Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-26-2023 HPC Agenda Packet CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Date:April 26, 2023 Time: 5:30p.m. Place:City Council Chambers Staff: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager I.Call to Order Commission Chair II.Roll Call Staff Liaison III.Approval of Meeting Minutes from 3/22/2023and 4/5/23Commission Chair IV.Staff AnnouncementsStaff Liaison V.Audience ParticipationCommission Chair VI.New Business A.Naches Historic Overlay-Kickoff MeetingStaff Liaison B.Certificate of Appropriateness –2403 W ChestnutSolarStaff Liaison VII.Old Business A.2023 Grant ApplicationStaff Liaison th B.9 S 10Ave –Removal from local registerStaff Liaison VIII.Other Business Commission Chair IX.Adjournment Adjourn to next scheduled Historic Preservation Commission meetingMay 24, 2023,at 5:30pmin the Council Chambers. Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Date:March22, 2023 Time: 5:30p.m. nd St. Place:Council Chambers, City Hall, 129, N. 2 Staff: Joseph Calhoun,Planning Manager/Historic Preservation Liaison I.Call to Order Meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30P.M. II.Roll Call Commissioners Hall, Bussey, Edmondson,Mannand King were present. III.Approval of Meeting Minutes from 02/22/2023 Minutes were approved unanimously. IV.Staff Announcements–Planning Manager/ Staff LiaisonCalhoun announced the following: A.Staffing in the City of Yakima Planning Division There will be oral boards conducted on 03/23/2023, for an assistant planner position. The expectation is to proceed with the qualifying candidates to have proper staffing in the planning division. Following the staffing conversation, it was mentioned by commissioner, Mann that the downtown director has given notice about leaving their position, and there will be an opening in search ofa certified downtown director. Anyone who might be interested can find information about this position on the Downtown Association website. V.Audience Participation None. VI.New Business th A.9 S 10Ave –Removal from local register PENDING, due to applicant not being present. VII.Old Business A.Fruit Row –March WA-ACHP meeting cancelled Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King There are currently no substantial updates on the Fruit Row nomination process, but the WA-ACHP meeting that was meant to be held last week was cancelled. Discussion with the consultant has been mainly about staffing issues in the department of archeology, and we are still pending on a reschedule date for the WA-ACHP meeting. B.2022 Grant Update The final draft of the contract was sent to the consultants on 03/21/2023, now the commission is waiting for the proper signatures to move forward withthe Naches Avenue overlay district. Questions regarding the 10 ft.fences arose, but there is not knowledge of the specifics of what is happening with them, there was problems with vandalism on irrigation systems, but as for rehabilitation that would be determined by the parks department and public works. C.2023 Grant Application th The application packet for this year’s grant cycle that is due April 282023 was presented to the commission, partly filled out by Joseph Calhoun. After the opportunity of meeting with Michelle Thompson, the plaque/ signage idea for the downtown area was deemed to need to be tied to another component. The application still needs to be finalized, but the goal is to have it fully completed by the next Historic Preservation th 2023, which is two days before the due date. If there need Commission meeting April 26 to be any revisions done to the application prior to submittal revisions shall be addressed at the meeting. Commissioner Bussey speaks more about the idea of the plaques and how they could be catered to be a walking tour that requires a sense of engagement to make it more attractive to citizens or tourists.The commission agreed that there should be some time set aside to focus on that discussion to draft up some specific ideas and think about how a proposal like this could be put into effect. Commissioner Bussey agreed to lead this discussion in the future and will coordinate with Joseph to schedule a special meeting dedicated to his proposal. VIII.Other Business th Representative for 9 S 10Ave –Removal from local register is not present, it has been decided to table the discussion until applicant can be present. Commissioners briefly questioned among themselves why might this applicant want to remove this parcel from the local register, but there are no clear answers, without his presence. The history of the building was also briefly discussed. This building is not only on the local register,according to the application, but also on the national register. IX.Adjournment A motion to adjourn to April 26, 2023 was passed with a unanimous vote. The meeting was adjourned atapproximately 6:00P.M. Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Schab’s Bier Den –Special Meeing Date:April 5, 2023 Time: 5:30p.m. Place:Schab’s Bier Den –Special Meeing Staff: Joseph Calhoun,Planning Manager/Historic Preservation Liaison I.Call to Order Meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30P.M. II.Roll Call Commissioners Hall, Bussey, and King were present. III.Audience Participation None. IV.New Business A.Downtown Walking Tour for DAHP Grant Application Commissioners and staff discussed the downtown walking tour grantapplication. The grant is due to DAHP on April 28, 2023. Commissioner Bussey will compile notes on the discussion and send them to staff for the application. Commissioners will discuss the final draft of the application at their April 26, 2023 meeting. V.Adjournment Amotion to adjourn to April 26, 2023 was passed with a unanimous vote. The meeting was adjourned atapproximately 6:00P.M. Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King #1.(4 # 7 . ( 2 CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Commission Findings of Fact April 26, 2023 In consideration of request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for alteration of historic property located at 2401 W YakimaAve.: SUBMITTED BY:Sierra Sather –Ellensburg Solar LLCc/o Natalie McClendon REQUEST Approve request to install solar panels on the roof of the existing single-family residence. FINDINGS Property Owner:Natalie McClendon Location:2403WChestnutAve Parcel:181323-31514 Background–On April 13, 2023,the applicantsubmitted a request toinstall solar panels on the roof of the historic residence located at 2403W ChestnutAve.The subject property is listed as a ‘contributing property’ of the Barge-Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District. The home was built in 1920and is located on the North side of Chestnut Ave, with the front of the home facingSouth. 1 2 Front of Home along W.ChestnutAve. Google Street View –Image Capure Circa 2022 3 Proposed solar array layout Yakima Municipal Code, Chapter 11.62 Historic Preservation Ordinance The City of Yakima Historic Preservation Ordinance for Special Valuation governs the review of changes to Yakima Register of Historic Places and providesfor the preservation, design review and rehabilitation ofeligible historic properties with the city of Yakima. Review of Changes to Yakima Register of Historic Places Properties (Chapter 11.62.050) After identifying the distinguishing historic characteristics of a property subject to the design review process, retention and preservation of those features andmaterials are the primary goals of the design review effort. Review Required–No person shall make anymaterial change affecting significant historic features as listed in the designation form to any existing property on the Yakima Register of Historic or contributing property within a historic district on the Yakima Register without review by the commission and without receipt of a Certificate of Appropriateness as a result of the review. The review shall apply to all features of the property that contribute to its designation and are listed on the designation. 4 Requests for Review and Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or Waiver. In accordance with YMC § 11.62.050(2)(B)(6), the proposed solar panels are not exempt from design review.This application requires a Type II Review by the Commission for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness(YMC § 11.62.050(2)(C)(2).The Type II Commission review decision shall be final and binding unless it is appealed to the Yakima City Council by the aggrieved person, public agency or other legal entity. Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation & Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings The intent of the Standards is to assist the long-term preservation of a property’s significance through the preservation of historic materials and features. The Standards pertain to historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and interior of the buildings. Rehabilitation assumes that at least some repair or alteration of the historic building will be needed in order to provide for an efficient contemporary use; however, these repairs and alterations must not damage or destroy materials, features or finishes that are important in defining thebuilding’s historic character. Approval Recommendations The property meets the Standards for Rehabilitation as listed below: 1)A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. a.The residence will stay as a single-family home. 2)The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. a.While a portion of the proposed solar panels will be visible from the public right-of- way, the overall historic character of the property will be retained and preserved. 3)Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. a.The property will remain as single family residence, No significant change will occur with the home. 4)Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. a.No other changes are proposed. 5)Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. a.None of the existing architectural characteristics of the home will be changed. The roof composition will remain the same, a portion of the roof will have solar panels installed. 6)Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. a.Not applicable. 5 7)Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. a.The solar panels will be installed to current code. 8)Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. a.Not applicable –no ground-disturbing activities proposed. 9)New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. a.The exterior alteration, while partially visible from the right-of-way, solar panels are quickly becoming a viable solution for many homeowners to reduce their power consumption. The BCNA was provided a copy of the notice and application and is supportive of the homeowner’s workto improve her home and reduce her carbon footprint. 10)New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. a.The proposed installationdoesnot alter the existing structure of the residencein a manner that would disrupt the historic integrity if removed. Basis for Decision-Based upon a review of design review guidelines stipulated in YMC 11.62.050, Review of Changes to Yakima Register of Historic Properties,application and, exhibits, testimony and other evidence presented at the open record public meeting by the City’s Historic Preservation CommissiononApril 26, 2023; and a review of Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings;the Historic Preservation Commissionmakes the following: CONCLUSIONS 1.The purpose of historic preservation design review guidelines is to preserve the historic integrity of properties; contributing or non-contributing listed on the Yakima Register of Historic Places. 2.The subject property is listed as a ‘Contributing property’ of the Barge-Chestnut Neighborhood Historic District. 3.Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of historic properties allows for the rehabilitation of a historic structure which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values. 4.Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of historic properties recommends that the size, scale, and massing of a new addition all pertain to the addition’s overall volume and three-dimensional qualities. Taken together, size, scale and massing are critical elements for ensuring that a new addition is subordinate to the historic building, thus preserving the historic character of a historic property. 6 5.The installation ofsolar panels on the subject residence shall be done in a manner that does not damage historicfeaturesormaterials, and does notnegatively impact the surrounding historic district. DECISION The Historic Preservation Commission, following a review of the applicationby a majority vote of its members, has determined that the request for the alteration will not adversely affect historic significant features of the residence,or the Barge Chestnut Historic District,and approves of the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness.The requested Type II forthe historic residence located at 2403W ChestnutAve., as described aboveis APPROVED, and determined to be eligible for issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness, as set forth in YMC 11.62.050. Cynthia Hall, Chair Date NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Type II Commission review decision shall be final and binding unless it is appealed to the City of Yakima City Council by the aggrieved person, public agency or other legal entityin accordance with YMC 11.62.050(4)(d).The appeal must be in writing on forms provided by the Commission, and filed with theClerk of the City of Yakima within fourteen (14) days of the date of the decision. Appeal forms may be obtained from the Department of Community Development. 7 Certified Local Government Grant Application (Please carefully review the Application Instructions before completing the application.) Name of Local Government: Djuz!pg!Zbljnb Address: 23:!O!3oe!Tu-!Zbljnb-!XB!:9:12 Email: Phone: kptfqi/dbmipvoAzbljnbxb/hpw Grant Contact: 61:.686.7153 Kptfqi!Dbmipvo Planning Education Register nomination Survey & Inventory Reconnaissance # of new or updated Intensive forms: Project Summary (ummarize your project in a few sentences) DsfbujpopgbEpxoupxoZbljnbIjtupsjdXbmljohUpvs-jodmvejohnbqqjoh-xfctjufvqebuft- boejoufsqsfujwftjhobhf/ * Grant Amount Requested: 24-111/11 Match Amount: 8-611/11 Total Project Cost: 31-611/11 Organize your description in the following order (see instructions for more info): Project Description Statement of Need Project Objectives Maps, photographs, or other supporting documentation may be included as attachments. . *0-word maximum UifijtupszpguifdjuzpgZbljnbdbocfejggjdvmuupbddfttboejtopuxjefmzlopxoczjut djuj{fot/Hfofsbmmbdlpgijtupsjdlopxmfehfdbojoijcjuxjeftqsfbetvqqpsupgijtupsjd qsftfswbujpofggpsut/Bmufsobujwfmz-hsfbufsbxbsfofttpgZbljnb(tijtupszdbocfbo jodfoujwfupqsftfswfuibuijtupsz/ Wjtjcmfijtupsjdtjhobhf-qmbdfebmpohdpnnpoxbmljohspvuft-xjmmqbttjwfmzqspnpufxjefs ijtupsjdbxbsfoftt/Xifouiftjhotbsfqbsupgbxbmljohupvs-uifzxjmmjowjufqbttfstczup fohbhfeffqfsxjuiZbljnb(tijtupsz-cpuiczdpoujovjohpouifxbmljohupvsqbuiupuif ofyutjhoboeczsfbejohbeejujpobmijtupsjdjogpsnbujpopouifupvs(txfctjuf/Bxbmljoh upvsdbobmtpcfqbsupgfevdbujpoboepvusfbdibdujwjujftczmpdbmtdippmt-ijtupsjdboe puifspshboj{bujpot-boefoufsqsjtjohjoejwjevbmt/ QspkfduPckfdujwft 2/Fohbhfqvcmjdbuufoujpoxjuiwjtjcmfnbslfstdpoubjojohijtupsjdjogpsnbujpobcpvu tjhojgjdboucvjmejohtjoepxoupxoZbljnb/ 3/Vtfuiftfnbslfstboeuifxbmljohupvsxfctjufupfodpvsbhfhfofsbmijtupsjd bxbsfofttboeqspnpufijtupsjdqsftfswbujpo/ b/JnqspwfbddfttupuifijtupszpgepxoupxoZbljnbcvjmejoht/ c/Jowjufqfpqmfupbdujwfmzfohbhfxjuiuibuijtupszczdpoujovjohbmpohuifxbmljohupvs/ c/FodpvsbhfjousjotjdjowftunfoujoupuifqsftfswbujpopgZbljnb(tijtupszcznbljohju npsfdpnnpomzlopxo/ 4/QspnpufboetvqqpsuuifhpbmtpguifDjuzpgZbljnbDpnqsfifotjwfQmbo3151(t IjtupsjdQsftfswbujpoFmfnfou/ b/Hpbm23/2;QspnpufcspbebxbsfofttboebqqsfdjbujpopgZbljnb(tifsjubhf c/Hpbm23/4;Jefoujgz-sfhjtufs-boeqspufduijtupsjdcvjmejoht-qmbdft-mboetdbqft-boe usfft d/Hpbm23/5;Fodpvsbhfcvjmejohsfibcjmjubujpoboeifsjubhfqspkfdutjoepxoupxo Zbljnb Please list each proposed grant activity separately, beginning with your estimated start and completion dates. A start date and completion date alone are not sufficient for the Schedule of Project Completion. This should be a complete listing potential activities associated with the grant, including for check-ins or draft submittal. . Mandatory draft or check-in th dates are April 28 and July 14th, 20 unless . Following draft submissions there will be 14 dayfor DAHP to review and comment on draft review of all reports, documents, publications, HPI forms etc. You may begin billing for project work starting October 1, 202. Final projects must be turned in by September 1, 202 . Final reimbursements requests must be sentin by September 30, 202. All drafts, check ins, final reports, and reimbursement requests should be sent to Michelle Thompson at michelle.thompson@dahp.wa.gov. Start Finish Opwfncfs3134 TPX0Cvehfu0DpousbduxjuiEBIQPdupcfs3134 Efdfncfs3134 Opwfncfs3134 CfhjoSGR0IjsjohQspdftt Kbovbsz3135 TPX0Cvehfu0DpousbduxjuiDpotvmubou Efdfncfs3134 Gfcsvbsz3135 Kbovbsz3135 QsfmjnjobszJEpgxbmljohspvuf Nbsdi3135 QvcmjdPvusfbdiboeQvcmjdNffujohxjuiIQDGfcsvbsz3135 Bqsjm3135 Nbsdi3135 Gjstuesbgupgxbmlspvufboejefoujgjdbujpopgsfmfwboucvjmejoht 2tutvcnjuubmpgesbguqspevduupEBIQBqsjm39-3135 SfwjfxpgDpnnfoutSfdfjwfe Nbz3135 Kvof3135 QvcmjdNffujohxjuiIQD Nbz3135 3oetvcnjuubmpgesbguqspevduupEBIQ Kvmz25-3135 SfwjfxpgDpnnfoutSfdfjwfe Kvmz3135 QvcmjdNffujohIQD Bvhvtu3135 GjobmQspevduTvcnjuubmupEBIQTfqu2-3135 Salaries/Volunteer Time Federal Share Total Hard MatchSoft Match 2-111/11 2-111/11 QmboojohUfdiojdjbo 1/11 4-111/11 QmboojohNbobhfs1/11 4-111/11 1/11 IQD 2-111/11 2-111/11 1/116-111/116-111/11 Total: 1/11 :-111/11 :-111/11 IjtupsjdQsftfswbujpoDpotvmubou 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 :-111/111/11 :-111/11 Total: 1/11 5-111/11 5-111/11 SpvufTjhobhf 1/11 3-611/11 TjhoJotubmm3-611/11 1/11 1/11 7-611/11 1/113-611/11 Total: 5-111/11 1/111/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/111/11 1/11 Total: 1/11 Soft Match Hard Match Federal Share 31-611/11 8-611/11 1/11 24-111/11 – To assure that your grant proposal is complete, please check off that you have included the following for your application: One completed digital copy of the three signature attachments and any supplemental information included emailed to Michelle Thompson at michelle.thompson@dahp.wa.gov Written documentation for federally approved indirect cost rate, if applicable. Written justification for volunteer rates, if applicable One signed original Statement of Understanding for Grant Management Requirements One signed original Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Form (Attachment ) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCE As the authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant agrees that, as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the Department of the Interior, it will comply with all Federal laws relating to nondiscrimination. These laws include, but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; (b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap; (c) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101 et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; and applicable regulatory requirements to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, handicap or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the applicant. THE APPLICANT HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. THIS ASSURANCE shall apply to all aspects of the applicant’s operations including those parts that have not received or benefited from Federal financial assistance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant by the Department, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is sued for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is so provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the Department. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Applicant by the Department, including installment payments after such date on account of applicants for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date. The Applicant recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made in this assurance, and that the United States shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of the assurance. This assurance is binding on the Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, and subrecipients and the person whose signature appears below who is authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant. SIGNATUREOF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE APPLICANT/ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED APPLICANT/ORGANIZATION MAILING ADDRESS BUREAU OR OFFICE EXTENDING ASSISTANCE DI-1350 (REV 6/91) STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR GRANT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS CLGs receiving HPF grant assistance must fulfill the terms of their grant agreement with the state and adhere to all requirements of the National Register Programs Manual. This requirement includes compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 241, as amended, which provides that no person on the grounds of age, race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Local financial management systems shall be in accordance with the standards specified in OMB Circular A-128, “Standards for Grantee Financial Management Systems.” Indirect costs may be charged as part of the CLG grant only if the CLG subgrantee meets the requirements of the manual. Unless the CLG has a current indirect cost rate approved by the cognizant federal agency, only direct costs may be charged. Grant recipients must maintain auditable financial records in accordance with the General Accounting Office’s Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions. The CLG subgrantee will provide, with request for reimbursement, documentation to support billings (time sheets, front and back canceled checks, etc.) for federal and non-federal share claimed. Repayment will be made to the SHPO organization if terms and conditions of the subgrant agreement are not followed or costs claimed are disallowed following audit. CLG SIGNATUREOFAPPLICANT TITLE DATE Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reproduction U.S. Department of the Interior Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549,DebarmentandSuspension,43CFRPart12,Section12.500,Participants’ responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). Copies of the regulations are included in the proposal package. For further assistance in obtaining a copy of the regulations, contact the U.S. Department of the Interior, Acquisition and Assistance Division, Office of Acquisition and Property Management, 18th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. (BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE) (1)The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposalthat neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participationinthistransactionby any Federal department or agency. (2)Where the prospectivelower tierparticipantisunable to certify to anyof the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Nameand Title of Authorized Representative Signature Date Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous EditionUsable Authorized for Local Reproduction Auth Instructions for Certification 1.By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 2.The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered and erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3.The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4.The terms “covered transaction,” “debarred,” “suspended,” “ineligible,” “lower tier covered transaction,” “participant,” “person,” “primary covered transaction,” “principal,” “proposal,” and “voluntarily excluded,” as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5.The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6.The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7.A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List (Tel.#). 8.Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9.Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous EditionUsable Authorized for Local Reproduction Auth .............................. -Twp, ■2-S. ChangesChanges Street LOCATION -G Roof Date: Machine 9 QRQn? State Asbestos/Asphalt Site Street Owner Zip Roof Religion The G 9 NARRATIVE 111 Olympia, INVENTORY NPS Fonn 10-900-* 0M8 No. 1024-0018 CM® E»p. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form Continuation sheet Item number Page Multiple Resource Area Thematic Group Name Yakima TR State Yakima Co., WA Date/Signature ; Attest Attest 13. Moore, Edward B., House * Attest Attest f Potter, H.W. , House Keeper wfiit-ioaai ' it.' " Attest fcfteret’ Is is. Powell House eeper ‘ .9gi3*er Attest n''' <Bft«r8d '.r Attest ^!)~Kee^r is. Sweet, Reuben, House Attest la t'.>a i^Hceeper '20. Watt, William, House P rr/: Attest Cr 1 ■STOOOO'ly UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOF THEINTERIOR WASO Form -177 (“R" June 1984) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES EVALUATION/RETURN SHEET Miller, John House(Yakima TR) Yakima County Working No.-------^ | 0 198T WASHINGTON Fed. Reg. Date: ____ Date Due: t^/S'? — — / -7/ (F ^ / t Action: ' kCCEPT „ y □ resubmission RETURN. □ nomination by person orlocal government liH ___REJECT, CZl owner objection Federal Agency:______ Q appeal Substantive Review: □ sample □ request□appeal □ NR decision Reviewer's comments: Recom./Criteria. Reviewer_____ Discipline_____ Date_________ , see continuation sheet technicalcorrections cited below Nomination returned for: substantive reasons discussed below 1. Name 2. Location 3. Classification Status Ownership Category Present Use Accessible Public Acquisition 4. Owner of Property 5. Location of Legal Description 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Has this property been determined eligible? CH yes □ no 7. Description Condition Check one Check one CD originalsite CD unaltered CD deteriorated Cl\] excellent CD moved date CD altered CD ruins CD good CDunexposed CD fair Describe the present and original (if known) physicalappearance □ summary paragraph □ completeness □ clarity □ alterations/integrity I I dates I I boundary selection 8. Significance Period Areas of Significance-Check and justify below Specific dates Buiider/Architect Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) □ summary paragraph □ completeness □ clarity j EH appiicable criteria □ justification of areas checked □ reiating significance to the resource E\] context E3 relationship of integrity to significance v, □ justification of exception E\] other 9. Major Bibliographical References 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property Quadrangle name UTM References Verbal boundary description and justification 11. Form Prepared By 12. State Historic Preservation Officer Certification The evaiuated significance of this property within the state is: nationai local state State Historic Preservation Officer signature titie date 13. Other EH Maps EH Photographs □ other Questions concerning this nomination may be directed ' Signed.Date Phone: GPO 918-4S0 Comments for any item may be continued on tat attached sheet Please refer to the map in the Multiple Property Cover Sheet for this property Multiple Property Cover Sheet ReferenceNumber: 64000913 11.62.045Yakima register of historic places. A. Criteria for Determining Designation in the Register. Any building, structure, site, object, or district may be designated for inclusion in the Yakima register of historic places if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community; if it has integrity; is at least forty years old, or is of lesser age and has exceptional importance; and if it falls in at least one of the following categories: (1)Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state, or local history. (2)Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style, or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. (3)Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder, or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. (4)Exemplifies or reflects special elements of Yakima’s cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history. (5)Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state, or local history. (6)Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. (7)Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. (8)Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. (9)Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events, or cultural patterns. (10)Is a creative and unique example of folk or vernacular architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories. B. Process for Designating Properties or Districts to the Yakima Register of Historic Places. (1)Any person may nominate a building, structure, site, object, or district for inclusion in the Yakima register of historic places. Members of the historic preservation commission or the commission as a whole may generate nominations. In its designation decision, the commission shall consider the Yakima historic inventory and the Yakima comprehensive plan. (2)Applications for nominations must bear the signature of the property owner(s) of record of the subject property as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor. In the case of districts, applications for nomination of districts or additions to an existing district must bear the signatures of the owners of a majority of the properties within the proposed district or area to be added to an existing district. At least sixty percent of the properties within such proposed district or area to be added to an existing district shall be contributing properties. Applications shall be on forms and include information and documentation supporting the historic significance of the building, structure, site, object, or district. (3)In the case of individual properties, the designation shall include the legal description and all features—interior and exterior—and outbuildings that contribute to its designation. (4)In the case of districts, the designation shall include description of the boundaries of the district, the characteristics of the district which justify its designation, a list of all contributing properties including features, structures, sites, and objects which contribute to the designation of the district, and a list of all noncontributing properties. (5)The commission shall consider the merits of the nomination, according to the criteria in subsection A of this section and according to the nomination review standards established in rules, at an open record public hearing. At least ten days prior to the hearing, written notice by first-class mail of the time, date, place, and subject of the hearing will be given to all owners of record of the subject property as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor, the authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, of the subject property. Public notice of the hearing shall also be provided and shall include, at least ten days prior to the hearing, publication in a newspaper of general circulation in Yakima and posting of the property. The commission shall, by a majority vote of its members, make a written recommendation to the city council that the nomination of the subject property be approved or rejected for listing on the Yakima register of historic places. The recommendation shall set forth findings of fact which constitute the basis for the recommendation. (6)Upon receipt of the commission’s recommendation, the city council shall approve, reject or refer the recommendation back to the commission for further consideration, as the council deems appropriate. Approval of a recommendation to designate a property for listing on the register shall be done by city council adoption of a resolution designating the building, structure, site, object, or district for listing on the Yakima register of historic places. (7)Properties listed on the Yakima register of historic places shall be recorded on official zoning records with an “HR” (for historic register) designation. This designation shall not change or modify the underlying zone classification. C. Removal of Properties from the Register. (1)In the event that any property is no longer deemed appropriate for designation or no longer meets the eligibility requirements for the Yakima register of historic places, the commission may initiate removal from such designation by the same procedure as provided for in establishing the designation in subsection B of this section. (2)Additionally, and except to the extent that a property is subject to a historic preservation special valuation agreement entered into under the authority of YMC11.62.060and applicable state law, the property owner(s) of record (as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor) of a property listed on the Yakima register of historic places may make a written request to have said property removed from the register. The written request must be signed by said property owner(s) and notarized. Upon receipt of such a properly notarized written request, the commission shall immediately remove the property from the register. (3)Additionally, and except to the extent thata property is subject to a historic preservation special valuation agreement entered into under the authority of YMC11.62.060and applicable state law, the property owner(s) of record (as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor) of a contributing property in an existing historic district may make a written request to have said property changed from contributing to noncontributing status. The written request must be signed by said property owner(s) and notarized. Upon receipt of such a properly notarized written request, the commission shall immediately change the status of the subject property from contributing to noncontributing. D. Change of Status from Noncontributing to Contributing within a District. The owner(s) of record of a noncontributing property within a district may submit an application to the commission for change of status of the property from noncontributing to contributing. The application shall identify all features of historical significance of the property in accordance with subsection A of this section and shall include the legal description and all features—interior and exterior—and outbuildings that contribute to its proposed designation as a contributing property. The commission shall consider the merits of the application according to the criteria in subsection A of this section and according to any review standards established in rules at an open meeting. This action shall be deemed a Type II commission review subject to the procedures of YMC11.62.050(C)(4). E. Effects of Listing on the Register. (1)Listing on the Yakima register of historic places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a historic district. (2)Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, or any contributing property in a district, excluding ordinary repair and maintenance and emergency measures defined in YMC11.62.030and the exemptions stated in YMC11.62.050, the owner must request and receive a certificateof appropriateness from the commission for the proposed work. Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the commission to review the property for removal from the register. (3)Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property or contributing property within a district, the owner must request and receive a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness. (4)Because Yakima is certified as a certified local government (CLG), all qualifying properties listed on the Yakima and National Registers of Historic Places may be eligible for special tax valuation on their rehabilitation under YMC11.62.060.