HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2005-069 Washington state Public works Trust Fund Loan applicationA RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. R-2005- 69
to authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to
complete and submit an application for a loan from the Washington State
Public Works Trust Fund in the amount of $1,995,630 for the replacement
of the City of Yakima's Ranney Well, and, if the loan application is
approved, to execute all necessary certifications, agreements and other
documents to complete the loan transaction.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima recognizes that the provision of infrastructure is
important to all residents and businesses of the community; and
WHEREAS, in the 2004 Water System Plan Update an evaluation of the domestic water
system identified deficiencies in the water supply for the City of Yakima, including the need for a
new water supply well to replace the Ranney Well; and
WHEREAS, the City has the necessary ground water right for a new supply well; and
WHEREAS, replacement of the Ranney Well will help correct the deficiencies identified
in the aforementioned plan to optimize the water supply, meet the domestic water supply needs
for Yakima, and increase the reliability of the City's water supply system; and
WHEREAS, these improvements are consistent with both the 2004 Cost of Service and
Rate Study and the City's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP); and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund has made low-interest loan
funds available for the construction and repair of water utilities; and
WHEREAS, the City will generate local funds from the Water CIP budget and reserves
to be used as a local match for a Public Works Trust Fund loan in the amount of $352,170; and
WHEREAS, the amount of local match funds provided will afford to the City a generous
interest rate of 0.5% on the $1,995,630 loan; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council has determined that it is in the best
interest of the City to apply for funding from the Washington Public Works Trust Fund to replace
the City's Ranney Well, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute all necessary documents
to complete and submit an application for a loan from the Washington State Public Works Trust
Fund in the amount of $1,995,630 for the replacement of the City of Yakima's Ranney Well and,
if the loan application is approved, to execute all necessary certifications, agreements and other
documents to complete the loan transaction.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3`d day of May, 2005
ATTEST:
City Clerk
aul P. George, Mayor
Washington State
Public Works Board
Public Works Trust Fund
Loan Application Packet
2005-2006
Section 1: APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPLYING FOR:
❑ Planning ❑ Pre -Construction
Borrower:
(Check Only One)
El Construction ❑ Emergency
City of Yakima, Water/Irrigation Division
Municipal Corporation Agency (MCAG) Number:
Federal Tax ID #:
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
State:
County:
8 5
9 11 - : 6: 0 0 1
2301 Fruitvale Blvd.
2301 Fruitvale Blvd.
Yakima
WA
Zip Code:
Yakima
Congressional District:
4ffi
Legislative District(s): 14th
Has the local government experienced severe fiscal distress
resulting from a natural disaster or emergency public works need
in the past five years?
❑ YES I1 NO
If "Yes," describe the event, when it occurred, and the fiscal distress it caused.
Section 2: SYSTEM INFORMATION
Primary system affected by
this project. (Check only
one)
•
Bridge
•
Road
Q
Domestic Water
•
Storm Sewer
•
Sanitary Sewer
•
Solid Waste/Recycling
Population within jurisdiction:
Contact Person:
Street Address:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Email Address:
79,500
Percent affected by this project:
82%
Dave Brown
2301 Fruitvale Blvd.
Yakima, WA 98902-1225
(509) 575-6204
FAX:
(509) 575-6187
dbrown@ci.yakima.wa.us
Section 3: PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Title:
Groundwater Well
Scope of Work: Describe in detail what will be done as part of this project.
• Conduct study to determine exact location for well, including hydrogeology and distribution
system analysis and preparation of drilling bid specifications.
• Design of well including pump and building
• Drilling well, installing casing and screens
• Installing pump
• Building new pump house
• Mechanical and electrical connections
• Telemetry connections
• Connection to water distribution system
• Install Disinfection
• Install Fluoride
• Backup Generator
• Treatment for taste & odor and/or iron & manganese
• Define Wellhead Protection area and modify Wellhead Protection Program
• Decommission Ranney Well
Proposed Performance Measure (For Construction, Pre -Construction, and Emergency
applicants only):
Describe how the success of the project will be measured. Be sure to identify how the change will
be measured, the standard against which the change will be noted, the amount of change that is
expected, and when the change will have occurred.
The project success will be measured by the well production of 4.3MGD of domestic water by
8/2007 that meets or exceeds all current drinking water standards.
Attach Project Map (required)
Total Project Cost:
PVVTF Loan Request:
$2,347,800.00
$1,995,630.00
General Project Information:
Does this project acquire, expand, improve, or renovate a public
water system(s) that is in violation of health and safety standards
or does it cover the cost of extending service to such a
system(s).
Does the financing or development of the project involve any
other jurisdiction?
Project Schedule
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes Q No
Indicate the month and year when the activities were or will be completed.
For Pre -Construction Applications, please limit schedule to Pre -Construction Activities.
For Planning Applications, list activities in "Other" categories below.
Activity
Engineering Report
Environmental Review
Land/ROW Acquisition
Current Status
Complete, WSP Update 3/2004
Completion Date
Complete
N/A
Permits Obtained In Progress
Public Involvement/Information Complete, WSP Update
4/2005
/
3/2004
Preparation of Bid Documents Not Started 10/2006
a
Award Construction Contract
F Start Construction
Complete Construction
Project in Use
Other: Transfer Water Right
Other:
Other:
Other:
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
Not Started
In Progress
11/2006
1/2007
6/2007
8/2007
9/2005
Project Costs
For Pre -Construction Applications, please limit cost estimates to pre -construction
activities. For Planning Applications, list costs in "Other" categories below.
Engineering Report
Environmental Review
Land/ROW Acquisition
Permits
Public Involvement/Information
Bid Documents
Construction
Other Fees
Contingency (20%)
Other: Wellhead Protection Program
Other: Decommission old well
Other:
Other:
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS
$ 20,000
$ 5,000
$0
$5,000
$ 1,500
$130,000
$ 1,770,000
$
$ 386,300
$ 20,000
$ 10,000
$
$
$ 2,347,800
Project Financing
Type of Fundin
Source
Amount
Grant #1
Grant #2
Grant #3
Total Grants
$1, 995, 630.00
This PWTF Request PWB
Other Loan #1
Other Loan #2
Total Loans
Local Revenue
$1, 995, 630.00
Rates & Reserves $352,170.00
Source #1
Source #2
Source #3
Total Local Revenue
$352,170.00
Other Funds
Total Funding
$2,347,800.00
Progra
Construction
Minimum of 5%
Local Match linked to Interest rate
-hate _ rm
15% Local Match ='/2% Interest Rate
10% Local Match = 1% Interest Rate
II5% Local Match = 2% Interest Rate
Minimum of 5%
Local Match linked to Interest rate
Pre -Construction
Eme
Plan
. 15% Local Match =1/2% Interest Rate
10% Local Match = 1% Interest Rate
5% Local Match = 2% Interest Rate
rgency
No Match Required
No Match Required 4% Interest Rate
20 years or life of the
improvement, whichever is
less
5 years (extended up to 20
years if construction funding is
secured by the second loan
repayment date)
20 years or life of the
improvement whichever is Tess
0% Interest Rate
6 Years
Solid Waste/Recycling 1111.
Section 4: PROJECT NEED/SOLUTION
Construction and Pre -Construction (Total Points = 40)
Not Scored for Planning and Emergency Applications, but you are required
to fill out Section 4.
A. abject Category (6 points maximum for Construction and Pre -Construction)
Identify the category (les) of the system(s) affected by the proposed project.
(Check all that apply.)
Bridge/
Sew
•
Principle Arterial
El Supply/Source-Primary
■
Treatment
•
•
Minor Arterial
■ Supply/Source-Secondary
•
Interceptor/Trunk Line
■
Final Disposal
•
Major Collector
El Treatment
•
Pump/Lift Station
•
Minor Collector
■ Storage
•
Collector
•
Local/Other
■ Transmission
•
Telemetry/Equipment
n Distribution
•
Conservation/Other
n Telemetry/Equipment
• Conservation/Other
Stoewer
•
Storage/Detention
•
Waste Reduction/Recycling
•
Treatment
■
Remedial Action
•
Interceptor/Trunk Line
■
Final Disposal
•
Collector
•
Transfer Station
•
Other
•
Other
1. For Construction A
Readiness -To -Proceed
Permits approved
0
Engineering/design complete
0
Project is in concept stage
EPOEMINOWnstRIMMIPPIIIMMEMIIIIIIME
Readiness -To -Proceed
Project will get permits approved
0
Project will complete engineering/design
Project is in approved plan
Project Need and Solution
The City of Yakima currently serves a population of approximately 65,000. The current normal
source of domestic water supply for the City is the Naches River Water Treatment Plant with a
nominal capacity of 25 MGD. This supply is adequate to meet the projected maximum day
demand (MDD) until 2008. The three active wells (Kiwanis, Airport, and Kissel Park) have been
designated as emergency use supplies. A drought condition such as 2001 and again this year
(2005) are examples of an emergency condition in which the emergency wells would be
activated. A major portion of the normal surface water source of supply is subject to proration
during low water years. In 2001 the output of the water treatment plant was reduced to 11.9
MGD and in 2005 the output is reduced to 12.5 MGD due to proration of the storage capacity
water right. Including the emergency wells, the total supply capacity during 2001 was 23.5 MGD
and in 2005 it will be 23.6 MGD (refer to Table 3-22). Referring to Figure 3-2, we can project that
during a severe drought condition similar to 2001, the available supply might be less than the
MDD beginning in 2004 if no additional source of supply is placed into service prior to that time.
As discussed above, it is projected that an additional normal supply source will be necessary by
2008 in order to meet the MDD without having to utilize the emergency well supplies. The source
capacity analysis presented in Table 3-22 is based on the development of new supply sources as
shown below in Table 3-44.
The proposed location for the new 3,000 gpm deep well is at the Elks or Gardner Park, located in
Yakima. The property is already owned by the City.
The altematives for developing new supply sources for the City of Yakima water system are
limited by water rights considerations. As discussed in the 2004 Water System Plan Update, the
City of Yakima holds a number of water rights that supply the City's domestic and municipal
irrigation distribution systems. All of the City's surface water rights are currently under the
jurisdiction of the Yakima County Superior Court as part of the surface water rights adjudication,
Ecology v. Acquavella, et al. On November 21, 2002, the Court issued a Conditional Final Order
that approves a proposed settlement of the City's Naches River water rights diverted at the
Naches River Water Treatment Plant and at Nelson Bridge. For purposes of this plan, the
Conditional Final Order provides an appropriate point of reference for the analysis of future
supply source development.
Ideally, any new source of normal water supply would not be subject to proration during low water
years and would be available year around. All but one of the City's current surface water rights
are subject to seasonal time of use limitations. The one existing groundwater right, which is
currently not fully utilized, is the Ranney Well right. The original Ranney Well water right was for
5000 gpm and can be used year around. Of this 5000gpm, 2000gpm will be transferred to the
Kissel Park Well. This leaves 3000gpm, which could be transferred to a new well. Under current
regulations, the Ranney Well would likely be considered groundwater under the influence of
surface water and therefore not suitable for domestic use without additional treatment. A new
3,000 gpm deep well would enable the City to beneficially use this existing water right, thereby
providing the additional year round source which is needed and assuring that this right is not lost
in the future for failure to put it to use as required by state water law.
Table 3-22 Source Capacity Analysis for Years 2000 through 2025 in MGD
Projected Demands
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Average Day Demand
13.1
13.8
14.7
15.9
17.0
18.2
Maximum Day Demand
22.9
24.1
25.7
27.8
29.8
31.9
Peak Hour Demand
36.6
38.6
41.2
44.5
47.7
51.0
Existing Supply Capacity
Existing Water Treatment Plant 1
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Existing Wells - Emergency Use Only
Kiwanis Well (3.4 MGD / 2,350 gpm)
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
Airport Well (4.0 MGD / 2,800 gpm)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Kissel Well (4.2 MGD / 2,900 gpm)
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
Total Emergency Well Capacity
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
Supply Capacity - Non-Drought Years
Existing Water Treatment Plant
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Existing Emergency Supply Wells 2' 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Capacity
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Supply Capacity - Drought Years
Existing WTP (10 cfs + 29% of 29 cfs) 4
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
Existing Wells (Emergency Use) 2' 5
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
Total Capacity
23.5
23.5
23.5
23.5
23.5
23.5
Supply Requirements
Required Supply to meet MDD
22.9
24.1
25.7
27.8
29.8
31.9
Projected Deficiency (w/o adding supply)
-
--
0.7
2.8
4.8
6.9
Future New Supply Sources (Proposed)
Elks/Gardner Park Well (1 at 3000 gpm / 4.3 MGD) 6
0.0
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
ASR Groundwater Wells?
0.0
0.0
3.6
7.2
7.2
7.2
Total Additional Supply from New Sources
0.0
4.3
7.9
11.5
11.5
11.5
Projected Supply
Existing Water Treatment Plant (non-drought)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
Existing Water Treatment Plant (drought) 4
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
11.9
Existing Groundwater Wells 2' 3
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
Future Elks/Gardner Park Well 6
0.0
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
Future ASR Groundwater Wells 7
0.0
0.0
3.6
7.2
7.2
7.2
Total Capacity - Non-Drought Year 3
25.0
29.3
32.9
36.5
36.5
36.5
Total Capacity - Drought Year 3' 4' 5' 7
23.5
27.8
31.4
35.0
35.0
35.0
1. The existing water treatment plant is rated at 25 MGD (17,400 gpm) consistent with the DOH Water Facilities Inventory (WFI).
2. Existing groundwater wells are designated for emergency use only.
3. Since the existing groundwater wells are for emergency use, they are excluded from the Non-Drought year supply.
4. During 2001, and due to drought conditions, the USBR reduced the storage control capacity of the WTP to 29%.
5. During 2001 drought conditions, the Groundwater Wells were activated.
6. The proposed Elks/Gardner Park Well would use 3000 gpm of the Ranney Well water right. Installation estimated for 2007.
7. Two future 2,500 gpm (3.6 MGD) ASR wells are proposed. Installations are estimated for 2007 and 2010. Initially both ASR wells
will be designated as emergency sources. In 2015 one ASR well will be changed to a normal source.
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1998 2000 2002
Figure 3-2 Projected 6 year and 20 year Maximum Day Demand
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2,
Table 3 -44 New Source of Supply to Meet Future MDD
New Source
Capacity MGD
Year Installed
Type of Supply
Elks/Gardner
Park Well
4.3
2007
Normal
ASR Well No. 1
3.6
2007
Emergency'
ASR Well No. 2
3.6
2010
Emergency'
'. Initially both ASR wells will be designated as emergency sources. In 2015
one ASR well will be changed to a normal source.
I1
2022 Total
MDD =30.86 MGD
limml
2008 Total
MDD =25.04
MGD
�-
2022 L1
MDD = 21.91
MGD
2008 L1
MDD=17.87
MGD
—;—Total
MDD forecast all zones MGD
t Level
1 MDD use forecast MGD
—4.— Level
2 MDD use forecast MGD
—F Level
3 MDD use forecast MGD
2008 L2
MDD =5.79
MGD
—♦
TT
4
7022 L2 MDD = 7.05 MGD
2008 L3 MDD = 1.35 MGD
2022 L3 MDD = 1.70 MGD
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2,
Table 3 -44 New Source of Supply to Meet Future MDD
New Source
Capacity MGD
Year Installed
Type of Supply
Elks/Gardner
Park Well
4.3
2007
Normal
ASR Well No. 1
3.6
2007
Emergency'
ASR Well No. 2
3.6
2010
Emergency'
'. Initially both ASR wells will be designated as emergency sources. In 2015
one ASR well will be changed to a normal source.
Section 5: Local Management
System Maintenance & Operations
Describe four (4) distinct improvements made to the system or activities performed on the system or on-going
�r4ivi+ioc I Inrlcr+�4on h.e +he cvc+em i , +ham .. n+ •.,1 Fa.... /A\ :.. aL... i..a.. .. a4...a .. ..a .:.. _ _ al__ _a_ v._
...... •.uvv ...I .v... .4.41%,01 . v.y a..... .a..aay... u 1 u Fica g., QI Iv Ivul rt.) 111 U lc 1 ulul c
reliability or performance. Be sure to indicate the month and year that the
begin or occur.
11 IQ1 I I IQII IIQII I VI 11111J1 VVC LI IC JyJICI l l J
examples began or occurred or will
Past Improvement/activity
From January 1, 2000 to application submittal
Date: Month/Year
Distribution System Leak Detection
7/2002
Replace Telemetry Radio Antennas
8/2002
Install Chlorine Residual Analyzer at Second Level Pump Station
1/2005
Replace Filter Effluent Turbidity Meters
2/2005
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain why:
Future Improvement/Activity
Application submittal to December 31, 2010
Date: Month/Year
Fire Hydrant Testing
8/2005
Distribution System Valve Testing and Exercising Program
10/2005
Replace Water Treatment Plant Effluent and Coagulation Control
Center Turbidity Meters
2/2006
Flush distribution system to improve water quality
6/2006
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain why:
1ministrative, Financial, and Planning
scribe four (4) distinct improvements or on-going activities or planning processes undertaken by the
stem in the past, and four (4) in the future that maintain or improve the system's financial, administrative
d/or planning status. Be sure to indicate the month and year that the examples began or occurred or will
in or occur.
Past Improvement/Activity Date: Month/Year
From January 1, 2000 to application submittal
Evaluation Water Treatment Plant Intake structure
Aquifer Storage and Recovery pilot test project
9/2000
12/2001
Update to the Water System Comprehensive Plan as required by
RCW 43.20.050, RCW 90.54.180
Cost of Service and Rate Study
3/2004
7/2004
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain why:
Future Improvement/Activity Date Month/Year
Application submittal to December 31, 2010
Complete an Operations and Maintenance Manual for Water
Treatment Operations
Update the Water System Emergency Response Plan
Cost of Service and Rate Study
7/2005
7/2006
7/2009
Update to the Water System Comprehensive Plan as required by 3/2010
RCW 43.20.050, RCW 90.54.180
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain why:
System Capital Improvement
Describe four (4) distinct capital projects undertaken in the past, and four (4) projects in the future that
maintain, improve, or expand the system. Be sure to indicate the month and year that the examples began or
occurred or will be • in or occur.
Past Improvement/Activity Date Month/Year
From January 1, 2000 to application submittal
Design and construct Fluoridation System
4/2002
Design and construct fish barrier (screens) at the Water Treatment
Plant river intake
Construction of improvements to the Water Treatment Plant
Chemical Feed Systems, including Chemical Containment
10/2002
11/2004
Design and construct improvements to the Water Treatment Plant
filter pipe gallery
2/2005
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain why:
Future Improvement/Activity Date: Month/Year
Application submittal to December 31, 2010
Design and construct pipe replacement/improvements to the second
level reservoirs
Design and construct New groundwater well
10/2005
6/2007
Design and construct improvements to the Water Treatment Plant
filter backwash water storage lagoon and wastewater recycle system
10/2008
Design and construct enhanced ultra violet disinfection at the water
treatment plant
Restorative: If you are unable to give four examples, please explain wh
8/2009
APIIIMITCE,RTIFjc4TION
RESOLUTION NO. R -2005-
A RESOLUTION to authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to
complete and submit an application for a loan from the Washington
State Public Works Trust Fund in the amount of $1,995,630 for the
replacement of the City of Yakima's Ranney Well, and, if the loan
application is approved, to execute all necessary certifications,
agreements and other documents to complete the loan transaction.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima recognizes that the provision of infrastructure is
important to all residents and businesses of the community; and
WHEREAS, in the 2004 Water System Plan Update an evaluation of the domestic
water system identified deficiencies in the water supply for the City of Yakima, including the
need for a new water supply well to replace the Ranney Well; and
WHEREAS, the City has the necessary ground water right for a new supply well; and
WHEREAS, replacement of the Ranney Well will help correct the deficiencies
identified in the aforementioned plan to optimize the water supply, meet the domestic water
supply needs for Yakima, and increase the reliability of the City's water supply system; and
WHEREAS, these improvements are consistent with both the 2004 Cost of Service
and Rate Study and the City's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP); and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Public Works Trust Fund has made low-interest
loan funds available for the construction and repair of water utilities; and
WHEREAS, the City will generate local funds from the Water CIP budget and reserves
to be used as a local match for a Public Works Trust Fund loan in the amount of $352,170;
and
WHEREAS, the amount of local match funds provided will afford to the City a
generous interest rate of 0.5% on the $1,995,630 loan; and
WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the City Council has determined that it is in the
best interest of the City to apply for funding from the Washington Public Works Trust Fund to
replace the City's Ranney Well, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute all necessary
documents to complete and submit an application for a loan from the Washington State Public
Works Trust Fund in the amount of $1,995,630 for the replacement of the City of Yakima's
Ranney Well and, if the loan application is approved, to execute all necessary certifications,
agreements and other documents to complete the loan transaction.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 3`d day of May, 2005.
ATTEST:
Paul P. George, Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION BY PREPARER OF APPLICATION
(Staff Member or Consultant)
WHEREAS, David Brown has prepared this application for a Washington State
Public Works Trust Fund loan; and
WHEREAS, the preparer recognizes and acknowledges that the information in this
application is the only information that will be considered in the evaluation and/or
rating process. Incomplete responses will result in a reduced chance of funding, and
that in order to ensure fairness for all, the Public Works Board does not accept any
additional written materials or permit applicants to make presentations before the
Board; and
WHEREAS, the information provided in this application is true and correct to the best
of the preparer's belief and knowledge; and
NOW THEREFORE, David Brown recognizes and acknowledges the above
declarations and certifies that this application meets the above requirements.
Signed:
Title:
Water/Irrigation Division Manager
Phone Number:
Date:
ATTEST:
509-575-6204
98312681100000 021605.apr
oiaer Associates
r
1 IN
LI,
w
7
Existing
of Withdrawal
Point
Ranney _
.70 1
Selah I.
11
— '-
•r2`
7
/
1 1
8
9
10
11
1,
�
18
17
1 ._
= •�
;
msn'4 Maps & Directions
Yakima, Washington, United States
eamrinngg Mkreso t4 ~
�apP. nt�b Tadwlogy
.Summitview Ave
Harwood
Ahtanum
�4=
Wiley City
L
V7
Mlao�ol
MapPoint•N
United States
Military Reservation
Yakima Training
Center
Terrace
Heights
eirchfield
Vakama Indian Reservation
02005 Microsoft Corp 02004 NA'TEQ , and forGOT, Inc .
24
Moxee
City
Your right to use maps and routes generated on the MSN service is subiect at all times to the MSN Terms of Use.
Data credits. copyright, and disclaimer.
ITEM TITLE:
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.
For Meeting Of: May 3, 2005
Consideration of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute
documents and agreements pursuant to a loan application to the
Washington Public Works Trust Fund for $1,995,630 to drill a new 3,000
gallon per minute water supply well.
SUBMITTED BY: Dave Brown, Water/Irrigation Division Manager
CONTACT: Dave Brown, 575-6204
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The City of Yakima Water/Irrigation Division requests Council approval to apply for a $1,995,630
loan from the state Public Works Trust Funds for a new 3,000 gallon per minute water supply
well. This application would be for 2005-06 funds, with the work scheduled to be completed
from 2006 to 2007. In order to secure the lowest program interest rate of 0.5%, the City is
required to provide a local match (from non -grant sources) of at least 15%. The Water/Irrigation
Division is proposing the match of $352,170 be provided from its Capital Improvements
Program budget (reserves). The total project cost is estimated at $2,347,800.
The scope of work for the includes:
• Conduct study to determine exact location for well, including hydrogeology and
distribution system analysis and preparation of drilling bid specifications.
• Design of well including pump and building
• Drilling well, installing casing and screens
• Installing pump
• Building new pump house
• Mechanical and electrical connections
• Telemetry connections
Cont... next page
Resolution X Ordinance Contract Other: Loan Application
Funding Source: 474 Water Improvement Fund - Washington State Public Works
Trust Fund
Approval for Submittal:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. R-2005-69
1
Cont.. from first page
• Connection to water distribution system
• Install Disinfection
• Install Fluoride
• Backup Generator
• Treatment for taste & odor and/or iron & manganese
• Define Wellhead Protection area and modify Wellhead Protection Program
• Decommission Ranney Well
These improvements are consistent with, and identified in, the 2004 Cost of Service and Rate
Study, as well as the 2004 Water System Plan.
With Council approval staff will submit the application by May 9, 2005. The project funding list
will be announced this fall and must be approved by the legislature in the 2006 session.
2