HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-25-15 YPC PacketCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Dara Davenport, AICP, Director
Planning DivisliOn
121 North Second tr eta 2nd Floor Yakima, Washington 98901.
PhD (91111) 575-9183 -u Fax (509) 575-6105
,tA)ww.yakimawa.go,()I,�;er7)ii.-e,ilplannitrg
City of Yakima Planning Commission
PUBLIC MEETING
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday February 25, 2015
3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
YPC Members:
Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose,
Paul Stelzer, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson
1"�:1IR Tli K,
C: r1?l vnipS Staff,
Joan Davenport (Community Development Director/Planning Manager); Jeff Peters (Supervising
Planner); Valerie Smith (Senior Planner); Robbie Aaron and Trevor Martin (Assistant Planners); and
Rosalinda Ibarra (Administrative Assistant)
Agenda
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Staff Announcements
IV. Audience Participation
V. Approval of 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
• January 8, 2014; January 15, 2014; January 22, 2014; January 29, 2014; February 5,
2014; February 12, 2014; February 26, 2014; March 26, 2014; May 14, 2014; June 11,
2014; June 25, 2014; July 9, 2014; July 23, 2014; August 27, 2014; September 24, 2014;
October 8, 2014; October 22, 2014; November 12, 2014; December 10, 2014
VI. Review of the Public Participation Plan for the Comprehensive Plan Update 2040
VII. Discussion on the Hearing Examiner's Interpretations on Mission Use in Consideration
of Allowed Zoning Districts and Revisions to the Definition of "Mission"
(Please review mission interpretations and the zoning district intent statements where the mission use is
allowed)
VIII. Other Business
IX. Adjourn
Next Meeting: March 11, 2015
I . — SHEET
City of Yakima Planning Commission
City Hall Council Chambers
Wednesday February 25, 2015
Beginning at 3:30 p.m.
Meeting
PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY
Page 1 02/25/2015 YPC Meeting
W
1r) YAK I AAA
I n 9
City of Yakima
Periodic Update Program
Scope of Work -for the ompreheniv Plain 2040 Update
Task 1: Inventory
1F,,lil OJAJ:) ! IN of
Task 1.1 Work with GIS Department on modeling and inventory
Task 1.2 Planner's analysis
Task 1.3 Groundtruth-ing
Task 1.4 Inventory Summary and Report
Task 1.5 Working with County on Population Projections, Employment Allocations, Interlocal
Agreement and Next steps
Deliverables: Summary report of findings
Task 2: Hire Consultant
Task 2.1 RFQ
Task 2.2 Interviewing
Task 2.3 Contract
Deliverables: RFQ, Contract
Task 3: Public Participation
Public Participation
Task 3.1 Public Participation Plan (PPP)
Task 3.2 Website Development
Task 3.3 Public meetings as prescribed by the PPP; Surveys & Visioning (four meetings/community
open houses)
Deliverables: Public Participation Plan
Task 4: Chapter/ Elements assembly
v.s. :/4J2015, updated 2/23/2015 1
Task 6.3 EIS 60 -day notice prior to adoption
Deliverables: Notices, EIS/Scoping, Final SEPA for 60 -day Review
Task 7: Adoption Process
Adoption Process
Task 7.1 Planning Commission study sessions on each Element
Task 7.2 Planning Commission Public Hearing on each Element
Task 7.3 City Council study sessions on each Element
Task 7.4 City Council Public Hearing on each Element
Task 8: OTHER
Incorporating proposed CPAs
Working with other jurisdictions
v.s. 2�"�, updated 2/23/2015 3
City of Yakima
Periodic Update Program
FORTIM
lu:X('YIIAD / F I 1 111,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040 HORIZON
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Public Participation Opportunities Related to the Update of Yakima's
Comprehensive Plan and Associated Development Regulations
Adopted: April 1, 2015
Comprehensive Plan 2040 Horizon—Public Participation Plan
The Comprehensive Plan is a requirement of the Growth Management Act (GMA), and is a
document that looks toward a 20 -year horizon for the City of Yakima. Its core purpose is to help
define—through goals, objectives and policies—how Yakima should accommodate forecasted
household and job growth, provide open space and recreational opportunities, and best manage
traffic and other vital services. It has been 10 years since the City has updated its Vision and
Comprehensive Plan maps and elements, therefore, it's time to update its Comprehensive Plan to
bring into focus the vision for Yakima for the next 20 years. The Periodic Update process requires
the City to engage citizens in a conversation about the City's future. Neighbors, business owners,
community groups and students are needed to participate in important conversations about land
use, transportation, parks, open space, and other vital services.
In addition to updating the core element chapters of the Comprehensive Plan, including, but not
limited to, Land Use, Utilities, Housing, Capital Facilities, and Natural Environment. Also, the City
is developing long-range plans for transportation, a new bike plan, and a downtown master plan.
Portions of these plans will be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan, where appropriate.
Public involvement is vital to these initiatives. We hope that you will join the conversation by
sharing your voice, attending meetings, and learning more through educational opportunities.
Project Timeline
(Administrative work, Scope of Work etc.) Fall 2014 -Winter 2014
Project Framing and Visioning Winter 2015 -Summer 2015
Element Review and Revision
Environmental Review
Final Approval
Winter 2016 -Fall 2016
Spring 2016 -Spring 2017
Spring 2017
Public participation is a key component of this two year planning effort. This Public Participation
Plan has been created for two purposes. First, to identify potential stakeholders and invite them
to participate in the planning process. Second, to guide public participation efforts throughout
the process to ensure early and continuous involvement throughout the decision-making process.
Efforts to ensure public participation will continue to evolve throughout the life of the Update
process.
The primary contact person for the City of Yakima's Comprehensive Plan 2040 Update is:
Valerie Smith, AICP
Planning Division
129 N 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6042
valerie.smith@yakimawa.gov
2
The City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) will take the lead as the advisory body for this
project. YPC meetings are regularly scheduled and open to the public with opportunities for the
public to speak at each meeting on both agenda items and non -agenda items. Staff will ensure
that City Council receives regular briefings on the work of the YPC; Add Built Environment
Committee information here.
Public Participation Plan
State law requires the City to invite citizens and stakeholders to participate in the Comprehensive
Plan update process. Public Participation is also very important to the City of Yakima as an
effective tool to balance competing interests and needs that are inherent in the land use decision
making processes. It is important that information be made available so any interested person
can understand the materials and participate. The City will encourage participation in several
ways.
Stakeholders
A variety of groups, agencies, and individuals may have interest in the update of Yakima's Comp
Plan. These stakeholders can be categorized as follows:
• Other Governmental Agencies
o Adjacent jurisdictions: Union Gap, Selah, Ellensburg, Yakima County....
o State Agencies: Washington State Dept. of Commerce, Washington State Dept. of
Ecology, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, and Washington Department
of Fish and Wildlife.
o Regional organizations: COG, MPO
o Tribal government: Yakama Nation
• Quasi -governmental Groups
o School Districts: Yakima, West Valley
o Yakima Housing Authority
• Residents and Property Owners
o Neighborhood Associations
• Business Groups and Associations
o Business organizations: Yakima Chamber of Commerce, Yakima's Historic
Preservation Commission,
o Trade organizations: Home Builders Association, Association of Realtors. Etc.
• Environmental Organizations and Conservation Groups
o Local groups
o Regional Groups
o Local Chapters of National groups
Outreach to the general public will include posters in public places such as libraries, community
facilities, and businesses. The City of Yakima residents will be sent a notice in their utility billing
3
statements, and project kick-off information will be circulated in the Yakima Herald Republic, City
newsletters... etc?
Throughout the Comprehensive Plan Update process, the City will maintain several channels for
communication and public participation. One of the primary tools the City will use, is a City
webpage dedicated to the project. This website will include notices for upcoming public meetings,
documents available for review, and other information related to the project. Visitors to the
website can also sign up to be on the interested parties list. Ideally, the website would include
interactive features that would allow all on-going exchallr'C U- if IfIlUlffldtiUfl af1U ideas related to
the project. A dedicated email address "Ask Planning" ask.planning@yakimawa.gov, is also
available for questions and comments on this project. (Kirkland has Special email set up
kirkland2035 kirklandwa. o ; Monthly project Bulletins that are mailed out, and an "Ideas
Forum" that engages people in real-time, kinda like Yak -Back)
Stakeholders who express interest in participating will continue to receive notices and
informational mailings from the City. Joining the interested parties list, by providing contact
information to receive updates about the project by email or post, will be the best way for an
individual to consistently receive notices and messages about the process.
A series of public workshops and public hearings will be held throughout the project. Prior to
public workshops or public hearings, notices will be posted in general community locations and
distributed through various City channels identified herein and per YMC Title 16 notice
requirements. These methods are intended to inform the general public, or those who have not
provided individual contact information, of key opportunities for participation in the
Comprehensive Plan update.
Document Review
Update of the Comprehensive Plan will result in several work products that require review. Some
of these products include: draft policy changes, draft code changes, issue papers, staff reports,
and environmental review documents. It is expected that the City will consult with stakeholders
in the development of documents and other work products for this update.
Once drafted, all documents will be available for official review by the public. Comment periods
will be clearly specified and advertised through the means identified in this public participation
plan. The City will maintain a database of all comments received throughout the Comprehensive
Plan Update process, which will be available for public review upon request.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process offers additional opportunities to seek public
input. The City anticipates integrating SEPA review into the proposal through the Growth
Management Act/SEPA integration process. Prior to Planning Commission making a final
recommendation on the updated Comprehensive Plan and any related changes to the Yakima
Municipal Code, the City will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, which provides the
opportunity for additional specific input on environmental impacts of the proposal.
4
Community Open Houses
The City of Yakima Planning Division will hold four community open houses in June thru October
2015. The open houses will feature a presentation covering four basic subject areas:
1. GMA requirements for review and update of comprehensive plans and development
regulations.
2. City of Yakima growth trends, forecasts, and accommodations.
3. Preliminary GMA compliance evaluation results.
4. Visioning for the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
The community open houses will also feature information stations covering various comp plan
elements and planning areas (e.g. land use, transportation, etc...). These stations will be staffed
to answer questions and gather public input.
Comprehensive Plan Basics
The Comprehensive Plan is a document adopted by the Yakima City Council. It describes how
Yakima will continue to provide necessary facilities and services to accommodate job and
population growth. Most importantly, it is a statement of the kind of community Yakima wants
to become, envisioned by those who live, work, recreate, and visit here. The Comprehensive Plan
includes a Vision Statement—a verbal snapshot of our desired character over the next 20-years—
and general Framework Goals to implement that Vision. The importance of Community Vision
Statements: see Kirkland PDF.
Why is the Comprehensive Plan important to me?
The Comprehensive Plan is used as a guide to decide where housing and business growth should
occur, what transportation system(s) we will have to support growth, what types of businesses
and jobs we want to encourage, what types of housing we should have in the community, how we
can protect our environmentally sensitive areas and what values we want reflected in the
character of our community. The Plan is the basis for zoning, which in turn guides development
permits in the City. Therefore, it is important to be involved in the formation of the Plan to
influence decisions on future development activity.
The Plan also establishes our desired public facilities and services for roads, parks, sewer, water,
fire and police protection and funding of those facilities and services through the six-year capital
improvement program. It provides policies to support economic development that encourages
what business and thus jobs and services locate here.
Who decides what the Plan says?
The City engages the community to develop a shared vision for Yakima based on common values,
desires and goals. The Planning Commission prepares a draft Plan based on the community's
5
vision, state and regional requirements, and planning principles, such as Smart Growth Principles.
Public meetings and hearings are held to get public comments on the draft Plan. The Planning
Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council and the Council approves the final Plan.
Written Comments
Written comments are welcome throughout the GMA Evaluation and Update process.
Opportunities for formal public comment at key points of the planning process will be provided at
public hearings before the City of Yakima Planning Commission and the City Council. The project
timeline below shows when public hearings are anticipated to be held. Additional information on
planning public hearings can be found in the location newspaper, the City website, etc., and as
described in this Public Participation Plan. To ensure consideration, written comments must be
received by the City of Yakima prior to the close of the public hearing.
All written comments submitted by mail or fax should be sent to:
City of Yakima Community Development Department
129 N. 2"d Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Fax: (509) 575-6105
ask. lannin @ akimawa, ov, please reference the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update in your
email.
Joint Planning Commission and Elected Officials Review Meeting
A work session will be held jointly between the City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC), City
Council, and Director of Community Development to review preliminary evaluation findings. The
joint meeting will be scheduled following the conclusion of the regional community open houses
described above.
Final GMA Compliance Evaluation
The YPC will work together with the Department of Community Development, and interested
parties, to review the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations for GMA compliance.
The evaluation process will identify needed update areas to comply with the GMA, and may
identify other recommended "areas of update" to address local or regional needs. During this
phase specific proposed amendments to the comprehensive land use and zoning map will be
considered and the results of the evaluation will be compiled in a Draft GMA Compliance Report.
The YPC will conduct at least one public hearing to gather and consider public input on the Update,
any proposed amendment applications, and any other proposed specific amendments. The YPC
will forward their recommendations and findings to the City Council for further action.
11
The Yakima City Council will hold at least one public hearing on the results of the Update review
and analysis. The public hearing(s) will also address any proposed revisions to the comprehensive
plan or development regulations, including any proposed amendment applications.
The City of Yakima will publish a notice of the adopted GMA Compliance document, and any
adoption of updates to the City's comprehensive plan or development regulations. The date the
notice is published will initiate a 60 -day appeal period pursuant to RCW 36.70A.290(2) on the
scope of the City's GMA compliance review and analysis, and adoption of any specific
amendments.
GMA Compliance Review Meetings
Eight (8) regular -scheduled meetings of the City of Yakima Planning Commission are planned from
January 2017 thru April 2017 to evaluate the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations
for compliance with the GMA. Regular -meetings are normally held on the second and fourth
Wednesday of each month at City Hall, 129 N. 2nd Street, in the City Hall Council Chambers, starting
at 3:30p.m. All meetings are open to the public, formal opportunities for citizen review and
comment on the results of the Planning Commission's GMA compliance evaluation will be
provided at the scheduled public hearings (see below) tentatively planned for Winter/Spring,
2017.
Tentative Schedule for community visioning, open houses and plan review:
Winter 2015
Project framing & analysis
Spring 2015
of current conditions
Summer 2015
Visioning &
Fall 2015
General public comments
Winter 2016
Comp Plan Elements review,
Spring/Summer
GMA compliance review &
Fall 2016
public comments
Winter 2017
Plan Adoption Process
Spring 2017
& Public Hearings
All outreach efforts will be documented by the City and available for public review upon request.
7
Conclusion
The update of Yakima's Comprehensive Plan is a collaborative effort in which the City will engage
the public, businesses, governmental agencies, and other interested groups. The City website,
public postings, community events, public meetings, and workshops will be used to reach out to
interested parties and get them involved in the process.
The City of Yakima will utilize a variety of methods to inform the public about upcoming public
meetings, availability of relevant planning documents and reports and important milestones
related to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update process, including, but not limited to:
1. Internet: the City of Yakima will establish a website for the project where interested
community members may go to for status updates, reports, meeting notices and agendas,
and other project information. The website will also include links to the City of Yakima
comprehensive plan and development regulations. Follow the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Update at httr)://www.vail<imawa.ggyL"services l�Lqc m re�hensive- Ian -u date
2. Mailing List: the City of Yakima will maintain a list of interested parties to receive notices
of scheduled public meetings. Notice will be provided either by mail or email. Individuals
and organizations interested in being on the mailing list should contact City of Yakima
Planning Division, at (509) 575-6183 or kpd nr inaki ver ; oovv.
3. News Releases: the City of Yakima will issues news releases announcing public meetings,
hearings, and comment periods to local media, including, but not limited to: the City's own
Y -PAC channel, the Yakima Herald Republic, KIMA, KNDO, local radio, etc.
4. Hearings -Decisions: Public notice of all public hearings and any decisions regarding the
review and update of the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations will be
published under "Legals" in the Yakima Herald Republic classified section. Public
notification of all hearings will be provided at least 10 days before the date of the hearing.
The notices shall include the date, time, location, and purpose of the hearing. The City of
Yakima may pay for other public notices in addition to this legal notification.
Public notification on the adoption of this Plan, or other specific development regulations
will follow the provisions of Yakima Municipal Code (YMC) and RCW 36.70A.
8
Chapter 15.03 ( PR Tl I
ZONING DISTRICTS RECORD/ F11,E
Sections:
15.03,01-0 Purpose and establishment of zoning districts.
15.03,.0,20 District and map overlay intent statements.
15,01 030 Map of zoning districts and overlays.
15.03.010 Purpose and establishment of zoning districts.
The following zoning districts are established to protect the public health, safety and general welfare by implementing
the goals and policies adopted in the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan.
Residential Districts
— Suburban Residential District (SR)
— Single -Family Residential District (R-1)
— Two -Family Residential District (R-2)
— Multifamily Residential District (R-3)
Commercial Districts
— Professional Business District (B-1)
— Local Business District (B-2)
— Historical Business District (HB)
— Small Convenience Center District (SCC)
— Large Convenience Center District (LCC)
— Central Business District (CBD)
— General Commercial District (GC)
— Regional Development District (RD)
— Airport Support District (AS)
Industrial Districts
— Light Industrial District (M-1)
— Heavy Industrial District (M-2)
District Overlays
— Airport Safety Overlay (ASO)
— Floodplain Overlay (FO)
— Greenway Overlay (GO)
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/html/yaki... Page 1 of 8 2/25/2015
— Institutional Overlay (10)
— Master Planned Development Overlay (PD)
(Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 2001-04 § 1, 2001: Ord. 2947 § 1 (part), 1986).
15.03.020 District and map overlay intent statements.
The district intent statements define the specific purpose of each district and/or zoning map overlay. They shall
reflect the policies of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan; serve as a guide for determining the appropriate
location of uses; help determine appropriate conditions for development; and help the administrative official interpret
the standards and provisions.
A. Suburban Residential District (SR). The intent of the suburban residential district is to provide a variety of
residential lifestyles with densities generally ranging from one unit per five net residential acres to seven units per net
residential acre. The higher density is reviewed and considered to be permitted when a public water system and the
regional sewer system are available, or if these utilities are not available, community water and sewer systems may
be allowed after review by Yakima County health district and the city of Yakima. (See YMC Chapter 15.05, Table 5-
1.) This district is further intended to:
1. Limit residential density to one unit per five net residential acres in areas where flooding, airport noise, or
other environmental constraints make the land unsuitable for residential use at higher densities. Development
at a lower density will be reviewed to allow conversion to higher densities once utilities are available or other
limiting issues are mitigated;
2. Maintain surface and groundwater quality along with the avoidance of potential health hazards, by limiting
residential density to one unit per five net residential acres, in areas where public services will not be provided,
and the dwelling units have individual wells and septic tanks. Development at a lower density will be reviewed
to allow conversion to higher densities once utilities are available or other limiting issues are mitigated;
3. Provide the opportunity for suburban residential development, up to three dwelling units per net residential
acre, in areas with either public water service or a community sewer system; and
4. Allow residential development to seven dwelling units per net residential acre in areas with both public
water service and sewer system.
This district is characterized by a mixture of land uses and residential densities including small farms, scattered low-
density residential development, and clusters of higher -density residential development. The minimum lot size in the
district varies according to the suitability of the land for development and the provision of urban level services. See
YMC 15.05,O3(E).
B. Single -Family Residential District (R-1). The single-family residential district is intended to:
1. Establish new residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses except
those which are compatible with, and serve the residents of this district, which may include duplexes and zero
lot lines if established during the subdivision process;
2. Preserve existing residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses to
ensure the preservation of the existing residential character, and serve the residents of this district; and
3. Locate moderate -density residential development, up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre, in
areas served by public water and sewer system.
http://www.codepubiishing.com/WA/yakima/html/yaki... Page 2 of 8 2/25/2015
Detached single-family dwellings are the primary use in this district. The district is characterized by up to sixty
percent lot coverage; access to individual lots by local access streets; required front, rear and side yard setbacks;
and one and two story structures. The density in the district is generally seven dwelling units per net residential acre
or less.
This zone is intended to afford single-family neighborhoods the highest level of protection from encroachment by
potentially incompatible nonresidential land uses or impacts. Nonresidential uses within these zones are not allowed;
except for public or quasi -public uses, which will be required to undergo extensive public review and will have all
necessary performance or design standards assigned to them as necessary to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent
residences.
Development exceeding seven dwelling units per net residential acre may be allowed in accordance with Table 4-1.
C. Two -Family Residential District (R-2). The purpose of the two-family residential district is to:
1. Establish and preserve residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings, duplexes and other
uses compatible with the intent of this district; and
2. Locate residential development with densities up to twelve dwelling units per net residential acre in areas
receiving a full range of public services including public water and sewer service, and police and fire protection.
The district is characterized by up to sixty percent lot coverage, access via local access streets and collectors, one
and two story buildings, some clustering of units, and required front, rear and side yard setbacks. Typical uses in this
district are single-family dwellings and duplexes. The density in this district generally ranges from seven to twelve
dwelling units per net residential acre. However, development up to eighteen dwelling units per net residential acre
may be allowed in accordance with YMC Chapter 15.04, Table 4-1.
D. Multifamily Residential District (R-3). The multi -family residential district is intended to:
1. Establish and preserve high-density residential districts by excluding activities not compatible with
residential uses;
2. Locate high-density residential development more than twelve dwelling units per net residential acre in
areas receiving the full range of urban services;
3. Locate high-density residential development near neighborhood shopping facilities; and
4. Locate high-density residential development so that traffic generated by the development does not pass
through lower -density residential areas.
The district contains a variety of attached or clustered multifamily dwellings.
E. Professional Business District (B-1). The professional business district is intended to:
1. Establish and preserve areas for professional offices;
2. Provide a buffer between commercial clusters and residential neighborhoods; and
3. Locate professional offices in areas presently receiving a full range of urban services.
Professional offices and, in some areas, a mix of professional offices and multifamily dwellings are the primary uses
in the district.
Generally, the professional business district contains smaller lot or parcel sizes. Residential densities are generally
greater than twelve dwelling units per net residential acre. Building coverage may be as high as eighty percent of the
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/htmi/yaki... Page 3 of 8 2/25/2015
site. Sitescreening requirements have been established to soften the visual impact of large buildings and parking lots
and to minimize potential nuisances from light, noise and glare. Development standards are intended to
accommodate a mixture of high-density residential development and office uses
F. Local Business District (B-2). The purpose of the local business district is to:
1. Provide areas for commercial activities that meet the small retail shopping and service needs of the
community; and
2. Accommodate small-scale commercial uses that need a higher level of visibility and easy access to major
arterials.
Uses characteristic of this district include small retail sales and service establishments
G. Historical Business District (HB). The purpose of the historical business district is to recognize existing isolated
commercial structures in otherwise residential areas, to allow those structures to be occupied by traditional
neighborhood business uses, and to allow these structures to be replaced if destroyed. This district is not intended to
allow structural expansion, or expansion of the use onto adjoining lots. It is further intended that this district is not to
serve as a small convenience center (SCC). Examples of HB uses are: taverns, small grocery stores, laundromats,
and other businesses serving the immediate residential neighborhood around this district. This zoning district is not
intended to be allowed to be further expanded or formed.
H. Small Convenience Center District (SCC). The purpose and intent of the small convenience center district is to:
1. Provide areas for commercial activities outside the downtown commercial district that meet community
retail shopping and service needs; and
2. Arr-nmmodate small commercial centers, generally huo to five eras in size, where most of the commercial
uses have located in a coordinated manner around a common parking lot and one major commercial approach
driveway.
Small convenience centers serve the day-to-day convenience shopping and service needs of the surrounding
neighborhood and should be designed to minimize undesirable impacts of the center on the neighborhood it serves,
Uses in this district should be retail or personal service establishments dealing directly with the consumer, the
primary occupants usually being such uses as a supermarket, fast food restaurants and drug store.
I. Large Convenience Center (LCC). The purpose and intent of the large convenience center district is to:
1. Provide areas for commercial activities outside the downtown commercial district that meet the retail
shopping and service needs of the community; and
2. Accommodate commercial centers, generally five to ten acres in size, where most of the commercial uses
are coordinated in a manner around a common parking lot and usually with two major commercial approach
driveways.
Large convenience centers serve the shopping and service needs of multiple surrounding neighborhoods and should
be designed to minimize the impacts. Uses in this district should be larger retail or personal services, the primary
occupants usually being such uses as multiple -tenant shopping, restaurants, office complexes, and multi mixed -
uses.
J. Airport Support District (AS). The purpose of the airport support district is to accommodate airport and aircraft
related activities within the airport property. This district includes the Yakima Air Terminal. A variety of uses are
permitted. However, the intensity of development is directly related to airport and/or aircraft related uses.
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/html/yaki... Page 4 of 8 2/25/2015
K. General Commercial District (GC). The purpose of the general commercial district is to accommodate wholesale
and retail activities with some high-density residential development. This district is primarily located near and along
the major arterials as designated in the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan. Like the CBD district, a variety of
land uses are permitted. However, the intensity of development is intended to be less than in the CBD district.
L. Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the central business district is to preserve the business district
of the city of Yakima as the region's center of commerce, finance, government, industry, recreation, and culture. This
district is characterized by very intensive development and a variety of land uses including retail sales and service
establishments, high-density residential development, financial institutions, professional buildings, and government
offices.
M. Regional Development District (RD). The purpose of the regional development district is to provide high visibility
from the interstate and state highways of the city of Yakima to provide regional commerce, office campus, recreation,
large-scale retail, culture, and large multiple mixed uses. This district is characterized by very intensive development
and a variety of land uses including retail sales and service establishments, high-density residential development,
financial institutions, professional office buildings, hotels, condominiums, and corporation headquarters.
N. Light Industrial District (M-1). The intent of the light industrial district is to:
1. Establish and preserve areas near designated truck routes, freeways, and the railroad for light industrial
uses;
2. Direct truck traffic onto designated truck routes and away from residential streets; and
3. Minimize conflicts between uses in the light industrial district and surrounding land uses.
The light industrial district provides areas for light manufacturing, processing, research, wholesale trade, storage,
and distribution facilities.
Uses permitted in this district should not generate noise levels, light, odor, or fumes that would constitute a nuisance
or hazard.
O. Heavy Industrial District (M-2). The intent of the heavy industrial district is to:
1. Establish and preserve areas near designated truck routes, freeways, and railroads for heavy industrial
uses;
2. Direct heavy truck traffic onto designated truck routes and away from residential streets; and
3. Minimize conflicts between heavy industrial uses and surrounding land uses.
The heavy industrial district provides areas for manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, processing, and distribution
and storage facilities. Uses in this district have the potential to generate high levels of noise, light, odor, fumes, or
smoke that require their protection from encroachment by incompatible land uses.
P. Airport Overlay (AO). The airport overlay is intended to protect the airspace around the Yakima Air Terminal at
McAllister Field from airspace obstructions or hazards and incompatible land uses. In addition to the regulations of
the principal use district, the airport overlay includes provisions for:
1. Preserving land adjacent to the Yakima Air Terminal at McAllister Field for future commercial and industrial
development; and
2. Assuring that land uses, locating near the airport, are compatible with noise, height obstruction and other
impacts from the airport operation.
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/html/yaki.,., Page 5 of 8 2/25/2015
Q. Floodplain Overlay (FO). The purpose of the floodplain overlay is to:
1. Protect natural drainage system associated with floodways and floodplains;
2. Ensure that new development will not affect the flood elevations in surrounding areas;
3. Ensure adequate protection of life, health, and property from flood events;
4. Control development located within the 100 -year floodplain unless it is possible to mitigate;
5. Ensure development is restricted within the floodway unless it is water dependent;
6. Emphasize FEMA standards in planning for flood prevention and damage reduction;
7. Comply with the city of Yakima's shoreline master program;
8. Minimize the expenditure of public money for flood -control projects;
9. Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken with
public money;
10. Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water lines, sewer lines, and streets;
11. Protect river, creek, and stream channels from encroachment so that flood heights and flood damage will
not be appreciably increased;
12. Ensure that potential buyers are notified that FEMA mapping is used to help identify that property is in an
area of special flood hazards;
"-..
11J. "i Surc that VI VJJViiji 0Vdi cra VJi v OCCUPY iiuvd hazard areas iiavc adcyuaie ii,foriiiation'viii ici1 uicy aplNiy
for development changes to their property so the property owner can assess the results of their development
actions;
14. Continue to implement the National Flood Insurance Program; and
15. Use and enforce the building code to help minimize losses due to flooding.
R. Greenway Overlay (GO). The Yakima River Regional Greenway Plan was adopted to preserve and maintain the
Yakima River as a natural resource for all citizens to enjoy. The greenway corridor extends from Yakima Canyon to
Union Gap. Greenway boundaries were originally defined in 1977 by the State Legislature with the creation of the
Washington State Yakima River Conservation Area.
The greenway corridor is classified into natural, conservation, and recreation areas. Each greenway corridor area
may contain various facilities developed by the Greenway Foundation, such as pathways, recreational sites, boat
landings, parks, playgrounds, campgrounds, and group camps. Many of the greenway facilities, such as trails, have
been constructed on the top of existing dikes and levees. The greenway provides access for levee maintenance and
repair and to be responsible for damage to trails caused by flooding.
In addition to the provisions of the principal use district, the purpose of the greenway overlay is to:
1. Make the greenway more attractive and accessible to the public;
2. Assure development conserves shoreline vegetation and controls erosion;
3. Implement the Yakima County/city shoreline master program and the Yakima River Regional Greenway
Plan;
http://www.codepublishing,com/WA/yakimalhtml/yaki... Page 6 of 8 2/25/2015
4. Limit development to activities which are particularly dependent on a location in the greenway;
5. Preserve and protect the fragile natural resources and culturally significant features along the greenway;
6. Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the greenway where increased use is desirable;
7. Protect public and private properties from the adverse effects of improper development in hazardous
shoreline areas; and
8. Give preference to uses creating long-term over short-term benefits.
S. Master Planned Development Overlay (PD). The master planned development overlay is intended to allow
larger scale, mixed-use developments in selected areas of the city where certain development requirements may be
adjusted as necessary to promote an integrated approach to planning and site design. The city finds that such
developments require special review and conditioning to ensure that adjacent areas are preserved and protected.
(YMC Chapter 15.28.)
T. Institutional Overlay (10). The institutional overlay is intended to allow designated community institutions that are
valuable and necessary to the community, but which are located adjacent to or within residential zones. The city
finds that these institutions require special review and conditioning to ensure that adjacent residential areas are
preserved and protected. (YMC Chapter 15.31.)
The institutional overlay includes provisions to:
1. Make the institution more compatible and accessible to the public;
2. Assure development has the ability for future expansion;
3. Provide increased protection such as increased buffers as the institution locates closer to residential
districts, especially R-1; and
4. Utilize the goals and policies of the Yakima urban area comprehensive plan. (Ord. 2011-52 § 2 (part),
2011: Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 2001-04 § 2, 2001; Ord. 95-13 §§ 1, 2, 1995; Ord. 3019 § 11, 1987;
Ord. 2947 § 1 (part), 1986. Formerly 15.03.030).
15.03.030 Map of zoning districts and overlays.
A. Adoption, Changes, Filing, and Replacement.
1. The zoning districts established by this title are defined as shown on the official zoning map for the Yakima
urban growth area. The official zoning map, together with all the explanatory material thereon, is adopted by
reference and declared to be a part. In addition, any adopted overlay shall be displayed on the zoning map as
identified by the adopted ordinance.
2. The official zoning map for the unincorporated portion of the Yakima urban growth area shall be maintained
in the Yakima County planning division. The city of Yakima department of community and economic
development shall maintain the official zoning map for that portion of the Yakima urban area within the Yakima
city limits.
3. Each official zoning map shall be identified by the adopted ordinance of the appropriate jurisdiction and the
date of adoption. The official zoning map maintained by the county/city shall be the final authority as to the
current zoning status of land.
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/htmi/yaki... Page 7 of 8 2/25/2015
4. Any changes in the district boundaries established by this title shall be made in accordance with the
provisions. The official zoning map shall be promptly changed after the amendment has been approved by the
respective legislative body.
5. No changes of any kind shall be made on the official zoning map except in conformance with the
procedures. Any unauthorized change by any person(s) shall be considered a violation and punishable as
provided under YMC Chapter '15.25.
6. If the official zoning map becomes damaged, destroyed, lost, or difficult to interpret because of the nature
or number of changes and additions, the legislative body may, by resolution, adopt a new official zoning map,
which shall supersede the prior official zoning map. The new official zoning map may correct drafting or other
errors or omissions in the prior official zoning map, but no such correction shall have the effect of amending the
original zoning ordinance or any subsequent amendment thereof.
B. Basis for Mapping the Floodplain Overlay Area, Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. The floodplain overlay shall
be that area within the one -hundred -year floodplain shown on the federal flood insurance rate maps (FIRM) for the
city and county. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) periodically updates these maps. (Ord. 2011-
52 § 2 (part), 2011: Ord. 2008-46 § 1 (part), 2008: Ord. 2947 § 1 (part), 1986. Formerly 15.03.040).
0
The Yakima Municipal Code is current through Ordinance
2015-003, passed January 20, 2015.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the
Yakima Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Clerk's
Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited
above.
,Clack_ here tai. view re� t�t�y . new tt� of dul ag��ces..r�gt yet �gd�(dµ ,d
(http:// .ya imawa. ov/council/archived-agenda-minutesn .
City Website: http://www.yakimawa.gov/ (http://www.yakimawa.govn
City Telephone: (509) 575-6037
http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/yakima/htmi/yaki... Page 8 of 8 2/25/2015
RE OR D / F III L11"
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of January 8, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Ben Shoval called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Ben Shoval, Co -Chair Dave Fonfara, Al Rose,
Scott Clark, Paul Stelzer, Bill Cook
YPC Members Absent:
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Mark Kunkler, George Colby, Bob Whitney, Holi
Williamson, Pablo Gonzales, Anna Marie Default, Brian
Platte, Michael Platte, Jeff McPhee, Paul Tabayoyon, Ken
Marble, Dave Ettl, Mitch Gordon
rbc
Bill Cook made a motion to switch item 6 and 7 owe agenda; Dave Fonfara seconded
this motion. Motion carried by unanimous votes
„
Staff Announcements
No staff announcements noted.
Election -and Chairman and Vice- fi l anW , r the Yakima Plannin;x Commission
Bill Cook nominated Dave Fond �r airman; Al Rose seconded his nomination.
Scott Clark nominated Ben airman; Ben Shoval respectfully declined. The
commission took a vote. otion�rrid unanimously for Dave Fonfara as the new
Chairman of the Yakima P �ng mmission.
Al Rose made a motion to :inate Scott Clark as Vice -Chairman; Ben Shoval
seconded this motion. Scott Clark accepted the nomination. The commission took a
vote. Motion carried unanimously for Scott Clark as the new Vice -Chairman of the
Yakima Planning Commission.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
Public Hearing- Text Amendment to YM:C 1.5 Related to Mari"uana
Mark Kunkler introduced the topic of discussion for the public hearing and answered
staff questions.
-1-
George Colby from the Yakama Nation talked about needing to follow federal law on
Yakama land. He also mentioned that marijuana is not part of Yakima culture, religion,
etc.
Bob Whitney talked about how marijuana and more crime will spread to the youth if it
is allowed. He also touched on the risks of marijuana.
Holi Williamson asked what the consequences would be for violating the city ordinance
to which Mark answered a possible fine or misdemeanor, but no felony.
Pablo Gonzales voiced his opposition to this ordinance. He talked about how it could
reduce tax revenue, hurt business, and make it difficult for people who use marijuana
medically to obtain their treatment.
Anna Marie Default introduced Dr. Kevin Sabet, a national drug policy expert. She
mentioned that Safe Yakima Valley Coalition fully supports this municipal code. She
also distributed the document, "Top Ten Messages about Legalization'.
Dr. Kevin Sabet who supports the amendment talks ;,bout California's experience with
trying to ban marijuana in some cities. From ation :I perspective, he told the
commission that many people will support them.,'
Brian Platte said he believes that they shcld allow rijuana so that it can get
controlled and keep it out of the hands of chit" .NAP
Michael Platte mentioned that people��o hacense to sell marijuana are more
responsible with who they sell it to than �yell it illegally. He also talked about
the potential of CBD production in Yakir a
Jeff McPhee from MCS of Was -on' on x :::::::::laffted why he opposed the ban. He believes
legalizing marijuana will reduce' ea the youth if we regulate it and not ban it.
Paul Tabayoyon expressed ainst the ban. He explained the pros and cons
with banning marijuana.
Ken Marble urged the cornry`i Ifo ensure that the zoning codes comply with local,
state, and federal laws. He expla' ed that those who sell marijuana target children and
the youth who will become addicted to it and buy their product. He reminded the
commission that marijuana users will buy marijuana where it is cheapest - the black
market.
Dave Ettl explained that he approves of the ban and that the commission should listen
to the people of Yakima rather than the west side who is driving the legalization. He
also said that this ban would not change access to medical marijuana at all.
Mitch Gordon referenced the United States use patent for Cannabis. He expressed his
concern of medical marijuana being tied with recreational marijuana.
Bill Cook made a motion to close the public hearing; Scott Clark seconded this motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
The staff answered questions from the commission.
Al Rose made a motion that the commission passes the Findings of Fact in ordinance
number 2014. The motion died with the lack of a second.
-2-
Al Rose made the motion again that the commission passes the Findings of Fact in
ordinance number 2014. Chairman Dave Fonfara seconded the motion.
Ben, Scott, and Paul all indicated that they want more time for discussion before voting.
Al Rose made a motion to table this discussion; Scott Clark seconded this motion.
Motion carried by unanimous vote.
The commission reached consensus to move forward with the consideration of the
action on January 15, 2014 at 3:00 p.m.
Other Business
No other business noted.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to January 15, 2014 was passed,th unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:13 p.m.1�
q
��
Chairman Dave Fonfara v' Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Mi
-3-
Maxey, Temporary D.A. II..
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of January 15, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose,
Ben Shoval, Bill Cook, Paul Stelzer
YPC Members Absent:
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Mark Kunkler, Bob Whitney, Anna Marie Default, Mike
Davison, Carmen Mendez, James Wilson, Lieutenant Nolan
Wentz, Patricia Byers
Staff Announcements d 60P
Jeff Peters announced that some special meetin,� will need to be set later in the
agenda. He also announced that the Plannin ,` epa. Went Manager will be at the
meeting at a later time. r
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
r Session- Continue Disc iissi
Staff members answered ques
nt to YMC 15 Mari
Mark Kunkler commented on the`%N#brandum dated January 10, 2014.
The commission asked que n � P-�iteraa:nt Nolan Wentz from the Yakima Police
Department.
Paul Tabayoyon shared his of that it would be unfair to future business to ban
marijuana.
Paul Stelzer brought up the hurdle of banks not giving financing, which results in
customers having to pay in cash.
James Wilson expressed his views on marijuana and how he wants it to be harder to
get.
Patricia Byers, a mental health therapist, talked about marijuana being a major gateway
drug for her patients.
Ralph Call talked about federal law and mentioned that Yakima would be on good legal
grounds if they chose not to legalize marijuana, which is illegal on the federal level.
Jeff Peters gave the commission options of actions to take at this point in time.
Bill Cook made a motion to approve recommendation A from the October 2
memorandum: maintain status quo, but with the addition of the lineation of the
-1-
wording "production, processing, and sale of recreational marijuana." Scott Clark
seconded this motion. Motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1.
Bill Cook made a motion to modify section 15 by the removal of the word "only" in the
findings of fact. Scott Clark motioned the second. The motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1.
Study Session- Follow-up to the Billboards & Digital Signs Workshop
Steve Osguthorpe read an email from a citizen who requested for it to be read.
Staff made the recommendation to receive public input before continuing the
discussion.
Ralph Call from the BCNA announced that the board will be talking about the issue and
sending the commission their recommendation. Ralph talked about the need to change
the perception of the citizens who think that they can't create change. He also expressed
his opinion of the negative aspects of the clutter of billboards and signs.
Anna Marie Default brought up that these worn down signs can attract more graffiti to
the area. All
Mike Davison said he strongly supports the baklk
nnHe explained how he
doesn't think billboards are as important as t% used �, Mike also mentioned that
digital signs are becoming cheaper but they �4i%p distraction.
Ben Shoval made a motion to address only
Stelzer seconded this motion. Motion cal
Other Business
The commission and staff
signs at the January 22 meeting. Paul
of upcoming meetings.
sR '
Adjourn
$W'
A motion to adjourn to Januar 01.4 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of January 29, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose, Bill
Cook, Paul Stelzer
YPC Members Absent: Ben Shoval (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Larry Oliver, Ralph Call, Tom Knaub, Jesse Oliver, Emma
Staff Announcements
Steve Osguthorpe announced that the public hearing with the planning commission on
billboards and digital signs will be on February 26. vc, scheduled hearing with the city
council is on March 18.rE :r
Jeff Peters mentioned the opening of the
on February 26.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
Steve referred back to the staff
digital signs
Bill Cook mentioned that
Al Rose discussed two
map amendment process
and discussed challenges of
be hacked into.
lumens and reflective.
The commission and staff taIRW about regulating digital sign animations, fading,
dimming, size, color, scrolling, static, number of signs, and illumination.
Ralph Call brought up his concern about smaller businesses having large signs and
comments about colored signs.
Mike Davison talked about colored digital signs in residential neighborhoods being
problematic.
The commission and staff went on to talk about billboards and discussed the four
points on the Staff Tentative Recommendation on Billboards.
Tom Knaub presented an email to the commission between Ben Shoval and Peter
Grover addressing Steve's memo as well as a study from Tampa about property value
in relation to billboards.
Other Business
No other business noted.
-1-
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to February 5, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 7:09 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
"*ra•t
M
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of February 5, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose
YPC Members Absent: Ben Shoval (excused), Bill Cook, Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Mark Kunkler, Jason Stiles, Scott Roberts, Tom Knaub, Ralph
Call, Ron Pelson, V.K. Best, David Servine, Fred Mears
Staff Announcements
Steve announced that they got the notice out for the SEPA determination.
Jeff announced that there is a development applic n for a long plat in the vicinity of
Coolidge Road and 88th. This will have the s e`ring date as the next public
hearing.
Audience Partici ation
Po�a+i
No audience participation noted.
Staff provided the draft ordinance . n ' rvlew of the ordinance. He discussed the
definitions of changing rnessa. .4 e, �" '"'s, luminance, motion, nits, off premise
directional sign, off premise sign,` , ancJ structurally altered.
Steve went over other chan� is M� c, draft.
Ralph Call mentioned that ,S t finks digital signs are not appropriate for protected
historic areas. He also wants ken the static message can change to be included in
the ordinance. Ralph also mention d that larger signs cause more clutter.
Tom Knaub talked about how the digital sign concerns have impacted billboards. He
suggested to the commission that they look into adopting something that would allow
existing billboards in Yakima to be moved to another area.
Larry Oliver talked about Yakima needing to be able to change with the times. He
added that digital signs help improve the aesthetics.
Jason Stiles expressed his concerns about being able to advertise adequately from the
perspective of a small business owner.
Scott Roberts said his concern that some of these rules being considered will limit the
usability of the signs and that larger signs may be necessary.
David Servine was also against digital signs being in residential areas and talked about
the size of signs and the illumination.
Fred Mears talked about bringing the brightness down on billboards.
-1-
Ron Pelson said he doesn't like all of the additional regulation. He doesn't believe signs
are very much of a distraction and limiting them can hurt business.
Other Business
The commission and staff talked about what form they would like to see the packet of
information in for the upcoming long plat public hearing to which the commission
requested a hard copy.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to February 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This
meeting adjourned at 4:57 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfaraate
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting srab alts r : Lusa M at ; mporary D.A. II...
Mi
mr;� ax
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of February 26, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose,
Paul Stelzer, Bill Cook
YPC Members Absent: Ben Shoval (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Mark Kunkler, Glenn Denman, Rich Hochrein, Duane R,
John Hull, Thomas Hull, Mike Heit, Patricia Byers, Ralph
Call, Rob La Grone, Neal Schreibeis, Tom Knaub, Carmen
Mendez, Luz Gutierrez
a
Staff Announcements
No staff announcements noted.
IP
Audience Particigation
No audience participation noted.
Public learine- P'reliminary Plat of Arra '; F �reloDaaaent Phase CCB
v�■� uvi� ua� o�wi a port abou cA', Tree evcavrilLu«.
Glenn Denman talked abouttl m ie, him and the planning department and
a;
answered questions from the co on.
Mike Heit, representing Aj)p'aa� ered some questions from the commission.
tla the commission recommends approval of the
Scott Clark made a M�
preliminary plat to include d' ' recent fire apparatus memo to be included in the
recommendation. The motion was seconded. Motion carried by unanimous vote.
The commission and staff took a 5 minute recess at about 6:34.
Opening of the 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process
Jeff gave a brief report. Al Rose made a motion to hold a meeting on May 14 at 3:30 p.m.
The motion was seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Public Hearing:: Text Amendments to YMC Ch 15.0 Si ns- Billboards
Steve Osguthorpe presented a slide show about the proposed billboards ordinance.
Ralph Call announced that the BCNA is against digital signs in protected areas and that
he is against billboards in general.
Luz Gutierrez said that she is against billboards and pointed out that these large groups
of billboards tend to be in the lower income areas.
-1-
Rob La Grone, the real estate representative for CBS Outdoor, talked about how limiting
signs affects the market.
Neal Scheibeis presented a rebuttal to the director's memorandum.
Tom Knaub suggested changing ads to have a more welcoming environment.
Ralph Call said that the presentations given don't really address what the moratorium
is about.
The commission and staff continued their discussion on the billboards issue.
Bill Cook made a motion to accept the recommendation drawn up in the discussion
today to ban future billboards and forward it to city council. Paul Stelzer seconded this
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Steve announced that two new code compliance offi. rs were hired.
Adjourn a �.
A motion to adjourn to March 12, 2014 was pard with animous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 8:28 p.m.f"
r �
m&WII
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for tk*7r l* �ni,,Wd by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of March 26, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook
YPC Members Absent: Ben Shoval (excused), Vice -Chair Scott Clark (excused), Paul
Stelzer (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Steve Osguthorpe,
Community Development Director
Others: Luz Gutierrez
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters announced that the terms of Commissioner Bill Cook and Commissioner Ben
Shoval will be up on June 30, 2014. Ben Shoval Indic d in an email to Jeff that he is not
planning to serve another term.
He also announced that there will be a meeg on 14 and a potential public
hearing for Apple Tree phase 4. On the sazuay.fll be the docketing meeting for the
comprehensive plan map amendments. G' up in August there will be some
potential study sessions and a public he�� m ember for the comprehensive plan
amendments.r,
Steve Osguthorpe mentioned a MPJ c update with seven main chapter issues
including conditional use, co. e � Ln and code amendment, permit review
procedures, procedures for endinents for site specific rezones, a new
subdivision code, variances, forcement:
Audience Participation
Luz Gutierrez commented on billboard issue saying that the signs are being taken
care of and they outreached t the Hispanic community. She also talked about
consistency with the application process.
Other Business
No other business noted.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to April 23, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 4:18 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-1-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of May 14, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Ben Shoval,
Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers
YPC Members Absent: Paul Stelzer (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Valerie Smith, Senior
Planner;
Others: Mark Kunkler, James Carmody
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters announced that Patricia Byers is now a part of the planning commission. He
also announced Valerie Smith as the new Senior PI r.
Audience Partici ation :y
No audience participation noted.
Public Hearing- Preliminaa Plat of ADVIe ," evelo meat Phase 4
The public hearing was introduced wi 5ta port by Jeff Peters and additional
comments by Mark Kunkler. �'13MMWMII
James Carmody representing )
like to continue with the public
Ben Shoval made a motion to
by staff. The motion was s
uction of
with Jeff and Mark that they would
the hearing until a future date to be determined
tan carried unanimously.
YPC
Valerie Smith gave the presentation on the introduction of the comprehensive plan
amendments. She mentioned that today's task will be setting a more concrete schedule
for the comprehensive plan amendments.
Jeff went over the 2014 Potential Zoning Ordinance Amendments for YPC Docketing.
He answered questions from the commission about fees and informed them on who has
already paid their fees.
Other Business
The commission and staff talked about upcoming meeting dates and what they will
discuss.
The next few upcoming meetings will be left on the agenda but may be cancelled at a
later time.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to May 28, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 4:17 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. H.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of June 11, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Ben Shoval,
Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers
YPC Members Absent: Paul Stelzer (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Valerie Smith, Senior
Planner;
Others: Mark Kunkler, James Carmody
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters reminded the commission that Steve Osguthorpe, the Community
Development Director/ Planning Manager, is re " . gig. He also added that the
planning department is down two planners and t y ris Wilson is retiring.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted. 42, OF
Update - 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendmen o osals
Jeff told the commission that all of the ni .` ments were complete for processing
and received letters of complete f pica , n. The text amendment for community
gardens was complete for proces�#.��e t� amendments for parking and signs have
until the end of the week to resp' cl< '` yment and submit additional information
or the applications will be cls`° a Signs submitted a text amendment request to
exempt part of the sign odot not pay the fee.
;
Jeff pointed out that the �k am ' lments will be worked on after there is a solid
proposal and all of the a:menr(s are either complete or incomplete. These notices
might go out towards the middle of July..
Discussion- Elements to be Included. in. Ci 's Draft Zoning Text Amendment for
Communfty Gardens
Valerie Smith gave a staff report comprised of gathered information on the topic and a
clear definition of a community garden.
The applicants, the pastor and the tender at Restoration Church, came up to speak
about why they want a community garden. They brought up compost and parking
issues.
The staff went further in depth in discussion on why parking is necessary for the
community garden according to current code.
Other Business
No other business noted.
-1-
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to June 25, 20 14 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5m2 p.m.
Charman Dave Fonfara,
Dae
This meetingwas filmed b rAC Minutesfor tWs meeting submitted blLisa Nfaxey Temporary D.A. E
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of June 25, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers,
Paul Stelzer
YPC Members Absent: Vice -Chair Scott Clark (excused), Ben Shoval (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Valerie Smith, Senior
Planner;
Others: Mark Kunkler, Tom Hale
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters announced that the department is behind on minutes but will present them
to be adopted as soon as they come in. h
He also mentioned that Joan Davenport will be a: o, d as interim planning manager
and talked about bringing in new planners. ._
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted. �h
Valerie Smith sent out an e ai A "at ' d the summary of the meeting with the
w:�
applicants and typed up a me
TA m it explained the background of this text
amendment.f ri
Jeff Peters mentioned than Y'M and"Wglalerie took the application summary to the Built
Environment Committee to thq* input.
The commission talked about the year agreement for using land for the community
gardens, lighting, and water usage.
Tom Hale, a member of the Restoration Church, commented on the restriction of
community gardens in the Central Business District. He believes they should be
allowed in those locations. He also mentioned how a common area could be used in the
community garden.
Bill Cook made a motion to allow community gardens in central business districts as a
class 1 use. The motion was seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Chairman Dave Fonfara pointed out that there is a scheduled joint study session with
the planning commission and council on August 12 to discuss the update of the 2025
comprehensive plan. He suggested to give commission the opportunity to discuss that
process prior to the meeting.
_1-
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to July 9, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:08 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of July 9, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers,
Paul Stelzer
YPC Members Absent: Vice -Chair Scott Clark (excused)
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Valerie Smith, Senior
Planner;
Others: Bill Hordan, Jason Galloway, Sergio Badillo, Tom Hale,
Suzanne Hale
Staff Announcements go
Jeff Peters mentioned that the City Council sugge, t the staff put together a public
meeting or study session on the comprehensivZ.Fni
fan utth''Joint
amendment process before
the joint session with council. Today the conn ved session to September 9,
2014. Jeff offered that this suggests that the sign can spend more time looking at
the comprehensive plan and decide whatrd:irecey want to go in the joint session.
He announced that he will be gone at
meeting as well as Joan Davenport
Planning Manager.rV
Jeff suggested moving the P
13, 2014, to give Jeff, Valerie,
Audience Partic!pation
No audience participation noted.
but Valerie Smith will attend the
iin Community Development Director/
"t'sion study session to Wednesday, August
time to prepare.
Review Draft Text Amendment Proposal for Community Gardens (TXT#003-141
Jeff and Valerie reflected on their meeting with the Master Gardeners of Yakima County
and updated the brief sheet of all the different issues they sent to the Planning
Commission members and got feedback from them.
Staff put the amendment in draft ordinance form. They added that they need to include
provisions for how to deal with complaints into the ordinance.
Valerie explained how the Master Gardeners envisioned the use of the community
gardens. She provided background information on community gardens and examples
from other locations in the packet given to members of the Planning Commission.
Staff mentioned that they are not recommending bathrooms in the community garden
area as a requirement as this point. The commission and staff agreed that they need to
-1-
look more into differentiating labor laws vs. volunteer work to decide if these facilities
are required or not by the health department.
The commission and staff compared mobile food vendors, which require a washroom,
to the community gardens situation, which is for private use. They also suggested the
idea of being able to make a deal with nearby places to use their facilities when needed.
Bill Cook discussed the wording, "should be considered." He questioned whether this
responsibility was aimed at the city or the applicant.
Valerie commented that her notes from the meeting with the Master Gardeners are not
part of the ordinance yet.
Dave commented that they should try to give the gardener a chance to learn as they go
by not requiring too much from the applicants. Paul added to this saying that keeping
up with regulations will fall on the applicant so that the city will not be too heavily
involved.
Tom Hale came up to the microphone and spokes about the bathroom issue. He
commented that he doesn't believe there are t'Ali
e kinds of health rules for this
situation. He also added that he's not sure '1400, µ , is the right word and that
gardeners will determine what they want.
Valerie suggested doing a mock MOU with ' �a Icant for the public hearing.
�Jw
Study Session to Review 2014.Cam reh i ' n Map A.rnendments
Staff stated that the goal is to makq ., „ th N mage in the future land use map fits with
the current land uses. Jeff Petery �es dolor coded map depicting the locations of
the proposed map amendments.*
g";
Staff provided the council # a tf from the SEPA online handbook dealing with
non -project actions.
Valerie went through all three fa cations and explained them to the commission.
A. CPA#001-14 - PLYMOUTH RANCH LLC
Address: Vicinity of I-hyy 12 &: N'16—(h Ave
Request: Chane the Future Land Use map designation for three parcels from
Re mal Commercial to Industrial and rezone three parcels from a.r, e
Convenience Center (LLC) to Light Industrial CM -11 to allow for future expansion
of an adjacent industrial facili .
The commission had consensus to grant the request.
B. DCPA#002-1 - IGDB, LLC / QASON GALLOWAY
Address: 801 / 807_/ 809 E Viola Ave
Request: Change the I^uture Laird Use map designation for three Rarcels from
Medium Densi Residential to General Commercial and rezone two parcels
from Two-Familv Residential R-2 to General Commercial. GC to ex and an
adjacent suovort business that serves the needs of agricultural producers and
rocessors in the area.
-2-
It was decided to further look into this request and study the surrounding uses
and how they might be impacted. Jeff added that it's important to look at the size
of the parcel vs. what they're planning to do. Bill Cook asked if there was a sewer
in front of that street to which Bill Hordan, representing the applicant Jason
Galloway, answered that there is not. Bill Hordan continued explaining the
situation for this application and mentioned that he can put together a general
site plan for this application.
Staff recommended that the commission look at all of these sites.
C. CPA#003-14 - SERGIO BADILLO
Address: 402 N 51h Ave
Request: Change the Future Land Use map designation for one parcel from High
Density Residential to General. Commercial and rezone from Mlultia-Famil
Residential R-3 to General Commercial GC to facilitate future substantial
improvements made in the neighborhood.
Bill Hordan, representing applicant Sergio B ;rllo, informed the commission of
the background for that area and deserib it as a mixed neighborhood. He
provided photos of the property and icorthe commission that Sergio
Badillo is willing to clean up the area an rezone n .
Other Business
No other business noted.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to
adjourned at 5:12 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
with unanimous vote. This meeting
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-3-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of July 23, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers,
YPC Members Absent: Vice -Chair Scott Clark (unexcused), Paul Stelzer (unexcused)
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Joan Davenport, Interim
Community Development Director/ Planning Manager
Others: Bill Hordan, Jason Galloway
Staff Announcements
Joan Davenport introduced herself again to the commission as the Interim Community
Development Director and Planning Manager.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
OKOI WIF11410 a a =U W4 S1
Valerie informed the
app, 11l.GlLLV1L. JLIC LL1L1, 1L.'K
public hearing with the
B. CPA#002-14 -
& Zoninz Text
RMP new information came in for this
4- ...1..,.0 .,., ...,L -..J- .,_a }ti.,.
LLL0.L, 1LVL144F_a WVCIC; a1LL VLLL LVL1CLr LLLL%.L LLLC
fission will be held on October 8.2014.
GALLOWAY
Since the last PlaO, iW hission meeting, a new aerial photo with
descriptions of the t and,, urroundings was received into the record for this
application.
Bill Hordan discussedw will happen if the rezone occurs and why the rezone
should be approved. Bill also talked about possible boundary line adjustments.
Bill along with many of the commissioners described this site as a neighborhood
in transition. Bill and the commission then discussed how the sewer situation can
be a limiting factor for developments in this area.
Commissioner Bill Cook brought up the issue of buffers in a situation where
there is an expansion of a commercial zone into a residential zone, for example,
and determining a project rezone.
C. CPA#003-14 - SERGIO BADILLO
Valerie gave more details about this request which was not able to be explained
at length in the last meeting. No new information came in for this application
since the last meeting.
Al Rose mentioned that he saw a newly built Laundromat in that neighborhood,
showing that the neighborhood is on the fringe of transition.
-1-
Bill Cook asked Valerie if a multi -family project be built in a general commercial
zoning district. Valerie referred to the zoning ordinance which said that multi-
family would be considered a Class 2 in the general commercial zoning district.
Chairman Dave Fonfara expressed his concern about spot zoning and
maintaining a certain amount of R-3 zone property within the city.
Al Rose questioned what future projects in that area would need this particular
zoning.
Patricia mentioned that this area is still highly residential.
Bill Cook questioned whether this is an example of spot zoning.
The commission and staff talked about historic zoning districts.
Bill Hordan handed out recent pictures of the location to the commission and
staff and then talked more about the site and the application as well as
developments in this area in the past.
D. TXT#003-14 - RESTORATION CHURCH KEVIN KEYETTE - COMMUNITY
GARDENS,
Valerie explained that there were few chart made to the draft ordinance and
that most changes were grammatical. Jef e will add in more distinctions
about community gardens specifically. erie saITM� at she contacted the Health
District about bathroom facilities to w*b Health District said that there is no
requirements to have them for crm.nzII°lens at this point.
Valerie mentioned that they are � ino
k °
`, h the applicant to come up with
some sort of mock application. a,
Discussion Upcoming of °"'P Council Study Session on Updates to
Urban Area Comprehensive Plan Ai2O "
Chairman Dave Fonfara remind4 veryone that the upcoming YPC/City Council
study session has been resc ffii1� ioesday September 9th at 10:00 a.m.
gg
Valerie presented the PON' oint at she prepared called the Yakima Urban Area
Comprehensive Plan 2017 Up, rogram, which will be presented again at the joint
meeting. She informed the co m scion on what will be discussed at the joint meeting
and answered questions from the commission.
Other Business
Bill Cook mentioned the opening of the MLK underpass that happened today.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to August 13, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 4:59 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of August 27, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers,
Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Paul Stelzer
YPC Members Absent: Ron Anderson
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Joan Davenport, Community
Development Director; Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner;
Robbie Aaron, Assistant Planner; Mike McDaniel, Assistant
Planner
Others:
Joan told the Planning Commission to be thinking about items to put on the agenda for
the upcoming joint study session.
Chairman Dave Fonfara talked about remembering the importance of receiving citizen
input for the Planning Commission and for City Council.
Joan talked about a citizen -based organization called Yakima Bikes and Walks. One of
the ideas that came out of the most recent Yakima Bikes and Walks meeting was to
bring in a Futurist to talk. A Futurist may be of assistance when making the new
Comprehensive Plan since transportation will change a lot in the next twenty years, as
Joan pointed out. Joan suggested coming up with more ways to inspire people in the
community as they turn their focus to creating the new Comprehensive Plan.
Valerie Smith presented a PowerPoint she prepared to help the Commission in
preparation for the upcoming joint study session with City Council.
-1-
Bill Cook suggested having slide 4 come before slide 3. He also made a
recommendation to emphasize "independent" sounding board. In addition,
Commissioner Cook suggested using the word "advises" rather than "sets" when
talking about the Planning Commission's involvement in long-term direction or vision
of the community's future.
Joan informed the commission and staff of the origins of the City Planning Commission.
Many of the commissioners expressed that it would be helpful for commission liaisons
to attend their commissions meetings. Jeff pointed out that there's a significant
difference in interaction between liaisons and their commission depending on which
commission you are considering. He also mentioned asking Council what their
expectations are for that position.
Joan discussed the uniqueness of the city -only comprehensive plan and mentioned that
the Planning division will be hiring a professional Planning Consultant next year.
Joan said she would prepare an outline for the joint study session and then send it to
the City Manager, Planning Commission, and staff. df
The integrated GMA SEPA process will be anothr ': of discussion in the upcoming
joint study session, according to Joan.
Chairman Dave Fonfara made a comment tl t°ecent ruling by the Court on voting
relating to council districts may have some of e1 ow different parts of Yakima are
developed, ultimately affecting the c plan. Davenport responded by
mentioning that Council has an execon the 28th and will discuss the
summary judgment. She also point,. the judge will issue additional rulings.
Joan inforrrled the commission
at the u
Joan brought up two
future land uses.
i#!,� rtments will be invited to the joint study
Lmented that she wanted someone from Solar to
ble to comment.
crn topics including the zoning ordinance and
Commissioner Byers mentioned that it's good to have the topics on the agenda brought
up even if they dont get discussed at length. Joan added that the agenda could be
labeled as the Work Plan for the Planning Commission for the next couple of years.
Final Review of the Shoreline Master Pro am SMP Update from Department of
Ecology
Jeff went over the Department of Ecology letter and recommendations. He mentioned
that the Planning staff met with their attorney and the Department of Ecology to discuss
the recommendations. He added that most of the recommendations are very minor.
He shared that he sent a letter back accepting the recommendations to move forward
with adopting the final ordinance.
Other Business
-2-
Jeff told the commission that they can review the minutes from 2013 at their leisure and
then at the next meeting they can deal with any changes and adopt them. Peters also
reported that he will send the 2014 minutes to the commission next week.
Valerie informed the commission and staff about a short course on planning in Zillah
on October 8th from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. put on by the State Department of Commerce.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to September 9, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This
meeting adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by:'LisaPaxey, Temporary D.A. II.
W11
-3-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of September 24, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose,
Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson
YPC Members Absent: Bill Cook, Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Jeff Peters, Supervising
Planner; Glenn Denman, Building Official and Supervising
Code Inspector
Others: Tom Hale, Joe Walsh
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters introduced Ron Anderson back to the Pl , g Commission. Ron Anderson
shared with the commission, staff, and others a lit about himself.
Audience Participation '
No audience participation noted. ^v,,
w�
of
Jeff Peters explained the process
sections.
Al Rose made a motion to
the Agenda and have the
changes to the adjourni!
carried unanimously. 41
Discussion of Sigg Code Arnendinents
of approving the 2013 YPC Minutes in
YPC Minutes from 2013 that are listed on
review the October 23rd minutes and make
)priate. The motion was seconded; motion
Peters introduced Glenn Denman to the Planning Commission as the Building Official
and the Supervising Code Inspector.
Jeff went over the topics of the Sign Code Amendments packet and then proceeded to
go over the Signs YMC 15.08 PowerPoint. The PowerPoint covered issues such as the
definition of signs including roof signs and exempt signs, the renaming of the "exempt
signs" section, and examples of what exempt signs are.
Dave Fonfara made the comment that the current sign code language is sometimes
inconsistent and can be confusing to both the sign users and code enforcers. Dave
suggested that the Planning Staff bring back suggestions that will simplify the process.
Al Rose suggested starting with the definitions and then implementing regulations that
are appropriate.
Glenn Denman added that Codes approach is to have the code be less restrictive than it
is now because of the difficulty to enforce the current code.
-1-
Patricia Byers brought up the issue of people attaching vinyl signs to buildings and
calling them permanent signs. In addition, Byers talked about signs for non-profit
organizations and expressed that she believes the percent of the window being covered
is more important than the number of signs in the window.
Jeff brought up the concern about health and safety when windows are covered heavily
in signs. Dave made the argument that some buildings dont have windows at all. Al
added on to the conversation by mentioning that some buildings may not have signs
but the windows are covered by drapes, which is also a health and safety issue.
Jeff Peters went on to discuss issues relating to wall signs and the cross over between
wall signs and roof signs.
Chairman Dave Fonfara mentioned that three of the five Planning Commission
members needed to leave around 4:45 pm. The chairman pointed out that there was a
member in the audience waiting for the community gardens discussion and that time
was running out. He suggested either continuing with the sign discussion and dealing
with the community gardens discussion at the inning of the next meeting or
skipping right to the community gardens ascas:i
The commission and staff agreed to move on ltd e co"'unity gardens discussion and
have staff bring back definitions for the signs Ato%for the `next meeting.
Valerie Smith provided a memo di,
include community gardens in. the
brought in a sample of a Me
Sponsor (whoever will be sponse
She mentioned that a MOU w ul
submittals. Chairman Dave d
forward with the text acne ment f+
Tom Hale came up to the
ssirent status of the text amendment to
J111 rban Area Zoning Ordinance. Smilh also
MumEUnderstanding (MOU) Between ABC
Owl%" nrnunity garden) and the City of Yakima.
required with their type 1 or type 2 application
*pressed the commissions interest in moving
community gardens.
briefly spoke about the sample MOU.
Valerie reminded the commission and that all of the comprehensive plan amendments
for 2014 are going to the public hearing on October 8, 2014.
Other Business
No other business.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to October 8, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 4:47 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of October 8, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Vice -Chair Scott Clark, Al Rose,
Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson
YPC Members Absent: Bill Cook, Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Jeff Peters, Supervising
Planner; Mark Kunkler
Others: Bill Hordan, Tom Hale, Jason Galloway, Sergio Badillo
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters informed the commission that Planning s f met with Codes staff to discuss
matters relating to sign code amendments. Peters the sign code amendments draft
would be ready by Friday.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
Public
A. PLYMOUTH RANCH, L
CPA#001-14, RZ#001-14,
Valerie Smith gave a
through, and a nil
11
Amendments
am
of the project proposal, the process it went
staff report.
Bill Hordan informed cmission and staff that the property was decided to
be used for warehousing W a large office for Washington Fruit.
Al Rose made a motion to approve CPA#001-14. Patricia Byers seconded this
motion; the motion carried unanimously.
Vice -chair Scott Clark made a motion to approve RZ#001-14. Al Rose seconded
the motion; the motion carried unanimously.
B. JGDB, LLC - JASON GALLOWAY / BILL HORDAN
Valerie Smith gave a brief overview of the project proposal, the process it went
through and a summarization of the staff report
Bill Hordan explained how he views this process in two steps with the first step
being the comprehensive plan change and rezone and the second being the Class
3 Review. He explained how they cannot file a Class 3 Review right now since
the current zoning would not be appropriate for the intended use. Jeff clarified
for the commission that Class 3 Reviews go to the Hearing Examiner, as Bill had
-1-
stated. Al Rose questioned which reviews go to the Planning Commission Public
Hearings to which Jeff replied by verbally listing out the applications. Bill
provided aerial photographs of what the property looked like before and after
Jason's ownership. Bill described the neighborhood as a "neighborhood in
transition." Along with the aerial photographs, Bill submitted the cost of
purchasing properties on Viola Avenue in the exhibit. Ron Anderson asked
about the anticipated size and location of the warehouse and about the property
lines in the back half of the lots which Bill said was used for storage. Bill and
Scott Clark both mentioned that the current use is the most appropriate for that
area. Scott reminded everyone that situations like these which don't have a clear
solution are precisely why the Planning Commission exists. Patricia Byers asked
what happens if the Class 3 Review is not successful, to which Bill answered that
more owners like Jason will continue to move in, realize they need more room,
and move out of the area. Al Rose proposed putting stipulations on approval of
the rezone to do a boundary line adjustment and go through the Class 3 Review.
Jeff and Mark had the same thought patteras Rose, as Mark explained. Jeff
explained that he has never conditioned q,�on-project rezone before but that
Mark has dealt with them before. Ron Ani s rouht up the fact that adding
conditions could affect the future land],,%use 3 * said that he was leaning
towards approving the rezone as su USO'considering that the neighborhood
has benefited from Jason's business be � cated there and that the surrounding
R-2 uses are not being used as R- it
Jason Galloway camp. up to thp. pdgJt 'hd spoke as well. He concurred that
surrounding uses are not b a es R-2 and that it would be good for the
neighborhood if he stayed Q; r
Bill Hordan came baa podium and presented a letter from neighbors
expressing how e gel a t ,son's business being in their neighborhood. He
added that there hi pe1 n �;'opposition from neighbors. Byers concurred with
Clark's earlier corn"netht. Jason's positive impact. Rose questioned whether
adding conditions could ause legal problems. Mark confirmed that adding
conditions could cause more complications.
Jeff told the commission that staff will need some sort of findings for the
findings, facts, and conclusions document. Chairman Dave Fonfara provided
ideas for findings such as economic development proponents of the
comprehensive plan and proof of the neighborhood in transition. Jeff confirmed
that these items could be used in the findings.
Scott made a motion to approve CPA#002-14 and RZ#002-14 as submitted. The
motion was seconded; the motion carried unanimously.
-2-
C. SERGIO BADILLO / BILL HORDAN
Valerie Smith gave a brief overview of the project proposal, the process it went
through and a summarization of the staff report. Jeff mentioned the change in
recommendation.
Bill Hordan thanked the staff for their support. Anderson added that he thinks
this is another example of a neighborhood in transition that will continue to
develop. Anderson made a motion to accept the recommendation to approve
CPA#003-14 and RZ#003-14 as submitted. Patricia seconded the motion; the
motion carried unanimously.
D. RESTORATION CHURCH / KEVIN DEYETTE
Valerie Smith gave a brief overview of the project proposal and the process it
went through.
Kevin Deyette thanked the staff and rennde Pveryone of the positive aspects of
having a community garden. w
Valerie read the staff report for this Pro)
t�3
Scott Clark made a motion to approified and as recommended by staff
TXT#003-14. The motion was seconded; otion carried unanimously.
Other Business
Jeff Peters said that staff needs Z".,
Yovide the commission with a revised sign
ordinance for their review. He the commission that the sign ordinance needs
to go through the Planning ss and on to City Council for adoption by the end
of the year by request of t"."W ity no r. Jeff said that the draft needs to be done and
reviewed by the end of ��er brought up the major issues of the amount (or
percentage) of widow signage should be permitted, removing temporary signs
from the exempt section, number of temporary signs allowed, and definitions.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to October 22, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:13 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-3-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of October 22, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers,
Ron Anderson
YPC Members Absent: Scott Clark, Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Jeff Peters, Supervising
Planner
Others: Bill Hordan
Staff Announcements
Staff Member Valerie Smith shared that the Kos�.eformation
hensive Plan Update is well
underway and that they will be meeting with dinvolved in the update. Valerie
and Jeff Peters confirmed that they should have for the Commission
in December.
Jeff made the announcement that he
Conference in Spokane. Jeff briefed the
for this comprehensive plan and develo
1.I addititon w uic ether iaannonw'a'rnr
Planning Commission Chairman
November 18. Chairman Dave a -
update.
Audience Participation
No audience participation notes,.,
were able to attend the APA
on state level updates mandated
T'-
tet, - f -j . ..... ,» a 4-U
x:4taon=" uiatulic miry �vLu«u &StCeu ure
Zvi' an update at the Council meeting on
taff he plans on attending and giving the
Review and. Approval of 2014 Comprehensive Plan Map & Text Amendments
Al Rose made a motion for approval and to send the Findings and Recommendations to
Council. Patricia Byers seconded the motion; the motion carried unanimously.
Continued. Discussion on Sign Code Amendments
Peters provided an overview of the proposed changes to the sign code YMC 15.08.
Jeff explained changes including the addition of definitions for "fascia sign" and
"marquee/ display case sign" and the modification of the definition of "roof sign."
Glenn Denman came into the meeting briefly to answer questions for the staff and
Planning Commission. Jeff asked Glenn if there is a section in the Building Code that
requires a certain amount of sunlight inside the building to which Glenn answered yes;
habitable spaces do, but sunlight can be substituted for artificial light in some cases.
Glenn also mentioned that there is no code that regulates covering windows.
-1-
Al Rose brought up the idea to ask someone from the Police Department about safety
concerns when it comes to covering windows. Peters said he could get a statement from
someone in the Police Department and then email it to the Commission.
Bill Cook made a suggestion to modify the window sign definition to say "Window
signage which exceeds 50 percent of any given window area is not permitted."
Jeff then moved on to explain changes to the exempt signs section, including changing
the name "exempt signs" to "non-regulated signs."
Bill Cook questioned one of the items under non-regulated signs where it says on
number eleven: "temporary signs totaling 32 sq. ft. or less per lot or parcel, and have no
more than two temporary signs per parcel (see YMC 15.08.110) except portable signs;"
Bill pointed out that this would allow for an unlimited amount of portable signs. He
then pointed out that under the fee exempt signs section where it speaks to temporary
signs, portable signs are not mentioned as they were in the section above. Jeff and the
commission agreed that there needs to be clarification in the language.
Chairman Dave Fonfara announced that he neede�to excuse himself early from the
Planning Commission meeting.
Other Business ^
Jeff mentioned that the City Council asked "ng Staff to go before the Council to
clarify on matters relating to sign code apMgpeik
He estimated that the process for the sf, %M"' amendments would be complete in
either January or February.
Peters told the commission than c1dl d out an email to the Commission of the
sign t de amendments draft ''.".changes discussed in this meeting incorporated
into
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to November 12, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This
meeting adjourned at 5:14 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of November 12, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Al Rose, Bill Cook, Patricia Byers, Ron
Anderson
YPC Members Absent:Scott Clark, Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Valerie Smith, Senior Planner; Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner;
Trevor Martin, Assistant Planner
Staff Announcements
Staff Member Valerie Smith introduced Trevor Martin,, the new assistant planner, to the
Planning Commission. Trevor proceeded to tell the Com �sion a little bit about himself.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
Continued Discussion on Amendments to t�, e Y tir1C 5.08, - revisions as of 11/07/14
Valerie discussed the memo she passet-k"Oftberi
8Ff the meeting about the recent council meeting
when they discussed time limitationWfin W,� signs.
Al Rose brought up the possibility, , e public thinking political signs are temporary signs,
which would be reflected in results. The Commission and Staff went on to
discuss what defines a temp sigi"' the time limitation is removed.
Bill Cook suggested removing bI, igns from the definition of temporary signs.
Jeff informed the Commission that City Council and City Manager would prefer for the time
limitations on temporary signs to be removed.
Jeff suggested revising item 11 under Non -Regulated Signs on page 6 of 16 to say, "... no more
than one temporary sign per parcel per street frontage" or even just "per parcel." Jeff expressed
that the City Manger believes the existing language with regards to temporary signage as far as
number of temporary signs allowed is adequate.
Al Rose brought up that temporary signs could include garage sale signs. Al mentioned that he
believes garage sale signs are not a big issue if they are on the property of the one who posted
the sign. However, he mentioned that if the sign or signs are not on the property of the person
posting them, they would need a time limitation or some way to regulate them.
Bill Cook added that the Commission should still review the final results of the survey after the
survey comes to a close. Dave Fonfara asked if citizens will have a chance to provide input at a
Planning Commission meeting to which Jeff confirmed that they will.
-1_
Bill Cook brought up the idea of notifying those who took the Sign Survey of the Public
Hearing. Jeff explained that survey respondents emails may not be able to be retraced simply
from filling out the survey online.
Bill Cook expressed his concern about working on the Sign Code draft amendments with
council's direction. He added that he does not feel staff -driven. Al agreed with Bill but
expressed that he does feel council -driven.
Jeff informed the Commission that staff has concerns with the size and number of temporary
signs. Peters suggested reducing the size limit from 32 sq ft to 24 sq ft per lot or parcel and
reducing the number of signs per parcel from 2 to 1.
Al Rose went over changes he made to his copy of the draft Sign Ordinance.
Peters explained that he will send the Planning Commission an updated draft of the Sign
Ordinance by email.
Sign Survey Results
Jeff shared that they received 33 results from the Sign
that people have issues with the aesthetics of tempos
most people either want more restrictive rg;ula
regulations the same. 4
the Ci s 2025 Comprehensive Plan
Valerie briefed the Commission on a lvl i
Development Joan Davenport and Sig''`
Staff's recommendation to allow cn , , s
to docket any requests received fry 20 nc
the negative impact this schl
Comprehensive Plan. Peters Manned ree
Comprehensive Plan in 2015, wn D1.7.
He added that the results indicate
. Also, he mentioned that it seems
signs or to keep the
3 Amendments & t
r%rn of Transmittal from Director of Community
ung %1. onner Jeff Peters. Valerie explained Planning
'\ " to amend the Comprehensive Plan in 2015 but
, 2017. Ron Anderson expressed his concerns about
Lave on property owners wanting to amend the
possible options for scheduling amendments to the
After an in depth discussion, the Irtmission agreed to leave 2015 as is with acceptance of
independent citizen requests and to incorporate approved amendments submitted in 2016 and
2017 to the Comprehensive Plan to the 2025 Comprehensive Plan which will go into effect the
summer of 2017.
Other Business
The Commission had consensus to cancel the next Planning Commission meeting scheduled for
November 26, 2014 as well as the meeting of December 24, 2014.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to December 10, 2014 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-
City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) City Hall Council Chambers
Meeting Minutes of December 10, 2014
Call to Order
Chairman Dave Fonfara called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
Roll Call
YPC Members Present: Chairman Dave Fonfara, Scott Clark, Al Rose, Bill Cook,
Patricia Byers, Ron Anderson
YPC Members Absent: Paul Stelzer
Staff Present: Jeff Peters, Supervising Planner; Joan Davenport,
Community Development Director/Planning Manager;
Mark Kunkler; Rob Peterson
Other: Rhonda Hauff, Rachel Saimons, Nathan Poehl
Staff Announcements
Jeff Peters requested that the Commission move it number 6 on the agenda, Report
"
Council's Direction on Moratorium for Missions ,� C Zone, with item number 7,
Airport Overlay Master Plan. The Conunission,ld cons us to make those changes to
y�SJ W.
the agenda.
Audience Participation
No audience participation noted.
Peters presented an update" ince of the proposed sign amendments and
requested final revisions toy, " al%,�, ato �repare it for public distribution.
Bill Cook suggested chang'`%the sua:l of the roof sign in the draft to resemble a
commercial building rather tha �: residential building.
The Commissioners each gave their input on the percentage of window that a window
sign can cover. Jeff made a remark that 50% can be left in the draft for now and that the
percent can be amended after the public hearing and receiving public comments.
Jeff asked the Commission if they were okay with renaming the category of "exempt
sings' signs to "non-regulated signs' and splitting that category into non-regulated
signs and fee exempt signs. The commission agreed on this amendment.
Patricia Byers made the comment that on number 5 under Fee Exempt Signs where it
reads, "and/or more than two temporary signs per parcel", the "and/or" may cause
confusion. Mark Kunkler suggested taking out the "and" and leaving the "or."
Bill Cook suggested changing number 2 under Fascia Signs to use a different term than
"pinned away." Jeff said it could be changed to say, "pinned/ projecting from."
-1-
Air ort Overlay Master Plan
Airport Manger Rob Peterson provided an extensive overview of the proposed airport
overlay master plan and explained why it's necessary for the City of Yakima to adopt
and implement this plan.
Anderson asked what the elevation is in zone 6 to which Rob answered that it can vary.
Rob explained that the further away from the airport the higher the elevation permitted.
Anderson also asked about plans to extend the runways. Rob replied that there is one
recommendation for extension that will bring the runway from 7604 ft to a total of 8860
ft in length.
Cook asked about how the master plan will affect areas that are already developed to
which Rob answered that the master plan cannot reverse what has already been done
and will only affect future development.
Report Council's Direction on Moratorium for Missions in the SCC Zone
Mark Kunkler explained the moratorium imposed
Mark explained that this moratorium impacts y
Convenience Center) for land uses such as cosi
reported the historical background of this iss
Nathan Poehl, a member of the audience,
as a citywide issue and considering all
be permitted.
Other Business
Council on October 21, 2014.
located in the SCC (Small
:enter, mission, etc. He then
the importance of looking at this
)rtunities where missions should
Jeff provided the commission �� 3 Time Line with SEPA and an Airport
Overlay Development Regulation" Line.
Joan Davenport informed to onlssn that the Council Chambers is available if the
commission would like lave Planning Commission meeting next week. The
commission had consensus t n to January 14, 2015.
Adjourn
A motion to adjourn to January 14, 2015 was passed with unanimous vote. This meeting
adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Chairman Dave Fonfara
Date
This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting submitted by: Lisa Maxey, Temporary D.A. II.
-2-