HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSC Agenda Packet 1-26-17
Council Public Safety Committee
2nd Floor Conference Room
City Hall
January 26, 2017
3:30 p.m.
Members: Staff: Others:
Councilmember Coffey City Manager Cliff Moore
Councilmember D. Gutierrez Police Chief Dominic Rizzi
Councilmember Lover (alternate) Fire Chief Bob Stewart
Councilmember Mendez City Prosecutor Cynthia Martinez
Brad Coughenour
Scott Schafer
Revised Agenda
Approval of December 1, 2016 minutes
New Business
Police Fees – Jeannett Mora
SAFER grant – Bob Stewart
Old Business
Private ambulance dispatch fees and ordinance – Brad Coughenour
Domestic Violence issues – continuing discussion topic
Other Business
Information items
Adjournment
Council Public Safety Committee
December 1, 2016
MINUTES
Members: Staff:
Councilmember Carmen Mendez (chair) City Manager Cliff Moore
Councilmember Kathy Coffey Chief Dominic Rizzi, Police
Councilmember Dulce Gutierrez Deputy Chief Ted VanderHouwen, Fire
Scott Schafer, Public Works
Cynthia Martinez, Prosecutor
Helen Harvey, Legal
Brett Sheffield, Engineering
Brad Coughenour, SunComm
Terri Croft, Police
The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m.
Approval of minutes of November 3, 2016
Gutierrez noted that Brook Goosman was missing from the attendance list. It was
MOVED by Gutierrez to approve the minutes of the November 3, 2016 meeting with the
addition of Goosman to the attendance list. Motion was SECONDED by Coffey. Motion
PASSED unanimously.
Domestic Violence Presentation
Martinez gave an introduction to domestic violence, noting that “domestic violence” is a
descriptor of a crime and not a crime in and of itself. Domestic violence can be
attached to many different relationships. The police department approach to domestic
violence crimes is to have all domestic violence crimes investigated by specially trained
investigators. The legal department approach is to follow the charging and prosecution
recommendations of the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys. Prosecution
is declined in only 20% of DV crimes, and it was noted that prosecution is often
hampered by uncooperative victims. Although the legal and judicial system try to get
treatment for first time offenders, treatment is expensive and lengthy, and is not usually
covered by insurance. 85-90% of DV defendants require public defenders. Those that
do make it through the treatment program have good reports and it does reduce
recidivism. Yakima County has a victim-witness program, and the City receives funding
through a pass-through grant to fund YWCA advocacy programs. Municipal Court has
additional powers in DV cases. They may order 5 year probation, surrender of
weapons, and issue restraining orders. The method of case assignment in the legal
department allows for continuity and for the prosecutors to remain aware of issues and
offenders in the community.
Abigail Mott of the YWCA gave a report on YWCA DV program. The YWCA has been
in its current location since 2009 and has operated a DV shelter since 1978. The have
a 24 hour shelter with priority given to victims of partner crimes. They do serve male
victims as well as female victims, but finding housing for male victims is more difficult.
The average stay at the temporary shelter is 5 weeks, and then victims can move into
transitional housing, which is a 24 month subsidized housing program. The YWCA
primarily serves as victim advocates and work in a non-controlling manner. They do not
offer chemical dependency treatment, anger management, or sexual assault programs.
They have partner agencies that they refer those issues to. They offer a mobile
advocacy program that offers outreach and education. The do offer a prevention
outreach program to school aged children at the Henry Beauchamp Community Center.
They are not currently in the school system but are trying to find an avenue to introduce
DV prevention in schools. Abigail stated that the YWCA considers domestic violence to
be a public health crisis.
Gutierrez asked what the training opportunities were for prosecutors. Martinez advised
they attend the domestic violence symposium once a year, and also participate in the
Community Crisis Response Team. Gutierrez also asked about uncooperative victims,
noting that Seattle prosecutes DV cases without victim cooperation and asked how
Yakima could do the same. Martinez advised we used to prosecute even without a
cooperating witness. Prosecutors previously relied on “excited utterances”, however,
there are limitations on what constitutes an excited utterance. Officers have victims
complete a Smith affidavit, which can be utilized in the prosecution. Gutierrez asked if
we have ever had in-house victim advocates and what the cost would be. Martinez
advised we had not, and the cost would be 1 full time employee. Gutierrez inquired if
judges order other treatment to offenders. Martinez advised that they do, and will
sometimes want to see one treatment completed before beginning another treatment
type or program.
Coffey wrapped up the topic by stating this was an educational process for the
committee members and she would like to see the dialog on the topic continue. She
recommended continuing on a path of prevention, education, and public service
announcements.
It was MOVED by Gutierrez and SECONDED by Coffey to keep the item on the January
agenda for further discussion. Motion PASSED unanimously.
Ambulance Dispatch Fees
Coughenour reported that a discrepancy was found in billing of agencies that SunComm
supports in dispatch services. SunComm charges outside fire, police, and emergency
service providers for services, however, does not charge private ambulance companies.
Coughenour opened discussion if the ambulance companies should be charged for this
service. He worked with the legal department to draft an agreement, which was
presented to both private ambulance companies. Tony Miller, EMS Manager for
Yakima County, expressed concerns that the ambulance companies decline to respond
to calls for service if they are charged. David Lynde of American Medical Response
stated that the ambulance companies pay fees for AVL, CAD, interfaces, etc., and have
over $2 million annually in uncompensated services throughout Central Washington.
Additional fees would require they evaluate their ability to respond to all calls. He
requested the fees not be implemented.
It was noted that the state of Washington requires 1 ambulance county-wide, and that
the Yakima Fire Department is not licensed for patient transport. Gutierrez inquired if
other cities were in a similar situation. Coughenour advised that Lewis County was the
only other agency with a written dispatch contract with private ambulance companies.
Coughenour also noted that the City charges fire districts for dispatch service, so it
makes sense to charge the ambulance companies for the same service. Lynde stated
that the contract created a $26,000 impact on their company, and they have almost no
ability to collect on many charges. He also expressed concern with the impact of future
cost increases if the fees were now mandated. Areas of compromise should be
identified, for example, not charging the ambulance company if the patient refuses
transport. There was discussion of gifting of public funds/services issues. Mendez
suggested the topic be added to the quarterly County EMS meeting.
It was MOVED by Coffey and SECONDED by Gutierrez to send the issue to full council
for discussion on the December 13 meeting. Motion PASSED.
Proposed Update to YMC 6.45.015 Disclosing Intimate Images
Goosman advised the proposed revision to the municipal code to adopt the RCW
regarding disclosing intimate images without consent of the subject of the image.
It was MOVED by Gutierrez and SECONDED by Coffey to move the issue on to the full
council. Motion PASSED unanimously.
Old Business
Collision Report
Sheffield provided a response to the inquiry of how many collisions had occurred at 40th
Avenue/Chestnut, 16th Avenue/Chestnut, and Lincoln/Custer in the past 2 years.
YPAL Contract Discussion
Shoenbach introduced Joe Willis, the new executive director of YPAL. YPAL had
provided additional information on the objectives, programs, and deliverables for the
contract discussion. Some suggested or planned programs were a GED program,
nutrition courses for adults, advocacy programs, violence prevention projects, and
bringing an alcohol/drug counselor in one day per week. YPAL envisions utilizing the
building more to provide weekend programs and establishing outreach to the
neighborhood. Gutierrez noted that the informal recommendations had been
incorporated into the draft agreement. She stated that it should be expressly stated that
space needs to be made available for other agencies/partners. Willis advised that they
have met with architects for reconfiguration and are developing phases for needed
changes. Shoenbach noted the importance of maintaining the safety of the children in
the facility when choosing partners. Mendez added that any partners using the facility
need to be in line with the mission of YPAL. Gutierrez asked to have coordination with
the facility and Miller Park, and to find a way for the community to have access to
restrooms without disrupting the activities at the facility. Shoenbach advised this had
been taken into consideration and a separate entrance for restrooms is planned.
Priority schools are still being determined. Shoenbach noted that YPAL does currently
have a relationship with Stanton Academy. Gutierrez inquired if domestic violence
prevention programming or aggression replacement programs could be implemented.
Partnerships with the YWCA and Farmworkers Clinic can be established to make
referrals for these types of programs.
Coffey asked about the number of program participants from outside of Yakima.
Gutierrez recommended an increased fee for out of area participants. Coffey suggested
that issue be addressed before the contract was finalized. Gutierrez recommended a
$40 fee. Shoenbach stated he would take that to the YPAL board.
Coffey inquired if the agreement met state requirements for grants, namely making sure
evidence-based curriculums were included in the contract. She also noted that the
contract needed to chance written notices from the Chief of Police to the City Manager.
There was additional discussion to add the number of hours the facility would be open.
It was MOVED by Mendez and SECONDED by Coffey to move the contract to the full
council for approval. Motion PASSED unanimously.
It was MOVED by Coffey and SECONDED by Mendez to adjourn to the January 26,
2017 meeting. Motion PASSED unanimously.
Meeting was adjourned at 4:54 p.m.
Approved:
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-____
AN ORDINANCE relating to Public Services; amending the City of Yakima Municipal Code
for the purpose of updating the fee schedule for certain police services.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. The following section, 1.70.010, of the City of Yakima Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
1.70.010 Generally.
A. Fees Imposed. There is imposed a fee payable by each person requesting
services listed in subsection B of this section.
B. Schedule of Fees and Collection. The police chief is authorized to charge and
collect fees from each person requesting any services listed below according to the
following schedule:
Service Unit Fee
1. Fingerprint cards (not classified—not
including applicants for concealed
weapon permits
Per card
YPD supplied card
Additional per card
$ 5.00
$ 3.00
2. Verification report of lost or stolen
property and crimes against person
Per report $10.00
3. Traffic accident report (including
witness statements if requested by
the victim or victim’s representative).
Accident reports beginning 2016 are
also available at www.buycrash.com.
Per page
BuyCrash
$ .15
$12.00
4. Standard photocopies letter or legal,
per page
(RCW 42.56.120)
Per page $ .15
5. COBAN Video on DVD (per DVD)
and Digital Photos on CD-ROM (per
CD)
Per DVD or CD $ 8.00
6. Local record check plus clearance
letter for visa, passport, etc.
Per letter $10.00
7. Notary service Per Notarization $10.00
8. CPL (Concealed Pistol Permit)
New Permit - application fee
FBI fee for New Permit
(FBI fee subject to change)
Renew (prior to expiration)
Renew (within 90 days of
expiration)
Replacement
$36.00
$12.00
$32.00
$42.00
$10.00
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 7th day of March, 2017.
ATTEST: Kathy Coffey, Mayor
Sonya Claar Tee, City Clerk
Publication Date:
Effective Date:
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-____
AN ORDINANCE relating to Public Services; amending the City of Yakima Municipal Code
for the purpose of updating the fee schedule for certain police services.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. The following section, 1.70.010, of the City of Yakima Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
1.70.010 Generally.
A. Fees Imposed. There is imposed a fee payable by each person requesting
services listed in subsection B of this section.
B. Schedule of Fees and Collection. The police chief is authorized to charge and
collect fees from each person requesting any services listed below according to the
following schedule:
Service Unit Fee
1. Fingerprint cards (not classified—not
including applicants for concealed
weapon permits
First Per card
YPD supplied card
Additional per
cardEach additional
card
$ 5.00
$ 3.00$
2.00
2. Verification report of lost or stolen
property and crimes against person
Per report $ 510.00
3. Traffic accident report (including
witness statements if requested by
the victim or victim’s representative).
Accident reports beginning 2016 are
also available at
www.buycrash.com).
Per reportpage
BuyCrash
$ 5.00.15
$12.00
4. Case reportStandard photocopies
letter or legal, per page
(RCW 42.56.120)
Per page $ .25.15
5. Record check (person with no
records)COBAN Video on DVD (per
DVD) and Digital Photos on CD-
ROM (per CD)
Per nameDVD or
CD
$ 58.00
6. Record check (person with record
and with copy of record)
Per name $ 5.00
7.6. Criminal Local record check plus
clearance letter for visa, passport,
etc.
Per letter $10.00
8. Police department annual report Per report after first
report
$ 5.00
9. Photographs for nonpolice applicants
(taxi drivers, private security, etc.)
Per photograph $ 5.00
10. Identification card (for non police
applicants, private security, etc.)
Per card $ 5.00
11.7. Notary service Per
pageNotarization
$ 310.00
12.8. CPL (Concealed Pistol Permit)
New Permit - application fee
FBI fee for New Permit
(FBI fee subject to change)
Renew (prior to expiration)
Renew (within 90 days of
expiration)
Replacement
$36.00
$12.00
$32.00
$42.00
$10.00
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 7th day of March, 2017.
ATTEST: Kathy Coffey, Mayor
Sonya Claar Tee, City Clerk
Publication Date:
Effective Date:
Formatted: Underline
Administration
Fire Suppression
Fire Investigation
& Education
Training
Communications
401 North Front Street, Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6060
Fax (509) 576-6356
www.yakimafire.com
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 17, 2017
TO: Public Safety Committee
FROM: Bob Stewart, Fire Chief
RE: SAFER Grant update
The purpose of this memo is to:
1. Provide the Public Safety Committee with an update on the SAFER (Staffing for
Adequate Fire and Emergency Response) grant application period.
2. Provide a brief explanation of award changes that have been made for this grant cycle.
3. Propose funding options.
4. Obtain direction on how to proceed.
The FY 2016 SAFER grant application period is now open, and will remain open through
February 10, 2017. This 3-year grant cycle differs from previous years in that it includes the
requirement for cost sharing. Please recall that previous grant awards funded salary and benefits
at 100% for either 2 or 3 years. By comparison, FY 2016 SAFER has a cost share of 25%, 25%
and 65% respectively over the 3-year grant period. The following is an example of the City’s
monetary contribution for 3 firefighters using current salary and benefits numbers. (Note that
these numbers are approximate and future COLA is not factored in)
Year 1 $65,000
Year 2 $65,000
Year 3 $162,000
Year 4 and beyond $260,000 (current approximate numbers without future COLA)
Administration
Fire Suppression
Fire Investigation
& Education
Training
Communications
401 North Front Street, Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6060
Fax (509) 576-6356
www.yakimafire.com
Directly associated with our current staffing challenges is the Fire Services Agreement with
Union Gap. When this initial 3-year agreement was drafted, it included funding for 9 personnel,
whereas deployment of a 24/7 fire apparatus actually requires 12 personnel. Staff members from
Yakima and Union Gap are currently meeting to renegotiate the Fire Services Agreement for
2018 and beyond. Both sides agree that personnel funding must be increased, and it is the goal of
these negotiations that Union Gap will contribute additional funding for 1 firefighter per year
over the 3-year period to include 2018, 2019 and 2020. Conceivably, this would provide funding
for the City’s portion of the SAFER grant – if awarded, without being burdensome to the general
fund.
Given the change in the FY 2016 SAFER grant, staff is requesting guidance from the Public
Safety Committee on how to proceed.
Administration
Fire Suppression
Fire Investigation
Fire Training
Fire Prevention
Public Education
401 North Front Street, Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6060
Fax (509) 576-6356
www.yakimafire.com
“The Yakima Fire Department is dedicated to providing
quality public safety services to our community.”
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 17, 2017
TO: Public Safety Committee
FROM: Bob Stewart, Fire Chief
RE: Ambulance (Dispatching) Fee Ordinance Update
The purpose of this memo is to provide a status update on the proposed ordinance to establish
ambulance (dispatching) fees.
During the December 13, 2016 Council business meeting, SunComm Communications Manager,
Brad Coughenour, proposed establishment of a $5.00 per call dispatching fee for private
ambulance to be assessed on specific incident types. Representatives from both private
ambulance companies serving Yakima spoke against establishing such a fee. After hearing
conflicting testimony, council voted to move this item to the January 17, 2017 business meeting.
Due to the controversial nature of this issue, it was determined that the best course of action was
to remove this item from the January 17, 2017 council agenda and convene a meeting of the
stakeholders. Such a meeting was held on January 4, 2017, and included representation from
City Council, City Manager, City Legal, private ambulance, communications, City and County
fire, County EMS, and County Fire Commissioners. Following much dialog, it was agreed upon
for the issue to be discussed further during upcoming forums to include County Fire
Commissioner and EMS boards. The anticipated outcome is a secondary stakeholder meeting
where a counterproposal will be presented. As of the time of this memo, a date has yet to be set
for that stakeholder meeting.
Upon receipt of a counterproposal, staff will bring this issue before the public safety committee
for direction.