Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12/02/2008 12 Railroad Grade Separation Project Supplemental Contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc.
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON III AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. l l2' For Meeting of December 2, 2008 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Supplement No. 5 for the Professional Services Contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc. for Railroad Grade Separation Project SUBMITTED BY: William Cook, Director CED CONTACT PERSON /TELEPHONE: Michael Morales, Deputy Director — 575 -3533 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: The city has engaged Berger /ABAM to provide design and administrative services for the development of the Lincoln Avenue /MLK Boulevard Grade Separation Project. In June 2008, the city council approved Supplement No. 4, which expires on December 31, 2008. Staff requests authorization to execute Supplement No. 5 of this agreement, which would extend the agreement to June 30, 2010, and cost $217,912. The need for Supplement No. 5 is directly related to the additional design changes, management /administrative costs related to delays by, and negotiations with, BNSF over right- of-way acquisition and relocation. After a year long stalemate, BNSF has agreed to consider an • alternative design and property acquisition scenario that appears feasible. However, this solution will require design changes and updated appraisals. Supplement No. 5 will cover project design changes due to BNSF negotiations, administration up to the start of Lincoln Avenue construction in spring 2009 and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. up to the start of construction in the spring of 2010, or earlier if funds become available for MLK. Continuing active project design is recommended due to the potential for this project to receive additional funding via a federal or state stimulus package. Continued on page two Resolution X Ordinance _ Contract X Other (Specify) Project Schedule Funding Source: Cumulative Reserve for Capital Improvements; Fund 392 APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: ��� City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution authorizing Supplement No 5. BOARD /COMMISSION /COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: 1111 Page Two Work completed and ongoing includes: • NEPA and SEPA environmental review completed and approved. 0 • Right of Way Plans completed and approved, acquisition in process • Phase 1 (Underground utility relocations), completed • Final Design (Contract Documents) for Lincoln Avenue underpass at 95% • Final Design (Contract Documents) for MLK Blvd. underpass at 60% • Intermediate contract to clear the ARCO site is 90% complete • Storm drainage ponds for BNSF property west of the tracks have been designed • Coordination, management and administration related to acquisition and relocation of BNSF property. Additional work for design completion includes: - • Provide update to WSDOT /FHWA describing changes made to the project since the Environmental Assessment was completed • Revise the Right -of -Way plans and True Cost Estimate ' • Purchase most of BNSF property east of tracks leaving BNSF in place west of tracks • Prepare appraisals, appraisal reviews , and offers for the property east of the tracks • Design and detail a new storm drainage pond on property east of the tracks • Design and detail a new BNSF truck access bridge across Lincoln Ave. west of the tracks • Design and detail a new ramp on the west side of Hollingbery's Lincoln Ave. loading dock to allow for access from 1s Ave.,. eliminating the need to cross BNSF property • Design and detail the connection of the glass art wall to the strut and walls 11111 S • RESOLUTION NO. R -2008- A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager of the City of Yakima to execute an additional (fifth) supplemental agreement with BERGER /ABAM Engineers, Inc., for engineering and consulting services for the Railroad Grade Separation Project. WHEREAS, in July 2000 the City of Yakima issued and advertised a request for qualifications from firms interested in providing consulting services for the design and development of a grade separation railroad project; and WHEREAS, the request for qualifications advertisement described the matter as a multi- phase project that would later include preparation of plans, specifications and estimates related to the construction of the Railroad Grade Separation Project ( "Project"); and WHEREAS, as a result of that request for qualifications process, the City selected and contracted with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., to provide the said services for the Project; and WHEREAS, additional engineering and consulting services are required to proceed with the Project, including as more fully set forth on the proposed Scope of Work Modifications associated herewith; and WHEREAS, it is requested that the City Manager have the authority to execute an additional (fourth) supplemental agreement for additional engineering and consulting services to • proceed with the Project and to extend the completion date and term of the second contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., through June 30, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City of Yakima to authorize the City Manager to execute an additional (fifth) supplemental agreement with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., for additional engineering and consulting services to proceed with the Railroad Grade Separation Project and to extend the completion date and term of the contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., through June 30, 2010, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an additional (fifth) supplemental agreement with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., for additional engineering and consulting services to proceed with the Railroad Grade Separation Project and to extend the completion date and term of the contract with BERGER/ABAM Engineers, Inc., (City Contract No. 2003 -53) through June 30, 2010. The total additional compensation authorized by said supplemental agreement shall not exceed $217,912.00. The form of said supplemental agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney or his designee. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2 day of December, 2008. David Edler, Mayor ATTEST: • City Clerk 1 Yakima Rai rade Separations • • E e of Probable Construction Costs • Engineer's 90% Estimate File: C: \Documents and Settings\bdesgros.YAKIMA_CITY\My Documents\Engineer\Rail Road \Grade Sep - FMSIB - 2000 -11 \Estimates \[Estimate_09 -26 -08 90% Cost Est_ Lincoln Avenue MLK, Jr. Blvd. Total Subtotal - Estimated Bid. Price in 4th Quarter of 20071 $14,715,1161 $14,427,7341 $29,142,8501 Inflation (1 Year at 1.7 %, 0.5 Years at 1.2 %) $339,949 $850,373 Inflation (1 Year at 1.7 %, 1.5 Years at 1.2 %) $510,424 Estimated Bid Price in 4th Quarter of 20081 $15,055,065 $29,993,223 Estimated Bid Price in 4th Quarter of 2009 $14,938,1581 Construction Contingency (10% on Lincoln, 5% on MLK) $1,505,507 $746,908 $2,252,414 Estimated Total Payments to Contractor) $16,560,5721 $15,685,0661 $32,245,6371 Estimated Reimbursement of BNSF for Construction by BNSF Forces (Includes 25% Contingency) $431,724 $431,724 $863,448 Estimated Total Construction Costs! $16,992,2961 $16,116,7901 $33,109,0851 Estimated Future Design Engineering Costs $420,000 $50,000 $470,000 Estimated Future City Administration Costs $100,000 $50,000 $150,000 Estimated Future Construction Engineering Costs $1,042,400 $1,042,400 $2,084,800 Estimated Future ROW Costs $2,187,000 $20,000 $2,207,000 SUBTOTAL - FUTURE COSTS! $20,741,6961 $17,279,1901 $38,020,8851 Design Engineering Costs Spent to Date $2,182,271 $0 $2,182,271 City Administration Costs Spent to Date $300,000 $0 $300,000 Phase 1 Costs Spent to Date $2,200,486 , $0 $2,200,486 ROW Costs Spent to Date $70,000 $0 $70,000 SUBTOTAL - COSTS SPENT TO DATE! $4,752,7571 $01 $4,752,7571 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS AT COMPLETION! $25,494,4531 $17,279,1901 $42,773,6421 I GRAND TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $42,773,6421 Estimate 09 -26 -08 90% Cost Est 42.773- million.xls 1 of 1 11/25/2008 , LINCOLN AVENUE AND MLK, JR BLVD. GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT BEST CASE SCHEDULE • ID Task Name Duration Start Finish 2009 2010 2011 N D D© ©Q©IQD©O © D 0© ©EZIf OOd O © RE ©0 ©0P1 1 Prepare Lincoln Ave. Grade Separation Bid Documents (Design Team) 67 days: Thu 11/6/08 Fri 2/6/09 Flisulef 2 Revise 95% PS &E for Access Bridge and Moving Pond (Design Team) _.__...._._._........__..._... .....__._._._._..__.._..._.._32 days Thu 11/6/08 Fri 12/19/08 in 3 . Review 90% PS &E (BNSF) 28 days Wed 11/12/08 Fri 12/19/08 - 4 _.. Incorporate BNSF 90% Review Comments (Design Team) 10 days Mon 12/22/08 Fri 1/2/09 5 Review 95% PS &E (City, BNSF, and WSDOT/FHWA) • 15 da Mon 1/5/09 Fri 1/23/09 6 Prepare Bid Documents (Design Team) 10 days Mon 1/26/09 Fri 2/6/09 i 7 Acquire ROW from BNSF • 81 days Fri 11/7/08 Fri 2127/09 . 8 Rev Grade Separation ROW Plans and True Cost Estimate (Design Team) 6 days Fri 11 /7/08 Fri 11/14/08 9 Approval of ROW Plans and True Cost Estimate (WSDOT /FHWA) 1 day Mon 11/17/08 Mon 11/17/08 10 Approve Funding for ROW Acqusition (WSDOT/FHWA) • 0 days Mon 11/17/08 Mon 11/17/08 4 11/17 11 Prepare Appraisals (Design Team) 7 days Mon 11/10/08 Tue 11/18/08 12 Review Appraisals (Design Team) 13 days Wed 11/19/08; Fri 12/5/08 13 Make Offers (Design Team and City) 5 days Mon 12/8/08 Fri 12/12/08 14 Review Offers/Negotiations (BNSF and City) 25 days • Mon 12/15/08 Fri 1/16/09 ;: 15 Close on Property Acqusitions (All) 15 days Mon 1/19/09 Fri 2/6/09 -, 16 Certify ROW ( WSDOT) 15 days; Mon 2/9/09 Fri 2/27/09 , 17 Bid and Award Lincoln Ave. Construction Contract 65 days • Fri 2/27/09 Fri 5/29/09 18 Advertise for Bid (City) 0 days Fri 2/27/09 Fri 2/27/09 2/27 19 Bid on Lincoln Ave. Construction Project (Contractors) • 25 days Mon 3/2/09 Fri 4/3/09 20 Award Lincoln Ave. Construction Contract (City Manager, Council, and WSDOT /FHWA) 20 days Mon 4/6/09; Fri 5/1/09 - : ® 21 Issue NTP (City) 22 20 days Mon 5/4/09 Fri 5/29/09 Lincoln Ave. Ground Breaking Ceremony 0 days Fri 5/29/09 Fri 5/29709 5/29 23 Construct Lincoln Ave. 260 days Mon 6/1/09 Fri 5/28/10 ® -,• 24 Construct Lincoln Ave. (Contractor) 260 days Mon 6/1/09 Fri 5/28/10 ,- 25 Prepare MLK, Jr. Blvd. Grade Separation ■Bid Documents (Design Team) 265 days; Mon 3/2/09 Fri 3/5110 26 Complete 95% PS &E (Design Team) • 30 days Mon 3/2/09 Fri 4/10/09 27 Incorporate Lessons Learned from Lincoln Construction (Design Team) 15 days Mon 1/4/10 Fri 1/22/10 28 Review 95% PS &E (City, BNSF, and WSDOT /FHWA) 20 days Mon 1/25/10 Fri 2/19/10 29 Prepare Bid Documents (Design Team) , 10 days' Mon 2!22/10, Fri 3/5/10 30 Bid and Award MLK, Jr. Blvd. Construction Contract 65 days. Fri 3/5/10 Fri 6/4/10 31 Advertise for Bid (City) 0 days; Fri 3/5110: Fri 3/5/10 i°37 32 Bid on MLK, Jr. Blvd. Construction Project (Contractors) s' 25 days Mon 3/8/10. Fri 4/9/10 33 Award MLK, Jr. Blvd. Construction Contract (City Manager, Council, and WSDOT /FHWA) 20 days Mon 4/12/10: Fri 5/7/10 34 Issue NTP (City) 20 days Mon 5/10/10; Fri 6/4/10 _.___.__.---._.-__._.—_---.___.._.___.-_._..-.--.---..__._.._..._.__..._..-------._._....._..___....__-------_._.. ._...--- ...._._.._.._..___.._.- •-- _ .............__ .._.:__....' _.._.._. 35 MLK, Jr. Blvd. Ground Breaking Ceremony 0 days, ..._ 6!4/10 Fri 6!4!10 6/4 36 Construct MLK, Jr. Blvd • 260 days Mon 6/7/10 Fri 6/3/11 1 110 . 37 Construct MLK, Jr. Blvd. (Contractor) 260 days Mon 6/7/10 Fri 6/3/11 Z Ill Page 1 1 � W ashington State I/ Department of Transportation Organization and Address Supplemental Agreement BERGER /ARAM Engineers Inc. Number 5 33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300 , Federal Way, WA 98003 Original Agreement Number L A -4453 Phone: (206) 431 -2300 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date STPX- NCPD -000S (062) 31 December 2008 30 June 2010 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable MLK Blvd. and Lincoln Avenue Grade Separation $ 2,476,185.00 Description of Work Intermediate and final design, right -of -way. plans, and environmental documentation for rebuilding MLK Blvd. and Lincoln Avenue under the BNSF railroad in downtown Yakima. The Local Agency of City of Yakima desires to supplement the agreement entered into with BERGER /ABAM Engineers Inc . and executed on 20 June 2003 and identified as Agreement No. LA-4453 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. 4110 e changes to the agreement are described as follows: I Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See attached. H Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION is amended to charge the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Work will be completed by 30 June 2010 . III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: See attached. • as set forth in the attached Exhibit D, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: BERGER ABAM Engineers Inc. By: City of Yakima 0 Wilook, Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140 -063 EF Date Revised 9/2005 1111 SECTION 11, SCOPE OF WORK These Scope of Work Modifications add to and revise Exhibit B, Scope of Work, Phase 2 and /or the Supplement No. 2, No.3, and No.4 Scope of Work Modifications. Where conflicts occur between these Scope of Work modifications and the original Scope of Work and /or the Supplement No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4 Scope of Work Modifications, these modifications will take precedence. Item A - Out of Scope Work Already Done to Try to Reach Agreement with BNSF • Five months of added coordination, management, and administration related to acquiring the BNSF property west of the tracks and relocating their facilities • Added design work to determine the feasibility of alternate access to BNSF's facilities and of moving the pond to the east side of the tracks Item B - Out of Scope Work Still Needed to be Done to Construct Lincoln Ave. • Provide a memo to WSDOT /FHWA describing changes made to the project definition since the Environmental Assessment was completed • Design and detail the connection of the glass art wall to the strut and walls • Prepare Supplement No. 5 Item C - Proposed Changes to the Scope of Work to Accommodate BNSF Leaving Their Facilities As Is • Purchase most of the BNSF property east of the tracks and leave BNSF's facilities where they are west of the tracks • Revise the ROW plans and true cost estimate 1111 • Prepare appraisals, appraisal reviews, and offers for the property east of the tracks • Design and detail a new storm water pond on the property east of the tracks • Design and detail a new access bridge across Lincoln Ave. west of the tracks • Design and detail a new ramp on the west side of Hollingbery's Lincoln Ave. loading dock so it can be accessed from f` Ave. and eliminate the need to cross what would now still be BNSF's property Item D - Possible Future Work that would need a Management Reserve • Modifying the demolition contract for the ARCO site to keep some of the tanks and pumps operational (this will require a specialized engineering subconsultant) • • Completion of the MLK, Jr. Blvd. contract documents from 95% to 100% (this is anticipated to mostly be including any lessons learned from construction of Lincoln Ave.) • Exhibit D Supplement No. 5 Summary Analysis of Costs Item A - Out of Scope Work Already Done to Try to Reach Agreement with BNSF BERGER/ABAM $ 32,466 Item A Subtotal $ 32,466 Item B - Out of Scope Work Still Needed to be Done to Construct Lincoln Ave. BERGER/ABAM $ 14,282 Widener and Associates $ 15,159 Item B Subtotal $ 29,442 Item C - Proposed Changes to the Scope of Work to Accommodate BNSF Leaving Their Facilities As Is BERGER/ABAM $ 95,292 PHAROS $ 12,270 Kennedy Jenks $ 13,443 Item C Subtotal $ 121,005 Totals • BERGER/ABAM $ 142,040 Widener and Associates • $ 15,159 PHAROS $ 12,270 Shannon and Wilson $ 13,443 Subtotal $ 182,912 Item D - Management Reserve Unassigned $ 35,000 Item D Subtotal $ 35,000 SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 GRAND TOTAL $ 217,912 • . f No. 5 Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Item A - Out of Scope Work Already Done to Try to Reach Agreement with BNSF Direct Salary Cost (DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Executive 0 $ 81.25 $ - Project Manager 162 56.01 9,074 Project Engineer 0 56.01 - Senior Engineer 40 38.46 1,538 Planner 0 39.13 - Engineer/Technician 0 28.56 -. Graphics/CADD 0 32.93 - Project Coordinator 10 27.16 272 Clerical 0 27.88 - Direct Salary Cost Total 212 $ 10,884 Overhead Cost 158.23% of DSC $ 17,221 Net Fee 32.00% of DSC $ 3,483 SUBTOTAL $ 31,588 Reimbursables 5 Roundtrips at 300 miles each at.$0.585/mile $ 878 111 REIMBURSABLES SUBTOTAL $ 878 Subconsultants: $ - SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ - SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 - ITEM A TOTAL $ 32,466 III • 0 0 Project Name: City of Yakima, MLK Blvd. and Lincoln Avenue Grade Separations Project No: FA PWT 04 016 Prepared By: CCW Item A - Out of Scope Work Already Done to Try to Reach Agreement with IINSF Date: 25- Nov -08 PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR GRAPHICS/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXEC MGR ENGR ENGR PLANNER ENGR/TECH CADD COORD CLERICAL TOTAL SUB ITEM A -1: RAILROAD COORDINATION A -1.1. Added Meetings and Coordination With BNSF 102 102 TOTAL ABAM RAILROAD COORDINATION HRS 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 ITEM A -2: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A -2.1. Added Project Management and Administration 42 10 62 TOTAL ABAM MANAGEMENT HOURS 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 52 ITEM A -3: DESIGN WORK FOR ACCESS FEASIBILITY A -3.1. Determine Feasibility of Alternate Accesses 16 24 A -3.2. Determine Feasibility of Moving Pond 40 2 16 18 TOTAL ABAM DESIGN WORK FOR ACCESS FEASIBILITY HOURS 0 18 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 58 BERGER/ARAM Supplement No. 5 - Item A Total 0 182 0 40 0 0 0 10 0 212 Supplment No. 5 Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Item B - Out of Scope Work Still Needed to be Done to Construct Lincoln Ave. Direct Salary Cost (DSCI PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Executive 0 $ 81.25 $ - Project Manager 40 56.01 2,240 Project Engineer 0 56.01 - Senior Engineer 56 38.46 2,154 Planner 0 39.13 - Engineer/Technician 0 28.56 - Graphics/CADD 16 32.93 527 Project Coordinator 0 27.16 - Clerical 0 27.88 - Direct Salary Cost Total 112 $ 4,921 Overhead Cost 158.23% of DSC $ 7,787 Net Fee 32.00% of DSC $ 1,575 SUBTOTAL $ 14,282 Reimbursables $ REIMBURSABLES SUBTOTAL $ - Subconsultants: Widener and Associates $ 15,159 SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ 15,159 SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 - ITEM B TOTAL $ 29,442 • 111 el • Project Name: City of Yakima, MLK Blvd. and Lincoln Avenue Grade Separations Project No: FA PWT 04 016 Prepared By: CCW Item B - Out of Scope Work Still Needed to be Done to Construct Lincoln Ave. Date: 25- Nov -08 PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR GRAPHICICA PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXEC MGR ENGR ENGR PLANNER ENGR/ TECH DD COORD CLERICAL TOTAL SUB TASK 13-1: EA PROJECT DEFINITION CHANGE MEMO B -1.1 . Develop and Coordinate NEPA Reevaluation Memo B -1.2. Coordination with Widener 0 WID 8 8 TOTAL ARAM EA PROJECT DEFINITION CHANGE MEMO - 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 TASK B -2: DESIGN ARTWORK STRUCTURAL SUPPORT B -2.1. Coordinate with Artist and Glass Wan Engineer 8 8 B -2.2. Design Structure to Support Artwork 16 2 24 28 B -2.3. Modify Plans to Include Support for Artwork 4 24 16 44 TOTAL ABAM DESIGN ARTWORK STRUCTURAL SUPPORT HOURS 0 14 0 56 0 0 16 p 0 86 TASK B -3: PREPARE SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 B -3.1. Prepare ,Scope 8 B -3.2. Prepare Fee proposal 8 8 B -3.3. NegotiatQ 2 8 2 TOTAL ARAM PREPARE SUPPLEMENT NO.5 HOURS 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 • BERGER/ABAM Supplement No. 5 - Item B Total 0 40 0 56 0 u 16 0 0 112 • • • i • Supplment No. 5 Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Item C - Proposed Changes to the Scope of Work to Accommodate BNSF Leaving Their Facilities As Is Direct Salary Cost (DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Executive 12 $ 81.25 $ 975 Project Manager 76 56.01 4,257 Project Engineer 48 56.01 2,688 Senior Engineer 432 38.46 16,615 Planner 0 39.13 - Engineer/Technician 0 28.56 - Graphics/CADD 252 32.93 8,298 Project Coordinator 0 27.16 - Clerical 0 27.88 - Direct Salary Cost Total 820 $ 32,833 Overhead Cost 158.23% of DSC $ 51,952 Net Fee 32.00% of DSC $ 10,507 SUBTOTAL $ 95,292 Reimbursables , • REIMBURSABLES SUBTOTAL $ - Subconsultants: PHAROS $ 12,270 Kennedy Jenks $ 13,443 SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ 25,713 SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 - ITEM C TOTAL $ 121,005 .4) 0 • . 0 Project Name: City of Yakima, MLK Blvd. and Lincoln Avenue Grade Separations Project No: FA PWT 04 016 Prepared By: CCW Item C - Proposed Changes to the Scope of Work to Accommodate BNSF Leaving Their Facilities As Is Date: 25- Nov -08 PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR GRAPHICIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION EXEC MGR ENGR ENGR PLANNER ENGR/TECH ADD COORD CLERICAL TOTAL SUB TASK C -1: REVISE ROW DOCUMENTS • C -1.1 Revise ROW Plans 8 C -1.2 Revise True Cost Estimate 8 _ C -1.3 Prepare Appraisal, Appraisal Review, and Offer 0 PH C -1.4 Coordinate with PHAROS 0 PH 12 12 TOTAL ABAM REVISE ROW DOCUMENTS HOURS 0 20 • 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 20 TASK C -2: NEW STORM WATER POND C -2.1. Revise Drainage Report 2 18 C -2.2. Revise 14 Plan Sheets 18 C -2.3. Prepare Two New Pond Drawings 8 20 22 48 C -2.4. Revise and Prepare New Pump Station Plan Sheets 4 80 40 104 0 KJ TOTAL ABAM NEW STORM WATER POND HOURS 0 12 0 98 0 0 62 0 0 170 TASK C -3: NEW ACCESS BRIDGE C -3.1. Determine Geometry for New Bridge 4 8 8 C -3.2. Rerun Global Model for Underpass Structure and Revise Calculation 20 8 80 88 C -3.3. Revise Geometry of Underpass Structure 4 4 - 4 24 C -3.4. Revise Reinforcing Design 36 4 4 40 48 C -3.5, Revise Twelve Plan Sheets 10 32 38 80 Prepare Six New Plan'Shaets 10 72 96 C -3,7. QA/QC Z 178 32 16 16 64 TOTAL ABAM NEW ACCESS BRIDGE HOURS 12 32 48 272 0 - 0 150 0 0 514 TASK C-4: -RAMP FOR HOLLINGBERY C-4.1 Design and Detail New Ramp for Hollingbery 4 24 40 68 TOTAL ABAM RAMP FOR HOLLINGBERY HOURS 0 4 0 24 0 0 40 0 0 68 TASK C -5: REVISE COST ESTIMATE C-5.1. Revise for New Pond 2 8 10 C-5.2. Revise for New Bridge 4 24 28 C-5.3. Revise for New Ramp 2 8 . 10 TOTAL ARAM REVISE COST ESTIMATE HOURS 0 8 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 48 BERGER /ABAM Supplement No 5 - Item C Total 12 76 48 432 0 0 , 252 0 _ 0 820 , . • . .. .... . . . LINCOLN AVENUE AND MLK, JR. BLVD. GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT ' . BEST CASE SCHEDULE ID Task Name ' I Duration Start Finish 2009 2010 2011 NJD JIFIMIAIMIJJJIAISiOiNiD J1F1m1A1m1J1J iAISIOIN ID J iFIMIAIMIJIJ 1 Prepare Lincoln Ave. Grade Separation BId Documents (Design Team) 67 days Thu 11/6/08 Fri 2/6/09 pr 2 Revise 95% PS&E for Access Bridge and Moving Pond (Design Team) 32 days Thu 1 i /6 /0 6 — ri iiiiiio a Os 3 Review 90% PS&E (BNSF) 28 days Wed 11/12/08 . Fri 12/19/08 4 Incorporate BNSF 90% Review Comments (Design Team) 10 days Mon 12/22/08 Fri l/2/09 5 Review 95% PS&E (City, BNSF, and WSDOT/FHWA) 15 days Mon 1/5/09 - Fri 1/23/09 6 ---1314a7PRICITSOCUTniiiToisTintTliTn)-------------- ------- — 1 - 0 - Jiys --- " -- M - CiiiT/16769 --- TRY810 - 9 7 Acquire ROW from BNSF 81 days Fri 11/7/08 Fri 2/27/09p' 8 Revise Grade Separation ROW Plana and True Coat Estimate (Design Team) 6 days Fri 11/7/08 Fri 11/14/08 9 Approval of ROW Plans and True Cost Estimate (WSDOT/FHWA) 1 day Mon 11/17/08 Mon 11/17/08 10 Approve Funding for ROW AcqusitIon (WSDOT/FHWA) 0 days . Mon 11/17/08 Mon 11/17/08 4711/17 11 Prepare Appraisals (Design Team) 7 days Mon 11/10/08 Tue 11/18/08 1.1 . 12 Review Appraisals (Design Team) 13 days Wed 11/19/08 Fri 12/5/08 13 Make Offers (Design Team and City) . 5 days Mon 12/8/08 Fri 12/12/08 I 14 ----- RinTiaNC 7 ffitis7HegPiiiiic>iii(iiiigiinci ' iii).------ 25 days Mon 12/15/08 Fri 1/16/09 15 Close on Property Acqusitions (All) . 15 days Mon 1/19/09 Fri 2/6/09 16 Certify ROW (WSDOT) 15 days Mon 2/9/09 Fri 2/27/09 17 BId and Award-Lincoln Ave. Construction Contract 65 days Fri 2/27/09 Fri 5/29/09 18 Advertise for BId (City) 0 days Fri iiiiiol WI 1/0169 2/27 19 BId on Lincoln Ave. Construction Project (Contractors) 25 days Mon 3/2/09 Fri 4/3/09 20 Award Lincoln Ave. Construction Contract (City Manager, Council, and WSDOT/FHWA) 20 days Mon 4/6/09 Fri 5/1/09 .... 21 Issue NTP (City) 20 days ' Mon 5/4/09 Fri 5/29/09 ... 22 Lincoln Ave. Ground Breaking Ceremony 0 days Fri 5129/09 Fri 5/29109 5/29 , 23 oPriiiiiicili;ciliiAW.-------------------- 260 days Mon 6/1/09 Fri 5/28/10 ; . 24 Construct Lincoln Ave. (Contractor) 260 days Mon 6/1/09 Fri 5/28/10 • 25 iiiiiiWivi:R,:i:BTid.oilideSTopaiation Bid tioCunliriiiiiicsigritiiiiiii — "iif ciiiiii ---- Wiq - ii - iiiiiii ---- iii - iiiffei . . 26 Complete 95% PS&E (Design Team) 30 days Mon 3/2/09 Fri 4/10/09 27 Incorporate Lessons Learned from Lincoln Construction (Design Team) 15 days Mon 1/4/10 Fri 1/22/10 \milli 28 Review 95% PS&E (City, BNSF, and WSDOT/FHWA) 20 days Mon 1/25/10 Fri 2/19/10 29 Prepare Bid Documents (Design Team) 10 days Mon 2/22/10 Fri 3/5/10 30 BId and Award MLK, Jr. Blvd. Construction Contract 65 days Fri 315/10 FrI 6/4/10 31 Advertise for Bid (City) 0 days Fri 3/5/10 Fri 3/5/10 1;5 32 Bid on MLK, Jr . Blvd. Construction Project (O"ontractors) 25 days Mon 3/8/19 Fri 4/9/10 33 Award MLK, Jr. Blvd. Construction Contract (City Manager, Council, and WSDOT/FHWA) 20 days Mon 4/12/10 Fri 5/7/10 34 Issue NTP (City) 20 days Mon 5/10/10 - Fri 6/4/10 35 MLK, Jr. Blvd. Ground Breaking Ceremony - o days Fri 6/4/10 Fri . 6/4 36 Construct MLK, Jr. Blvd 260 days Mon 6/7/10 Fri 6/3/11 . f . . __________ ____...... • 37 Construct MLK, Jr. Blvd. (Contractor) ' 260 days Mon 6/7/10 Fri 6/3/11 Page 1 • ID . . 4111) ' • .1111 ARE TWO UNDERPASSES REALLY NECESSARY ?. It's time to take a fresh look at our railroad underpass needs. The projected costs to construct this project have gone out of sight. The Yakima City staffs estimated cost . for the underpasses in 2001 was $14 million: Now - seven years later, professional advisors estimate the cost would be at least $42 million, and rising. Also, northwest railroad officials now indicate train volume pressure has been reduced because longer trains are in service, and, the Stevens pass tunnel bottleneck has been solved. In 2001, the Yakima vehicle traffic "delay" at the railroad crossing was estimated to an average of nine minutes. Now - on three different occasions the delay time was down to about • four minutes: It has become apparent to many of us that one underpass on a two -way Lincoln Avenue would be sufficient:. This would provide fire department access to the west side needs and solve the engineering nightmare on Pierce Avenue, leading over. to Martin Luther King Boulevard going east. As a result of seaport industry competition and the faltering economy locally and nationally, we believe that one underpass is all that is required.: This would produce a big savings of taxpayer dollars. As time marches on, we hope the City Council will use common sense regarding the underpass issue and consider a more prudent use of taxpayer • money. /.2 - g -S 14 - ) Q/k eP � Q u� ,.,. TM Salle. Cwt. Bac ARE TWO UNDERPASSES REALLY NECESSARY? It's time to take a fresh look at our railroad underpass needs. The projected costs to construct this project have gone out of sight. The Yakima City staff's estimated cost for the underpasses in 2001 was $14 million. Now - - seven years later, professional advisors estimate the cost would be at least $42 million, and rising. Also, northwest railroad officials now indicate train volume pressure has been reduced because longer trains are in service, and the Stevens pass tunnel bottleneck has been solved. In 2001, the Yakima vehicle traffic "delay" at the railroad crossing was estimated to an average of nine minutes. Now — on three different occasions — the delay time was down to about four minutes. It has become apparent to many of us that one underpass on a two -way Lincoln Avenue would be sufficient. This would provide fire department access to the west side needs and solve•the engineering nightmare on Pierce Avenue, leading over to Martin Luther King Boulevard going east. As a result of seaport industry competition and the faltering economy locally and nationally, we believe that one underpass is all that is required. This would produce a big savings of taxpayer dollars. As time marches on, we hope the City Council will use common sense regarding the underpass issue and consider a more prudent use of taxpayer money. / \ft— M. A. 'Mei" Tar mass Pr P.O. Box 1288 • Yakima, Washington 98907 • ww saveouramericanrights.com TM Sauce. OWL. I a0 Righta. GRADE SEPERATION - MLK Jr. & LINCOLN AVE. UNDERPASSES September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes Yakima City Staff estimates the cost of the Grade seperation aka "Underpasses" for "MLK Jr." St. & Lincoln Avenue at $14,000,000. March 19, 2002 adjourned meeting minutes. Mr. Wolcott from Berger ABAM Engineering reviewed the problems caused by the BNSR rail traffic. Safety concerns at the Railroad grade crossings have caused accidents and it was noted a fatality occurred at the Mead avenue crossing which involved the Central Railroad. In addition, the delay caused by the estimated 4- 24 through trains per day was expected to impact Police and Fire response time. As it turns out there is a much greater safety factor existing when you consider that the East bound traffic on Lincoln avenue is choked down to a sharp right hand 90% turn on to Pierce avenue heading South about 3 /4 of a block then another sharp left hand 90% turn to enter eastbound MLK Jr. This traffic transition is a hazard and doesn't speak well of engineering — photos taken Nov. 1 S ` 2008. Air pollution: The City was /is concerned about the air pollution created by idling cars stopped for trains. It is my belief there is more air pollution created by cars stopped for traffic lights on MLK Jr. and Lincoln avenues. Cross traffic lights are triggered immediately when one car approaches thus causing MLK Jr. & Lincoln, traffic to stop unnecessarily. This occurs early in the morning between 5 am and 6:30 am. P.O. Box 1288 • Yakima, Washington 98907 • www.saveouramericanrights.com September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes. Traffic: The City has calculated the average vehicle delay at 9 minutes per crossing. By 2030 the estimated delay at rail crossings would be 11 minutes per train to clear. 2008 Facts: 3 BNSF through- trains heading south were timed to determine the traffic delay at the Yakima R/R crossings and the results were train #1 = 3 minutes 3 seconds to clear; train #2 = 4 minutes 3 seconds to clear and Train #3 = 4 minutes to clear. September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes. City statistics showed through trains totaled 4 to 6 per day with a potential capacity of 12 to 14 per day. The City argues that enlarging the Stampede Pass tunnel and other line improvements could increase trains per day through Yakima to 20 — 26. Mr. Walcott claims to have documents supporting the increased train capacity. 2008 Facts: BNSF has no immediate plans to invest in Washington. There is no longer a bottleneck in the Stevens Pass Tunnel. There's has been a phenomenal increase in productivity, including the expansion to 10,000 foot trains through the Stevens Pass Tunnel instead of 7,000 foot trains. See 6 -27/ 7 -3 -2008 Puget Sound Business Journal. September 18, 2001 adjourned meeting minutes. Trains — Mr. Wolcott pointed out that the Railroad is a private company and their business depends on competition as well as the import/export of goods. It was noted the BNSF — SPS route through the Columbia River Gorge was at their capacity, leaving the Stampede pass route as the most likely to be expanded. 2008 Facts: The Columbia River Gorge route of SPS will receive improved connections where the North -South Rail line turns east to parallel the Columbia River to the Vancouver Bypass when the $115 million project is completed. Further, executives for the West's two largest railroads are pouring money into Southern California routes, whiles investing very little in the Northwest. Los Angeles and Long Beach have the best prospects for import growth while Puget Sound ports stalled at about a quarter of the Southern California volume. See 6 -27/ 7 -3 -2008 Puget Sound Business Journal. March 19, 2002 adjourned meeting minutes. Mr. Wolcott suggested "MLK Jr." and Lincoln Ave. should be Phase 1 of the grade seperation "underpasses" project due to the amount of traffic utilizing those streets. Estimates of probable construction cost for Phase 1 were $24,963,339. By 2005 estimated costs for the same Phase 1 construction had risen to $29,950,000 and $34,770,000 by the end of 2006. Currently, the cost estimate for this project has increased to over $42,000,000 with no end in sight. This figure does not included the additional costs to purchace BNSF property west of the main tracks and south of Lincoln Avenue which we guess will be upwards of $750,000. Fact: 8 -19- 2008 "Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce" Mexico has opened bidding on a new $4 billion Seaport that will rival Los • Angeles and Long Beach which are the largest ports in America. The Punta Colonet Project is located 150 miles south of the U.S. border and a planned railroad would bring containers directly to points across the mid - western U.S. and is anticipated to begin operation in 2012 with a capacity to handle 2 million 20 foot containers and could expand to several times more. Yes, these freighters would be sailing from Asia with goods heading north. Fact: 9 -2 -2008 "Los Angeles Times" Los Angeles, Long Beach, Seattle and Tacoma imports are down 13% for first 7 months of 2008. Those that are in the know don't believe a turnaround will begin before the second quarter of 2009. Now, with financial institutions and Wall Street in distress, it is anybody's guess as to what will occur. Fact: 6 -27 -2008 "Puget Sound Business Journal" the Vancouver Fraser Port authority will spend $2.5 Billion on a new offshore terminal doubling their capacity to 5 million 20 foot containers. In addition, expanding the terminal to handle Y2 million 20 foot containers. The newly opened Prince Rupert port has a goal of handling containers from Asia bound for the Mid -West. British Columbia ports were up 7% the first half of 2008, while Seattle was down nearly 5%. IT APPEARS, BASED ON THE ABOVE - STATED FACTS, THE ESTIMATED TRAIN TRAFFIC STASTISTICS USED TO START THIS PROJECT WERE INNACURATE. NOW THAT CURRENT AND ESTIMIATED FUTURE TRAIN TRAFFIC SHOWS THAT THE PREVIOUS TRAIN TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN REALIZED, THE WISE MOVE WOULD BE, AT A MINIMUM, TO REDUCE THIS "UNDERPASSES" PROJECT TO ONE (1) ONLY UNDERPASS!!!! • mi.11:4,1)-j' (-7077 lz- SK)P - Aa44 er IZ/Z/0 65 /24 / "ZiA/6 PA 55 6. •E P 7 - ; e 6 /41 //ti (.( r , 1 1 - r" ' —///e• • f e . ho . I-, 0 00 )6 ,16 0 - - M L L : /kJ / k/ 4 / fr _ G-0 OA /1A Afat /1) ■4_,./6 ■/,/‹-v:Ot cf ( _ /e/c( frt 5 _ _6 'P 7. 7 1 / /Vir6-LS 1 47 _ /2.0 Faki — (:-) e). r cI6 _C.) / AK • . 1/P 6 !A .‘:• 1 .0 .4,1_ _ PA C- 2'2 5. .43 Ais --z ,3.:?ee..c C.; 7 / ei`i•cf 10 gr/6-:•1/2 Z/4- . ••-- 1PM) ,!=5. ( ; * L 4 C , —4 41 :> 5: 4/14/Ai . it) S ' e 0,, ":„ rz 7 _, /2_ 7`a - /f-1,? • 4t: / 71 4 iv .7" /46 "-; 77. 7 ALs R /u 0 /ti.e)(c: 77" e F 7 8 4's P /1( - . -7/ o v (f•- , -- d/e-/2 6 _5 /1)6 2 r> Q7.7 ) 7e-e/cr--0-.0 / / / 4 A) A) e- .• (A • c . • • , . , • Rod , , ?. &t.,6 J f / D , .0-4)(:)4 - .7 - hg plc Lic- Pe -17-0 • • - t iiL r '! ) •OC '004 72.: Pas- (iv6;3 L.-1,-ce &et . , / g Aci 4? z‘../ " 1-1 / 1.4 ; ,-, 1 1; -- • - • • • • - • • _ I (2 4 1N.5. /I!( p (Di zyTiTc:-.4 Za3- t . / Al( &C /.9S. _ ..06 E 6 vi2C; L 0_4-- S.7?-5. /4.) jiJ • (- 6. I &,csv_NiAJc- 7/6 d-4-. 6-tjti P ""S cA1 Rnia, . . /4-1V / ___ 4 c. LtlAG pc, a / • L 6 •C'o72 //IA 42_0,,r2,.7-- • tt . L . kGt At _ p cic _ . . . . . . . / a A Al SI2 cf OV-z- 6 • T (17 r 4/k C' A.)71: •. 7Z • S ivt 7?"2e:).L4:_c / 4. s 7• 6 7 7 -o , /- -• . ... .. . .. _ .__ A . . . . : . . . . .....- • , . . , . ....... I (4:: i ....-<:'' '- . '. C -1 ' 4:2 ?4= .? ( , :`_ "I C.,., -• ...t , i ..' ' • ,-. .. .,4 ,...,-._ t !.....y...,.. ,,e._ , _L.... ; :e 4 - 1 ,-..., v— / .---' / 1 - 1 - ('--,- i '- , - I •• --''' / 1 0/ 4.1 (-,/ • , -.., ---', ":" .f . ". .. - '-‘ 1 ' . 7/ tn i ,' ''''' 2 , ,..i • .-•,- .„-- ,• ,, .,-.), •...„ ...- , ,--, \,,,, r ( , ........„ _ - '-' I:- '/-- .„_ '........,) Q:...-,' , .....-- . . _ . . _ .. ... . . . i i e . „...• * * * . , \ ,, ,„..^.. .., ...:..‘ I '-' P .:: -- I _ -!( e'''' ..-_,,::::"..__^.± e1 , 4..-,:/ -..., r ,•<... , ,,e'' f,,, :, ,... „];'...... -/./ '''""?' „/' r'''....., — --2". .,.. .1 ., - I ' - .- - - ,- -- ' ( 1 ` /:, i -- , : 1 - 4 -62"- - - /-'-'';‘,','":' 'IA i'''' ( ,, - - ........: „.. ..1_ ,r- /,,..- . ......` 1 ' --- 1,1 .f , " • ';' . ,;;',1 i,.‹,,- .,,,,...., --, ,. - -6 .-- .., ..,....„, ...., „ . c;:, c_., • -.-.-... /- . . . . • . ,,‘: ... ,.- .'.'i / . • . --,— .....,- i r r ' :01 1"' ^• . :0.) . '7'.. t s I i .N e • ,' • .. ;I i .,.., ../ ), t ,.., 1 i t ir e /WC? ''' :1 (7 4 ''' ' .. ,......., i ......,..,-._ ..... ..--. _,..,..,_ , . ..., c. .t ......,,i . ..1 ./ /2 -(e / , Vi /.- ,t) L-E EC/ ■'''' '. .,.. . / .• , , 1-- .4.,' o Lt-4/. 7 v z „ , „,•.,i,-,,,,,,-, f,...1A-..- , / 4 , ... ,,, ,,, - ,,) ..7.., ... A„..... ,,,,... ,:-...,„„•...,.1(..( i (.. 1 ?' ' .. . .,,, I -,. 1 1 ''' • t .. . .2 i ,,_, , .. 7 , I / /NI ,.-- ,.., I , . 0 ,,,.../ .7 1 ,...^ . ' ''''''",. . i e ,,, A**.,, , Y", '' / ) e'''''.• 1." .•••1 C ,-. ' _ .. ..,,; .. 4-•••"` ( ''' /— e i < — ...... -• C-- 64( , .1‘ . ..-....',.. n ) '''1,i+ ?. /7_ f.....Q.• .10 , :i 1 •-... ,,,,,a ''''' 7 n. ... ' ^"..- '...... . ''.. ...) 7 .. • . . - --- . . _ _ _. _.__ . _ . • . - • - - --- • -------- -- - - - • . • - • . . . ..- -._ .. --- -...-. _... . • . . . - . . ... __ . ... • _ . . . . . . . . .. _ _ . _ .. . _ .. _ . ... _ ' - _.__.. , . _.... . .. . • . - - . . . . .. . .. . .. . I . • - - - -- . . . • - ' - - . . . . - - • _ . - . . .. ' . . -- , . . . _ . . • . . . . . . , , f. -F fAcr `:, oe.. 4c7 7 _S-, -?4-771 l.), ; ( e.„- 74, a_fizAh9- (... 'z + (1ie',• o cr&),/ -A..) G c 6 ,/c1 fli G --- -23 "0 <"_. . + < Z.L. ‘7 A.) i 9-.. ‘,(_6/.... tt/e....) -e. ILI 4 1.1. c-17. -- /4,e L Al2_ 6c-Ii. pdszAzz-7. , ,.?u_774, . ? i . 2 e.7c2 i / . 1 V. ' . .. " A_ p . l d. ce/(42 - Ze s -i• 7 t / ill& 4 .7 74 S . ‘er..t (...1 : . .&& GI //•..L &PL---rg 4.7 t'.1.),0: .1 2*.:i .'?.... z4 j,412-,9-c..;7 4 7 1/44ji‘e _..,. y eci 6,p)10\14 7-7La 5 a.-1/e L are 44,07. /gO. /I ',.;, i ._ n .tev..2 A . 6e)z.4_s by k - - - / ed tv.674-64, O. I 4/1)6L/Z.-S• Tit /f 5 4 , 10".kj: 4 --,+ • 1 J ,' • ri-a. dc 4,0^,) ig 9 i 6 K; gei.) + meiv tle_s , ;-=`;: 4'6 8 , f ° . k/j. .< t,,,.,i, ,i.i, .. ,\.).4-,oe_i , 67 - - 7 4 - / - 1 - 0 '52 4 e.tiY.:. i . A (6 rr! 6 ..F (1.5.1-7 fj/■. J-S ;,vi (A/m.1 ,5if ,,) ci,s-t;tEs. ;,-.(_ ,. . / \ . i c -2z.. -4) 6 " Pvf 6 e 7-- 5,i.),...,,,,,\,01 „..g.,..,c,..,,,t.,76.-::%..c. 7.....7;;/..•<:,a-,1,,,-4 6' .:1 -1 1 - & Y_;1. 11.\*- ' /2,.,t 7 ".47-tilitie ! .4..U./: 1. f. .,:::..p6.4,6(_. $ ..5. A, 716 .(1.0.ktl Lie' J i'_ 4 (JO° 2' a --MI I f 1 o' - 2 - L - \14 • Conqiit(A).c.se.., - 77e_ /116k4 610-/Vi Rat/VC4_ i?fr! 06/ FO4 1 /4.--.5. t dt2 t A I i i r, ..,4-• - ei. .... f , ,9 e" ,-.7:....,!..,,,..b5,---,...„ (7 A 5.09. .A6 certi PC) etZ . Nalk5 6 R)41;6. Colvm Ix' 4- Pa..S.,.... ro. 7. 4,e...1 47 - 74 -c-- ye.".1-g, • hi 4,1? se:A-77z .4,5 . 1 i , ., -- <5 . '. r. ti j 5'64! AJ,..., 76 qc ._, , A)6 5 .:_._ ,G3, Li se,..1.4.4 <4. - ./..:-_ _.c.1--(7) i/e„c 4.e.... 7Se k,r.... 7i) 4 1,1-4. ‘<--‹;, > R4dEi .5. 44-( Altviid t .:A.4 s6 0-0AI 6 4‘ ii?- irs • - 6 4 - L -, - . 0 -I -: - , ,t' L.0, 041‘..-,s. /i-Ac.' to,A.t- .X/4ci) /),(Pve7 ik. Aa_.(4, 6e0i414.7 1)1'1(t--, p/04.6fel- - • -2e),(zi:= ...7-.....47Z.2.c`..-1. .41 Aci,61.# 1- ,..-- cf- (..t #4 P., ). -I-ZR D,, id, 4e,*(,), - . A-71, p� • /!'�_ /._ °- �C�ILy..ClL Mr�waLcv . eolvSu�^TR.v— " QY> �` ,b"et4 1/G�n.0 F2.iNci . ..:.... lNr4 -S .... ^)d r t1-. 19: :44 c c c.c. i ca /1-Ale (G 1 N � � C � C --- -._ 1 l. 1 4 i.' 61,as 6 � 1 - 4 , 2 _? ..k_e /,.. t to . -4 A71. -4 n ' -?2 s¢! V7 /_r _ - . r .. _ ti C9 !1 ' . D.0 .G_1!6 1.0k kit) - EA-37 C 6 .1.1./V2;:7 Al 1: c-• .14"i e_oLzv. A4..1 clic) Dko k.c l- (76 ° _ . .ra' ) m .. T _. lE ... 4-✓ , he'd "(s _.._.... r 77 ,A _dQ v_r2!ere ._- .t -rites / �._,v..l r / �� D..S ... `a14-P1 c G _ ; 6 C- c�9 :5..: ......7ftt / liC_ . d17 � .__.i.ry 7 ..._.. • ..__ f /V!!1��s:.:_ �b lU ..v ft 1...: s�r�ti• 0 4.,W - 4 .'... .: _ 14-4 : , :