Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/01/2022 12. Closed record public hearing and Resolution to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation regarding the preliminary plat of "Canterfield Estates" submitted by Mayling Chin located in the vicinity of 4802 Spring Creek Rd. 5l BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 12. For Meeting of: November 1, 2022 ITEM TITLE: Closed record public hearing and Resolution to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation regarding the preliminary plat of "Canterfield Estates" submitted by Mayling Chin located in the vicinity of 4802 Spring Creek Rd. SUBMITTED BY: Joan Davenport,AICP, Community Development Director Joseph Calhoun, Planning Manager Albert Miller,Assistant Planner(509) 576-6772 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: PLSA Engineering & Surveying on behalf of Mayling Chin, submitted a preliminary long plat application to subdivide approximately 8.5 acre parcel into 11 lots in two phases. The Hearing Examiner held an open-record public hearing on August 25, 2022 and submitted a recommendation of approval on September 8, 2022. The complete hearing record was distributed to City Council in the agenda packet on October 18, 2022 and can be found online at: https://www.yakimawa.gov/council/agendas-and-minutes/ To participate in this public hearing please refer to the Public Comment Guidelines at: https://www.yakimawa.gov/council/public-comment/ ITEM BUDGETED: NA STRATEGIC PRIORITY: Neighborhood and Community Building APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution ATTACHMENTS: Description Upload Date Type 2 Resolution 10/19/2022 Resolution 3 RESOLUTION NO. R-2022- A RESOLUTION approving the Preliminary Long Plat of Canterfield Estates, a 11-lot subdivision, located at 4802 Spring Creek Rd. WHEREAS, on August 25, 2022, the City of Yakima Hearing Examiner held an open-record public hearing to consider the application for a Preliminary Long Plat known as "Plat of Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2," submitted by PLSA Engineering on behalf of Mayling Chin (PLP#005-22, SEPA#013-22, TCO#007-22, CAO#004-22); and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, the Hearing Examiner issued his Written Recommendation for approval of the proposed plat, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the proposed application conforms to the City of Yakima Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Development Standards Ordinance, Traffic Concurrency Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations; and WHEREAS, at a Closed Record Public Hearing on November 1, 2022, after notice duly given according to the requirements of the Yakima Municipal Code, the Yakima City Council adopted the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Yakima has complied with the substantive, procedural, and notice requirements associated with SEPA, the Growth Management Act, and the Yakima Municipal Code for the purpose of reviewing the application; and WHEREAS, the Yakima City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City of Yakima to pass the following; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above recitals are hereby incorporated into this resolution. Section 2. Incorporation of the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation and Conditions of Approval. The Hearing Examiner's Recommendation is hereby adopted and ratified by the Yakima City Council as its conditional decision and approval of the Application herein. A copy of the Recommendation is attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Findings. The Yakima City Council adopts the findings of the Hearing Examiner as its own findings herein, and further finds that the requirements of RCW§ 58.17.110 have been met. Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this resolution is declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution. 4 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of November, 2022. ATTEST: Janice Deccio, Mayor Sonya Claar Tee, City Clerk 5 Exhibit "A" CITY OF YAKIMA WASHINGTON HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION September 8,2022 FLOWED Car4MCEIE1IrlertillitbiLitil SEP 0 2022 In the Matter of an Application for a ) Preliminary Long Plat with a Critical ) Area Standard Development Permit ) Submitted by: ) ) PLPF005-22 Mayling Chin,property owner CA08004-22 ) SEPAP013-22 For all 1I-Lot Single-Family Residential ) TC0#007-22 Preliminary Long Plat on 8.5 Acres ) Located itt the Vicinity of 4802 Spring ) Creek Road to be known as the Plat ) Of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 & A. Introduction. The preliminary findings relative to the hearing process for this matter are as follows: (1) The Hearing Examiner conducted an open record public hearing for this application on August 25.2022. (2) The Planning Division staff report which recommended approval of this preliminary long plat with a critical area substantial development authoriyation subject to enumerated conditions was presented by Assistant Planner Albert Miller.Tile applicant's representative thr this application, Thomas Durant of PLSA Engineering & Surveying, presented testimony in favor of the proposed preliminaty plat and requested several clarifications or revisions of six of the recommended conditions. (3) Two written comments from neighbors were received prior to the hearing which are in the record. May I ing Chin,property owner 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase 1&2 PLPrr005-22t CA000442 SEPA4013-22 end TC0a007-22 6 (4) No other testimony or written comments were submitted at or before the open record public hearing.The record was left open for receipt of an email from Mr,Miller as to the nature of the floodplain and whether there is a floodway on the property. 'That information was received by email of August 26, 2022, which shall be included as an additional exhibit in this matter, This Recommendation has been submitted to the Planning Division within 10 business days of the public hearing, SU ma ry of Recommendation. The Hearing Examiner recommends approval of this proposed Preliminary Plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 and 2"with the requested Critical Area Standard Development Permit,subject to conditions, C. Basis for Recommendation. Based on a view of the site with no one rise present on August 24,2022: the staff report,exhibits,testimony and other evidence presented at the open record public hearing conducted August 25, 2022; and a consideration of the applicable subdivision requirements, development standards, critical areas ordinance provisions and consistency'criteria:the Hearing Examiner makes the following: FINDINGS I. Applicant, Property Owner and Re resentative. The applicant and property owner is Mayling Chin, 4802 Spring Creek Road, Yakima, WA 98903, The representative of the applicant and property owner for this proposal is Thomas Durant, Planning Manager of PESA Engineering and Surveying, 521 North 20ill Avenue 43, Yakima,WA 98902, RECENED SEP 0 8 2.022 croli or VAKIM Mayfing Chin,pmperty owner 2 CONltdigaTY LiENTLUNCE NT 4802 Spring Creek Road Cantertield Estates Phase 1&2 PLP4005-22,CAO#004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TC0#907-22, 7 H. Location. lthe location of the proposed preliminary plat is at 4802 Spring Creek Road south of 48.00 West Washington Avenue. The Yakima County Assessor,s Parcel Number of the 8.5-acre site is 181333-41012. 111, Application. This is an application for an 8.5-acre 11-lot Preliminary Long Plat (PLP) vvith related applications for Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) Review, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Review and Transportation Concurrency Ordinance (TCO) Review. The preliminary plat would be completed in two phases. The lots in. Phase I would consist of Lots 1 through 4 and Lots IQ and 11 mostly in the 7,740 to 9,851 square-foot range. Lot 1 contains an existing residence with accessory buildings and is proposed to be larger than one acre. Ten netv middle-Mcome residences would be constructed on the other lots. Phase 2 would consist of the Lots 5 through 9 within a 100- year floociplain with all lots larger than one acre with more than 5,000 square feet of buildable area as required by City Code. Small portions of Lots 1 through 4 are also within the floodplain and also have more than 5,000 square leet of buildable area. Lots 2 through 11 will have access from a new eul-de-sac street named Cantertield Drive to Spring Creek Road and then to Washington Avenue. Lot 1 directly accesses Spring Creek Road (Document Index D-2). These applications were received on May 26,2022. and deemed complete for processing 011 June 21, 2022(Document Index Cel and E-I to E-4).These applications are being processed under Chapters 14,20 for Subdivision, 15,27 for Critical Areas, 6.88 for SEPA Review and 12.08 for Transportation Concurrency Ordinance Review set forth in the Yakima Municipal Code(YMC). Kamp SEP 0 8 2022 CRY Of eaarati Mayling Chin,property owner 3 COMMUNIT CRP Pk 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase 1&2 PLP4005-22,CA014004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TC0#407-22 8 IV. Jurisdiction. YMC §1.43.080 and §14,20.100 provide that the Hearing Examiner shall hold a public hearing and submit a recommendation to the City Council regarding preliminaiy long plats Nvhich shall include findings and conclusions based on the record relative to the subdivision criteria listed in YMC §14.20.100(A) and RCW Chapter 58.17. YMC §IA3.100, YMC §I6.03.01003-42) and YMC §15.04.020(E) provide that applications such as for a Critical Area Standard Development Permit may be considered under the highest level of review for all of the consolidated applications, In this case the highest level of review is for the Preliminary Long Plat. That level of review,requires the licaring Examiner to make a recommendation to the Yakima City Council which will make the final decision on the proposed Preliminary Long Plat and the Critical Area Standard Development Permit. V. Notices. A Notice of Application,Environmental Review and Public Hearing for a Preliminary Long Plat(PLP#005-22), Critical Areas Ordinance Review (CAO#004-22), and State Environmental Policy Act Review(SEPA#013-22)was provided by posting a Land Use Action Sign on the property ort June 29,2022; by mailing said Notice to the applicant, SEPA agencies and adjoining property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel requesting comments on the proposed application on August 3, 2022: arid by publishing said Notice in the Yakima Ikrald-Republie also on August 3, 2022. Two written comments from neighbom were received doling the public comment period. VI. Comprehensive Plan. The site of the proposed Preliminary Plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 & 2" is located within the Love Density Residential designation which provides mainly for single-family detached dwellings -With other dwelling types under PLC IVF 0 Mayling Chin,property owner 4 4802 Spring Creek Road 2lln came/lieu Estates Phase I &2 PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 SEPA#013-22 anti TC0#007-22 COMMLN „ • , 9 certain circumstances. The pomitted density is tip to seven dwelling units per acre for infill development. The following goals and policies apply to this proposal: Goal 2,3: Preserve and enhance the quality, character. and functiori of Yakima's residential neighborhoods, Policy 23.103): Continue to allow for detached single family dwellings iri residential districts. Policy 2.33:Create walkable residential neighborhoods with safe streets and good connections to schools,parks,transit,and commercial services. Policy 2.3.3(A):Construct sidewalks along all new residential streets. Policy 2.3.3(C): Promote small block sizes to ensure good connectivity and reduced walking distances between residences and schools, parks, and services. Specifically: * Low density residential:Blocks between 400-800 feet long are appropriate. * Mixed resideritial:Blocks between 300-660 feet long are appropriate. * Provide for through public through block connections for large residential blocks. a Commercial and mixed-use designations: Configure development to provide pedestrian connections at 300 to 660 feet intervals, Configure development to provide vehicular cormections at 600 to 1,320 feet intervals. Allow flexibility for private internal streets to meet connectivity objectives. Goal 2.6: Community design. Promote compatible high quality development that enhances the character and identity of Yakima, Policy 2.6.2(A): Recognize that the character of public rights-of-way play a role in detennining community character. Wherever feasible, promote complete streets and incimporate streetscape improvements, such as way-finding signs, lighting, public an, enhanced la.ndscaping and street furniture, to enhance conununity character. Goal Presenfe and improve existing residential neiahborhoods. Policy 5.2.1: Invest in and improve quality of life in existing neighborhoods. Goal 5.4: Encourage design, construction, and maintenance of high quality housing. irr Mayling Chin,properly owner 5 t 8 0 0 202? 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2 PLP4005-22,CA04004-22 erEis SEPA4013-22 and TC0#007-22 1 0 Policy 5.43: Encourage development of wethdesigned new braising in coordina- tion with population movah,employment growth,and transportation goals, Policy 5,41: Promote complete streets and trails to interconnect Yakima's neighborhoods and promote walkability, II. Zoning and Land Use. The 8,5-acre parcel is located within the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zoning district and it is currently vacant except for a single-family residence with accessory.buildings located on the proposed Lot I, Surrounding land uses are mostly large lots of one-half acre to three acres developed whit single-family residences. North of the property is mostly vacant including land surrounding the Yakima Air Terminal. The proposed subdivision is similar to surrounding single-family residential uses. YMC..§15.03.020(B)states that the purpose,intent and characteristics of the R-1 zoning district where the proposed preliminary plat is located is to: (I) Establish new residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses except those which are compatible with, and serve the residerits of, this district, which may include duplexes and zero lot lines if established during the subdivision process. (2) Preserve existing residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings free from other uses to ensure the preservation of the existing residential character,and serve the residents of this district. (3) Locate inoderate-density residential development, up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre,in areas served by public water and sewer systerri, (4) Detached single-family dwellings are the primary use in this district. The district is characterized by up to sixty percent lot coverage; access to individual lots by local access streets; required front, rear,and side yard setbacks; and one- and two-story structures. The density in this district is generally seven dwelling units per net resideraial acre or less. (5) This zone is intended to afford single-fairilly neighborhoods the highest level of protection from encroachment by potentially incompatible nonresidential land uses or IC IF Mayling Chin,properly warier 6 4802 Spring Creek Road 511- 202P Canted-mid Estates Phase I&2 PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 REPA#013-22 and TE0g007-22 COPIA I 7 7-7-7 77. 11 impacts, Nonresidential uses within these zones are not allowed; except for public or quasi-public uses, which will be required to undergo extensive public review and will have all necessary performance or desiem standards assigned to them as necessary to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent residences. (6) Duplex and multifamily development up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre may be allowed in accordance with Table 4-1, VIII. Environmental Review. lhis application was required to undergo State Environ- mental Policy Act review because it is required for Subdivision applications within the City (YMC §14.20.030) and because the subdivision is taking place partially within a Critical Area. After reviewing the application, coordinating with 13ST, and considering public comnicrits, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued ort August 3, 2022,which was not appealed(Document Index F-4M IX. Transportation Coneurreney Ordinance. The applicant applied for Trans- portation Coneurreney (TCO#007-22) on May 26, 2022, and was approved for coneurrency on June 14, 2022. The development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the city arterial system and reserve capacity, exists on all impacted streets (Document Index F4). X. Development Services Team and Public Agency Comments, The following comments were submitted by the Development Servioes Team which met on June 28, 2022,and by public agencies: (1) Code Administration: The City of Yakima Code Administyation comments were as follows: RECEIVED 0-0 0 0 2(122 Mayling Chin,property owner 7 4,802 Spring Creek Road CEY Dt vd Cantertield Estates Phase I&2 COM _ MPS-00542,CACW00,4-22 SEPASS13-22 and TC0#007-22 12 (a) Addressing shall he as follows:Lot 1: 4802 Spring {.:reek 12d.; Lot 2 1901 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 3: 1903 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 4: 1905 Canterlieid Dr,: Lot 5; 1907 Canterfield Dr.; Trot : 1913 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 7: 1916 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 8: 1910 Canterneld- Dr.; Lot 9: 1904 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 10: 1902 Canterfield Dr.;and Lot 11: 1900 Canterfield ter; (b) Pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Washington State Fire Code (W zSI±C), publicly available fire hydrants will be required along streets spaced at intervals that will provide required fire flow coverage for proposed structures in accordance with SFC Appendix C (c) These findings are not intended to be an exhaustive review of this proposal. (2) Engineering: Engineering comments relative to this proposed preliminary plat were to the effect that TMC Title 12 improvements and other improvements are required including,but not limited to the following: (a) YMC 8.67 and 12.05 —New curb, gutter; and 5' sidewalk required along frontage of Spring Creek Rd; and within new development, Residential street section shall conform to standard detail R3. New sidewalks shall be constructed per standard detail R5 (b) 8.64 Driveways to be constructed per this chapter and standard detail R4. (c)8.72—An excavation and street break permit shall be obtained for all work within the public right of way.Refer to chapter 8 for requirements.Roads less than five years old can be cut,but will cost one hundred fifty percent of restoration fee with no PC1 discount. (d) 12.02 Easements will need to be established per this chapter, (e) 12.06.050— Cul-de-sac streets shall conform to this section, with a right of way diameter of 80' and an improved diameter of 6 ". Phased developments or temporary dead-end streets shall provide for adequate temporary turnarounds between project phases Or future street extension. The design shall provide for continuation of the full Tight-of-way width to the phased boundary. RECEIVED Mayling Chin,property owne 8 CI rY OF YMCA 4802 Spring Creek Road COMMUNiFY OLD.(.OPME NT Canterfield Estates Plisse H &2 PLPV005-22,CAM004-22 SFYA#013-22 and TCoi*07-22 13 (f) 12.06 — Street and right of way widths shall conform to this section unless otherwise approved. 50 of right of way is required for Spring Creek Rd, and new residential street. (g) 12.06,080— Street lighting—A street light shall be installed at each street intersection and at mid-block if the block exceeds five hundred feet in length. Street lights shall meet the design and placement standards of the city engineer. Lighting improvements shall become the property of the city of Yakima upon installation and will thereafter be maintained by the city. (h) YMC 14,05,200/14.20.130 — All frorMage improvements shall be eompleted prior to long plat approval. At the discretion of the City Engineer, the owner may bond for required frontage improvements or may be allowed to postpone improvements through a Covenant/Deferral Agreement. If bonding is allowed, it shall be executed and recorded.prior to or as part of approval of the long plat. Cithl engineering plans, which are stamped and signed by a civil engineer, arc required to be submitted for reviety and approval for all Title 12 required improvements and prior to approval of bonding. If frontane nuprovements are required at this time, they shall be completed prior to Ccrtifieate of Occupancy. (3) Surface Water: Prior to any grading on this project, ail erosion control nteasures shown on the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control plan shall be in place and the developer shall pass an erosion control inspection by the City. This project shall get a Large Project Stormwater Permit.Drainage plans arid calculations shall he provided to the Surface Water Engineer for review and approval. The applicant shall provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan to the City for review mid approval. Since the total area of this project is over 5 acms,the applicant cannot apply for the erosivity waiver. A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement will not be required as the street is public. For the plat approval, the applicant will not have to provide a completed TESC plan, drainage plans and calculations,SWPPP or anything else related to stormwater. However,prior to any grading,the TESC plan and SWPPP must be approved and erosion control inspection must be passed, (4) Wastewater: City Sewer will need to be extended into the development per YMC Title 7 arid 12 and per City of Yakima Wastewater Standard Details. (5) Nob Hill Water Association: The owner will need to contact Kirsten Mcpherson at Nob Hill Water with signed engineered plans in order for water design to RECEIVED Mayling Chin,property owner 9 4802 Spring r Creed.Road SFP 0 8 2022 Cantetield Estates Phase &2 PLP#008-22,C AMON-22 Di harms., SEPA#013-22 and TC04007-22 COWAN 14 be started for new development. New water mainline, tire hydrants, and water service connections will be required to be installed for new development. (6) The Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE): Regarding water resources, if you plan to use water for dust suppression at your project site, be sure that you have a legal right, in Washington State, prospective water users must obtain authorization from the Department of Ecology before diverting surface water or withdrawing ground water,with one exceptitm.Ground water withdrawals of up to 5,000 gallons per day used for single or group domestic supply,up to 5.000 gallons per day use for industrial purposes, stock watering. and for the irrigation of up to one-haif acre of non-commercial lawn and garden are exempt from the permitting process. Water use under RCW 90.44.050 exemption establishes a water right that is subject to the same privileges,restrictions,laws and regulations as a water right permit or certificate obtained directly from Ecology, Temporary permits may be obtainable in a short time-period,The concern of Water Resources is existing water rights, In some instances water may need to be obtained from a different area and hauled in or from an existing water right bolder. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these Water Resources comments, please contact Christopher Kossik at (509) 379-1826 or entail at Christophenhossik@eey.wagov, p7)Alitanum Irrigation District: While this parcel is located within our District, the parcel has no surface water right established in the Final Decree (2019), the Conditional Final Order Subbasin No, 23 (Ahtatium) (2019). and the Final Schedule of Rights dated May 9,2019,in State of Washington.Dept.of Ecology v.Acquavella,et.al. (2019). In summary, no inigation water wilt be provided by our District to this development. However. our I3oard must sign off on the plat for this subdivision. The surveyor will need to provide us with the original Mylar,as well as one copy.for District signature.As our Board meets once per month. please telephone in advance for meeting dates to avoid delays. If any huffier information is required,you can contact us at(509) 249-0226. XI. Written Public Comments from Two Neighbors. Written comments from two neighbors submitted during the comment period followed by a response in italics are as foliows: REM 1V1-11 f 0 C 21021 Mayling Chin,property owner CITY CI T T, 4802 Spring Creek Road COMM Y , Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2 PLP41105.22,CAO#004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TO:VW-22 1 5 (1) Stephanie Costal (July 13, 2022): I am writing this letter on behalf of myself (Stephanie Costal)and Matthew Swetnam,co-owners of 4904 Spring Creek Rd.Yakima, WA 98903. Reference numbers — RCN/005-22, SEPA8013-22, CA08004-22 — Applicants name=Mayling ChiMPLSA. Its unfortunate that we earth control the spaces surrounding our properties...and while we have enjoyed years of privacy...I understand that the land in question belongs to Mayling and is hers to do with as she pleases. I have some concerns arid requests that hopefully can be addressed by writing this letter, I'm wondering if it's possible for there to be certain stipulations set in place that a potential buy er must abide by? I would like My current standard of hying to remain the same as much as will be possible. We purchased this house, for the sole reason of the seclusion and privacy it has afforded us, I would not like having a two story house built close to my property line so that it ends up I feel like I am living in a fish bowl. I have many animals that will become extremely loud and noisy when people approach my property. I fear that any new neighbors will be greatly disturbed by the honks(Amy geese or the barks of my dogs. I worry it will end up causing potential problems like someone filing a nuisance animal report or complaints M the city that may end up with me,having to find new homes for my pets. My request would be that houses must be built a certain distance away from my property line and not be two stories. Our second concern is one that has to do yvith the time which construction will be taking place. Long exposure to noise and dust from construction sites can cause stress, anxiety', possible health problems along with sleep disturbances. I am a home health care provider and have the good fortune of caring for my '76 yrs old mother. I have concerns about how an impending construction site will effect her health as well as others in the surrounding area. My last request/concern is about the Springcreek Wetlands and the wildlife that resides there, I would like to request that the wetlands be delineated and have a safety buffer or certain allowances put into place for the conservation oldie many birds and wildlife that make their homes there. We appreciate the chance to share our concerns and information in order to look at potential options that will keep all parties satisfied. Thank you,Sincerely,Stephanie Coson. RECUR/ED 344 4 - 402 May ling Chia,property owner 11 CITY EY 4802 Spring Creek Road COMMLNilY ' Cantertield Estates Phase 1&2 PLP#005-22,CAO#0.04-22 SEPA#013-22.and TC014007-22 16 The proposed subdivision will adhere to all design standards few the 1?-1 zoning district and the Airport Safety Overlay district. Per TMC 615.03.020(B), the 1?-1 district is intended to "preserve existing residential neighborhoods for detached single-family dwellings..."and "ensure the preservation of the existing re,sidential character"of the district It is also intended "to affiod single-farnily neighborhoods the highest kvel protection from encroachment by potentially incompatible nonresidential land taes or impacts." The design standards required for the R-1 zoning district are set forth to promote public health, safety and welfare, arid any development on the proposed subdivision will adhere to these standards. The subdivision will comply with Critical Areas standards sefforth YMC Chapter 15.27. The purpose of these standctrds can be found in TMC,615.27.130.In addition, the phashlg of the development, the rear setback requirements and the large size of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 should address to a greater extern than other permissible plat designs the privacy, nuisance, dust and wildlife concerns expressed in this comment. (2) John Mefford (July 10, 2022): I am writing to comment on the proposed development of Canterfield Estates, Phases 1 and 2. Over the last ten years, I observed much development in the City of Yakima and Yakima County. appreciate the opportunity to comment to help the City of Yakima balance growth with the needs of all the metribers of the community. My comments can be grouped into three major areas: 1)impact to drainage with resulting potential increase in flooding threat,2)potential uses of pesticides and possible overspray during any phase of the development, and 3) a and respectful acknowledgement of indigenous cultural resources drat may potentially be encountered. 1)The application makes mfercticc to the classification of the 100-year floodplain as a critical area by the City, of Yakima. Typically', a development in a 100-year floodplain means there is a 1%chalice of flooding. liowever,if a structure is near a flooding source such as a stream or drainage or if the landscape is tittered in certain ways,the risk of!Moiling may actually be higher than 1%.In dais situation, the risk of flooding may be as high as 26% so that over the course of a 30-year mortgage there can be a one in four charier of flooding. As shown in the preliminary plat diagram., all of Phase 2, which constitutes the tnajority of development in square footage,ties south of the north boundaty line of the FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain, thus fully existing within the floodplain. Will the proposal be consistent with the requirements imposed by the MTEIVE D Mayling Chin.property owner 12 ZOT: 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterriekt Estates Phase 1&2 CRY G- PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 COMMUNI1 SEPAUP13-22 and TC017007-22 17 Cite of Yakima and/or Yakima County for development in a floodplain and ifso, what impact will that haveon surrounding properties? For instance, the proposal does not call for till to be brought in. Father. grading will be performed sea that cuts and tills are expected to balance. Even given this situation, will any modifications of the landscape necessary for development in a 100-year floodplain potentially increase the chances of flooding in adjacent areas;' cannot interpret what appears to he contour lines on thepreliininary plat diagram since there are not elevations associated with the contour lines.However,based on the general topography, the'drainage: is essentially eastward consistent with the various drainage features such as Spring Creek, Wide hollow Creek and unnamed ephemeral tributaries in the vicinity. What I want to know is if any future modification on Phase 2 lots will direct drainage to the south as opposed to the east such that the chance of flooding is increased to these properties adjacent. 2) ale application dines not mention use of herbicides. Yet, can we discount the potential future use of herbicides such as D onau to control noxious weeds and invasive species during any time during the development of Canterfacld Estates? It is not unconunon for herbicides to be applied to the soil after a development has been cleared of vegetation, especially in cases where the development may take several years to complete. If used, please ensure the proper management and application of herbicides so that conditions such as cwerspray and drift do not occur that will impact the surrounding residential community or the environment. 3) The answer to question #2 concerning historic and Cultural Preservation in Section 13 of the SEPA checklist does not adequately address the intent of the subsection, i.e., whether a proper evaluation was undertaken or even if one was actually performed.Tlie operating assumption ofen is that if a cultural resource i not readily visible then it doesn't exist. Yet, we may be ignorant about items of cultural interest,especially archaeological ones,that may reside in the subsurface: The existence of or the encroachment of the urban environment does not negate the possibility of encountering indigenous cultural resources. To address that possibility is the function of the Department of Archaeology and historic Preservation's(I AI II') WISAARD database and its predictive model. One of the key elements in that predictive model is the proximity to water bodies such that the probabilift of encountering cultural resources Mereases as one approaches that feature, Note that Spring Creek, a spring-fed waterbody,exists in close proximity to the proposed development. RECr#°el l Mayling Chin,property owner 13 41:-r 0 s a 202l 4802 Spring Crehr Road Cantertield Estates Phase t do 2 CITY C; $:I0000 PGP##005-22, `A1E40042.2 000110,10N r TO,00 ..'; SEPA#013-22 and' C0a001- 2 18 Also, my understanding of the WI SAARD system is that it was meant to rely on Bayesian statistics such that new information adds to the predictive model used in evaluating an area for the potential to encounter items of cultural interest,. Yet, bow does one even recognize an item of cultural significance? Typically an Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) aids in helping workers and others identify items of cultural significance and what steps to take if encountered. I did riot see any reference to an IDP iii question #3. This scents to he an oversight, Although an IDP may not be required by law,it is good practice, I support residential development provided that possible impacts have been. fully c,onsidered and mitigated,as necessary,to prevent cir reduce adverse effects to the existing community and to the natural resources,including our cultural ones, In closing, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed developirient, your acknowledgements of the importance of public comment in shaping future growth arid in providing transparency in government making. Sincerely,John Mefford,5123 Lyons 1„,00p,Yakima,WA This proposed development will comply with all the standards for development/ construction in critical areas, specifically the mapped 100-year floodplain. by complying with CiO. requirements to avoid increasing flood hazards iTt,floodplains by nzeans set forth in Y11,1C Chapter 15,27, A plat note will require the owners, their grantees and assignees in interest to retain all surface water generated within the plat on-site. A plat note will also require that no structure,fences, walls or other obstructions Min impede drainage shall be placed within the,floodplain without the approval of the City of Yakima Community Development Director and in accordance with the City of Yakima Alunicipal Code critical areas ordinance and farther that the property owner shall keep the 100- year floodplain traversing his/her property „tree of debris which would impede the function cif the floodplain. Since this property falls entirely within the DAHP Predictive Model at a level 4, High Risk, an Inadvertent Discovery Plan will be required to be approved by the Planning Division prior to any ground disturbance even though DAIIP did not continent on this proposal. X1L Applicable Subdivision Ordinance and Statutory Provisions, Applicable subdivision regulatory provisions are as follows: Rter NED May tine Chin,property(miter 14 4802 Spring Creek Road SFP 0 8 2022 Canterflekt Estates Phase 1&2 PtsPen05-22,CAOMIO4-22 COMittUri SEPRe013-22 and TC(1#007-22, 19 (1)YMC 15.05.030 A) Creation of new lots Subdivision requirements: Table, of Subdivisionl Requirements; The YWIC §15.05.030(A)Table establishes basis:develop- ment criteria for lot size and width that must be met when reviewing an application for a new subdivision. For detached single-fancily dwelling construction in the P-1 zoning district,the;required minimum lot size is 6,000 square feet. (2) YMC §15,05.030 C 1 In residential districts, this standard is intended to maintain the residential character of the area and will Mary by dwelling type; the suitability of the land for development, and the type of water and sewer system. The following are the minimum lot size;requirements in the residential districts,except when the Yakima health District determines that a larger area is necessary for the safe installation of approved water supply and sewage disposal systems. The required minimum lot size;for parcels within the floodplain is one acre. (3) YMC. 15.30.040: Airport Safety Overlay Zones: The subject property is located in. Zone b of the Airport Safety Overlay, and per YMC 15.30.060, detached single family dwellings are Class(1)uses. (4) YMC §15.30.050 'Might Limitation: Height Limitation 2(AOD Zone f) No building within this zone shall exceed thirty-five feet above the ground. Any building proposed to exceed this height must undergo further review by the airport manager and the FAA. The administrative official may require lights or markers as a warning t< aircraft on any buildings.structures.communication towers,uses,or trees,or the topping of any trees to reduce their height,when recommended by the FAA, WSDOT Aviation Division or the airport manager. Lights and markers shall meet FAA specifications. Whenever the height limitations of this section differ from those of any other section of this chapter,or that adopted by another local ordinance or regulation,the more restrictive limitation shall apply. (5) YMC §8.96.010: Complete Streets purpose: The purpose of the complete streets policy is to ensure all users are planned for in the construction of all cite.., transportation improvement projects as outlined m the comprehensive plan and detailed in the soon to be adapted hike master plan and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan. By enacting the ordinance codified in this chapter the city of Yakima encourages healthy, active living, reduction of traffic congestion and fossil fuel use, inclusion and maintenance of trees and appropriate landscaping,and improvement in the; safety^and quality of life of residents in the city of Yakima by providing sale,convenient and comfortable routes for walking, bicycling and public transportation. The complete streets policy will improve street connectivity for all modes, llt"nrs t:t= Mayling Chint property owner 15 :F i$ "E1 "", 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterlield Estates Phase 1 &2 t,ry PLP#005-22,CAC} 004- 2 comm 7r SF.PAtt012-22 and TC:C3 ttC-22 20 (6) YMC §8.%.020:Definitions: -Complete street- means a road that. is designed to be safe and accessible for drivers, bicyclists, transit vehicles and riders. and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. `the compltie streets policy focuses not just on individual roads but changing the decision-making process so that all users are routinely considered during the planning. designing,building and operating of all roadway s. -Street.- means any public right-of-way, including arterials, conneetom. ways, lanes and roadways by any other designation. as well as bridges.tunnels. and any other portions or the transportation network,that is open for use hy the general traveling public+ -Street project- means the construction, reconstruction, retrofit, maintenance. alteration or repair of any street, and includes the planning. design. approval and implementation processes, except that "'street project- does not include minor routine upkeep. such as cleaning, sweeping, mowing. spot mpair or interim measures on demur routes. If safety and convenience earl be improved within the scope of pavement resurfacing, such as grind and overlay and restriping, such projects should evaluate and make mei) attempt to implement complete streets as outlined in the soon to be adopted bike master plan and ADA transition plan to provide access and increase safety km all users%Grind and overlay and restriping projects are limited to striping elements as called for in the soon to be adopted bike master plan and ADA transition plan. Sionalization changes shall not trigger additional complete streets elements. "'Users- means individuals of all ages and abilities, including children, vouth, families, older adults and individuals with disabilities who use streets, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motor vehicle and freight drivers. public transportation riders and drivers. (7) fil5.05,020(11): Site design requirements and standards: Access Re uired: All new development shall have a minimum ef twenty-feet of lot frontage upon a public road or be served by an access easement at least twenty feet in width. The purpose of this standard is to provide for vehicular access to ali new development; provided,the construction of single-family residences on existing legally established lots is exempt from the requirements of this section, (8) YMC §15.05.055(1): New development improvement standards.: Fire apparatus access roads for one-, Ma- or inulti-family residential developments shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 1)106 and 1)107,respectively,of Appendix 1)of the RECF !Angling Chin,property owner 16 4802 Spring Creek Road 202:- Canterrield Estates Phase 1&2 PL114005-12,CA04004-22 CrY - SEPA4013.12 and TC04007-22 ROMIX: , - 21 applicable International Fire Code, Additionally. such residential developments shall he suhiect to the requirements of Section D105 of Appendix I) of the applicable International Fire Code pertaining to aerial tire apparatus roads, as applicable. All other applicable provisions of the International Fire Code, as now existing or as hereafter amended and adopted by the City,are required. Minimum requirements for the primary and secondary access will be at least twenty feet wide unobstructed paved lanes. (9) YMC *12,02,010: Establishment of casements: Public utility easements shall be established for the location of new and proposed public utiliW lines serving new land divisions and land development. Public utility easements shall also be established across the front of new lots and redeveloped lots to provide future access as determined necessary by the City Engineer. Public utility easements shall be dedicated(granted)at the time that subdivision andior land use approval is granted, 00)YMC §12.02.020: Easement location and width:Eight-foot-wide utility ease- ments shall be dedicated along the front of each lot in subdivisions and short subdivisions. Easements for new andlor future utility lines shall be a minimum of eight feet in width,or twice the buried depth of the utility,whichever is greater. (41) ymc .12,olow; Sewer service re tided: Pursuant to YMC §12.03.010, new lots and development,shall be served by a sanitary sewer line located adjacent to the lot or development site, (12) Wilt "12.03.040:Minimum sewer size:The minimum size for public sewer lines is eight inches in diameter. (13) YMC §12.03.070: Side sewer service: Each building containing sanitary facilities shall be served by a separate private side sewer line frorn a public main. (14) YMC §12,04,010: Water service required: All new lots and development shall be served by a public water supply line maintained by the City of Yakima,Nob Hill Water Company [Association".or other water purveyor,and located adjacent to the lot or development site. The water line shall be capable of providing sufficient flow and pressure to satisfy the tire flow mid domestic service requirements of the proposed lots and development as approved by the City Engineer in cooperation with the Code Administration Manager and Water Irrigation Division Manager. 115) YMC 102.04.020: Water line extension required: Water lines shall be extended to the point where the adjoining property owner's responsibility for further extension begins. This typically requires extension across the street or easement frontane Erhightli Mayling Chin,property ogner 17 ht.I 7 „.70L 4802 Spring Creek Road Canted-Rid Estates 11110Se 1 &2 PEPHOD5-72,CA04004-27 SEPA#013-72 and TO-0007-22 22 of the developing property. in some cases it will require dedication of an easement and a line extension across the property or extension along two or more sides of the developing property. Extensions will be corisistent with and itnoleinent the City's adopted water comprehensive plan. (16) YMC "1104.040: MIMMI1111 size and material.standards:New water line.s the City of Yakima water system shall be constructed of Class 52 ductile iron and shall be a Minh/111111 of eight inches in diameter. Improvements and additions to the Nob Water Company [Association] systerrt shall content) to the requirements of Nob Hill Water Company!Association], (1'7)YIVIC 812,05,010:Sidewalk installation required: Sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of all new, improved and reconstructed streets. Projects which repair small portions of or maintain existing street shall not be considered "improvement" for die purpose of this section and shall not trigger the requirements of this section. Sidewalks shall also be installed across the frontage of all newly developed or redeveloped lots where fea.sible. (18)YMC 512.06.020: Ri iht-olowa and avernent width standards: Right-M-way shall be dedicated and street surfacing provided in accordance with the applicable standards: Residential Access—50 feet ROW and minimum 32-feet of pavement width. (19) RCW 58.17.280 arid YMC Cha ter 14,15.090 —Nainin and null:Merin of slum subdivisions,subdivisions,streets,lots and Mocks: Any city,town or eminty shall, by ordinance, regulate the procedure whereby short subdivisions, subdivisions, streets, lots and blocks are named and munbered. A lot numbering system and a house address system., however, shall be provided by the municipality for short subdivisions and subdivisions arid must be clearly shown ori the short plat or final plat at the time of approval. (20) R,CW 58,1'7,110 1 YMC '14.20.100 A and YMC 514.20,120 A):'f he city, town,or eOunty legislative body shall inquire into the public use and interest proposed to be served by the establishment of the subdivishan and dedication. It shall deterininc(a)if appropriate provisions are made for, but not limited to, the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces,drainage ways, streets or roads,alleys,other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation., play- grounds, schools and schooldrounds, sidewalks, and other planning features tbat a.ssure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and front school; and(ft) whether the public interest will be served by the subdivision and dedication, RFCEIVE Mayting Chin,pa needy owner 4802 Spring Creek Road -Tr a P Cantertieht Estates Phase I&2 PLP/1005-22,CM30004-22 SEPA0013-22 and TC00007-22 23 XIEL Applicable Critical Areas_Ordinance Provisionsi Applicable Critical Areas Ordinance regulatory provisions are as follows (1) Critical Area Develo mem Authorization Re aired Pursuant to YAW 1 .27.300(A),no new development, construction or use shall occur within a designated critical area without obtaining a development authorization in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, except for those provided for in YMC §1517303. The, southern portion of this parcel is within a designated critical area in the form of a 100- year floodplain which consists of either backllow from `spring Creek to the north of the property or a tloodplain of Bachelor Creek to the south of the property. The property is not within a floodway. An application fora Critical Area Standard Development Permit is the requisite authorization that is consolidatedwith the preliminary plat application for approval by the Yakima City Council. (2) general Critical Areas Protective Measures—Subdivision Pursuant to ITIVIC §15.27.321(B)(2)(a-c&g),_critical areasshall be actively protected through the following (a)loads and utilities forthe subdivision shall avoid critical areas and their buffers,as much as possible. (b) When geologically hazardous areas (excluding erosion, oversteepc ned slopes of intermediate risk, stream undercutting,and:earthquake hazards),FEMA floodways, channel migration zones(CMZs) streams,wetlands and/or vegetative buffers fall within the boundary of a subdivision: (i) Said critical areas shall be protected by placing them entirely writhirt a separate critical area tract or by including them entirely within one of the developable parcels. Gather options, such as conservation casements and building envelopes, may be deemed appropriate by the administrative official as meeting this provision when special circumstances obstruct the viability of this provision: (ii) for those new lots that do contain said critical areas, usable building envelopes (five thousand square feet ctr more for residential uses) shall be provided on the plat that lies outside said critical areas.. (c) New lots partially within the floodplain shall provide a usable building envelope (live thousand square feet or more for residential uses) outside- the floodplain Rt®taCV imi Mayling Chin,property ownet 1 4802 Spring Creek Rood Pik G'7 2022 Cantedield Estates Phase] cc 2 Pt P#QQ5-2 ,CAt3#004-22 CI FY t.}?' 7 r tk11 SPPA#913.22 and TC0#007-22 i OI.MJf'4I x r t 24 (d) F oodplains and critical areas shall be depicted on preliminary subdivision plats and relevant information about them disclosed on the final plat. (3) permitted Uses-F loodwav I rintte:Pursuant to YMC 1 . 7.4(1}(A).detached single-family dwellings are permitted uses within the flood fringe(floodplain)as long as the proposal complies with the flood hazard d protection standards of YlvIC §15.27.407 and YMC§i 5,27,408, (4) Subdivision Proposals: YMC 15.27.407(F) requires that all subdivision proposals shall: (a) Be consistent with the need to minimize flood damage; (b) have roadways, public utilities, and other facilities such as sewer,gas; electrical;and water systems located and constricted to minimize flood damage; (c) have adequate drainage provided to reduce exposure to flood damage; (d) Include base flood elevation data;and (e) In the cases where base: flood elevation is not available and the subdivision is greater than five acres or!lib-lots,a step-bade-water analysis shall be required to generate the base flood elevation data. X V. Specific Preliminary Pia t Findings.s. C 14.20.100(A) provides that the Hearing Examiner shall consider a proposed preliminary plat during an open record public hearing to inquire into and determine whether the following standards and criteria are satisfied; (1)- Subsection 14,20.111(}( )(1) — Consistency with the ity's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance Intent, Design Improvement and Development Provisions Applicable to the -1 Zoning District, A determination of consistency with the City's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance intent, design; improvement and development provisions applicable to the 11-1 zoning district bivalvesa consideration of the following provisions of Title 15 and"title 12 of the Yakima hAunieipal Code(YM ): (a) Consistene with the Intent of the Sin le-Family Residential R-1 Zoning District: YMC §15,03,020(13) indicates that the intent of the R-1 zoning district is to establish and preserve residential neighborhoods primarily for ECt:il'rt ay ling Chin,property owner 20 4802 Spring Creek Road SE P 0 rz 2022 Canterrield Estates Phase 1&2 PLP#005-22, A 004-22 gilt;r c cgi SEPA#013-22 anti T ON007-22 25 detached single-family dwellings of a density up to seven dwellings per net residential acre. The purpose of this proposed preliminary plat is to provide lots for middle income detached single-family residences of a density of about 1.4 dwelling units per net residential acre for the 11 lots on 8,5 acres. The first phase consisting of 6 dwelling units on 1.78 acres(with street area removed)is about 3.4 dwelling units per net residential acre. The second phase consisting of 5 dwelling units on 5.46 acres(with street area removed) is about R92 duelling units per net residential acre. (b} Consistency with Design, Improvement and Development Provisions Applicable to the Single-Family residential(it-l)Zoning District: YMC Chapter 15.05 establishes certain basic development requirements. These are the minimum criteria that must be met to assure land use compatibility and promote the public health, safety and velure. The proposed development meets the requirements applicable in the R-1 zoning district as follows: (i) Maximum Lot Coverage, `I1te maximum! lot coverage is the percentage of net land arca of a site that can be covered with structures and other impervious surfaces. In the R-1 zoning district, the maximum lot coverage is 60 percent. Ail lots within the proposed preliminary plat have sufficient lot area to comply with this development standard. Ott Minimum Lot,Size: The lots ranging in size from 7,753 square feet to 1.18 acres will meet the minimum 6,000-square-foot lot size requirement for single-family residences served by pudic water and sewer service in the R-1 zoning district. All of the lots wholly within the floodpiain will meet the minimum lot;size of 1 acre within the floodplain The single-family residences on those lots are only permitted uses if"they comply with the flood hazard protection standards of YA4C §15.27.407 and C>§15.27,4d8. (iii)Minimum Lot Width. The hats will all meet or exceed the mini- mum lot width of 50 feet prescribed for the R-1 zoning district by Table 5-2 of YMC Chapter 15.05, (iv) tensity. The proposed preliminary plat has an overall density of 1.4 dwelling units per net residential acre not including streets. Phase 1 will have 3.34;dwelling units per net residential acre and Phase 2 will have 0,92 dwelling units per net residential acre. This density complies with RE-COVED May ling Chin,property owner 21 4802 Spring Creek Reed iettr{ 7 Canter-field Estates Phase l&2 PLP#005-22, `A 4-'22 C'I T k` ) ‘"a;.. S3 PA#€0I3-22 and TC0#007-22 C M I, 'i v ' 26 YMC §15,03,020(111 and YMC.1 §15.05.020(B) which both allow up to seven dwelling units per net residential acre not including street area in.the R-1 zoning district. (v) Maxitnum Building Height:lhe rnaxinitirri building height in the R-1 zoriing district is 35 feet (YMC Chapter 15.05, Table 5-1). The property is entirely within Zone 6 of the Airport Safety Overlay (ASO) which also Mints the building height to 35 feet. (vi)Structure Setbacks: In the residential zoning districts, structure setbacks are intended to provide light,air and emergency access. All lots in the proposed preliminaiy plat have sufficient area to meet the setback requirements specified by YMC Table 5-1 in YMC Chapter 15.05 which are as follows: Location From Centerline FrOM Property Line Of Right-of-Way Front 45 feet 20 feet Rear NiA 15 feet Side(internal) NiA 5 fret Side(street) 40 feet 10 feet • - (2) Subsection 14.20.100(A)(2) — Consistency with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map 111-3 of the 2040 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan designates the property within. the proposed preliminary plat as suitable primarily for detached single-family residences with. a density of up to 7 dwelling units per net residential acres for infill development. As noted above. the proposed preliminary plat is consistent with float 2.3, Policy 2.3.1(13), Policy 2.3.3, Policy 2.3.3(A), Polley 2.3.3(C),Goal 2.6. Policy 2.6.2(A),Goal 5.2, Policy 5.2.1, Goal 5.4,Policy 5.4.3 and Policy 5,4.7. (3) Subsection 14.20.100(A)(3)—Consistency with die provisions of this title, Title 14 entitled "Subdivision Ordinance." As proposed and With the recommended conditions. this preliminary plat will meet all the design requirements in YMC Chapter 14,20 of the City's subdivision ordinance and in the City's Title 12 devehminent standards. This review and the recommended conditions are intended to ellStire REIT gair, Mayling Chin,properry owner 22 6LF 0 202 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estatas Phase I&2 T Y "es 71 PLPMIS-22,CAO#004-22 COSRUI, ' Li " SEPA#013-22 and T00#002-22 27 consistency with the provisions of the City's subdivision ordinance as well as other applicable City ordinances. (4) Subsection 14.20.100(A)(4) — Appropriate provisions for enutnerated features.. As proposed and with the recornmended conditions,this 1 I-lot preliminary plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 & 2"will make following appropriate provisions for the features required by VAC§14.20.100(A)(4)and RCW 58.17.110(I): (a)Public health, safety welfare- Die construction of 10 new single-family dwellings will promote the public health. safety and general welfare insofar as there is a need in this community for additional housing and insofar as this proposed preliminary plat would be required to comply with ail applicable City development standards, and all conditions of approval specified by the City Council. (b) Open spaces- The proposed lots are larger than the minimum lot size required in the R-1 zoning district for single-family dwellings. lhe lot coverage limitation of not more than 60 percent in the R-I zoning district will provide adequate light and air for future residents in accordance with the standards in the zoning ordinance without additional open spaces. (c) Drainage systems: Drainage system facilities rnust be provided in accordance with state and local regulations including the City of Yakima Municipal Code and the Eastern Washington Storm Water IVIanual. A plat note will state that the Owner anti Enure owners will be required to retain all surface water generated within the plat on-site. An additional plat note state that no structure. fences. walls or other obstructimis that iinpecie drainage shall be placed within the Iloodplain and that the owner shall keep the floodplain traversing hisiher property free of debris which would impede the function of the Cl (d) Streets, alleys, and other public ways: The subject property will have frontage upon Spring Creek Road, a Local Residential Street which requires 50 feet of right-of-way and half-street right-of-way of 25 feet. A cul-de-sac will be installed per Title 12 Development Standards at the south end of the intent&street that will be named Cantcrfield Drive. (e) Transit stops:The nearest transit stops are located on West Washinmon Avenue at the intersections of 40'11 Avenue arid 64th Avenue which are respectively about one nide east and one mile west of thc site. tr,C.,"3 Mayheg Chin,property owner 23 La-r t, 2112'1' 4802 Sprong Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase I &2 PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TC0#007-22 28 40 Water supplies: Public water is required to be used for domestic and fire flow purposes. An adequate water supply for this subdivisiori is available from the Nob fli It Water Association. (g)Sanitary waste disposal:Public sewer is available to this site by way of a 12-inch line along Spring Creek Road. The owner will have to extend sewer lines from each of the lots to the main sewer line along Spring Creek Road. (h)Parks and playgrounds. Open space,parks,recreation anti playgrounds are located about onedenth of a mile away at SOZO Sports Complex and about one-half of a mile away at Randall Park. The proposed prelithinau plat is not located in a plat-tried parks and recreation area. Provisions for parks and recreation areas are not necessary within the proposed preliminary plat due to the size, number and location of the propose('lots, Provisions for playgrounds exist at the schools which children within the proposed preliminary plat would be attending, and could also be individually provided on the lots themselves which are of a size which would allow for playground areas as needed or desired, (i) Sites far sehoolh Whitney Elementary and Wilsrm Middle School are located approximately within I trifle to the north, and Eiserthower High School is located approximately vyithiri L2 miles north of this subdivision, (j) Sidewalb: Sidewalks are required and shall be provided along the frontage of this development and within the new development. (k) Serves the public use and interest: This proposed 11-lot residential subdivision is consistent with neighboring residential land uses,better serves the needs of the City than the present undeveloped status of the property and helps satisfy the need for additional housing within the City, (1) Time Limitation: Upon preliminary plat approval, the applicant has five years from the date of preliminary plat approval to submit the final plat. Iltereafter, at least 30 days prior to the expiration of preliminary approval, the applicant must submit to the City Council a written request to extend the approval period for a maximum period of one additional year (YIVIC §14.20.160). Before the final plat can be recorded,all required infrastructure must either be engineered, completed and inspected or be crighteered and financially secured,and approval of the final plat must be obtained frorn the City of Yakima Community Development Department. Mayling Chin,property owner 24 8 20re 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase &2 Era ' ' ' PI,Pd005-22,CA04004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TCOMME7-22 29 XV. Specific Critical Areas Ordinance Findings. Specitie findings relative to the Critical Areas Ordiriance arc as follows: (1) This application was subject to Environmental Review which resulted in the issuance of a Determination of Non:significance(DNS)on August 3,2022,which was not appealed, (2) Consistent with YMC 815.27.031(C)(2).the Administrative Official reviewed the available information pertaining to the proposal and made a determination that Critical Areas were present,but there is no iinpaet„ (3) Per YMC 815.2'7.309, it has been determined that a Critical Arca Standard 1)evelopment Permit is required, (4) Consistent with YMC 815.27311 relative to Authorization Decisions—Basis for Action.,the applicant meets the following criteria: (a) Impact of the project to critical area features on the property and abutting property: The impact to critical area features will be minimal as long as the subdivision provides adequate building pads, envelopes or leeitprints elevated above,the floodplain that crosses proposed Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. All requireinents of YMC Chapter 15.27 to avoid creating-flood hazards for nearby properties must be follovved and the owner 111118r obtain the Planning Division's approval of a cultural resources Inadvertent Discovery Plan which will also laelp address a neighbor's questions and concerns, (b) Danger to life or property that would likely occur as a result of the project: The floodplain of Spring Creek amlior Bachelor Creek is located OP the parcel, tutd the proposed grading plan will be required to charmelize the floodwater flowing into tile development so as to avoid creating additional danger to life or property in the area. (c) Compatibility of the project to critical area„features' The lots that lie within the floodplain(Lots 5,6,.7,8 and 9)will be required to have building pads or envelopes elevated above the floodplain. Excavation in these parcels will be done in a way that results in net zero slope change, so that the flood channel will be minimally altered,and neighboring parcels will not be affected by the impact or the development.Executing this project will done re,sponsibly,conforming with all guidelines YMC Chapter 15.27. CEIVti) Mayling Chin,property owner 25 2022 4802 Spring Creel(Road Canto-field Estates Phase 1&2 COY PLE4005-22,CA0004-22 SEPA#013-22 and TC04007-22 COMM 30 lab C onfvrarance with applicable development standards: All applicable standards of YMC Chapter 15,27 will be met. (0 Compliance with flood hazard mitigation requirements of f't C IS.27.400 through 15.27.43 : Also in order to avoid creating additional flood hazards for other properties from development of this project, the development; must adhere to all applicable standards. Construction must occur in a way that is protected against flood damage. Additionally, the alteration of ate natural floodplain will be minimized arid its natural pathways will be maintained. Penalties for noncompliance will be enforced. (f)Adequacy of the information provided by the applicant or available to the Planning Division:The application that was submitted is adequate for review. egj Alternative Courses ofAction: Based upon the project evaluation,the decision maker shall take one of the following actions. (i) Gram the development elopment authorization, (ii) Grant the development authorization with conditions as allowed by YMCI §15.27.312 in order to mitigate impacts to the critical area Ceature(s):or (iii)Deny the development authorization. (5) Since the consideration of"the Critical Arca Standard Development Permit has been consolidated for review with the Preliminary Long Plat application and since the proposal will comply with the criteria required for the requested critical area developarertt authorization,the Hearing Examiner recommends that the City Council grant the Critical Area Standard Development Permit development authorization in conjunction with approval of the Prelitninmy Long Plat of-C;antertield Estates Phase 1 &2." XVI. Consistency Analysis Conducted Pursuant to Subsection 16.06.020(B)of the Yakima Municipal Code. The consistency analysis for this proposed Preliminary Long Plat of"Canterfteld Estates Phase 1 &2"is as follows: (1) The type of land use contemplated by the proposal (a single-family residential development) is permitted on this site so long as it complies with the conditions imposed by the Yakima City Council, as well as the regulations of the zoning REV&Eh May^ling Chin;property owner 26 4102 Spring Creek Road ei R, Canterfietd Estates Phase i&2 1'LP#005 22.'CRO#004-2 SEPA#01342 and TC0#007-22 31 ordinance, subdivision ordinance, building codes and other applicable regulations, The proposed single-family dwellings are Class(I)permitted uses in the R-1 zoning district. (2) The level of development consisting of maximum lot coverage of 60 percent, lots that are larger than the Mikti1MUTI let size requirements and development density of 1.4 dwelling units per net residential acre will not exceed the allowable level of development in the Single-Family Residential(R-1)zoning district. (3) The availability arid adequacy of infrastructure and public facilities is not an issue because the additional infrastructure that will be provided at the owner's expense would insure that adequate infrastructure and public Meanies axe available for the proposed preliminary long plat. (4) The character of the proposal, such as the proposal's consistency with applicable development standards of the City's Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, primarily involves consideration of specific development standards relating to lot size, access,potable water,sewage disposal arid other features of the proposed preliminary plat which have been discussed in detail above. With the recommended conditions, the proposed Preliminary Long Plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2" with the requisite Critical Area Standard Development Permit will be consistent with die development standards of applicable City ordinances. CONCLUSIONS Based on the famgoing Findings,the Hearing Examiner concludes as follows: (I) The Bearing Examiner has jurisdiction to recommend to the Yakima City Council the approval of the proposed Preliminary Long Plat of"Cantertield Estates Phase 1 &2"with a Critical Area Standard Development Permit pursuant to YIVIC §1.43,080, YMC §14.20.100 and YMC Chapter 15.27. (2)A SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)was issued for this proposed preliminary plat on August 3,2022,that became final without any appeal,. (3)The proposed subdivision has been approved for concurrency on June 14,2022, for the reason that the development will not exceed the PM peak hour capacity of the City arterial sYsteal and reserve saPack exists nn linPaeled streets. REMOVE& Mayling Chin,property owner SEP .0 8 2022 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2 CITY Of Yakkis; PU41005-22,CA134004-22 MONO Ors—J-11 WPM/01342 and TCOP007-22 32 (4) Notices for the open record public hearing were given in accordance with applicable ordinance requirements, (5)The proposed Preliminary Long Plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2,"with the requested Critical Area Standard Development Permit and subject to all of the conditions detailed below, is in compliance with the applicable provisions of thc 2040 Comprehensive Plan. zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinanee; makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces,drainage ways,streets,transit stops,potable water supplies,sanitary wastes,parks and recreation,playgrounds and sidewalks; and, according to the weight of the evidence presented at the hearing, does not require that specific provisions he made for the other requisite plat considerations such as additional schools, additional schoolgrounds or additional planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students vvho walk to and from school;and said plat will serve the public use and interest. (6)This proposed Preliminary Long Plat of"Canterfield Estates Phase 1 &2-with the requested Critical Area Standard Development Permit is in compliance with the consistency requirements of Subsection 16.06„02003)of the Yakima Municipal Code, RECOMNIENDATION The Hearing Examiner recommends to the Yakima City Council that the proposed I I-lot preliminaty plat of"Cann:dick' Estates Phase 1 &2"with the requested Critical Area Standard Development Permit to be developed for single-family residences as described in this Recommendation and in related doeuments which are assigned file numbers PLP#005-22, CAO#004-22, SEPA#013-22 and TC0#007-22 be APPROVE)), subject to compliance with the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall submit a cultural resource Inadvertent Discovery Plan prior to excavation and construction, During development of the lots, the owner shall ensure that any application of herbicides avoids overspray or drift onto adjacent properties in a marmer that impacts the surrounding residential community or the environment Mayling Chin,property owner 41102 Spring Creek Road nr;' t 202.7 Canto-field Estates Phase 1&2 PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 SEPA#013-22 and Te0/4007-22 CONIN(Lr, Y ',110-VENT 33 (2)Thc project shall comply with all applicable guidelines established for critical areas set forth in YMC Chapter 15.2 7. (3) There must be a legal water right for any water that will be used for dust suppression. (4)Fire hydrants will be required along streets spaced at intervals that vilill provide fire flow coverage for proposed structures in accordance with the Washington State Fire Code Appendix C, (5)New curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be installed along the frontage of Spring Creek Road and within the new development. (6) Driveways will be constructed per YMC Chapter 8.64 and standard detail R4. (7) An excavation and street break permit shall be obtained for all work within the public right-ohway, (8) basements shall be established per YMC Chapter 12.02. (9) The cul-de-sac street shall contbrin to YMC 812.06,050, (10) Street arid right-of-way widths shall conform to YMC Chapter 12 06, (11) Street lights shall be installed at each street intersection and at mid-block if the block exceeds five hundred feet in length, Street lights must meet the design arid placement standards of the City Engineer, (12) All frontage improvements shall be completed prior to final long plat approval. (13)The owner must contact the Nob Hill Water Association to arrartge for water service to the plat New water mainline, fire hydrants, and water service connections may bc required. All lots shall be served with public water from the Nob Hill Water Association. No individual domestic or irrigation wells shall be permitted for any of the lots.Prior to final plat approval, written verification from the Nob 11111 Water Association must be subtnitted to the Planning Division indicating that each lot within the final plat has been serviced with domestic water and applicable fees have been paid. (14) ine Alitanum Irrigation Districes approval must appear on the face of the final plat. RECfIVE1) SF' a ;3: 202'i Mayling Chin,property owner 29 CITY 4802 Spring Creek Road COWMUITI Canter field Estates Phase 1&2 PLP#005-22,CAO#004-22 SEPAddl 3-22 and TC0#007-22 34 (15) Prior to any grading, a Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted and appnwed. An erosion control inspection must also be passed. (16)City Sewer will need to be extended into the development per YMC Tide 7 and Title 12 and per City of Yakima Wastewater Standard Details. All lots shall he provided with public sewer service according to YMC Title 12 standards. Prior to final plat approval,vvritten verification from the City of Yakima Engineering Department must be provided to the Planning Division indicating that all sewer extensions have been completed anti inspected or financially secured. (17) Prior to approval of the final plat, all required improvements shall be constructed or financially secured according to the standards and requirements of the City Engineer and YMC Title 12. (18) All public and private utilities shall be located underground with the exception of telephone boxes and such similar structures. (19) All public and private utilities to be located within public road rights-of-way must be constructed prior to the start of road construction, (20) Roadway sections within the floodplain shall be constructed in accordance with the applicable regulations of YMC Chapter 15.27,Part Four. (2 1) This plat shall be subject to the following notes,which must be placed on die face of the plat: (a) The addresses shown on this plat are accurate as of the date of recording, but may be subject to change, The City of Yakima Building Codes Division is responsible for the confirmation or reassignment of addresses at the time of buildirtg permit issuance. (b) The owners shown hereon, their grantees and assignees in, interest hereby covenant and agree to retain all surface water generated within the plat ot% site. (e) Portions of Canterfield Estates Phase 1 & 2 shown hereon may fall within the 1% annual chalice (100-year) floodplain and limits shown on current Flood Insurance Rate Maps,Floodplain information is subject to change as a result of future FEMA Map revisions michor amendments. RF FORD Mayting Chin,property owner 30 REP 0 0 2027 4802 Spring Creek Road Canterfield Estates IFbase 1&2 ell‘- 11,0#005-22,CA04004-22 COMM!, SEPAR013-22 and TC0#007,12 35 (d) structure, fences, walls, or other obstructions that impede drainage shall be placed within the limits of the (100-year) floodplain established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) without the approval of the City of Yakima Community Development Director and in accordance with the City of Yakima Municipal Code critical areas ordinance.The property owner shall keep the 100-year floodplain traversing hisiher property free of debris which would impede the function of the floodplain. (22) All addresses for the lots shall be as follows:Lot 1: 4802 Spring Creek Rd,, Lot 2; 1901 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 3: 1903 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 4: 1905 Canterfitid Dr.; Lot 5: 1907 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 6: 1913 Canterfield Dr,; Lot 7: 1916 Canterfield Dr.; Lot 8: 1910 Canterfadd Dr.; Lot 9: 1904 Canterfield 1,ot 10: 1902 Canterfielfi Dr.; and Lot II: 1900 Canterfield Dr. All addresses must be clearly shown on the face of the final plat as required by RCW 58,17,280. (23) All other requirements of the zoning and,subdivisinn ordinance,although not specifically set forth herein,shall be complied with in their entirety. (24) Upon preliminary plat approval,the applicant/owner has five years to submit the final plat, A one-year extension of time to submit the final plat may be requested by submitting a written request for such an extension to the Yakima City Council at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the preliminary plat approval, DATED this 8th day of September,2022. .14 • M., Gary M.C illier,Hearing Examiner RCCITM 4,P 00 0202F CII COMMU• Mayling(aim pmperty owner 31 4802 Spring Creek Road Canted-add Estates Phase 1&2 PLE3005-227CA04004.22 SEPA4013-22 anti TC0#007-22