The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-14-2022 YPC Agenda Packet DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Joan Davenport, AICP, Director Planning Division Joseph Calhoun, Manager nd 129 North Second Street, 2Floor, Yakima, WA 98901 ask.planning@yakimawa.govwww.yakimawa.gov/services/planning/ypc/ CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION Yakima City Hall Council Chambers nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 129 N 2 December 14, 2022 3:00 p.m. –5:00 p.m. YPC MEMBERS: Chair Jacob Liddicoat, Vice-Chair Lisa Wallace, Leanne Hughes-Mickel, Robert McCormick, Mary Place, Colleda Monick, and Frieda Stephens City Council Liaison: Soneya Lund CITY PLANNING STAFF: Joan Davenport (Community Development Director),Rosalinda Ibarra (Admin Assistant) Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager), Eric Crowell (Senior Planner), Eva Rivera (Planning Technician), Irene Linos (Temp. Department- Assistant I) REVISEDAGENDA I.Call to Order II.Roll Call III.Staff Announcements IV.Approval of Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2022 V.Public Hearing - CITY PLANNING - YMC 15.26 LAND DEVELOPMENT FEES Applicant: City of Yakima Planning Division File Numbers: TXT#002-22, SEPA#023-22 Site Address: Citywide Request: Proposed amendments to YMC 15.26 Land Development Fees, updating the land use application fees VI.Airport Land Use Discussion VII.Public Comment VIII.Other Business IX.Adjourn Next Meeting: January 11, 2023 The meeting will also be recorded and posted on the Y-PAC website. Visit the Yakima Planning Commission webpage for more information, including agenda packets and minutes. City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) Meeting Minutes November 9, 2022 Call to Order Chair Liddicoatcalled themeeting to order at3:01p.m. Roll Call YPC Members Present:Chair Jacob Liddicoat, Lisa Wallace,Mary Place,Leanne Hughes- Mickel,Colleda Monick, Rob McCormick. Staff Present:Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager, Sara Watkins, City Attorney, Soneya Lund; City Council Liaison, Eva Rivera, Planning Technician Staff Announcements–Planning Manager, Calhounannounced the following: Updateon ADU Approved Plans, Glen Denman provided an RFP documentand will soon go out for distribution. Still working on bringing someone from the airport to the next meeting on December 14, 2022. Reminder that theNovember 23 and December 28 meetings have been canceled. –It was motioned by CommissionerWallaceand seconded October 26, 2022,Meeting Minutes by Commissioner Monick to approve the meeting minutes ofOctober 26, 2022,as presented.The motion carried unanimously. Planning Fee Study–Calhoun summarizedthe Development Fee Cost of Service Study prepared by FCS Groupwhich was presented to the council in October.Commissioner Wallace asked why there wasn’t a 100 percent fee recovery before. Commissioner Monick answered it was to encourage development.Commissioner Place asked if the study took inflation into account. Calhoun answered that was discussed by the council and that it would be taken into consideration.Commissioner Liddicoat asked if the fee increase was exclusively for the Planning Division, and Calhoun answered it was directed at community development and fire permits. Commissioner Hughes-Mickel asked if the fees included all costs, and Calhoun let her know all were flat upfront fees.Chair Liddicoat expressed his worry about some fees being too high for a small project compared to a big development project. Commissioner Wallace asked if the council could pick and choose what fees to increase. Calhoun replied that it was under the purview of the council. Chair Liddicoat commented if there could be a lower fee schedule during the downtime to help staff out.There was adiscussion on making appeal fees more accessible to lower-income citizens and the pros and cons of free pre-app meetings.Calhoun said he would email the committee members anemail link to the City Council study session. Other Business–City Councilwomen Lund let the commission know she made a motion for discussion at last week’s City Council meeting to put Coolidge Road of the six-year DIF for some possible federal grant funding.Chair Hughes-Mickel had a question about who pays for a fire inspection fee, Calhoun answered he would find out who pays for that fee. Chair Liddicoat suggested having airport staff present should be pushed back since the next meeting would be a hearing. Adjourn–A motion to adjourn to December 14, 2022,was passed with aunanimous vote. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:05 p.m. Chair Liddicoat Date This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting were submitted by:Eva Rivera. -1- DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Joan Davenport, AICP, Director Planning Division Joseph Calhoun, Manager nd 129 North Second Street, 2Floor, Yakima, WA 98901 ask.planning@yakimawa.govwww.yakimawa.gov/services/planning/ypc/ CITY OF YAKIMA PLANNING COMMISSION Yakima City Hall Council Chambers nd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 129 N 2 December 14, 2022 3:00 p.m. –5:00 p.m. YPC MEMBERS: Chair Jacob Liddicoat, Vice-Chair Lisa Wallace, Leanne Hughes-Mickel, Robert McCormick, Mary Place, Colleda Monick, and Frieda Stephens City Council Liaison: Soneya Lund CITY PLANNING STAFF: Joan Davenport (Community Development Director),Rosalinda Ibarra (Admin Assistant) Joseph Calhoun (Planning Manager), Eric Crowell (Senior Planner), Eva Rivera (Planning Technician), Irene Linos (Temp. Department- Assistant I) REVISEDAGENDA I.Call to Order II.Roll Call III.Staff Announcements IV.Approval of Meeting Minutes of November 9, 2022 V.Public Hearing - CITY PLANNING - YMC 15.26 LAND DEVELOPMENT FEES Applicant: City of Yakima Planning Division File Numbers: TXT#002-22, SEPA#023-22 Site Address: Citywide Request: Proposed amendments to YMC 15.26 Land Development Fees, updating the land use application fees VI.Airport Land Use Discussion VII.Public Comment VIII.Other Business IX.Adjourn Next Meeting: January 11, 2023 The meeting will also be recorded and posted on the Y-PAC website. Visit the Yakima Planning Commission webpage for more information, including agenda packets and minutes. City of Yakima Planning Commission (YPC) Meeting Minutes November 9, 2022 Call to Order Chair Liddicoatcalled themeeting to order at3:01p.m. Roll Call YPC Members Present:Chair Jacob Liddicoat, Lisa Wallace,Mary Place,Leanne Hughes- Mickel,Colleda Monick, Rob McCormick. Staff Present:Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager, Sara Watkins, City Attorney, Soneya Lund; City Council Liaison, Eva Rivera, Planning Technician Staff Announcements–Planning Manager, Calhounannounced the following: Updateon ADU Approved Plans, Glen Denman provided an RFP documentand will soon go out for distribution. Still working on bringing someone from the airport to the next meeting on December 14, 2022. Reminder that theNovember 23 and December 28 meetings have been canceled. –It was motioned by CommissionerWallaceand seconded October 26, 2022,Meeting Minutes by Commissioner Monick to approve the meeting minutes ofOctober 26, 2022,as presented.The motion carried unanimously. Planning Fee Study–Calhoun summarizedthe Development Fee Cost of Service Study prepared by FCS Groupwhich was presented to the council in October.Commissioner Wallace asked why there wasn’t a 100 percent fee recovery before. Commissioner Monick answered it was to encourage development.Commissioner Place asked if the study took inflation into account. Calhoun answered that was discussed by the council and that it would be taken into consideration.Commissioner Liddicoat asked if the fee increase was exclusively for the Planning Division, and Calhoun answered it was directed at community development and fire permits. Commissioner Hughes-Mickel asked if the fees included all costs, and Calhoun let her know all were flat upfront fees.Chair Liddicoat expressed his worry about some fees being too high for a small project compared to a big development project. Commissioner Wallace asked if the council could pick and choose what fees to increase. Calhoun replied that it was under the purview of the council. Chair Liddicoat commented if there could be a lower fee schedule during the downtime to help staff out.There was adiscussion on making appeal fees more accessible to lower-income citizens and the pros and cons of free pre-app meetings.Calhoun said he would email the committee members anemail link to the City Council study session. Other Business–City Councilwomen Lund let the commission know she made a motion for discussion at last week’s City Council meeting to put Coolidge Road of the six-year DIF for some possible federal grant funding.Chair Hughes-Mickel had a question about who pays for a fire inspection fee, Calhoun answered he would find out who pays for that fee. Chair Liddicoat suggested having airport staff present should be pushed back since the next meeting would be a hearing. Adjourn–A motion to adjourn to December 14, 2022,was passed with aunanimous vote. The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:05 p.m. Chair Liddicoat Date This meeting was filmed by YPAC. Minutes for this meeting were submitted by:Eva Rivera. -1- Executive Summary One of the main challenges facing aviation today is the encroachment of incompatible land uses near and around airports. Development of incompatible land uses can degrade airport operations, impede airport expansion, and reduce quality of life for airport neighbors. Encroachment is a key factor contributing to escalating operating costs and restriction of airport operations. It has even resulted in closures of numerous general aviation airports in the United States. The Airport and Compatible Land Use Program Guidebook is designed to help airports, communities, and jurisdictions work cooperatively and proactively toward preventing incompatible development around airports in Washington State. Jurisdictions can use the tools and resources found in the guidelines to develop policies and development regulations that discourage the encroachment of incompatible land use adjacent to public use general aviation facilities. It does not provides recommended best management practices for local land use jurisdictions. emerging best management practices for aviation land use compatibility planning. Washington’s Airport System The Washington Aviation System Plan (WASP) encompasses 138 public-use airports Washington has 65 airports listed in the 2009–2013 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Airports on the NPIAS are deemed as having national airports in Washington has important funding implications because these airports are not eligible to receive federal grants for facility improvements and land use compatibility measures. Of the 138 public-use airports in Washington, almost 80 percent are publicly-owned, either by municipalities, including port and airport districts, or by the state. Policy decisions involving publicly-owned airports in the state are typically made by elected Funding to develop, maintain, and operate airports is derived from a variety of sources including user fees, revenues from land and facility leases and rents, local government funds, and federal and state grants. For those airports in NPIAS, a substantial proportion of development and major maintenance funding comes from the FAA grant program. State grants serve a similar function for the smaller NPIAS airports and others in the state airport system. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page iii January 2011 Executive Summary Why should communities work to protect public-use airports? and serves a variety of roles and functions. Airports provide unique transportation access as part of Washington’s multi-modal transportation system. They are crucial goods, promote business and commerce, and contribute to a better quality of life. Washington’s airports serve a wide range of transportation, economic and emergency activities, including: Why is land use compatibility a concern for airport preservation? Airport activities affect adjacent areas. Most people are familiar with the negatives associated with proximity to an airport. The effects generated by airports affecting adjacent properties may include: Adjacent land uses also affect airport activities. Fewer people understand the effect that adjacent land uses can have on airport activities. Development around an airport can reduce property available for operations and safety areas, create obstructions to the airspace needed for aircraft to safely approach and depart the runway, reduce clear airspace needed to support advanced technologies, and generate opposition to existing and future airport activities. Page iv WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Executive Summary consequences for communities. Ultimately, incompatible development reduces opportunity for economic development, reduces transportation access, reduces the value of public investment in airport infrastructure, and reduces quality of life for communities. Encroachment of Incompatible Land Uses Encroachment of incompatible land uses is a key factor contributing to constraints on expansion and restrictions on operations of airports in the U.S. In many cases, it can even lead to airport closures. Why is encroachment occurring? requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act. affordable due to its proximity to the aviation facility. development because the land, in many cases, is served by utilities and other infrastructure. development on airport operations. What is WSDOT’s role in planning for airport land use compatibility? RCW 37.70.547 of Washington’s Growth Management Act requires towns, cities, and counties to discourage development of incompatible land uses adjacent to public use airports through adoption of comprehensive plan policies and developmentregulations. WSDOT Aviation’s role under the Growth Management Act is to address this issue byadvocating for the preservation of public use airports and providing decision makers with the best available information about airport land use compatibility. The state’s program emphasizes airspace protection and discourages residential development, schools, hospitals, and other medical facilities adjacent to airports, most industrial and commercial land uses as airport-compatible. WSDOT does not have regulatory authority over land use decisions; however, we offer a technical assistance program to help towns, cities and counties address aviation issues. What is the purpose of the compatibility planning checklist? WSDOT Aviation has provided a step-by-step checklist to make airport land use compatibility resources easier to use and understand. The checklist communicates state guidelines and best management practices, and directs users to more detailed reference materials. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page v January 2011 Executive Summary How should you use this checklist? This checklist outlines a six step process for airport land use compatibility planning. The steps take you through research and analysis that will help your jurisdiction make informed decisions about airport land use compatibility. The products you develop as you move through the checklist provide background materials that will help the jurisdiction “show their work” by demonstrating how they arrived at their decisions. This type of transparency supports public outreach programs and is useful for supporting local decision-making if challenged before the Growth Management Hearings Boards. This checklist will help you craft defensible, objective policies and zoning regulations. Step 1: Getting Started and Gathering Data In this step, you will begin your work on airport land use compatibility planning by laying a foundation for your process. Your other major task in this step will be to gather the airport and land use data that will enable you to address airport land use compatibility issues. You will know you have been successful when: in place. Step 1: Products under state law. land use compatibility planning steps and in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan as well as the capital facilities element, when applicable. the airport. Page vi WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Executive Summary Now that you have learned about the airport and its setting and have created a to consider for land use compatibility planning. You will know you have been successful when: and know what areas in the airport environs are affected. Step 2: Products Imaginary Surfaces and Elevations. Step 3: Identify Compatibility Concerns You have set a foundation that described key information about your airport and is time to examine the level of compatibility in your community. This step will help you understand the various issues involved in determining compatibility. You will know you have been successful when: future development. review in the next step. Step 3: Products WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page vii January 2011 Executive Summary Step 4: Prepare Comprehensive Plan Steps 1 through 3 led you through the research and analysis needed to describe and assess the interactions between airports and surrounding land uses. You now key challenges to prevention of more incompatible uses. What are your options for addressing those challenges? This step will help you think through the various compatibility strategies available, then evaluate and incorporate the best strategies into the draft of your comprehensive plan. You will know you have been successful when: planning strategies. comprehensive planning process and incorporated compatibility policies into the draft comprehensive plan where appropriate. and adoption. Step 4: Products whether positively or negatively (Worksheet 4A). Worksheet 4B). Worksheet 4C). Worksheet 4D). Step 5: Adopt the Comprehensive Plan This short step takes the comprehensive plan update you prepared in Step 4 through the adoption process. Particular emphasis is given to gaining support for the airport land use compatibility measures you have incorporated into the draft plan. You will know you have been successful when: been understood and appropriately considered in the comprehensive plan update. compatibility planning. Page viii WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Executive Summary propose to take in your comprehensive plan update. that contains appropriate measures to protect the airport from encroachment by incompatible land uses. Step 5: Products measures. use compatibility. measures. Step 6: Implement the Airport Land Use Compatibility Policies Congratulations! You have shepherded airport land use compatibility matters through draft comprehensive plan update which has now been adopted by your community’s implementing regulations, getting them adopted, and then using them on a day-to-day basis to ensure that compatibility concerns continue to be recognized and avoidable You will know you have been successful when: Step 6: Products process where airport land use compatibility concerns will be addressed Public Outreach WSDOT Aviation conducted an extensive public outreach process to obtain feedback on the Airports and Land Use Compatibility Program Guidebook. Among its outreach efforts, WSDOT released a draft copy of the guidebook on May 6 at the annual Washington Airport Managers Association meeting in Wenatchee. Airport sponsors, and comment on the draft guidebook. The 30-day review period began on Monday, May 10. Stakeholders were also encouraged to recommend real or hypothetical land use challenges for the guidebook’s scenarios section. WSDOT staff selected several scenarios and wrote appropriate responses to the challenges presented. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page ix January 2011 Executive Summary Additionally, WSDOT held four community meetings across the state to obtain feedback on the guidebook. The meetings were scheduled as follows: Arlington, WA 98223 Chehalis, WA 98532 102 N Third Street, Yakima, WA 98901 906 West Main, Spokane, WA 99201 WSDOT incorporated comments received during the 30-day comment period period on Tuesday, October 26. Use Your Resources This guidebook gives you concrete tools to assist you in your planning efforts. It is important that local jurisdictions, planners and airports work cooperatively to achieve their planning goals. WSDOT Aviation is also a resource. The department provides technical assistance that supports and facilitates informed decision making. You can contact our planning department for airport land use compatibility technical assistance at 360-651-6300. located at www.wsdot.wa.gov/aviation/planning. Page x WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Table F-1 Maximum Residential Density Compatibility ZonesZone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 Maximum Residential Density Average Number of Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Agricultural Maintain current comprehensive 0 (farmland/forest)plan designation and zoning designation Rural 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 1 d.u. per 0 AAA (outside an urban growth boundary)10 acres10 acres5 acres10 acres5 acres Urban BCBC 00 (within the urban growth boundary) Maximum Intensities for Nonresidential Uses Average Number of People Units Per Gross Acre Agricultural ED,ED,ED,ED,FD 1-5 (farmland/forest) Rural EEEEEG 1-510-2510-2540-60100-150100-150 (outside an urban growth boundary) Urban EEEEEG 1-550-7580-120100-150100-150No Limit (within the urban growth boundary) Notes: A Cluster to preserve open space to maintain open approach corridor at and near runway ends. WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-1 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Table F-2 Airport Land Use Matrix Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 A. Resource Operations Agriculture, horticulture, general farming PPPPPP (crops only, not feedlots and stockyards) Agricultural buildingLLPPPP Agricultural chemical sales/storageXLPPPP Agricultural Housing/Farm laborXXLPLP Agricultural housing/farm laborXXLPLP Agricultural marketXXPPXP Agricultural related industriesXLPPPP Animal husbandry XLLLXP Agricultural feeding operation or stockyards XXXXXX Agriculture or food processing facilityXLPPLP Livestock auctionXXXLXP FairgroundsXXXXXP Floriculture, aquacultureXLPPPP Fruit bin sales/storageXLPPPP General forest silver cultureLLPPPP Forest product processingXLPPPP 3. XXLLLP Mining including sand and gravel pitsXLLLXP Stockpiling of earthen materialsXLLLXP B. Rural Development 1. Rural Residential Single-family dwelling (large lot, 5 acres or greater*)XLLPXP Single-family dwelling, rural centers XXLLXL Residential Cluster Development, 40% openXXLSCXXP Multi-family dwellingXXXXXP Temporary farm housingXXPPLP Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited Page F-2 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 2. Rural Centers Single-family dwelling; up to 12 dwelling units/acreXXLLXL Two - Four family dwelling (duplex) (*)XXXXXL Multi-family dwelling; 12-20 units/acreXXLXXP 21+ units/acreXXPPXP Agriculture/forest/mineral resources or industry (see item A) Community services (see item D2) Retail and commercial service (see items D4 & D5) Industrial/manufacturing (see item D4s & D5) C. Education Facilities 1. Education Facilities Junior or community collegeXXLLLP Schools, K-12 elementary, middle, senior highXXXXXX Business schoolXLLLLP Vocational schoolsXLLLLP D. Urban Development 1. Residential Single-family dwelling; up to 12 dwelling units/acreXXXXXL Two - four-family dwelling (duplex)(*)XXXXXL Multi-family dwelling(*): 15 or more XXLSCXXP XXPPXP Residential development cluster 40% > open spaceXXLLXL XXLLLP Mobile home parksXXLLXL Boarding houseXXLLLL Retirement homesXXXXXL Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-3 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 2. Community Services CemeteryPPPPLP Churches, synagogues, templesXXLLXL Community center meeting halls, fraternal XXLLXP organizations Convalescent, nursing home and group homesXXXXXL Day care facilities, family in-homeXXLLXL Day care centerXXLLXL Funeral homeXXPPXP XLPPPP HospitalXXXXXX Medical clinicXXLLXP Correction facilitiesXLLLLL LibrariesXXPPXP Museums and art galleriesXXLPPP ZooXXPPXP 3. Amusement and Recreation Amusement park (permanent)XXLLXL Bowling alleysXXPPXP CampgroundXLLPLP Recreational vehicle parks; short termXLLPLP Drive-in theatresXXLLXP FairgroundsXXPLLP Golf coursesXLPPXP Gymnasiums, exercise facilitiesXLLLLP Horse racing tracks, speedwaysXXXXXX Miniature golf coursesXXPPXP Movie theatres, auditoriums exhibition hallsXXLLXP ParksLLPPLP Roller skating rinkXXLLXP Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited Page F-4 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 Addressing, mailing, and stenographic servicesXLPPLP Advertising agenciesXLPPLP Airport uses and activities commercial/industrialLPPPPP Animal clinic/hospitalLPPPPP Antique storesXLPPXP Automobile, truck, manufactured home, and travel LPPPPP trailer sales Automobile and recreational vehicle (RV) sales; LPPPLP weekend Automotive: car washLPPPLP Sales lot/auto centerLPPPPP Parking lots and garagesLPPPPP Maintenance and repair shopsXPPPPP Paint and body repair shopsLPPPPP Parts and accessories (tires, batteries, etc.)XPPPPP Specialized repair shops (radiator, etc.)LPPPPP Towing servicesLPPPPP Wrecking and dismantling yardLPPPLP BakeryXPPPLP Beauty and barber shopsXLPPXP Bed and breakfast innXXLLXP Boats and marine accessoriesPPPPP PPPLP only Building and trade (plumbing, heating, electrical, PPPLP painting, etc.)only Clothing and accessoriesXLPPLP Communication towersXXLLLL Computer and electronic storesXLPPLP Department, discount, variety storesXXPPXP Drug stores (optical goods, orthopedic supplies)XLPPLP Employment agencies (private)XPPPLP Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-5 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 Farm and implements, tools and heavy construction XLPPPP equipment Farm suppliesLPPPPP Financial institutionsXPPPLP Food store XPPPLP Furniture, home furnishings, appliancesXPPPLP General hardware, garden equipment and suppliesXPPPLP Grocery and convenience stores XLPPLP Heavy equipment storage, maintenance and repairXLPPLP Insurance agents, brokers, and service agenciesXPPPLP KennelsLPPPLP Laundries, laundromats, and dry cleaning plantsXPPPLP Liquor storesXPPPLP Lumber yardsLPPPLP XXLPxP Mini StorageLPPPPP Motels and HotelsXXPPPP Motorcycles sales/repair (including maintenance)XPPPLP Paint, glass, and wallpaper storesXPPPLP Pet stores, pet supplies, and dog groomingXLPPL XLPPPP attorneys, government, etc. LPPPLP Repairs: small appliances, tv, business machines, LPPPLP watches, etc. Restaurant, cafe and drive-in eating facilitiesXLPPPP Service stationXLPPLP Sporting goods, bicycle shopsXPPPPP Taverns, bars, dance establishmentsXLPPLP Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited Page F-6 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 5. Industry/Manufacturing Aircraft partsLPPPP only Aircraft industrialLPPPP only Apparel and accessoriesXLPPXP Bakery products (wholesale)LPPXP only Beverage industryLPPXP only Canning, preserving, and packaging fruits, XLLLXP vegetables, and other foods Cement and concrete plantsXLLLXP Chemicals (industrial, agricultural, wood, etc.)XXLLXL Concrete, gypsum, and plaster productsLPLLP only Confectionery and related products (wholesale)PPPLP only Mini storagePPPPPP Product assemblyLPPLP only Prefabricated structural wood products and PPPLP containers only Printing, publishing, and bindingPPPLP only Rendering plants, slaughter housesXXXXXL Rubber productsXLPPLP Sawmills and planing millsLPPLP only Sheet metal and welding shopsPPPLP only PPPLP for retail sale)only Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-7 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Compatibilty Zones Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4Zone 5Zone 6 WarehousesPPPPP only Wholesale tradePPPPP only Storage facilities; bulkLPPPPP commercialLPPPPP mini-storageLPPPPP Bus terminalsXLPPLP Transportation storage and maintenance facilitiesPPPPP only XPPPPP without truck parking with truck parkingLPPPPP Contract truck hauling, rental of trucks with driversLPPPPP LPPPPP PPPPP only Railroad switch yards, maintenance, and repair XPPPPP facilities, etc. Taxicab terminals, maintenance, and dispatching XPPPPP centers, etc. 2. Utilities Power generating facilitiesLLLLLL Utility services (substations, etc.)LLLLLP Wholesale tradeLPPPLP Storage facilities; bulkLPPPPP CommercialLPPPPP Chart Symbols “L” Limited “LSC” Limited Special Conditions “P” permitted “X” Prohibited Page F-8 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Airport Runways Under 3000 Feet Zone 6 ArcÓs Vertex RunwayÓs endpoint or 25% of RunwayÓs length Zone 3 Vertex offset Airport Compatibility Zones DimensionsLength Notes Zone 1Zone 1 includes the runway’s RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered stipple within Zone 1 Zone 2NA Zone 3* runway’s length Zone 4NA Zone 5* Zone 65,000’Set the vertex for Zone 6’s arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ – Runway Protection Zone WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-9 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Airport Runways 3,000 to 5,000 Feet Airport runways 3,000 to 5,000 feet Zone 6 ArcÓs Vertex RunwayÓs endpoint Zone 3 Vertex offset Airport Compatibility Zones DimensionsLength Notes Zone 1Zone 1 includes the runway’s RPZ. The RPZ is depicted by ordered stipple within Zone 1 *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2NA Zone 3* Zone 4NA Zone 5* Zone 65,000’Set the vertex for Zone 6’s arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ – Runway Protection Zone Page F-10 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Airport Runways Greater Than 5000 Feet Zone 6 ArcÓs Vertex RunwayÓs endpoint Airport Compatibility Zones DimensionsLength Notes Zone 1Zone 1 includes the runway’s RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered stipple within Zone 1 *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2NA Zone 3* Zone 4NA Zone 5* Zone 6Set the vertex for Zone 6’s arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ – Runway Protection Zone WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-11 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F 6 6 4 Traffic Side of Airport Non-Traffic side Pattern Zone 6 ArcÓs Vertex 2 3 1 3 Run- Assumption: * or 25% of RunwayÓs length Topographical Constraints prohibits aircraft operations on one side of the Zone 3 Vertex offset traffic pattern 5 Airport Compatibility Zones DimensionsLength Notes Zone 12,000 Zone 1 includes the runway’s RPZ. The RPZ is depicted with ordered stipple within Zone 1 *RPZ dimensional standards are dictated by runway approach type. Zone 2NA Zone 3NA Zone 4NA Zone 5* Zone 6Set the vertex for Zone 6’s arc parallel to the end of Zone 2 RPZ – Runway Protection Zone Page F-12 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011 Appendix F Compatibility Criteria Zone 6 ArcÓs Vertex RunwayÓs endpoint Airport Compatibility Zones DimensionsLength Notes Zone 1Zone 1 includes the runway’s RPZ. The RPZ is depicted by ordered stipple within Zone 1 Zone 2NA Zone 3* Zone 4NA Zone 5* Zone 6 RPZ – Runway Protection Zone WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 Page F-13 January 2011 Compatibility Criteria Appendix F Page F-14 WSDOT Airports and Compatible Land Use Guidebook M 3074.00 January 2011