Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-08-15 YPC Packet
FOR '11,1, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Rf!ORI) Irian Davenport, AfC.P, Director m 11 ann:n,,,? Division 129 North Second,51reet, 2nd Floor Yakima, ilvas in lon 98901 Phone (W),575-6183 - iax (501),) 575-6105 City of Yakima Planning Commission PUBLIC HEARING City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday July 8, 2015 3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. YPC Members: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson, Carmen Mendez 'i PlanningStaff. Joan Davenport (Community Development Director/Planning Manager); Jeff Peters (Supervising Planner); Valerie Smith (Senior Planner); Robbie Aaron and Trevor Martin (Assistant Planners); Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant); and Lisa Maxey (Department Assistant) Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Staff Announcements IV. Audience Participation V. Approval of the Meeting Minutes for June 10, 2015 VI. Final Review and Approval of the YPC Findings of Fact and Recommendation to City Council regarding the use and definition of "Mission" in the GC, CBD, and M-1 zoning districts. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: Airport Safety Overlay (TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15) The staff report and draft ordinance will be posted on-line at: iiktp.�wnrwk%awa,,caclrtrPalqn1141stllam��trt, collunissizw11-naeekin VIII. Other Business IX. Adjourn Next Meeting. July 22, 2015 City of Yakima Planning Commission City Hall Council Chambers Wednesday July 8, 2015 Beginning at 3:30 p.m. Public Hearing PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY Page 1 07/08/2015 YPC Hearing MOM _. .......___. __................ ........................... ..... ........................................................................ --- ........_uu ................... .........................�. Page 1 07/08/2015 YPC Hearing It ECO [t 1) I III11IIIL E ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY LAY YMC 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 Yakima Planning Commission Open Record Public Hearing July 8, 2015 EXHIBIT LIST Applicant: City of Yakima Planning Division File Numbers: TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 Site Address: Citywide Staff Contact: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner Table of Contents CHAPTER A Staff Report CHAPTER B Draft Ordinance CHAPTER C Draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone Revision Map CHAPTER D SEPA Checklist CHAPTER E Public Notices CHAPTER F Public Comments ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AI,' PORT SAFETY OVERLAY YMC 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 Yakima Planning Commission Open Record Public Hearing July 8, 2015 Applicant: File Numbers: Site Address: Staff Contact: CHAPTER A EXHIBIT LIST City of Yakima Planning Division TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 Citywide Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner Table of Contents Staff Report CHAPTER B Draft Ordinance CHAPTER C Draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone Revision Map CHAPTER D SEPA Checklist CHAPTER E Public Notices CHAPTER F Public Comments ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AI PORT SAFETY OVERLAY Y" C 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER °APTER A Staff'Report deport A-1 Staff Report 07/08/2015 ............. ..._w__� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6183 • Fax (509) 575-6105 ask.planning@yakimawa.gov • htip://www.yakimawa.gov/services/planning/ CITY OF YAKIMA REQUEST FOR URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS Application # SEPA#020-15, TXT#003-15 APPLICANT: City of Yakima APPLICANT ADDRESS: 129 N. 2nd Street, Yakima, WA, 98901 REQUEST: Proposed text amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance amending Yakima Municipal Code (YMC) Chapter 15.30 Airport Safety Overlay (ASO), to ensure regulations are in line with the Airport Master Plan. DATE OF REQUEST: DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONTACT: May 29, 2015 July 8, 2015 Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner Robbie Aaron, Assistant Planner I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The City of Yakima Department of Community Development has prepared a proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (TXT). The proposal includes amendments to Title 15 of the City of Yakima's Municipal Code (YMC), specifically the Chapter with regards to the Airport Safety Overlay— YMC Chapter 15.30. The proposed amendments are intended to ensure that regulations are in line with the newly adopted Airport Master Plan. II. PROCESSING Proposals to amend the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (YUAZO) follow the City's established process in YMC § 15.23.020(B) and YMC Title 16. In Winter 2014/2015, the Planning Division conducted a review of the existing Airport Safety Overlay ordinance to consider how to implement the proposed update of the Airport Master Plan. The Planning Division met with the Airport Manager to discuss the key areas of YMC Chapter 15.30 to be amended. The review resulted in an Airport Safety Overlay ordinance amendment proposal for the YUAZO, and suggestions on regulations and provisions to render the amendments compatible with the other applicable codes. The Planning Division brought their preliminary draft of the proposed amendments to the Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) on January 28, 2015, tQ establish a baseline for open discussion and YPC review. Yakima Code Administration (509) 575-6126 • Planning (509) 575-6183 •Office of Neighborhood & Development Services 0MPE , 3. Further limits and/or prohibits permitted land uses which are incompatible with airport operations, or present a hazard to the public within the underlying zoning districts; and 4. Redefines the land use application process for land uses located within the confines of the Airport Safety Overlay. Staff Analysis: With the help of the Yakima Planning Commission, Yakima Air Terminal Manager, and WSDOT, the Planning Division Staff has drafted the above amendments to be included in the Yakima Municipal Code Title 15 Zoning Ordinance. As discussed over multiple study sessions with the Planning Commission, it is pertinent to establish regulations to ensure the compatibility of land uses that surround the airport, and the proper f future implementation of the YUAZO as intended by this Text Amendment. Staff believes 1 that the proposed amendments properly implement the intent of the YUAZO, and other applicable codes while also providing for safety and compatibility concerns for land uses surrounding the airport. C. CONCLUSIONS: a) The text amendment is a major change that is necessary in order to promote the r compatibility of land uses surrounding the airport. b) No adverse impacts have been identified by the approval of the amendment request. c) The requested text amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance is supported by the City of Yakima's Urban Area Comprehensive Plan 2025. d) The amendment to the Yakima Municipal Code, Title 15 Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, which includes, but is not limited to, new Sections for Applicability (YMC § 15.30.020), Definitions (YMC § 15.30.030), Airport Safety Overlay Zones (YMC § 15.30.040), Height Limitation (YMC § 15.30.050), Land Use Overlay (YMC § 15.30.060), Application Requirements (YMC § 15.30.070), and Nonconforming Uses (YMC § 15.30.080). e) A DNS was issued for this proposal on June 25, 2015, and the 14 -day appeal period ended on July 9, 2015. VI. RECOMMENDATION The Community Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the foregoing proposed text amendment request. RECOMMENDATION made this 8th day of July, 2015. 01, /s/ Robbie Aaron, for Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner Department of Community Development, Planning Division 2015 Text Amendment TXT #003-15, SEPA#020-15 Airport Safety Overlay Ordinance Amendments Staff Report DOC. INDEX # 3 a ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AIRPOR,T SAFETY OVERLAY Y C 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 EXHIBIT IT LIST CHAPTER B Draft Ordinance B-1 Draft Ordinance for YPC Review 07/08/2015 i Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) Sections: 15.30.010 Purpose. 15.30.020 Ot411atlaom.,_ Alnl �l"" ", hi ily 15.30.030 A;g;allizrltan tl'nml'Ns°ta�lBy�Ye"Ntty t�1����.17Lfiniton 15.30.040 last 1� nSe� aN:l,ga1R rrll(y l ver 1j 15.30.050 t °laas� () allass fit l l tglp I lrs�wllwl�ar 15.30.060 A-pp1i i uit'enients ,1r1 N i p lav lwl<l, ": 15.30.070 l"lai;gl 4itatl.11n111Az1r1Nl+�:arxi�r�flnirea�rle�1�� 11Nog„��pl� fa allw.lL'.l)t9ll; 1,, .,lll,lllldl. 1"KIVi0N 1 � iel l r pre ea�p Haul r,o-°t nrrrl.lwr�tlil l ,. p Ncl;,- i�;wt� � l:l allNlrlg l,i .. Page 1/8 15.30.010 Purpose. The airport safety overlay is intended to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field and any other state and federal system airports from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proximity to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field or other public airport with defined airspace per Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77. (Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 2001-04 § 4 (part), 2001). i."rexp .N.,qymitbirg,.(Nl.jljrjlq(l)'5l Ns,..rall...ltt�jw , wAlal ltll��p "t'y"t Panic, ,.tdat s".a qttty" N,a� lnNl etelel irIlll� tlp�er�at,geell..��.1.i1tl.�.d.11 �.1N�try k;ll'q G)g.11” (tl) tN wll rose,id iAspaqm..imuat ltrl g�tt( t4 .le�g¢el( lrtal l�.,aral�wr l,mrl .�ya,li�� (Nlv �ilati �,k l�cell 1-5 ;14'1.O',211I�nit�ou�',�. The-lbH winoerm.; aro-ostabusbell fnr-tlle pof-t! e Vakinia Airy. -110 tninal at, AAt�Alli�leu l,s..iteltl-tar�tueuy t�ll�a�� +slat,+���al-9da•1e1��N syleam� t�i��,paa��t. r lauace"lta teltl"' eeaea^ ey�staaaatture}..tree cer...la e tf4and as lei l'a ttetaapu. eeis p Nmttsatltatymop..ee s tl�la^�cc�.�^elmirr�eh,,laarrtoe-safe-�a°ati��a��r f"eircll�..iu�-rs�unrl-�i�rr¢�-r9el�nnlimled l�r)a-ilreaaln�NiE�tmmi��ae- ef iFa[ undEw this -title, �*Air sp aee tmlestu uet�oaai ' u' eettets" Hatay r � ta��e, t���..l a al ��n�ess, s rwa;'i oa Mtleawl oG..lie `awl � ella�a trel � l# e,. l�atr:iareeaey,...ualalareeaae w„ lran ltetam�aaN;..leaerl a rtttal ut eaaee ahsaaou tae �tah�e oirp it a iellaaerl lay.heeler �l�'4� a geititets (h A l l l�ttrt "i'.. Air- uuet�t` a�rNs a+,�+tt"m�a��1 Nol°l"lee li"�aiJ unoNtm�metea9.,1wlssage"+I a�mt�nller-» twrlass�ae�td-tlaauht���"nirsl��a�Nw�tav�uam� lrrtll�i�n �ty..��1 l�r�l�r�,y, uviB aNl'll rt iirrae o a sere"" n�� o s-tla s c rw gummy s irslra (lnruu� ary> appi, µ-l�tN , traralsiti� aeN„ h�ro� 74,)mal �;rlld- con7eal-stwfacos).alu ,4�igwwted-6-the FederalAvi�utia�r- cNe�ar�i� a6uo��"alrr�l.es defined by F'Al J)iol 7T `:st�tli�tl-ao-�rr-+ele�atff��a=` taaearn�tltt�-,&t�,�,lrt�st�.ltttit�t.tt('an�slit-l;tt^�rl"s �as�l.tle-lttattlt�r..aa�^a�a;..rtartstm�m�tl�ir�-I'eaat�elro�"tva�" rte-etaaa.,aa,.le�e"1'a u�.l4tt�ab'tl-tom-air-lttivtll��laa��ty"ttans- H °"� de �ouix�au�tNodtlayrlhel AA"tll�al��doattil°slaaa�� .° rt�el-i��ta ea�tasR�t� ,- ha'zardtltu aiw W&Vigafioli, The FAA, determinatoaate"tNp�tt�t l lttteet�N�sll�aletitttt does�ttat stilt�l,eaamm luau �ar��1�r tata�itti�re=ttntlea°..letltau�,aN..rttNatloreal�s �aot e+a�taR-Okae-;9,wnxttia°�ti �aeial #°rraara-tlettsrmcraio- tl�wtt..:ut i� tape.,.. aarspaee-leaear`d-Gr MOWialty:..4 tible-tared aa. — un irAiti-t l -lam ��Pol����sil�ly pul iNel�ro-la��btl ers�s".�...�eeea.�yR el..tasevm tlaene,llsotei " 141° p��able=w�thiue�tlae��ererNata��s�aCety. ver"lay;-i uluding' l--..T"'e- kn(l t4ses.Jo etl ort -the i,g star-araett botuid by-ihe Wnitss til"..tl�e p� r-lheawed--the�tutiaarrtal"s0r1°ac�tlllny@ ue t'^ranri��al sutal'a�e �d ear.. l la�at�,rre1 snelei N ata+vnrti�ty its ttr,,. �amQoa.1.°°�tlaae)werheyWrL't1) INDEX INDEX # 0mcaaeibof- T- 0 t.a Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORTSAIEVY OVERLAY (ASO) Pee 2/8 ipcihW 110*110"— Suc* or niobtle-i4oiRe pwki�- sehiwlls; Baro , kne,entj I These Wd uses"whhha the prunarly,or secondary airjwrt,rafety overlay coo uidtwing:airspace IfiazmK as detenf6ned by the adinin istratine offi(aiA n loans area I vpresefa in ft -1 I'll 0- 11d, ievlu%I,H1 4ht- i ii ineraiost,porl kuar-ofl41w- rrart ray ils-defined unamerplan, ((),rd, -20108-46 4,14-4 4 (Pon! 200 1 J SJO.034 - Applivation of-sriquwt-sull ovellay, provi&WIm A,- -A11 m44*g-dis4it", t'rfet"AA11 a ted- UvI do v this lint,, i $1 With i III4h �- 41 jfp0f+- 'V10 W They kpmt*WW y- 0WFkQA 80) contains-thaw,-aroas 4erined4iyfedoral Aviatim Regidnficq (fsAR)-Pao 77 g a ry-su rfifu es,al]4 theflj 11 way'-prolvel iolv,zo H om rd tesdi"n I- 44le-aifpoFt- layou [ -Jflal v (4 d -icmiJ fig, W,ppm-iM<kxu'l1Pr4;ed of two, julfis., saflety ovordressos OPOMMMM UnMuchm altair val bamulAby the -FAA -defined - 2); . ..... .... and4heapproask and IralNititirial approac"It surl"devs IeX1011dirlp, tX,'y0fKJ the (Or& )p009 46-§- 1- „-2W i Usad in YNHAWAMPYNiC Chaper as -deer inore-Fewietive; No ssepavale iWQWWwRwaC%r, (44use In theakrom oveday4vaquitud, pvvilUdAw Mnistvilfive official cat's con0t+,,xivv,4y- dttlil I,hatl,+11431 pro l)m%d--,tFk lut u fe-*W-usa� 27- — - - W411 or planned-oppr(, mulm, nut -W4441-0 MMM&MnImly pl'otevaioll arwil -or-an idenfified futurosimy- &e DIM,, flitu'vall neiso- 9, , G"', ilses� Am] I � b,e, mjf�jea lo Class, (2)), aprA ioation alld fQView- V NUT IS 30AMY A .. --U' zoning distri(A ................ . ..... 4.4, Is7,1 a tRwteac:R ire f4: 1;5,0 A70 -and 5- 1 ; whichevei-are the gh""estficlion 2,-- The, pro vJsklIv,;-o f --yr, W", _Gflaptw! dRaarreta,.aaad b6b. INDEX # We wtotlov,()rA) 14:` Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) 3., - safety concerns, ME K — Wvan ahmpaeolmynal has beenAamnakedmaKiSt olvabstunutiolis oavigation r41(4114hay ba ta Ir e': Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) 4-, -- Noiwiihstandiin anv the-adminismitive official -shall lieart appi-uve any u)VWIF� UW; OF trut-w1mi the -FAA fws dusi)air nated it-whazwd f4avigal iull, Page 4/8 twlhat, Or lVg1l1Hfl0l1lv4he shall aW, : .... ....... MWI takew, ph -we" wit It ill -t he-flivpwl -sofety"t"weday in -S"oh F,r1">--600:MUUVA,8,8I i0ll-betweei+ the,airport-and -a ircraft F-vasult- ill, glare 1 ri-the, eyes, 411", 1 )i lols-using k he-airjurry J 111pair. OreirH(�-4,)iati-q4u'.iht'-Iit,lillir(,,Isotht4-,wise orale a hazard which may ill ally way.. endanger (Ilea -lat"ng, lakeolf, 01%fTta1l0tWef4l4g,0f colnpolled-t)y state -woh- w4tif e fiwallkvws, witkiwa-tfa damn do as tuana is nraad suFfkes i,,Wlhe c4inical,sur-faeo area,. (OW,2008-46 § I (paA)s1008! 0rd,-20t1-I-(W§A (parl); 2001). ...... . ... 111elipor ""Rd Ifillffilig, fiews, Aff-ilew airj1*vts;-fi el ij,) ortsij, *),r, Ill f1d hig- no ldfshal I -be, 4es igfied's cl, lhat--thwinekhm( w vieiflity- be, 1hat-ak,traf1W4&fi not filly -five tnt",sured-ataw -pr-qwrl:y line -and -shall land -uses, as defined -hi show or weasures wifl he bFiV 200-1414 § 4 (pad), 2,010 1-� 1530.020 APPLICABILITY, natural features or tjsc» k)calcd wilhill 0t,s-w,wvoq that arc d efined I y,ljieLM,rpor Overfay J)jq cl C V4 i ed ( n 11te Yakirlin Airferininal al McAllister Field Part 77 Sitr fi ces nlop; Cdr ich"i toll Mies areas rrf lbcmrLOA 14110,30 51 Hba` A i'VO-ift1�' 7,oll-9S ivi I , - - _ 1�ofl 15.30.030 DEFINITIONS d,dlc_Ilwllalw<l^wrat , -t-e-ralsgull NI e()I tJto-j!5PfjYrQjeqjn ll ej, plwfqk)(fllc,Ya AUR-PORT-:-Thle, Yakima Air ifli; �jq,pf valdina includi !Jesignated! in the Yakima it Terminal at McAllimer Field Master 114,1 . ...... fl-llvsllvill,! �)f orl, AIRPORT "411V TgN- -1, lipm sell! level, g ljt�-fa% flig,jil"g as it 1111�1-1 The Yakima Air,rerminal at McAllister 1,10d is olic th( 0 y i �Ovq (flusl sell lcvql., AIRPORT INFLUENC11, tZf-',A-. Includes airpprt,prqp, qyq!lA 4j,1Igpd within the Airpqrt,�,.' 6 is dewribed ill YMC t53W )jyl�jn U-0 Tertnittal at McAllister Filed Master Plan. outwlal°lfl ilt,t(11,11111)ws,k!CCJ!,I",()!!,�trq,c�,!Ir�t,ani !,tlu hCj,g!j!jjndlatiqn slo Xg,� Olvdi iri YMC 1530-05 �J`k 1?�rfine n offbq,l 11)rqaclt skirrace coiincidc wrath Ille . ..... Q "RK . ..... KQ,,p. INDEX # IhmembeF q,2444- Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) Page 5/8 t'0Nlt'At, SURFACE: An rur�a�pls�ryr wr�ur`9 act e�.lendinf.r, 01. t ��au�d a ld i�eo��°darid,froin tbrtr_p ronhe u-�, ('llre lhor izonaa�-l.. ^gaup l'acc at a slop; oftwcrttl ^ to on (?,tl:_l)_fqr horizontal distance offour thousand tear (sl.11t)t)°t„ DEED l yl?NOTICE: A tcrrray statrinent nutr�rrrled In YM „ 15.30,.?'?? as a dote oil the,fac;e„of'�a short111.1. jZ1p,.,..r)na)Irar.. ;,a_rl4lyisaonat.r...bilr.tlrnv"sit;a 11t4fra�Nwcrcaq,clltNw�arrrap.alWlNlaawlarar}a�rh,t.raatrfytuaaalscrtatlt,ucr�,.l).ltrg).artetawup�,r�1.lirdalt.11c,. laLoltw,rty us,lraaterl ad ac°,crrq tea gala activ�f,�u,rr trt�u..t..krr�c� �arcM largaNacr_ty rant ,lrc„ rnlprar, q t fay,�ltiacraafi nllrsrw”, rrrNlra,s,;., yibrath tr alyd...laa.)v...11yrwatu aaircraft,. 1m;AA..I {IILI 7�1,(rll I., _i 11 Cl4mf t ,1 PROPOSED D �t," NS l RUCTIONuOR ALTERATION,: A form which the Federal,, A.vtrtl,t.star:Adlprpp,Astraltrrpttfl,mA.�.1.�.411rrt�'�..q+�alrd�.�crsa,rlalc.i�;a�wla�rlat.�+r<arar��wv�ra:l.t"�.let"tayaaasrrta�..lar.,r�c�tl^�tdtr,fta,rG <r�,tzrr ottt,.tsla,IeriR,.. 0lilt, c ou Irl, ad,tact_arpa ala"aa e. vr,ttlapaa, lyp: ata latal t..lrp flarena r lar p aa_aarrd a.Vloaaws tlra l_ AA for t oracltua t aawrr,aala sltrat,e att,aN,y a tpa., detel ttrpaae wiltell,+er itic (ib 'et will',rrcly t°rrr„;N.y rifle intsirtace rur° nav_itptieaala? arlaNs.•;. FAR, PART 77, SURFACES: ThePart,o_f49 CFR of the Federal Aviattoro lfc�ill„ation that deals svrllt..oblract „ earl"list„wrr�lrxr+�y,b�rkt,l� t)rl.�Itl4cf [,'Alf„PAR ..,1” 77 f,)NLS: lrnptlrrraat;y saprraltaea gaup°laaces established with t"a lar.Naar,a tcr.c".arc 6w„rtltrsvdttr ail` rnr rriwNaagrt„ 1 jjel:t:. arae hycm�Ites ofdtavlaae�a�.9�IJ..lar.l.r��i��"t��,.171.,�glalarta�trll�.l�l.tearr�,rtorr.lrM,m(�l� 1,tett,r�raM)q�'ri.�.rarlrN.(h4<arriearla, HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION: An obstruction determined to have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and an tit tla,°�_ ........ efficient 4.tr,ayl�<tlalt arlasltater rcrcpat rptrNraatra„ 111lti1;1 l"I"or the lrur°neuro ori",rlelsrratNrrirar the lie 'i )n lirnilSill, all ZoraawS a nd ,as shown on the Yakima„A „r„ Terminal at McAllister FieldFuturePart 77 Zones „tapan” t1r,Ns el atasrar »l)"aI.G lar, lgl pulrt aa!;pye mean sea,leyel elevation unless cat„6arrvarva wculfio,l. HORIZONTAL „SURFACE A_horizonlaal llaanl:.cana,laaxtala ti.lnlhy Newt I1_ t)`) thatvt rtNr.a.:a tel},luslaea9 arlrtarntt °„levalrattt.". tk l"roe011.IMer (0 which-p"l lire r.,olmjdes \VVIR thej'acaatra lacrrrarete�t aai the conical slyt fq .l I'his r� eNhevctalaraggcirr"cN arNNa�t ,. tettNae,Tca t,f1.Ialal,"t„aa aaaye,statsats versa level for the Yakima Apr Terminat,_atMCAlllster,Field lIlaveloinrcnoi scaterdycntpollStl land which e renaitied vacant afie the ina' cl',1 ,.,,redh clews halaaaaer rt ga$as„", urred in an a rest., OBSTRl.t I.,IL). ! try..o4altrtatlartrttutaal„rrraaawQla..geaaalr,lm.ail.11 l,r,14rlraalGczl;,,iarawpocaau Frralgs9ltrzticalrw_err erltcrattraaau.�. lt7clvtdrrat .a.alrplltaap,eratpta arpsateraaro,ls.gasawd tloa.rrs�at_w ilic9a t wr:aa clw ap l;rol,wpr(Nrraa.Nac ra 11.9. satl_ltrrth in t'"NK' 15 lil...ti`a0C RAL GROWTH: I,I, ly1aauas tt l,l,ac; also°aa9,s car rraarvil rt or ian)e cat_wagetaati e rnaatteerr-, Nll Iol.'1tt7aaf.,.1.Ir..A1,i1P).thlgllt96alzr,aaaclt,ttgtalt.avlt4trarattlsrrtal,,.I.It:Nc.ilii..ltttlb.,lltal,trural..lallaa tlst:,.lal,a}tt.ratfl.,.,. 1.t,as,tr arrtraap(s Ono, aft,cararaai,A)'A,a~d,*ectrgl0c ear a�Pnlll,raaarra,aatlrrrl"t. sv„;la_rrrw rwac dgy,ic es...An aairct,aall araaaV err,” sgic a a n aapprorach sltarapld,be flyirra�, inaccordance watlh,"ata IFR il.lrrstr"+rTaacla ..l`"Irl"lat il lr,gfs)Jjj.l":ha lllaalt., PRIMARY SURFACE A surface, Non rtaadrgt�al.ly .eesatcWa d parr a a,l,pr�twPaa _wigs ar %vidth ofone tNaousand feet (l,S)t" 0",.1. fOrarrstrim=rtaaA't11l)Irrsrraa"lges"arial.dlyolrtbltt.,lmq ti ,(r t,( 4)tl."),.etas anprmatraa,l.maltlaruaalctacros When ,the 1aalasy,".rs".Ir�rwaa,zltca,rrr.N,l ., l)p°eat fr f llanrc rasa lama ,..tlte latart%aar;v sslr face extends two hundred _feet beyond eachwend of the r n 4Y.,Tlr;eAcvaation of any ata}Int on the..lar!marY strrfacc rs the same as the el.ewition of the nearest o,int,on the runway ceraterftne The,,, elerw,atrtrpa,atl tNre 1',trtratray„ ,amrl"arµr at,glte Yakima Air Ter tnal,at McAllister 1, gcld.,,rw ttrte tlaamcrs4alad Noris rsmtiora„feet (N.�lt�. �,.alherye, rnealpa, wase Ir vel!,; R(JNWAY7 Adetined are r ort an, errroti rarenarttd for fandpn and kake-off oFaircra alapa rts,len th TIAN .l..µf.,lfy NN,AI ;,`slrU0",'A J.. ,>., l,lN.cat".Pr',):1.<4 iltat.fv. nr.4sr,iltM fs r,ta Ald crllt sxllwaN aft rttlltml..,lle x 4 t4.tl los tca,lillf 4f4➢t.wara ,, ca l?.ter l.lNre. trpacl tatrNway..aa tett alpr„la aOttatcRa;:d rtl.ar slolra qf5. cvgrr , cl,l.7".l Ita.ar`,i/oiatagl,q.y py r eau lr ltacat yr l"tNcaMlla (. II R. li"opal the Shies of he prpa)aaar°a? aaaclarlalaaaa at Nw suarlrpcc°s to avheraN they irpterstn,_ct,wyritNa.tlrrr hor,zonjpl saudr,gaprpaall sppll9acc, „, VISQA?RUl^�WAY A runwav intended solely for the ongaartion oN Rartcpial) us,in isuaal111111,walenperaclt,.laretcaWaNtrtc with.. ptc'p, traa.l lrt:...ara instrument paaoaycalaaaa and no instrument daation indicated trI Kan,fA ralaararov_crl arorltort lxtya�sat„la,tt,W Atr vo, Srtl"a„ ttr tlyole Mr 4rkwr uLy. (rt 5-1 he -Yikitasa Muniurpal Coal«a45w�sr��ra�t-tRrraffo-mglh�fara6raWCO XJtu 039�9 Q Q IR Yakima Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASU) Page 6/8 "tatty„q tl$auutvaa'"a°wmmaswliwtrw lwraaaal Ilau_a'axatnaw atcoraatataactllw, yorlway gtraaflwwl"daa;laapapw"t.lfi'% ym,l,each tend of, tile w°waataw�,gtd,gin°dtf Nwawwxla..ma .4.Nr ISN' r.l t dw�saww� + t'llflished ne)..acc!,,n:, hlww, wit ;w�A A 4:llis,t,0 !llosNl r can thc ya"Abilat onwaaoarl3utw h.lcta ttec, tplataa m l,a Vap ll,maal a�dtnwwxwa_ tac ,,. ,iwaa dwwc,llmactc;cl .aot c,tam tlm syips of lmmdml pamatrpc. o roa P. (lu ta,t,tl;c�mll� � lra M �w ..: as Nd�tlwt 1pt� .@.g. alt � placlrpd 5. "aalw .l dw w fdlw;gd 0! waa,lpsL a°oincenlraaui,on tt!„iact ident,a, lake place Zone 2 iyjqrq tiitq,. Tlip*,_-Ppp�.��,a4)aImp,l � l,.�.!q�..,m.tr,�$ p a�f�.yao Ntorhi Nexlo,t, a tatbg ij,5 aalt lmcaatcat t),a,mafa: paarlrmmc l.tm4 talddt ' c tmt 3 lamerl aamtpa,amt� � atNmw � @�,� « <a�am�� ,.p�,�a,�w����w ��uw����al, <,l�l �w �;�pgq w,�N��dt ,l,gNa ,�acE� w ��� ion �Nl, n,�.�pa,w,tl;iw,tw.,a,� .. q F,.taaw.pti.tpart awla lw atgatl„a I Its_ ore Nwla,aww.utl aatl,a Viral,pa kt.q '.1:.aythdat'' �����.r��klrlt... �o-l.Trtm_aldr pant aal r,a�wat,a.al atvlzat a:,anal a,lcaanart tams mmiw tN;ulad�a all.. l �lal. p�,gp , l c . llt w „ w itl turns Which are [lie ..awt concern with Zone 3 can be a narrow w! rN .f gl.ati rrt)laro�,v� to .N. ,.rla g?a t„lwa .aq,dra tarlf w art D Is Grp urna dak� aa, wLLY lltr _ �s t Jly Cc1vtxa,tN sflpjd„a$estilratlion Or to remain it tlrctraft,ac 1paatt aaa ,ar;mrrtaa aircraalt coati mpt)}f llaa .,irtwa.,,yjf the , ,ra tld drtlt,cw fit alttprm ",t mta, lyjp,q c tl' Qarc ucB ,mpl laptamavta, to uacem,, it, this al -ea to is as lowwa�at,Vtitude stall s)r,ird dNaaal.calbatipttcat.,tie, ltlftttw clttltmtml a,taw wpawlc....iapa,6alrt„ral am tramgt �"taFltm� �l f)aatwa�r,halm;�aa,tt�a�wgl�.��r:i�amq�w,umr, �'aaa��,.,,.im.qpi�;aaaw.�a�la�°wl�a�rcmattl,.mrmw.� �.�.�tpAs;ia��� a��ta.�,ma��w:c)aallm,�w�m.�'r"�.Dmt�amflmlr.�:,. fry a,a(t It ,lrtg. tr light t'daat or in ov,crfly thmsmmatra a.aai hotw-Illi'll,itpile, Th zorict.is, gaaartl aalnrN�P *.6ttatil�cr�,lll on rtalwwat „w. ere ril irorticIll uwwlmrdg ttp3,w,arclptlav laa*ks i lhis aartrcat�wmac"rdear 9hsres and at �vwuora)� lamapN� w�lfa�ap N,rm��maad�:warls l �a �a�glt�wwwr°wa,glaarr��,ral�al mattN,lrt l�allta rain dzm at .c wmla Nrt t... taar ...I w.a g.mww at<am,ru r..latmmtds alaaaj aMam; ,h sicie...o the ru;mtlw y, ar ra aarlf d,u taut agsa�rraaalYy..%ly cava+w l aµ... �a¢lm_ llapw rattmr , he .mtrwwtcilpatl rr It i1.s from ircraf`l that lose directional ctaonal control while q Qatt rajg.Qaa.Jtr t„<ttlpr takeoff 'T"hc . risks are, lower than itt,Zc i es I t,gtrtatagh .t.ttmt ,srb).?.m.l�ar to_,t,..l those of �7atttc ..., ttrt .. 9rzmf t f'aaltraat Zone. ..1 fit I zone contains tfm; tcml,aa4ltaatlw..a 0 tlt�,triml.q�w,aol rItw,aaraalarq�.mp, �wlm�.d.a..alrr,rraa ll... .i:l'ra P_mpltiwmau leaaptpµal,tBclpaprltlm apmlitaat,tap,alrt c°tagam,ga 41,11i,ght1d°ainitug.�m°m,awdcaa„Zone6ar„licallm,gaamg�l,than ,tga . cplYmwatw ra_amcl ct,mmt,atpmttmtq _stlbstmtmwdt,Call,kwVar.ggta„ ,.f9!a.qaaq,warlatarkr..Im:NotaF,gjN,taw,,l>adtlllMc�µmmac atatVcmc,rl,cwvar„R�,ac,l�ma a,. area, 15.30.050 HEICIFFIAMITATION l; lac, hciggtt q,lattitaatiaawa aaawta amwa^ Iww q° Ia ,atlm,Nt,l,t lma cl..catmwai l mma Willi Clmca 9” AR laatrt 77 Sa,ralilces ... ftltjgpts t°irc011g, Na vigalite ,A,Nta«ltalcc<lmatd,atm,c ai �t,yal�p�ti ll lal�w:.. l,lcyggat, l,owattMtatl.apa..l "tatac.l.a�"aaataw.,ta �a �. al�..la.at41.,"t� . dap I.11mxlclaltg.tw�atlpaat,ntlmf �oTp� �lpall aaWrc9 i.�.:.t;a�c�t Qakaat�rc l.l.m... ala padwt �14,�"M�mttma)r�. Ucila"t l attt.mlawtittat;,,,lctlaw 2.(Z n fid Ng 1paaalafaptL,) ty, bfil,ll^a,as,,�one shall exceed 1. 0 1,cgtwrabove the aairpq t tlgvmtlmon..... 15.30.060, LAND USt,', OVERLAY. Zones described ..brioNvareshtttwr,at._ill tlawltto l �tatict�+Oveli',w lc'taat ( „ t�/l..a,aaam,yt,www;tla tNpa. t tacw:.cwl lamtta�,taw review iist,tct below trr order to iam�tal9m�tc,gam3�,a�al mdot�lwl�° zl..l.tml ewtq l,idapa�,aa� itl.ap ca,la,cv *aaa,amwptandiaag llta�auamwtmpN,�,tmaai l(aa_c,mtmamGtaadw.d... wmatl� i.fil _of the ammrtjplq._ alrtrl Use wrarlta l...faglcw aantl linarww�a rcrtcLim awzwa'fwaaa lallan atrgl.lmta raarltl �aattan. .m... uses and raclavwties are�..allowed within the ...t l°!_�aamrt,"�a Land lUse.ww .a t�aaaas�maww�m�cand nd�w�w�ap al ti,. . Qql q t pac « r;lY ,la� y .(i. am a..lw tr,cl. ami tarla�c 1, l.a �alt.lgm, glia ar�asa, a atctmtaaaraaaa�..ill,tflais secttaa¢t'. drtas„r,.ra "w,iaatt ay t;Yw�waNGaa,Cvl,,rlrt.pugp,.laatl� , �lbC,%N'iaaa'waal�aMaaa�atawN�Qart�da���11 �wamta� w^aaaaaa`a�apapt alda�tatagtla ttrcladaaaaaahaa;.,;ttym� ll:t,-kl,wap"W�Qaat Yakima Municipal Code Page 7/9 Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY (ASO) A %°icN%N¢t1nNa re6tlirtN N N pr c ri ? .N.�.9lwit%t .,l4jsbyn&N,y. rwNN ), 0t 1, N c,N,hlic..a.tN .?adpscw„. �aNuwlw Na%�NN�tNt9; ( �wrwrta �mnr �..re, It isg...I� w rIIli.c."��.Molels and Ilolpls; �:'%trwrNiNt��x N"?.I°e.�prviIp1tNw�N..Cw�a�NwwN Nw7.t. � adis va.l„�qu hlc.s.� al,4! w(,81a a ft�gr is 1 ellicrit i"Nlrd,col ,NcI ,Ir and N awl r awa N l e�IwswNµwdi �I!,4,r N1dR l r penerwItin 9air r,fit gasn N9li[it y,serwiaes.. (;,.Rsm"(D ! lw, lttiwrwlpsawl . illflerr or ( orniitt,to iea ,ty arllardte 13aws rre as c.9aaaaal.,. sunti0l1rn[ ma hoo ., dpaai,wamaa;:, d9pB"�&.�NkINW,��..d,g1,N�r.�. �,)ElltitNNNN�Ji�IW4N1,R rGD,;ON��`p'��; Ir,amlaliidailet] , Maas ., er C bat eaN+,( eannn itaNwity� eenle�;rs, %NNINSiggh(gt1 ato. d'airw w flelqlmjlcty care.lawrtliti s Nwarsla t,%gyp Niew residential, I eea n!pra rataa� crllter tries wwrutg) srnti�ilr eeaiacc Nwtp°talr�atas eal"N.awl,'sawras„ reNt�d+°r°i l�" l?).sraats,aalyd, sNrilld.2datsr healrsa s ,. a l .1rN.± hrNt sd ad...%? �, . waw,ll ,t n N NarN ,c ,[► itlg T NoN ,f. ,Irgda wdop of ylida�wl�lasitN aana'l NNraat�9a trtralctnln+a toe 4N�nsltlnn..NYNtl Y ytrwn.n.�laac wlwntina s,ttwFaac awl *lase arl sdaatr�rarAdCdwaaallwiLs.,ar(.. rNd lla a N,N, , .nyr,l ..nla. .1 � i ra Wt a,Itrr�N%td Ne, la it.m, r aa�Naa 7v_ haw r?t1 aW %sc exhibit hazardous cNa 4rac a3 filt s, hazardous MIdlire �attractants nn<°.luditig v s cda�aaasa au tl (ta i rtiofi,sa,Vi%rla,r rmmwlgn agvgrti ;nit rNrtLl tcrrrw rK,tt N dWicilities with �ak,ove- grqlrlwd water �tr�lwgd���� and m nw niaadc wmellancls, ,a�p�� �ts�, f3aerla�µ.rwaNwr. nt°r-"�"r�%rf� ���ri�er•r� trNmex : ( Baiss (l„) ,Nsu s , ate,d his 1) use listed in table 4a 1 aNNro,�a ss,otlferwase„mentioned zn this. section. 4.l<aa (.). t a Nqr%"N,wb "d 1 � r8r1N 1,1NlBa, w4'�n,,z 1,tt NNS. ',� Lt Nw 1,Nk w , , i9w,Aewli_� 4 15 ,9 4,tlr pG't p holn4' a rld uww Iw%%MNwa S l da raa,G ..lSa idllta s,raal.4. eu lwa,Ir rs, eaw°rer p,irara N,aeNN tle , l' canaaaarwaane.iatiaarr„trawvarwsn IrasNraie%rls (irredensirgail, "ILIricuIturual, wa'tuba.�.eta.z..d,.d�+�laa�a:warld�l,aalit+r,r�rn�9.,6rwuhq�r�laara��e��I�cww�a..N eAga,,N,a,Nl,i..n9agiBpt%uW�s,,. (.°dnss (3) Uses_ Alvi usem nlPark; I'raalur0aatac dd,ra a lraaca .. N. m).n �acr lwNt Nl a%rtrl art �u i, aN awltN.._..... al aaNrc rr t,atw¢aaa _ aC laaa ar,� s N,t da�raau,poru rN.l ert 1 t+�,, a uwN near awp,rNstunig s!:(kctu�.,-ttil:l,Iao allowed._. 1 .:30.07011 , Pt''I~ ICAT'ION REQUIREMENTS. a._ to dieawllaaltN1n uses within then awn�rwparwNt s��i ly row auPsw ..e staa�,aNi�dieel (ayn ltlars �Naaap�el_._"adraa�d9 INr�IINu)amthe iurNNaw�w.duw . information: l_'._--PropoUndary lines as Nies" relate to INIc 1i.%aarrndorNurs of die ..Land Use Zones: 1 ..p m ,.m n ,� , �i .".x �.,,,,NaawlNarr .lcwaltnrarr�aaaa)�rau tlret.o sidles%_tin,N%ed wnrw�tlwsrrllaarllrinrw s,slnoalrrNs %iltw.pt gwnnwmand tlacs,„_ taller INiadww ---11tl...Icel iwN laci INt.,N 3. A descrripion,rat QN,te, prnpp5a-d,, ase and p w lar4aan.'Moa pip rag earrnpa tt lalN I ,datrraN_l n aaii°pwraw°I N;darnfia� ,w l°.a Ewen thaw use is to he,lo anted ��ith'ilr, Ilp waiNlparnt ; a9a.Ia ive to .dl�a ..iwlrpa,tw,azl_N1Ne. ON�� @NNS �aiN,paorl oppraatio s,twnrd sal`bly. 11In Consideration of” Sara arpalalwealI oil 9e;ni„eN �airnN,a?rrtp slau,rc teNi_ea aai trt,laa.r„aasr salapvNr �a!alli e�c,r,N,r�,tNirrly ll, N. 9eMa1„trl, llcidsadrt IN,aa ridaaac,Nrr atrarttvu..awtNn rill r'naay,g .akarNNu tlwc tr raallw;i dat,to submit eilher o the laill,aawwwrw �.... ..: aawttNlle nytr% Iica,raa a rw.a„pain Ner._la,Ncide s,sr"raraaal r nip rNaa,awN sdt,.ai heaaarr;tral,laand,srriwCy01'a which 4 leirrl :siale;s that N,way�r,Nt,'?ptit�au,umM�^�I�,IMrtttait wwilN a��siuNt �r°ati�rt tlra�_p�roYerpacasa,,al.w9.�.wW,tar �. froNlurwwxNpN .e , N nI icr or daNatlw Oct „�. )y Nltadsalt3rptr r,,aa t. raNwr tad`lwpol,ata,yee9 struc(ures basal ola..lhve estulblishe d airport vie.valiol�t Nnart 4,5 (si„altllratira.,),. da w,ratie,wlts shall Nl;s Lie el III aN.Ne d layar aa, rrter.a,a� laraala 'Signal el gince.r or as trr e,w,gsr,a)..,N%triad. asnt s�.�5�r,,� aar:,carnatt� daa_l�(ltsywr° nrtrttls raar�..Nataa.t, sltrtwwrw ns..11aaurrrr,��rt,#��+��� .��.��srwtpawkyClr m�atl,Ne.pi, ,atvaafl�ts,�a�� spt��Y"w dill iw. ] he %%CCLIa�4Cy,, awl <ta.,lewwrtimil s slinII, be cert tied Nayp,ote eingiIpewer or sur°va yor. Ill, „t;rrripa aa8,t;c dauas,r nithi rrrta,lon -s With not more th ar,r dive -cool r.u.lta r, baa#� liartwrrw �w�i lawrrt,� yt NNlwwNw.a�.Naa`: �yN%iaepN d (e er of°t�l NrNeal t, strnae tail a_p 901 NO' i c It 1, is ppaew rwrpl..Ny. a rNn y.ewia at,....11arswxwa pa share„ ,Isea kaaa.q.r tile: ArrtAa t% ,'�se.l Ny,,, ;)” aEtjjy.N!� lr�,arii,, !rNNv INDEX Ocrratweu ra .N:1,�.._ r Yakirna Municipal Cade Chapter 15.30 AIRPORTSAFETY OVERLAY (ASCI) atlac to at ca .ut,44uc9-0—I4r� „wmuq�rqu nu�u„_auu aft"g.) q I1 � t 6c5at uN aau 4aXee^N- _(Ord. �(3QJli_.)�a �� O,p;.cl X! 1 0'L .4 Ww111, 0 I.h D�,caskuns.@^yl be administrative official l uuulder 4'ype 0)o�1�b 4)e appealed tal.the _ Ire aa�ala^ i accordance with Y G�.,,� "�Naa@alar I ,Sty ..(Q �� 't��� - 4( a ltr�ri) 20&� a.Or(, a 29,l'l n �.i�aarl ,_ aa�araaaaa��a° aauco, 12M61 4' i tin eaves that aqua battik„Irma th sa ,st4nglan& qRhu th a7£,.,,ba�Maptiq �b.t„t,4a�� t,),va b xl) ut��a ..4� bb4<tuabuutatl �t1.�� 4ug”. considered qcarupl, a b a as lass .,. 1pusu tu�tt.at4.,t4w aµ a> V.s u , pail-anit(ed tIIr �wpggh �wb ",�..h 15J,9..,�..�la ta..tusa„ti4t�k,ka non, radik bp_b . lay 4a q,a Na4,a. ma ,4b t l l talu t14o� .4�b0.aaha�... 9u 4 5 .a, glautabua tri (ig .q1T-0r' . aan4, uL gkl a au, tg4cu a t wat ! 6 tutd�palP,u?H,q ., (?I., .k 4reau Yatktat�rta t u�asaal t'at ;`t alc�-�sa a a�roamha aq�arct a 9� tlaalq aaara a ' tllai i� ,PQQ INDEX ib1�� �•a aa9ara�,� �tk k �1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT -- AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY Y Y '; ;C 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER C Draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone RevisionMap ap C-1 Draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone Revision Map 01/12/2015 ........... I I ......... ..__.. .......... .. .w.................. . � ..... ........ .... m � ...� ..w�....... �� ......M.... �.... � �m ��� W.W... _..._._ � ..w ..... av '00u� wm oil IO id > �Ijfpi IN Vomo —�iuwu m "wox owwwwwwrw�w�"w�+i u uumumo yV V 1 1 IrrllpNR # IV NdIM 4 W 1 P �k 1 I r 1171 1 m 100110000%% i lw 4 "I �0 iVl0100�u X111 N W E S i r� Safety uveria,LA, onRevision,, 1/12/2015 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 Feet °f ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY AY Y : .0 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER D SEPA Checklist f D-1 SEPA Checklist / Environmental Review 05/27/2015 _�_... ..._.... .................. I ., LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF YAKIMA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, 2ND FLOOR, YAKIMA, WA 98901 w VOICE: (509) 575-6183 FAX: (509) 575-6105 INSTRUCTIONS — PLEASE READ FIRST Please tv e or print your answers clearIX. Answer all questions completely. If you have any questions about this form or the application process, please ask a Planner. Remember to bring all necessary attachments and the required filing fee when the application is submitted. The Planning Division cannot accept an application unless it is complete and the filing fee paid. Filing fees are not refundable. This application consists of four parts. PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION AND PART IV — CERTIFICATION are on this page. PART II and III contain additional information s ecific to our Ero2osal and MUST be attached to this a e to com fete thea lication. PART I — GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant's Name, Address, Name City of Yakinaat Planning Department And Phone Number....... Street 12®.... _ . 9 North Second Street City Yakima �ST WA Zip � 98901 Phone 1(509) 575-6183 2. Applicant's Property Interest Check I ❑' Owner ❑ 4 Agent U Purchaser ❑ Other: Local Government One 3. Property Owner's Name, Name UUUU Address, And Phone Number (If Other Than Applicant) Street City[ ST pp Zip Phone (( ) .. f � [I 4. Subject Property's Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Parcels within the boundaries of the City of Yakima city htnitas. 5. Property Address: N/A 6. 1.,a gnl Description of Property. (if leng(hy, please attach it on a separate document) N/A 7. Propesl s L isting zoninyy, ® SR E R-I E R-2 E R-3 E B-1 E B-2 E IIB E SCC E LCC E CBD E GC E AS E RD E M-1 ® M-2 8.1Typc 0f Alrl7iication: (("Iat,ek All That Apply) Administrative Adjustment E Environmental Checklist (SEPA) ❑' Easement Release ❑ Type (2) Review ❑ Right-of-Way Vacation ❑ Rezone ❑ Type (3) Review ❑ Transportation Concurrency Q Shoreline ❑ Short Plat ❑ Non-Conforming Structure/Use ❑ Critical Areas ❑ Long Plat ❑ Type 3 Modification 0 Variance ❑ Admin. Modification ❑ Interpretation by Hearing Examiner ❑ Amended Plat ❑ Appeal ❑ Temporary Use Permit ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Home Occupation ❑ Comp Plan Amendment ❑ Planned Development ❑ Short Plat Exemption; ® Other:rwZoniny��Jl�)m11111ca���wa���et�l3 gkit PART II — SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION, PART III — REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS, & PART IV — NARRATIVE 9, SEE ATTACHED SHEETS PART V — CERTIFICATION 10. I certify that the in6orqquid a aMi Otis a:Itplication and the required attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Plt ,'1:RTY OWNERS SIGNATURE A DAT11 E FOR ADMINISTRATIVE I[SF.ONLY Revised 12-08 J i4 O o--- I'S Notes: FILE DATE FEE PAID RECEIVED BY Amount Receipt No.Dateig, Ilear, ,n RF'as MAY fi ltlr5) DOC. IND YAKhWii J t AWRONMENTALCHECKLIST ti l STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) (AS TAKEN FROM WAC 197-11-960) YAKIMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.88 PURPOSE OFCHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW Ch. 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the ;enc decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information relillislonab't'j, related to detet`mini a if there maX be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist, for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION„ complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "° r os �rlb'" " ro roscr " and "affected m,eo gra phis; a"rca,"" res ect.ivel A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) 1. Name Of Proposed Project (If Applicable): City of Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance Airport Safety Overlay Amendment. 2. Applicant's Name & Phone: City of Yakinia Planning Department, 509-575-6183,. 3. Applicant's Address: 129 North Second Street, Yakima, WA 98901, 4. Contact Person & Phone: Jeff Peters at (509) 575-6163 5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Yakima 6. Date The Checklist Was Prepared: May 27, 2015, 7. Proposed Timing Or Schedule (Including Phasing, If Applicable): N/A 8. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, cxplain: Not at this time. DOC. INDEK # �, 9. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: Yakima Air Terminal Airport Master Plan. 10. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None pending 11. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: SEPA determination, City of Yakima Planning Commission Public Hearing, and City Council Approval. 12. Give a brief, but complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.): This proposal includes an amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance amending and superseding the City's existing Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) which purpose is to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proximity to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field. The new chapter proposes language which: a. Redefines the ASO protection areas from two to six zones which are based upon scientific information provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division; b. Provides individual building height restrictions per zone which are based upon the potential for airspace obstruction of the FAA Part 77 airspace; c. Further limits and/or prohibits permitted land uses which are incompatible with airport operations, or present a hazard to the public within the underlying zoning districts; and d. Redefines the land use application process for land uses located within the confines of the Airport Safety Overlay; (see draft ordinance for more information). 13. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.: City limits. DOC. INDEX # RAI B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) Space Reserved for Agency Comments 1... Earth a. General description of the site(," one): flat ❑ rolling ❑ hilly ❑ steep slopes Ll mountainous other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent s 11 lope)? N/A. 2. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service S®il Sur r cry... t�l�ima COL 11Ry NA �t�wiint,tsm d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. See United States Department of'Agriculture Soil Conservation Service �taN��itarygyn�aJ "o wa 1t0 .?itrd' retw Ifi�h r�l,'tMull e Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use'? If so, generally describe. N/A g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N/A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A 3. Water a. Surface: a" FJVE MAY 130C. INDEX N' Of� YAKIWi 1G7 0111. I B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) 1I Space Reserved for I, Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Although this is a non -project action, the primary area that the ASO will cover has the following streams: Wide Hollow, Ahtanum, Bachelor, and Spring Creeks. 2. Will the "ro ect re _ u. p j require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or re moved from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N/A ...,.. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A b. Ground: L Will ground water be withdrawn, o 11 r w 11 i 11 ll water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A 3 ........ .................... .... Water Runoff (including stormwater): Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A DOC. INDEX # MAY 1�1"y B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) 1 Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A Other Types Of Vegetation; b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are minor amounts of threatened or endangered species know to live in or around the city limits of Yakima, however this proposal does not involve any change to the land or liabitat, and is considered nonc- .ro`ect. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are minor amounts of threatened or endangered species know to live in or around the city limits of Yakima, however this proposal does not involve any change to the land or habitat, and is considered none pa gjpct. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Migratory birds may utilize property within the City limits; however this proposal does not involve any change to the land or habitat, and is considered none -project. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health Space Reserved for AQenev Comments , c , uy i B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) t Space Reserved for a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so, describe. N/A 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A b. Noise 1, What types of noise exist in the area, which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/A 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what'? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classifications which are effected by these amendments are as follows: SR, R-1, R-2, R-3, B-1, B-2, HB, SCC, LCC, AS, GC, CBD, RD, and M-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Comprehensive Plan designations within the City of Yakima area as follows: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Professional Office, Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial, General Commercial, Regional Commercial, CBD Core Commercial, and Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so specify. N/A — Non -Project Action i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in thecompleted prc o mpl project? oject? N/A j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A DOC. INDEX # AM y, f��; B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) Space Reserved for A enc Comments k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The existing proposal will modify the above mentioned City of Yakima regulations and land use plans. 9. Housing mv ....., a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A ....... c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structures, not including antennas; what are the principal exterior building materials proposed? The tallest height that this ordinance allows for an antenna in the residential and historic districts is sixty feet. In all other zones 100 feet is the maximum allowed height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The draft ordinance proposes to impose screening and other site design criteria to reduce the aesthetic impacts of wireless communication facilities (see draft ordinance for additional in6ortnation). 11. Light and Clare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None, however the ordinance does provide regulation of lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None, however the ordinance does provide regulation of lighting. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A DOC. INDEX # 7 �o B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) Space Reserved for Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N/A b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural important known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/A b. Is site currently serviced by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c.. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? N/A How many would the project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). N/A e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The draft ordinance proposes regulations which protect both the general public and the airspace and use of the Yakima Air Terminal which the ASO is center upon. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 15. Public Services i� DOC. INDEX #%Wm t(���. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (To be completed by the applicant) a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe: N/A b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. N/A C. SIGNATURE (To be completed by the applicant.) Space Reserved for Aeenev Comments The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying �., on them to mak +, decision. Signature a �.Ol1 fer'ywner or Agent Date Submitted PLEASE COMPLETE SECTION "D" ON THE NEXT PAGE IF THERE tS, NO PROJECT RELATED TO THIS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW D. SUPPLEMENT SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (To be completed by -the Space Reserved For a licant.) (DO NOT USE THE FOLLOWING FOR PROJECT ACTIONS A enc Comments Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list `of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities that would likely result from the proposal and how it would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented, 2. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed Zoning Ordinance change will not affect how land uses discharge to water, emissions to the air, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, or the production of noise. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: As the proposal will not increase any of the above environmental conditions, no measures to avoid or reduce these conditions have been proposed. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed zoning changes will not affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life as all the proposed changes will not change any existing environmental regulations. ® _. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: As the proposal will not effect any of the above animal life, no measures to protect or conserve plant and animal life has been proposed. M/, Y° 6) ( DOC. INDEX # #"°ip+ Dry rw f3l.a � ", a„ 4 1 � D. SUPPLEMENT SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (To be completed by the Space Reserved For a licant. DO NOT USE THE FOLLOWING FOR PROJECT ACTIONS .,.AgSEEX Comments 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed zoning amendments do not involve regulations dealing with energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None proposed. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposed zoning amendment does not propose any change to regulations for environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are None proposed. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No change to land and shoreline uses are proposed. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed f. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed zoning changes would not be likely to increase demand on the transportation or public service system and utilities as the regulatory changes only address processing of various land use applications. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None proposed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposed zoning amendments will not conflict with any local, state, or federal laws, or requirements for the protection of the environment. h4AY ?P'II,`r DOC. INDEX # ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY VMC 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEPA#020-15 EXHIBIT LIS CHAPTER E Public Notices E-1 Notice of Application, DNS, and YPC Hearing 06/02/2015 E -la: Legal Notice and Press Release E -lb: Parties and Agencies Notified E -lc: Affidavit of Mailing E-2 Notice of DNS Retention 06/25/2015 E -2a: Parties and Agencies Notified E 2b Affidavit of Mailing ..........., „ ,m ..... AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA RE: SEPA#020-15. TXT#003-15 Cid! Planning - Airport Safety Overlayrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrvrv�W�ry ci ide www A,,,. ..... ..... ...��.�.� I, Rosalinda Ibarra, as an employee of the Yakima City Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of DNS Retained. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the applicant and all parties of record, that are individually listed on the mailing list retained by the Planning Division, and that said notices were mailed by me on this 25th day of Lune 2015. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Rosalinda Ibarra Administrative Assistant DOC. INDEX Parties of Record - City - Airport Safety Overlay - SEPA#020-15 TXT#003-15 Ya - ki1 I ___ ............ . -------- ma Air Terminal Halverson Northwest Law Group c/o Robert Peterson c/o Mike Shinn 2400 West Washington Avenue PO Box 22550 Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima, WA 98907 ------- . ............... - - - - - . ........................ — — --------- .............................. ................. 1n' --House Distribution E-mail""List Name Division E-mail Address Debbie Cook Engineering Q(,,bbk.ggu&Cq)ya inut�ya ggy ............. Dana Kallevig . .. ...... . ......... Wastewater ................................. - --------- - __ . .............. in (kaga.k�xIlqy�g&qhij awki gq - — -- - - . ..... Engineering . . ............... (1all.1"kidle(M, kii Ov Mark Kunkler Legal Dept . .. ......... . . . . ..... Mark. 1,i le @Dy�jkhnawax, y _Jeff C`utte"r . . ..... . ....... Legal '-'"' Dept '''-- — — --------------- - - - --- i _Lt fj -ei'Lt t-ey y .............. �LikjjLiayLgAov Archie ie Matthews ............ ONDS archic, tlauv cV atsi '14 V_ Mark Soptich Ti -r. e.. Dept.... ...- niark.s c 1)y' ki awa try.......... Chief Rizzi .. ................. . . . ........ -11-1111111-11 . ..... Police Department Doininic.rizzi 4) k' Joe Caruso Code Administration Joe . cgr�us o @,Xgjkjmgwa.�gpy" - Carolyn Belles - - ------ --- Code Administration Ov Jerry Robertson Code Administration Glenn Denman Code Administration Suzanne _..........._..........._'sDe B us'chere mm Code Administration SL)zaiinqjebussch��!L�- yell al � DaveBrown. ......... Water/Irrigation dav I (�l ri i�i iik i nLaNyLq,,g_qv .... ................ Mike Shane Engineeringv gg-_ Randy Meloy . ....... mm . Wastewater . ........ Liv_a jan -11".. .1.1 .1 ...... ........ ................................ .... . . . . _'__""'____ Scott Schafer ... . . ...... ___ .......... . ... . .......... .......... . . ..... Public Works Dept scott's, 1ia L, ii) WL kjqjL i,.g2( _y James Dean Utilities V . ............. .. James Scott Refuse Division ---- — - - - -- - -- - --------------- ------------ - - - James . scot t a yak iinawagL)y j3 _ . .. . . ......................... .... ... . .. Kevin Futrell ............ Transit Division ------ I 1A L) V, - - Joan Davenport -- ----- - - . ........... . ............ ............ . . ................ . . . Planning .... ... . . ..... nlwa. gov For the Record/File Binder Copy ......... .......... . ....... Revised 12/2014 Type of Notice: . .......... .. . /Is """ File Number: Date of Mailing: V L-4LI . . ........... DOC. INDEX # Scott Clark Dave Fonfara Ron Anderson 732 Summitview Ave, #608 8708 Cameo Court 107 South 711 Avenue, Ste#202 Yakima WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima, WA 98902 Alfred A. Rose 1006 Westbrook Place Yakima, WA 98908 Carmen Mendez 10 North 9th Street Yakima, WA 98901 WC, mun�xy� es'YO"t'k(d Owl 3- 4f .m.. ( 'g 5,115--, - William Cook 7701 Graystone Court Yakima, WA 98908 Patricia Byers 1530 Suncrest Way Yakima, WA 98902 DOC. INDEX # -EZA.., AhtanGm Irrigation District Cascade Natural Gas 9 Chamber of Commerce Beth Ann Brulotte, Executive Assistant Jim Robinson, Field Facilitator 10 North 9th Street 10705-8 Gilbert Road 701 South 1st Ave Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98903-9203 Yakima, WA 98902 chamber@yakima.org bethb@ahtanum.net Jim.robinson@cngc.com Department of Commerce Department of Ecology Department of Ecology Growth Management Services, Annie Szvetecz, SEPA Policy Lead Gwen Clear P.O. Box 42525 P.O. Box 47703 1250 West Alder Street Olympia, WA 98504-2525 1 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Union Gap, WA 98903 reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov separegister@ecy.wa.gov crosepacoordinator@ecy.wa.gov Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Natural Resources Department of Social & Health Services Eric Bartrand SEPA Center Andrew Jenkins or Jeanne Rodriguez 1701 South 24th Ave PO Box 47015 P.O, Box 45848 Yakima, WA 98902 Olympia, WA 98504 Olympia, WA 98504 Eric,Dartrand@dfw.wa.gov sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov andrew.jenkins@dshs.wa.gov Jeanne. rodriguez@dshs.wa.gov Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Energy racility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC Engineering Division Greg Griffith or Gretchen Kaehler, Deputy State Stephen Posner, SEPA Officer Dana Kallevig and Debbie Cook, City Engineer Historic Preservation Officer PO Box 43172 129 N 2nd Street P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-3172 Yakima, WA 98901 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 sposner@utc.wa.gov dana.kallevig@yakimawa.gov dahp.separeview@dahp.wa.gov debbie.cook@yakimawa,gov Nob Hill Water Association Office of Rural and Farm Worker Housing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch Eric Rhoads, Engineering Technician Marty Miller Karen Urelius, Project Manager 6111 Tieton Drive 1400 Summitview Ave, Ste# 203 P.O. Box 3755 Yakima, WA 98908 Yakima, WA 98902 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 eric@nobhillwater.org Martym2@orfh.org Karen.M.Urelius@usace.army.mil Wastewater Division West Valley School District WSDOT Marc Cawley or Jeremy Hoover Angela Watts, Asst. Supt. Of Business & Operations Paul Gonseth, Planning Engineer 2220 East Viola Ave 8902 Zier Road 2809 Rudkin Road Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98908-9299 Union Gap, WA 98903 marc.cawley@yakimawa.gov wattsa@wvsd208.org gonsetp@wsdot.gov jeremy.hoover@yakimawa.gov WSDOT WSDOT, Aviation Division Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs Rick Holmstrom, Development Services Carter Timmerman Steve Wangemann, Deputy Superintendent for 2809 Rudkin Road 7702 Terminal St SW Trust Services Union Gap, WA 98903 Tumwater, WA 98501 P.O. Box 632 holmstr@wsdot.wa.gov timmerc@wsdot.wa.gov Toppenish, WA 98948 Steve.wangemann@bia.gov Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries Project Yakima Air Terminal Rocco Clark, Environmental Coordinator John Marvin Robert Peterson, Airport Asst Manager P.O. Box 632 760 Pence Road 2400 West Washington Ave Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima, WA 98909 Yakima, WA 98903 Rocco.ciark@bia.gov jmarvin@yakama,com robert.peterson@yakimawa.gov Yakima County Commissioners Yakima County Health District Yakima County Public Services Commissioners.web@co.yakima.wa.us Ryan Ibach, Director of Environmental Health Lynn Deitrick, Planning Director 1210 Ahtanum Ridge Dr Ste#200 128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor Union Gap, WA 98903 Yakima, WA 98901 yhd@co.yakima.wa.us Lynn. Deitrick@co.yakima.wa.us ryan.ibach@co.yakima.wa.us Yakima County Public Services Yakima Greenway Foundation Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency Vern Redifer, Public Services Director Al Brown, Executive Director Hasan Ta hat, Engineering & Planning Supervisor 128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor 111 South 18th Street 329 North 1st Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98901 Vern. redifer@co.yakima.wa.us al@yakimagreenway.org hasan@yrcaa.org DOC. INDEX y .... - ...m �w....— Yakima Valle Conference of Governments .. Yakima Valley Museum �......... ... . .. Yakima k ima Waste Systems Shawn Conrad and Joseph Calhoun, Planner John A. Baule, Director Keith Kovalenko, District Manager 311 North 4th Street, Ste# 202 2105 Tieton Drive 2812 1/2 Terrace Heights Dr. Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98901 conrads@Vvcog.org calhounl@vvcog.org john@vakimavalleymuseum.org keithk@wasteconnections.com Century Link I', Charter Communications City of Union Gap Manager Kevin Chilcote David Spurlock, Development Director 8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304 1005 North 16th Ave P.O. Box 3008 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98902 Union Gap, WA 98903 Department of Agriculture Department of Fish & Wildlife Environmental Protection Agency Kelly McLain Mark Teske NEPA Review Unit P.O. Box 42560 201 North Pearl 1200 6th Ave. MS 623 Olympia, WA 98504 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Seattle, WA 98101 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration, Seattle Airports Governor's Office of Indian Affairs 2200 W. Washington Ave District Office PO Box 40909 Yakima, WA 98903 Cayla Morgan, Airport Planner Olympia, WA 98504 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-4056 Pacific Power Soil conservation District Trolleys Mike Paulson Ray Wondercheck Paul Edmondson 500 North Keys Rd 1606 Perry Street, Ste. F 313 North 3rd Street Yakima, WA 98901 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98901 United States Postal Service WA State Attorney General's Office WA State Dept of Health, Office of Drinking Water Jeff McKee 1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102 Christine Collins 205 W Washington Ave Yakima, WA 98902 16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500 Yakima, WA 98903 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs Yakama Indian Nation Yakama Indian Nation Superintendent Johnson Meninick, Cultural Resources Program Ruth Jim, Yakima Tribal Council P.O. Box 632 P.O. Box 151 P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Toppenish, WA 98948 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakama Nation Environmental Management Yakima School District Yakima Valley Canal Co Program Elaine Beraza, Superintendent Robert Smoot Kristina Proszek, Environmental Review 104 North 4th Ave 1640 Garretson Lane Coordinator Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98908 P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 _..w.. Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District Sandra Hull 470 Camp 4 Rd Yakima, WA 98908 \\Apollo\Shared\Planning\Assignments-Planning\LABELS and FORMS\SEPA REVIEWING AGENCIES _updated 06.19.15 -Form List.docx Type of Notice: File Number:,, DOC. INDEX # Date of Mailing:^ �" Ibarra, Rosalinda From: Ibarra, Rosalinda Sent: Thursday, June 25, 201511:36 AM To: Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann Brulotte; Cascade Natural Gas - Jim Robinson; Cawley, Marc; Chamber of Commerce; Cook, Debbie; Department of Commerce (CTED) - Review Team; Department of Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO Coordinator; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric Bartrand; Department of Natural Resources; Department of Social & Health Services - Andrew Jenkins; Department of Social & Health Services - Jeanne Rodriguez; Dept Archaeology & Historic Preservation - SEPA Review; Desgrosellier, Bob; Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner; Hoover, Jeremy; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Kallevig, Dana; Nob Hill Water - Eric Rhoads; Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing - Marty Miller; Peterson, Robert; Riddle, Dan; US Army Corps of Engineers - Karen M. Urelius; West Valley School District - Angela Watts; WSDOT - Carter Timmerman; WSDOT - Paul Gonseth; WSDOT - Rick Holmstrom; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Steve Wangemann; Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries - John Marvin; Yakima County Commissioners; Yakima County Health District; Yakima County Health District - Ryan Ibach; Yakima County Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public Services Director, Vern Redifer; Yakima Greenway Foundation - Al Brown; Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency - Hasan Tahat; Yakima Valley Conference of Governments - Joseph Calhoun; Yakima Valley Conference of Governments - Shawn Conrad; Yakima Valley Museum - John A, Baule; Yakima Waste Systems - Keith Kovalenko; Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Caruso, Joe; Cutter, Jeff; Davenport, Joan; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; Futrell, Kevin; Kunkler, Mark; Matthews, Archie; Maxey, Lisa; Meloy, Randy; Rizzi, Dominic; Robertson, Jerry; Schafer, Scott; Scott, James; Shane, Mike; Soptich, Mark Ce: 'Mike Shinn'; Al Rose; Alfred A. Rose ; 'Carmen Mendez'; Carmen Mendez (mdcmm303@gmail.com); Dave Fonfara; Ensey, Rick; Patricia Byers; Ron Anderson; Scott Clark; William Cook Subject: NOTICE OF DNS RETAINED - City Planning - Airport Safety Overlay - SEPA#020-15, TXT#003-15 Attachments: SEPA DNS RETAINED - City Planning -Airport Safety Overlay - SEPA020-15, TXT003-15.pdf Attached is a Notice of DNS Retained regarding the review for the Airport Safety Overlay. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact assigned planner Jeff Peters at (509) 575-6163 or by e-mail at l j-1 f.J'.)L14 wy N NqN � W1 . Thank you! Rosalinda Ibarra Community Development Administrative Assistant r°osttlintlatlaatN•rat��t� �„itt' �,�va, +cry t'i;' 9 -Vali11tar (LIMMIin N lliviwi y�1 129 North tad Street, Yakima WA 98901 p: (509) 575-6183 * f: (509) 575-6105 This email is a public record of the City of Yakima and is subject to public disclosure unless exempt under the Washington Public Records Act. This email is subject to the State Retention Schedule. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT loan Davenport, AICI', Director Planning Division 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-61.53 - Fax (509) 575-6105 www.yakimawa.govlserviceslplanning CITY OF YAKIMA DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE NOTICE OF RETENTION June 25, 2015 File Numbers: SEPA#020-15, TXT#003-15 The City of Yakima Department of Community Development issued a: [X] Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS), [ ] Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS), [ ] Modified DNS/MDNS, on June 2, 2015, for this proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and WAC 197-11-340(2). This retention concerns an amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance amending and superseding the City's existing Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) YMC 15.30, which purpose is to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proximity to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field. This threshold determination is hereby; [X] Retained [ ] Modified. Modifications to this threshold determination include the following: [ ] Withdrawn. This threshold determination has been withdrawn due to the following: [ ] Delayed. A final threshold determination has been delayed due to the following: Summary of Comments and Responses (if applicable): N/A Responsible official: Joan Davenport AICP Position/Title: Communitv Develo meat Director/SEPA Responsible Official Phone: 509 $75-6183 Address: 129 N 211d Street, Yakima, ''SNA 98901 Date: June 25, 2015 Signature:?,Davenport, W You may appeal this determination to J City of Yakima Community Development Director, at 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901, no later than July 9, 2015. You must submit a completed appeal application form with the $580 application fee. Be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the City of Yakima, Planning Division, for information on appeal procedures. Yakhrrrnas DOC. INDEX # ��� AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA RE: SEPA#020-15 "'City Panning - Airport Safety Overlay Citywide I, Lisa Maxey, as an employee of the City of Yakima Planning Division, have dispatched through the United States Mails, a Notice of Application, DNS, and Yakima Planning Commission Public Hearing. A true and correct copy of which is enclosed herewith; that said notice was addressed to the property owner and applicant, and SEPA reviewing agencies; and that said notices were mailed by me on the 2nd day of June, 2015. That I mailed said notices in the manner herein set forth and that all of the statements made herein are just and true. Lisa Maxey Department Assistant II DOC. INDEX # Milantun Irrigalion District Beth A -.,'--i Brulotte Executive Assistant 10705-B Gilbert Road Yakima, WA 98903-9203 bethb@ahtanum.net L(&ht. net .......... - Department of Commerce Growth Management Services P.O. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 985042525 Department of Fish and Wildlife Eric Bartrand 1701 South 24th Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Dept of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Greg Griffith Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer P.O, Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 b n) t) d -a h I m -a. Z v � Nob Hill Water Association Eric Rhoads Engineering Technician 6111 Tieton Drive Yakima, WA 98908 1yJCRLu AtnAwFan —1-1-11". ............... Wastewater Division Shelley Willson or David Schneider 2220 East Viola Ave Yakima, WA 98901 kill) WSIXY11 Rick Holmstrom Development Services 2" Rud kin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 Yatnow County Commissioners Yakima County Public Services Vern Redifer Public Services Director 128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 t'r;ykatlsAitmrvtla Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency Hasan Tahat Engineering & Planning Supervisor 329 North 1st Street Yakima, WA 98901 Nww iV gpm t! rs j Yakima Valley Museum John A. Baule Director 2105 Tieton Drive Yakima, WA 98902 All Cascade Natural Gas Jim Robinson Field Facilitator 701 South 1st Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Ecology Annie Szvetecz SEPA Policy Lead P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Department of Natural Resources SEPA Center PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504 vlmllvllnw &IM Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council -EFSEC Stephen Posner SEPA Officer PO Box 43172 Olympia, WA 98504-3172 se r) mw I V � LtALtc-' L'C' L, Af Lk' Marty miner 1400 Sumn-dtview Ave, Ste# 203 Yakima, WA 98902 West Valley School District Angela Wafts Asst. Supt. Of Business & Operations 8902 Zier Road Yakima, WA 98908-9299 Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs Steve Wangemarm Deputy Superintendent for Trust Services P.O. Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 S V�n� cilIm ak!LAO tsL , Mm- Yakama-Khckitat Fisheries Project John Marvin 760 Pence Road Yakima, WA 98909 0-urim w(lbakma-l') &Ll n) Yakima County Health District 1210 Ahtanum Ridge Dr Ste#200 Union Gap, WA 98903 Yakima Greenway Foundation Al Brown Executive Director Ill South 18th Street Yakima, WA 98901 qIlft) ya Yakima Valley Conference of Governments Shown Conrad and Joseph Calhoun Planner 311 North 4th Street, Ste# 202 Yakima, WA 98901 ("I'M Chamber of Commerce 10 North 9th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Oilin ALo r�mmalif Department of Ecology Gwen Clear 15 West Yakima Ave, Ste# 200 Yakima, WA 98902 Department of Social & Health Services Andrew Jenkins Jeanne Rodriguez P.O. Box 45848 Olympia, WA 98504 qflAtMO 1 311 e,rodriiiii iso I w, Engineering Division Dana Kallevig and Debbie Cook, City Engineer 129 N 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch Karen Urelius Project Manager P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 KarenAM, WSDOT Paul Gonseth Planning Engineer 2809 Rudkin Road Union Gap, WA 98903 &, LpgjtqjO%y , I qt4aty Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs Rocco Clark Environmental Coordinator P.O, Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 R4«+rN111mv Yakima Air Terminal Robert Peterson Airport Asst Manager 2400 West Washington Ave Yakima, WA 98903 m11g1:('1w31a.§Ra ftilL' allmi'v?m Yakima County Public Services Lynn Deftrick Planning Director 128 North 2nd Street, 4th Floor Yakima, WA 98901 lvw tlI tltilkp tn'YAa-Vlays ".ama Yakima Health District Ryan lbacb Director of Environmental Health 1210 Ahtantan Ridge Drive Union Gap, WA 98903 l citta tLadll � mlu usse WSDOT, Aviation Divisi(P 0 C - I N 1) EX # Carter Timmerman fiunnerc0hysi lot, wa. v Cantor; Charter Com'ulvducati6m, City of Union Cap Manager Kevin Cidicote I David 1purlock Development Director 8 South 2nd Ave, Rm#304 1005 North 16th Ave P.O. Box 3008 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98902 Union Gap, WA 98903 . ........... -- - - -- Depar ent of Agriculture Kelly McLain P.O. Box 42560 Olympia, WA 98504 ........ --- Federal Aviation Administration 2200 W. Washington Ave Yakima, WA 98903 Pacific Power Mike Paulson 500 North Keys Rd Yakima, WA 98901 ................ United States Postal Service Jeff McKee 205 W Washington Ave Yakima, WA 98903 WSDOT, Aviation Division Carter Timmerman 7702 Terminal St SW Tumwater, WA 98501 Yakama Nation Environmental Management Kristina Proszek Environmental Review Coordinator P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima Waste Systems Scott Robertson 2812 Terrace Heights Dr Yakima, WA 98901 wvy�*�; Mark Teske 201 North Pearl Ellensburg, WA 98926 Airports District Office Cayla Morgan Airport Planner 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-4056 Ray Wondercheck 1606 Perry Street, Ste. F Yakima, WA 98902 WA State Attorney Generals Office 1433 Lakeside Court, Ste# 102 Yakima, WA 98902 Yakama Indian Nation Johnson Meninick Cultural Resources Program P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 to OWN IV 104 North 4th Ave Yakima, WA 98902 Yakima-Tieton Irrigation Distrio q,andra Hull 470 Camp 4 Rd Yakima, WA 98908 Type of Notice: File Number: I Date: —........... . . . .... u pdated 05.29.15 - Form Llst.docx Environmental Protection Agency NEPA Review Unit 1200 6th Ave. MS 623 Seattle, WA 98101 Governor's Office of Indian Affairs PO Box 40909 Olympia, WA 98504 Trolleys Paul Edmondson 313 North 3rd Street Yakima, WA 98901 WA State Dept of Health, Office of Drinking Water Christine Collins 16201 E Indiana Ave, Ste# 1500 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Yak ama Indian Nation Ruth Jim Yakima Tribal Council P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 Yakima Valley Canal Co Robert Smoot 1640 Garretson Lane Yakima, WA 98908 Yak ama Bureau of Indian Affairs P.O, Box 632 Toppenish, WA 98948 ----------- -- - -------------- k -110C. INDEX # --F-- (b- Scott Clark Dave Fonfara Ron Anderson 732 Summitview Ave, #608 8708 Cameo Court 107 South 7`h Avenue, Ste#202 Yakima WA 98902 Yakima, WA 98903 Yakima, WA 98902 Alfred A. Rose 1006 Westbrook Place Yakima, WA 98908 Carmen Mendez 10 North 9th Street Yakima, WA 98901 William Cook 7701 Graystone Court Yakima, WA 98908 Patricia Byers 1530 Suncrest Way Yakima, WA 98902 (a OF ROM& 1 Ii0, �? SEM..F -f � f DOC. INDEX # i1— In -House Distribution E-mail ..�.l List Name Division E-mail Address Debbie Coo ---- .......... Cook _ ......----- Engineering �_�._ _.n. ......... Deilia Dana Kallevig Wastewater rllria.flg�44yaliriirwYtl. 1y. .. m. Dan Riddle ................... _. Engineering .,_. w...m.._.�.. dan r° ddl t' r as y a ;c ... w .. ...� Mark Kunkler �.......... .. Legal Dept _ _. _ .. ..... . M��rk.ku � l r(,c,)yAl�ri���a w )V Jeff Cutter _,Archie Legal. Dept . m.�w g j&f,riaw _moy heMatt...... ws �W.. ---------------- ONDS mim l i r tk y { y&rnrawa.igy - ---- ... _ ........ e. Mark Soptich ........... .... Fire Dept raid<„rrpCmr<Patya.lmra gcY Chief Rizzi.. Police Department � ca irirp_t,iz, y�u��i n awa.gpy Joe Caruso ... r...Belles ............Code_.... Code Admin .._w.�...,..ww istration l« _nama 8(rrr� �tar��a�y�i �crw g Carol yn .��.���.... ._._... Administration _ �� m.............��i caarolyrt [)eilc (ici,) ,al<rnl,awa g��y a.�� .......mm...... �. �...� JerryRobertson e ��.. Code Administration !�. er r rw .�......., Glenn Denman � �. Code Administration gltara ccrarr°rylcrrrraav Suzanne DeBusschere Code Administration Suzanne.(i<��u s<.11ggci �� iri��� �a Via. _..........��r_ .. ------- Dave Dave Brown --___ ..... Water/Irrigation „ ,,...... Fy f'M g4A M�� � d�ivc bi<awr e Shane Engineering inik hawnc@yra tgtgv , e RandY Meloy .Wastewater Scott Schafer Public Works Dept ott-Se a: � a mart ary Trym Jame...... _.... s Dean L ------- ... Utilities J�ainc� a��.Liij(6i)y <mi m�ay�a,W?y James Scottmmm... ................... Refuse Division ... �tirrcatt tiy�a<liaiayyi grey Kevin Futrell Transit Division ... vi ra,. rtrir luy< l'i�aa gp Joan Davenport Planning+rltipar lttrtary gy ......------- . ............ ... For the Record/File �. ..._ _.... ,,... , e._. _.._..��......... �.� Binder-,...,,..�����....�_....... Copy w.w. ,,,,, www ................................. Revised 12/2014 DNS Type of Notice•C�.. ...�r�.,_a pp .I :w "�I.�.�.!. File Number(s): . �Qm�a�..w �.................... ........�........ Date of Mailing: (.p /02 / I DOC. INDEX # . Maxey,, Li a From: Maxey, Lisa Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:48 AM To: Aaron, Robbie; Allyn, Kaarre; Beehler, Randy; Bill & Linda Beerman; Brown, Michael; Business Times Randy Luvaas (E-mail); City of Union Gap; City of Union Gap; Claar Tee, Sonya; CWHBA Joe Walsh (E-mail); Davenport, Joan; David Gaudette; David Kearby - Associated General Contractors of WA; Davido, Sean; Dianna Woods; Doug Carey; Evodio Reyes; Farmworker Housing Marty Miller (E-mail); Gary Forrest; Ibarra, Rosalinda; Jamie Carmody; Ken Camarata - AIA; Crockett, Ken; Lozano, Bonnie; Luz Bazan Gutierrez - RCDR; Maxey, Lisa; Mike & Cindy Noble; Mike Dooley - Wilbert Precast; Mike Shinn; Peters, Jeff; Phil Hoge; Price, Cally; Ralph Call; Robert Lockhart; Ron Pelson(ron@traditionaldesignsinc.com); Sandy Lloyd; Schafer, Scott; Smith, Valerie; Steve Erickson; Steve S; Terrence Danysh; Terry Keenhan; Thomas Carroll; Walt Ranta; Belles, Carolyn; Brown, David; Caruso, Joe; Cook, Debbie; Cutter, Jeff; Dean, James; DeBusschere, Suzanne; Denman, Glenn; Futrell, Kevin; Kallevig, Dana; Kunkler, Mark; Matthews, Archie; Meloy, Randy; Riddle, Dan; Rizzi, Dominic; Robertson, Jerry; Scott, James; Shane, Mike; Soptich, Mark; Crockett, Ken; Daily Sun News - Bob Story; KAPP TV News; KBBO-KRSE Radio - manager; KCJT TV News; KDNA Radio; KEPR TV News; KIMA TV News; KIMA TV News - Crystal Bui; KIT/KATS/DMVW/KFFM - Lance Tormey; KNDO TV News; KUNS-TV Univision; KVEW TV News; NWCN News; NWPR - Anna King; Randy Luvaas - Yakima Business Times; Reed C. Pell; Tu Decides - Albert Torres; Yakima Herald Republic - Craig Troianello; Yakima Herald Republic - Erin Snelgrove; Yakima Herald Republic - Mai Hoang; Yakima Herald Republic - Mark Morey; Yakima Herald Republic Newspaper; Yakima Valley Business Times - George Finch; Beehler, Randy; Ahtanum Irrigation District - Beth Ann Brulotte; Cascade Natural Gas - Jim Robinson; Chamber of Commerce; Department of Commerce (CTED) - Review Team; Department of Ecology - SEPA Register; Department of Ecology -CRO Coordinator; Department of Fish and Wildlife - Eric Bartrand; Department of Natural Resources; Department of Social & Health Services - Andrew Jenkins; Department of Social & Health Services - Jeanne Rodriguez; Dept Archaeology & Historic Preservation - SEPA Review; Desgrosellier, Bob; Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council - Stephen Posner; Nob Hill Water - Eric Rhoads; Peterson, Robert; US Army Corps of Engineers - Karen M. Urelius; Schafer, Scott; West Valley School District - Angela Watts; WSDOT - Carter Timmerman; WSDOT - Paul Gonseth; WSDOT - Rick Holmstrom; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Rocco Clark; Yakama Bureau of Indian Affairs - Steve Wangemann; Yakama-Klickitat Fisheries - John Marvin; Yakima County Commissioners; Yakima County Health District; Yakima County Planning Director - Lynn Deitrick; Yakima County Public Services Director, Vern Redifer; Yakima Greenway Foundation - Al Brown; Yakima Health District - Ryan Ibach; Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency - Hasan Tahat; Yakima Valley Conference of Governments - Shawn Conrad; Yakima Valley Museum - John A. Baule; YVCOG - Joseph Calhoun Cc: Al Rose; Alfred A. Rose (silvrfx40@bmi.net); 'Carmen Mendez'; Carmen Mendez (mdcmm303 @gmail,com); Dave Fonfara; Ensey, Rick; Patricia Byers; Ron Anderson; Scott Clark; William Cook (cook.w@charter.net) Subject: NOTICE OF APPLICATION, PUBLIC HEARING & DNS - City Planning - Airport Safety Overlay - SEPA#020-15 Attachments: NTC OF APP, PUBLIC HEARING & DNS - City Planning - Airport Safety Overlay - SEPA.pdf Attached is a Notice of Application, Determination of Non -Significance (DNS), and Public Hearing regarding the above - entitled project. If you have any questions about this proposal please contact assigned planner Jeff Peters at (509) 575- 6163 or by e-mail at Leff.pettrs a aldmawa v. Thank you! Lisa Maxey Department Assistant 11 (509) 576-6669 DOC. INDEX # E -la YAKIMA, H.E' RALPUBLICdJ,Gt A dally part of your Ilfe % µ m yakima-herald.com -Ad Proof - This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Please proof read notice carefully to check spelling and run dates, if you need to make changes Account #: 110358 Company Name: CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING Contact: ROSALINDA IBARRA Address: DEPT OF COMMERCIAL ECONOMICAL DEVELOPEME 06/02/15 Stop: 129 N 2ND STREET Total Cost: YAK.IMA, WA 98901-2720 Telephone: (509) 575-6164 Account Rep: Simon Sizer Phone # (509) 577-7740 Email: ssizer@yakimaherald.com Ad ID: 549353 Start: 06/02/15 Stop: 06/02/15 Total Cost: $232.65 Agate Lines: 132 # of Inserts: 1 Ad Class: 6021 Herald -Republic 06/02/15 DOG. INDEX # CITY OF YAKIMA NOTICE OF APPLICATION, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE DATE: June 2, 2015: TO: SEPA Reviewing Agencies, and Inter- ested Parties: FROM: Joan Davenport, City of Yakima Community Development Director: SUBJECT: Notice of Application, Public Hearin and Determination of Non -Significance: NODCE AI PLYf ATM. Project Location: Citywide: Project Applicant: City of Yakima, Planning Division: File Numbers: SEPA #020-15: Date of Application: May 23„20,15 Date of Determination sof Completeness: May 29, 2015:. F ) ` JQN_, The City of Yakima Planning Department and Yakima Air Terminal are proposing an amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zon- ing Ordinance amending and superseding the City's existing Air- port Safety Overlay (ASO) which purpose is to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses In proximity to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field. The new chapter proposes language which: 1) Redefines the ASO protection areas from two to six zones which are based upon scientific information provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division; 2) Provides individual building height restrictions per zone which are based upon the potential for airspace obstruction of the FAA Part 77 airspace; 3) Further limits and/or prohibits permitted land uses which are incompatible with air ort operations, or present a hazard to the public within the underlying zoning districts;; and 4) Redefines the land use application process for land uses located within the confines of the Airport Safet Overlay. (See Environ- mental Checklist. SEP'A#0120-15 for faur'ther Overlay, and explanation online at: htt 1//wwwyakimawa.gov/postcard/ , RM ,� The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impaots, and has determined! that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43,21C.030 (2) (c). The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public upon request at the City of Yakima Plan- ning Division. This DNS is issued under WAC § 197-11-340(2); the lead agewill not act on this to osal for 20 days from the date below. nc S Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed application, Ali written comments received by June 22, x"015, wibe considered prior issuance of the final threshold determination. Please send written comments to: Joan Davenport, Community Development Director; City of Yakima, Department of Community Development; 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901: ),I_QjEDf�� ', Decisions and future notices will be sent to anyone who submits comments on this applioaticn or requels additional notice. The file contain- ingthe corriplete application is available forublic review at the City of Yakima Planning Divisiono 2nd floor Eity Hall, 129 North 2nd Streetb Yakima„ Washir �ton. If you have any question on this proposal, please c'ontaot Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner at (509) 575-5103 or by e-mail at jefi.peters yakir:nawa.gov. NOJIGEM. applicatilon will require two public hear- ings; one closed record hearing before the City of Yakima Plan- ning Commission to be followed by an open record public' hearing before the Yakima. City Council, The public hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Commission has been scheduled for July, ff, 2015, beginning at 3:30 pm, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd -Street„ Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Divi- sion, 129 N 2nd' St., Yakima, WA 93901, A separate public notice will be�rovided for the public hearing before the Yakima City Council, (549353) June 2, 2015 Courtesy of Yakima Herald -Republic CITY OF YAKIMA NOTICE OF APPLICATION, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE DATE, Mune 2, 2015, TO: SFPA Reviewing Agencies, and Inter ested Parties! FROM, Joan Davernport, City of Yagdma Corernunity Devotoparment Direclor: SUDJECT, Notice of Application, public Hearin and Doterrnination of Non -Significance NOT.I� ,f�, l T)f ,l4: Project Location: Citgide* Projlect Applicant; City of Yakirmat, Plannln Divisiorn, FIIe Jrambers: SEBA �#020.15: Date of Application, fw ay t?5, 2005. Dato of N„Deternafnatdon of Completeness: May 29,2015: pFAQ AE!C�Tpl ,%fjT(f . a Td re City of Yakima Planning Department and Yakima AIr Terminal are roposing an a mencirnerrt to the City of Yakinnra'sr Urban Area on- tg i rdinaance ennendinand superseding the City's existing Alr- port Safety Over"lay (AS?)) which trrpose is to psrolect the aairspaacaa around the Yakima Air Terminal a�McApgdstor Fieldfrom airspace obstructions or, hazards and incomaatible land uses in proximity to the Yakima Air Ter°rralnarsl at McAllister Field. Tile new chapter proposes language w1'rgch: 1) Padefir raps the A$0 protection areas ifell, two to six zones which are based upon scientific Information provided by the Federal Aviallon Administration, and Washington Stale Department of Trams sortation (WSDOT) Aviation Division, 2) Wovgcles individual buil in height restrictions her zone which ansa based upon' telernlial or airspace obsiructtorr of the FAA Part 77 airspace,, 3) Furiller Ilm'its and/'or prolydbils trrrrranitleci land uses which are''incornpatible with aairgqaort operations, or present a. hazard to the public within the urrc/e�rlying toninp districts„ and 4) Redefines the land use application process forfaand uses located within the confines of the Aprpaort Safety Oven . (See Environ- mental Checklist SEFAaf00-15' for 1nrtller description and ent lanallon online at; lift )://'w w yaklntawa.glov/postcard/ �� l t .� 1 +i.9'' K The City of Yakinia has reviewed the proposed pro)ract for probable adverse onvironmontal impacts, and has determined that It does not have a probanfe signiflcanl adverse Impact on the environment, An ersvin°ornrnaorataal Imgr«rct statement (Elea) is not required under, l4C't�N 43,210,030 (2) (c)o The iniorrmation r°elled upon In reaching this detprrmination Is avallai'ale to lq°re �aut�IVc rrpton reapursst at this t;uty s°ai Yatrirrna ilesro- nira NTivisiora. °TtrVs GNNS is gssuocl unncfer QAC 19T1t340(2); the ead agerno will not act on this pro aosal for 20 da s from the elate below° AST" ? WPA i 191Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to roview and comment or) the pronosed ala licatiom All wrdltenn comments received by June 22„ 0W wdgV �e considered prior issuance of tho final threshold dote anInation, Please sena written comments to. Joan Davenport,, Commurrily Devol�raprmenl Director; City of Yakirna, Department of Corm nuNIy l 1101 rrnonlN '129 North unci Street, YakdmnoWWashinglon 989fll q T , E ?p PE0) If l a Decisions ,and future notices will be sent to anyone who submits comments on this applicallon or requests additional noficem The file contain. In the complete application is available foraublic review at the C" y of Yal imn Planning Division, 2nd floor 611y Hat), 125 North 2nd SI toot,'Yakima, WasI in ton, It you have any question on tills proposal, please contact Jei Peters, Supervising Planner at �509) 575-063 or b to -meld at j'eif p°rotors a yagcirtra wa,cTov f f 1. + �. RUNU �A�JNAf This application will require two public hear- Incg% one closed record hearing before the City of Yakima Plan- ning Commission to be followed b am open record public heardnag before the Yakirrra City Council, "T"'e public hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Commission has been scheduled for Jut'�r, II, 2095, beginning, at 3,'30 pn1, in the Council Charnbers„ City l al4, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakdma,'WWA, Any person desiring to express their views on this anrratter Vs Invited to attend tine paarbtgo iaeardrror to submit their written comments to, City of Yakima, Plannin,g%ivir Sion„ 129 tW 2nd St., Yakima, "AWA 98909, A separate public notice will taep�rovided for the public hearing before the Yakirma City CouncNl. (549353) June 2, 2015 DOC. INDEX # ®1a Planning Division, 129 North Second Street, 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 57,5-6183 - Fax (50.9)57.5-610.5 a��kj)l n,ning((��N'aakimawae. ow - http.-llw�ww.,yraak0ma¢ v . oviservices1 0ann0a?,,I CITY OF YAKIMA NOTICE OF APPLICATION, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE DATE: June 2, 2015 TO: SEPA Reviewing Agencies, and Interested Parties FROM: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Notice of Application, Public Hearing and Determination of Non - Significance NOTICE OF APPLICATION Project Location: Citywide. Project Applicant: City of Yakima, Planning Division File Numbers: SEPA #020-15 Date of Application: May 28, 2015 Date of Determination of Completeness: May 29, 2015 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Yakima Planning Department and Yakima Air Terminal are proposing an amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance amending and superseding the City's existing Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) which purpose is to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proximity to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field. The new chapter proposes language which: 1. Redefines the ASO protection areas from two to six zones which are based upon scientific information provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division; 2. Provides individual building height restrictions per zone which are based upon the potential for airspace obstruction of the FAA Part 77 airspace; 3. Further limits and/or prohibits permitted land uses which are incompatible with airport operations, or present a hazard to the public within the underlying zoning districts; and 4. Redefines the land use application process for land uses located within the confines of the Airport Safety Overlay. (See Environmental Checklist SEPA#020-15 for further description and explanation online at: htt :11www.akimrnaw . ov/ os c rd// ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City of Yakima has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts, and has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not DOC. INDEX. ## yakhoa required under RCW4m . mwC,03C (2) (c). The information relied upon in reaching this determination is available to the public upon request at the City of Yakima Planning Division. This DNS is issued under WAC § 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 20 days from the date below. Responsible Official: Joan Daven ort A, -M,,, I® Position/Title: SEPA Res onsible Official Phone:509575-616_3 Address: 129 N.2' Streeter Yakima, W 1. Date: June 2, 2015 Signature: RE NEST FOR -WRITTEN I C MMENTS: Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed application. All written comments received by June 22, 2015, will be considered prior issuance of the final threshold determination. Please send written comments to: Joan Davenport, Community Development Director; City of Yakima, Department of Community Development; 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington 98901. The following conditions have been identified that may be used to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal: No impacts identified. Required Permits — None. Required Studies — None. Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA/GMA Integrated Environmental Summary. Preliminary determination of the development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency: N/A NOTICE OF DECISION Decisions and future notices will be sent to anyone who submits comments on this application or requests additional notice. The file containing the complete application is available for public review at the City of Yakima Planning Division, 2nd floor City Hall, 129 North 2nd Street, Yakima, Washington. If you have any question on this proposal, please contact Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner at (509) 575-6163 or by e-mail at jgft.petLs@yqk Mg . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This application will require two public hearings; one closed record hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Commission to be followed by an open record public hearing before the Yakima City Council. The public hearing before the City of Yakima Planning Commission has been scheduled for July, 8, 2015, beginning at 3:30 pm, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 129 N 2nd Street, Yakima, WA. Any person desiring to express their views on this matter is invited to attend the public hearing or to submit their written comments to: City of Yakima, Planning Division, 129 N 2nd St., Yakima, WA 98901. A separate public notice will be provided for the public hearing before the Yakima City Council. DOC. INDEX # f ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT — AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY Y C 15.30 TXT#003-15, SEP:A.#020-15 EXHIBIT LIST CHAPTER F Public Comments lwlil� i���if�%i' F-1 Comment Letter received from Mike Shinn, Halverson 06/22/2015 Northwest Law ......... _._..._M �.��...... ..�.................. _ --l-1-1 ...... ......,W HALVERSON NORTHWEST Rayrnond G- Alexander Adarn K Anderson Alan D Campbell J Jay Carroll Jarnes S Elliott Robert N Faber Mark E. Fickes Carter L, Field rup° FrederickN Halverson+ June 22, 2015 Pau[E Hart¢ Kellen J, Holgate q" Lawrence E Martin" Terry C_ Schmalz+ Joan Davenport � '° " Lchaelda llers Community Development Director F hien Michael F, Shinn Sara L. Wakkins' City of Yakima Stephen R Aintree Department of Community Development Also Oregon Bar Member 129 N. 2nd Street +Of Counsel Yakima, WA 98901 Re: Notice of Application, Notice of Public Hearing and Determination of Non -Significance; SEPA #020-15 Dear Joan: Please accept these preliminary comments which are made on behalf of our client, Congdon Development Company, LLC and Congdon Orchards, Inc. "(Congdon") in relation to the SEPA threshold determination for the replacement of the existing Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) provisions of the Yakima Urban Area zoning ordinance. The adoption of a new ASO Ordinance has been needed for quite some time and we applaud the City's efforts at adopting a new ASO by weighing the air travel needs and safety concerns of the Yakima Air Terminal with the developmental needs of our community. You may recall that I submitted comments to the Yakima Regional Planning Commission in September, 2008 (a copy of those comments dated September 25, 2008 are attached for reference), when skepticism about the planning process for new ASO provisions produced more questions than answers. The advent of a citizens advisory committee involved in the current planning process has created an atmosphere of transparency that didn't exist in the past. Nevertheless, Congdon does wish to preserve an opportunity to make substantive comments with regard to the proposed ASO legislation when it comes up for public hearing in July, 2015. In particular, after further study Congdon wishes to reserve the right to propose some modifications to the land use restrictions as set forth in the proposed ASO materials. For example, the proposal for the Yakima ASO absolutely precludes any new residential construction in Airport Safety Overlay Zone No. 2. A significant portion of Congdon's property lies in Zone 2 and is currently zoned R-2. In doing some brief research, we learned that Franklin County has similarly developed compatibility zones in connection with the Tri -Cities airport but in relation to Zone 2 the so-called "Inner Approach/Departure Zone", which is similar to the Yakima Municipal Airport's Zone 2, residential development .,,,,.- halversonNW.com HALVERSON ( NORTHWEST LAW GROUP P.0 , DOC. INDEX # Yakima Office: 405 F:. Uru:oln Avenroe (PO Box 22.S5o ( Yakima, WA 98907 1 P) 509,248.6o3o I f} 509.453.688o ' Surmyside Office: 9zo Franklin Aven6re, Suite i I PO Box zio ( Sunnyside, WA 98944 1 P) 509.837.5302 1 0 5509.837.2465 .b June 22, 2015 Page 2 is permitted as follows: "Residential is permitted on legal lots of record and on new lots provided the density is not greater than 4 dwelling units per 20 acres. Clustering of residential lots to preserve open space adjacent to approach corridors and new runway is preferred." Franklin County Code, Section 17.76.090. With regard to height limitations, in Zones 1-5 the proposed ASO prohibits any building exceeding 35 -feet above the ground. The City of Spokane's Municipal Code, in relation to Spokane International Airport, has height restriction exemptions in certain cases where structures or objects are shielded by existing permanent structures or by natural terrain or topographic features of equal or greater height (Spokane Municipal Section 17.C.180.060). The compromise that Congdon might wish to propose after some further study, is instead of outright prohibitions or outright allowances, a formula for case-by-case review whereby proposals could be evaluated and mitigating conditions proposed under either a Type 2 or Type 3 review process. Indeed, this would also assist the parties in dealing with the prospect of future runway expansion. For now, future runway expansion appears to be premised upon an assumption that fully loaded Boeing 737s may be visiting the Yakima Airport more often. This is an assumption we seriously question, and if unrealistic unnecessarily limits future development. However, if Planning Staff and a land -use applicant have the flexibility to revisit that issue in the context of Type 2 or Type 3 development review the parties would be able to account for new facts and circumstances in the years to come. As a matter of fact, recent studies including one done by NASA titled the Cruise Efficient Short Take -off and Landing (CESTOL) suggests that future aircraft may need considerably less runway space than is the case now, making land use restrictions based on hypothetical future runway needs unnecessary. We thank you for your consideration and look forward to participating in the future public processes which will lead to the adoption of a new and improved Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and Airport Safety Overlay Chapter. Sincerely, Halverson I Northwes,.aw-croup P.C. Michael F. Shinn :S/jlf closure GAHA ConffidedkMF=0NG70N DEVELOPMENT C0-1B353YA'i-AS0-3Ct2U_tr to Joan Davaanport 6.22 16.dnou DOC. INDEX # r I w , VfVN V a All 11 1" A A T 10 ": I,;- "Cy H,00, 1 01 Yakima Regional Planning Commission 128 N. Second Street Yakima, WA 98901 Alan L) Cirnpbell WesH C�irnph4 - Jirnm C, Ciavvnody ) 6 u Garrofl - I'mul - , I )mnp.,wy lamuw 5, Ellioa MarL E. Hckpn - ('Artm I . Fj(M - Chad I- 4 LiMidd - Tykir M, k linddey L Mnr[in - Kevan 1, Montoya - Lhwh A. Seller,, Wchaell I . Shinn ..`a lm i , WAirr'. Of (.:uumek [ redeiid, M I Ldkfurson - Forii), C Sch(mdz Re: Yakima Air Terminal Proposed Airport Overlay Zone Amendment Study Session Dear Commission Members: Please accept these preliminary comments which are made on behalf of my client.. CongdC Deopopad odoo711 velment Cmny, LLC an• Cngdon Orchards, Inc. ("Congn") in relatin to the stu session scheduled for Thursday, September 25, 2008 regarding proposed amendments to 11 t Airport Safety Overlay Chapter of the Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. Congdon supports the mission of the Yakima Air Terminal and also has substantial landholdings to the west of the Yakima Airport. (Three Congdon parcels are currently the subject of a lease with option to purchase by the airport.) In preparation for the development of Congdon's landholdings, Congdon entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ,Alith the City of Yakima dated May 24, 2001 re,156rencing a coniprehensivo development plan fiv the Congdoll property, proposing to rezone approximately'725 acres in the vicinities of South, 64", 72"' Avelittes, West Nob Hill Boulevard and West Washington Avenue to include R-2, Two -Family Residential; R-3, Multi -Family Residential; CBDS, Central Business District Support; SCC, Small Convenience Center; and M-1, Light Industrial. That Memorandum of Understanding was supplied to the Yakima Air Terminal and produced a letter from then Airport Manager, Bob Clem, approved by Yakima Air Terminal Board Chairman, Greg Berndt, dated May 24, 2001 indicating that the land use development and related improvements on the Congdon properties as contemplated by and described in the Memorandum of Understanding "are compatible with the use and development provisions of Chapter 15.30 of the Yakima Municipal Code and are subject to the height, lighting and visibility restrictions contained therein and all applicable Federal Aviation Administration and State of Washington rules, regulations and ordinances." A copy of the May 24, 2001 letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Thereafter, on November 30, 2001, the City of Yakima and Congdon entered into a Development Agreement recognizing that Congdon would be applying for land use approvals to zone its property in confon-nanco with the Memorandum of Understanding, and that upon achieving land use approvals those would be vested rights under the Development Agreenient. D 0C. INDEX # 509.248,60310 a fax 509.45:: h8 :, 401) East Lincoln o P U, Box 22550 Yaldrn,,.i, WA 98907 wvvw.vh1eg71,(..:c.un Yakima Regional Planning Commission September 25, 2008 Ud'y ()i:: Page 2 That Agreement was recorded with the Yakima County Auditor on March 8, 2002 Under Yakima County Auditor's File No. 7261412. The Agreement provides that except for the imposition of new or different regulations to the extent required by serious threat to public health and safety, new regulations may not be applied to or affect the Congdon property which would otherwise limit or reduce the density permissible for the Congdon property or any part thereof, nor limit or control the, location of buildings, structures, grading, or other improvements of the Congdon property in a manner that is inconsistent with or more restrictive than the limitations then in effect. Congdon then applied for and received land use approval for the zoning changes requested by City Ordinance No. 2002-45 published August 23, 2002, effective September 23, 2002. At Article IV, subsection B. of the Ordinance the City Council found that the letter attached hereto as Exhibit 1, dated May 24, 2001, from the Yakima Air Terminal was dispositive with regard to compatibility of the proposed -uses within the newly granted zones in teims of the safety of Yakima citizens on the ground and in the air and the use and operation of the Yakima Air Terminal. Both the Development Agreement and the City Zoning Ordinance were deemed valid after appeal to Division III of the Washington State Court of Appeals, by decision of that Court dated December 21, 2006. Meanwhilc, members of the Yakima Air Terminal Board began discussing the existing Airport Safety Overlay Re"lations with Conj4don representatives in 2005. A ineetina was held in July ', 2005 to discuss the Airport's plans. While Congdon was, and is, supportive of the Airport's desire to adopt better airport safety overlay legislation, Congdon questioned some of the underlying assumptions built into the Airport's regulatory change proposals. One of the major questions involved the planned extension of Runway 9/27 by 2,557 feet. At the time of these meetings, justification for airport expansion as stated in the Yakima Air Terminal 2003 Layout Plan (ALP) was based on Aviation Demand Forecasts that the Yakima Air Terminal would realize the capture of 65% of the products originating in the Yakima Valley which are currently trucked elsewhere for shipment. This major -cargo assumption was the basis for identifying the Boeing 757 as the Airport's future design aircraft, which in turn became the sole justification for the planned runway extension. Congdon challenged the runway extension and its concomitant effect on redesign of airport zoning districts by letter from Congdon's consultant, David Ketchum, to the Yakima Air Terminal Board dated March 29, 2006. (That letter which was copied to Yakima Planning Manager Doug Maples, Federal Aviation Administration Airports District Office Manager Wadc, Broant., and FQderoLdmiation Regional Office Acting Manager Matt Cavanaugh, is attached hereto as Exhibit 2,) The letter was not responded to by any of the recipients. There followed in December 2006 the unveiling at a Yakima Air Terminal Board meeting of its draft Airport Overlay Ordinance. A copy of the December, 2006 draft is attached as Exhibit 3, The 2006 draft is virtually identical, with some minor grammatical changes, to the Overlay Zoning Ordinance dated July 22, 2008 currently on the City's website which is the subject of the current study session. I JP• m TOT� 10 sog= M �� Yakima Regional Planning Commission September 25, 2008o��, Page 3 Once again, before addressing the merits of the ordinance itself, Congdon continued to question the assumptions underlying the runway expansion which dictates in no small part the boundaries of the zoning districts. Congdon's consultant, David Ketchum, once again wrote to the Yakima Air Terminal Board of Directors by letter dated May 22, 2007, copied to the same Federal Aviation Administration officials, the Yakima Planning Manager, and the Yakima County Clerk. This letter is attached as Exhibit 4. While there had been an intervening assessment of the runway expansion issue by the Air Terminal's consulting fffiri, Bernard Dunkleberg & Company, the June 2006 published Runway Safety Area Assessment provided no new runway extension analysis or empirical support for it. No response was received from the Yakima Air Terminal to this letter either. In January, 2008, however, Yakima Air Terminal officials extended an invitation to Congdon representatives to meet and discuss the Yakima Air Terminal's goals for implementing new airport zoning districts. We were also provided with a Bernard Dunkleberg & Company's Master Plan Addendum Planning Memo that came out in November, 2007 with analysis indicating that corporate general aviation operations and specifically the operation of an aircraft called the Gulfstream 100 were being used to determine the appropriate runway length. The Bernard Dunkleberg analysis reported that aircraft required a runway length of 9,500 feet compared with the primary runway length of 7,603 feet. However, that report's analysis contained peculiar assumptions with regard to even the Gulfstream 100. Our contacts with the chief pilot of the Gulfstream 100 program as well as the company that provided Gulfstream Aerospace with its flight operation programs challenged the Bernard Dunkleberg assumptions. Congdon wrote to Bill Wheeler on January 22, 2008, with these concerns, and a copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit 5. From that letter we received an e-mailed response dated February 21, 2008, purportedly justifying the Gulfstream 100 aircraft assumptions and its use as a model for determining appropriate runway length. In fact, the e-mailed response suggested several companies operating Gulfstream 100's at the Yakima Airport including Bank of America. So, Congdon checked on these assumptions and here is what we found: Bank of America which was listed as a user of the Gulfstream 100 out of Yakima always uses commercial airlines for any company -related travel and during the assistant manager's 11 -year tenure in Yakima they had not used private charter companies. We contacted a company called Executive Flight in Wenatchee to see if they knew of any charter companies using the Gulfstream 100. They were aware of one charter company in Seattle. At this company, called Clay Lacy Aviation, they confirmed that they were the only company in the Pacific Northwest that has any Gulfstreams and they use a Gulfstream 4, not a Gulfstream 100, and that by their review of the Yakima runway specifics they would be able to fly in and out of Yakima in a Gulfstream 4 without problem with the current runway configuration. In short, therefore, even before addressing the ordinance language, there should be a clear -understanding of the justification for the assumptions which underlie it. If it is simply a matter of wanting to preserve the options of the Airport going for -ward, which is certainly understandable, the impact that would have on Congdon's vested rights, the diminution in DOC. INDEX # Yakima Regional Planning Commission September 25, 2008 1,41 Page 4 1, vc— property development values, must be considered, too, and would not be permissible under the Development Agreement without just compensation to Congdon. In addition, in Congdon's letter to the Yakima Air Terminal dated Janaary 22, 2008, we had requested empirical study/data to help us understand the configuration of the airport zoning districts in proximity to the runway. Development regulations under the Development Agreement to which Congdon is vested, can only be modified to the extent required by a serious threat to public health and safety. Some empirical studies must be reviewed and artalyzed so as to determine what zoning district dimensions are necessary for public health arld safety, versus protection of Airport operations. These studies have not been made available to Congdon yet. In short, Congdon looks forward to participating in all future public processes which take place once an application has been filed to amend Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance chapters concerning the airport. There are obviously a number of technical, complicated features of the Ordinance which will require study and consideration. . 123M VELIKANJE HALVERSON P.C. M I ofiael F. Shinn g:Nho con ffiacd\rnfs\congdon development 912512008 11:39 amk, DOC. INDEX # W, A F'EC,,!FlVD IJUN P, ".) ?t " T15 Y -Wh ow DOC. INDEX# RECEIVED m Ay � 9 Z0 DI YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL CITY U1 YAKIMA W7y ^Y ALLISTIER F1'ELD COMMUNITY. DEVELOPME, aftamalm 2403 \Aiesz Washinguon Ave, Yakin)a, Warhinomn 9EI903 , J509) 5758 149 (509) 575-6195 Fax .Halvurson & APP1 M!, te N Box22730 Yakima, Washington M. Dear I&- Schmiz: _ gt�rnn d huroverne&c oa the Congdon nt ya coconEm thzt the land use devclopim t MdMlat- inia Urb= AT". Cmuprellensive plan mAd impIvIlentil'1�1, Properties �-"�rcleb are =& purgja�jjt,to t)1c'yak Ordinnna,es, dum of UadcTstanding cnteTed �,111 Oml a2, conternplatcd by and ckscribed in thvIcniol into 'betwe-en Congdon and the City of- Yr ia-n am con,jpeiblz with the use aid develapmcnt Provisions of Chapter 15.30 of 6C Yaldraa"Nlulicival Cade acrd axe subject to the height, h.s.7-hq, an -d visibili i C restrictions contained tlzrein and all applicable Federal 1.viali6n Administrdioll aA Stlt - of W rules, regulations and ordinances. it i: understood thal, Congdon vll Provide =1 agrd L'Pon"",tion disclosure and d=d &c on, wlhich will be 51 . ed for rccordirig with the Yakirna Couuty Auditor, �Ikh will recognize the pm-oxisteace of the airport and the right of aircraft ovm-flizhL Additionally, the Yddma Air Terunnal hu determined that lhje purchasc Of C011,0CAl's Mpelty, Of a hi-ali land acqiisitioa Pri0rit`Y appzor=t-,Iy 100 acres, lying just South of the main rimway will be projects identffied for completion witlain the Airport Layout Plan, subseq-uel3t ijj, 1)riarity to the ybiriw,,q 27 Safcry _Azea 1n),l)ravaneut'PrqjecE (So6" Ik'ye) and oto cr acccecssa',rY Or r1mudated prqjects required bylbe FAA., Such pumlame arq subjectfurther tainn aggreement between Codon and the Yakirn,,a Air Ten incl oil primo aDd obtaining avaiiabir, FAA and looaltinding, Sincerely, Bob Clem Airport Manager , Chamnan GTt-gVdt1 yaZ= 'Torminal Board ZSIF YAKNA NNIN G DIV, Filed Hearing ExV64iner EXH #11. a� File TOTAL P-01 EXHIBIT 2 // \� W,. 3372.. } qV ►�T►[iI1Z'� to) I Kai I M, 041 PO Box 287 Grecnbafflc, WA 98253 I have been retained by Congdon Orchards (Congdon) to provide consulting services related to fature development of those portions -of their property that inay be impacted by development of the Yakima Air Terminal (YAT). I understand that representatives of.Congdoninet with some air terminal board members on July 11, 2005 to dg airport safety overlay (ASO) w-idto encourage more open communication -between airport representatives and Congdon in order to 49_MM#*Ui, even though a 2005 update to the Yaldma Air Terminal 2003 Airport Layout Plan (ALP), has been in preparation over this last year,'Congdon has not been supplied with any information since the July meeting. We. have, through our own efforts, obtained a copy of the, 2005 ALP and its related master plan. This plan we note is an update to a similar plan accomplished in 1996. A section of the 1996 -plan titled "Aviation Demand Forecasts" disc -asses thepotential for 'Yakima Air Tenninal (YAT) to "'realize the capture. of 65 percent of the products originating in the Yakima'Valle that are Guirrently being tracked elsewhere for .y shipment." Mj Mr, U1, D design aircraft, Which in turn became the L&ejk qg ofora-planned2;557 foot extension of runway 9/27. The planned extension of -runw�y 9/27 and its impact on the airport's safety overlay h major implications for neighbors of the airport,'for the City of Yaldma, and for the Yakima Comprehensive Plan.,Consequently, we were more than a little surprised to re in the 2005 update that, instead of revisiting, testing and critically evaluating the major cargo assumptions made in 1996, -those assumptions were simply., in the plan's words, 4(carrie-d over." This action is even more perplexing since little, to our knowledge, was accomplished toward the major -cargo goal in the nine year period between the, original 1996 assumptions and July �005. DOC. INDEX # J U N 91 1.'11) ?019; As evidence of how reality can, over time, deviate dramatically from assumptions and forecasts we call your attention to the passenger forecasts contained in the 1996 plan and how they compare to updated forecasts in the 2005 version. For the year 2002, the 1996 plan predicted 139,300 passoj)ger enplancnicnts- Actually there were 59,522 or,43 pol-ocra of those predicted, We note, also that the 1996 plan estimated 212,800 enplaiieni,ents in 2011 'It he 2005 plan, hzisreduced forecast anplanements for 2013 to '110,600, atgahiflally half of those predicted irl 1996. Clearly, the 9/27 extension is one of the most significant of the many improvements and modifications contained in the 1996 and 2005 plans. Yet, inexplicably, during preparation of this latest plan, its rationale was not addressed. The 2005 plan states that the sequencing of the [major cargo elements.] are considered to be demand driven, and are expected to occur in the latter portions of the 20 -year planning period. Indeed, the runway OX(tasion is shown in Phase 11.1 which occurs batwoori the years 2013 and 2023. Further, it is stated that an cnviTonnu,,nta1 assessment (EA) would be required before mtending runwa, 9/27, These statements, falcon at - 'y Lace value, indicate, that if the milway extelisioll is not required it will riot be constructed and that adjacent landowners' interests, through -the EA process, are protected. Not so. First, environmental assessments often begin with presumptions that projects are operationally necessary. That is to say that those who really know the su�ject ill this case the airport board and,,presannably, the Fed,crat Aviation Adnii,iristration (FAA) — de,cm a project important and required, During preparation of an EA, focus cannot be expected to'be placed on the necessity of the extension, so much as on how to ruitigMe it. Second, andmore immiuerilly important, the planned extension, -h-ripacts the current ASO. This results in significant land use impacts now and over the near mid nfid-tenh future for many property owners whether or not the runway extension is constructed, Congdon Orchards is a major landowner whose properties lie completely within the city of Yakima and to a large extent in the currently -depicted ASO. Congdon is not in opposition to justifi,ed airport development or necessary airport expansion. It considers itself.a neighbor and partner,of'botb the airport and the City of Yaldma. It is incumbent, however, on Congdon management to zealously object when it sees -what it Considers to be an inadequate planning action such as that which occurred during the, 2005 ALP update, It is one thing to carry aver .a portion of a plan that is progressing, if only generally, according to schedule but to carry over and reinitiate a segment of a plan thathad shown little or no progress in an ensuing nine year period is,at minimum, questionable. Our strongly held position is that the update to the Yakima Air Terminal ALP is invalid with -respect to the runway 9/27 extension and its impact on the ASO because an inclusive and deliberative process was not employed during the plan's preparation. R I r- C 1I '%If _L, 0 DOC. INDEX # ci,vy 0"", P!.AIMR,"i',K,1 'v Had the Yalcima Air Terminal Board held public meetings, or at least asked for input from affected landowners or at minimum provided a draft of this plan or review it is likely that this letter would not have been written. Someone certainly would have questionedthe, logic of carrying over nine, year old, stale, potentially invalid assumptions which hav('�, mch rnqjor Mid POtOrltkll ["UtUIT, finpacts. The City and County of Yaldnia and the Yakirna Air Terminal Board must recognize that, this publication legitimacy due to improper procem Atroiriinnim, all sections which address or relate to the runway 9/27 extension should be investigated. The plan should be republished after a thorough review and re -justification, if possible, of the major cargo assumptions. The scope of workresearch, working documents, and draft plan should be produced with proper public notice and hm[Put, C C .. �&. Doug Maples, Planning Manager City of Ytdcirna 129 North 2'd Street Yakima, WA 98901 1 -\/Ir. Wade Bryant, Manager (SEA -600) Federal Aviation Administration Airports District Office 1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 9805,5 Mr, Cliff Adams Chairman & CEO 1155 Camino Vallecito Lafayette, CA 94549 M,,,,, Kim Eaton Yakima Cotinty (Jerk 128 Nofth,2"' Stre e, (' Yakinia, WA 98901. Planning, Programming and Capacity (ANM-610) Federal Aviation Administration Northwest Mountain Regional Office. 1601 Lind A -venue -SW Renton, WA 98055 ("VIV Of 16'16 °f!' EXHIBIT 3 DOC. INDEX # DRAFT' AIRI'ORTOVERLAY ORDINANCE DA)I,',tJ D 12-12-06 hl V Vt 153M10. YF[LE & '17he ordiriance codified in this chapter shall be kno-wri and may be cited as tlic "AirrK)rt Overlay Ordinance." The districts defined by this chopttr may be referred to as the "Air- port Zoning Districts," 1-5,30,020. PURPOSE, AND INTENT The Airport Overlay Ordinance has two Fundamental purposes: (A) To minitTii7c the public's exposure to excessive noise and hazards that would result from incompatible land use development around YaEma Air 7'erminal, and (B) To protect Yalurna Air Terminal frorn potential encroachment by land -uses that is in- compatible with airport activities that may weaken the future development and use of the airport and still allow compatible development of land by adjacent property owners. (C) To comply with Revised Code ffashington, RCIV36,70.547, GeneralAviafion Airports, Sit- ing (lI',Ncoyxpatible Uses which requires that "Every county, city, and town in which there is located a general aviation airport that is operated for the benefit of the general public, whether publicly owned or privately owned public use, shall, through it's comprehen- sive plan and development regulations, discourage the siting of incompatible uses adja- cent to such general aviation airport," The intent of this chapter is to: (A Implement policies of tht YakiNia Urban Area Copprehensive Plan, -die, Yak' "";?L — 4z1ir:rWv4-- nalMayler Plan, and the State of Washington Department of Transportation Aviation 71, (B) Establish land use lonlng regulations around Yalcirna.fair Terminal that are specifically designed to address issues of compatibility between the air?ort and surrounding land uses. ses. Rev respect to noise, safety, and height limits (air- space are established with space protection). (L) Enable the City of Yaldrna Administrati.on and'Plarining Division, as well. as adjoining jurisdictions, to administer and. enforce said zoning rep, ilations in accordance with RCW 14-12, 15,30,030, APPLICABILITY 031, Affected Lurid Use Activit.-es—Gen era! Applicability � I (A) In general, this chapter applies to the following activities affecting land situated within the primary influence area of the Yakima Air Terr-ninal (as defined herci &C. M)EX # (1) Proposed changes to arnend zoning regulations, (2) Proposed land subdivisions or segrep,,-ati c s, (3) Proposed new construction, 'A" (4) Changes to the existing uses oF land or structures to the extent that such changes require the Code Administration and Planning Division to review the change or to issue or modify a use permit, administrative permit, or any o dier crititleme-i-It approval. (5) Any sLrucLure or tree, including ones in existence prior to the effective date of ffils chapter, the height of which -would conflict -with the standards set Ford-i herein. (B) Within the secondaqr influence area of the Yaldrnalilr Terminal, this chapter is con- cerned only -with structures or trees, including ones in existence prior to the effective date of this chapter, the height of which would conflict with the standards set fortis herein. 032, Affected Land Use Activities—Specific Actions Requiring Review (A) Specifically, the following types of proposed land uses or development, if involving land within the primary influence area of Yaldina Air Terminal, shall be reviewed under the provisions of this chapter: (1) Any project requiring a zoning ordinance amendment, (2) Any request for an administrative adjustment from the provisions of this chapter, (3) Any non -aviation use of land -within Airport Compatibility Zones I and 2 as de- fined herein. (4) Any residential dwellingwr'Lhin Airport Compatibility Zone 3 or 4, 5 and 5a, (5) Proposed development of a school or hospital in Airport Compatibility Zones I through 5. (6) An7 new structure (including towers and, antennas) or -tree that would exceed the height limitation criteria set forth in Section 15.30.080. (7) Any project having the potential to create electrical or visual hazards to aircraft in flight, including: electrical interference with radio communications or navigational signals, lighting which could be mistaken For airport lighting, glare in the eyes of pilots of aircraft using the airport; and impaired visibility near the airport. (8) Projects having the potential to attract an increased number of birds or other wildlife to the -vicinity of the airport, (9) Arry proposed land useaction -within the prirnai:�, influence area the Airport Manager will be provided an opportunity to comment on the action for airport activities, (B) Within the secondary airport influence area, any structure (including towers arid anten- nas) thatwould exceed the height limitation criteria set forth in Section 15.30.080 re- quires review in accordance with CFR Part 77 Height and Obstructions. DOC. INDEX # _f�L — (C) Additionally any proposed development witlain the airport conical area involving con- st-tuction or -alteration of structure (including antennas or towers or trees) taller than two hundred (200) feet above ground level at flit site, or may othen.vis& constitute an obstruction to the navigable airspace, shall be submitted by the applicant to dae Yakirna Air Terminal Man -aver and Washington State Department of Transporta6on Aviation Division For review. Such structures also require, notification to the Fcderal Aviation Administration in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, Paragraph 77A,3(2.)(I), 033, Uses Not Affected Except with respect to height limitation requirements on structures and ii.-ces, this chapter does not apply to: (A) Existing development as of the effective date, of this chapter for Which no expansi I on or changes of use are proposed even if the existing uses are not in conformance -with the standards herein, (B) Construction, other than. in Airport Overlay Zones 1, 2 or 3, of a single-farmly home on a legal"lot of record as of the effective date of this chapter if such use is permitted by City of Yakima development regulations, (C) Any otherwise allowable use 35 feet or less in height within Compatibility Zones 4, or 5 or within the secondary airport influence area unless such height exceeds the criteria set forth in Section 15.30,080, (D) Aviation -related development Of an7"nrPOrt property approved by the -Airport Man- ager. and/or Aj-rport Board and, if applicable, approved by City of Yakima under the approved zoning and construction codes. (E) The mariner in which aircraft operate on the airport or in the surrounding airspace, 034, Precedence In interpretation and application, the provisions of this chapter shall be held to be mini- mum requirements, adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety, and general wel- fare, In the event of conflict between the requirements of this chapter and any other re quitements of any, other lawfully adopted rales, regulations, legislation, or resolutions appli- cable to the same area, the most restrictive limitations or requirements, shall govern, 035, Severability Should any section. or provision of this chapter be declared by the courts to be unconstitu- tional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the chapter as a whole, or my part thereof other than the part so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. 1.5,30.040, DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply for the purposes of this chapter: (A) "Airport" means any area of.® land designated and set aside for the landing and -taking off of aircraft., including all necessary taxiways, aircraft storage and tic-dowh areas, hangars, and c)ther nectss-aty buikht�gs, and open spaces, desipated for the stot"12, MFU� I ' Ir I and1I ' 1' b operatJ "ion of aircraft,and utilized or to be tailizcd in interest of the ti llt�f purposes. DOC, IND EX# JUN ?III"i 3 (11� I Y U PLA!AM',!"'31 UP, (B) "Airport Hazard" means any use of land within the -Airport Influence Area that ob- structs the airspace required for flight of aircraft in [anding or taking off at Yakima Air Terininal or is otherwise haz-ardOUS to such air navigation, (C) ",Airport Influence Area" is the area, as delineated herein, routinely 2.ffecttd by aircraft operations at Yakima Air Terminal. The airport influence area is divided into primary and sccondar, areas, All provisions of dais chapter apply to the primary airport influ- ence: -area, Only height limitations as established in Section 15.30.080 apply within the secondary airport influence,, area. P) "Day --Night Level (DNL)" is the noise metric used for evaluating airport noise impacts under this chapter. The noise levels are depicted by a set of contours, each of which represents points having the same DNL value. (_E) " Aviation Deed Declaration" means a notice, recorded wid-i the deed to a property, indicating that the, property is subject to overflight by aircraft approaching, departing, or maneuvering in the vicinity of Yakima Air Tcrrriinal and acknowledging the pre- existerice,of the airport, (F) "Federal Aviation Regulatioris (FAR) Part 77" rneans that part of federal regul.Rt-iDns dealing with obstructions to air navigation. (G) "Rare Special Events" are ones (such as balloon fairs or an air show it an airport) for which a facility is not designed and normally not used and for which extra safety pre- cautions can be taken as appropriate, (H) "Residential Density" means the number of dwelling -unitsper net acre ofland.. This term includes dwelling unit density (See 15,01020 YIVIC). (I) "Structure" means anything constructed or erected which recluires location on. the ground or attached to something -hing having location on the mound (See 1.5.02.020 YM.C), (1) "Tree," as used herein, means any form of vegetation, (K) "Usage Intensity" is the number of people occupying a. specific parcel, site, or land use. development divided by the gross acreage of the parcel, site, or development. Usage intensity criteria are applicable to all types of land uses except residential, 051.. Airport Layout Plan 11-iis chapter is based. upon the Yakivia Air T'(.,iwiina1Airpo?-1 Layout Plata drawing dated May 20, 2002, a,s approved by the Yakima Alr1lerminal Board, Included in die. Airpmt,Laycut Plaii are proposed improvements to the airport's runway system: specifically: (,h) Extension of Runway 9-27 westward by 1,279 feet and eastward by 1,278 feet, thus in- creasingthe total length. from 7,603 existing as of the effective date of this chapter. to 10,160 feet. (13) A. precision instrument approach to the future end of Runway 9 and realignment of the existing Puiriway 27 precision instrument approach to the future tunwzy end. (C) Extension of RUIVWY 4-22 southwestwilrd by 695 feet, thus increasing 01to4,1'JVpL From 3,835 feclas of the effective date of ffiis Chapter to 4,530 Feet, DOC. INDEX 4 01 052Aiixport Overlay Map (M—.ap 1) (A) 'I'l-ic Airport Overlay Map depicts the, boundaries of the Terminal irifluencearea and airport compatibility overlay for which various co.anpatibility. criteria I I i are. defined ' I n this chapter, The airport cornpatib'lity overlay boundaries take into ac- count c-count both the aircraft in V,Lri(.-,)us portions of the airport environs and dae noise im- pacts ge.nerated by normal aircraft operations, (B) SpeciFic factors upon which the boundaries tht-, primary airport inflr..icricc area Parr de.. lineated are ;as follows: (1) Airport Oveday Zone 1: Encompasses the airport runways, ffie tufivmy primary surface, rLu`IWa5X Safety area and adjacent .runway ot)ject free area, as each is identi- fied on the airport layout plan. (2) Airport Overlay Zone 2: Encompasses the runway protection zones and ex. - tended object free area and transitional sutfaccT, as depicted on tlie airport layout plan, (3) Airport Overlay Zone 3: Rncompasses inner approach. along the extended run- vray centerline extending out 5,000 feet from the ends of the future expan.Tion Runways 9 and 27 ruri'may protection zon.es, Locations -within this zone are over. o gi n level approach Bo -wen by aircraft at altitudes as low as 300 feet ab ve rou - d . ev on - o.ch to the runways, (4) Airport Uvettay Lone 4I—Incompasses the middle approach from the Outer ecige of Zone 3 to a point it meets the inner edge of the conical surface. (5) Airport Overlay Zone 5 and 5.AEncompasses that portion of approaches from the inner portion of the conical surfkc to the outer edge of the conical sur. - face, including the arn, tandcrne-,iffi the horizontal surface (5-A), (C) The boundaries of the secondary airport influence, area coin-cide, with floe lind-ts of the airspace protection surfaces for the YaLdma Air Terminal as established in accor- dance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 and as shown in the .Aiipo)-t Layout plan. Future runway extensions and ninwaTinstrument approacl-i procedure im- provements are reflected. in these boundaries. 053, Airspace Protection Plan Map (.Map 2) Secondary .Airport Influence Area drawing depicts ffie airspace surfaces defined for Yakima. Air Terminal in accordance with Federal, Aviation Regulations, PaLt. 77, Subpart C, For ffie piirposcs ofthis chapter, the fixture runway confipui -ation and types ©f rurlW,,ly ap. proaches are assurned in the.Airspace Protection Plan. 1530 60 . ACCI]IITABILYI_V OF SPE CIFIC PROPOSED L.A. USES 061. 'I'abli_- 15,30-1 'J.'h,e acceptaI.-)ility of specific proposed land LLSCS within the, prirriaq influence area of Yalcirna, Air Teri-rilmit is indicated in Table 15,30 .-1, The listed uses are assessed with respect to air- port noise, safety, and. aitspace protection concerns as addressed by the dens"I', intensity., heightlb.-natation, and soured insulation requirements def,"ined in a -As cluapter. J� DOC. INDEX # 062, Consideration of Unusual Characteristics Nonresidential land uses listed as allowed (Class 'I or 2 review) typically c6teria and are nornially allowa[)]c mthin the indicated airport overlay zorles. V oril"Isuid chirauedstics of propc-)&ed land use or development w(,')uld cause ffie use! or dew "Icil.uint:f1t tri conflia wkli the kisagt, intensity or odier cornpatibilit-, cri- teria herein, then the use shall no L be permitted even if listed as allowed. 061 Uses Not Listed Any use not listed in Table 15.30-1 but which may be capable ofcompl)6ngwitlt the l i,sage intensity and other criteria herein, shall be evaluated on racase.d.)y •case basin 'wid} respect, to those criteria. 15.30,070. DENSITY AND INTENSITY LIMITATIONS FoR NEw E® VE LOPMENT Any subdivision of pn'.)perty for the purposes of residen dal dei,elopment within the primary "arPort I , n (Itieru.:e area shall coiriply with the following density criteria; _(A),' Airport Compatibility Zones I and 2: No new dwellings permitted. ort Compatibility Zone 3: No new land divisions for the purpose of creating addi- onal residential parcels acl (C) Airport Coll-ipatibility Zones 4 No new land divisions foriiie purpose of creatinb - ditional,'Nit.flfi-Family residential parcels, Single-family residential rrmy be considered on a case-by-case basis and must comply wid, Wag ,e intensity (Section 15.30-073), he.ieit limitation (Section 15,30,084), sound insulation (Section 15,30,091), and aviation deed declaration (Section 15.30J��'_rrod R)1qrte G9-2) requirements, (D) Airport Coinpatibility Zone 5 and 5A. md Secondary Airport Influence Axex, Deed declat-at: recluired for new housing developmeras and other noise sensitive uses where indicated. 072. Mixed Use Development Mixed-use development In which residential uses are proposed to be located in conjunction ,vith nonresidential uses in the same or nearby buildings on the same site shall be treated as nonresidential development, The occupancy of the residential portion shall be added to that of the nonresidential portion and evaluated with respect to the non-residential usage in- tensity criteria defined in Section 15.30.073. Any proposed nonresidential construction or use of land for which a zoning approval, use permit, building permit, or other City of Yaldma approval is required shall be subject to the following usage intensity limitations: (A) Airport Overlay Zone 1: No people other than aircraft occupants, airport personnel, and other persons authorized by airport regulations. (B) Airport Overlay Zone 2: No more than 10 people within any single one -acre area; no uses in buildings, D f EX it (C) A.Irport Overlay Zone 3: No more than 50 people per acre average over the site and no more 100 people within any single one -acre, area; rio buildings greater tlian two sto ties above ground_ (D) Airport Overlay Zone 4: No more than 100 people per acre average over the site and no rnorc than 300 people witl-iin any single; one -acre area. Airport Overla,:y Zones 5 -,.nid 5.A and Secondary.Aiii-port Influence Area: No airport related limitattions apply, 074Usage Intensity CalculadDll Factors TheRyaydnium.:number of people permitted on a site shall be calculated based on tl:iefol- lowing factors: (A) All people (c,g, ernPI07ees, cusLorners, visitors, etc,) who may be on the property are to be included in the calculations. (B) The calculations must reflect the to[.,al riurnber of people on the site at any time, except .1 rate Special P-7entS, (C) All usage intensities are calculated on a gross acreage basis including thesh t. s 's e of a e, � i ar adjacent roads and permanently open lands, (D) The one -acre areas indicated in ffi.e preceding density criteria are to be rectangular in shape, .riot elongated or irregularly shaped, 075, Usage Intensity Data Sources The usage intensity of all individual uses highly depends upon the specifics of the proposed land use and its design. Where necessary to determine the accel.:)t-ability of a particular pro posal (Class 2 review), the anticipated nurnb'er of people per acre can be calculated based any of the following metl-i.ods: people would arrive at the site by means other than autornobile (or would park off site), the anticipated number of people on the site can be estimated to be at least equal to the number of automobile patking spaces requited for the rosea A higher aurnber shall be assurned for uses, which typically attract more than one person per -vehicle. (B) 171ternafional.Bud&nA Code (.TBC) ocapang. levelr 'Fhe anticipated maxitnUt.T.i number of people occupying indoor facilities on a site can be assumed to be no higher than the to- tal floor area of 'ffic proposed use divided by the mininaurn square feet- per occupant re quirernents listed in the :IBC, Because the IBC criteria represent. highly ffitengivu, levels of usage, the number obtained through this calculation can be divided in half for the purposes of t1w usage intensity criteria in this secfiori, (C) Dr)cupientp.d Suivqi or Asia�sis Results,- A project applicant may provide evidence, such as surveys of existing uses similar to th-e type proposed, documenting that specific features of a proposal would result in a inage intensity lower dian ffiat assuined 'Osing the fnefl'l- ods indicated above. Acceptance oEsuch exidence shy dl be at the cii� y of Yaklma. U N 2 00C. WDEX # 076, Parcels Lying tbin Two or More Airport Overlay Zones If a parcel proposed for residential subdivision is split by airport overlay zone boundaries, the to tid nwriber of dwelling units perrnitted shall be CaICLIlated as If the parcel were rriultiple parcels divided at the airport overlay zorie boundary line. Sirs-iilady, if a parcel proposed for nonresidential use is split by airport overlay zone boundaries, the usage intensity shall be calculated as if the parcel were divided at ffie compatibiliq zone boundary line. In botb cases, however, the development density or intcnsit-r allowed within the mare restricted portion of the parcel can (and is encouraged to) be transferred to (clustered on) the less re- StLictecl portion even if die resulting development in the latter area then exceeds the criteria for that cornpatibllit�r zone. This transfer of development is also allowed with respect to multiple parcels proposed to be developed as a single project. 15.30,0 0o HF.IGH,r LIMITATIONS 081. Basis for Heiglit Li its Protection of navigable, airspace from obstructions that can be hazards to aircraft flight re- qt,iires csja11)hshrrient 9f limits on the helgbt of structures, trees,and other objects in the VJ cillity of'yoldrnci Air Terminal. 'Ibese ler -xits are 1,-)rimarily based upon 11,art'77, Subpart C, of Oic Federal Aviation R,efyukations but also may take into account the United. States g Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedurcs ("FEDYS) and applicablc,,iiq.,)ort design stan- dards published by the Federal Aviation Administration. 082, Airspace Protection Surfaces The critical airspace for Yakima Air Terrninal is depicted in the Airspace Protection Map, Map I and 92, Thcw map takes into aCC01111t fil Wre i1T1pr0VCMentS to the airport's rurrways and runwriy approaches. The critical airspace is defined by a set of fn,e typeof surfac.es as follows; (A) A prirmix), surface is longittidinaI17 centered on each tunw2yand extends 200 Feet be- yorld each end of the, nimay. The wi�,Ith is 1,000 Evet for Rurnvay 9-27 and 500 feet for Runway 4-22. The elevation of any point on, the prirnat-y surface is the sante pis, �bt elevation of the nearest point on the runway centerline. (B) Approach surf -aces ,ue lotigi,iudkodly ccnw,ered on tlic oacrided Lurmay rntlerline ,md extend oiawaxd and upward beginningat, and at tlie swine elevation as, cacli, end c,.,,f a primary surface. Approach surface dinierisicins -arv] slc)pes f'or ca.ch runway end a -re as follows: (1) Runways 9 and 27: (a) Inner edge width: 1,000 feel Outer end -width: 1.6,000 feet Lcrigtl-i: 50,000 feet (d) Slope: 50 to I (I foot vertically for each 50 feet horizontally) for the 'inner 10,000 feet of length and 40 to 1 for the outer 40,000 feet. (2) Runways 4 and 22: (a) Inner e_dge width; 500 feet. N Outer edge width: 1,500 feet. HM Psi (c) LLrigffi5,000 feet DOC. INDEX # _d r (d) Slope: 20 to 1, (C) Ti.arisitional surfaces extend outward From the sides of each prirnatlr surface and each approach surface. Thesc surfaces slope upward one foot vertically for each seven feet horizontally (7:1), measured at a 90 degree angle to the runway centerline and extended runway centerline, arid continue to where tlicy intersect a horizontal or conical surface. 1�Ot. those, portions of a precision approach surface, which extend through or beyond the Iiinits oFthe conical surface, the adjacent transitional sutfaces extend 2, distance of 5,000 feet horizontally from tl-ic edge of the ,.t.pproach surface rneaSUrcd at a 90 --degree, angle to the extended runway centerline, P) A horizontal surfacc .is established at an elevation oF 150 feet above the hif,hest poird: on the airports ninways, specifically 1,095 feet above rneari sea level, The inner edge of t1te horizontal surface is defined by its intersection with transitional surfaces, The outer edge is defrned by drawing arcs with radii of 1-0,000 feet centered on the runway center- line at each end of the pritnary surface of Runway 9-27, then connecting the arcs with lines drawn. tangent to dlel_.n. (.E) A. conical,'surface extends outward for a distance of 4,000 feet from the periphery of the horizontal surface and upward at a slope of one foot vertically for each 20 feet horizontally (20:1), 083, App.acabifity This section shaU apply to all objects on the gorund. within the primary andsecondaryair.. port influence -,ireas whether such objects are man-made structures or nat.iral, such as trees and other types of vegetation. mz�� (A) No object shall be permitted to have a height exceeding that of the critical airspace sur.. faces defined above except tliat no object shall be restricted to less than Yi feet in heiglitiri locations otherthanbeneath the inner portion ofthe FARCart ' 7 , 1. p p o, r a 7 ch surfaces (within 5,000 feet :for RUnW,i7,9 9 and 27 or 3,000 Feet for Runways 4 and 22) or a transitional surface adjacent to a runway or inner portion of the approach surfaces. (B) No exception to the height criteria that establishes an. obstruction.r.nay be granted even if the Fed-eral.Aviation Administration has conducted an aeronautical study of the ob- stiLiction and found that it -would not be a hazard to air navigption without additional inforrm.i.-tion. Granting an exception is at the discretion of hire City of'Yakitna. The City of Yakima will request con.irnerit from the Yakirna.Alr 'fetminat Obstruction markingand lighting may be required for any stnicture or tree (including antennas and towers) that penetrates a critical airspace surface inaccord atice with ITederal Aviation Administration standards, (C) 1ii the design. or reconstruction of roadways and rail lines, allowance shall be made for vehicles having an assumed height as Follows: (1) Vehicles on interstate highways (17 feet); (2) Vehicles on other public roads (15 Feet), (3) Vc4aicles on private roads or in parking lots (10 feet); (4) R.Ailroad trains (23 Feet). 1P..1i„ DOC. INDEX # F_ 9 085, Notification to Federal Aviation Administration Nothing in this chapter shall diminish the responsibility of the project proponent subrniting a Notice of Consnuction or Alteration to the Federal Aviation Administratdon if required in accordance with Subpart B of Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77, "Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace," 1530, M OTHER REQUIREMENTS 091, Sound Insulation (A) Dwellings and other buildings housing noise -sensitive uses (e.g., schools, libraries, hos- pi 'h the City of Yalciffia hos- pitals, theaters, etc.) -hall be sound insulated in accordance with Building Code to reduce the interior day -night F10211. level (:CS I.;) to 50 d1-3 or less. (B) Achieving this standard may require: (1) Applying weatherproofing materials, (2) The baffling of vents and mail slots; (3) The installation of solid -core wood doors or foam -core steel doors; (4) The installation of windows with special noise attenuation characteristics; (5) The installation of new interior walls -along. existing walls, and; (6) The installation of a ventilation system, 092, Aviation Deed Declaration (A) As a condition for approval of new development within Airport Compatibility Zone I d,irough 4, (excluding airport property), and zont% 5 and 5A_' where noted, a notice re- garding aircraft overflight activil,.7 ih0 be recorded with the deed to the property. Said notice shall indicate that the property is routinely subject to overflight activity by air- craft using the airport, and that residents may experience inconvenience, annoyance, or discomfort from the noise of such operations and should be prepared to accept such occurrences; and that the current volume of aircraft activity ,it the airport could in- crease in the Future, (B) Any subsequent deed con7eyiTlg the parcel or subdivisions thereof to a new owner shah also contain a statement to this effect, 15.30,100. NONCONFORMING CONDITIONS (A) Land uses, structures, objects, and trees not in confo rmance wl itl -i this Airport Overlay Zoning ordinance as of the effective date of the chaplet: may continue in use urider the following conditions! (1) Continuation of the use must not be in conflict with other sections of fl-je zoning code or with building regulations. (2) Anonconforri-iing use may be changed to atiodier nonconlorming use only iftlic new use does not involve expansion of the affected land area, an increase in building size, or an increase in the intensity of usage (i,c. the, nL� ,,�64vof,peplpie per acre), DOC, INIDEX, # 'JUN 21 01 U15 10 (3) Any nonconforrning use diat is deerned by thc,, Code Administration and Plan- ning.Manapr, or designee, to have been discontinued or abandoned as deffiled .Manager, 1)), the Urbum Ar.E-a Zoning Ordinance (LJAZO) or tliat has been rnoi:e tjaarl 80% dtstro7ecl, torn down, or Physically deteriorated must confor.rn to the criterka of this Chapter upon. reuse or reconstruction, (B) Nothing in this section shall be interj)retec] to prv,-vviat nom of rnairittriance of existirl.g uses and strLicb-ires. 1530,11_0- REVIEW PROCEDURES 11L Application Req-Lifternerits Applications for land uses or land use,developrnent within the prim-ary airport fl-ffluence area established by this chapter shall include the following informatiot -r (1) Property boundaries and acreage, including the geographic relationship to the - airpairportrunways ,.iri.cl/or to the zones cleFtned for noise, safety, and airspacebaro tecEon. compatibility purposes (Section. 15,30.050), (2) Location, elevation, and heigl)t of all existing and proposed bLkildings, structures, and treats taller than thirty-five feet in height, (3) A description of the proposed permit-tcd.land use includingthe number of cl-"veli.. ing units and/or number of people: expected to occupy the site, (B) In consideration of ari application For a building, sttucture, or other use, which will ex- ceed fbirty--five (35) feet in height, the reviewing official shall require the applicant to subL a certificate from a registered. professional engineer or a licensed land surveyor clearly indicating the maximum elevations of proposed stri.)cture(s) and the irriaginary surface based on ffie established airport elevation and USGS daturn. 'The regqstet-ed professional engineer ora licensed land surveyor shall determine elevations plus or mi- nus orae foot shown. as mean sea le -vel (rnsl) elevation. 112, Reviev;r Criteria (A) In re -viewing such proposals, the Code Adrninistration and Plannirq?, Manager - shall con- s1der the follo-,fving factors anal render a decision based on tlie application a..Isirig ffic fol- lowing: (1) The compatibility crittrlz, adopLtd by the City of Yakima, (2) Information regarding aircraft ffilAit I ri the vicinity of the proposed deve.lopment , and tli e nab -ire of the noise and 1-teigght and obstructiciti-s, which can be -,_m.t1ci.pattd to occur; and (3) Characteristics of the proposed land use development, �zt DOC. INDEX # 01, m 15,30,120, ADIAINISTRATivE ADJUSTMENTS 1.22. Height Limitations Administrative adjustments from the Freight lirnit criteria set forth in Section 15.30,080 shall be permitted only if all of the following conditions are met; (A) At least one, of the following exists—, terrain, trces, or other oblects of eqtial or greatcr height are situatedwithin a 1001460,t: radius of the object; err the Federal Aviation Administration has conducted an "'Ieronautic"il study ail,' the props secl object and determined that the object would not create ,in obstruction or hazard to the navi- gable airspace of the airport, (B) The uwler of tlat property has dedicated an avigation casement to the Yaldrna Air Terminal. (C) The owner of the prol,',)erty agr.ees to take responsibility for ensuring that any obstruc- tion naarking and/or lighting roquired by the Federal Aviation Adrniriistr;rtion is iri- stalled, operated, and maintained, unless the Yal6rna !%ir Termirial manager has agreed in writing to be responsible for such installation, operation, arid rmairiterianct. Where substantial incompatible development -already exists, additional infill development of similar land uses may be allowed to occur even if such land uses are not allowed else where ill the zone, This exception does nest apply within Airport Compatibility Zones tar 2, A parcel can be considered for infill, clevelopinuit if it meets all of the Followflig criteria: (A) The parcel SiZC is not larger than 20 acres. (B) The site is at least 65% bounded (excluding roads) by existing uses similar to, or more intensive than, those proposed. (C) 'lire proposed project n' riot extend the perimeter of the area defined by the sur- rounding, 2.1rcady developed, incorni"jatible uses. p) The proposed project would not, in the case of a residential subdivision, have a density greaterthaii the averap the .,r of that on other parcels within 300 feet of periinettx of tl porcel to be subdivided; or in the case of nomesidenfial use, have a usage interlsity rnw-e than 50% above the intensity permitted in accordance with Section 15,30.073 of this chapter. (B) The proposed projectwill not otherwise increase the intensity arid/or incompatibility of use through 3 Tose 1:)era its, density transfers, subdivisions, or other entitlements or de- velopment strategies. 121 Other Administrative Adjustments Otlier administrative adjustments from the criteria set forth in this chapter r -nay be granted in cases wl-3erca normally incompatible land use can be considered compatible because of terrain, specific location, or other extraordinary factors or circumstances related to the site or proposed use. DOC. INDEX # 12 15.3DA.30. AD MIN! STRATIVE A:Dju STMENTRROCKDURES 1.31, Applicatiori forA.d.m:i.t.-i.istrative.A.di�kistment: Any person clesiring to use property iri any niarintr in conflict with ffie provisions set forth in this chapter inay apply to the Code Administrati(ori and Planning DMIslon for an,,i.drniniS trative,adjustrnent fta.rn the overlay regulations, T'he Code Administration and PlarinNag Di- vision rriay subject any o.drninis(rativea( 1justment conditions 11i.,at Code.Adri-iin.1stration and Planning Mariagtr deems necessary, 1.32, Adiii.iii:istratii7e.A.djur;,tirient Reviews (A) The Code Administer.-.ation shall consider: all applications for ',sl ,u- nirnstrat�ion adjustri-itrit. The Code Adnainistra.tion and Plan.n.6-1g.Marlager will pro - h .1 vide the Airport Manager applications that are subject to tlaeairport m,erh,.�r for coin.- ry'),ent to -address the aeronauticsil effects of such adrni.nistration adjustn-ient, (13) Ira .preaching a decision on -,in administrztionad)ustinent, the Code Administration and Planning Manager shall rnalcespecific firi(fings addressing ffieadministratiort -adjtist- ment, ln,,.addition, the findings shall inctude elements such as the characteristics of -die terrain, surrounding land uses, or other circumstances, which would address criteria of this chapter to be an uridt.ie hardship upon use, of the property and tlius should warramt the adm.inis't-r,,.a:tivcadji.istrTierit, (C) The granting of an administrative adjustment shall be considered site specific and. shall not be �,enerafized to include oiler sites, 0 15.30.140. APPEALS 141, Appeal t,o Hearing Examiner Any person aggrieved by may decision of Code. Ach-ninistration and Planning Division made .in its administration of the provisioris set Forth in ffiis chapter rnayappeal to tliePICaring Exarniner, as follows: (A) All appeals ski -all be tal= within fifteen, (15) worldrig days after an order is Filed in the office of Code Administrition and Planning Division, specifying the P,.,roun.ds of such -vision shall tratismit the appea-1 to appeal.. The Code.Administration arid Planning Di the Hearing Examiner and include all the dociarri.ents constituting the record upon Which the action appeal was taken, (B) An appeal shall stay all proceedings in furiherancle of the action appeal unless the Code .Administration an.d Planning DIvision. cettifies to iiae.Fle,,irng Examiner that., a stay 1001.1id cause imminent peril to life, or properter. (q The Code A.drninistration and 111anning Division shall: (1) Establish a time for: the hearing of appeals, (2) Give public notice', (3) Due notice to the parties of record. DOC, INDEX# 1Y, R (D) 'I'lic Cit), of Y1,11-JMD'S Flearing Byaminer rnay reverse, affirms wholly or or mod- ify, the delcision of'due Chy, of- Yaldn°ii rqpirdhig 'i aP -vvltldn the Airport Overlay, pursizznt this chapux and other City of Y,,ddma M"unicipi] Codes, 142. Appeal to City Council Emmy person aggrievC(J Riffectcd by z decision of the City of"Yimbrna's Heail-ing T'w'Mirnjner. may ,Lppe2l within fiftec,mm (15) chys to the Ciq ('J )"'Airria City Council, and upon app(A a closed M�CIOI.d public hefiring-vM lie cc)i'iducted. M"I golf= Mono= The authority for enforcement of this chapter rests with the City of Yaldma in whose juris- diction the land use, structure, or tree to be abated is situated. (Yakima County, and City of Union Gap?) 152. Abatement Violations of the criteria set forth in this chapter shall be remedied through commencement of abatement proceedings in accordance with adopted regulations of the State of Washing- ton and the City of Yakima. FRECEIVED 010C. 11111�fl'� JHLfll 2 2 2015 14 PLANIMIQ,1�1'3'1 ON Yakima Air Tem-dnal 2400 West Washington Avenue Yakima, Washington 98903 1 W=IREIAS, . . ............ . are the owners in fee of that certain parcel of land situated in the County of Yakima, State of Washington, more particularly described as follows: (insert legal description below) NOW, THEREFORE, notim is given to all current and future property owners that: "The subject property is located adjacent to andJor within close proximity to and flight paths of the Yakima Air Torrrdnal -- McAllister Field and a variety of aviation -activities may impact the property. Such 1"Ied to ' noise, vibration, chemical, odors, hours of•li overhead flights and other associated aviation activities," I ALSO, current and fature property owners are notified that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established standards and notification requirements that regulate height hazards, These standards may affect this property by lirniting the height of structures, buildings, trees and other Part 22 Civil Aviation imaginary surfaces. Any questions on height'Mzards or obstructions should be. directed to the Yakima Air Terminal, your local jurisdictions planning department, or the FAA, Signed day of .20— E)OC. INDEX # 'V 64" V'! Avio6on !.>,ed DnaNrilioin for ke Yakima Air Teanlna12106 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ss' STATE OF BE IT uAder sitbefore me, thegned, a Notary Public in and for the County of Yakima and State of Washington aforesaid, came n to me to be the same persons who executed the with�i peri�i la w "--- — - ------ . ......... instrument of writinnd such persons duly acknowledged the execution of the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal, the day and year last above written, Notary Public Notary Public My commission expires RECEIVED DOC. INDEX # JUN 2 2 2015 Aviation Deed DBG1aTfttiQ[1 for the X Air Tominal —12!06 AIRPORT DRAFT _ 12/12/06 A7o-1 AZD-2 AZD-3 ..-3_.. z Z QV _z2 � OIr Q 2 Z N 0E Q (n Z p z d Zri NUZO W N MZ Table 30-1, Permitted Land Uses ° ° L CL o U- a 3 W �N N FC U -F" a 4 Nr Q a N a aES aow °C AGRICULTURAL (COMMERCIAL) Agriculture, Horticulture, General Farming (not feedlots acrd stockyierds) Agricultural ultural Buildi A icultural Chemical Sales/Storage Agricultural Market Agricasl'tus°al and A risuit �.a.. g ural. Related Industries Arslinal Husbandry Concentrated) p Floriculture, AquacultureOperation l•lm_ �._-. s ri� ....._ �,. _._ Frw Bin Sales / 5to'age AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION Arnusement Park (Permanent) w-..� anent) Bowlin Alloys C'ram ar roa l g grid Drive in Theatres ,. Fairgrounds Garr�e µRooms, Card Roo _..,�_...�_�.__...--....._...�................msElectromc Game Rooms Golf Courses Clubhouses, gull driving rfinge mIT _w Gyrrpua ^�lua�rs, Exercise Facilities Horse Racing Tracks Speedways _�_....._ Miniature Golf Courses Movie Theatres, Auditoriums Exhibition Halls Parks Roller Sksattssg Rin. k CemeCory" Churches, sa n .-� y gcrgues, temples COMMUNITY SERVICES (continued) y ter meetin halls, g fraternal Communit Cen nal or r i�scations w �w.. .... home and sli�sup homes (*} Convalescent, nur n _ _ _ w, Day Care Facilities (not home occupation): Family in - Home _-�._ �.......... DKay Care Center Funeral Home __... _.._ Police Fire Stations ambulance service Correction Facilities(*) Junior or Community �"t. .-.�- .. - Museums, art Igatlorie AZD-4 AGRICULTURAL (COMMERCIAL) 1 � .- .....- ------- 1 � 1 3 1 2 2 AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION 2._� 3 2 3 2 2 ..-3_.. .._ _...._, �..ov. _www........ 3 ,�... 2 .� ... _. 3 .-..a,... 3_..... ...m. ..... 3 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2 2............ ........m m A TTS DnU T (-)'W-PPT AV 7flNF 3 3 3 3 .3 _. AIRPORT DRAFT — 12/12/06 AZD-1 AZD-2 AZD-3 AZD_4 ools, Elemerrtrrary & Middle ill Senior High (**I Business school( f _ 3 3 Voc ational schools (*) ..��.. 3 3 storage of gravel and equipment for street construction i 2 2 Wastewa.t� er Sprayfweld Zoo MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING Aircraft harts2 2 I 1 ..�......,�www..... --- www Aircraft Industrial 3 2 2 Afrparel and acessories 3 2 c Bake�,(r i ducts {wholesale) 3 Beverage industry 3 3 Ca11 nning, Preserving and packaging fruits 2 2 yr�f� es and other foods m— _ — — Cement and Concrete ,.)ants m ._�......... Chemicals {indI ustrial, aclrlcultural, wood, etc 3 2 Con0rete, ylrsyrTr and plaster L)rodract,. 2 2 Confecctionery and related products (Wholesale) 2 2 �r�rtlrr hand tools and general hardware _...__ m �.......I .,e.4. �. _.... � ._......._ ._—..��..... Product assernl,)ly 2 ._ _...._ - 2 2 Electrical transmission and distribution equipment 3 2 Electronic compo aonerrt...� 1, and accessories 3 2 Product assembly 3 2 --MANUFACTURING (continued) MANUFACTURING (continued) Engineering, medical, optical, dental and scientific� 3 2 instruments ._ _ _......,_ Product assembly _ � _ —.w 3 2 �r 22 Fabricated structural metal products �,wwe.W Food yarrar essirtcd 22 Furniture and custom cabinet shop's2 2 Product assernia9y 2 2 Glass laoftr.r.r .., _.� _.n. .,. 2 � 2 y and rproducts produt _Product a�asenrCaly.._-...._ ... Grain mill products .. 2 He tin rr a u�. g l p rrataas wood stoves 2 Leather farodtrcts 2 z Leather tannin„ and finwlrorrrg �_.._.._ „se 3 Mar hio'rrar f and rrryrrrlament 2 2 Metal cans and riPriry products 3 3 _-. _._ . .e ....... .� _....... . __ ._.. , m_....._w_ .... n.,. ... 2 ----- . _ ? haSr lra� �srboa dsconta containers and be mels and allied products 2 z ... 0 m� 2 es Planned Development, Industrial22 2 Plastic products _-.._....ro,.. Product assemb4 2 2 _P, refclapntural and bwood gproducts an containers antarners 2.� . m.a _2 2 2. indin e,. Prin 2 _a _- 2 �un4i�tade (serviceindustries) u. ts,Re_nderinaalucltta�r housese ...- .a. 2 2 Rubber ircrartilr cis �........ .. . ... ,. 2 2 Sawmills and planing mills _..,. .. Sheet m.. _ -, M -.w ury I aala .- a. ..., .w...... _..mmm... z.,,---------- .�._ eta) and wrtdir' .IT..... A Tnnnnm r-1ZTUUT AV 7nNTTG 4r r Z=� AIRPORT DRAFT — 12/12/06 AZD-1 AZD-2 AZD•S AZD-4 -.....-, -,- " .. e .� . . .w" -num- ._ ... _. ..._ ._ ...._.� .. _...� ...._ .._ ....� ...2 Stene products (Includes finishing of monuments for I 2 2 Transportation equipment, including trailers and campers Woodworking: Cabinets, Shelves, etc.���� MINING / REFINING�/..OFFSITE................................��ww......�_ HAZARDOUSWASTE TREATMENT Asphalt _ paving and roofing materials, rock crushing includingMining ravel pits .._..o.........sand and_9........... �...., _� ,...... �. 5tockpilmq of earthen materials MINING / of / OFFSITE HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT (continued) Offsite Hazardous Waste Treatment and Storage Facilities RESIDENTIAL (Accessory uses, see 15.040.050) e g y Detach d sin le famil dwelling Detached single family dwelling (zero lot line)(*) Attached single family dwelling, common wall(*) Two family dwelling ��w.....�................. (duplex)(*) Converted Dwelling (*)� Multi -family dwelling. 0-7 DU/NRA( ) 2 DU/NRA() ....... ..r� .__.��._.�� �n.......�..._ 13+ DU/NRA(*) PlannedDevelopment, Residential('***) _ _._..�.... Mobil.._ .... ..._.._ _......... . _ ..�.. e home parks(**) Mobile home or manufactured homes(**) Boarding House Retirement homes.... emporary; hardship units RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE Addressing, Mailing and Stenographic mrv....m..,.ilServices ..�..w _ a Advertising Agencies ............. _.._. � ,,.... ,.,.,v,. w.,,,,.,..,.w...w._.. ...... Airport Commercial _._, inial Clinic/ Hospital Antique Stor.es _..._. Artist's Supplies .�...Auction House ... Automobile, Truck, Manufactured Home & Travel Trailer Sales Recreational reand Automobile e(RnSales Automotive. Car wash Barking Lots & C'A aro-'aale°'9 Maintenance _& llepaarr Shoo 11 mmair S_—_......_.... w paint & Bod... y Re ho . p � Ps Parts & Accessories (Tires, Batteries, etc.) Specialized Repair 5 ...mm.�._..�_. �_.....��.eee..m..._._ p Shops (Radiator, etc.) ....Towing Services ......_.. RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE (continued) Automotive: Wren iaitui ...�. .. .... , ww„ & DisMaTatVir�ltl Yard auty & Barber shops RESIDENTIAL 2 2 l 2 A Tr)Tinrrm llT7r;T7T n V Vr-IXTU AIRPORT DRAFT— 12/12/0 6 AZD_1�_�._r�_mm AZD-2 AZD-3 � AZD-4 B.d e .. - ." Br.eakfa—f, a".st._ & Inn Boats & Marine Accessories 2 2 .Books, 5tatione......._..�., ry, Office Supplies 2 2 Building and Trade (e.g. Plumbing, Heating, Electrical, 2 2 Praas�ting, etc.)—IT.__•__- Butcher Shop 2 2 �ww Call Center2 _.. _...—,. _._................ _ _.....-_.._...__... .m .._. 2 _._ . ._._ _ .... Camera Store 2 2 Store —so 2 2 _Candy Clothing, & Accesnes _ 2 2 Coin & Stanip Shope 2 2 Commercial Services ...�.._.._�.���_......._..,..���.�,�,,.�....._� � 2 2 Communication . T_.. .,..... �� Owers 3 3 CnrnpuRµe& Elertrnntr Stnrc —2- Delicatessen 2 DoparQrnt.¢tt, Discount Varlet. stores w....._......�..__,r'..-_....�,.,�....�����....�.�,.�..._.. 2 2 (Drug Stores (Optical goods, Orthopedic Supplies) 2 2 i ent Atieo�cies (private) r p y t _.... -m ,. 2 _ 2 ._.. ......_.�._ ...... e �.M.. ,brit Store ..w�......_-�..�M ..._...._..._....�,�2 �..N�2 ... .,Farm & Implements, Tools & Heavy Construction 2 2 Equipment Farm Supplies 2 2 Financial Institutions . mm ---_ ....- ... - _ . _ ,� 2 2 .. _�. ...,... .� F'laaros't 2 2 � ,Food store, specWty 2 2 Fuel oil and coal distributors 2 Furniture, home furnishings, aptliances m mm 2 2 General hardware, garden equipment and supplies 2 2 Gift Sho.�.. I _�_...... �ww----....� e _.. �...� 2 A,..__�-...- 2 -w... Grocery I Canven(ence store closed 10:D0 p.m. to 2 2 6:00 a.m. Open 10:OOp trz. to 6:00 a.m. 2 3 Heating and plurtsbing e uipMenl stores 3 2 Ho�rrs es poi rtNr.nt .,tori y � p � � age, maintenance and repair 2 2 Insurance ns ants, hrok��� ers and service tsgenr dss ....._ ,. 2 2 R.. _ � _� � ..m RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE (continued) .�..�, RETAIL SERVICE TRADE,AND,.S�_.�.. (continued) _.a..._.��.....�._..,�...�,..�._ .., _�_... jewtflry, watches silverware sales and repair Kennels., _-..-...��-.-.._ 2 .. 2 _... _ W.....,.. h H�..�. ..M........�. .. plants, s Laundromats and drycleaning ttl����t Laundries, 2 2 � ICl�tar Stores 2 umberytard _... ��,_.._. .2. _ _. W ....m.....- �� .� ....� Medical and dental laboratory, offices clinic ., „ _mm., ? ..w..,�....._.._.�.a...nd Motels and Hotels 2 2 _�..�._.,,,�... �..._ ..,-_ .. _ . _. _ ..... ...........— _ Motorcycles sales/ repair (including maintenance) .... ____ ..._. ........ ....... 2 2 ®..... ......._ ..... (iusic stores _.a 2 2 Ht�rs.. _�_.. el 2 m.. _ outdoor advertirspttg (billboards) See _ Section 15 08 e 13 0 -------- Paint, wallpaper stores w,r(tl �a Pratr�t lass and,.._.-.mm�K.a-.� ......._.�.�,�, _ ....��_._ .� _ �. 3 2 a- Pet stores pse4 * lHptpt s and dory grooming _ 2 - Printing, photocopy service 2 r.__ .. �1. Professi sawuaq office buildings for architects, attorneys, 2 3 r tsover��unb�artt etc Rad� .,, 2 m _...... 2 Commerc� �pment, Commercial ,Planned Development, _.. ... .. �.... 3 3 6f al estate offI.........��._..- _-- ..._ ccs 2 3 " 3 .,ter A YTS rIn'T r'Yirr.nr A-\/ �r1i.T'C J"r AIRPORT DRAFT - 12/12/06 AZD-1 AZD-2 AZD-3 i I AZD-4 - — — — — . . . . . .............. . 'gental:'A' Auto, truck, trailer, fleet leasing services . . . . . ...... . . . ................. . ... ..... .. ... 2 . ........ 2 - ----- . ............. . . Heavy oclulprnent (excoLitAytpTotive) . . .......... . .... .. 2 ....... --- 2 riei)oir's: Small Appliances, TV's, Business Machines, 2 2 Watches, etc Locksmiths and Gunsmiths 2 2. . ....... . . .... . . Ro-upholstery and Furniture 2 2 Small Lnr)rne prid'Garden ir�� i it 2 2 . ...... .... .Equi Cafe and Drive-in Eating, Facilities 2 2 Second Hand Store 2 2 . . . . ...... Service Station closed between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 3 3 _2penAelvveen 10:00 l�i.m. and 6:00 a.m, . . . . ........... -1 .. . . . ........ .. ..... . . . . . . ............ .. . . 3 3 ,shShoe R . . ........ . . ...... 2 2 Sh 'Citing RnnEL�, 2 2 .. . ... Small Tools, Lawn/Garden Equipment, etc. _2 2 Sport! 1!9 Roods, BjcyiLlq� . ..... . - j . ..... 2 . .... ......... 'caverns, Bars, Dance Establishments 2 3 --T Technical Equipment Sales 2 Toy and Hobby Store 2 2 (continued) RETAIL TRADE, AND SERVICE (continued) _..._`—... �"_`"—"'—" ' ' Stations andShops . . .......... . ..... 2WTGService . - " ""'— ...... Video SalRantaI este Material Processing and Junk Handling .3 TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION Bus terminals, s°torece and maintenance facilities 2 2 Transportation brokerage offices; without truck parking 2 With truck parking 2 I 5ontract truck haulal of trucks with drivers 2 2 Air all, truck terminals (for short term storage, office, 2 2 etc.) .Railroad switch yards, maintenance and repair 2 2 facilities, etc, Taxicab terminals, maintenance and dispatching 2 2 centers, etc, --- - ---- Ai5�'rt landing field 91- ---- 'Airport Ogaerations 1 1 2 UTILITIES UTILITIES Power. generating facilities Wility services (substations, etc.) 2 2 WHOLESALE TRADE -STORAGE WHOLESALE TRADE -STORAGE ';Warehouses . . ..... leae tre Wholesale ad . . ....... . ................ . .. .... ...... 3 2 Storage facilities, bulk3 ... ..... . . 2 Commercial 2 . . ........... Residential mini -storage 3 1. = Class (1) Permitted 2, — Class (2) Review and Approval by Administrative Official 3, = Class (3) Requires Public Hearing and Approval by Hearing Examiner Mank = Notpormitted development in 5, Deed declaration acknowledging the pre-existanae of the airport for new zone Dead declaration acknowledging the pre existence of the airport fot new development in zones 5 and 5A, --------- ---- AT-RPC)-RT C)VF.-RT,AY ZONE J"r I WA me AaRsIDE Mr. Bill �Alhccl er Chairman, Yakima Air Terminal Board of Directors 2400 West'\�Tashington Avenue Yakima, WA 98903 Dear Chairman Wheeler: PO Box 287 Grcenbaiik., WA 98253 (360) 222-3646 Aii-side@Airside,.net 'In March 2006 1 wroLt a letter to the Yakima AdrTerminal Board with copies to the City of Yakima, Yakima County and the Federal Aviation Administration in which I indicated that I had been retained by Congdon Orchards to provide consulting services related to development of Congdon Orchards property which isnear the Yakima Air Tenninal. A cop), of that letter, which was not answered or acknowledged, is appended to this letter. The primary message in the 2006 correspondence was that the 2,557 -foot runway extension shown on both the 1996 airport layout plan (ALP) and the 2003 update to the ALP published in 2005 has not beenjustificd. The 1996 plan provides no data, evidence or criticaa....... to support identification of the Boeing 757 as the airport's ultimate design aircraft, The recent -leAuver" the unfounded 1996 desire "to realize the ca3ture of 65 II' rcent of the products originating in the Yakima Valley that are currently being trucked elsewhere for shipment." Inexplicably, the 2003 update made no effort to challenge, test, evaluate or even disc -Liss the only item. in the plan used for justification of a runway extension. The 2006 letter encouraged the City of Yakima, Yakima County and the YakimaIdr Terminal tn ■ and due to the absence of public process exercised during their creation. Airport Safety Overlay Yakirna Air'ferniinal management is continuing its efforts to develop an airport safety overlay (ASO) based on the ultimate (extended) airport shown on the airport's layout plan, We. state once more that this is placing the pro-verbial cart before the horse, Before creating an ASO, it is to develop a reasonable and balanced ASO should then he based on the results of that evaluation, Usinc, an I I -year old, potentially in -valid, clearly unjustified assumption that was created -wiffiout �sillo�ical and will most certainly open the ordinance to legitimate, challenge. Recent RSA Assessment In June 2006 Barnard Dunkelberg & Company (BD&C), at the request of the air WITTlinal, published a runway safety area (RSA) assessment for Runway 9/27. It is illy understanding that tjiis assess; lent has been cited by aj rport management as a validation. of the uIG rpate lengthened runway as depicted in the i naster PLAVI. V effort, # If so, this is all inaccurate Portrayal of BD&C's DOC. �N[` X BD&C did not review or comment on the legitimacy of the runway extension in its runway safety area analysis. The fourth hullutod item in the Study Approach Section on page A.3 states that "this analysis will be limited to considerations related the existing runway length of 7,602 feet." Further, on page B.10, the assessment states that '71 -ds analysis does not project future runway requirements, nor does it supplant the efforts reflected in the 1996 and 2003 Airport Layout Plan." The assessment, in other words, accepted those plans as they were written, The BD&C scope of work obviously did not include an evaluation of the legitimacy of the runway extension. Indeed, the last paragraph of page B.21 clearly states that the purpose of the analysis is "not to establish the long-term runway length requirements or propose, a runway extension," We also note that the second paragraph of page B,6 indicates that the C -Ill airport reference code which includes the Boeing 737, not the Boeing 757, "rcmains applicable to the currant operational conditions of Yakima Air Terminal" and that, on page B.24, "the existing runway length is proj acted to be adequate to meet the needs of [the Bombardier Regional Jet in the Salt Lake City market]," To recap., Congdon Orchards is a supporter of Yakima Air Terminal. It has landholdings in the vicinity of the airport and wishes to cooperate, with efforts to both protect and appropriately develop the air terminal. Congdon Orchards 'believes that the. 1996 airport master plan that identified a 2,557 -foot runway extension based on the use of Boeing 757 aircraft to transport Yakima Valley cargo was potentially in error because there was no evidence or critical evaluation of the actual need. The 2003 master plaia updatt that was published in 2005 provided the air terminal with an over 1996 plan was not addressed — that it was "cairied over" — that the opportunity was lost. it is especially notable that little or no progress to develop the cargo theory -was made by the time the 1996 document was half way through its 20 -year planning window. • The, BD&,C runway safety area assessment does not support lengthe. rung of Runway 9/27. It simply takes prior plans at face value. It clearly states that its purpose is not to address runway length, And the assessment indicates that the runway's current length is adequate for existing operations. • Current efforts to develop an airport safety overlay are premature corisidering true above ee, factors and the absence of public process that has el-iaracterized developinent of both the 1.996 master plan and its update, Recommendations A ctio n 1: Before moving forward with efforts to develop an ASO ordinance we recommend, once more, that the sections of the master plan that address runway lengthening be thoroughly and critically evaluated by an independent firm that is clearly qualified to do so and that has the support of both the air wraiinal and affected p-ropurty owners. Prior tc) cantnict, Llit scope of work and (hon the resultirigresearch, working docunwnts and draft reporl shouid be open to the public, The DOC, INDEX evaluation should be published only after appropriate public notice and the processing of public connnents. The existing master plan should their be updated as appropriate. Action 2: Using either the validated existing or appropriately altered master phirt, develop an ASO that balances tht mirremt and future needs of Yakima's airport -with reasonable adjacent development. In summary Both Congdon Orchards and Airside agree that Yakinia Air Terminal is a vital facility that should be protected, We understand also that depicting an ultimate airport in master plans takes a certain arnount of visioning and is not a simple task. However, it is inappropriate to identify an ultimate airport without supportive data. We ask that all parties recognize that the runway extension, as depicted, may be based on an invalid premise, and that any ASO legislation relying on it may be open to serious challenge. Given the history of the development of the airport's ultimate configuration as indicated in the existing master plan, it is imperative- to take Action 1, Once accomplished, the master plan can then serve as a solid and legitimate foundation for development of an ASO ordinance-. Addressing these issues thoroughly and with appropriate public and agency communication is vital due to the notable impact of Yakima Air Terminal's actions on many adj acont landowners. Draft Airport Overlay Ordinance —12-12®d6 As we have clearly stated, efforts to promulgate an airport safety overlay ordinance are premature as they are based on. a ranway length that has not beenjustifiod, However, since a draft ASO has been circulated and Congdon Orchards has been asked for comments about it, we offer the follow' g° In oeneral 0 We recognize that placement of reasonable limitations on residential and other kinds of development is a primary and justifiable goal of airport safety overlays, Further, it is obvious that crafting ASO ordinances is not an easy process. ASOs throughout the 11nittd. States employ a variety of methods that attempt to achieve anport/commanity compatibility. Most ordinances identify noise, structure heights, and risk of accidents as issues that must be addressed, With respect to the draft ordinance: AZD-1 The airport's FAR 77 Primary Surface is fully contained on airport property and is obviously an area that needs to be under the control of airport management, We have no comment about this zone. According to the draft narrative, this zone includes the airport's ranway protection, zoucs (TU'Z9) which extend off the ends of the runways and the FAR 77 Tramitional Sul,fitces which cAwid laterally from the edges of the FAR 77 Primary Surfaces to 150 fee( above flae airport's Prillylary surface elevation. However, on the safety overlays draft array, the FAR 77'rransitional for Runway 9/27 arc identified as being in D-2,ZD-4, not AZ If the FAR 77 Transitional Surfaces for Runway 9/27 are intr,.aided 41 be in AZE)-2 ' is depicted'�fl 00(' X Table 30-1, this zone- is overly restrictive.The outer txtrcrnices ofthe tnwsifioa� s nurt"aces 'I crid a considerable distance from Elie air terminal. Portions of the transitional surfaces are adjacent to AZD-4 and further away from the centerline of the runway yet more restrictive than AZD-4. AZD-2 also appears to be in conflict with the airport's master plan since that plan, on its land use drawing, indicates "ultimate aviation related commercial/industrial" within the transitional surface north of the runway and ""ultimate commercial/industrial" (presumably non -aviation related) in the transitional surface South of the runway, The ground area underlying the, FAR 77 Transitional Surface is extensive, We recognize that of it arc, close to the airterrninal but some areas are far-reanoved and maintain that. the yestrictions in Table 304 are inuch too limiting. AGI -3 and AZD-4 These zones are generally in line with the runway but are a considerable distance from it. I have, reviewed a number of ASO documents during my career, This draft ordinance is much more restrictive than other ASO plans that I have seen. A valid, local example of another ordinance is Chapter 14,702 of the Spokane Count), Code titled Ailj)ort Overlay (AO) Zone which rIpp)ies to tile perjjjjtting of jim, construction in the vicinity of Spok,u)c, Tirternational Ailport, Felts Ficid, Deer llarl< Airport and Fairchild Air Force Base, - pDKane C7,171TR A_PZ-A is defined as all land in the approach area which extends outward from the end of the FAR Part 77 Primary Surface a distance equal to one-third of the existing or plan -nod length of a runway. APZ-B is all land in. the approach area which extends outward from the end of the FAR Part 77 Primary Surface a distance equal to two-thirds of the existing or planned length of a nm -way. Beyond the areas encompassed by APZ-B, Spokane County may limit development based on underlying zoning, proposed height of structures and noise contours but the core, of its ordinance is the area encompassed by zones APZ-A and B, If the process [hat Spolane Courttytwes were applied to Yakima Aar 'l'ernlinal's Planned rurnv;'V 9/27, Z®A would eytcnd approximately 3,400 f6et froin the, end of the FAR Part 77Prixnary Surface and APZ-B would extend approximately 6,800 feet from the, ead, oft ire FAR Part 77 Primary Surface- Beyond the 6,800 fool &Lanco (here, would be r)o restrictions except those related to ariderlyint,, zoning. J"he draft YKFASO r:)rdij:,mice extends AZD3 to a distance of' 7,500 feet from the primary surface and AZD-4 to thcbeginning of the FAR, Part '/7 Clonioal Surface which is 10,000 feet from the primary surface. The Yakima Air Terminal draft ASO is much more restrictive than. the Spokane example. Noise Noise is of course one of the issues that calls for lirnitations to eertain kinds around ail -ports. Exhibit 6-2 of the Yaldnio Air Terminal Muster P, lan Uj)da le depicts noise contours forecast in the year 2012 after Boeing 757s are expected by the plan to begin carr lyiIIII41? I� I/j,"4, cargo from the Yakima Malley, The exhibit indicates no noise -based restrictions to development for areas that are expected to be outside, of the 65 average day -night (DNL) noise contour. Exhibit 6-6 of the plan depicts the, out)oC. INDEx it edge of the, 65 DNI, contour as approximately 500 feet from the extremity of the Runway 9 protection zone or about 3,000 feet from the, end of the FAR Part 77 Primary Surface. Thc 65 DNL contour at the Runway 27 end is Considerably closer to the. runway, We are not W -Am wwww them but it is clear Mat Me extbnSiVe areas InWuclucl in AzU-3 U114, 1� Uru IIVL ILU16r, Ua6rU UI 11 are they are not consistent with the current airport plan. AZD-5 — Aviation DeedDeclaration The deed declaration indicates that FAR Part 22 is related to civil aviation imaginary surfaces. This statement is not accurate. FAR part 77 titled "objects affecting navigable airspace" is the relevant reference, Section 77.25 is titled "civil airport imaginary surfaces," Further, the deed declaration indicates that the FAA "regulates" height hazards and that (FAA) standards may "limit" the height of structures, This is not accural.u. The FAA responds to notices required under Part 77 in one of three ways: (1) no obj ection, (2) conditional determination (offers mitigation to remove objections) and (3) objectionable. We do not mean to minimize' the FAA's important role in protecting navigable airspace, however misunderstandings about the extent of the FAA's powers with TeSpcct to zoning, land use and building ht,-ights often find their ways into local ordinances. FAR 77 does not limit anything L- I ASO summary We recognize that protection of Yakima Air Terminal is critical to its future and that achieving the December 12, 2006 draft ASO are overly restrictive and are not consistent with the Yakima Comprehensive Plan and portions of the disputed airport layout plan. The draft is also more restrictive than many other ASO ordinances, General surnmary It is vital that theYakima Air Terminal Board order a thorough review of the need to lengthen the air terminal's Runway 9/27 to over 10,000 feet, Efforts to develop an airport safety overlay -lijed until that review is co leteThe ASO that is ultimatel developed REMM11 BOOM Imygammamton I Sincerely, (1). Ketchum David Ketchum President, Airside, Inc, CC: Amber Hansen, I" vice chair Jim Adams, 2,,d vice chair Les Rae, Secretary Toni Holbrook, Treasurer Susan Whitman., Yakima City Council Mike Leita, Yakima County Commission Buck Taylor, Manager, Yakima Air Terminal Enclosures: March 2006 letter INDEX DOC. INDEX. # w *`1 Ar VANITYS M AVO January 22, 2008 Mr. Bill Wheeler Airport Board Chairman 2400 W. Washington Avemfl Yakima, WA 98903 1 Alan D, Campbell James C. Carmody - J. Jay Carroll - Paul C. Dempsey James S. Elliott Mark E. Flckes Carter L. Fjeld - Chad L. Hatfield Tyler M, Hinckley - John W. Hulbregtse Lawrence E. Martin - Kevan T, Montoya Linda A. Sellers - Michael F. Shinn Sara L, Watkins Of Counsel: Frederlck N. Halverson • Terry C. Schmalz On behalf of Cliff Adams, I would, first of all like to thank you and Buck Taylor for taking t time to meet with us on January 10, 2008 at your offices, As you will recall, we discussed, t following: in general terms the Yakima Air Terminal's goals of implementing new airpo zoning districts; the specc goal of acquiring Congdon property beneath what the airport woI u call "Airport Zoning District No. 2"; providing a "clear space," a space clear of buildings houses, through what the airport calls "Airport Zoiiing District No. 3." '11,11s clear Space wou, be an area ftorn, the runway centerline extended to approximately 64th Avenue to afford pilots, clear path to land in case of emergency, We also discussed the possible width of that "CIO path," along with the concept of clustering (potentially achieving greater densities then wou otherwise be. permitted) on other parts of the Congdon property within Airport Zoning District in exchange for the tradcoff of providing the "clear path," As Mr. Adams indicated these topics would be discussed at the Congdon Orchards' recent board meeting. Subject to finalizing the issue of the need for lengthening the runway, Mr. Adams received general approval for the concept of providing a "clear path" through what ultimately would be Airport Zoning District No.?3. The Board also indicated that it wished to be as cooperative as it could in the airport's effort to enhance airport and neighborhood safety. As a result, Mr. Adams is contacting a consulting firm to look at alternative development strategies for property in the area of the Yakima Air Terminal's proposed Airport Zoning District No. 3. We would like to meet with you and Buck Taylor when our studies are completed, In the meantime, with respect to the airport zoning districts, it will be most helpful for Congdon Orchards to have, the following information, which we also think would be needed during the public participation process for the creation of airport zoning districts: DOC. INDEX # F- 509.248 6030 1 fax 509.453.6880 405 East Lincoln - P,O, Box 22550 ®, Yakima, WA 98907 www.vhlegal.r-orn Mr. Bill Wheeler jf, Yakima Air Terminal Board 'e! f /k, January 22, 2008 Page 2 1. The empirical studies/data which establish the configuration of the airport zoning districts in proximity to the runway; and 2. The empirical studies/data that would help establish the dimensions of the "clear path" area; and 3, An indication of whether angling the "clear path" would compromise the safety objectives for having it, in your experts opinion. We are interested in having this information so that we can provide further assurances to Congdon's shareholders that accommodations for a "clear path" are supported by objective facts and data with regard to airport safety needs. Of course, any location of the airport zoning districts is also a direct function of the location of the end of the physical runway. In March, 2006, and March, 2007, we asked our expert to review the Airport's Master Plan and 2005 airport layout plan. Letters were sent to the Yakima Board with copies to the City and County of Yakima raising questions of process and the correctness of the underlying assumptions that a runway extension was needed. To date, there has been no response to these letters that support the conclusion that a runway extension is required. Our view continues to be that the updated master plan and 2005 airport layout plan did not involve sufficient public participation and are defective. We mentioned again at our meeting on January 10 the fact that we still have questions about the need for the airport's runway extension. You indicated that the Barnard Dunkelberg & Company's Airport Master Plan Addendum Planning Memo that came out in November 2007, ..e m. o hay...__ .�.._l� . _ ... la imi ng , a,�n resolve that issue. We li,a��q, �J1 � hanc c to have our exp c zt review the P1 �� and we would like the airport's permission to query the authors of the report as we have noticed several conclusions that do not seem to be accurate. For example, in the section beginning on page A.6 entitled "Aircraft Specific Runway Length Assessment," the analysis states that corporate general aviation operations encompass the most operationally demanding aircraft currently in use in large numbers at the airport. The report indicates that based on FAA standards, runway length should be designed for the most operationally demanding aircraft that is reasonable for the airport, and for the analysis, the Gulfstream 100 (formerly known as the Israel Aircraft Industry Astra) was chosen. Also according to the report, that aircraft accounted for° raves- 220 operations at the airport. isr 2005 and is operated byµ several of the crr °spanies that regularly operate at the airports. According, to the Barnard. Dunkelbcrg analysis, operation of that aircraft requires a runway length of 9,500 feet compared with the current primary runway length of 7,603 feet; a 25% deficiency according to the report. ` Are there airport records which substantiate these numbers for the Gulfstream 100 in 2005, and after? And, what company(ies) are flying them out of Yakima? DOC. INJEX # F-1 �i C "rii Mr. Bill Wheeler Yakima Air Terminal Board 67) January 22, 2008' Page 3 However, there is a discrepancy in the analysis' assumptions for the Gulfstream 100 on page A.9. You will note that the flap setting used under the analysis' assumption is zero degrees. Even with my limited knowledge of aircraft, I know that a zero degree flap setting is particularly unusual. Our expert contacted the chief demonstration pilot of the Gulfstream 150 and Gulfstream 200 factory program, Mr. Brett Rundle, who was recently promoted from chief pilot of the Gulfstream 100 program. We found that a zero degree flap setting is not recommended or standard, that 20 degrees is the standard flap setting for the Gulfstream 100. Mr. Rundle referred our expert to the President of Ultra-Nav Aviation, Inc., the company that provided Gulfstream Aerospace with computerized flight operation programs, Mr. Charles D. Meyer, and provided him the same assumptions used in the November 2007 Barnard Dunkelberg Planning Memo except that we asked Mr. Meyer to use the standard take -off flap setting recommended by Gulfstream Aerospace of 20 degrees. The analysis, which is appended to this letter, indicates that the Gulfstream 100, with the proper flap setting, would require a runway length of 6,521 feet even if the aircraft were departing at full gross operating weight. Another discrepancy appears in the weight analysis beginning at page A.10 for "commercial service aircraft operations." Two points are made here; (1) that the Yakima Air Terminal is designated as a diversion airport for _flights scheduled to land at Seattle -Tacoma International Airport or Portland International Airport; and, (2) that the Boeing 737-400 should be further analyzed in terms of more distant markets. However, no data is provided that there is .sufficient demand to justify trying to establish either passenger or cargo service beyond the western United States, Table 5 which appears on page A.10, indicates that 9,500 feet of runway is necessary for the 737-400 to operate at maximum structural take -off weight from Yakima and the inference is that the airport is deficient. Our expert contacted an air charter service called Xtra Airlines, which operates the Boeing 737-400 and 737-800 aircraft, by telephoning their dispatch office in Elko, Nevada. According to Xtra Airlines, a 737-400 with a full load of passengers from Yakima and sufficient fuel to arrive at its destination in Nevada (Windover, rarely Las Vegas) plus the required fuel reserve, would weigh 127,269 pounds, or over. 23,000 pounds less than the maximum structural take -off weight shown in Table 5. The airline confirmed that the Yakima Air Terminal runway, regardless of take -off direction, is adequate to serve this departure scenario up to a temperature of 109° Fahrenheit, which is considerably hotter than. the standard Yakima day plus 27° Fahrenheit. A 737-800 in similar conditions would weigh 150,098 pounds and would also be capable of operating with a full passenger load up to a temperature of 11 V Fahrenheit with the existing runway length. With regard to the point about diverting aircraft from Sea -Tac International Airport, Table 5 does not point out that aircraft recovering from diversions do not need to take off at their maximum structural take -off weights, but instead would require fuel sufficient to operate to their originally intended destinations. There are other report comments suggesting the need to prepare for potential 757 and 767 cargo operations, but this harks back to the original master plan report suggesting the Yakima Air DOC. INDE7G # I Mr. Bill Wheeler Yakima Air Terminal Board January 22, 2008 Page 4 Terminal as a point of origin for shipping fruit, which we have never seen practical data to support, We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the November 2007 Barnard Dunkelberg report may be based on assumptions for which there does not appear to be empirical support. The report may reach some unsubstantiated conclusions. It appears those conclusions are driving the ultimate placement of the airport zoning districts. We do understand the airport's desire to keep all of its options open by extending the runway, but in the final analysis, in the absence of objective supporting data, it still appears to us to be a desire, rather than a need. Thus, we want to contact the authors of the Barnard Dunkelberg November 2007 Addendum Planning Memo to get their explanation of the runway analysis they performed. We offer this letter in the spirit of open discussion which we hope to continue with you. Cc: Cliff Adams g:lhu confllctfs\ceegdan development cum1g35Ayet-usu-0UbVhLa1M hr disuicls.doc 1122/20UH 9:44 ummsoffice -.dI oq DOC. INDEX # �°" � �� Iii DOC. INDEX # ". .," UNIT DSII " ;0 - ,�". I"DEII FILE COPY ,g husion YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO THE YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS TO YMC 15.02 DEFINITIONS, AND TABLE 4-1 PERMITTED LAND USES ADDING THE USE OF "MISSION" TO THE CITY'S URBAN AREA ZONING ORDINANCE June 24, 2015 WHEREAS The City of Yakima Hearing Examiner established a use and definition for a "Mission" in two Use Interpretations in 1992 and 1995 (City of Yakima Interpretations INT#1-92, and INT#2-95). Defining a "mission" as "...a facility typically owned or operated by a public agency or non-profit corporation, providing a variety of services for the disadvantaged, typically including but not limited to temporary housing for the homeless, dining facilities, health and counseling activities, whether or not of a spiritual nature, with such services being generally provided to the community at large."; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima Hearing Examiner also provided via the previous interpretations, that a "mission" should be allowed in the General Commercial (GC), Central Business District CBD), and Light Industrial Zoning Districts (M-1) as Class (2) Uses requiring Type (2) Review; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima recognized that it did not have adequate zoning controls in place to appropriately site a mission or other homeless service, thereby adopting a six month moratorium on October 21, 2014, (ORD No. 2014-027) regarding operation of mission, community center, boarding house, comprehensive community health center, and multi-purpose community center uses in the Small Convenience Center (SCC) zoning district; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima City Council directed that the Yakima Planning Commission draft development regulations which appropriately regulate uses such as missions, community centers and mixed use building, boarding houses, comprehensive community health centers, and multi-purpose community centers; and WHEREAS On October 22, 2014, prior to the moratorium becoming effective Yakima Neighborhood Health Services requested an interpretation for a proposal to operate a community center providing public assistance services in the form of a food bank, health and social services, laundromat facility, and temporary homeless warming shelter in the SCC zoning district; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission held study sessions to review and discuss the City Council moratorium, and issue of mission, community center, boarding house, comprehensive community health center, and multi-purpose community center uses in the SCC and other lfaki riga 0.19 �� V FILE COPY zoning districts of the City on: December 10, 2014, January 14, 2015, February 11, 2015, and February 25, 2015; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission gave direction at its February 25, 2015, meeting that it had sufficient opportunity to review the Hearing Examiner's interpretations, mission definition, permitted zoning designations, and district intent statements, and requested that City Planning staff schedule the public hearing for consideration of the Hearing Examiner's use interpretations; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima last amended the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance in January 2015; and WHEREAS Proposals to amend the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance (YUAZO) follow the City's established process in YMC § 15.23.020(6) and YMC Title 16. WHEREAS Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130(1) the City is required to regularly take legislative action to review and revise its development regulations in accordance with the Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS Under the provisions of YMC 1.42 the Yakima Planning Commission is responsible for the review of amendments to the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance and for recommending to the City Council the approval, modification or denial of each amendment; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima Planning Commission is charged with periodically reviewing all zoning and use interpretations issued by the City of Yakima Hearing Examiner under YMC 1.42.030 to consider their inclusion or exclusion from the Yakima Municipal Code; and WHEREAS Public notice of these amendments was provided in accordance with the provisions of YMC § 15.11.090, and YMC § 16.05.010 — 050. All property owners within three hundred feet of an SCC zoning district were mailed a Notice of Public Hearing on March 6, 2015, a legal ad in the Yakima Herald was also published on March 6, 2015; and WHEREAS The City of Yakima Planning Division initiated Environmental Review for this proposal on March 5, 2015, both preparing a State Environmental Policy Act Checklist (SEPA), and issuing the Notice of Application and Environmental Review on March 9, 2015; and WHEREAS Environmental Review of this proposal was concluded on April 13, 2015, with the issuance of a Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Retention of which the SEPA appeal period ended on April 27, 2015; and 2015 Yakima Planning Commission 2 Findings and Recommendations FILE COPY WHEREAS The recommendation for these amendments are based upon the criteria specified in YMC §§ 16.10.040 and 15.22.050; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission reviewed the district intent statements and development standards of the CBD, GC, M-1, SCC, and LCC zoning districts (listed below) to determine if the use of a "Mission" and "Community Resource Service Center" are appropriate; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission held its required open record public hearing on March 25, 2015, providing opportunity for the public to comment on the draft amendments; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission heard from twelve members of the public regarding the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS After hearing from the public, the Yakima Planning Commission deliberated on the amendments proposed for incorporation into YMC § 15.02 Definitions, and YMC § 15.04 Table 4-1 Permitted Land Uses as identified below: "Mission": 1. The Planning Commission found that the "Mission" use as defined by the City's Hearing Examiner's 1992 and 1995 decisions appropriately defined a "Mission"; 2. The definition of a "Mission" meets the zoning district intent statements of the General Commercial (GC), Central Business District CBD), and Light Industrial Zoning Districts (M-1); and 3. The Class (2) Review process is the appropriate level of review in the above mentioned zoning districts; and WHEREAS The Planning Commission by unanimous vote recommend: 1. Approval of the "Mission" Text Amendment request as set forth in the Hearing Examiner's 1992 and 1995 decisions; and 2. That the proposed "Community Resource Service Center" Text Amendment should be separated from consideration of the "Mission" use, and scheduled for a study session on April 8, 2015, as the proposal did not contain sufficient information to be appropriately reviewed; and WHEREAS The Yakima Planning Commission concluded its consideration of the "Mission" Text Amendment on March 25, 2015, forwarding its recommendation with findings of fact, and conclusions to the Yakima City Council (attached); and WHEREAS After appropriate public notice was provided in accordance with the procedures of the City of Yakima, by the Yakima City Clerk, the City of Yakima City Council in an open record hearing on 2015 Yakima Planning Commission 3 Findings and Recommendations FILE COPY May 19, 2015, took public testimony regarding the proposed "Mission" ordinance, and considered the City of Yakima Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the proposed ordinance; and WHEREAS After considerable deliberation on the proposed ordinance, the Yakima City Council found that more public input and involvement was desired from property owners along N. 1st Street, and that the Planning Commission should consider increasing the level of review of a "Mission" use from a Type (2) review to that of a Type (3) review, and by a vote of 5 to 0 remanded the proposed ordinance back to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS The Yakima City Planning Commission was notified of the council's action and direction on the proposed ordinance on May 27, 2015, to which the Planning Commission held an initial study session to discussions their initial options to address the councils request; and WHEREAS At the conclusion of the May 27, 2015, study session, and following discussion with city staff, the City Planning Commission found that it may be possible to increase the level of review of a land use without increasing the uses burden of compatibility or class of use, and directed City staff to bring back a revised ordinance at their next meeting accomplishing this objective; and WHEREAS On June 10, 2015, the Yakima City Planning Commission held a second study session regarding the remand of the "Mission" use ordinance at which the City Planning and Legal divisions submitted a two page staff report outlining the issues requested to be addressed, background on the history of the proposed use, staff suggested amendments, and a revised draft definition of the "Mission" use. The Yakima Planning Commission took significant public testimony from members of the public including: the Union Gospel Mission, Gateway Organization, and business and property owners along N. 1st Street. At the conclusion of the study secession, the Planning Commission directed city staff to proof the draft definition, revise the proposed ordinance, and schedule the public hearing for June 24, 2015; and WHEREAS On June 11, 2015, the City of Yakima Planning Division in accordance with YMC Title 16 provided public notice for the proposed Planning Commission remand hearing which included: 1) written notice to parties of record, 2) email to city divisions and media, and 3) Legal add in the Yakima Herald; and WHEREAS On June 24, 2015, the City of Yakima Planning Commission opened the required remand hearing, received additional public input on the proposed ordinance changes, further deliberated 2015 Yakima Planning Commission 4 Findings and Recommendations FILE COPY on the City Council's request to increase the level of review for a "Mission" use to that of a Type (3) Review, and made the following findings; and Now therefore, the Yakima City Planning Commission presents the following findings and recommendations to the Yakima City Council: Based upon a review of the information contained in the City of Yakima Hearing Examiner's 1992 and 1995 Unclassified Use Interpretations, (City of Yakima Interpretations INT#1-92, and INT#2-95), City of Yakima Comprehensive Plan 2025, Yakima Neighborhood Health's supplemental information, exhibits, testimony and other evidence presented at an open record public hearing held on March 25, 2015, and remand hearing of June 24, 2015; and a review of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance; the Planning Commission makes the following: FINDINGS The amendment proposal to establish, further regulate or permit the use of "Mission" as defined by the City of Yakima Interpretations INT#1-92, and INT#2-95, and considered by the City of Yakima Planning Commission at its March 25, 2015, public hearing within the Yakima Municipal Code, Title 15 Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. The requested changes are consistent with the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan by meeting the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan set forth in the General Development, Public Services, Land Use, Transportation, and Utilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Yakima Planning Commission has studied the proposed issues and finds that the proposed ordinance amendment will not have an adverse consequence for adjacent jurisdictions or service providers. There are no regionally significant issues known related to the request; consequently, this request will not significantly contribute to the cumulative impacts of other Comprehensive Plan amendments, and/or zoning amendments. This proposal meets the County -wide Planning Policies and intent of the Growth Management Act because it will provide appropriate land use controls which direct service providers of the homeless populations of Yakima to appropriate zoning districts within the City of Yakima that have the least impact on surrounding business, and residential neighborhoods. YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONCLUSIONS a) The text amendment impacts the Central Business District, General Commercial, and Light Industrial zoning districts of the City. b) No significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified by the approval of the amendment request. c) The requested text amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance is supported by the City of Yakima's Urban Area Comprehensive Plan 2025. d) The amendment to the Yakima Municipal Code, Title 15 Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, which includes, but is not limited to, a new definition in YMC § 15.02, and addition of a new land use category to YMC § 15.04 Table 4-1 Permitted Uses. e) The City of Yakima Planning Commission considered the issues raised by the Yakima City Council on remand at its June 24, 2015, meeting by: 1) considering additional testimony from business and property owners along N. 1 st St. at two public study sessions, and one open record hearing, and 2) elevated the level of review of a "Mission" to that of a Type (3) Review. 2015 Yakima Planning Commission 5 Findings and Recommendations FILE COPY f) The City of Yakima Planning Commission concludes that increasing the level of review of a "Mission" use from a Type (2) to Type (3) Review process does not hinder a mission from locating within the CBD, GC, and M-1 zoning districts, but rather enhances the public's involvement in commenting on such applications. g) The City of Yakima Planning Commission further concludes that due to the impacts of a "Mission" on surrounding businesses, and residential neighborhoods that "Mission" uses should be required to enter into a development agreement between the City of Yakima and applicant/property owner. MOTION Based upon the analysis, findings and conclusions outlined above, it was moved and seconded that the Yakima Planning Commission recommend APPROVAL of the modified text amendment to the Yakima Municipal Code (YMC) Title 15, Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. The motion carried by unanimous vote. Having made the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Planning Commission hereby renders its: RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL The Planning Commission of the City of Yakima, having received and considered all evidence and testimony presented at public hearings, and having received and reviewed the record herein, hereby recommends that the City Council of the City of Yakima APPROVE the zoning Text Amendment application (TXT #001-15 & SEPA #007-15), and accompanying ordinance. RECOMMENDED this 24th day of June, 2015. By: Dave Fonfara, Chairman Yakima Planning Commission 2015 Yakima Planning Commission 6 Findings and Recommendations FI,.,I.R, "l" 01 E UL' EC00l VIII J F]II[I' ,1111' HALVERSON NORTHWEST Raymond G Alexander �M GROUP Adam K, Anderson LAW Gi'CP Alan D. Campbell J. Jay Carroll RECEIVED James S. Elliott RobertN. Faber Mark E. Fickes JUL Q ® Carter L. Fjeld J U L ® 2015 Frederick N, Halverson+ Paul E, Hart+ y� Kellen J Holgate Jul 8 2015 CITY o tr"'��,y'� Lawrence E. Martin' Y COMMUNITY IDE V'ELOPMENT Terry C Schmalz - Linda A, Sellers Michael F. Shinn Sara L Watkins' Planning Commission Stephen R.Wlnfree 129 N. 2nd Street 'Also Oregon Bar Member Yakima, WA 98901 -Of Counsel Re: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (TXT #003-15) Regarding the Yakima Municipal Code's Airport Safety Overlay — YMC Chapter 15.30 Dear Commission Members: Please accept these comments on behalf of our client, Congdon Development Company, LLC and Congdon Orchards, Inc. ("Congdon") in relation to the proposed text amendment to the City of Yakima's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance amending Yakima Municipal Code ("YMC") Chapter 15.30, Airport Safety Overlay ("ASO") which will be presented for public hearing Wednesday, July 8, 2015, before the City of Yakima Planning Commission. Accompanying notice of the hearing was a link to the City of Yakima's Staff Report and draft Ordinance, believed to be indexed as documents A-1 and B-1 in the record of these proceedings. Congdon has previously commented during the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) phase (SEPA No. 020-15) in this text amendment review process, and Congdon's comments are identified in Section IV. Facts: B., of the City Staff Report. The proposed ordinance attached to the Staff Report is different from two recent versions also authored by the City of Yakima's Planning Division. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a copy of the Planning Division's Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) proposed Ordinance dated June 2, 2015 which was provided to the undersigned on June 15, 2015. It was this version of the Ordinance to which Congdon's comments of June 22, 2015 were addressed. The June 22, ASO version deviates from the version accompanying the Staff Report in the following particulars: 1. The definition of "Infill" is more informative and descriptive in the June 2 draft ASO Ordinance, providing as follows: "INFILL: the practice of developing or redeveloping under utilized land in the midst of a community, especially land that is surrounded by existing uses similar to the ones proposed. This may mean further subdivisions of existing parcels to accommodate additional growth, redevelopment of underutilized property to increase its density or intensity, or simply creation -of new development on vacant land." halversonNW.com HALVERSON ! NORTHWEST LAW GROUP P.C. Yakima Office: 4o5 E. Lincoln Avenue I PO Box 2,2550 1 Yakima, WA 98907 1 P) 509.248.6030 10 509.453.688o Sunnyside Office: 9io Franklin Avenue, Suite i I PO Box zzo I Sunnyside, WA 98944 1 P) 509.837.5302 10 50037.2465 July 8, 2015 Page 2 2. The term "non -conforming use" is not found in the draft ASO attached to the Staff Report, but will be found in the June 2, 2015 version (Exhibit "A" hereto), to be defined as follows: "NON -CONFORMING USE: Any use, situation, lot, building or structure that legally existed prior to the adoption of a development regulation that would otherwise prohibit its use." 3. Section 15.30.050 of the overlay Ordinance attached to the Staff Report omits a sentence from the first paragraph which is contained in the June 2, 2015, draft. That sentence reads, "All height limitations shall adhere to the FAA approved airport layout plan." In addition, the last sentence of 15.30.050 attached to the Staff Report says that buildings within Zone 6 shall not exceed "150 -feet" above the airport elevation. Whereas, the same provision in 15.30.050 attached hereto as Exhibit "A" reads as follows: "Height limitation 2 (Zone 6)- no building within this zone shall exceed 35 -feet above the ground. Any building proposed to exceed this height must undergo further review by the Airport Manager and the FAA." 4. Under Section 15.30.060, Land Use Overlay 2, the ASO version attached to the Staff Report omits reference to YMC Section 15.04.030 (from whence the referenced table 4-1 comes). The same Yakima Municipal Code reference to Section 15.04.030 is missing from the Class 1 use sentence under Land Use Overlay 3, but is contained in the June 2, 2015 version attached hereto as Exhibit "A". In addition that version accompanying the Staff Report omits the last sentence of Section 15.30.060 which is set forth in the June 2, 2015 version, as follows: "Any use not specified in the above Sections must undergo review and receive approval from the Airport Manager." 5. Under Section 15.30.070, the version attached to the Staff Report does not include the reference to Class (2) and Class (3) uses as was done in the June 2, 2015 version attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Also, terminology in that section is different. In subsection A.1. the boundary lines must be given as they relate to "land use zones", the terminology in the June 2 version is "land use overlay". Following the submittal of Congdon's June 22, 2015 comments, another version of the ASO was provided to the undersigned which provides Planning Staff with the tools to determine the compatibility of residential development using Class 3 use standards at the time development may be proposed, in order to examine then -existing circumstances affecting the airport. Congdon supports the change made by Planning Staff, and a copy of the revised Ordinance received June 30 modifying Section 15.30.060 Land Use Overlay 2, in red -line, is appended hereto as Exhibit "B". Congdon's substantive remarks are set forth below. First, however, Congdon wishes to point out some technical corrections that should be made even to the June 30 version, Exhibit "B" hereto. Under Section 15.30.040 describing Zone 5, the "sideline zone", after explaining what Zone 5 is, the Section concludes with the following sentence "The risks are lower than in R' cFiVED JUL Q 8 2015 COMMIXTY DW-LOPME4r July 8, 2015 Page 3 Zones 1 through 3 and similar to those of Zone 5." Here we're talking about Zone 5, so the risks of Zone 5 must be similar to some other zone, other than itself. Presumably, if the risks are lower than in Zone 3, the risk would be similar to Zone 4? Also, Section 15.30.070 appears to confuse the nomenclature between Classes of Use and Types of Review. Other sections of the Yakima Municipal Code suggest that 'uses' are categorized by class, and that land use 'review' is categorized by "type". Section 15.30.070.A. fails to make that distinction. Congdon's substantive comments relate generally to the review standard appropriate for development proposals in the future. For example, Exhibit "B" would now provide that residential infill, mixed use residential, and cluster development could be conditionally approved as a Class 3 use on an R-2 zoned parcel located in Airport Safety Overlay Zones 2, 3, or 4. Congdon has a significant number of acres that could someday become the subject of that type of review based upon where these Airport Zones are proposed in relation to the Yakima Air Terminal. Attached hereto as Exhibit "C" is a draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone map provided to the undersigned by City of Yakima Planning Staff. Congdon properties have their zoning designations written on the map. The map, based upon the Yakima Air Terminal Airport Master Plan of May, 2015 recommends building into the ASO mapping an ability to extend runway 9/27 from its existing length of 7,604 feet to 8,847 feet to "preserve the potential for a runway extension should demand for additional length occur in the future, either to accommodate new aircraft or as part of a strategic plan to attract new airport tenants ... determined to be essential to the long- term goal of using the airport as a central component of community economic development." May 2015 Master Plan, Chapter 5, Evaluation of Alternatives, Section 5.1, Table 5-1. If the recommended runway expansion were someday deemed appropriate and necessary then the airport zones depicted in the mapping attached as Exhibit "C" and the heightened review standard of Section 15.30.060 for residential infill as reflected in the draft ASO attached hereto as Exhibit "B" are seemingly appropriate. However, at this time and throughout the 20 -year period covered in the Master Plan there are no conditions identified that would require lengthening of Runway 9/27. In fact, the Master Plan repeatedly states that the current configuration o0f Runway 9/27 is adequate for the planning period. The Master Plan provides: YKM Master Plan Chapter 4: Facility Requirements Table 4-1, Page 4-1: Existing Facility Assessment: The Section entitled "Airfield System" states that the existing runway "provides sufficient take -off length for all of the aircraft forecasted to use the airport." JUL2015 CITY OF YAMMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 8, 2015 Page 4 Page 4-4, the final sentence on Page 4-4, of the Master Plan states that the 9/27 runway length is "adequate" and cites FAA Advisory Circular 150/5325- 46 entitled Runway Length Requirements for Airport Design in so concluding. Section 4.3 Runway Capacity: This section does not address runway length per se, but rather the ability of the runways to accommodate existing and forecast aircraft activity levels. The final sentence on page 4-10 states that "demand levels forecast for YKM will not exceed the capacity of the [existing] runway system." Section 4.3.2 Requirement Recommendation: The first sentence of this Section provides "the preceding analysis shows the current runway length of 7,604 feet on Runway 9/27 is sufficient for all future operations by all aircraft types, except for the airbus A319 and 320 and the Boeing 737, 777, and 747 aircraft." However, there is no projected forecast for these commercial aircraft to operate from the Yakima Air Terminal on a commercial basis to distant destinations. Section 5.2 Runway Alternatives: 5.2.1 Runway 9/27 Page 5-5 This Section of the Master Plan ties the concept of economic development to a runway extension at some future time. While economic development and a runway extension may be related, there are no forecast scenarios as to what kind of economic development might justify a runway extension. The point Congdon is making is that the laudable goal of providing the ability to expand in the future does not necessarily mean it will ever be justified and occur. In fact, the airport's thoroughly prepared Master Plan states the opposite. This means that a revised ASO that is based on a runway extension is solely for the purpose of keeping "options open." Since runway length is a factor in determining the dimensions of the airport safety zones, if at the time a development proposal is made there is still no forecast justification for expanding the runway, then Congdon suggests that the level of review for an otherwise permitted activity under the City of Yakima's Zoning Ordinance should not receive heightened review (should be at most Type 2 review) where it can be shown that the Airport Safety Overlay Zone extends too far because of the forecast expansion. And while it is much better to have some review than no review, as would have been the case under the June 2 version of the ASO upon which Congdon commented, Type 3 review RECEIVED CITY Ol YAMMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT July 8, 2015 Page 5 would seem to place an undue burden upon any developer who could demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff that there is no more likelihood for runway expansion when the residential development proposal is received sometime in the future, than there is now and using Airport Safety Overlay Zones extending beyond their reasonable confines based upon a future hope for runway expansion would no longer be appropriate. Congdon's Recommendation: Congdon's suggestion in this regard would be to incorporate a provision within the ASO calling for Type 2 review for otherwise consistent zoning uses in areas outside ASO mapping based on the expansion of Runway 9/27. In other words, there would be two maps, one with the Airport Safety Overlay Zones drawn based upon no runway expansion, and another just like that attached hereto as Exhibit "C". If there was a proposed development allowable under the ASO map drawn based upon the current runway length configurations that would be a Type 2 review, which the Planning Staff always has the option to elevate to Type 3 review based upon then -existing facts and circumstances, and if the likelihood of runway expansion where actually in the forecast at the time such an application were received then the Type 3 review standard could be applied. The other substantive comment Congdon wishes to make concerns Airport Safety Overlay Zone 5, which purports to allow "only airport uses and activities". See Section 15.30.060. On the attached Exhibit "C", are identified three Congdon parcels zoned M- 1, partially located within the confines of Airport Safety Overlay Zone 5, Two of the parcels are better depicted in the attached Exhibit "D". That property is currently used for agricultural practices, and Congdon has recently been working with Airport Manager, Rob Peterson, to coordinate planting of the properties de-picted in Exhibit "D," in hops. (Congdon has already sent in materials to the FAA for approval because of the hop trellises.) The Airport Safety Overlay Ordinance, Section 15.30.080 allows non- conforming uses to continue, and even be expanded through YMC Chapter 15.19. But under the ASO this property of Congdon's would be forever relegated to agricultural use (as a legal non -conforming use even with anticipated FAA approval for growing hops) or "airport uses and activities" although it has no access to existing airport infrastructure. Meanwhile, another portion of this property, right now, is being investigated by the entity interested in building new soccer fields near the airport, for use as overflow parking and for R.V. camping. Presumably, if the current version of the ASO were adopted these uses would be prohibited. (Dr. Lloyd Butler has recently asked this very question of Yakima's Community Development Director, Joan Davenport, in an email dated June 30, 2015, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "E"). Congdon is not aware whether any response has been given to date. In summary, the proposed absolute prohibition on anything other than airport uses and activities in Zone 5 (other than pre-existing non -conforming uses) strikes the undersigned as overly restrictive if, as defined by the proposed ASO, Zone 5 is one in which "aircraft do not normally fly over" and its risks are "lower than in Zones 1 and 3 and similar to 'Zone 4'? Shouldn't Zone 5 be permitted uses consistent with other Airport Safety Overlay JI.11, 0 8 201 CITY OF YAKIW July 8, 2015 Page 6 Zones with which it is similar? There is the potential that this restriction, if it does not line up with a reasonable public health and safety risk, could constitute a regulatory taking of property without compensation as being overly restrictive. Congdon recommendation: Congdon suggests that when Section 15.30.040 is corrected to reflect the proper zone to which Zone 5 is similar, that similar use allowances and restrictions should apply to it, and that it should be differentiated from Zone 1, which is clearly the area with greatest risk, "Zone 1 is where the greatest concentration of accidents take place." See the last sentence of Zone 1 under proposed YMC Section 15.30.040. Congdon is not intending to be hypercritical of City Planning Staff and the Yakima Air Terminal Board's attempts at improving the ASO. It has needed improvement for many years and this version has been the product of many meeting hours and consultation with qualified consultants. And Congdon is not critical of a plan which attempts to preserve flexibility for the airport going forward, although Congdon also wishes flexibility in planning for the future use of its property. We've advocated two substantive modifications of the ordinance to build in flexibility so as to enable Planning Staff to balance the interests of property owners and the airport in the future, when a concrete development proposal is made. Congdon suggests that this open record hearing be kept open and concluded at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to see how its suggestions might be received by Planning Staff and incorporated into a final recommended version of the Airport Safety Overlay Ordinance. Sincerely, Halverson I Michal F. Shinn "S/jlf closures GAHA Conflicted\MFS1CONGDON DEVELOPMENT CO.18353WAT-ASO-0021tr to City of Yakima Planning Commission 7,7.15.rev.docx Afl,,- i -i 8 (.) ii 'ry OF YAKNA COMMUNITY 0 V 1 opmr. tl, Sections: 15.30.010 15.30.020 15.30.030 15.30.040 15.30.050 15.30.060 15.30.070 15.30.080 15.30.010 PURPOSE, Exhibit "A" PROPOSED NEW Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY Purpose Applicability Definitions Airport Safety Overlay Zones Height Limitation Land Use Overlay Application Requirements Nonconforming Uses The airport safety overlay is intended to �t the airspace arour' Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field and any other state and �I system airports fro ace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proximl the Y Air Terrain cAllister Field or other public airport with defin�jspace per Fetl✓,ron Regulations () Part 77. Property within the airport safety; and fuel particulates, as may be used for aircraft na on and fli operating withiirre a. The provisions of f us 0(' `�� 1th1n t AIRPORT: The Ya property design airport. _T axp o aircraft noise, vibration, fumes, dust operate f h aircraft, now known or hereafter �jlf air spp.r landing at, taking off from, or .lands, buildings, structures, natural features or Fthe Airport Overlay District and designated on Surfaces map which identifies areas of height map. ished for the purpose of protecting the airspace of the Yakima Air any other state and federal system airport. 'urinal at McAllister Field operated by the City of Yakima including all Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field Master Plan as part of the AIRPORT ELEVATION: The highest point of an airport's useable landing area measured in feet from sea level. The Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field is one thousand forty nine feet (1049') above mean sea level. AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA: Includes airport property and all land within the Airport Safety Overlay Zones 1 through 6 as described in YMC 15.30.040 and depicted in the Airport Safety Zones map adopted in the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Filed Master Plan. Airport Safety Overlay i�1 DRAFT for City Council —June 2, 2015 JUL 0 8 2015 BTY OF YAKWA Exhibit "A" APPROACH SURFACE: An imaginary surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline, extending outward and upward from the end of the primary surface and at the same slope as the approach zone height limitation slope set forth in YMC 15.30.050. The perimeter of the approach surface coincides with the perimeter of the approach zone. CONICAL SURFACE: An imaginary surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface at a slope of twenty to one (20:1) for a horizontal distance of four thousand feet (4,000'). DEED NOTICE: A formal statement provided in YMC 15.30.??? as a note on the face of a short plat, major subdivision or binding site plan or recorded age" % he property notifying potential property owners that the property is located adjacent ctive airport and said property may be impacted by aircraft noise, odors, vibration, and I I� aircraft.. FAA FORM 7460-1, NOTICE OF PROPOSED CO CTION TERATION: A form which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) req be complete�pyone who is proposing to constructor alter an object that could aff space within the airp ' fluence area and allows the FAA to conduct an airspace analysiermine whether the owill adversely affect airspace or navigational aids.,, , %; FAR PART 77 SURFACES: The 9 CFR of th , Viral Aviation Re ulation that deals with objects affecting navigable airsp ✓ g FAR PART 77 ZONES: Imaginary airs '�e sur ����t ablishRI hi relation to each runway of an airport. There ar '�� i of surfacw. 1) pri 0r (3) transitional; (4) horizontal; and (5) conic J� / %r r `Wk. HAZARD TO AIR 1 )CATION obstructi,(� etermined to have a substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficier iz �. a navi ' ars ace.. H �� g p pose tern nilimits in all zones and as shown on the Yakima erminal atter F tore Parte nes map, this datum shall be height above mean s el elevation u� othespecified. HORI ; L SURFACE: ] rizon ane one hundred fifty feet (150') above the established airporta n, the pert er of which plane coincides with the inner perimeter of the conical surface. This ven hu, d ninety nine feet (1199') above mean sea level for the Yakima Air Terminal at Meter F� INFILL: The practice ROveloping or redeveloping vacant or underutilized land in the midst of a community, especially land that is surrounded by existing uses similar to the ones proposed. This may mean further subdivisions of existing parcels to accommodate additional growth, redevelopment of under-utilized property to increase its density or intensity, or simply creation of new development on vacant land. NONCONFORMING USE: Any use, situation, lot, building or structure that legally existed prior to the adoption of a development regulation that would otherwise prohibit its use. Airport Safety Overlay DRAFT for City Council —June 2, 2015 JUL. 0 8 2015 2 TY OF YAKI A COMMI NRTY DEVELOPMENT Exhibit "A" OBSTRUCTION: Any object of natural growth, terrain, of permanent or temporary construction or alteration, including equipment or materials used therein which exceeds a limiting height set forth in YMC 15.30.050. OBJECT OF NATURAL GROWTH: Means a tree, shrub or similar organic or vegetative matter. PRECISION APPROACH: A landing approach made without visual reference to the ground by the use of aircraft instruments and ground-based electronic or communications systems or devices. An aircraft making such an approach should be flying in accordance with an IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) flight plan. PRIMARY SURFACE: A surface longitudinally centered or "., day with a width of one thousand feet (1,000') for instrument approaches and five-hun � . t (500') for visual approaches. When the runway has a specially prepared hard surface,,I urface extends two hundred feet beyond each end of the runway. The elevation point o� rimary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the ru centerline. The tion of the Primary Surface at the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister one thousand forty�eet (1049') above mean sea level. i .. RUNWAY: A defined area on length. irport TRANSITIONAL SURFACES: TheseA the runway centerline, and runway for each foot ver'from th r /�.. War=rlilff=9Gf _1 « r and take-off`�'f�,-,aircraft along its rd at ninety -degree angles to of seven feet (7') horizontally roach surfaces to where they r the operation of aircraft using visual approach �,,ach procedure and no instrument designation ong%is zone encompasses the runway protection zone (RPZ) at ho 6 the RPZ dimensions established in accordance with FAA !pend mostly on the visibility minimums for the approach to that the zone are the strips of land immediately adjacent to the runway structures. Zone 1 is where the greatest concentration of accidents Zone 2 — Inner Approach/Departure Zone —This zone wraps around and extends beyond Zone 1 along the runway centerline. Next to the RPZ, it represents the area where the risk of aircraft accidents is the greatest. On departure, aircraft are typically at full power in the initial phase of climb. On approach, they are at low altitude as they prepare for landing. Zone 3 — Inner Turning Zone —This zone is a wedge-shaped area lying along the sides of Zone 2. It is primarily significant at general aviation airports where most of the flights are visual. At airports where most aircraft approach and depart on instrument flight plans, then the close -in turns which are the concern with Zone 3 can be a narrow wedge. When operating visually, departing aircraft Airport Safety Overlay DRAFT for City Council — June 2, 2015 JUL tI 8 2015 3 CITY O� YAKIMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Exhibit "A" may begin turning over this area to fly toward their destination or to remain in the traffic pattern. Arriving aircraft often overfly this area as well, especially if they are flying a tight pattern. One type of accident known to occur in this area is a low -altitude stall -spin that can happen if a pilot attempts to make too tight of a turn. Zone 4 — Outer Approach/Departure Zone — This area lies beyond Zone 3 along the extended runway centerline. Aircraft flying straight out or in overfly this area at low -altitude. The zone is particularly significant on runways where much of the operations are on instrument procedures and at busy airports where elongated traffic patterns are common. The risks in this area are moderate, but less than in Zones 1 through 3. ,/r Zone 5 —Sideline Zone —Lying Cnarrow�,bam normally fly over the sideline zorincip while landing or just after takeoff. The risks ar those of Zone 5. Al. Zone 6 — Traffic Pattern Zone — The final q V(, where aircraft fly as they approach and 6 Zone 6 is typically larger than the other zone lj take place here, but they are s kKed over the 15.30.050 HEIGHT LIMITATION. The height limitation zones are he' est4l Objects AffectinP1, �1 Airspace are to the FAA app; airp ;tryout plaMR/a,, Height Lim itatic� 'I one 1,�%' , 4, and aboveground. �iit (Zon s N VIII b building proto IN heig ae FAA. 15.W AND USE 0° AYS. ✓ ide of the runway, aircraft do not ircraft that lose directional control ;fines 1 through 3 and similar to ntains the remaind"0 he airport environment e airport or are engage fight training. In area, bbinp;1' ubstantial pr tage of accidents consisf with the FAR Part 77 Surfaces — Iow:�,� height limitations shall adhere o building within this zone shall exceed 35 -feet rfis zone shall exceed 35 -feet above the ground. undergo further review by the Airport Manager Zones des&friibelow ar own in the Airport Safety Overlay Zone (ASOZ) map with the types of land use re�� Liste ow in order to promote general safety and welfare of properties surrounding the a�, the continued viability of the airport. Land Use Overlay 1 (.ne 1 and 5 — Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) and Sideline Safety Zone): only airport uses and activities are allowed within the RPZ and Sideline Safety Zone. Land Use Overlay 2 (Zone 2, 3 and 4 — Inner Safety Zone, Inner Turning Zone, and Outer Safety Zone): Class (1) Uses—Any Class (1) use listed in YMC § 15.04.030 Table 4-1— Permitted Land Uses, unless otherwise mentioned in this section. Airport Safety Overlay DRAFT for City Council — June 2, 2015 TY OF MAMMA COMMUNITY 0 EYELOPMENT Exhibit "A" Class (2) Uses—Agricultural building; Agricultural related business; Animal husbandry; Correction facilities; Golf Courses; Campground; Gymnasiums, exercise facilities; Motels and Hotels; Canning, preserving, and packaging fruits, vegetables, and other foods; Cement and concrete plants; Concrete gypsum and plaster products; Power generating facilities; Utility services. Class (3) Uses — Agricultural market; Junior or Community College; Business school; Vocational school; Bed and breakfast inn; Communication towers; Prohibited Uses — Schools (K-12), community centers, nursing home and group homes, day care facilities, hospital', new residential, new churches, shopping centers and other uses with similar concentrations of persons, rendering plants and slaughter �„ ,i s. Other prohibited uses shall be; Horse racing tracks, speedways; The production of a . "paving and roofing materials; rock crushing; fuel storage facilities; storage or use of t amounts of materials which are explosive, flammable, toxic, corrosive or otherwi� ibitt' rl'ous characteristics; hazardous wildlife attractants including waste disposal W ions, wat. nagement and storm water facilities with above -ground water storage:/non-made wetlarir,. Land Use Overlay 3 (Zone 6 — Traffic Class (1) Uses — Any Class (1) otherwise mentioned in this Class (2) Uses — Retirement horn and group homes; Day care facil Chemicals (indItura generating fajjparl"'PIP, Class (3) Uses — nd Uses, unless ples; Convalescent, nursing home cilities; Communication towers; kol and Slaughter houses; Power r uses with similar concentrations of persons. se allowed. undergo review and receive approval from the FOR CLASS (2) AND CLASS (3) USES. (2) and Type (3) uses within the airport safety overlay established iIe following information: ary lines as they relate to the boundaries of the Land Use Overlay 2. Location, elevation, and height of all existing and proposed buildings, structures, utility lines, and trees taller than thirty-five feet in height; 3. A description of the proposed use; and 4. A statement of compatibility from the airport manager when the use is to be located within the airport safety overlay relative to the impact of the use on airport operations and safety. Airport Safety Overlay DRAFT for City Council — June 2, 2015 JUL 15 8 Z015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Exhibit "A" B. In consideration of an application for a building, structure, or other use which will exceed thirty-five feet in height, the administrative official may require the applicant to submit either of the following: 1. A certificate from a registered professional engineer ora licensed land surveyor, which clearly states that no airspace obstruction will result from the proposed use, or 2. Either or both of the following: a. The maximum elevations of proposed structures based on the established airport elevation and USGS datum. Elevations shall be deb fined by a registered professional engineer or a licensed land surveyor, accurate to r minus one foot, shown as mean sea level elevation or other available survey rhe accuracy of all elevations shall be certified by the engineer or surveyor. 61'. b. A map of topographic contou land within one hundred feet of th sought. This map shall also bear professional engineer. (Ord. 2008-1 C. Decisions by the ad appealed in accordance with (part), 1986). Existing uses t and will be co Ch. 15.19. For a Airport Safety Overlay DRAFT for City Council — June 2, 2015 '.not more Of posed structure( rification of a licen intervals, showing all :h the permit is being urveyor or registered (part), 2001). pe (2) and Type preview may be 018-46 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 2947 § 1 I(e W option of this Overlay may remain nsion of t ese uses is permitted through YMC height, the height may not be increased unless CITY OF YAKlMA 6 IMaWo0-1 PROPOSED NEW Chapter 15.30 AIRPORT SAFETY OVERLAY Sections: 15.30.010 Purpose 15.30.020 Applicability 15.30.030 Definitions 15.30.040 Airport Safety Overlay Zones 15.30.050 Height Limitation 15.30.060 Land Use Overlay 15.30.070 Application Requirements 15.30.080 Nonconforming Uses 15.30.010 PURPOSE. The airport safety overlay is intended to., t the airspace arou s. he Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field and any other state and e I system ,airports fr m r ace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses in proxim they Air Termin cAllister Field or other public airport with defin space per Fe t on Regulations( Part 77. Property within the airport safet r xray be expo o aircraft noise vibration, fumes dust and fuel particulates, as may beNererufi operati�oaircraft now known or hereafter used for aircraft n% g ton and flig' 11 us h, wd air SP a � dor landing at, taking off from, or operating with Oat a„wr �p area.,,:' 15.30.020 The provisions of th hapt � h If „apply to�00 ands, buildings, structures, natural features or useAlf�ld Idcate :O,it�1 in thd�6,t 4' t t dr fined by��the Airport Overlay District and designated on . mr the anima Air T µrnaI it: Allister Fi (d P e, '7 Surfaces map which identifies areas of height %l!'Atations and thd`„Airport Saf t 19verlay Z060's map. 15.304r 401 DEFINITIONS The following terms are established for the purpose of protecting the airspace of the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field o� any other state and federal system airport. AIRPORT: The Yakir aAirT irninal at McAllister Field operated by the City of Yakima including all property designated 'in the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field Master Plan as part of the airport. AIRPORT ELEVATION: The highest point of an airport's useable landing area measured in feet from sea level. The Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field is one thousand forty nine feet (1049') above mean sea level. AIRPORT INFLUENCE AREA: Includes airport property and all land within the Airport Safety Overlay Zones 1 through 6 as described in YMC 15.30.040 and depicted in the Airport Safety Zones map adopted in the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Filed Master Plan. Airport Safety Overlay '0 ! q &f'1 CITY OF YAPKI A COMMUNITY DIE.VEL PMENT Exhibit "B" APPROACH SURFACE: An imaginary surface longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline, extending outward and upward from the end of the primary surface and at the same slope as the approach zone height limitation slope set forth in YMC 15.30.050. The perimeter of the approach surface coincides with the perimeter of the approach zone. CONICAL SURFACE: An imaginary surface extending outward and upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface at a slope of twenty to one (20:1) for a horizontal distance of four thousand feet (4,000'). DEED NOTICE: A formal statement provided in YMC 15.30.??? as a note on the face of a short plat, major subdivision or binding site plan or recorded agaaf ,�, the property notifying potential property owners that the property is located adjacent ),, ctive airport and said property may be impacted by aircraft noise, odors, vibration, a¢ld lctg.aircraft. FAA FORM 7460-1, NOTICE OF PROPOSED COQ r�f�CTiON OyATERATION. A form which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) raga „p�' a be complete ".w'n nyone who is proposing to construct or alter an object that could of . space within the airp+ fluence area and allows the FAA to conduct an airspace analysis It ermine whether the o f will adversely affect h airspace or navigational aids. FAR PART 77 SURFACES: Thel� 9 CFR of the' k5ral Aviation Regulatidn that deals with objects affecting navigable airsp FAR PART 77 ZONES: Imaginary airl airport. There ar,f'�r of surfa 011'and (5) conicl,", HAZARD TO AIR "NVIATI the safe and efficie ili: relation to each runway of an (3) transitional; (4) horizontal; etermined to have a substantial adverse effect on airspace, FCOOT,: "Fr �r'th pur�pose p �rl�term�ndrag � peight'limits in all zones and as shown on the Yakima Af4erminal at i6'c ,,hster F e(ci Lure Part 7726nes map, this datum shall be height above mean sea„ (�yel elevation u`a^ii4s,6other`w"r ' ;specified. HORIZONTAL SURFACE A'liiprizontal :plane one hundred fifty feet (150') above the established airport e9 6vtion, the perimeter of which plane coincides with the inner perimeter of the conical surface. This is eleven hundred ninety nine feet (1199') above mean sea level for the Yakima Air Terminal at McAI(lfer Field INFILL: The practice of.d'eveloping or redeveloping vacant or underutilized land in the midst of a community, especially land that is surrounded by existing uses similar to the ones proposed. This may mean further subdivisions of existing parcels to accommodate additional growth, redevelopment of under-utilized property to increase its density or intensity, or simply creation of new development on vacant land. NONCONFORMING USE: Any use, situation, lot, building or structure that legally existed prior to the adoption of a development regulation that would otherwise prohibit its use. Airport Safety Overlay ff" AMIM JUL o 8 2015' N Tr YAKIMA Exhibit T" OBSTRUCTION: Any object of natural growth, terrain, of permanent or temporary construction or alteration, including equipment or materials used therein which exceeds a limiting height set forth in YMC 15.30.050. OBJECT OF NATURAL GROWTH: Means a tree, shrub or similar organic or vegetative matter. PRECISION APPROACH: A landing approach made without visual reference to the ground by the use of aircraft instruments and ground-based electronic or communications systems or devices. An aircraft making such an approach should be flying in accordance with an IFR (Instrument Flight Rules) flight plan. PRIMARY SURFACE: A surface longitudinally centered ori;-„ 4prvay with a width of one thousand d op, i1��',�ny' feet (1,000') for instrument approaches and five-hund� ,,O' ° t (500') for visual approaches. When t fcthe runwayhas a specially prepared hard surface, iar�yurface extends two hundred feet beyond each end of the runway. The elevation of a " y y. point or�rlmary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the ru ' enterl'ine. Th K r tion ofthe PrimarySurface at the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister :f one thousand forty�i eel (1049') above mean sea level. �. RUNWAY: A defined area onairport 2,1� length. i�w„ and take offlofl ircraft along its TRANSITIONAL SURFACES: These'lrftgin `rye, urLfaces ex ` %,outward at ninety -degree angles to the runway centerline, and run way terli�� ded, at e of seven feet (7') horizontally for each foot vertu{1� from tff�e sed sof t Marl ani ° "proach surfaces to where they �.rr'�„; v' 2..;+a. t, spin , G.c intersect with he orizohta rd 111, f p s VISUAL RUNWAY.,runway w �nded soiely�'r the operation of aircraft using visual approach procedures, with no st"I igIJC )r; iYi'str anent aop,,Ioach procedure and no instrument designation andsa rid or, ahwFAA al5prav a agrport1a"yoagt plan.', S(i, 0.040 AIRPORT �Af ETV" D E LAY ZONE: S Zone Runway ProtLactlgn Zones This zone encompasses the runway protection zone (RPZ) at each end :f the runway'aha should use the RPZ dimensions established in accordance with FAA standards (APZ dimensions "rj pend mostly on the visibility minimums for the approach to that runway end) Alio included 10lthe zone are the strips of land immediately adjacent to the runway where FAA standardspr6cly.4 structures. Zone 1 is where the greatest concentration of accidents take place. Zone 2 — Inner Approach/Departure Zone —This zone wraps around and extends beyond Zone 1 along the runway centerline. Next to the RPZ, it represents the area where the risk of aircraft accidents is the greatest. On departure, aircraft are typically at full power in the initial phase of climb. On approach, they are at low altitude as they prepare for landing. Zone 3 — Inner Turning Zone — This zone is a wedge-shaped area lying along the sides of Zone 2. It is primarily significant at general aviation airports where most of the flights are visual. At airports where most aircraft approach and depart on instrument flight plans, then the close -in turns which are the concern with Zone 3 can be a narrow wedge. When operating visually, departing aircraft Airport Safety Overlay RE-OCEIVED 3 JUL 0 8 2015 QTY OF 'AI COMMI,JNITY DEVELOPMENT Exhibit "B" may begin turning overt his area to fly toward their destination or to remain in the traffic pattern. Arriving aircraft often overfly this area as well, especially if they are flying a tight pattern. One type of accident known to occur in this area is a low -altitude stall -spin that can happen if a pilot attempts to make too tight of a turn. Zone 4 — Outer Approach/Departure Zone — This area lies beyond Zone 3 along the extended runway centerline. Aircraft flying straight out or in overfly this area at low -altitude. The zone is particularly significant on runways where much of the operations are on instrument procedures and at busy airports where elongated traffic patterns are common. The risks in this area are moderate, but less than in Zones 1 through 3. LL� Zone 5 — Sideline Zone —Lying in narrow bands alongh side of the runway, aircraft do not normally fly over the sideline zone. The principal ri k'jls f o� 1rcraft that lose directional control while landing or just after takeoff. The risks are la t thari`,10, ones 1 through 3 and similar to those of Zone 5.yw`n,,r�: Zone 6 — Traffic Pattern Zone — The final b " where aircraft fly as they approach and d k Zone 6 is typically larger than the other zonefi take place here, but they are s,ed over the 15.30.050 HEIGHT LIMITATION, Lains the remain airport oCare er 37 bstantial he airport environment h1h%ght In area, ntaee of accidents The height limitation zones are he(6 y estdbli df( d, consistent �.i�th the FAR Part 77 Surfaces — Objects Affecting Y�, vigg'ol Airspace 4 ',, are de ri ed,d�elow )1"height limitations shall adhere to the FAA aped airpdr (rout plan.,, Height Limitation '! (Zone 1, R, ° 4, and 0 -Vo building within this zone shall exceed 35 -feet above the ground. I4ei t,Lli lt,atjoo'> „Zone ) -4,No buil+ ing'o n this zone shall exceed 35 -feet above the ground. AhVbuilding proposed to exce tl thls helght'mw t undergo further review by the Airport Manager and he FAA. 15.30.Q6d LAND USE OVERLAYS. Zones described below are shown in the Airport Safety Overlay Zone (ASOZ) map with the types of land use revlrpv_rr„_listen below In order to promote general safety and welfare of properties surrounding the airport and'the continued viability of the airport. Land Use Overlay 1 (Zone 1 and 5 — Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) and Sideline Safety Zone): only airport uses and activities are allowed within the RPZ and Sideline Safety Zone. Land Use Overlay 2 (Zone 2, 3 and 4 — Inner Safety Zone, Inner Turning Zone, and Outer Safety Zone): Class (1) Uses— Any Class (1) use listed in YMC § 15.04.030 Table 4-1— Permitted Land Uses, unless otherwise mentioned in this section. Airport Safety OverlayEIVED R 4 JUL 0 8 2015 CITY 01; YAKIMA Exhibit "B" Class (2) Uses—Agricultural building; Agricultural related business; Animal husbandry; Correction facilities; Golf Courses; Campground; Gymnasiums, exercise facilities; Motels and Hotels; Canning, preserving, and packaging fruits, vegetables, and other foods; Cement and concrete plants; Concrete gypsum and plaster products; Power generating facilities; Utility services. Class (3) Uses — Agricultural market; Junior or Community College; Business school; Vocational school; Bed and breakfast inn; Communication towers; Residential Infill; Mixed -Use Residential; Cluster Development Prohibited Uses — Schools (K-12), community centers, nursing home and group homes, day care facilities, hospital,,Aew-FP4def4W, new churches, shoppip ;'lc nters and other uses with similar concentrations of persons, rendering plants and slaught rah "Is s, Other prohibited uses shall be; Horse racing tracks, speedways; The production o I�aG suing and roofing materials; rock crushing; fuel storage facilities; storage or use o`f nifNcat%rnounts of materials which are explosive, flammable, toxic, corrosive or oth j exhibit ha hr' s characteristics; hazardous wildlife attractants including waste disprations, wate%ement and storm water facilities with above -ground waterstora�. a man-made wetlands,, Land Use Overlay 3 (Zone 6 —Traffic Pattern ) Class (1) Uses—Any Class (1) a Mhj YMC § 15 O Table 4-1— Permitted�i.and' Uses, unless „rW ti otherwise mentioned in this Y. MC Class (2) Uses Retirement home, N)�rches,sgues, tepgNs; Convalescent, nursing home and group homy c r facilites' d center � 6 r tion t cwliti s,; Communication towers; Chemicals (An$Ws4, agricultural, woou, et ,, to rdefi g I nts and Slaughter houses; Power generating fac(C� Class ( Uses —Amds (gentTark,,, s ibitbi Uses S,phooi '; 2), hospitals and other uses with similar concentrations of persons. ,ep�acement ore einsion of,eAlsting schooIss all be allowed. Any, use, not specified in the above sbctions must undergo review and receive approval from the Airport Mkbpager. 15.30.070 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS (2) AND CLASS (3) USES. A. Applications>forape (2) and Type (3) uses within the airport safety overlay established by this chapter shall include the following information: 1. Property boundary lines as they relate to the boundaries of the Land Use Overlay 2. Location, elevation, and height of all existing and proposed buildings, structures, utility lines, and trees taller than thirty-five feet in height; 3. A description of the proposed use; and 4. A statement of compatibility from the airport manager when the use is to be located within the airport safety overlay relative to the impact of the use on airport operations and safety. Airport Safety Overlay RECEIVED CDIVED 5 JUL 0 8 2015 CITY OF yAMMA (30M 1109 DEVELOPMENT i i„ P ENT Exhibit "B" B. In consideration of an application for a building, structure, or other use which will exceed thirty-five feet in height, the administrative official may require the applicant to submit either of the following: 1. A certificate from a registered professional engineer or a licensed land surveyor, which clearly states that no airspace obstruction will result from the proposed use, or 2. Either or both of the following: a. The maximum elevations of proposed structures based on the established airport elevation and USGS datum. Elevations shall be det t Tined by a registered professional engineer or a licensed land surveyor, accurate to I'U ibr minus one foot, shown as mean sea level elevation or other available surveyed e accuracy of all elevations shall be certified by the engineer or surveyor.g, b. A map of topographic cont land within one hundred feet of sought. This map shall also bear professional engineer. (Ord. 200 C. Decisions by the adrx� 'KK" appealed to the hearing e1i iI 11 2008: Ord. 2947 § 1(part), 1986), 15.30.080 NONCONFORMING USES ursi,ynot more th'"� e -foot intervals, showing all rosed structure (s� v hich the permit is being �erification of a licensed urveyor or registered -46° art), 2 Ord. 2001 4 (part), 2001). official pe (2) and Type (review may be Pante with "a "' Chapter 15.16. (Ord. 2008-46 § 1(part), Existing uses at; ici not rrieefu#ese starsftds and will be COW', noncsr,prming used 'tiit Ch. 15.19. For a us6, Jh` t is nosy on 'forming dq. ,, approy byµ e Airport l " - K Airport Safety Overlay iie tir ie f adoption of this Overlay may remain nsion of fh'ese uses is permitted through YMC height, the height may not be increased unless RECTIVED L.. 0 8 2015 6 CITY Of; YAII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I W+ S Draft Airport Safety Overlay Zone Revision 1/12/2015 2.500 um c P.1 S--,-- Ean, D$Lwne, NAVTEQ, T.MT.m, W—ap, JPC, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Gsofts., IGN, K d Star NL Ordnance Survey, E56 Japan, METI Geri China I I K—I�M. end Ihe C43 t�w.- O,�muy Legersd ---dy Q—wki�A- uj 5. P.1 S--,-- Ean, D$Lwne, NAVTEQ, T.MT.m, W—ap, JPC, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, Gsofts., IGN, K d Star NL Ordnance Survey, E56 Japan, METI Geri China I I K—I�M. end Ihe C43 t�w.- O,�muy Exhibit "D" 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Exhibit "E" Mike Shinn From: Dick Woodin <dick@congdonorchards.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 8:12 AM To: Mike Shinn Subject: FW: R V Park parcel #18133442002 Mike, I was copied on this from the soccer guys ... I will be interested in Joan's reply. Dick From: Lloyd Butler [mailto:doctorbutler@charter.net] Sent: 6/30/2015 6:41 AM To: Davenport, Joan Cc: kerry@sozosports.net; 'Dick Woodin' Subject: R V Park parcel #18133442002 Good morning, Joan, Thank you for all the good work you and your team are doing on developing this Yakima sports complex. This is just a small reminder to check on the possible airport restrictions on the use of parcel #18133442002. As you will recall, SOZO hopes to use it for overflow parking and for R.V. camping. Thanks, Dr. B. ,q,%j %1 r." JUL 0 8 2015 1 CITY OF, YAKW Appendix Compatibility Criteria Table -1 Maximum Residential Density Compatibility Zones Zone 1 LZone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Maximum Residential Density Average Number of Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Agricultural 0 Maintain current comprehensive (farmland/forest) plan designation and zoning designation Rural 0 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per (outside an urban growth boundary) 10 acres 10 acresA 5 acresA 10 acresA 5 acres Urban 0 0 B c B C (within the urban growth boundary) Maximum Intensities for Nonresidential Uses (Commercial, Industrial, Offices, and Activities) Average Number of People Units Per Gross Acre ........... ....... Agricultural 1-5E D, E D, E D, E D, F D (farmland/forest) Rura(oultside an urban growth bounda ) ry 1-5E 10-25E 10-25E 40-60E 100-150E 100-150c Urban!! (within the urban growth boundary) 1-5E 50-75E 80-120E 100-150E 100-150E No Limits Notes: A Cluster to preserve open space to maintain open approach corridor at and near runway ends. B Infill development up to average of surrounding residential area is allowed, but is appropriate only if nonresidential uses are not feasible C Promote high density and intensity mixed use development (15 or more d.u. per acre) D Maintain current comprehensive plan designation and zoning designation. E Special Function Land uses should be prohibited. F 50-100 people per acre allowed if on airport and aviation -related. G Special Function Land uses should be avoided. WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-1 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-2 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Compatibilty Zones Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 A. Resource Operations 1. Agricultural (Commercial) Agriculture, horticulture, general farming P P P P P P (crops only, not feedlots and stockyards) Agricultural building L L P P P P Agricultural chemical sales/storage X_ wL P P P P Agricultural Housing/Farm labor X X L P L P Agricultural housing/farm labor X X L P L P Agricultural market X X P P X P -.....�.. Agricultural related industries ............ X L .-- . P P P P Animal husbandry X L L L X P Agricultural feeding operation or stockyards X X X X X X . d processing facility Agriculture or food rocessm facil.. _ X L P P L P Livestock auction X X X L X P ....... Fairgrounds X X w......_ X ........ X X ........... P —Fairgrounds Floriculture, aquaculture X L P P P P Fruit bin sales/storage X L P P P P 2. Forest (Commercial) General forest silver culture L L I P P P P Forest product processing X L P P P P 3. Mining/Refining/Offsite Hazardous Waste Treatment Asphalt paving and roofing materials, rock crushing X X L L L P Mining including sand and gravel pits X L L L X P Stockpiling of earthen materials X L L L X P B. Rural Development 1. Rural Residential ............ ._.-..-._ ..-__ ... ......WW_ Single-family dwelling (large lot, 5 acres or greater*) X L L P X P _............. ... _._ Single-family dwelling, rural centers X X L L X L Residential Cluster Development, 40% open X X LSC X X P ...�__ ....... _w. ......� Multi -family dwelling X X X X X P Temporary farm housing X X P P L P Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-2 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-3 January 2011 Compatibilty Zones Zone 1 I Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 2. Rural Centers --- _----- ___ ............... . Single-family dwelling; up to 12 dwelling units/acre ......... ........ X X L ..... ..........._.. L X _........�. L Two - Four family dwelling (duplex) (*) X X X X X L Multi -family dwelling; 12-20 units/acre X X L X X P 21+ units/acre X X ...................._. P ,. . P X P Agriculture/forest/mineral resources or industry (see item A) Community services (see item D2) Retail and commercial service (see items D4 & D5) Industrial/manufacturing (see item D4s & D5) C. Education Facilities 1. Education Facilities ............. Junior or community college X X L L L P ..- ................ .. Schools, K-12 elementary, middle, senior high X X X X X X Business school X L L L L P Vocational schools X L _... L L _..� L P D. Urban Development 1. Residential w ................ Single-family dwelling; up to 12 dwelling units/acre X X X X X L Two - four -family dwelling (duplex)(") X ........... X X X X L Multi -family dwelling(*): 15 or more X X LSC X X P Mixed-use office/commercial/residential use X X P P X P Residential development cluster 40% > open space �. X ............. ............ ... _ X L L X L Residential infill X X L L L P �- .............. _.._w...--............. Mobile home parks X X L L X L Boarding house XX L L L L Retirement homes X X X X X L Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-3 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-4 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Compatibilty Zones IZ�2ne 1�Zone 2 Zone 3Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 2. Community Services Cemetery P P P P L P Churches, synagogues, tem les p X X L L X L Community center meeting halls, fraternal X X L L X P organizations Convalescent, nursing home and group homes X X X X X L Day care facilities, family in-home X X L L X L Day care center X X L L X L Funeral home X X P P X P Police, fire stations, ambulance service X L P P P P Hospital X X X X X X Medical clinic ................. X X L L X P Correction facilities ___ ....... X L L L L L Libraries X X P P X P Museums and art galleries X X L P P P __.... Zoo .............. _...... - X X P P X P I Amusement and Recreation Amusement park (permanent) X X L L X L Bowling alleys X X P P X P Campground X L L m ....- . ..._ P .......... L ....... P Recreational vehicle parks; short term X L L P L P ............... Drive-in th Fairgrounds X X P L L ........ P Golf courses X L P P X P Gymnasiums, exercise facilities X L L L L P Horse racing tracks, speedways X X X X X X Miniature golf courses X X P P X P Movie theatres, auditoriums exhibition halls X ................................. X _.-............_... L ____ _.............._ L ........__ _............_ X P Parks L L P P L P Roller skating rink X X L L X P Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-4 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria _._._._._.................. ._W m. Compatibilty Zones Zone1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zon e 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 ' 4. Retail Trade and Service ._ ............. Addressing, mailing, and stenographic services X L P P L ......._. P Advertising agencies ............._w X L P P L P Airport uses and activities commercial/industrial L P P P P �. P Animal clinic/hospital L P P P P P Antique stores X L P P X P Automobile, truck, manufactured home, and travel L P P P P P trailer sales Automobile and recreational vehicle (RV) sales; L P �I P P L P weekend Automotive: car wash L P P P L P Sales lot/auto center L P P P P P Parking lots and garages L P P P P P Maintenance and repair shops ..._..... ��-. X P P P P P Paint and body repair shops L P P P P P .�..... _....... Parts and accessories (tires, batteries, etc.) X P P P P P Specialized repair shops (radiator, etc.) L P P P P P Towing services L P P P P P _._.. ...... ....... Wrecking and dismantling yard L P P P L P Bakery �_. .......... X P P P L P Beauty and barber shops X L P P X P Bed and breakfast inn X X L L X P Boats and marine accessories X Except P P P P ............WW_. P ................ - ___ _ storage L ......... Books, stationery, office supplies Storage P P P L P only Building and trade (plumbing, heating, electrical, Storage P P P L P painting, etc.) only Clothing and accessories X L P P L P mmITITmmITITITITmmITIT Communication towers X X L L L L Computer and electronic stores X L P P L P Department, discount, variety stores X X P P X P Drug stores (optical goods, orthopedic supplies) X L P P L P Employment agencies (private) X P P P L P Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC' Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F -t. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 Page F-5 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-6 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Compatibility Zones Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Farm and implements, tools and heavy construction X L P P P P equipment Farm supplies L P P P P P Financial institutions X P P P L P Food store ._. _._._ X P P ... ......... P _... L P Furniture, home furnishings, appliances X P P P L _ ........ P ........ General hardware, garden equipment and supplies X P P P L P Grocery and convenience stores X L ----.._.._...__._..- P .......................I__.- P L ..... P Heavy equipment storage, maintenance and repair X L P P L P Insurance agents, brokers, and service agencies X P P P L P Kennels L P P P L P Laundries, laundromats, and dry cleaning plants X P P - P _ L P Liquor stores X P P P L P Lumber yards LP P P L P Medical and dental laboratory, offices and clinic X X L ............. - P x P _. _ ............ - Mini Storage L P P P P P Motels and Hotels X X P P P P Motorcycles sales/repair (including maintenance) X P P P L P Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores _..WWWWW X P P P L P Pet stores, pet supplies, and dog grooming X L P P L Professional office buildings for architects, X L P P P P attorneys, government, etc. Rental: auto, truck, trailer, fleet leasing services L P P P L P _._.�.�........ Repairs: small appliances, tv, business machines, L P P P L P watches, etc. Restaurant, cafe and drive-in eating facilities X L P P P P Service station X L P P L P Sporting goods, bicycle shops X P- P P P P Taverns, bars, dance establishments X L __...................... _... P P L P Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-6 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Compatibility Zones Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 5. Industry/Manufacturing Aircraft parts mmmm�ITITITIT�ITITmm .......... Storage ................... .. L P P P P only ....... .. .......... Aircraft industrial Storage L P P P P only ....... __... - Apparel and accessories _ _.. . X L P P X P Bakery products (wholesale) Storage L P P X P only Beverage industry Storage L P P X P only Canning, preserving, and packaging fruits, X LL L X P vegetables, and other foods Cement and concrete plants X L L L X P Chemicals (industrial, agricultural, wood, etc.) X X L L X L Concrete, gypsum, and plaster products Storage L P L L P only Confectionery and related products (wholesale) Storage P P P L P only Mini storage P P P P P P Product assembly Storage L P P L P only ........ ..... ............... .. Prefabricated structural wood products and Storage P P P L P containers only Printing, publishing, and binding Storage P P P L P only Rendering plants, slaughter houses X_ X X X X L Rubber products X L P P L P Sawmills and planing mills Storage L P P L P only Sheet metal and welding shops Storage P P P L P only _ Stone products (includes finishing of monuments Storage P P P L P for retail sale) only Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 Page F-7 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria 6. Wholesale Trade- Sto ...... Warehouses Wholesale trade .................................. Storage facilities; bulk commercial E. Transportation and Utilities Appendix F Compatibilty Zones Zone 1 1 Zone 2 1 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 I Zone 6 Storage P P P P P only Bus terminals X L P P Storage P P P P P only P P centers, etc. only L P P P P P L P P P P P L P P P P P 1. Transportation L P P P P P Bus terminals X L P P L P .....__ . Transportation storage and maintenance facilities Storage P P P P P centers, etc. only Transportation brokerage offices; X P P P P P without truck parking L LL L L L ...... ...._....._. with truck parking L P P P P P Contract truck hauling, rental of trucks with drivers L P P P P P Rail, truck terminals (for short-term storage, office) L P P P P P Air storage and office use Storage P P P P P Taxicab terminals, maintenance, and dispatching only P P P P P Railroad switch yards, maintenance, and repair X P P P P P facilities, etc. Taxicab terminals, maintenance, and dispatching X P P P P P centers, etc. 2. Utilities 2 ..............w Power generating facilities L LL L L L Utility services (substations, etc.) L L L L L P Wholesale trade L P P P L P Storage facilities; bulk L P P P P P Commercial _- - L P P P P P Chart Symbols • "L" Limited — Uses or activities that may be compatible with airport operations depending on their location, size, bulk, height, density and intensity of use. • "LSC" Limited Special Conditions — Development should be moved away from the extended runway centerline. Open space should be devoted to areas that experience elevated risk. • "P" permitted — Uses or activities that should be permitted, however, these activities should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create height hazard obstructions, smoke, glare, electronic, wildlife attractants, or other airspace hazards. • "X" Prohibited — uses or activities that should not be constructed near the airport. All uses or activities identified herein are subject to intensity and density limitations set forth in Table F-1. Particular attention should be given to developments that when located in combination with other permitted or limited activities may create cumulative impacts on airport operations. All uses should be reviewed to ensure that they will not create airspace hazards. Page F-8 INSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria January 2011 Airport Compatibility Zones Dimensions Length Width Notes Zone 1 1,000' 750' Zone 1 includes the runway's RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered j ......... stipple within Zone 1 Zone 2 1,500' 750' _........... ........ _ NA Zone 3 3,000' "Plot Zone 3's vertex 1,000' from the runway's endpoint or 250%lo of runway's length Zone 4 2,500' 500' NA Zone 5 500' Zone 5 ends 200' past the runway's endpoint Zone 6 5,000' 5,000' Set the vertex for Zone 6's arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ - Runway Protection Zone ........ ...... _ WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 Page F-9 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Airport Runways 3,000 to 5,000 Feet RPZ - Runway Protection Zone Page F-10 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 January 2011 Airport Compatibility Zones Dimensions Length Width Notes Zone 1 1,000' 750'* Zone 1 includes the runway's RPZ. The RPZ is depicted by ordered stipple within Zone 1 ED *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2 1,500' 750' NA Zone 3 3,000' ....... * __ ...... ...--- *Plot Zone 3's vertex 1,500' from the runway's endpoint Zone 4 ....m....._ 2,500' ........ 500' NA Zone 5 500 Zone 5 ends 200' past the runway's endpoint Zone 6 5,000' 5,000' Set the vertex for Zone 6's arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ - Runway Protection Zone Page F-10 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Airport Runways Greater Than 5000 Feet Airport Compatibility Zones Dimensions Length Width Notes Zone 1 2,500' 2,000' Zone 1 includes the runway's RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered stipple within Zone 1 El *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2 3,500' 1,500' NA Zone 3 6,000' .__.................. _- * *Plot Zone 3's vertex 2,000' from the runway's endpoint Zone 4 4,000' NA Zone 5 * 2,000' *Zone 5 ends 200' past the runway's endpoint Zone 6 10,000' 6,000' Set the vertex for Zone 6's arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ- Runway Protection Zone WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 Page F-11 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Airport Runway Under 3000 feet `Single Sided "l raffic Pattern Alternative Traffic Side of Airport Pattern Zone 6Arc's Vertex 55° ' 750' '�.. /7777 Assumption: Topographical Constraints prohibits aircraft operations on one side of the traffic Pattern 5,000' li N Non -Traffic side 2,500' 30° 1,500' 400.1 ' 1,000' i 30° ' Zone 3 Vertex offset LM Airport Compatibility Zones 5,000' 200' Dimensions Length Width Notes Zone 1 2,500' 2,000 Zone 1 includes the runway's RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered stipple within Zone 1 ED *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2 _ 3,500' 1,500'NA __m.. II Zone 3 ... 3,000' 3,000' NA ITITITmm ...-__..�....._.... Zone 4 4,000' W-�..wwwww �_............................ NA Zone 5 2,000' ........ ................ *Zone 5 ends 200' past the runway's endpoint Zone 6 10,000' 6,000' Set the vertex for Zone 6's arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ - Runway Protection Zone Page F-12 WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Airport Runways Greater Than 5,000 Feet.- Alternative A Airport Compatibility Zones Dimensions Length Width Notes Zone 1 1,000' 750' Zone 1 includes the runway's RPZ. The RPZ is depicted by ordered stipple within Zone 1 El �...... __---------- Zone 2 1,500' 750' ..... NA Zone 3 3,000' *Plot Zone 3's vertex 1,000' from the runway's endpoint or 25% of runway's length. 55° or greater traffic side. 30' with 400' width non - traffic side Zone 4 2,500' 500" NA Zone 5 * �............................ 500' .._ ........ Zone 5 ends 200' past the runway's endpoint _ ...... Zone 6 5,000' 5,000' Set the vertex for Zone 6's arc parallel to the end of Zone 2. 5,000' width traffic side. 4,000' width non traffic side. RPZ - Runway Protection Zone WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-13 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Page F-14 Appendix F WSDOTAirports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M3074.00 January 2011