Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2014-035 Voluntary Cleanup Program Agreement with the Department of Ecology; Former Municipal Landfill Remediation RESOLUTION NO. R- 2014 -035 A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager to execute a Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Agreement with Department of Ecology related to remediation of the former municipal landfill WHEREAS, the Yakima City Council has established that redevelopment of the former Boise Cascade mill (known as the Cascade Mill Redevelopment Project site) is an Economic Development priority; and WHEREAS, redevelopment of the Cascade Mill Project site is largely dependent upon the successful and timely remediation of the former municipal landfill located south of the railroad tracks on parcels 191318 -41001 and 191318 -42001 (part of), and WHEREAS, the City of Yakima will enter the Voluntary Cleanup Program as a Future Property owner and is presently in negotiations with the current property owner to acquire the area that contains the former municipal landfill, and WHEREAS, the VCP Agreement between City of Yakima and Department of Ecology will provide a more formal partnership in the evaluation and selection of the alternative for cleanup. The VCP provides a process for review and comment by DOE of site specific technical remedial actions under consideration by the City of Yakima related to the landfill, and WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology is a financial and regulatory permitting partner in the landfill cleanup project and has an interest in supporting and promoting a successful cleanup; therefore BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Voluntary Cleanup Program Agreement with Department of Ecology attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference with the cost of said Agreement to be reimbursed through the LIFT funding t, now, therefore, ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 25 day of February , 2014 ijrAtt ATTEST: - Micah Cawle , Mayor Sonya Claar• ee, City Clerk f - ? i MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council members From: Tony O'Rourke, City Manager Jeff Cutter, City Attorney Joan Davenport, Strategic Project Manager Date: February 25, 2014 Subject: Council Study Session Regarding Cascade Mill Landfill Issues Background The Yakima City Council previously conducted a Study Session regarding the 2014 work program for the Cascade Mill Redevelopment Project on November 26, 2013. The current focus of City efforts related to the project is engaging and commencing landfill remediation activities. This Study Session will address the time sensitive issues and required action steps. 1. Summary of Landfill Alternatives The estimated volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the former Yakima landfill is approximately 440,000 cubic yards of material, which is located at an average of 5 to 7 feet below the ground, and covered with a combination of wood waste and silt. Redevelopment options for the site are largely dependent upon the extent and treatment of MSW. A range of options have been reviewed and will be included in the analysis the city submits to Department of Ecology (DOE). Some of the core working assumptions for landfill clean -up activities include: a. Funds from Department of Ecology through the Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) program will be the primary means of financing the landfill cleanup. The extent of available funds is not entirely known at this time. DOE staff have expressed strong support for this project b. MSW will be removed from the alignment of new streets (Cascade Mill Parkway and East -West Corridor), as well as the ramps and Collector- Distributor of I -82 Interchange. c. Areas where MSW are not completely removed will continue to require monitoring as well as City supervision and potential liability. d. Prior to any remediation of the MSW, the wood debris on top of the landfill must be removed. Wood waste is not considered "hazardous" by DOE, but removal of wood waste will require DOE over -sight due to proximity of the MSW. Landfill Remediation Alternatives have been illustrated in Figures prepared by SLR International. On these Figures the areas available for redevelopment have been estimated and shown with a blue outline. These redevelopment areas do not reflect the land that will be dedicated to street and freeway ramp right of way. These Alternatives represent the full range of alternatives the City of Yakima will present to Department of Ecology. Actual implementation of these options as described in this memo, are generalized. As the City proceeds through the process of review of alternatives with the Department of Ecology, modifications may be evident and the final treatment may be a hybrid of these concepts. Alternative 1: Limited MSW removal. Surface cap, with monitoring — This option would remove only the MSW under the footprint of streets and highway ramps, as well as the 4 acres that occur on the "Plywood Plant" parcel. The majority of the MSW would be covered with an impermeable cap and left in place. Development options would be somewhat limited by this alternative to more passive uses or uses that do not pierce the cap, such as parking lots. This option was proposed when a soccer park was under consideration as the primary use of the landfill site. This option allows for 27.6 acres for passive development. Estimated cost to implement this remediation option is $7,240,000. Pros • Least expensive alternative • Easiest to implement • Eliminates current City liability associated with MSW beyond the Parcel 191318- 41001 (landfill parcel) property lines Cons • Within the landfill parcel, MSW is only removed under planned roadways; therefore, the greatest area of MSW (contaminant source) will remain • Least effective at remediating the contaminants of concern (methane in soil gas and nitrate in groundwater) • City's liability for large area of contamination will extend for long period of time (at least 30 years) • Presence of a large area of MSW reduces future property value • Due to limited effectiveness, Alternative 1 is not likely to be approved by Department of Ecology (Ecology) Alternative 2: Partial MSW removal, Perimeter berm, monitor groundwater for Nitrates This option would excavate MSW (approximately 280,000 c.y.) from a portion of the landfill, and backfill 245,000 c.y. of MSW in a berm. Approximately 35,000 c.y. of MSW would need to relocated off -site. Groundwater monitoring would be for Nitrates only. The average height of the berm would range between 3 and 7.7 feet. The area covered by the berm is estimated at 11.2 acres. The area available for development, without MSW is estimated at 19.6 acres. Cost to implement this alternative is estimated at $12,200,000. Pros • Eliminates current City liability associated with MSW beyond the landfill parcel property lines • MSW will be removed from southwestern and south - central parts of landfill parcel, which will result in large areas without MSW that could be sold and developed (particularly if the planned southern roundabout is moved closer to the southern property line and the east -west roads from that roundabout are narrower than currently designed) • Nitrate - impacted groundwater will be effectively remediated by natural attenuation Cons • Alternatives 2, 3a and 3b are the most difficult alternatives to implement • Two large areas of remaining MSW will be capped, which will contain but not eliminate the City's liability associated with the MSW in those areas • To reduce the high cost of off -site disposal of MSW, a large volume of the excavated MSW will be backfilled in constructed bermed areas and then capped. The heights of the berms will range from 3 to 7 feet, which will limit the future use of those areas. • Groundwater remediation will take up to 10 years to complete • High cost, but significantly less than cost of Alternative 4 Alternative 3A: Partial MSW removal, MSW Perimeter Berm, groundwater treatment This alternative is identical to Alternative 2, except a passive treatment is installed at the southern edge of the property line for groundwater treatment of Nitrates. These two options are included as environmental alternatives. The average height of the berm would range between 3 and 7.7 feet. The area covered by the berm is estimated at 11.2 acres. The area available for development, without MSW is estimated at 19.6 acres. Cost to implement this alternative is estimated at $12,300,000. Pros • Eliminates current City liability associated with MSW beyond the landfill parcel property lines • MSW will be removed from southwestern and south - central parts of landfill parcel, which will result in large areas without MSW that could be sold and developed (particularly if the planned southern roundabout is moved closer to the southern property line and the east -west roads from that roundabout are narrower than currently designed) • Nitrate - impacted groundwater will be remediated by passive de- nitrification and by natural attenuation. The nitrate remediation will take approximately 5 years less than Alternative 2. • Similar cost to Alternative 2, but it includes a more aggressive remedial approach for the nitrate - impacted groundwater. Ecology has previously expressed that they would prefer the additional groundwater remediation component of Alternative 3. Cons • Alternatives 2, 3a and 3b are the most difficult alternatives to implement • Two large areas of remaining MSW will be capped, which will contain but not eliminate the City's liability associated with the MSW in those areas • To reduce the high cost of off -site disposal of MSW, a large volume of the excavated MSW will be backfilled in constructed bermed areas and then capped. The heights of the berms will range from 3 to 7 feet, which will limit the future use of those areas. • High cost, but significantly less than cost of Alternative 4 Alternative 3B: Partial MSW removal, Backfill embankment with MSW This option includes the excavation of 350,000c.y. of MSW and the backfilling of approximately 185,000 c.y. excavated MSW at locations beneath and within two embankment berms. The berms would extend beyond the shoulders of the planned east -west roadway and the shoulders of the planned western on -ramp and off -ramp of I -82. The surface of the northern embankment would have a 1:8 slope. Portions of the berms would be on WSDOT property and they would have to approve the backfilling of MSW onto their right of way. This option would provide 24.1 acres for redevelopment without MSW. Estimated cost is approximately $19,300,000. Pros: • Provides a larger area for redevelopment • Eliminates current City liability associated with MSW beyond the landfill parcel property lines • MSW will be removed from southwestern and south - central parts of landfill parcel, which will result in large areas without MSW that could be sold and developed (particularly if the planned southern roundabout is moved closer to the southern property line and the east -west roads from that roundabout are narrower than currently designed) • Nitrate- impacted groundwater will be remediated by passive de- nitrification and by natural attenuation. The nitrate remediation will take approximately 5 years less than Alternative 2. Cons: • WSDOT would need to approve this concept and the actual design • City responsibility for MSW in the WSDOT right of way would likely be required • High cost to implement • Areas of remaining MSW will be capped, which will contain but not eliminate the City's liability associated with the MSW in those areas Alternative 4: Extensive MSW Removal This option involves the removal of most of the MSW from the landfill, relocation of the MSW to an approved location and backfilling with clean fill material. A partnership with Yakima County related to the relocation of MSW to one of the County landfills will be a critical component to cost control on this alternative. This option would provide 27.6 acres for redevelopment without MSW. Estimated cost is approximately $27,000,000 Pros • Eliminates current City liability associated with MSW beyond the landfill parcel property lines • MSW will be removed from the entire landfill parcel, except for an area at the northern end of the parcel. After the remedial action, almost all of the property could be sold and developed. • The source of the nitrate - impacted groundwater would be removed Cons • Very high cost • Difficult to implement • The area of remaining MSW will be capped, which will contain but not eliminate the City's liability associated with the MSW in that area Summary of Estimated Costs Closed City of Yakima Municipal Landfill Yakima, Washington Monitoring and Total Estimated Remedial Alternatives Capital Cost Maintenance Cost Cost Alternative 1 - Limited MSW Removal, and Groundwater and $7,000,000 $240,000 $7,240,000 Combustible Gas Monitoring Partial MSW Removal, Surface Capping Over Alternative 2 - Mounded Berms, and Perimeter Barrier Wall $11,800,000 $400,000 $12,200,000 with Passive Venting Partial MSW Removal, Surface Capping Over Alternative 3a - Mounded Berms, Perimeter Barrier Wall with $11,900,000 $400,000 $12,300,000 Passive Venting, and In -Situ Groundwater Treatment Partial MSW Removal, Surface Capping Over Alternative 3b - Embankment Berms, Perimeter Barrier Wall $18,700,000 $600,000 $19,300,000 with Passive Venting, and In -Situ Groundwater Treatment Extensive MSW Removal with Limited Surface Alternative 4 - Capping and Perimeter Barrier Wall with $26,600,000 $380,000 $27,000,000 Passive Venting 2. Department of Ecology Voluntary Clean -up Program (VCP) The City of Yakima, as a future property owner of the landfill area, proposes to submit to the Department of Ecology (DOE) a Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Agreement. The VCP provides a process for informal review and comment by DOE of site specific technical remedial actions under consideration by the City of Yakima related to the landfill. As a result of the VCP Agreement, DOE becomes more of a formal partner with the City of Yakima in the evaluation and selection of the alternative for cleanup. Under the terms of the VCP, the City of Yakima agrees to reimburse DOE for the cost of staff time in providing the site specific technical consultations. These costs are eligible expenses under the LIFT. The VCP is authorized under the Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D of the RCW. While entering into a VCP does not limit the regulatory authority of DOE, nor does it constitute a settlement of any liability. The VCP Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party. A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a VCP Agreement with Department of Ecology is included for your consideration, as well as the draft VCP Agreement. 3. Tentative Schedule for Landfill Cleanup Review by DOE The following potential schedule was developed with the Department of Ecology staff. These dates represent targets for the process. Actual deadlines will not be known until we start the process. March 2014 Join Voluntary Cleanup Program, ask for opinion on Remedial Investigation(RI) April 2014 Receive DOE written opinion on adequacy of RI May — July 2014 Complete any additional field work or sampling as necessary August 2014 Re- submit revised RI to DOE October 2014 Receive DOE written opinion on adequacy of RI October 2014 TARGET DATE TO BEGIN REMOVAL OF WOOD WASTE ON LANDFILL November 2014 Submit Feasibility Study (FS) to DOE for written opinion January 2015 Receive written opinion on FS February 2015 If FS is adequate, begin drafting Cleanup Action Plan (CAP) February 2015 Submit grant application for Remedial Action Grant funding March 2015 Finalize CAP, begin negotiations for Consent Decree May 2015 Finalize consent decree LEGEND D J U A F 7j MW$ \ . MW -12 * MONL ORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION U GP -17 IS SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION • LANNED ROADWAY OVER �� r. '.1W.8 GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION AND HIGHWAY B2 •i�I DESIGNATION �i � ■ � / GP -8 ® SOIL VAPOR COMPLIANCE PROBE LOCATION AND � DESIGNATION � - M -1 B � / \ CP -19 ® SOIL VAPOR PROBE TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW ..i ESI IMATED AREA OF ' ■ `1 1 1 7 _ EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT - \ il i ,ce MUNICIPAL SOLID � \ 1 • A4.N 12 - M WELL ABANDONED PRIOR TO NSW' MW11 WASTE REMOVAL ,;(1 �� Oil ' EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY ERR TY UCVELOPMENi � 1 v �� iii,- . G -1 / / / ' '`` I 1 ` ® ESTIMATED AREA OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE REMOVAL ! ' , 4 � 1 m \ — - - — PROPERTY LINE ......4 a s _ - ESTIMATED LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE / Q . _' .w. w 1., ∎�wa. .. RAILROAD TRACKS PARCEL 111 . G�•�:a••' ,� t •G . S1. 1 91311429m • 11 —�.. 47* i •AIRV lemex i - -+— .r FENCE 90 ` / �_ ,t'f:*, \ •\\ 1, •\ THE E: LOCA OF MONITORING WELLS MW -14, MW -15. • LIMITS OF FILL 70 \ MW -18 , AND MW- 17 ARE SHOWN ON FIGURE 13. p i •' p % RAISE PLANNED \ 1 G MW-9A ROADWAY AND RAMPS ,Vq,, 1 M1 FORMER PLYWOOD PLANT ® ESTIMAI ED AREA OF DRAIN '� �� \ 1 '� \ U. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE DITCH 4t.4Q PARCEL 1 �, REMOVAL •` \ 1 1181318 -42401 AS PARCEL .GP-18. , ..0.\� , 191318 -01001 \� 1 EAST \ / 1 % ■ � � � \ I • \\ ` • 1 ESTIMATED AREA OF le F \ r��� fit 1 1` MUNICIPAL SOUR WASTE 1 1 // O� \ \ 4' 4 ,11' Q ` PLANNED EXTENSION OF / 1: 1 � REMOVAL $ . / ` \ �` \ �,�, '! \ \�, NORTH fA1R AVENUE , `� ' <93 ,..:4---- \ \� �,�� \ 1` , 1 - PLANNED EXPANSION OF \ ` �� - 1 ;ff HIGHWAY 82 1 1/�y 0 4 :x` ° . � =i 1 s �. 1V11 P � J/ �� ,, : -. T ESTIMATED LIMITS OF 1 70 ° — � AI � � = spwd ROAD M j 04 \ S s 1 c_� —�� � i i , � � / i ®� C %ice �4. w ` e (- 1 1 GP -5 \ % I � ` ���7 111 \ GP-8 _ ((�� ®� �� ���� % 1 ` ` & E.PS St. GP -11 GP-12 \ \' ,` ■ / _ - \\ i 4�� i Q �� _\ MW ? 41 0 200 400 1 PARCEL VN. \��.t) , R 1 191318 -03539 .. . _ � _ SCALE IN FEET o I GP -15 PROPERTY LIE � PARCEL a -.__. �_. -._ -. 8 I 191318-42003 DATE 11/13 FIGURE 19 22118 2016 AVE SC DWN. MEH CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL BLDG- G sURE 202 APPIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON �y B OTHIILL, WA 93021 REVIS. 07/13 ALTERNATIVE I - S �R PROIECI NO LIMITED MEW REMOVAL, AND GROUNDWATER ��JJ T. <:: w2 -s: 101.00221.00009 AND COMBUSTIBLE GAS MONITORING \\ LEGEND 0 J C7�J n A [F 7 MW6 MW -12 -0 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION , 1 GP -17 ® SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION •LANNED ROADWAY OVER i1� h! \'JB GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION AND HIGHWAY 82 � /� � `� DESIGNATION GPA ® SOIL VAPOR COMPLIANCE PROBE LOCATION AND / ' � .i� / . -I DESIGNATION - s MW - % , GP-4 )j SOIL VAPOR PROBE TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW \ 1-_ j / I • f EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT =� ��-/ '/ e 0) MW -13 -Y MONITORING WELL TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW /� i MW-11 \ "1 ` EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT _ J 1 tAVJ PLANNED GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION �� !I �! _ Q �a i "�T�� ® NI /�\$$$• ® ESTIMATED AREA OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ANDIOR ` 1 z .. , , WO OD WASTE REMOVAL \ - � 4 1 i��� � &11 ■ ��� ��,"'/ s \ a k \ = l VAPOR BARRIER WALL • ••• � r �O i•Ilmos ;r9= = m��� E AREA OF CONSTRUCTED BERM AND SURFACE CAPPING PARCEL �`� �����'�• �I i. �1Wf •1i S ∎ • l , $L. I ' I 191318-42001 91 3 1 8-42001 ��, + 1�� - ' " � . ` WAWA UM 4��� ■1b IS A VENT LOCATION OS c P - �. - ,'' �'�� ' - � — — — — PASSIVE VENTILATION TRENCH C \ ' • ��� RAISE PLANNED . ∎� � \ + PROPERTV LINE i * \ _ LIMBS OF FILL TO ',`♦ ESTIMATED LIMBS OF MUNICIP SO LID WAS �, ���� \` $ • ROADWAY AND RAMPS S' \ - - �,� I I I I RAILROAD TRACKS M A FORMER PLYWOOD PLANT ' �.1 FENCE v \ 1 MW-12 I , ESTIMATED AREA OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE \ \ �,'. \� PARCEL , REMOVAL \ \ `. y, THE LOCATIONS OF MONITORING WELLS mw-14, MW -15, 091318-42401 , . - \ 4 , \ 1 t ••li AN MW46. AND MW -17 ARE SHOWN ON FIGURE 13. a s � . ' \� 1 Ep .p ` l 9 � N � \ �'', ESTIMATED AREA OF A 1W_ \ �`,� ■ PLA NNED EXTENSION OF • , MUNIC REMOVAL WASTE PARCEL \ ` � ' . p ∎ i 1 � �� / , � i l ► 191318 42404 �_ � � � � f\ FAIR AVENUE ,p �� •� .� �` \�' �' PLANNED EXPANSION OF • ■ I `'�9 \ , ` , HIGHWAY 82 IeS , \ K ? % t r lk • , ,,,,,.. • opy 'i E IS .E •St. CI.1 1 ��II' GP -1 , �\ � ' ' AL ��,!����. \ ` • 0 200 400 PARCEL VV ;;;.L44 ....-1 �r - i.,,,,,, , \ 191318-43539 GP -14 1, ESTIMATED LIMITS OF SCALE IN FEET „��;.,,,,,,�„ MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE - ` GP-15 \ B PARCEL i ' 187318 -42003 DATE 09/12 FIGURE 20 22118 zoa, Avr se 7N,,__. BD r CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL I BLDG. G surr6 202 APPR. MDS YAKIMA, WASHINGTON V ', BOTHELL: WA 98021 BEMs. 12 /13 ALTERNAI7VE 2 - SLR PROJECT NO. PARTIAL MSW REMOVAL, SURFACE T 419-02 -8900 xi F 4]5,9038198 10100211.00009 CAPPING, AND PERIMETER 13ARRIER WALL ;:1 LEGEND ESTIMATED AREA OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE�� \ MW -12 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION REMOVAL w ll GP -8 ® SOIL VAPOR COMPLIANCE PROBE LOCATION AND GP -5 ® SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION 1 PLANNED ROADWAY OVER MW B GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION AND ��'►� DESIGNATION HIGHWAY 82 � // Y� �i 1�I1� � � �� 1,� - DESIGNATION ■ ' '11'q -18 If / . I GP-4 ii=-4 SOIL VAPOR PROBE TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW --T -. EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 0 �� ' ` ,, MW-I3 , MONITORING WELL TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW -` �� / ` _ • ,— G J ` EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT / —` r i cP / �1,, , MW PLANNED GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION Q ` %/ _ • ® ESTIMATED AREA OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE AND /OR ` �� : + -� WOOD WASTE REMOVAL ® VAPOR BARRIER WALL `'� y— — i ii / /��� _ __ ,— - - ms ` + - r . . : ` : = = ; =� ; = AREA OF CONSTRUCTED MOUND BERM AND SURFACE ��-- � �- ,,. -. �e.a�. = CAPPING /' O P AfILH t , - - : � '� � - _ >��ji ni �w ie_t_� A VENT LOCATION . �' 1 tl81{4l001 % �_I` av �1r���e, 1�s.a_a�a t, b . 13• _�„/ �P — — — — PASSIVE VENTILATION TREN EATMENT CH LOCATION 'c P•II ti ' • � '� '�i'/// ` // ,1, , \ SD U RO UNDWATER TR • y \ LIMITS OF FILL TO ........... ..\ \' ---- PROP ERTY G LINE Dggq, RAISE PUNNED ��' � \ t 0 .. _ ESTIMATED LIMIT S OF MUNICIPAL S OLID WASTE \ �� ROADWAY AND RAMPS , \� �� •F q , MW -9A G?\ 0P�-3 - .,_ _ _ X14 , r \ *** 4 RAILROAD TRACKS I mm • FORMER PLYWOOD PLANT • \ , ' , 41 * A FENCE \ PARCEL , JJ %...... , v. ,191318 -42401 \ :;,�1, NOTE: OF • • ` \ �\ • � `�, MW i6, AND MW-17 ARE MONITORING N• MW -15, SHOWN ON FIGURE 13. 1 GP -18 ( AA A _ A �IiI I • q � , \ \��,' / \ � „ 1 ;' �, ESTIMATED AREA OF \` 1 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PARCEL 1 \ , W, / /�� \ \,, \� / P MILL PARKWAY �� \ � /sk. REMOVAL 191318.42404 ,,,,,,7 \ %0 e i C.' � \ \ �,� •,� I . _ I I PLANNED EXPANSION OF \ 4O S `) 1' 1 0t, \ ■` I \ 1 r .. HIGHWAY 02 ®GP -17 ` I / S , \ .,, CAS1� St. OP -1:� I \ GP -1 �t \,,�'��,, \ ` ....r'� MW-7 1 \ O 200 400 , PARCEL t <_, . \N ■\ C.' Z , 191311343539 ' ' G P•14 ......1..,,,.._ SCALE IN FEET F GP -15 PROPER; VUNE ESTIMATED AREA OF A PARCEL MUNICIPAL SOLID 191318 -42003 WASTE REMOVAL FIGURE 1 L ESTIMATED LII.IITS OF DATE 10112 1 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE 22118 20th AVE SE D MEH CLOSED CITY OF YAICIMA MUNICIPAL LAI DFI L BLDG U, SUITE 202 Ael'R. MDS YAKIMA, WASHINGTON SLR te' BOTIII LL WA 98021 REVIS 02114 ALTERNATIVE 3A - PARTIAL MSW REMOVAL, PROJECT NO. SURFACE CAPPING OVER MOUNDED BERMS, T: 4/5402-11100 P. 131 -Wi-MY 101.00221.00009 AND IN -SITU GROUNDWATER TREATMENT 1 \ LEGEND ESTIMATED AREA OF MVy MUNICIPAL SOUD WASTE \ MW -12 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION GP -5 ® SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION MW.g GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION REMOVAL PLANNED ROADWAY OVER AND ��' %�. �) DESIGNATION SOIL VAPOR COMPLIANCE PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION HIGHWAY 82 �� �i _.....7"" � / t . l GP -B ® _ �� ��i r dW -13 % �- • GP-4 C' SOIL VAPOR PROBE TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW i / I 1�, /i EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ..... te ! • f � � UW -13 MONITORING WELL TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO MSW �I .! I EXCAVATION OR PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT — r /� GP - �' = 0 1' MW 4 0 PLANNED GROUNDWATER COMPLIANCE WELL LOCATION ^��� Q ► _ �= - • _ 1 I 1 ,\ 1 ESTIMATEDA EEAOFMUNICIPAI SOLID WASTE AND/OR ;lira, . ..��� �__ iJ ® W W REMOVAL �� .� rV�FF�` ''',./4/4111/4"%r �•,,, \ ® VAPOR BARRIER WALL V // - 4.� i�r �� �- r � r - � r ^ . C • C� • !_ =- • MK �� v I I AREA OF CONSTRUCTED EMBANKMENT BERM AND �7 r r r � • Cr .• 1� a ∎ au la Q PARC -; `' � - . _ t.� =�►�asr r y . r .. ................................................ • � r = ;a S .... SURFACE CAPPING EL ��` 4 = �' — — — — PASSIVE VENTILATION TRENCH � � ^ �� \420ln � � �+ V� \. ` ��- — � ��� ��� � '',SN 1 IN -SITU GROUNDWATER TREATMENT LOCATION t °� ,''�' - -01 : , • LIMITS OF FILL TO � !�' 0 , ��'� \ \ = _ _ ESTIMATED LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL SOU °WASTE " RAISE PLANNED \� \44 MW 9A� . � ROADWAY ANU HAMPS ' \� ; I,!` I I I I RAILROAD TRACKS G\A ! N � T FORMCR PLYWOOD PLANT '. ®, • \ 4 % s,, - Tf FENCE !� � `. 4 Ar . \ A PASSIVE VEN I LOCATION 1 19131862401 - /-44 - - j e l l �`� , NOTE: P -10 ,..0 g ® ♦ t \ +, =�. ` ' THE LOCATIONS OF MONITORING WELLS MW-1 a, MW 15, * 8 �_-,.y Tom/ � �\ alkII aV � 4 i % 7 MW-18, AND MW -17 ARE SHOWN ON FIGURE 13. • ` ■ w. + � I I �`,�,'�'I,�4, PLANNED CASCADE ��, r, PS ! PARCEL \ { �� � ,i '.. , \� ,744‘s' 4\ \` MILL PARKWAY , , / � ' , .R 1 91 31 8 62404 Gp .1� ' �\ � , PLANNED EXPANSION OF •�, \ ' 0,0 ! \�\ • ` I GP -20 HIGHWAY 82 ■ FAS GP-I :� �i Q •1 A , / w��-� \ „ ' ,; N \ - �+""'� - ' MW.7 I 0 200 400 PARCEL �����.. _ . . 11(1: 1,,071#4.'■ ‘‘,# Al ,...,__ ., --,--:... _,410, AlOre,„-- "r . , , ,. , /4 GP-17 1 / . r '..-- '4.4•.'54 -:: 0: , \ S ' 1 191318 -43539 ' . NT SCALE IN FEET \..... - GP -1 • PROPERTY LINE Q PARCEL 191318 -42003 FIGURE 2 ESTIMATED LIMITS OF ESTIMATED AREA OF DATE 10/12 I MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE 22118 20th AVE SE DWN. MEN CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL REMOVAL APPR. MDS YAKIMA, WASHINGTON S LR ` ` BLDG. G. SUITE 202 BOTHELL, WA 98021 REVIS. 02/14 ALTERNATIVE 3B - PARTIAL MSW REMOVAL, 713-102-1481 ' PROJECT NO. SURFACE CAPPING OVER EMBANKMENT BERMS, T. �i 10100221.00009 AND IN -SITU GROUNDWATER TREATMENT `` LEGEND MW -12 -$ 2009 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION PLANNED CITY OF YAKIMA �, GP -5 ® 2009 SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION NEW PLANNED ROADWAY 'CANNED ROADWAY OVER � � ALIGNMENT HIGHWAY 82 ��� j GP -3 2008 SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION ce V � MW -9 0 PRE -2009 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION i� _ - ° � ` ' A!rN -B ® MONITORING WLLL OR SOIL VAPOR PROBE 70 BE P 1 0 /' �� i - rj -18 � . � �� �� I, \ ABANDONED PRIOR TO REMEDIAL ACTION �� O ♦� /I - MW PUNNED MONITORING WELL LOCATION •-______________ 01 MW 11\ 1 � ,'I� — PROPERTY LINE - _ \ a -------------•--___------ / ^ —\ �I OP-13 - - - ESTIMATED LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE • Q /�-• �� �• `'1 `� - ® c - __ ' J ,� 0 ‘V., r 1 ` _ 4�4_014��u"'- \�''/��``r,,, - I I I I RAILROAD TRACKS � \ 1 r ` - FENCE �• ►��r. r+�. ► X1. � h t; ,yy � 17_1:24 • - � a tl � ���� .sa �• a / / / ESTIMATED AREA OF EXCAVATION � � � � i .\n ��w6.• 11=1=1 11=1=1 a L1_LL 197318 4� �I- * /WM',.1VAIVILaa � S. %MI –USI 1 ■ E ,O• . I I ; I,�' ;, \ ® VAPOR BARRIER WALL y a \ �� r N AREA OF SURFACE CAPPING 9 \ , \� y A � �, VENT LOCATION \ \ - � � `, $' ,. - - - PASSIVE VENTILATION TRENCI I .. -F A FORMER PLYWOOD PLANT D1 M 440;1* � \ PARCEL \\ M ` �� 1 \ 191318 -42401 �, NOTE. ^ • THE LOCATIONS OF MONITORING WELLS MW -14, MW -15, ��g \ � \`,y MW -16, AND MW -17 ARE SHOWN ON FIGURE 13. 14, GP 10 �����y� \ �� 1. \ PARCEL MW1 /-:,. , n � / r , � \ \1 913182404 \ \ 1 : ' � % • ♦ � ; Ai ➢ 1-04,,,,i do . : . .. t . PLANNED EXPANSION OF f r. ,�'' 1 � � � / �\ HIGHWAY 82 S 2 \ \ y a. .... ` Mw -7 ' 8 0 200 400 i \ P_14 GP4 APPROXIMATE LIMITS SCALE IN FEET ` OF EXCAVATION e \ GP -15 PROPERTY LINE 1 PARCEL 191319 -42003 DATE 10/12 FIGURE 22 DWN. ROT CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL 1 22118 20th AVE SE APPR. MOO YAKIMA, WASHINGTON �, BLDG. G, SUITE 202 _ 3 SLR te' B L L, WA 98021 PROJE. O PROJECT NO3 ALTERNATIVE 4 - F: 5 02 e e 101.00221.00009 LANDFILL EXCAVATION AND OFF -SITE DISPOSAL VCP; AGREEMENT • • INSTRUCTIONS: Submit this Agreement (original) to Ecology as part of your Application. ^_ __ Before submitting, enter the Customer's name and the Site's address on the first page and sign --'' the Agreement on the second page. If your Application is accepted, then Ecology will do the DEPARTMENT OF following: 1) identify the Site and VCP project in the box below; 2) sign the Agreement; and ECOLOGY 3) send you a copy of the completed Agreement. State of Washington This document constitutes an Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the City of Yakima (Customer) to provide informal site - specific technical consultations under the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) for the Site identified below and associated with the following address: Closed City of Yakima Landfill, Parcels 191318 -41001 and 191318 - 42001, Yakima, Washington The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate independent remedial action at the Site. Ecology is entering into this Agreement under the authority of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. If a term in this Agreement is defined in MTCA or Chapter 173 -340 WAC, then that definition shall govern. Services Provided by Ecology Upon request, Ecology agrees to provide the Customer informal site - specific technical consultations on the independent remedial actions proposed for or performed at the Site consistent with WAC 173- 340- 515(5). Those consultations may include assistance in identifying applicable regulatory requirements and opinions on whether the remedial actions proposed for or conducted at the Site meet those requirements. Ecology may use any appropriate resource to provide the Customer with the requested consultative services. Those resources may include, but shall not be limited to, those of Ecology and the Office of the Attorney General. However, Ecology shall not use independent contractors unless the Customer provides Ecology with prior written authorization In accordance with RCW 70.105D.030(1)(i), any opinions provided by Ecology under this Agreement are advisory only and not binding on Ecology. Ecology, the state, and officers and employees of the state are immune from all liability. Furthermore, no cause of action of any nature may arise from any act or omission in providing, or failing to provide, informal advice and assistance under the VCP. Payment for Services by Customer The Customer agrees to pay all costs incurred by Ecology in providing the informal site - specific technical consultations requested by the Customer consistent with WAC 173 - 340 - 515(6) and 173- 340- 550(6). Those costs may include the costs incurred by attorneys or independent contractors used by Ecology to provide the requested consultative services. Ecology's hourly costs shall be determined based on the method in WAC 173 - 340 - 550(2). Ecology shall mail the Customer a monthly itemized statement of costs (invoice) by the tenth day of each month (invoice date) that there is a balance on the account. The invoice shall include a summary of the costs incurred, payments received, identity of staff involved, and amount of time staff spent on the project. The Customer shall pay the required amount by the due date, which shall be thirty (30) calendar days after the invoice date. If payment has not been received by the due date, then Ecology shall withhold FOR Facility / Site Name: I ., � N COMPLETION I ,- s 5 �X ya kir�tvr LL C � BY Facility / Site No.: • � A tr tc,s& ECOLOGY I - O RPrplvpd ONLY VCP Project No.: • q 6 • 2014 ECY 070 -324 (revised July 2008) C� ' p r,��`� any requested opinions and notify the Customer by certified mail that the debt is past due. If payment has not been received within sixty (60) calendar days of the invoice date, then Ecology shall stop all work under the Agreement and may, as appropriate, assign the debt to a collection agency under Chapter 19.16 RCW. The Customer agrees to pay the collection agency fee incurred by Ecology in the course of debt collection. Reservation of Rights / No Settlement This Agreement does not constitute a settlement of liability to the state under MTCA. This Agreement also does not protect a liable person from contribution claims by third parties for matters addressed by the Agreement. The state does not have the authority to settle with any person potentially liable under MTCA except in accordance with RCW 70.105D.040(4). Ecology's signature on this Agreement in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any Ecology rights or authority. Ecology reserves all rights under MTCA, including the right to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such actions necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Site. Effective Date, Modifications, and Severability The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which this Agreement is signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of Ecology and the Customer. Amendments shall be in writing and shall be effective when signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. If any provision of this Agreement proves to be void, it shall in no way invalidate any other provision of this Agreement. Termination of Agreement Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause by sending written notice by U.S. mail to the other party. The effective date of termination shall be the date Ecology sends notice to the Customer or the date Ecology receives notice from the Customer, whichever occurs first. Unless otherwise directed, issuance of a No Further Action opinion, either for the Site as a whole or for a portion of the real property located within the Site, shall constitute notice of termination by Ecology. Under this Agreement, the Customer is only responsible for costs incurred by Ecology before the effective date of termination. However, termination of this Agreement shall not affect any right Ecology may have to recover its costs under MTCA or any other provision of law. Representations and Signatures The undersigned representative of the Customer hereby certifies that he or she is full authorized to enter into this Agreement and to execute and legally bind the Customer to co : • with th_ ; • - -ment. CITY •N .•crNO: - STATE OF WASHINGTON RES:ILUTIONNO: _ 1© Na m 7 Q, ` Cit of "aktma �� DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY a Signature Signature .175 Vil I Printed Name Printed Nam' of Signatory I ( � 1 � Section Manager, Y i' ` r Toxics Cleanup Program Section Title of Si natory Date: Dater 7 i � If you need this document in an alternative format, please call the Toxics Cleanup Program at 360 - 407 -7170 Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877 - 833 -6341 ECY 070 -324 (revised July 2008) VCP AGREEMENT �.. INSTRUCTIONS: Submit this Agreement (original) to Ecology as part of your Application. Before submitting, enter the Customer's name and the Site's address on the first page and sign the Agreement on the second page. If your Application is accepted, then Ecology will do the DEPARTMENT OF following: 1) identify the Site and VCP project in the box below; 2) sign the Agreement; and ECOLOGY 3) send you a copy of the completed Agreement. State of Washington This document constitutes an Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and the City of Yakima (Customer) to provide informal site - specific technical consultations under the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) for the Site identified below and associated with the following address: Closed City of Yakima Landfill, Parcels 191318 -41001 and 191318 - 42001, Yakima, Washington . The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate independent remedial action at the Site. Ecology is entering into this Agreement under the authority of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. If a term in this Agreement is defined in MTCA or Chapter 173 -340 WAC, then that definition shall govern. Services Provided by Ecology Upon request, Ecology agrees to provide the Customer informal site - specific technical consultations on the independent remedial actions proposed for or performed at the Site consistent with WAC 173- 340- 515(5). Those consultations may include assistance in identifying applicable regulatory requirements and opinions on whether the remedial actions proposed for or conducted at the Site meet those requirements. Ecology may use any appropriate resource to provide the Customer with the requested consultative services. Those resources may include, but shall not be limited to, those of Ecology and the Office of the Attorney General. However, Ecology shall not use independent contractors unless the Customer provides Ecology with prior written authorization. In accordance with RCW 70.105D.030(1)(i), any opinions provided by Ecology under this Agreement are advisory only and not binding on Ecology. Ecology, the state, and officers and employees of the state are immune from all liability. Furthermore, no cause of action of any nature may arise from any act or omission in providing, or failing to provide, informal advice and assistance under the VCP. Payment for Services by Customer The Customer agrees to pay all costs incurred by Ecology in providing the informal site - specific technical consultations requested by the Customer consistent with WAC 173 - 340 - 515(6) and 173- 340- 550(6). Those costs may include the costs incurred by attorneys or independent contractors used by Ecology to provide the requested consultative services. Ecology's hourly costs shall be determined based on the method in WAC 173 - 340 - 550(2). Ecology shall mail the Customer a monthly itemized statement of costs (invoice) by the tenth day of each month (invoice date) that there is a balance on the account. The invoice shall include a summary of the costs incurred, payments received, identity of staff involved, and amount of time staff spent on the project. The Customer shall pay the required amount by the due date, which shall be thirty (30) calendar days after the invoice date. If payment has not been received by the due date, then Ecology shall withhold FOR Facility I Site Name: __I COMPLETION BY ECOLOGY Facility I Site No.: 431 OF coeo ONLY VCP Project No.: FEB 2 8 2014 ECY 070 -324 (revised July 2008) 1 f V k 4/ RFsmc)- any requested opinions and notify the Customer by certified mail that the debt is past due. If payment has not been received within sixty (60) calendar days of the invoice date, then Ecology shall stop all work under the Agreement and may, as appropriate, assign the debt to a collection agency under Chapter 19.16 RCW. The Customer agrees to pay the collection agency fee incurred by Ecology in the course of debt collection. Reservation of Rights / No Settlement This Agreement does not constitute a settlement of liability to the state under MTCA. This Agreement also does not protect a liable person from contribution claims by third parties for matters addressed by the Agreement. The state does not have the authority to settle with any person potentially liable under MTCA except in accordance with RCW 70.105D.040(4). Ecology's signature on this Agreement in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any Ecology rights or authority. Ecology reserves all rights under MTCA, including the right to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such actions necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Site. Effective Date, Modifications, and Severability The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which this Agreement is signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of Ecology and the Customer. Amendments shall be in writing and shall be effective when signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. If any provision of this Agreement proves to be void, it shall in no way invalidate any other provision of this Agreement. Termination of Agreement Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause by sending written notice by U.S. mail to the other party. The effective date of termination shall be the date Ecology sends notice to the Customer or the date Ecology receives notice from the Customer, whichever occurs first. Unless otherwise directed, issuance of a No Further Action opinion, either for the Site as a whole or for a portion of the real property located within the Site, shall constitute notice of termination by Ecology. Under this Agreement, the Customer is only responsible for costs incurred by Ecology before the effective date of termination. However, termination of this Agreement shall not affect any right Ecology may have to recover its costs under MTCA or any other provision of law. Representations and Signatures The undersigned representative of the Customer hereby certifies that he or she is full authorized to enter into this Agreement and to execute and legally bind the Customer to co - with the • --m - nt. CITY '•N 'AC r NO: I Y akima N O : �j � C STATE OF WASHINGTON Cit of � akima DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Name • ustomer 1114- 4, Signature Signature IP0ctr1aJ Printed Name Printed Nam' of Signatory • Section Manager, I hi et WW1 r Toxics Cleanup Program Section Title of Si natory Date: Date: t/ If you need this document in an alternative format, please call the Toxics Cleanup Program at 360- 407 -7170. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877 - 833 -6341. ECY 070 -324 (revised July 2008) Voluntary Cleanup Program DEPARTMENT OF Washington State Department of Ecology E Toxics Cleanup Program St of Washington APPLICATION FORM Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), the Department of Ecology (Ecology) may provide informal site - specific technical consultations to persons conducting independent remedial actions at a hazardous waste site. Ecology may provide such consultations under the authority of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. To enter the VCP, complete and submit to Ecology a VCP Application. The Application consists of the following two documents: 1. Application Form (including required attachments). E THIS DOCUMENT 2. Agreement. For guidance on how to complete your Application, please refer to the Application Instructions, which are available separately on the VCP web site: www.ecy.wa.gov /programs /tcp /vcp /vcpmain.htm. Part 1 - ADMINISTRATION A. Customer Information. The Customer is the person or organization requesting services from Ecology under the VCP, and is responsible for paying the costs incurred by Ecology. The authority and duty of the Customer are explained in the Agreement. Name of Customer: City of Yakima What type of entity is the Customer? If the Customer is a "person," then the Customer shall serve as both ❑ Person the Project Manager and the Project Billing Contact. Please identify this person and their contact information in both Parts 1B and 1C. If the Customer is an "organization," then please identify the Project ® Organization Manager in Part 1B and the Project Billing Contact in Part 1C. Both persons must be employed by the Customer organization. What is the Customer's involvement at the Site? Please check all that apply. ❑ Property owner ❑ Business owner (operator) ❑ Past property owner ❑ Mortgage holder ® Future property owner ❑ Consultant ❑ Property lessee ❑ Attorney ® Other — please specify: Past property lessee If not the current property owner, is the Customer acting as the agent for the property owner? ❑ Yes ® No If not the current property owner, is the Customer authorized to grant access to the property? ❑ Yes ® No O Ec3 RecPivad 611- , FEB 2 8 2014 ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 1 RF(;), Part 1 — ADMINISTRATION continued B. Project Manager Information. Ecology will send this person all official correspondence. This person must either be the Customer or be employed by the Customer. This person may not be an independent contractor hired by the Customer. Please enter the required information below. Name: Joan Davenport, City of Yakima Title: Strategic Project Manager Mailing address: 129 North 2nd Street City: Yakima State: WA Zip: 98901 Phone: (509)576 -6417 Fax: E -mail: joan.davenport @yakimawa.gov C. Project Billing Contact Information. Ecology will send this person monthly invoices. This person must either be the Customer or be employed by the Customer. This person may not be an independent contractor hired by the Customer. Please enter the required information below. Name: Joan Davenport, City of Yakima Title: Mailing address: same as above City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: E -mail: D. Project Consultant Information. Is the Customer a consultant? ❑ Yes If you answered "YES," then skip to the next question. ® No If you answered "NO" and the Customer hired a consultant to conduct the independent remedial action, then enter the required information below. Name: Mike Staton Title: Principal Geologist Organization: SLR International Corporation Mailing address: 22118 20 Avenue Southeast, Suite G202 City: Bothell State: WA Zip: 98021 Phone: 425 - 402 -8800 Fax: 425 - 402 -8488 E -mail: mstaton @slrconsulting.com Do you want Ecology to contact the Project Consultant? ® Yes ❑ No E. Property Owner Information. Is the Customer the owner of the property where independent remedial action is being conducted? ❑ Yes If you answered "YES, " then enter the type of entity and skip to the next question. ® No If you answered "NO," then please enter all of the required information below. Name: Dennis Radocha Title: Associate General Counsel Organization: OfficeMax Incorporated Mailing address: 1111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 510 City: Boise State: ID Zip: 83702 Phone: (208)388 -4184 Fax: (630)647 -3864 E -mail: dennisradocha @officemax.com ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 2 Part 1 — ADMINISTRATION continued What type of entity is the property owner? Please check only one. ® Private ❑ County ❑ Tribal ❑ Municipal ❑ Federal ❑ Mixed ❑ State ❑ Public School ❑ Other — please specify: F. Request for Written Opinion. Are you requesting a written opinion at this time? ® Yes ❑ No If you answered "YES," on what planned or completed remedial action do you want a written opinion? We are requesting an opinion on the completeness of the previous remedial investigation at the landfill site, and if the City can move forward with a feasibility study. Please attach to this Application any additional remedial action plans or reports you want Ecology to review. Ecology will base its opinion on the information contained in the Site file, including any information attached to this Application. If you answered "NO," please explain why you are enrolling in the VCP at this time and when you expect to request a written opinion from Ecology. Attach additional pages if necessary. G. Reporting Requirements. Please comply with the following reporting requirements when requesting written opinions on planned or completed remedial actions: ❑ Licensing. Documents submitted containing geologic, hydrologic, or engineering work must be under the seal of an appropriately licensed professional, as required by Chapters 18.43 and 18.220 RCW. ❑ Data Submittal. Environmental sampling data must be submitted in both a printed form and an electronic form capable of being transferred into Ecology's data management systems. For instructions on how to submit the data, please refer to the following Ecology web site: www.ecy.wa.gov /proqrams /tcp /data submittal /Data Requirements.htm. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in unnecessary delays. Ecology will not issue a No Further Action (NFA) opinion unless these requirements are satisfied. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 3 Part 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE A. Name of the Site. If Ecology has already identified the Site, enter the name provided by Ecology. Otherwise, enter a suggested name for the Site. You may also include an alternate name. Name: Closed City of Yakima Landfill Alternate Name: B. Location of Property where the Releases Occurred (Source Property). The "source property" is the property where hazardous substances were released into the environment. For example, if petroleum was released from a leaking UST, the source property is the property where the UST was located. Do you know on which property the releases occurred? ® Yes If you answered "YES," then please refer to the source property when answering the following questions. El No If you answered "NO," then please refer to the property addressed by your remedial action (cleanup) when answering the following questions. Physical Address. Please enter the physical address of the property below. Street Address: Parcels 191318 -41001 and 191318 -42001 (there is no street address for closed landfill) City: Yakima State: WA Zip: 98901 Geographic Position. Please enter the geographical position of the property below. For additional guidance on how to complete this part, please refer to instructions on the VCP web site. LATITUDE: Degrees: 46 Minutes: 36 Seconds: 46.9434 COORDINATES LONGITUDE : Degrees: -120 Minutes: 29 Seconds: 38.256 LOCATION ON PROPERTY: Center of closed landfill area (landfill is located at southern end of former [e.g., point of release or center of parcel] Boise Cascade sawmill property) COLLECTION METHOD: Digitally collected from map. [e.g., GPS or address matching] COLLECTION SOURCE: 1:8,400 [i.e., map scale] HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD83 [i.e., base reference for coordinate system] ACCURACY LEVEL: +1 250 feet [i.e., +/- feet or meters] Legal Descriptions. TRS DATA: Township: 13 Range: 19 Section: 18 Quarter - Quarter: NW -SE TAX PARCEL #(s): 191318 -41001 and 191318 -42001 I ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 4 Part 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE continued C. Identification of Properties affected by the Releases (Affected Properties). An "affected property" is a property affected by the release of hazardous substances on the source property. For example, petroleum released from a leaking UST on one property (source property) may migrate through the soil or ground water onto an adjacent property (affected property). Do any of the releases affect any properties adjacent to the source property? If you answered "YES," then please identify below each property that you ® Yes know has been affected by the releases on the source property. If you need to identify additional properties, please attach additional pages. ❑ No If you answered "NO," then skip to the next question. ❑ Unknown If you answered "UNKNOWN, " then skip to the next question. 1 Address: 1015 E. Lincoln Ave., Yakima, WA Tax Parcel(s): 191318 -44022 and 191318 -44023 2 Address: 137 N. Fair Ave., Yakima, WA Tax Parcel(s): 191318 -44030 3 Address: 107 N. Fair Ave., Yakima, WA Tax Parcel(s): 191318 -44002 4. Address: 121 N. Fair Ave., Yakima, WA Tax Parcel(s): 191318 -44031 D. Identification of Public Right -of -Ways affected by the Releases. Do any of the releases affect any public right -of -ways (e.g., streets)? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify below. Otherwise, skip to the next question. The southeastern corner of the landfill extends onto a small portion of the WSDOT property along the west side of Highway 82, and the methane gas concentrations in the soil vapors within the landfill footprint exceed the upper explosive limit. The nitrate - impacted groundwater from the landfill extends beneath East Lincoln Avenue. Attach additional pages if necessary. E. Extent of the Site. What is the approximate areal extent of the Site? Please check only one. ❑ < 5,000 square feet ❑ > 5,000 square feet, but < 1 acre ❑ > 1 acre, but < 10 acres ® > 10 acres ❑ Unknown ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 5 Part 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE continued F. Description of Release(s) at the Site. Source of Release(s). What are the source(s) of the release(s) at the Site? Please check all that apply. ❑ Point source (e.g., leaking tank) ® Non -point source (e.g., contaminated soil used as fill) ❑ Area -wide lead and arsenic soil contamination (see questions below) ❑ Other — please specify: ❑ Unknown To the extent known, please describe the source(s) of the release(s): The City of Yakima operated a municipal landfill at the southern part of the sawmill property from 1963 to approximately 1970. Based on the results of recent investigation activities, the municipal solid waste (MSW) in the landfill is the source of nitrate concentrations in groundwater that exceed the cleanup level. The MSW is one of the sources of methane concentrations in soil vapors that exceed the upper explosive limit. Wood waste associated with the former log storage operations on top of the closed landfill is also a source of methane concentrations greater than the upper explosive limit. Attach additional pages if necessary. Circumstances of Release(s). To the extent known, please describe below the circumstances of the release(s). Nitrate is leaching from the MSW in the vadose zone (due to storm water percolation through the waste) as well as the limited MSW below the groundwater table. Methane gas is generated from the buried MSW and wood waste. The nitrate and methane are due to ongoing releases that began over 6 years ago. Attach additional pages if necessary. Circumstances of Release Discovery. To the extent known, please describe below the circumstances of the discovery of the release(s). In 2008, Parametrix conducted a subsurface investigation at the former Boise Cascade sawmill property, including at the closed landfill area. Combustible gas (methane) was detected in soil gas near the landfill at concentrations greater than the upper explosive limit. Iron and manganese concentrations in the groundwater near the landfill exceeded the secondary MCLs; however, subsequent investigations showed that the metals were due to sources upgradient of the landfill. Attach additional pages if necessary. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 6 Part 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE continued Area -Wide Soil Contamination. For information about the area -wide soil contamination project, please refer to the following web site: www.ecy.wa.gov /programs /tcp /area wide /area wide hp.html. For information about the Tacoma Smelter Plume (TSP) and the associated Management Plan, please refer to the following web site: www.ecy.wa.gov /proqrams /tcp /sites /tacoma smelter /ts hp.htm. Is the Site located within an area affected by smelter emissions, such as the TSP area? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown To determine whether your Site is located within the TSP area, please refer to the map on the TSP web site identified above. Is the Site located on a former apple or pear orchard in operation prior to 1947? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown Is the Site impacted by area -wide arsenic and /or lead soil contamination? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown G. Nature and Extent of Hazardous Substances Released at the Site. The following questions refer to conditions after the release, but prior to any cleanup, of the hazardous substances at the Site. Hazardous Substances and Affected Media. To the extent known, please identify in the following table the hazardous substances released at the Site and the media (e.g., soil) impacted by those substances. Use the codes at the bottom of the table. AFFECTED MEDIA HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE GROUND SURFACE SOIL WATER WATER SEDIMENT AIR EXAMPLE: Benzene C S N/A N/A B Nitrate N/A C N/A N/A N/A Methane N/A N/A N/A N/A C (soil vapors only) When identifying the affected media in the table above, please use one of the following codes: • C = confirmed, above cleanup level • B = confirmed, below cleanup level • 0 = confirmed, not present • S = suspected • N/A = not suspected • U = unknown ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 7 Part 2 - DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE continued Drinking Water. Does any of the contamination at the Site pose a threat or potential threat to an existing drinking water source (ground water or surface water)? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, what type of drinking water system is threatened by the contamination? Please check all that apply. ❑ Single Family ❑ Public Drinking Water Supply If you checked "Public Drinking Water Supply" above, is the contamination located within or upstream of a 10 -year wellhead protection area? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown To help answer the above question or if you answered "Yes" to that question, then go to https: / /fortress.wa.gov /doh /eh /dw /swap /maps/ or call (800) 521 -0323. Indoor Air. Are contaminant odors present in any buildings, manholes, or other confined spaces? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify: Attach additional pages if necessary. H. Maps of the Site. Please attach to this application map(s) that identify, to the extent known, the following: ❑ The location of the site. ❑ The properties, and any public right -of ways, affected by the site. ❑ The source(s) of the release(s) at the site. ❑ The nature and extent of contamination at the site. ❑ Any human or ecological receptors impacted by the site (e.g., drinking water wells). ❑ The physical characteristics of the site (e.g., property lines, building and road outlines, surface water bodies, water supply wells, ground water flow direction, and utility right -of- ways). ❑ The properties adjacent to the site and the uses of those properties (e.g., gas station, dry cleaner, residential). ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 8 _ I Part 3 — OPERATIONAL HISTORY OF THE SITE A. Current Use of Source Property. Note that the following questions refer only to the Source Property, not other properties affected by the Site. Answer these questions to the best of your ability. Current Property Owners. To the extent known, please identify below the current owner of the source property. Name: Dennis Radocha Title: Associate General Counsel Organization: OfficeMax Incorporated Mailing address: 1111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 510 City: Boise State: ID Zip code: 83702 Phone: (208)388 -4184 Current Business Owner (Operator). To the extent known, please identify below the current owner of the business located on the source property. Name: Brad Hill Title: Organization: Yakima Resources, LLC Mailing address: 805 North 7 Street City: Yakima State: WA Zip code: 98901 Phone: (206)861 -6331 Current Business Operations. To the extent known, please identify below the current operations of the business located on the source property. What is the current land use of the source property? Please check all that apply. ❑ Residential ❑ School ❑ Commercial ❑ Childcare facility ® Industrial ❑ Park ❑ Agricultural ❑ Other — please specify: Is there a currently operational commercial or industrial business located on the source property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify in the following table the current business operations using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and specifying the operations. NAICS CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS EX: 447110 Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 9 Part 3 — OPERATIONAL HISTORY OF THE SITE continued Is there a solid waste handling facility located on the Source Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify: Attach additional pages if necessary. Is there a dangerous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility located on the Source Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify: Attach additional pages if necessary. Regulation of Current Business Operations. Does the business operate under any federal, state, or local permits related to the release of hazardous substances into the environment (e.g., NPDES permit)? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify the regulated operation, the name of the permit, and the date it was issued in the table below. REGULATED OPERATION PERMIT DATE ISSUED EX: Wastewater discharge NPDES permit 02/02/02 Has a state or federal notice of enforcement action (e.g., notice of violation) ever been issued related to the release of hazardous substances at the business? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "yes" above, please specify (notice and year issued): Have business operations resulted in any other spills or other unpermitted releases on the source property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify in the table below. RELEASE DATE OF RELEASE STATUS OF RELEASE Arsenic Unknown Ongoing at locations upgradient of landfill Manganese Unknown Ongoing at locations upgradient of landfill Sodium Unknown Ongoing at locations upgradient of landfill Iron Unknown Ongoing at locations upgradient of landfill Acidic (low pH) groundwater Unknown Ongoing at locations upgradient of landfill ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 10 Part 3 — OPERATIONAL HISTORY OF THE SITE continued Storage Tank Information. In table below, please identify all above ground storage tanks (AST) and underground storage tanks (UST) that have been used for storing hazardous substances on the source property, irrespective of whether the tanks are still in use or in place. If you are unable to provide answers to specific questions regarding a tank, please enter "U" for unknown. IDENTIFICATION STATUS AND CLOSURE RELEASES Hazardous Substance Ty Size TANK ID DATE IN USE DATE CLOSURE PAST CURRENT (AST /UST) (Gallons) INSTALL (Y /N) CLOSED METHOD(') (Y /N) (Y /N) EX: Diesel UST 10,000 4 02/87 N 05/98 Removed Y N ( ") Options = Removed or Closed in Place B. Past Use of Source Property. Note that the following questions refer only to the Source Property, not other properties affected by the Site. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. Past Property Owners. To the extent known, please identify below the owner of the source property at the time the release occurred. Name: Dennis Radocha Title: Associate General Counsel Organization: Boise Cascade Corporation, who is currently owned by OfficeMax Incorporated Mailing address: 1111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 510 City: Boise State: ID Zip code: 83702 Phone: (208)388 -4184 Fax: E-mail: dennisradocha @officemax.com Past Business Owners (Operators). To the extent known, please identify below the owner of the business (operator) at the time the release occurred. Name: Brad Hill Title: Organization: Yakima Resources, LLC Mailing address: 805 North 7` Street City: Yakima State: WA Zip code: 98901 Phone: (206)861 -6331 Fax: E -mail: bradleyahill @gmail.com Identification of Past Business Operations. Please identify in the following table the past operations of businesses located on the source property using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and /or specifying the operations. NAICS CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS EX: 447110 Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores 333243 Log debarking machinery, stationary, manufacturing; Chippers, stationary (e.g., log), manufacturing 562212 Solid waste landfills, nonhazardous ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 11 Part 3 — OPERATIONAL HISTORY OF THE SITE continued C. Future Use of Source and Affected Properties. The following questions refer to both source and affected properties. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. Will any ownership interest in the source or affected properties be conveyed prior to, or upon completion of, the cleanup? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify: The parcel that contains most of the closed landfill (Parcel 191318- 41001) will be sold to the City of Yakima. Attach additional pages if necessary. Will any of the source or affected properties, or portions of those properties, be redeveloped as part of the cleanup? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify the proposed land use below. Please check all that apply. ❑ Residential ❑ School ® Commercial ❑ Childcare facility ❑ Industrial ® Park ❑ Agricultural ® Other — please specify: An extension of North Fair Avenue and an east -west roadway that extends over Highway 82 will cross the property Please also specify the activities proposed for that land use: The property redevelopment plans have not been finalized; however, the Cascade Mill Parkway and associated sidewalks and planters will be constructed across the southwestern part of Parcel 191318- 41001. An east -west roadway that will extend over Highway 82 will be constructed across the northern part of Parcel 191318 - 41001. Attach additional pages if necessary. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 12 Part 4 — ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY OF THE SITE Have you previously reported the release(s) of hazardous substances at the Site to Ecology? ® Yes — If so, when? October 2009 ❑ No ❑ Unknown Has the cleanup of the Site, or any portion of the Site, ever been managed under the VCP? ❑ Yes — If so, please specify the VCP Project Number: No ❑ Unknown Has the cleanup of the Site, or any portion of the Site, ever been managed under a federal or state order or decree? ❑ Yes — If so, please specify the type and docket number: ® No ❑ Unknown Part 5 — DESCRIPTION OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIAL ACTIONS AT THE SITE A. Scope of Remedial Actions. Do you plan to characterize and address all of the contamination at the Site, including any contamination located on affected adjacent properties, as part of the VCP project? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "NO" above, please describe below the scope of the VCP project, including the contamination (properties, portions of a property, media and /or hazardous substances) that you DO NOT plan on characterizing and /or addressing as part of the VCP project. Please include additional pages if necessary. The City plans to address the contamination that is due to releases from the MSW (methane in soil vapors and nitrate in groundwater). There are elevated concentrations of several contaminants in the in the groundwater beneath the landfill area [arsenic, manganese, iron, and sodium, as well as acidic (low pH) conditions] that are due to sources located hydraulically upgradient of the landfill area, and the City does not plan to further characterize or remediate those contaminants. Attach additional pages if necessary. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 13 Part 5 — DESCRIPTION OF INDEPENDENT REMEDIAL ACTIONS AT THE SITE continued B. Status of Remedial Actions. What is the current status of remedial actions at the site? Please check all that apply in the table below. REMEDIAL ACTION PLANNED ONGOING COMPLETED NOT APPLICABLE INITIAL RESPONSE (UST ONLY) X INTERIM ACTION REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION X FEASIBILITY STUDY X CLEANUP ACTION X C. Documentation of Remedial Actions. Please list in the table below all known remedial action plans or reports produced for the site, including: • The title of the plan or report, • The author (e.g. consulting firm) of the plan or report, • The date the plan or report was produced, • Whether the plan or report has been submitted to Ecology, • The date the plan or report was submitted to Ecology. SUBMITTED TO ECOLOGY TITLE AUTHOR DATE Y /N? DATE EX: John Doe's Site: Remedial Investigation Work Plan Mom's Consulting Firm 02/20/05 NO N/A 1 Draft Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Parametrix June N N/A Former City of Yakima Municipal Landfill 2008 2 Remedial Investigation Report, Closed City of SLR International Corp. 10/12/09 Y Oct. 2009 Yakima Landfill Site 3. Additional Investigation Report, Closed City of SLR International Corp. 3/17/10 Y March 2010 Yakima Landfill Site Soil Vapor and Groundwater Sampling 4. Report —May 2012 Event, Closed City of SLR International Corp. 7/17/12 Y July 2012 Yakima Landfill 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 14 1 Part 6 — STATEMENT AND SIGNATURE A. Statement and Signature. The undersigned affirms that the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of his or her knowledge. Please note that someone other than the Customer may sign this Application Form. Name: Mike Staton Title: Principal Geologist Signature: 74 ((� Date: 2__// e Organization: SLR International Corporation Mailing address: 22118 20 Avenue Southeast, Suite G202 City: Bothell State: WA Zip code: 98021 Phone: 425 - 402 -8800 Fax: 425 - 402 -8488 E -mail: mstaton ©slrconsulting.com B. Affiliation. What is the signatory's involvement at the Site? Please check all that apply. ❑ Customer ❑ Property Owner Z Consultant ❑ Attorney ❑ Other — please specify: If you need this publication in an alternate format, please call the Toxics Cleanup Program at 360 - 407 -7170. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877 - 833 -6341. ECY 020 -74 (revised May 2013) 15 ' �-� , y �, ;s } \ � � � ; � ' �� J at Q�i -`'.,. '}��} lt,� J 1�, l+J� •C 7 - Z �c Ch I 1 rd `s 160 =1 • ll \\tom -1� r .1 - - ' '. z ' ' ''('. ( .4, al, _ 6 PIPLe,- 1 . liM . IN : • r .. i ~/ ': 12 , ■ i t 1 • rl�- i. 7 � = = ? . , '1 '7 s '• mil ... / \ \''"4,- 14 _ ,..,-. ...._..,..-?,' • . .. — • �•+ — -� ■ • � i 5 -,,• -" � an •>`1•.m - 7-: .HAL • :.i , z i - FORMER •, . \ • •I, • • ,� • L ` '�o� I - - - - r Q r { SAWMILL 1 :\\ \ � CLOSED a l Elks Me YASIMA pa 1-1,,, - • r • ' : • -. , i I� � t „pia ,1 ' 'ROPERTY them . _ p ark i3 : - • - ! �t yam'.” r ' ' 111' 1 %. ''..i . . .0 0- v_i .•-.. I ( L AND FILL , ' ' fit' • Alliajg f., 1 i \ ; .....? ir ft ler i t Geld 01 �.. � . �j • ? r . c y \ — _ - s .. _� - i Y4-- ,;AYI.I.' \�oI 1�'`1� � -_ y `•, •- 1 ,^ �- M y ` __, ., . of r\ Ij J � - , ti � j - ., _ , , 1 _, .,. ‘ M ll es roy `' l , V 4 L • t••:• iii .,, ;, _�i - =' { � : , X11 1 • f1L14?----A • F - .•'_..` I — i _Park , I 1 (13- t0. - 1_,-1-,.. ,, . } • +''' 1 1 r l S- ”t\ I r II'3 rr \ - A L}'� ^ -,, " g.;jP; .,,, t - .. : x 1.1aci H, h , • ' "' �' �`� � ' • � • �_ o ar -'`A, - " i r , h. !;.4 J •� Q \ ,� - ' • \''. , :: :: ... - ` • s. 1 = • ice -.s • s , • :y' - • 1 g , It c .•• . `s I tea rk '",; ', I' 111\i ^ ti ?. :(• . s • "' i - , ' _ - = 1, H Tt i i f ∎ M ' p - ` r , , • '',• \, t 11 G o �- ` 1. t ' _ ,, i 1 T' A ms h i r.• ' Ig I _ •• - r4'1 �/- � �f' � y �' ..� k 1 1 C - _ I II I ' . i ,! •.. • ,.. ` • VF i [U H LI i L .' - T" Ill TTi A , D` ; r !th . 'F' � s,�t w, L t. 1 — !� '1 1 [- I n 1 k p State - a m 41111 m N N N o _ v 0 N O c9 0 0 2000 4000 WASHINGTON o N a. . 0 SCALE IN FEET SOURCE: Yakima @' West and s , DATE 10/12 FIGURE 1 cc 22118 loth AVE SE DWN. BDT CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL ul BLDG. G, SUITE 202 "PR. Ai� YAKIMA, WASHINGTON , BBO THELL, WA 98021 REVIS. `' PROJECT NO. [ sLR F :425- 402 -8488 101. 00221,00009 LANDFILL LOCATION MAP 0 0 U I LEGEND GP -5 ® 2009 SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION GP -3 3 2008 SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND DESIGNATION - - —t - GP -22 ®.' DESTROYED SOIL VAPOR PROBE LOCATION AND - 1 DESIGNATION 1 / \ GP -6 (62.6 %) PERCENTAGE OF COMBUSTIBLE GAS (METHANE) BY 0.0 %\ GP -1 -• VOLUME IN SOIL VAPOR SAMPLES COLLECTED ON (NS)0 „,.... \ . , ` , 0 ��� MAY 10, 2012 \\ \ 1 \ (NS) NOT SAMPLED -`� - / ®GP -22 GP -13 .0' \ \\ \ \ N 1 — - - — PROPERTY LINE % -� - / / / (14.3 %) \ \ ;>, — ESTIMATED LIMITS OF M UNICIPAL SOLID WASTE / - •"' 11 I \ \ \ R+ MI RAILROAD TRACKS - --- I \ %. \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ ` \ ,. FENCE - - PARCEL i'\ X I ■ ∎ \ 191318 -42001 \ I t l \ r ` ^ ; EASS'G St. \ m 0 \ I \ ®GP -11 , \ - -o \ \ \ NOTE. \ v \ -7.,:s $ \ I I (40.3 %) \ r � \ 1 I. THE FLAMMABLE RANGE OF METHANE IS \ " Ti, 9 \ I ■ ^ _ _ — \ \ \ � 1 APPROXIMATELY 5% (LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT) TO 9 \ 1 \ r 10% (UPPER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT) BY VOLUME IN AIR. O3 11 \ ' \ I I \ PARCEL \ O ` \ \ 1 1�� \ 0 G01 %) \\ 1 1 191318-41001 DRAINAGE \ ' \ 9 < _1 r I¢ t DITCH \ \ % o % \m PARCEL 9 1 \_ . ' II \ LOG DECK - 1191318 -42401 P SPH Pt- I 10 \ \ . - 1 1 � '�} FORMER \ \' % , C ,- GP -16 J I ELEVATED \ (0.0 %) - I CHI \ ' GP -10 / 4.-1- I II \\ ® (34. °) / UNE - - "" \ EPSt .p^ St. - - 1 N - — ' O P - / I al /' / I J t, PARCEL \191318 -42404 1 (24.7%.) 1 ' / ' I (53 2 %) G 1 /� w 1 1' .? 1 GP -17 E 0.0 %) 1 ASPHALT GP 19 ESTIMATED LIMITS OF 1 N 1 (62.6 %) c, SPHALT ROAD MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE •J \ $ 1 ATE SCALE A ' \1 v HOUSE _ _ • - - GP -5 \ FIRE SUPPRESSION / y 9 (15.2 %) N. 9.- , — PUMP HOUSE 3 ? - � GP -12 ®)‘ i GP -8 EA ST • • St ' ®GP -18 (13.9 %) (0.0 %) ®(0 0 %) .o S 1 PARCEL 1 1 F ENCE _ _` - - _ FORMER 0 200 400 1 191318 -43539 09-9 JELD -WEN 9 (0.0 %) FACILITY SCALE IN FEET - - PROPERTY LINE P, PARCEL 191318-42003 DATE 02/14 FIGURE 2 o APARTMENT 221 I8 20th AVE SE OWN. MEH CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL BUILDING BLDG. G, SUITE 202 APPR. YAKIMA, WASHINGTON a BOTHELL, WA 98021 FLEWS. rROJECT NO. METHANE CONCENTRATIONS - T 425 - 402.9900 F. 425- 402 -9498 101 00009 S MAY 10, 2012 MW-6 \ (N •, \ LEGEND i \ MW -12 9 2009 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION / _ __,/ ; MW -18 \ F? \ MW -8 0 PRE -2009 MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND DESIGNATION / _ (86) '\ - 1 (621) NITRATE CONCENTRATION (IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (pg /L)) i MW-11 �. IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTED ON MAY 10, 2012 (51) ./. I ....• \ \ \ ` I (NS) NOT SAMPLED 1 0,000 NITRATE ISOCONCENTRATION LINE (IN Ng /L) -' II LI ( \\ \\ ' \ 1 ESTIMATED MITS \ I i � GENERAL GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION OF MUNICIPAL \ "X% \ EPSt • S1" 001 ' ' * \\ I I / SOLD WASTE \ \ \ 5 i — - -. — PROPERTY LINE \ 9m m r 1 \ `\ / ESTIMATED LIMITS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE y 0 FORMER \ ' 7 9 9 \ I I I \ ` O MW -9A PLYWOOD YAKIMA TRACKS 9 (4,560) PLANT \ 9 ~\ \ GREENWAV • / W-12\---- 'I I' DITCH DRAINAGE 1 PATH w 8 FENCE r (39) Lt FORMER LOG \ ' X ._ / 2 PH �- FORMER m PS C ( ELEVATED DECK \ r =� / SUNSET ROTARY / I lc? I CHIP BINS \ \ m ?.4 PARK AREA NOTES: EPSt'F. $1 I / I ^' / 1) THE SITE GROUNDWATER SCREENING LEVEL FOR N(W70 �/ / '/� 10,000 L J M (<10� / NITRATE IS 10,000 V9/L ■ 5 / ` / 2.) IT APPEARS THAT THE ELEVATED NITRATE t \ ASPHALT � / CONCENTRATION AT WELL MW -8 WAS PRIMARILY THAT WAS LEACHED N 5 ROAD / FROMOTHE NITRATE AREA WHEN EXTINGUISHING 8 GATE ASPHALT / / T SEPTEMBER 2009 LOG FIRE WITH A --� \ _ SIGNIFICANT VOLUME OF WATER. PRIOR TO ` , ( FEBRUARY 2010, THE GREATEST NITRATE ■ CONCENTRATIONS AT MW-8 WAS 17,900 Ng/L. EASt ,E S% \` E w FEN \ __ MW -7 M 1 1 (86,200) (621) 3 1 PROPERTY LINE FORMER I o JELD -WEN 1 > ° APARTMENT FACILITY I x ,IS BUILDING \ rn I O� \ a r T ■ o I LL,IC�CQ� I= 4 7 \ \ \ p er FRANK FREDERICK WSDOT (533) p WAYSIDE m PROPERTY LEDGESTON \ 'i f I E MARRIOTT HOTEL \ \ a, HOTEL 1 a, \ § i I 3 I , \ o ] \ N 3 —__ o MW -16 —__ \ 3 N. FAIR • T . • 3, • I 9 \ 0 300 600 23. / M u (147) 147) \ SCALE IN FEET LI I- F- U w DATE 02/14 FIGURE 3 a 22118 20th AVE SE D WN. MEH CLOSED CITY OF YAKIMA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL BLDG. G, SUITE 202 APPR. MDS _ YAKIMA, WASHINGTON c ROTHELL, WA 98021 REVIS. SLR ���`���"' PROJECT NO. F 425402 -8488 101.00221.00009 NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS - MAY 2012 F x .11 Ii ~ BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAKIMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. For Meeting of: 2/25/2014 ITEM TITLE: Study Session: Cascade Mill Landfill Clean -up Options and consideration of Resolution authorizing City Manager to sign a Voluntary Cleanup Program Agreement with Department of Ecology SUBMITTED BY: Tony O'Rourke, City Manager Joan Davenport, Strategic Project Manager SUMMARY EXPLANATION: This study session item will address the status and alternatives for cleanup of the former municipal landfill located on the Cascade Mill Redevelopment site. Redevelopment options of the landfill are largely dependent upon the extent and treatment of the municipal solid waste (MSVV). The review and permit process requires close collaboration with the Department of Ecology. Participation in the Voluntary Cleanup Program with DOE is the suggested method of information sharing and review of technical information. Resolution: X Ordinance: Other (Specify): Contract: Contract Term: Start Date: End Date: Item Budgeted: Yes Amount: Funding Source /Fiscal Funds necessary for review costs by DOE for the Impact: Voluntary Cleanup Program will be paid for out of the LIFT program. Strategic Priority: Economic Development Insurance Required? No Mail to: Phone: APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Review material. Approve Resolution that authorizes City Manager to sign Voluntary Cleanup Program application to Department of Ecology. ATTACHMENTS: Description Upload Date Type 0 Study Session Memorandum 2/20/2014 Backup Material 0 Alternative 1 map 2/20/2014 Backup Material 0 Alternative 2 map 2/20/2014 Backup Material 0 Alternative 3a map 2/20/2014 Backup Material D Alternative 3b map 2/20/2014 Backup Material Alterntive 4 map 2/20/2014 Backup Material 0 Resolution authorizing VCP with DOE 2/18/2014 Resolution VCP Agreement 2/20/2014 Backup Material