HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-1991-D6034 Lukehart / Right-of-way / Fair AvenueRESOLUTION NO. "41
4
A RESOLUTION authorizing execution of an Agreement for Convey-
ance of Property for Improvement of Yakima Ave-
nue/I-82 Interchange Area and Fair Avenue.
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore authorized
execution of an Agreement for Joint Construction of Improve-
ments of Yakima Avenue/I-82 Interchange Area and Fair Avenue
with Yakima County and the Washington State Department of
Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the joint improvement of the aforementioned area
requires donation of area to be used as right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, Gary D. Lukehart and Mary M. Lukehart, husband
and wife, desire to contribute right-of-way to the aforemen-
tioned project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best
interest of the City of Yakima to join with Yakima County and
the Department of Transportation for the State of Washington
in the execution of the Agreement for Conveyance of Property
for Improvement of Yakima Avenue/I-82 Interchange Area and
Fair Avenue, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager and the City Clerk are hereby authorized
and directed to execute the Agreement for Conveyance of Pro-
perty for Improvement of Yakima Avenue/I-82 Interchange Area
and Fair Avenue, a true copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this /7 day of
1991.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(res\prpty.jv)
C1,1- C
Mayor
r►''' Transportation Improvement Board
Letter of Transmittal
Aid
TO: � ENUA\ s E , CoN)� LA—
IR.E CTO (Z OF E' L() VT1 L .
We are sending you the following items:
C Prospectus
❑ Project Application
Date:
2`10192
Project No.\
9E- Igo (0o)-)
Attention: J
Re:
3
1 f t 4I9Z
n Copy of letter
['Consultant Agreement
COPIES
DATED
DESCRIPTION
3
1 f t 4I9Z
AG) R-EENVZ- I s F6(Z CONVit`fPrtL E
O�
PieOP,
REMARKS:
❑ Approved as noted
❑ Resubmit for approval
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ RETURN COMMENTS BY
❑ For approval
O For your action
O Returned for corrections
O For your information
0 ISE CCP`( FOC. CA)?-- 'P t LES OE
1�T ,-NPPR-b\rE, Th E A-G)REEnkE1\t-M, ) OR.L. in M-LDrtAL-,
Copy to: 1--E From:lE'Ne'��
(Zo) S' -4-479
Phone Number:
TIB Form 190-012
Revised 04/91
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY
FOR IMPROVEMENT OF
YAKIMA AVENUE/I-82 INTERCHANGE AREA
AND FAIR AVENUE
OLA
/'This Agreement, made and executed this _-ir day of
*Ma, by CITY OF YAKIMA (City) , YAKIMA COUNTY (County) , WASRINGTO;
STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Department) , and GARY D. LUXEHART
and MARY M. LUKEJiART, husband and wife (Lukehart) , hereinafter referred to
as "the parties."
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima, Yakima County, and the Washington
State Department of Transportation have heretofore entered into an
agreement for the joint construction and improvement of the Yakima
Avenue/I-82 Interchange Area and Fair Avenue, by widening and new
alignment involving new structures, existing structure removal or
modification, installation of curbs, gutters, drainage facilities,
sidewalks, landscaping, relocation or installation of utilities,
installation of traffic signals, new roadway sections, pathways,
street lights, and guardrail (hereinafter referred to as "the
Project"); and
WHEREAS, the grant of state monies for construction of such
Project is partially dependent upon local private contribution of
land for the aforementioned Project; and
WHEREAS, Gary D. Lukehart and Mary M. Lukehart, husband and
wife, own certain real property in fee simple which is within the
proposed bounds of the aforementioned Project and the Lukeharts
desire to convey up to Sir Thsndred Thowwid Dollars ($603,000) of such
property for the Project, provided that the Project provides for
reasonable commercial access and circulation to the remaining
Lukehart property; and
WHEREAS, the parties recognize the mutual benefits from
improving I-82 as transportation corridor, and Fair Avenue for
enhancing access to the fairgrounds and the Sundome; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual
covenants contained herein, the parties hereby enter into an
agreement as follows:
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY -1
jec-c:\data\agmt\lukebart.acp
1. Larraca PartThe parties to this agreement are CITY OF
YAKIMA (City), YAKIMA COUNTY (County), WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (Department), and GARY D. LUKEHART and MARY M. LUKEHART,
husband and wife (Lukehart).
2. Lukehart PropertyDescription Lukehart owns certain
property designated on attached Exhibit A which shall be
considered for purposes of right-of-way for the subject Project.
3. Conveyance. The City, County, and Department plan to
construct substantial improvements to the Yakima Avenue/I-82
Interchange and Fair Avenue (Project) which will enhance the
entrance to the City of Yakima; provide better access to downtown
and the SunDome; improve safety; and further a variety of public
interests and benefits. Lukehart shall convey unencumbered fee
simple title by Statutory Warranty Deed to the designated entity
(City, County, and Department), any or all of the Property, upon
the written request of the Department's District Assistant Project
Development Engineer, the City's Director of Engineering and
Utilities, and the County's County Engineer, or their respective
designees. The condition
property conveyed shall be
of title shall be unencumbered. The
for the purpose of public right-of-way
in accordance with the development plans for the I-82/Yakima
Avenue Project. They conveyance shall be expressly conditioned
upon the Project providing reasonable commercial access and
circulation to the remaining Lukehart property.
Prior to conveyance, the City, County, and Department shall
consult with Lukehart concerning the preliminary and final Project
design to the extent such Project will affect the remainder of
Lukehart's property. The City, County, and Department shall
consider Lukehart's suggestions concerning such Project design,
provided, however, that the City, County and Department shall not
be bound to accept any of Lukehart's suggestions. Lukehart's
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY -2
TD -11 DC.1
conveyance of property shall in no way be conditioned upon
favorable treatment of Lukehart's suggestions.
Lukehart's total conveyance without monetary compensation, by
the entities, shall not exceed a fair market value of Six Hundred
Thousand Dollars ($600,000) . All conveyances shall be completed on or
before December 1, 1992.
4. Assignment. None of the parties to this Agreement shall
have the right to assign this Agreement, or any other rights or
obligations hereunder, or to terminate obligations hereunder,
without first securing the written consent of all other parties to
this Agreement.
5. Appraisal. Prior to the conveyances provided for in
Section 3, the City, County, and Department shall conduct an
appraisal of the property for the purpose of determining the fair
market value of Lukehart's conveyance hereunder. In the event
Lukehart contests the fair market value of any parcel or portion
thereof, Lukehart may, at his expense, conduct his own appraisal.
any variance between the two appraisals shall be resolved by a
third appraiser chosen by the other two appraisers. The opinion of
the third appraiser as to the fair market value on any parcel or
portion thereof to be conveyed shall be final and binding.
Lukehart and the entities shall share equally the expense of a
third appraiser. Lukehart shall have thirty (30) days from his
receipt of the first appraisal to invoke the courier appraisal
provisions of this section. Otherwise, Lukehart's ri .t of counter
appraisal shall be waived.
6. Survey. Lukehart shall allow representatives of the
City, County, and Department to enter onto and survey, appraise,
and perform surface and subsurface exploration at the property at
all reasonable times. The cost of such survey, appraisal, and
exploration work required to perform the terms of this Agreement
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY - 3
jcc-c:\data\agent\lukehart.acp
shall be paid by the City, County, and Department in proportions
upon which they shall agree. Said survey, appraisal, and explora-
tion data shall be made available at no cost to Lukehart upon
request.
7. Provision Remedies. In addition to the remedies provided
by law, this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable by each
party. Venue shall be in the Yakima County Superior Court. In the
event of litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
This Agreement shall not be effective until executed by all
parties hereto. If for any reason the entities do not construct
the project, this Agreement shall terminate and the parties shall
have no remedies against each other.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement
on the f) day of
ATTEST:
, 1991.
CITY OF YAKIMA
-C eft, 2 By
City Clerk
ATTEST:
i f !'
f
y Clerk bk.., ji -f)/ t`, -f)
77
UL By
Richard A. Zais, Jr.,
City Manager
./Y6L:rt)
Alex Deccio, Chairman
Yakima County Commissioner
By
Graham Tollefson,
Yakima County Commissioner
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY - 4
jcc-c:\data\agmt\iuhehart.acp
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
AJJ rte= Cc-`Iz63
By
arses Kla
Yakima Co my Commissioner
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATN
.7-1\<---
Title,.-F�
AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY - 5
jcc-c:\data\agent\lukehart.acp
Tract 1
Fractional Lots 13, 14, 15, and the South 13
feet of Lot 12, Block 208, Eastern Addition to
North Yakima,
^ow
v2kima
recorded in Volume
"A+" of Plats, Page 19, Records of Yakima
County, Washington.
and
The South half of the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 18, Township 13
North, Range 19 East, W.M.,
Excepting therefrom the following:
1) That part thereof lying Northerly of the
following described line:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 16,
Block 206 of said Plat of Eastern Addition;
thence North 18'30' West aiong the Easterly
line of North Tenth Street 213.00 feet to the
point of
L....®." irk ..A
xac$4.....+..�
of :aid described line;
thence North 71'30' East to the North line of
Exhibit A
the South half of the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of said Section 18 and the
terminus of said described Line.
2) Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot
15, Block 208, of said Plat of Eastern Addi-
tion; thence North 71'30' East, at right angles
to the Easterly line of North Tenth Street, to
the West line of the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of said Section 18 and the
point of beginning; thence North 82'28' East
255.00 feet; thence South 3615' East to the
South line of the North half of the South half
of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of said Section 18; thence Easterly
along last said South line to a point which is
916.00 feet west of, (as measured along the
South line of the North half of the South halt
of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of said Section 18,) the .Southeast
corner thereof; thence Southerly parallel with
the East line of said Section 18, to the South
line of the North half of the South half of the
South half of the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of said Section 18; thence
Westerly along the South line of last said
subdivision to the Southwest corner thereof;
thence Northerly along the West line of the
Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of
said Section 18 to the point of beginning.
3) That part thereof lying Northeast of a line
drawn parallel with and 110.00 feet Southwest-
erly, when measured at right angles and/or
radially from, the centerline of primary State
Highway No. 3 (S.R. 82) Selah Junction to East
Yakima Avenue.
4) Right of way for East "A" Street along the
South line thereof.
5) Right of way for North 10th Street along
the West line thereof.
6) Commencing at the Southwest corner of the
Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of
said Section 18; thence East along the South
line thereof 537.50 feet; thence North 1.33'
West 115.00 feet to the point of beginning;
thence West '0,00 feet; thence North 1'33' West
to the North line of the South half of the
South half of the South half of the Southeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Sec-
tion 18; thence Easterly along last said North
line 20.00 feet; thence South 1'33` East to the
point of beginning. (This exception is for a
driveway.)
. Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 2
The North half of the following described
property:
The North 208.725 feet of the West 208.725 feet
of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast
quarter of Section 19, Township 13 North, Range
19 East, W.M.,
Except the North and West 15.00_feet thereof
for road.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 3
The South 100.00 feet of the North 115.00 feet
of the West 165.00 feet of the East 1133.00
feet, as measured along and parallel with the
North and East lines, of the Northeast quarter
of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Town-
ship 13 North, Range 19 East, W.M.
and
The South 50.00 feet of the North 65.00 feet of
the West 150.00 feet of the East 968.00 feet as
measured along and parallel with the North and
East Lines, of the Northeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 13
North, Range 19 East, W.M.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 4
The South 50.00 feet of the North 65.00 feet
of the East 125.00 feet of the West 694.00
feet, as measured among and parallel with the
North and West lines of the Northeast quarter
of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Town-
ship 13 North, Range 19 Bast, W.M.,
and
The So,,th 50.00 feet of the North 115.00 feet
of the East 140.00 feet of the West 694.00
feet, as measured along and parallel with the
North and West lines, of the Northeast quarter
of the Northeast quarter of Section 19, Town-
ship 13 North, Range 19 East, W.M.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 5
That part of the Northeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 13
North, Range 19 East, W.M.. Described as fol-
lows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said
subdivision; thence South 1'22' West along the
West line thereof 249.00 feet; thence South
88638' East 188.00 feet; thence South 11'08'
East 289.00 feet to
Avenue; thence North
North line of Yakima
point of beginning;
the North line of Yakima
75'49'40" East along said
Avenue 307.00 feet to the
thence North 1'22' East
parallel with the West line of said subdivision
319.00 feet; thence South 88'38' East 140.00
feet; thence South 1'22' West 280.07 feet, more
or less, to the said North line of Yakima
Avenue; thence South 75'49'40" West 145.31 feet
to the point of beginning.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 6
Lot 5, 6, and 7, Larsen Rome Sites, according
to the Plat thereof as recorded in Volume
"_"
of Plats. Page 5, Records of Yakima County,
Washington,
Except right of way for "A" Street and Fair
Avenue along the North and East lines thereof.
and
Lots 1, 2, and 4 through 21, inclusive, Marquis
Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Volume "E" of Plats, Page 6, Re-
cords of Yakima County, Washington.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 7
Lots 8 and 9, :Larsen Home Sites, according to
r a
- l t
tiz
thereof as recorded in Volume "I"•. of
Plats, Page 5, Records of Yakima County, Wash-
ington.
Except right of way for primary State Highway
No. 3 (S.R. 823.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 8
Lots 25, Ib, and 17, Larsen Home Sites, accord-
ing to the Plat thereof as recorded in Volume
"I" of Plats, Page 5, Records of Yakima County,
Washington.
Except right of way for primary State Highway.
No. 3 (S.R. 821.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 9
That part of the East 615.00 Leet of the North-
east quarter of the Northeast quarter of Sec-
tion 19, Township 13 North, Range 19 East W.M.,
lying South of the South line of Yakima Avenue
and North of the right of way of primary State
Highway No. 3 (S.R. 12) .
Except the Last 30 feet thereof for road.
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
Tract 10
•
That part of the West 50.00 feet of the East
705.00 feet of the Northeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 13
North, Range 19 East, W.M., Lying South of the
South line of Yakima Avenue and North of the
right of way of primary State Highway No. 3
(S.R. 82) .
Situated in Yakima County, Washington.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dick Zais, City Manager & Members of Yakima City Coun
FROM: Dennis E. Covell, P.E. - Director of Engr. & Utilities
DATE: December 13, 1991
SUBJECT: December 13, 1991 Steering Committee Meeting for
Yakima Gate Way Project
8C
The December 13 Steering Committee Meeting for the Yakima
Gateway Project was presented a number of ideas for improving the
future access and circulation patterns of the Yakima Avenue/I-82
Interchange Area and Fair Avenue Project. A copy of those ideas and
consultant comments of advantages and disadvantages for each idea
is also presented for your information. These ideas and other ideas
are being developed for presentation for public comment in February
of 1992. Members of the Steering Committee have been asked to
share these ideas with others and with the membership of the
various groups they represent prior to the public meeting so that
their imput will be a part of the ideas presented at the public
meeting. Council will have the opportunity to meet with the
consultant, CH2M-Hill, and the County Commissioners on January 14,
1992 for a luncheon briefing on these ideas and an over all briefing
of project activities.
STEERING COMMITTEE
1. AI Royal - Downtown Coalition
2. Pat Gilmore - D.A.R.C.
3. Gary Lukehart - Developer
4. Rand Elliot - Holiday Inn
5. Greg Stewart - Central Wash. Fair Board
6. Dan Hesse - Yakima County Public Works
7. Dick Anderwalt - Yakima County Planning
8. Leonard Pittman - W.S.D.O.T.
9.
10. City of Yakima:
Fred Stouder
Glenn Rice
Denny Covell
Fred French
Jerry Copeland
Bill Schultz
Gary Webster, Greater Yakima Chamber of Commerce
SEA 32984.04.06/Yannna I-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
1-82
<2
2>
<2
2> ‘;
<1
<1
017
<2
2> ""—
.
Boise Cascade Mill
PRELIM
FIT
E. Lincoln Ave.
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
N. 9th St.
ui
7
E. Yakmia Ave.
Kiwanis Park
7.0 ,91111001,ie
0 500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 1
(MODIFIED BELL -WALKER RECOMMENDED PLAN)
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 1
(Modified Bell Walker Recommended Plan)
Description:
• Diamond interchange at I-82 and Yakima Avenue with loop in northeast quadrant.
• Parclo AB at the intersection of Yakima Avenue and Fair Avenue.
• Separate exit ramp from 1-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• Provides direct access from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
• No new intersections along Yakima Avenue.
• Easy to sign.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Vacates existing "flyover" bridge for potential use by pedestrians and bicycles.
Disadvantages:
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• No direct return ramp from Fair Avenue to I-82 northbound.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound.
• Existing flyover ramp is not preserved and will have to be closed before loop ramps on westbound Yakima Avenue can be
constructed.
• Requires more right-of-way in northwest quadrant than Bell -Walker plan.
• A separate pedestrian bridge crossing over I-82 may be required.
• 3-phase signal control at west intersection on Yakima Avenue as capacity control.
• Difficult pedestrian/bicycle connection to Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202/021.51 /1 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.08A ' 41-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
1-82
0t0••
<2
2>
<1
Boise Cascade Mill
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
v
(.1
E. Lincoln Ave.
N. 9th St.
E. Yakmia Ave.
•
eir A
lee
•
Kiwanis Park
,9
WI 01.
Wide
<2
2>
0 500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 2
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 2
Description:
• Similar to Alternative 1 with existing flyover ramp remaining tied to loop ramp at Fair Avenue.
• No separate exit ramp from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
• Separate entrance to I-82 southbound from Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• Has direct ramp connections to Fair Avenue from I-82 northbound and from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound.
• Uses partial existing flyover ramp. This will reduce traffic on Yakima Avenue.
• No new intersections created along Yakima Avenue.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Requires less right-of-way in northwest quadrant item Alternative 1.
Disadvantages:
• No direct ramp connections to Fair Avenue from I-82 southbound and from Fair Avenue to I-82 northbound.
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound.
• A separate pedestrian bridge crossing over I-82 may be required.
• Profile and superelevation on flyover ramp may not comply with recommended design criteria.
• Signing will be more complex item on Alternative 1.
• Flyover ramp will have to be closed before loop ramps on westbound Yakima Avenue can be constructed.
• Requires 3-phase signal control at west intersection on Yakima Avenue.
• Difficult pedestrian/bicycle connection to Greenway. May require additional structure.
Comments:
sea82021024.51 /2 12112/91
SEA 32984.04.08/Yalu" a 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
#S?
ft
tl
•
• /
/
1-82
<1
<2
2>
<2
2> 1
1>
Boise Cascade Mill
<,
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
E. Lincoln Ave.
...... 4
ai N. 9th St.
L.C.1
E. Yakmia Ave.
v
??
<•-• .... ,,
42>
Kiwanis Park
kfotheva..
woos
<2
2>
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 3
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 3
Description:
• Identical to Alternative 1 without the exit ramp connection from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
• Two-way frontage road on the west side of I-82 south of Yakima Avenue.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• Less complex than other alternatives.
• No new intersections along Yakima Avenue.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Requires less right of way than Alternatives 1 and 2.
• One of the least costly alternatives.
• Frontage road should reduce traffic volumes on local streets and encourage development of area south of Yakima Avenue.
• Vacates existing "flyover" bridge for potential use by pedestrian and bicycles.
Disadvantages:
• No direct ramp connections from/to Fair Avenue to/from I-82.
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• Traffic on Yakima Avenue westbound will increase between the two new loop ramps due to the removal of existing flyover
ramp.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound will reduce level of service and cause a safety problem.
• Existing flyover ramp will have to be closed before new loop ramps can be constructed.
• Pedestrian bridge crossing over I-82 may have to be constructed to provide access between east and west sides of freeway.
• Requires 3-phase signal control at west intersection on Yakima Avenue.
• Frontage road will require right-of-way to be acquired from Kiwanis Park.
• Difficult pedestrian/bicycle connection to Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202/024.51/3 12/12/91
SEA 32884.04.08/Yalma 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
/
1-92
<2
2>
1>
<1
41 4
•
1>
Boise Cascade Mill
if
I-11 •:)
1,/
•‘;')•
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
N. 9th St.
7
E. Yakmia Ave.
Kiwanis Park
7-o ,90
fhb_
we/A.
eltgrOloos
4-
2>
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 4
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 4
Description:
• Similar to Alternative 3 with an exit ramp from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue and an entrance ramp from Fair Avenue to
I-82 northbound approximately 3,000 feet north of Yakima Avenue, no frontage road provided.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access from Fair Avenue to northbound I-82 and from southbound I-82 to Fair Avenue reduces traffic on
Yakima Avenue.
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• No new intersections along Yakima Avenue.
• Bridge for new northbound entrance ramp can be used for pedestrian/bicycle areas to Greenway from west of I-82.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Good potential access for pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• No direct ramp connection from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound and from I-82 northbound to Fair Avenue.
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• Traffic on Yakima Avenue westbound will increase between the two new loop ramps due to the removal of existing flyover
ramp.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound will reduce level of service and cause a safety problem.
• Existing flyover ramp will have to be closed before new loop ramps can be constructed.
• Requires 3-phase signal control at west intersection on Yakima Avenue.
• Impacts donated park area near Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202/024.51/4 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06/Yakorna 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
•
1-82
<1
<2
2>
•
•••
<2
2>
4.‘
Boise Cascade Mill
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
rr''?
I" <I
11'7
E. Lincoln Ave.
ui
N. 9th St.
E. Yakmia Ave.
4
•
Kiwanis Park
‘9,
why
(:971eip
eip
<2
2> """.
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 5
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 5
Description:
• Parclo B at I-82 and Yakima Avenue.
• Half diamond with one loop ramp at Yakima and Fair Avenues.
• Direct ramp connections from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access to (from) I-82 southbound from (to) Fair Avenue. This will reduce traffic on Yakima Avenue.
• One intersection along Yakima Avenue is eliminated.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Requires less right-of-way in northwest quadrant than other alternatives.
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• Vacates existing "flyover" bridge for potential use by pedestrians and bicycles.
Disadvantages:
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• No direct access ramp from (to) Fair Avenue to (from) I-82 northbound.
• Traffic on Yakima Avenue westbound will increase between the two new loop ramps due to the removal of existing flyover
ramp.
• Short weaving length on Yakima Avenue eastbound.
• Existing flyover ramp will have to be closed before new loop ramps can be constructed.
• Pedestrian bridge crossing over I-82 may have to be constructed to provide access between east and west sides of freeway.
• Roundabout maneuver require for northbound Fair Avenue traffic to access Yakima Avenue eastbound and I-82 northbound.
• Difficult pedestrian/bicycle connection to Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202/024.51/5 12/12/91
SEA 32084.04.08Na., Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
,•••
••c•
43.
1-82
<2
2>
<2
2>
<1
ix
Boise Cascade Mill
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
Li
E. Lincoln Ave.
ai N. 9th St.
siii
E. Yakmia Ave.
Kiwanis Park
Oc
1497,/
wOoi
Gyp
<2
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 6
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 6
Description:
• Parclo B at I-82 and Yakima Avenue.
• Half diamond with one loop ramp at Yakima and Fair Avenues.
• Ramp connections from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
• Direct ramp connections from I-82 northbound to Lincoln/13 one-way couplet.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access to/from I-82 southbound from/to Fair Avenue. This will reduce traffic on Yakima Avenue.
• Direct access from I-82 northbound to Lincoln/B one-way couplet.
• Provides direct access from I-82 southbound.
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in all directions.
• Bridge for the I-82 northbound off -ramp to LincolnB one-way couplet could also be used for pedestrian crossing.
• Possible access for pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• No direct access ramp from Fair Avenue to I-82 northbound.
• Short weaving length on Yakima Avenue eastbound.
• Roundabout maneuver required for northbound Fair Avenue traffic to access Yakima Avenue eastbound and I-82
northbound.
Comments:
sea8202/024.51/6 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06/V. ..a 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
4-tr
•c•
(15
a-•
•
...::::•••","•••••••
1-82
<2
2>
•••
6 ),.)
eje
<1
<2
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
• 1>
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
E. Lincoln Ave.
N. 9th Si.
2.33
ui
E. Yakmia Ave.
•—•;•.•,)
4,f
>
N.:
fs?
7-0
s•el
Kiwanis Park
St,
ncy0„...
•
%nos.
<2
2>
0 500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 7
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 7
Description:
• Similar to Alternative 5 with west existing intersection remaining on Yakima Avenue.
• No direct ramp connection from I-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Provides direct access to I-82 southbound from Fair Avenue.
• Provides direct access between Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue in nearly all directions.
• No new intersections created along Yakima Avenue.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Vacates existing "flyover" bridge for potential use by pedestrians and bicycles.
Disadvantages:
• No direct access from (to) I-82 northbound to (from) Fair Avenue.
• No direct access from 1-82 southbound to Fair Avenue.
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramp at Fair Avenue.
• Traffic on Yakima Avenue westbound will increase between the two loop ramps due to the removal of the flyover ramp.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound.
• Profiles of ramps in northwest quadrant may not meet recommended design criteria.
• Existing flyover ramps will have to be closed before new loop ramps can be constructed.
• Pedestrian bridge crossing over I-82 may have to be constructed to provide access between east and west side of freeway.
• Roundabout movement required for northbound Fair Avenue traffic to access Yakima Avenue eastbound and I-82
northbound.
• Difficult pedestrian/bicycle connection to Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202I024.51/7 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06Nakima I-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
1-82
<2
2>
°tee
/711,
4
2>
\7
—
Boise Cascade Mill
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
r J
N. 9th St.
E. Yakmia Ave.
Pa •
1r
V •
Kiwanis Park
p../
‘10/77
e/pe
Vro,,
<2
2>
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 8
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 8
Description:
• Existing interchange with new direct ramp connection from Yakima Avenue east of I-82 to Fair Avenue northbound.
• One loop ramp at Fair Avenue in southwest quadrant with direct ramp from northbound I-82 to Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Direct access from Yakima Avenue to Fair Avenue northbound will reduce traffic on Yakima Avenue.
• Semi -direct access from I-82 northbound to Fair Avenue northbound.
• Direct access from Fair Avenue to and from Yakima Avenue east.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No weaving on westbound Yakima Avenue.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Traffic can be maintained easily during construction of new ramps.
• Less right-of-way required in northwest quadrant than other alternatives.
• Construction cost should be less than other alternatives.
• Possible access for pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• I-82 northbound to northbound Fair Avenue traffic must pass through a new crossing at Yakima Avenue.
• No direct access to (from) Fair Avenue from (to) I-82.
• No direct access from eastbound Yakima Avenue to Fair Avenue or from Fair Avenue to westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Short weaving length on eastbound Yakima Avenue.
Comments:
sea8202/024.51/8 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.08/Yakima 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
;..:e:iga•a-•••
1-9
<2
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
E. Lincoln Ave.
ui
N. 9th St.
E. Yakmia Ave.
<2
<1
1>
tee.
Kiwanis Park
"1I7
.7,ou
nos
4
2> """"
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 9
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 9
Description:
• Existing interchange with new direct ramp connections from Yakima Avenue westbound to northbound Fair Avenue and
from northbound I-82 to northbound Fair Avenue.
• Direct ramp connections from Fair Avenue to northbound I-82 and from southbound I-82 to Fair Avenue approximately
3,000 feet north of Yakima Avenue.
• One loop at Fair and Yakima Avenues in southwest quadrant.
Advantages:
• Direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in almost all directions will reduce traffic volume on
Yakima Avenue.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No new intersections created along Yakima Avenue.
• No weaving on westbound Yakima Avenue.
• No impact to Greenway.
• Traffic can be maintained easily during construction of new ramps.
• Less right-of-way required in northwest quadrant than other alternatives.
• Ramp from Fair Avenue to I-82 northbound can be used as access to Greenway.
• Possible access for pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass (two locations).
Disadvantages:
• No direct return movement from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound.
• No direct access from Fair Avenue to westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Short weaving length on eastbound Yakima Avenue.
• Profiles of new ramps over I-82 may not meet recommended design criteria.
• FHWA may not allow construction of new ramps 3,000 feet north of Yakima Avenue.
• Construction cost will be more than other alternatives.
• Short distance between northbound entrance to Fair Avenue and intersection with southbound exit ramp intersection.
• Impacts donated park area near Greenway.
Comments:
• 1-82 southbound entrance ramp from Fair Avenue could be added.
sea8202/024.51/9 12/12/91
SEA 32884.04.08/YakIma 1-82 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
I-8
•
<1
<2
2>
•
<2
2>
1
Boise Cascade Mill
E. Lincoln Ave.
t: r
• re
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
N. 9th St.
ui
3
E. Yakmia Ave.
<2 ,,
Kiwanis Park
voi:y0
070/A.
elrg,
fO
fle6
<2 --
2> '"'"
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 10
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 10
Description:
• Existing interchange with new direct ramp connections from Yakima Avenue westbound to northbound Fair Avenue and
from northbound 1-82 to northbound Fair Avenue.
• Loop in southwest quadrant of I-82 intersection.
• Direct ramp connections from Fair Avenue to northbound I-82 and from southbound I-82 to Fair Avenue approximately
3,000 feet north of Yakima Avenue.
• One loop at Fair and Yakima Avenues in southwest quadrant.
• I-82 southbound entrance ramp from Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in almost all directions will reduce traffic volume on
Yakima Avenue.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No new intersections created along Yakima Avenue.
• No weaving on westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Minimum impact to Greenway.
• Less right-of-way required in northwest quadrant than other alternatives.
• Ramp from Fair Avenue to I-82 northbound can be used as access to Greenway.
• Possible access for pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass (two locations).
Disadvantages:
• No direct access from Fair Avenue to westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Short weaving length on eastbound Yakima Avenue.
• Profile design for the new ramps over I-82 may be difficult.
• FHWA may not allow construction of new ramps 3,000 feet north of Yakima Avenue.
• Construction costs will be more than other alternatives.
• Short distance between northbound entrance to Fair Avenue and intersection with southbound exit ramp intersection.
• Impacts donated park area near Greenway.
Comments:
sea8202N24.51/10 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06P. 1-82 Interchange/11-27-1/CJS
1-82
<2 —
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
•
<1
<2
2>
<2
fe.
r
• s
E. Lincoln Ave.
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
<1
1>
45 N. 9th ST..
u.i
E. Yakmia Ave.
Kiwanis Park
w_oti
047
'root,
/Vs
<2 ----
2>
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 11
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 11
Description:
• Existing interchange remains. A half diamond interchange is constructed 1,200 feet north of Yakima Avenue that ties into
Fair Avenue and LincolnB one-way couplet.
• Northbound ramp could be constructed between existing flyover ramp and new half diamond interchange eliminating need
for third signal phase at east intersection on Yakima Avenue.
Advantage:
• Direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in almost all directions will reduce traffic volumes on
Yakima Avenue.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No weaving on westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Traffic can be maintained easily during construction of new ramps.
• Half diamond can be used to access the Greenway from Fair Avenue.
• FHWA may be more receptive to split diamond than Alternative 9 and 10.
• Strong potential for access of pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• No direct return movement from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound.
• Short weaving length on eastbound Yakima Avenue.
• Third signal phase is needed at Yakima Avenue and I-82 northbound exit ramp if alternative ramp is not constructed.
• Impacts Greenway near new northbound entrance ramp.
Comments:
sea8202l024.51n1 12n2/91
SEA 32984.04.06NL 1-82 Interchange111-27-91/CJS
1-92
<2
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
•
<1
• 42
2>
E. Lincoln Ave.
A7
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
oi N. 9th St.
<t>
ui
E. Yakmia Ave.
<2
e.,.•
<""••,' o •
• Kiwanis Park
Pa•
,r4
'4700
hus
<2
2>
0 500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 12
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 12
Description:
• Similar to Alternative 11 with separate exit ramp on I-82 northbound to serve traffic destined for the Lincoln/B one-way
couplet.
• Larger radius loop ramp at Fair Avenue than in Alternative 11.
• No ramp connections between Yakima Avenue westbound and Fair Avenue.
• Separate entrance ramp from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound.
Advantages:
• Direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in almost all directions will reduce traffic volumes on
Yakima Avenue.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No new intersections created along Yakima Avenue.
• No weaving on westbound Yakima Avenue.
• Traffic can be easily maintained during construction of new ramps.
• Half diamond can be used to access the Greenway from Fair Avenue.
• FHWA will be more receptive to a split diamond than Alternatives 9 and 10.
• Strong potential for access of pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• No direct access from Fair Avenue to westbound to (from) Yakima Avenue.
• Short weaving lengths on eastbound Yakima Avenue.
• Impacts Greenway near new northbound entrance ramp.
Comments:
sea8202, )24.51/12 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.08A al -82 tnterchange/11-27-91/CJS
1-82
<2
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
•
•
<1
1> >
Proposed Yakima
Avenue Retail
E. Lincoln Ave.
<2
e'..
•(',,e ,
...7 r..:: ....,
Kiwanis Park
•
Pair' A.
7i) &
titJo
47e/po
whys
<2
2>
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 13
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 13
Description:
• Similar to Alternative 11 with two way connection on east side of freeway between Yakima Avenue and half diamond inter-
change north of Yakima Avenue.
• Does not have ramps at the crossing of Yakima Avenue over Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in almost all directions will reduce traffic volumes on
Yakima Avenue.
• Maintains use of existing flyover ramp.
• No weaving on Yakima Avenue eastbound or westbound.
• Traffic can be easily maintained during construction of new ramps.
• Half diamond can be used to access Greenway from Fair Avenue.
• Strong potential for access of pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• No direct return movement from Fair Avenue to I-82 southbound.
• Northbound Fair Avenue must make roundabout maneuver to access Yakima Avenue and the return movement is similar.
• Yakima Avenue and I-82 northbound exit ramp intersection requires four phase control.
• Impacts Greenway near new northbound entrance ramp.
Comments:
sea 8202/024.51 n 3 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06/Yaiuma1-82 Interchange/11-27.91/CJS
,:•""""".
8
(t,
Wol
f
1-82
<2
2>
0
<1
<1
<2
2,
Boise Cascade Mill
1>
•„:7
Proposed Yakima
/
Avenue Retail
I
/
")
/ 11 I "•4
E. Lincoln Ave.
ai N. 9th St.
ui
.41
E. Yakmia Ave.
Kiwanis Park
so74100.10/
PeliprOtioce
<2 ---
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 14
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 14
Description:
• Parclo B interchange at I-82 and Yakima Avenue.
• Half diamond 1,300 feet north of Yakima Avenue on I-82 connects to Fair Avenue.
• Separate exit to Fair Avenue from I-82 northbound.
• Half diamond with one loop at Yakima and Fair Avenue.
Advantages:
• Has direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in all directions. This will reduce traffic volumes on
Yakima Avenue.
• North to east movement is eliminated at west intersection on Yakima Avenue.
• Half diamond can be used to access Greenway from Fair Avenue.
• Strong potential for access of pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• Truck traffic may not use loop ramps at Fair Avenue.
• Traffic on Yakima Avenue westbound will increase between the two new loop ramps due to the removal of existing flyover
ramp.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue westbound.
• Existing flyover will have to be closed before new loop ramps can be constructed.
• Impacts Greenway near new northbound entrance ramp.
Comments:
sea8202ro24.51/14 12/12/91
SEA 32984.04.06/Yakima 1-62 Interchange/11-27-91/CJS
1-82
Pee
<2
2>
Boise Cascade Mill
•
•
•
<1
<2
2>
/
7
1>
Proposed Yakima ..
i.)
Avenue Retail 1..1
E. Lincoln Ave.
ui
N. 9th St:
E. Yakmia Ave.
ir
Kiwanis Park
7b
44110
7,1
Peiv
rOU
nas
<2
500
Scale in Feet
ALTERNATIVE 15
DECEMBER 1991
ALTERNATIVE 15
Description:
• Split diamond interchange at Yakima Avenue with direct ramp connections to/from Fair Avenue from/to I-82.
• Parclo AB interchange at Fair Avenue and Yakima Avenue.
Advantages:
• Has direct access to/from Fair Avenue from/to Yakima Avenue and I-82 in all directions. This will reduce traffic volumes on
Yakima Avenue.
• Relatively easy to sign.
• Diamond interchange north of Yakima Avenue can be used to access Greenway from Fair Avenue.
• Traffic can be easily maintained during construction.
• Strong potential for access of pedestrians and bicycles to Greenway at new overpass.
Disadvantages:
• A left turn is introduced at Yakima Avenue and I-82 northbound exit ramp.
• Short weaving lengths on Yakima Avenue eastbound and westbound.
• Impacts Greenway near new northbound entrance ramp .
• Requires more right of way in northwest quadrant than other alternatives.
Comments:
• One or both loop ramps at the intersection of Fair and Yakima Avenue could be eliminated.
sea8202/024.51
sea 82021024.51 /1 5 12/12/91