HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-01-26 NCBC Agenda Pkt_rescheduledYakima City Council Committee
Neighborhood & Community Building Committee (NCBC)
Council Chambers, City Hall – 129 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA
*Rescheduled*
Thursday January 26, 2017
1:30 p.m.
City Council City Staff
Councilmember Dulce Gutiérrez (Chair) Cliff Moore, City Manager
Councilmember Avina Gutiérrez Joan Davenport, Community Development Director
Councilmember Carmen Méndez
Councilmember Holly Cousens (alternate)
Agenda
1. Community Equity Program (J. Davenport)
a. Asset Data Collection Update
b. Further Discussion
2. Community Renewal District (S. Watkins)
3. Parks Updates (K. Wilkinson)
a. Parks Commission Budget Priority Rankings
b. Parks Survey Results
c. Parks and Playground Rules and Regulations Ordinance
4. Board Appointed Reports – Standing Item
a. Comprehensive Plan Update (J. Calhoun)
b. Homeless Network (C. Méndez)
c. Parks & Recreation Commission (D. Gutiérrez)
d. Henry Beauchamp Community Center (A. Gutiérrez)
e. Historic Preservation (A. Gutiérrez)
f. TRANS-Action Committee (D. Gutiérrez)
g. Transit Development Plan / Transit Related Issues (D. Gutiérrez)
h. Ethics & Human Rights Committee (A. Gutiérrez)
i. Community Integration Committee (D. Gutiérrez)
j. Bike/Pedestrian Committee (C. Méndez)
5. Other Business / Requests
a. Approve Minutes of 12/16/2016
b. Recap of Deliverables for Next NCBC Meeting
c. Future Items
Interpreter for Next Meeting
6. Audience Participation
Next Meeting: February 16, 2017
The complete agenda packet is available online at: https://www.yakimawa.gov/council/city-council-committees/
001
CITY OF YAKIMA
LEGAL
DEPARTMENT
200 South Third Street, Yakima, Washington 98901 (509)575-6030 Fax: (509)575-6160
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: COVERED BY THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND ATTORNEY
WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES
M E M O R A N D U M
January 11, 2017
TO: Chairperson Dulce Gutiérrez, Neighborhood and Community Building
Committee and Committee members Avina Gutiérrez and Carmen
Mendéz
Cliff Moore, City Manager
FROM: Sara Watkins, Senior Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Community Renewal Law and Examples
Dear Chairperson Gutiérrez and Committee Members,
Please accept this memorandum as an outline of the Community Renewal Law, RCW
Chapter 35.81, for your review and further discussion. This was done at the request of
Committee member Avina Gutiérrez, who requested that staff look into the use of this
statute. This memo outlines the law itself, as well as some legal issues surrounding use
of the law. I also include some examples of projects and processes used by other cities
utilizing this statute for your review and discussion.
1. The Community Renewal Law, Chapter 35.81 RCW: Background
The Community Renewal Law was originally passed in 1957 and updated in 2002. The
purpose of the law is to address areas of municipalities suffering from blight and provide
those municipalities a tool to acquire and redevelop blighted areas to stimulate
economic development.
Under the law, “blighted area” is defined as:
an area which, by reason of the substantial physical dilapidation, deterioration,
defective construction, material, and arrangement and/or age or obsolescence
of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, inadequate
provision for ventilation, light, proper sanitary facilities, or open spaces as
002
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 2
determined by competent appraisers on the basis of an examination of the
building standards of the municipality; inappropriate uses of land or buildings;
existence of overcrowding of buildings or structures; defective or inadequate
street layout; faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility or
usefulness; excessive land coverage; insanitary or unsafe conditions; size,
adequacy, accessibility or usefulness; excessive land coverage; insanitary or
unsafe conditions; deterioration of site; existence of hazardous soils,
substances, or materials; diversity of ownership; tax or special assessment
delinquency exceeding the fair market value of the land; defective or unusual
conditions of title; improper subdivision or obsolete platting; existence of
persistent and high levels of unemployment or poverty within the area; or the
existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes, or
any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of
disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency or crime; substantially impairs or
arrests the sound growth of the municipality or its environs, or retards the
provision of housing accommodations; constitutes an economic or social
liability; and/or is detrimental, or constitutes a menace, to the public health,
safety, welfare, or morals in its present condition and use.
RCW 35.81.015(2).
The statute encourages public-private partnership, stating, “A municipality, to the
greatest extent it determines to be feasible … shall afford maximum opportunity,
consistent with the needs of the municipality as a whole, to the rehabilitation or
redevelopment of the community renewal area by private enterprise.” RCW 35.81.030.
“Rehabilitation” and “redevelopment” are both specifically defined in the statute as
follows:
“Rehabilitation” includes the restoration and renewal of a blighted area or
portion or portion thereof in accordance with a community renewal plan, by (a)
carrying out plans for a program of voluntary or compulsory repair and
rehabilitation of buildings or other improvements; (b) acquisition of real
property and demolition or removal of buildings and improvements thereon
where necessary to eliminate unhealthful, insanitary or unsafe conditions,
lessen density, reduce traffic hazards, eliminate obsolete or other uses
detrimental to the public welfare, or otherwise to remove or prevent the spread
of blight or deterioration, or to provide land for needed public facilities; (c)
installation, construction or reconstruction of streets, utilities, parks,
playgrounds, and other improvements necessary for carrying out in the area
the community renewal provisions of this chapter; and (d) the disposition of
any property acquired in such community renewal area for uses in accordance
with such community renewal plan.
003
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 3
“Redevelopment” includes (a) acquisition of a blighted area or portion thereof;
(b) demolition and removal of buildings and improvements; (c) installation,
construction or reconstruction of streets, utilities, parks, playgrounds, and
other improvements necessary for carrying out in the area the community
renewal provisions of this chapter in accordance with the community renewal
plan; (d) making the land available for development or redevelopment by
private enterprise or public bodies (including sale, initial leasing, or retention by
the municipality itself) at its fair value for uses in accordance with the
community renewal plan; and (e) making loans or grants to a person or public
body for the purpose of creating or retaining jobs, a substantial portion of
which, as determined by the municipality, shall be for persons of low income.
RCW 35.81.015(19) & (18) respectively.
A Community Renewal Plan must be formulated by the municipality as part of the
process. Community Renewal Plans must also be consistent with the city’s
comprehensive plan and updates, and, if necessary, any changes to the comprehensive
plan must be made prior to approving the Community Renewal Plan and its projects.
RCW 35.81.060(1).
Community Renewal Plans must have the following elements:
1. They must be consistent with the comprehensive plan;
2. They must be sufficiently complete to indicate the proposed actions to be
carried out in the renewal area (i.e. demolition, land acquisition,
improvements, etc.) and must outlining any zoning changes and public
facilities improvements;
3. Must address the need for replacement housing if any housing is lost as a
result of the plan; and
4. May include a plan to address persistent high levels of unemployment or
poverty in the community renewal area.
RCW 35.81.015(6). Any community renewal project proposed as part of the Community
Renewal Plan includes an undertaking that will eliminate or prevent the spread of blight,
encourage economic growth through job creation or retention, and/or redevelop or
rehabilitate the community renewal area. RCW 35.81.015(7).
2. Community Renewal Plans: Steps Necessary to Have a Plan Approved
004
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 4
There are a lot of steps that need to be taken prior to approval of a Community Renewal
Plan. First, staff and a council member committee will need to look at what areas of the
city might fall under the definition of “blight” and determine if any would be appropriate
for a Community Renewal Plan. There may be a number of areas in the city qualifying
under the statutory definitions. Research and evaluation of economic and non-
economic factors will need to be done to determine which location(s) should take priority
based on best fit(s) for the city and private development within the statutory
requirements. This research could include evaluating whether there are interested
private developers interested in the area, whether community members in the area are
supportive of the plan, and where funding will come from to accomplish components of
the plan (if necessary—such as to purchase property or improve infrastructure).
Once areas are vetted and an area or areas are chosen to be further evaluated as part
of a Community Renewal Plan, the City Council must pass an ordinance or resolution
which finds the following:
1. One or more blighted areas exist in the municipality; and
2. The rehabilitation, redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or
areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or
welfare of the residents of such municipality.
RCW 35.81.050(1). This creates the need for a community renewal agency to exercise
power and authority with regards to the community renewal areas.
After the ordinance is adopted, the City Council can elect to have the agency and its
powers exercised in one of three ways:
1. Appointing a board composed of not less than five members which must
include both municipal and elected officials, appointed by the mayor and
approved by the full council; or
2. The City Council can exercise authority with regards to the agency
themselves directly; or
3. The City Council can form a new public corporation outside of the City
Council to exercise the powers outlined in the statute.
In all events, the group of individuals exercising decision-making authority is considered
the community renewal agency.
The agency evaluates the blighted areas outlined in the ordinance or resolution and
comes up with a proposed Community Renewal Plan with proposed appropriate
community renewal projects. In some cities, the agency set up ad hoc committees or
005
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 5
resident advisory committees to get community input during the project planning
process. Consultants have also been hired to help communities visualize how blighted
areas can be improved to further economic development and enhance the community.
No Community Renewal Plan, or any project thereunder, can be approved by the City
Council unless it is determined that the proposed plan and projects conform to the
comprehensive plan. If the plan and projects do not conform to the comprehensive
plan, the City Council cannot take action on the proposed Community Renewal Plan
until the comprehensive plan or parts of the comprehensive plan for the area have been
prepared as necessary. RCW 35.81.060(1).
Once it is determined that the plan is in conformance with the comprehensive plan, the
City Council must hold a public hearing on the Community Renewal Plan and
corresponding proposed project(s).1 The notice requirements are different than a
regular public hearing, and require two publications, one per week for two consecutive
weeks not less than ten nor more than thirty days prior to the date of the hearing. RCW
35.81.060(3). Notice also must be mailed not less than ten days prior to the hearing to
each property owner within the plan area. Id.
After the public hearing, the City Council can approve the plan and its projects if it
makes the following findings:
1. A feasible plan exists for making available adequate housing for residents
who may be displaced by the project;
2. The community renewal plan conforms to the comprehensive plan for the
municipality;
3. The community renewal plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent
with the needs of the municipality, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of
the community renewal area by private enterprise;
4. A sound and adequate financial program exists for the financing of the
project; and
5. The community renewal project area is a blighted area as defined in RCW
35.81.015(2).
RCW 35.81.060(4). Community renewal plans can be modified by the City Council.
RCW 35.81.060(5).
Once the plan for the community renewal area is approved through ordinance, then the
plan can be carried out through an RFP procedure, contracting, providing technical
1 Regardless of how the agency is set up (i.e. new committee, City Council itself, or a new public corporation), the
City Council is the ultimate decision maker on the Community Renewal Plan and its projects.
006
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 6
assistance, providing financial assistance, and to survey and appraise the property in
preparation for projects, among other municipal powers as outlined in RCW 35.81.070.
One significant power a municipality has to accomplish the community renewal plan is
to acquire property through eminent domain. RCW 35.81.080. “Condemnation for
community renewal of blighted areas is declared to be a public use….” However, using
eminent domain for community renewal areas has been criticized as using public funds
to acquire private property for private use, since the end result of community renewal
projects is private housing and/or commercial economic development. Council will need
to evaluate community renewal areas to determine if eminent domain is necessary,
especially with regards to displacing residential property owners through eminent
domain. Some cities’ projects have not required eminent domain, instead agreeing to
purchase properties rather than condemn them. There are many options available.
If the City acquires property as part of the community renewal plan, it can turn around
and sell or lease the property for a community renewal project to a private entity. It can
also retain the property, but only if the property is retained for parks, education, public
utilities, public transportation, public safety, streets, administrative buildings or civic
centers (as long as they are part of the community renewal plan). RCW 35.81.090.
Bonding is also allowed to finance projects. RCW 35.81.100, et. seq. Contracts and
RFPs will need to be specific to the community renewal project and its goals.
Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) are also authorized under the statute to allow the
city to assess certain of the properties (or all of the properties depending on the
improvement) for improvements to infrastructure, such as sidewalks or connection to
sewer, for example. It should be noted that these LIDs are also available outside the
Community Renewal Law forum to repair and replace sidewalks and other public
facilities and infrastructure.
(RCW http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=35.43.040)
3. Examples of Community Renewal Projects
A list of community renewal projects can be found here under Local Government
Implementation:
http://mrsc.org/Home/Explore-Topics/Economic-Development/Financing-Economic-
Development/Community-Renewal-Law.aspx
One example is the City of Shoreline, which declared an abandoned Sears building, and
surrounding parking lots and commercial properties along Aurora Avenue, as blighted. It
determined that the area constituted blight for a number of reasons, including that the
layout of the Sears building created a physical barrier to and from other commercial
sites to the north and south, that there were not adequate road or pedestrian
007
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 7
connections to connect with all of the possible sites in the area, and that it wasn’t
delivering on its potential to be a large-scale walkable shopping center for Shoreline
residents. See:
http://mrsc.org/Corporate/media/MediaLibrary/SampleDocuments/Ords/s55r333.pdf
Shoreline then authorized the City Manager to start the process, obtain appraisals,
acquire property, and take other actions to formulate a community renewal plan for the
area. This original ordinance was passed in September 2012. Shoreline went through
a significant environmental review throughout 2014 for its proposed improvements to
the area. There were public hearings on the draft environmental impact statement in
2015. As far as I can tell, construction has not started. Here is the webpage that is
dedicated to the plan and the overall redevelopment of the Aurora Square community
renewal area:
http://www.shorelinewa.gov/business/aurora-square-community-renewal-area
As part of any community renewal plan discussions, there should be a discussion of the
public relations issues—how information is disseminated, a website with updated
information about the plan and its projects, and community meetings.
Vancouver, Washington, undertook an enormous challenge in its 2005 Fourthplain
Community Renewal Plan, which included residential and commercial properties, an
underutilized commercial corridor, and street and facility improvements. The Plan
focused attention on specific areas and the overall goal was to make the area better for
its residents. Vancouver prepared extensive documentation outlining the background
for the plan, why the plan would benefit residents, and how the plan would be
implemented. It engaged many stakeholders and had a public involvement program
that targeted a diverse group of people, both residents and business people, to be
involved. It engaged the community and made sure that committees and working
groups reflected the community’s diversity.
An extensive amount of time was put into the project before the plan was adopted to
ensure that the plan was acceptable to the community and could be accomplished.
Consultants were hired at various steps along the way to help with planning and
process. The 78 page plan can be found in the link below, and I would encourage you
to review it to get a sense of the process and resources necessary for community
renewal planning. It is a good example of a plan and the process, including the public
involvement components, of the community renewal law.
http://www.cityofvancouver.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_and_econo
mic_development/page/1415/fourthplainsubareaplan.pdf
4. Summary of Procedure
008
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 8
Here is a basic summary of the steps to enact a Community Renewal Plan/Projects,
noting that some of the steps could take more time than others:
1. Research possible locations and determine if they meet the definition
of “blight.”
2. Adopt an ordinance or resolution finding that specific areas (or area)
are blighted and redevelopment of those areas (or area) is necessary
in the interest of public health and welfare.
3. Decide how the powers allowed by statute will be carried out:
a. Formation of a new board or commission consisting of municipal
and elected officials;
b. The City Council will act itself; or
c. Formation of a new public corporation.
4. Create a proposed Community Renewal Plan and proposed
Community Renewal Projects.
5. Ensure the proposed plan and projects conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan. If it does not, the Comprehensive Plan must be
amended before the Community Renewal Plan or projects go before
City Council.
6. Provide the proposed plan and projects to City Council.
7. Set and hold a public hearing on the proposed plan and projects.
8. Vote on the proposed plan and projects—the plan and projects must
meet the statutory requirements and be acceptable to Council for
approval. It should be noted that an approved plan and projects may
be modified at a later date by the City Council if necessary.
9. Carry out the Community Renewal Plan (bidding, construction,
infrastructure improvements, etc.).
5. Conclusion
The Community Renewal Law allows the City to evaluate lands that fall under the
statutory definition of “blight” and encourage economic development through a
community renewal plan and its projects. Before a plan can be drafted, there first needs
to be a finding of “blight” in a specific area or areas of the City. To determine these
areas, Council will need to instruct staff to review possible areas that could fall under
the statute, and bring a list to Council, or committee, for review. Council may want to
include community members, business owners, and other stakeholders during this initial
review, and each step of the way.
The law does not create a quick fix for blighted areas, or create funding for
infrastructure improvements. It instead is a method to promote public-private
009
Memorandum to NCBC members
January 11, 2017
Page 9
partnerships to enhance economic development opportunities for cities. The process is
extensive and time consuming, but other communities have been successful, and if the
Council directs staff to move forward, staff will contact other cities to learn from their
experiences.
010
Park Future Needs Taken from the 2012-2017 Comprehensive Plan
Miller
New sign
Renovate old pool building - Removed 2016
Mcguinness
Replace playground equipment
New sign
New lights – Security Lights 2011
Redo planters around trees
Resurface basketball court
Replace fence
Exercise equipment
Tree removal / pruning
Cherry Park
Replace playground equipment
Prune /replace trees
New sign
Milroy
Restripe parking lot
New sign
New lights – Security Lights 2011
Replace drinking fountain
Replace restroom structure - New Restroom 2016
Replace swings
Naches Parkway
Replace broken sidewalk sections/ramps
Cut down dead/problem trees
Tie in with future Boise Cascade Mill Development
Walter Ortman Parkway
Continue trail to the east along Willow St. - 2012
Powerhouse
Permanent benches along pathway
Landscape pathway from 16th to 20th Ave.
Add workout station
Kiwanis / Gateway
Finish softball field project - completed 2013
Xeriscape hillside and planter areas around parking lot
Draft 1/11/2017
011
Improve pond – aerating fountain
Replace parking lot lights
Restripe parking lot
Look for opportunities for future property acquisition
New towable bleachers – purchased portable bleachers in 2015
Netting over bleacher areas - 2015
Storage unit for ballfield maintenance
Temp fences
Trees around field 4
Batting cages
MLK Jr.
New sign - 2016
Demo building - 2016
Convert tennis courts to mini soccer
New picnic tables
SE Community Park
Replace parking lot lights
Restripe parking lots
New playground - 2015
Tree pruning/removal
Fair Island 1 & 2
S. 2nd St.
Arboretum
Kissel
Another picnic shelter
Expand basketball court
Upgrade portion of the irrigation system
Screened area for trash bins
Add permanent benches around pathway
Shade structures between tennis courts
Fisher
Taller fence
Redo roof and concrete pad for maintenance bldg
Increase parking - 2015
Reroof starter house
Create entrance off parking lot - 2015
Golf carts - 2015
Remodel/relocate starter house
Draft 1/11/2017
012
Gardner
Pave gravel parking
Fence entire east side of park
Replace restroom building
Replace playground
New sign
Drinking fountain
Perry Soccer complex
Lions
New bulkhead for pool
New sign
Remove old spray ground
Remove or renovate old restroom
Tree removal/pruning
Franklin
New sign
Redo snack shack, update restrooms in pool area
Paint exterior of pool building
Replace playground that was removed due to safety issues - 2013
Replace/ enlarge picnic shelter - 2013
Increase parking - 2013
New water slide
Repair tennis courts
Landscape along Stanley Blvd.
New trees
Raymond
Replace the removed playground
New sign
Larson
New sign
Grind/overlay walkway sections as needed
New small playground
Paint restroom building
Replace picnic shelter
Replace sand under play equipment with wood chips
Tree pruning
Tieton Terrace
Replace swing set
Possibly locate a small playground
Sign
Draft 1/11/2017
013
Picnic shelter
Rosalma
Portia
Tree removal /pruning
S.6th Ave. Parkway
Replace broken sideway sections as needed
Chesterley
New sign
Expand skate park
Remove bleacher pads on fields 1-3
Remove trees on fields 1-3
Add permanent tables and benches
Elks
Upgrade power to storage/concession building
Run power to scoring buildings
Demo yellow field
Upgrade fence sections as needed / replace outfield fence on green field
New sign
Upgrade parking lot
Remove old restroom building
Summitview
Gailleon Park / Harman Center
Paint interior and exterior of Harman Center
Restripe parking lot - 2016
New security system
Gilbert Park
Replace picnic table as needed
New sign
Restripe parking lot
Replace parking lot lights - 2013
Tree pruning and replacement
N. 44th Ave. Parkway
Grind/Overlay asphalt path - 2015
Replace trees as needed – Planted trees 2016
West Valley Community Park
New sign on east side
Draft 1/11/2017
014
Additional picnic shelters
Grind/overlay walking trails
Parking lot lights
New filtration system for irrigations - 2014
New spray park
New paved pathways for walkers
Randall
Grind/overlay pathway
New restroom on east and west sides – 2016 Restroom replaced on east side
New sign/planters
Replace bridges
Clean up nature area
Redo access points at parking lots
New lights in parking lots
Terrace hillside for concerts in the parks
Replace tables by creek
Permanent benches along pathway
Replace fence south side
Viewing platform next to pond - 2015
Install irrigation, parking area and hydro seed undeveloped Randall Park south of creek – Dog
Park constructed in 2014-2015
Fairbrook Islands
Xeriscape one of the islands
Draft 1/11/2017
015
1/11/2017
1
YAKIMA
PARKS & RECREATION
COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN
2017 – 2022
SURVEY RESULTS
JANUARY 11, 2017
No
0%
Yes
100%
Do you live within the Yakima City limits?
No Yes
016
1/11/2017
2
21
46
70
87
58
372
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
LESS THAN ONE YEAR?
1 TO 3 YEARS?
4 TO 8 YEARS?
9 TO 13 YEARS?
14 TO 18 YEARS?
MORE THAN 18 YEARS?
If you live in Yakima, how long have you lived within the city limits?
17
3
150
17
3
170
309
102
13
10
130
141
18
34
71
13
1
31
11
35
26
88
277
7
11
25
174
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
CHERRY PARK
CHESTERLEY PARK
ELKS MEMORIAL PARK
FAIRBROOK PARKS
FISHER PARK GOLF COURSE
FRANKLIN PARK & POOL
GAILLEON PARK ‐ HARMAN CENTER
GARDNER PARK
PORTIA PARK
GILBERT PARK
KISSEL PARK
KIWANIS PARK
LARSON PARK
LIONS PARK & POOL
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. PARK
MCGUINNESS PARK
MILLER PARK
TIETON TERRACE PARK
MILROY PARK
PERRY SOCCER COMPLEX
POWERHOUSE CANAL PATHWAY
RANDALL PARK & DOG PARK
RAYMOND PARK
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK CENTER
SUMMITVIEW PARK
WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK
Which Yakima City Parks listed below are close to your home or apartment?
017
1/11/2017
3
40
2
106
6
4
77
319
48
7
2
60
171
28
156
84
12
1
22
4
15
17
53
305
2
7
7
111
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
CHERRY PARK
CHESTERLEY PARK
ELKS MEMORIAL PARK
FAIRBROOK PARKS
FISHER PARK GOLF COURSE
FRANKLIN PARK & POOL
GAILLEON PARK ‐ HARMAN CENTER
GARDNER PARK
PORTIA PARK
GILBERT PARK
KISSEL PARK
KIWANIS PARK
LARSON PARK
LIONS PARK & POOL
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. PARK
MCGUINNESS PARK
MILLER PARK
TIETON TERRACE PARK
MILROY PARK
PERRY SOCCER COMPLEX
POWERHOUSE CANAL PATHWAY
RANDALL PARK & DOG PARK
RAYMOND PARK
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK CENTER
SUMMITVIEW PARK
WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK
If you visit the Yakima City Parks, which do you visit regularly? Please check all
boxes that apply.
61
330
130
231
121
246
299
193
155
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
LOCATION
SPORTS ACTIVITIES
AMENITIES ‐ PLAYGROUND, POOL, PICNIC TABLES, ETC
ORGANIZED ACTIVITIES/EVENTS
EXERCISE/FITNESS
FRESH AIR AND OPEN SPACES
RELAXATION
SAFE ENVIRONMENT
Why do you and your family choose to go to the parks identified above?
018
1/11/2017
4
32
48
233
387
165
180
10
219
24
63
8
107
23
185
59
95
20
35
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
OTHER
BASEBALL & SOFTBALL FIELDS
OPEN SPACES
PATHWAYS/WALKWAYS
PICNIC FACILITIES
NATURE AREAS
VOLLEYBALL COURTS
PLAYGROUNDS
SKATEPARKS
SOCCER FIELDS
PICKLEBALL COURTS
GOLF COURSE
DISC GOLF COURSE
SWIMMING POOLS
TENNIS COURTS
DOG PARK
MILLER OR MLK SPRAY PARKS
BASKETBALL COURTS
What type of park and recreation facilities do you and your family use the most.
Please check all boxes that apply.
127
120
153
63
77
54
57
14
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
10+ TIMES PER MONTH
5 ‐ 9 TIMES PER MONTH
2 ‐ 4 TIMES PER MONTH
ONCE PER MONTH ON AVERAGE
5 ‐ 10 TIMES A YEAR
LESS THAN 5 TIMES A YEAR
VERY RARELY
NEVER
On average, how often do you visit parks?
019
1/11/2017
5
96
316
215
87
132
107
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
PROGRAM GUIDE
FRIENDS
PROGRAM FLYER ‐SOCCER, SOFTBALL,ETC.
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE
How do you receive information regarding park facilities and recreation
programs?
21
289
143
85
69
118
103
160
147
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
PROGRAM GUIDE
NEWSPAPER
TV/RADIO ADVERTISING
PROGRAM BROCHURE ‐ SOCCER, SOFTBALL, ETC.
FACEBOOK
EMAIL
WEBSITE
DIRECT MAIL
How would you like to receive your park and recreation information in the
future?
020
1/11/2017
6
146
97
347
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
MAIL IN REGISTRATION
WALK IN REGISTRATION
ONLINE REGISTRATION
What method do you prefer for the registration of park programs and
facility rentals?
15
645
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
YES
NO
Have you ever attended a Parks and Recreation Commission meeting live at City
Hall?
021
1/11/2017
7
50
612
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
YES
NO
Have you watched the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings on YPAC
television station?
36
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
YES
NO
Did you find it informative?
022
1/11/2017
8
493
47
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
YES
NO
The Parks and Recreation Division is considering selling advertising space in our
Program Guides. Are you in favor of this if it will decrease the cost of the
printing of the Programs Guides?
211
217
192
28
0 50 100 150 200 250
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT
VERY IMPORTANT
IMPORTANT
NOT IMPORTANT
How important are Yakima City Parks and Recreation facilities to you and your
family?
023
1/11/2017
9
118
380
124
12
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
POOR
How do you rate overall park maintenance? (cleanliness, field conditions,
mowing, graffiti removal, vandalism repair, etc.)
58
357
189
26
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
POOR
How do you rate overall park structures and features? (such as lighting, tables,
parking, playgrounds, restrooms, etc.)
024
1/11/2017
10
433
56
130
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
YES
NO
UNDECIDED
When you visit City Parks, do you feel safe?
2.88
2.43
2.12
2.59
3.04
2.61
2.9
2.95
2.73
2.14
1.83
2.03
2.11
2.45
2.09
2.54
2.91
3.16
3.4
2.61
3.16
2.28
2.87
2.9
3.24
3.22
2.54
2.81
2.03
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK
TAHOMA CEMETERY
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY PARK CENTER
RAYMOND PARK
RANDALL PARK
RANDALL DOG PARK
POWERHOUSE CANAL PATHWAY
PERRY SOCCER COMPLEX
OTHER
MILROY PARK
MILLER PARK
MCGUINNESS PARK
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. PARK
LIONS POOL
LIONS PARK
LARSON PARK
KIWANIS PARK
KISSEL PARK
HARMAN CENTER
GILBERT PARK
GATEWAY SPORTS COMPLEX
GARDNER PARK
GAILLEON PARK
FRANKLIN POOL
FRANKLIN PARK
FISHER PARK GOLF COURSE
ELKS MEMORIAL PARK
CHESTERLEY PARK
CHERRY PARK
Please rate the amenities of the following parks
1= poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent
025
1/11/2017
11
62
34
112
310
203
246
178
39
34
26
38
332
46
129
43
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
OTHER
BASEBALL & SOFTBALL FIELDS
OPEN SPACES
PATHWAYS/WALKWAYS
PICNIC SHELTER
PARK BENCHES & TABLES
PLAYGROUNDS
SKATEPARKS
SOCCER FIELDS
PICKLEBALL COURTS
DISC GOLF
SWIMMING POOLS/WATER FEATURES
TENNIS COURTS
DOG PARKS
BASKETBALL COURTS
What Parks and Recreation facilities would you like to see more of? Please check
all boxes that apply.
207
450
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
YES
NO
Tahoma Cemetery is owned and operated by the City of Yakima. Do you have a
family member buried at Tahoma?
026
1/11/2017
12
24
106
47
5
0 20406080100120
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
POOR
If yes, please rate the burial services that we provided for you and your family.
348
259
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
YES
NO
Have you or any members of your family participated in ANY City of Yakima
recreation programs?
027
1/11/2017
13
330
74
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
YES
NO
Would you or your family members participate in the programs again?
16
28
11
25
43
23
254
145
17
29
16
117
17
62
153
121
38
12
72
11
19
17
23
25
73
100
113
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
OTHER
ADULT BASKETBALL LEAGUE
ADULT OUTDOOR VOLLEYBALL
ADULT SOCCER LEAGUE
ADULT SOFTBALL LEAGUE
ADULT VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE
CONCERTS IN THE PARK
HARMAN CENTER PROGRAMS
SPORTS CAMPS ‐ RUGBY/LACROSSE/CHEER
SUMMER PROGRAM AT KISSEL PARK
FITNESS BOOT CAMP
GOLF
GOLF TOURNAMENTS
GOLF LESSONS
MOVIES IN THE PARK
SWIM LESSONS
TENNIS LESSONS
TREK N TRAVEL TROLLEY
WATER WALKING
"BEYOND THE BELL" PROGRAM
FLAG FOOTBALL
FRIDAY NIGHT GLOW BALL GOLF OUTINGS
HALLOWEEN HAUNTED TRAIL
HYDRO FIT/WATER ZUMBA
YOUTH BASEBALL
YOUTH SOCCER
YOUTH SWIM LESSONS
Which Recreation Programs have you or your family members participated in?
Please check all boxes that apply.
028
1/11/2017
14
1
2
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
12
13
14
17
19
25
28
31
32
35
56
65
75
90
138
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
STAR GAZING
FLAG FOOTBALL
GOLF TOURNAMENTS/NIGHT GOLF
BEYOND THE BELL
CAMPS & CLINICS
TENNIS
TREK N TRAVEL TROLLEY
ADULT SOCCER
EXERCISE/FITNESS
HALLOWEEN HUNT/HAUNTED TRAIL
TENNIS LESSONS
BASKETBALL LEAGUE
SUMER PLAYGROUND PROGRAM
ADULT VOLLEYBALL
HYDRO FIT/AQUA ZUMBA
SOCCER
SWIMMING
GOLF LESSONS
WATER WALKING
YOUTH BASEBALL
SOFTBALL
YOUTH SOCCER
GOLF
HARMAN CENTER ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS
SWIM LESSONS
MOVIES IN THE PARK
CONCERTS IN THE PARK
Park Programs ‐ Frequency of Rating
Excellent
44%
Good
47%
Fair
8%
Poor
1%
Recreation Programs ‐ Overall Ratings
Excellent Good Fair Poor
029
1/11/2017
15
365
242
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
YES
NO
Have you visited the Harman Center?
104
12
6
35
69
23
32
41
10
59
33
127
11
48
35
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
OTHER
CARDS
GAMES
DANCES
SOCIAL/VISITING
COMPUTER ROOM & CLASSES
SATURDAY BREAKFAST
LUNCH
DINNER
TRIPS AND/OR TOURS
ENRICHMENT CLASSES ‐ PAINTING, ETC.
RENTAL ‐ WEDDING RECEPTION, BANQUET, ETC.
BILLIARDS
COFFEE BAR
ORGANIZED GROUPS ‐ QUILTING, KNITTING,
ETC.
Have you visited the Harman Center?
If yes, what programs or events did you participate in? Please check all that apply.
030
1/11/2017
16
36
561
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
YES
NO
Have you or a family member ever volunteered at the Harman Center?
70
116
30
9
2
368
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
FAIR
POOR
NO TELEPHONE INTERACTIONS WITH STAFF
Please rate your telephone interactions with staff.
031
1/11/2017
17
48
98
35
12
2
399
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
FAIR
POOR
NO INTERACTIONS WITH STAFF
Please rate your interactions with park maintenance staff.
81
147
33
15
4
309
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
FAIR
POOR
NO INTERACTIONS WITH STAFF
Please rate your interactions with recreation program staff.
032
1/11/2017
18
27
40
13
8
3
494
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
EXCELLENT
GOOD
AVERAGE
FAIR
POOR
NO EMAIL INTERACTIONS WITH STAFF
Please rate your email interaction with staff.
More walkways and pathways , $14.33
Increase open spaces areas , $2.01
More indoor swimming opportunities, $12.02
Construct more skate parks, $1.16
Maintain existing facilities , $21.75
Construct more playgrounds , $5.14
More spray parks, $6.95
More land for large park, $3.28
Construct more sports fields, $1.47
Increase recreation programs, $3.24
More outdoor swimming, $11.69
Construct more tennis courts , $1.01
More small neighborhood parks , $5.06
More movies & concerts, $5.76
Other, $5.14
YOU HAVE $100 TO SPEND AS YOU LIKE ON THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
033
1/11/2017
19
3
5
40
113
88
123
144
99
40
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
14 OR YOUNGER
15‐19
20‐29
30‐39
40‐49
50‐59
60‐69
70‐79
80+
What is your age?
113
255
89
108
51
21
9
1
0
0
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11+
How many people live in your house or apartment?
034
1/11/2017
20
413
173
90
44
18
4
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
NONE
1
2
3
4
5
6 OR MORE
How many children live in your home that are under the age of 18?
169
442
21
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
MALE
FEMALE
PREFER NOT TO ANSWER
What Is Your Gender?
035
1/11/2017
21
82
12
487
7
1
23
46
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
LATINO
ASIAN
WHITE
AFRICAN AMERICAN
PACIFIC ISLANDER
OTHER
I PREFER NOT TO ANSWER
What Is Your Ethnic Origin?
35
65
89
75
85
62
31
74
119
0 20406080100120140
UNDER $20,000
$20,001‐35,000
$35,001‐50,000
$50,001‐65,000
$65,001‐85,000
$85,001 ‐ $100,000
$100,001 ‐ $115,000
ABOVE ‐ $115,000
I PREFER NOT TO ANSWER
What is your yearly family income?
036
1/11/2017
22
7
8
69
19
122
40
235
119
36
0 50 100 150 200 250
GRADE 8 OR LESS
SOME HIGH SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE
SOME TECHNICAL SCHOOL COURSES
SOME COLLEGE COURSES
TECHNICAL SCHOOL GRADUATE
COLLEGE GRADUATE
MASTERS OR DOCTORATE DEGREE
I PREFER NOT TO ANSWER
What is your highest level of education?
037
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-____
AN ORDINANCE amending the City of Yakima Municipal Code, Title 13, Parks and
Playgrounds, Section 13.16: Rules and Regulations, to add 13.16.170:
Misuse of playground apparatuses, park equipment, water playground
features, or other park facilities prohibited, and 13.16.180: Interfering with
department personnel prohibited
WHEREAS, there have been complaints that people are misusing park equipment and
facilities for purposes other than their intended purpose, which restricts proper usage of the
equipment for residents seeking to utilize parks and playgrounds as intended; and
WHERAS, improper usage of park equipment can cause damage, require extra
maintenance or repair, and can cause equipment to need replacement prior to the end of its
expected useful life; and
WHEREAS, park and playground equipment, spray parks, and all park facilities should be
open to the public to be used for their intended purposes; and
WHEREAS, during routine maintenance activities, Parks and Recreation division
personnel have encountered residents who refuse to temporarily move so that personnel can
maintain the parks; and
WHEREAS, the proper and timely maintenance of parks in the City benefits all residents
and allows our parks to remain in good condition; and
WHEREAS, refusal to temporarily move so that park maintenance activities take place
creates unmaintained portions of parks, which is detrimental to the City and its residents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yakima finds that it is in the best interest of the
City and its residents to amend the Yakima Municipal Code to provide for rules pertaining to use
of park facilities and equipment, and to prohibit interference with Parks and Recreation division
personnel; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. Section 13.16.170: Misuse of playground apparatuses, park equipment,
water playground features or other park facilities prohibited, shall be added to the Yakima
Municipal Code and state as follows:
13.16.170 Misuse of playground apparatuses, park equipment, water playground
features or other park facilities prohibited. No person shall in any manner use any of the
playground apparatuses, park equipment, water playground features or other park facilities for
any purpose other than their intended purpose.
Section 2. Section 13.16.180: Interfering with division personnel prohibited, shall be
added to the Yakima Municipal Code and state as follows:
13.16.180 Interfering with division personnel prohibited. No person shall interfere
with or in any manner hinder any employee or authorized volunteer of the park and recreation
038
division while the employee or authorized volunteer is engaged in constructing, repairing,
maintaining or caring for any park property, equipment, or facilities.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this ____ day of, 2017.
ATTEST: Kathy Coffey, Mayor
Sonya Claar Tee, City Clerk
Publication Date:
Effective Date:
039
Yakima City Council Committee Minutes
Neighborhood & Community Building Committee (NCBC)
City Council Chambers, City Hall
December 16, 2016
Committee Members Staff
Dulce Gutiérrez (Chair) Cliff Moore, City Manager Joseph Calhoun
Avina Gutiérrez Joan Davenport, Community Dev Director Scott Schafer
Carmen Méndez Sara Watkins Alvie Maxey
Archie Matthews Rosalinda Ibarra
Ken Wilkinson
Chair Dulce Gutiérrez called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
In response to an audience member’s inquiry regarding translation, D. Gutiérrez reminded the public that
advance notice is required for those services to be available at the council committee meetings. An
interpreter is always available at the regular city council business meetings.
A motion was made and seconded to move agenda item 4 Board Appointed Reports to the beginning of the
meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The committee also agreed to allow audience participation during the
discussion for items 1 Community Equity Program and 2 Follow-Up Discussion on Ten Point Plan to
Address Homelessness.
Board Appointed Reports – Standing Item
Comprehensive Plan Update – Calhoun reported that the Planning Commission reviewed the Land Use
Element. The environmental review is ongoing with public review anticipated in January 2017.
Homeless Network – Annette Rodriguez provided some of the highlights from the previous meeting. She
reported that the network is considering on becoming a 501(c)(3) to seek future funding opportunities; a
homeless memorial will be held at the Millennium Plaza; preparations to conduct the annual Point in Time
Survey are underway.
Parks & Recreation Commission – D. Gutiérrez recapped the prior meeting which included topics such as an
Adopt a Park ordinance being considered and revisions to the mission statement.
Henry Beauchamp Community Center – Wilkinson reported that much of the discussion was focused on
programs and activities offered at the center and its capital needs.
Historic Preservation – Calhoun noted that the commission is considering potential candidates for awards.
TRANS-Action Committee – next meeting will be in January 2017. A. Gutiérrez brought up a citizen’s
request to establish a bus route from Terrace Heights to the city.
Transit Development Plan/Transit Related Issues – The next meeting will be January 10, 2017.
Ethics & Equal Rights Committee and Community Integration Committee –D. Gutiérrez recapped the
orientation provided to the members of these two exploratory committees on December 8th.
Bike/Pedestrian Committee – The next meeting is December 20th at 1:30 p.m. Phil Mattoon reported that the
committee members will complete the required training on Open Public Meetings and Public Records.
Community Equity Program – Due to technical difficulties display of the website at the meeting was not
available. Calhoun described phase two of the equity study which consists of analysis of the data collected.
Staff mapped a ½ mile buffer around all the elementary schools that showed streets with and without
sidewalks. Further analysis will include the addition of street lights, ADA ramps, and collision data. He also
explained the Park Score analysis which uses census tracts and information to illustrate a ten minute walking
area from park entrances. A potential project to conduct a sidewalk conditions assessment citywide and the
possibility of overlapping certain data layers was discussed. Schafer reported that the street light installation
to LED project will take approximately two months to complete.
Tony Courcy, city resident, approached the committee about whether or not the city has an infrastructure
inventory. Rogelio Montes commented that the new lighting will likely reduce crime and extended his
assistance in any way for the betterment of the community.
040
The committee voted by motion to keep this item on the January agenda so staff can present the updates
made to the equity study website. Motion carried unanimously.
Follow-Up Discussion on Ten Point Plan to Address Homelessness – Audience members were given an
opportunity to address the committee on the ten point plan.
David Helseth, President of the Justice Housing Yakima (JHY), appreciated the City’s efforts on dealing
with the homeless problem. He presented a document which proposes ten points that complement the City’s
plan. He stated that getting direct input from homeless individuals to identify their needs and expectations
and also hiring a program manager to oversee the encampment are two critical parts for a successful
outcome. He indicated that JHY is not in a position to provide program management services at this time but
may have a potential person of interest.
Ellie Lambert, ALPHA team and member of JHY, spoke of her experience in managing a homeless
encampment and connecting individuals to necessary services. She also pointed out the importance of
establishing policies and procedures. The committee members expressed interest in further communication
with Ms. Lambert moving forward.
Previously the City Council tasked the NCBC to discuss three main points of the ten point plan and identify a
preferred camp location, partnerships and services offered by other agencies, and provide funding source
options. Considerable discussion continued regarding several sites and their viability as potential locations.
Among the factors considered were the site location, ownership, accessibility, facilities and amenities.
Ultimately, a motion was made by A. Gutiérrez, seconded by Méndez, to recommend the Tiger Mart on
North 1st Street as the location for a potential homeless encampment. Motion carried unanimously.
D. Gutiérrez reported on the following services that are already being provided by various agencies:
∙ Triumph Treatment and the Union Gospel Mission provide hygiene centers;
∙ Yakima Neighborhood Health Services (YNHS) provides storage of personal belongings, postal mail
services, job matching program, obtaining identification cards, family reunification program, and
establishing bank accounts as well as supportive housing;
∙ Rod’s House provides services for homeless and at risk youth.
Rhonda Hauff, YNHS, addressed the written comments submitted from them. She added that their board
conducts periodic focus groups to assess the needs of the community they serve and further described the
resources and services they offer. She was in favor of partnering with the City as needed and as available
funding permits. The topic of animal-assisted therapy requires further research to see what options are locally
available. Hauff also explained the motel voucher program that is available through the Northwest
Community Action Center for homeless couples and those who have pets. Additional monies are being
sought to expand this resource.
Extensive dialogue ensued about providing 24 hour security and having a full time program manager/site
coordinator. Staff and audience shared their experiences and lessons learned from the previous homeless
encampment. Also discussed was the process timeline for establishing this plan as being March 1st, prior to
the extreme winter weather shelters closing.
Pastor Andy Ferguson, represents churches in Yakima, suggested that the project be broken down into
smaller tasks to make it more manageable so that churches can be able to handle and coordinate, as opposed
to taking on the whole issue.
The following funding options were brought up for consideration: using reserves from the general fund,
pursuing a Human Services Department for the City, seeking grant funding, collaborating with existing
service providers, accessing the 2163 money from the County recording fees, utilizing a portion of the
revenue collected from marijuana retail sales tax, involving United Way and the Yakima Valley Community
Foundation. Méndez motioned, seconded by A. Gutiérrez, and requested staff to identify other funding
sources that can be utilized for this program; motion carried.
041
Dave Hanson, Sunrise Outreach, suggested that having a controlled environment will make it more possible
to self-govern the encampment and at the same time reduce the security cost.
A motion was moved by Méndez, seconded by A. Gutiérrez, to send the recommendations on location,
partnerships and funding to the full Council at the next January 10th business meeting; motion carried
unanimously. A working session will be scheduled with participation of all the service providers interested in
attending.
Community Renewal District – A. Gutiérrez made a motion, seconded by Méndez, to move item 5c
Community Renewal District to the next NCBC meeting in January; motion carried unanimously.
Parks Updates – Wilkinson provided a breakdown of the maintenance and repair costs for the Millennium
Plaza. He also reported on the parks capital projects as ranked by the Parks Commission members with
community input. A. Gutiérrez expressed an interest in having an opportunity to further discuss and possibly
reprioritize some of the capital projects listed. Wilkinson clarified that some projects are carried out through
grants which require local match funding.
Approve Minutes of 11/29/2016 – Motion made by Méndez, seconded by A. Gutiérrez, to approve the
minutes of 11/29/2016 as presented; motion carried by unanimous vote.
ONDS 6th Ave Property Update – Watkins provided an update on a property on 6th Avenue which the City
has a lien on due to a fire. The current owner has agreed to assign the deed of trust to the City which enables
the city to move forward with property foreclosure. Potential acquisition and redevelopment of the lot can be
accomplished with funds through the Office of Neighborhood & Development Services. A. Gutiérrez
motioned, seconded by Méndez, to recommend that the full Council move forward with staff’s recommended
plan; motion carried. It will be presented at the next January 10th meeting.
Other Business/Requests – Staff reviewed the list of deliverables from this meeting.
• Bring back the Equity Study discussion
• Item 5c Community Renewal District was postponed to the January 19th NCBC meeting
• Continue dialogue on park capital project priorities
• Exploratory committee minutes to be included in the NCBC agenda packets
• Add to January 10th Council agenda a report on the homeless encampment plan
No future items noted. D. Gutiérrez reminded the public that interpretation services need to be requested in
advance.
Adjourn – D. Gutiérrez adjourned this meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. The next meeting is scheduled for
Thursday January 19, 2017.
Approved by:
Date Approved:
Prepared by: Rosalinda Ibarra, Community Development Administrative Assistant
042