Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-22-2023 HPC Agenda Packet CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Date:March22, 2023 Time: 5:30p.m. Place:City Council Chambers Staff: Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager I.Call to Order Commission Chair II.Roll Call Staff Liaison III.Approval of Meeting Minutes from 2/22/2023Commission Chair IV.Staff AnnouncementsStaff Liaison V.Audience ParticipationCommission Chair VI.New Business th A.9 S 10Ave –Removal from local registerStaff Liaison VII.Old Business A.Fruit Row –March WA-ACHP meeting cancelled Staff Liaison B.2022 Grant UpdateStaff Liaison C.2023 Grant ApplicationStaff Liaison VIII.Other Business Commission Chair IX.Adjournment Adjourn to next scheduled Historic Preservation Commission meetingApril 26, 2023,at 5:30pmin the Council Chambers. Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King CITY OF YAKIMA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Council Chambers, City Hall Date:February 22, 2023 Time: 5:30p.m. nd St. Place:Council Chambers, City Hall, 129, N. 2 Staff: Joseph Calhoun,Planning Manager/Historic Preservation Liaison I.Call to Order Meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30P.M. II.Roll Call Commissioners Hall, Bussey, Edmondson, and King were present, with Commissioner Mann absent (excused). III.Approval of Meeting Minutes from 02/22/2023 Minutes were approved unanimously. IV.Staff Announcements–Planning Manager Calhoun announced the following: A.Further Update on Fruit Row Nomination Staff gave the update that emails have been exchanged between Spencer and himself. It is expected that the Fruit Row Nomination should be on the agenda for theMarch (03/22/2023)Historic Preservation meeting. B.Naches Overlay (Grant for current Fiscal Year) A zoom meeting was scheduled for 02/23/2023 with Michelle Thompson from dahpto discuss the Naches overlay such as next steps to continue the project. Any questions that would arise from the Historic Preservation commissioners were encouraged to be mentioned to Joseph, so they could be addressed at the zoom meeting. V.Audience Participation None. VI.New Business A.2023 CLG Grant Discussion A grant manual and grant application instructions, for this year’s dahp grant cycle, were presented to the HistoricPreservation commissioners. The application for this year’s dahp grant cycle are due April 28, 2023. Discussion for the option of markers/plaques for downtown was found not typically funded though this type of grant because of the ongoing maintenance thatwill follow the plaques and it has been suggested that another Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King type of project be proposed for this grant. Some of the material for the grant was reviewed and further explained.Commissioners are encouraged to speak up if they could think of agrantproposal. Questionsregarding the Grant were also strongly encouraged, while Joseph may not have direct answers, the zoom meeting with Michelle Thompson will help answer any comments, questions or concerns regarding this grant.A considerationto update the Yakima GIS system to enhance public availability toeasily research what a parcel on the historic preservation might entail, such as limitations and requirements was mentioned as a proposal for the grant. There was concern regarding if the Historic Preservation should apply this grant to the GIS system because of the fact that the Historic Preservation is not responsible for the maintenance of the GIS system, but rather the City of Yakima internal staff. Previously approved projects from this grant were discussed and explained. The Naches overlay was also discussed and it was brought to the commissioners attention that the Naches overlay can be a foundation for future projects, and these future projects are ones that would not require a full on grant, but instead could be maintained through the commission and staff. The marker/ plaque idea to improve the downtown area was considered once again, but since it may not be completely appropriate to be funded through the grant cycle, it was suggested that there be other funding that could be put towards the marker/plaques for the downtown area. Overlapping of projects is assumed to not occur, but it will be asked to Michelle Thompson if grant funds could be distributed among several projects rather than just one. Thereis still some concern about coming to a consensus when choosing what project to pursue with the CLG grant, it was agreed that Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager/ Historic Preservation Liaison follow up with the commissioners via email about how the zoom went with Michelle Thompson so that it can be discussed at the next Historic preservation meeting in March.The marker/ plaque proposal is further evaluated by the commissioners and is recognized under education and public awareness for the residents and tourist of the City of Yakima. VII.Other Business Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager/ Historic Preservation Liaison was thanked and recognizedby the Chair, Hall, for stepping in and guiding the Historic Preservation Commission though their upcoming projects. VIII.Adjournment A motion to adjourn to March 22, 2023 was passed with a unanimous vote. The meeting was adjourned atapproximately 6:01P.M. Commission Members Clayton Bussey Joe Mann Dawn King .............................. -Twp, ■2-S. ChangesChanges Street LOCATION -G Roof Date: Machine 9 QRQn? State Asbestos/Asphalt Site Street Owner Zip Roof Religion The G 9 NARRATIVE 111 Olympia, INVENTORY NPS Fonn 10-900-* 0M8 No. 1024-0018 CM® E»p. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form Continuation sheet Item number Page Multiple Resource Area Thematic Group Name Yakima TR State Yakima Co., WA Date/Signature ; Attest Attest 13. Moore, Edward B., House * Attest Attest f Potter, H.W. , House Keeper wfiit-ioaai ' it.' " Attest fcfteret’ Is is. Powell House eeper ‘ .9gi3*er Attest n''' <Bft«r8d '.r Attest ^!)~Kee^r is. Sweet, Reuben, House Attest la t'.>a i^Hceeper '20. Watt, William, House P rr/: Attest Cr 1 ■STOOOO'ly UNITED STATES DEPARTMENTOF THEINTERIOR WASO Form -177 (“R" June 1984) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES EVALUATION/RETURN SHEET Miller, John House(Yakima TR) Yakima County Working No.-------^ | 0 198T WASHINGTON Fed. Reg. Date: ____ Date Due: t^/S'? — — / -7/ (F ^ / t Action: ' kCCEPT „ y □ resubmission RETURN. □ nomination by person orlocal government liH ___REJECT, CZl owner objection Federal Agency:______ Q appeal Substantive Review: □ sample □ request□appeal □ NR decision Reviewer's comments: Recom./Criteria. Reviewer_____ Discipline_____ Date_________ , see continuation sheet technicalcorrections cited below Nomination returned for: substantive reasons discussed below 1. Name 2. Location 3. Classification Status Ownership Category Present Use Accessible Public Acquisition 4. Owner of Property 5. Location of Legal Description 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Has this property been determined eligible? CH yes □ no 7. Description Condition Check one Check one CD originalsite CD unaltered CD deteriorated Cl\] excellent CD moved date CD altered CD ruins CD good CDunexposed CD fair Describe the present and original (if known) physicalappearance □ summary paragraph □ completeness □ clarity □ alterations/integrity I I dates I I boundary selection 8. Significance Period Areas of Significance-Check and justify below Specific dates Buiider/Architect Statement of Significance (in one paragraph) □ summary paragraph □ completeness □ clarity j EH appiicable criteria □ justification of areas checked □ reiating significance to the resource E\] context E3 relationship of integrity to significance v, □ justification of exception E\] other 9. Major Bibliographical References 10. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property Quadrangle name UTM References Verbal boundary description and justification 11. Form Prepared By 12. State Historic Preservation Officer Certification The evaiuated significance of this property within the state is: nationai local state State Historic Preservation Officer signature titie date 13. Other EH Maps EH Photographs □ other Questions concerning this nomination may be directed ' Signed.Date Phone: GPO 918-4S0 Comments for any item may be continued on tat attached sheet Please refer to the map in the Multiple Property Cover Sheet for this property Multiple Property Cover Sheet ReferenceNumber: 64000913 11.62.045Yakima register of historic places. A. Criteria for Determining Designation in the Register. Any building, structure, site, object, or district may be designated for inclusion in the Yakima register of historic places if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community; if it has integrity; is at least forty years old, or is of lesser age and has exceptional importance; and if it falls in at least one of the following categories: (1)Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state, or local history. (2)Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style, or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. (3)Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder, or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. (4)Exemplifies or reflects special elements of Yakima’s cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history. (5)Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state, or local history. (6)Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. (7)Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. (8)Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. (9)Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events, or cultural patterns. (10)Is a creative and unique example of folk or vernacular architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories. B. Process for Designating Properties or Districts to the Yakima Register of Historic Places. (1)Any person may nominate a building, structure, site, object, or district for inclusion in the Yakima register of historic places. Members of the historic preservation commission or the commission as a whole may generate nominations. In its designation decision, the commission shall consider the Yakima historic inventory and the Yakima comprehensive plan. (2)Applications for nominations must bear the signature of the property owner(s) of record of the subject property as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor. In the case of districts, applications for nomination of districts or additions to an existing district must bear the signatures of the owners of a majority of the properties within the proposed district or area to be added to an existing district. At least sixty percent of the properties within such proposed district or area to be added to an existing district shall be contributing properties. Applications shall be on forms and include information and documentation supporting the historic significance of the building, structure, site, object, or district. (3)In the case of individual properties, the designation shall include the legal description and all features—interior and exterior—and outbuildings that contribute to its designation. (4)In the case of districts, the designation shall include description of the boundaries of the district, the characteristics of the district which justify its designation, a list of all contributing properties including features, structures, sites, and objects which contribute to the designation of the district, and a list of all noncontributing properties. (5)The commission shall consider the merits of the nomination, according to the criteria in subsection A of this section and according to the nomination review standards established in rules, at an open record public hearing. At least ten days prior to the hearing, written notice by first-class mail of the time, date, place, and subject of the hearing will be given to all owners of record of the subject property as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor, the authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, of the subject property. Public notice of the hearing shall also be provided and shall include, at least ten days prior to the hearing, publication in a newspaper of general circulation in Yakima and posting of the property. The commission shall, by a majority vote of its members, make a written recommendation to the city council that the nomination of the subject property be approved or rejected for listing on the Yakima register of historic places. The recommendation shall set forth findings of fact which constitute the basis for the recommendation. (6)Upon receipt of the commission’s recommendation, the city council shall approve, reject or refer the recommendation back to the commission for further consideration, as the council deems appropriate. Approval of a recommendation to designate a property for listing on the register shall be done by city council adoption of a resolution designating the building, structure, site, object, or district for listing on the Yakima register of historic places. (7)Properties listed on the Yakima register of historic places shall be recorded on official zoning records with an “HR” (for historic register) designation. This designation shall not change or modify the underlying zone classification. C. Removal of Properties from the Register. (1)In the event that any property is no longer deemed appropriate for designation or no longer meets the eligibility requirements for the Yakima register of historic places, the commission may initiate removal from such designation by the same procedure as provided for in establishing the designation in subsection B of this section. (2)Additionally, and except to the extent that a property is subject to a historic preservation special valuation agreement entered into under the authority of YMC11.62.060and applicable state law, the property owner(s) of record (as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor) of a property listed on the Yakima register of historic places may make a written request to have said property removed from the register. The written request must be signed by said property owner(s) and notarized. Upon receipt of such a properly notarized written request, the commission shall immediately remove the property from the register. (3)Additionally, and except to the extent thata property is subject to a historic preservation special valuation agreement entered into under the authority of YMC11.62.060and applicable state law, the property owner(s) of record (as indicated by the records of the Yakima County auditor) of a contributing property in an existing historic district may make a written request to have said property changed from contributing to noncontributing status. The written request must be signed by said property owner(s) and notarized. Upon receipt of such a properly notarized written request, the commission shall immediately change the status of the subject property from contributing to noncontributing. D. Change of Status from Noncontributing to Contributing within a District. The owner(s) of record of a noncontributing property within a district may submit an application to the commission for change of status of the property from noncontributing to contributing. The application shall identify all features of historical significance of the property in accordance with subsection A of this section and shall include the legal description and all features—interior and exterior—and outbuildings that contribute to its proposed designation as a contributing property. The commission shall consider the merits of the application according to the criteria in subsection A of this section and according to any review standards established in rules at an open meeting. This action shall be deemed a Type II commission review subject to the procedures of YMC11.62.050(C)(4). E. Effects of Listing on the Register. (1)Listing on the Yakima register of historic places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a historic district. (2)Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, or any contributing property in a district, excluding ordinary repair and maintenance and emergency measures defined in YMC11.62.030and the exemptions stated in YMC11.62.050, the owner must request and receive a certificateof appropriateness from the commission for the proposed work. Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the commission to review the property for removal from the register. (3)Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property or contributing property within a district, the owner must request and receive a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness. (4)Because Yakima is certified as a certified local government (CLG), all qualifying properties listed on the Yakima and National Registers of Historic Places may be eligible for special tax valuation on their rehabilitation under YMC11.62.060. Certified Local Government Grant Application (Please carefully review the Application Instructions before completing the application.) Name of Local Government: Djuz!pg!Zbljnb Address: 23:!O!3oe!Tu-!Zbljnb-!XB!:9:12 Email: Phone: kptfqi/dbmipvoAzbljnbxb/hpw Grant Contact: 61:.686.7153 Kptfqi!Dbmipvo Planning Education Register nomination Survey & Inventory Reconnaissance # of new or updated Intensive forms: Project Summary (ummarize your project in a few sentences) DsfbujpopgbEpxoupxoZbljnbIjtupsjdXbmljohUpvs-jodmvejohnbqqjoh-xfctjufvqebuft- boejoufsqsfujwftjhobhf/ * Grant Amount Requested: 1/11 Match Amount: 1/11 Total Project Cost: 1/11 Organize your description in the following order (see instructions for more info): Project Description Statement of Need Project Objectives Maps, photographs, or other supporting documentation may be included as attachments. . *0-word maximum Please list each proposed grant activity separately, beginning with your estimated start and completion dates. A start date and completion date alone are not sufficient for the Schedule of Project Completion. This should be a complete listing potential activities associated with the grant, including for check-ins or draft submittal. . Mandatory draft or check-in th dates are April 28 and July 14th, 20 unless . Following draft submissions there will be 14 dayfor DAHP to review and comment on draft review of all reports, documents, publications, HPI forms etc. You may begin billing for project work starting October 1, 202. Final projects must be turned in by September 1, 202 . Final reimbursements requests must be sentin by September 30, 202. All drafts, check ins, final reports, and reimbursement requests should be sent to Michelle Thompson at michelle.thompson@dahp.wa.gov. Start Finish Salaries/Volunteer Time Federal Share Total Hard MatchSoft Match 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/111/111/11 Total: 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/111/11 1/11 Total: 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/111/11 Total: 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/111/11 1/11 Total: 1/11 Soft Match Hard Match Federal Share 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/11 – To assure that your grant proposal is complete, please check off that you have included the following for your application: One completed digital copy of the three signature attachments and any supplemental information included emailed to Michelle Thompson at michelle.thompson@dahp.wa.gov Written documentation for federally approved indirect cost rate, if applicable. Written justification for volunteer rates, if applicable One signed original Statement of Understanding for Grant Management Requirements One signed original Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Form (Attachment ) U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCE As the authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant agrees that, as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the Department of the Interior, it will comply with all Federal laws relating to nondiscrimination. These laws include, but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin; (b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap; (c) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101 et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; and applicable regulatory requirements to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, handicap or age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the applicant. THE APPLICANT HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. THIS ASSURANCE shall apply to all aspects of the applicant’s operations including those parts that have not received or benefited from Federal financial assistance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the Applicant by the Department, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is sued for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is so provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the Department. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Applicant by the Department, including installment payments after such date on account of applicants for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date. The Applicant recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in reliance on the representations and agreements made in this assurance, and that the United States shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of the assurance. This assurance is binding on the Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, and subrecipients and the person whose signature appears below who is authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant. SIGNATUREOF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE APPLICANT/ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED APPLICANT/ORGANIZATION MAILING ADDRESS BUREAU OR OFFICE EXTENDING ASSISTANCE DI-1350 (REV 6/91) STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR GRANT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS CLGs receiving HPF grant assistance must fulfill the terms of their grant agreement with the state and adhere to all requirements of the National Register Programs Manual. This requirement includes compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 241, as amended, which provides that no person on the grounds of age, race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Local financial management systems shall be in accordance with the standards specified in OMB Circular A-128, “Standards for Grantee Financial Management Systems.” Indirect costs may be charged as part of the CLG grant only if the CLG subgrantee meets the requirements of the manual. Unless the CLG has a current indirect cost rate approved by the cognizant federal agency, only direct costs may be charged. Grant recipients must maintain auditable financial records in accordance with the General Accounting Office’s Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions. The CLG subgrantee will provide, with request for reimbursement, documentation to support billings (time sheets, front and back canceled checks, etc.) for federal and non-federal share claimed. Repayment will be made to the SHPO organization if terms and conditions of the subgrant agreement are not followed or costs claimed are disallowed following audit. CLG SIGNATUREOFAPPLICANT TITLE DATE Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reproduction U.S. Department of the Interior Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549,DebarmentandSuspension,43CFRPart12,Section12.500,Participants’ responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988 Federal Register (pages 19160-19211). Copies of the regulations are included in the proposal package. For further assistance in obtaining a copy of the regulations, contact the U.S. Department of the Interior, Acquisition and Assistance Division, Office of Acquisition and Property Management, 18th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. (BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE) (1)The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposalthat neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participationinthistransactionby any Federal department or agency. (2)Where the prospectivelower tierparticipantisunable to certify to anyof the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Nameand Title of Authorized Representative Signature Date Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous EditionUsable Authorized for Local Reproduction Auth Instructions for Certification 1.By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 2.The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered and erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3.The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4.The terms “covered transaction,” “debarred,” “suspended,” “ineligible,” “lower tier covered transaction,” “participant,” “person,” “primary covered transaction,” “principal,” “proposal,” and “voluntarily excluded,” as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5.The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. 6.The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. 7.A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to, check the Nonprocurement List (Tel.#). 8.Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9.Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Standard Form 424D (Rev.7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Previous EditionUsable Authorized for Local Reproduction Auth