HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1992-D6061 Clean AirA RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. D 6061
authorizing the City Manager to sign all applications,
grant agreements and amendments, and other documents
relating to the Centennial Clean Water Fund for
collection system planning, design, and construction grant
financing.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima has developed a plan for wastewater
collection, treatment, and disposal for the Yakima Regional Urban Area; such
plan being necessary to determine the needs of the area for health, safety and
well being of the people; and
WHEREAS, the plan is developed in accordance with the requirements
of Public Law 92-500 and 95-217, and has set forth facilities and systems
required to be constructed, improved and rehabilitated to serve the needs of
the area; and
WHEREAS, the costs of planning, design and construction of the
wastewater collection and treatment facilities are eligible for Centennial Clean
Water Fund financing; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager is duly authorized to sign applications, loan
agreements, and amendments, and other documents relating to wastewater
collection systems planning, design, and construction programs.
ADOPTED THIS day of , , 1992.
ATTEST:
(4_ > L
CITY CLERK
Clean Water Fund Resolution
2/7/92
cw
MAYOR
City of Yakima
129 N. 2nd. Street
Yakima, WA. 98901
Attachment G
Executive Summary
This project consists of two City programs, Inflow control and
Infiltration control.
The Inflow program consists of mapping of pipelines, subbasins, and
known trouble spots, identification of sources by smoke testing or other
means, education of the public by mailings and meetings, coordination and
cooperation with the property owners, enforcement and legal commitment
when necessary, and repair of public owned sources.
The Infiltration program consists of futher exploration and analysis of the
subbasins identified in the "Comprehensive Plan" as the worst
contributors of extraneous flow. We will specifically identify and
evaluate each source of flow, select the best corrective action, and
correct the problem, if possible, with City forces. One or a combination of
these basic activities will be utilized to correct the problem areas: 1)
Chemical grouting, 2) Spot repair.
City of Yakima
129 N. 2nd. Street
Yakima, WA. 98901
Attachment H
Project Proposal
Infiltration is considered to be extraneous water entering the sewer
system as the result of the height of the groundwater table, the type and
tightness of the sewer joints, and the soil type. Sewers which permit
infiltration during periods of high groundwater have a high possibility of
permitting exfiltration (sewage entering back into the soil or
groundwater) when groundwater conditions are below the pipeline invert.
Inflow is distinctly different than infiltration. It is generally associated
with specific outside events such as rainfall, street flushings, irrigation
system flushings, of similar events. Inflow enters the collection system
through planned or devised connections for disposal of unwanted
extraneous water into the collection system. Typical sources of inflow
include roof drains, yard and parking lot drains, and cooling water
discharges.
The presence of Infiltration and Inflow in Yakima's collection system
reduces the available capacity of sewer lines for customer use and
reduces the efficiency of treatment at the treatment plant. The decrease
of hydraulic loading will reduce the total pounds of waste discharged into
the Yakima River due to the increased ability of the treatment processes
to perform their biological activities.
As detailed in the approved "Facilities Plan Update", and the
"Comprehensive Plan", Inflow and Infiltration (1/1) account for
approximately half of the Yakima Regional WWTP sewage flows during the
irrigation season. These extraneous flows cause plant hydraulic
overloading which can result in serious plant upsets and subsequent NPDES
permit violations. Through the performance of the appropriate remedial
activities, it is estimated that upwards to 6 mgd can be removed from the
present high flow.
1
Appendix B of the "Comprehensive Sewer Plan" presents a detailed Inflow
program and suggests it be implemented by the City. The suggested
program begins by looking at each subbasin, preparing maps of significant
information, notifying property owners of our work in the area, then using
smoke or dye testing or other means to identify sources of Inflow. Once
sources are identified, the task of elimination would begin. The
elimination of the Inflow source lies in education, coordination,
enforcement, and legal commitment. Education being the most beneficial
and economical.
The project for which financial assistance from this Grant is intended,
would allow Yakima to:
1) Start up a full time Inflow program. This program would consisting
of mapping of the entire collection system and identification and
reduction of Inflow in the "worst" subbasins and
2) Intensify our level of activity in programs required to develop and
maintain a foothold in the battle of controlling Infiltration in the "worst"
subbasins. This would included an aggressive continuation of the Grouting
Program and Manhole Rehabilitation by City Forces and the development of
a small works roster program within Grant guidelines to perform
necessary Spot Repair.
3
•
•
Legend Legend
WSW 1141111111 Boundary
-- Subbaaln Boundary E
-- tubbaaln Boundary F
..i
241.
716
741
7O
w
57'
i ie •
Roatonat WW1'
{
•
1
stri
9 1
•
614
'.1.{1,4
- t
Yakhna Urban Area
Existing And Future Subbashi glap
•
41]
Attachment E
Project Budget
Two Year Infiltration/Inflow Grant Program
Infiltration Inflow Total
Equipment $261,500 $ 37,000 $298,500
Material $150,000 $ 30,000 $180,000
Labor $195,000 $127,500 $322,500
Supervision/Administration @ 15% $ 29,2.50 $ 19,126 $ 48,376
Payroll Benefits @ 35% $ 78,490 $ 51,318 $129,808
Overhead @ 15% $ 45,410 $ 29,692 $ 75,102
Contingency @ 5% $ 37.980 $ 14.734 $ 52.714
Total $797,630 $309,370 $1,107,000
TOTAL PROGRAM $1,107,000
Infiltration Annual Budget (one year)
Equipment
TV/Grout
Jet/Vacuum
Support Equip
Spot repair backhoe
Material
Grout
Pipe repair
Misc.
Labor
$60/hr @ 1050hr
$50/hr @ 1050hr
$10/hr @ 525hr
$40/hr @ 250hr
Grout Crew 4@12.50 @ 1200hr
Spot Repairs 4@12.50 @ 250hr
Part time assistance 12.50 @ 1000hr
Eng/Public Works Co-ord 12.50 @ 1000hr
Supervision/Administration
Payroll Benefits
Overhead
Subtotal
Contingency
TOTAL
@ 5%
@ 15%
@ 35%
@ 15%
63,000
52,500
5,250
;I 0.000*
1;30,750
40,000
25,000
10.000:
75,000
60,000
12,500
12,500
12.5Q0
97,500
14,625
39,244
22.70'
174,074
379,824
18.991
6398,815
Inflow Annual Budget (one year)
Equipment
Smoke Testing
Pipe Repair
Computer (mapping)
Material
Smoke Testing
Pipe Repair
Misc.
Labor
Testing Crew
Repairs
Support staff
Mapping
$ 5/hr @ 1500hr
$40/hr a► 200hr
$10/hr @ 300hr
2@12.50 @ 1500hr
4@12.50 @ 200hr
12.50 @ 1000hr
12.50 @ 300h
Supervision/Administration
Payroll Benefits
Overhead
Subtotal
Contingency
TOTAL
@ 5%
@ 15%
@ 35%
@ 15%
i
7,500
8,000
3.000
18,500.
4,000
12,000
1.00Q
15,000
37,500
10,000
12,500
3.750
63,750
9,563
25,659
14.846
113,818
147,318
7.367
$154,685
WASTEWATER DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING & UT1UTIES
FAX (509)575-6116 SCAN 278-6077
2220 E. VIOLA, YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98901
Wastowaler... 575-6078
Engin oring _...575-6111
Wator/11r19011®n__..575-6154
YAKIMA INFILTRATION/INFLOW GRANT PROGRAM
February 21, 1992
GRANT APPLICATION
THE WASHINGTON STATE
CENTENNIAL
CLEAN WATER PROGRAM
11110111IIASIIIITOI STATE
IIDEPAITYEIT IF
ECOLOGY
fiiu1ii'if shit
ettletelft 11
ECOLOGY
CENTENNIAL CLEAN WATER FUND
GRANT/LOAN APPLICATION
Ecology Use
Application Number
1. APPLYING FOR (Cheek one)
® Grant 0 Loan 0 Grant/Loan
(Financial Hardship Only)
2. PROJECT TYPE (Check ane)
0 Activity ® Facil:y .. .
.
3. PROJECT TITLE (Five words or less)•
Yakima Infiltration / Inflow Grant Project
•
4. APPUCANT NAME (PUBUC BODY) AND ADDRESS
City of Yakima
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
Authorized Signatory Name and Title:
R. A. Zeis Jr_
5. APPUCANT CONTACT PERSON, TITLE. ADDRESS AND
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Mr. Dennis E. Covell
Director of Engineering & Utilities
City of Yakima
129 North 2nd Street
Yakima, WA 98901
(509) 575-6161
City Manager
The person whose name is fisted here must sign the application.
6 FUNDING CATEGORY APPUED FOR: (Check one)
7. MULTI -CATEGORY PROJECT APPUED FOR:
Are you submtfttng this project for consideration in another funding
catecio
0 Yes Til No
If yes. indicate by checking the Category(s) and Subeategory(s) if
appropriate and complete a separate application and rating
questionnaire for each category in which an appfication is
0 Marine 0 Freshwater
0 Ground Water 0 River and Other Freshwater
❑ Statewide Activlies and Facilities
■ Marine (complete blue rating questionnaire)
■ Ground Water
❑ Statewide (complete yellow rating questionnaire)
❑ Spokane 26 share (attach Memorandum of Agreement)
131 Freshwater
❑ Lakes Activitiessubmitted.
(complete fight green rating
questionnaire)
® River and Other Freshwater (complete green
rating questionnaire)
❑ Nonpoint Source (complete tan rating questionnaire)
❑ Discretionary
❑ Basic (complete pink rating questionnaire)
0 Spokane ■ Lake Activities
(IFS share) 0 Nomoint
0 Discretionary (Basic)
8. OTHER FUND SOURCES
Other fund sources (i.e. 205j Federal Water Ouafty Management Planning Grants) may be used to provide financial assistance for high
priority eligible projects. These projects would be administered under the same terms and conditions u CCWF projects.
If you do NOT wish to be considered for funds from other sources. please check the book. 0
9. APPLICANT AND PROJECT LOCATION
a. County of Applicant Yakima
e. Legislative district(s) of project:
Include all state legislative districts where at least five patent of
the project will be accompbshed. (Total must equal 10014.)
District No. 14 Percent 95
b. County of Project: Yakima
e. What is the legislative district d applicant: 1 q
d. Does the project involve an activity covering legislative
districts statewide?
❑ Yes IR No
Please provide a map showing project location. it appropriate.
See attachment A
District 1 5 p S
District No. Percent
District No. perms
District No. Percerd
Ito. FOR FACAITY PROJECTS ONLY
a. Type of PTO (Check ons)
❑ Planning (Step 1)
❑ Design (Stop 2- Deportment of Ecology WOFAP approved faeiftties plan or engineering report required)
Q Construction (Step 3 - Department d Ecology WOFAP approved plans and specifications required)
❑ Design and conabnaafon City Force; No additional specification required
(Step 4 - Department of Ecology WOFAP approved facades plan or engineering report required - tee guidelines for eligibility)
❑ Planning/Design/Construction (Basic Discretionary Subcategory only)
b. Fac1Sy Project Status
DOCUMENT
Engineering Report
Fealties Plan
Plans and Speafications
Ismoonmaamomnom
e.
d.
APPROVE
(3 Yes 0 N
® Yes ❑ No
❑Yes No
DATE
August 31' 1990
1 yes. attach approval letters from the Department of Ecology Water Quality Financial ,Assistance Program and copy d report or pian
ctwer Gage. See attachment B
NPDES/State Permit No. WA -002402-3
Enforcement Action: • See attathnent C
® Yes 0 No See attachment D
11. FOR ACTIVITY PROJECTS ONLY
a. Type of Project (Check one)
❑ Planning
❑ Implementation
❑ Other (e.g. public education)
Specify:
Note: M Implementation projects must be based on a planning
document approved or certified by the Department of
Ecclogy at the time of application.
b. Planning document status:
(1) Has a planning document for an implementation project
been submitted for review and approval by the
Department of Ecology?
❑Yes 131 No
It yes. date of submittal:
Note: M factffiies construction projects must have an engineering
report or facilities plan (Step 1) and plans and specifications
(Step 2) approved by the Department's Water Quality
Financial Assistance Prognue at the fimo d appbeabon.
(2) Has the planning document bean reviewed and approved by
the Department of Ecology?
❑ Yes Dab _ ❑ No
Attach approval letters from the Department of Ecology, and a
copy of report or plan cover.
c. Puget Sound Watershed Projects:
(1) Is this proposed project In sequence with the county's or ~wed
rarrhhng of watersheds according to Chapter 400-12 W
❑Yes 0 N
(2) If yes, what Is the rami number of the proposed watershed
Project',
(3)
Number :
Is this proposed project consistent with a watershed
management pin?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, provide a letter from lead agency.
If no, please explain on a separate sheat d paper.
12. SOURCE OF FUNDS
' a. Total Estimated Project Cost
" b. Total Estimated Eligible Project Cost
c. Ecology Grant Share
d. Ecology Loan Share
e. Applicant's Share
$ 1,107, 000
$ 1,1f7,fff)
$ 553,500
$
$ 553, 500
f. Other FederaVState Grant/Loan (Specify type)
- L.. %) $
(_ %) $
L_-16) $
C_ %) $
* The total project cost may include costs necessary for the successful completion of the project that may NOT be eligible for grant or ban
participation under the Centennial Clean Water Fund Program.
" Amount used as the base cast for Ecology grant or ban share.
13. BUDGET/CASH FLOW
Attach a one-page cost summary outlining project costs by abject or siemens.
Attach a completed cash flow summary fonn. (�
14. REQUESTED LOAN TERMS
a. 0 0 - 5 Year Term — 0% Interest Rate
❑ 6 -14 Year Term —4% interest Rate
❑ 15 - 20 Year Term — 5% interest Rate
b. Specific Term Requested: Years
See attachment F
See attachment E
Note: 100% loans may be awarded for up
to the ceiling limit of the category.
15. FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ASSISTANCE
Financial hardship assistance grants and/or loans are being
requested in accordance with WAC 173-95-150:
a. Facility
b. Activiy (Ground water category only)
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, please submit documentation regarding need
(e.g. inabiity to repay debt, umernployment, etc.).
■ Yes r' No
ft yes, please submit Financial Capability Outline with your
application.
16. PROJECT DURATION
a. Approximately how long will this project take to complete?
(1) Projected Start Date November 1992
17. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
Does this project involve or impact more than one public body?
❑Yes ®No
8 yes, do all pubic bodies support the goats and objectives of the
project?
0 Yes 0 No
If yes, attach Tetters of agreement or memorandums of agreement
between affected pubic bodies and their support of the project.
If no, please explain on a separate sheet of paper and attach.
Interlocal agreements are required at the time of a grant or loan
award for all projects involving more than one public body
(2) Projected Completion Date October 1994
18. WATER BODY TYPE INVOLVED IN PROJECT (Check one or more)
Ii Freshwater River or Stream
• Marine Water other than Puget Sound
• Puget Sound (direct discharge) • Federally Designated Sole Source Aquter
0 Ground Water
■ Wetlands
❑ Freshwater Lake
• Other Specify
19. WETLANDS
® No
Does this project protect or impact a wetland? • Yes
20. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Have you completed planning as required by Chapter 36.70A RCW,
the "Growth Management Act?'
■ Yes El No ■ WA
tf not. when do you anticipate completing a plan? July 1993
21. SUMMARY OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Provide an executive summary of the proposed project. (Must be in 150 words or less.) Attach summary to this form.
See attachment G
22. 1 CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE AND
CORRECT AND THAT I AM LEGALLY AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AND SUBMIT THIS INFORMATION ON BEHALF
OF THE APPLIC ANT. This must be the same person fisted
in item 4 above. If the signatory is not a mayor, city manager, county
the signatory to sign on behalf of the public body must be
executive, board of commissioners chairman, etc., a resolution authorizing
attached.
R. A. Zais Jr.
\�a,.'r4,
PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE
City Manager
TITLE DATE
23. Send original and 10 copies In the designated category color, Including supporting documentation, to:
. Department of Ecology
Water Quality Financial Assistance Program
Policy and Evaluation Section
Mail Stop PV -11
Olympia, WA 98504-8711
Page