HomeMy WebLinkAboutYSC March 15 2023 PacketYakima Sustainability Committee
Agenda
March 15, 2023
City Hall — Council Chambers
4:30 p.m. — This meeting is in -person, live -streamed at wwwa i a a. ov, and
telecast live on Y-PAC, Spectrum Cable Channel 194. Public comments may be
made in person or by phone. You may call in and participate by dialing 1-253-215-
8782 or 1-971-247-1195, enter meeting ID 913 3324 2427#, participant ID #, and
meeting password 617202#.
1. Call to Order
3. Approval of Minutes
4. Public Comment
There will be 35 minutes allotted for public comment with two and a half (2 1/2) minutes per speaker to allow
audience participation as many opportunities as possible. Written communication and e-mail messages are
strongly encouraged.
5. Discussion on Anaerobic Digester Grant
6. Presentations:
a. Climate Change in the Yakima Valley - Steve Ghan, Climate Scientist
b. Air Quality Report — Karina Solorio, Civic Spark Fellow
7. Other Business
8. Adjournment
Next Meeting: April 19, 2023, at 4:30 p.m.
Yakima Sustainability Committee
Minutes for March 15, 2023
1. Call to order by Chair Jeff Scott at 4:34 p.m.
2. Roll Call: members present Jeff Scott, Ray Paolella, Jennifer Hickenbottom (via
Zoom), Jeremy Leavitt, Marcelino Osorio (via Zoom), Dan Schapiro
City staff: Rosylen Oglesby, Sy Ruiz, Trace Braldburfi, Karina Solorio
3. Ray moved to approve the Minutes from Fe
Motion passed.
4. Public Comment: Michele Nelson Jars
for Saturday, April 22, from 10 a.m. to 2
her involvement with glass recycling. She
of increased traffic in the city if the Yakin
Coleen Anderson offered two
new buildings and develop ur
Paul Tabayoyon, Asian Pacific Islan
public policy experience as an additi
5. Trace updated the committee on the'aaero
additional grant was not obtained, the City of
much smaller capacity than originally planne
partnerships for additional funding.
1 concern about the effects
expanded.
ion Plan --to electrify
on of Yakima County, offered his
littee resource.
bic digester grant. Since an
Yakima only has the budget for a
d. The city has unsuccessfully sought
6. Steve Ghan presented his work by modeling precipitation in the region. He
expressed high confidence that warmer temperatures will drive increasingly earlier
runoff from snow packs but lower confidence in how the quantity of precipitation
will change. Adaptation measures include additional storage to capture the early
runoff.
Karina gave a presentation on air quality in Yakima. Historical data shows that
winter months generally have worse air quality. In recent years, late summer also
shows periods of unhealthy air quality. Nitrates generated from agricultural
practices contribute to poor air quality and related health issues.
7. The committee discussed the next steps. There is interest in identifying "low -
hanging fruit" in terms of incentives available to citizens as well as grants available
to the city for conservation and/or renewable energy. An inventory of the city
vehicle fleet and buildings would be a starting place to consider efficiency
improvements.
It was noted that the committee is tasked with drafting a Climate Action Plan with
one-year, five-year, and ten-year time frames. An emissions assessment and
reduction goals would generally be included among 'the, first steps for a plan.
8. Meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. until the next meeting scheduled on April 19,
2023.
OMIMHWAMU
Lessons
Winter snow fell as rain
Mountain Snow
Roza Canal closed in May to conserve water
for summer months
UM
Yakima River Discharge
Jan Feb Mar 0
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
—Mean 2015
__2000-2019
Depleted Irrigation
C%"r') ,##1 Press
PRODUCERS OF FOOD & FIBER
WSDA estimates 2015 drought damage topped $700 million
Drier soil
♦ • �•e•
Wildfires spread faster
Okanogan complex fire 'is
ILE
state's largestih histor-
... and wider
JEW l I / I I I JL q? 1.1, XI d I, Jt L, I I IYl J_s 0
Warmer water kills fish
Simulating Climate in the Western U.S.
Annual Precipitation Annual Temperature
Observed Observed
Simulated 1980-2000
46N
44N
5
3 42N
—2
ION
.7
38N
5.
5
36N
34N
32N
46N
44N
5
3 QN
—2
1 4ON
0.7
36N
0.5
36N
34N
32N
N,
.............
R
124A 122W 1 MW I I RW 116W 114W 112W I, IDW
In" W
i1mulated 1980-2000
zR,ji
12,44 122W 1 7UN I I FJW
116W 114W 112W IDW
1,"W 1HW
46N
Jit 25 44N
15 42N
-
-to
40N
0
—5
36N
34 N
32N
ON
25 44N
20
15 42N
to
40N
5
0 5eN
—5
36N
34N
)2N
Ghan et al. (2006)
March Snow Water
Observed
Simulated 1980-2000
A L
01
...
... ...
124W 127W Y, 20W 1
1 16W 11 4W 112 W
1 IDW 108'R 106W
Application to Climate Change
• IPCC A1B Scenario
• Simulate 1977-2100
• • •-•-11-- •:1 /11q qi I1:1 11
1960 190 2000 200 2040 200 2080 210
Application to Climate Change
9 IPCC AlB Scenario
,D CAM3 and CLM3 run offline, using SST & sea ice from CCSM simulation
• SST bias correction: T* - Tobs + (T - T)
• Sea ice bias correction: C — Cobs+ do dT (T — T)
,D Greenhouse gas and aerosol from CCSM simulation
,D 2'x2.5' resolution
9 Simulate 1977-2100
,D Focus on change between 1980-2000 and 2080-2100
Climate Change Western U.S.
MERMI
rr �r rrr
~
t
h
t 1
.
�°d&W
124W 122W
12"uW IM 114W field IIN IIJRW
(2080-2100)/(1980-2000)
mm/day
n.s
o. a
�E3,1
—0# 2
1 —dS.S
Surface Elevation
deg C
Regional Mean Snow Water
Surfdt* Ejew4on (�O)
I
60%loss = 20%/deg
3 C warming
30-40% of normal
Trends in April
Snowpack in
the Western
United States,
1955-2016
Pervent change:
40
10 0
w
0 0 :o
1,0C►0
� Elsner et al. (2010)
Fourth National Climate Assessment Volume 2 Chapter 24
The climate -related events of
2015 provide a glimpse into the
Northwest's future, because the
kinds of extreme events that
affected the Northwest in 2015
are projected to become more
common. The climate impacts
that occurred during this record -
breaking warm and dry year
highlight the close
interrelationships between the
climate, the natural and built
environment, and the health and
well-being of the Northwest's
residents. Source: USGCRP.
Impacts of
Climate
Change on
Pacific
Northwest
Native Plants
Climate Impacts on Vegetation
Disturbance
USGCRP 2014
Projected response of some key Pacific Northwest species
to climate change by the end of the 21st century based
on multiple model output (worst case scenario)
UnsAbies pecified
r r rr
U147f, WMA r TAr
Unspecified
r rr �r
Tsug
r heterophylla
Unspecified
r rr r� r r
Pinus contorta
. bies grandis
Populus tremuloides
El
0
Peterson et al. (2014)
Conclusions by Peterson et al.
• Experimental studies give insights into
potential vegetation responses but cannot
represent the range of complexity found in
most ecosystems.
• Subalpine forests may be the Pacific Northwest
biome most vulnerable to climatic changes.
• There is little model agreement about
projected changes for dry coniferous forests,
and only limited model output for the shrub -
steppe biome. Peterson et al. (2014)
Adaptation
• Increase storage capacity in the Yakima watershed
• Crops that require less water
• Selective harvesting of trees
Proposed Wymer Reservoir
Mitigation
. A
This presentation aims te,
pollution and its effects on
presentation:
• Air quality at glance
• Sources of pollution
• Main pollutants
• Air quality studies
• Effect on health
provid
Yakima.
a brief overview
Below is the outline
of air
of the
Pg. 2 • Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report • March 15, 2023
is
Air
quality
At
1 Glance
• Yakima's winter months bear more than three times the concentration of
PM2.5 as the summer months.
• - •• TI arch representsmost polluted month exceeding
EPA standard of it good. 13
• Spring and Summer seasons average lower pollution
round out the annual air quality average of "good."
levels, enough to
Pg. 3 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023
Dailys, 1999 to 2021
Yakima County. WA
FEBJAN P MAY JUN JUL AUG SCP OCTDEC
Good 1 days
Moderate1.- trr days,
r a;=jj Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups (35#5 ) 1 days
Unhealthy 5 - '5 r 3 0 days
Verb Unhealthy w ft3days
Hazardous 25 5 rr 31 0 days
Pg. 4 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 is
'I
A E ""' N f-' E A v
TH tI P A
PM 2.5 Daily AQI Values in 2005
Jv k tj Full NI I AP APR MINNI, )UH JUL Al U G SEP Oc f riON, DE C'
PM 2.5 Daily AQI Values, in 2020
JAH FEB fvl,,,kR APR, M Ay JUN Jut A U Gv SEP OCT HOXI DEC
Pg. 5 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee e Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 s
I ITM F.,IKM;nO I ME Me
• Mobile Sources
• Transportation emissions comprise about 39 percent of the State's
greenhouse gases.
• Stationary Sources
• Mining, logging, agriculture processing, and construction industries
represent a smaller share of the city's overall emissions but will
continue to grow as jobs and productivity growth.
• Area Sources
• Gas -powered agricultural equipment, spraying
processing facilities contribute to air pollution.
pesticides, and
Pg. 6 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 is
LRU1.71Rf�-Tiff
• Particulate Matter (PM2 5) —i.e. traffic fumes and wildfire smoke
• Particulate Matter (PMj0) — i.e. soot particles
• Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)—i.e. vehicle engines
• Ozone (03)—i.e. ground level
Pg. 7 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 0
Air Quality StudiecA
• 2014 Yakima Air Wintertime Nitrate Study (YAWNS)
• Washington State University and Central Washington University
conducted a study to determine the cause of higher -than -usual levels
detected during routine air testing in the Yakima area.
is American Lung Association 2020 Air Report
• The American Lung Association analyzes data
monitors to compile the State of the Air report.
reports track Americans' exposure to unhealthy
ozone levels.
from official air quality
This annual air quality
particle pollution and
Pg. 8 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 is
• American Lung Association 2020 Air Report
• Air quality reached a record high for short-term particle pollution
between 2016-2019
• Ranked
5 for 24-hour
particle
pollution
out
of 221
metropolitan areas.
• Ranked
27 for annual
particle
pollution
out
of 202
metropolitan areas.
• 2014 Yakima Air Wintertime Nitrate Study (YAWNS)
• Likely causes: ammonia from agriculture activities, oxides of nitrogen
from vehicles, and the right weather conditions
• Nitrate levels were higher than anywhere else in the State.
• Over 30% of fine particulate matter in Yakima County is due to ammonium nitrate.
Pg. 9 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 is
:1: VICITE ! rm d
7771 0 E =..M L-7-X'01M
The EPA has confirmed a direct connection between heart disease and PM 2.5
air pollution.
• Above average rates of cardiovascular disease in Yakima County.
• Other Health Issues:
• Methemoglobinemia
• Increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage or birth defects
• Emphysema
• Hypertension
• Asthma
• Bronchitis
• A variety of types of cancer
Pg. 10 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 0
i n Ah 0
1=40 rE
is Winter Season is commonly prone to high levels of air pollution.
is Three main sources of air pollution:
• Stationary
• Mobile
• Area
• Studies have indicated that Yakima experiences high
pollution, which has a direct health impact on
members.
levels of air
community
Pg. 11 9 Yakima Sustainability Committee . Air Quality Report 9 March 15, 2023 is