HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/03/2015 07 2014 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER); First Public Input HearingBUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 7.
For Meeting of: March 03, 2015
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
ITEM TITLE: First public input hearing on the 2014 Consolidated Annual
Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)
SUBMITTED BY: Joan Davenport, AICP, Community Development Director
Archie Matthews, ONDS Manager (509) 575-6101
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Each year as part of the process of submitting to HUD the 2014 year end Consolidated Annual
Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER), the City holds two public input hearings to accept
comments on the year end report. This is the first public input hearing on the 2014 Consolidated
Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The full Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Year 2014,
including Sections 7 and 8, is available online at:
http://www.yakimawaegov/services/neighborhood-development-services/
Resolution:
Other (Specify):
Contract: Contract Term:
Start Date: End Date:
Amount:
Ordinance:
Item Budgeted:
Funding Source/Fiscal
Impact:
Strategic Priority:
Insurance Required? No
Mail to:
Phone:
APPROVED FOR
SUBMITTAL:
City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct first public input hearing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Draft 2014 CAPER Report
Upload Date
2/23/2015
Type
Backup IMaterliall
The City of Yakima
Office of Neighborhood Development Services
Consolidated
ual Performance Evaluation
Report
For Year of 2014
For further information, contact:
The Office of Neighborhood Development Services
112 S. Eighth Street
Yakima, WA 98901
509-575-6101
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SECTION ONE
Required N
ative)
Summary of Resources
Assessment of Five -Year Goals and Objectives
irmatively Furthe g Fair Housing .....„.. „
ordable Housing
Continuum of Care for the Homeless
Other Actions
Leveraging Resources
•
SECTION 'MO (CDB( Nfarrativ0
Plan Changes
Efforts in C. ing Out Planned Actions
Resources, Certifications, and Implementation
National Objectives
Displacement and Relocation Compliance
Economic Development
Low -Moderate Income Benefit
Housing Rehabilitation
Neighborhood Stabilization Progr
SECTION T
E (HO
1
, 1
N. ative)
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
HO I F Ids Distribution Categories ,., 12
Match Req ements, 0 Fo u 4107
HO 1 Assisted Rental Housing Inspections
Affirmative Marketing
SECTION FOUR
Self Evaluation _._ • _ „ _ „..._ 13
Citizen Comments 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Conti ed
SECTION FIVE
Table 3A –S
11 11
SECTION SIX
ary of Specific . rual Objectives 15
Integrated Disbursement and Info
• IDIS PRO2
• IDIS PRO3
• IDIS PR22
• IDIS PR23
• PR026 Financial Su r1 lr'
• IDIS PR33
SECTION SEVEN
ation System list of Activities
2011 CDBG Estimated Expenditures
2011 Home Projects Expenditures Ru
2011 ual Reconciliation Report
Contract and Subcontract Activity Report
Exhibits—Map Illustrations
SECTION I IG.I-IT
HOual Performance Report
HO Match Report
HO ` 1 ; Rental monito ° l g Reports
E E reports
g Balances
SECTION ONE
2014 Consolidated A ual Perfo ance
Evaluation Report
INTRODUCTION
Each year the City of Yakima receives funding from the Federal Gove ent for two
entitlement progrs: Co r . ty Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME
Investment P erships (HO 1 ). These progr: u s c with them some very specific
requirements in the areas of pla g and repog. This docent is the required
ual report for both progr s. Knowe as the Consolidated ual Performance
Evaluation Report (CAPER), it provides data on the progrs and activities for which
funds provided by CDBG and HO 1 were spent.
The CAPER is written to provide the specific info :ration required by Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) regulations, and is submitted to HUD for review and
approval. This sub 'ssion follows a mandated 15 -day public co ent period. At the
s r i el .t e, it also provides the oppo'ty to report to the local co 'ty (Citizens and
Elected Officials) on the activities and successes of the past year.
The p ° a ary purpose of Co ai , 'ty Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the HO 1
Investment P. NI ership Progr, a r (HO ) is to help meet the needs of low/moderate
income residents while developing a strong community with the provision of decent
housing, a suitable li g environment and expanding economic oppo 'ties within the
City limits of Y `- r. a
FUNDING RESOURCES
For the y 2014, the City of Y ` a ra received $841,886 in CDBG funds, and $406,607
in HO 1 funds, for a total of $1,248,493.
Progr# a income is revolved back into the existing budgeted progr. :s as defined and
voted on by the Y ' a City Council.
Much of the data required by HUD as to how the funds were spent is provided via the
compute ' ed system knoas Intekrted Disbursement and info n ation System (IDIS).
Copies of the s ary reports created by this system are attached to the CAPER.
HUD Required Narrative Statements
• ASSESSMENT OF FIVE-YEAR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
CDBG p1 t g s with a doc is ent kno as the Consolidated Plan. This
doc is ent outlines broad goals and strategies to meet the identified needs of the
co unity served by the CDBG progr . The City Council of Y. a has
designated programs to serve city wide, with no specific defmed target area in
d, thus m g progr. so s available to all low/moderate income individuals
the City of Y. iiia.
The City Council has also, in response to citizen input, identified goals and
objectives to guide the plai ed expenditure of these funds. These goals are
focused on the follo i g areas:
1. Clean-up neighborhoods
2. Access to se 'ces and infrastructure
3. Access to safe, decent, affordable housing
4. More even distribution of econo i c groups throughout the City of Y
5. Econo • c Development: more jobs, better job skills.
6. Econo is c Development: new and increased small businesses and development
opport 'ties.
7. Se ces available to more people.
8. CDBG funds provide only part of the overall budget.
9. Increased citizen participation.
10. Historic Preservation.
1
Taken from the 2014 ual Action Plan budget, activities address the above
referenced goals as follows:
• The allocation of funds for Co as unity Se ces is always a top priority
for the City Council.
• The Gr. ill ti Progr. is provides benefits to co is s ty se ces.
• The goal for our Econo u 'c Development expenditures is to expand our
local economy and provide jobs for low/moderate income persons.
• Housing counseling helps keep decent affordable housing wi reach
of our area residents. Basic se ces like water and sewer are still not
available to all area residents and the Office of Neighborhood
Development Services strives to continue working aggressively to
expand these se 'ces.
• The CDBG Single F
Rehabilitation, and the Relocation programs all assist in m, a g housing
affordable.
ly Rehabilitation, the Elderly/Disabled
• The Lead -Based P:,._° t Abatement helps keep our housing stock safe
and affordable, while addressing important en ° o r si ental concerns.
• D g all our housing rehabilitation, we
incorporating Historic Preservation concerns wi
work diligently
our co ' #. 'ty.
in
Brous goals were set for all progr l i s d t g the City's budget process. Most
of these goals were met or surpassed, as statistical info •• ation provided wi
this doc ent demonstrates.
(Please see table 3A for S ary of Specific ual Objectives)
•
•
The City of Yakima continues to work with local agencies to overcome the
obstacles in se i.g the special needs populations in Y u a.
The City of Yakima takes great care in not hinde
the Consolidated and ual Action plan.
• AFF
41
g the activities as identified in
LY FUR 1 G FAIR HOUSING
The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice of the City of Yakima
identifies a nber of potential b 'ers. Under the Direction of the City Co cil
this office provides a Housing Counseling service to help overcome these b ; Vers.
Thousands of contacts are made each year to assist renters, landlords and
homeo ers. The City of Yakima continues to provide documents and
info. ;la ation as well referrals to legal assistance groups, to credit counseling
agencies, and other offices in a direct attempt to overcome fair housing
pe • :i i ents. Every effort is made to assist clients to resolve their ° i u culty in a
satisfactory m er as is demonstrated in this doc ent as to the diverse group of
f ies and individuals benefiting from our activities as supported through federal
resources.
�a
The following actions were taken in 2014 to __.__:atively further fair housing:
• 3,036 walk-in clients, with another 4,832 clients were served with the Housing
Co rseling Hotline for a total of 7,868 clients served through this progr 1I in 2014
with Housing Co seling.
• ONDS met with local housing lenders and realtors to present City sponsored
housing progr s.
• 0 I► S continues to meet and work with Co r p i t ,'ty Housing Development
Org . zations (CHDO), such as Habitat for H , , 'ty and OIC of Washington to
continually address local needs for aff atively er fair housing wi the
City of Y i is a.
• AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The City of Yakima concentrates our CDBG affordable housing efforts the
following progr i s: Single Fa 'ly Rehabilitation, and the Lead Based P t
Abatement progr si. These progr, s served a combined total of 85 homes,
helping q , ed low to moderate income homeo aers with greatly needed home
repairs to continue to live safely in their o homes with basic heat, power, water
and s. a. 'tary conditions.
The City of Y. a received Neighborhood Stabilization Protg, funds through
the Washington State Depni ent of Co « ierce. These funds were used to
purchase distressed properties and foreclosed properties. This enabled the City of
Yakima to subdivide parcels into a total of 12 vacant lots to eventually receive as
many new single fai ly homes, c ently 14 homes have been fully constructed,
and sold to qualified low and moderate income first e homebuyers. This
prop . was in p. i ership with OIC of Washington and Yakima Valley Habitat
for 14 'ty, both certified Co ii -ty Housing Development Org. zations
(CHDO).
The City of Yakima continues to work closely with the Yakima Housing Authority
to strategize about affordable housing oppo 'ties for the future.
• CON M OF C
FOR
11
HO
1
LESS
le this program does not receive regular budgeted funding from the City of
Y i a, we continue to recognize the importance of assisting with progra that
serve the homeless.
g 2014, ONDS worked with the local Continuum of Care, kno as the
Homeless Network of Y i a County. The city of Yakima assisted the network in
providing services to homeless people, including m. 'ig available cold weather
shelters d g the i ters of 2014. Three emergency cold weather shelters were
approved for use at 808 W. Mead, 225 N. 2nd Street and 511 N. 44th Ave from
December 151 of 2014 through M rch 15th of 2015.
As addressed within the Consolidated Plan, the City of Yakima chooses to combat
homelessness by not repeating services supplied by the Ya a Co ty
Continu of Care, but by contin g to assist low income, at risk elderly and
disabled homeo iers 'th emergency rep, s to enable them to stay in their home
g homeless due to no heat, no water, no electricity,
and thereby not beco
inadequate sewer and other life safety needs.
R ACTIONS
Under the direction of the Yakima City Council, ONDS continues a successful
p u ership program with the City Codes Division. This is working to combat
problems that would othe 'se lead to ler deterioration of neighborhoods, and
reduce the quality of life of area residents.
The City also works with People for People and the Northwest Co "ty Action
Center both of which provide volunteers to paint -out graffiti and do alley and
vacant lot clean-up, as well as snow removal for the elderly and disabled. These
joint venture progr. 11 help provide a "Positive Work Experience" to the
individuals, as well as providing much needed co I "ty services to the
neighborhoods.
The City continues to work with Juvenile Justice, the Y. .' a County I g Court,
the Y. n a County DUI Court and the Y i 1 a Co ity Gang Court to provide a
location for court-ordered co it "ty service to convicted offenders to serve their
court-appointed co i "ty se •ce hours. ONDS uses these individuals to paint -
out gr. WI and do alley and vacant lot clean-up, as well as snow removal and
wheel ch. r. lip assembly to disabled homeo i ers.
Neighborhood Development Services continues to p er with Public Works to
provide alley cleanup and lot specific cleanup through the Senior/Disabled
Rehabilitation progrin helping qualified progr. applicants, as well as weed
abatement d • g the s u er months using vol iteer labor. Public Works then
pays any costs associated with dump fees for any properties other than qualified
applicants through the CDBG Senior/Disabled Rehabilitation progr
The City of Y. i i a continues to combat Lead -Based P t issues throughout the
city by doing lead-based p • it inspections, risk assessments and clearance
ex. as ations for applicants of the 0 er-Occupied Rehabilitation progr. s.
CO
TY BASED DEVELOP NT ORGANIZATION (CBDO)
OIC of Washington as a certified Co
continues to manage Co i s 'ty Se
East Coil 11 "ty Center (SECC).
"ty Based Development Org. zation
ce Progr. s at the City of Yakima South
• NEIG
I "
0
OOD REVITAL TION ST 1 EGY
A (NRSA)
The NRSA includes the South East Co i iunity Center and the prop.. s and
people served by OIC of Washington as a certified CBDO. (See attached SECC
Quarterly Reports). 0 S also serves the A through the Single F y
Repair Progr oo as well as the Public Se *ce progrso that assists q ed low to
moderate income Senior/Disabled with emergency heating assistance (See table
3A).
Econo o I c Development is also an activity that benefits through the NRSA
desil I ation, but due to CDBG budget reductions there were no Economic
Development funds budgeted for 2014 other than the Section 108 loan fund, which
has not developed an application at this time even though potential projects are
c ntly being reviewed.
• LEVERAGING RESOURCES
The Yakima City Co a cil continues to aggressively address graffiti and
neighborhood clean-up efforts within the City of Y a, and continue to direct
CDBG Co 'ty Se .ce resources in supplying equipment and staff
supe .sion to local volunteers, thereby producing approximately 20,605
volunteer hours. Had the City paid for these hours the cost to the taxpayers would
have far exceeded $200,000.
The City of Y a p. No erships with local Co is *ty Housing Development
Org. tions (C 00), such as the local Habitat for H of 'ty and OIC of
Washington, in the Neighborhood Stabilization Progr, it (NSP) on the N. 3rd Street
Affordable Housing Project. ONDS leveraged an es ated $650,000 of state NSP
funds, appro i ately $200,000 CDBG for infrastructure, approximately $750,000
of HO Investment funds and approximately another $450,000 of private non-
profit investments by both OIC and Habitat for H oo.o ty.
Finally, our Co I *ty Se ce sub -grantees are asked to leverage our
contribution *th other funding. Often this outside funding exceeds the total
o t of our portion. These progr u s combined resulted in essential se ces
being provided to hundreds of persons each year.
•
• MINORITY/WO N BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
The City of Y. II a continues to actively encourage women and u nority
contractors to p cipate in the Cities construction activities.
Please see the attached MBE it E contract and subcontractor activity report.
SECTION TWO
CDBG NA ' ' TIVE
• Consolidated Plan Priorities, Needs, Goals, and Objectives
• FU 1 ING PRIORITIES
As illustrated by statistical info ation provided in this CAPER, the City of
Y a has utilized our CDBG funds effectively.
11
The goals identified in the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan are the basis for all
funding decisions. As previously discussed, all CDBG funds and expenditures can
be directly i ed to one of the Plan goals. And for 2014 all Block Grant
expenditures were for the benefit of low/moderate income persons, either
individually doc a ented as low/moderate or as a qualified area benefit se g a
low/moderate clientele comprised of over 51% of the area populace.
• PLAN C
GES
There were no substantial amendments or changes to the 2011-2014 Consolidated
Plan in 2014.
• EFFORTS IN C
, II
G OUT PL NED ACTIONS
Please refer to the info a ation included in the introduction as well as the N. ative
Statements. The City of Yakima certifies that it is following a c ent HUD -
approved Consolidated Plan. It has pursued all resources that were proposed in the
Plan; it has f. ly and al $ *ally provided requested ce u cation of consistency
as specified in the Plan, and has not hindered Consolidated Plan a plementation.
• RESO
CES, CER
ICATIONS,
1 '
LE
1
NTATION
As previously described, ONDS and the City of Y. a actively and successfully
pursued funding and other assistance from a variety of sources in addition to
CDBG and HO . This effort has dr.'i atically increased the a pact of the two
progr. a a s. As req ed, 0 PS provides the req ed certifications of compliance
with all relevant Federal Regulations, and req es the same certification from all
contractors and sub -grantees. ONDS works carefully to implement all the
progr n s identified for action in the Consolidated Plan, and, in no case, does
anything to u pede these efforts.
• NATIONAL 0
CTIVES
All 2014 activities and expenditures were used to help accomplish one of the three
national objectives of the CDBG legislation. These are:
o Low/Moderate Income Benefit
o Prevention of Slum or Blight
o Urgent Health and Welfare
• DISPLACE
1
NT
RELOCATION CO ' LUNGE
g 2014 ONDS had no activity that required relocation assistance to a
displaced homeowner.
P
• ECONOMIC DEVELOP NT
There were no kno instances d g 2014 where jobs were made available to
low/moderate income persons and not taken by them
Through Micro -Enterprise assistance approximately 62 jobs were ret
total of 7 jobs were created.
• LOW -MODERATE INCOME BENEFIT
ed and a
All activities were for the benefit of low/moderate income persons. Evidence for
this is cont. ied in the individual file for each activity.
• HOUSING RE BILITATION
D g 2014, CDBG funds were spent on housing rehabilitation for sin
homes o i ed by the residents.
• NEIGHBO
:
OOD STABILIZATION PROG
e -f
II
The City of Y. a also received Neighborhood Stabil' ; tion Progr. funds
through the Washington State depni ent of Co erce in the .lio it of
$650,000. This allowed the City of Y. a to purchase one foreclosed property
with a substandard dangerous building. This structure was demolished and the
single lot was sub -divided into two parcels and constructed two (2) new single
f. ii y homes that were sold to qualified low to moderate income first i ate
homebuyers. The City also used a portion of these funds to purchase a foreclosed
single fa 'ly home which was rehabilitated and sold to a low income first e
homebuyer in p. ership *th Habitat for H i ty. F se iaore, the City
purchased an additional a • e blighted undeveloped lots for redevelopment, two of
SECTION THREE
those lots have been subdivided into two and three parcels, respectively and a total
of fourteen new single f. y homes were constructed, and sold to q ied low to
moderate income first time homebuyers.
HOME N
0 A
T
• 110 FUNDS DISTRIBUTION CA TEGORIES
All HO 1 funds were distributed according to the categories of need identified in
the Consolidated Plan. With the exception of Co II II l'ty Housing Development
Org. i zation (CHDO) funds, all funds were spent on Homeo ership activities.
TCH REQ
1'
1
NTS,
Please see the attached
HOME match req • ements.
The info s ation req ed on contracts and subcontracts with
o i ed businesses was provided on a separate report.
: I
•
FO ' #40107 and # 40107-A
FO
#40107and #40107-A for reporting the
II I
ority and women -
The City of Yakima continues to encourage women and ority-owned
businesses.
• HOME ASSISTE
ENTAL HO tNC INSPECTIONS
All affordable rental housing 'ts previously assisted with HOME funds were
monitored according to the prescribed schedule. All were found to be in proper
condition and all were in compliance with ordability co 11 Intents.
• AFF
I
TIVE
TING
I
All HOME projects are marketed according to approved
actions as req ed by
p
0 II
ative marketing
• SECTION 3 REPORTING
As req ed by the Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968,
as . as ended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u, mandates that the Dep ent ensures that
employment and other econo 'c oppo 'ties generated by its housing and
co -ty development assistance programs are directed toward low and very
low income persons, p 'cularly those who are recipients of gove i ent
assistance housing. Therefore the City of Y i lia du y sub II ts the req ed
Section 3 S ary Report to D ually.
SECTION FOUR
• SELF EVALUATION
The stated ssion of the CDBG progr and ONDS is to assist in developing a
more viable co *ty by helping to provide decent, affordable housing, a
suitable li g en o ent, and econo c oppo • 'ties, p arily through
se • g low and moderate income persons.
I I
In seeking to accomplish this goal, ONDS continues to operate one of the most
diverse and successful CDBG progr. s in the entire region. Great care is taken to
provide significant funding and assistance in several areas. 0 P S is also ique
in that we provide many of these se •ces directly rather than through sub -grantees
or contractors, which allows more individuals to be assisted while holding the cost
do significantly by el' • ating the need for a third party.
Our se ces can be divided into three categories: econo
co 11 11 • ty se 'ces, and housing. Wi • • each, we provide a
progr, s and services.
11
c development,
ety of specific
We believe that wi the constr., • ts of our budget we do an excellent job in each
area. The affordable housing needs in Y •• a are so great that the challenges
sometimes seem ins ountable. Yet we fmd that • pro • g a house in a
neighborhood often starts a trend that extends too many other homes. The City of
Yakima continues to recognize there are still people in this co is •• iy who do not
have access to public water and sewer for their homes. So the expansion of these
se °ces continues to be an important issue for many reasons, including the health
of the co • • ty.
Yakima's Senior/Disabled Home Rehabilitation Progr. • s enabled 85 homes to
remain safe decent housing, successfully se • • g well over 100 occupants and
keeping them wi s' their homes, and out of the already over -burdened public
housing system, or nursing homes, thus saving h dreds of thousands of tax
dollars in financial support through social se ces.
For all we do, there is much more that needs to be addressed. We must continue
to work more efficiently, and do a better job prioritizing our efforts and
investments. Projects that provide the greatest benefit for the most people at the
lowest cost continue to need funding.
Basic human needs must be met with a continually s g budget. Basic h an
needs such as power to supply heat in the winter, water for • g, s, 'tary
sewer systems to protect our valuable underground water sources and replacing
failing septic systems, thereby protecting areas from surface water cont. 11• • ation.
Basic h 11 an needs, such as safe, clean, affordable housing continue to be a top
priority for the City of Ya.
• CI EN COMMENTS
The City of Y. ° 11 a continues to encourage citizen participation and make
progr _ 11 info _I I tion available throughout the year to the public as defined in the
adopted "Citizen P 'cipation Policy".
(Any receivedwritten public coent on this doc... gent will be added to the end
accordingly )
,
of this doc ent and sub al 'tted to
11
11
SECTION FIVE
*Outcome/Ojectve Codes
Availability/Accessibility Affordability
Decent Housing DH -1 DH -2
Suitable Living Environment SL -1 SL -2
www.. ._�. ...
Economic Opportunity EO -1 EO -2
Sustainability
DH -3
Table 3A -- Summary of Specific Annual Objectives
SL -3
EO -3
DH -1
DH -3
SL -3
Specific Annual Objectives
Own r Housin
Increase Access of LMI persons to
Dccent/AITordable housing
through new construction using,
CHDO's in the N, 3"I Street
Affordable housing development.
Communi Develo i ment
Increase Suitable Living
Environment through the
abatement of Dangerous Buildings
Increase Suitable Living
environment with Sustainability
through the support of Code
Compliance in LMI
Neighborhoods
Decent Housing and Suitable
living Environment through
Landlord/Tenant and Housing
Counseling programs
Sources of
Funds
HOME and
NSP for lot
acquisition.
Performance
Indicators
Number of Units
Number of
buildings
removed
E:,;ed
Number
Actual
Number
Outcome/Objective*
Decent housing/
Suitable living
Suitable living
Sustainability of Suitable Living
Environment through the
Rehabilitation of existing Public
Facility at SECC
Decent Housing and Suitable
living Environment Sustained
through Rehabilitation of existing
public Facility at Y -Pal
Locations
brought into
compliance with
local codes
Number of
clients served
Suitable living/
sustainability
Continued use of
existing building
Continued use of
existing building
0
Decent
housing/Affordable
Suitable living/
Sustainability
Suitable living/
sustainability
SL -3
Public Services
Low/moderate income
Senior/Disabled
Heating assistance
SL -1
Increase the range of services
available to assist LMI persons by
assisting OIC/South East
Community
Center. (SECC)
CDBG
CDBG
Number of
persons served
u
C
1,000
Suitable living/
sustainability
7,122
Suitable living/
Sustainability
DH -3
SL -3
DH -
1.1
Decent Housing and Suitable
Living Environment Sustained by
Painting Out Graffiti in LMI
Neighborhoods
Single Family
Rehabilitation
Single Family Rehabilitation of
owner occupied Low to Moderate
income homes.
DH- Relocation
1.7
CDBG
CDBG
CDBG
Number of
locations painted
2,500
Number of Units
Number of
persons assisted
with relocation
costs
20,605
E
1.1
Economic Development
Micro -Enterprise assistance
CDBG
Number of jobs
available to L/M
persons
Suitable living/
Sustainability
Availability/Accessibili
ty
Decent
housing/Affordable
Jobs available to LMI
persons
SECTION SIX
City of Yakima
Office of Neighborhood Development Services
2014 CDBG ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES WITH S/B
(With Cany Forward Dollar's)
HUD Programs (CDBG)
I CDBG Single Family Rehabilitation 570.202 (b)
Senior / Disabled Rehabilitation 499,948 210,494
First Time Homebuyers Assistance 200,000
Program
Program Delivery 2014
Expenses Expenses Admin
Total
699,948 210,494
II Community / Public Services 570.201 (e)
Graffiti Abatement (approved by HUD 2007) 50,500 29,164
Fair Housing Counseling 507.201 (k) 4,200 47,622
Senior -Disabled Energy Assistance 7,230
OIC of WA -CBDO (not part of Pub Svs Cap) 75,000
Total 136,930 76,786
III Public Facilities 570.201 (c)
Southeast Community Cntr / Miller Park Activity Cntr
(or other public facilities in the neighborhood)
Public Infrastructure
Total
IV Code Compliance 570.202 (c ) (Program Delivery)
5,000
5,000
178,000
178,000
V Economic Development 570.203 (b)
Unknown Project 85,470
Total 85,470
2014 Total
Estimated
Expenses
710,442
200,000
910,442
79,664
51,822
7,230
75,000
213,7
6
5,000
5,000
178,000
178,000
85,470
85,470
VI Administrative CDBG Costs 570.206 (s/b) 136,685 136,685
(Prog) 60,000 60,000
196,685 196,685
Grand EstimatedTotals for Year 2014 927,348 465,280 196,685 1,589,313
0 927,348 465,280 196,685 1,589,313
Entitlement is estimated as Congress has not yet approved the national HUD Budget.
Program Income is estimated since the figure is unknown until the money is received.
Appropriate adjustment will be made, if needed, when HUD awards are received.
Carry forward will be encumbered when amount is known, in Spring, 2013
Estimated 2014 CDBG Revenue 948,286
20% Admin 189,657
*** Code Compliance consists of 2 FTE and 64% of Permit Tech- is currently under a program line
but is still paid as a program delivery expense.
AFTER THE AAP WAS DONE THERE WAS AN INCREASE TO CODE COMPLIANCE TO PAY FOR SALARIES
AND BENEFITS FOR THE CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICERS. WE REDUCED SENIOR/DISABLED PROGRAM
AND PROGRAM DELIVERY TO COVER THESE COSTS.
2014 EST CDBG BUDGET Page 1
Account No. & Description
City of Yakima
Office of Neighborhood Development Services
2014 CDBG ESTIMATED REVENUES:
ESTIMATED
2014
124.330.0000.33114.2CY
CD Block Grant -Current Year
124.330.0000.33114.2 PY
CD Block Grant -Prior Year
124.699.0000.36140. P I I
CDBG-Program Interest Income
124.699.0000.38500. PRG
CD Block Grant -Program Income
124.699.0000.36110. I NT
Interest from Investments
2013 Carry Forwards
841,886
605,889
6,400
135,138
0
Actual Entitlement from HUD 3/21/14.
(At end of Year Add Actual CF)
Estimated PI Based on 3 homes sold with
CDBG PI
$25,000 x 3= $ 75,000
US Bank @ 12 Mo. Est = $ 60,138
2011 ESTIMATED CDBG Revenues:
1,589,313
EN
PI
CDBG ADMIN
841,886
141,838
983,424
20% $ 196,685
$ 983,424 CY EN/PI
Page 1 2014 EST CDBG REV
City of Yakima
Office of Neighborhood Development Services
)111 Wok
124.337.0000.33114.2HM
HUD HOME Program
124.337.0000.33114.2 H P
HOME Program -Prior Year
124.337.0000.36140.HMI
HOME Program Interest Income
124.337.0000.38500. HMP
HOME Program Income
2014 HOME
2013 Carry forward
406,607
747,270
16,493
492,646
HOME Revenue Totals:
1,663,016
2014 HOME ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
,\?10i'\M\‘0
Program 2014 Total
All activity is eligible under 92.205 (a) (1) Program Delivery 2014 Estimated
HOME PROJECT CATEGORIES: Expenses Expenses Admin Expenses
First -Time Homeowner Assistance (up to $50,000 each) 200,000 200,000
Single -Family Home Rehabilitation 0
Community Housing Development Organization 60,991 8,972 69,963
(CHDO: HUD requirement, minimum of 15% of Entitlement)
New Construction 1,284,394 15,784 1,300,178
0
Administrative HOME Costs 92,875 92,875
Grand Estimated Total Expenses for Year 2014 1,545,385 24,756 92,875 1,663,016
1,663,016
0
1,545,385
Entitlement is estimated as Congress has not yet approved the national HUD Budget.
Program Income is estimated as the figure is unknown until the money is received.
Appropriate adjustment will be made, if needed, when HUD awards are received.
Carry forward will be encumbered when amount is known, in Spring, 2014
2014 HOME BUDGET ESTIMATE
24,756
Estimated 2014 HOME EN and PI Revenue 915,746
10% Admin 91,575
92,875
IC 2/10/2015 Page 1
The full Consolidated Annual
Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER)
for the Year 2014, including Sections 7
and 8, is available online at:
htt "'wwwakimawa ov services
h borhood-deveIo
ment-services