The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/20/2017 05B Community Integration Exploratory Committee Second Quarterly Report to CouncilBUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDASTATEMENT Item No. 5.13. For Meeting of: June 20, 2017 ITEM TITLE: Community Integration Exploratory Committee Second Quarterly Report to Council SUBMITTED BY: Randy Beehler, Community Relations Manager SUMMARY EXPLANATION: This is the second quarterly report from the Community Integration Committee to City Council. Attached is the report which contains a summary of the action items taken to date, a list of action items that are pending, and a summary of the findings made as of the date of the report. Chair Arthur Alcazar and Member Laura Armstrong will be presenting. ITEM BUDGETED: NA STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Neighborhood and Community Building APPROVED FORcllv� SUBMITTAL: City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: BOARD/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Accept report ATTACHMENTS: Description Upload Date Type D CIEC 2ndQrReport 611312017 CD%r Memo Community Integration Committee June 2017 Over the last several months, the Community Integration Exploratory Committee has met twice per month to increase productivity and ensure that appropriate data collection and research is gathered and evaluated. We have discussed a timeline for the remainder of the year and plan to have a final report by September 2017. Currently, our committee has been diligently studying three areas of interest in regards to community integration: 1) Best Practices of Community Integration 2) Yakima's Integration -Related Data 3) Benefits of Integration. 1) Best Practices of Community Integration Innovative city leaders with notable success in transforming their communities understand the mutual benefits of implementing community integration strategies. While each city model may differ slightly in their design, these best practices share a common integration focus; connecting people, building inclusive methods and approaches, and changing systems and cultures. The Committee researched numerous examples, and chose four (4) west -coast cities to highlight their community integration best practices: • Kennewick, WA — Kennewick declared its commitment to engage participation and provide effective means for promoting diversity, equality, and inclusiveness as they work together to make their city the place of choice to live, work, play and do business. According to the 2016 Community Well -Being Report, Kennewick rated 465 out of the top 189 best communities to live in based on their well-being index score (indicators include: purpose, social, financial, community, and physical rank). Recently, the Diversity Commission launched a city-wide diversity survey to engage community members and receive feedback. Consolidated feedback will be recommended to the city council later this year (h!!Qs://www.go2kennewick.com/) Sonoma County, CA - Sonoma County experienced dramatic shifts in demographics, where Latinos and seniors started to represent a larger portion of the county's population. Sonoma County's strategically focused around these two aforementioned demographics to enhance individual and community health for all residents. Sonoma County implemented several community engagement practices such as: institutionalizing community feedback, formalizing intra -county collaboration, building and sustaining strategic community partnerships, and committing to culturally competent practices (Sonoma County Department of Health Services). Seattle, WA - In 2016, the city of Seattle's former Mayor Murray published Executive Order 2016-06' establishing equitable outreach and public engagement practices, and dedicating citywide efforts, directed by the Department of Neighborhoods, to reaffirm the city's commitment to inclusive community engagement. Spokane, WA - In 2014, the city of Spokane launched V1sion2020: "The City of Choice: safer, stronger, smarter" — a plan that emphasizes the value of cultivating a community that encourages collaboration, enhances community awareness and creates effective meaningful experiences for community engagement (https://my.spokanecL.org_/ ). As a result of these intentional efforts, these "best practices" cities cited a plethora of positive improvement including: increased program participation, more efficient use of public resources, improved relations with sectors in the community, increased community contributions to shared outcomes and better information for program planning. Community integration and engagement has moved from being ' City of Seattle, Executive Order 2016-06. http://murray.seattle.gov/M-content/uploads/2016/07/Executive-Order-2016-06.pdf (6 June 2017). a "nice thing to do" to an essential way of more effectively aligning resources with community needs and opportunities. The Community Integration Exploratory Committee highlights the value of these integration efforts in other cities, and recognizes the potential benefits for such intentional integration within the Yakima community. 2) Yakima's Integration -Related Data According to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, people's pyramid of needs (including physiological, safety, belongingness and love, esteem, cognitive, aesthetic, self -actualization, and transcendence) must be met for a person to become self -actualized, feel valued and respected; but, not everyone has the same access to the resources that meet these needs in Yakima and nation-wide. Healthy People 2020 are a comprehensive set of 10 -year national goals for improving health of all Americans such as access to health services, environmental quality, injury and violence, mental health, and social determinants that also help meet people's hierarchy of needs and can consequently lead to self -actualization and engagement in the community. The Social Determinants of Health topic area within Healthy People 2020 identifies ways to create social and physical environments that promote good health for all. All Americans deserve an equal opportunity to make the choices that lead to good health. But to ensure that all Americans have that opportunity, advances are needed not only in health care but also in fields such as education, childcare, housing, business, law, media, community planning, transportation, and agriculture. • Age It is critical for the City of Yakima to focus on today's youth, because compared to Washington state, Yakima County has a younger resident population with a median age of 32.4 years compared to 37.4 years in Washington. More specifically, Yakima County has higher proportions of children less than 18 years of age, and fewer adults age 25 to 64, compared to Washington. Ensuring our youth has their needs met would lead to their self -actualization, good health and success, and ultimately to a thriving Yakima community. Yet, the City of Yakima does not provide equal access to social and economic 80 84 opportunities across races, 70 74 ethnicities, incomes, 60 64 languages, and cultures. This is W 50 54 counter to Healthy People ` 40-44 2O2O's research that improving 30-34 the conditions where we live, learn, work, play and the 20 -24 quality of our relationships will 10-14 create a healthier population, 0-4 society, and workforce. YAKIMA COUNTY 2014 POPULATION PYRAMID 7% 5% 3% 1% 1§; PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION 5. 7 • Education According to Maslow's hierarchy theory, a student's physiological needs (air, food, drink, shelter, sleep, etc.) must be met before they can fulfill their cognitive need of knowledge and understanding. Comparing education data from Washington state, to Yakima School District (YSD), (Eisenhower High School, Davis High School, and Stanton Academy) shows an increase in the Latina/o population as well as the higher rate of free and reduced lunch compared to the state (see Table 1 below). It is imperative, then, that the City of Yakima is responsive to the cultural, linguistic, and economic (in all definitions of the words) trends to meet the needs of all residents and therefore, leverage a healthier and more successful Yakima community. TABLE 1 X WA C*.*. YSD 1U Davis Stant Latina/o 22.4% 77.1% 65.9% 82.9% 75.4% White 56.1% 18.2% 28% 11.4% 17.2% Fee / Reduced Lunch 44% 73.3% 58.2% 64% 81.3% 4 Yr Graduation Rate 78.1% 65.3% 83.6% 76.21% 19.4% • Income "Communities with greater income inequality can experience loss of social support and sense of community for all residents." Figure 1 below demonstrates the vast income inequality among races and ethnicities within Yakima County. • Housing The City of Yakima's Equity Study demonstrates that people with lower income can only afford to buy houses in districts with lower property value; this perpetuates the same income inequality cycle, but with housing and neighborhood inequality. Figure 4 below is the 2016 Total Property Value by District from the Yakima Equity study. "Families who pay more than they can afford for housing have too little left over for other necessities such as food, clothing and healthcare Therefore, families are unable to fulfill other needs and thus, these unfulfilled needs prevent success of Yakima's families. Even though the correlation between crime and property values are ambiguous, qualitative quotes from survey respondents during a survey collected at La Casa Hogar in 2016 show the impacts of living in East Yakima (districts with the lowest property values): -Ifeel like I don't matter. I already have stress living in this neighborhood which is dangerous, I don't need extra stress" Median Family Income by Race/Ethnicity of Householder' ■v.u..v„n ■ww,. so,. ■—s,.,a Figure 1 $65,475 $68,472 5100,000- $84,360 $84,360 $83,820 $40,274 $80.000 $73974 $21,250 $40216 NA $57.423 $59,496 3 $49,976 $45.575 $57,342 $35,549 $55,545 $42,699 $42,69 ido.000 $42,711 $42,948 $38,410 $44,013 111 $40,639 No,000 $20.000 50 Non-HispaNcf Whip Bt k Aa. Mne.ban hWi—I Al. -Native Native H—ui / Rac;f blander o0—Rice M Pk Rice HblaaNeflatka • Housing The City of Yakima's Equity Study demonstrates that people with lower income can only afford to buy houses in districts with lower property value; this perpetuates the same income inequality cycle, but with housing and neighborhood inequality. Figure 4 below is the 2016 Total Property Value by District from the Yakima Equity study. "Families who pay more than they can afford for housing have too little left over for other necessities such as food, clothing and healthcare Therefore, families are unable to fulfill other needs and thus, these unfulfilled needs prevent success of Yakima's families. Even though the correlation between crime and property values are ambiguous, qualitative quotes from survey respondents during a survey collected at La Casa Hogar in 2016 show the impacts of living in East Yakima (districts with the lowest property values): -Ifeel like I don't matter. I already have stress living in this neighborhood which is dangerous, I don't need extra stress" • Extracurricular From Yakima City's 2017 Summer Program Guide — in special events section, two types of concert series are promoted: 1) the Summer Sunset Concert Series at Franklin Park featuring rock and indie bands; and 2) the Concert Series at Miller Park featuring only "America's Latino music culture". These two types of concert series and their respective locations make it very difficult to create community integration opportunities, especially through music which is a natural mediator between cultures. Also, pictures on the Summer 2017 Guide are neither representative nor reflective of Yakima's community demographics. Lastly, the majority of the programs cost money and require transportation, two needs to which many families do not have ample access .2 Special Events Franklin Park Summer Sunset Concert Series FRIDAY EVENINGS • 6:30-8:30 p.m. Bring your picnic dinner and a blanket or lawn chair Relax and listen to great music in a beautiful park. July 14 Adrian Xavier Reggae Cooperatively July 21 Pastel Motel brought to you by Indie Rock KXDD 104.1, 1..h, 9n 1I.. J_ 1 a._ 11-11 7. Ir 11 Al. H/ Inc 7 • City of Yakima Committees Concert Series at Miller Park SUNDAY EVENINGS • 5-7:00 p.m. From July 16 through August 20 and a special concert on September 10, you can enjoy 7 fun -filled, free family -friendly concerts to help quench the thirst for music with some of the Valley's best sound representation of America's Latino music culture. July 16 Sinceridad de La Sierra July 23 Los Nuevos Coyotes July 30 Rafaga de Tierra Caliente The City's boards and commissions advise and make recommendations to the City Council. Some boards such as the Public Facilities District Board recommend for members to "Have knowledge and/or experience in tourism, convention, and/or business. Diversity of backgrounds, ethnicity, gender, education, cultures, industries, business experience, etc. desirable." Diversity of City employees is lacking but could be particularly helpful, especially when deciding whether to embark on creating a permanent community integration committee. 2 This statement will be further explored in the September Final Report 3) Benefits of Integration Equitable communities, defined as communities with `just and fair opportunities for all"', grow strong economies and vibrant and resilient communities. Integrated communities in which people have equal capacity to participate and benefit from opportunities (including political, social and economic), regardless of race, religion, language, ethnicity, gender or other attributes enjoy higher community trust, social capital, and resultantly, higher economic benefits. Integration CommunityF;1 Increased Trust Economics • Mutual Trust in Communities When communities actively integrate across cultures ("culture" as broadly defined) including race, religion, income, gender, or any other social barrier, and embrace diversity, benefits are seen community- wide. In 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) Community Relations Services department created a toolkit with methods to increase mutual trust between communities and police. Often, the creation of mutual trust begins with increasing understanding across diversity and differences within a community's residents. The DOJ research highlights the value of tactics, such as increasing cultural competency education, to be able to "communicate effectively with, and understand the cultural norms of, these different groups."4 As increased trust yields from integration, higher productivity and economic benefits soon follow. `7 think most people on the east side are more scared of the cops than the gangs. "s Monica Jenkins, east side resident, Yakima Herald Republic article • Economic Benefits Economic research demonstrates a positive correlation between increased trust and economic benefits. When community trust rises by 10%, there is a correlated 0.8% increase in GDP per capita. An increase in trust by 7% is correlated with a 1% increase in community investment. These findings are from numerous studies that explore the links of trust to economic growth (Putnam 1993). Furthermore, economic research finds a strong and significant relationship between trust and output per worker. "In every instance, higher levels of trust and civic norms are correlated with higher economic growth, on a macro level, and significantly higher levels of output per worker, on a micro level.„6 s Marguerite Casey Foundation — Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy.” 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/defaultlfiles/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdt5. (14 May 2017). 4 "Importance of Police -Community Relationships and Resources for Further Reading." Community Relations Services Toolkit - Department ofJustice. 2015. <https://www.justice.gov/crs/file/836486/download> (2 June 2017) 5 Yakima Herald -Republic. 15 May 2017. <http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/east-yakima-residents-at-forum-say-they- don-t-trust/article 5MM42-3919-1le7-9928-335a656c4e87.htm1 >.(2 June 2017) 6 Valenti, Michael A. and Olivier G. Giovannoni. "The Economics of Inclusion: Building an Argument for a Shared Society." The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. February 2013. <http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp 755.pdf>. (15 May 2017). 7 Nationwide, embracing diversity and integration catalyzes: a) increased economic growth, b) a strong, prepared workforce, and c) increasing businesses' bottom lines. Policies- national, state and local- that explicitly expand stable employment opportunities to historically marginalized or minority populations increase economic growth at every level. From 1960 to 2008, up to 20% of the nation's economic growth can be attributed to the entry of women, and populations of color into higher-level occupations from which they were previously excluded.' By integrating these sectors of employees, the economy is able to combat the annual cost of replacing workers due to turnover as a result of workers' feeling "excluded;" nation-wide that cost is a staggering $64 billion.' Thus, as more workers feel "included" and stay at their workplaces, unemployment rates decrease. An unemployment rate of 4% across all racial, ethnic and gender groups, when combined with an increase in "labor force participation- would add $1.3 trillion per year to the U.S. GDP."9 • Relevance to Yakima Yakima's unemployment rate hovers at 9.9% and there is little data around diversity in our workforces. In December 2016, Yakima's unemployment rate was 9.9%10. While the U.S. Bureau demonstrates that unemployment rates are higher nation-wide among Black or African American and Latina/o populations", there is no unemployment data found based on race. The data section of this report demonstrates the population growth trends among Latina/o and non-Latina/o. Considering these local trends, and based on the aforementioned benefits of diverse workforces, it is and will continue to be increasingly critical for Yakima to ensure a diverse workforce at all levels and across all sectors of Yakima's economy to support economic vitality, sustainability, and growth for the City of Yakima. Yakima's neighborhoods do not receive the benefits of integration. The City of Yakima's Equity Study reveals that the neighborhoods on the east side of 16th Avenue are predominantly Hispanic/Latina(o) with many neighborhoods at over 70% Hispanic/Latina(o) (see data section of this report). Meanwhile, neighborhoods on the west side of 16th Avenue are blue indicating many neighborhoods serve as home to less than 4% Hispanic/Latina(o) residents. Unfortunately, this means that Yakima's neighborhoods do not receive the benefits of integration including: "greater tolerance, fair-mindedness, and openness to diverse networks and settings ."'Z Research shows that "exposure to diversity helps broaden people's social networks by creating meaningful opportunities for interaction across racial and ethnic lines."13 "Racial diversity leads to more complex thinking among college students (Antonio et al. 2003). And informal interactions between people of different racial groups improve college students' academic Ibid. 8 Marguerite Casey Foundation —Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy." 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdf>. (14 May 2017). s Yakima Herald -Republic. 15 May 2017. <hM://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/east-yakima-residents-at-forum-say-they-don-t- trust/article 5b82fa42-390-11e7-9928-335a656c4e87.html>. (2 June 2017). 9 Ibid. 10 Meseck, Donald W. "Yakima County Economy- 2016 in Review." WA State Employment Security Department. Report provided to the Yakima Chamber of Commerce on March 13, 2017. <http://www.yakima.org/img/pdf/1477.pdf>. (15 May 2017). 11 "Unemployment Rate and Employment -Population Ratio vary by Race and Ethnicity." Bureau of Labor Statistics- The Economics Daily. 13 January 2017. httl2s://www.bls.gov/ol2ub/ted/2017/unemployment-rate-and-employment-1ol2ulation-ratio-vary-by-race-and- ethnicity.htm. (2 June 2017). 12 Turner, Margery Austin and Lynette Rawlings. "Promoting Neighborhood Diversity -Benefits, Barriers and Strategies." August 2009. The Urban Institute. < hM://www. urban. org/sites/default/files/publication/30631/411955-Promoting-Neighborhood-Diversity-Benefits-Barriers-and- Strategies.PDF > P.4. (2 June 2017). 13 Ibid. outcomes and social growth (Grain et al. 2002)."14 Based on the equity study and the racial divisions, Yakima's neighborhoods reap few of these integration benefits. In conclusion, equitable and integrated communities with "just and fair opportunities for all"15 benefit from higher community trust, higher economic benefits and social capital. Over the next several months, our Committee will continue to explore opportunities centered on the topic of community integration and we will evaluate if it is deemed necessary to make this committee permanent. However, from our research this far, communities that embrace integration and diversity are strong communities where all people can take part in economic, civic and social life. 14 Ibid. is Marguerite Casey Foundation — Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy." 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/defaultlfiles/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdf5. (14 May 20I7). References Best Practice References: • Diversity Commission Survey 2017, City Resolution 16-11. www.go2kennewick.com • https://www.go2kennewick.com/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=133 • Best Practices in Action: "Strategies for Engaging Latinos, Seniors and Low-income Residents of Sonoma County". May 2012. Blue Sky Consulting Group & Common Knowledge. • City of Seattle, Office of the Mayor. 2016. Executive Order 2016-06. Edward B. Murray, Mayor. • Building the City of Choice" 2014. www.Spokanecit.�Org • https:Hstatic.spokanecity.org/documents/news/stories/2014/01/30/building-a-safer- stronger-smarter-city-of-choice/annual-report-2014.pdf • 2016 Community Well -Being Rankings. "State of American Well -Being". Gallup- Healthways 2016. Facts and Data References: • https://www.yakimawa.gov/counciliboards-commissions/ • https://yakima.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJoumal/index.html?gppid=edb33521fed7400e839aelbl e7ad3fcc • https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-of-health#two • https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/leading-health-indicators/2020-LHI-Topics • http://www.offn.wa.gov/databook/pdf/53077.pdf • http://reportcard.ospi.kl2.wa.us/summary.aspx?schoolId=1&reportLevel=State • https://vakimgparks.com/assets/summer-program-guide-2017.pdf • https://www.yakimamemorial.org/pdf/about/communily-hna-2016.pdf • https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html • https://joumalistsresource.org/studies/economics/real-estate/the-impact-of-crime-on-property_ value s -research -roundup Benefits of Integration References: • Marguerite Casey Foundation — Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy." 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdf>. (14 May 2017). • Yakima Herald -Republic. 15 May 2017. <http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/east-yakima- residents-at-forum-say-they-don-t-trust/article_5b82fa42-39f9-11 e7-9928-335a656c4e 87.htm1 >.(2 June 2017) • "Importance of Police -Community Relationships and Resources for Further Reading." Community Relations Services Toolkit -Department of Justice. 2015. <https://wwwj*ustice.gov/crs/file/836486/download> (2 June 2017) • Valenti, Michael A. and Olivier G. Giovannom. "The Economics of Inclusion: Building an Argument for a Shared Society." The Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. February 2013. • <http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_755.pdf>. (15 May 2017). • Ibid. HE • Marguerite Casey Foundation — Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy." 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdf>. (14 May 2017). • Yakima Herald -Republic. 15 May 2017. <http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/east-yakima- residents-at-forum-say-they-don-t-trust/article-5b82fa42-39f9-11 e7-9928-335a656c4e 87.html>. (2 June 2017). • Ibid. • "The Costs of Segregation: Lost Income. Lost Lives. Lost Potential." Urban Institute, Metropolitan Planning Council. http://www.metroplanning.org/uploads/cros/documents/cost-of- segregation.pdf. March 2017. (2 June 2017). • "Everyone Pays a Hefty Price for Segregation, Study Says." National Public Radio (NPR). 31 March 2017. http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2017/03/31/522098019/everyone-pays-a- hefty-price-for-segregation-study-says (2 June 2017). • Meseck, Donald W. "Yakima County Economy- 2016 in Review." WA State Employment Security Department. Report provided to the Yakima Chamber of Commerce on March 13, 2017. < http://www.yakima.org/img/pdf/1477.pdf >. (15 May 2017). • "Unemployment Rate and Employment -Population Ratio vary by Race and Ethnicity." Bureau of Labor Statistics- The Economics Daily. 13 January 2017. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/unemployment-rate-and-employment-population-ratio-vary- by-race-and-ethnicity.htm. (2 June 2017). • Turner, Margery Austin and Lynette Rawlings. "Promoting Neighborhood Diversity -Benefits, Barriers and Strategies." August 2009. The Urban Institute. • < http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/30631/411955-Promoting-Neighborhood- Diversity-Benefits-Barriers-and-Strategies.PDF > P.4. (2 June 2017). • Ibid. • Ibid. • Marguerite Casey Foundation — Policy Link. "Just and Fair Employment for All: Good for Families, Community and the Economy." 24 March 2015. <http://www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Employment-for-All-FINAL-03-11-16.pdf>. (14 May 2017). m n N x o 0 Ilk 3 !!!++ r-+ / / 0 r ' � o + � V o • C� ( D v rp D 3 rt o w p un =3c D v Ln co C O �' ma v N j O n CD -0 O 3 3 3 cD 3 3 -0 3 CCD r rD rD rD D rD rD �, rD t r-+ rD rD rD 3 `-t _0 O O r-frD 3 rD 3 CT3 0- + rD [,� rD (DrD �„ O rD rD w rD X -7 0o rn CD D rD -0 Q- _0 C �, � O O O :7 r-r r+ O � 7 v v, C) —h CL) CT C rD CD- o rD r+ ova CD (D o (D rD n rD O O 3 3 rD rD CT rD CD rD rD - rD CD O rD rD 0- W CD O � n O � n —. n Q n'aq (D n. (D n• � rD r-t rr. Cl) Qj r-+ O �. Q � n Q Q O � � � CD r n r-r O CDCD r Q Q = = (D O r+ Q — � cry UQ D 0 Q (D rD E D r-+ r-r O rD m V) W CD r--F CrQa) D <' O ' ° D3 CD CrQ CT V) rD �' (D CD r) � � �, m m 0 0, -< — CD 7C Q (D e-+ -� O (T C cr) O' r+ V) O = p O � � rD O� cn r+ —. — — r+ 0 � • D �+, V) 0 o CD rD O n n Q -+, rD -0 (D E3 3 cn r+ r+ S ram+ UQ (D CD- = (D v� (D p.) -0 (D r+ n (D (D Q O (D O O (D rD O O cn (D = � = � O C r (D V' O (D cn (n E Q (D r+ ( rD — (D (D D O cn' �. = — — Q r-r 3 (D -0 O r+ (D O C M CD O r+ O U) � v • O 77 (D r-r 3 f D _u CD (D � cn (DD �+ O n �. CD- -0 Ln (D < a) r-+ Ul Ln _0 (D � o o 7 � �. � � W (D CL V) �' rl+ oRa OL) rt _0 � O a, r-+ D —. cn n fD r, O O °p O D -0 =- (D h T� r-r r-+. rD (D CD �- ::3 r-+ Q (D 3 2 CT r-+ CD U' O O p C7 E v 0 Cl) o (D Q < (D Z rD —h cn (D 0 Cl) r.+ D r-+ (D rD V) 0 S� O U' (Dr-t Cep 0-7 � � . (D � n � 0) a) L-" r-+ (D n O (D � pn < 0- -O -- 0 - (D O cu e-r 70 6- (D O Ln rD n O � � � CD N CD rD Wi n o- � c M O (D (D Ln rt' rD Ln r-+ � p � � �� _0 � �� w r"F —. rD p o n O cn n (D N r-- N C t < _. `n•CD- -p � of Un cn p (D n (D (D O :�E 5 cr, � �p � � Q0 Qn � n 3 =a) 3 p — cnrD ro n �+ O -Ln r--F- rD � � rD rD rD 0- O a) CTn � O � (D r�-r � (D — O' (D (<D Cl) ' M � CD + CD O M O Ln O n _0 rD Q O `+• E --In � O Ln Q V) Ln r-+ < rD N rD V) O D ` Ln CD cn p •v � • f7 (D (D rD (D o 3 m o 3 fD h - O rt rt r-+ CD CD CD CD _0 aQ r+ r�+ aq 1 O 0 � n Q 0 rF •• O . . CD- r..r rD co r+ r+ � O � r-* r-+ � n n O (n 3 3 rD Ln rD r rD r-+ U� _. O Ln � r-r n O r-+ r--f O cn —• V) n n O tn CO rD r-+ � (D - (D < �1 CD rD r-'h r-r - CD O r-r 0 (DD n m : U) 3 O �+ n• n z< Ln r-rrD � On p r*. CCD n n Ln � (D O O n rD CD — O O w a) � rD = rD rD O cn O Q * Q 3. n cn rD O -, � (D Q M CD = rD n Ln V) r-* r-r. O n — rD rD = O Ln 3 rD O Ln3 5 3. I -< o O O UQ n O CD — O + = Q Ln — n rD n O — O r+ —. rD — O rD �, � aQ QrD CD Ln rcn-r (7q rD . rD r--r m O r A r+ f fD p � N rD n ? Z ZT v � n ID o Ln c — 3 Q orD � 3 z (U ::30 - Oro 0 � � --1 '{ `2 o . v rt e-t CL Q 0) Q 0� 1 ZT L v �, �--F fD 0 rD Ln D � 3 -o rD (/) o L N � � r-F• � o D �• Q D � o T Q • V) `V I f.+ rD O fD A � fD l ) 0 V) ( + m CL oC: C C: n r • 0 rD o � � g -1 0 n rt 0 0 3 3 m r+ �'• `n° ° o W ul f D 0 0 _0Ln T. �' CD Ln 0 0 v 0 (D (D 0 o Lo 0 z rD x r-+ V) r.+ (D (D rV).+ rD (D :3 --1 0 to h NJ (D V) 0 0 3 o-q1 0 3 w r+ '-� o m 3 r+ Ca- 0 cu Ln