning & preparedness activities. Numerous factors contribute to the resilience of communities and effective emergency management outcomes. 1. 2 Understand and meet the actual needs of the whole community. Community engagement can lead to a deeper understanding of the unique and diverse needs of a population, including its demographics, values, norms, community structures, networks, and relationships. The more we know about our communities, the better we can understand their real-life safety and sustaining needs and their motivations to participate in emergency management -related activities prior to an event. Mw��n 3. Strengthen what works well in communities on a daily basis. A Whole Community approach to building community resilience requires finding ways to support and strengthen the institutions, assets, and networks that already work well in communities and are working to address issues that are important to community members on a daily basis. Existing structures and relationships that are present in the daily lives of individuals, families, businesses, and organizations before an incident occurs can be leveraged and empowered to act effectively during and after a disaster strikes. Nolle Community Outreach Framework Page 4 ➢ Understand community complexity. Communities are unique, multi -dimensional, and complex. They are affected by many factors and interdependencies, including demographics, geography, access to resources, experience with government, crime, political activity, economic prosperity, and forms of social capital such as social networks, social cohesion between different groups, and institutions. ➢ Recognize community capabilities and needs. Recognize communities' private and civic capabilities, identify how they can contribute to im rove re- and ost-event outcomes and Understand Community "DNA" Learn how communities'social activity is organized and how needs are met under normal conditions. A better understanding of how segments of the community resolve issues and make decisions—both with and without government as a player—helps uncover ways to better meet the actual needs of the whole community in times of crisis. p p p actively engage them in all aspects of the emergency management process. ➢ Foster relationships with community leaders. Engage communities through the relationships that exist in everyday settings and around issues that already have their attention and drive their interactions. Connect the social, economic, and political structures that make up daily life to emergency management programs. ➢ Build and maintain partnerships. While certainly not a new concept, building relationships with multi -organizational partnerships and coalitions is an exemplary organizing technique to ensure the involvement of a wide range of local community members. The collective effort brings greater capabilities to the initiatives and provides greater opportunities to reach agreement throughout the community and influence others to participate and support activities. The critical step in building these partnerships is to find the overlapping and shared interests around which groups and organizations are brought together. Equally important is to sustain the motivations and incentives to collaborate over a long period of time while improving resilience through increased public-private partnership. ➢ Empower local action. Enable the public to lead, not follow, in identifying priorities, organizing support, implementing programs, and evaluating outcomes. Empower them to draw on their full potential in developing collective actions and solutions. ➢ Leverage and strengthen social infrastructure, networks, and assets. Align emergency management activities to support the institutions, assets, and networks that people turn to in order to solve problems on a daily basis. .................. -...W_ _............... . Whole Community Outreach (Framework Page r ► � ♦ ►" � r r r r= Volunteer Organizations Faith -based Organizations Community Leaders (e.g., representatives from specific segments of the community, including seniors, minority populations, and non-English speakers) Disability Services School Board Higher Education Institutions Supply chain components, such as manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, and logistics providers Home Care Services Medical Facilities Government Agencies (all levels and disciplines) Chamber of Commerce Non-profit Organizations f( ° i' ,; t r 11 r"i Whole Community Outreach IFrairnne ark Pathways for Action Pathway ". 77,77, �Iw�tian l��s,,, ,,,,,,,,, , �,,,,,, . .... , _WWW ✓ Know where the real conversations and decisions are made. They are not always made at the council level, but at venues such as the community center, neighborhood block parties, social clubs, or Identify the actual needs of the places of worship. Tap into these opportunities to listen and learn communities we serve. more about the community. For example, homeowner association quarterly meetings (social or formal) may serve as opportunities to identify current community issues and concerns and to disseminate important public information. ✓ Identify a broad base of stakeholders, including scout troops, sports clubs, home school organizations, and faith -based and disability Develop partnerships in order to communities to identify where relationships can be built and where develop an understanding of information about the community's needs can be shared. Partner the community's needs with groups that interact with a given population on a daily basis, such as first responders, groups/organizations have already established trust within the community and can act as liaisons to open up communication rhnnno/c ✓ Maintain ongoing, clear, and consistent communication with segments of the community by using vocabulary that is understood and known by those members. ✓ Discuss how organizations can have a formal role in the community's emergency plan and, when feasible, include them in training activities and exercises. ✓ Use the power of social media applications (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) to disseminate messages, create two-way information Engage the whole community in exchanges, and understand and follow up on communication that is emergency management already happening within the community. include a wide breadth off v/Involve children and youth through educational programs and community members. activities centered on individual, family, and community preparedness. ✓ Develop recovery plans with full participation and partnership within the full fabric of the community. ✓ Incorporate emergency planning discussions into the existing format of community meetings. Multi-purpose meetings help increase participation, especially in communities where residents must travel long distances to attend such meetings. _..._......... _ .......... Nolle Community Outreach Fir ime ork Page 7 Pathway �4ct�n Items ✓ Integrate the public and community institutions into the planning process by participating in non -emergency management community meetings. Listen to the public's needs and discuss how individuals can play a role in the planning process. Generate public interest in ✓ Make yourself available for local radio call-in programs to answer disaster preparedness to get a questions that callers have about emergency management and seat at the table with solicit input from the listeners on what they see as the top priorities community organizations. for community resilience. ✓ Have an open house at your emergency operations center (EOQ and invite the public. Invite schools for field trips. Explain the equipment, organization, and coordination that are used to help protect the community. ✓ Identify local opinion leaders and learnmwhat......ey..._........................... —.__.............�.. the are interested or involved in and tailor emergency management materials and Tap into what communities are information to meet their interests. interested in to engage in ✓ Identify issues or challenges various groups in your community are discussions about increasing currently confronting, how they are organizing, and how emergency resilience. management might help them address pressing needs. ✓ Understand how you can share and augment resources with partners within your community during emergencies. For example, providing a power generator to a store that has all the supplies the community needs but no power to stay open would be an example of a way in which to share and augment resources. ✓ Work with partner organizations to better understand the various ways they will be able to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from threats and hazards and supplement their activities and resources rather than compete with them. Strengthen what already works ✓ well in communities. Identify organizations that already provide support to the community and determine how you can supplement their efforts during times of disaster when there might be a greater need. For example, if food banks distribute food on a regular basis, emergency managers can deliver additional food to the food banks to help them meet a greater demand during a disaster. �.. ✓ mmmmmmmmmo __..Provideade adequate information to organizations ahead oftime �..... so they can better prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from threats and hazards. In return, organizations will provide you with information on their status and ability to assist Communities and emergency when you need them. For this reason, ongoing multi -directional management supporting each information sharing is one of the most important aspects of maintaining your partnerships. Have regular meetings with formal other. and informal community leaders and partners to maintain momentum. ✓ Provide support to for-profit private sector organizations in the development of business continuity plans. Keeping businesses up and running after an event helps to stabilize a community's economy and promotes resiliency. ..._................. _- ._. _......_..... Whole Community Outreach Framework ............................................... __........................................ ...._................ ....... Page