Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1994-119 CH2M HillRESOLUTION NO. e_11-94 -119 A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk of the City of Yakima to execute Supplement # 3 to the agreement with CH2M Hill for professional services. WHEREAS, it is necessary to engage professional services for the Yakima Gateway Project; and WHEREAS, CH2M Hill has offered to perform those professional services in accordance with the provisions of the attached Supplement # 3 to the agreement document: and the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City that the Supplement # 3 to the agreement document be executed by the City, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City Manager and the City Clerk of the City of Yakima are hereby authorized and directed to execute Supplement # 3 to the agreement with CH2M Hill for the purpose mentioned above, a copy of which Supplement # 3 to the agreement is attached hereto and by reference made a part thereof. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 13th day of September, 1994. ATTEST: CITY CLERK i,cc MAYOR SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT #3 Project No. NPT32984 Agency City of Yakima Name of Project I-82/Yakima Avenue Interchange and Fair Avenue Project Agreement No. 91-103/D-6015 Gentlemen: The City of Yakima desires to supplement the agreement entered into with CH2M Hill, Inc., executed on November 12, 1991 and identified as Agreement No. 91-103/D-6015. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into a agreement for professional services; and WHEREAS, the CITY has requested that the CONSULTANT assist the CITY by performing additional engineering services related to the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, Section XIV, EX'1KA WORK of the AGREEMENT provides for payment by supplemental agreement for additional work; and WHEREAS, both parties desire to supplement said AGREEMENT by expanding the Scope of Work and increasing the maximum total payable to cover the cost of the extra Phase II and Phase III work on the PROJECT, NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed that the terms, stipulations and conditions of the original November 12, 1991 AGREEMENT shall be binding upon the parties hereto except insofar as amended by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT as follows: I Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, shall be amended at the end of the section, on Page 1 of the AGREEMENT, by adding the following thereto: The CONSULTANT shall perform the work tasks necessary to complete the added engineering work for the PROJECT as further detailed in Exhibit B, Supplemental Agreement #3, Phase II - Predesign and Environmental Impact Evaluation, Phase III - Final Design and Right -Of -Way Acquisition attached hereto, and by this reference, made a part of this AGREEMENT: Supplemental Agreement #3 Page 2 II Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, shall be amended to change the COMPLETION DAM, shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT to read November 30, 1995. III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended on Page 2 of the AGREEMENT after the first sentence, by adding the following thereto: A Summary of Payments under the original AGREEMENT, Supplemental Agreement #1, Supplemental Agreement #2 and Supplemental Agreement #3 is set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The maximum amount payable for completion of work under the original AGREEMENT, as shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT, shall be increased by this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT to four million five hundred eleven thousand seven hundred four and 00/100 dollars ($4,511,704.00), inclusive of all fees and other costs. A detailed breakdown of the CONSULTANT's cost proposal for this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is attached hereto as Exhibit B-1, and summarized in Exhibit D-1 attached hereto, and by this reference made a part of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT. IV Section VI, SUBCONTRACTING, shall be amended by the addition of the attached Exhibit G, Supplemental Agreement #3, attached hereto, and by this reference, made a part of this AGREEMENT. Supplemental Agreement #3 Page 3 EXECUTION If you concur with the provisions of this SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT and agree to the changes as stated above, please so indicate by affixing your signature in the appropriate spaces below and return to the CITY's office for final action. Sincerely, CH2M Hill, Inc. By: ki-i431 �` ���� CITY OF YAKIMA By: e_ Timothy h. King, P.i. Richard A. Zais, Jr. Transportation Manager Date: Date: City Manager AT'1'ES 1'ED: S1 ✓4 L 7L_ _- j &- City Clerk Date: / 167414/ City Contract No. (---11-4- ' ! . `' C .J EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS City of Yakima Yakima Gateway Project Supplemental Agreement #3 Fee Itemization/Status Phase I (Original Agreement) Phase II (Supplement #I) Phase III (Supplement #2) Extra Work (Supplement #3) Totals Fee Itemization: Direct Salary Cost $75,057 $328,190 $378,341 $311,618 $1,093,206 Overhead $126,097 $551,360 $635,613 $523,519 $1,836,589 Direct Non -Salary Costs $63,845 $529,931 $509,400 $272,480 $1,375,656 Fixed Fee $20,265 $88,611 $102,152 $84,137 $295,165 Subtotals $285,264 $1,498,092 $1,625,506 $1,191,754 $4,600,616 Optional Services $0 $73,298 $322,000 ($322,000) $73,298 Fee Totals $285,264 $1,571,390 $1,947,506 $869,754 $4,673,914 Fee Adjustments: Fixed Fee Credit ($20,265) ($88,611) ($53,334) $0 ($162,210) Adjusted Fee Totals $264,999 $1,482,779 $1,894,172 $869,754 $4,511,704 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue EXHIBIT B Supplemental Agreement #3 Extra Work SCOPE OF WORK Phase II - Predesign and Environmental Impact Evaluation Phase III - Final Design and Right -of -Way Acquisition YAKIMA GATEWAY PROJECT CITY OF YAKIMA CH2M HILL August 1994 August 24, 1994 Page 1 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Section i PROJECT DESCRIPTION In addition to the major work tasks performed in Phase II - Predesign and Environmental Impact Evaluation, Supplemental Agreement No. 1, and Phase III - Final Design and Right -of -Way Acquisition, Supplemental Agreement No. 2, several items of extra work have been or will be performed in connection to the I-82/Yakima Avenue Interchange and Fair Avenue Project. The extra work tasks can be grouped into four categories as follows. WSDOT's Naches to Beech Project To facilitate construction sequencing and avoid `throw away' work elements, portions of the WSDOT South Central Region's Naches to Beech project will be constructed in the Yakima Gateway Project. Task lA Incorporate Bridge 82/122N -W & Roadway Work Value Engineering (VE) Team Study The Value Engineering Study was conducted in July 1993. The Transportation Improvement Board (11B) selected value engineering team concluded that the overall design was adequate and no significant cost savings could be realized. The VE team made several recommendations regarding the staging of the project which were subsequently adopted by the City and are the basis for the extra work tasks listed below. Task 2A Task 2B Task 2C Task 2D Task 2E Task 2F Task 2G Task 2H Task 2I Project Management & QA/QC CR Line and DR Line PS&E Traffic Signals Frontage Road Study Y Line and Frontage Road PS&E Multiple PS&E Packages Design Report Revisions Environmental Assessment Revisions Early Stage 1A Contract Document Growth Impact Enhancements During the last year, increased development in the Terrace Heights area has precipitated the need to construct more elements of the ultimate project in Stage 1. The County expanded water system along with the Corps of Engineers removal of most of the industrial zoned property from the flood zone has made development attractive and resulted in several new generators of traffic through the interchange including a new WalMart store to the east of I-82. The following extra work tasks address the growth impacts of this development on the Yakima Gateway Project. Task 3A Task 3B Task 3C Task 3D Task 3E Task 3F Project Management & QA/QC Redefine CR Line and DR Line Configurations Environmental Assessment Revisions Right -of -Way Services Bridge Design Design Report Supplement August 24, 1994 Page 2 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue General City Requests Over the duration of the project, the City has requested various engineering tasks be performed to: address and resolve unanticipated project constraints; assist in obtaining additional funding; respond to other agency's processes; and prepare PS&E on additional work elements to be constructed in Stage 1 of the project. Task 4A Utilities Task 4B Access to Yakima Retail Area Task 4C Hazardous Materials - Phase 2 Investigation Task 4D STP Funding Application Task 4E Wetlands PS&E Task 4F PS&E Surveys Task 4G Federal Demonstration Funding Application Task 411 TIB Funding Assistance Task 4I Environmental Assessment Revisions Task 4J Project Management Task 4K Bridge Design Task 4L WSDOT Region 5 PS&E Review Process Task 4M HUD Modifications August 24, 1994 Page 3 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Section 2 VALUE ENGINEERING (VE) TEAM STUDY TASK 2A Project Management & QA/QC Project Management This task includes the work necessary to manage the CONSULTANT' s production efforts, administer the contract, monitor progress and provide direction on the tasks itemized in this section. The project manager will facilitate communications between team members and the funding partners regarding progress on the tasks listed below, maintain team continuity and arrange for additional staff as appropriate to respond to schedule revisions. The Yakima Gateway Project Schedule is to be periodically revised to reflect the processes for and the progress on the VE related revisions, specifically: 1) THE CR/DR Line PS&E; 2) the Frontage Road Study; 3) the Y Line/Frontage Road PS&E; 4) development of three construction packages; and 5) preparation of the design report revisions. The project schedule was extended to address the VE Study recommendations adopted by City Council. This resulted in additional costs for salary escalation which is itemized under TASK 4J herein. OA/QC The project manager will be responsible to the City to ensure that the tasks listed hereinafter are technically competent and meet the City's needs and expectations. TASK 2B CR Line and DR Line PS&E The VE Study recommendation VEP #3 adopted by the City, is to construct the DR Line (Ramp I) as part of Stage 1. This necessitates rebuilding a portion of the existing CR Line (the I-82 southbound on-ramp from Yakima Avenue) and the I-82 mainline One additional plan sheet for each type of plan is required to cover the subject area. The affected plan types are the roadway sections, site preparation, alignment and right-of-way, profiles, temporary water pollution control, drainage, drainage and ditch profiles, landscaping, irrigation, paving, intersection grading, retaining walls, channelization, illumination, and signing. Also affected are the special provisions and the engineers estimate. This work will be included as part of the Stage 1B contract package. TASK 2C Traffic Signals The VE Study recommendation VEP #6 adopted by the City, is to defer several traffic signals until Stage 2 of the project, when the traffic warrants will be stronger. The signals deferred are at the Y Line/J Line, J Line/F Line and at the northbound I-82 ramps/Y Line. A temporary signal is to be provided for traffic control purposes during construction at the EL Line and Terrace Heights Way intersection. The Fair Avenue/Pacific Street signal work will be transferred to Huibregtse, Louman and Associates Inc. as part of a separate consultant agreement directly with the City for the Spruce Street to Pacific Street section of Fair Avenue. August 24, 1994 Page 5 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Section 1 WSDOT's NACHES TO BEECH PROJECT TASK 1A Incorporate Bridge 82/122N -W & Roadway Work At the request of WSDOT South Central Region, the Naches to Beech Street Project PS&E for the rehabilitation of the CL Line flyover ramp, including existing Bridge 82/122N -W, will be incorporated into the I-82/Yakima Avenue Interchange and Fair Avenue Project. This will reduce the impacts to the public by minimizing the closure time for the CL Ramp. One additional drawing will be required for each type of plan set to cover the area. In addition there are work items required to include the WSDOT design onto the Yakima Gateway Project plan sheets. The affected plan types are the roadway sections, site preparation, paving, drainage, intersection grading, channelization, illumination and bridge plans. Also affected are the special provisions and the engineers estimate. August 24, 1994 Page 4 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue TASK 2D Frontage Road Study This task was authorized by the City in a letter dated September 14, 1993, and is based on the VE Study Comment #3 to eliminate the frontage road along the south side of E. Yakima Avenue. A design study was prepared to determine the feasibility of eliminating or reducing the frontage road along E. Yakima Avenue. Community contacts were made, plans and cost estimates prepared, and a recommendation developed for consideration by City Council. TASK 2E Y Line and Frontage Road PS&E The City Council adopted the recommended alternative for the frontage road (Alternative No. 3) contained in the Frontage Road Study, dated October 1993, prepared under TASK 2D. The VE Study recommendation VEP #5 adopted by the City, was to extend the merge length of the CL Line onto E. Yakima Avenue (Y Line). These revisions necessitated additional design work for E. Yakima Avenue and the frontage road from N. 10th Street to Pitcher Street. One additional plan sheet for each type of plan will be required to cover the area. The affected plan types are the roadway sections, site preparation, alignment and right-of-way, profiles, temporary water pollution control, drainage and ditch profiles, landscaping, irrigation, paving, intersection grading, channelization, illumination and signing. Also affected are the engineers estimate and the special provisions. This work will be included as part of the Stage 1B contract package. TASK 2F Multiple PS&E Packages The VE Study Comment #4 adopted by the City Council, was to package Stage 1 of the project into multiple construction contract documents. This resulted in duplication of information presentation, additional design work and the necessity to prepare multiple sets of other items such as the special provisions. Several additional drawings for each type of plan will be required. The affected plan types are the general plans, site preparation, alignment and R/W, profiles, temporary water pollution control, drainage, utilities, landscaping, irrigation, grading, paving, channelization, illumination, signing, and traffic control. Also affected are the costs for plan assembly, special provisions and engineers estimate. In addition to the affected plans, there is additional work to provide PS&E Surveys, itemized in TASK 4F, and Hydraulics Report modifications. TASK 2G Design Report Revisions Authorized by the City in a letter dated September 14, 1993, under this task numerous revisions to the Design Report will be prepared to reflect the changes as a result of the City Council adopted VE Study recommendations specifically the frontage road study, three construction packages and inclusion of the CR/DR Line, including Fair Avenue in Stage 1A. TASK 211 Environmental Assessment Revisions Since the Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation was completed and submitted in October 1993, a number of project elements have been revised as a result of the VE Study recommendations. The Environmental August 24, 1994 Page 6 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Assessment has been continuously updated to reflect these revisions. The additional work required has included but was not limited to the following: • Revisions to the text to reflect the changes in the project description. • Tracking the status of the IAC letter and providing additional information to assist the IAC in their process. Repeated attempts by the City, WSDOT and Consultant to get a formal response from the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation so as to meet the U.S. Department of Interior's request, proved unsuccessful. Because of the need to conclude the EA review process, the City directed us in a letter dated June 14, 1994, to prepare a summary of the attempts to solicit IAC input and the verbal indications that IAC does not disagree with the proposed mitigation measures. Noise and air quality analysis related to extending the CR Line and DR Line south adjacent to the Kwanis Park. Producing a "near inial" EA incorporating extensive review comments from the FHWA and the WSDOT Headquarters, Environmental Section on the October 1993 preliminary Final EA. The ultimate resolution to several of the comments as addressed in our letter dated April 6, 1994, is the basis for the extra work associated with the EA as listed in TASK 4I hereinafter. TASK 2I Early Stage IA Contract Document To address the initial VE Study recommendations and the subsequent comments generated through the combined design/access hearing process, has resulted in the right-of-way not clearing until February 1995, or 3 months after the Stage 1A construction document will be completed and ready for advertisement. To meet one of the project objectives of preserving and encouraging economic development, the PS&E will be revised by adding a retaining wall adjacent to the BL Line and providing a temporary connection of Fair Avenue to 10th Street, thereby eliminating the right-of-way from Stage 1A and allowing the earliest possible advertisement. Approximately 50 plan sheets will be effected by these revisions. August 24, 1994 Page 7 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Section 3 GROWTH IMPACT ENHANCEMENTS TASK 3A Project Management & QA/QC Project Management This task includes the work necessary to manage the consultant's production efforts, administer the contract, monitor progress and provide direction on the tasks itemized in this section. The project manager will facilitate communications between team members and the funding partners regarding progress on the tasks listed below, maintain team continuity and arrange for additional staff as appropriate to respond to schedule revisions. The Yakima Gateway Project Schedule is to be periodically revised to reflect the processes for and the progress on the `Growth Impact Enhancement' related revisions specifically: 1) the PS&E on the CR Line and DR Line; 2) the right turn lane on Y Line to the CR Line; 3) the double left on the BR Line to the Y Line; and 4) preparation of the design report supplement for these changes. The project schedule will be extended to address the growth impact enhancements. This work will result in additional costs for salary escalation which is itemized under TASK 4J herein. Urgent Project Requests Over the last several months issues have arisen that, if perceived by the City to have a potentially adverse impact on the project cost and/or schedule, were dealt with and resolved with the utmost of urgency. Effectively and efficiently performing these "fire drill" tasks were and will continue to be essential to meeting the objectives of the Yakima Gateway Project as established by the Steering Committee and adopted by the City Council. Generally, these types of urgent issues can not be anticipated let alone budgeted for. To place the highest priority on the resolution of these issues, results in deferring work on other project tasks. Issues related to the unanticipated growth east of I-82 that have been addressed to date include: 1) revised traffic projections; 2) air quality analysis; and 3) a prioritization of Stage 1 construction elements. Overtime Changes in the project schedule as a result of `Urgent Project Requests' and other scope of work revisions, have necessitated specific staff to work overtime in order to perform the original and additional scope of work tasks by the scheduled milestone dates. Overtime for certain staff was authorized by the City in a letter dated March 3, 1994. QAJQC The project manager will be responsible to the City to ensure that the tasks listed hereinafter are technically competent and meet the City's needs and expectations. August 24, 1994 Page 8 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue TASK 3B Redefine CR Line and DR Line Configurations To address the unanticipated growth east of I-82 and yet provide a Level of Service (LOS) for the E. Yakima Avenue/I-82 interchange equal to or better than the existing through the year 2008, requires that the following revisions be made to the intersection of E. Yakima Avenue and the SB I-82 ramps: Two left -turn lanes will be provided from E. Yakima Avenue onto the CR Line. To provide ample distance for the two left -turn lanes to merge, the CR Line ramp will be widened further to the south. The taper lengths of the CR Line and DR Line will be extended along southbound I-82 to the Beech Street Undercrossing. The BR Line terminus will be revised to provide two left -turn lanes onto eastbound E. Yakima Avenue. A right -turn lane will be provided from eastbound E. Yakima Avenue to southbound I-82 via the CR Line. Plan sheets that will require additional work are the roadway sections, site preparation, alignment and right-of-way, profiles, temporary water pollution control, drainage, drainage and ditch profiles, paving, intersection grading, retaining walls, channelization, illumination, signing, and bridge plans (refer to TASK 3E). Also affected are the special provisions and the engineers estimate. This work will be included as part of the Stage 1B contract package. TASK 3C Environmental Assessment Revisions Since the Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation was completed and submitted in October 1993, a number of project elements have been revised as a result of the `Growth Impact Enhancements'. The Environmental Assessment has been continuously updated to reflect these revisions. The additional work required has included but was not limited to the following: • Revisions to the text to reflect the changes in the project description. • Traffic analysis to respond to the JEM Development Company's letter dated January 26, 1994. • Air quality analysis to respond to the same JEM Development Company's letter. • Remodelling of the noise impacts to reflect the new traffic volumes. TASK 3D Right -of -Way Services To include the VE Study recommendations adopted by City Council, as discussed in Section 2 above, and subsequently modified on the basis of growth, additional land acquisitions will be required in Stage 1 of the Yakima Gateway Project. The public comments received at the combined design/access hearing were directed at the manner in which the project will address the growth impacts on the existing parcels of land. Before the land acquisition process can begin, an extensive amount of work (Phase II) has been performed to address the public concerns so August 24, 1994 Page 9 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue that the right-of-way plans can be approved. Additional Phase III right-of-way services: true cost estimate; relocation assistance; appraisals; negotiations will be effected. There are twenty-seven (27) additional parcels to appraise and negotiate and two (2) additional relocations than originally anticipated. Two of the parcels to appraise involve the Yakima Housing Authority, Parcels 5-YG044 and 5-YG050. Phase III work effected by or directly the result of the public comments received at the combined hearing are as follows: • Revised drainage design due to the elimination of the right-of-way required for the biofilter swales. • Provide a cul-de-sac at the end of Pitcher Street closed by the construction of the J Line. • For safety, revise the sidewalk configuration along LN and B Lines. • For safety, revise the bicyclist/pedestrian barrier configuration on the southeast corner of the CR Line/E. Yakima Avenue intersection. These items of work will be performed as part of TASK 2F. TASK 3E Bridge Design To address the unanticipated growth east of I-82 required several revisions to the intersection of E. Yakima Avenue and the SB I-82 ramps, (refer to listing in TASK 3B). One of these revisions, to provide a right -turn land from eastbound E. Yakima Avenue to southbound I-82 via the CR Line, necessitated that the E. Yakima Avenue Overcrossing of Fair Avenue be widened to the south. For construction staging purposes, consideration was given to constructing two side-by-side bridges instead of one much wider bridge. The Bridge Preliminary Plan had to be revised and resubmitted to the WSDOT Headquarters, Bridge Section. The final design, special provisions and the engineers estimate were affected by this change. TASK 3F Design Report Supplement The Design Report, finalized in December 1993, will be supplemented to incorporate the revisions made to the interchange design concepts by providing the `growth impact enhancements ' specifically the changes enumerated herein to the CR, BR, DR, EL, and Y Line. Also addressed in the design report supplement but not associated with the growth impact enhancements will be the access revisions made to the Yakima Avenue Retail Area and the Fair Avenue widening to six lanes to accommodate the close proximity of the access to the AR Line and Fair Avenue intersection. August 24, 1994 Page 10 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Section 4 GENERAL CITY REQUESTS TASK 4A Utilities Utility Study The original scope of the utility study, as described in Task 2AC, Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to the original agreement, dated September 14, 1993, was limited to addressing the existing conditions and proposed improvements for the water and sewer utilities. In that there are other utilities affected by the construction of the Yakima Gateway Project, the scope of the utility study was expanded to include information on the existing conditions and proposed relocations, revisions and betterments for power, telephone, gas, irrigation and cable. A utilities coordination meeting was conducted on April 21, 1994 with representatives from each of the utilities present to provide an overview of the project scope, collect information on existing systems and identify potential conflicts that needed to be resolved. This information will be documented and summarized in the utility study and forms the basis to the utilities PS&E as described herein below. Utilities PS&E This task was originally authorized by the City in a letter dated September 14, 1993, the scope being submitted and approved by the City in a letter of authorization dated May 20, 1994. This task will prepare the plans, specifications and engineers estimate (PS&E) for the utility relocations, revisions and betterments that are to be constructed in Stage 1A and Stage 1B of the project. This work will be ultimately funded by Public Works Trust Funds but in the short term will be funded out of the Capital Improvement Program. Assumptions 1. Utility permits, easements, funding agreements and other similar documents will be coordinated and processed by the City and/or the WSDOT South Central Region and are excluded from this scope of work. 2. Where practical, utility work should be deferred to the Stage 1B construction contract which is scheduled to be awarded after the May 1, 1995 Public Works Trust Fund loan execution date. 3. The Stage 1A utility components shall include the following: • Fair Avenue Water Main. Extend the existing Fair Avenue water main north and west along the F Line from the intersection of Spruce Street and Fair Avenue to 10th Street between the LN Line and B Line couplet. Fair Avenue Gravity Sewer. To serve the proposed Yakima Retail Area, provide a 10 -inch gravity sewer parallel with the Fair Avenue water main. 10th Street Water Mains. Lower the existing 12 -inch and 8 -inch water mains that run along 10th Street in the area between Lincoln and B Streets to provide sufficient cover for protection against heavy traffic loads and severe winter temperatures. Water Main Abandonments. On the west side of 10th and 12th Streets, terminate the existing water mains that currently cross the proposed Yakima Retail Area. August 24, 1994 Page 11 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Water Main Crossing of 1-82. Provide a 12 -inch water main across 1-82 within the project area to connect the City's major water system west of 1-82 with an existing 12 -inch dead-end water main east of 1-82 along Terrace Heights Drive. This main is part of the City's master plan for the area. Two route alternatives will be considered for the 1-82 water main crossing: 1) a jacked crossing beneath 1-82 and a pipeline along the east shoulder of the BL Line; and 2) within the proposed widened portion of the Y Line Overcrossing 1-82 bridge structure. 4. The Stage IB utility components shall include the following: • Fair Avenue Water Main. Complete the Fair Avenue water main from Terrace Heights Drive to Spruce Street. Provisions will be made at the intersection of Fair Avenue and Spruce Street for a future extension of the Fair Avenue water main to the south. Fair Avenue Gravity Sewer. Complete the south portion of the sewer system that will serve the proposed Yakima Retail Area. This portion of the gravity sewer will extend from Terrace Heights Drive to an existing manhole in Spruce Street, east of Fair Avenue. Flow patterns along Fair Avenue between Chestnut Street and Spruce Street will be reconfigured to abandon the existing sewage pump station and force main currently serving this area. • TAR Ramp Water Main. Reestablish and connect the existing 8 -inch water main disrupted in Stage IA by construction in the area of the TAR Ramp. • Pitcher Street Water Main. Reestablish the existing 6 -inch water main along Pitcher Street that will be disrupted near the center of the J Ramp. Pitcher Street Gravity Sewer. An 8 -inch gravity sewer along Pitcher Street will be disrupted near the center of the J Ramp and will be reestablished and connected to the Fair Avenue gravity sewer. Specific items of work to be performed in this task include: Task 4A.01 Utility Coordination. Continued coordination will be performed to identify the existing utilities in the project area and on the design efforts for utility relocations and improvements. Task 4A.02 Design Drawings. Prepare the design drawings for the Stage lA and Stage 1B contract documents. Seventeen (17) drawings are anticipated for Stage 1A; fourteen (14) drawings for Stage 1B. Task 4A.03 Corrosion Engineering. Evaluate existing soil resistivity data to determine pipeline corrosion protection requirements. Task 4A.04 Special Provisions. Prepare the special provisions for the water and sanitary sewer construction based on the 1994 edition of the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction and as supplemented as necessary by the City of Yakima standard specifications. Task 4A.05 Utility Permits and Agreements. Utility permits, easements, funding agreements and other similar documents will be coordinated and processed by the City. Task 4A.06 Cost Estimates. Prepare a construction cost estimate for the utility work based on WSDOT's bid tabulation database, supplier contacts and other industry recognized sources as required. August 24, 1994 Page 12 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Task 4A.07 Senior Review/Quality Control. Monitor and provide an overall review of the final utility design by a senior utilities designer. Perform a design check by a mid-level utilities designer. Task 4A.08 Submittals. Prepare utility design drawings, special provisions and cost estimate for submittal along with the other Stage 1A and Stage 1B PS&E plan types. Task 4A.09 Lead Engineer Activities. Provide staff coordination, scheduling, supply client requested information and perform other general activities associated with the utility design. TASK 4B Access to Yakima Retail Area One of the `urgent project requests' by the City, as defined in TASK 3A, was the revisions to the points of access into the Yakima Retail Area. To facilitate the developer's desired access locations and yet satisfy the limited access requirements of the WSDOT, required modifications to the location, number and configuration of the accesses. The section of Fair Avenue between the LincolnB couplet and the AR Line intersection had to be widened to six lanes to accommodate the revised access locations. Several drawings required modifications as a result of these revisions including the roadway sections, site preparation, alignment and right-of-way, profiles, paving, intersection grading, channelization, and illumination. TASK 4C Hazardous Materials - Phase 2 Investigation This task was authorized by the City in a letter dated February 28, 1994. The objective of the Phase 2 investigation is to 1) confirm the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) constituents above its respective regulatory action and cleanup level according to Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MICA - WAC 173-340); 2) to define the extent of identified contamination (and constituents); and 3) to develop an appropriate corrective action response to any confirmed, actionable contamination, that is consistent with the activities and schedule of the I- 82/Yakima Avenue Interchange and Fair Avenue Project and with MTCA cleanup priorities and requirements. This investigation is to satisfy the requirements for appropriate inquiry under the Superfund Amendment Reauthorization Act (SARA) Section 107(b)(3), which is that section of the Superfund law that addresses standards and requirements for property owners in investigations of environmental liability. Specific items of work to be performed in this task include: Task 4C.01 Additional Land Use Research and Site Reconnaissance. Collect information on land parcels 5-YG006 and 5-YG011 to be used in the development of a focused, purposeful sit sampling effort. The types of information that will be collected includes precise locations, types and quantities of materials, knowledgeable contacts, access authorization, duration of use and construction details. Task 4C.02 Surficial Soil Sampling Effort. Collect from each parcel, surficial soil samples (from 0 to up to 3 feet below ground surface). The total number and precise location of samples will be determined in Task 4C.01. Deliver the samples under standard chain of custody procedures to an approved and Ecology -certified analytical laboratory for analyses. The proposed analyses will include, at a minimum, U.S. EPA Method 418.1 for TPH and Ecology Analytical Methods for petroleum compounds as appropriate for the type of constituents identified in the Task 4C.01 research effort. Research analytical results will be validated for accuracy and overall representativeness. Task 4C.03 Corrective Measures Identification. Prepare a technical memorandum and submit to the City that summarizes the results of the field efforts and identifies what remedial actions (if any) are needed for each parcel. August 24, 1994 Page 13 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Remedial actions if needed, will be developed in light of the highway development project needs and will likely concentrate on excavation and disposal options that are consistent with applicable environmental regulations. Persistent data gaps (if any) will be identified which may affect the project and the steps that should be taken to answer these data needs will be outlined. TASK 4D STP Funding Application This task was authorized by the City in a letter dated February 14, 1994. An application for Statewide STP Competitive Program funding for the Yakima Gateway Project was prepared for and submitted on behalf of the City of Yakima to the WSDOT Local Programs Division in March 1994. The application was for $1,000,000 in STP Competitive funds on the basis of the primary objectives of the project. TASK 4E Wetlands PS&E A wetland study, as described in Task 2AE, Supplemental Agreement #2 to the original AGREEMENT, dated September 14, 1993, was performed and concluded that wetland mitigation is required for the Yakima Gateway Project. The plans and details for wetland mitigation shall be prepared in accordance with the approved Design Report, approved Wetlands Study, WSDOT Design Manual (DM) and the WSDOT Project Production Manual (PPM). The wetland mitigation plans will show the grading and planting, sections and other applicable items. A vegetation planting plan will include species specifications, planting locations and instructions, and site preparation. TASK 4F PS &E Surveys The VE Study recommendations adopted by the City, the growth impact enhancements and the general City requests have all necessitated that additional PS&E surveying be performed. Recognizing that it would be difficult to itemize individual surveying efforts in accordance to the source of the request, the additional surveying services have been collected under this one task. Field surveys will be conducted to develop cross sections and topographic data for the following project components: • Frontage Road • E. Yakima Avenue between 8th Street and the CL Line intersection • CR Line to the south • DR Line • Pitcher Street cul-de-sac • EL Line to the south for the temporary detour modifications Supplemental ground surveying will be performed to locate the above and below ground existing utilities including power, telephone, water, sewer, cable, irrigation and gas. August 24, 1994 Page 14 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue TASK 4G Federal Demonstration Funding Application This task was verbally authorized by the City on April 26, 1994. By 12:00 p.m. on April 28, 1994, responses had been prepared and faxed to the WSDOT Local Programs for numerous "HIGHWAY CRITERIA" questions; a requirement to continue competing for Federal Discretionary funding for Stage 2 of the Yakima Gateway Project. TASK 4H TIB Funding Assistance This task was verbally authorized by the City in June 1994. Documentation was developed and supplied to the City for the preparation of a Design Prospectus for additional TIA funding for the construction of the Yakima Gateway Project, Stage 1. The funding increase request was based primarily on the VE Study recommendations that increased the amount of Stage 1 construction. The request for increased TIA funding was presented to the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) on July 21 & 22, 1994. The 1'113 granted the requested $1,160,568 increase, thereby raising the 1113 share of the project funding to $11,626,721. TASK 4I Environmental Assessment Revisions Since the Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation was completed and submitted in October 1993, the following new issues were discovered or requested that have required additional analyses and supplements to be prepared for the EA. The EA originally scoped for the Yakima Gateway project was to focus on a limited number of environmental issues including air quality, drainage and floodplains, noise, hazardous waste sites, land use, relocation, visual quality and transportation. Other issues including wetlands were neither scoped nor addressed in the EA for a number of reasons which have been addressed in previous correspondence. Wetland The drainage area adjacent to the Boise Cascade mill yard has been identified as a potential wetland area. A wetland study was conducted (Task 2AE, Supplemental Agreement No. 2) and the area confirmed to be a wetland. This task prepared the necessary documentation for a supplement to the EA for the wetland and was authorized by the City in a letter dated June 10, 1993. In addition to preparing the wetlands section for the EA other requests have been received including: 1) preparing cross sections from the Yakima River through the Boise Cascade property; 2) preparation of a Wetlands Finding; and 3) preparing a section in the EA on avoidance options and mitigation plans. Historic Preservation Documentation was prepared and provided to the WSDOT for submittal to the Western Regional Office of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. A letter of concurrence from the ACHP will have to be included in the Final EA. Endangered Species Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, requires federal agencies to ensure that their actions do not jeopardize endangered or threatened species or their critical habitats. A list of candidate, proposed, threatened and endangered species was requested from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) in response to a request from the FHWA as part of their comments on the draft EA. The response received from the USFWS on May 17, 1994, August 24, 1994 Page 15 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue identified the bald eagle and peregrine falcon as federally listed threatened or endangered species and three candidate species in the project area: the bull trout, the loggerhead shrike and the western sage grouse. The USFWS requested that a Biological Assessment be prepared to address: 1) the level of use of the project area by bald eagles and peregrine falcons; 2) the effect of the project on eagles and falcons primary food stocks and foraging areas influenced by the project; and 3) the impacts of the project construction and implementation which may result in disturbance to eagles and falcons and/or their avoidance of the project area. A letter of concurrence from the USFWS is required in the Final EA. Stormwater The Washington State Department of Fisheries and the FHWA requested that a quantitative analysis of cumulative stormwater drainage impacts be performed. Typically, a more qualitative analysis is appropriate at the EA level. TASK 4J Project Management Project Management This task includes the work necessary to manage the consultant's production efforts, administer the contract, monitor progress and provide direction on the tasks itemized in this section. The project manager will facilitate communications between team members and the funding partners regarding progress on the tasks listed herein, maintain team continuity and arrange for additional staff as appropriate to respond to schedule revisions. Extended Project Duration The original contract duration for Phase II was 13 months from July 1992 to August 1993. Based on the current Yakima Gateway Project Schedule, Revision No. 15, dated July 11, 1994, the contract duration for Phase II has now increased to 28 months with the projected completion date: November 22, 1994. Similarly, the original contract duration for Phase III was 20 months from September 1993 to April 1994 but has now been increased to 27 months with the projected completion date: November 17, 1995. The project schedule has undergone extensive revisions primarily to account for: 1) the VE Study recommendations (Section 2); 2) the growth impact enhancements (Section 3); 3) revised construction sequencing, and 3) process, be it the right-of-way acquisition, SEPA adoption, WSDOT PS&E review or the EA approval processes. These schedule extensions have created an overlap between Phase II and Phase III work tasks where the two phases were originally intended to be performed in sequence. Certain prerequisite Phase II predesign activities to Phase III final design work tasks have not reached closure such as the Design/Access Deviations approval, the FHWA EA approval, two Bridge Preliminary Plans, approved Right -of -Way plans and the Design Report. This task provides for the extra work and salary escalation associated with the continuation and extension of the Phase II and Phase III contracts and the coordination necessary to perform the work tasks out of sequence. The increased Specific Rates of Pay were authorized by the City in a letter dated March 3, 1994. Salary escalation for the work remaining to be completed, is listed in Exhibit B-1 under Task 5. Project Schedule Development The Yakima Gateway Project Schedule has been periodically revised to reflect the processes for and the progress on: 1) the incorporation of the WSDOT Naches to Beech project (Section 1); 2) the VE Study related revisions (Section 2); 3) the growth impact enhancements (Section 3); and 4) the general City requests listed herein. This task provides the resources for performing the schedule revisions and updates. August 24, 1994 Page 16 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue Urgent Project Requests Premised upon the definition in TASK 3A of what constitutes an `urgent project request', the issues of a general nature that have arisen and been addressed to date include: 1) R/W acquisition process revisions; 2) interchange landscaping modifications; and 3) revisions to the points of access into the Yakima Retail Area. Overtime Changes in the project schedule as a result of `Urgent Project Demands' and other scope of work revisions, have necessitated specific staff to work overtime in order to perform the original and additional scope of work tasks by the scheduled milestone dates. Overtime for certain staff was authorized by the City in a letter dated March 3, 1994. QA/QC and Constructibility Review The project manager will be responsible to the City to ensure that the tasks listed hereinafter are technically competent and meet the City's needs and expectations. At the request of the WSDOT South Central Region and as verbally authorized by the City, CH2M Hill's QA/QC Team performed WSDOT's Constructibility Review as part of review of the 70 percent PS&E submittal and provided documentation in the format and to the extent that satisfied the WSDOT's internal requirements for the project. TASK 4K Bridge Design The bridge PS&E is on the critical path of the project. Resolution of issues that could have a potentially adverse effect on Task 2U progress (Supplemental Agreement #2), are considered to be `urgent project requests' by the City, as defined in TASK 3A. The extra work performed to maintain the bridge PS&E on schedule is as follows. Bridge 82/123N -W At the WSDOT Headquarters Bridge request, the north abutment will be rebuilt to reduce the risk associated with widening Terrace Heights Way underneath existing Bridge 82/123N -W. A retaining wall system was recommended in the Structures Report submitted in December 1993. A bridge preliminary plan was prepared for the abutment modifications. At the WSDOT request, the falsework system will be design as part of the abutment modifications PS&E rather than have the Contractor provide this service. A credit has been given for the elimination of the PS&E for the retaining wall beneath this bridge. Bridge 82/123 The original concept for widening existing Bridge 82/123 (E. Yakima Avenue Overcrossing I-82) was to provide a new structure adjacent but unconnected to the existing bridge. To save the existing Bridge 82/123N -W, required a shift in the Yakima Avenue roadway centerline thereby causing the longitudinal expansion joint between the structures to fall in the middle of a traffic lane; a undesirable situation. In addition, to accommodate this widening and provide a new standard roadway cross -slope, required a variable depth overlay to be placed over the existing deck. Because of these revisions, the new and existing bridge will be connected together. The existing bridge was analyzed for an increased vertical load attracted from the new bridge and evaluated for seismic vulnerability. The new widened portion of the structure was designed to reduce the seismic forces to be resisted by the existing structure, thus minimizing the impacts of the existing bridge's seismic deficiencies. August 24, 1994 Page 17 DRAFT I-82/Yakima Avenue CL Line Deviation #8 The preliminary bridge plan for the CL Line Overcrossing of Fair Avenue shows a bridge width that matches the existing CL Line Overcrossing I-82 (Bridge 82/122N -W), after constructing the rail replacements as designed by the WSDOT Headquarters for the Naches to Beech project. Deviation #8 proposes a substandard width for both the existing Bridge 82/122N -W and the proposed new CL Line Overcrossing of Fair Avenue. On April 5, 1994, the City gave verbal authorization to prepare a technical memorandum that responds to the WSDOT Headquarters request to evaluate the existing bridge to determine if it can be widened to design standards. Analysis of the existing bridge was performed and a cost comparison prepared. The technical memorandum was prepared and submitted to the WSDOT South Central Region on May 3, 1994. TASK 4L WSDOT South Central Region PS&E Review Process The WSDOT South Central Region PS&E review process differs from that originally defined by the WSDOT in December 1992 and upon which the schedule and scope of work were subsequently premised. Initially, one set of consolidated review comments were to be received back from the WSDOT Region on the 90% PS&E submittal. The revised review process will involve multiple sets of comments being received back from the WSDOT Region and up to three (3) iterations being required on some plan sets until being sent out as a 100% submittal to the WSDOT Headquarters. Additional engineering, CADD and production effort will be required. In a meeting on August 11, 1994, the City verbally authorized CH2M Hill to provide the engineering services necessary to respond to the WSDOT South Central Region's revised PS&E review process of Stages 1A, 1B and 1C submittals. TASK 4M HUD Modifications Based on the July 8, 1994 meeting between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Housing Authority of the City of Yakima (HA) and the City of Yakima, the proposal to mitigate the potential impacts of the Yakima Gateway Project on the HA -owned public housing properties will require additional engineering services. Pending legal agreements, the scope of work is presented herein for completeness. Fair Avenue Project To resolve the safety, parking and access concerns at this site will involve: Preparing PS&E for a short concrete retaining wall and fence along the west side of Fair Avenue for the entire length of the HA property. Crash -through type barriers would be provided across the fire access lanes. Prepare PS&E for a paved access into the existing HA maintenance facility and the HA project. • To safely load and unload school children, provide a bus turnout on the south side of E. Chestnut Avenue in front of the newly acquired parcels. August 24, 1994 Page 18 DRAFT North Tenth Street Project To address the noise, vibration and traffic concerns at this project will involve: I-82/Yakima Avenue • Develop PS&E to relocate the access point for the project to the south, joining it with the existing access for the adjacent retirement facility and other site modifications for circulation and handicap access. • If structurally feasible, the four eastern units of the existing eight-plex building will be demolished and rebuild in-kind. SUP3SCP2 August 24, 1994 Page 19 RUN DATE: 8/22/94 RL,.. TIME: 2:19 PM WKSP: C:'EXCEL\FILES\i-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLW FILE: C:\EXCEL\FILES\i-821SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:\EXCEL\FILES\FEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I.82IYAKIMA AVENUE Supplement 3 Page: 1 of 2 ::PH¢$EUMtyIAR".:.... :.: { }: 'ik$lf a iASKDfSCf1IRTlDN; :.- CH211�<HILL. {OURS BY:©RADE. E: E6:.. .............4•.............33ES......... "E2: E1' ....... T4 ...... T3:...... T2. - . ©A: CH2M t+ILL. . ERCE" f IVT 7D7AE OE 'iOTAI:. TOTA1:. ToTAe, TOTA7:. IABQR &:EXPPhISE3. TA &K: TQTAI. # ABOR HOURS . HDURS .. if1$TS EXPENSE LA69R.AND CbSTS....:EXPEN$ES. 1993 - ... - 190- 995: ...- . _. 1 )WSDDTNACHESTOSEECH: .. " _ ?tncoiii..Br 82j122NW &.ro :work {2-1s)::. 0 2 j 26 0 106 0 176 95 26 140 31 602 4.3% $33,756 $8,872 $42,628 $0 $42,628 _ . " .. ":NACNE$3Q.9EEC.H S1JBTOTAL:.. 0 2 ! 26 0 106 0 776 95 26 I 140 31 602 4.3% $33,756 $8,872 $42,628 $0 542,628 �- , .:.._::...: VAI UE:EHGINEERING STUDY' . . A P[oject:ManagementaridQA/QC:_ 36 0 378 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 190 700 5.0% $52,536 $3,020 $55,556 $0 $55,556 0 50 0 160 0 289 163 46 I 202 45 954 6.9% $53,903 $14,499 $68,402 $0 368,402 C affigSignaIs 0 0 (7) 0 (22) 0 (50) 38 0 (36) (7) (84) A.6% ($4,405) ($2,652) ($7,057) ($24,912) 317,855 :: ... i3 Fiotdage:Roail:Sfudy 2 0 2 0 52 0 4 32 ! 0 0 8 100 0.7% $6,450 $604 $7,054 $7,054 . _ . _ . _ E: YLlne!FrontageFined PS&E!(129): 0 0 42 0 142 0 299 139 45 201 45 913 6.6% $50,990 $14,175 $65,165 $0 505,165 F MufiplePS&EPackages. 2.Z 1 2 0 0 127 0 336 0 798 336 i 0 j 587 723 2,307 16.6% $128,521 $57,782 $180,303 C: >?Drslgn_RepottReWsigtts... 0 0 60 0 208 0 36 152 40 0 8 504 3,6% $33264 $11,119 $44,383 $44,383 208 1.5% $76,448 $3,747 $20,195 $11,126 59,069 _ _._ ... H: 'FEA:Revtsions.- 10 62 0 6 64 48 0 0 j 12 0 6 t _'Fatty St 1A Contract 0 0 68 0 153 0 194 90 ; 0 136 676 4.9 % $39,931 $4,774 $44,705 $0 $44,705 i 'VE:SUBTOTAL 48 62 720 6 1,189 48 1,570 950 142 1,090 453 6278 45.3% 5377,638 $101,068 $478,706 $37,651 $441,055 t_. iWTH1MPACTENkfANCEMENTS Am jectManagementand QAtdC__ 20 20 206 0 124 0 14 74 0 8 98 564 4.1 % $41,107 $1229 $42,330 $0 $42,330 . _ B ,jRedeflrteGWDR.Ciopfiguratiors 0 0 12 0 32 0 76 32 I 0 I 56 12 220 1.6% $12,245 $2,578 $14,823 $0 514,823 .. C 0 12 0 96 0 32 0 0 18 0 8 166 1.2% $11.981 $3,926 $15,907 $0 515,907 :}EA"Rev(Sions $:ervlces 208 0 76 0 76 0 8 12 j 0 8 24 412 3.0% $41,359 $67.371 $108.670 $0 $108,670 408 2.9 % $22,960 $2,179 $25,139 $25,139 "r E r8ridge pesigli:." 0 0 24 0 66 0 132 66 j 0 96 24 ._ .... F' '#Design,Repntt.Sppplement 0 0 15 0 45 0 105 45 I 0 15 15 240 1.7% $14,111 $5.973 $20,024 $0 $20,024 " ......" , . " ...... " !:..'*:taRQWiHENHANCE SUB OTAt ...... 228 ffi 333 96 343 32 335 229 18 i 183 181 2,010 14.5% $143,757 $83,136 $226,893 $25,139$201,754 .....:...:.. A 0 104 I 40 386 18 0 40 722 642 ; 27 73 2,052 14.8°/ $128,731 $21,791 $750,522 $0$160,522 _<(Ufiltt(es:: B- :;Aecesst4YalsimaRel�lAiea 0 0 0 0 r $ 0 34 i 40 48 0 172 12% $9,626 $1225 $10,851 $0r,851 C:::Hai: Mitls,•:pii.:2 ifivestigatioii. _ :... 0 0 54 0 r r 0 12 0 84 322 2.3°! $20,357 $8,644 $29,001 20 0.7% $1,918 $2 $1,920 292 2.7 % $18,413 $5,971 $24,384 91 0.7 % $5,069 $25,078 $30,147 $0$29,r $0$1,92r $0 $0r 01 9: {STP AppIFcation 10 0 4 0 r � s 2 0 1 0 4 E. ' `NeOtends:RS&E. 0 40 1 0 48 0 116 48 0 22 17 " .. _.. " .. F >!P$&E:Surveys 0 0 6 0 r 12 i 0 24 5 ..' ...' ......................:: 6:Federal 9emvnstratl4tt:Fundfhg: 12 0 32 0 r ' 0 ! 0 0 7 57 0.4% $4,721 $279 $5,000 $0 r$30,1r ,:....- _.,.- ._.-....:: H (TIB:Funding_ : 8 0 25 0 r r r 0 0 0 8 41 0.3% $3,601 5399 $4,000 $0 . rrr ( EA:Revslons 0 30 20 0 r r 0 14 16 i 14 142 1.0% $10,200 $1,479 $11,679 850 6.1% $58,008 _ $1,773 9,787 50 ___ -559,781 .... ............ ._.;.... ,;, ...._. _ . �.:P.iojeetMan ageme0t. 24 24 248 0 r r 92 0 � 120 68 K Bridge desIgh; 0 21 25 0 < r r 36 0 62 13 _ 286 2.1 % $17,433 $1,626 $19,059 $0 59 ....:.:.:.......:: _._ ..:.-... ...:.. E.: Solth entraLReaim Rev1ewPrtic6ss 0 0 26 0 :r r r 82 0 134 26 540 3.9% $30,104 $6,666 $36,$19,770 $00 ......: r 26 I 0 24 8 116 0.8% $6,630 $824 $7,454 $0 $7,454 '"*'�`EhF..C1TYREUUESTS;SUBtE3T1lL-.,... 54 219 489 386 •: r 1,054 708 477 327 4,975 35.9% $314,811 $75,757 $390,586 $0 'o-390,568 _ .. $476,005_' 94:8% r r • 3 5% :. .: ,_.... ..... ........._CE .....:.: ..... . ... ........... 0.00% ..:,QPT1Oyl(LSERV�CES". ...... ... ... . :($ALAR:Y;ESGALATION 5.67% ---_- $49,320 $3,647 $52,967 $0 $52,967 . 50 $D $0 50 $o St 128,9YI, 94.7% E TJMATEO HOURLY LABOR:RATE (0993) ;577,38. j:. .514:72 -.573.04: MULTIPLIERm._ .-._.. 2.95mm .:............ ...... . LABOR PLU$ QVERtiEAi) 2 §5 < 5128.97_ x .. 5111rr,43:. 891.39: 578.77 .::.. S667a:.. 560,86 554.72. 660.39 :55127. .1 $43.42 335.52' .. RUN DATE: 8/22/94 -,vN TIME: 2:19 PM WKSP• C:\EXCEL\FILESII-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLW FILE: C:\EXCEUFILES\-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:\EXCEL\FILEStFEEMAC6XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I-82/YAKIMA AVENUE Supplement 3 Page: 1 of 7 """ 1111... .. - PROJECTSUMMARY PIiASESUMMARi pERSHEETANAI:YSIS TASK iTASK" TASK ; TA$ftDESCRIRTION- CEI2M HILL._ HOURS -or -4,-FtiAtX E7. E6<- E5: E4 E3 ... _. E2.. . - : :El" . T4 T3" T2 OA --E7, C(i2MHlEL 44HigtF ANALYS($ ... NT T©TAS. OF TATA( TOTAL. TOTAL TOTAL LABOR&EXPENSES 1 Low: .. . NO: HOURS: COST PERCENT ":; TOTAL LAfiOFt t#OURS H01iRS .. - COSTS :EXPENSE:. LABOR AND CTS. ©S.._ EXPENSES: 1993 ... t 994 ER SHE ET= OF PER- PER- COMP.- iSHTS..: SHEET" " ;"SHEET ::. DF TASK _. COMMENTS t" 1_1 11. : - .. TO BEECH: �•fWSDOT"NACHf$ r. A:.i:rieut{i Br. 8 (122111K ■ Roadway (1j Site Preparatiaa Plans �/ 2 6 12 14 2 I 8 1 45 0.3% $2,583 $884 $3,467 $0 53,467 D 1 61 $3,467 8.1 -® 16 4 28 6 112 0.8% $SJ73 $1,071 $7,244 $0 57244 0 0 0 $0 17.0% [a #: Drtagel Plans 100 D.73'. $5,587 $2,338 $7,925 $0 57,925 0 1 146 $7,925 18.6 Prism 1ietaits:(4) ' "' "" / 4 28 14 16 18 4 triterseetion Graatriq.Rlar s; 2 16 12 2 20 4 68 0.5% $3,721 $1538 $5,259 ' $D $5259 0 0 0 $0 12.3°/, . o _ . -1 111 Ctianrretizatfot["PFa»a..." �/ . .. ....:.:... ". .: flluipfnation Plans .. Sp•ecfat Provisions Dta(t 1 8 4 537 0 0 0 $0 36% 1 Flnsl �/� _ " (' EnglneersEsimiate i/ Summaryoftivantttfes �/� 3 6 14 6 10 3 42 0.3% $2,356 $212 $2,568 50 $2,568 0 0 0" 50 6.0% t:.. :Engineersfsfimate r_ :Incorporate:RaiFReptaaemeri[Piaes 22tJWI-RoadN(ork:Sutrtofat-."_" / 0 2 26 D 706 0 176 95 26 1 140 1 31 602 4.3% 533,756 $8,872 $42,628 _ SO $42,628 2 100.0% I:. `''NACHES"TO BEECH SUBTOTAL 0 2 26 0 106 0 176 95 26 140 31 602 4.3% 533,756 $8,872 $42,626 $0 $42,628 2 2" 1111 iVALUf ENGINEER#NG STUEkY 1111 j ........ . girri .....- OA/QC A..;ProtectManagemeMandOAfdC ��� 342 96 i 190 628 4.5% $44,603 $2,772 547,375 50 $47,375 0 0 0 $0 85.3% .i,.P,ro)ectManagemer]E 111 ... " OA/OG I 72 0.5 $7,933 $248 $BJ81 $0 $8,181 0 0 0 $0 14.7% {`� ��� 36 0 376 0 96 0 � 0 0 i 0 ' 0 � 190 700 5A% $52,536 $3,020 555,556 $0 $55,556 0 100.0% B' .,`,:P.M.&"1lN005tlfitotal'-..:.::,,._.,.,:....:,. 441R:E10e PS&E(1.30}_ 1. Floadway$ec0ons(1): 27 0 2°/ $1536 $884 $2 420 $0 52420 0 1 43 $2,420 3 5 Site:PreparafionPfa0s1?I',..,.... ���� 2 4 8 4 2 I 6 1 .,..,_....:.:, Affgontent9iidRIW-Plans{) 8 18 $1,406 $7,700 118 50 $7,700 0 1 136 $7,700 113% Prnles(1)_ 6 2 i 4 1 0.1 % $990 $662 $1,592 $0 $1,592 0 1 28 $1,592 2.3% t: 1.wPC:Plans.(t "_ " " " " I; Dtainage Pfane (1):.:. 36 18 4 26 6 112 0.8% $6,207 $1,071 $7,278 50 $7278 0 1 128 $7,278 10.6% ..............,..:.. : ".......:...���� #: " l): 38 16 � 4 24 6 116 0.8% $6,521 $1,071 $7,592 $0 $7,592 0 1 132 $7,592 11.1% :Drvfnago-ans(1NcliRojes ..... .. F.;PavfngPtars(1.) �/ r 44 26 i 4 32 6 136 1.0% $7,526 $2,011 59,537 $0 59,537 0 1 174 $9,537 13.9% ....................."..... l:.. % 16 4 i 16 4 76 0.5% $4,192 $2,011 $6,203 50 $6203 0 1 114 $6203 9.1 % .i:::Inf619e pR"G[efting:fi8t15:(1):::. ,.... .:.::. 52 0.4% $2,907 $884 $3,791 $0 $3,791 0 1 68 $3,791 5.5% #: CfiannelitationPlens(t): �� 8 17 7 2 ! 12 3 etainngWalIPians(l: t6 12 II ' % P19990) 8 18 12 ! 2 12 2 56 0.4% $3,137 $1271 $4,408 50 94,408 0 1 80 $4,408 ... ........: _. . 1:.Illernteatlon $ ping Pta"ns" �9... ����� �111:1. .. .:: _........... ......:.:. "...0. " '9.0%6..... .......:$a'...........:$0" $0 21 0.2% $1,174 $324 $1,498 1111.. ...5<%'.:........:.....$0 $0 $1,498 0. 0 o` $0:.. 0 1 21 $1,498 00% 2.2% 1111. Star SpeolficaHons (l} : / .............:` i 2 4 2 _..-::. :..._ 1111..:.111 1 :4 P () ..:. 4 4 � 2 � 8 2 3D0 $1,658 $884 $2,542 $D $2,542 0 1 46 $2,542 3.7% �0% EnglneersEstnnmte Summary of Ouant81es: �� 4 1111. _1111 :Engineers -Estimate �/�� 4 j 3 6 2 31 0.2% $1,732 $95 $1,827 $0 $1,627 0 0 0 $0 2.7% ,,.:..:. :. 4 _. . ::.Spec1atProvlsiorrs:. % 1. 7 3 2 5 1 22 0.2% $1,217 $110 $1,327 50 $1,327 0 0 0 50 1.9% Final:e/ �:.., :Final. 1 3 7 3 2 5 I 1 22 02% 51,217 $110 $1,327 $0 $1,327 0 0 0 90 1.935 l ""."CR/DR Lfne:PS&E Subtotal..::.,.:. D 0 50 0 160 0 289 163 45 202 45 954 6.9% 553,903 514,499 968,402 $0 568,402 - 13 100.0% , ; : ,,.., ... RUN DATE: 8/22/94 huN TIME: 2:19 PM WKSP• C:\EXCEUFILES1-821SUPP3\SUPP3.XLW FILE. C:\EXCEUFlLES\-82\SUPP3ISUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:IEXCEL IFILESIFEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I-82(YAKIMA AVENUE Supplement 3 Page: 2 of 7 { ..- t :.... CH2MtlitL. HOURS BY GRADE E7_ E6 E5 E4- E3: E2: E1 <T4.. T3: T2•: ... OA: .._.. PHASE-Stl{N�1ARY : PEF#SHEET,ANALYSIS'• TASK _.-.- .PROJECF$UR1NiARY CH2MHILL . 4H11gh .. ANALYSIS - TOTAL LABOR & EXPENSES . i=Loin NO:. HOURS:: COST ::PERCENT - PERCENT TOTAL OF TOTAL TASK. TOTAL.LABOREXPENSE HOURS- ....... HOURS COSTS TOTAL: TOTAL : LABOR AND COSTS :.- ,EXPENSES:--...- 1993 1994 1995 SHEET OF PER: PER COMP:.._ :SHTS: :SHEET SHEET OF : TASK • COMMENTS.. - - . :TASK -.... - .-_TASKDESCRIPTION:...... C iTiafficSignals .. T. Delete YiJ J/Ez.aiid YIEL (131) (20) (60) (140) 1 (100) 1 (20) (340) -2.5% (918,666) ($6246) ($24,912) ($24,912) $0 0 0 0 $0 353.0% .. / �. 13 38 90 38 1 64 13 256 1.8% $14,261 $3,594 $17,855 $0 517,855 0 0 0 $0 -253.0% !:.Add:Temporary:Signot aIYJE4: _ . z "TrafficSz naIs:Subtotai %�%�/ 0 0 0 22 0 1 50 38 0 I 36 0 84 -0.6% $4,405 $2,652 $7,057 $24,912 $17,855 0 100.0% , D jFrontage Road Study -. ... :.............. Froiitagg ROadStudy � 2 2 52 4 32 8 100 0.7% $6,450 $604 $7,054 $7,054 $0 0 0 0 100.0% ... ..._..... ... j ° 0 0 OD/ $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0.0% Fr. , : • e:Road Stu' --Subtotal � 2 0 2 0 52 0 4 32 i 0 0 8 100 0.7% $6,450 $604 $7,054 $7,054 $0 0 100.0% E1Y_LiiielfrantagelloadPSBE:(1-29) j - ::fRoadwaySecfiops:-CI ) 2 6 12 6 2 j 8 1 37 0.3% $2,100 $884 $2,984 $0 $2,984 0 1 53 $2,984 4.6% ..���/ St2ePreparagort.plaos(:1). � 2 4 8 4 2 I 6 1 27 0.2% $1,536 $884 $2,420 $0 $2,420 0 1 43 $2,420 3.7% . z Alignrnetden dRlYYPlants (1) % ��/ 8 18 36 16 4 24 4 110 0.8% 96,294 91,406 97,700 18 0.1% $990 $602 $1,592 90 $0 $7,700 $1,592 0 1 136 $7,700 0 1 28 $1,592 11.8% 2.4% ... ... _....:....:: x^:Profit(1):: V 1 2 6 2 2 1 4 1 1WPCPIans(II-.::........ 1 4 4 4 1 4 1 19 0.1% $1,087 $462 $1,549 $0 $1,549 0 1 27 $1,549 2.4% ©rainagePtan&(1) :: / ��/ 4 18 36 18 4 I 26 6 112 0.8% $6,207 $1,071 $7,278 $0 $7278 0 1 128 $7278 11.2% € -1)ieinage andi)ltch Profiles_(3)- �f 4 24 38 16 4 1 24 6 116 0.8% $6,521 $1,071 $7,592 $0 $7,592 0 1 132 $7,592 11.7% __._.. Pav(ngP1ans(f) / A 4 18 44 18 4 1 28 6 122 0.9% $6,732 $2,011 $8,743 $0 $8,743 0 1 160 $8,743 13.4% ,...... IntOtimdtietk Gfaditig-Plans: (1-}1 4 2 10 24 12 4 16 4 72 0.5% $3,950 $2,011 $5,961 52 0.4% $2,907 $884 $3,791 56 0.4% .. .....$3,137 $1271 ... ...$4,408 $0 $0 $5,961 $3,791 ..- .. $4,408 0 1 110 $5,961 0 1 88 $3,791 ._ 0 ..... 1 80 $4,408 9.1% 5.8% 6.8% ChannoUzetionPlans(1): , 3 8 17 7 2 12 3 z:..Nlutafilation.Piaiis(1) j// 2 8 18 12. 2 - Signing Plane _...2. - --. .12 .j Srtopiscilfcaflo s(i) �/ 1 4 10 4 2 7 2... 30 0.2% $1,633 $324 $1,957 $D $1,957 0 1 30 $1,957 3.0% 1 2 4 12 6 2 1 8 2 36 0.3% $1,998 9884 92,882 90 92,882 0 1 52 $2,882 4.4% :.. ... Engineers Estrmate ��� : ... ... . 1._. ° a:o°f.:..:::.:...;.�ao $D.:.. :. .o 31 0.2% $1,732 $95 $1,827 ..:.... pct.:.::. $0 ::::Ss- $1,827 .....:..,:....._.:.::.....fl;::,.:.so 0 0 0 $0 D.:,O 2.8% .:.:.:..::....::.::.,.:.:....:_.' SttmmaryofOuanthies Y 2 q 10 4 3 6... 2 Englneers'Estimate... 4 j�/ 2 4 10 4 1 3 6 2 31 0.2% $1,732 $95 $1,827 $0 $1,827 0 0 0 $0 2.8% : citil: rOlsio - .. , .. ... €:. j '- (: 0: 0 0 $if: .. 9.0 / . ;5pedat:Provisiaris ..:.... :... 8.k 1 3 7 3 1. 2 i 5 1 22 0.2% $1,2177 $11$00 $1,327 $0 $1,327 0 0 0 $0 20/ % #; �� 1 3 7 3 i 2 1 5 1 22 0.2% $1,217 $110 $1,327 $0 $1,327 0 0 0 $0 2.0% . _-.Final . ......... .. .... t '""YUne/FrOota.- RcLPS&ESubtotal. ��%/ 0 0 42 0 142 0 299 139 45 201 45 913 6.6% 550,990 $14,175 $65,165 50 $65,165 13 100.0% ..-.. . '€:...p... j ;i F' AtulNplePS&E packages:(2=7.37:'12):: : .:...........:.: + % FlnaeHt Repots � 7 1 27 0.2% $1,495 $123 $1,618 -r• $0 $1,618' 0 0 0 $0 0.9% Pans ( General -Plans (�} z 3 8 1 18 8 12 I 3 52 0 4% 52,920 $1344 $4,284 56 0.4% $3,156 $1,903 $5,059 $0 $0 $4264 $5,0591 0 4 17 $1,066 0 6 13 $843 2.4% 2.8% 1-. ���, $ 1 teii& :... SRe.Freparalian.Plaris(6): 4 8 20 8 12 4 :i:: z .. ' ...:........tang .. Aligifptsntaed RM Plaits ' j 8 22 54 22 i 40 1 8 154 1.1% $8,548 $3,873 $12,421 $0 $12,421 I 0 7 29 $1,774 6.9% .P.01110-13)- 2 4 10 4 1 8 2 30 0.2% $1,665 $819 $2,484 34 0.2% $1,801 $981 $2842 50 $0 $2,4841 $2842 0 3 13 $828 0 7 7 1.4% 1.6% .i' <;: 4444_ 4444/ TWPC Plaits (7}:' ���� 2 4 12 4 i 10 2 1 DrainageMetal1D):.... . - , ���j 14 38 92 38 I 68 8 258 1.9% 514,458 $6,337 $20,795 12 0.1% $691 $1,474 $2,165 $0 $20,795 0 10 34 52,080 11.5% $0 92,165 0 0 0 $0 1.2% €' :Irrigffiiati Plans:: / 1 2 4 2 i 2 1 .,.� 1 4 8 4 j 7 1 25 0.2% $1,385 5683 92,068 50 52,068 0 2 17 91,034 1.1% Paiiiggi'lans:(7) %/� 10 20 54 20 40 12 156 1.1% $8,615 53,948 $12,563 $0 $12,563 0 7 30 51,795 7.0% f:. : Ct>a11neljza1too Plans (7): �� 5 12 30 12 i 24 5 68 0.6% $4,868 $2271 $7,139 114 0.8% $6,381 52,700 59,081 $0 $0 $7,139 $9,081 0 7 17 $1,020 0 6 25 $1,514 4.0% 5.0% : _ � • _i►IiiroNfatioiiPlans(8) �j� 6 18 38 18 1 28 6 Sigping:Plans.($). 4 12 26 12 I 21 4 79 0.6% $4,392 $2,842 97,234 $0 $7234 0 9 13 5804 4.0% _��/ W/ TzefticGiyiitrolglans(3&)....... ���� 20 58 134 58 98_ z 20 388 2.8% $21,616 $9,938 $31,554 504 3.6% $28,164 $6,131 534,295 50 $0 931,554 $34295 0 36 14 5877 0 0 0 $0 17.5% 19.0% .- -AnA 441 1144 %���/, PIatlAsseinblyr � 28 76 172 76 i 124 28 1 SpeciatProvisions. / 8 22 54 22 1 40 8 154 1.1% $8,548 $2,467 $11,015 50 911,015 0 0 0 $0 6.1% 4444_ 1411 EngitleersEsttmate/ ��/ 10 24 62 24 46 1 10 176 1.3% 59,758 $3,948 $13,706 $0 $13,706 0 0 0 $0 7.6% 't:.. �j/ 1 ' 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0.0% 4444. .. ............... .: RUN DATE: 8/22/94 WKSP: C:\EXCEL\FILESU-821SUPP3ISUPP3.XLW FILE: C:IEXCEL\FILES\I-821SUPP3ISUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:IEXCELIFILESIFEEMAC6J(LM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW , ..,. I TIME. 2:19 PM EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I-82/YAKIMA AVENUE Supplement 3 Page: 3 of 7 CH2I1M HILL HOURS-13Y:GRADE TASK .--. - ... TASKDESCRIPT}QN: Yu11100:PS&E Pie.109 s.:$obtbtal Design:RepOrt Rgt!isibna . • DR:ReVisfoiis (2.20) E3 ......... E4 127 0 Ei.---.-- . . :T3 T2 OA: ToTh TASK :HOURS . PROJECT SUMMARY GH ?M. HILL. PEKENT t3F TOTAL- TQTAL. :LABOR_ HOURS: COSTS:. TOTAL. 'f07At :EXPENSE: LABoRAND COSTS:: .. El(PENSE$: 2,307 16.6% 5128,521 551,782 5180,303 PHASE $ MMARY: .._ ..,: PER:$HEETANALYSIS: ... ...... 1=Low: TOTAL LABOR&EXPENSES. 1993: 3994: 1995 $180,303 140:. HOURS GUST SHEET Or :PER PER COMAp SHTs:- . SHEET SHEET: 104 TASK ANALYSIS : OF TASK 100.0% 152 3.6% 533,264 0.0% 50 811,119 $44,383 $44,383 50 100.0% 0.0% :COMMENTS :1 tiesi Re. rt:RevfsionsSubtotal EARiivisior>&:. „ . :R04,0$I6118to:Te*t .. _. 'TrackingfAC Letter ......... . - ;..Addito alArgtialily.Analysis..:::..... RemodeGegoi.Noissfinr: .. Rdsjwnsety:Comments (10/93} .... . 3.6% $33,264 511,119 $44,383 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 51,900 $422 52,542 0.0% 5493 132 1.0% 511,091 0.0% 50 208 1.5% $16,448 $162 $87 $201 $2,062 $509 52,743 $35 $11,126 $0 $0 0 53,747 $20,195 $0 50 $0 $11,126 $2,062 0 0 $509 0 0 $2,743 0 0 53,755 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 0 0 $0 $11,126 1: Early Sf:1A t;onfract. TemporaryConnectron to Tenth General Plaits (2} :RiradViaySecti00s:(1}. .. Site: Preparation:P10s:(2); _...._................ Alignmentaiid Rtli{_Plana :01•0410 A- : TWPG.Ptans (t}: ....... .. ...... . Drainage-.Plans.(5}..... _..... .. ... _. Drainage and atch:Profles.(2k:.:._.... Paving .F.1ans;(5}:_ _ ..... >i . IntersectionGrading Pians (3} 2 : Channetizattion:Plans t5}: .:1Huruination Plans:. Signing Plans .... ........ .. ... . Sign:Spr c[gcatlori.141Q} ...: ...... . Flails{ .. ... _...:.-..-_.................. Trafle:Cbtitiol:Plans (2). .Englneers Estimate:....... . Summary:01 Quantities: .Engineers Estimate. Spee(el Provisions:. ;Retain(ngWalt:atangBC ............... .:Roallway Sections (1) Align......................... ReEatlaN'PIanlDetaiElEEleir (1}. Stiniinalyetfllua...... s.. Engineers.Estimate. ..... ... .......:...........: SpecialProVlstois_ ,..-. . 20 j�/ 4 14 12 .111.1 / 4 8 14 6 10 7��� 2 6 8 4 ! 6 ji 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% $963 51,571 51,669 0.3% $2,435 16 0.1% $963 16 0.1% $974 61 0.4% $3,528 16 0.1% $963 61 0.4% 53,528 61 0.4% 53,528 0.3% $2,435 0.3% 52,549 0.2% 51,571 $159 $179 5195 81,122 51,750 $1,864 $307 52,742 5159 $1,122 $143 $1,117 $3,841 $1,122 . $0 $1,122 0 2 $0 $1,750 0 1 $0 51,864 0 2 50 $2,742 0 3 $0 $1,122 0 2 $0 51,117 0 1 50 $3,841 0 5 50 $1,122 0 2 50 $3,825 0 4 50 $3,841 0 5 $0 $2,645 0 3 50 $2,826 0 5 $0 $1,766 0 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% $153 $159 $159 51,116 51,122 51,122 35 0.3% $2,046 $106 $2,152 $2,046 $106 52,152 $963 572 51,035 .$0:: :$0::. . $0: 12 0.1% $694 14 0.1% 5817 14 17 11 11 11 0 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% $817 $1,009 5650 5673 5650 50 676 4.9% $39,931 •' VE SUBTOTAL 62 720 6 1,189 1,570 950 142 1,090 45.3% 5377,638 $159 5159 $159 $159 $159 $976 51,168 5809 $832 5809 $0 $4,774 544,705 8 27 15 13 8 16 100.0% 10.2% 2.5% 13.6% 18.6% 55.1% 0.0% 100.0% $0 [ 0,0% 5561 2.5% $1,750 $932 $914 $661 $1,117 $768 $561 $956 $768 $882 $565 14 $883 3.9% 42% 6.1% 2.5% 2.5% 8.6% 2.5% 8.6% 8.6% 5.9% 6.3% 4.0% .0:......:d....... 0: 50: .....0.03/4 10 2 5112 2.5% 51,116 0 $1,122 0 51,122 2 8 $561 2.5% 0 2 8 $561 2.5% ...50:: ..0: :9 . 0 . . $0 ..0 03/4 ., . . 52,152 0 52,152 0 $0 $0 $0 40 : .. . $0 $853 0 $0 $976 0 2 $0 $976 0 2 $0 81,168 0 2 $0 $809 0 0 $0 5832 0 0 $0 $809 0 0 $0 50 0 0 0 0 $0 4.8% 0 0 $0 4.8% $1,035 0 0 0 0' 2 0 $0 2.3% 0: $0: 0.0%< 6 $427 $488 $488 $584 $0 $0 5101,068 $478,706 537,651 $44,705 5441,055 189 1.9% 2.2% 2.2% 2.6% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8% 0.0% 100.0% RUN DATE: 8/22/94 RUN TIME: 2:19 PM WKSP: C:\EXCEL\FILESU-82\SUPP3ISUPP3.XLW FILE: C:IEXCEUFILESLI-821SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:IEXCEL\FILES\FEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22-Aug94 NPT 481.HW TASK _ TASK CESCRIPTION: t 3GROWTHTMPACT ENH/MICEMENTO 9ct MafageMeiN ojeet Manageme EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I-82/YAKIMA AVENUE E:T:.. _... E6: 4 Supplement 3 CH2M::HILL HOURS BY:GRADE_ Page: 4 of 7 .T3 72:. ....._©A: edefine 13/0 Co Hetiefne.CIT/DR ;Configu Ackintonal.Traffic Analysig AdditRmill Air Quality Anal), Re»todepng of.Noise.finpaC 11 , 0 0 12 0 rj 814,823 0 0 0 514,823 315,907 eals._- . toti-- option Suppe j rO////%/ 8108,670 :'*:GROWTH ENHANCE,-SU.B.TEitAL 228 32 96 343 32 335 229 18 181 240 1.7% 314,111 $5,913 320,024 2,010 14.5% $143,757 $83,136 3226,893 $25,139 5201,754 RUN DATE: 8/22/94 WKSP• C:IEXCEUFILES11-821SUPP3ISUPP3.XLW FILE: C:tEXCELIFILESU-821SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:\EXCEUFILES\FEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW RUN TIME: 2:19 PM EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA 1-82IYAKIMA AVENUE Supplement 3 CH2MI HILL. HOURS BY.GRAOE PROJECT SUMMARY Cli2M:11ILL: PERCENT OF` TOTAL TOTAL :A80R. HOURS: , .:C©STS TASK D€SCROTION: TOTAL TOTAL EXPENSE:. LABOR AND COSTS .. E:XPENSES: Ufl ity StMdk gn:DrewngsI. ' ... i:.. Sitaactifte:Notes:(4). . Ouant0.Tthulations (2):.. Plat* (14. _... HIM Rofiies.g).. ... Unlit :OStails.(8j.:.„ .:-.. . iTosioli:Engineering Specfa4Pr0v 8Io_ns ... ... PeiniitslAgteenients Engtneers Estimate:.......... :Senloi RaviewILQC:. ... . . SubmRlals/Fiitup- . .. . Utifitles CootdiLead £ngr Act. jz • ,1111=111016_ami 18 • /_ • , Ni =ME j//4 ? -- -- U__ 112 0.8% $6,345 38 0.3% $2,167 559 4.0% 533,103 2.7% 1.7% 0.1% 0.7% 522,089 514,628 $622 $5,054 PHASE SUMMARY . P€R.SHEETANALY$IS 44iigh: TOTAL. 1=1piv: LABOR: &:EXPENSE$... 110. t0OURS COST' SHEET: OF PER :PE# :COMP; :SHTS:. . SHEET...:SHEET TASK ANALYSIS Page: 5 of 7 COMMENTS; $211 56,502 $0:. .. $0. 5410 $6,755 $410 52,577 56,469 $39,572 $6,499 $4,083 $131 $391 $28,588 $18,711 $753 $5,445 56,502 $0. $6,755 $2,577 $39,572 $28,588 $18,711 $753 $5,445 $0 0 4 28 $1,689 0 2 19 51,289 0 10 56 53,957 $4,084 $2,339 $0 $0 4.5% 1.7% 26.3% 19.0% 12.4% 0.5% 66 0.5% $4,916 0.8% $10,965 187 1.3% $10,605 161 1.2% $11,946 0 0.0% $0 $224 $5,140 $108 511,073 $2,356 $12,961 512,445 $0 $11,073 $12,961 *' Utgities SulifotaF: 2,052 14.8% $128,731 $21,791 $150,522 5150,522 100.0% ,:Roadway -Sections. Stte.PteparattotiektOs ... ...... .. . . . . AJ gnment aril HAZY Plaits : Profites ...:. _: PavfngPlans :Intersection Gtadtng:Plans ....... i::1;liattiiel)iatloti Plans tilumiaatian Pians: 0.1% $465 0.6% $4,855 0.2% 51,756 $428 $549 $5,321 0 0.4% 0 $0 0 $0 172 12% $9,626 $1,225 $10,851 $10,851 100.0% C That Mtls. - Pfi2i Investigation ..- . l:. 7ask:1;= Add.taiid t1ss:Researefi . Records Reviewtfnterviews } : :S fte Reconna1saa ice 1$$P/SAP Pens: Tec(inkal:Meinoian 0.0% 02% o.1% $0 $1,650 $825 54 0.4% 53,114 ' Task2: Soll:Samp5ng ....... ... .. . 1 ..Fleld Pteparatiort.• .. Lab Allowance: 1 _ :Excavaflon Alloy/ante DataReviewNalidatton. _ ProleetManagement I.. AdminatrativeAssistance Task 3=.Cotrective.Measures Technical Memorandum Final Meeting: 02% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 51,663 $366 $1,097 $426 $0 $615 $3,162 $0 $106 $0 $0 $0 60 $405 $5,000 50 $1,650 51,085 53,274 $1,769 5366 $1,097 $426 50 5615 53,567 55,000 52,500 52,500 18 0.1% 51,645 50 $1,650 $1,085 $3274 $1,769 $366 $1,097 $426 $0 5615 $3,567 $5,000 $2,500 $1,645 $914 $426 0.0% 5.7% 3.7% 11.3% 6.1% 1.3% 3.8% 1.5% 0.0% 2.1% 12.3% 17.2% 4 0.4% $3,327 $213 $3,540 0.0% $366 $0 $366 0 0 0 $0 1.3% RUN DATE: 8/22/94 HUN TIME: 2:19 PM EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA 1.82/YAKIMA AVENUE WKSP• C:\EXCEL\FILES\I-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLW FILE: C:\EXCELIFILES\I-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:\EXCELV ILES\FEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW Supplement 3 Clint -HILL HOURSBYGRADE. 7:........: E6...-... _ : E5' ... ....:E4 . ES ..... E2 .. Et:- ... .:T4 ......... T3'... -. T2:. .. QA: 6 :PROJECT SUMMARY' C_ :I .. ...... ::PERCENT TOTAL OF TOTAL. TOTAL TOTAL TASTE. TOTAL. :LABOR: :: :EXPENSE'. :LABOR AND .HOURS....... kIOURs _ COSTS -::COSTS:.-..: EXPENSES:: PHASE SUMMARY TASK ANALYSIS:: Page: 6 of 7 TOTAL, I ABOR.& EXPENSES _HOURS COST 5999:5 I. -SHEET OF :PER:' PER 1495. :COMP,.: .SHTS:... SHEET. ->SHEET MNs: Pi1,2lnvee€:Subtotal:............ ..: Ef: ;STP4840n.......... .STP..APptieation 0.0% 5213 2.3% $20,357 68,644 $29,001 100.0% 20 0.1% 51,918 $2 $1,920 0 0.0% 50 $0 50 f- * STR401ieatio8Subfotai: :C-iordlnate wltttfcofagy 1 :Wetland Plans (4) .............:.....::::.:.... • SpermProvisions 0.1% 61,918 $1,920 24 0.2% $2,530 $120 $2,650 244 1.8% 514,541 $5,785 $20,326 24 0.2% 51,342 566 51,408 0 0.0% $0 $0 50 292 2.1% 518,413 $5,971 $24,384 91 0.7% $5,069 $25,078 $30,147 0 0.0% $0 50 $0 91 0.7% $5,069 525,078 530,147 $1,920 $0 $0 $1,920 100.0% 100.0% 520,326 $1,408 $0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Fad@ral Danicttatratloti Ftirrtdiiig ..... . I- Federal 6818ttatiatlanl unding 51 0.4% $4,721 5279 65,000 100.0% 51 0.4% $4,721 $279 $5,000 100.0% ITIS Fiior(tiig t T113.Fanding: 41 0.3% 53,601 $399 $4,000 `".:TIB Fuiidirtg Subtot4I ;EA.Re901008 z:YV.etaana. 1_ :H19tOfiC , . t ,Etidangered:Sp00183............ ...... StormWatat .... _.. . 0.0% $0 $0 $0 41 0.3% 53,601 $399 $4,000 50 0.4% 54,031 $980 55,011 10 0.1% 5802 $99 5901 14 0.1% 51,168 $99 $1,267 68 0.5% $4,199 $301 54,500 0 0.0% 50 $0 50 142 1.0% 510,200 $1,479 511,679 100.0% 100.0% $901 51267 $4,500 $0 JProjeet Management .:..........::............... 3; : PmjectiNanageinent._.. -- .-, .. _... ..... .... . , Extended Duration TPiojeetScheduleDeveiopment: Urgent Project Requests _ : Overtime j: OALtiC and.Coflstrirctibniljf Fe** ":Pe66OU Manageioent Subtotal . . 24 24 248 0 110 0 164 76 0.5% 55,158 458 3.3% 525,366 5199 525,565 132 1.0% $12,064 5640 $12,704 104 0.8% 57,614 $199 57,813 24 0.2% $1,449 560 51,509 56 0.4% $6,357 5130 56,487 850 6.1% 558,008 51,773 559,781 525,565 512,704 57,813 51,509 $6,487 $59,781 100.0% RUN DATE: 8/22/94 nJN TIME: 2:19 PM EXHIBIT B-1 LABOR AND EXPENSE ESTIMATE CITY OF YAKIMA I-82IYAKIMA AVENUE WKSP• C:\EXCEUFILES1-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLW FILE: C:\EXCELIFILESU-82\SUPP3\SUPP3.XLS MACRO: C:\EXCEL\FILES\FEEMAC6.XLM DATE: 22 -Aug -94 NPT 481.HW TASK ......... _. TASKDESCRI ON: K: Bridge 82/.12.3...... GL t1ne DevlaUon#8 821123 Supplement 3 CH2M:HH i. HQURSBY:GRADE- E7 E6-- E5 ...:E4 ......... `ES E2. Et: .... - .. `TOP ... T3:.. ... . T2 OA :PROJECTSUMMARY PRASE SUMMARY -.. -.:.. CH2M 11ILl PERCENT. TOTAL. OF TOTAL. TASK TOTAL. LABOR: HOURS..... HOURS COSTS : TOTAL. TP -TAC EXPENSE: LABOR:AND:: COSTS....:EXPENSES:: TOTAL. 6ORP &:EXPENSES PERS1 EETANALYSiS: 4f31gh- 140* N : HOURS' COST" SHEET :OF PER, PER COMP: : SHTS: SHEET .....: SHEET TASK ANALYSIS :PERCENT :OF -TASK Page: 7 of 7 COMMENTS 99 0.7% $5,546 5624 56,170 154 1.1% 38,599 3872 $9,471 33 0.2% $3,288 $130 $3,418 $6,170 $9,471 33,418 2.1% 317,433 31,626 319,059 519,059 100.0% (So tft:Oadraf.Reglon:RevlewProcess 2.0% 315,799 33,382 319,181 170 1.2% $9,480 32,152 311,632 86 0.6% 34,825 31,132 55,957 0 0.0% 30 $0 50 3.9% $30,104 $6,666 $36,770 519,181 100.0% M fHUD Modifications .... . i:. Fair Ave -App.. ........... . . Site Prep Pian ... .... ... . #:.. :Paving Plans ] Inteiseatfon:Grading Plaits 1.1161910018:0, -Row .. . Signing:Plans Tenth Street. .. _ . .... . .AtignmertFaetl:RAV Pians:.,... . Paving Plats Orailing GEN C1TY:REIIUESTS::S.tlaTOTAL 15 0.1% $855 $99 5954 17 0.1% 5993 $99 51,092 15 0.1% 5955 599 3954 13 0.1% $734 $99 3833 15 0.1% $872 $99 $971 13 0.1% 5734 399 $833 15 0.1% 5855 5131 $986 13 0.1% $732 $99 $831 0 0.0% 50 $0 50 116 0.8% 36,630 5824 37,454 51,092 12.8% 4,975 35.9% $314,811 575,757 $390,568 13,865 100,11% 5869,982... 5266,833. 31,138;/95 76:4% .. ... 216%:........ -100.0% 100.0% :swops. U05 OpUanat Services ......:......:.:.......:..:....::....:.:.::..:.::............: �.:* OPTIONAL SERVICES SUBTOTAL .:ISALARY,ESCALATION: ., . # SalaryEscalatiolt............. ............ * SALARYP:ESC: SUBTOTAL 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% 50 50 50 0 0.0% 50 50 $0 0.0% $49,320 53,647 $52,967 0 0.0% $0 $0 50 0 0.0% 549,320 53,647 $52,967 552,907 100.0% 100.0% MASTER:SUBTOTAL 315.....:::::. 4,568;: 2.27%.....::,.....:11.91% .: STIMAT€D HOURLY LABORRATE.(1993) `ABOR PLUS OVERHEAD .32610: $78:77 :323.30:. $6874 16.79% :::6.45%:_ :1 :13.63% $20.63. ;$18;55;....; ;... 320:47 ....1...:317.38 1. ;:514.72 0 0.0% So 30 So 0 0.0% 30 So 50 0 0.0% 50 So $0 992.. .13;665 100:0.% 4919.,282: $272480 • 11,191,762: ,15Ye :: 771% ... -..:22:8% .. ...100.S% 1204 [MULTIPLIER 2.95 360586 $54:72. :: $60.34. 351:27.. i.. 843.42. ..S35.52..': ".54;128,972 94,7 RUN DATE: 8/22/94 RUN TIME: 2:20 PM EXHIBIT D-1 SUMMARY SHEET ' CONSULTANT PEE 0E1'R.MMMATtON.. CITYOf MAXIMA: -1S21YAKIMA AVENUE Supplem043 . . ... ....„ .:.:.... .... :mink HILL FILE:. ' G:IEXCELIFILE$}f:821SUPP3'SUPP3:X1:S DATE:: .1332Y194 NPT481;HW 1. Direct Salary Cost (DSC) 1,993 Average Hourly Raw Labor Class Role Hours Rate Cost Rate E7 PM/Sr. Reviewer 330 $43.72 514,428 E6 Task Lead Engineer 315 $35.74 $11,258 E5 Lead Engineer 1,568 $30.98 $48,577 E4 Lead Engineer 488 $26.70 513,030 E3 Design Engineer 2,236 $23.30 552,099 E2 Design Engineer 80 $20.63 $1,650 El Designer 2,744 518.55 550,901 T4 Lead Design Tech. 2,328 $20.47 $47,654 T3 Lead Drafting Tech. 894 517.38 515,538 T2 Design/DraftTech. 1,890 $14.72 527,821 OA Technical Assistant 992 512.04 511,944 2. Total Direct Salary Cost (DSC) 13,865 5294,900 $21.27 3.Overhead Cost (OH) - Including Salary Additives (Based upon Federal audit) (DSC) 168.00% $495,432 Subtotal 5790,332 4. Fixed Fee (DSC) 27.00% 579,623 5. Reimbursables CH2M HILL 5122,498 6. Subconsultant Costs MBE WBE OTHER TOTALS HLA 5.17% 561,580 SHIMONO 0.11% 51,264 TECHSTAFF 4.96% 559,061 ETS 0.00% $0 CARLA KEEL GROUP 0.00% $0 RAN OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS 2.36% 528,076 SUB7 0.00% $0 SUB 8 0.00% $0 SUB9 0.00% $0 Totals 0.11% 4.96% 7.52% 5149,982 7 Escalation Costs (1993 to 1995) 549,319 S.:TOTAL. .....: ..:.:: .:.:..:::.. . ....: .::._:..... $f,191;754::. 9. Management Reserve Fund 50 l0 QRANDTOTAt.=£stit9atedEee. ..::. .. ..:.....:.: ..�, :..:.. :..,::$$i91;754:. ..:;:.::...:: NOTES: LUMP A. Escalation factors: SUM 1994 -1995 Tabor rates over 1993: 6.00% I , .::YES...:, Current work planned for 1994 - 1995: 94.49% Salary escalation factor. 5.67% Includes faed fee noted above: 10.07% B. Other factors: Overhead: 168.00% Fixed fee on DSC: 27.00% Labor 100.00% Multiplier 295.00% Page: 1 of 1 BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. 160 For Meeting Of September 13. 1994 ITEM TITLE: Gateway Project - Supplemental Agreement #3 SUBMITTED BY: Department of Engineering & Utilities - Engineering Division CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Dennis E. Covell, P.E. - Director - 576-6313 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Since September 1993, the scope of work for Phase 1 of the Gateway Project has been revised to: • Implement Value Engineering (VE) recommendations • Address impacts on the project resultant from increased growth activity in the Terrace Heights area. • Incorporate portions of the W.S.D.O.T.'s Naches to Beech project into Phase 1 of the Gateway Project. Resolution X Ordinance Contract Other (Specify) Supplement # 3 Funding Source Fund 143 - Transportation Improvement Board APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: City Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute supplement #3 to the agreement for engineering services with CH2M-Hill for the Gateway Project. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: Resolution No. R-94-119 TD -14 .11.16 1 - SY7/94 Agenda Statement September 13, 1994 Page 2 of 2 The cost of Phase 1 has increased as a result of the scope of work revisions. However, Phase 1 is now funded without an increase in cost to the City of Yakima, Yakima Transit, Yakima County of developer, Gary Lukehart by the most recent successful funding increase efforts in which the WSDO7 increased their funding participation. by $1,225, 582 which resulted in $1,160,568 additiona Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) funding. Total Phase 1 funding involving TIB funding anc associated local match money now totals $17,754,950. The analysis of that funding is shown as follows: Funding Source Ori _ Funding final % Split July, Funding 1993 % Split August, Funding 1994 % Split City of Yakima 1 ,691 ,689 12.62% 1,836,041 11.95% 1,836,041 10.34% WDOT 924,717 6.90% 1,003,572 6.53% 2,229,154 12.55% Yakima County 603,076 4.50% 654,503 4.26% 654,503 3.68% Yakima Transit 201,026 1.50% 218,168 1.42% 218,168 1.23% Developer 600,000 4.48% 1,190,363 7.74% 1,190,363 6.70% Local Totals 4,020,508 30.00% 4,902,647 31.90% 6,128,229 34.50% TIA Funds 9,381,185 70.00% 10,466,153 68.10% 11,626,721 65.50% Total Funds 13,401,693 100.00% 15,368,800 100.00% 17,754,950 100.00% In Supplement Agreement #2, executed September 14, 1993, several optional services wen identified. These tasks were listed as optional because the exact scope and cost of the service: could not be determined at that time. The scope and cost for these services has now been define( and are summarized in the accompanying Table 1. The total cost is $869,754 as reflected it Supplement #3 and is included in the funding now in place for Phase 1 of the Gateway Project.. TD -14 .1.1.16 2 -- 3'8/94 Table 1 Project Scope Revisions Yakima Gateway Project Task Task Description Cost Comparison Supplement 12 Optimal Services (9/14#93) _ Supplement 13 (E/72/94) Difference (ss+rlesnt 13 teas Sepptewest #Z) WSDOT Naches to Beech 1A_ Incorp. Bridge 82/122N -W & Rdwy Work 50 542,628 542,628 WSDOT Nadtes to Beech Subtotals $0_ 542,628 542,628 Value Engineering Team Study 2A Project Management & QA/QC 50 555,548 555,548 2B CR Line and DR line PS&E 5173,000 568,402 (5104,598) 2C Traffic Signals (518,000) (57,057) 50 2D Frontage Road Study 535,000 57,054 (527,946) 2E Y Line and Frontage Road PS&E 50 565,165 565,165 2F Multiple PS&E Packages 591,000 5180,303 589,303 2G Design Report Revisions 516,000 544,383 528,383 211 Environmental Assessment Revisions 50 520,195 520,195 2I Early Stage 1 A Contract Document 50 544,705 544,705 Value Engineering Team Study Subtotals $297,000 5478,698 5181,698 Growth Impact Enhancements 3A Project Management & QA/QC 50 542,330 $42,330 3B Redefine CR Line and DR Line Configurations 50 514,823 514,823 3C Environmental Assessment Revisions 50 $15,907 515,907 3D Right -of -Way Services 50 5108,670 5108,670 3E Bridge Design $0 525,139 525,139 3F Design Report Supplement 50 520,024 520,024 Growth Impact Enhancement Subtotals 50 5226,893 5226,893 General City Requests 4A Utilities 525,000 5150,522 5125,522 4B Access to Yakima Retail Area 50 510,851 510,851 4C Hazardous Materials - Phase 2 Investigation 50 529,001 529,001 4D STP Funding Application 50 51,920 51,920 4E wetlands PS&E 50 $24,384 524,384 4F PS&E Surveys 50 530,147 530,147 40 Federal Demonstration Funding Application 50 55,000 55,000 4H TIB Funding Assistance 50 54,000 54,000 41 Environmental Assessment Revisions 50 511,679 511,679 41 Project Management 50 559,781 559,781 4K Bridge Design 50 519,059 519,059 4L WSDOT South Central Region PS&E Review Process 50 536,770 536,770 4M HUD Modifications 50 57,454 $7,454 General City Requests Subtotals _ $25,000_ $390,568 5365,568 Escalation * 50 1 552,967 1 $52,967 Extra Work Totals 1 $322,000 1 $1,191,754 5869,754 Suppkmental Agreement 02 Optional Services Credit 1 $322,000 I Supplemental Agreement #3 Total I $869,754 I * Escalation in salary cosh for emended contract duration of up to 15 months.