Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
R-2009-149 2010 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER); Office of Neighborhood Development Services
RESOLUTION NO. R 2009-149 A RESOLUTION Adopting the HUD mandated five year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan for the City of Yakima. WHEREAS, Every five years, HUD requires the City of Yakima to submit a Five Year Consolidated plan and Annual Action plan as a requirement for receiving federal funds; and WHEREAS, In order to access the federal CDBG and HOME funds for the next five years, the city is required to submit a five year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action plan; and WHEREAS, the Office of Neighborhood Development services has fulfilled the requirements for public input meetings and held an open 30 day public comment period. WHEREAS, the City of Yakima has a completed Draft 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan to include the first years Annual Action plan for 2010, now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA: The City of Yakima City Council adopts the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and the Manager of the City of Yakima is hereby authorized to direct staff to submit the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action plan to HUD as required. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of November, 2009. ATTEST: David E • er, Mayor ITEM TITLE: BUS INESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAK||NA. WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No. ��3 For Meeting of November 17, 2009 Public Hearing on the 2010'2014 Community Development Block • Grant and HOME Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual Action Plan . and Resolution adopting the final plan for submittal to HUD. SUBMITTED BY: Bill Cook, CED Director ' CONTACTPERSON: Michael Morales, CED Deputy Director (575-3533) SUMMARY EXPLANATION: This public hearing before the City Council is to provide an opportunity for and consider any comments on the Draft of the 2010-2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual Action Plan. The Plan is attached (Council Only). Council must also adopt the final draft of the Corisolidated PJan and 2010 Annual Action plan for submittal to HUD , Explanation: Investment of the Federal Funds received through the CDBG and HOME programs is guided by a 5 -year strategic plan and an annual action plan. Following considerable citizen input from many sources, under the guidance of Yakima City Council rn�nlb8rS, and as recommended by the U.S. Depa�rnent0f|�OuSing and Urban Development (HUD)�regu|8d0nS, a consultant has drafted a proposed plan. Also contained in the plan is a proposed budget for FY 2010 programs. Tli82O1O-2O14 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual i,nction Plan have been advertised and available for public comment sinceSeptember 8r 29, 200 any received writtencomment during the 30 day comment period is included in that plan � The Neighborhood Development Council committee has reviewed both the plan and the budget. The committee has recommended the plan and budget for approval bythe fu||'counoii Resolution X Ordinance Other (Specify) Contract Mail to (name and address): Funding Source U.S. D8parnen�OfHOuSin� and Urban Development ` APPROVED FOR SUBMI� City Manager K4�� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve request. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Committee recommended that this proposal be forwarded to the fuU Council for approval. . Yakima, Washington 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan 17 November 2009 City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services 2010 HOME 2010 HOME ESTIMATED REVENUES 124.337.0000.33114.2HM HUD HOME Program 124.337.0000.33114.2HP HOME Program -Prior Year 124.337.0000.36140.HMI HOME Program Interest Income 124.337.0000.38500. HMP HOME Program Income 2009 Carry Forward 682,410 9,000 380,000 HOME Revenue Totals: 1,071,410 2010 HOME ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES Program All activity is eligible under 92.205 (a) (1) Program Delivery 2010 HOME PROJECT CATEGORIES: Expenses Expenses Admin 2010 Total Estimated Expenses First -Time Homeowner Assistance (up to $30,000 each) 140,000 140,000 Down Payment Assistance (up to $4,000 each = 30 or more) 120,000 25,000 Ir 145,000 * Single -Family Home Rehabilitation -, 0 '14 Community Housing Development Organization 649,558 29,711 - 5,000 .g 684,269 a (CHDO: HUD requirement, minimum of 15% of 2009 HOME Entitlement plus Program Income) re !..q New 'Construction 0 0 % 0 ft 0 Administrative HOME Costs 102,141 102,141 Grand Estimated Total Expenses for Year 2009 909,558 54,711 107,141 1,071,410 Entitlement is estimated as Congress has not yet approved the national HUD Budget Program Income is estimated as the figure is unknown until the money is received. Appropriate adjustment will be made, if needed, when HUD awards are received. Carry forward will be encumbered when amount is known, in Spring, 2009. Estimated 2009 HOME EN and PI Revenue 1,071,410 10% Admin 107,141 11/12/2009 ic Budget Prep.2009.Guesstimete 161,852 1,971,410 Account No. & Description City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services 2010 CDBG ESTIMATED REVENUES: ESTIMATED 2010 124.330.0000.33114.2CY CD Block Grant -Current Year Estimated 1,185,386 124.330.0000.33114.2PY CD Block Grant -Prior Year 2009 Carry Forwards 124.699.0000.36140.PII CDBG-Program Interest Income 124.699.0000.38500.PRG CD Block Grant -Program Income 124.699.0000.36110.INT Interest from Investments 9,000 60,000 150 2010 ESTIMATED CDBG Revenues: 1,2 4,536 11/12/2009 ic 2009 Draft Budget City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) FOR 2009 & 2010 PROPOSAL NSP Entitlement NSP Administration (10%) 65,000 NSP Program Costs 585,000 650,000 650,000 City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood .Development Services (ONDS) CDBG-R (ARRA) FOR 2009/2010 FUNDING PROPOSAL CDBG-R Entitlement CDBG-R Administration (10°x) 31,750 CDBG-R Program 285,750 317,500 317,500 HUD Programs (CDBG) City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services 2010 CDBG ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES (Does not Include any Carry Forward Dollars) Program Program Delivery 2010 penses Expenses Admin 2010 Total Estimated Expenses CDBG Single Family Rehabilitation 570.202 (b) Senior / Disabled Rehabilitation Single Family Rehabilitation Single Family lst Time Home Buyers Single Family Rehabilitation - 308 Irrigation Rehabilitation Relocation 570.201 (i) 157,934 145,000 84,916 0 10,000 4,000 Total 243,916 157,934 II Economic Development 570.203 (b) Adaptis Inc - Grant Year 2010 100,000 Whirlpool Corp - Year 2010 45,000 Unknwon 50,000 Total Community / Public Services 570.201 (e) Graffiti Abatement Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing 570.201 (k) OIC of WA: SECC Programs Total IV Public Facilities 570.201 (c) Southeast Community Cntr / Miller Park Activity Cntr (or other public facilities in the neighborhood) 401,850 5,00 4,000 22,750 4,100 50,299 75,000 95,000 26,750 54,399 75,000 83,100 13,049 70,000 156,149 Total 70,000 V Neighborhood Imp - Dangerous Bldgs Clearance 570.201 (d) 20,000 VI Code Compliance 570.202 ( c ) 1/11 Administrative CDBG Costs 570.206 160,630 250,907 7 n.t‘i 70,000 20,000 160,630 250,907 Grand EstimatedTotals for Year 2009 612,016 391,613 250,907 ,254, 321,426 1,254,536 Entitlement is estimated as Congress has not yet approved the national HUD Budget. Program Income is estimated since the figure is unknown until the money is received. 1,254,536 Appropriate adjustment will be made, if needed, when HUD awards am received. 0 Carry forward will be encumbered when amount is known, in Spring, 2009. Estimated 2010 CDBG Revenue 20% Admin * Code Compliance consistist of 2 FTE and 64% of Pemit Tech 11/12/2009 ic Budget Prep.2009.DRAFT.Guesstimate.SS 1,254,536 250,907 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table of Contents Introduction General Executive Summary 107 1 Strategic Plan Priority Housing Needs . Housing Inventory 15 General Questions 62 Housing Market Analysis 1� Managing the Process ' 22 Citizen Participation 25 Institutional Structure � � � 40 Monitoring • � 42 Priority Needs Analysis & Strategy 90 BarhersboAffordable Housing 43 Lead -Based Paint 92 45 Housin 49 Housing Needs 107 Priority I-Iomeless Needs 49 Priority Housing Needs . Housing Inventory � ' 113 62 Housing Market Analysis • ' 63 Specific Housing Objectives 74 Needs of Public Housing � � 79 Public Housing Strategy � 90 BarhersboAffordable Housing 92 Homeless 107 Homeless Needs 133 107 Priority I-Iomeless Needs Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) 111 . Housing Inventory � ' 113 Homeless Strateg/c P|mn ' � 115 | Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) [vlai|-0ut/Phone-BackSurvey 120 121 Community Development 133 121 Antipoverty Strategy Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) 131 LowInconne HousingTa�Credit � ' 132 s SSpecial Needs 13 Specific Special Needs Objectives . 133 Non -Homeless Special Needs Analysis 135 Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) 148 Specific HOPWA Objectives 149 Other Narrative 151 Other Narrative 151 A endUx Glossary A-1 . ` Yakinna Population Projections B-1 2005-2007 American Community Survey C-1 Letters of Comment D-1 [vlai|-0ut/Phone-BackSurvey E-1 Tables 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA) Summary - 2005 2 WSPS Survey of Percent Respondents Saying Yes 13 � Yakima Funding Prject|ons 21 4 Potential Lead -Based Pant Hzards in Yakima, 2009 46 5 Housing Affordability Trends 1970-2006 49 6 Fair Market Rent by Number of Bedrooms 50 7 Area Median Income (AMI) and Low Income Definitions 51 8 Typical Poverty Household Expenditures 51 g CHAS AffordabJlity Mismatch Statistics 52 10 Disability Statistics by Age Group 53 11 CHAS Renter Households with Problems - Percentages 53 12 CHAS Renter Households with Prob|erns- Numbers 54 13 CHAS Owner Households with Problems - Percentages 55 14 CHAS Owner Households with Problems - Numbers 56 15 Housing Units Lackirig Complete Services 57 16 CHAS Hispanic Renter Households with Housing Problems - Percentages 58 17 CHAS Hispanic Reriter Households with Housing Prob|erns - Numbers 59 18 CHAS Hispanic Owner Households with Housing Problems - Percentages ,60 19 CHAS Hispanic Owner Households with Housing Problems - Numbers 60 20 Comparative CHAS Housing Problems - Total vs Hispanic Population Percentages 61 21 Comparative CHAS Housing Problems - Total vs Hispanic Population Numbers 62 22 Housing Inventory by Type 2000-2006 63 23 Housing Values 2000-2006 67 24 Housing Rents 2000-2006 68 25 Percent Owner -Occupied Housing Cost.is of Income 2000- 2006 69 26 Percent Renter -Occupied Housing Cost is of Income 2000- 2006 , 69 27 Mobile Home Inventory 200-2006 70 28 Poverty Status Total and Hispanic Populations 2000 71 29 Poverty by Family Status ofTotal & Hispanic Populations 2000 71 30 Owned House Values of Total & Hispanic Population 2000 72 31 Rents ofTotal & Hispanic Populations 2000 81 32 YHA Public Housing Inventory 2009 81 33 YHA Multifamily Housing Inventory 2009 82 | 34 YHA Elderly Housing Inventory 2009 82 35 YHA Farmworker housing 82 36 YHA HandidU it 2009 capp� Units 83 37 Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity Projects 85 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 38 Next Step Housing Inventory 2009 88 39 Triumph House Inventory 2009 89 40 Estimate of Unmet Housing Need 2009 by Housing Type 112 41 Homeless Housing Inventory 2009 113 42 Transitional Housing Inventory 2009 114 43 Permanent Supportive Housing Inventory 2009 115 44 Substance Abuse Treatment Needs 137 45 Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 137 46 Drug Prevalence in Adults and Youth 139 47 Public Funded Services in 2005 140 48 Certified Providers Located in Yakima 144 Graphics ~°cs 1 Yakinna UGA Comprehensive Plan 5 2 Yakima Census Tracts 18 3 Yakima CDBG Target Area 126 11%11 -11.46ttAek'it'llitga The 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan coordinates all elements of community development (housing, neighborhood development, economic development, and human services) into unified approach for community development actions. The plan establishes needs, resources, priorities, and proposed activities to be undertaken with respect to the Community Development Biock Grant (CDBG) and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), along with other Department of Housing and Urban Development (MUD) The CDBG was signed into Iaw on August 22, 1974 as the Housing and Community Development Act. As one of the largest and most successful federal block grants to the states, cities, and counties, this program allocates approximately $4,000,000,000 annually. An advantage of the CDBG is the local control allowed over the use of federal funds, thus enabling areas to Iocalize programs and activities. Activities funded by CDBG include affordable and accessible housing, housing rehabilitation projects, childcare centers, hem|thcare, senior citizen programs, street and sidewalk reconstruction, water and sewer line construction, business loans, and community centers. Each program funded must meet one of the following objectives: • benefit low and moderate -income persons, ° prevent or eliminate slums or blight, or • meet urgent community needs. HUD requires that 70% of CDBG funds be used for activities that primarily benefit Iow and moderate -income persons. Yakima first applied for CDBG funds in 1976, followed by the start of its own Block Grant Program as an "entitement city". However, Yakima did not become an "entitlement city" until 1978. As an "entitlement city" Yakima receives funding each year based on a formula which takes into consideration population and measures of distress, including poverty, age of housing, housing overcrowdings, and growth lag. Citizen participation has been a fundamental element in the allocation of CDBG funds. "Grassroots" neighborhood meetings served to allocate funds Until 1981, at which time the Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) was designated by the Mayor to be the central community outreach agent. A Community Deveopment Advisory Committee (CDAC) was established composed of representatives from the Yakima Housing Authority (YH/\),Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), and Yakima County Human Services Department to assist in the development of this 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. The CDAC will also advise on the allocation offunds for HOME, which was created by the National Affordable Housing Act of199Dwith the intent to provide decent, affordable housing to lower-income households, expand the capacity of non-profit housing providers, strengthen the ability of state and local governments to provide housing, and leverage private -sector participation. Yakima became a HOME "Participating ]urisdiction"|n 1996. Funds from HOME are allocated by formula to Participating Jurisdictions and are strictly for housing. Participating Jurisdictions must commit and spend their funds within certain timeframes or they will consequently lose HOME funds. Written agreements with developers, owners, contractors, and sub -recipients must be made within 24 months, and HOME funds must be expended within 5 years. As a general rule, HUD requires that a 25% match of non-federal money be invested into each program, along with 15% of funds reserved for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO). However, the HUD statue provides for a reduction of match requirements for 3 conditions 1) fiscal distress, 2) severe fiscal distress, and 3) Presidentially -declared Disasters under the Stafford Act. Yakima qualifies under the fiscal distress category and therefore, the match requirement has been reduced to 12.596. Next Step Housing and Triumph Treatment Services are the qualified CHDOs in Yakima. Activities for HOME funding include: homebuyer activities (acquisition and/or rehabilitation, new construction), rental housing (acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction), and tenant - based rental assistance (similar to Section 8 housing assistance). In order to receive formula allocations of the above federal funds, HUD requires the creation of a 5 -year Consolidated Plan. An accompanying annual Action Plan 15 developed yearly and its progress is monitored on an annual basis by a Consolidated Annual Performance Report (CAPER) submitted to HUD. The Consolidated Plan presents Yakima's plan to pursue the overall goals of the community development and planning programs of HUD, which are: " To provide decent housing, • To establish and maintain a suitable living environment, and • To expand economic opportunities for every Americari, particularly for very low and low-income persons. The Consolidated Plan serves the foliowing functions: • It is a planning document for the City, and builds on a participatory process initiated at a grassroots level, |U • It is an application for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs (e.g. CDBG, HOME), • It provides astrategy to be followed in carrying out a variety of HUD programs, and • It provides a plan of action that provides a basis for assessing performance. COMPONENTS OF THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN Although HUD does not prescribe a specific format, the Consolidated Plan must contain certain elements and tables. MUD has created an optional tool, Consolidated Plan ManagementProcess (CPMP), to assist formula grantees in meeting the requirements of a Consolidated Plan. Beginning with this plan, Yakima converted from a locally developed format used in prior years to the CPMP for the development of the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. Components of the CPMP Five Year Strategic Plan include narrative responses to specific questions that must be responded to in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. Readers will see HUD's questions in small type followed by Yakima's response. The questions and responses provide information about: • The geographic area and population includJng the allocation of investments. • How the Consolidated Plan process is managed including citizen participation, the institutional structure to carry out the plan and monitoring. • Description of needs, analysis of priorities and the strategies to address needs in housing, public housing, housJng barriers, homeless and special needs and in community development. Annual actions and activities are covered in the annual Action Plans, a separate document based on the needs, goals and strategies described in this 5 Year Strategic Plan. Available resources for the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan term includes funding from CDBG, HOME, Program Income, Revolving Loan Fund, and Section 108. 8�K 3 ~ 5 Year Strategic Plan This document includes Narrative Responses to specific qiJestions that grantees of the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS and Emergency Shelter Grants Programs must respond to in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. Executive Summary Vrttat The Executive Summary is required. Include the objectives and outcomes identified in the plan and an evaluation of past performance. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Executive Summary: This Strategic Plan coordinates strategy to meet housing, community development, and non -urgent needs. The Strategic Plan serves as a guide for developing the Annual Action Plans involved in each 5 -year Consolidated Plan term - or for the 2010 to 2014 period. This section includes the Anti -Poverty Strategy as well as the institutional structure within which the Consolidated Plan is implemented. The Strategic Plan is designed to achieve the foliowing CBDG, HOME, and National Objectives: CDBG Objectives • Provide decent housing • Create suitable living opportunities • Expand economic opportunities HOME Objectives • Expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, with primary attention to rental housing for low-income persons • Leverage private sector participation • Expand the capacity of non-profit housing providers National Objectives • Benefit low-income* persons • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight • Meet a need having a particular urgency For the purposes of the Strategic PIan Section, the term "/ow -income" will includes those households with income at or below 80% of the median income. PERFORMANCE OUTCOME MEASUREMENT US Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) expects Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships Program 3-5 Year Strategic Han 1 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction (HOME) grantees to use performance measurement systems to address productivity and program impact. Beginning in 2006, HUD implemented a refined performance measurement system. The 5 components of the performance measuring system are: 1) Goals, 2) Inputs, 3) Activities, 4) Outputs, and 5) Outcomes. Determining appropriate measurements for "outcomes" is critical to the performance measurement system. Developing "outcome" measurements is complex because CDBG and HOME funds can be used for a variety of activities with differing funding priorities from year to year. The amount of CDBG and HOME funds received by Yakima is small relative to the large amount of housirig, human services, and economic development activities in Yakima and Yakima County. Three broad Objectives are established for activities funded with CDBG and/or HOME that focus on low and moderate -income households that are consistent with the needs and strategies of the C nsoUidated Plan: o Create suitable living environments ~ Provide decent, affordable housing o Create economic opportunities There are 3 possible common Outcomes which describe change for each of the 3 broad Objectives, i.e., "what type of change or result is sought?" • Availability/Accessibility - activities funded with CDBG and/or HOME that make services, infrastructure, housing, or shelter available or accessible to low and moderate -income people, including persons with disabilities. Accessibility does not refer only to physical barriers, but to making the affordable basics of daily living available and accessible to low and moderate - income people. • Affordability - activities furided with CDBG and/or HOME that provide affordability in a variety of ways in the lives of low and moderate -income people. This can include the creation or maintenance of affordable housing/ basic infrastructure hookups, or services including transportation or day care. • Sustainability (promoting Iivable or viable communities) - projects funded with CDBG and/or HOME where the actvity or activities are aimed at improving communities or neighborhoods, helping to make them livable or viable by providing benefit to persons of low and moderate -income or by removing or eliminating slum or blighted areas, through multiple activities or services that sustain communities or neighborhoods. Progress toward Outcomes is measured with Output Indicators, examples of which include the number of: ` • Households assisted • Community -wide assistance activities o Persons served (in shelters or public services) � Rental housing units produced • Housing units rehabilitated • Years of affordability • Homeowners assisted or homeownership units created • Jobs created or retained 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 2 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction ■ Dollars of investment leveraged Objectives are combined with Outcomes to produce an Outcome Statement. Outcomes are the "benefits" relating to a change in conditions, status, attitudes, knowledge, or behavior that result from the funded programs. The means or reported outcomes are the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and the ongoing reporting to the federal Integrated Data and Information System (DIS). Since many activities are multi-year (such as construction projects), the outcomes are measured on an annual basis over 5 -year periods. The Outcomes portion of the measuring system will be reported each year in the CAPER. The strategies identified in this section and the actions indentified in Action Plan Section have been developed in consideration of the described performance measuring system. The Consolidated Plan is a planning document that provides as assessment of Yakima's community development needs, proposes strategies to address those needs, and annual identifies specified acidities to implement strategies. The concept of building a strong community focuses on suitable living environments, decent affordable housing, and economic opportunities for all. This Consolidated Plan is effective from 2010 through 2014. The Annual Action Plans are integral to the Consolidated Plan describing the resources and actions to be undertaken each year, to address the identified community needs consistent with strategies identified in the 5 -year Consolidated Plan. The activities that are described in the Annual Action Plans are designed to meet CDBG and HOME objectives. In 2007, HUD established performance measurement system that requires all funding activities address one of the objective categories (decent housing, suitable living environment, and economic opportunities) and one of the following outcomes: Availability/Accessibility, Affordability, Sustainability. Each CDBG or HOME funded individual project described in the companion Annual Action Plans lists a general objective category and a general outcome category. ANTICIPATED RESOURCES Yakima expects to receive CDBG funds and HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds from HUD. In addition to these funds, Yakima will utilize CDBG and HOME program incomes from past activities. These funds will be used to leverage other federal, state, and local resources to meet housing and community development needs. The amounts of CDBG and HOME funds expected to be available are listed in the accompanying Annual Action Plans. The Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) will have approximately 618 authorized Section 8 Assistance allocations available to serve low-income households in Yakima County for which YHA has funds for approximately 450 households of which 75-80% or 400 households reside in private housing units within Yakima. Developers of housing projects serving low-income households, such as the Yakima Housing Authority and the Diocese of Yakima Housing, will also apply for Low -Income Housing Tax Credits, State Housing Trust Funds, and other housing development funds. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 3 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Agencies serving homeless individuals and families will apply for funding assistance under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Programs. CONSULTATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Yakima consulted with numerous public and private agencies, created and worked with an Advisory Committee conducting 3 general public open houses and designing and conducting a mail-out/phone-back survey of a sample of registered city voter households residing within the Renewal Community Area (RCA) neighborhoods in preparing this Consolidated Plan. The draft Consolidated Plan was made available for public review and comment between 29 September 2009 and 30 October 2009 with 2 public hearings scheduled for 20 October and 17 November. A summary of citizen comments is provided in the General section of this document under Citizen Participation. The Annual Action Plans are also prepared consistent with the Consultation and Citizen Participation section of this Consolidated Plan and include public meetings with 30 -day public comment periods. For more details on the public process and citizen input, see the Citizen Participation section. NEEDS The data in the Needs Section of this Consolidated Plan serve as the basis for the 5 - year housing and community development goals, and also supports Yakima's priorities for allocating resources, establishing objectives, and developing strategies to achieve desired results. Unless stated, the source of the statistical information was taken from the 2005-2007 American Community Survey Census and compares Yakima with Yakima County, Puget Sound (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties - the most urbanized portion of the state), Washington State, and the US for a comparable perspective. The detailed statistical tables that generated the graphics that follow in this report are provided in the Appendix. POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS 120.000 100.0x 80.000 60.000 90.000 20,000 0 Yakima population projections ■Cty gUGA Population trends - Yakima's population increased from 3,154 persons in 1900 following incorporation in 1886 to an estimated 82,940 in 2007. The largest average annual rates of growth were realized in the 1900- 1910 period at 16.1% per year following the development of the railroad and irrigation, 1940-1950 at 3.5% with the advent of World War II and military training and agricultural production, and 1990-2000 at 2.7% with the influx of agricultural workers and migrants to the city. Yakima's population comprised 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 4 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction 35% of Yakima County in the year 2000 according to the US Bureau of the Census. Yakima has increased an annual average of 2.7% per year between 1990 and 2000, and 2.0% per year between the years 2000 and 2005 compared with 1.7% and 0.3% in Yakima County, and 1.9%, 1.8% and 1.5% in Puget Sound, and 1.1% in Washington State for the same periods. Yakima's population is increasing at a more rapid rate than the comparable areas in Washington State. Table 1: Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA) Summary - 2005 Unincorporated Total Urban Growth area Area (UGA) Acres Yakima Total area* 15,337 10,835 26,173 Developed areas 13,985 8,464 22,450 Vacant land 1,099 2,192 3,291 2004 population 79,480 12,289 91,769 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM), Forecasting Division, 28 June 2005 - Table III -1 of the 2006 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan * Includes water area which is neither counted as developed or vacant. Graphic 1: Yakima UGA Comprehensive Plan !moil Tiv 'TiiSt= Ilir lliIIIIIlI1:;-. • �.•'•, AGili tyC.• V/41�' ""— I ,SCh... ilt°.i,lill1Nal;111811r ':r!!IIII:�' s., T' moot a l.., �.... r� - �F ; i 11.X11', ;LI11 1: / ,dil 41101!!!/' il Ty". of, 1 1;4,.'0.=.,,�, l ` Om. LA lon ..e. - .,?. t?,n..r mot. 'o Dena;, F..gti. 1,44..nGwK,0e400•t111_Mwy9MbY1Ca440m., C67C.0C."00.'4. (1� Lave ce..e+wnce C.m.. - 4.9mCa rr. RMS RI,,..awi voce MvaI Canm.na, _ rG 1i YatMu WhanAnte Comprahaeana Plan Future Land Use By the year 2025, the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) expects Yakima's population could reach 93,815 persons, or even 119,641 persons depending on the rate of annexation from Yakima's designated Urban Growth Area (UGA) representing 33% or 42% of all Yakima County's population respectively. Yakima would average an annual rate of growth between 0.6% and 1.4% per year 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 5 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction per OFM's projections which would be less than the comparable areas in the state and less than has been typical of Yakima in recent years. 38.0 37 0 36.0 35.0 34,0 33.0 32.0 31 0 30 0 29.0 L Median age m r 0 U � Age distribution - the median age was 32.1 years in Yakima compared to 32.3 years in Yakima County, 37.2 years in Puget Sound, 36.8 years in Washington State, and 36.4 years in the US. Median ages are lower in Yakima and the county due to the larger family sizes and number of younger age children within the population. The percent of persons 65 years and older, however, was 14% in Yakima compared to 11% in Yakima County, 10% in Puget Sound, 12% in Washington State, and 13% in the US. The city has concentrated a proportionately Targe number of families with young children and elderly adults - trends which will have significant impacts on housing requirements. 45% 40% - 3 3( 20% 15% -- 10% 10% 5% Hispanic or Latino of any race a 0 O1 0 u A } Ethnicity - 38% of Yakima's population was Hispanic or Latino compared with 40% in Yakima County, 7% in Puget Sound, 9% in Washington State, and 15% in the US. There were no other ethnic groups with significant percentages of the population in Yakima or Yakima County other than Caucasian. Of the population 5 years and over in Yakima, 32% spoke a language at home other than English compared with 35% in Yakima County, 16% in Washington State, and 20% in the US. Yakima and Yakima County likely concentrated a large Hispanic or Latino population due to the predominance of agricultural industries within the local area and as a result of past migrations. 3.00 2.90 2.80 I 2.70 2.60 2.50 2.40 2.30 2.20 Average household size Yakima Co Households and household composition - 64% of all Yakima households were families compared with 72% in Yakima County, 62% in Puget Sound, 70% in Washington State, and 67% in the US. The average household size in Yakima was 2.68 compared with 2.95 in Yakima County, 2.48 in Puget Sound, 2.52 in Washington State, and 2.60 in the US. Yakima's larger family households has and will create 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 6 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction a larger number of dependents and less number of working adults than is typical of the more urban areas of the state resulting in lower available per household and per capita incomes. HOUSEHOLD INCOME Median per c 535.000 `" 0 � ;°. �• Percent owner occupied HOUSING Household income - median household income in Yakima was $35,820 compared to $40,321 in Yakima County, $61,684 in Puget Sound, $53,940 in Washington State, and $50,007 in the US. Per capita income in Yakima was $19,362 compared to $18,186 in Yakima County, $32,455 in Puget Sound, $28,290 in Washington State, and ¢26,178 in the US. Generally, Yakima and Yakima County household incomes reflect the area's Iargely lower wage -paying agricultural industries and larger households with fewer working adults than is typical of the more urban areas of the state and nation. Households living in poverty - 21% of all persons living in Yakima had incomes below poverty Ievels compared with 21% inYakima County, 10Y6 in Puget Sound, 12% in Washington State, and 13% in the US. Approximately 15% of all families living in Yakima had incomes below poverty Ievels compared with 16% in Yakima County, 6% in Puget Sound, 8% in Washington State, and 10% in the US. Approximately 37% of all female headed families with related children under 18 years of age had incomes below poverty levels in Yakima compared with 43% in Yakima County, 21% in Puget Sound, 26% in Washington State, and 29% in the Occupied housing units - 56% of all housing units were occupied by owners in Yakima compared to 65% in Yakima County, 64% in Puget Sound, 66% in 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 7 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Washington State, and 67% in the US. The average number of rooms per unit was 5.0 in Yakima compared to 5.3 in Yakima County, 5.4 in Puget Sound, 5.4 in Washington State, and 5.4 in the US. Housing type - 57% of all housing units were single family detached in Yakima compared with 64% in Yakima County, 60% in Puget Sound, 63% in Washington State, and 61% in the US. Age of housing - less than 696 of all units were built since the year 2000 in Yakima compared to 8% in Yakima County, 11% in Puget Sound, 11% in Washington State, and 1O96 in the US. Conversely, 19% of all housing units in Yakima were constructed before 1939 compared to 14% in Yakima County, 11% in Puget Sound, 12% in Washington State, and 15% in the US. The larger concentration of multifamily and older housing structures within Yakima will affect the type of housing programs that will be needed within the city and the CDBG target areas in particular. HOUSING COST AND AFFORDABILITY 5400,000 0350,000 5300,000 S250,000 • Median house value,: Median value - the median varue of an owner -occupied housing unit was $132,600 in Yakima compared to $134,800 in Yakima County, $337,372 in Puget Sound, $361,200 in Washington State, and $181,800 in the US. Median rent was $606 per month in Yakima compared to $602 in Yakima County, $879 in Puget Sound, $799 in Washington State, and $781 in the US. Housing values and rents are less in Yakima and the county due in part to the lower land costs associated with a rural development pattern and economy compared with the more urban areas of the state. Housing costs - 30% of all owner -occupied households were paying more than 3096 of all household income for housing costs in Yakima compared to 2996 in Yakima County, 35% in Puget Sound, 32% in Washington State, and 29% in the US. Of those households where rent as a percent of income were computed, 47% were paying more than 30% of all household income for housing costs in Yakima compared to 43% in Yakima County, 45% in Puget Sound, 45% in Washington State, and 46% in the US. Housing affordability - the Washington Center for Real Estate Research (WCRER) at Washington State University maintains data on home resale, building permits, and rental trends on a county basis. WCRER calculates the Housing Affordability Index (HAI) based on a model developed by the National Association of REALTORS© which measures the ability of a typical family to make payments on a median priced resale home, assuming 20% down payment and 30 year amortizing mortgage - first-time homebuyers are assumed to buy a less expensive home with lower down payments and lower income. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 8 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction According to WCRER, Yakima County's HAI was 164.7 in the first quarter of 2009 meaning that median family income was 64.7% more than thebare minimum required to qualify for a mortgage on the median priced home, compared with 135.5 for Washington State. Yakima County's First -Time HAI was 100.8 compared to 73.3 for Washington State, meaning county first-time buyers were just able to qualify for a mortgage necessary to buy a lower price home with a lower down payment.. HOUSING NEED Households with any houshgprobkms Housing problems - according to the US Bureau of Census CHAS (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) in the year 2000, 43% or 11,451 of all 26,630 households in Yakima had some form of hoLsing problem including overcrowded, lack of complete plumbing, and/or paying more than 30% of all household income for housing compared to 39% in Yakima County and 33% in Washington State. Approximately 31% or 4,410 of all 14,229 owner households had some form of housing problem in Yakima compared with 32% in Yakima County and 28% in Washington State. Approximately 57% or 7,068 of all 12,401 renter households had some form of housing problem in Yakima compared with 52% in Yakima County and 44% in Washington State. Paying more than 30% of household income - 34% orQ,0S4nfall 26,6]O households in Yakima were paying more than 30% of all household income for housing compared to 39% in Yakima County and 3396 in Washington State. Approximately 25% or 3,557 of all 14/229 owner households were paying more than 30q6 of all household income for housing in Yakima compared with 25% in Yakima County and 26% in Washington State. Approximately 44% or 5,456 of all 12,401 renter househo|ds!were paying more than 30% of all household income for housing in Yakima compared with 38% in Yakima County and 37% in Washington State. Paying more than 50% of household income - 1596 or 3,994 of all 20,630 households in Yakima were paying more than 50% of all household income for housing compared to 12% in Yakima County and 1296 in Washington State. Approximately 9% or 1,280 of all 14,229 owner households were paying more than 5096 of all household income for housing in Yakima compared with 9% in Yakima County and 9% in Washington State. Approximately 21% or 2,604 of all 12,401 renter households were paying more than 50% of all household income for housing in Yakima compared with 18% in Yakima County and 17% in Washington State. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 9 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Housing Assistance - the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) administers 618 combined tenant -based housing choice vouchers and project based vouchers to help low-income families in Yakima and Kittitas Counties - of which 120 units are located within Yakima. Section 8 vouchers are generally assigned on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to appropriate unit size and type availability. As of August 2009, the Section 8 tenant -based waiting list was over capacity and closed. Public Housing - the Yakima Housing Authority currently owns and manages 189 units of public housing for low-income families, another 38 elder units, and 70 Farmworker units within Yakima. Other housing providers - include the Catholic Charities Housing Service (CCHS), a division of the Yakima Catholic Diocese, which currently owns and manages 40 senior and 36 Farmworker with another 231 low-income family units under development. The Yakima V&ley Partners of Habitat for Humanity have constructed 58 low-income houses averaging about 4 units peryear and the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) have constructed another 54 low-income units averaging about 5 units a year with homeowner self-help and volunteer assistance. Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) - assists in the development of opportunities for first-time homebuyers by providing technical assistance and/or partnering withnon-profit agencies such as the Yakima Valley Partners of Habitat for Humanity and the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) in the creation of new, affordable homes or the rehabilitation of existing houses. The ONDS aiso assists eligible homeowners in the maintenance and rehabilitation of their homes by providing inspections, reasonable designs, cost estimates, and detailed specifications for each project. In 2008, ONDS: • completed emergency home repairs for 43 senior houses, o completed regular home repairs for 34 senior houses, " assisted with 27 down payment assistance programs, • painted the exterior of 23 houses, ▪ organized 7,606 volunteer hours painting over graffiti,and " cleaned by 188 iliegal dump sites. NEEDS OF HOMELESS PERSONS The Homeless Network of Yakima County conducted a Point -In -Time Survey of the homeless on Thursday the 24th of January 2008 - and in each of the prior years beginning in 3005. The survey was conducted by volunteers over a 24-hour period, typically the Iast week of January each year. According to the results of the 2008 Point -In -Time Survey, there were 1,055 homeless individuals in 570 households in the county of which 511 or 48% were male, 483 or 46% were female and the remaining 61 individuals gender was not recorded. Approximately 32% or 333 individuals ofthe total counted were under the age of 18, 11% or 119 individuals were under age 5, 1% or 12 individuals were over 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 10 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Of the total counted, approximately 43% were living with family or friends, 20% in transitional housing, 15% in emergency shelter, 3% in vehicles, 2% outdoors, and 296 in abandoned buildings. Approximately 16% or 174 individuals of the total were recently released from jail, treatment facilities, nmed|ca|•or psychiatric hospitals, work release, and foster care. Yakima had 448 or 42% of the total homeless individuals counted. SPECIAL POPULATIONS HOUSING AND SERVICE NEEDS Certain populations require special housing and services tailored to their specific conditions and problems including victims of domestic violence, people with development disabilities, the mentally UL the elderly, and substance abusers. There are over 42 different public, non-profit, and private agencies providing housing and housing services within Yakima of which at least 8 serve the mentally i||, 13 serve substance abusers and addictions, 1 serves persons with HIV/AIDS, 1 serves persons with suicidal risks, and 2 serve crisis pregnancies. LEAD-BASED PAINT AND LEAD HAZARDS Deteriorated units, especially units with deteriorating roofing and plumbing systems, and units where unsafe practices were used in rehabilitation are particularly at risk for lead hazards. Approximately 19% or 6,367 of 33,082 total housing units in Yakima were constructed prior to 1939 when lead-based paint and materials were frequently used in construction and installation practices. ONDS and OIC have aggressive lead-based paint removal programs which have thus far included ONDS treating 430 units and OIC treating 67 units (51 of which were within Yakima) since the year 2U0Oinitiation of the programs, or 7.696 of the total pna-1939 housing inventory. BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING Yakima's Comprehensive PIan identifies several areas affecting the development of affordable housing inc|uding.zoning, land use,subdivision requirements, impact fees, licensing and permits, and extension of transportation and utility services. The Yakima Planning Division monitors available land, zoning, and land use in order to ensure pjected population increased can be accommodated with new housing constructions available to all income groups. Yakima County's Department of Human Services has also established an Affordable Housing Program and Coordinator to work with Yakima and other cities within the county on a comprehensive approach to affordable housing issues. FAIR HOUSING Like other communities, Yakima likely has the following impediments to fair housing choices: ~ Housing discrimination primarily affecting persons of color, the disabled, and families with children, 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 11 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Home mortgage lending practices that likely deny or make it difficult to obtain financing or favorabte lending terms, and • Limited knowledge by the public -at -large concerning protected classes, fair housing laws, and the resources avaiPabe to households affected by unfair practices. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Yakima County - is the state's second largest county in terms of square miles (4,296) and has the 7th largest population (230,907). The county also has the largest concentration of minority populations in the state (44%) including over 50% of the entire state's Native American population. Yakima County is also home to the largest population of migrant and seasonal farm workers in the state which has been estimated at over 81,175 persons including family members by the Washington Migrant & Seasonal Farm Workers (MSFW) Enumeration Study for Washington State. The area's economic basis - agriculture and service industries - employs over 60% of the working population in relatively low paying, seasonal employment with little or no opportunity for upward advancement. Full-time occupations that pay more than minimum wage account for less than 13% of the work force. Yakima County has been designated an "economically distressed" county by the Washington State Legislature due to the county's chronically depressed economy. The Federal Military Training Center and the Yakima Indian Reservation account for 78% of the county's lands - leaving only 22% of the county's properties in tax generating status. Yakima County coritinues to experience severe economic hardships in spite of the injection of millions in state and federal dollars for employment and training programs over the past 20 years. Yakima - as one of the county's largest cities and the county seat, is a reflection and repository of some of the county's most distressed economic trends and households. As a result, Yakima was declared a Renewal Community (RC) by the U5 HUD Secretary, 1 of only 40 such designations nationwide and along with Tacoma, the only designations within Washington State based on a demographic profile submitted by the city. The designated Renewal Community area includes portions of census tracts 01, 02, 06, and 15 - or the oldest developed eastern portions of the city located along the railroad tracks then east to the Yakima River. The population was 24,298 persons or 34% of the city's total population of 71,845 in the designated Renewal Community area in the year 2000 of which 4,405 or 18% were youth ages 15-24 years. The Renewal Community designation goal is to promote economic development in distressed communities by offering tax benefits if: • A business or property owner plans on relocating a building in the area, or • A company has employees who live in the area, or • A person or business owns property in the area, or • A business is located in the area, or • A business or developer plans on locating a new business in the area. In addition to the Renewal Community designation, Yakima has recently completed an application to designate a Yakima Revenue Development Area (YR0vA)of55b acres in census tract 02 or the former Boise Cascade Sawmill & Plywood Plant, ]e|d- 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 12 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Wen' plant, Trail Wagons RV building, and PacificPower substation. Yakima is requesting up to $25,000,000 of Local Infrastructure Financing Tool (LIFT) funds to partially finance over $50,000,000 of public transportation and utility improvements necessary to redevelop the site to include mixed-use, transit oriented development (TOD) providing 4,631 permanent jobs with 171 units of mixed -income housing. CRIME The Washington State Population Survey (WSPS) is conducted on a biannual basis through a series of telephone interviews statewide by the Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) to obtain current information on social, demographic, and economic conditions within the state. Beginning in 2004 the WSPS asked half of its respondents a new set of questions pertaining to the respondent's awareness of serious crime in their neighborhood inthe past 12 months. The 2008 VVSPSaUows analysis by 10 regions — including Yakima and the Tri -Cities (Yakima, Benton, and Franklin Counties) as a single region. Following is a summary of the perceptions of persons who participated in the survey from Washington State in total and the Yakima and Tri -Cities region: Table 2: WSPS Survey of Percent Respondents Saying Yes Regiom, Washington State Yakima/Tri- Cities People openly selling drugs? 18% 1896 People openly using drugs? 15% 18% Auto theft? 23% 21% , Theft of personal property? 43% . 40% Breaking and entering to steal personal property? 30% 32% / Violent physical attacks? 13% 11% Crimes committed with guns? 9% 9% Sexual assault or rape? 7% 8% Murder? 6% 8% Source: Washington State Population Survey (WSPS) 2008 by Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) As shown, survey respondents from theYak|rna/Tr|-[ities region perceived there to be more crime than state respondents in total for: 1) people openly selting drugs, 2) breaking and entering to steal personal property, 3) sexual assmu|tornape, and 4) murder. Conversely, survey respondents from the Yakima/Tri-Cities region perceived there to be less crime than state respondents in total for: 1) auto theft, 2) theft of personal property, and 3) violent physical attacks. The percent of Yakima/Tri-Cities respondents indicating that "people were openly selling drugs" in their neighborhoods was 12% in 2004 increasing to 26% in 2006 then declining to 18% in 2008. According to the 2007 Uniform Crime Report, the number of thefts or attempted thefts in the Yakima/Tri-Cities region was 2,457 or a rate of 5.3 per1,000 population The Yakima Police Department records crime statistics for 9 districts within the city, of which districts 1-6 are Iocated within the Community Renewal Area. From 2005 to 2007, the total number of crime incidents declined within all city districts and within 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 13 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction some of the Community Renewal Areas in particularly for of all kinds including homicides, rape; robbery, assault, burglary, theft, and arson. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES Capital p-ects and services - are developed and planned in accordance with Yakima's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which matches public facility and service requirements with costs and anticipated city revenues. The CIP is a 6 -year financing plan for capital expenditures which is based on the city's Comprehensive Plan and is revised and extended on an annual basis along with any annual revisions to the city's Comprehensive Plan accordingly. Transportation - services and project requirements are developed for a 20 -year horizon in the city's Comprehensive Plan and financed and implemented on an annual basis in accordance with the CIP. Parks, recreation and open space - services and project requirements are also developed for a 20 -year horizon in the city's Comprehensive Plan, in the supplemental Yakima Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, and financed and implemented on an annual basis in accordance with the CIP. INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES & SERVICES There are over 42 different public, non-profit, and private agencies providing housing and housing services within Yakima of which at least 11 provide housing for low- income, seniors, disabled, and farm workers, and 19provide transitional housing for domestic abuse, substance abuse, homeless families, adults, and youth. In addition, 8 of the 42 agencies serve the mentally ill, 13 serve substance abusers and addictions, 1 serves persons with HIV/AIDS, 1 serves persons with suicidal risks, and 2 serve crisis pregnancies. PAST PERFORMANCE The year 2010 will be the first year of this 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. The Annual Action Plans will report progress on addressing priority housing and non- housing community development needs each year from 2010-2014 as Yakima ONDS has annually reported progress for the previous 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan. The 2008 Annual Action Plan provides onevaluation mfthe 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan performance. A detailed breakdown report of prior year uses and performances has also been provided in the Consolidated Anrival Performance & Evaluation Report (CAPER) and which is available at the Yakima's ONDS offices or on-line at Yakima's webpage (www.ci.yakima.wa.us). 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 14 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Strategic Plan Due every three, four, or five years (length of period is at the grantee's discretion) no less than 45 days prior to the start of the grantee's program year start date. HUD does not accept plans between August 15 and November 15. Mission: The Strategic Plan's mission is to propose measurable goals for actions that will address issues set by HUD requirements for the use of CDBG and HOME funding. These goals include projects that service homeless and low-income populations, address fair housing and lead-based paint issues, overcome institutional barriers to the production and preservation of affordable housing, and foster economic development and neighborhood revitalization. Yakima coordinates with the Yakima Housing Authority, Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), Catholic Charities Housirig Services (CCHS), and numerous other public, non-profit, and private agencies on housing and human service goals. Housing priority needs are for: • Homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless • Low-income families and individuals • Low-income families and individuals with special needs Yakima's 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan goals are to: • Assist in the creation of housing projects that serve the homeless • Develop basline data on local homelessness and formulate coordinated plans to address the causes of chronic homelessness • Enable low-income households to afford market rate housing � Provide affordable permanent housing for low-income households • Rehabilitate housing to improve the living conditions of low-income households o Work to eliminate housing discrimination " Raise the lending community's awareness about the application of fair housing laws to homeownership o Educate the public of protected classes, fiar housing laws, and the resources available to them to prevent discrimination o Indentify and mitigate barriers to affordable housing resulting from zoning, subdivision, land use, permits, impact fees or service extensions • Distribute materials on lead-based paint hazards • Assure that all information on lead-based paint hazard is in compliance withstateandfedera| laws, and • Increase the number of trained and certified lead-based paint inspectors and contractors Community & Economic Development priority needs for non -housing goals are to: • Stimulate economic development • Provide basic human service support • Revitalize target areas including the Renewal Community arid Yakima Revenue Development Area (YRDA) in particular 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 15 Version 3.0 Jurisdiction Yakima's 2010~2014 goals for priorities are to: o Develop target area plans to guide economic development so that living -wage job opportunities can be created for Iow-incomepopuiations = Implement projects or programs that foster the thriving businesses, commercial, and industrial centers to encourage the creation of living -wage job opportunities � Increase employment opp�rtunities for Iow and moderate -income households • Enhance the delivery of effective support services to priority low-income and homeless populations by providing funding and technical assistant to human service agencies • Encourage and promote safe, comfortable, and thriving neighborhoods, and • Encourage civic pride in neighborhoods and develop connections between neighborhoods and community resources General Questions 1. Describe the geographic areas of the jurisdiction (including areas of low income families and/or racial/minority concentration) in which assistance will be directed. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Managing the Process response: Yakima is located in south central Washington State in the upper region of the Yakima Valley south of the confluence of the Naches and Yakima Rivers. Yakima is bound on the north and east by these 2 rivers and is characterized by the gentle slopes and rich silt -loamy soils of a river basin. Irrigation is a necessary factor throughout the Yakima ValIey due to the dry semi -arid climate. Before irrigation the land was a desert, although with lush vegetation along the Yakima River and an abundant salmon run. Native villages dotted the riverbank, and a major fishery was located near Se|ah just north of Yakima. In the 1860s white ranchers drove herds of cattle from Oregon to take advantage of the Yakima ValIey bunchgrass. Farmers in turn, supplanted ranching a decade later as irrigation experiments demonstrated the fertility of the land. The river, railroad (1885), and arge-scale government irrigation projects (1900s) determined subsequent patterns of developmerit. In December 1884 the Northern Pacific Railroad (NP) decided to bypass Yakima City (now called Union Gap) which was the only town in Yakima County at the time. To the dismay of early Yakima City residents, the NP placed its depot 4 miles north on an unpopulated sagebrush plain. NP officials claimed a swamp prevented the laying of rails through Yakima City, but more likely the lure of cheap, undeveloped land was the motive. To promote the new town, NP offered free lots plus moving expenses to all Yakima City businessmen who opened shop at the new location by 1 May 1885. Most merchants packed up and moved north to the new town location bringing their buildings with them. The buildings were pulled on rollers on top of 4 -inch wood plants by mule teams - some taking over a month to be moved the distance. Yakima City was substantially depoputated by the move and in 1885 voters chose North Yakima, theNP town, as the county seat. In 1918, county residents complained that "North Yakima" sounded like a suburban, and the 2 towns were merged to become Yakima and Union Gap respectively. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 16 Version 2.0 ]urisdiCtion Early settlers raised livestock on the bunchgrass hills, driving cattle and sheep to market. In the late 1870s private built irrigation projects hasted the transition from ranching to farming. Real progress was made in 1902 when the fledging Reclamation Service, now the US Bureau of Reclamation, unified irrigation efforts. From 1900 to 1910 the population of the Yakima Valley tripled, and Yakima established its commercial and social domination of the region. Today nearly a million irrigated acres in the Yakima Project grow app|es, hops, cherries, grapes, pears, asparagus, hay, and mint. Yakima Firing Center - occupies 263,000 acres of sagebrush land on which the US Army trains thousands of soldiersfrom the National Guard, Army Reserves, and international units from Canada and Great Britain. Yakima Reservation - occupies over 1,000,000 acres and is the largest reservation in the state stretching from the forested hillsides of Mt Adams to the irrigation -lush valley of the Yakima River. The reservation was created under the Treaty of Walla Walla following the Indian Wars of 1855 and 1858. The current Yakima Nation is governed by a council of 14 members, a recognition of the 14 "tribes and bands" that were signatories to the 1855treaty. The council encourages education, improved housing, environmental enhancement, and economic opportunity on the reservation. Farm labor - farm labor shortages during World War D led schools to dismiss classes early so that students could help with the crops. During a particular crisis the Army detailed soldiers from a Yakima area gunnery range onto farms. In 1943 the US government brought in workers from towns and cities in central Mexico. These workers - many of whom were teenagers = were regimented into forces to supply railroad or agricultural work crews on an as -needed basis. Actually, Mexican workers had already been coming seasonally and illegally - riding the rails north and earning in a month what it would take a year to earn in Mexico. Nor were these men the first; family members had been among the first to migrate to Northwest mine booms from the 1860s to the 1880s. The official Bracero Program, which continued until 1964,allowed up to 50,000 Mexican workers per year to cross the border to work on US farms. Labor contractors also traveled Texas, Colorado, and California promoting jobs in Washington's asparagus, sugar beet, and potato fieJds and in the orchards. Whole families joined single men riding north in the backs of trucks, or paid out money earned from early -season Southwest crops to buy gas and tires for traveling to earn money from late -season Northwest crops. Many settled in the urban areas, especially Yakima, creating bilingual families that have become citizens with protections under the law. These early settlers are now being joined by refugees and migrating workers from other Central American countries seeking work in the agricultural industries. Agricultural technology improvements and mechanizations on the farms, however, have spurred these workers to settle and seek jobs inthe urban areas and services industries. Hispanics - are the fastest growing ethnic group in Yakima. In 1990, Hispanics comprised 16% of the city's population. In 2000, with a gain of 15,299 people and a 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 17 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction growth rate of 172%, the Hispanic population comprised 34% of the city's population. In contrast, the non -Hispanic population dropped from 84% of the city's population in 1990 to 64% in 2000. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT TARGET AREA Yakima is defined by 13 census tracts in the year 2000 Census - 7 of which are designated as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Target Area due to a concentration of poverty, housing conditions, and racial or ethnic concentrations. The 7 census tracts - 01, 02, 03, 06, 07, 12, and 15 - include 53% of the year 2000's population or 43,891 persons out of a total 2000 census city population of 82,762 persons. Graphic 2: Yakima Census Tracts % Hispanic or Latino of any race Ethnic concentration - approximately 43% of the CDBG Target Area census tracts are of minority ethnic groups compared to 28% city-wide, and 48% are Hispanic or Latino of any race compared to 30% citywide. Approximately 83% of the Yakima's Hispanic or Latino population is distributed within the CDBG Target Area of which tracts 02, 06, 12, and 15 located closest to the downtown core contained the greatest percentages. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 18 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1111 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Housing tenure - 92% of all housing units within the CDBG Target Area are occupied compared with 94% city-wide. Approximately 42% of all occupied units within the CDBG TargetArea are occupied by owners compared with 56% city-wide. Approximately 9% of all housing � are v acantCompared to76city- -�00�m�QUm city- wide, of which 23% of the va c ant CDBG Target Area housing units are vacant for reasons other than being for rent, sale, seasonal, recreational, or occasional use compared to216city-vide.%~^n~~~--~i~d 90% 80% i -f: triw70%. , NCe 60% _. , ��- SO% i14 -4.. � • ;$'''- if- e 40% —� , ����.m ' � e Percent vacant I 8%_� Ieu - � | �� 14% '0 f _�` - VI ret Lq_ SIC I' i4 �� _ - — � ax - -- ----e- �w_ __ _ '- --�---- mw�__ __ ____ ',1 -_ ___ r. __ _ � it:j 20% � � —°rn`=to~cop0 � _- ~ �� �-.,/m»—�-"-—�- � � -_-�-_�V �-�a .— __ A# �ow 4, 'Ts .c..3 I-� Percent vacant I 8%_� Ieu - � | �� 14% '0 f _�` - VI ret Lq_ SIC I' i4 �� _ - — � ax - -- ----e- �w_ __ _ '- --�---- ---- __ 2% -�_�_�_�_�_�_,_~_ om ',1 -_ ___ r. 4,. � � it:j ?. * k — � � 'V =, m ~ � � � � ra , 1 0 � � Median family inc • � 1.31\ - - � | �� '0 f _�` - VI ret Lq_ SIC I' i4 ri _ -_ ___ r. Household characteristics - approximately 31% of the householders of occupied housing units within the CDBG Target Area are Hispanic or Latino of any race compared to 19% city- wide. Approximately 21% of households of occupied housing units within the CDBG Target Area are over age 65 compared to 2496city-wide. Approximately 43% of all householders of occupied housing units over the age 65 are located within the CDBG Target Area of which the greatest percentages are located in census tracts 03 and 12 away from the downtown area at the fringe of the target area boundaries. The average household size within the CDBG Target Area is 2.80 compared with 2.63 city- wide, the average family size if 3.56 within the CDBG Target Area compred with 3.28 city- wide. Income - the median family income of households within the CDBG Target Area was $24,895 compared to $34,798 city-wide. The median household income of households within the CDBG Target Area was $20,828 In general - the CDBG Target Area has the highest concentrations of ethnic persons and households, particularly Hispariics or Latinos, with larger households and 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 19 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction � families, in more rental units, with lower incomes, and higher percentages of poverty than the city at Iarge. 2. Describe the bass for allocating investments geographically within the jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA) (91.215(a)(1)) and the basis for assigning the priority (including the relative priority, where required) given to each category of priority needs (91.215(a)(2)). Where appropriate, the jurisdiction should estimate the percentage of funds the jurisdiction plans to dedicate to target areas. % belo noverty&cvm/ wm 50% = -- /s0% — --- —�- - e. mm 0 tJ � ° � ~ �� /mm /om ox ' -- _z. _�_______ ---�- c.:- U� � � - � ~__�_________ ,, � � ms � e- ~ M0 N0 0D _ - N � � . . . . —~~�="=������� % of median family income 250% 200m � � ! /s0% — --- —�- -- 1, -' 0 tJ � w | /mm n4. mm_.," �" � � L _- ~. —" � = = ^ � = � � � � � �� inconnes in census tracts 01 at 35% or $9,782, tract 15 at 64% or $17,702. ac 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Managingthe Process � ess response: Approximately 26% of all households within the CDBG Target Area had incomes below poverty level compared to 15% city-wide. Approximately 82% of all households with incomes below poverty level were Iocated within the CDBG Target Area with the highest concentrations in census tracts 06, 07, and 15 Iocated closest to the downtown core. The median family income of CDBG Target Area families was 72% of the median city-wide family income with the owest percentages and family incomes in census tracts 01 at 35% or $12,227 and tract 02 at 27% at $9,544. The median household income of CDBG Target Area households was 75% of the median city-wide household income with the lowest percentages and households 02 at 55% or $15,635, and Based on income distribution, as well as the other ethnic concentrations and housing characteristics cited earlier, CDBG and HOME resources will be allocated predominantly within the identified CDBG Target Area census tracts. 3. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs (91.215(a)(3)). 3-5 Year Strategic PIan Managing the Process response: A major obstacle to meeting underserved needs within Yakima is not having sufficient local, state, or federal resources especially considering the magnitude of 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 20 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction the underserved needs. In some instances where local, state, and federal resources are provided, a project or program may still not be feasible if insufficient funds cannot be leveraged from matching non-profit and private resources, such as low income housing tax credits or other development financing. Yakima has the foliowing limited resources to implement the 2010-3014 Strategic Plan assuming Yakima continues to receive an annual increase of 1% per year in CDBG and HOME funding: Table 3: Yakima Funding Projections Fiscal year 2010 2011 Source 2012 2013 2014 CDBG $1,185,386 $1,197,239 $1,209,311 $1,331,303 $1/233,516 HOME $682,410 $689/334 $696,126 $703,087 $710,117 Total $1,867,796 $1,886,473 $1,905,337 $1,934/390 $1/943,§33 Source: Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) In addition to the resources listed above, Yakima can apply to HUD for Section 108 Guaranteed Loan funds for qualified housing and economic development projects. Under this program, Yakima can borrow a total amount equal to 5 times Yakima's annual block grant or between $5,926,000 and $6,167,000. Yakima, the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA), and a variety of public, non-profit, and private human service and housing agencies pursue a diverse list oflocal, state, federal, and private resources with which to fund service delivery to low-income households in need, and supporting neighborhood and economic development activities. Yakima is particularly supportive of the following programs among others: = Public Housing Comprehensive Grant HUD Grants for Public Housing Tax Exempt Bonds • Taxable Bonds 1 Low -Income Housing Tax Credits • FHLB Affordable Housing Program • Funding under SHB 2060/2163 � Safe Havens Section 202 Elderly • Section 811 Handicapped ▪ Historic Preservation Tax Credits • Moderate Rehabilitation SRO • Rental Vouchers • Rental Certificates ▪ Public Housing MROP ▪ Public 1 -lousing CIAP • New Markets Tax Credits Program • McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Programs • HOPWA ° Emergency Shelter Grant • WA Housing Finance Comm Programs • WA Housing Trust Fund Programs • WA Housing Assistance Programs = WA Community Reinvestment Assoc = WA Community Development Fund ▪ United Way The Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) will have approximately $2,700,000 in Section 8 Assistance funding available in 2009 for an authorized 618 housing units in Yakima County to serve low-income households of which approximately 75-80% or 400 units 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 21 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction will likely be funded in Yakima. Like ONDS, YHA expects annual funding levels for Section 8 Assistance program will increase no more than 196 per year if the agency receives a similar allocation in the future. Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity and the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) will also have funds available on an annual basis to service low-income household housing and other human service needs. The Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS) of the Yakima Catholic Diocese has been funded in the past by Low -Income Housing Tax Credits and may apply for additional Low -Income Housing Tax Credits in future years. Non-profit agencies providing services to homeless individuals and families can apply for funding assistance under the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Programs. Discretionary grants from state and federal governments for housing, community development, and social services are pursed if and when such grants become available. Public/private partnerships, where additional funding resources are leveraged, are also sought out and encouraged. These relationships and funding arrangements, however, are difficult if not impossible, to predict in advance. Managing the Process (91.200 (b)) 1. Lead Agency. Identify the lead agency or entity for overseeing the development of the plan and the major public and private agencies responsible for administering programs covered by the consolidated plan. 2. Identify the significant aspects of the process by which the plan was developed, and the agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participated in the process. 3. Describe the jurisdiction!s consultations with housing, social service agencies, and other entities, including those focusing on services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. *Note: HOPWA grantees must consult broadly to develop a metropolitan -wide strategy and other jurisdictions must assist in the preparation of the HOPWA submission. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan Managing the Process response: Lead agency - Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Ser -vices (ONDS) is the lead agency responsible for preparing Yakima's Consolidated Plan, and has been designated to be responsible for the planning, development, and implementation of itsCDBG and HOME Programs. Key public and non-profit agencies that administer programs covered by the Consolidated PIan include: • Aging & Long Term Care (ALTC) • Ahtanum Pioneer Church • American Red Cross • AmeriCorps 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 22 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction � Association of C urches • Avail Home Health o Calvary Rescue Mission • Care Net • Cascade-BIue Mountain Food Share • Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS) • Community Living Inc • Community Presbyterian Church • Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health (CWCMH) ▪ Consejo Counseling • Consumer Credit Counseling Services of Yakima • Department of Veteran Affairs - Yakima Vet Center • Easter Seal Society of Washingto ▪ Elmview o Enterprise for Progress in the Community (EPIC) o Education Services District (ESD) 105 • For a Better Tomorrow • Greater Columbia 2-1-1 o Habitat for Humanity • Homeless Network of Yakima County • Lower Valley Crisis Center • Merit Resources Services o Neighborhood Housing Services of Eastern Washington (NHSEW) • Next Step Housing • Northwest Community Action Ceriter ° Northwest Harvest • Northwest Justice Project • Office of Rur& & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) • Opportunities Industrialization Center (OIC) ° People for People a Project Warm-up Distribution o Providence House " Ridgeview Group Home o Rural Community Development Resources (RCDR) a St Vincent de Paul Center • Sundown M Ranch • Sunrise Outreach • The Saivation Army o Triumph Treatment Services • Twin Peaks Youth Ranch ▪ Union Gospel Mission • United Way of Central Washington • US Veteran's Affairs Department = Volunteer Attorney Services o Washington Department of Veterans Affairs o Washington Families Fund (WFF) • Washington Department of Social & Health Services (DSHS) • Willow Place Boys Home • Workforce Washington -Veterans • Yakima City Planning Department • Yakima County Department of Human Services • Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse 3-5Year StrotegicPlan 23 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Yakima County Veteran Programs • Yakima Community Services Office (CSO) • Yakima Health District • Yakima Hearing & Speech • Yakima Housing Authority • Yakima Interfaith Coalition - La Casa Hogar • Yakima Neighborhood Health Services • Yakima School District #7 • Yakima Valley Community Land Trust • Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic • Yakima Work Source Job Corps • YWCA Significant aspects of the process - includes the use of consultants generating statistical information needed to establish needs, gaps and barriers; ONDS consulting with public and private agencies and citizens including a Housing Advisory Committee composed of the Yakima Housing Authority, Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), and Yakima County Department of Human Services; and the Community Development Advisory Board providing review and feedback. Consultation with other agencies - ONDS consults with public and private agencies that provide assisted housing, health services, and social and fair housing services - especially those focusing on services to children, the elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons through the Homeless Network of Yakima County staffed by the Yakima County Department of Human Services. ONDS also consults with the Washington State Department of Commerce (CTED) and the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) to assure that the Yakima Consolidated Plan is inclusive and addresses statutory purposes. The Homeless Network of Yakima County is the coordinator of the Yakima County 10 -Year Homeless Housing Plan. The Homeless Network of Yakima County is composed of a broad group of Yakima County public, non-profit, and private human services agencies including many of the groups listed above. The Homeless Network of Yakima County conducts regular meetings and agendas, updates the Yakima County Continuum of Care Plan, and organizes the annual Point -In -Time Homeless Persons Count. ONDS consults with health and child welfare agencies and the Yakima County Health Department on data and programs related to lead-based paint hazards and poisonings. Yakima County Health Department data is utilized to locate housing units where children have been identified as lead poisoned. ONDS also provides lead- based paint assessments and services and consults on an on-going basis regarding issues of lead-based paint hazards. ONDS notifies adjacent units of local government, to the extent practicable, of the priority non -housing community development needs, and submits the final Yakima Consolidated Plan to Yakima County and Washington State agencies for review and comment. ONDS and other Yakima city staff also consult with and serve on the boards of adjacent units of general local government, including local agencies with 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 24 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction wide -spread planning responsibilities such as the Yakima County Economic Development Council. ONDS also consults with local human service agencies including the United Way of Yakima County regarding the non -housing needs of children, elderly, persons with disabilities, homeless persons, and other populations of need concerning priority needs and funding gaps. ONDS uses information generated |n.the Point -In -Time annual homeless count, United Way of Yakima County's State of Caring Index (when published), and other sources to identify service trends, available services, and gaps. ONDS works closely with the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) concerning public housing needs and consistency with YHA's planned programs and activities in the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) Agericy Plan and the Yakima Consolidated Plan. Yakima does not have a troubled YHA but, if necessary, would provide financial or other assistance if needed to improve YHA operations and remove any such designation. ONDS also seeks to ensure that activities regarding local drug elimination, neighborhood improvements programs, and resident programs and services funded under YHA programs and those funded under the Yakima Consolidate Plan are fully coordinated to achieve comprehensive community development goals. Citizen Participation (91.200 (b)) 1. Provide a summary of the citizen participation process. 2. Provide a summary of citizen comments or views on the plan. 3.Provide a summary of efforts made to broaden public participation in the development of the consolidated plan, including outreach to minorities and non- English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. 4. Provide a written explanation of comments not accepted and the reasons why these comments were not accepted. *Please note that Citizer, Comments and Responses may be included as additional files within the CPMP Tool. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Citizen Participation response: Yakima, as a recipient of CDBG funds, provides for active participation by all citizens who are affected by CDBG funded activities in accordance with Title I of the 1974 Housing & Community Development Act and its subsequent amendments. Yakima submits a housing strategy that includes citizen participation in agreement with HOME Investment Partnerships' Program regulations, 24 CFR 92. Yakima citizen participation in CDNG and HOMEactivities may range from needs assessments and strategic planning to project selection and all phases of implementation and evaluation. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 25 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS The citizen participation process includes the gathering of input on community issues such as housing, transportation, social services, population growth planning, capital facilities, and economic development in 2 formats: • On-going input on Yakima programs and service needs a Specific input on the Yakima Consolidated Plan On-going input - is gathered on Yakima programs and services needs through the following sources: • Point -In -Time Homeless Housing Count and 10 -Year Homeless Plan Updates • United Way of Yakima County's State of Caring Index (when published) � Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services (YCDASA) • Yakima County Communities Mobilized Against Substance Abuse &Vio|ence (YCMASA) • Yakima Renewal Community Program • Loan Review Boards for the Yakima Home Improvement Program, Rental Rehabilitation Program, Housing Development Program, & Commercial and HUD 108 Loan Program • Yakima County Economic Development Council � Yakima Comprehensive Plan growth management meetings ▪ ONDS membership on non-profit and agency boards • Citizen advisory committees and commissions In addition, Yakima citizens are actively recruited and involved in decision-making by attending meetings, serving on various boards and commissions that represent CDBG Target Area and city-wide interests. The city website provides information on the agenda, schedule, membership, and other particulars of each board and Specific input—on the Yakima Consolidated Plan was obtained through the following sources: • Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) — was established composed of representatives from the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA), Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), and Yakima County Human Services Department to assist in the development of this IO1O-2O14Consolidated Plan. • Community Development Advisory Board (CDAB) — advises ONDS, Planning Commission, City Council, and the Mayor and City Manager on the formulation of policies and plans, and to identify potential CDBG and HOME -funded projects. One of CDAB's primary roles is to ensure citizen participation in all phases of the CDBG and HOME programs in accordance with federal regulations. CDAB members are appointed by Mayor and Council and represent a broad range of community interest including housing, financing, low-income advocacy, disabled, minorities in the CDBG Target Area and city-wide. CDAB members may not be employed by the city; are not compensated for work on the board; and must assemble and conduct agendas in open public meetings. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 26 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction The CDAB conducted a public meeting on the draft Yakima Consolidated Plan on Friday the 18th of September 3009. • Yakima County Council - is the elected policy and appropriations body and an especially important representative of the public. The Council consists of 5 members plus the Mayor and Assistant Mayor. Council members are invited to all meetings and receive periodic reports on CDBG funded activities. The Council must authorize the use of grant funds for specific purposes. • Other govennnmentaKagencies-noMceswenesentduhngbhepub|iccomment period announcing the availability of the Yakima Consolidated Plan to the Yakima County Commissioners, Yakima County Departments of Human Services and Health, and the Washington State Departments of Commerce (CTED) and Social & Health Services (DSHS). " Public & Assisted Housing Development Residents - and residents of the CDBG Target Area were provided opportunities to review and comment on the Yakima Consolidated Plan by ONDS and the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA). Public meetings were conducted in the: • Southeast Community Center located at 1211 South Seventh Street from 6:00-8:00 pm on Tuesday the 4th of August 2009, Miller Park Activity Center located on North 4th Street & East E Street from 6:00-8:00 pm onTuesday the lst of September 3009, ° City Hall located at 129 North 2nd Street at 2:00-4:00 pm on Thursday the 24th of September 2009, and City Hall located at 129 North 2nd Street at 6:00-8:00 pm on Tuesday the 29th of September 2009. The ¥akima Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans were developed through a public process and are consistent with HUD strategic goals, as well as localgoals and objectives that are identified in the Yakima Housing Authority's Action Plan. Yakima Consolidated Plan activities and other information that relate to housing developments is provided to the Yakima Housing Authority and made available at the annual public hearing for the Public Housing Authority (PHA) Plan. The draft Yakima Consolidated Plan is also provided to the Yakima Housing Authority for availability to public housing residents and the Yakima Housing Authority's Resident Advisory Board (RAB) for comment. Upon request, ONDS will format the Citizen Participation Plan for persons with disabilities and for non-English speaking citizens. CITIZEN COMMENTS Yakima considers the views of all citizens, public agencies, and other interested groups in preparing the final Yakima Consolidated Plan. Comments and views that were received in writing or in oral testimony at the City Council's public hearings on the draft Yakima Consolidated Plan - as well as those not accepted, and the reasons therefore, are summarized and included in the final Yakima Consolidated Before City Council dopts the Yakima Consolidated Plan, ONDS makes available to citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties information that includes the 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 27 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction expected amount of assistance (including grant funds and program income) and the range of activities that may be undertaken, including the estimated amount that will benefit persons of low and moderate -income. The draft Yakima Consolidated Plan, including the Citizen Participation Plan, was available to the public for review and comment beginning on the 15th of September 2009 with the formal 30 -day public review period beginning on the 29th of September and ending on the 30th of October 2009. Within 5 business days notice to ONDS, special accommodations will be provided for persons with disabilities and for non-English speaking persons. Copies of the draft Yakima Consolidated Plan will be available at: • ONDS offices at 112 South Eighth Street, • City Clerk's Offrce at City Hall at 129 North Second Street, and • Yakima Valley Regional Library at 102 North Third Street, Yakima, Washington 98901; and on the • Yakima website www.ci.yak|rna.vva.us at a PDF file. The draft and adopted or final Yakima Consolidated Plan, any substantial amendments, and the CAPER will all be avai(able to the public, and upon request of ONDS can be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Letter and e-mail notifications of the availability of the draft Yakima Consolidated Plan have also been provided all other government, non-profit, and private housing and human service agencies along with requests for corrections and/or updates. City Council will conduct 2 public hearings on the draft Yakima Consolidated Plan on 20 October and 17 November in City Hall Council Chambers. ANTI -DISPLACEMENT AND RELOCATION PLAN Yakima has adopted a plan to minimize displacement and relocation that may occur as a result of activities proposed in the Yakima Consolidated Plan. Yakima's Residential Anti -Displacement et Relocation Assistance Plan was adopted by Yakima City Council in accordance with HUD Section 104([)) of 1974, as amended. Yakirna'sp|an mitigates the loss of low and moderate -income housing and requires Yakima to make public specific information about any proposal to use housing and community development funds horactiv|t/es that will result in the loss of such units. Several strategies to minJmize the displacement of persons from their homes have been set forth in city policies and all replacement housing must be provided within 3 years. Yakima citizens can comment on the city's Anti -Displacement & Relocation PIan during the Consolidated PIan's public comment period and hearings. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSOLIDATED PLAN A 15'day public notice was given for all public meetings and a 30 -day public notice and comment period will be given in the public notices section of the city's newspaper of record, the Yakima Herald -Republic, prior to the scheduled public hearings with Yakima City Council and prior to the Yakima Consolidated Plan's submission to HUD. Any substantial amendments to the Consolidated Plan, will also be provided a 1O -day 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 28 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction advance notice in the Yakima Herald -Republic to allow public review and comments with ONDS during a 30 -day period prior to adoption. Substantial changes to the Consolidated Plan are defined as involving more than 10% of allocated funds for the • Changes ir the citizen participation process, • Changes in allocation priorities or in the method of distributing funds, • Changes in the use of CDBG or HOME funds from one eligible activity to another, or • Initiation of an activity, using funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan- (including program income), not previously described in the Action Plan. PERFORMANCE REPORTS The Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation Report (CAPER) is made available for public review and comment for 15 -days prior to being submitted to HUD following the publication of a public notice in the Yakima Herald -Republic. All written and oral comments are considered in the final preparation of the CAPER and are included in summary form in the report. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MEETINGS Yakima holds at least 3 public hearings per year to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stage of the community development program and Consolidated Plan process. The hearings a'cldress housing and community development needs, development of proposed activities, and a review of program performance. At least 1 meeting | held prior to the proposed Consolidated Plan's publication. Public hearings are held at times convenient to potential and actual beneficiaries in locations that meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility standards. Translation services are provided during the hearings for non-English speaking residents who wish to hear and participate in the public hearing. Special accommodations for other services can also be provided upon request. All public hearings are advertised in the public notices section of the Yakima Herald - Republic 1O -days prior to the hearing. Public hearings provide the opening and closing of the public comment period and are held in Council Chambers at City Hall. Oral and written comments received during the comment period and at the public hearing are summarized and included in the final submission to HUD. All comments or views not accepted or not incorporated, and the reasons therefore, are also summarized. Citizens may attend and comment at the public hearing on all aspects of the plan and process, including the Citizen Participation Program, as well as any projects proposed for funding. NOTIFICAT/ONS All notices and agendas of public meetings and hearings include Yakima's Equal Opportunity Statement, which outlines the procedure for those individuals requiring 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 29 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction special accommodations. Yakima's voice and TDD phone numbers are provided in all public notices. In addition to public notices in the Yakima Herald -Republic, citizens are also informed of the availability of the draft and final Consolidated Plan and performance reports throughout Yakima at public libraries, City Hall, community centers, and on the Yakima website. E-mail and written notifications is also provided of the availability, comment, and hearings dates for the draft and final Consolidated Plan to the over 42 public, non- profit, and private human services and housing provider agencies located within Yakima's service area. ACCESS TO RECORDS AND INFORMATION On request, the public is provided with reasonable and timely access to information and records relating to the Consolidated Plan and Yakima's use of assistance under the program. Citizens and citizen groups have access to ¥akima records for at least 5 years through the standard public disclosure process. SUBMITTING VIEWS, COMPLAINTS, AND APPEALS The preferred first step - for anyone dissatisfied with the Consolidated Plan and process is to discuss it with ONDS staff and supervisors. An open discussion reminds ONDS to constantly work to keep the public informed about all CDBG and HOME activities. Written response to written complaints will be provided within 15 working days. The next step - in pursuing a complaint is to discuss it in a meeting or written correspondence with the Yakima Community Economic Department (CED) Director who oversees ONDS and has responsibility for directing the citizen participation process. Like ONDS, a written response to written complaints will be provided within 15 working days. The next step - in pursuing a complaint is to present it to the Community Development Committee (CDC - a 3 person Councilmember Subcommittee), which has overall responsibility for CDBG and HOME programs and may recommend corrective measures to the Mayor and City Manager. A meeting time can be set by contacting the CDC chairperson in care of ONDS or CED offices. In the event that a citizen is dissatisfied - with the action taken by CDC, the final contact should be the Mayor or City Manager. Citizens may also voice concerns to the full City Council during regular council meetings. If Iocal attempts to resolve the disagteemment fail - actions of Yakima that are in violation of HUD regulations may be appealed directly to the Yakima Area Representative at the Seattle Area Office of HUD at 206-220-5150. Copies of the regulations and the name, address, and phone number of the current Area Representative will be made available on request of ONDS. Comments on the Consolidated Plan process and regarding Yakima's past performance on CDBG programs are also invited. Citizens are encouraged to submit comments to: 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 30 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Archie Matthews, Operations Supervisor Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) 112 South 8th Street Yakima, Washington 98901 509-575-6101 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS Following iso summary of public comments made during public input meetings, public hearings, by letter, and from the mail-out/phone-back survey - copies of which are provided in Appendix E. Testimony from public meeting - the Yakima City Council Neighborhood Development Committee held a public input meeting on the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan on the 24th of September. The principal comments made during the meeting were: • The process does not allow enough time for citizens to participate. • Minutes should be taken at public input meetings to make sure the ideas are expressed in the Consolidated Plan. The participants also mentioned the following community needs should be addressed: More neighborhood associations - the associations should be able to address issues pertaining to the community. • More funds should be provided for prevention programs such as the Southeast Community Center. • More opportunities should be provided to education the public about the Consolidated Plan process. • More opportunities shoud be provided for parents to work together to develop programs to help youth. Testimony from public hearings - the Yakima City Council conducted a public hearing on the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan on the 20th of October. Public testimony at the public hearing included the foliowing: • John Everhart, Pastor of Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, spoke highly of the efforts of the Yakima ONDS employees. He also suggested some of the CDBG funds be used to make improvements to the food bank facility. • Maria Garcia, 1001 North 30th Avenue, stated that the majority of the CDBG money is being spent for housing but would like to see more funds directed toward economic development for small businesses. She also stated that not much is being done in the northeast neighborhood and suggested funds be used for lighting, sidewalks, and training for community organizations. Letters - were received during the 30 day comment period from the following sources: • East Yakima Neighborhoods Association - outlined and supports Yakinna'spolice emphasis patrols, proposed gang Iegislation, and graffiti 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 31 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction programs in the eastside neighborhoods within the CDBG target area. However, the Association indicated that the City Council's focus on enforcement does not also include sufficient emphasis on neighborhood resident participation. In particular, the Association would like to see'more emphasis and attention placed on developing neighborhood associations for the residents of east Yakima to provide leadership training, education, and youth crime prevention programs. The Association believes existing service providers are overwhelmed and are not reaching "at -risk" youth in particular. • Donna Holden, 112 South 8th Street - thanked ONDS for the home repairs made to the windows in her mother's house prior to her bringing her � Ms Rae C Prenslow, 315 North 42nd Avenue - thanked ONDS for the weatherization improvements and window installations made to her house. o Christine Goodwin, Hands of Hope - outlined the following immediate needs: • Year-round temporary overnight shelterthat exceeds 30 days that is available to men, women, families, and teenagers. = Affordable transitional housing for men, women, families, and teens that offers strong mentoring and life skills training. • Affordable transitional housing for those with mental health issues that includes non -restricted residential status that also offers strong mentoring programs. • Affordable temporary migrant worker housing to help alleviate "cnrnp|ng" on riverbanks without proper health hygiene and sanitation resources, which in turn negatively impacts the community. • Subsidized permanent housing which includes heavy case management for chronic homelessness caused by substance abuse addition or mental health issues. • Yakima Neighborhoods Association (YNA) - presented a concept paper for the proposed funding of an "East Yakima Early Learning Initiative". The paper outlined a proposal bythe Yakima Neighborhoods Association (a proposed nonprofit organization) with which to fund a 5 year effort to finance staff and expenses with which to organize and provide residents of the CDBG target area leadership, civic, and educational training; and to reduce crime, create youth crime prevention programs, revitalize the neighborhoods, and develop small businesses. The YNA proposes to use a small community center or simiar facilities in a neighborhood setting within the CDBG target area in partnership with the Yakima School District, faith -based agencies, and other service providers, including businesses. The YNA would be governed by 11 initial incorporators, and thereafter by a board of between 16-21 elected members from the YNA membership to serve 2 -year terms. The board would be augmented by an advisory committee to be recruited from local professional and corporate groups. YNA's proposal includes a detailed Iist of proposed general and specific programs, target area map, and $150,000 staff and expense budget for the 3-5 ¥ear Strategic Plan 32 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction first year's operation. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS All comments were accepted and will be considered by the Council's Neighborhood Development Committee as well as the City Council at large. MAIL-OUT/PHONE-BACK SURVEY In October 2009 a random sample of resident voter households within the CDBG Target Area were contacted to participate in a controlled sample survey concerning HUD funded housing conditions and programs. 250 households agreed to participate in the survey and were mailed a copy of a summary descrFption of the plan and a copy of the questionnaire. Survey results were compiled for the first 100 households who completed the surveys by follow-up telephone call - the number planned for in the original survey scope. The nasu|ting survey results are accurate to within f/-1096 of the opinions of the general population within the CDBG Target Area. Following is a summary of the results for the total sample group - the detailed survey and results are provided in Appendix E. Respondent Characteristics: • Residency - 77% of the respondents have lived in Yakima over 20 years, 7% 16-20, 5% 6-10, 3% 2-5, and 2% under 1 year. • Location - 49% of the respondents live west of the railroad :tracks and south of Yakima Avenue, 2696 west of the railroad tracks and north of Yakima Avenue, 13% east of the railroad tracks and south of Yakima Avenue, 8% east of the railroad tracks and north of Yakima Avenue, and 4% don't know or refused to answer. a Tenure - 84% own and 16% rent. • Housing type - 77% reside in single family houses, 12% in manufactured units, 6% in duplex or townhouses, and 5% in multifamily units. • Assisted housing - 3% reside in YHA publicly assisted housing, 3% in othbr assisted housing, and 1% in Habitat, OIC, or CCHS housing. • Age group - 47% were over 65, 30% between 55-64, 15% between 45- 54, 8% between 35-44, and no respondents were below age 34. • Household status - 6596 live in a family unit, 3196 live alone, and 3% live in an unrelated household. • Income group - 33% have incomes below $20,000, 24% between $30- 39,999, 15% between $20-29,999, 13% between $50-74,999, 6% between $40-49,999, 4% between $75-100,000/ 3% over $100,000, and 2% refused to answer. Existing housing conditions within the neighborhood - survey respondents were asked to rate housinq conditions in your neighborhood in general on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the poorest and 5 is the best condition? poor 1-2 / best 3 4-5 � QuaU@y-cunstructiUn, design, and visual appearance? 17% 56% 27W� 0 Density - range of lot sizes and housing types including single and multi -family housing units? 19% 49% 32% 3-5 ¥ear Strategic Plan 33 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 7 Hazard management - floodplains, lead -paint, asbestos, graffiti, and handicap access? 32% 42% 22% 8 Improvements - roads, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks? 41% 27% 30% 9 Amenities - street lights, trees, landscaping, and signage? 27% 39% 34% 10 Common areas - parks, playgrounds, and open spaces? 38% 31% 31% 11 Preservation - of older, even historic housing units 33% 35% 18% Services - schools, fire, police, roads? (14% had no opinion)? 22 Maintenance - trash, litter, and graffiti? 26% 31% 43% 12 Maintenance - trash, litter, and graffiti? 47% 22% 31% As shown, at least a third or more of all survey respondents gave poor scores (1-2) to maintenance conditions followed by improvements, common areas, preservation efforts (though 14% had no opinion of this condition), and hazard management. Conversely, a third or more of all survey respondents gave best scores (4-5) to amenities only. How would you rate your own housing conditions? poor / best 1- 2 3 4-5 13 Overall satisfaction - with your apartment or house? 7% 25% 68% 14 Cost - for rent or mortgage payments? 8% 25% 57% 15 Cost for housing related services - including utilities and property taxes? 28% 43% 28% 16 Location - community and neighborhood you live in? 22% 34% 44% 17 Space - number of bedrooms and bathrooms? 6% 37% 56% 18 Features - kitchen, family room, fireplace, garage? 19% 34% 47% 19 Improvements - roads, curbs and gutters, sidewalks? 33% 34% 32% 20 Amenities - playgrounds, parks, landscaping? 36% 30% 32% 21 Services - schools, fire, police, roads? 16% 28% 55% 22 Maintenance - trash, litter, and graffiti? 26% 31% 43% 23 What percent of your household's gross monthly 19% 0% income - do you pay for rent or a mortgage? 14% 10% 21% 20% 20% 30% 16% 40% 4% 50% 2% 50%+ 4% don't know/refused 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 34 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 Jurisdiction 24 What percent of your household's gross monthly income - do you pay for sewer, water, power, natural gas, and other utilities? 4% 1% • • 6% 2% 11% 3% 4% 4% 11% 5% 10% 6% 6% 7% 5% 8% 4% 9% 32% 10%+ 7% don't know/refused As shown, majority (over 50%) or more of aPI .survey respondents were satisfied overall with their own housing unit followed by costs, space, and services while more than a third were satisfied with the Iocation, and maintenance. Conversely a third or more of all survey respondents were not satisfied with amenities and improvements. Over 22% of all survey respondents indicated paying more than 30% of gross monthly household income for rent or mortgage and 32% were paying more than 10% in addition for utilities. Housing market assumptions - survey respondents were asked to w.hat extent they agreed or disagreed with the following statements made during housing workshops about trends that may be affecting the housing market and a household's ability to cope with housing costs on a scale of 1 is where you most disagree and 5 is where you most agree with the statement. disagree/ agree 1~2 3 4-5 Market assumptions 25 Public workers - teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and other critical public service workers cannot pay rising housing costs and are not accepting local job offers? 9% 3490 22% 26 ' Service worke s - technical and entry level manufacturing, retail, health, and other service workers cannot afford rising housing costs and are not accepting local jobs affecting our ability for economic development? 2 W 0 33% 27 Young adults - are increasingly unable to rent or buy an affordable living unit that they can pay for with local entry level job incomes? 8% 9 62% 28 Single -headed families, especially female - are unable to rent or buy an affordable living unit and pay for daycare, health costs, and other family expenses? 6% 20° 7��� 29 Elderly adults, including single individuals - are increasingly unable to find affordable housing that fits their changing life style needs. As a result, they continue to live in and keep older lower priced housing units out of the market - possiblyto the point where the house starts to deteriorate because they are unable or cannot afford to pay for maintenance? w� 60 72% 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 35 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 30 Special populations, including the mentally ill, victims of domestic abuse, and the temporary homeless - are unable to be provided housing - possibly to the point where current sponsors are unable to develop and operate necessary housing units and shelters? As shown, more than a majority agree that elderly adults including single individuals followed by single -headed families, young adults, and special populations are severely stressed in the current housing market. Conversely, more than a third do not think public workers are not accepting local job offers as a result of current housing market conditions. ONDS program priorities - survey respondents were asked to assign priorities to continuing or even expanding, if federal monies allow, Yakinna's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) use of federal monies from Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and the HOME programs to finance a number of housing and neighborhood improvement programs and policies within the Renewal Community Area on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest priority? ONDS ro rams lowest / highest 1-2 3 4-5 31 / First Time Home Assistance Program - providing financial assistance up to $4,000 for down payment and closing costs for qualified first-time low to moderate - income homebuyers? In 2008, ONDS helped 27 first- time buyer households. 20% 36% 41% 32 Senior/Disabled Persons Home Repair Program - for up to $2,500 to fix roofs, porches, and other interior repairs using ONDS materials and Habitat for Humanity volunteer labor for senior or disabled households? In I008, ONDS fixed 34 senior/disabled housing units. 6% 19% 72% 33 Senior/Disabled Emergency Repair Program - for up to $500 to fix plumbing, electrical, heating, or other emergencies? In 2008, ONDS performed 43 emergency repairs. 9% 13% 76% 34 Neighborhood Clean-Up/Improvement Program - up to$500 per house to fix code violations cited by the city Code Inspector? In 3008, recruited 7,606 volunteer hours and removed 15 tons of trash. 19% 26% 53% 35 Homeownership through New Construction Program - acquiring vacant lots or abandoned buildings and make these available to Habitat for Humanity or the OIC for self-help constructed new housing for households that qualify and participate? In 3008, ONDS provided lots and loans for 4 Habitat for Hurnan|ty.and 5 OIC self help construction projects. 14% 23% 61% 36 Senior/Disabled Exterior Paint Program - to pay for materials and sometimes labor, for households that cannot perform or pay for the work otherwise? In 2008, ONDS painted 23 houses. 10% 15% 71% 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 36 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction 37 Tenant/Landlord Counseling - to provide assistance in disputes and legal advice if appropriate. In 2008, ONDS assisted 599 walk-in requests and 4,949 telephone calls. 21% • 28% 47% 38 Emergency Heat/Utility Assistance - for households who cannot pay utility bills, particularly during winter months? In 2008, ONDS referred 65 households to OCI and other appropriate agencies. 10% 22% 65% 39 Energy Weatherization - to install insulation, wrap pipes, replace windows, and other improvements to conserve energy and protect against bad weather conditions. In 3008, ONDS installed weatherization packages in 35 houses. 10% 27% 59% As shown, more than a majority of survey respondents gave high priorities to continuing ONDS programs for senior/disabled emergency repairs followed by senior/disabled persons home repair, senior/disabled exterior paint, emergency heat/uti/|tyossistance, energy weatherization, and neighborhood clean- up/improvements. Conversely, there were no ONDS programs that a third or more respondents indicated to be Iow priorities. Other city housing program approaches - survey respondents were advised that Yakima has initiated a number of actions to manage rising housing costs and growth impacts on a city-wide basis. Such actions include the clustering of housing to reduce environmental impacts and site development costs; allowing innovative housing and mixed-use pjects to increase site and cost efficiencies; adopting performance related design and development standards to improve the quality of the housing product and reduce development costs - to name a few. Yakima has also amended codes to allow accessory dwelling units, cottage or small lot houses, duplex and townhouses, manufactured and modular housing products that reduce costs and provide a wider variety of rental and purchase options. In addition, Yakima, Yakima County, non-profit, and for-profit housing market agencies could also adopt the foliowing measures to reduce costs and increase choice. Each one of these program approaches will involve costs to the public in some manner, some approaches costing more than others, and some programs having more impacts on housing costs and public policies and funds than others. Based on their knowledge of existing conditions, survey respondents were asked to rate priorities for the following possible programs. Education and mentorin � lowest / highest 1-2 3 4-5 40 Conduct housing finance classes - that provide education and mentoring assistance on how to budget and pay for household purchases, maintenance, insurance, utilities, and other expenses? 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 37 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Rehabilitation programs to retain affordable housin � 41 Establish a home rehabilitation and deferred payment program - where the eIigibIe house is refurbished and the cost 15 deferred for payment until the house is sold to allow the current occupant to continue to reside in the house with current home payments? The rehabilitation loan is repaid when the house is eventually sold by the current occupant at no or a low cost interest rate. 35% 29% 41% Measures that reduce land costs 42 Increase high density zoning dimtrlctm-ofmuderate to high density residential districts so that more developable sites are made available for lower cost single family and multi -family housing products? 37% 34% 24% 43 Encourage accessory dwelling units (ADU) - that build housing units that are attached or next to an existing single family house in established neighborhoods to increase housing where community, transportation, and other public services are already provided? 38% 31% 27% 44 Encourage coxVtage/smmaUUUots developments - that allow smaller lots and cottage sized single family housing units in single family neighborhoods to increase housing where commuriity, transportation, and other public services are already provided? 26% 27% 40% 45 Encourage infill development - of townhouse, manor house, and other attached single family housing units on vacant or underused land within existing urban neighborhoods to increase housing density, choice, and reduce land costs? 23% 38% 34% As shown, a majority of survey respondents gave high priorities for conducting housing finance classes, while a third or more gave high priorities to establishing a home rehabilitation and deferred payment program followed by cottage and small lot development, and infill development. Conversely, a third or more gave low priorities to accessory dwelling units followed by increasing high density zoning districts, and establishing a home rehabHitation and deferred payment program. Financing - survey respondents were also asked to rate the priority for establishing a city housing action fund, the amounts they would pay, and a possible special purpose, short duration property tax levy. lowest / highest 1-2 3 4-5 Financing options 46 Create a city housing action fund -with which to create the monies necessary to match other federal, state, and local funds for accomplishing the housing projects and programs described in the items above? 31% 31% 34% 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 38 Version 2.0 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction 472 Assuming some public monies would be required to create the city housing action revolving fund - how much would your household be willing to pay per Year to sponsor such an effort? Financing options 48 Aporove a limited duration (6 year) property tax levy - a special purpose property tax that would add a limited levy assessment (between 525 and $50 per house per year) for up to 6 years for the sole purpose of funding affordable housing projects and programs? 38% 90/0 10/6 2% $KV $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $50 $75 $100 $100+ don't As shown, survey respondents were equally split between whether a city housing action fund should be created, while more than a third would not contribute though a third would be willing to pay more than $20 a year, but a clear majority would not approve a property tax levy as a means of generating funds. Housing plan responsibilities - survey respondents were asked who should be primarily responsible for providing conditions that reduce housing costs as outlined in the action items described in the survey. Sponsor disagree/ agree 1-2 3 4-5 49 Public entities - City of Yakima, Yakima County, 32% 300/6 35% ' Yakima Housing Authority, andVVashington State? 50 Non-profit organizations - including Yakima Valley 25% 28% 42% Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), Catholic Charities Housing Services | (CCHS), Next Step Housing, Yakima Valley Community Land Trusts, and other affordable housing interest groups? 51 Private market - developers, realtors, and lenders? 32% 22% 42% 52 Joint ventures involving the public, non-profit, and private market entities? 19% 30% 46% As shown, a third or more of the survey respondents indicated a preference for joint ventures followed by private and non-profit organizations, then public entities. Note - surveys were also mailed to neighborhood residents who participated in the public open houses and workshops. Workshop participants returned 24 surveys that were collated and incorporated into Appendix E, but not combined with the mail- out/phone-back surveys because they were not randomly recruited and are therefore not statistically representative of the CD8(] target area populations. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 39 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Institutional Structure (91.215 (i)) 1. Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan, including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. 2. Assess the strengths and gaps in the delivery system. 3. Assess the strengths and gaps in the delivery system for public housing, including a description of the organizational relationship between the jurisdiction and the public housing agency, including the appointing authority for the commissioners or board of housing agency, relationship regarding hiring, contracting and procurement; provision of services funded by the jurisdiction; review by the jurisdiction of proposed capital improvements as well as proposed development, demolition or disposition of public housing developments. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Institutional Structure response: Yakima's Mayor has designated the Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) responsible for the planning, development, and implementation of its CDBG and HOME programs. Yakima manages Consolidated Plan activities through a broad-based outreach approach involving a wide variety of public, non-profit, and private human services and housing agencies.ONDS participates on boards of directors and community coalitions, coordinates with the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) and thenon-profit community for the delivery of services to public housing residents. Technical assistance and a teamwork approach facilitate joint development of affordable housing to low and moderate -income households within the city limits. The specific forums for this interaction include: • Yakima Housing Authority (YHA), Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), and Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity representation on Yak|rna's Comrnunity Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) • ONDS participation in the Homeless Network of Yakima County � ONDS joint ventures with Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity o ONDS joint ventures with Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) on self-help housing projects ONIDS's joint efforts with the Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity and Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) have resulted in the construction of approximately 4 and 5 low and moderate -income housing units per year by each group respectively. {}NOS provides sttes and financial assistance while these groups provide the materials, labor, organization, and volunteers. Additional projects are p|anned for the Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS), Next Step Housing, Providence House, and the newly formed Yakima Valley Community Land Trust, along with other public, non-profit, and private continue to submit applications, with ONDS assistance and support, for program and project funding frorn the: • Washington State Department of Commerce's (CTED) Housing Assistance/Affordable Housing Program, 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 40 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program, and the • Washington State Housing Finance Commission's Tax Exempt Bond and Tax Credit Programs. ONDS also participates in the coordinated efforts that are part of the Continuum of Care model of the Homeless Network of Yakima County in which Yakima plays a key OVERCOMING GAPS Yakima has assessed the following strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of housing services and programs: Strengths: • Cooperatiori and working relationships among institutions ~ Knowledge of the development process • Access to federal housing programs o Knowledge of low-income needs � Organized human service delivery Weaknesses: • Limited resources available to agencies to increase affordable housing and housing related services, • Competition for Iimited funds among human services agencies, • Release of individuals from mental or penal institutions without identification of housing resources, • Insufficient housing resources targeting single individuals, women and children who are victims of domestic violence, youth 12 to 21 years of age, and the mentally ill, • Insufficient housing resources for individuals with special needs (for example, individuals with AIDS and related diseases), o Insufficient resources to adequately address unemployment and underemployment in the Yakima area, � Insufficient affordable childcare for single, female parents, and • Insufficient medical, dental, transportation, and case management services for the mentally i||, developmentally disabled, youth, and elderly. COORDINATION Yakima will pursue various activities outlined in the Consolidated Plan to eliminate gaps, strengthen, coordinate, and integrate ONDS with public housing agencies, assisted housing providers and human service agencies, and other private and public agencies. ' ONDS will work closely with other public, non-profit, and private human service providers to determine the most beneficial approach in providing community education, capacity building, and developing methods to maximize agency efficiency. ONDS will continue to participate in collaborations established through the Homeless Network of Yakima County and the Yakima Housing Authority Advisory Committee. These 2 collaborative systems coordinate the resources of government agencies, non-profit organizations, housing developers, social service providers, neighborhood groups, and the business community in addressing the specific needs of homeless 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 41 �Version 2.0 Jurisdiction populations. ONDS will work with agencies that have HUD Supportive Housing Program grants to coordinate the receipt of renewal grants. ONDS will work with various private and public agencies and institutions when developing the economic development component of the Comprehensive Plan including the Yakima County Economic Development Council, Yakima Chamber of Commerce, Yakima County, and the Port of Yakima, among others. ONDS will encourage and facilitate joint applications for resources and programs among housing and service entities, and will continue to work with the YHA and local non-profit agencies to eliminate gaps in the system. ONDS will also continue to work closely with the OIC to remediate lead-based paint issues. ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC HOUSING DELIVERY SYSTEM ONDS and the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) realize that cooperation and support between the agencies is essential in order to best serve Yakima's low and moderate - income and special needs residents. Examples of this close relationship include: ■ Yakima Housing Authority's (YHA) Executive Director serve on Yakima's Community Development Advisory Committee (CDAC) to assure close coordination for funding housing and special needs services ■ ONDS assists YHA in developing YHA's 5 Year and Annual Capital Plans. Likewise, YHA staff also assists ONDS in the development of the 5 Year Consolidated Plans and Annual Action Plans • Annual cooperation and funding assistance from Yakima to YHA on projects that develop local subsidized rental housing units for occupancy by low, moderate or special needs residents • Coordinated Police support for YHA elderly and public housing units ■ Cooperation between ONDS and YHA under Washington State's Housing Cooperation Laws to provide zoning and other waivers or support for YHA's serving low and moderate -income households There has been no demolition or disposition of public housing developments and none is expected in the next 5 years. Monitoring (91.230) 1. Describe the standards and procedures the jurisdiction will use to monitor its housing and community development projects and ensure long-term compliance with program requirements and comprehensive planning requirements. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Monitoring response: Yakima's CDBG program is audited by HUD and Washington State under the Single Audit Act on an as -needed basis based on risk assessments. The audit verifies that Yakima meets all statutory requirements and that information reported is correct and complete. ONDS is responsible for monitoring CDBG and HOME program sub -recipients. ONDS monitors sub -recipients on-site every 2 years or as needed (based on a risk analysis) in order to ensure all regulatory requirements are met and that the information reported is complete and accurate. Sub -recipients are also monitored quarterly from 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 42 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction written reports submitted by the sub -recipient to Yakima to ensure consistency with CDBG and HOME program regulations. Monitoring consists of both on and off-site reviews. In addition, ONDS may also contract private firms to do monitoring of contracts and projects funded by CDBG, HOME, and General Funds. Yakima is only required to monitor prjects and programs it funds from money received directly from HUD. Grants or loans awarded directly to other entities by HUD or other Federal or non -Federal agencies are typically not monitored by (]NOS. Priority Needs Analysis and Strategies (91.215 (a)) 1. Describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category of priority needs. Z. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Priority Needs Analysis and Strategies response: Yakima will support and encourage affordable housing and supportive housing services for the foliowing prioritypopulations: PRIORITY 1: HOMELESS AND THOSE AT RISK OF BECOMING HOMELESS • Families a Domestic violence victims • Unaccompanied Youth � Chronically meritaily 111 • Persons with co-occurring disorders • Persons with alcohol or drug addictions Housing for Homeless Yakima recognizes homelessness as the most severe housing problem. In 2004/ the Yakima County Human Services Department initiated a process of creating a Continuum of Care Plan, a county -wide plan to prevent and end homelessness and to make self-deternnination possible for homeless individuals and families. The Homeless Network of Yakima County, the entity sponsored by the Yakima County Human Services Department, established the Continuum of Care Strategic Planning Committee (representing approximately 40 public, non-profit, and private agencies, housing developers, school districts, businesses, and religious institutions) met, analyzed data, and identified gaps and strategies in the process of completing a 3-5 year Continuum of Care Plan. A functioning "Continuum of Care" system coordinates community resources in order to address specific needs of the homeless population. The 2005 Yakima County Continuum of Care Man (adopted by the County Commission in I005, and updated and adopted by the Homeless Network of Yakima County in 2005), 15 available at ONDS and the Yakima County Human Services Department website www.co.yakima.wa.us. An updated Gaps Analysis was completed in 2008 by the Homeless Network of Yakima County and will be used to support one new project through the HUD 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 4 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction McKinney Act Fund's Supportive Housing Program. Yakima continues to support and cooperate with the Homeless Network of Yakima County. In 2005, the Homeless Network of Yakima County developed a 10 -Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness in Yakima County and is currently developing a new homeless services delivery system that will emphasize prevention, rapid re -housing, supportive services and specialized re-entry programs. The goal and strategies in the Consolidated Plan support the Continuum of Care system. = Extremely low-income (30% of median and below) ▪ Very low-income (50% of median and be|ovv) o Low-income (80% of median and below) Housing for Low -Income Median household incomes in Yakima are substantially below those of Washington State even while housing costs are comparable to state levels. Increased housing costs are forcing some low-income households to pay more than 30% of gross household income for safe, decent, market -rate housing. Households with severe housing cost burdens may not be able to meet other basic rieeds such as childcare, healthcare, insurance (home, health, auto, life), adequate or reliable transportation, or even adequate food or utilities. The availability of affordable housing and of subsidies that make housing affordable for these households can benefit the entire community. Preservation of existing homes is generally more cost-effective than new construction and also maintains the character of the neighborhood. Consolidated PIan strategies and actions are focused on assisting low-income families and individuals obtain and maintain affordable housing. PRIORITY 3: LOW-NCOME FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS WITH SPECIAL � Elderly/Frail elderly • Chronically mentally 11 ▪ Physically and developmentally disabled • Persons with co-occurring disorders • Persons with alcohol or drug addictions • Victims of domestic violence � Pregnant and parenting women OBSTACLES With such a large portion ofthe households ofYakima oflow ornnoderate-inconie,a major obstacle to meeting the underserved needs is to have sufficient local, state or federal resources. In some cases, having a portion of the funds available from resources through Yakima may not make a project or program feasible if insufficient private funds, such as low income housing tax credits or other development financing, are not available to the project or program. 3- Year Strategic Plan 44 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Lead-based Paint (91.215 (g)) 1. Estimate the number of housing units that contain lead-based paint hazards, as defined in section 1004 of the Residential Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, and are occupied by extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families. 2. Outline actions proposed or being taken to evaluate and reduce lead-based paint hazards and describe how lead based paint hazards will be integrated into housing policies and programs, and how the plan for the reduction of lead-based hazards is related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Lead-based Paint response: The Residential Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 seeks to identify and mitigate sources of Iead in the home. A high level of lead in the blood is particularly toxic to children aged 6 and younger damaging the central nervous system, causing mental retardation, convulsions and sometimes death. Even low levels of lead can result in lowered intelligence, reading and learning disabilities, decreased attention span, hyperactivity and aggressive behavior. Children who live in homes with lead-based paint can become exposed by inadvertently swallowing lead contained in household dust. This is particularly a problem when houses are remodeled using practices such as scraping or sanding of old paint. Children can also be exposed by chewing on woodwork or simply with common hand to mouth contact. Lead-based paint is not the only culprit. Lead has also been identified in many other sources, including some vinyl blinds, pottery, lead in water pipes, lead in dust brought into the home from work sites, some hobbies (like Iead solder in stained glass work), and some herbal remedies. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that children ages 1-2 be screened for lead poisoning. The CDC also recommerids that children 3-6 years of age should be tested for lead if they: • Have not been tested before and receive services from public assistance programs. • Live in or regularly visit a building built before 1950. • Live in or visit a home built before 1978 that is being remodeled. • Or - have a brother, sister, or playmate who has had lead poisoning. Unfortunately, the Washington Department of Health estimates that only 4% of Washington children ever receive a blood lead test. In the 4 -year period from 2000 through 2003, 33,025 children under the age of 6 were tested in Washington and 425 had confirmed elevated blood -lead levels. CDC provides funding for testing for children who are not eligible for Medicaid or who do not have private insurance. Most of the testing is performed by private physicians and clinics, at the request of parents. The Washington Department of Human Services maintains a web site with instructions for lead testing, an indication of hazards, lists of resources and links to other sites. The State of Washington Lead Poisoning Prevention Program compiles data on testing statewide and results of those tests. Testing data are not tracked by location 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 45 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction unless the children are Medicaid -eligible. Results that are confirmed positive for elevated blood -lead levels are tracked by location. The information is reported to the Yakima County Health Department for follow-up. The age of the housing unit is a leading indicator of the presence of lead -hazard,. along with building maintenance. Lead was banned from residential paint in 1978. A 1999 national HUD, survey found that 67% of housing built before 1940 had significant LBP hazards. This declined to 51% of houses built between 1940 and 1959, 10% of houses built between 1960 and 1977 and just 1% after that. Based on. those estimates, approximately 7,138 homes pose potential lead-based paint hazards in Yakima. However, the HUD study also noted that there were regional differences in the probability of a hazard; the risk was more prevalent on the east coast (43%) than on the west coast (19%). Table 4: Potential Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Yakima, 2009 Potential hazards Construction Number housing units Rate* Units Before 1940 6,367 67% 4,266 1940-1959 8,747 51% 4,461 1960-1979 9,856 10% 986 1980-2000 6,215 1% 62 2000-2006 1,897 n/a n/a Total 33,082 9,775 Clickner, R et.al. National Survey of Lead & Allergens in Housing, Final Report, Volume 1: Analysis of Lead Hazards. Report to Office of Lead Hazard Control, US Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD), 2001 and the 2005-2007 American Community Survey According to the Yakima County Health Department, there is no official current report on children's elevated blood levels for lead. Of past cases that are know, most were the result of adoptions of children from out of country and migrant Latino children. It is not routine to test for lead for children in Yakima County and that may be why the number is so low. The National Lead Information Center's toll free telephone number (1-800-424-5323) and an Internet address of www.epa.gov/lead/nlic.htm. LEAD-BASED PAINT AND LEAD HAZARDS The Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) recently acquired an XRF analyzer (x-ray fluoroscopy), under a federal Healthy Homes Initiative grant. The XRF is both more precise and less intrusive in testing than previous techniques. The Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reduction grant provides for: • Equipment, including the XRF analyzer, • Training for staff and contractors on lead safe practices, both for the worker and residents, and Inspections and/or risk assessments. The OIC also provides weatherization home rehabilitation in Yakima County. The OIC is able to test for lead hazards in these homes, along with homes referred by public health nurses, the YHA, ONDS, and other partners including Yakima County Head Start. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 46 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 Jurisdiction ONDS and OIC test for Iead-based paint in homes participating in the Home Rehabilitation Program. ONDS also refers contractors to the Building Performance Center for safety training and certification. Doctors currently test children for elevated levels oflead in the blood when indicated by symptoms, and report positive findings to the DOH. DOH refers the case to the Yakima County Health Department if the levels warrant investigation. Yakima County Health Department staff visit the home to identify and remove the cause. Public health nurses working in the First Steps Program (initiated in 3001) visit Medicaid -eligible mothers of newborns and children up to 1 year old. As part of the Home Safety Assessment, the nurses use the "No Lead in My Bed" protocol, which arose out of concern for lead use in mini -blinds, often located over the cribs or beds of very young children. Nurses also work with OIC to test for lead. While efforts are underway to identify and remove lead hazards, ONDS and the (]IC encourage increased testing for elevated lead in the blood of children as well as increased education for health and human service providers and the general public. ONDS plans actions to reduce lead-based paint hazards, consistent with the below listed goals, strategies and objectives, through ONDS's Home Rehabilitation Program (HRP). In addition, the HRP will, whenever possible, coordinate actions with the OIC and the healthy homes and lead-based paint hazard reduction program and grants. While there have been few documented cases of Iead-based paint poisoning in Yakima, the statistics indicate there is the potential for approximate 9,775 housing units to contain lead-based paint hazards a substantial portion of which are likely to be occupied by low and moderate -income households. LEAD-BASED PAINT Goal 1: Over 5 years, distribute materials on lead-based paint hazards to all clients, contractors, and human service agencies. Strategy 1: Educate clients and construction and rehabilitation professionals about lead-based paint hazards, and provide resources for assessment and abatement. Objectives: • Over 5 years, distribute the pornph|et, Lead -Based Paint, a Threat to your Children, to 125 single-family and rental family Home Rehabilitation Program clients. • Develop and distribute lead-based paint information to 25 contractors yearly (remodelers, window replacement contractors, and painters). • Make a lead-based paint hazard guide available to maintenance personnel of older multi -family rental complexes. • Provide lead-based paint guide to 3 agencies engaged in rehabilitation activities. Goal 2: Assure that all information distributed onUead-based paint is in compliance with current state and federal law. Strategy 1: Keep updated on state and federal law requirements. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 47 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Objectives: • Contact Washington State annually to obtain a current list of certified risk assessors, certified inspectors, and accredited testing laboratories. • Add information on lead-based paint to Yakima's website, with links to other sites providing regulatory information to keep citizens updated on their rights related to the current law. • Provide ONDS staff with training to stay current in regulations and procedures pertaining to lead-based paint hazards. Goal 3: Increase the number of trained and certified inspectors and contractors within the community in order to adequately address lead-based paint hazards. Strategy 1: Through collaboration with local, state, and federal agencies provide technical assistance and funding for local training in lead-based paint procedures. Objectives: • Secure sources of funding for training certified risk assessors, certified inspectors, and safe work practices contractors. • Maintain and make available a list of certified risk assessors, certified inspectors, and safe work practices contractors for use by local citizens to address their lead-based paint hazards. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 48 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Housing Needs(91.205) *Please also refer to the Housing Needs Table in the Needs.xls workbook 1. Describe the estimated housing needs projected for the next five year period for the following categories of persons: extremely low-income, low-income, moderate -income, and middle-income families, renters and owners, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, including persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, single persons, large families, public housing residents, victims of domestic violence, families on the public housing and section 8 tenant -based waiting list, and discuss specific housing problems, including: cost -burden, severe cost- burden, substandard housing, and overcrowding (especial(y large families). 2. To the extent that any racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need for any income category in comparison to the needs of that category as a whole, the jurisdiction must complete an assessment of that specific need. For this purpose, disproportionately greater need exists when the percentage of persons in a category of need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic group is at least ten percentage points higher than the percentage of persons in the category as a whole. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Housing Needs response: HOUSING AFFORDABILITY Housing costs are generaily considered to be affordable when all housing associated costs (including mortgage or rent, utilities, taxes, etc) equals no more than 30% of gross household income. Escalating housing and utilities costs have forced many households to pay considerably more for housing than is affordable or even feasible. While housing costs are increasing, income is not increasing at the same rate. For example, the median value of owner -occupied housing increased 76% from 1970 to 3006 while median household income increased 36% and median family income 20% for the same periods, or by less than half. The median value of gross rent increased 32q6 during the same period, which more closely parallels income trends. Table 5: Housing Affordability Trends 1970-2006 Median income Median housing measures � Household Family Gross rent Owner value 1970 $26,430 $38,495 6458 $75,191 1980 $31/386 $40,631 $519 $104,049 1990 $39,812 537,247 $517 $83,978 2000 $29/475 $34,798 $526 $106,200 2006 S35,820 $46,360 $606 $132/600 1970-2006 � � $9,400 $7,865 $148 $57,409 °to change 360/0 2096 320/0 76% Source: US Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007, SOCDS Census Data: Select Output Table, not adjusted for inflation 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 49 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Conversely, economic conditions in Yakima were affected inthe late 1990s, reducing median household and family incomes noticeably, but not significantly, similar to the slight reductions in the median rents during the same period. Median housing values, however, were adversely affected falUng almost $20/000 between 1980 and 1990, before rebounding in the year 2000. The Washington Center for Real Estate Research (WCRER) at Washington State University maintains data on home resale, building permits, and rental trends on a county basis. WCRER calculates the Housing Affordability Index (HAI) based on a model developed by the National Association of REALTORS@ which measures the ability of a typical family to make payments on a median priced resale home, assuming 20% down payment and 30 year amortizing mortgage - first-time homebuyers are assumed to buy a less expensive home with lower down payments and lower income. According to WCRER, Yakima County's HAI was 164.7 in the first quarter of 2009 meaning that median family income was 64.7% more than the bare minimum required to qualify for a mortgage on the median priced home, compared with 125.5 for Washington State. Yakima County's First -Time HAI was 100.8 compared to 73.3 for Washington State, meaning county first-time buyers were just able to qualify for a mortgage necessary to buy a lower price home with a lower down payment. The Nati�nal Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) maintains annual data on the Fair Market Rents (FMR) set by HUD based on actual housing cost and the income required to afford that housing in US counties. Table 6: Fair Market Rent by Number 01 Bedrooms Number of bedrooms Housin /Income Factor Zero One Two Three Four Fair Market Rent (FMR)* $461 $541 $700 $922 $972 Income needed to afford** $18,440 $21/540 $28,000 $36,880 $38,880 Hourly wage required to afford $8.87 $10.40 $13.46 $17.73 $18.69 Hours/week at minimum wage 44 52 67 88 93 * HUD 2008 Fair Market Rent **Needed to afford assuming 30% of household income for rent. Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition (NIHLC) Out of Reach 2008: America 's Housing Wage CIimbs The Fair Market Rent (FMR) - in Yakima County for a 2 -bedroom apartment is $700. In order to afford this level of rent and utilities, without paying more than 30% of income on housing, a household must earn $2,333 monthly or $28,000 annually. Assuming a 40 -hour work week, 52 weeks per year, the required level of income translates into a Housing Wage of $13.46. A minimum wage worker - in Yakima County earns an hourly wage of $8.07. In order to afford the FMR for a 2 -bedroom apartment, a minimum wage earner must work 67 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. Or, a household must include 1.7 minimum wage earner(s) working 40 hours per week year-round in order to make the 2 -bedroom FMR affordable. The estimated mean (average) wage for a renter - in Yakima County is $8.76 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 50 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction an hour. In order to afford the FMR for a 2 -bedroom apartment at this wage, a renter must work 61 hours per week, 52 weeks per year. Or, working 40 hours per week year-round, a household must include 1.5 worker(s) earning the mean renter wage in order to make the 2 -bedroom FMR affordable. Monthly Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments - for an individual are $637 in Yakima County. If SSI represents an individual's sole source of income, $191 in monthly rent is affordable, while the FMR for a studio housing unit is $461. Table 7: Area Median Income (AMI) and Low Income Definitions Percent of Area Annual Maximum Median Income income limit monthly housing (AMI)- cost Income definition Extremely low income to 30% of AMI $12,000 $300 Very low income to 50% of AMI $20,000 5500 Other low income to 80% of AMI 532,000 5800 Notes - NIHLC estimated Yakima County's AMI (Area Median Income) was $40,000 in 2008. Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition (NIHLC) Out of Reach 2008: America's Housing Wage Climbs Extremely low-income households (those with incomes at or below 30% of Area Median Income or AMI) - are hard-pressed to find housing they can afford if Fair Market Rents for even studio apartments start at $462 per month, and are therefore more likely to live in unsuitable housing or in. overcrowded conditions, and are at risk of homelessness. In the event an extremely low-income household is paying Fair Market Rents for studio or even larger units, they are not likely to have income remaining for childcare, medical insurance or basic health care, adequate food, and other necessities. Table 8: Typical Poverty Household Expenditures Item Source Amount Annual income for a family of 4 living in poverty US Census, Current Population Survey, Annual Social & Economic Supplement, 2004 $18,810 Rent DOL, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer -5,274 Expenditures Survey, February 2004 $13,536 Utilities DOL, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer -2,350 Expenditures Survey, February 2004 $11,186 Transportation DOB, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer -4,852 Expenditures Survey, February 2004 $6,334 Food DOL, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer -4,815 Expenditures Survey, February 2004 - assuming food stamps for the majority $1,519 Health care DOL, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer -793 Expenditures Survey, February 2004 - assuming health insurance through employer $726 Child care US Dept of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition -2,030 Policy & Promotion, Expenditures on $-1,304 Children by Families, April 2004 - assumes subsidy of 75% of real cost Source: Catholic Campaign for Hu an Development, Poverty USA, 2004. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 51 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction The above table was developed from an analysis of national costs and expenditures prepared by the Catholic Campaign for Human Development to illustrate how difficult a family of 4 living in poverty has meet daily living expenses. AFFORDABILITY MISMATCH Affordability mismatches occur when the allocation of available housing at specified rents or prices in the housing market are not matched with local area households' ability to pay. For example, housing units are not generally allocated on the basis of need but rather than ability to pay on a first-come first-served basis. Thus, even if units are rented or sold at a price affordable to low-income households, households with Iow incomes are not necessarily occupying the lower priced units. HUD provides an analysis of the availability of units priced within range of low- income households and compares that with the income of the occupants. According to the 2000 census CHAS (Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) data, • 47%% of the rental units within the appropriate affordability range for extremely low-income households (below 30% AMI) were actually occupied by households with incomes in that range, • 56% of the rental and 38% of the owner -occupied units within the appropriate affordability range for very low-income households (31-5096 AMI) were actually occupied by households with incomes in that range, • 65% of the rental and 43% of the owner -occupied units within the appropriate affordability range for Iow-income households (51-80% AMI) were actually occupJed by households ith incomes in that range, Clearly, lower income renter households are essentially blocked from renting or acquiring affordable units by households by households with higher incomes and/or who arrived first in the housing marketplace. Table 9: CHAS Affordability Mismatch Statistics Rent rice affordable at <30% AMI Rentals Owned* Units in price range 1,450 n/a Occupants at <3096 AMI 47% n/a Vacant units for rent/sale 360 n/a Rent/ rice a o dabUe at 31 k-50% AMI Units in price range 2,775 2,179 Occupants at <50% AMI 5696 38% Vacant units for rent/sale 680 70 Rent ice affordable at 51%- 0% AMI Units in price range 6,565 4,499 Occupants at <80% AMI 650/0 43% Vacant units for rent/sale 455 99 * Includes units for sale Source: HUD 2000 CHAS data AFFORDABILITY AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES In 2006, approximately 13,290 persons or 17.8% of the total population over 5 years of age in Yakima had a disability. Disability percentages were lowest at 6.5% 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 52 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction for the younger age 5-15 groups compared with 14.3% for age 16-64 and 49.0% for age 65 and over. Table 10: Disability Statistics by Age Group e In Grou W/disabilit Percent 5-15 years 12,919 844 6.5% 16-64 years 51,078 7,320 14.3% 65+ years 10,459 5,126 49.0% Total population 5 years and older 74,456 13,290 Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 17.8% To the extent that over 65 year age groups are also present in greater proportions in poverty households and households paying over 30% of gross household income for housing, it is presumed the elderly age group is also least able to find affordable housing, particularly housing designed for the disabled. NEED FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE Renter Households with Problems HUD's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS year 2000 data) defines housing problems as a cost burden (paying over 30% of income for rent and utilities), overcrowding, and/or lack of complete kitchen and plumbing facilities, RVs and other impermanent quarters are excluded. Table 11: CHAS Renter Households with Problems - Percentages Household size and tom osition 0-30%-o FI 702 925 393 860 2,880 with housing problems 73% Small Large All Total Household income level Elderly related related others renters Persons in households 1-2 2-4 5+ na na 0-30%-o FI 702 925 393 860 2,880 with housing problems 73% 87% 91% 79% 82% paying > 30% 67% 81% , 85% 76% 77% paying >50% 48% 72% 66% 60% 62% 31-50% of MFI 690 880 454 614 2,638 • with housing problems 66% 89% • 93% 74% 80% paying > 30% 66% 73% 62% 68% 68% paying >50% 23% 19% 109/0 15% 18% 51-80% of MFI 475 1,205 490 755 2,925 with housing problems 62% 53% 82% 47% 57% paying > 30% 62%. 33% 24% 44% 39% paying >50% 22% 5% 0% 5% 7% 81% of MFI 678 1,645 290 1,345 3,958 with housing problems 37% 21%. 53% 14% 24% paying > 30% 299/0 2% -0% 10% 9% paying >50% 17% 0% 0% 0% 21% All households 2,545 4,655 1,627 3,574 12,401 with housing problems 60% ' 55% 82% 47% 57% paying > 30% - 56% 39% 45% 43% 44% paying >50% 28% 19% 19% 18% 21% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 53 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction All renter households - over 57% (6,294 households out of 12,401 total Yakima renter households in the year 2000) of all renter households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems, 44% or 5,488 households were paying more than 30% of household income for housing, and 21% or 2,557 households were paying more than 50% of household income for housing. Table 12: CHAS Renter Households with Problems - Numbers Household size and composition 0-30% of MFI 702 925 393 860 2,880 with housing problems 512 Small Large All Total Household income level Elderly related related others renters Persons in households 1-2 2-4 5+ na na 0-30% of MFI 702 925 393 860 2,880 with housing problems 512 805 358 680 1,558 paying > 30% 473 745 334 650 2,202 paying >50% 339 665 260 515 1,779 31-50% of MFI 690 880 454 614 2,638 with housing problems 455 780 424 454 2,113 paying > 30% 455 645 279 419 1,798 paying >50% 160 165 45 94 464 51-80% of MFI 475 1,205 490 755 2,925 with housing problems 295 630 400 355 1,680 paying > 30% 295 395 115 330 1,135 paying >50% 105 55 0 40 200 81% of MFI 678 1,645 290 1,345 3,958 with housing problems 253 345 155 190 943 paying > 30% 198 25 0 130 353 paying >50% 114 0 0 0 114 All households 2,545 4,655 1,627 3, 574 12,401 with housing problems 1,515 2,560 1,337 1,679 6,294 paying > 30% 1,421 1,810 728 1,529 5,488 paying >50% 718 885 305 649 2,557 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includesrent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Renter households by income level - the percent of all households who have housing problems increases as income decreases from 24% of all households with incomes above 81% of Median Family Income (MFI) to 57% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 80% of all households with income between 31- 50% of MFI to 82% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. The trends are similar for households who are paying more than 30% and 50% of all household income for housing. Renter household type with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for large related households with over 5 members at 82% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 60% followed by small related households with 2-4 members at 55% followed by all other households at 47%. However, the number of households with housing problems is greatest for small related households with 2-4 members at 2,560 households followed by all others at 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 54 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction 1,679 households followed by elderly households at 1,515 households followed by large related with over 5 members at 1,337 households. Renter household type paying more than 50% of income for housing - the percent is greatest among the elderly with 1-2 members at 28%, followed by small 2-4 members and large 5+ members at 19% followed by all others at 18%. However, the number of households paying more than 50% of income for housing is greatest for small related with 2-4 members at 885 households followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 718 followed by all others at 649 followed by large related over 5 members at 305. Owner Households with Problems All owner households - over 31% (4,452 households out of 14,229 total Yakima owner households in the year 2000) of all owner households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems, 25% or 3,589 households were paying more than 30% of household income for housing, and 9% or 1,325 households were paying more than 50% of household income for housing. Table 13: CHAS Owner Households with Problems - Percentages Household size and com osition 0-300/0 of MFI 494 195 193 245 1,127 with housing problems * 64% Small Large All Total Household income level Elderly related related others owners Persons in households 1-2 2-4 5+ na na 0-300/0 of MFI 494 195 193 245 1,127 with housing problems * 64% 92% 100°/0 74% 77% paying > 30% 64% 92% 82% 69% 73% paying >50% 38% 82% 73% 53% 55% 31-50% of MFI 779 323 159 140 1,401 with housing problems 47% 86% 94% 79% 65% paying > 30% 47% 75% 82% 61% 60% paying >50% 15% 37% 35% 46% 25% 51-80% of FI 1,020 600 488 275 2,383 with housing problems 22% 58% . 86% • 44% 47% paying > 30% 20% 53% 41% 44% 35% paying >50% 7% . 11% 2% 13% 2% 81 of MFI 2,530 4,695 1,074 1,019 9,318 With housing problems 8% 15% 43% 19% 17% paying > 30% . 8% 12% 14% 19% 12% paying >50% 1% 2% 1% 4% 2% All households 4,823 5,813 1,914 1,679 14,229 with housing problems 23% 26% 64% 36% • 31% paying > 30% 23% 22% 33% 35% 25% paying >50% . 9% 7% 11% 16% 9% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Owner households by income level - the percent of all households who have housing problems increases as income decreases from 17% of all households with incomes above 81% of Median Family Income (MFI) to 47% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 65% of all households with income between 31- 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 55 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 50% of MFI to 77% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. The trends are similar for households who are paying more than 30% and 50% of all household income for housing. Ownerhousehold types with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for large related households with over 5 members at 64% followed by all others at 36% followed by small related households with 2-4 members at 26% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 23%. However, the number of households with housing problems is greatest for small related households with 2-4 members at 1,511 households followed by large related households with over 5 members at 1,223 households followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 1,229 households followed all others at 599 households. Owner household type paying more than 50% of income for housing - the percent is greatest for all others at 16% followed by large related households with over 5 members at 11% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 9% followed by small related households with members at 7%. However, the number of households paying more than 50% of income for housing is greatest for small related with 2-4 members at 424 households followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 415 followed by all others at 270 followed by large related over 5 members at 216. Table 14: CHAS Owner Households with Problems - Numbers Household size and comaosition 0-30% 0 494 195 193 245 1,127 with housing problems 314 Small Large All Total Household income level Elderly related related others owners Persons in households 1-2 2-4 5+ na na 0-30% 0 494 195 193 245 1,127 with housing problems 314 180 193 180 867 paying > 30% 314 180 158 170 822 paying >50% 189 160 140 130 619 31-50% of FI 779 323 159 140 1,401 with housing problems 369 278 149 110 906 paying > 30% 369 243 130 100 842 paying >50% 114 120 55 65 354 51-80% o MFI 1,020 600 48.8 275 2,383 with housing problems 225 350 418 120 1,113 paying > 30% 200 315 198 120 833 paying >50% 75 65 8 35 183 8 0/0 o F 2,530 4,695 1,074 019 9,318 with housing problems 210 704 464 189 1,567 paying > 30% 200 554 150 189 1,093 paying >50% 35 798 14 40 887 All households 4,823 5,813 1,914 1,679 14, 229 with housing problems 1,119 1,511 1,223 599 4,452 paying > 30% 1,085 1,290 635 579 3,589 paying >50% 415 424 216 270 1,325 Notes; MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 56 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Yakima City - % households with any housing problems 90% oM 107 0.396 m" 30,703 294 1.096 ' Lacking telephone service available �= ww 4.0% ,C44_ 4-4 m° 40% *%_ • uw ` 4 � � . �� os.,.� All households with housing problems of all tenures All household types with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems regardless of rental or owner tenure is greatest for renting large related households with over 5 members at 82% folowed owner Iarge related households with overS mernbers at 64% followed by renting elderly households with 1-2 members at 6O% foIowed by renting small related with 2-4members at 55%. Conversely, those households with the least percentages with housing problems were owner elderly households with 1-2 members at 23% followed by owner small related households with 2-4 members at3696. Yakima City - % ouseholds paying >50% housing costs with any housing problems All household type paying more than 50% of income for housing regardless of rental or owner tenure - the percent is greatest for all renting elderly househoids with 1-2 members at 28% and renting smaH related 2- 4 members and large related with 5 or rnore members at 19%. Conversely, the percent paying more than 5O96 is Ieast for owner small related households with 2-4 members at 7% followed by owner elderly households with 1-2 members at 9%. Lacking complete services and overcrowding Lack of services and overcrowding are also indicators of inadequate housing conditions. According to the American Community Survey in 3008, approximately Table 15: Housing Units Lacking Complete Services Lackin Percent Lacking complete plumbing fixtures ]0,70] 107 0.396 Lacking complete kitchen facilities 30,703 294 1.096 ' Lacking telephone service available 30,703 1,327 4.0% 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 57 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Persons per room Total Crowded ' Percent 1.00 or less persons per room 30,703 28,607 93.2% 1.01-1.50 persons per room 30,703 1,852 6.0% 1.51 or more persons per room 30,703 244 0.8% Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 1.0% or 294 housing units in Yakima laced complete kitchen facilities while 4.0% or 1,227 lacked available telephone service. Approximately 6.0% or 1,852 housing units were overcrowded with between 1.01 and 1.50 persons per room, while 0.8% or 244 were severely overcrowded with more than 1.50 persons per room. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING PROBLEMS BY RACE OR ETHNICITY — RENTER HOUSEHOLDS Hispanic or Latino Renter Households with Problems HUD's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS year 2000 data) also provides housing information on Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems in general including paying over 30% of income for rent and utilities, overcrowding, and/or lack of complete kitchen and plumbing facilities. Due to the more limited number of households within the Hispanic or Latino sample, CHAS statistics do not include information on the extent of the cost burden compared with general housing problems nor does it break out family households by size. Table 16: CHAS Hispanic Renter Households with Housing Problems - Percentages Total population His anic or Latino 0-30% 702 8 860 2,880 70 785 80 935 w/problems 73% 88% 79% 82% 57% 92% 81% 89% 31-50% 690 1,334 614 2,638 25 710 145 880 w/problems 66% • 90% 74% 80% 40% 93% 76% 89% 51-80% 475 1,695 755 2,925 10 700. 125 835 w/problems • 62% 61% 47% 57% 100% 79% 72% 78% 81% 678 1,935 1,345 3,958 10 550 185 745 w/problems 37% 26% 14% 24% 0% 54% 27% 46% All hshlds 2,545 6,282 3,574 12,401 115 2,745 535 3,395 w/problems 60% 62% 47% 57% 52% 81% 59% 77% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. All renter households - over 57% (6,294 households out of 12,401 total Yakima renter households in the year 2000) of all renter households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems compared with 77% (2,586 households out of 3,395 Hispanic or Latino households). Renter households by income level =. the percent of all households who have housing problems increases as income decreases from 24% of all households with 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 58 Version 2.0 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 All Total All Total 0/0 MFI Eldrly Famly other renter Eldrly Famly other renter Persons 1-2 2-5+ na na 1-2 2-5+ na na 0-30% 702 8 860 2,880 70 785 80 935 w/problems 73% 88% 79% 82% 57% 92% 81% 89% 31-50% 690 1,334 614 2,638 25 710 145 880 w/problems 66% • 90% 74% 80% 40% 93% 76% 89% 51-80% 475 1,695 755 2,925 10 700. 125 835 w/problems • 62% 61% 47% 57% 100% 79% 72% 78% 81% 678 1,935 1,345 3,958 10 550 185 745 w/problems 37% 26% 14% 24% 0% 54% 27% 46% All hshlds 2,545 6,282 3,574 12,401 115 2,745 535 3,395 w/problems 60% 62% 47% 57% 52% 81% 59% 77% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. All renter households - over 57% (6,294 households out of 12,401 total Yakima renter households in the year 2000) of all renter households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems compared with 77% (2,586 households out of 3,395 Hispanic or Latino households). Renter households by income level =. the percent of all households who have housing problems increases as income decreases from 24% of all households with 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 58 Version 2.0 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction incomes above 81% of Median Family Income (MFI) to 57% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 80% of all households with income between 31- 50% of MFI to 82% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. This pattern is even more pronounced in Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems increasing as income decreases from 46% of all households with incomes above 81% of MFI to 78% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 89% of all households with income between 31-50% of MFI to 89% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. Table 17: CHAS Hispanic Renter Households with Housing Problems - Numbers Total o ulation His anic or Latino 0- 00/0 702 1,318 860 2,880 70 785 0 935 w/problems 512 1,163 680 1,558 40 722 65 827 31-50% 690 1,334 614 2,638 25 710 145 880 w/problems 455 1,204 454 2,113 10 639 110 759 51-80% 475 1,695 755 2,925 10 700 125 835 w/problems 295 1,030 355 1,680 10 553 90 653 81% 678 1,935 1,345 3,958 10 550 185 745 w/problems 253 500 190 943 0 297 50 32347 All hshlds 2,545 6,282 3,574 12,401 115 2,745 535 3,395 w/problems 1,515 3,897 1,679 6,294 60 2,211 315 2,586 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Renter household type with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 62% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 60% followed by followed by all other households at 47%. The percent of Hispanic or Latino household types who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 81% followed by all other households at 59% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 52%. Generally, Hispanic or Latino elderly households fare relatively better than elderly households in the general population. The number of Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems is greatest for families at 2,211 households followed by all others at 315 households followed by elderly households at 60 households. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING PROBLEMS BY RACE OR ETHNICITY - OWNER HOUSEHOLDS Hispanic or Latino owner Households with Problems All owner households - over 31% (4,452 households out of 14,229 total Yakima owner, households in the year 2000) of all owner households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems, 25% or 3,589 households were paying more than 30% of household income for housing, and 9% or 1,325 households were paying more than 50% of household income for housing. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 59 Version 2.0 All Total All Total % MFI Eldrly Famly other renter Eldrly Famly other renter Persons 1-2 2-5+ na na 1-2 2-5+ na na 0- 00/0 702 1,318 860 2,880 70 785 0 935 w/problems 512 1,163 680 1,558 40 722 65 827 31-50% 690 1,334 614 2,638 25 710 145 880 w/problems 455 1,204 454 2,113 10 639 110 759 51-80% 475 1,695 755 2,925 10 700 125 835 w/problems 295 1,030 355 1,680 10 553 90 653 81% 678 1,935 1,345 3,958 10 550 185 745 w/problems 253 500 190 943 0 297 50 32347 All hshlds 2,545 6,282 3,574 12,401 115 2,745 535 3,395 w/problems 1,515 3,897 1,679 6,294 60 2,211 315 2,586 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Renter household type with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 62% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 60% followed by followed by all other households at 47%. The percent of Hispanic or Latino household types who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 81% followed by all other households at 59% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 52%. Generally, Hispanic or Latino elderly households fare relatively better than elderly households in the general population. The number of Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems is greatest for families at 2,211 households followed by all others at 315 households followed by elderly households at 60 households. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING PROBLEMS BY RACE OR ETHNICITY - OWNER HOUSEHOLDS Hispanic or Latino owner Households with Problems All owner households - over 31% (4,452 households out of 14,229 total Yakima owner, households in the year 2000) of all owner households of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems, 25% or 3,589 households were paying more than 30% of household income for housing, and 9% or 1,325 households were paying more than 50% of household income for housing. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 59 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Owner households by income level - the percent of all households who have housing problems increases as income decreases from 17% of all households with incomes above 81% of Median Family Income (MFI) to 47% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 65% of all households with income between 31- 50% of MFI to 77% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. The percent of all Hispanic or Latino households who have housing problems is even more pronounced increasing as income decreases from 48% of all households with incomes above 81% of MFI to 75% of all households with incomes between 51-80% of MFI to 92% of all households with income between 31-50% of MFI to 90% of all households with incomes below 30% of MFI. Table 18: CHAS Hispanic Owner Households with Housing Problems - Percentages Total copulation Hispanic or Latino 0-30% 494 388 245 1,127 40 220 30 290 w/problems 64% 96% 74% 77% 25% 100% 100% 90% 31-50% 779 482 140 1,401 20 280 4 304 w/problems 47% 89% 79% 65% 50% 96% 0% 92% 51-80% 1,020 1,088 275 2,383 55 565 0 620 w/problems 22% • 71% 44%1 47% 0% 82% n/a 75% 81% 2,530 5,769 1,019 9,318 4 805 55 864 w/problems 8% 20% 19% 17% 0% 49% 36% 48% All hshlds 4,823 7,727 1,679 14,229 119 1,870 89 2,078 w/problems 23% 35% 36% 31% 17% 72% 56% 68% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Owner household types with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for all other households at 36% followed by family households at 35% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 23%. The percent of all Hispanic or Latino households who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 72% followed by all other households at 56% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 17%. However, the number of Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems is greatest for family households at 1,346 households followed by all other households at 50 followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 20. Table 19: CHAS Hispanic Owner Households with Housing Problems - Numbers Total population Hispanic or Latino All Total All Total 0/0 MFI Eldrly Famly other owners Eldrly Famly other owners Persons 1-2 2-5+ na na 1-2 2-5+ na na 0-30% 494 388 245 1,127 40 220 30 290 w/problems 64% 96% 74% 77% 25% 100% 100% 90% 31-50% 779 482 140 1,401 20 280 4 304 w/problems 47% 89% 79% 65% 50% 96% 0% 92% 51-80% 1,020 1,088 275 2,383 55 565 0 620 w/problems 22% • 71% 44%1 47% 0% 82% n/a 75% 81% 2,530 5,769 1,019 9,318 4 805 55 864 w/problems 8% 20% 19% 17% 0% 49% 36% 48% All hshlds 4,823 7,727 1,679 14,229 119 1,870 89 2,078 w/problems 23% 35% 36% 31% 17% 72% 56% 68% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Owner household types with housing problems - the percent of all households who have housing problems is greatest for all other households at 36% followed by family households at 35% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 23%. The percent of all Hispanic or Latino households who have housing problems is greatest for family households at 72% followed by all other households at 56% followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 17%. However, the number of Hispanic or Latino households with housing problems is greatest for family households at 1,346 households followed by all other households at 50 followed by elderly households with 1-2 members at 20. Table 19: CHAS Hispanic Owner Households with Housing Problems - Numbers Total population Hispanic or Latino '0-30% 494 388 245 1,127 40 220 30 290 w/problems 314 373 180 867 10 220 30 260 31-50% 779 482 140 1,401 20 280 4 304 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 60 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 All Total All Total MFI Eldrly Famly other owners Eldrly Famly other owners Persons 1-2 2-5+ na na 1-2 2-5+ na na '0-30% 494 388 245 1,127 40 220 30 290 w/problems 314 373 180 867 10 220 30 260 31-50% 779 482 140 1,401 20 280 4 304 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 60 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction w/problems 369 427 110 906 10 269 0 279 51-80% 1,020 1,088 275 2,383 55 565 0 620 w/problems 225 768 120 1,113 0 463 0 463 81% 2,530 5,769 1,019 9,318 4 805 55 864 w/problems 210 1,168 189 1,567 0 394 20 414 All hshids 4,823 7,727 1,679 14,229 119 1,870 89 2,078 w/problems 19 2,734 599 4,452 20 1,346 50 1,416 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING PROBLEMS BY RACE/ETHNICITY - ALL HOUSEHOLDS Hispanic or Latino Owner Households as Proportionate Share All households - over 43% 12,102 renter and owner households out of 26,630 total Yakima households in the year 2000 of all household types and of all income levels in Yakima had housing problems compared with 74% or 4,024 Hispanic or Latino renter and owner households out of 5,473 had housing problems. While Hispanic or Latino households have housing problems in a greater proportion than the general population, the households who are having problems are proportionately distributed amongst the income ranges in the same proportion as all households having housing problems ranging between 30-35% in each income group. Table 20: Comparative CHAS Housing Problems - Total vs Hispanic Population Percentages Total population Hispanic or Latino 0-30% 2,880 1,127 4,007 935 290 1,225 w/problems 82% 77% 80% 89% 90% 89% 33% 31-50% 2,638 1,401 4,039 880 304 1,184 w/problems 80% 65% 750/0 89% 92°/0 90% 51-80% 2 925 2 382 5 308 835 620 1 455 810/0 w/problems All hshlds 3,958 24% 17% 12,401 14,229 9 318 3 276 745 864 1 609 19% 46% 48% 470/0 30% 26,630 3,395 2,078 5,473 w/problems 57% 31% 43% 77% 68°/0 74% 33°/0 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 61 Version 2.0 Rent Own Total Rent Own Total 0/0 of % MFI Total 0-30% 2,880 1,127 4,007 935 290 1,225 w/problems 82% 77% 80% 89% 90% 89% 33% 31-50% 2,638 1,401 4,039 880 304 1,184 w/problems 80% 65% 750/0 89% 92°/0 90% 51-80% 2 925 2 382 5 308 835 620 1 455 810/0 w/problems All hshlds 3,958 24% 17% 12,401 14,229 9 318 3 276 745 864 1 609 19% 46% 48% 470/0 30% 26,630 3,395 2,078 5,473 w/problems 57% 31% 43% 77% 68°/0 74% 33°/0 Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 61 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Table 21: Comparative CHAS Housing Problems - Total vs Hispanic Population Numbers Total population Hispanic or Latino 0-30% 2,880 127 4,007 935 290 1,225 w/problems 2,355 944 3,299 830 260 1,090 o/ 31-50% 2,638 1.401 4,039 880 304 1,184 w/problems 2,113 906 3,019 780 280 1,060 35% 51-80% 2,925 2.382 5,308 835 620 1.455 w/problems 2,165 1,112 3,277 649 465 1,114 34% 81% 3,958 9,318 13,276 745 864 1,609 w/problems 942 1,565 2,507 345 415 760 30% All hshlds 12,401 14,229 26,630 3,395 2,078 5,473 w/problems 7,575 4,527 12,102 2,604 1,420 4,024 33% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Priority Housing Needs (91.215 (b)) 1. Identify the priority housing needs and activities in accordance with the categories specified in the Housing Needs Table (formerly Table 2A). These categories correspond with special tabulations of U.S. census data provided by HUD for the preparation of the Consolidated Plan. 2. Provide an analysis of how the characteristics of the housing market and the severity of housing problems and needs of each category of residents provided the basis for determining the relative priority of each priority housing need category. Note: Family and income types may be grouped in the case of closely related categories of residents where the analysis would apply to more than one family or income type. 3. Describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category of priority needs. 4. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Priority Housing Needs response: At least 6,294 renter households and 4,452 owner households had significant housing problems in Yakima in the year 2000 census. The numbers have likely increased in the years since due to continued rising housing costs and stagnant if not decreasing incomes. However, priority housing needs based on the gross number of households who are most likely to be in need of critical housing assistance consist of: • Renter households with incomes below 30% of Median Family Income (MFI) - since this group includes 1,558 households with housing problems of which 1,779 are paying more than 50% of their gross household income for housing. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 62 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rent Own i Total Rent Own Total % of 0/0 MFI Total 0-30% 2,880 127 4,007 935 290 1,225 w/problems 2,355 944 3,299 830 260 1,090 o/ 31-50% 2,638 1.401 4,039 880 304 1,184 w/problems 2,113 906 3,019 780 280 1,060 35% 51-80% 2,925 2.382 5,308 835 620 1.455 w/problems 2,165 1,112 3,277 649 465 1,114 34% 81% 3,958 9,318 13,276 745 864 1,609 w/problems 942 1,565 2,507 345 415 760 30% All hshlds 12,401 14,229 26,630 3,395 2,078 5,473 w/problems 7,575 4,527 12,102 2,604 1,420 4,024 33% Notes: MFI is median family income. Housing problems include cost greater than 30% of income and/or overcrowding and/or without complete kitchen or plumbing facilities. Cost includes rent and utilities. Totals may vary slightly from census data. Source: HUD 2000 CHAS tables. Priority Housing Needs (91.215 (b)) 1. Identify the priority housing needs and activities in accordance with the categories specified in the Housing Needs Table (formerly Table 2A). These categories correspond with special tabulations of U.S. census data provided by HUD for the preparation of the Consolidated Plan. 2. Provide an analysis of how the characteristics of the housing market and the severity of housing problems and needs of each category of residents provided the basis for determining the relative priority of each priority housing need category. Note: Family and income types may be grouped in the case of closely related categories of residents where the analysis would apply to more than one family or income type. 3. Describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category of priority needs. 4. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Priority Housing Needs response: At least 6,294 renter households and 4,452 owner households had significant housing problems in Yakima in the year 2000 census. The numbers have likely increased in the years since due to continued rising housing costs and stagnant if not decreasing incomes. However, priority housing needs based on the gross number of households who are most likely to be in need of critical housing assistance consist of: • Renter households with incomes below 30% of Median Family Income (MFI) - since this group includes 1,558 households with housing problems of which 1,779 are paying more than 50% of their gross household income for housing. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 62 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction • Owner households with incomes below 30% of MFI - since this group includes 867 households with housing problems of which 619 are paying more than 50% of their gross household income for housing. • Renter households with incomes between 31-50% of MFI - since this group includes 2,113 households with housing problems of which 464 are paying more than 50% of their gross household income for housing. • Owner households with incomes between 31-50% of MFI - since this group includes 906 households with housing problems of which 354 are paying more than 50% of their gross household income for housing. The basic obstacles to meeting underserved needs include: • The rising cost of housing - relative to community wage levels makes it hard to supply safe, decent and affordable housing to lower income groups, and • The subsidies required providing affordable housing for ail those in need - is far above the amount of resources that are available. Housing Market Analysis (91.210) *Please also refer to the Housing Market Analysis Table in the Needs.xls workbook 1. Based on information available to the jurisdiction, describe the significant characteristics of the housing market in terms of supply, demand, condition, and the cost of housing; the housing stock available to serve persons with disabilities; and to serve persons with HIV/AIDS and their families. Data on the housing market should include, to the extent information is available, an estimate of the number of vacant or abandoned buildings and whether units in these buildings are suitable for rehabilitation. 2. Describe the number and targeting (income level and type of household served) of units currently assisted by local, state, or federally funded programs, and an assessment of whether any such units are expected to be lost from the assisted housing inventory for any reason, (i.e. expiration of Section 8 contracts). 3. Indicate how the characteristics of the housing market will influence the use of funds made available for rental assistance, production of new units, rehabilitation of old units, or acquisition of existing units. Please note, the goal of affordable housing is not met by beds in nursing homes. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Housing Market Analysis responses: HOUSING TRENDS Types of Housing and Number of Units Yakima's housing inventory increased 15% between 2000 and 2006 compared to an increase in population of 19% from 71,845 persons to an estimated 85,226 person in the same time period. Table 22: Housing Inventory by Type 2000-2006 2000 2006 Type 2000-2006 Number % Number % Number 0/0 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 63 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Single family Detached 16,244 57% 18,802 57% 2,558 16% Attached 1,245 4% 1,997 6% 752 61% Multifamily 2-4 units 4,177 15% 5,092 15% 915 22% 5-19 units 2,666 9% 3,054 9% 388 15% 20+ units 2,477 9% 2,103 6% -374 -15% Mobile homes 1,854 7% 2,018 6% 164 9% Other* 80 0% 16 0% -64 -80% Total 28,743 100% 33,082 100% 4,339 *Includes boats, RVs, vans and other more temporary housing types. Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding 15% The greatest increase in the inventory by housing type was for single family attached units which increased by 61%, followed by multifamily of 2-4 units by 22%, single family detached by 16%, and multifamily of 5-19 units by 15%. Mobile homes increased by 9% while multifamily of 20 units or more declined by -15% as well as other temporary housing units Residential building permits as percent of which included RVs and vans, existing housing stock by -80%' 2.5% Residential construction 201. 20%activity in region and Yakima t.n _ 1.5% 1.614 1 4•. According to data maintained by the Washington Real Estate 10% 0.9% Research Center (WRERC) and 0.=. Yakima Planning Department, 0.44 the percent of new housing stock being added each year 00. was relatively consistent in 0.5% 0.3 . 04% 120 0% 100.o% 80.0% N N o the state and Puget Sound at _W'h,ngl0n41ate —nage! Sound _,..,,,,,,aCounty 1,ma about 1.6-2.0% up until the beginning of the housing meltdown in 2007. Percent single family are of all building permits 94.4.4 0 0 0 0 00 N N N N N N N —Washings on 54 sir--nu3,t Sound —Y44[44, 1 unty —Yat 0 The percent of new stock in Yakima County, however, was comparatively modest until 2007 when it climbed to 1.4% of existing housing stock. The percent of new stock in Yakima was lower than all areas even though the city experienced an increase in construction by the end of 2007. Up until the year 2007 and 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 64 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction the beginning of the housing market meltdown, the percent of all new residential construction was predominately concentrated in for sale single family housing - especially in Yakima County (94.7-94.4%). The single family housing market cooled significantly beginning in the year 2009, however, when the percent of all new residential construction in single family housing declined to 51.1% in Puget Sound, 64.2% in Washington State, and 89.3% in Yakima County. The single family housing market remained a large part of housing construction in Yakima during these periods retaining 94.7 to 89.3% of all residential construction up through the year 2009. For sale housing price trends in region and Yakima The median value of existing home sales - has progressively increased in Washington State from $179,900 in 2001 to $309,600 in 2007 (most recent year for which information has been compiled). Cumulative rise in median home price 5450,000 5400,000 5350.000 5300,000 071,5 5250,000 sN641 3)19,444 37074100 5200,000 31T9.900- S18L500 5150 000 f125,700 5/27.700 x1064100 3110,700 11:,300 5100,000 The median value of existing 55o.000 home sales in Yakima were 50 higher than Yakima County but g g o g g $ g lower than Puget Sound (King, N N N N ry N N _...,,,in,.....—Yo arta Couny —...M, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish 3318.4 5160,44 11974100 3316.687 3505000 i1XT11 ]0,596 1 5,1 7S .300 The median value of an existing home sold in Yakima County was below Washington State but has also increased from $106,800 in 2001 to $147,500 in 2007. 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Annual increase in median home prices ru M co 0 O N 41 O OO N O N N 2004.200S 0 —Washmmcn %Jain ---Puget Sound —0 ,6 ma Courcy —y,a IT 0 County) reaching $170,596 in the year 2007. The annual increase in median home prices - peaked in the 2004-2005 years in Washington State and Puget Sound (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties) at 16.0- 16,4% annual increase. Yakima County had comparable increase through 2004 then dropped significantly to 1.4% annual increase in the 2004- 2005 time periods (city information is not available for the years before 2005). 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 65 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 01.200 SI .000 5800 5600 0400 • 5200 SO 20.0% 1 5.0% 1 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% .5.0% • 10.0';. • 1 5.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% Average apartment rents 2005-2009 sem.. 5960 3669 1796 3631 Sa69 3577' 3469 0 0 0 0 3026 35 o4 CO 0 I.hinnton State - . unci Sound Ima County —Yakima Apartment inventory 2005-2009 0 --Wa.mmoton State --Pones Sound — 1.. ma County '—Y.:, .na Apartment vacancy rate 2005-2009 00% 0.a. 0.0% 00. 0 m. N 10 0 0 0 01 0 —Washington State —Pug,, Sound —Y ni oma County —Yakima 0' 0 The annual change in median home prices increased in the county and city, and decreased in the state and Puget Sound by the year 2007 between 7.4-10.0% just before the housing market meltdown. Apartment rents and vacancy rates Median apartment rents - have progressively increased in Washington State from $757 in 2001 to $930 in 2009. The median apartment rent in Yakima County was below Washington State and Puget Sound and has remained relatively stable increasing slightly from $489 in 2001 to $506 in 2009. Comparable information on apartment rentals is not available for the City of Yakima. The inventory of apartments - declined in all areas during the housing market boom years as some buildings were converted to condos and sold. The inventory has stabilized as the sales market melted down but is not increasing significantly enough to meet housing requirements. Comparable information on apartment rentals is not available for the City of Yakima. Apartment vacancy rates - declined from the year 2005 to 2008 as the housing sales market cooled, but 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 66 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction increased beginning in 2009foraU areas though Yakima County (4.7%) is lower than the state or Puget Sound. Comparable information on apartment rentals is not available for the City of Yakima. HOUSING TENURE Ownership - increased in Yakima from 11,785 owner -occupied housing units in the year 2000 to an estimated 17,047 owner -occupied housing units in 2006 or by 5,262 units or4S96. Table 23: Housing Values 2000-2006 2000 Owner value 2006 2000-2006 Nmbr 0/0 Nmbr Nmbr �$50,000 637 5q6 1,639 10% 1,002 58% $50-$99,999 • 4,761 40% 3,432 20% -1/339 -28% 5100-5149/999 4/067 35% 5/270 3196 1,203 30% $150-5199,999 1,292 11% 3,403 2096 2,111 63% $200-5299,999 649 6% 2,150 13% 1,501 131% 6300-$499,999 260 2% 930 ' 6% 670 158% 5500-$999/999 112 ' 1% 148' 1% 36 32% $1,000,000+ 7 0q6 75 0% 68 871% Total 11,785 100% 17,047 Median value $106,200 $132,600 Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding 100% 5,262 45% 25% The Iargest percentage increase byvalue category was inthe $1,OOO,OOO+ range with an increase of 68 units but equal to 871% increase in the units within that value range. The greatest numerical increase, however, was in the $150,000-$199,999 value range by 2,111 additional owner -occupied housing uriits followed by 1,501 owner - occupied units in the $200,000-$299,999 range followed by 1,203 owner -occupied units in the $100,000-$199,999 value range followed by 1,002 owner -occupied units in the below $50,000 value range. Conversely, there was a decrease of -1,329 owner -occupied housing units in the $50,000-$99,999 value range during the same time period equal to -28% ofthe inventory within the value range. Likewise, median owner -occupied value increased from $106,200 to $132,600 or by 25% during this time period. The overall increase in owner -occupied housing units during this 6 -year period is significant reflecting the more flexible housing mortgage lending practices, subprime mortgage market, and other factors. Inventory increases in the upper value ranges are likely due to new construction as well as appreciating market values. However, increases in the lowest value range may be due to continued depreciation of the oldest, less marketable units in the older neighborhoods of Yakima. Rentals - increased from 12,347 units in 2000 to 13,656 units in 2006 or by 1,309 additional units or 11% within the time period, 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 67 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction The largest percentage increase by value category was in the $1,000-$1,499 range with an increase of 425 units but equal to 72% increase in the units within that value range. Table 24: Housing Rents 2000-2006 2000 Rents 2006 2000-2006 Nmbr 0/o Nmbr 0/0 Nmbr 0/0 <$200 567 5% 504 4% -63 -11% $200-$299 757 6% 523 4% -234 -31% 5300-5499 4,029 33% 3,395 25% -634 -16% $500-$749 4,594 37% 5,183 38% 589 13% 5750-5999 1,174 10% 2,449 18% 1,275 g% $1,000-$1,499 587 5% 1,012 7% 425 72% $1,500+ 201 2% 190 1% -11 -5% No cash rent 438 4% 400 3% -38 -9% Total 12,347 100% 13,656 100% 1 Median rent $526 $606 Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding 09 11% 15% The greatest numerical increase, however, was in the $750-$999 value range by 1,275 additional rental units followed by 589 rental units in the $500-$749 range followed by 425 rental units in the $1,000-$1,499 rental. Conversely, there was a decrease of -634 rental units in the $300-$499 rental range, -234 in the $200-$299 rental range, and -63 rental units in the under $200 rental range during the same time period. Median rents increased from $526 to $606 or by 15% during this time period. compared with 25% in the increase in owner -occupied housing units. The overall increase of 1,309 renter -occupied housing units during this 6 -year period is significantly lower than 5,262 owner -occupied housing units during this same time period reflecting the more flexible housing mortgage lending practices, subprime mortgage market, and other factors that spurred homeownership. Inventory increases in the upper value rental ranges are likely due to new construction as well as appreciating market values. However, decreases in the lowest rental ranges may be due to a loss of inventory and the continued depreciation of the oldest, less marketable units in the older neighborhoods of Yakima. Percent housing cost is of household income Ownership — increased in Yakima from 11,785 owner -occupied housing units in the year 2000 to an estimated 17,047 owner -occupied housing units in 2006 or by 5,262 units or 45%. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 68 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Table 25: Percent Owner -Occupied Housing Cost is of Income 2000-2006 Owner -occupied 2000 2006 2000-2006 paving Nmbr % Nmbr %o Nmbr 0/0 <20.0% 6,143 52% 7,973 47% 1,830 30%11 20:0-24.9% 1,497 13% 2,207 13% 710 47% 25.0-29.9% 1,084 9% 1,716 10% 632 58% 30.0-34.9% 905 8% 1,318 8% 413 46% 35.0%+ 2,048 17% 3,817 22% 1,769 86% Not computed 108 1% 16 0% -92 -751% Total 11,785 100% 17,047 100% 5,262 45% Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. Also totals include households with and without mortgages. The largest percentage increase in housing cost as a percent of income category was in the 35%+ range with an increase of 1,769 households or 86% more households paying more than 35% of their gross household income for housing costs. The greatest numerical increase, however, was in the under 20% cost to income ratio by 1,830 additional owner households followed by 1,769 households in the 35%+ cost to income ratio followed by. 710 households in the 20.0-24.9% cost to income ratio followed by 632 households in the 25.0-29.9% cost to income ratio followed by 413 households in the 30.0-34.9% cost to income ratio. Conversely, the only decrease was in the not computed category. The overall increase in the number of households paying more than 35% of gross household income for housing cost during this 6 -year period is significant reflecting the more flexible housing mortgage lending practices, subprime mortgage market, and other factors that encouraged households to spend more for housing than is considered prudent. However, some portion of this overextended household group may. also be due to the fact that these households have to pay more than is considered prudent in order to obtain housing in the overheated new housing marketplace. Rentals - increased from 12,347 units in 2000 to 13,656 units in 2006 or by 1,309 additional units or 11% within the time period. Table 26: Percent Renter -Occupied Housing Cost is of Income 2000-2006 Renter -occupied 2000 2006 2000-2006 paving Nmbr % Nmbr %o Nmbr 010 <20.0% 3,056 24% 3,472 25% 416 14% 20.0-24.9% 1,345 11% 1,661 12% 316 10% 25.0-29.9% 1,470 12% 1,527 11% 57 4% 30.0-34.9% ' 1,107 9% 1,214 9% 107 10% 35.0%+ 4,613 37% 5,214 38% 601 13% Not computed 756 6% 568 , 4% -188 -25% Total 12,347 100%. 13,656 100% 1 Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. 09 11% The largest percentage increase in rental housing cost as a percent of income category was in the 35%+ range with an increase of 601 households or 13% more 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 69 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction households paying more than 35% of their gross household income for rental housing costs. The greatest numeric& increase was also in the 35.096 rental cost to income ratio by 601 additional rental households followed by 416 households in the under 20% rental cost to income ratio followed by 316 households in the 30.0-24.996 rental cost to income ratio followed by 1O7households |nthe 3O.O-]4.996 rental cost toincome ratio followed by 57 households in the 25.0-29.9% rent& cost to income ratio. Conversely, the only decrease was in.the not computed category. The overall increase in the number of rental households paying more than 35% of gross household income for rental housing cost during this 6 -year period is likely a reflection of the higher rents associated with newer apartment complexes developed during this time period. However, some portion of this overextended household group may also be due to the fact that these households have to pay more than is considered prudent in order to obtain rental housing in the overheated new housing marketplace. Mobile Homes and Manufactured Houses Mobile homes represented 7% of the total housing units in Yakima in 3000 and 6% of the total inventory in 2006, but increased in number by 164 units or 9% from 1,854 to 2,018 units. Table 27: Mobile Home Inventory 200-2006 2000' 2006 Type 2000-2006 Number 0/0 Number 0/0 Number o/0 Mobile homes 1,854 7% 2,018 6% 164 Total 28,743 100% 33,082 100% 4,339 Source: US 2000 Census and American Community Survey 2005-2007 15% Mobile homes can be one of the most affordable ownership options in the housing marketplace. At the same time, occupants in mobile home parks are not guaranteed a space and are vulnerable to redevelopment and rezoning. The status of mobile home parks in urbanizing areas is particularly tenuous when higher economic uses of the land outweigh the less reliable income of temporary housing. Furthermore, it is not easy to obtain funding for renovation or purchase of mobile homes, which means mobile homes are increasingly threatened and sometimes in deteriorated and unsafe condition Recent Washington State legislative action which requires that all zoning within municipal juhadicUops in the state permit manufactured (constructed for permanent occupation on a traditional foundation as opposed to mobile constructed to theoretically be moved onvvhee|s) housing alongside stick-builthousing products means this lower cost production option (from 15-2596 Iess expensive than traditional on-site stick -built) may be more easily accessible than in part housing rnarWetp|aces. RACE AND ETHNICITY HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS Persons in poverty status - in Yakima were 22% of the total population in 2000 compared to 38% of the Hispanic or Latino population. Hispanic or Latino persons, however, represented 57%ufall persons in poverty status indicating poverty is not 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 70 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Table 28: Poverty Status Total and ��ispanic��opuUatiuvns2000 Total population Hispanic or Latino Poverty Total Povert 0/0 Total Povert 0/0 of 0/0 overt <5 years 6,170 2,352 38% 3,483 1,751 50% 74% 5-17 years 14,606 4,423 30% 7,289 3,077 42% 7O96| 18-64 years 39,865 7,796 2096 12,629 3,953 31% 51% 65+ years 9,456 1,137 12% 452 164 36% 14% Total 70,097 15,708 Source: US 2000 Census 220/0 23,853 8,945 38% 570/0 Poverty by age group - was most pronounced in persons under 5 of the total population at 38% compared to 50% of the Hispanic or Latino population. Hispanic or Latino persons under age 5, however, represented 74% of all persons under age 5 in poverty indicating poverty is concentrated in the youngest ages in the Hispanic or Latino community. Poverty by family type - was most pronounced in families headed by females at 42% then males at 24% compared to 58% of Hispanic or Latino families headed by females at 44% by males. Hispanic or Latino families, however, represented 59% of all families in poverty indicating poverty is conceritrated in families in the Hispanic or Latino community. Table 29: Poverty by Family Status of Total & Hispanic Populations 2000 Total population Hispanic or Latino Poverty Total Povert 0/0 Total Povert 0/0 of 0/0 overt Married couples 12,253 1,107 9% 2,994 736 2596 6696 child <5 1,263 218 17% 423 143 34% 6696 Male household 1,387 333 24% 523 228 44% 68% child <5 319 151 47% 173 98 57% 65% Female hshld 3,553 1,494 42% 1,337 771 58% 52% child <5 542 344 63% 255 171 67% 50% Total . 17,193 Source: US 2000 Census 2,934 17% 4,854 1,735 36% 59% Ownership- for all households in the total population in the year 2000 was 49% compared with 35% of Hispanic or Latino households. The median value of all owned units was $106,200 compared with $82,800 for Hispanic or Latino households. Virtually all Hispanic or Latino owned units were below $149,999 in value of which Hispanic or Latino households owned 30% of all units valued under $50,000 and 26% of all units valued ¢50,000-$99,999 even though they were 16% of all owner households. ]-5Year Strategic Plan 71 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Table 30: Owned House Values of Total & Hispanic Population 2000 Total population Hispanic or Latino Owner value Number 0/0 Number0/0 0/0 of owners < $50,000 637 5% 191 10% 30% $50-$99,999 4,761 40% 1,233 67% 26% 5100-$149,999 4,067 35% 374 20% 9% $150-$199,999 1,292 11% 41 2% 3% 5200-$299,999 649 6% 6 0% 1% $300-5499,999 260 2% 0 0% 0% $500-$999,999 112. 1% 9 0% 8% $1,000,000+ 7 0% 0 0% 0% Total owned Median value Mean value 11,785 $106,200 $125,873 00% 1,854 $82,800 $89,138 100% 6% Total households Percent owners 24,132 49% 5,232 35% Source: US 2000 Census Note: Totals may not add due to rounding Rentals - for all households in the total population in the year 2000 was 51% compared with 65% of Hispanic or Latino households. The median rent of all rental units was $526 compared with $494 for Hispanic or Latino households. Most Hispanic or Latino rented units were distributed within the $300-$749 similar to the total population. Hispanic or Latino households rented less than 1% of all units below $200 and 19% of all units $200-$299 even though Hispanic or Latino households represented 27% of all renting households. Table 31: Rents of Total & Hispanic Populations 2000 Total population Hispanic or Latino Rents Number 0/0 Number 0/0 of % renters <$200 567 5% 93 3% 1% $200-$299 757 6% 141 4% 19% $300-$499 4,029 33% 1,462 43% 36% $500-$749 4,594 37% 1,271 38% 28% $750-$999 1,174 10% 240 7% 20% 51,000-$1,499 587 5% 98 3% 17% $1,500+ 201 2% 0 0% 0% No cash rent 438 4% 73 2% 17% Total Median rent Mean rent 12,347 $526 $552 100% 3,378 100% $494 $507 27% Total households Percent ownership Source: US 2000 Census Note: Totals may not add due to rounding 24,132 51% 5,232 65% ASSISTED HOUSING INVENTORY Section 8. Housing Assistance - the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) will have approximately $2,700,000 in Section 8 Assistance funding available in 2009 for an 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 72 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction authorized 618 housing units in Yakima County to serve !ow -income households of which approximately 75-0096 or 400 units will likely be funded in Yakima. YHA expects annual funding Ievels for Section 8 Assistance program will increase no more than 1% per year if the agency receives a similar allocation in the future. Section 8 vouchers are generally assigned on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to appropriate unit size and type availability. As of August 2009, the Section 8 tenant - basad waiting Iist was overcapacityacity and closed. Public Housing - the Yakima Housing Authority currently owns and manages 189 units of public housing for low-income families, another 38 elder units, and 70 Farmworker units within Yakima. Other housing providers - include the Catholic CharitiesHousing Service (CCHS), a division of the Yakima Catholic Diocese, which currently owns and manages 40 senior and 36 Farmworker with another 231 low-income family units under development. The Yakima Valley Partners of Habitat for Humanity have constructed 58 low-income houses averaging about 4 units per year and the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) have constructed another 54 low-income units averaging about 5 units a year with homeowner self-help and volunteer assistance. Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) - assists in the development of opportunities for first-time homebuyers by providing technical assistance and/or partnering with non-profit agencies such as the Yakima VaIIey Partners of Habitat for Humanity and the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) in the creation of new, affordable homes or the rehabilitation of existing houses. The ONDS also assists eligible homeowners in the maintenance and rehabilitation of their homes by providing inspections, reasonable designs, cost estimates, and detailed specifications foreach project. In 2008, ONDS: o completed emergency home repairs for 43 senior houses, ° completed regular home repairs for 34 senior houses, o assisted with 27 down payment assistance programs, =. painted the exterior of 23 houses, • organized 7,606 volunteer hours painting over graffiti, and • cleaned by 188 illegal dump sites. Demolition or lost from the inventory - only a small number of housing units of the total number of housing units in Yakima are expected to be lost because their substandard condition is not suitable for rehabilitation. ONDS an active housing rehabilitation program for households with incomes at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). Additionally, the Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) also operates programs to rehabilitate or weatherize housing units. At the current time, the Yakima Housing Authority does not expect to demolish any existing public housing stock. USE OF FUNDS Yakima and the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) use local resources for housing or human services, and state and federal resources available to target households with incomes at or below 8096 of Area Median Income (AMI). Yakima and YHA target low income /51-8096 AMI), very low (31-5O96 AMI)or extremely low income (under 30% 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 73 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction-- AMI) or special needs populations depending on the requirements of the various N� programs and funding sources available to the 2 agencies. Yakima's housing needs cover a wide spectrum and are greater than the resources 1 available. As a result, available public resources to serve low and moderate -income households will need to be distributed across the spectrum of needs and heavily leveraged when possible. This means providing funds for rental assistance, 0� homebuyer assistance, housing rehabilitation, and the creation or development of new housing serving the target groups. Specific Housing Objectives (91.215 (b)) 1. Describe the priorities and specific objectives the jurisdiction hopes to achieve over a specified time period. N� 2. Describe how Federal, State, and local public and private sector resources that are reasonably expected to be available will be used to address identified needs N� for the period covered by the strategic plan. -- 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Specific Housing Objectivesme������: 1 Yakima will support and encourage affordable housing and supportive housing services for the following priority populations. Priority 1: Homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless: • Families ° Domestic violence victims N� � Youth -- • Chronically mentally U| o Persons with co-occurring disorders N� • Persons with alcohol or drug addictions m� Priority 2: Low-income families and individuals: • Extremely low-income (30% of median and below) o Very low-income (5096 of median and be|ow) • Low-income (80% of median and below) N� Priority 3: Low-income families and individuals with specials needs: ▪ Frail �|d�r|v __` • Pregnant and parenting women N� • Chronically mentally 111 m� a Persons with co-occurring disorders • Persons with alcohol or drug addictions The following goa|s, strategies, and objectives are based on the above priorities and are consistent with the statutory goals outlined in the introduction statement in this section. N� mm HOUSING FOR THE HOMELESS Goal 1: Assist in the creation of 5 housing projects that serve the homeless. 3-5 Year Strategic P 74 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Strategy 1: Where appropriate, provide direct funding for projects that serve priority homeless populatioris. Objectives: • Use local CDBG and HOME grant dollars to subsidize approved emergency, transitional, and permanent supportive housing projects that serve priority homeless populations. Strategy 2: Provide technical assistance to facilitate the development of p'ec1s that provide housing to priority homeless populations such as the identification of funding sources and assistance with grant and loan applications, financial analysis, project management, and fostering collaborations among housing and service providers. Objectives: • Supplement the time and capacity of housing providers in project planning and implementation, thereby improving the chances of success. • Improve the potential for establishing formal links that will connect supportive services, especially case management, with the proposed housing project. Strategy 3: Prioritize local CDBG and HOME funds for projects that provide or coordinate case management for homeless special needs populations. Objectives: • Return more homeless individuals and families to self sufficiency by targeting local funding to housing that addresses the causes of homelessness through combinations of housing and services. Goal 2: Over a 5 year period, develop baseline data on |uca\ homelessness and formulate coordinated plans to address the causes of chronic homelessness. Strategy 1: In collaboration with homeless housing providers, identify the needs and resources to address homelessness. Objectives: • Identify the number of homeless families and individuals and the primary causes of homelessness in Yakima and Yakima County. • Assess the ability of current programs to address the needs of homelessness. • Identify community resources needed toaddress homelessness. • Formulate long range plans to secure resources to address homelessness in Yakima and Yakima County. HOUSING FOR LOW-INCOME Goal 1: Over 5 years, enable 135 Iow-income households to afford market -rate housing. Strategy 1: Provide a subsidy mechanism to allow low-income households to obtairi and maintain occupancy in market -rate rental housing. Objectives: • Fund a rental assistance program to allow 17 low-income families per year to afford market -rate rents over 5 years. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 75 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Strategy 2: Provide a subsidy mechanism to allow low-income households to obtain and maintain occupancy in market -rate, owner occupied housing. Objectives: • Fund a homebuyer assistance program to allow 10 Iow or moderate -income families per year to purchase homes. Strategy 3: Generate additional housing resources, consistent with those identified as appropriate, for low-income households in Yakima. Objectives: • Work with local housing providers and stakeholders to research the feasibility and appropriateness of producing additional funding resources within the community for housing. Utilize a portion of such resources for rental assistance. Goal 2: Over 5 years, assist other public and non-profit organizations to provide funding for 200 units of affordable permanent housing for low-income households. Strategy 1: Develop permanent housing that is affordable to those who are unable to participate in market -rate housing without paying more than 30% of their income for housing, Objectives: • Assist other public or private non-profit or for-profit organizations to develop 200 units of low-income permanent housing in conjunction with tax credits or other leveraged funding. Strategy 2: Collaborate with local non-profit housing providers and local nonprofits providing services for specia needs househods to provide appropriate permanent housing serving special needs populations, especiaIy those that are currently housed in facilities primarily developed for the elderly. Objectives: • Assist in eliminating the conflict of housing elderly and the chronically mentally ill in the same residential facilities. • Assist providers of mental health in securing clustered, small -sized residential units or appropriate facilities that enhance the delivery of services to non- homeless mentally ill or special needs populations. Goal 3: Over 5 years, complete regular home napairsfor 170 senior and emergency home repairs for 215 of senior housing units to improve the living conditions of low- income households residing in the City of Yakima. Continue painting the exterior of housing units to stabilize neighborhood housing investments and appearances. Strategy 1: Enable low-income residents, especially those in COBGtarget block group areas, to live in safe and decent housing by maintaining the physical structures. Objectives: • Continue to fund 170 regular repair and rehabilitation loans through the Yakima Home Rehabilitation Program to bring units rented or owned by low- income households up to local housing standards or energy codes. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 76 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Continue to provide emergency home repairs for215 and regular home repairs for 170 senior housing units. • Continue to paint the exterior of 115 housing units to stabilize neighborhood housing investments and appearances. • Continue to remove illegal dump sites, paint or remove graffiti, and organize over 38,030 volunteer hours to clean-up, paint -up the neighborhoods. • Provide financial assistance to a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) to fund loans and grants for rehabilitation and weatherizat|on of 25 units of low-income tenant -occupied housing. • Provide assistance to non-profit owners of low-income rental housing (emergency, transitional, permanent) to finance the rehabilitation of properties that are being brought up to local housing standards and codes. • If grant sources can be identified and obtained, provide funding for the repair of mobile homes owned or occupied by low-income households. • Assist developers thr�ugh coordination with Yakima departments to improve and develop new incentives to rehabilitate and adaptively reuse older buildings for housing. FAIR HOUSING Goal 1: Work to eliminate housing discrimination which primarily affects persons of color, the disabled, and families with children. Strategy 1: Develop fair housing educational programs for housing and human services agencies and staff who serve protected classes, especially families, people of color and persons with disabilities. Objectives: • Provide landlords and property management companies with information on Fair Housing and reasonable accommodations. • Provide education to local agencies and staff that work with protected classes on what constitutes a violation of fair housing laws, and where to file a complaint. • Hold a local fair housing workshop; invite people who provide housing and human service agencies. • Provide a speaker from the Fair Housing Center ofWashington. • Promote self -testing in the rental and sales markets. • Contract Fair Housing Center of Washington to test housing providers to measure willingness to make reasonable accommodations for prospective disabled residents. Goal 2: Raise the lending community's awareness about theapplication of fair housing law to homeownership. Strategy 1: Encourage the involvement of banks and mortgage lending companies in furthering fair housing practices. Objectives: • Ensure that educational opportunities exist so that local lenders and their employees can receive training to improve their understanding of their obUgations under fair housing. • Work with lenders and agencies that provide homebuyer assistance tPrnarket programs to people of color. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 77 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Encourage banks, mortgage lending companies, and real estate organizations to engage in Best Practices Agreements, Voluntary Affirmative Marketing Agreements, and to utilize Community Reinvestment Act funds to further fair housing practices. Goal 3: Work to educate the public at large of protected classes, fair housing laws and the resources available to them. Strategy 1: Provide more fair housing education and outreach to increase knowledge of fair housing topics and rights. Objectives: • Provide fair housing training for property owners, managers, and staff to ensure equal treatment of potential tenants. • Extend outreach programs to serve protected classes and their service providers. • Distribute information directly to agencies (landlords, owners, lenders, realty companies, and service agencies) that assist protected classes with housing services. • Provide training on filing complaints with HUD and the Washington State Human Right Commission to change the seeming conflict between community input indicating discrimination against families with Children and the lack of familial status complaints filed. Strategy 2: Educate the general public about fair housing through a variety of media channels. Objectives: ■ Publish one article or notice per year about fair housing in the Yakima Herald - Republic. • Collaborate to provide educational information within a fair housing event. • Distribute posters and hand-outs translated into other languages common to the area that educates the public about fair housing. • Maintain a list of volunteer interpreters willing to present to a non -English- speaking groups to increase awareness of fair housing laws, what constitutes a violation, and where to file a complaint. • Maintain an Internet website that provides current information for citizens about fair housing practices. Yakima, the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA), and a variety of human service and housing agencies pursue a diverse list of private, local, state, and federal resources to fund housing and the delivery of housing services to low-income households in need. Among others, Yakima is particularly supportive of applications to these programs: • Public Housing Comprehensive Grant • HUD Grants for Public Housing • Tax Exempt Bonds ■ Taxable Bonds • Low -Income Housing Tax Credits • FHLB Affordable Housing Program • WA State Housing Finance Commission Programs • WA State Housing Trust Fund Programs 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 78 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • WA State Housing Assistance Program • McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Programs • WA Com|ssion Reinvestment Association • WA Community Development Fund � United Way " Emergency Shelter Grant o Public Housing Comprehensive Grant • HOPWA = Funding provided under SHB 2060/2163 • Safe Havens • Section 202 Elderly � Section 811 Handicapped o Historic Preservation Tax Credits • Moderate Rehabilitation SRO • Rental Vouchers • Rental Certificates � Public Housing MROP ° Public Housing CIAP • New Markets Tax Credits Program • EPA Brownfield Demonstration Grant � Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Remedial Action Matching Grant o HUD Brownfield Economic Development Initiative Grant The Yakima Housing Authority has approximately $2,700,000 in Section 8 Assistance available in 2009 to serve low-income households depending on future federal allocations. Developers ofhousing projects serving low-income households, such as the Yakima Housing Authority and Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS), may also apply for Low -Income Housing Tax Credits. Agencies serving homeless individuals and families will apply for funding assistance under the McKinney-Vento H�meless Assistance Programs. Discretionary grants from the federal and state governments for housing, community development, and social services are pursued when and if they become available. Public/private partnerships, where additional funding resources are brought to bear, are sought out and encouraged. These relationships and funding arrangements are difficult, if not impossible, to predict in advance. Fair Housing activities will be funded using Community Development Block Grant funds. Needs of Public Housing (91.210 (b)) In cooperation with the public housing agency or agencies located within its boundaries, describe the needs of public housing, including the number of public housing units in the jurisdiction, the physical condition of such units, the restoration andrevitalization needs of public housing projects within the jurisdiction, and other factors, including the number of families on public housing and tenant -based waiting lists and results frothe Sectin SO4 needs assessment of public housingprojects located within its boundaries (i.e. assessment of needs of tenants and applicants on waiting list for accessible units as required by 24 CFR 8:35). The public housing agency and jurisdiction can use the optional Priority Public Housing Needs Table 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 79 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction (formerly Table 4) of the Consolidated Plan to identify priority public housing need to assist in this process. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Needs of Public Housing response: HOUSING ASSISTANCE YHA Section 8 Housing Assistance - the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) has 618 combined tenant -based (housing choice vouchers) and project -based vouchers to help low-income families in Yakima and Kittitas County for which YHA has ¢2,700,000 in annual funds for approximately 540 households of which 75-8096 or 400 households reside in private housing units within Yakima. Up to 20% of the Section 8 allocation can be project—based vouchers of which YHA seta -side 75 units for homeless households. VASH Vouchers for Veterans Assistance are provided for 35 additional units or 653 total Section 8 vouchers. The Section 8 program s federally funded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Section 8 rental assistances are a critical tool that helps to meet the ¥akima Housing Authority's central mission of providing decent, safe, and affordable housing. The Section 8 program is an indispensable means of helping to achieve that goaL Section 8 program requirements are the household: w qualifies as a family/household • has income within the income limits • meets citizenship/eligible immigrant criteria • provides documentation of SociaI Security Numbers • signs consent authorization documents In addition to the eligibility criteria, families must also meet the Housing Authority's screening criteria in order to be admitted to the Section 8 Program. Section 8 vouchers are generally assigned on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to appropriate unit size and type availability. As of August 2009, the Section 8 tenant -based waiting list was over capacity and closed. In general, YHA receives fewer Section 8 allocations than comparable cities in Washington with the same equivalent housing needs. YHA will be applying for a higher allocation of Section 8 vouchers from HUD in the future accordingly. Private Party Section 8 Housing Assistance — can be secured directly from HUD in addition and separate from YHA and include a number of project and scattered site locations within Yakima. YHA Public Housing — the Yakima Housing Authority currently owns and manages 150 multi -family dwellings that were financed by HUD. Tenants pay approximately 30% of their income for rent and utilities and HUD provides an operating subsidy to the Housing Authority. The Yakima Housing Authority has developed a philosophy which affirms social values and addresses the physical and economic needs of those seeking its assistance. YHA's programs promote a living environment, which fosters economic 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 80 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 Jurisdiction and social diversity by offering a hand up not a hand dut, as families are encouraged towards self-sufficiency. Public housing program requirements are the household: • qualifies as a family/household • has income within the income limits o meets citizenship/eligible immigrant criteria • provides documentation of Social Security Numbers = signs consent authorization documents In addition to the eligibility criteria, families must also meet the Housing Authority's screening criteria to be admitted to the Public Housing Low -Income Program. Table 32: YHA Public Housing Inventory 2009 YHA Public Housin - Units 914 East Spruce Street (Spruce Lane) . 20 81ONorth 6t» Avenue � 16 504/508 Pacific Avenue (Pacific) 15 615North 15mAvenue (Cascade) 15 1022 East Chestnut (Fairview) 14 6U3[entra|Avenuo/Sierra\ 14 610 East Arlington Street (Eastwood) 10. � 621 North 16t Avenue (Edgewood) 10 1214Willow (Willow Lane) 10 8O1Centno|Avenup(Parkv|ew) 10 1322 South 18th Avenue (Evergreen) 6 13U7/13U9/1311A&BSouth 18m Avenue 6 1212 South 9m Street 4 Total 150 YHA Multifamily Housing - Nueva Primavera was developed more than 10 years ago with Revenue Bonds. YHA has not developed a housing project since — but is considering applying for Washington State Housing Trust Funds and CDBG funds for future pjects possibly by 2010 or 2011. Table 33: ¥HA Multifamily Hvomsing Inventory 2009 Nueva Primavera Multifamil HousUn� 810 North 6th Avenue 38 1118 Fruitland Boulevard Total 39 YHA Elderly Housing _ Glenn Acres, YHA's first Senior Housing was purchased in 1999 from a private developer who built the project under HUD's 21d(3) program. Glenn Acres provides housing for 38 low-income, handicapped/disabled and elderly households in the City of Yakima. Located in a quiet neighborhood considered to be one of Yakima's finest, the tenants have easy access to medical facilities, shopping, churches and other social services in addition to public transportation. The project is surrounded by a mixture of single family houses, multi -family buildings, and condominium buildings. No other Iow-income apartment buildings are located in the area. Elderly Housing requirements are the household: • Head of Household or spouse must be at least 62 years of age 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 81 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Annual income must be 5096 or Iess of area median income see income limits • Household members must pass credit check and criminal background check. Table 34:YHA Elderly Housing Inventory 2009 Glenn Acres units 15 North 37th Avenue 38 YHA Farmworker Housing - Yakima Housing Authority owns and -manages 147 units of agricultural rental housing. The units were developed in partnership with the Office of Rural Economic and Community Development (ORECD) and Yakima Valley Communities. The units are located on 40 sites located throughout the county in: • Toppenish • Granger • Cowiche/Tieton • Yakima The Yakima site provides 44 units in single family, duplex and triplex units. Farmworker USDA program requirements are the household: • Earn at Ieast $4,583.00 a year in an agricurtural warehouse or on the farm. • Earn no more than 30% of the area median income. " Has an adult in the household who is a US citizen or legal resident of the US. • Is a low income family - a family of 6 earning less than $48,300 a year or a family of 4 earning less than $39.900 a year? Table35: housingl������armm�vor�er Sunset Terrace USDA units 24 417/419/503/505 North 6th Avenue 4 1004/1006/1008/1010 Buwalda 4 1611/1613/1615/1617 South 1st Avenue 4 202 A&B North 9m Street 2 1707 A&B Pleasant Avenue 2 603/605 South 4th Street 2 1112/1114 South 18th Avenue 2 311 South 7th Street 1 608 South 8t»Street 1 330 South 9th Street 1 509 South 10th Street Pioneer Plaza USDA 20 1115/1117/1119/1121 Pleasant 1408/1410/1412/1414 Willow 4 408/410/412 East Spruce Street 902/904/906 East Beech Street 1]14/1]16 South 12m Avenue 2 507/509 North 6th Avenue 2 510/512 Cherry Avenue Mariposa Park Tax Credit Units 2 26 314 Cherry Avenue 19 918 Fenton Street 6 919 Fenton Street 1 YHA Handicapped - units are set-aside within the other public, farnlvvorkerhousing 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 82 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Table 36: YHA Handicapped Units 2009 Handica ed included in other housin counts 13 914 East Spruce - 31, 32, 33, and 34 4 621 North 16th Avenue -39and 4O 2 1212 South 9m Street - 1 . 1 1307 - A South 18th Avenue 1 810 North 6th Avenue - 10UZ 103 104 4 �14 Cherry Avenue - 101 � 1 CCHS Farmworker Housing - Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS) developed Buena Nueva in the Yakima Valley in 2003. The project consists of 36 units of rental housing for Farmworker families and singles that includes 26 units of year round housing and 10 units of migrant seasonal housing. The development includes an on-site manager's unit and a community building with an on-site office. The project serves low income Farmworkers at or below 5096 of the AMI and includes full site amenities including children's play areas, underground sprinklers, night lighting, site fencing and circulation sidewalks. The project's name "Buena Nueva" is Spanish that translates to the "Good News" of the Gospel. DYHS Senior Housing - the Diocese of Yakima Housing Services (DYHS) recently completed development of Rose of Mary Terrace as a HUD 302 affordable housing project for seniors 62+ years of age who are at or below 5096 of Yakima County's Area Median Income (around $19,950 per year for two). Rental subsidies keep rents affordable - 30% of a senior's net adjusted monthly income. The building has 40 units available for rent. It is an independent living facility, not for those needing assisted living or nursing home care. The facility houses seniors, 62 years old and over, with Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) under S19,950 for a married couple or under $17,450 for a single person. The completion date was July 2008 at which time there were already 78 applicants for the 40 units. The diocese subdivided the 5 -acre parcel on which Rose of Mary Terrace was developed into 5 lots and sold lot 3 of the project for $200,000 to DYHS - an independent non-profit corporation. DYHS receives no funding from the Diocese of Yakima or Holy Family Pahsh, but receives grants from the state and federal government for low-income seniors. DYHS would like to purchase lot 1 and 2, right next to the Gathering Hall and driveway going out to 50th to build 2 more units possibly 274 years in the future. Future development projects would be for senior housing, not low income families but one of the new buildings could possibly be for assisted living. Self -Help Housing Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity - was originally founded in 1984 as Buena Partners by Fred and Pam Bauman who completed the first self-help home in 1986 in Toppenish. The name was subsequently changed to Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity in 1986. The organization completes about 4 houses per year for households s earning between 30-6096 of Annual Median Income (AMI) for a total of 126 homes to date for 1I6 low-income households with over 660 household members in 11 communities from 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 83 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Yakima to Prosser worth about $10, 00,000 - of which 58 have been constructed in Yakima. The units are single family with 3 bedrooms, 1 bath, but no garage. The floor plans are simply laid out with no amenities or centralized heating. The units are worth approximately $11O,OOO-$1ZU,UDOincluding land and are financed for $95,U8Uwith 20 year mortgages with no interest. rhe remaining equity is provided by 500 hours of sweat equity from the benefiting household which may include volunteer assistance from other family members and friends. Habitat candidates are selected based on need, income, credit, and willingness to attend the instruction classes and provide the sweat equity hours. Habitat's volunteer base includes between 500-1,000 persons a year of which about 50q6 are annual regulars drawn from throughout the state. Volunteers pay $150 per person to support the pject and Habitat's overhead costs. Houses are sometimes clustered where land allows, but typically scattered throughout Yakima. Sites are provided by Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS), Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), Washington State Department of Community Development (CTED), and others - typically without cost. ONDS also acquires sites with deteriorated buildings, clears the structures, than donates the land. The Washington State Housing Trust Fund recently provided a $500,000 grant to Habitat and OIC to acquire land for Marvin Gardens, a cluster development and the only site acquisition that Habitat and OIC have ventured to date. ONDS typically provides the land and construction loan, and second mortgages for 20% of loan value behind 80Y6 first mortgages provided by a number of local banks including Banner, Central Valley, Golf Savings Banks, and Yakima Federal Savings & A typical Habitat house will cost about $120,000 including $30,000 in land, $80,000 in building costs, and S10,000 in administration costs. On a typical $120,000 financing package, $30,000 will be provided by ONDS in the land donation, $40,000 from a local bank loan for S4U,OOOfinanced over 15 years on a fixed rate set by the marketplace, and $40,000 by Habitat in contributions from local sources including gifts -in-kind from corporations, churches, donors, foundations, and volunteers, and $10,000 in administrative costs paid by Habitat and Yakima County. The house will be sold for $95,000 with a $30,000 soft -second from ONDS that is forgiven at 5% per year over 20 years. The house is then financed on a no interest 20 year mortgage. Habitat operates ReStore - a used construction materials outlet selling donated materials, equipment, seconds, mis-shipments, and other items. ReStore, which has been in operation 7 years, is operated by 2 full-time staff and volunteers, and grosses about $350,000 a year which is used to provide Habitat's administrative and overhead costs.. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 84 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Table 37: Yakima Valle Partners Habitat for Humanit Pro ects 901 North 10th Avenue 1 903 North 10th Avenue 1 1319 Jerome 1 1Z17Cherry Avenue 1 1314 Jerome 1 1117 Jerome 1 | 1217 Jerome 1 1611 Willow 1 1613 Willow 1 811 North 24th Avenue 1 2002 Swan . 1 1206 McKinley 1 807 Cornell 1 | 508 East R Street 1 1113 North Naches 1 1115 North Naches 1 602 North 8th Street � 1 � 604 North 8th Street 1 608 North 8«` Street 1 �� 304 North , Street 1 , � 401 North 7th Street 1 302 North 10th Street * 3O7North 9th Street 1 303 North 9th Street 1 907 East Spruce 1 5USSouth 4th Street 1 404 South 6m Street 1 411 South 6th Street 1 403 South 6th S�neet � 1 716 South 7th Street 1 714 South 8th Street 1 712 South 7th Street 1 714 South 7th Street 1 814 South 8th Street 1 816 South 8th SLreet 1 606 South 12th Street 1 x 916South 7^ Street 1 1112 South 7th Street 1 1110 South 9th Street 1 ' 900 South 7th Street 1 | 902 South 7th Street 1 904 South 7th Street 1 906 South 7th Street 1 910 South 6m Street 1 911 South Naches 1 1015 South Naches . t '11O7South Naches 1109 South Naches 1 | 1109 South 6th Street 1 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 85 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 1009 South 6th Street 1 1007 South 6th Street 1 1313 1/2South 6th Street 1 1313 South 6th Street 1 1315 South 6th Street 1 1315 YtSouth 6m Street 1 1303 South 7th Street 1 1302 South 7th Street 1 1304 South 7th Street 1 Subtotal in Yakima Subtotal elsewhere Total 58 68 126 Yakima Valley Partners goal is to increase home production from 4 per year to about 8 per year by the year 2014 of which between 5O-6096 would be located within Yakima depending on land and site availability. Self -Help Housing Office of Industrialization Center (OIC) - is a non-profit organization providing community services through federal, state and local agencies from locations in Mount Vernon, Moses Lake, Pasco, Sunnyside, Ellensburg, Roslyn, Seattle, Wenatchee, and Yakima since 1971. [)l['srnlss|on is to promote human services, economic development, and affordable housing. OIC hosts AmeriCorps teams that serve throughout Yakima County. One team builds new affordable homes for first time and low-income homeowners averaging about 5- 6 houses per year throughout Yakima County. Material costs are funded by ¢600,000 in annual HOME funds that are projected to remain constant through the year 2014 and Washington State Housing Trust Fund second mortgages. Sites are generally provided by Yakima's ONDS through donation. OIC teams also work on a variety of community service projects with Yakima's ONDS including senior housing restoration, disabled housing ramp building, numerous team building exercises, and graffiti clean-up activities. The team hasa site with OIC of Washington's Home Owner program and another with Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity. OIC's weatherization programs reduce energy costs for low-income renter and owner households including households living in a house, mobile home, duplex, or apartment building. Eligible households include those whose income does not exceed 13S96offederal poverty income levels, and/or where one household member receives Supplement Security Income (SSI). Weatherization services are offered at no cost to qualifying homeowners, services offered to renters may require up to a 50% contribution from the property owner. Since 2002, OIC has weatherized over 897 homes including 461 single family of 1-3 units, 134 multifamily of over 4+ units each, and 302 mobile homes in households with over 1,157 children, 236 seniors, and 110 disabled individuals. OIC also provides Farmworker Housing Assistance Program (HAP) with temporary, short-term, and emergericy housing assistance including rent, security deposits, utility payments, and case management services. The Emergency Housing Assistance 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 86 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction (EHA) program provides vouchers for motels and other short -tem housing assistance with evictions and shut-off notices, and case management. Land Trust — the Yakima VaIIey Community Land Trust was formed in June 2008 by citizens concerned about rising land prices and diminishing supplies of affordable housing in and around Yakima, Washington. The Yakima Valley Community Land Trust has a vision of serving not only potential home owners below the Area Median Income, but also individuals with developmental disabilities and individuals who have been homeless who are exiting the Homeless Continuum of Care. Next Step Housing of Special Needs Populations - has been providing quality, clean and sober transitional and permanent housing to residents of the Yakima Valley since 1991. Next Step provides housing, case management, and clinical treatment services for special needs populations including the developmentally disabled and homeless. Next Step is the only non-profit housing provider in the state that combines individuals recovering from substance abuse and their families with individuals and families living with Developmental Disabilities. Next Step Housing is the first agency in Washington to successfully combine these two special needs populations experiencing similar levels of social marginalization. Because both groups experience similar marginalization in society, this integration of special needs populations has proven successful. Over 5096 of Next Step residents are homeless when they first apply for housing with 70% earning below 30% of the area median income (AMI). All Next Step properties are Alcohol and Drug Free Communities and all properties enjoy zero tolerance for alcohol and drug abuse. Residents who return to chemical dependency are moved out immediately. Regular random observed urine -analysis and Breathalyzer checks ensure the safety of all residents. In June of 1997, Next Step Housing contracted with the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) to design and provide case management services for YHA Families forSelf- Sufficiency Program. In 1999, the Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) certified Next Step as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). In 2000, Next Step Housing purchased the Lamplighter Apartments, a 16 -unit building consisting of 12 one -bedroom and 4 two-bedroom units with a four -unit set- a -side for adults living with Developmental Disabilities. These family units were the first and only affordable, independent, permanent, clean and sober housing in Washington serving households with children. In November of 2007, Next Step Housing opened 9ear_Free Place, the firstnew construction, tax -credit development in the organization's 17 year history. Pear Tree combines financing from 10 public agencies, private foundations and non -profits including the Washington State Housing Finance Commission, the Washington State Housing Trust Fund, the City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services, Yakima County Human Services, the WCRA, Impact Capital, the Home Depot Foundation, Green Communities and the National Endowment for the Arts. Pear Tree's three-bedroom tovvhhornes are some of the few apartments in Washington targeting large families with children in an Alcohol and Drug Free Community. Pear Tree is also the first sustainable design and construction in all of 3-5 ¥ear Strategic Plan 87 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Yakima County to meet the Enterprise Green Communities Criteria. Eight non-profit allies collaborated including Next Step Housing, the Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing (ORFH), Enterprise Progress in the Community (EPIC) and Pomegranate Center. This year, Pear Tree P|acewasaFinalist&mtheAffordy8»le Housing Finance Reader's Choice Awards in the category of Special Needs Housing. Next Step is currently constructing Pear Tree Place Phase D which will include the first clean and sober 4 -bedroom units in Washington managed by State Operated Living Alternatives (SOLA). These 4 SOLA homes will house people living with severe Development Disabilities staffed by DSHS professional caregivers on site, in each unit, providing care 24/7. Lease up is scheduled for September, 2009. Table 38: Next Step Housing Inventory 2009 Lamplighter Apartments 16 406-408 North Naches 1 -bedroom 12 2 -bedroom 4 set-aside developmental disability (1) Sommerset A aotmments 45 711 West Walnut studio � 1 -bedroom 20 2 -bedroom 20 set-aside homeless (11) commercial units (2) community playground (1) Clean House A antmmentm 22 220 North 2nd Street studios 22 set-aside devetopmental disability (1) Pear Tree Place I Under Development Pear Tree Place II 24 1 -bedroom 8 2 -bedroom � 7 3 -bedroom townhouse 11 set-aside developmental disability (8) set-aside homeless (6) Under Development Pear Tree Place II 24 Transitional housing for adults in Denney House y recovery 414 South 4m Street beds Chambers House 8 31 Kenney Drive beds 8 Triumph House Special Needs Populations - Triumph Treatment Services is a comprehensive non-profit 501 (c) (3) agency serving Yakima County with chemical dependency treatment, outpatient, residential, and housing services. It is multifaceted, providing a continuum of care for chemically dependent individuals and their families. Trium ph Treatment Services provides assessment, intensive outpatient services, stabilization group, relapse prevention, family programs, residential treatment, ]-5Y�ar5Lrategic Plan 88 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 -bedroom 8 4 -bedroom townhouse 4 set-aside homeless (6) Transitional housing for adults in Denney House y recovery 414 South 4m Street beds Chambers House 8 31 Kenney Drive beds 8 Triumph House Special Needs Populations - Triumph Treatment Services is a comprehensive non-profit 501 (c) (3) agency serving Yakima County with chemical dependency treatment, outpatient, residential, and housing services. It is multifaceted, providing a continuum of care for chemically dependent individuals and their families. Trium ph Treatment Services provides assessment, intensive outpatient services, stabilization group, relapse prevention, family programs, residential treatment, ]-5Y�ar5Lrategic Plan 88 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction alcohol and drug information school (ADIS), and housing in Yakima, Washington. Services are certified and licensed by the Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse (DASA) and the Department of Health (DOH). Founded in 1961 as a small outpatient alcoholism treatment center, the agency has, since then, added 3 residential chemical dependency treatment facilities for Iow- income, clean and sober, and case managed: a 78 -bed facility for men in Buena, Washington; a 32 -bed facility for women in Yakima; and another 60 -bed facility for women and their children in Kennewick. Triumph currently has 1 outreach program - the Parent -Child Assistance Program (P -CAP) which utilizes 7 paraprofessionals to seek out and support at -risk women and their children under a best practices model. Table 39: Triumph House Inventory 2009 Riel House — All Women's beds 1408 West Yakima Avenue beds 32 Riel House is a specialized long-term primary intensive inpatient treatment program offering an all -women's residence where mothers can keep their young children with them while they tackle addiction problems. Women living at Riel House receive treatment for their chemical dependency and are able to keep their babies and other children under age 6 with them. The program's aim is to provide a healthy lifestyle and chemical -free environment for women and their children while learning new coping and parenting skills. Handling and enjoying social and recreational situations without the use of alcohol and drugs is emphasized. Women may enter treatment at* Riel House at any time during their pregnancies. Women are also eligible for treatment at Riel House if they are actively parenting children under age 6 or if they are seeking return of their children under age 6 from protective custody (CPS). Riel House exclusively serves women and is staffed by specially trained counselors. Therapy is an ongoing part of living at Riel House and includes Domestic Violence Classes, Nicotine Cessation Classes, Art Therapy Classes, Weekly Nursing Visits to thefacility/Psychologist Appointments, and Early Learning through "CircIe of Success" Parenting Classes. Overall, Triumph Treatment has 134 units of various kinds of housing that serve individuals and families in transitional and permanent housing in addition to a short- term shelter for families. Triumph has several contracts which incorporate outreach and intensive case management. These facilities range from inpatient residential short term or long term treatment programs through case managed or independent housing in graduated steps. Many of the facilities offer housing through project based vouchers. These vouchers require residents to maintain specific life style standards asa condition of their residency. Residents using Project Based VuucherscangraduatetoTenant Based Vouchers after successfully completing 1year ofthe program. At that point, they can move out to the general community with additional help for housing support as well as case management. By gradually returning to normal living, the recovery becomes integrated into a person's life. Here are some of the facilities that serve as stepping stones on the road to recovery. Triumph purchased Roosevelt Place, a former nursing home, in 2003 that now houses Kids Inc, a large licensed child care center nd women/children's housing facility. There is also a commercial kitchen at this site, which serves the child care 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 89 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction center and one of the residential programs with hot, home -style meals, along with offering some catering services to the community. Triumph Treatment Services in part of the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) Pacific Northwest Node which allows them to participate in research projects and selected clinical trials. Triumph was chosen as a community partner because of their comprehensive programming, experience with research and interest in transfer of research to practice. Public Housing Strategy (91.210) 1. Describe the public housing agency's strategy to serve the needs of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families residing in the jurisdiction served by the public housing agency (including families on the public housing and section 8 tenant -based waiting list), the public housing agency's strategy for addressing the revitalization and restoration needs of public housing projects within the jurisdiction and improving the management and operation of such public housing, and the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living environment ofentnerne|y low-income, low-income, and moderate families residing in public housing. 2. Describe the manner in which the plan of the jurisdiction will help address the needs of public housing and activities it will undertake to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership. (NAHA Sec. 105 (b)(11) and (91.215 (k)) 3. If the public housing agency is designated as "troubled" by HUD or otherwise is performing poorly, the jurisdiction shall describe the manner in which it will provide financial or other assistance in improving its operations to remove such designation. (NAHA Sec. 105 (g)) 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Public Housing Strategy response: The Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) plays an integral part in meeting the Consolidated Plan objectives. YHA funding is obtained through the Capital Fund Grant under a separate public process, and from other grants and local funds. The Capital Fund Grant is a separate HUD program that Yakima does notoversee. Yakima has no troubled public housing agencies. The YHA is a very well run agency excelling in providing housing for Iow-income and special needs households. The YHA includes annual budgets in their Annual Agency Plan for management and operational improvements. These monies are used to fund a Preventive Maintenance Inspection Support Program, capital improvements, community policing, computer software purchase, and other management improvements that support public housing, including staff training. For complete information on planned physical improvements to the living environment of public housing units and sites contact the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) at www.yak-pha.org for their Agency Plan. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 90 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction PUBLIC HOUSING Goal 1: Preserve Public Housing as a viable and attractive housing resource for the low-income citizens of the community. Strategy 1: Strive to reduce and prevent drug and criminal activity in public housing neighborhoods and projects. Objectives: • Offer drug prevention programs that include additional law enforcement services provided by the Yakima Police Department. Apply annually for grants to fully fund these programs. • Hold Neighborhood Block Watches on-site at all the Public Housing complexes and initiate discussion on security and alternatives for empowerment. Strategy 2: Assist public housing residents, particularly older residents and residents with disabilities, maintain an independent lifestyle. Objectives: • Renew the YHA's contract with the Northwest Regional Council in order to staff the Resident Services Coordinator position, which provides referrals to services and helps residents obtain assistance. • Offer regularly scheduled, affordable, and specialized transportation for shopping, medical appointments, and other needs to residents of YHA Public Housing through the Yakima Transit, in an effort to help them maintain their independence. • Provide memberships and transportation to youth organizations for all children in public housing between the ages of 5 and 18. Strategy 3: Preserve YHA senior housing primarily as public housing for senior citizens. Objectives: • Continue YHA's admission preferences that give disabled people an opportunity for Section 8 assistance and elderly people a direct access to public housing facilities. ▪ Develop alternative housing for the disabled. Goal 2: Facilitate greater resident self-determination and self-sufficiency. Strategy 1: Encourage participation of public housing residents in the management of their public housing through the Public Housing Resident Initiatives Program. Objectives: • Assure that residents representing Yakima public housing developments participate in Resident Council meetings. • Invite residents of all Yakima public housing units to attend Board of Commissioners' meetings to give input and to provide suggestions regarding the operation, policies, and other matters relating to YHA business. • Hold monthly meetings between a YHA Operations staff representative and the Resident Council in order to address any mutual issues or concerns. • Post all regular staff openings in public housing family complexes to encourage application by residents. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 91 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Strategy 2: Encourage public housing residents to achieve self- sufficiency. Objectives: • Through the Family Self -Sufficiency Program, offer housing assistance to leverage public and private sector resources that can help public and assisted housing residents will realize economic independence. Strategy 3: Increase the availability of affordable housing to residents of Yakima. Objectives: • To help meet the demand for affordable housing, begin developing plans for additional family housing units and elderly/disabled housing units over the next 5 years using Low -Income Housing Tax Credits, Historic Preservation Tax Credits, taxable bonds, and other innovative housing development techniques that increase the supply of affordable housing. Goal 3: Provide housing stability within an overall context of supportive services for homeless persons with mental illness. Strategy 1: Reassess the community's ability to respond to the needs of its homeless mentally ill population, focusing on housing stability as a component of overall care. Objectives: • Support plans to construct a multifamily housing facility that will serve homeless mentally people. • Work with area mental health providers and other potential service sponsors to provide supportive services to the residents of planned housing developments. • Collaborate with other service providers to assess current programs to determine gaps and the ability of these programs to address the needs of target populations. Strategy 2: Secure additional funding for housing assistance for the homeless and mentally ill. Objectives: • Collaborate with providers and agencies to determine who can provide needed assistance to the target populations and assist in their application for and receipt of funding. Offer the outreach resources, and provide on-going services to mental health providers or service agencies who are best equipped to reach the target populations. • Through collaboration, prepare and submit an application for additional Shelter Plus Care funding through HUD Barriers to Affordable Housing (91.210 (e) and 91.215 (f)) . Explain whether the cost of housing or the incentives to develop, maintain, or improve affordable housing are affected by public policies, particularly those of the local jurisdiction. Such policies include tax policy affecting land and other property, land use controls, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limits, and policies that affect the return on residential investment. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 92 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 2. Describe the strategy to remove or ameliorate negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing, except that, if a State requires a unit of general local government to submit a regulatory barrier assessment that is substantially equivalent to the information required under this part, as determined by HUD, the unit of general local government may submit that assessment to HUD and it shall be considered to have complied with this requirement. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Barriers to Affordable Housing response: Yakima Countywide planning policies establish a countywide framework from which county and municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted. Within Yakima County the term "affordable housing" applies to the adequacy of the housing stock to fulfill the housing needs of a|| economic segments of the population. The underlying assumption is that the marketplace will guarantee adequate housing for those in the upper economic brackets, but that some combination of appropriately zoned and, regulatory incentives, financial subsidies, and innovative planning techniques will be necessary to make adequate housing provisions for the needs of middle and lower income persons. Housing is a crucial element o[Yakirna's 2006 Comprehensive Plan and 2008 Zoning Ordinance Update. Yakima developed an affordable housing strategy for its Visioning 2010 process in the early 90's. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element continues the goals, policies and initiatives contained in the 1997 Plan and the affordable housing strategy. Yakinno's 2006 Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element includes the following requirements in accordance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA): (a) an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs; (b) a statement of goals, policies and objectives for the preservation, improvement and development of housing; (c) identification of sufficient land for housing, including but not limited to, government -assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multi -family housing, group homes and foster care facilities; (d) adequate provisions for existing and projected housing needsfor all economic segments of the community. A major objective of the Housing Element is to encourage development of affordable housing throughout the Yakima Urban Area. It includes: • an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs; • a statement of the goals, policies and objectives for the development of housing; o identification of sufficient /and for housing, including, but not limited to, government -assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, group homes and foster care facilities; and • adequate provisions for existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 93 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING BARRIERS — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and 2008 Zoning Update contain the following policies and actions meant to resolve barriers to affordable housing: Land Use Goals and Policies Goals and Policies serve 2 principal purposes: guide development decisions in the Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA), such as rezone requests, development reviews, etc. or to outline specific actions or programs that implement the Comprehensive Plan. The following goals in the Land Use Element ofthe 2006 Comprehensive Plan refer to housing: Goal 3.1: Provide for a broad distribution of housing in Yakima that meets the affordability and neighborhood design needs of the public Policies 3.1.1 High Density Residential 3.1.1.1 Development shall be at an overall density of 12 dwelling units per acre or more. Recommended zones include: Two -Family Residential (R-2) and Multi -Family Residential (R-3), Professional Business District (B-1), and Central Business District (CBD). 3.1.1.2 Permitted housing types include townhouses, condominium, multi -family and manufactured housing. 3.1.1.3 Provide high-density residential as a transitional use between commercial/office and medium density residential areas. 3.1.1.4 Development shall be located along arterials or collector streets and should have good access to public transit. 3.1.1.5 Sidewalks shall be provided in the development site with connections to existing and proposed pedestrian sidewalk systems. 3.1.1.6 Connect schools, parks and meeting places with neighborhoods through a system of pedestrian network such as sidewalks, greenways and pathways. 3.1.1.7 Development shall be encouraged to minimize impacts on surface water. Low impact practices are encouraged. 3.1.2 Residential Planned Development (Residential PD) 3.1.2.1 Residential PD can be developed if the size of a development exceeds 20 acres. 3.1.2.2 Residential PD allows new development to provide a mixture of housing sizes and prices and to provide incentives for developers to include affordable units in higher cost developments. ].1.2.] Residential PD requires a new development to include open space, recreation areas, trails, sidewalks, streetlights, landscaping and underground utilities in exchange for site design flexibility and density bonus. This allows neighborhood commercial uses to be located within a Residential PD. Goal 3.2: Build sustainable new neighborhoods Policies: ' 3.2.1 In large-scale residential projects, encourage'development through Residential Planned [)eve|opnnent(Residenba| PD) zone. 3.2.2 Provide incentives such as allowing developers a density bonus in exchange for 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 94 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction continue to protect environmentally critical areas within a Residential - PD development. 3.2.3 Innovative design, such as Cluster Development (CD) and other Low Impact Development ideas are encouraged to develop within the Residential PD zone. Goal 3.3: Preserve existing neighborhoods U*xxUicUes, 3.3.1 Preserve the character of neighborhoods such as historical character, architecture, natural features and layout. 3.3.2 Ensure that new development is compatible in scale, style, density, and aesthetic quality to an established neighborhood. 3.3.3 Integrate historic preservation by ensuring new construction and development integrate the existing historical buildings and landscaping to help create a distinctive identity for the neighborhood. Goal 3.4: Restore old neighborhoods and revitalize declining neighborhoods The restoration and revitalization of older neighborhoods will increase property values, provide housing close to work and preserve historic structures. Since older neighborhoods are already served with roads, sidewalks, utilities, schools, parks and landscaping, upgrading ofthese services and features is important to keeping the neighborhoods desirable and livable. Many policies under the goal "Build Sustainable New Neighborhoods" and the goal "Preserve Existing Neighborhoods" can also be applied to improving old and declining neighborhoods. In addition, the following policies also apply: Policies: 3.4.1 Encourage preventive maintenance and appropriate reinvestment in older and declining neighborhoods. Improve the infrastructure including, but not Iimited to: park improvements, sidewalks, alleys, street maintenance, street lighting, trees and other Iandscaping within the right-of-way. 3.4.2 Maintain neighborhood upkeep through strict City code compliance. 3.4.3 In residential areas where commercial and residential uses are heavily mixed, encourage the establishment of neighborhood commercial services and foster mixed uses including retail, office and apartments. This is particularly important in areas on South Second Street and South Third Street north of East Race Street. Discourage commercial uses that are non -neighborhood related. 3.4.4 Maintain and preserve the existing single-family residential neighborhoods of Northeast, Southeast and Barge/Chestnut areas of the City. 3.4.5 Minimize the overcrowding/over-parking issues in old neighborhoods through: • encouraging the conversion of single-family detached structures to multi- family structures through zoning control. Limit, and in some cases restrict, rezoning of R-1 to R-2 for individual single-family detached structures. • encouraging development of multi -family projects as infill or redevelopment projects in old neighborhoods as a means to provide affordable housing. � encouraging the conversion of residential houses to offices in areas that serve as transitional uses between commercial and residential, particularly along North Second Street north of Lincoln Avenue in the Northeast Neighborhood area. • encouraging cohesiveness among neighborhood residents and community, and encourage interaction between neighborhoods and the government. 3.4.6 Preserve and restore historic houses within the neighborhoods, using private and public partnership when possible. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 95 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 3.4.7 Allow home occupations that would not generate excessive traffic, create parking problems, or degrade the livability or appearance of the neighborhood. Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element implemented the following actions necessary to realizing affordable housing. Available Land Housing requirements - Yakima's Comprehensive Plan estimates the Yakima wastewater service area will have a range of population between 93,815 and 101,499 persons by the year 2025. To plan for the maximum growth, approximately 4,000 to 6,400 new housing units will be needed to accommodate the growth over the next 20 years. Yakima's Urban Growth Area (UGA) is projected to have a nevv population between 29,000 and 37,000 persons by the year 2025 and will add approximately 9,300 to 15,0001 new housing units within the sameperiod. Yakima's land inventory - consists of 86% of the residential /and developed for low-density residential; 6% for medium density residential; and another 8% for high-density residential. The current average density in Yakima is estimated to be 5.7 dwelling units per acre. Yakima's Comprehensive Plan predicts there will be a demand for land suitable for medium and high-density residential uses to provide more affordable housing for low to medium income families in the next 20 years. Land supply - based on an assumption that 60% of the new housing units will be developed for low-density residential, 15% for medium density residential, and 25% for high-density residential through 2025, Yakima will need a total of 710 to 1,144 acres of vacant land for future residential development based on the 2 population projections. Yakima's Urban Growth Area (UGA) will need a total of 1,650 to 2,660 acres of vacant land within the same period Based on the year 2025 residential projections, the demand for housing will consume 2596-4096 of the gross developable land within Yakima and 33%-53% of the land within Yakima's Urban Growth Area (UGA). The projections indicate that there will be sufficient land to accommodate the future growth of the Yakima Urban Growth Area within the next 20 years. Residential Zoning Future Land Use Map (FLUM) - contained within the 2006 Comprehensive PIan proposed the following residential land use designations: • Low Density Residential - consisting primarily of free-standing single-family residences of a density less than 7.0 dwelling units per acre. This is considered the lowest possible residential density that can efficiently support public services. • Medium Density Residential - characterized by a mixture of single-family detached residences and duplexes, with a variety of other housing types at a residential density ranging between 7.0 and 11.0 dwelling units per acre. • High Density Residential - multi -family residential development including apartments, condominiums and townhouses, containing 12 or more dwelling units per acre. A limited range of other mixed land uses may be permitted, such as some professional offices and community services. • Mixed Use Planned Development (MU -PD) - an overlay district to recognize and accommodate the changing commercial/residential marketplace by allowing 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 96 Version 2.0 ]ur|sd|Ction commercial and residential mixed uses that create an opportunity for the redevelopment of underdeveloped or redeveloping sites into more intensive uses in the core of the urban area. Itis intended that development on designated sites would be implemented in conjunction with the approval ofa Master Planned Deve|oprnent(MPD)app||caMon.TheMU-PDznnew|||a||ovvornixtureofindustria|, commercial, and residential uses within a framework that protects existing uses and provides compatibility through a Master Plan Development (MPD) process. The Mixed Use Planned Development (MU -PD) allows flexibility in the uses permitted for properties. Zoning Classifications - the 2008 (Jrban Area Zoning Ordinance (UAZO) and Zoning Map determine the actual use that can be made of land within Yakima and Yakima's Urban Area. Four new zones were proposed as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update process, 3 of which refer to housing: • Residential Planned Development (R -PD) zone - can be applied to a development parcel upon request by the oWner and upon submittal of a master site plan. • Cluster Development (CD) - and other innovative residential development can be implemented in any residential designation through an approval of R -PD rezoning. A Cluster Development (CD) designs development to fit the natural landscape and protect critical areas. It supports the goals of respecting nature, protecting hillsides and wetlands, preserving open space, and minimizing the Ioss of woodlands and wildlife habitats. • Mixed Use Planned Development (MU -PD) - allows a greater mix of uses than the "purer" residential, commercial or industrial planned development zones. Developers of Regional Commercial or large size commercial or industrial designated lands could propose industrial, commercial, residential, open space, recreational or virtually any combination of uses according to an approved master plan. MU -PD will be a market-driven land development concept where the proponent may design a plan around new and creative design themes, with Yakima having review authority and the abiliy to attach conditions to mitigate impacts. The process, as with other Planned Oeve|opnlentzones, would involve significant public outreach. Affordable Housing Solutions Affordability is whether or not an adequate number of housing units are available and are also affordable to all economic segments of the community. In order to meet federal housing affordability standards, housing costs (excluding utilities) should not exceed 30% of gross household income. Unfortunately, the number of housing units that are available and affordable within the Yakima Urban Area is in short supply. Yakima developed plans and policies to provide safe, clean and affordable housing for all economic segments of the city through the creation of public/private partnerships for affordable housing development and conservation and rehabilitation of the existing housing stock. Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) has historically addressed the existing housing stock in the central and eastern city neighborhoods where traditionally very-Iow and low-income persons live. The federally designated CDBG Target Area primarily encompasses neighborhood areas north of Mead Avenue and east of 16th Avenue. In 2006, City Council considered a possible tax incentive program for the downtown area along Yakima Avenue (Lincoln to Wainut, Fourth Avenue to Sixth Street), where increases in tax assessments will be deferred for up to 10 years on properties 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 97 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction redeveloped for affordable housing. The proposed downtown housing area extended from roughly Fourth Avenue to Sixth Street and from Lincoln Avenue to Walnut Street. The parameters of the area may be changed as needed. STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING BARRIERS — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT The 2006 Comprehensive Plan Housing Element outlined the following goals and policies concerning affordable housing in Yakima. Goal 5.1: Encourage diverse and affordable housing choices Policies 5.1.1 Continually monitor affordable housing needs and assist in providing locations for affordable housing as necessary to meet this need. 5.1.2 Support an inventory of potential sites for affordable housing development and redevelopment. 5.1.3 Encourage affordable housing developrnent. 5.1.4 Encourage a range of affordable homeownership options. 5.1.5 Encourage the provision of fair share housing opportunities to all economic segments and mixed uses for infill developments. 5,1.6 Provide administrative and technical support to housing projects that complement existing programs. 5.1.7 Encourage good faith efforts that the City of Yakima and other Iocal governments not impose regulations that may constitute barriers to affordable housing availability, and appropriate compatible residential densities. 5.1.8 Support programs to improve existing housing stock. Goal 5.2: Provide homeownership opportunities Policies 5.2.1 Encourage various educational and financial assistance strategies to expand homeownership opportunities. 5.2.2 Work with existing housing providers and private lenders to provide homebuyer education seminars for potenti& first-time homebuyers; include outreach to current renters. 5.2.3 Work with local lenders to increase financial assistance to first-time homebuyers. 5.2.4 When possible, provide community residents with home maintenance information and housing counseling including financial responsibility of homeownership and budgeting. Goal 5.3: Adopt or revise the city's development standards to increase affordable housing opportunities Policies 5.3.1 Review of existing zoning regulations and consideration of innovative standards that will encourage construction of affordable housing and encourage the participation of neighborhood associations and the development community in this process. 5.3.2 Facilitate small lot sizes, condominiums, clustering and other options that increase the supply of affordable homeownership options. 5.3.3 Assist, when allowable, the conversion of accessory buildings into housing units as a means to increase the supply of affordable housing units and to help existing 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 98 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Goal 5.4: Participate in efforts to maximize the land available for affordable housing in the community Goal 5.5: Preserve and improve existing residential neighborhoods Policies 5.5.1 Stabilize existing viable neighborhoods. 5.5.2 Seek alternatives, when feasible, to demolition and removal of units from housing stock. Goal 5.6: Ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing for persons with special needs Policies 5.6.1 Support development of new units and the operation of existing units for housing persons with special needs. 5.6.2 Support development of programs that offer assistance to persons identified as being homeless. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan Housing Element implemented the following actions necessary to realize affordable housing in Yakima included the following. • Accessory Housing - provisions incorporated in the 2008 Zoning Code Update provide affordable housing and include dwelling units attached or detached from the primary residential units on a single-family parcel. Attached units contained within a single-family home are the most commonly encountered type of accessory dwelling unit. Accessory apartments typically involve the renovation of a garage, basement family room or a similar space in a single-family residence. • Manufactured Housing - provisions in the 2008 Zoning Code Update represent a small but significant housing type that has experienced constant growth, with the exception of 1991, in Yakima's housing inventory increasing 360% between years 1995-2000. This increase can be attributed mostly to annexation of 705 units during the same period, which represented 6496 of the total number of manufactured/mobile home units /1,108 units) citywide. The number of manufactured / mobile home units permitted on residential lots averaged 23.5 per year between years 1990-I000. From January 1990 through December 1995 the number of manufactured home units permitted on individual lots rose by an additional 42 units. An additional 193 units were bulit between years 1995- 2000. Mobile home development decreased by 54% between years 2001 and December 2004. No substantial mobile home development in mobile home parks has occurred since the 1990 Census. lnJune 2OO5Yakima enacted Ordinance 2005-29 concerning regulation of manufactured home placement within the Yakima and amended Yakima Municipal Code section 15.04.120. Effective July 1, 2005, any manufactured home constructed after June 15, 1976 may be sited in the same manner, and subject to the same conditions, as a site built home, provided: • The manufactured home has not been previously titled and is not a"mobile home"; • Is set upon a permanent foundation (concrete or an approved concrete product) which can be either load bearing or decorative; • Complies with all local design standards appflcable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be located; 3-5Year Strategic Plan 99 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Is thermally equivalent to the State energy code; and • Meets all other requirements form designated manufactured home as defined by RCW 35.63.160. The new ordinance did not alter the existing zoning ordinance regulations for the placernent of used ors|ng|ewide manufactured homes. • Maintenance, Rehabilitation and ComservatUxxn-effortsaneimpnrtanLtothe preservation of older housing stock. Structurally substandard rental housing in need ofrenovation typically indicate absentee landlords and renters who may be less inclined to maintain their home and demonstrates the necessity of a renovation/conservation program. Enforcement of minimum maintenance codes has assisted in maintaining a stable housing supply. Preservation of the structural integrity of residential housing is a primary concern in many of the older neighborhoods. The structural condition of existing units is a crucial factor in maintaining an affordable and safe housing stock. The structural condition ofYakirna's housing stock is categorized as: • 1) good, sound condition; • 2) substandard condition - suitable for renovation; and • 3) substandard condition - unsuitable for rehabilitation. Year 3000 Census data on housing conditions for Yakima indicated approximately 15% of the housing stock is structurally substandard and 3096isln need of rehabilitation. Low-income households that are unable to bear the c�st of renovation occupy most of the structurally substandard, older housing stock. Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) has historically assisted in addressing the existing housing stock in the central and eastern city neighborhoods where traditionally very -low and low-income persons live. The federally designated Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Target Area primarily encompasses neighborhood areas north of Mead Avenue and east of 16th Avenue. Housing stock within the CDBG Target Area neighborhoods contains a higher percentage of substandard housing than neighborhoods outside of the Target Area. Yakima's 20 -year program has a history of obtaining private lending dollars to complement housing and urban development funds. The ONDS has rehabilitated 1,500 residential units utilizing these programs. • Housing Agencies - most housing constructed within Yakima is a result of private developers and persons on privately owned land. Housing for very -low and low-income households often requires subsidies from external sources even after the Land Use Map and Zoning Code have allowed for their construction. The Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) provides housing for families with annual incomes O96 -5O96 Average Median Family Income (AMFI); mostly those with incomes of 0%-30% HAMFI. Low-income and low -moderate income families are serviced by ONDS. When the 1997 Comprehensive Plan was adopted, the Yakima Housing Authority (YHA) owned 150 multi -family public housing units located on 11 sites located throughout Yakima. YHA currently has 400 housing units countywide, with a total of 322 housing units available within Yakima boundaries. 3-SYear Strategic Plan 100 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction The Diocese of Yakima Housing Services (DYHS) program has built more than 200 affordable housing units for farm workers and other low-income families in and around Yakima. The Homeless Network is an association of emergency housing providers, service providers, community leaders, and other interested persons or entities concerned about addressing the emergency, transitional and permanent housing needs of the homeless persons and families. The Homeless Network is focused on reducing homelessness in Yakima County by 2014 through the implementation of fundamental changes in both services to the homeless and delivery of needed services to the homeless. This goal will require the coordination of services through a countywide integrated system and multidisciplinary services structure. The Homeless Network currently has a membership of over 45 local agencies. • Group Homes - are defined as "non -institutional group quarters" or as living quarters that house 10 or more unrelated persons living in the unit, such as rooming houses and group homes. Group homes include "community-based homes" providing care and supportive services. Such places include homes for the mentally i||, mentally retarded, and physically handicapped; drug/alcohol halfway houses; communes; and maternity homes. The extent of the housing need for special population groups (present and projected) is based on the anticipated continued growth of the special needs population. In addition, persons with special needs require a range of supportive services in conjunction with affordable housing to ensure independent living. The 1990 Census reported 1,759 persons in Yakima residing in group -quarters increasing to a reported 2,139 persons residing in group -quarters by the 2000 Census. • Foster Care Facilities - foster care services within Yakima are limited to individual family homes and homes licensed to provide foster care in a group setting. There are 103 individual homes licensed by the State of Washington to provide foster care in Yakima. There are 2 family homes licensed to provide foster care in a group environment to address "specific populations". Efforts are underway to license additional caregivers. • Impact Fees - new housing developments increase demands on schools, utilities, parks, and transportation systems to varying degrees. The costs associated with increasing demands for facilities and services (such asruads, schools, parks, police, and fire fighters) can be addressed through impact fees tied to new development. Even though the level of impact fees connected to new residential construction does not reflect the full cost of service and facility impacts, the fees nevertheless add to the cost of providing housing. For low- and moderate -income households, unsubsidized, new residential construction may be prohibitive or require too large a share of their income to buy or rent. State law allows local jurisdictions to provide relief from the imposition of impact fees for affordable housing projects. Yakima has done so in several instances, by using other non-pject based city funding sources. An exception to Yakima's impactfee program does allow the city to waive school impact fees, provided it can be shown 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 101 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction that a housing project, such as a senior living project, will have no impact on schools. ■ Licensing Permits - Yakima is sensitive to the issue of processing time and the costs involved with extended delays. The permitting process is continuously reviewed and changes are made, where appropriate. Yakima recently implemented a procedure to waive certain permit fees for qualified housing projects that provide housing for low-income residents. ■ Extension of Transportation and Utility Service - Yakima's plans to extend major utility service lines have a direct bearing on when and where homes are built. How those extension costs are allocated also impacts the price of homes built in areas where the services are extended. Historically in Yakima, each project developer paid for the extension of needed services and then recovered the cost in new house prices. The 2006 Comprehensive Plan, however, encourages Yakima to be proactive in fully or partially funding utility extension projects in appropriate areas to encourage affordable housing. ■ Fair Housing - HUD requires each local jurisdiction to analyze impediments to fair housing choice. Yakima's ONDS contracted the Fair Housing Center of South Puget Sound, now known as the Fair Housing Center of Washington (FHCW), to perform an Analysis of Impediments required by HUD. Using 2000 Census and other local, state, and federal data sources, the Fair Housing Center of Washington (FHCW) prepared an analysis of demographic, income, housing, and employment data. The Analysis of Impediments targets 5 key areas: ■ Demographic information and resources, ■ Complaints and allegations of discrimination in housing, ■ Impediments to fair housing, ■ A review of current public and private actions to address housing discrimination, and ■ A listing of impediments and recommendations for action. The Analysis of Impediments identified the following impediments to fair housing choice in Yakima: ■ Housing discrimination primarily affects persons of color, the disabled, and families with children, ■ Home Mortgage Lending data shows Native Americans, African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to be denied financing or obtain sub -prime mortgages, and ■ The public at large has limited knowledge of protected classes, fair housing laws and the resources available to them. The Analysis of Impediments recommends Yakima maintain its commitment to affirmatively further fair housing. Implementation of the following recommendations will strengthen Yakima's interest in fair housing activities and alleviate remaining impediments to fair housing choice: ■ Expand current education and outreach efforts, 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 102 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Continue on-going enforcement activities, • Target homeownership and lending marketing to African American, Native American and Hispanic households, and • Ensure implementation of current housing and human services strategies. AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT In addition to the goals and policies, zoning code updates, and other implementation measures, Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) has instituted the foliowing actions to conserve and realize affordable housing: Housing Programs • FTH Assistance Program - provides affordable homes for qualified first time homebuyers. Applicants who have a good credit rating, no current judgments and are low to moderate income may receive a partial deferment on their home loan of upto$3O,OOO. • Down Payment Assistance Program (DPA) - provides financial assistance of up to $4,000 for down payment and closing costs associated with qualified first-time homebuyers. Buyer Qualifications • Applicants' family income must be 80% or Iess of the area median income. • Applicants must be first-time homeowners (not having owned a horne in the last 3 years or a displaced homeowner). ~ Applicant must complete homeownership training through available Washington State Housing FinanceCommission approved classes prior to closing. • Applicants work with a realtor to select home and lender financing. Property Qualifications • Home must meet de (evidenced by FHA/VA or other inspection) or buyer may obtain private financing to include rehabilitation cost. ~ Home must be owner -occupied or vacant at least 90 days (city will supply certification for owner to sign) or a current tenant may purchase if qualified. ONDS Down Payment Assistance is a deferred loan at 0% interest payable if home is sold within 5 years of purchase. After 5 years this financing becomes a grant. • Senior/Disabled Persons Home Repair Program - was established over 20 years ago providing an average grant af approximately ¢2,500 per home with a lifetime benefit limit. Due to limited funding not all repairs may qualifyif the cost is found excessive to complete. All areas in need of repair are evaluated during the initial home inspection with health, safety and weatherization-related repairs given the highest priority. Homeowners must be at 80% or below Federal Median Income (FMI) guidelines and asset levels must be $10,000 or below, not including the home or primary vehicle. Repair assistance is also available for approved emergency home repairs. This program is limited to specific types of repairs with a $500 repair limit. Yakima strongly supports preserving neighborhoods and provides this service at no cost to qualified low-income senior/disabled homeowners. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 103 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Exterior Paint Program - is special program also available to qualified homeowners to paint the exteriors of their homes. Volunteers from Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity provide the volunteer labor and ONDS provides the qualified applicants, supervision and materials needed to complete the jobs. This program stretches limited resources by using donated labor to improve neighborhoods one house at a time. All program applicants must be 55 years of age or older or disabled as defined by Social Security guidelines. (There is no age limit for qualified disabled homeowners.) The applicant must also own or be purchasing a home and live in it on a year round basis (rental property does not qualify). • Neighborhood Clean-Up/Improvement Pmogramm-prov|des.fundsboassist neighborhoods in correcting Municipal Code violations that have resulted in the issuance of a citation from a Yakima Code Compliance Officer. ONDS will provide a match in dollars to assist in the total cost of abatement of a violation up to a maximum of $500. The program is only available to use one time per resident. • Homeownership Through New Construction Program - was implemented in 1998 to provide newly constructed homes in the city limits for low to medium - income first-time homebuyers. The program provides set-aside funds to assist the developer and the homebuyer. • Senior/Disabled Exterior Paint Program - provides professional painting by a licensed, bonded contractor, who scrapes and cleans the existing surfaces free of loose and chipping paint. Paint colors are chosen by the individual homeowners and the paint is applied by individual local volunteers as well as volunteers from such agencies as Yakima Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity and several local churches. • Single Family Rehabilitation Program - provides funds to assist low to moderate -income homeowners in home rehabilitation. The Single Family Rehabilitation Program will bring a home up to current local codes, and/or address housing needs to meet family size. • The applicant must be below 80% of the current Federal Median Income Guidelines. • The home is to be located in Yakima. • Home must be owner occupied. • Homeowner must have property insured. • Homes must pass visual assessment for deterJorated paint. • Applicant must not have filed bankruptcy with the last 3 years and have accounts owing in collection. ° Applicant must by a US Citizen or have Permanent Resident status. • Applicant's total debt income must not exceed 4096 of monthly income. Community Service/Economic Development • Public/Community Service Program - provides funds to existing or new organizations, to create or expand programs focused in target area community services and eligible neighborhood improvements. (FMD no • Economic Development - funds are used to continue to promote Economic Development Program activities to address the need for sustainable employment opportunities. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 104 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Public Facilities - program provides funds to assist Yakima departments on eligible CDBG Target Area projects. Such projects are addition or replacement of capital items, particularly in essential services areas like Parks and Recreation. Projects must benefit low and moderate -income residents and include, but are not limited to, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or installation of public facilities and improvements. • Tenaynt/LandUord Counseling - program provides assistance to either tenants or landlords in their disputes. Printed material is available at ONDS offices at 112 South 8th Street or an applicant can call 575-6101 to discuss any situation in tenant/landlord dealings. ONDS cannot give legal advice but can explain steps to help reach agreement or supply phone number for further help. • Graffiti Program — every April ONDS purchases paint, brushes, buckets and other supplies, and then, with the help of local paint contractors, volunteers to through pre -designated sections of Yakima and paint over graffiti. • Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) - 15 a private non- profit, community-based organization that has obtained or intends to obtain staff with the capacity to develop affordable housing for the community it serves. ONDS designates and assists such organizations in qualifying, applying, and securing state and federal grants for affordable housing development. • Lot�qwisition Program - provides mmgram-provides fundsto purchase lots for future project s. Lots must be in the CDBG Target Area and qualify under the following criteria: • Must be residential zone or rezoned. • Must be vacant or have substandard dwellings. • Development must start within 12 months of purchase. • Land may be acres and subdivided into lots. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 105 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction This page intentionally blank 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 106 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction ����� ��s4i •"*PZ�~���� Homeless Needs (91.205 (b) and 91.215 (c)) *Please also refer to the Homeless Needs Table in the Needs.xls workbook PA 414*.4 Homeless Needs— The jurisdiction must provide a concise summary of the nature and extent of homelessness in the jurisdiction, (including rural homelessness and chronic homelessness where applicable), addressing separately the need for facilities and services for homeless persons and homeless families with children, both sheltered and unsheltered, and homeless subpopulations, in accordance with Table 1A. The summary must include the characteristics and needs of Iow-income individuals and children, (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered. In addition, to the extent information is available the plan must include a description of the nature and extent of homelessriess by racial and ethnic group. A quantitative analysis is not required. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Homeless Needs response: EXTENT OF HOMELESSNESS A 10 -Year Plan to End Homelessness in Yakima County was developed by the Partners of the Homeless Network of Yakima County in I005, an association of emergency housing providers, service providers, community leaders, and other interested persons or entities who were concerned about addressing the emergency, transitional, and permanent needs of the horneless. The Homeless Network of Yakima County in association with the Yakima County Department of Human Services has conducted annual Point -in -Time (PIT) surveys of the homeless in Yakima County since 2006 to determine the population of homeless that have the most severe lack of housing opportunities. The number of homeless within any community is not a static number and the number of homeless within Yakima County may be increasing in the current economic climate. The results of the 2009 Point -In -Time (PIT) survey indicated there were 1,314 homeless individuals or 657 homeless households in Yakima County, representing a substantial increase in the numbers of homeless from the previous year (1,055 individuals). Another 317 homeless children were identified by the Yakima School District and DCFS that were not included in the preceding totals. (The number in Yakima declined slightly from 448 in 2008 to 418 in 2009.) The Plan to End Homeessness in Yakima County by 2014 identified 3 main categories of homeless within Yakima County - each with different housing needs. Episodically Homeless - are those who often use the shelter system but are not considered chronically homeless. • Transitionally Homeless - are individuals and families who may only experience 1 episode of homelessriess in their lives. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 107 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Chronically Homeless - are unaccompanied individuals who have had 4 or m�re episodes of homelessness within the past 3 years and have a disabling condition; or, an unaccompanied individu& who has been continuously homeless for a year ormore with a disabling condition. Chronically Homeless individuals, although a small proportion of the total YaWrna Homeless population (7% of the total counted in 2008 or 73 individuals), likely consume the most public resources in terms of contact with the criminal justice system and health system. Nationally, the chronically homeless make upapproximately 2]96ofthe homeless popu|aUon.The Yokinnaconnrnunityrecognized the |nco|chronicaUhomeless population will require long-term housing with associated supportive services and made this a priority within the Plan to End Homelessness in Yakima County by 2014. Description of Yakima County Homeless Population The 2009 PIT surveys were conducted by the combination of interviews at service centers and shelters and street outreach to the places where surveyors were likely to encounter homeless people. Surveys were conducted in Sunnyside, Wapato, ToppenishanUYakinna. Homeless participants received food and supplies at localized staging areas. The 3009 PIT survey was conducted in January 2009 by a combination of interviewing those homeless persons who participated in Project Homeless Connect in Yakima and Sunnyside and through outreach volunteers who sought out those who were not aware of nor chose to participate in the Project Homeless Connect events. Homeless Point -in -Time surveys were also held in Toppenish, and Wapato. Homeless in Yakima County The number of homeless individuals in Yakima County declined slightly from 1,991 homeless in 2005 to 1,055 homeless in 2008 then increased again to 1,314 in 3009. In 2009 PIT surveys 51.5% were rna|e and 48.5% female. The 3009 homeless by age group were: • 11.796 - 0-5 • 16.3% - 6-12 • 8.1% - 13-17 • 3.8% - 18-20 • 6.396721-25 • 14.3% - 26-35 • 14.4% - 36-45 • 12.0% - 46-55 • 5.0% - 56-64 • 1.4% - 65+ • 6.7% - unknown or refused Education levels were: • 19.8% - K-6 • 12.9% - 7-9 • 11.9% - 10-11 • 16.996 - GED or high school diploma = 7.3% - post high school • 21.3% - refused to answer 3-5 ¥ear Strategic Plan 108 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 9.996.- no schooling The percent of homelessthatwere recently released from: • 5.7% - jail a 2.3% - treatment facility ▪ 3.196 -medical hospital � 0.696 - psychiatric hospital � 0.4% - work release • 0.5% - foster care The number of individuals who have been homeless in Yakima County for 1 year or Ionger more than doubled from 164 in 2008 to 410 in 2009 even while those who have been homeless for Iess than 1 month remained relatively stable at 142 in 2008 to 145 in 2009. Following are the reported lengths of time from the 2009 PIT for those who resp�nded: - 15.2% - one month or Iess • 15.4% - 2-3 months • 26.4% - 4-12 months • 43.096 - more than one year The registered increase in the number of long term homelessness may be due to improvements in point -in -time data collection methods for successfully counting individuals who have been homeless ford longer period of time. The riumber of homeless veterans in Yakima County declined from 71 in 3005 to 98 veterans in 2008 to 54 veterans in 2009. According to the 2008 PIT results, only 14 veterans were receiving any sort of Veteran's benefits and 22 of the 98 total in the 2008 PIT Survey have been homeless for|ongerthan 1 year. Disabling Conditions Of those homeless listing a disabling condition in the 2009 PIT Yakima County survey: • 23.3% - listed untreated dental, ▪ 21.1% - alcohol or drug abuse, a 2O.096 - a permanent physical or medical condition, • 18.796- mental illness, and o 16.996 - visual impairment. The top 5 services needed by the reporting homeless in 2009 were: • 29.096 - food • 28.1°6 - clothes • 15.4Y6 - job training and placement • 14.996 - health care • 13.696 - dental care Unsheltered Homeless In 3008, there were 24 unsheltered individuals and 10 unsheltered families. In 2007 there were 50 unsheltered individuals and 24 unsheltered This data was derived from the COC HUD report which relies on PIT data and which classifies sheltered homeless as follows: • Unsheltered Homeless - the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act defines the unsheltered horne|essarethoseyvhu reside in a place not meant 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 109 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction for human habitation, such as vehicle, out of doors, in parks, in abandoned buildings, in garages, under bridges, etc. ° Sheltered Homeless - the sheltered homeless are those whose primary nighttime residence is a supervised public or prJvate emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive hoLsing, or temporarily living with family or friends. The McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act does not recognize as homeless those that are currently living in permanent supportive housing or that are doubled up with family or friends. Reasons for Homeless in Yakima County The top reasons cited by the homeless of Yakima County in the 3009 PIT survey for those that provided a cause for experiencing homelessness were: • 37.7% - inability to pay the rent or mortgage • 24.8% - job loss • 19.096 - alcohol or drug use • 18.696 - family break-up Substance abuse was cited as the number one reason for homelessness each year from 2005 to 2007. In 2008 and 2009, substance abuse was surpassed by the inability to pay the rent or mortgage and job loss. The survey results indicate the importance of services connected with housing and could lead to further support of the Housing -First model in Yakima County. Low - barrier shelter and housing would give homeless individuals who are also active substance users access to housing not predicated on sobriety and engagement in Sources of Income 2009 PIT data indicated Yakima County homeless received income from the following top 5 sources: • 50.7% - public assistance • 16.O96- none = 13.3% - Social Security ▪ 11.0% - relatives, partners, or friends • 9.096 - other including selling blood or plasma, panhandling, making and selling goods The 2009 PIT data indicates 16.0% of the homeless population has no income at all from any source. This implies that any housing developed would need substantial operating support, targeting incomes at 0 to ]O96ofArea Median Income (AMI). Rents from tenants could not be expected to help cover operating expenses. Places of Shelter Data from the PIT surveys from 2005 to 2008 indicate that an average of 8% of the homeless population went unsheltered, 16% were staying in an emergency shelter, and 22% were staying in transitional housing. It appears from PIT data from I005 to 3008 that a significant portion of the Yakima homeless population is doubled up with family or friends or couch -surfing. In 2008 43% of homeless individuals spent the previous night with family or friends compared with an average of 31% of the total population surveyed for the years 2005 through 3008. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 110 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction The 2009 PIT data indicated the homeless were living in the following conditions: • 46.796 - temporarily living with fanni|y or hiends • 13.8% - |nennergencyshelter o 13.596 - in other type of shelter including motel, hotel, detox, etc • 8.2% - living outdoors • 8.O96 -living in transitional hoLsing • 2.3% - living in vehicle o l.8% - in abandoned buildings • 5.6% - refused or no response This is consistent with general national characteristics of rural homelessness where fewer individuals are found sleeping on the streetsand more individuals, who might otherwise be homeless, are found couch -surfing or doubled -up with family and friends. These individuals are at great risk for becoming street bound. Limitations of Point -in -Time (PIT) data There are debates on the ability of Point -in -Time (PIT) counts to accurately capture the number of homeless in a community. However, for Yakima County this is the only comprehensive count of the homeless that occurs. Reliability/accuracy problems include: • relying on volunteers to accurately gather data; • ability to find all the homeless people within a community in 1 day; � not encountering couch -surfers; and • those unwilling to be identified or counted. The count provides only a snapshot of the number of homeless in the community. Due to the inherent inability of any point -in -time count to capture all of those who may be homeless on any given day, many homeless advocates believe that the point -in -time survey vastly undercounts the actual total number of homeless in the community. Priority Homeless Needs 1. Using the results of the Continuum of Care planning process, identify the jurisdiction's homeless and homeless prevention priorities specified in Table 1A, the Homeless and Special Needs Populations Chart. The description of the jurisdiction's choice of priority needs and allocation priorities must be based on reliable data meeting HUD standards and should reflect the required consultation with homeless assistance providers, homeless persons, and other concerned citizens regarding the needs of homeless families with children and individuals. The jurisdiction must provide an analysis of how the needs of each category of residents provided the basis for determining the relative priority of each priority homeless need category. A separate brief narrative should be directed to addressing gaps in services and housing for the sheltered and unsheltered chronic homeless. 2. A community should give a high priority to chronically homeless persons, where the jurisdiction identifies sheltered and unsheltered chronic homeless persons in its Homeless Needs Table - Homeless Populations and Subpopu|ations. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 111 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 3-5 Year Strategic PIan Priority Homeless Needs response: ESTIMATE OF UNMET NEED Housing The Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing (ORFH) estimated unmet need using HUD's April I006 instructions for Calculating Unmet Need for Homeless Individuals and Families. The numbers were arrived at by looking at the number of unsheltered homeless from Yakima County's 2009 Continuum of Care (COC) application, the approximate percentages of chronically homeless, episodically homeless and those who might benefit from transitional housing from the 2009 Point -In -Time survey and the number of units already in existence identified in Yakima County's 2009 COC Table 40: Estimate of Unmet Housing Need 2009 by Housing Type Emergency shelter beds units Beds for individuals 42 Family units Transitional housin Beds for individuals 56 Family units 4 Permanent Su�»K»oxtive Housin * Units for individuals *Permanent Suppor�weHousing targets ohron��homeless Source: Housing for the Homeless /n Yakima County 2009 Feasibility Study, Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) �� � 44 The estimate was further informed by interviews with homeless service providers and those locally knowledgeable about the Yakima County homeless population. Interviews were used to help estimate the number of homeless who need each category of housing, namely emergency shelter, transitional housing or permanent supportive housing. ORFH'sestimation ofunmet need is summarized below. The estimate takes into consideration all vouchers that are currently available to homeless families and individuals. When determining the number ofunits to construct it is a common underwriting practice to have demand levels at 1 and 1.5 times the number of units (or beds) that are constructed. The purpose is to assure an adequate market exists for the potential units/beds that are being created. Based on the ratio of 1.5 beds of demand for each bed created, the following number of beds was recommended: In Most Need The greatest need in Yakima County is housing for homeless individuals who are not already engaged in services. These individuals are likely those with substance abuse issues and/or permanent mental or physical disabilities and are the most difficult to engage. Although in 2008 the inability to pay rent or mortgage was cited as the top reason for homelessness, the primary population identified through available data from years 2005 to 2007 are active substance abusers not already engaged in services. Housing options for those with active substance abuse issues appear to be severely limited. Recovering homeless may be able to access the clean and sober units in the 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 112 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 Jurisdiction community and those engaged in treatment services can take advantage of provider housing. However, those with untreated issues have few, if any, options available. Services Interviews suggest that Yakima has a full continuum of services available to the homeless, although employment services, job training, inc|usiveicasemanagennent and mentoring could be enhanced to better serve the homeless population. Homeless Inventory (91.210 (c)) The jurisdiction shall provide a concise summary of the existing facilities and services (including a brief inventory) that assist homeless persons and families with children and subpopulations identified in Table 1A. These include outreach and assessment, emergency shelters and services, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, access to permanent housing, and activities to prevent low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) from becoming homeless. The jurisdiction can use the optional Continuum of Care Housing Activity Chart and Service Activity Chart to meet this requirement. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Homeless Inventory response: EXISTING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS Emergency Shelter According to HUD's 2007 Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Programs Housing Inventory Chart Report and local information there are 6 organizations in Yakima County providing a total of 216 year-round emergency shelter beds. This number does not include Extreme Winter Weather beds. Of the permanent emergency shelter beds, 86 are reserved for families and victims of domestic violence and 4 are reserved for special needs clients. The remaining 80 beds in Yakima are provided by the Union Gospel Mission. According to anecdotal information, many homeless individuals are reluctant to make use of the Union Gospel Mission shelter system due to restrictions placed on the shelter stay. Ultimately, for single homeless adults in Yakima there is no alternative emergency shelter to the Union Gospel Mission. Yakima County may be able to reach a significant portion of individuals reluctant to use the Mission by providing an alternative low -barrier shelter/resource center. Table 41: Homeless Housing Inventory 2009 Onanio]on T e 0occu ant Units Beds YWCA* Family shelter Family 15 37 Lower VaIIey Crisis and Support Services - LVCSS DV shelter Family 8 24 YWCA* OVshe|terlnUividua|s and families � 25 Noah's Ark Emergency shelter Individuals 30 Central WA Comprehensive Mental Health - CWCMH Crisis beds Individuals 4 Union Gospel Mission* Emergency shelter Individuals 8O Total in Yakima County Total in Yakima* 26 216 18 142 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 113 VerSion 2.0 Jurisdiction 1 Source: Housing for the Homeless in Yakima County 2009 Feasibility Study, Office of N� Rural & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) In addition to the year-round shelter units listed above, the Extreme Winter Weather shelter system operates within Yakima from November to March and offers a maximum of 62 beds of which 12 beds are reserved for families and 50 beds are for individuals. The beds for individuals operate at near capacity each night. Because the winter shelters are located in churches not intended for the purpose of an emergency shelter and may not be up to current building code standards, the winter weather shelter system requires a special waiver and authorization from Yakima each year. The Extreme Winter Weather shelter is funded by Yakima County, administered by Sunrise Outreach, and is dependent upon volunteers for operation. The shelter system was never intended to be a permanent solution to the need for additional year-round shelter beds in the Yakima. The Plan to End Homelessness in Yakima County by 2014 lists as a number one priority the creation of emergency services to serve the homeless and has the goal to develop non -religious emergency shelters. Transitional Housing There are approximately 180 transitional housing beds and 56 units available to individuals and 139 transitional housing units available to families in Yakima County of which 12 of the family transitional units are located at the Union Gospel Mission and 28 units are provided to families through Yakima County housing vouchers. The remaining 99 units are restricted to the clients of service providers. In addition to the transitional housing units available to families, there are 56 vouchers and 180 transitional housing beds available to individuals who are homeless. Only the housing vouchers are available to the general homeless population and not restricted toa specific population. Table 42: Transitional Housing Inventory 2009 Occu ant Units Beds Triumph Treatment Services* Transitional housing Families 51 Triumph Treatment Services Transitional Housing - Granger/Toppenish Families 5 Union Gospel Mission* Transitional housing Families 12 Yakima Neighborhood Health Services* Transitional housing Families 4 Yakima County Transitional housing - vouchers Families 28 Triumph Treatment Services* Transitional Housing Families - Individuals 39 128 Yakima County ., Transitional housing - vouchers Families ' 56 Central WA Comprehensive Mental Health Transitional housing - homeless veterans Individuals 11 Next Step lIousing* Transitional housing - drug and alcohol free Individuals 16 Union Gospel Mission* Transitional housing - drug and alcohol free Individuals 20 Yakima County Transitional housing - Individuals 5 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 114 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction HIV/AIDS Total in Yakima County Total in Yakima* Source: Housing for the Homeless in Yakima County 2009 Feasibility Study, Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) 195 180 102 164 Permanent Supportive Housing There are 156 beds of permanent supportive housing available in Yakima County of which 133 are reserved for clients of service providers. Of the remaining units, 11 are drug and alcohol free and 6 are in a group home. Of the permanent supportive housing units, 6 are through Triumph Treatment Services available to the general homeless population who are not already engaged in services. Table 43: Permanent Supportive Housing Inventory 2009 OnanUoatixxn T e Occu amt Units Beds Next Step Housing* Permanent supportive housing - drug and alcohol free Families - Individuals 11 (11) Sunnyside Housing Authority Permanent supportive housing - group home Individuals 6 Triumph Treatment Services* Permanent supportive housing Families - Individuals 6 55 Central WA Comprehensive ' Mental Health Permanent supportive housing Individuals 80 YakJma Interfaith Coalition* Permanent supportive housing Individuals 4 Total in Yakima County Total in Yakima* 17 156 11 59 Source: Housing for the Homeless in Yakima County 2009 Feasibility Study, Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) Existing Service Options for the Homeless There are currently 41 organizations that offer a full range of services to the honne|essinYakirna County. Services available include clothing and supplies, transportation assistance, mental health, employment and training, legal, medical and dental services. Examples of some specific services offered include: • Salvation Army: Vision Care • Northwest Justice Project: Legal Services � Triumph Treatment Services: Chemical Dependericy Treatment � Yakima Interfaith Coalition - 107 House, a local walk-in service center for the homeless where people can get referrals, gas vouchers, bus tokens and hygiene packs. The Hygiene Center is open for 2 hours per day and offers a place to shower. Laundry tokens are available at the Hygiene Center. • Yakima Neighborhood Health Services - Corinections: Health and Dental Treatment Homeless Strategic Plan (91.215 (c)) 1. Homelessness— Describe the jurisdiction's strategy for developing a system to .address homelessness and the priority needs of homeless persons and families (including the subpopulations identified in the needs section). The jurisdiction's strategy must consider the housing and supportive services needed in each stage 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 115 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction of the process which includes preventing homelessness, outreach/assessment, emergency shelters and services, transitional housing, and helping homeless persons (especially any persons that are chronically homeless) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living. The jurisdiction must also describe its strategy for helping extremely low- and low-income individuals and families who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. 2. Chronic homelessness—Describe the jurisdiction's strategy for eliminating chronic homelessness by 2012. This should include the strategy for helping homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and independent living. This strategy should, to the maximum extent feasible, be coordinated with the strategy presented Exhibit 1 of the Continuum of Care (CoC) application and any other strategy or plan to eliminate chronic homelessness. Also describe, in a narrative, relationships and efforts to coordinate the Conplan, CoC, and any other strategy or plan to address chronic homelessness. 3. Homelessness Prevention—Describe the jurisdiction's strategy to help prevent homelessness for individuals and families with children who are at imminent risk of becoming homeless. 4. Institutional Structure—Briefly describe the institutional structure, including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions, through which the jurisdiction will carry out its homelessness strategy. 5. Discharge Coordination Policy—Every jurisdiction receiving McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), Supportive Housing, Shelter Plus Care, or Section 8 SRO Program funds must develop and implement a Discharge Coordination Policy, to the maximum extent practicable. Such a policy should include "policies and protocols for the discharge of persons from publicly funded institutions or systems of care (such as health care facilities, foster care or other youth facilities, or correction programs and institutions) in order to prevent such discharge from immediately resulting in homelessness for such persons." The jurisdiction should describe its planned activities to implement a cohesive, community -wide Discharge Coordination Policy, and how the community will move toward such a policy. 3-5 Year Homeless Strategic Plan response: Planned Units Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health (CWCMH) currently has plans for 20 units of permanent supportive housing for adults in Sunnyside if funding is available. The YWCA has 16 family shelter units in development and Triumph Treatment Services will be adding 4 additional permanent supportive housing units for clients within Yakima. These units do not address the housing need of those who are homeless and not already engaged in services. ORFH's Feasibility Study Recommended Next Steps The 2009 Feasibility Study for Housing for the Homeless in Yakima County prepared by the Office of Rural & Farmworker Housing (ORFH) analyzed a number of alternative facility development models, sites, and funding strategies. ORFH recommended the following steps be taken to resolve final proposals and projects to resolve unmet needs: 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 116 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 1. Reach consensus on desired model of development in order to identify appropriate funding sources. a. A single development will not be capable of serving all the housing needs identified above, including shelter, transitional and permanent supportive housing. Consider multiple developments overtinne in distinct locations or phases of development ifonosingle site. b. Both housing and a shelter/service center could be contained on one site given the following conditions: . Housing units were separate and distinct from shelter space. i|. Residents of housing units were not required to enter units through service center ar shelter. iii. Site is located in an area where shelter residents have access to community services. 2. Identify an owner/sponsor willing to take on the housing -first, low -barrier model of housing to address the highest need population -who are those homeless who have active substance abuse problems and/or mental health and physical disabilities and who are not already engaged in services. 3. In conjunction with the owner/sponsor, identif' sources of operating revenue to support the long-term operations of the proposed model of development. 4. Secure an appropriate site. S. Engage and enter into Memorandum of Understanding with service providers. a. Service providers who provide on-site services to residents will need to ctosely coordinate with existing services in the community in order to provide efficient delivery to residents and to not duplicate efforts. 6. Pursue capital financing. CONTINUUM OF CARE Yakima adopted the Yakima County Continuum of Care Plan as city policy. The plan outlines the continuum of programs and services required to move a family or individual from homelessness to independent living and self-sufficiency. The Continuum of Care Plan guides the ONDS's use of resources to reduce the number of homeless households. The Continuum of Care does this by designating priority levels to homeless projects and programs and by assessing whether proposed projects duplicate existing services. The first priority of the Continuum of Care is to maintain existing resources that serve the needs of the homeless within the community. The plan identifies new projects and services that fill critical gaps in prevention services, outreach, emergency and transitional housing, support services, and long-term affordable housing. Su pport .of transitional housing facilities helps homeless families and individuals transition into independence, and in doing so, helps carry out Yakhna's Anti -Poverty Strategy. ONDS is leveraging resources for implementing the Anti -Poverty Strategy by providing technical assistance to homeless housing and service providers. Yakima recognizes homelessness as the most severe housing problem. Beginning in 2005, the Yakima County human service community began the process of creating a Continuum of Care Plan, a county -wide plan to prevent and end homelessness and to make self-determination possible for homeless individuals and families. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 117 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction In the years following, the Homeless Network of Yakima County (representing approximately 46 non-profit and government agencies, housing developers, school districts, businesses, and neighborhoods) analyzed data and identified gaps and strategies in the process of updating the Continuum of Care Plan. The Homeless Network ofYakima County developed a 1O-YearPlan to End Homeless which included the following goals, objectives, strategies, and activities: 10 YEAR PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS IN YAKIMA COUNTY Goal: Reduce the number of homeless persons in Yakima County by 50% by the year 2015 Objectives: • Reduce the number of homeless families and individuals, including: youth and chronically homeless • Conduct adequate data collection and planning to efficiently manage resources for housing and services for the homeless population Strategies: • Develop, enhance and expand affordable housing stock • Prevent homelessness among families and individuals at imminent risk of losing housing • Increase household income • Improve access to health services Housing Activities: • Develop new affordable rental housing for families and individuals = Develop additional clean and sober units • Increase the number of units available for individuals waiting to get into treatment • Increase the number of units of re-eritry housingfor individuals exiting institutions • Develop youth center to include housing and services • Create additional cooperative or transitional housing for homeless youth • Support and sustain existing housing for homeless youth • Increase the number of rental vouchers for homeless families and individuals • Expand weatherization and home repair assistance to low-income families and individuals at risk of homelessness Prevention Activities: • Secure funding for additional Housing First opportunities • Increase coordination between benefitand homeless services provider to create "no wrong door" access • Provide post placement case management in permanent housing projects • Create coordinated life skills/home maintenance training • Create and distribute resource information directory � Develop advocacy, dispute resolution for Iandlords � Create peer support group for homeless households o Develop on-line housing and services directory • Develop public services campaign on issues about homelessness • Conduct case management training and networking program • Develop interagency agreements regarding discharge planning 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 118 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction • Increase number of street outreach professionals • Encourage service providers to designate youth point person and create a list of contacts within the community • Increase outreach workers for contacting homeless youth Increasing Household Income Activities: a Establish an Individual Development Account program • Develop bilingual job readiness program Improving Access to Healthcare Activities • Establish access to bilingual medical and legal services to households not covered by medical coupons • Improve outreach to people who are homeless about HIV/AIDS services • Increase collaboration between mental health and substance abuse treatment service providers for pep|e needing both treatment services • Establish program where nurses accompany mental health case managers in outreach activities • Establish proactive outreach and harm reduction for people who are injection drug users Improving Data Collection and Planning: • Conduct annual Point in Time Count and publicize results Conduct annual Continuum of Care housing inventory and publicize the results Increase Homeless Management Information System participation INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE The institutional structure for delivering homeless services including housing that is currently being implemented adapts evidenced -based models of homeless prevention, rapid re -housing/ jail diversion, and focused re-entry planning. The key components establish new commitments to increase access to supportive and mainstream services that are vital to retaining permanent housing. As called for in Washington State's 10 year plan, the system will shift the focus from emergency response strategies to prevention and long term housing. The approach which affects all homeless subpopulations increases efficiencies of the existing homeless housing infrastructure which consists of Iow-rent housing, transitional housing and emergency shelter. The approach saves money by diverting some individuals away from high-cost institutional facilities. The new institutional structure commits the community to homeless prevention, rapid re -housing, institution discharge planning, and supportve services. DISCHARGE COORDINATION Discharge coordination in Yakima and Yakima County is handled through the CORE (Community -Oriented Re -Entry) program. CORE 15 a team approach to re-entry and discharge planning with access to tenant -based housing assistance and mainstream services through the Yakima County Homeless Services Center. Yakima County criminal justice, substance abuse and mental health systems have opened a Crisis Triage Center to coordinate services for people with mental health and/or substance abuse disorders who tend to cycle through the jail and the hospital 3-5 Year S a egic Plan 119 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction emergency department. The Crisis Triage Center is staffed 24/7 to provide expedited assessment, stabilizing interventions, and access to services. CORE team members collaborate with Yakima County Homeless Services Center's rapid exit coordinator and housing speciatist to provide housing solutions. Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) (States only) Describe the process for awarding grants to State recipients, and a description of how the allocation will be made available to units of local government. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan ESG response: 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 120 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 5,13=°�= Community Development (91.215 (e)) *Please also refer to the Community Development Table in the Needs.xls workbook 1. Identify the jurisdiction's priority non-housirig community development needs eligible for assistance by CDBG eligibility category specified in the Community Development Needs Table (formerly Table 2B), — i.e., public facilities, public improvements, public services and economic development. 2. Describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category of priority needs. 3. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 4. Identify specific long-term and short-term community development objectives (including economic development activities that create jobs), developed in accordance with the statutory goals described in section 24 CFR 91.1 and the primary objective of the CDBG program to provide decent housing and a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities, principally for Iow- and moderate -income persons. NOTE: Each specific obective developed to addt-ess priority need, must be identfied by number and contain proposed accomplishments, the time period (i.e., one, two, three, or more years), and annual program year numeric goals the jurisdiction hopes to achieve in quantitative terms, or in other measurable terms as identified and defined by the jurisdiction. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Community Development response: NON -HOUSING NEEDS Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive PIan's Economic Development Element includes the provisions of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) concerning the following: `. • Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans; � promote economic opportunity for all residents of the state, especially for unemployed and disadvantaged persons; and • encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, and local public services and facilities." Yakima's Economic Development Element of the Comprehensive Plan established an economic vision for the community and supports the core goal of the local and State planning principles. In 2086, there were 78,100 jobs in the Yakima area. There are over 250 manufacturing firms in the Yakima area along with an agricultural industry with Washington State's highest value of farm output, 16th highest in the nation, The Yakima VaIIey is emerging as one of Washington State's, and soon one of the nation's top wine producing regions. Historically, agriculture, 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 121 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction forest resources, mariufacturing and associated industries provided the "primary jobs" for the community. Agriculture has always been considered a foundation for a strong local economy because it generates local jobs for the production and processing of commodities and products destined for consumers outside the area. However, a local economy's long-term strength is built upon diversification of a community's business base and the establishment of a planning process that allows for timely and efficient response to changing market conditions and demands. The agriculturally based Yakima Valley is subject to significant seasonal variations in unemployment. Stabilization of the employment base, particularly in the urbanizing Yakima Urban Growth Area (UGA) is very important to the stability and quality of life in the Yakima community. Yakima Resources' owner of the Boise Cascade lumber sawmill, announced the mill's closure in 2005 with the loss of 250 jobs. This followed the closure of the Layman Lumber Company in Naches along with other timber -related industry. In addition, Yakima Resources closed the plywood mill in August 2006 with a loss of an additional 250 jobs. These closures signal a decline in one historical natural resource industry in Yakima but make available large land areas for redevelopment. Yakima Resources is currently pursuing plans for the Boise Cascade Lumber site, and other statewide and regional companies have expressed interest in other large tracts within the City. Historically, Yakima served as the regional center for professional services including medical, dental, legal, accounting, engineering, and architecture, In 2006, over 700 new jobs were added in the health care industry. Additionally, the downtown core area increased an estimated 1,000 jobs during the same period. Growing technology and service -based industries offer an opportunity for continued growth as the more resource-based industries within Yakima's UGA decline. Economic development programs depend on supporting land use, transportation, and capital facilities initiatives. The Economic Development Element is an integral part of the City's 20 -year Comprehensive Plan. Local jurisdictions, including Yakima and Yakima County, seek to promote economic development as a way to stabilize tax base. The focus ofthese programs is to create a flexible and supportive permitting process, expansion of business and employment opportunities, maintenance of the current job base, and flexibility in responding to market conditions and opportunities. Combined with new zoning mechanisms such as Planned Commercial, Planned Industry overlays and Regional Commercial zoning, redevelopment of several large tracts of land into mixed-use centers will increase the marketability of Yakima to a wide range of economic development interests. ECONOMIC GOALS AND POLICIES Goal 4.1: Ensure that the local economy continues to revitalize and that new 21st century jobs in all wage levels are available for residents Policies 4.1.1 The City and County will demonstrate their commitment to long-term economic growth by promoting a diverse economic base, providing opportunity for all residents. Growth that helps raise the average annual wage rate of community residents and preserves the environmental quality and livability of the community is viable growth and will improve the lifestyle of residents. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 122 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 4.1.2Economic growth will be supported by master planned and mixed use developments in existing nodes (such as downtown) and redevelopment opportunities (such as the Boise Cascade lumber sawmill site, race track, etc.). 4.1.3 Stimulate economic development that will diversify and strengthen economic activity and provide primary and secondary job opportunities for local residents. 4.1.4 Encourage redevelopment of key properties in the City through use of local, State and federal funding opportunities and public/private partnerships to strengthen Yakima's position as a regional economic center through redevelopment and revitalization. 4.1.5 Create a long-term development program for the downtown business core. Goal 4.2: Provide adequate services to properties to promote diversified economic growth Policies 4.2.1 The City will work in public-private partnerships to ensure that infrastructure investments are undertaken to support economic development. 4.2.2 Coordinate land use planning to insure that industrial and commercial uses are placed where transportation accessibflity 15 or is planned to be greatest. CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 66% 64% 62% 60% 58 56 54 52% Percent civilian employed in labor force � � � �� ,0 ::4E� � � 1,~ + EmmKnUoyment The percent of Yakima residents employed in the civilian labor force is slightly lower (56-57%) than Puget Sound (Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kitsap Counties), Washington State, and the United States and is likely due to the greater proportion of the population in younger, children age groups. • The percent of Yakima employed persons working in base industries (mining, agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and manufacturing) is higher (26-31%) than Puget Sound (Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kitsap Counties), Washington State, and the United States - indicating the city and county are less urban developed than these comparable areas. • The percent of Yakima employed persons working in service industries (retail 3-5 Year Strategic Plari 123 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 82% 80% 78% ,6% 74% 72% ,0% 68% 66% 64% 62% Percent employed in services Median annual jncome for occupations S250,000 om\mm mm.000 S/uo`uoo oumm SO Home purchasing capability ° m .0 Retail clerk/salesperson and wholesale trade, business services, finance, education, and government islower (d9- 7496)than Puget Sound (Snohomish, King, Pierce, and Kitsap Counties), Washington State, and the United States - indicating the city and county are less urban developed than these comparable areas. • Yakima median househord income (assuming a single breadwinner) for selected public and private occupations could vary considerably depending on the demand for the occupation in the Iocal economy. The mediari incomes shown above are based on 2008 wage and salaries paid within the Yakima metropolitan statistical area (MSA). • As shown, Police and Firefighters are currently being recruited at annual median income Jevels above the year 2008 household average for Yakima County compared with teachers, retail clerks, cashiers, and waiters. • The home purchasing capability of our selected public and private occupations could vary considerably where a Police Officer can afford to purchase the highest value house ($225,127) and a Retail Cashier the lowest value house ($71,533) assuming each person was the only household breadwinner and 30% of their gross income is used to purchase the house on a 30 year, 625% interest mortgage with 1Oq6down. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 124 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 Jurisdiction • As shown, the median value house sold in Yakima County in 2007 was considerably more than most of these occupations could afford or qualify for ($151,833). SI ,600 51.400 x/.zoo $1,000 5800 s»on 5400 5200 $n Monthly trial capability by occupation Teacher - education all clerk/salesperson PUBLIC FACILTIES AND SERVICES • The rental capability of selected Yakima public and private occupations could vary considerably where a Police Officer can afford to rent the highest value apartment ($1,500) and a Retail Clerk the lowest rental unit ($480) assuming each person was the only household breadwinner and 30% of their gross income is used for rent excluding utilities and other incidentals. Yakima's community development needs also include public facilities and services which can be described as follows: Capital Facility Projects and Services - of Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan outlines goals and policies guiding decisions on use of capital funds. The Capital Facility or Improvement Program (CFP or CIP) is a strategic document matching the costs identified for future projects with anticipated revenue. The Comprehensive Plan CIP is available from Yakima's Planning Department. Public facilities include streets and sidewalks, street lighting systems, traffic signals, water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreational facilities, and schools. Public services include Iaw enforcement, fire protection and suppression, public health, education, recreation, environmental protection, and other governmental services. Transportation - a livable and prosperous community is reliant on functional and safe circulation systems. The main objective of Yokirna's transportation system is to produce a viable and safe arterial system, one that meets current and future transportation demands. The Transportation Element of Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan considers the location and condition of the existing traffic circulation system, identifies transportation problems, projects future neeUs, and identifies methods to address future transportation needs while maintaining established level of service standards. Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) PUam-d|scussescommunitysetting, existing facilities, opportunities, land and facility demands, finances, strategies, goals and objectives, development plan elements, public opinion, and implementation in the CDBG Target Area and city-at-Iarge. The plan is avaiIabe from the Parks and Recreation Department. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 125 Version 2.0 ve 'CI . -_ � __ re _ � � � . `_��___�__ '_— ~ 0 Teacher - education all clerk/salesperson PUBLIC FACILTIES AND SERVICES • The rental capability of selected Yakima public and private occupations could vary considerably where a Police Officer can afford to rent the highest value apartment ($1,500) and a Retail Clerk the lowest rental unit ($480) assuming each person was the only household breadwinner and 30% of their gross income is used for rent excluding utilities and other incidentals. Yakima's community development needs also include public facilities and services which can be described as follows: Capital Facility Projects and Services - of Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan outlines goals and policies guiding decisions on use of capital funds. The Capital Facility or Improvement Program (CFP or CIP) is a strategic document matching the costs identified for future projects with anticipated revenue. The Comprehensive Plan CIP is available from Yakima's Planning Department. Public facilities include streets and sidewalks, street lighting systems, traffic signals, water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreational facilities, and schools. Public services include Iaw enforcement, fire protection and suppression, public health, education, recreation, environmental protection, and other governmental services. Transportation - a livable and prosperous community is reliant on functional and safe circulation systems. The main objective of Yokirna's transportation system is to produce a viable and safe arterial system, one that meets current and future transportation demands. The Transportation Element of Yakima's 2006 Comprehensive Plan considers the location and condition of the existing traffic circulation system, identifies transportation problems, projects future neeUs, and identifies methods to address future transportation needs while maintaining established level of service standards. Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) PUam-d|scussescommunitysetting, existing facilities, opportunities, land and facility demands, finances, strategies, goals and objectives, development plan elements, public opinion, and implementation in the CDBG Target Area and city-at-Iarge. The plan is avaiIabe from the Parks and Recreation Department. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 125 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Targeted Neighborhoods - the year 3000 Census defined Yakima by 13 census tracts - 7 of which are designated as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Target Area due to a concentration of poverty, housing conditions, and racial or ethnic concentrations. The 7 census tracts - 01, 02, 03, 06, 07, 12, and 15 - include 53% of the year 2000's population or 43,891 persons out ofa total 3000 census city population of 82,762 persons. Yakima targets CDBG funds to projects that are most likely to provide benefits for residents of these CDBG Census Block Groups including projects to improve recreation, housing, safety, and services. Graphic 3: Yakima CDBG Target Area PRIORITIES First priority - CDBG funding priorities for non -housing needs considers the availability of other resources (both interms of other funding and number of participating agencies/organizations) as well as the immediate needs of households to be served and long term impacts of investment. Funding agencies that provide services addressing the immediate needs of Iow-income, elderly and special needs hQuseholds was deemed to be the highest priority. Second priority - the long term benefits of addressing capital needs of the target block groups with CDBG funds was identified as the second priority due to the long term benefits to residerits of providing enhanced park recreation opportunities, trail connections such, as safe school routes, and increased pride of residence. Third priority - although funding economic development activities that create living wage jobs to be filled by low-income households is extremely important to the community, there are currently a large number of activities and organizations 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 126 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction already engaged in economic development and the use of CDBG funds was ranked lower priority than human services or neighborhood improvements. OBSTACLES Low or inadequate wages are a major underlying barrier keeping low and moderate - income persons from contributing to the economy. This is due in part to lower wage scales paid for agricultural work and partly to the growth of lesser paying service and retail jobs in the local economy. In addition, underemployment and art -time jobs result in limited incomes. Persons with limited income have difficulty affording adequate housing and also are minor contributors of monies going back into the economy ultimately resulting in restricting commuriity tax revenues. Economic development actions include efforts to attract businesses that generate higher wages, providing opportunities for post -secondary education to cover job skills gaps, improving language skills, and assistance with childcare costs. One of the largest barriers to meeting public facilities and services needs, job creation and the needs the targeted neighborhoods is the limited resources available to the community. While [OBGfunds can be used to assist job creation, public facilities and capital projects in the targeted neighborhoods, the other community need of housing and human services must also be considered which will limit the amount of CDBG available. LONG AND SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES Yakima will support and encourage the foflowing non -housing community development (Economic Development, Social Services, and Neighborhood Revitalization) activities: 1. Basic Human Service Support • Continuum of Care Plan (services in support of the homeless) • Human services (e.g., housing, job training, physical health, mental health, affordable childcanc/andbas|cneeds) 2. Neighborhood Revitalization • - Special economic development activities • - Infrastructure (i.e., street improvements) • - Neighborhood facilities (i.e., recreational facilities, parks, playgrounds) • - Housing 3. Economic Development • - Job training • - Living wage job creation • - Infrastructure COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NON -HOUSING GOALS AND STRATEGIES The following goals, strategies, and objectives are based on the above activities and are consistent with the statutory goals outlined in 2006 Yakima Comprehensive Plan. Human Services Basic human needs such as healthcare, clothing, housing, childcare, and job training are not always available to low-income families and individuo|s. Housing and services 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 127 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction for homeless populations or those at risk of becoming homeless have been designated as one of the City's highest priority needs. The following strategies strive to meet these needs. Goal 1: Enhance the delivery of effective support services to priority low- income and homeless populations by providing funding and technical assistance to human service agencies. Strategy 1: Support projects addressing priorities and strategies outlined in the Continuum of Care Plan in order to most effectively serve the homeless or those at risk of becoming homeless. Objectives: • Encourage local housing and service providers to coordinate proposed projects and programs with the community's Continuum of Care planning process by targeting technical assistance and funding to those projects that do. Strategy 2: Maximize CDBG funding for human service agencies serving low-income populations. Objectives: • Support human service agencies and programs by using the maximum allowable CDBG for human services. • Provide multi-year funding, allow human service agencies greater ability to plan programs and projects, and reduce administrative burden. Strategy 3: Through collaboration with local human service providers, establish a triage system to address multiple service needs of low- income individuals and households. Objectives: • Reduce the number of steps and agency referrals before homeless persons can obtain needed services. • Use resources efficiently by streamlining the intake and referral system for all homeless services. Strategy 4: Where appropriate, provide or facilitate the provision of training and technical assistance to human service agencies. Objectives: • Improve the number and quality of services to low-income households by improving the capacity of human service agencies. Strategy 5: Identify and implement opportunities for streamlining administrative burden associated with receiving CDBG Human Service funding, while ensuring accountability and use of funds for programs that effectively address priority needs. Objectives: • Establish policies and procedures for the collection and analysis of information about program accomplishments. • If possible, establish policies and procedures for grant applications and reporting that coordinates with those of other human service funders, such as the Yakima County Human Services Department and United Way. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 128 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Neighborhood Revitalization A clean environment with parks, open space, and adequate infrastructure are essential components for a vital neighborhood. Areas targeted for CDBG assistance are also its oldest neighborhoods and are in need of infrastructure improvements such as streetscapes, sidewalks, lighting, parks, and trail Goal 1: Encourage and promote safe, comfortable, and thriving neighborhoods. Strategy 1: Implement public improvement projects in two or three CDBG target areas over the next 5 years. Objectives: • Allocate funding and provide staff time to determine appropriate projects for key neighborhoods to improve the quality of life for residents. • Identify and utilize public and private sources of funding to leverage Yakima's financial support for projects that improve target neighborhoods. • Coordinate the efforts of Yakima departments, such as Public Works, Parks, and Police to maximize the effectiveness of neighborhood improvement projects. Strategy 2: Identify and rehabilitate underutilized properties or contaminated (brownfield) properties that create a negative impact on low-income neighborhoods. Objectives: • . Allocate funding and provide staff time to determine appropriate planning, testing, abatement, and reuse of such properties. • Coordinate efforts of city, state, and federal agencies with public/private partnerships to create resources to make changes to impacted neighborhoods. Strategy 3: Encourage the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of older properties to preserve the historic character of neighborhoods, which serves to instill pride of heritage and community involvement. Objectives: • Provide technical assistance and feasibility research to private property owners, developers, and non-profit agencies to enable them to create housing and appropriate commercial uses from older and historically significant buildings. Goal 2: Encourage civil pride in neighborhoods and develop connections between neighborhoods and community resources. Strategy 1: Encourage strong neighborhood associations to represent neighborhood residents. Objectives: • Support the efforts of residents to obtain resources that enhance neighborhoods, such as creating daycares and community centers. • Support policies and 'activities that connect neighborhoods to community resources. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 129 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Economic Development Employment that offers a living wage helps ensure that families can afford the necessities of life. If all citizens earned livable wages, could afford adequate housing, and had access to health care, their other basic needs would be easier to fulfill. Economic development planning in Yakima has been limited to target area planning and has not utilized CDBG funding. Economic development activities to be undertaken by Yakima will most likely be funded with general funds or otherlocally generated funds or with state or federal grants for specific projects. Goal 1: Develop area -wide plans to guide economic development so that living -wage job opportunities can be created for low-income populations. Stoateg0, 1: Establish a unified vision of area economic development in order to guide and/or coordinate local actions that promote or expand living -wage job opportunities. Objectives: • Participate, through collaboration of local public and private agencies in the development of an accepted unified vision of area economic development in order to guide and/or coordinate local actions. • Initiate actions from the 2006 Yakima Comprehensive Plan that refer to economic development. Goal 2: Over 5 years, implement 5 projects or pnogrammmthat0ostenthe thriving businesses, commercial, and industrial centers needed to encourage the creation of living -wage job opportunities. Strategy 1: Improve the physical infrastructure. Objectives: • Assist in financing improvements to create the physical infrastructure necessary to attract companies that pay living wage salaries. • Implement projects proposed through the 2006 Yakima Comprehensive Plan. Sti-ategy 2: Provide technical and funding assistance to Iocal businesses that provide living -wage employment for low- and moderate -income employees. Objectives: • Collaborate with Iocal economic development stakeholders to develop a marketing package that encourages businesses paying living wages to locate in Yakima. Goal 3: Increase employment opportunities for Iow and moderate -income households. Strategy 1: Encourage companies that offer living -wage jobs b/locate orexpand existing operations to Yakima and Yakima County. Objectives: • Collaborate with local governmental and private agencies to encourage companies offering living wages to Iocate to Yakima and Yakima County. • Collaborate with non-profit agencies and educational facilities that provide job training to prepare youth and the unemployed, especially minorities, for jobs that pay living wages. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 130 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Antipoverty Strategy (91.215 (h)) 1. Describe the jurisdiction's goals, programs, and policies for reducing the number of poverty level families (as defined by the Office af Management and Budget and revised annually). In consultation with other appropriate public and private agencies, (i.e. TANF agency) state how the jurisdiction's goals, pnogranns, and policies for producing and preserving affordable housing set forth in the housing component of the consolidated plan will be coordinated with other programs and services for which the jurisdiction is responsible. 2. Identify the extent to which this strategy will reduce (or assist in reducing) the number of poverty level families, taking into consideration factors over which the jurisdiction has control. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan Antipoverty Strategy response: Yakima works to bring different service providers together to address the issues of poverty and to make recommendations around policies, resources, services coordination, and community engagement and awareness. Key economic development issues include: • too few living wage jobs resulting in low-wage employment that often means odd hours that pose childcare and transportation challenges; • cost ufchi|Ucareverses wages, • not enough slots for subsidized job training and education, lack of job skills. Key housing issues include: • high cost of housing, • high burden of housing costs relative to income, • underserved subgroups that have few options, • background (credit, criminal, and chemical dependency histories) and • difficult to navigate systems. Other issues include: � lack of affordable health care, • lack of access to a primary care provider, • affordability and availability of health and dental care insurance, • high cost of childcare relative to wages, • limited hours, • lack of availability of care for special needs or infants, � limited bus routes and hours of operations, o transportation tied to employment options and • access to food/nutrition including food quality and availability. The goals and strategies contained in the Consolidated Plan for CDBG and HOME funding for housing and human services most often directly address these poverty issues. Yakima funding (CDBG and general fund) for the human service programs for transitional living, services for mentally 111, domestic violence, health and dental programs, food distribution, job training and affordable child care and the CDBG and HOME funding for permanent and transitional housing development, housing rehabilitation, and tenant based rental assistance all support the goals and strategies of reducing poverty. 3-5 Year Strategic Plari 131 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Many of Yakima's CDBG programs strive to increase self-sufficiency of low-income families and reduce the number of households with incomes below the poverty line. Yakima further strives to reduce poverty levels by providing financial assistance to human service agencies that provide support services to those in poverty including the cost of offering basic services such as housing, food, clothing, and child care can be reduced. As has been cited elsewhere within this Consolidated Plan, the needs far outpace resources. However, the public and non-profit funders and non-profit service provider community are aware of this imbalance and actively collaborate to coordinate funding of services to leverage the amounts of funds for efficiency and to end duplication of services. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Coordination (91.315 �Kx�� x^~v^ 1. (States only) Describe the strategy to coordinate the Low-income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) with the development of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income families. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan LIHTC Coordination response: 3-5 ¥ear Strategic Plan 132 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Specific Special Needs Objectives (91.215) 1. Describe the priorities and specific objectives the jurisdiction hopes to achieve over a specified time period. 2. Describe how Federal, State, and local public and private sector resources that are reasonably expected to be available will be used to address identified needs for the period covered by the strategic plan. 3-5 Year Non -homeless Special Needs Analysis response: STRATEGIC PLAN The Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services developed a Strategic Plan for 3007-2013 containing information necessary for Yakima County to make informed decisions about future programs and expansion of current programs. The Strategic Plan was overseen by a Planning Committee and involved the participation of over 46 education, treatment, government, law enforcement, parent and community groups, ethnic minority and racial groups and organizations, and others and accomplished the following: • Provides the beginning of a comprehensive assessment of the needs, current services, and gaps in service surrounding substance abuse for Yakima County as a whole. • Plans goals and objectives for Yakima County Division of Alcohol and Other SubstanceAbuse5ervices(Y[OAG/\)andYakirnaCountyCornrnunities Mobilized Against Substance ,Abuse and Violence (YCMASA) over the next 6 years. • Meets the requirements set by the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) Division of Alcohol and Substance Abuse as set forth in the County Prevention - Intervention - Treatment - Aftercare Strategic Planning Guidelines. The Strategic Plan is continually updated and revised as comments from the community are received and new programs are developed. The goal is to have all information surrounding substance abuse (alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs) in Yakima County contained in one document for easier reference and leverage for all agencies who address the needs of substance abuse. The following goals are for new resources and are in addition to sustaining current services with existing providers: Prevention Goals 1. Community bonding: To increase community readiness to address alcohol, tobacco and other drug issues 2. Family bonding: To increase opportunities and rewards for family pro -social involvement 3. Decrease the 30 use rate for youth of alcohol, tobacco and marijuana 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 133 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Violence Prevention Goals 1. To reduce youth membership in gangs as measured by the Healthy Youth Survey Continuum of Care Goals 1. Increase capacity to meet community needs 2. Increase community educationregarding substance use disorders and available services Intervention Goals 1. Establish sobering services and wet housing to address inebriates that do not require detox 2.`Add[ess the gap in services between the various stages of diagnosis and treatment 3. Provide outreach Screening and Brief Interventions for Substance Abusers in outpatient healthcare facilities Treatment Goals 1. Increase professional development for Chemical Dependency Professionals 2. Address geographic barriers to accessing services 3. Development of a continuum of care to specifically fit the needs of youth 4. Expansion of inpatient treatment Aftercare Goals 1. Enforce compliance of clean and sober housing providers with local laws and codes 2. Creation of formal life skills training for individuals leaving treatment MOBILIZE THE COMMUNITY AND BUILD CAPACITY The Planning Committee developed the Guiding Directions early in the process to ensure any decisions made aligned with those directions. The Planning Committee also held public forums before completing the community assessment to ensure the community was involved and invested from the beginning of the planning process. Guiding Directions This section describes the vision, mission, and guiding principles for YCDASA and YCy4ASAthat were developed prior to the creation of this strategic plan. Vision In collaboration with national, state, and local community rganizations, Yakima County Division of Alcohol and other Substance Abuse Services and Yakima County Communities Mobflized Against Substance Abuse and Violence are working to ensure that people with or at risk for chemical dependency have the opportunity for a fulfilling life. Mission To improve the quality of life for families and individuals by providing comprehensive alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention, intervention, treatment, and aftercare services accessible by all. Guiding Principles To succeed in its Mission, YCDASA and Y[MASAare dedicated to building collaborative partnerships with communities, tribes, counties, service providers, schools, colleges, the criminal justice system, hospitals and health care providers, and other agencies in the private sector and within local, state, and federal 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 134 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction governments. YCDASA and YCMASA are committed to ensuring services are provided to individuals and communities in ways that are culturally relevant, and honor the diversity of Yakima County. To carry forth with its Mission, YCDASA and YCMASA commits to the following: 1. To support substance abuse prevention and treatment programs by leveraging existing programs with County resources and by maintaining partnerships with substance abuse and prevention professionals. 2. To educate and inform the community about services, trends, and research by developing ongoing relationships with partners willing to feature topics relating to addiction. 3. To encourage family involvement by advocating to agencies and the public that family involvement is vital in all stages of prevention and recovery. 4. To support clean and sober housing providers who create and maintain clear and consistent standards by requesting them to maintain membership in a Mousing Alliance. 5. To contract with service providers who share the philosophy that access to chemical dependency treatment is a right, not a possibility. 6. To provide a range of culturally sensitive services capable of meeting the needs of our community by seeking providers who employ a diverse workforce. 7. To continue working to reduce the stigma surrounding ddi don recovery and treatment by supporting Addiction Recovery Month with planning and organization 8. To support evidence -based practices and training by supporting agencies which use the best of prevention science and research curricula to teach young people and adults. 9. To provide increased access to care for those with co-occurring disorders by challenging providers to employ duly certified staff. 10. To ensure that policy and practice are the bedrock of sustainable change by reviewing our process on a scheduled basis. 11.Toprovide logistically accessible services to all who are in need by seeking providers located or willing to provide services in less populated areas of Yakima County. 12. To seek out and support training and professional development opportunities for Substance Abuse Professionals. Non -homeless Special Needs (91.205 (d) and 91.210 (d)) . Analysis (including HOPWA) *Please also refer to the Non -homeless Special Needs Table in the Needs.xls workbook.* 1. Estimate, to the extent practicable, the number of persons in various subpopulations that are not homeless but may require housing or supportive services, including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families), persons with alcohol or other drug addiction, victims of domestic violence, and any other categories the jurisdiction may specify and describe their supportive housing needs. The jurisdiction can use the Non -Homeless Special Needs Table (formerly Table 1B) of their Consolidated Plan to help identify these needs. *Note: HOPWA recipients must identify the stze and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their famiIes that will be served In the Metropolitan area. 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 135 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 2. Identify the priority housing and supportive service needs of persons who are not homeless but may or may not require supportive housing, i.e., elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, developmental, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families), persons with alcohol or other drug addiction by using the Non -homeless Special Needs Table. 3. Describe the basis for assigning the priority given to each category of priority needs. 4. Identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 5. To the extent information is available, describe the facilities and services that assist persons who are not homeless but require supportive housing, and programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health nstitutions receive appropriate supportive housing. 6. If the jurisdiction plans to use HOME or other tenant based rental assistance to assist one or more of these subpopulations, it must justify the need for such assistance in the plan. 3-5 Year Non -homeless Special Needs Analysis response: COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT The community needs assessment process included a review of the current strategic planning documents for tobacco prevention and control. These include the county six year plan administered by the American Lung Association of Washington - Yakima County, school and youth plan administered by Educational Service District 105, and the Yakama Nation plan. The document also acknowledges the tobacco prevention work in the Latino community provided by Radio KDNA. The assessment contains information about the population that both YCDASA and YCMASA serve including a profile of the population and its needs. Homelessness Substance abuse is both a precipitating factor and a consequence of homelessness. In a study by the National Health Care for the Homeless Council, it was determined that prevalence estimates of substance use among homeless individuals are approximately 2O-3596; as many as 10-3096 are "dually diagnosed" with an additional mental health diagnosis. Homeless persons have a higher need for treatment than in the housed population, yet can expect to face more difficulties in accessing the help they need. In 2007, the Point -In -Time survey in Yakima County determined that of 1,069 homeless individuals (estimated to be about 33% of the actual homeless population in Yakima County), 144 of those who responded to the survey reported alcohol and drug use was a disabling condition, the number one reason. Alcohol and drug use was the top reported cause for homelessness for 228 individuals. Disability In Yakima County, among people at Ieast 5 years old in ZOUS, 14% reported a disability. The likelihood of having a disability varied by age - from 6% of people 5 to 20 years old, to 12% of people 21 to 64 years old, and to 45% of those 65 and older. Those with a developmental disability can be more susceptible to substance 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 136 Version 2.0 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction abuse th n previously thought. About 2% of the population has mental retardation, with many persons having manifestatons of other developmental disabilities along with their mental retardation. In a survey for the National Association for the Dually Diagnosed (NADD) Monograph Series, less than a dozen treatment programs in the United States were identified for persons with both cognitive disabilities and substance dependence. Yakima County currently has 1 outpatient service avai|ab|e. Need for Treatment Most of the statistics available around the need for treatment do not take into account the variables needed for individuals to be amenable to tneotrnent. In 2004, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) researched the variance between those who need treatment and those who made an effort to go to treatment. The data indicate that individual motivation accounts for participation as much as available services. Cost was the number one barrier to individuals entering treatment in the nation. Public funded Overall >200% <200% DASA KDASAy Need FPL FPL Eli ibUe Clients Served Yakima County Client Penetration Rate 2003 16,507 9,810 6,697 4,411 1,918 43.596 Marijuana 11.096 10.396 12.1% 417 352 388 2006 . 16,726 9,0737,652 * * * Cocaine 10.9% 10.3 12.0q6 19 18 11 * Not available Source: Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services Strategic Plan 2007-2013 In 2006, the Washington State Department of Health and Human Services (DSHS) - Data and Research Division released updates to the previous estimates of need of treatment from 2003 in Yakima County. They reported an increase from 420 adults estimated to need treatment. Public Funded (DASA) Treatment Admissions The Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Drug Abuse Trends in Washington State 2006 report noted that for individuals admitted into DASA funded 'treatment in Yakima, alcohol was the primary drug of choice for adults and marijuana was the primary drug of choice for youth excluding detox, transitional housing, group care enhancement, private pay, and Department of Corrections. The counts include total admissions into DASA funded treatment. Counts may be duplicated for an individual based on multiple admissions or multiple modalities of care. Table 45: Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Prima Dnu 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Alcohol - 186 157 128 76 70 68 Marijuana 526 480 473 417 352 388 Methamphetamine 34 80 102 45 50 86 Cocaine 30 21 21 19 18 11 Heroin 15 15 7 4 7 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 137 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Source: Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services Strategic Plan 300J-2013 Treatment for Veterans 5AMHSA's National Survey on Drug Use and Health found the following trends nationwide: • In 2003, an estimated S6.696ofveterans used alcohol in the past month compared with 50.8% of comparable nonveterans. An estimated 13.2% of veterans reported driving while under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs in the past year compared with 12.2% of comparable nonveterans. ▪ An estimated 18,896 of veterans reported that they smoked cigarettes daily in the past month compared with 14.396 of comparable nonveterans. SAMHSA's National Survey on Drug Useand Health found that in 2003, an estimated 3.5% of veterans used marijuana in the past month compared with 3.0% of their nonveteran counterparts. In 2006, 30 veterans received outpatient treatment in Yakima County paid with public funds. The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) estimates that 33% of adult homeless men and nearly 25% of all homeless adults have served in the armed forces. DVA also state that many other veterans are considered at risk because of poverty, lack of support from family and friends and precarious living conditions in overcrowded or substandard housing. Treatment for Elderly Individuals over the age of 65 make up roughly 10.7Y6 of the total Yakima County population (approximately 24,367 people). The elderly represent the fastest growing age cohort; by 2030 this group will nearly double in size and will represent 20% of the US population. The estimates of the prevalence of heavy drinking or alcohol abuse range from 2% to 2096 for this population, though little data exist to quantify drug use, abuse, and dependence patterns. There is some suggestion that the baby -boom generation is more likely than earlier generations to have been exposed to drug and alcohol use and may drink or consume drugs at greater rates after age 65. The need for treatment services will multiply. Treatment for Foster Care Youth Adolescents in foster care were about 50% more likely to need treatment during the 6 months prior to the interview than were adolescents living with their parents. In 2007, there were 593 children in Yakima County that are out of their homes. They were case managed by the state or other private agencies. 3-5 Year Strategic PPan 138 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Table 46: Drug Prevalence in Adults and Youth Adults Youth 2006 rade eveK Source: Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services Strategic Plan 2007-2013 Drug Manufacturing and Trafficking The United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) counts Yakima as being in the Pacific Region which includes Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Alaska, Hawaii, and part of California. According to the DEA, the Pacific Region's access to drug production and source areas are in Mexico and Canada as well as in Asia and Europe. This region serves as a thoroughfare into this country. The DEA has also identified various national distribution centers for wholesale quantities of illicit drugs -YakirnaVa||ey is one of those distribution centers. According to the DEA, methamphetamine is increasingly available in the region. While domestically produced methamphetamine has been on the decline, increased production in Mexico has resulted in Mexican methamphetamine,mostly ice, emerging as the most prevalent type available in this region. Yakima County had 9 reported methamphetamine lab and/or dump sites in 2005 compared to the high of 43 in 2002. Conversely, marijuana production has increased significantly; and the marijuana has a significantly higher THC (delta -9 - tetrahydrocannabinol) |eve|thmn in the past. Yakima County now Ieads the state in marijuana cultivation. Substance Availability The number of alcohol and tobacco retail sales licenses in a county is an important measure of the availability of both. The following license numbers do not include alcohol and tobacco sold on military bases and reservations. While there is no clear way to determine the exact availability of drugs, the perceived availability can be measured. 3-5 Year Strategic Pian 139 Version 2.0 2003 2006 5m 8th 10th 12th Alcohol | Lifetime use 85% 8596 34% 46% 65% 75% Past 30 days 53% 53% 7% 20% 37%42% Binge alcohol Lifetime use 64% 64% � * * * Past year 25% 25% 096 12% 22% 29% Any IlIicit Drug Lifetime use 42% 41% * Past 30 days 5% 5% 0% 1296 2096 21% Marijuana Lifetime use , 39% 38% 5% 18% 35% 44% Past 30 days 4% 4% 3% 11% 1996 20% Cocaine or Crack Lifetime use 1596 15% Past 30 days 0% 0% * * � Methamphetamine Lifetime use 6% 5% * 2% 4% 3% Past 30 days 0% 0% * * * * Heroin Lifetime use 2% 2% ' * * * * Past 30 days 0% 0% � * * * Inhalant Lifetime, use 4% 4% Past 30 days •096 0% * * | Cigarette Lifetime use 61% 6196 6% 15% 2596 33% Past 30 days 18% 18% 3% 6% 1296 16% Source: Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services Strategic Plan 2007-2013 Drug Manufacturing and Trafficking The United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) counts Yakima as being in the Pacific Region which includes Washington, Oregon, Nevada, Idaho, Alaska, Hawaii, and part of California. According to the DEA, the Pacific Region's access to drug production and source areas are in Mexico and Canada as well as in Asia and Europe. This region serves as a thoroughfare into this country. The DEA has also identified various national distribution centers for wholesale quantities of illicit drugs -YakirnaVa||ey is one of those distribution centers. According to the DEA, methamphetamine is increasingly available in the region. While domestically produced methamphetamine has been on the decline, increased production in Mexico has resulted in Mexican methamphetamine,mostly ice, emerging as the most prevalent type available in this region. Yakima County had 9 reported methamphetamine lab and/or dump sites in 2005 compared to the high of 43 in 2002. Conversely, marijuana production has increased significantly; and the marijuana has a significantly higher THC (delta -9 - tetrahydrocannabinol) |eve|thmn in the past. Yakima County now Ieads the state in marijuana cultivation. Substance Availability The number of alcohol and tobacco retail sales licenses in a county is an important measure of the availability of both. The following license numbers do not include alcohol and tobacco sold on military bases and reservations. While there is no clear way to determine the exact availability of drugs, the perceived availability can be measured. 3-5 Year Strategic Pian 139 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Licenses The number of alcohol retail licenses has remained stable over the last couple of years and in line with the rest of the state while tobacco licenses have shown a decrease. Alcohol retail license include restaurants, grocery stores, and wine shops, but does not include state Iiquor stores and agencies. As of 2005, there were 427 alcohol licenses in Yakima County, the same as in 2004. As of 2005, there were 313 tobacco retail and vending machine licenses in the county, a decrease from 319 in 2004. Adult Smokers Since 2003, theamount of individuals who have never smoked has risen, while the number of daily smokers has dropped. Mental Health and Chemical Dependency Co-occurring services, formally known as services forMentally I|| Chemically Affected (MICA), are specialized services for those afflicted with a severe mental illness in addition to chemical dependency. The recent administration of the GAIN Short - Screen by chemical dependency professionals, mental health professionals, and other social workers provides a screening to support the clinician's decision to refer for formal assessment services. Public Funded Services Publicly funded services for the co-occurring population in Yakima County in 2006 included: Table 47: Public Funded Services in 2006 Outpatient - adult 134 Intensive outpatient - adult 65 Total Adult Outmatient 199 Outpatient - youth 13 Intensive outpatient - youth 16 Total Youth Outpatient Source: Yakima County Division of Alcohol & Other Substance Abuse Services Strategic Plan 2007-2013 29 Physical Health Impact In 2003, Yakima County was one of 9 counties selected to participate in the Washington State Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (WASBIRT) program. WASBIRT placed full-time Chemical Dependency Professionals ([DPs) in the emergency rooms of 3 local hospitals. ThesCDPs worked closely with other hospital emergency department and trauma center staff members to serve as bridge builders between the hospital system and the substance abuse treatment system. The report states that the greatest underlying cause of ijury is the misuse of alcohol and drugs. Infectious Disease Long-term heavy drinking increases risks for high blood pressure, heart rhythm irregularities, heart muscle disorders, and stroke. It increases risks for certain forms of cancer, especially cancer of the esophagus, mouth, throat, and larynx, for cirrhosis and other liver disorders. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 140 Version 2.0 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes acute and chronic disease; transmission occurs by exposure to blood or body fluids of a person with an acute or chronic infection. The most common risk factor for hepatitis C in the United States is sharing of injecting drug equipment with an infected person. About 85% of those infected will develop chronic HCV infection, which may lead to cirrhosis. Community Laws and Norms Favorable to Substance Abuse Alcohol continues to be the drug of choice for the majority of adults and youth in Yakima County. According to the 2006 Healthy Youth Survey rate of first use is statistically higher than the state average for eighth and tenth graders. The Healthy Youth Survey noted that young people who have positive or accepting attitudes toward drug use are more likely toengage ina variety of health risk behaviors. Future GA -U Impact The GA -U program 15 a state -funded program providing cash and medical benefits for adults without dependents who are physically or mentally incapacitated and expected to be unemployable for more than 90 days. The GA -U medical caseload increased by more than 60% from September 2002 to April 2005, and 15 forecasted to continue to grow over the biennium. At the same time, the State Legislature reduced funding for general assistance cash grants, increasing the need to find ways to reduce the GA -U caseload. In 3006, there were 113 GA -U clients in Yakima County who received state -funded treatment services. Criminal )ustice Data - Drug Court In conjunction with and support from the Yakima County Sheriff, County Alcohol and other Drug Coordinator, Superior Court Administrator, a Substance Abuse treatment provider appointed by the county legislative authority, Director of the Department of Assigned Counsel, Presiding Drug Court Judge, and the County Prosecutors Office, Yakima County plans to sustain its Adult Drug Court program with the use of its Criminal Justice Treatment Account (CJTA) allocation received from Washington State. From 2002 to 2006, the Adult Drug Court maintained an average of 65 participants per year and has successfully graduated over 114 people. Drug Court is an intensive case management model that yields a felony charge recidivism rate of 11% for successful graduates. 90% of DTA funds will be used directly for Chemical Dependency Treatment and 1O90 will be used for transportation to treatment for both Drug Court and non -Drug Court offenders uppn whom a prosecutor has filed charges. With the current CJTA allocation, Yakima County plans to purchase residential treatment (21-28 days) for up to 16 Drug Court participants, provide intensive outpatient treatment (5-8 weeks) for up to 50 participants and purchase continuing care outpatient treatment for up to 66 participants each year (9-24 months). CJTA funds are not the only resource used to purchase treatment for Drug Court participants. There are a limited number of participants who have private health insurance, and also a limited number who receive a DSHS Medicaid card which is billable for Chemical Dependency Treatment. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 141 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Other Initiatives The Omnibus Treatment of Mental and Substance Abuse Disorders Act of 2005 passed during the 2005-2006 Legislative Session in Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5763. Section 804 of the act allows County Executive Authorities to increase local sales tax bv1/1Othof196. Monies collected under this Tax can only be used for the purpose of providing new or expanded chemical dependency or mental health treatment services and for the operation of new and expanded therapeutic court programs. Yakima County Commissioners are currently researching the value of such a tax and the services which could be purchased to affect recovery rates for Chemically Dependent and Mentally 111 Criminal offenders, in addition to reducing the recidivism of illegal activity by those who go untreated in the criminal justice system. COMMUNITY NEEDS Needs Matrix The Planning Committee was dedicated to weighing community feedback as one of the first sources for stating the need in Yakima County. After the formation of the guiding principles, a survey was developed to query the community about areas where they saw the greatest need. Public Forums were also planned and conducted on 3 separate dates and locations across the Valley. The data gathered from both the survey and the forums were correlated into the Needs Matrix. Only after community data was included did the Planning Committee use the data gathered in the community profile to complete the matrix. After the completion of the needs portion of the matrix, the current services were added and gaps identified. While not all gaps are represented in the Goal and Implementation, the Planning Committee wanted to ensure that they were all docurnented. MEDICAID TREATMENT EXPANSION NEEDS A review of services being provided to Medicaid eligible recipients in Yakima County revealed that services available are consistent with other counties across the region. Supplemental Security Income Eligible Recipients (SSI) SSI recipients become eligible after being diagnosed by a physician as suffering from a physical or psychiatric disability determined to last more than one year, or to be considered permanent. SSI recipients primarily enter the treatment system when prompted to do so by the criminal justice system, (if they have been arrested), by their doctor (if prescribed), by their DSHS social worker, or in rare cases by their own intrinsic desire to receive treatment for a substance use disorder. The majority of SSI clients are motivated by the criminal justice system. A current assessment of services provided to this population reveals that for those who are not motivated by the criminal Justice system, focused outreach efforts by Yakima County has resulted in a significant increase in the number of contacts, assessment and admissions. In addition to focused county engagement efforts for this population, contracted treatment providers continue to provide assessment arid motivational counseling services intended to bring about a readiness to receive services. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 142 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction General Assistance — Unemployable Adults GAU recipients qualify for public assistance after being diagnosed by a physician as suffering from a physical or psychiatric disability determined to last at least 3 months. GAU eligible clients primarily enter the treatment system as a requirement of their DSHS eligibility. A chemical use assessment is required by DSHS in cases where alcohol or other drug use is documented as being a contributing factor in the recipients' incapacity. A current assessment of services to this population reveals that for those not motivated by the criminal justice system, policies for social work staff working in Community Services Offices (CS0s) provides a satisfactory referral process that includes required sanctions for those who do not comply with assessment and prescribed treatment services. Recent outreach efforts by Yakima County have slightly increased the number of contacts, assessments and admissions for GAU recipients. Incentives for GAU recipients do not currently exist. Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) TANF families qualify for public assistance when parenting a child or children and their reported resources are below the qualifying threshold. TANF recipients are required to participate in the creation of an Individual Responsibility Plan (IRP). If chemical use is identified as a barrier to employment on the IRP, the TANF recipient is mandated to participate in a chemical use assessment and follow any and all treatment recommendations if a substance use disorder is diagnosed. Acurnent assessment of services to this population reveals that for those not motivated by the criminal justice system, policies for TANF case managers working in CSOs provide a satisfactory referral process that includes required sanctions for those who do not comply with assessment and prescribed treatment services. Recent outreach efforts by Yakima County have slightly increased the number of contacts, assessments and admissions for TANF recipients. Incentives for TANF recipients do not currently exist. Youth Youth enter the treatment system from many referral sources; Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration (JRA), County Juvenile Justice Program, schools, and A current assessment of services to this population reveals that the admission and retention rates fall far below that of the adult population, which is consistent with state figures. Current outreach efforts include 1 full time Chemical Dependency professional (CDP) in the County Juvenile Detention Center, and 1 full time CDP in the local JRA office. The benefits of services provided at the County Juvenile Center include increased assessments and admissions to treatment. CRIMINAL JUSTICE NEEDS Substance abuse treatment services for offenders are not widely available in all phases of the correctional system, according to the first set of findings from a national survey funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). An assessment of the Criminal Justice needs relating to Substance Abuse revealed that service to incarcerated inmates is very limited, and almost non-existent for both 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 143 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction adult and juvenile populations. Revenue to provide substance abuse treatment to inmates in county and municipal jails does not currently exist. An October 2005 snapshot comparison of adult inmates in the Yakima County Jail compared with the Washington State Treatment and Assessment Report Generation (TARGET) Management Information System revealed that over 65% of those incarcerated had previously received Chemical Dependency treatment at some time in Washington State. This high ratio of inmates in need of continued treatment is not supported by funds to address this issue thus contributing to continued drug/alcohol use contributing to criminal activity. CERTIFIED PROVIDERS -YAKIMA Table 48: Certified Providers Located in Yakima Certification Contact Information Program Description # and Agency 39 1214 00 Apple Valley Counseling Service 505 North 4th Street, Treatment Service Treatment Focus Suite #2 Yakima, VVA989O1 Phone (509) 452-1000 1-877-452-3837 Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Intensive Outpatient Outpatient 39 0503 00 Barth Clinic Avenue -Yakima 201 East Lincoln Miscellaneous Yakima, WA 98901 Youth Phone (509) 457-5653 Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School Youth & Adult DUI Assessment Youth & Adult Intensive Outpatient Youth & Adult Outpatient Youth & Adult 39 0500 01 Casa De Esperanza- Gehov|ora| Health Services Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic 4O2North 4th St, Suite 300 Yakima, WA 98901 Phone (509) 453-9307 1-800-30]-9]87 Miscellaneous JCAHO Accredited Pregnant &Post -Partum Spanish Youth On -Line Reporting Treatment Service 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 144 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Alcohol & Drug Information School Youth 8LAdult DUI Assessment Youth & Adult * Intensive Outpatient Youth & Adult * Outpatient Youth & Adult 39 0960 00 Center For Addictions Recovery And Education (CARE) Center For Counseling And Psychotherapy, Inc., P.S. 1U1SSouth 4Uth Avenue, Suite 23 Yakima, WA 98908 Phone (509) 966-7246 Miscellaneous Youth Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School Adult/Adolescents DUI Assessment Adult/Adolescents Intensive Outpatient Adult/Adolescents Outpatient Adult/Adolescents 39 0205 00 Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health 402 South 4th Avenue Yakima, VVA98902 Phone (509) 575-4034 Miscellaneous JCAHO Accredited Pregnant & Post -Partum Youth On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus * Opiate Dependency Treatment Cod * Outpatient Cod 39 1080 00 Community Resource Group 1O8S.4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Phone (509) 965-5310 (509) 210-0213 Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Outpatient 39 1081 00 Community Resource Group 790 ob Hill Blvd. Yakima, WA 98908 Phone (509) 965-5310 (509) 210- 0213 Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Outpatient 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 145 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction 39 1197 00 Delozier Recovery Services 3908 Creekside Loop, Suite 125 Yakima, WA 98902 Phone (509) 469-5515 Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Intensive Outpatient Outpatient 39 0490 01 Dependency Health Services -Yakima Detoxification Branch Of Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health 505 South 4th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902-3240 Phone (509) 453-2900 Miscellaneous JCAHO Accredited Pregnant & Post -Partum Youth On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus * Sub -Acute Detoxification Cod Adult & Youth 20 Beds 39 0490 00 Dependency Health Services -Yakima Outpatient Branch Of Central Washington Comprehensive Mental Health 401 South 5th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Phone (509) 248-1200 Miscellaneous Pregnant & Post -Partum Youth On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus DUI Assessment * Intensive Outpatient Cod * Outpatient Cod 39 0918 00 Doc -Ahtanum View Correctional Complex Assisted Living Facility OCO/CD Treatment Services 2009 South 64th Avenue Yakima, WA 98903 Phone (360) 725-8602 Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus Intensive Outpatient Corrections 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 146 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 Jurisdiction 39 0765 2009 South 64th Doc -Ahtanum Avenue Yakima, WA View Work 98903 Phone (360) Release 735-8602 OCO/CD Treatment Services Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus * Outpatient Correctional 39 1091 00 202 W. Yakima Ave., Doc -Yakima #200 Yakima, WA Community 98902 Phone (360) 'Justice Center 725-0603 OCO/CD Treatment Services Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus Intensive Outpatient Offenders Outpatient Offenders 39 0406 00 122 South Third Janice M. Street Yakima, WA Burke 98901 Consulting Phone (509) 248-0133 . Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Outpatient 39 1329 00 La 917 Pitcher Street [|inica Noroeste Yakima, WA 98901 De Phone (509) 225- Comportamientos 8554 Modificados . Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment Intensive Outpatient Outpatient 39 1078 00 414 North 3rd Street Merit Resource Yakima, WA 98901 Services - Phone (509) 469- Yakima 9366 Miscelianeous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus Alcohol 8`Drug Information School DUI Assessment * Intensive Outpatient * Outpatient 39 0139 00 102 South Naches Triumph Avenue Yakima, WA Treatment 98907 Phone (509) Services 348-1800 . Miscellaneous Pregnant & Post -Partum Youth On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus 3-5 Year Strategic PIan 147 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction Alcohol & Drug Information School DUI Assessment * Intensive Outpatient * Outpatient 39 0139 02 Triumph Treatment Services -Riel House Branch Of Triumph Treatment Services 613 Superior Lane Yakima, WA 98902 Phone (509) 575- 4810 Miscellaneous Pregnant & Post -Partum On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus * Long -Term Residential Women/PPW 14 Beds 39 1070 00 Veterans Administration -Yakima Substance Abuse Outreach Branch Of VA Medical Center - Walla Walla 310 North 5th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Phone (509) 457-2736 Miscellaneous JCAHO Accredited Treatment Service Treatment Focus Outpatient Veterans 39 0253 00 Yakima County Assessment Service DUI And ADATSA 128 N Second Street — Courthouse, Room B-18 Yakima, WA 98901 Phone (509) 574-2749 Treatment Service Treatment Focus * ADATSA Assessment Center DUI Assessment Outpatient 39 0947 00 Yakima County TASC Yakima County Assessment And Referral Service 128 N Second Street — Courthouse, Room B -Yakima, WA 98901 Phone (509) 574 - 2749 Miscellaneous On -Line Reporting Treatment Service Treatment Focus * TASC Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) *Please also refer to the HOPWA Table in the Needs.xls workbook. 1. The Plan includes a description of the activities to be undertaken with its HOPWA Program funds to address priority unmet housing needs for the eligible population. Activities will assist persons who are not homeless but require supportive housing, such as efforts to prevent low-income individuals and families from becoming homeless and may address the housing needs of persons who are homeless in order to help homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and independent living. The plan would identify any obstacles to meeting underserved needs and summarize the priorities and specific objectives, describing how funds made available will be used to address 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 148 Version 2.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jurisdiction identified needs. 2. The Plan must establish annual HOPWA output goals for the planned number of households to be assisted during the year in: (1) short-term rent, mortgage and utility payments to avoid homelessness; (2) rental assistance programs; and (3) in housing facilities, such as community residences and SRO dwellings, where funds are used to develop and/or operate these facilities. The plan can also describe the special features or needs being addressed, such as support for persons who are homeless or chronically homeless. These outputs are to be used in connection with an assessment of client outcomes for achieving housing stability, reduced risks of homelessness and improved access to care. For housing facility projects being developed, a target date for the completion of each development activity must be included and information on the continued use of these units for the eligible population based on their stewardship requirements (e.g. within the ten-year use periods for projects involving acquisition, new construction or substantial rehabilitation). 4. The Plan includes an explanation of how the funds will be allocated including a description of the geographic area in which assistance will be directed and the rationale for these geographic allocations and priorities. Include the name of each project sponsor, the zip code for the primary area(s) of planned activities, amounts committed to that sponsor, and whether the sponsor is a faith -based and/or grassroots organization. 5. The Plan describes the role ofthe lead jurisdiction in the eligible metropolitan statistical area (EMSA), involving (a) consultation to develop a metropolitan -wide strategy for addressing the needs of persons with HIV/AIDS and the|rfarni|/es living throughout the EMSA with the othe[ jurisdictions within the EMSA; (b) the standards and procedures to be used to monitor HOPWA Program activities in order to ensure compliance by project sponsors of the requirements of the program. 6. The Plari includes the certifications relevant to the HOPWA Prograrn. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan HOPWA response: Not applicable to Yakima. 1. Describe how Federal, State, and local public and private sector resources that are reasonably expected to be available will be used to address identified needs for the period covered by the strategic plan. 3-5 Year Specific HOPWA Objectives response: Not applicable to Yakima. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 149 Version 2.0 - Jurisdiction Include any Strategic Plan information that was not covered by a narrative in any other section. See the Appendix |nforrnation attached for a glossary, population projections, Community survey data, letters of comment, and the detailed results of the mail-out/phone-back survey of the CDBG Target Area residents. 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 151 Version 2.0 Jurisdiction This page intentonafIy blank 3-5 Year Strategic Plan 152 Version 2.0 • Affordable Housing: Affordable housing is generIIy defined by HUD as housing where the occupant is paying no more than 30% of gross income for gross housing costs, including utility costs. The City's definition is: "The monthly expenditure for housing including mortgage/rent repayment, insurance, and taxes shall not exceed 3O96 of the gross househod income. Overall debt including housing costs and revolving debt shall not exceed 40% of gross household income." AIDS and Related Diseases: The disease of acquired immunodeficiency syndrorne or any conditions arising from the etiologic agent for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction: A serious and persistent alcohol or other drug addiction that significantly limits a person's ability to live independently. Assisted Household or Person: For the purpose of identification of goals, an assisted household or person is one, which, during the period covered by the action plan, will receive benefits through Federal funds, either alone or in cojunction with the investment of other public or private funds. The program funds providing the benefit(s) may be from any funding year or combined funding years. A renter is benefited if that person takes occupancy of affordable housing that is newly acquired, newly rehabilitated, or newly constructed, and/or receives rental assistance through new budget authority. An existing homeowner is benefited during the year if the home's rehabilitation is completed. Afirst time homebuyer is benefited ifa home is purchased during theyear. A homeless person is benefited during the year if the person becomes an occupant of transitional or permanent housing. A non -homeless person with special needs is considered as being benefited, however, only 1? the provision of supportive services is Iinked to the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of housing unit and/or the provision of rental assistance during the year. Households or persons who will benefit from more than one program activity must be counted only once. For inclusion in thegna|s, the housing unit must, at a minimum, satisfy the HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards (see 34CFR section 883.1O9). Brownfield: Abandoned, idled, or under-utilized industrial and commercial facilities where expans/on or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. CDBG: Community Development Block Grant is a federal program authorized under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, with the primary objective 0? developing viable urban A-1 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 communities, by providing decent housing opportunities and a suitable. living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate -income. Committed: Generally means a legally binding commitment of funds to a specific project to undertake specific activities. Cost Burden > 30%: The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 30% of gross income, based on data published by the US Census Bureau. Cost Burden > 50% (Severe Cost Burden): The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 50% of gross income, based on data published by the US Census Bureau. Disabled Household: A household composed of one or more persons, at least one of whom is an adult (a person of at least 18 years of age), who has a disability. A person shall be considered to have a disability if the person is determined to have a physical, mental or emotional impairment that: (1) is expected to be of long -continued and indefinite duration, (2) substantially impeded his or her ability to live independently, and (3) is of such a nature that the ability could be improved by more suitable housing conditions. A person shall also be considered to have a disability if he or she has a developmental disability as defined in the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6001-6006). The term also includes the surviving member or members of any household who were living in an assisted unit with the deceased member of the household at the time of his or her death. Disproportionate Need of Racial/Ethnic Groups: A "disproportionate need" defined for purposes of the Consolidated Plan is if a particular group is five percentage points or greater than the need for the population as a whole. Economic Independence and Self -Sufficiency Programs: Programs undertaken by Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) to promote economic independence and self-sufficiency for participating families. Such programs may include Project Self -Sufficiency and Operation Bootstrap programs that originated under earlier Section 8 rental certificate and rental voucher initiatives, as well as the Family Self -Sufficiency program. In addition, PHAs may operate locally developed programs or conduct a variety of special projects designed to promote economic independence and self-sufficiency. Elderly Household: For HUD rental programs, a 1 or 2 person household in which the head of the household or spouse is at least 62 years of age. Elderly Person: A person who is at least 62 years of age. A-2 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 Existing Homeowner: An owner occupant of residential property who holds legal title to the property and who uses the property as his/her principal residence. Extremely Low -Income: Households whose incomes do not exceed 30% of the median area income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller and larger families and for areas with unusually high or Iow-incomes or where needed because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents. Family: See definition in Z4CFR812.2(TheNatiVna|Affondab|e Housing Act definition required for used in the Consolidated Plan; rule differs from the Census definition). The Bureau of Census defines a family as a householder (head ofhousehold) and one or more other persons living in the same household who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption (see a|so"Horne|ess Family"). Family Self -Sufficiency (FSS) Program: A program enacted by Section 554 of the National Affordable Housing Act, which directs Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) and Indian Housing Authoht|es(IMAs) to use Section 8 assistance under the rental certificate and rental voucher programs, together with public and private resources to provide supportive services, enabling participating families to achieve economic independence and self-sufficiency. First -Time Home Buyer: An individual or family who has not owned a home during the 3 -year period preceding the HUD -assisted purchase of a home that must be used as the principal residence of the home buyer, except that any individual who is a displaced homemaker (as defined in 24 CFR 92) or a single parent (as defined in 24 CFR 92) may not be excluded from consideration as a first-time home buyer on the basis that the individual, while a homemaker or married, owned a home with his or her spouse or resided in a home owned by the spouse. FmHA: The Farmers Home Administration or programs it administers. For Rent: Year round housing units that are vacant and offered/available for rent (US Census definition). For Sale: Year round housing units that are vacant and offered/available for sale only (US Census definition). Frail Elderly: An elderly person who is unable to perform at least activities of daily living (i.e. eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, and household management activities). (See 24 CFR 889.105.) Group Quarters: Facilities providing living quarters not classified as housing units (US Census definition). Examples include prisons, nursing homes, dormitories, military barracks, and shelters. A-3 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 HOME: The HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which is authorized by Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act. Homeless Family: A family that includes at least one parent or guardian and one child under the age of 18, a homeless pregnant woman, or a homeless person in the process of securing legal custody of a person under the age of 18. Homeless Individual: An unaccompanied youth (17 years or younger) or an adult (18 years oro|deh without children. Homeless Youth: Unaccompanied person 17 years of age or younger who is living in situations described by terms "sheltered" or "unsheltered." HOPE 1: The HOPE for Public and Indian Housing Home Ownership Program, which is authorized by Title IV, Subtitle A of the National Affordable Housing Act. HOPE 2: The HOPE for Home Ownership of Multifamily Units Program, which is authorized by Title IV, Subtitle B of the National Affordable Housing Act. HOPE 3: The HOPE for Home Ownership of Single Family Homes Program, which is authorized by Title IV, Subtitle C of the National Affordable Housing Act. Household: One or more persons occupying a housing unit (US Census definition). See also "Family." Housing Problems: Households with housing problems include those that: (1) occupy units meeting the definition of Physical Defects; (2) meet the definition of Overcrowded; and (3) meet the definition of Cost Burden Greater than 30%. Housing Unit: An occupied or vacant house, apartment, or a single room (SRO housing) intended as separate living quarters (US Census Institutions/Institutional: Group quarters for persons under care or custody. (US Census definition) Large Related: Ahousehold of 5 or more persons, which includes at least 1 person related to the householder by blood, marriage, or adoption. Lead -Based Paint Hazard: Any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead -contaminated dust, lead -contaminated soil, lead - contaminated paint deteriorated or present in accessible surfaces, A-4 Appendix A: Glossary friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects as established by the appropriate Federal agency (Residential Lead -Based Paint Hazard Reductio,n Act of 1992 definition). LIHTC: (Federal) Low -Income Housing Tax Credit, Low -Income: Households whose incomes do not exceed 80q6 of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD adjustments for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 80% of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. NOTE: HUD income limits are updated annually and are available from local HUD offices. Low -Income Concentrations: Locally defined as any area (block group) where the percentage of low-income persons is 51% or greater. Moderate -Income: Households whose incomes are between 81% and 95% of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller or larger families, except that HUD may establish incorne ceilings higher or lower than 95% of the median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs orfair market rents, or unusually higher or low family incomes (This definition is different than that for the CDBG Program). Non -Elderly Household: A household that does riot meet the definition of "Elderly Household," as defined above. Non -Homeless Persons with Special Needs: Includes frail elderly persons, persons with AIDS, disabled families, and families participating in organized programs to achieve economic self-sufficiency. Non -Institutional: Group quarters for persons not under care or custody (US Census definition used). Occupied Housing Unit: A housing unit that is the usual place of residence of the occupant(s). Other Household: A household of 1 or more persoris that does not meet the definition of a Small Related household, Large Related household, or Elderly household. Other Vacant: Vacant year round housing units that are not For Rent or For Sale. This category would iriclude Awaiting Occupancy or HeId. Ovenorowded:A housing unit containing more than 1 person per room (US Census definition). A-5 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010~2014 Owner: A household that owns the housing unit it occupies. (US Census definition) Physical Defects: A housing unit lacking complete kitchen or bathroom (US Census definition). Project -Based (Rental) Assistance: Rental Assistance provided for a project, not for a specific tenant. Tenants receiving project -based rental assistance give up the right to that assistance upon moving from the project. Public Housing CIAP: Public Housing Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program. Public Housing MROP: Public Housing Major Reconstruction of Obsolete Projects. Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentrations: Locally defined as any area (block group) where the total minority population is greater than twice the citywide average. Rent Burden > 30% (Cost Burden): The extent to which gross rents, including utility costs, exceed 30% of gross income, based on data published by the U.S. Census Bureau. Rent Burden > 50% (Severe Cost Burden): The extent to which gross rents, including utility costs, exceed 50% of gross income, based on data published by the U.S. Census Bureau. Rental Assistance: Rental assistance payments provided as either project -based rental assistance or tenant -based rental assistance. Renter: A household that rents the housing unit it occupies, including both units rented for cash and units occupied without cash payment of rent (US Census definition) Renter Occupied Unit: Any occupied housing unit not owner occupied, including units rented for cash and those occupied without payment of cash rent. Rural Homelessness Grant Program: Rural Homeless Housing Assistance Program, which is authorized by Subtitle G, Title IV of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act. Section 215: Section 215 of the Title II of the National Affordable Housing Act. Section 215 defines "affordable" housing projects under the HOME program. Service Needs: The particular services identified for special needs populations, which typically include transportation, personal care, A-6 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 housekeeping, counseling, meals, case management, personal emergency response, and other services to prevent premature institutionalization and assist rndrviduals to continue Iiving independently. Severe Cost Burden: See Cost Burden > 50%. Severe Mental Illness: A serious and persistent mental or emotional impairment that significantly limits a person's ability to live independently. Sheltered: Families and persons whose primary nighttime residence is a supervised publicly or privately operated she|ter, including emergency shelters, transitional housing for the homeless, domestic violence shelters, residential shelters for runaways and for the homeless youth, and any hotel/motel/apar-tment voucher arrangement paid because the person is homeless. This term does not include persons living doubled - up or in overcrowded or substandard conventional housing. Any facility offering permanent housing is not a shelter nor are ts residents homeless. Small Related: A household of 2 to 4 persons that includes at least 1 person related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Substandard Condition and not Suitable for Rehab: By ocal definition, dwelling units in such poor condition as to be neither structurally nor financially feasible for rehabilitation. Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehab: By Iocal definition, dwelling units that do not meet standard conditions butane both financially and structurally feasible for rehabilitation. This does not include unity that require only cosmetic work, correction of minor livability problems, or maintenance work. Substantial Amendment: A major change in an approved plan. It involves a change to the 3 -year strategy, which may be occasioned by a decision to undertake activities or programs inconsistent with that strategy. Substantial Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of residential property at an average cost for the project in excess of $25,000 per dwellingunit. Supportive Housing: Housing, including Housing Units and Group Quarters, which have a supportive environment and include planned service component. Supportive Service Need in FSS PIan: The plan that PHAs administering a Family Self -Sufficiency program are required to develop, identifying the services they will provide to participating families and the source of funding for those services. The supportive services May include child care; transportation; remedial education; education for A_7 Appendix A: Glossary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 completion of secondary or post secondary schooling; job training, preparation and counseling; substance abuse treatment and counseling; training in homemaking and parenting skills, money management, and household management; counseling in home ownership; job development and placement; follow-up assistance after job placement; and other appropriate service. Supportive Services: Services provided to residents of supportive housing for the purpose of facilitating the independence of residents. Some examples are case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training. Tenant -Based (Rental) Assistance: A form of rental assistance in which the assisted tenant may move from a dwelling unit with a right to continued assistance. The assistance is provided for the tenant, not for the project. Year Round Housing Units: Occupied and vacant housing units intended for year round use (US Census definition). Housing units for seasonal or migratory use are excluded. Total Vacant Housing Units: Unoccupied year round housing units. (US Census definition) Unsheltered: Families and individuals whose primary nighttime residence is a public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings (e.g., streets, parks, alleys). Vacant Awaiting Occupancy or Held: Vacant year round housing units that have been rented or sold and are currently awaiting occupancy, and vacant year round housing units that are held by owners or renters for occasional use (US Census definition). Vacant Housing Unit: Unoccupied year-round housing units available or iritended for occupancy at any time during the year. Very Low -Income: Households whose incomes do not exceed 50% of the median area income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller and larger families and for areas with unusually high or low -incomes, or where needed because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents. Worst -Case Needs: Unassisted, very low-income renter households who pay more than haif of their income for rent, live in seriously substandard housing (which includes homeless peop|a\, or have been involuntarily displaced. A-8 Appendix A: GloSsary Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 �� �� �� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 United States Historical Washington State Puget Sound (King/Kitsap/Pierce/Snohomish) 1 Yakima County 1865 Yakima 1886 UGA 1 1000 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1880 1990 2000 2005 76,094,000 92.407.000 106.466.000 123.077,000 132.594.000 152.371,000 180.671.000 204.870.000 226.500.000 250'410.000 274,634'000 285,981,000 518.100 1,142.000 1.356.600 1.563.400 1.736.200 2.379.000 2.853.200 3.413,300 4.132'200 4,866,663 5.894.121 6,233.345 196.285 492.306 634,254 736,906 820.202 1.196.172 1.512.978 1.938'899 2.240.260 2.748.895 3.275.847 3.524.000 13.462 41.709 63.710 77,402 99.019 135,723 145.112 145.212 172.508 188.823 222.581 225.622 3,154 14.082 18'539 22,101 27.221 38,486 43.284 45,588 49,826 54.843 71.845 79.480 3.154 14.082 18.539 22.101 27.221 38.486 43.284 45.588 49.826 E4.843 71.845 79'480 Projections 2010 297.716.000 6,648.112 3'636,420 237,435 85.392 100.066 2015 310,133'000 7,096,501 3.856.545 354.257 88.442 107.155 2020 322,742.000 7.545.269 4,080.990 269,401 91.188 113,537 2025 335'050.000 7'975.471 4,295.432 283.884 93.815 119'641 Average annual rate of growth 1900'1910 2.0& 8.2% 9.6% 12.0% 16.1% F6.1% 1010'1920 1.4% 1.7% 2.6% 4.3% 2.8% 2.8% 1920'1930 1.5% 1.4% 1.5%2.0% 1.8% 1,8% 1930-1940 0.7% 1.1% 1.1% 2.5% 2.1% 2.1% 1940'1950 1.4% 3.2% 3.8% 3.2% 3.5% 3.5% 1950'1960 1.7% 1.8% 2.4% 0.7% 12N 1.2% 1960'1970 1.3% 1.0% 2.5% 0.0% 0.50 0.5% 1970'1980 1.0% 1.94 1.5% 1.7% 0.9& 0.9% 1980'1990 1.0% 1.6% 2.1% 0.9& 1.0% 1.0% 1900'2000 0.9% 1.9% 1,8% 1.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2000-2005 0.8% 1.1% 1.5% 0.3% 2.0% 2.0% Projected average annual rate 2005'2010 0.8% 1.3% 0.6N 1.0% 1.4% 4.7% 2010'2015 0.8% 1.3% 1.2% 1.4% 0.7% 1.4% 2015'2020 0.0W 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 0.6W 1.2% 2020'3025 0.8% 1.1% 1.0% 11% 0.8% 1.1% US Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-25, Number 1018, Mid Series 14: fertiU,y~1.8 births/woman, nnnrta|ity~81.2 years, 500'000 yearly net imniigration. Washington State, Office of Financial Manugennen,. Population Trends for Washington State, January 2002 Washington State Data Book, Office of Financial Management, Mid series Yakima Planning Department Intermediate Projections in 2005 Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Service Area. 8$-1 Appendix B: Population 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 7:* qg� United »S Washington WA Puget Pu et Snd Yakima Persons 298.757.310 6.37/.390 3.497,527 M�,223,8190i7. 85,228 Households Ave�gehousehold size Families Percent households in families 111.609.629 2.60 7*.625^059 67% 2.472.477 2.52 1,594.289 64% 1.386.114 2.48 •` 865.712lit .44 52%W������3:29‘ 30.703 2.68 19.500 64% Population by age 0- 4 5- 9 10-14 15-19 20-.24 25'34 35-44 45'54 55'59 60'61 65'71 75-84 85+ ' 20,480.07 19,683,354 20.609.310 21.469.78U 20.867.88n 39.96*.90O 43.622.331 43.233'*3* 17.808'8*6 13,751,759 19.898.01G 13,300,312 *.975.788 412.374 404,973 434,460 442,382 433.4/1 882.534 943.*08 969.727 402.e43 307,402 380.102 255,711 101,963 223.736 215.923 23*.077 229.089 220.276 496,156 566.065 557.323 22*.592 166.1*0 1e0.0931,869 123.582 50.475 ,i, . 070 8.066 6.654 5,325 5.604 7.7*1 11.906 10.148 9.618 4,924 3.526 4.152 2.093 weIan vne 36.4 37.2 dignIZ3g 32.1 Percent under 18 2896 znw znm 30% Family household Percent of all households67% 74,625,059 1,594,289 70% 86 .7lz 62% 4 19,500 64% married couple 55.603.280 .|.zs«.eoo 668.859 13.713 married couple w/related chilc 2*.182.954 530.910 297.771 6,611 male only ' 5'103.598 108'320 60'264 1.549 male only w/related child 2.515.755 61.2*7 31.732 744 female only 13.918.181 . 251.009 136.589 4,238 female only w/related child 8.293,17E 1*5.372 87,558 �,,N�����i 2,830 Non -Non -family households Percent of all huuehn|ds 30.98*.570 Bm 878,188 3996 520,402 11,203 living alone ' 30/421.692 591.110 409 --:.A. 8,943 . over 65 10,248,**0 200.340 104'618 �����Q��8X� 3,953 111, 09,629 Residence in 2004 2,472,477 l.3aO..)l4 30,703 same house in 2004 different house in count different house in same st elsewhere 245.651.828 28^e26.415 18.422.193 9.890.632 5,032.706 756,681 219.450 443,186 2.754,823 428 548 . 104,I55 204,730 �������81,1: 03.056 15,362 2,465 2,791 Population l+years mznn* 294.699.072 6,288,449 3,451,446 83,674 c -x Appendix C: 2005_2007 American Community Survey Yakima cono/u/auwdPlan 2m10 -2o14 pa c�.tive scacplifsratiti United States Washington - State s. Puget Sound Laic a o Yakima Persons 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 230;9:1)7 85,226 Households 111,609,629 2,472,477 1,386,114 76698- 30,703 Average household size 2.60 2.52 2.48 2 5t' 2.78 Families 74,625,059 1,594,289 865,712 55171 19,500 Percent households in families 67% 64% 6296 fi ,m :2% 64% Age by ex 0- 4 5- 9 7% 7% 6% 696 6% 6% '9% 8% 9% 8% 10-14 7% 796 7% 'a S% 6% 15-19 7% 796 7%8% 3% 7% 20-24 7% 796 6% 9% 746 25-34 13% 1496 14% 3% 14% 45-54 14% 15% 16% 3% 1 1 % 55-59 6% 696 6% "6% 6% 60-64 5% 5% 5% "4% 4% 65-74 796 6% 5% % 6% 75-84 4% 456 4% 496 5% 85+ 2% 296 1% $ w2% 3% Median aoe 36.4 36.8 37.2 32i Percent under 18 Percent 65+ 28% 13% 2796 12% 26% 10% 33% 11% 30% 14% Family household Percent of all households 74,625,059 67% 594,289 865,712 7096 62% 19,50 64% married couple married couple w/related child male only male only w/related child female only female only w/related child 75% 3296 7% 3% 19% 11% 0 77/ 33% 7% 4% 16% 10% 7o 34% 7% 4% 16% 10% _ r �,% :9% 4 3.6%°' 5% 1:8% 7096 3496 8% 4% 22% 1 5% Non -family households Percent of all households 36,984,570 33% 878,188 39% 520,402 38% 091fi7 2,296' 1 ,203 36% living alone 82% 79% 79% .'-;,` 79% 80% over65 28% 23% 20% 35% 35% Total households Residence in 2004 1 1 1,609,62 2,472,477 1,386,114 30,703 same house in 2004 83% 80% 80% % 7596 different house in same count 1056 12% 12% 1 596 1 896 different house in same sr 3% 7% 3% 3% 396 elsewhere 3% 7% 6%� 2 3% Population 1+ years in 2004 294,699,072 6,288,449 ,451,44 2 12,21 83,674 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ►Gl i'GTi Education (age 25+ yrs) United States Washington State Puget Sound ;i makci Yakima less than 9th grade 9th -12th grade, no diploma high school graduate some college, no degree associate degree bachelors degree graduate or professional degree 12,691,550 18,556,909 58,762,191 38,383,119 14,392,617 33,475,448 19,384,549 171,153 299,461 1,086,559 1,018,950 393,371 825,337 448,959 72,379 144,575 555,414 548,47527790: 217,593 544,61813 291,372 22,87,6] 178 067; t 39"98 - ` 7k8 X74 $54 ���7,r,844, ` 7,216 6,755 14,239 11,195 2,838 6,086 3,507 Total 195,646,383 4,24 790 2,374,426 8 5 ,836 Total population 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 23019071 85,226 Total persons 16 years+ 233,658,279 5,028,054 2,775,630 a1 8r63 64,066 total in labor force151,062,383 16,166,886 3,312,856 1,904,2551071$ 40,391 total civilian employed 140,148,744 3,051,540 1,763,333 '6109_ 36,029 total in armed forces 1,011,531 46,877 31,268 190 63 Occupation managerial, professional service occupations sales and office operations farming, fishing, and forestry construction, extraction, mainten production, transportation 47,838,787 23,251,699 36,206,078 986,629 13,800,395 18,065;156 1 ,1 16,980 489,338 758,660 48,534 283,388 354,640 711,448 7 24174 263,813 1'6 1]59' 441,047 ,`24 $1$ 4,469 kii,816- 155,097 223, 187,459 155 8,7,0k 8,853 7,027 8,441 3,476 2,201 6,031 Industry 40, 48,744 05 40 1,76 60.60l 6,029 agriculture, forestry, fishing, min 2,530,155 76,831 9,87814724 4352 construction 10,886,582 238,940 134,787 483' 1255 manufacturing 16,166,886 335,142 211,156 1if),,4$1 : 3812 subtotal base industries 29, 8 6 6 0,913 355,821 2,91.65$ 9,4 9 wholesale trade retail trade transportation; warehouse, utilitii information finance, insurance, real estate professional, scientific, managerr education, health, and social sen arts, entertainment, recreation other services public administration 4,710,627 16,181,199 7,1 12,743 3,486,447 10,091,678 14,125,664 29,362,441 12,135,550 6,754,946 6,603,826 109,554 349,849 156,184 87,565 198,796 331,294 608,807 260,635 140,333 1 57,61 0 61,736 6,9431 198,332 , 989 90,255 h3 9Z01 64,191 222, 127,5023*239 -- 223,727 5 20©a 332,350 20,278, 147,619 ,295 83,322 4' 161 78,478 :, 4125'31 2762 3999 919 410 1490 21 53 8040 3899 1 773 1 165 subtotal service industries total industries 110,565,121 140,148,744 2,400,627 3,051 ,540 1,407, 2 (i 6.6';402 26,610 1,763, 96060 36,029 private wage and salary workers 110,005,307 2,345,094 1,388,901 ,7525'7;? 30,124 government workers 20,309,605 489,247 256,435 15 157 4,129 self-employed in own business 9,514,875 210,580 114,825 5,428- 1,716 unpaid family workers 318,957 6,619 3,172 a�`4 21 60 Tota 140,1 48,744 0 540 763,333 61W 96;060) 36,029 Median household income Median family income Per capita income $50,007 560,374 $26,1 78 $53,940 $65,428 $28,290 561,684$400T3r21 575,740$;47 8i�7; $32,455 $lt$ 186a $ 35,820 5 46,360 $ 19,362 C-3 Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 Education (persons 18 years+) Iracation and dtei i • United States Washington State Puget Sound ir" Yakima o! Yakima less than 9th grade 9th -12th grade, no diploma high school graduate some college, no degree associate degree bachelors degree graduate or professional degree 6% 9% 30% 20% 7% 17% 10% 4% . 7% 26%23% 24% 9% 19% 11% 3% )17% 6% 1+ %% ��.�29% 23% z X20% 9% 6% 23%60% 12% . 6% 14% 13% 27% 5% 5% 12% 7% Tota 195,646,383 4,243,790 2,374,426 138;305 51,836 Total population Total persons 16 years+ total in labor force total civilian employed total in armed forces 298,757,310 233,658,279 65% 60% 0% 6,371,390 5,028,054 66% 61% 1% 3,497,527 4T12301907 2,775,630 :1'68,61g3= 69%y 5 6% 64%57% 1% 0% 85,226 64,066 63% 56% 0% Occupation managerial, professional service occupations sales and office operations faming, fishing, and forestry construction, extraction, mainten production, transportation 34% 1 7% 26% 1% 10% 13% 37% 16% 25%l7% 2% 9% 12% 40%X25% 1 5% 7 25% X922% 0% s 2% 9% 8% 11% 25% 20% 23% 10% 6% ° Industry 140,148,744 3,051,540 1,763,333 e9.610.60ri 36,029 agriculture, forestry, fishing, min construction manufacturing 2% 8% 12% 3% 8% 11% 1% 15% 8% 5% 12%sA ,1y0% 12% 3% 11% subtotal base industries 21% 21% 20%114.-- 26% wholesale trade 3% 4% 4% 5% 7%` 0/ 7% •8% retail trade 12% 11%" 11% 1t0% ° 11� transportation, warehouse, utiliti 5% 5% 5% 4% 3% information 2% 3% 4% i% 1% finance, insurance, real estate 7% 7% 7%3% 4% professional, scientific, manager). 10% 11% 13% - 5% 6% education, health, and social sere 21% 20% 19% i 21t 22% arts, entertainment, recreation 9% 9% 8% ( 8% 11% other services 5% 5% 5% 4% 5% public administration 5% 4% subtotal services industries total industries 79% 79% 80% MONO% 74% 140,148,744 3,051,540 1,763,333 v, t 96;060 36,029 private wage and salary workers government workers self-employed in own business unpaid family workers 78% 14% 7% 0% 77% • 16% 7% 0% 79% 1 5% 7%` 0/ ' 7P78%i 16.% X696 84% 1.1% 5% 0% Tota 'Q60ifl 36.029 Median household income Median family income Per capita income $50,007 $60,374 $26,1 78 $53,940 $65,428 $28,290 $61,684$4� 0,321' $ $75,740 �'$4787q $32,455.$1 8;i1,86t 35,820 $ 46,360 $ 19,362 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mparativeosociao:statistt Household (famil /nonfamil incom United States Washington State Puget Sound akifna El) Yakima $ 0- 9,999/ $ 10- 14,999 $ 15- 24,999 8,514,777 6,429,618 12,364,317 61,054 46,110 114,871 48,350 34,498 76,727 ..(k ''71,065-I ... . Pjl- ' 83('- 3364 2589 4888 $ 25- 34,999 12,231,619 137,331 87,479 -/- 2 .a55 -v. 4181 $ 35- 49,999 16,257,603 218,310 142,953 -, , 4710 $ 50- 74,999 21,037,956 341,631 212,773 -,,i ' 5143 $ 75- 99,999 13,556,898 251,148 161,987 * .. -07,; 5% 2649 $ 100-149,999 12,773,026 261,148 184,018 i '5(7,W 1,943 $ 150-199,999 4,313,913 86,722 66,075. I.09' , p, 494 $ 200,000+ 4,129,902 75,264 58,388 ,' 6,7 742 Total 11,609,62 Individuals in poverty status by age 93,589 1,073,248 it,T;t0e=„449 30,703 between 18-64 years 11.9% 11.1% 9.1%'t% , •,I6,1074i, .. - . ' 0 , 4 It i,,.. 4,35g 7; -1- o8 i -4 058$ 23,449 8,497 1,801 1,897 5,401 19.0% Over 65 years 9.9% 8.6% 8.7% l'Itt , 3I6 12.4% Total in Poverty 18+ years 10.7% 9.0% L6.103% 1 7.8% Percent of Population in Poverty 13.3% 11.8% 9.7% 01,7% 21.0% Total families in poverty in 1999 9.8% 8.0% 6.3% 1 5.3% Married couple families with related children <18 yrs. with no related children <1 8 yrs. Other families Male head w/related child <1 8 yrs. Male head w/o child <1 8 yrs. Female head w/related child <18 Female head w/o child <1 8 yrs. 4.8% 6.6% 28.6% 36.9% 4.0% 5.4% 26.3% 33.5% 3.0% 4.3% 21.3% 28.0% 8.6% 1 3.9% 37.2% 44.4% Source of income Earnings Wages or salary Self employment Interest, dividents, or net rental Social security Supplemental security (SSI) Public assistance cash income Retirement Other types 89,560,105 29,938,325 4,460,967 2,606,375 19,466,640 2,004,332 601,396 93,093 82,924 440,4330 1,159,410 293,477 45,528 40,162 226,054 , •,I6,1074i, .. - . ' 0 , 4 It i,,.. 4,35g 7; -1- o8 i -4 058$ 23,449 8,497 1,801 1,897 5,401 Amount of income - mean ,593,589 ,073,248 6698 30,703 Earnings Wages or salary Self employment Interest, dividents, or net rental Social security Supplemental security (SSI) Public assistance Retirement Other types 568,965 514,319 57,648 53,237 519,862 570,571 514,670 $7,912 53,205 S20,725 579,246 $14,736 - $7,939 $3,316 S21,536 ,°`1,' 4 5, ,29.2, 4; i....,.- 4-''''`., P,• - I'-'''' -P. v9) ,. $,I7,,,9,44401 '-- ,• t7A 9i N .08f',,. . 550,600 513,528 58,138 53,355 $16,280 C-5 Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 Hardt ve so'c�iil st`atis acs CO Family/nonfamily household income United States Washington State Puget Sound akimaaCo Yakima $ 0- 9,999 $ 10- 14,999 $ 15- 24,999 $ 25- 34,999 $ 35- 49,999 $ 50- 74,999 $ 75- 99,999 $ 100-149,999 $ 150-199,999 $ 200,000+ 8% 6% 11% 11% 15% 19% 12% 11% 4% 4% 4% 3% 7% 9% 14% 21% 16% 16% 5% 5% 5% 3% 7%1,5% 8% 13% 20% 15% 17% 6%% 5% 9% r �� °' a � '�` 12% 16% f 20% 10% 7% � 4a2% 11% 8% 16% ° 14/ 15% 17% 9% 6% 2% 2% Total 111,609,629 1,593,589 1,073,248 gfig 6,98 30,703 Individuals in poverty status by age Under 65 years Over 65 years 11.9% 9.9% 11.1% 8.6% 9.1% 8.7% T744 4% 1, 6% 19.0% 12.4% Total in Poverty Percent of Population in Poverty 11.6% 10.7% 9.0%5b6',8% 1 7.8% 13.3% 11.8% 9.7%Kf); M12 21 .0% Total families in Poverty 9.8% 8.0% 6.3% 5°15% 1 5.3% Married couple families with related children <1 8 yrs. with no related children <18 yrs. Other families Male head w/related child <1 8 yrs. Male head w/o child <18 yrs. Female head w/related child <18 Female head w/o child <1 8 yrs. Source of income 4.8% 6.6% 28.6% 36.9% 4.0% 5.4% 26.3% 33.5% 3.0% 4.3% 21.3% 28.0% 8.6% 1 3.9% 37.2% 44..4% Earnings Wages or salary Self employment Interest, dividents, or net rental Social security Supplemental security (551) Public assistance cash income Retirement Other types 126% 0% 0% 0% 38% 6% 5% 28% 0% 108%80% 0% 0% 0%0% 27% 4% 4% 21% 0% � lt '' .' , 0% 02‘ 27% 5% 15% O% 76% 0% 0% 0% 28% 6% 6% 18% 0% Amount of income Allatra Earnings Wages or salary Self employment Interest, dividents, or net rental Social security Supplemental security (551) Public assistance cash income Retirement Other types $70,571 $0 $0 $0 $14,670 $7,912 $3,205 520,725 $0 $79,246 "$52;292 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $14,73 t$ ',5:20,,i 6 $7,939 s0$8,138 53,316 ,$39 ,,75 521,536 $)7 108 $0 ,o-;=,$0 $50,600 $0 $0 50 $13,528 53,355 516,280 $0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti United States Washington State Puget Sound Ya aQo Yakima Total housing units 126,237,884 2,698,930 1,483,662 821;gg 33,082 Occupied housing units 111,609,629 2,472,477 1,386,114 {'n 76#698i 30,703 percent owner occupied 67% 66% 64% a 65% 56% percent renter occupied 33% 34% 36% X35% 45% Vacant housing units percent seasonal, recreational use 14,628,255 226,453 97,548 5 49O 2,349 Rooms 1 room 2 rooms 3 rooms 4 rooms 5 rooms 6 rooms 7 rooms 8 rooms 9 rooms or more 1257832 3,953,307 11658785 22008707 27605800 23891299 15507478 10079665 10275011 41,882 111,413 252,441 462,757 520,815 457,162 353,514 232,515 266,431 26,720 66,280 153,379 248,030 263,692 236,541 196,047621.x' 134,268 158,705 �`49 24514 6,438p °.15966 l,9;779',5 1c5;334 1,-.-L3 5 5 r ',x54902 428 1,654 3,457 7,824 6,839 5,392 3,148 1,888 2,452 Mean number of rooms Year Structure Built 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.0 2005+ 2000-2004 1990 to 1999 1980 to 1989 1970 to 1979 1960 to 1969 1950 to 1959 1940 to 1949 1939 or earlier 2,350,881 10,560,759 18,072,365 18,389,849 21,357,510 14,831,846 14,633,548 7,610,300 18,430,826 57,124 249,697 491,147 396,871 506,093 285,859 237,814 157,802 316,523 30,410,E ';' 864 138,544 :5`633; 258,397 1°Ot525 242,448 973§1'1 255,341 16 028 178,848 .;8 466 127,776103,7-• 82,121 2" 169,777 185 1,712 2,706 3,509 6,140 3,716 5,087 3,660 6,367 Total housing units Median year built Units in structure 126,237,884 unavailable 2,698,930 1,483,662 unavailable 33,082 1, detached 1, attached 2 3 or 4 5-9 10-19 20+ mobile home/trailer boat, rv, van, etc. 77,612,835 7,168,650 5,049,891 5,734,344 6,162,198 5,656,157 10,023,728 8,729,075 101,006 1,697,887 90,676 73,939 103,509 127,023 155,679 237,431 207,344 5,442 890,27452'7*10 57,618 2t883 34,1211 0313 59,72 3,600' 86,14 2SO4k 112,371 17 83' 175,6892;877,1 65,455 =:t 1;%2,0 2,270 _. _ 98 18,802 1,997 2,599 2,493 1,564 1,490 2,103 2,018 16 Total 126,237,884 2,698,930 2T1, t8 33,082 C-7 Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 rpiaditiltesTei ,ti United Washington States State Puget Sound -P.2',Ak oi 4.eb Yakima Total housing units 126,237,884 2,698,930 1,483,662 ,-;_riii' 4''''82;i118.8, 33,082 Occupied housing units percent owner occupied percent renter occupied Vacant housing units - percent inventory percent seasonal, recreational use 111,609,629 67% 33% 2,472,477 66% 34% 8% 0% 1,386,114 0% 0% 7%, 0% 76t,6983 6' -, 5 7 - , 30,703 56% 45% 7% 0% Rooms 1 room 2 rooms 3 rooms 1% 3% 9% 2% 4% 9% 2% 4% 0 10% -, 126 5% 10% 4 rooms 17% 17% 17%i• .,, "-_fr 24% 5 rooms 22% 19% 18% . - 21% 6 rooms 1926 17% 16% ',,..,,, 16% 7 rooms 12% 13% 13%rnt0P 10% 8 rooms 8% 9% 9% ' ' '-i 6% 9 rooms or more 8% 10% 11% , 7456 7% Mean number of rooms Year Structure Built 5.4 #REF! #REF! 2005+ 2000-2004 1990 to 1999 2% 8% 14% 2% 9% 18% 2% ,' : '' ----,,,,-11 ' 9% ' -: ' -7 1% 5% 1980 to 1989 1526 1526 16% ,r2- 11% 1970 to 1979 17% 19% 17% , .. - 20° .-,-, 19% 1960 to 1969 12% 1126 12% ,0 1126 1950 to 1959 • 12% 9969% •9 15% 1940 to 1949 6% 6% 6%41d 11% 1939 or earlier 15% 12% 11% , 7456 19% Total housing units Median year built Units in structure 126,237,884 2,698,930 1974 ,348,146 33,082 0 1, detached 1, attached 2 3 or 4 5-9 10-19 20+ mobile home/trailer other 61% 6% 4% 5% 5% 4% 8% 7% 0% 63% 3% 3% 4%,, 5% 6% 9% 8% 0%0% 60% 4% 2% 6% ° ' 8% --, 12% ' ' . 4% rr • "'i `a. ,64% ,.„ '5% d—t• ._ '2% -...,...,, 14% -,, , 57% 6% 8% 896 5% 5% 6% 6% 0% Total 126,237,884 2,698,930 1,483,662 ElF2.182-0811 33,082 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Value (owner -occupied units) United States Washington State Puget Sound Aar' kirna,E Yakima $ 0- 19.999 $ 50- 99.999 s./oo.«yo 12.167.778 64./38 90.*35 23.388 ' 15,464r,'"" 8;87,,i, 1.639 3,432 5 100'1*9.999 12.251.934 171,047 36,428 5.270 5 150'199,999 10.189.231 211.308 76'7*9 3.403 5 200'299.999 11.98*.9*1 � 392.989 /18.545 2.150 5 son'*99,999lz.5on,rn5 5,396,801 444'295 320.329 950 i 500'999.999 8.037.317 207.29* 163.692 148 51.000.000+ 1.766.187 39.e94 32.36/ �Z1' 75 Total 75.072,66o Median value 5181.800 Owner costs as % of household income 1,621,460 5261,200 886,956 S337,372 4� 7,047 32,600 less than lS% 22.592 21.753 76.165 230.85* 227,139 173.053 e1.654 57.807 12.276 11.23* 24,463''' ' ,§,:i, ,07',,,,4 109,7065.183 148.159 127.111 � 50.010 16.194 ,�8�0�� 504 523 3,395 2.449 � l.olz � 190 400 15.0-19.99( 34,613,515 679,328 334,934 7,973 20�-24.8n ' 10.131,038 230,259 129.240 2,207 25.0'29.9n 7.631.385 187,700 10e.846 1.716 30.0'3*`9n 5,396,801 136.02579.111 44.367 1,31 8 35.0+9i 16.882.229 381,609 231.011 3.8l7 Not computed *17.698 6.539 2,814 �,0,,,i0A-15f, 16 Total Rent (renter -occupied units) 75.072.666 r.ez|.*on 886,956 1 7,047 $ 0- 200 5 700' 299 $ 300- 499 5 500- 749 $ 750- 999 5 1.000'1.499 $ 1,500+ No cash rent *89.033 1.267.718 *.)76.]91 9.605.657 8,298,018 7.003.643 3.047.207 7.199.296 22.592 21.753 76.165 230.85* 227,139 173.053 e1.654 57.807 12.276 11.23* 24,463''' ' ,§,:i, ,07',,,,4 109,7065.183 148.159 127.111 � 50.010 16.194 ,�8�0�� 504 523 3,395 2.449 � l.olz � 190 400 Total 36,536,963 weu/unnem 57.81Grossmntau % of household income in 1999 � 851,017 5799 499,158 5879 13,656 $606 less than 15m *.388.0*9 e9.431 57.881 1.162 15.0'19.99( 4.330.730 108.805 65.959 2,010 20.0'24.9% 4.383.348 113.194 70.589 1.561 25o'29.99( 3.957.*89 98.278 00.503 1,s27 30o'34.9n 3.047.995 7+.470 44.367 1.214 35.0+% 13.639.e18 ]09.)49 178.053 5.214 Not computed 2.789.531 47,690 21.806 -;8J574, 568 Total 36,536,963 851,017 *n9.l58p l],65* C-9 Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey aratiwe oc�al stat Value (owner -occupied units) usinaual United States Washington State Puget Sound a Ima 0 Yakima $ 0- 49,999 $ 50- 99,999 $ 100-149,999 8% 16% 16% 4% 6% 11% 3% 2% 4% 11% ;1.8% 30% 1 0% 20% 31% $ 150-199,999 14% 13% 9% NO g s� 19% 20% $ 200-299,999 16% 24% 25% % 13% $ 300-499,999 17% 27% 36%7% 5% $ 500-999,999 11% 13% 18% % 1% $1,000,000+ 2% 2% 4% ° Total Median value 75,072,666 $1 81,800 1,621,460 $261,200 886,956 $337,372 9;834, 17,047 4;'8001 $132,600 less than 1 5% 15.0-19.99E ° 20.0-24.9% 25.0-29.9% 30.0-34.9% 35.0+% Not computed 0% 46% 13% 10% 7% 22% 1% 0% 42% 14% 12% 8% 24% 0% 0% 38% 1 5% 12%' 9% 26% 0% , . � .� 0 4Z% 14% 10% 9% 2�0% 0% 0% 47% 1 3% 10% 8% 22% 0% Total Rent (renter -occupied units) 75,072,666 1,621,460 886,956 17,047 $ 0- 200 $ 200-299 $ 300- 499 $ 500- 749 $ 750- 999 $ 1,000-1,499 $ 1,500+ No cash rent 3% 3% 11% 26% 23% 19% 8% 6% 3% 3% 9% 27% 27% 20% 7% 4% 2% 5%X23% 22% 30% 25% 10% 3% 4 ,, +17% r � �4,% �4% 38% 6% • 2% ,, ��:6% 4% 4% 25% 38% 18% 7% 1% 3% Total 36,536,963 Median rent $781 Gross rent as % of household income in 1999 851,017 5799 499,158 S879 13,656 $606 less than 1 5% 15.0-19.9% 20.0-24.9% 25.0-29.9% 30.0-34.9% 35.0+% Not computed 12% 12% 12% 11% 8% 37% 8% 12% 13% 13% • 12% 9% 36% 6% 12%6 13% # 1=3 , � 1�4% 14% � % 12% 9% S% 36% -34%38% 4% �8% 1 ° 1 5% 15% 12% 11% 9% 4% Total 36,536,963 851,017 499,1 58 Rffialau6ig 13,656 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 United States Washington State Puget Sound Yakima Workers 16 years and older 136,926,294 3,005,600 1,740,301 uni9.471.37,i • 35,511 Commute to work car, truck, orvan ' drove alone 104,188,65o 2.197,458 1.232.728 99.701 28.789 car,truck, or van - carpooled 14,525,922 347,800 202,025 � 6.230 public transportation/ taxi/fny 6.638.872 155.580 132.003468 na 0, walked or biked , 3.906,520 102,867 55.411 522.281 796� other means 2.298,351 5*^073 31.615 ' 410 worked mhome 5.368,07* 147.822 86.519 �vX�0�VA 810 Total 136'926.294 Mean travel time to work in minu 25.1 Private vehicle occupancy 3,005,600 25.3 1,740,301 29.1 .51/ l7.* Car, truck or van drove alone 8.783.3*3 161.507 99.701 Daytime population change commut ing Worked in state of residence worked in cuunrvofmgdencc e worked outside ofcounty nfsidence Worked outside state of residence Carpooled in 2 -person carpool n 3 -person carpool in 4 -person carpool in 5 -6 -person carpool ' in 7 -person or more carpool 1 vehicle � 36.977.395 761,164 448 952 Other means including working at home *mv/o! ��#nU��8- na 0, •,-.,%4 “0:,,, Total 0 Vehicles per occupied housng unit(owner and renter) 0 31. o 0 vehicle 8.783.3*3 161.507 99.701 Daytime population change commut ing Worked in state of residence worked in cuunrvofmgdencc e worked outside ofcounty nfsidence Worked outside state of residence 2,856 1 vehicle � 36.977.395 761,164 448 952 *o|v/o! *mv/o! ��#nU��8- na 10.643 2 vehicles *2.535.428 941.114 522.281 10,836 3 vehicles ' �Z.�)z.�u3 608,362 sls,�8U 6.368 *vrh|des 5ormore vehicles 44 � . ' ,8V1 Total 111.60e.629 Average number of vehicles available Place of work 2,472,477 1,386,114 30,703 Living in a place - 16 years and over worked in place of residence worked outside of place of residence Not ovmg|naplace �3��4«.g na na na Daytime population change commut ing Worked in state of residence worked in cuunrvofmgdencc e worked outside ofcounty nfsidence Worked outside state of residence � � Total workers 16+ Transposition Total resident pupu|axinnna To�|workers working inthea�a Total workers living in the area Estimated daytime population na na na Daytime population change commut ing na wv,kcr��ho|iwe�/�orked�amecovnry � na smp|oyment/re,iuence,aou wo/v/o! *o|v/o! *mv/o! ��#nU��8- na c'zz Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey para r►resoci nsportationt. aracterisiics United States Washington State Puget Sound Yakima C:o Yakima Workers 16 years and older 1 136,926,2941 3,005,600 1,740,301 94,487E 35,511 Commute to work DSO' car, truck, or van - drove alone 76% 73% 71% r, %. 75% car, truck, or van - carpooled 11% 12% 12% 16% 18% public transportation/taxi/ferry 5% 5% 8% -J 1�% 1% walked 3% 3% 3% % 2% other means 2% 2% 2% °l% 1% worked at home 4% 5% 5% A,;,3% 2% Total 136,926,294 Mean travel time to work in minu 25.1 Private vehicle occupancy 3,005,600 25.3 1,740,301 29.1 941487 135f�� 35,511 1 7.6 Car, truck or van drove alone Carpooled in 2 -person carpool in 3 -person carpool in 4 -person carpool in 5 -6 -person carpool in 7 -person or more carpool Other means #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!#DIV/01 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! �? #DIV/0! #DIV 01 } : '#DIV/0! #DIV/01 i-� #D!VZ0!f #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 Vehicles per household (owner and renter 0 0 vehicle 1 vehicle 2 vehicles 3 vehicles 4 vehicles 5 or more vehicles 9% 33% 38% 20% 0% 0% 7% 31% 38% 25% 0% 0% 7% 32% 38% 23% 0% 0% 6 6 27% 37% 31% 0% % 9% 35% 35% 21% 0% 0% Total 1 1 1,609,629 Average number of vehicles available 0.0 Place of work 2,472,477 0.0 30,703 0.0 Living in a place worked inlace of residence p worked outside of place of residence Not living in a place #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! / #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!#DIV/0k #DIV/0! 4DIV/01� " DI/01�.� Ep 1#0.1Y/Qt:, #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Worked in state of residence worked in county of residence worked outside of county of residence Worked outside state of residence �� � #QIV/0! k Q U/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 9 #DI //OJJ s. 7#DIV/0� #DIV/ 1.., , a #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Total workers 16+ Transposition 0 0 0 Total resident population Total workers working in the area Total workers living in the area Estimated daytime population Daytime population change commut Workers who lived/worked same cou Percent who live/work in same area #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/01 0 0 0 0 0 �� � #QIV/0! k Q U/0! 0- 0�; 07 0 0 w na na na na #DIV/0! na #DIV/0! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t'. PgrAISIYA:s ?-7,41,c,:e34 4,07 United States Washington State Puget Sound Wert rrlaWol Yakima Total population 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 Vtit't-tt -3 ;99;714 85,226 One race 292,623,984 6,153,150 3,358,239 tit"-'1*225'89i 83,372 Two or more races 6,133,326 218,240 139,288 It,,,,- ,.... 116,, 1,854 tda Race alone or in combination 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527E-,•,,'•.,,V23090r71' 85,226 White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Nati% Asian Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Some other race 226,686,952 39,111,687 4,333,179 14,521,264 820,373 19,878,144 5,337,320 279,196 169,135 496,264 43,252 283,073 2,803,786 - 000762824 224,032 tti,o 76,744'1r2003, 402,698 6 '': - . 32,723 W1. 6.1 110,309 t 5573 59,465 1,810 2,226 1,712 200 21,675 ,r.'13-4 • Total population 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 --,,t:.. t23,Q90git 85,226 Hispanic or Latino of any race Not Hispanic or Latino 44,019,880 254,737,430 582,874 5,788,516 239,250 -`,:i•-4 --.9Z232. 3,258,277 '31.$10754 32,302 52,924 KV*" Population 5 years and over 278,276,723 5,959,016 3,273,791rit4234);1!„.44:`i ' 77,160 English only Language other than English speak English less than ver Spanish speak English less than ver Other languages speak English less than ver 223,949,581 54,327,142 24,069,536 33,701,181 16,021,820 20,625,961 8,047,716 4,983,603 975,413 451,560 421,564 208,309 553,849 243,251 2,675,340 ri.,--r ,i,1, i5;6874, 598,451 , ,,,.itit„ 276,920 - 63' 168,261 . Oi-5 Oti 81,827 "41 -4 -Vi 430,190 • 847i, 195,093', .,,.:. till'Ail60) 52,370 24,790 14,974 23,225 14,446 1,565 528 Total population 278,276,723 5,959,016 3,273,791 -7.t0;114141 77,160 C-13 Appendix C: 2005-2007 American Community Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 jtqii e earl Wi'a*M-APAII-A3A-ZriPilstWt United States Washington State Puget Sound - aid CO' Yakima Total population 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 " A .72--3..0;90,74.„ 85,226 One race 98% 97% 96% 98% 98% Two or more races 2% 39S 4% A TY.1- #','"- - 2% Race alone or in combination 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 .-',"4:2391.907; 85,226 White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Nati). Asian Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Some other race 76% 1 3% 1% 5% 0% 7% 84% 4% 3% 8% 1% 4% 80% 6% 2% 12% 1% 3% . ' :".7696 — , .. . , ' 1: 70% . 3% 2% 0% 25% Total population 298,757,310 6,371,390 3,497,527 44,-.,2-30a0,701 85,226 Hispanic or Latino of any race 15% 9% 7% „11,041-41%.t4 38% Not Hispanic or Latino 85% 91% 93% --.:' r'V''.' .0% 62% Population 5 years and over 278,276,723 5,959,016 3,273,791 N1:114' APAA:k 77,160 English only Language other than English speak English less than ver Spanish speak English less than vet Other languages speak English less than ve 80% 20% 44% 12% 48% 7% 39% 84% 16% 46% 7% 49% 9% 44% 82% 1 8% 46% 5% 49% 13% 45% 5 5 ....7.-- . , , -, • • 2. ,.. - , ,30%.- 68% 32% 60% 30% 62% 2% 34% Tota 278,276,723 5,959,01 ,273,791 210,144 77,160 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Yakima Council Neighborhood Development Committee Thursday, September 24, 2009 Council members present: Bill Lover and Sonya Rodriguez Staff Present: Michael Morales and Archie Matthews Public Input Meeting on the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual Action Plan Investment of the federal funds received through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs is guided by a 5 -year strategic plan and an annual action plan as required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This public input meeting was held to provide an opportunity for public comment on the draft of the 2010-2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual Action Plan. Summary of Public Input The process doesn't allow enough time for citizens to participate. Minutes should be taken at public input meetings to make sure the ideas expressed are included in the Consolidated Plan. Community needs mentioned: • More neighborhood associations: the associations would be able to address issues pertaining to the community. • Funds for prevention programs such as the Southeast Community Center. • More opportunities to educate the public about the Consolidated Plan process. • Opportunities for parents to work together to develop programs to help youth. Bill Lover, Chair D-1 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 OCTOBER 20, 2009 5. Audience Participation Alex Santillanes, 1407 W. Chestnut Avenue, spoke of his concern about noise, graffiti, vandalism, thefts, and heavy traffic resulting from a transition home for women located at 1408 W. Yakima Avenue. He also complained about a new transition -type residence going in next door at 1406 W. Yakima Avenue that he discovered had not received clearance from City Hall. He questioned the zoning as well as lack of involvement from the City. Bill Cook, Director of Community and Economic Development, advised that they had recently received word that there was construction at that address and they sent out an inspector. They informed the owners that they were required to get building permits for the work. They have leamed it is being converted from a tri- plex to a group home. The non-profit organization that runs the house has been advised that the zoning needs to be reviewed. R-3 zoning may work depending on the maximum number of people they plan to house. Based on definition in state and federal law, up to six unrelated people constitute a "family.* This issue is being researched and a report will be brought back to Council. Bill Duerr, 3206 W. Yakima Avenue, stated that the Yakima City Charter is incomplete and outdated. He requested a list of all amendments and ordinances modifying it from April 1, 1986 to present. He also suggested having it updated prior to new Council members being swom in, potentially in January 2010. 7:00 P.M. — PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. Public Hearing on the 2010-2014 Community Development Block Grant and HOME Consolidated Plan and 2010 Annual Action Plan In his opening statement, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development Morales said that over the last two months, the 2010 Annual Action Plan has been undergoing a public comment period for citizen input, needs assessment, and identification of needs in the community. • Mayor Edler opened the public hearing John Everhart, Pastor of Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, spoke highly of the efforts of the Office of Neighborhood Development Services employees in the community. He also suggested some of the funds be used to make improvements to the food bank facility. Maria Garcia, 1001 N. 20th Avenue, stated that the majority of the money is being spent in the housing area and she would like to see more funds directed toward economic development for small businesses. She also claimed that not much is being done in the northeast neighborhood and suggested funds be used for lighting, sidewalks, and training for community organizations. • Mayor Edler closed the public hearing The next public hearing and adoption date is scheduled for the November 17th City Council meeting. The comment period is still open and citizens were D-2 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 East Yakima Neighborhoods Association July 18, 2007 Resubmitted on Septerribet_- 24)009 SEp 9- 10 OF OEEL OH&0 With the renewal of downtown, the east side of the City of Yakima is also coming under scrutiny because the graffiti and the poorer eastside neighborhoods leave a negative impression on the visitors that must pass through them as they come into downtown. The City has undertaken a "Safe Community Initiative" that focuses on enforcement with the police "emphasis patrols," and the proposed gang legislation. The City is also focusing on improving our community image through the graffiti clean up program and has enacted a new law that prohibits parking on the yards. These are all part of the City's effort to reduce crime and clean up the east side. But the residents of east Yakima continue to be ignored and left out of this crime reduction and clean up effort, except as the targeted community and the recipients of code violation tickets. The City Council's total focus is on enforcement and we, as community residents, feel that prevention and educational programs are very important and effective tools that must be included as part of the City of Yakima's effort to, "build, sustain and strengthen the City's public image as a clean, safe, attractive and progressive community." Neighborhood associations are effective and proven vehicles that allow local residents to participate in the civic affairs of their neighborhoods to support of the City Council's efforts to develop a desirable place to live and work but the City has resisted the implementation of the Northeast and Southeast Neighborhood Plans even though the City of Yakima's Mission and Vision Statement, dated February 14, 2006 calls for increased community involvement and a review of the neighborhood plans that were developed nine years ago. The 2006 Annual Action Plan, prepared for HUD, also calls for the creation of neighborhood organizations but nothing has been done. The Council's failure to look at prevention and educational programs for the residents of east Yakima as a tool to reduce crime and revitalize east Yakima must be addressed and The East Yakima Neighborhood Association will be incorporated for this purpose. The board of directors will reflect demographics of the residents of east Yakima and will be open to all and that will serve the all of the residents of east Yakima. In addition to the crime reduction and neighborhood revitalization efforts, the East Yakima Neighborhood Association will also focus on providing leadership training, education and , youth prevention programs. The demand for prevention programs overwhelms the existing service providers serving this area and/or they are not reaching the "at risk" youth. Most agencies provide a very poor level of service due to limited funds, their inability to secure funding and their lack of bi-lingual staff. Most importantly, they are also not involving the residents of east Yakima in their decision making process. D-3 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 .9 00 Friday, October 2, 2009 Mr. Archie M. Matthews, Operations Supervisor Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Mr. Matthews; On behalf of me and my Mother, we would like to extend a thank you to the Neighborhood Development Services for our home repair. I worked in the Americorps Program with Natasha who supervised the painters on our home and I was impressed with her supervision skills. They did a fantastic job! The new windows are wonderful. 1 will be bringing my Mom home from the nursing home next week and I am so happy that she will be comfortable. The windows are working out just great except for one thing -now I have to keep them clean. Before, the old windows were just covered up with curtains and shades. Once again, let me tell you how much I appreciated everyone's professionalism through the whole process. Sincerely, Donna Holden 926 East Chestnut Yakima, WA 98901 (509) 452-2365 Yakima Co RECOVED ocr 5 2009 D-4 dix SED: vrEs Comments 0466p-2014 ao RE CI OCTI OFFICE OF NI DEVELOPME 7-1:466 t4}_ak., LL itjL an- i L. '227a -i -r1A.4,02 Le i LL - D-5 Appendix D; Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 /) October 29th, 2009 Archie Mathews City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 S. Eighth St. Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Mr. Archie Mathews: In reply to identifying community needs to be addressed through the investment of Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) and Home Funds, I am submitting in writing the following needs. In the course of service to our corrununity, The Hands of Hope, has identified the following immediate needs that exist: 1. Year round temporary overnight shelter that exceeds 30 days that is available to men, women, families and teenagers is needed. 2. Affordable transitional housing for men, women, families and teens that offers strong mentoring and life skills training. 3. Affordable transitional housing for those with mental health issues that includes non- restricted residential status that also offers strong mentoring programs. 4. Affordable temporary migrant worker housing to help alleviate "camping" on riverbanks without proper health hygiene and sanitation resources, which in turn negatively impacts our community. 5. Subsidized permanent housing which includes heavy case management for chronic homelessness caused by substance abuse addiction or mental health issues. These recommendations are based on experience that includes aiding the homeless at varying income levels, into temporary and transitional housing with permanent housing being the ultimate solution. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509-388-4309. Sincerely, Christine Goodwin "Hands of Hope" D-6 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 Note: RECEIVED OCT 2 9 2009 CITY OF YAKIMA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT This is a concept paper being presented to Mr. Bill Cook, Director of Community and Economic Development, City of Yakima. This is not a complete proposal. Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation criteria to be jointly developed with the City of Yakima. A grassroots effort by residents of the City of Yakima has developed an initiative to increase resident participation in the civic affairs of the City of the city and to join with the City of Yakima's efforts to efforts to build, sustain and strengthen the City's public image as a clean, safe attractive and progressive community. The residents have come together for the purpose of creating a mechanism to organize and develop neighborhood associations in the targeted area outlined in the attached map and titled, "East Yakima Early Learning Initiative". The targeted area is the lower income area within the City of Yakima and other service providers are already using these neighborhoods as their targeted area. The Yakima Neighborhoods Association, (a to be formed non-profit incorporated in the State of Washington), is hereby requesting funding from the City of Yakima CDBG funds for the start up costs and staffing for a five year period in the amount of $150,000. These funds will provide salaries for three staff Positions, the Executive Director, an Outreach person and a Volunteer Coordinator. The balance of the staff will be volunteers. A preliminary budget is attached. The mission of the Yakima Neighborhoods Association (YNA), is to empower the residents living in the target area through leadership, civic and educational training to increase the residents' community participation as a key, and critical factor to finding resolOtions to the many problems that the residents face daily in their neighborhoods and.to work with the City of Yakima. The YNA will used as a vehicle to reduce crime, create youth prevention programs, revitalize the neighborhoods and small business development. In addition to the crime reduction and neighborhood revitalization efforts, the Yakima Neighborhoods Association will also focus on providing leadership training, education and youth prevention programs. A neighborhood association envisions a small community center or use of similar facilities in a neighborhood setting throughout the target area. Partnerships with the school district, faith based agencies and other service providers, including businesses, will be fundamental to the formation of the YNA Program for the use of their facilities, services/training. D-7 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 The neighborhood associations also envision a community center or other facility that the neighborhood residents can visit and make it one of their family's night outings. Regularly scheduled services for all of the family and offered on a regular basis would allow the family to take their children with them while they do their activity or class and their children attend structured activities suitable for their age, including baby sitting services. Participation by all residents of the target area will be encouraged and promoted on an ongoing basis. YNA will be open to all of the residents living in the targeted area. One of the primary goals of the YNA Program is to get target area residents to become volunteers and increase their participation in the civic affairs of the City of Yakima. Target area residents will be the volunteers of the program and should .be supported and encouraged to participate at all times. A base of operations will be secured from an existing service provider in the area and will be considered an in-kind contribution. (OIC had agreed to provide office space at the South East Yakima Community Center in the past). Board of Directors The Yakima Neighborhoods Association will be governed by leadership that reside, own property or have businesses in the target area and will be reflective of the population of the neighborhood. The board will be comprised of no less than 16 and no more than 21 members. The board of directors will be elected by the enrolled membership. Elections will be held on a yearly basis. The eleven incorporators will serve as the interim board of directors and the balance of the directors will serve per a community nomination process to be developed. The board member terms will be limited to two years and will be staggered to maintain continuity. Corporate/Professional/Activist Advisory Committee To seek the help of professional and corporate groups, it is envisioned to invite corporate representatives to provide their input and advice on programs being developed. The number of advisory group will be between 7 to 15 members, and can be increased if needed. This advisory group will meet quarterly during a one hour lunch meeting the third Tuesday of the month following quarter. YNA board and/or staff will provide agenda and presentations. Program Operations During the initial stages, an outreach effort through all English and Spanish media D_B will be undertaken to inform the target area residents about the YAytt@ififiRD:VilrfOnents Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 a recruitment too to increase membership participation. At the same time, leadership training and other educational programs will begin to be offered at a central location. Also, as part of the YNA Program, an annual survey of the targeted area will be undertaken annually to determine the priorities and needs of the residents and to evaluate the services coming into the targeted area. The YNA will coordinate with the service providers on programs the residents want at their neighborhood location and will also develop courses which are requested but not currently offered by any service provider. Staff The Executive Director will be in charge of the overall operation of the program and oversee the- two staff under the direction of the YNA Board of Directors. One of the most important issues is the long term sustainability of the YNA program so *the executive director will be explicitly charged with fundraising to cover the operating costs of the YNA staff and programs. The Outreach Person will be involved in promoting the program within the community and recruiting residents to join YNA as volunteers or as students for the programs offered. A good Volunteer Coordinator that can mobilize the residents is critical to the success of the existing programs that will serve to draw other volunteers EVALUATION Neighborhood Associations The YNA will have the staff ancrexpertise to assist all residents living in the targeted area to begin the formation of a neighborhood association and one of the primary program goals is the development of neighborhood associations so the number of associations created will be a critical factor in the evaluation of the program. Resident Participation (Volunteers) The overall goal of the, YNA Program is to increase the participation of the residents living in the target area in the civic affairs of the City of Yakima and the number of volunteers recruited and working will be a very good indicator of the program's success. Leadership. Education and Career Development Youth Prevention Programs D-9 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 The need anddemand for youth prevention programs overwhelms the existing service providers serving this area and the parents list prevention programs for the youth as a very high priority. .Senior Citizen Services Senior citizen services are limited in the target area with the only Senior Center located some 40 blocks west of the target area. Microenterprise Development Respectfully submitted to the City of Yakima as part of the resident's testimony for inclusion to the HUD CDBG FIVE YEAR PLAN by the organizing committee for the Yakima Neighborhoods Association, this 29Ih day of October, 2009. D-10 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 Some recommended programs that have been recommended and discussed by both parents and young adults within the East Yakima are as follows: General Programs * Structured After School programs that can be coordinate and developed with the school districts as well. " Structured year round programs for youth of different ages. * Structured year round parenting information programs for adults. * Structured ''Building Blocks" series for ESL, ABE, GED & citizenship programs that can lead to more civic involvement and participation with some support ' and coordination with the school district and YVCC. " Career training opportunities in fields that are seeking to hire in the future * Set up support groups to support teen parents * Educational workshops to develop resumes and develop self esteem. * Educational workshops on drugs and alcohol awareness. * Educational workshops regarding rights, laws, etc Specific Programs * Youth Financial Fitness leadership program that encourages the understanding of math as a valuable tool for employment and provides internships in the financial arena. * Youth entrepreneur training programs with potential loans for young people to develop a business with help from a mentor. * Home ownership training that can lead to home ownership opportunities. " Program with fire department and police department that will provide information and exposure and basic training for young cadets in both careers. - * Leadership program for 12 months that will take young teens, adult teen and young professionals into a structured environment that will educate them on how the city functions, the county, economic development, code enforcement, law enforcement, how to run a meeting, etc. * Home Day Care training for young and mature adults to seek employment in that D-11 field. Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION CITY OF YAKIMA FIVE YEAR CDBG PLAN OCTOBER 29, 2009 * Voter education to show the importance of civic involvement. * Graffiti art program that will utilize youth talent on city or community projects. * Set up a low watt radio program to give young students exposure to radio electronics and DJ work. * Computer training to learn the basic programs for parents and/with youth. * Youth soccer leagues that will be encouraged and supported by the community.. ?io 0 v- 57, 'faint- WA et (9.P) f(p•- 352'( aerc• rrc.,5 07 5 4,7 Alt_s •-v7 ri'90 ?h 5 Al 24 yigiee 3o7 ( 5--P 9y) -53-7 9 ---.\-urrc_s )7,3 97 D-12 ic Vakfrha Consolidated P an 2010-2014 Comments (509-151- ISbi-9_ __ _11111111 111111 NIS 11111 1111111 11111 111111 111111 111111 11E1 1.1111 11111 111111 1111 INN 1111111 11111 11. I • i. • !. :11 41 1 ! t 4 . t ' i ! ' ''',.1g.',Q.ic j•tkl,,k; • .... . • ' :3 'r•.„ I ' • . .: . 'dx. - *•-- l • -r'. • I • ; -.,,,, I ; ;-,. .I. II1 . ., , ;,,,, ,_.. .........,•r:a I ' ' I ''' 1 ; : ji — .1- -- .• __ i i. i , -1 - ,... •'• ..,..--__,._._ ._ ,.„1-:. .1 A YakittEarly Learning Initiative _44 it id Use"' z 3 Project Parks Housing Service Manufacturing School Transportation Communication/Utilities Retaivvvholesale 1.• Public/Cultural Agricultural UndevelopedNacant April 10, 2007 . 1 111111111111111 • YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOODS ASSOCIATION YAKIMA NEIBHGORHOODS ASSOCIATION PRELIMINARY TWELVE MONTH OPERATING BUDGET Salaries Executive Director $20/hr X 2080 = 41600 Volunteer Coordinator 32280 $16/hr X 2080 = Outreach Person $15/hr X 2080 = 31200 105080 Payroll Taxes and Fringe Benefits 25% 26270 Total Salary and Fringe Benefits 131350 Phone, Fax & Internet 2400 Office Supplies 1200 Travel Reimbursement 2000 Insurance 3500 Direct Mail 5000 Promotion 3600 Incorporation 950 Total Expenses 150000 D-14 Appendix D: Comments Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 Surve results 19 October 2009 In October 2009 a random sample of resident voter households within the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Target Area were contacted to participate in a controlled sample survey concerning HUD funded housing conditions and programs. 250 households agreed to participate in the survey and were mailed a copy of a summary description of the plan and a copy of the questionnaire. Survey results were compiled for the first 100 households who completed the surveys by follow-up telephone call - the number planned for in the original survey scope. The resulting survey results are accurate to within +/-10% of the opinions of the general population within the CDBG Target Area (the statistics are rounded and may not add to 100% and do not list don't know responses). The statistics also account for undecided, did not know, or refused a response - which is shown where applicable. Following is a summary of the results for the total sample group. 4,11,P=Srighipe'' "-eta 4,#,VS.Oti'Zitele:Vitcfpgi* ": The federal government estimates an average household (individuals and families) should pay no more than 30% of all household income (including all wages, salaries, pensions, stock and bond interest, and other income) for housing costs (including rent or mortgage payments, utilities, insurance, and other incidentals) if a household is to be able to pay for food, health, clothing, transportation, and other basic needs. At the present time (2007), approximately11,563 or 38% of all Yakima households are paying more than 30% of their total household income for housing. As a result of these conditions, we are developing a housing plan to address rising housing costs for all kinds of households, for all areas of the city, and the Renewal Community Area neighborhoods in particular. Our objective is to create policies and programs that provide housing that is affordable for city households - and to develop strategies for assisting with housing solutions for households that cannot live affordably (those paying more than 30% of their household income for housing). We would like to know your opinions about current housing conditions and priorities. Please read these questions carefully, circle your preferred answer, and be prepared to read your answers when we call. Plf4gOrraVanc •ur ,V111,;(p..f.**1'4Ailrake31, How would you rate housing conditions in your neighborhood in general on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the poorest and 5 is the best condition? poorest 1 2 3 best 4 5 5 Quality- construction, design, and visual appearance? 2% 15% 56% 26% 1% 0% E-1 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 6 Density- range of lot sizes and housing types including single and multi -family housing units? 1% 18% 49% 28% 4% 0% 7 Hazard management - floodplains, lead- paint, asbestos, graffiti, and handicap access? 9% 23% 42% 16% 6% 4% 8 Improvements - roads, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks? 10% 31% 27% 21% 9% 2% 9 Amenities - street lights, trees, landscaping, and signage? 6% 21% 39% 26% 8% 0% 10 Common areas - parks, playgrounds, and open spaces? 15% 23% 31% 21% 10% 0% 11 Preservation - of older, even historic housing units? 10% 23% 35% 14% 4% 14% 12 Maintenance - trash, litter, and graffiti? 17% 30% 22% 23% 8% 0% How would you rate your own housing conditions? poorest / 1 2 3 best 4 5 7 13 Overall satisfaction - with your apartment or house? 2% S% 25% 48% 20% 0% 14 Cost - for rent or mortgage payments? 3% S% 25% 35% 22% 10% 15 Cost for housing related services - including utilities and property taxes? S% 23% 43% 23% S% 1% 16 Location - community and neighborhood you live in? 4% 18% 34% 34% 10% 0% 17 Space - number of bedrooms and bathrooms? 3% 3% 37% 33% 23% 1% 18 Features - kitchen, family room, fireplace, garage? 2% 17% 34% 30% 17% 0% 19 Improvements - roads, curbs and gutters, sidewalks? 13% 20% 34% 18% 14% 1% 20 Amenities - playgrounds, parks, landscaping? 10% 26% 30% 22% 10% 2% 21 Services - schools, fire, police, roads? 4% 12% 28% 38% 17% 7% 22 Maintenance - trash, litter, and graffiti? 7% 19% 31% 28% 15% 0% 23 What percent of your household's gross 19% 0% monthly income - do you pay for rent or a 14% 10% Mortgage? 21% 20% 20% 30% 16% 40% 4% 50% 2% S0%+ 4% don't know/refused 24 What percent of your household's gross 4% 1% monthly income - do you pay for sewer, 6% 2% water, power, natural gas, and other utilities? 11% 3% 4% 4% 11% S% 10% 6% 6% 7% S% 8% 4% 9% 32% 10%+ 7% don't know/refused E-2 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The following statements were made during housing workshops about trends that may be affecting the housing market and a household's ability to cope with housing costs. To what extent do you disagree or agree with the following on a scale of 1 is where you most disagree and 5 is where you most agree with the statement? Market assum tions disagree 1 2 / agree 3 4 5 25 Public workers - teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and other critical public service workers cannot pay rising housing costs and are not accepting local job offers? 19% 20% 34% 18% 4% 5% 26 Service workers - technical and entry level nnanufacturing, retail, hea|th, and other service workers cannot afford rising housing costs and are not accepting local jobs affecting our ability for economic development? 10% 18% 33% 26% 7% 6% 27 Young adults - are increasingly unable to rent or buy an affordable living unit that they can pay for with local entry level job incomes? 6% 12% 18% 30% 32% 2% 28 Single -headed families, especially female- are unable to rent or buy an affordable living unit and pay for daycare, health costs, and other family expenses? 3% 3% 20% 28% 43% 3% 29 Elderly adults, including single individuals - are increasingly unable to find affordable housing that fits their changing life style needs. As a result, they continue to live in and keep older lower priced housing units out of the market - possibly to the point where the house starts to deteriorate because they are unable or cannot afford to pay for maintenance? 5% 6% 16% 34% 38% 1% 30 Special populations, including the mentally ill, victims of domestic abuse, and the temporary homeless - are unable to be provided housing - possibly to the point where current sponsors are unable to develop and operate necessary housing units and shelters? 3% 11% 28% 25% 31% 2% E-3 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010'20/4 < istin p4O_, YaYY►cS Yakima's Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) uses federal monies from Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and the HOME programs to finance a number of housing and neighborhood improvement programs and policies within the Renewal Community Area (see also, ONDS website at www.yakima.wa.us). What priority would you give to continuing and even expanding, if federal monies allow, the following ONDS programs and projects on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest priority? ONDS nroarams lowest / highest 1 2 3 4 5 31 First Time Home Assistance Program - providing financial assistance up to $4,000 for down payment and closing costs for qualified first-time low to moderate -income homebuyers? In 2008, ONDS helped 27 first- time buyer households. 10% 10% 36% 21% 20% 3% 32 Senior/Disabled Persons Home Repair Program - for up to $2,500 to fix roofs, porches, and other interior repairs using ONDS materials and Habitat for Humanity volunteer labor for senior or disabled households? In 2008, ONDS fixed 34 senior/disabled housing units. 3% 3% 19% 32% 40% 3% 33 Senior/Disabled Emergency Repair Program - for up to $500 to fix plumbing, electrical, heating, or other emergencies? In 2008, ONDS performed 43 emergency repairs. 3% 6% 13% 29% 47% 2% 34 Neighborhood Clean-Up/Improvement Program - up to$500 per house to fix code violations cited by the city Code Inspector? In 2008, recruited 7,606 volunteer hours and removed 15 tons of trash. 6% 13% 26% 28% 25% 2% 35 Homeownership through New Construction Program - acquiring vacant Tots or abandoned buildings and make these available to Habitat for Humanity or the OIC for self-help constructed new housing for households that qualify and participate? In 2008, ONDS provided lots and loans for 4 Habitat for Humanity and 5 OIC self help construction projects. 5% 9% 23% 28% 33% 2% 36 Senior/Disabled Exterior Paint Program - to pay for materials and sometimes labor, for households that cannot perform or pay for the work otherwise? In 2008, ONDS painted 23 houses. 4% 6% 15% 34% 37% 4% 37 Tenant/Landlord Counseling - to provide assistance in disputes and legal advice if appropriate. In 2008, ONDS assisted 599 walk-in requests and 4,949 telephone calls. 1 1 % 10% 28% 23% 24% 4% E-4 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 38 Emergency Heat/Utility Assistance - for households who cannot pay utility bills, particularly during winter months? In 2008, ONDS referred 65 households to OCI and other appropriate agencies. 1% 9% 22% 29% 36% 3% 39 Energy Weatherization - to install insulation, wrap pipes, replace windows, and other improvements to conserve energy and protect against bad weather conditions. In 2008, ONDS installed weatherization packages in 35 houses. 3% 7% 27% 32% 27% 4% irW4tVt..0,,*01 eTre.1.' vi;+*,.•,,w0PeAKI,,,i:415itiwoizzoriptlejo eff 051 4 I I 0 ".-P7Va'ARnin0qZ4*;41';11 Yakima has initiated a number of actions to manage rising housing costs and growth impacts on a city-wide basis. Such actions include the clustering of housing to reduce environmental impacts and site development costs; allowing innovative housing and mixed-use projects to increase site and cost efficiencies; adopting performance related design and development standards to improve the quality of the housing product and reduce development costs - to name a few. Yakima has also amended codes to allow accessory dwelling units, cottage or small lot houses, duplex and townhouses, manufactured and modular housing products that reduce costs and provide a wider variety of rental and purchase options. In addition, Yakima, Yakima County, non-profit, and for-profit housing market agencies could also adopt the following measures to reduce costs and increase choice. Each one of these program approaches will involve costs to the public in some manner, some approaches costing more than others, and some programs having more impacts on housing costs and public policies and funds than others. Based on your knowledge of existing conditions, how would you rate the following possible programs? Education and mentorin lowest / highest 1 2 3 4 5 40 Conduct housing finance classes - that provide education and mentoring assistance on how to budget and pay for household purchases, maintenance, insurance, utilities, and other expenses? 6% 15% 27% 22% 28% 2% Rehabilitation programs to retain affordable housing 41 lowest 1 2 3 highest 4 5 Establish a home rehabilitation and deferred payment program - where the eligible house is refurbished and the cost is deferred for payment until the house is sold to allow the current occupant to continue to reside in the house with current home payments? The rehabilitation loan is repaid when the house is eventually sold by the current occupant at no or a low cost interest rate. 10% 15% 29% 23% 18% 5% E- 5 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 Measures that reduce land costs lowest 1 2 / highest 3 4 5 42 Increase high density zoning districts - of moderate to high density residential districts so that more developable sites are made available for lower cost single family and multi -family housing products? 21% 16% 34% 14% 10% S% 43 Encourage accessory dwelling units (AOU)- that build housing units that are attached or next to an existing single family house in established neighborhoods to increase housing where community, transportation, and other public services are already provided? 20% 18% 31% 17% 10% 4% 44 Encourage cottage/small lots developments - that allow smaller lots and cottage sized single family housing units in single family neighborhoods to increase housing where community, transportation, and other public services are already provided? 14% 12% 27% 23% 17% 7% . 45 Encourage infill development - of townhouse, manor house, and other attached single family housing units on vacant or underused land within existing urban neighborhoods to increase housing density, choice, and reduce land costs? 12% 11% 38% 23% 1 l % 5% Financingotflions lowest / 1 2 3 highest 4 5 46 Create a city housing action fund -with which to create the monies necessary to match other federal, state, and local funds for accomplishing the housing projects and programs described in the items above? 16% 15% 31% 19% 15% 4% 47 Assuming some public monies would be 38% $0 required to create the city housing action 9% $5 revolving fund - how much would your 7% $10 household be willing to pay per yearto 2% $15 sponsor such an effort? 14% $20 11% $25 6% $S0 1% $75 9% $100 1% $100+ 2% don't know/refused E-6 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Financing options lowest / highest 1 2. 3 4 5 ? 48 Approve a limited duration (6 year) property tax levy- a special purpose property tax that would add a limited levy assessment (between $25 and $50 per house per year) for up to 6 years for the sole purpose of funding affordable housing projects and programs? 37% 19% 18% 14% 9% 3% ".:04014f5,iirl :f5'SSIZ"*..09641UW PPit*"';','",r,•., 51,10kWri:a*A*4.1:PAs'%44.-W 041 " nSlufigleSKPS* Who do you think should be primarily responsible for providing conditions that reduce hOusing costs as outlined in the action items described in this survey? onsor1 disagree 2 / agree 3 4 5 49 Public entities - City of Yakima, Yakima 20% 12% 30% 19% 16% 3% rent own 16% 84% County, Yakima Housing Authority, and What type of house do you live in? 77% single family 6% duplex or town 5% multifamily 12% manufactured unit Washington State? 50 Non-profit organizations - including Yakima 11% 14% 28% 26% 16% 5% Valley Partners Habitat for Humanity, Office of Industrialization Center (OIC), Catholic Charities Housing Services (CCHS), Next Step Housing, Yakima Valley Community Land Trusts, and other affordable housing interest groups? 51 Private market - developers, realtors, and lenders? 17% 15% 22% 18% 24% 4% 52 Joint ventures - involving the public, non- profit, and private market entities? 9% 10% 30% 18% 28% 5% '7,41VVVit"..:ZAtIV:et l'r4tAQ.A,14r°: VAN1P' racier -ism wit-,,,,,-44„,>Ava-vvy4r,A.4.444r, 53 How long have you lived in Yakima? 0-1 2-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 20+ 2% 3% 5% 6% 7% 77% 54 Where do you live in the neighborhood? 8% East of the railroad tracks and north of Yakima Ave 13% East of the railroad tracks and south of Yakima Ave 26% West of the railroad tracks and north of Yakima Ave 49% West of the railroad tracks and south of Yakima Ave 4% don't know/refused 55 Do you rent or own your residence? rent own 16% 84% 56 What type of house do you live in? 77% single family 6% duplex or town 5% multifamily 12% manufactured unit E-7 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 57 Do you live in any of the foliowing housing developments sponsored by the Yakima Housing Authority, Rural Farm Workers, Catholic Charities Housing Services, Next Step, or others? 3% YHA publicly assisted housing 1% Habitat, OIC, CCHS housing 0% Section 8 assisted housing 00 YWCA or other specia! need 3% other assisted housing 2% don't know/refused 91% private housing 58 What age group are you in? O% 19-24 0% 24-34 8% 35-44 15% 45-54 30% 55-64 47% 65+ years 59 What 15 your household status? 31% live alone . 3% live in an unrelated household 65% live in a family 1% don't know/refused 60 What income group 5 your household in? 33% under $20,000 15% $20-29,999 24% $30'39,999 6% $40-49,999 13% $50-74,999 4% $75-100,000 3% $100,000+ 2% don't know/refused Do you have any specific comments or recommendations to make about the hoplan or this survey, or affordable housin in eneral? 61 47 respondents had comments ^ Never seen HFH housing wide family never saw tagging and graffiti with wide population of Hispanics. ^ Havng|ived in high'density, |arger, urban areas Chicago and Buffalo, | have experienced the increase in crime related to unfettered increases in density. Most of this increase is related to low-income housing. High-end, high density does not share the same statistics. Single-family homes have the best chance of avoiding this disparity—Habitat for Humanity has shown this repeatedly. Statutes to increased density with multi -family housing will only increase poor quality with increased risk of significant crime. | am an architect in the area. • | wish they would do better on cleaning up graffiti, especially downtown Yakima. It seems like the people that live in low-income subsidized are often involved in drugs and gangs, and they should screen people bettor, 50 the drug and gang associated residents in subsidized housing are screened first and not allowed in low-income housing projects in the first place. E-8 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SingIe-family zoning should only be in residential areas. Multi -family dwellings should only be in nnu|d'fanni|yzoning area, and do not mix single-family houses with the multi -family houses in same zoning area. Provide street improvement projects in unimproved city of Yakima areas such as mine (west of railroad tracks and north of Yakima avenue). We need to have more housing for low-income and preferably not just for the W1exicans, but the whites and blacks as well. Every one should be really careful on how they spend their money or what they spend it on before doing it. It is dark on the northeast side of town, so |vvou|d like more Street Iighting after dark. 1 am tired of the gangs. 1 do not know what you would do to make it affordable. And you don't give away free housing to anyone because they don't appreciate it. Rents are too high and the only way to make it affordable is to go by their wages. | think that they need to take care of the streets and sidewalks because this senior apartment complex hascity sidewalks with big cracks and itis uneven and it is hazardous for walking, especially for older people and those who use assistance (chairs, scooters) for getting around. " / don't think that taxpayers should be buying homes for supposed low-income people. | have much less disagreement with helping with rental housing which should be done by the private sector such as Section 8. • Upset that the appraised value of my home regarding the taxes went up $22,500 for no reason, which is outrageous. | can't make these payments. ^ We are all being taxed to the limit right now. We don't need any more programs to come out of peoples pockets. If government wants to help peop|e, they need to help in the creation of jobs for those who currently don't have them. " | don't know what the housing plan is, so | can't make any comments. | haven't received anything that looks like a plan—just a higher concentration of housing which | don't approve of. ^ When HUD or Habit for Humanity bui|d, they should research more equal in distribution. The people in the houses should be responsible for upkeep and keeping them clean and the management should be responsible to make sure they are kept up and clean and they should be considerate of neighbors. • When they start condensing people in one area, you create social unrest like rats in a cage—perfect for gangs. • Believe home ownership increases the quality of a neighborhood because people are more apt to respect the look and quality of the neighborhood. • Utilities are too high; | get to choose between heating, eating and medicine because 1 cannot afford all at once. • The rent in the Yakima area 15 very high—too high for the area. Property taxes are too high. E-9 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey • Don't reduce the manpower of the fire or police departments. The streets are in bad shape especially the side streets. It doesn't make sense to me that they would seal coat a road without patching or repairing first. I find grass growing in the cracks on some streets • Until you get rid of the street violence, no one will want to live here. Get rid of the gangbangers. • I think that our utilities are extremely high here. Downtown they tax everything to death. All the utilities are taxed to death. It just adds to the cost of living and when you're on a limited income, it's very hard to make ends meet. • The proposals should be used for providing better housing conditions; no I meant that the private sponsors should be used to provide better housing conditions. • I think a lot of these programs should be given to US Citizens only. Question 42. I decided that my neighborhood has been destroyed since they turned it into multi -family dwelling. Too many people coming and going. Too high population for neighborhood. The alleys are full of garbage. No one cleans out there anymore. Question 48, property taxes—taxes have a habit of never going way. I disagree with that one. • No knowledgeable to make comments and answer the questions to the best of my knowledge. • I'm all for helping people, but I don't want to help people who don't help themselves or who don't really don't need people who won't help themselves are who spend what they do have foolishly. • Taxes are too high at times. • I'm concerned regarding population density in regard to apartments and housing that turns into apartments and overcrowding at schools. If we have apartments, condominiums etc. there will be many children living in the areas and will add to the overcrowding of our schools. We need to be careful with overpopulation and street -parking issues. We need more lighting midblock on the streets besides just the corners more lighting means Tess crime. Encourage people to clean their properties. Whether they are landowners or renters make sure they maintain, paint, and keep them up to code. My primary concern is the overpopulation regarding schools and parking. These issues have been going on for years and years and we must do something about them. • Since 1946, our city has redone Yakima Avenue 178,000. Is Yakima Valley wine country or the fruit bowl of the west? Streets sidewalks and lamps and so forth, but the traffic here in the city limits is terrible. Because of former planning, the streets have not gotten larger, many places we had houses sit back to widen the street later and it never happened. For example, 10th Avenue and 32nd. Many more need professional guidance to take care of the abundant traffic. This is my pet peeve, I live at 28th and Meade and 24th to 32nd needs a lot of remodeling. There is Kassel Park there. Traffic on these few blocks is overly busy, in other words a lot of us (neighbors and otherwise) call it "Meade E-10 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 freeway." When my husband and | had our home built in 1958, which was less than 13,000. I'm wondering just what they are planning on doing. We need more information. When they send out a survey in this nnanner, it's too vague arid it's difficult to know what they are really planning. That's the way the city has been run for a long time. I'm elderly and live alone in a large house, which needs to have many vines removed. | don't want to hire just anybody because they would have to go through my house to get to vines in the back of the house. How would | go about getting help to remove these vines? Aim camera at 15th and Viola at closed -down store Low`inconne, high-density housing results in increased crime, gangs, trash and noise. Traffic Question 31 is talking about paying down payments, which sounds gneat, but partially caused the current economic problems and crisis caused the breakdown of the real-estate market and the current banking problems. Q37 sounds really good but a good percentage of renters currently can cause a great deal of damage to property, the councilors would side with the tenants and not the landlords, and it's very expensive to evoke tenants. Q 42, to 45 the current lot size is only 40 feet and ifyou have high-density houxing, you wind up with a very untenable situation unless you have renters following the laws regarding noise trash and traffic. |ann 74 and retiring this year and any expectation that | would be able to contribute in any way financially is ludicrous. | think it's a big need for housing here in Yakima. To me rent is too high for the quality of the premises that you rent. ^ We have a disabled person in a wheelchair that has to go in the street to get to Albertsons or Safeway. | already have a scooter and will need the same thing. Make all the utility companies that put in utilities, level out the street so we can drive on them with out having bumps in them. It's been 40 years and they have done nothingto level them out. ° My daughter can't get health insurance for herself or anything. It's hard to live at minimum wage. She's having hard times. They just can't seem to get cheap enough housing to support their families. | would like to know how to get into affordable housing in Yakima. , They should help US citizens first since it's their money they are using for these services. They should get the information out so people would know where to go to get the help from these programs. | have relatives that could use the help and they are US citizens and not illegal. My neighbor's home should be condemned. He needs help. His toliet doesn't flush and his house is falling down. His garbage is where his porch is. Neighbor doesn't have food to eat sometimes E-11 Appendix E: Mail-out/Phone-Back Survey o 1 would like to see them clean up some of the,places around hear the whole neighborhood yards, trees, and houses need to be painted. It is hard to see the house for the garbage in yard. You don't know if the house is occupied because of the unkempt yard, weeds and cars north of our street. They tore it up and then replaced it any which way and very bunnpy, no sidewalks and no lighting from °N" Street to past "S''Street. • | live in a mobile home in a nice mobile home park and | like it very much. | did appreciate the help | received from the city when they helped pay via a grant to fix my furnace. • Problems include gangs with graffiti, drugs, etc. moving in and changing the city. | don't see the city doing anything useful to repair these problems and what they are doing seems to have been a waste of the taxpayers' money. It will be a waste of the taxpayers' money to try to fix up the neighborhoods without getting rid of the gangs and crap. • Being a senior, | have worked with a lot of seniors and some of the people only make $400 or $500 from social security, we're not getting any raise for this year or for this coming year. It's making it very hard for me. Finances are getting very strained and I'm adiabedc. | know more about senior issues and the other issues | don't know much about. | wish they would get back to giving citizens of this country a better brcak, than those living in the country illegally. • Better planning on landscaping features on housing developments is needed. Lack of grass being planted has created dust storms. They built the houses but no yards. • 1 don't know where this is going. 1 live in a neighborhood that is getting worse every year. Even if people buy houses, they are not keeping them up. It's just ratty, it's not like it used to be. | know that the value of my property is going down because of my neighbors. It's going downhill. ^ If the governnmen, got out of housing, the prices would be much lower. They tax things too much. If they would stick to the basics of fire, police protecdun, and things on that line that cannot be done by an individual on a citywide basis and got out of welfare, they'd have money for the fire and police protection. The basics, the necessities that people need on a citywide basis. E-/2 Appendix E: Mai/mw Survey Yakima Consolidated Plan 20/0-20/4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mail-Out/Mail-Back Surveys of Workshop Participants Response percentage Q# 1 2 3 4 6 7 ? total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 5 0% 25% 60% 10% 0% 1 5% 6 5% 20% 30% 25% 10% 2, 2 10% 7 '10%-30% 1 30% 20% 5% 3 4 5% 8 15% 20% 25% 10% 5% 4 6 25% 9 10% 20% 30% 25% 5% 5 5 10% 10 25% 15% 25% 25% 5% 3 0 5% 11 15% 30% 25% 15% 0% 0 15% 12 40% 15% 20% 15% 0% 10% 13 0% 10% 10% 60% 15% 3, 5% 14 0% 0% 10% 35% 40% 0 15% 15 0% 20% 35% 5% 30% 0 0 10% 16 0% 35% 30% 20% 10% 0 6 5% 17 0% 0% 30% 45% 20% 8 6 5% 18 '0% 0% 30% 50% 15% 5 0 5% 19 15% 5% 40% 30% 5% 2 5% 20 15% 15% 30% 25% 0% 15% 21 15% 10% 15% 45% 10% 3 5% 22 30% 15% 25% 0% 5% 10', 7 25% 23 '5% 20% 20% 20% 20% 5 4 15% 24 5% 0% 20% 5% 20% 0 5 50% 25 35% 5% 30% 10% 5% 3 3 15% 26 25% 20% 10% 25% 5% 9 6 15% 27 20% 0% 25% 20% 30% 1 5% 28 20% 0% 15% 15% 45% 5% 29 10% 5% 5% 45% 30% 3 5% 30 10% 10% 25% 20% 5% 1 3 30% 31 15% 15% 25% 15% 15% 1 5 15% 32 10% 0% 15% 35% 25% 3 7 15% 33 5% 0% 30% 25% 35% 7 6 5% 34 15% 0% 30% 5% 45% 8 7 5% 35 5% 25% 25% 5% 30% 6 10% 36 5% 15% 35% 25% 15% 5% 37 5% 10% 35% 30% 15% 3 5% 38 5% 0% 15% 40% 35% 2 5 5% 39 5% 0% 25% 30% 30% 5 4 10% 40 15% 0% 10% 20% 40% 3' 3 15% 41 20% 0% 10% 40% 15% 0 4 15% 42 30% 0% 30% 20% 10% 0 5 10% 43 25% 0% 10% 30% 10% 5 25% 44 25% 20% 20% 15% 10% 10% 45 20% 15% 15% 35% 0% 6 15% 46 30% 10% 0% 20% 25% 4 3 15% 47 30% 5% 0% 0% 25% 20% 5% 15% 48 30% 0% 15% 5% 25% 2 3 25% 49 20% 0% 15% 10% 30% 1 0 25% 50 10% 5% 20% 15% 20% 0 0 30% 51 15% 15% 20% 5% 25% 0 20% 52 15% 5% 15% 30% 15% 9 20% 53 0% 5% 0% 15% 5% 60% 2 15% 54 45% 10% 15% 20% 0% 1 10% 55 30% 50% 5% 0% 0% 15% 56 40% 20% 25% 0% 0% 15% 57 0% 0% 15% 0% 0% 85% 58 5% 5% 10% 5% 20% 45% 10% 59 30% 0% 35% 20% 0% 5% 10% 60 40% 5% 10% 5% 15% 15% 5% 5% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Response number. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 5 12 2 0 1 1 4 6 5 2 2, 2 6 6 4 1 1 3 4 5 2 1 5', 2 4 6 5 1 21 5 3 5 5 1 1 3 6 5 3 0 3 8 3 4 3 0 2 0 2 2 12 3 1 0 0 2 7 8 3, 0 4 7 1 6 0 7 6 4 2 1 0 0 6 9 4 1i 0 0 6 10 3 1 3 1 8 6 1 1 3 3 6 5 0 3 3 2 .3 9 2 1� 6 3 5 1 4 4 4 4 3 1 0 4 1 4 10', 7 1 6 2 1 31 5 4 2 5 1 3 4 0 5 4 6 1 4 0 3 3 9 1 2 1 1 9 6 1 2 2 5 4 1 6 3 3 5 3 3 3 2 0 3 7. 5 3 1 0 6 5 7 1 3 0 6 1 9 1 1 5 5 1 6 2 1 3 7 5 3 1 1 2 7 6 3 1 1 0 3 8 7 1 1 0 5 6 6 2 3 0 2 4 8 3 4 0 2 8 3 3 6 0 6 4 2 2 5 0 2 6 2 5 5 4 4 3 2 2 4 3' 3 7 0 3 6 2 0 4 5 3 6 1 0 0 5 4 1 3 6 0 3 1 5 5 4 0 3 2 6 5 2 1. 4 3 4 6 3 3 4 1 5 4 3 1 3 6 3 4 0 1 0 3 1 12 3 9 2 3 4 0 2 6 10 1 0 0 3 8 4 5 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 17 1 1 2 1 4 9 2 6 0. 7 4 0 1 2 8 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 E.2-13 Appendix E.2: Mai -Out/Mail-Back Survey of Workshop Participants Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 olrimen 40. c:kSur YU,e.�+fin 1011a111 1 61 I would have had a tough time (expense wise) in bringing my home up to code standard! Thank you Wayne F 2 24 No 3 Front page Let's see the old housing renovated 20 Graffiti. No bathrooms, swings, and water sprays are off 21 5`h Ave., 16`h, Walnut, & Summit view roads bad 23 Mortgage $4801.00 month 1 5% 24 Grouped in phone 40 In school. High School required meat. We need more jobs, apprenticeships, internships, helping families build and fix their own homes. 41 Why sell it if you fix it and they don't have to move or pay. 42 What zones? 43 Maintain the ones we have 44 It's already developed - must be maintained. 54 5'h Ave, between Tieton and Nob Hill 56 Married 57 No 59 1 dog, dad, mom, 2 kids 61 Maintain what we got. City of Yakima is responsible for repairing and maintaining roads, sidewalks, street lights, signs, parks and keeping utilities as low as possible (property tax) Yakima Schools are responsible for: educating young adults on budgeting income for housing finances as are .... The private markets for being homes of costs and "fine print" policies (and keeping insurance as low as possible.) and sharing "help options" by non-profit agencies, are responsible for being fair and consistent in aiding families so they become independent, and not dependent (not abusing the assistance). As neighbors we are responsible to each other to aid and help build a better community. 4 61 There is plenty of housing available - many vacancies in NE Yakima. The problem is income - not available housing. So Don't build more housing at public expense - instead provide vouchers or rent subsidies so low income renters can choose market cost housing that fits their needs. If this is really a consolidated plan, let ONDS tally and provide the number of employees in the city of Yakima being paid by tax dollars to create and manage subsidized housing. Include HLID, ONDS, all city departments, OIC charities, etc. My wife and I have provided 21 rental units and below market pricing to help renters - This costs us about $30,000 a year plus labor - our own expense without government incentives - How about you? 5 57 NO 61 Not what we need - wasted money - too much bureaucracy 7 61 Just not able to answer some of this survey. Moreover, I find that little is ever accomplished - especially now during hard economic times. The city in better times did nothing. I think code enforcement should be enhanced and strengthened. 8 59 Con (with) mi (my) familia (family) 10 61 1. Economy too depressed to spend tax dollars on housing etc. 2. Eligibility for government aid unreliable at this point. - too much fraud at all levels. 3. More than ample housing for elderly in Yakima. If they choose to stay in older larger homes, they can rent to younger ones in exchange for home maintenance etc. 4. Need to return to group hones with supervision for mentally ill etc. 5. NO first time home assistance program. Bad idea. 6. Government monies should be limited to paying for page 1 #19 thru #22 E.2-14 Appendix E.2: Mail-Out/Mail-Back Survey of Workshop Participants Yakima Consolidated Plan 2010-2014 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E.2-15 Appendix E.2: Mail-Out/Mail-Back Survey of Workshop Participants and housing for IderIy and disabled. 7. Need more classes for the young on budgeting which they aren't getting in school. 8. Should strive at this time for absolute minimal federal and state government involvement. 11 61 We are adamantly opposed to any multi family dwelling units in this area. 12 9 Landscaping 20 landscaping . 35 Does a white family ever receive help with this? 13 57 No 59 Husband Qwife 61 Please make it affordable for Iow income and seniors $400.00 to B500.88 is a lot of money plus utilities. We have to sacrifice what is important: rent, medicine or utilities we can't do it all on low income. If we miss a bill or a payment we pay twice. Please help us! � 15 8 No sidewalk, curbs or gutters. 16 61 Historic aspects of neiqhborhoods ve to be taken irito account!! | 19 23 7 24 ? 20 59 Con (with) mi (my) familia (family) E.2-15 Appendix E.2: Mail-Out/Mail-Back Survey of Workshop Participants The City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services Consolidated Annual Performance And Evaluation Report For Year of 2010 For further information, contact: The Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 S. Eighth Street Yakima,WA 98901 509-575-6101 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SECTION ONE (HUD Required Narrative) Summary of Resources 4 Assessment of Five -Year Goals and Objectives 5 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing 6 Affordable Housing 7 Continuum of Care For the Homeless Other Actions 8 Leveraging Resources 9 SECTION TWO (CDBG Narrative) Funding Priorities 10 Plan Changes Efforts In Carrying Out Planned Actions Resources, Certifications, and Implementation National Objectives Displacement and Relocation Compliance 11 Economic Development Low -Moderate Income Benefit Housing Rehabilitation Neighborhood Stabilization Program SECTION THREE (HOME Narrative) HOME Funds Distribution Categories 12 Match Requirements, HUD Form 4107 HOME Assisted Rental Housing Inspections Affirmative Marketing SECTION FOUR Self Evaluation 13 Citizen Comments 14 2 2010 Consolidated Annual Performance And Evaluation Report INTRODUCTION Each year the City of Yakima receives funding from the Federal Government for two entitlement programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME). These programs carry with them some very specific requirements in the areas of planning and reporting. This document is the required annual report for both programs. Known as the Consolidated Annual Performance Report (CAPER), it provides data on the programs and activities for which funds provided by CDBG and HOME were spent. The CAPER is written to provide the specific information required by Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations, and is submitted to HUD for review and approval. This submission follows a mandated 15 -day public comment period. At the same time, it also provides the opportunity to report to the local community (Citizens and Elected Officials) on the activities and successes of the past year. The primary purpose of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is to help meet the needs of low/moderate income residents while developing a strong community with the provision of decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities within the City limits of Yakima. FUNDING RESOURCES For the year 2010, the City of Yakima received $1,283,426 in CDBG funds, and $677,752 in HOME funds, for a total of $1,961,178. Program income is revolved back into the existing budgeted programs as defined and voted on by the Yakima City Council. Much of the data required by HUD as to how the funds were spent is provided via the computerized system known as Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS). Copies of the summary reports created by this system are attached to the CAPER. 4 HUD Required Narrative Statements • ASSESSMENT OF FIVE-YEAR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES CDBG planning starts with a document known as the Consolidated Plan. This document outlines broad goals and strategies to meet the identified needs of the community served by the CDBG program. The City Council of Yakima has designated programs to serve city wide, with no specific defined target area in mind, thus making programs available to all low/moderate income individuals within the City of Yakima. The City Council has also, in response to citizen input, identified goals and objectives to guide the planned expenditure of these funds. These goals are focused on the following areas: 1. Clean-up neighborhoods 2. Access to services and infrastructure 3. Access to safe, decent, affordable housing 4. More even distribution of economic groups throughout the City of Yakima 5. Economic Development: more jobs, better job skills. 6. Economic Development: new and increased small businesses and development opportunities. 7. Services available to more people. 8. CDBG funds provide only part of the overall budget. 9. Increased citizen participation. 10. Historic Preservation. Taken from the 2010 Annual Action Plan budget, activities address the above referenced goals as follows: • The allocation of funds for Community Services is always a top priority for the City Council. • The Single Family Exterior Paint program strengthens our affordable housing efforts. • The Graffiti Program provides benefits to community services. • The goal for our Economic Development expenditures is to expand our local economy and provide jobs for low/moderate income persons. • Housing counseling helps keep decent affordable housing within reach of our area residents. Basic services like water and sewer are still not available to all area residents and the Office of Neighborhood Development Services strives to continue working aggressively to expand these services. 5 • The CDBG Single Family Rehabilitation, the Elderly/Disabled Rehabilitation, and the Relocation programs all assist in making housing affordable. © The Lead -Based Paint Abatement helps keep our housing stock safe and affordable, while addressing important environmental concerns. • During all our housing rehabilitation, we work diligently in incorporating Historic Preservation concerns within our community. Numerous goals were set for all programs during the City's budget process. Most of these goals were met or surpassed, as statistical information provided within this document demonstrates. (Please see table 3A on page 16 for Summary of Specific Annual Objectives) The City of Yakima continues to work with local agencies to overcome the obstacles in serving the special needs populations in Yakima. The City of Yakima takes great care in not hindering the activities as identified in the Consolidated and Annual Action plan. • AFFIRMATIVELY FUR'I HERING FAIR HOUSING The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice of the City of Yakima identifies a number of potential barriers. Under the Direction of the City Council this office provides a Housing Counseling service to help overcome these barriers. Thousands of contacts are made each year to assist renters, landlords and homeowners. The City of Yakima continues to provide documents and information as well referrals to legal assistance groups, to credit counseling agencies, and other offices in a direct attempt to overcome fair housing impediments. Every effort is made to assist clients to resolve their difficulty in a satisfactory manner as is demonstrated in this document as to the diverse group of families and individuals benefiting from our activities as supported through federal resources. The following actions were taken in 2010 to affirmatively further fair housing: • 2,561 walk-in clients, with another 3,266 clients were served with the Housing Counseling Hotline for a total of 5,827 clients served through this program in 2010 with Housing Counseling. • ONDS met with local housing lenders and realtors to present City sponsored housing programs. • ONDS continues to meet and work with Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO), such as Habitat for Humanity and OIC of Washington 6 and the to continually address local needs for affirmatively further fair housing within the City of Yakima. • AFFORDABLE HOUSING The City of Yakima concentrates our CDBG affordable housing efforts in four programs: Single Family Paint, Single Family Rehabilitation, the Elderly/Disabled Rehabilitation programs, and the Lead Based Paint Abatement program. These programs served a combined total of 124 homes, helping well over 150 residents during the year. Construction continued in a new 20 unit single family housing development called "Marvin Gardens". The City of Yakima completed the necessary infrastructure in 2008 and began building homes in partnership with two Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) using HOME funds to be sold upon completion to qualified low/moderate income first time Homebuyers. This development has a total of twenty (20) houses completed and fourteen (14) homes sold with the remaining six (6) houses currently being marketed to qualified low to moderate income first time homebuyer applicants. The City of Yakima continues to work closely with the Yakima Housing Authority to strategize about affordable housing opportunities for the future. The City of Yakima continues to support "2-1-1 Get Connected, Get Answers," a call system, as a means of combating Barriers to Affordable Housing, thus enabling people to connect with Emergency Shelters, Counseling & Support Groups, as well as accessing Affordable Housing agencies, legal counsel, etc. • CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR THE HOMELESS While this program does not receive regular budgeted funding from the City of Yakima, we continue to recognize the importance of assisting with programs that serve the homeless. During 2010, ONDS worked closely with the local Continuum of Care, known as the Homeless Network of Yakima County. The network made progress in providing services to these people, including continuing to making available cold weather shelters during the winters. McKinney funds were applied for and grants awarded to provide a number of different services at widely -scattered sites throughout the county, including the City of Yakima. 7 ® OTHER ACTIONS Under the direction of the Yakima City Council, ONDS continues a successful partnership program with the City Codes Division. This is working to combat problems that would otherwise lead to further deterioration of neighborhoods, and reduce the quality of life of area residents. The City of Yakima works with a large variety of volunteers and volunteer - based organizations and self-help agencies, such as Habitat for Humanity volunteers, which assisted in painting thirty-two (32) homes, providing volunteer labor for the Senior/Disabled Exterior Paint program. The City also works with People for People and the Northwest Community Action Center both of which provide volunteers to paint -out graffiti and do alley and vacant lot clean-up. These joint venture programs help provide a "Positive Work Experience" to the individuals, as well as providing much needed community services to the neighborhoods. The City continues to work with Juvenile Justice to provide a location for juvenile court-ordered community service to convicted juvenile offenders to serve their court-appointed community service hours. ONDS uses these individuals to paint -out graffiti and do alley and vacant lot clean-up. Neighborhood Development Services continues to partner with Public Works to provide alley cleanup and lot specific cleanup through the Senior/Disabled Rehabilitation program, as well as weed abatement during the summer months using volunteer labor. Public Works then pays any costs associated with dump fees for any properties other than qualified applicants through the CDBG Senior/Disabled Rehabilitation program. The City of Yakima continues to combat Lead -Based Paint issues throughout the city by doing lead-based paint inspections, risk assessments and clearance examinations for applicants of the Owner -Occupied Rehabilitation programs and Down Payment Assistant Program. A visual inspection by ONDS of each property assures the housing meets Housing Quality Standards and has no deteriorated paint that could potentially contain lead. ONDS also continues to work with the local Clean Air Authority in helping qualified homeowners change out their "un -certified wood burning stoves" with alternate, more efficient heating sources. 8 • LEVERAGING RESOURCES The Yakima City Council continues to aggressively address graffiti within the City of Yakima, and continue to direct CDBG Community Service resources in supplying equipment and staff supervision to local volunteers, thereby producing 12,051 volunteer hours. Had the City paid for these hours the cost to the taxpayers would have far exceeded $120,000. The City of Yakima partnerships with local Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO), such as the local Habitat for Humanity and OIC of Washington, in the continued construction development "Marvin Gardens" with ONDS funds thereby leveraging an additional estimated $650,000 of state and local funding. The City of Yakima also contributed a $50,000 CDBG grant in partnership with Rural Community Development Resources (RCDR) in helping serve local Micro -enterprises with technical assistance and helped steer Yakima Renewal Community businesses toward the $250,000 loan capital from Bank of America, in addition to other sources of financing within the RCDR network. Finally, our Community Service sub -grantees are asked to leverage our contribution with other funding. Often this outside funding exceeds the total amount of our portion. These programs combined resulted in essential services being provided to hundreds of persons each year. • MINORITY/WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE The City of Yakima continues to actively encourage women and minority contractors to participate in the Cities construction activities. Please see the attached MBE/WBE contract and subcontractor activity report. 9 ECTION TWO CDBG NARRATIVE e Consolidated Plan Priorities, Needs, Goals, and Objectives e FUNDING PRIORITIES As illustrated by statistical information provided in this CAPER, the City of Yakima has utilized our CDBG funds effectively. The goals identified in the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan are the basis for all funding decisions. As previously discussed, all CDBG funds and expenditures can be directly linked to one of the Plan goals. And for 2010 all Block Grant expenditures were for the benefit of low/moderate income persons, either individually documented as low/moderate or as a qualified area benefit serving a low/moderate clientele comprised of over 51% of the area populace. • PLAN CHANGES There were no amendments or changes to the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan in 2010. • EFFORTS IN CARRYING OUT PLANNED ACTIONS Please refer to the information included in the introduction as well as the Narrative Statements. The City of Yakima certifies that it is following a current HUD -approved Consolidated Plan. It has pursued all resources that were proposed in the Plan; it has fairly and impartially provided requested certification of consistency as specified in the Plan, and has not hindered Consolidated Plan implementation. • RESOURCES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND IMPLEMENTATION As previously described, ONDS and the City of Yakima actively and successfully pursued funding and other assistance from a variety of sources in addition to CDBG and HOME. This effort has dramatically increased the impact of the two programs. As required, ONDS provides the required • certifications of compliance with all relevant Federal Regulations, and requires the same certification from all contractors and sub -grantees. ONDS works carefully to implement all the programs identified for action in the Consolidated Plan, and, in no case, does anything to impede these efforts. • NATIONAL OBJECTIVES All 2010 activities and expenditures were used to help accomplish one of the three national objectives of the CDBG legislation. These are: 10 o Low/Moderate Income Benefit o Prevention of Slum or Blight o Urgent Health and Welfare • DISPLACEMENT AND RELOCATION COMPLIANCE During 2010 ONDS had no activity that required relocation assistance to a displaced homeowner. • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT There were no known instances during 2010 where jobs were made available to low/moderate income persons and not taken by them. All jobs assisted with CDBG Economic Development funds included a provision for any necessary training. • LOW -MODERATE INCOME BENEFIT All activities were for the benefit of low/moderate income persons. Evidence for this is contained in the individual file for each activity. • HOUSING REHABILITATION During 2010, CDBG funds were spent on housing rehabilitation for single- family homes owned by the residents. Specific details as to how many are available from the attached IDIS reports. • CDBG-R The City of Yakima received CDBG-R funding from HUD in the amount of $317,515.00 and used that funding to successfully replace deteriorated infrastructure and utilities along "A" street, as well as support job retention through the non-profit agency OIC of Washington to continue "Public Service" program at the South East Community Center. • NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM The City of Yakima also received Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds through the Washington State department of Commerce in the amount of $650,000. This allowed the City of Yakima to purchase one foreclosed property with a substandard dangerous building. This structure was demolished and the single lot was sub -divided into two parcels and is currently under redevelopment and construction of two (2) new single family homes that will be sold to qualified low to moderate income first time homebuyers. The City also used a portion of these funds to purchase a foreclosed single family home and is currently rehabilitating the home and it too will be sold to a low to 11 ECTION THREE moderate income first time homebuyer. Furthermore, the City purchased an additional three blighted undeveloped lots for redevelopment, two of those lots have been subdivided into two and three parcels, respectively and a total of five new single family homes are under construction, while the third lot is currently under HUD environmental review and pending a Request of Release of Funds to allow future construction of six (6) single family homes to be sold to low to moderate first time homebuyers. HOME NARRATIVE ® HOME FUNDS DISTRIBUTION CATEGORIES All HOME funds were distributed according to the categories of need identified in the Consolidated Plan. With the exception of Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) funds, all funds were spent on Homeownership activities, either First Time Homebuyer or Down Payment Assistance, amounts for each category are itemized on enclosed charts. ▪ MATCH REQUIREMENTS, HUD FORM #40107 and # 40107-A Please see the attached HUD FORM #40107and #40107-A for reporting the HOME match requirements. The information required on contracts and subcontracts with minority and women -owned businesses was provided on a separate report. The City of Yakima continues to encourage women and minority-owned businesses. ® HOME ASSISTED RENTAL HOUSING INSPECTIONS All affordable rental housing units previously assisted with HOME funds were monitored according to the prescribed schedule. All were found to be in proper condition and all were in compliance with affordability commitments. (Please note monitoring reports are attached.) AFFIRMATIVE MARKETING All HOME projects are marketed according to approved affirmative marketing actions as required by HUD. 12 ECTION FOUR • SELF EVALUATION The stated mission of the CDBG program and ONDS is to assist in developing a more viable community by helping to provide decent, affordable housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities, primarily through serving low and moderate income persons. In seeking to accomplish this goal, ONDS continues to operate one of the most diverse and successful CDBG programs in the entire region. Great care is taken to provide significant funding and assistance in several areas. ONDS is also unique in that we provide many of these services directly rather than through sub -grantees or contractors, which allows more individuals to be assisted while holding the cost down significantly by eliminating the need for a third party. Our services can be divided into four categories: economic development, community services, housing, and infrastructure. Within each, we provide a variety of specific programs and services. We believe that within the constraints of our budget we do an excellent job in each area. The affordable housing needs in Yakima are so great that the challenges sometimes seem insurmountable. Yet we find that improving a house in a neighborhood often starts a trend that extends too many other homes. The City of Yakima continues to recognize there are still people in this community who do not have access to public water and sewer for their homes. So the expansion of these services continues to be an important issue for many reasons, including the health of the community Yakima's Senior/Disabled Home Rehabilitation Programs enabled 124 homes to remain safe decent housing, successfully serving well over 150 occupants and keeping them within their homes, and out of the already over -burdened public housing system, or nursing homes, thus saving hundreds of thousands of tax dollars in financial support through social services. For all we do, there is much more that needs to be addressed. We must continue to work more efficiently, and do a better job prioritizing our efforts and investments. Projects that provide the greatest benefit for the most people at the lowest cost continue to need funding. 13 Basic human needs must be met with a continually shrinking budget. Basic human needs such as power to supply heat in the winter, water for drinking, sanitary sewer systems to protect our valuable underground water sources and replacing failing septic systems, thereby protecting areas from surface water contamination. Basic human needs, such as safe, clean, affordable housing continue to be a top priority for the City of Yakima. • CITIZEN COMMENTS The City of Yakima continues to encourage citizen participation and make program information available throughout the year to the public as defined in the adopted "Citizen Participation Policy". (Any received written public comment on this document will be added to the end of this document and submitted to HUD accordingly.) 14 SECTION FIVE *Outcome/Obiective Codes Table 3A -- Summary of Specific Annual Objectives # Availability/Accessibility Affordability Sustainability Decent Housing DH -1 DH -2 DH -3 Suitable Living Environment SL -1 SL -2 SL -3 Economic Opportunity EO -1 EO -2 EO -3 Table 3A -- Summary of Specific Annual Objectives # Specc Annual Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Expected Number Actual Number Outcome/ Objective* Owner Housing DH -1 Increase Access of LME persons to Decent/Affordable housing through new construction using CHDO's on Marvin Gardens housing development HOME Number of Units 10 14 houses sold and 6 houses marketed Decent housing/ Suitable living DH -2 Increase Access of LMI persons to Decent/Affordable housing through Down Payment Assistance for Homeownership HOME Number of Units 30 27 Decent housing/ Suitable living Community Development SL -1 Increase Suitable Living Environment through the abatement of Dangerous Buildings CDBG Number of buildings removed 2 1 Suitable living SL -3 Increase Suitable Living environment with Sustainability through the support of Code Compliance in LMI Neighborhoods CDBG Locations brought into compliance with local codes 50 1767 Suitable living/ sustainabili ty DH -1 Decent Housing and Suitable living Environment through Landlord/Tenant and Housing Counselingprograms CDBG Number of clients served 2,500 5827 Decent housing/Af fordable Public Facilities SL -3 Sustainability of Suitable Living Environment through the Rehabilitation of existing Public Facility at SECC CDBG Continued use of existing building 1 1 Suitable living/ sustainabili ty DH -3 SL -3 Decent Housing and Suitable living Environment Sustained through Rehabilitation ofexisting public Facility at Y -Pal CDBG Continued use of existing building 1 0 Suitable living/ Sustainabil ity 15 16 Public Services SL-1 Increase the range of services available to assist LMI persons by assisting OIC/ South East Community Center. (SECC) CDBG Number of persons using services at SECC 1,000 7,422 Suitable living/ sustainabili ty DH-3 SL-3 Decent Housing and Suitable Living Environment Sustained by Painting Out Graffiti in LMI Neighborhoods CDBG Number of locations painted 5,000 2,692 Suitable living/ Sustainabil ity Single Family Rehabilitation DH- 1.1 Single Family Rehabilitation of owner occupied Low to Moderate income homes. CDBG Number of Units 65 124 Availabilit y/Accessibi lit' DH- 1.7 Relocation CDBG Number of persons assisted with relocation costs 1 0 Decent housing/Af fordable Economic Development EO- 1.1 Grow America Fund CDBG Number of jobs available to L/M persons 5 Presumed Benefit Area Jobs available to LMI persons EO- 1 4 Rural Community Development Resources (microenterprise technical assistance) CDBG Number of L/M persons assisted. 35 67 TA assistance to LMI persons 16 SECTION SIX )IS - PRO2 EPORT ALL PGM YR ALL inding Agency: YAKIMA an Year 1DIS Project Project IDIS Activity ID U.S. Department oI trousmg ana urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Integrated Disbursement and Information System List of Activities 13y Program Year And Project YAKIMA, WA Activity Name 1JA11.. TIME: PAGE. Actrvrty rrogro Funded Amount Draw Amount s. UL -2411 13:57 1 Balance 6 7 8 9 P6. CDBG. Graffiti Abatement 1310 Program: Graffiti Abatement 1311 Delivery. Graffiti Abatement Project Total P7• Fair Housing Counseling 1306 1307 Project Total P8: Single Family Housing Program Fair Housing Counseling Delivery: Fair Housing Counseling 1308 Program: Single Family Housing 1309 Delivery: Single Family Housing Project Total P9• Public /Community 1312 Service Project Total 10 P10• CDBG ADMINISTRATION Project Total 12 P12. CDBG Economic Development Project Total 13 P13• HOME Project Total 14 P14 HOME CHDO'S Project Total OIC OF WA: SECC 1325 P9: CDBG: ENERGY ASSISTANCE 1313 Program: CDBG Administration 1314 Delivery. CDBG Aministration 1315 Program: Economic Development 1321 CDBG: RCDR-MICOENTERPRISE/SM BUSSINESS 1338 CDBG: JOB FAIR 2009: ECON. DEV 1316 HOME ADMINISTRATION 2010 1324 CHDO: 1518 Fairbanks Ave & 908 S 5th Ave 1350 HOME, CHDO-OIC Revolving Loan Fund 1351 P14. CHDO. MARVIN GARDENS PHS 3 1355 HOME, CHDO-OPER; OIC OF WA.:GENERAL 1356 CHDO. Open 1374 P14 CHDO: MARVIN GARDENS PHS 4 Open CDBG $10,790.00 Open CDBG $70,358.00 $8,386.00 $61,003.00 $2,404.00 $9,355.00 581,148.00 Open CDBG $4,100.00 Open CDBG $40,730.00 569,389.00 $2,429.00 $28,916.00 511,759.00 $1,671.00 $11,814.00 544,830.00 Open CDBG 8535,116.00 Open CDBG $496,368.00 531,345.00 $454,579.00 $138,738.00 513,485.00 $80,537.00 $357,630.00 51,031,484.00 Open CDBG $75,000.00 Open CDBG $5,000.00 5593,317.00 $27,733.00 $1,704.00 5438,167.00 $47,267.00 $3,296.00 $80,000.00 Open CDBG 8110,000.00 Open CDBG $170,000.00 $29,437.00 $106,949.00 $118,196.00 550,563.00 $3,051.00 $51,804.00 5280,000.00 Open CDBG $0.00 Open CDBG $50,000.00 Open CDBG $5,000.00 5225,145.00 $0.00 $50,000.00 $5,000.00 554,855.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 555,000.00 Open HOME $145,732.00 $55,000.00 $89,013.00 $0.00 $56,719.00 5145,732.00 Open HOME $67,241.00 Open HOME $200,000.40 Open HOME $264,393.00 Open HOME $16,531.80 Open HOME $0.00 Open HOME $117,709.38 589,013.00 $61,241.00 S101,155.00 8264,393.00 $4,660.00 $0.00 $28,347.00 556,719.00 $6,000.00 $98,845 40 $0.00 $11,871.80 $0.00 $89,362.38 5665,875.58 5459,796.00 $206,079.58 ogram Grand rand Total 1362 F1'H: 3104 Hathaway Ave. Marvm Ciardens Open HOME $30,295.00 $30,295.00 $0.00 Project Total 594,905.00 587,033.00 57,872.00 20 P20: CDBG Public Facilities 1354 PRGM: "A" Street: Sidewalk Open CDBG 5200,000.00 $163,445.00 $36,555.00 Protect Total 5200,000.00 5163,445.00 536,555.00 24 P24: Code Compliance Pgm 1320 Delivery: Code Compliance Pgm Open CDBG $179,445.00 $164,552.00 $14,893.00 Project Total 5179,445.00 5164,552.00 514,893.00 25 P25• CDBG 1364 PGM: CLEARANCE: 917 Fenton Open CDBG $8,480.00 $8,480.00 $0.00 Project Total 58,480.00 58,480.00 50.00 28 P10: CDBG-R 1326 P28: CDBG-R DELIVERY ADMINISTRATION Open CDBG- $31,751.00 $20,921.00 $10,830.00 ADMINISTRTION 1327 P28: CDBG-R "A" Street Project. (sidewalks) ) Open CDBG- $238,497.00 $238,272.00 $225.00 1340 P28: CDBG-R SECC Public Service Open CDBG- $47,267.00 $47,267.00 $0.00 Project Total 5317,515.00 5306,460.00 511,055.00 CDBG 51,960,387.00 51,340,110.00 5620,277.00 Program Total CDBG- 5317,515.00 5306,460.00 511,055.00 HOME 51,122,035.58 5787,667.00 5334,368.58 2010 Total 53,399,937.58 52,434,237.00 5965,700.58 CDBG 525,772,806.29 525,151,541.29 5621,265.00 CDBG- 5317,515.00 5306,460.00 511,055.00 HOME 512,112,077.81 511,578,516.60 5533,561.21 538,202,399.10 537,036,517.89 $1,165,881.21 P.�M. ENT0 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development 'tea* hit * Integrated Disbursement and Information System ���099�o Q��z CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2010 '9'9,1N DEVE\-o YAKIMA 3M ,Year: 2010 roject :' i0Q07:.=1P:7: Fair:Housing,Counseling iIS;=%Activity,, :1306.'.=sFairHousingACounseling :atus. )cation. Open 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 itial Funding Date: Ing " Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments People (General) 150 ctual Accomplishments 03/01/2010 4,100 00 1,752.00 1,752.00 Objective: Provide decent affordable housing Outcome. Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Fair Housing Activities (if CDGS, then Date: 24 -Feb -2011 Time: 14:00 Page: 1 National Objective. LMC 9t03 Description: To assist families in the city limits of yakima with landlordtenant issues, housing referrrals, home purchasing referrerals,ect for year 2010 Owner Renter Total Person ember assisted: Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Asian. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crican Indian/Alaskan Native & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi -racial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female -headed Households 0 0 0 Income Cateoorv. Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 0 Low Mod 0 0 0 0 Moderate Non Low Moderate Total Percent Low/Mod nnual Accomplishments Year # Benefiting GM'. Year: 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Accomplishment Narrative roject: -0007 - P7. .Fair Housing..Counseling IIS'Activity: 1307 - Delivery: Fair Housing Counseling r� Open )canon. 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 itial Funding Date: inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year: Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments People (General) . 150 ctual Accomplishments umber assisted: 03/02/2010 40,730 00 28, 916.00 28,916.00 1G��tiite: .k/African American Asian. American Indian/Alaskan Native: Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: American Indian/Alaskan Native & White: Asian White: Black/African American & White: American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American. Other multi -racial. Asian/Pacific Islander. Hispanic: Total: Female -headed Households: 0 0 0 Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Description: the delivering Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Fair Housing Activities (if CDGS, then of Fair housing counseling for year 2010 National Objective: LMC Owner Renter Total Person Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Income Cateaorv- Extremely Low Low Mod Moderate Non Low Moderate Total Percent Low/Mod Owner Renter Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting L (ear: .2010 roject: )1S=Activity:- Latus. )cation. 0008 - P8: Single Family Housing Program 1308. -.Program: Single Family Housing Open 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 dial Funding Date: financing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year: Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments -'sousing Units 25 .1 Accomplishments umber assisted: 03/02/2010 535,116.00 407, 820.00 407, 820.00 White. Black/African American. Asian. American Indian/Alaskan Native. Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander: American Indian/Alaskan Native & White: Asian White. Black/African American & White: American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American. Other multi -racial' Person 0 0 0 0 0 Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Description: Program costs Owner Total Hispan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Create suitable living environments Affordability Rehab; Single -Unit Residential (14A) for the Single Family Program for year 2010 Renter Total Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 National Objective: LMH Total Person Total Hispanic Total Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female -headed Households: 0 0 0 Income Cateaorv- Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 0 Low Mod 0 0 0 0 Moderate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low/Mod .1 Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting 3M Year: 2010 'oject--: 0008 - P8: Single Family Housing Program IS Activity: 1309: Delivery: Singlefamily Housing :atus: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments cation: 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Outcome: Affordability Matrix Code: Rehabilitation Administration (14H) itial Funding Date: 03/02/2010 nancing inded Amount: 496,368 00 Drawn Thru Program Year 138,738.00 Drawn In Program Year 138,738.00 •oposed Accomplishments Housing Units 1 dual Accomplishments National Objective: LMC Description: This program covers the deliverying of the Single Family Housing Program for year 2010 Owner Renter Total Person ember assisted: Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & White. u u u u u u u u Asian White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other mufti -racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female -headed Households. 0 0 0 Income Cateaorv. Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 0 V„ Mod 0 0 0 0 r i. .erate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low/Mod inual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting 3M Year: 201.0 'Oject: 0006.-P6: CDBG: GraffitiAbatement IIS -Activity: 13':1E0-4Prograrn: Graffiti Abatement Open Objective: Create suitable living environments I. m. 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Outcome: Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Public Services (General) (05) National Objective. LMA itial Funding Date: 03/02/2010 Description: nancing This activity is to assist with program of Graffiti Abatement for Year 2010 Funded Amount: 10,790 00 Drawn Thru Program Year 7,633.00 Drawn In Program Year: 7,633.00 roposed Accomplishments People (General) 150 Total Population in Service Area. 76,801 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 52.00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year *Benefiting 2010 this activity will provide for the program costs for 2010 for graffiti abatement GM Year: 2010 roject: 0006 -:P6. CDBG: Graffiti:Abatement )IS .Activity: 1311 --Delivery: Graffiti Abatement tatus. ocation. Open 112 S 8th Street Yakima, WA 98901 iitial Funding Date: i Ging runded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year: roposed Accomplishments People (General) 1 Total Population in Service Area: 76,801 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 52.00 03/02/2010 70, 358.00 61, 003.00 61, 003.00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting G--" Year: 2010 r‘. -,.act: 0009--P9: Public/Community Service )IS>Activity: 1312 - OIC OF WA: SECC tatus: Open 3cation. 1211 S 7th Street Yakima, WA 98901 dial Funding Date: inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments People (General) . 150 03/02/2010 75, 000.00 27, 733.00 27,733 00 Objective: Outcome. Matrix Code: Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Public Services (General) (05) Description: The delivering of Graffiti Abatement Program for year 2010 Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Public Services (General) (05) National Objective: LMA National Objective. LMA Description: ACTIVITY PROVIDES THE COSTS FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AT SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER THROUGH OIC OF WA FOR YEAR 2010 iota! F opuIatlon in service Area. lb,4b9 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod. 77.60 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM Year: 2010 roject: 0010 - P10:- CDBG ADMINISTRATION US Activity: 1.31:3 - Program: CDBG Administration :atus. Open Objective: )cation. Outcome: Matrix Code: General Program Administration (21A) National Objective: itial Funding Date: 03/02/2010 Description: nancing this activity will provide for the program costs of administering CDBG funds for year 2010 Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments 110, 000.00 97,649 00 97,649 00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting SM Year: 2010 rn�t; 0010 - P10: CDBG-ADMINISTRATION ( .ctivity: 1:314 -Delivery: CDBG Aministration :atus. Open Objective. )cation: Outcome: Matrix Code: General Program Administration (21A) National Objective. itial Funding Date: 03/02/2010 Description: nancing this activity is for the delivering of CDBG funds for year 2010 Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year •oposed Accomplishments 170, 000.00 118,196 00 118,196.00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GMNear: 2010 roject--:: - 0024 -:P24: Code Compliance Pgm )ISActivity: 1320—Delivery: CodeCompliance Pgm tatus. Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Dcation: 112 S 8TH STREET YAKIM, WA 98901 Outcome: Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Code Enforcement (15) National Objective: LMA ;;tial Funding Date: 03/03/2010 Description: inancing THIS ACTIVITY IS FOR THE DELIVERING OF CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICERS IN 2010 Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year: ( rawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments People (General) . 15 Total Population in Service Area. 76,801 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 52.00 179,445 00 164,552.00 164, 552.00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GMYear: 2010 rojects 0012.-1312: 'CDBGEconomic;Development- IIS,Activity: 1',321- CDBG: RCDR-MICOENTERPRISE/SMsBUSSINESS TA Open Objective. Create economic opportunities ;cation. 24 S 3RD Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Outcome: Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Micro -Enterprise Assistance (18C) Mal Funding Date: 06/23/2010 Description: inancing ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR MICRO ENTERPRISE FOR 2010 National Objective: LMA Funded Amount: 50,000 00 Drawn Thru Program Year: 36,380 00 Drawn In Program Year 36,380 00 roposed Accomplishments Businesses 35 Total Population in Service Area. 33,352 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 71.30 nnual Accomplishments Year # Benefiting Accomplishment Narrative 2010 assistanct to mico-enterprise for TA, and small business creation. GM; Year: 2010 roject:. 0009 -,P9: Public./Community Service )ISaActivity: 1325 -P9: -CDBG: 'ENERGY.ASSISTANCE tatus. Open Dcation. 112 S 8TH STREET YAKIMA, WA 98901 Funding Date: r._.�cing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments People (General) 2 ctual Accomplishments umber assisted: White: Black/African American Asian. American Indian/Alaskan Native: 04/15/2010 5,000 00 734 00 734 00 ve Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander American Indian/Alaskan Native & White: Asian White: Black/African American & White: American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American. Other multi -racial: Asian/Pacific Islander: Hispanic: Total: Female -headed Households Income Cateoorv• Extremely Low Owner Renter Total 0 0 0 Objective: Create suitable living environments Outcome: Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Public Services (General) (05) National Objective: LMC Description: THIS PROGRAM WILL ASSIST SENIORDISABLED AND VERY LOW TO MODERATEINCOME FAMILIES WITH ENERGY ASSISTANCE FOR YEAR 2010 Owner Renter Total Person Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Person 0 LOW MOO U U U U Moderate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low/Mod nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM Year: 2008 roject: 0020—CDBG:PUBLIC FACILITIES PROGRAM 2008 1"' activity: 1336 - PRGM: f:MAPL-E/FAIR AVE: "TRIANGLE" Latus Completed Objective: Create suitable living environments )cation: 112 S 8TH STREET YAKIMA, WA 98901 Outcome. Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Public Facilities and Improvement dial Funding Date: 10/27/2010 Description: inancing CDBG PUBLIC FACILITY PROGRAM FOR 2008 YR. Funded Amount: 12,981.00 Drawn Thru Program Year 12,981 00 Drawn In Program Year: 0.00 roposed Accomplishments Public Facilities 1 Total Population in Service Area. 31,060 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod: 58.10 l Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting National Objective: LMA ACTIVITY REMAINED OPEN FOR OUTSTANDING EXPENDITURES ON THIS PROJECT 2009 REOPENED FOR CHANGES TO ACTIVITY (SEE ACTIVITY 1191) -PER HUD MOVED DOLLAR INTO THIS ACCOUNT, WHICH IS GM • Year: 2010 roject: 0012 -.P12: CDBG Economic Development IS Activity: 1338 - CDBG` .JOB FAIR 2009: ECON. DEV. :atus. Open Objective: Create economic opportunities )cation: 120 S 3rd St Ste 200A Yakima, WA 98901-2868 Outcome: Sustainability Matrix Code: ED Direct Financial Assistance to For- itial Funding Date: 10/06/2010 Description: National Objective: LMJ Inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Jobs 1 ctual Accomplishments 5,000 00 5,000 00 5,000.00 (:Ub(L tL.ONUMI(. UtVtLUF'MtN 1 F'KU(iKAM 401U-JOD I -81r Owner Renter Total Person umber assisted Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P, "erican Indian/Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ve Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi -racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female -headed Households. Income Cateaorv. 0 0 0 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 0 1'" • Mod 0 0 0 0 i...Jerate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low/Mod nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM Year: 2009 roject: 0012 - CDBG: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IIS Activity: 1339 - P12: SPORTSCENTER: SECT 108 tatus: Dcation: Open 214 E. Yakima Ave Yakima, WA 98901 iitial Funding Date: inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year: roposed Accomplishments Businesses 1 Total Population in Service Area: 33,352 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod 71 30 ,I Accomplishments Year # Benefiting 10/15/2010 988.00 0.00 0.00 Accomplishment Narrative GM' Year: 2010 roject: 0020 ,.-4320t CDBG Public Facilities HS,Activity; 1354-PRGM: "A"'Street: Sidewalk Latus. Open )cation. East A Street Yakima, WA 98902 Mal Funding Date: inancing ended Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Public Facilities 1 Total Population in Service Area. 3,614 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod. 76 70 11/30/2010 200,000 00 129,125 00 129,125 00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM Year: 2010 Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Create economic opportunities Sustainability ED Technical Assistance (18B) National Objective: LMA Description: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COSTS PERTAINING TO SPORTCENTER PROJECT 2009 Objective: Create suitable living environments Outcome: Availability/accessibility Matrix Code: Public Facilities and Improvement Description: CDBG PUBLIC FACILITY PROGRAM FOR 2010 "A" Street Sidewalks National Objective. LMA LOW MOO Moderate Non Low Moderate Total Percent Low/Mod u 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM: Year: 2008 roject: 002(1=--CDBG:PUBLIC FACILITIES .PROGRAM2008 V" activity: 1.336 -=PREM: E.MAPLE/FAIRAVE: "TRIANGLE" latus. Completed )cation. 112 S 8TH STREET YAKIMA, WA 98901 dial Funding Date: inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Public Facilities 1 Total Population in Service Area. 31,060 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod 58 10 10/27/2010 12,981 00 12,981 00 0 00 1 Accomplishments Year # Benefiting Accomplishment Narrative U 0 0 0 Objective: Outcome. Matrix Code: Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Public Facilities and Improvement Description: CDBG PUBLIC FACILITY PROGRAM FOR 2008 YR. National Objective. LMA ACTIVITY REMAINED OPEN FOR OUTSTANDING EXPENDITURES ON THIS PROJECT 2009 REOPENED FOR CHANGES TO ACTIVITY (SEE ACTIVITY 1191) -PER HUD MOVED DOLLAR INTO THIS ACCOUNT, WHICH IS GM Year: 2010 roject: 0012 - P12: CDBG Economic Development ►IS Activity: 1338-- CDBG: JOB FAIR -2009. ECON. DEV atus Open )cation. 120 S 3rd St Ste 200A Yakima, WA 98901-2868 itial Funding Date: 10/06/2010 Objective Outcome: Matrix Code: Description: Create economic opportunities Sustainability ED Direct Financial Assistance to For - National Objective LMJ Inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Jobs 1 ctual Accomplishments 5,000 00 5,000 00 5,000 00 UUtiCi tL:UNUMI(. UtVtLUI-'MLN 1 VKUUKAM LU1U-JOD fair Owner Renter Total Person umber assisted: Total Hispan Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Hispanic White 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q^nerican Indian/Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ve Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American & White. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native & Black/African American. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi -racial. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian/Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female -headed Households. Income Cateoorv. 0 0 0 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 0 Mod 0 0 0 0 I..-Jerate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low/Mod nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting GM Year: 2009 roject: 0012 - CDBG. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IIS Activity: 1339 - P12: SPORTSCENTER: SECT 108 tatus. kation: Open 214 E. Yakima Ave Yakima, WA 98901 iitial Funding Date: inancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Businesses 1 Total Population in Service Area. 33,352 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod. 71 30 10/15/2010 988.00 0 00 0 00 JI Accomplishments Year # Benefiting OM. Year: 2010 Accomplishment Narrative roject: 0020AP20 CDBG,Public Facilities IIS+Activity: 1'354 -`•PRGM° "A" Street: Sidewalk Latus. Open )cation. East A Street Yakima, WA 98902 itial Funding Date: 11/30/2010 financing ended Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year roposed Accomplishments Public Facilities 1 Total Population in Service Area. 3,614 Census Tract Percent Low / Mod 76 70 200,000 00 129,125 00 129,125 00 nnual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefiting 3M Year: 2010 Objective: Outcome. Matrix Code: Create economic opportunities Sustainability ED Technical Assistance (18B) National Objective' LMA Description: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COSTS PERTAINING TO SPORTCENTER PROJECT 2009 Objective. Outcome Matrix Code: Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Public Facilities and Improvement Description: CDBG PUBLIC FACILITY PROGRAM FOR 2010 "A' Street Sidewalks National Objective. LMA oject. IS Acfivityr 1364• -.PGM:' CL'•EARANCE: 917 Fenton 0025- P25: CDBG Clearance/Neighborhood Improvement igm atus cation. Open 917 Fenton St Yakima, WA 98901-3076 tial Funding Date: lancing Funded Amount: Drawn Thru Program Year Drawn In Program Year oposed Accomplishments Housing Units 1 i. .I Accomplishments Year # Benefiting 12/16/2010 8,480 00 1,746 00 1,746 00 Accomplishment Narrative Total Funded Amount: Total Drawn Thru Program Total Drawn In Program Year: Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code. Create suitable living environments Availability/accessibility Clearance and Demolition (04) Description: CDBG IMPROVMENT PROGRAM 2010 $10,457,616.00 $9,723,218.00 $1,327,074.00 National Objective. SBS t03 - YAKIMA Page: 1 of 1 22 (2 of 3) - Status of HOME Activities - Entitlement led by ntee - Subgrantor State - Non -State Entitlement dity Type N CONSTRUCTION N CONSTRUCTION N CONSTRUCTION N CONSTRUCTION )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY 1" 'ITION ONLY TION ONLY :iUiSITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY )UISITION ONLY TION ONLY ,TION ONLY Grantee IDIS Activ Activity Address Activity Status 34952 YAKIMA 1148 HATAWAY AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98901 Final Draw 34952 YAKIMA -1197 3102 Hathaway St 3108 Hathaway , Yakima WA, 9£ Open 34952 YAKIMA 1259 Hathaway Hathaway , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 34952 YAKIMA 1363 N 3rd St. , YAKIMA WA, 98901 Open 34952 YAKIMA 663 34952 YAKIMA 857 34952 YAKIMA 1157 34952 YAKIMA 1193 34952 YAKIMA 1211 34952 YAKIMA 1231 34952 YAKIMA 1238 34952 YAKIMA 1240 34952 YAKIMA 1241 34952 YAKIMA 1242 34952 YAKIMA 1243 34952 YAKIMA 1244 34952 YAKIMA 1246 34952 YAKIMA 1247 34952 YAKIMA 1250 34952 YAKIMA 1264 34952 YAKIMA 1268 34952 YAKIMA 1271 34952 YAKIMA 1272 34952 YAKIMA 1273 34952 YAKIMA 1279 34952 YAKIMA 1282 34952 YAKIMA 1285 34952 YAKIMA 1288 34952 YAKIMA 1289 34952 YAKIMA 1291 34952 YAKIMA 1293 201 SOUTH 8TH STREET , YAKIMA WA, 98901 201 SOUTH 8TH STREET , YAKIMA WA, 98901 1411 FAIR AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98901 701 S 11TH AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 112 S 8TH ST , YAKIMA WA, 98901 1203 PLEASANT AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98901 613 S 4TH STREET , YAKIMA WA, 98901 511 N 26TH AVENUE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 110 S 8th Street , Yakima WA, 98901 502 N 23RD AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 1003 S 5th Avenue , Yakima WA, 98902 808 Pleasant Avenue , Yakima WA, 98902 1706 CORNELL , YAKIMA WA, 98902 905 N 10TH AVENUE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 404 S 24TH AVENUE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 315 S 8TH AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 1016 S 5TH AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 811 S 3RD ST , YAKIMA WA, 98901 3001 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 706 N 3RD AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 1115 S 32nd Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 1314 Swan Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 905 Cornell , Yakima WA, 98902 2005 Jerome , Yakima WA, 98902 1705 Tieton Drive , Yakima WA, 98902 1804 S 15th Ave , yakima WA, 98902 3003 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Status Date Total i Home Commit Date New Committed P New Drawn Amount New PCT (1) 6/29/2010 4 4 8/26/2009 $515,583 00 $515,583 00 100 00% 12/15/2010 2 2 12/18/2008 $71,500 00 $50,750 00 70 98% 10/8/2010 4 4 10/27/2009 $352,252.00 $352,252.00 100 00% 2/14/2011 0 0 12/14/2010 $50,000 00 $108 00 0.22% Open 9/1/2005 1 1 6/16/2004 $66,085 00 $66,073.00 99 98% Final Draw 12/5/2008 0 0 4/1/2005 $11,452.00 $11,452 00 100 00% Open 3/28/2008 1 1 3/27/2008 $4,543 00 $43 00 0.95% Final Draw 12/5/2008 1 1 12/5/2008 $4,131 00 $4,131 00 100 00% Canceled 3/19/2010 0 o 6/29/2009 $0.00 $0 00 0 00% Final Draw 9/30/2009 1 1 6/19/2009 $4,164.00 $4,164 00 100 00% Open 2/9/2010 0 0 8/26/2009 $4,578 00 5202.00 4 41% Final Draw 10/13/2009 1 1 8/26/2009 $4,123.00 $4,123 00 100 00% Open 10/13/2009 1 1 9/24/2009 $4,200 00 $4,119 00 98 07% Open 9/30/2009 1 1 9/24/2009 54,200.00 $4,147 00 98 74% Open 10/13/2009 1 1 9/24/2009 $4,200 00 $4,098.00 97 57% Final Draw 9/30/2009 1 1 9/26/2009 $38 00 $38 00 100 00% Open 10/13/2009 1 1 9/26/2009 $4,538 00 $4,140 00 91.23% Open 10/13/2009 1 1 9/26/2009 $4,538 00 54,163 00 91 74% Completed 12/31/2010 1 1 9/30/2009 $4,102.00 $4,102.00 100 00% Open 11/24/2009 0 0 11/21/2009 $5,000 00 538 00 0 76% Open 2/17/2010 0 0 11/21/2009 $4,576 00 $4,388 00 95 89% Final Draw 11/24/2009 0 0 11/21/2009 $38.00 $38.00 10000% Open 1/20/2010 1 1 11/21/2009 $32,854 00 $32,459 00 98 80% Open 1/20/2010 1 1 11/21/2009 $5,000 00 $4,136 00 82.72% Open 2/17/2010 o o 12/30/2009 $4,537 00 $4,170 00 91 91% Open 2/17/2010 0 0 12/30/2009 $5,000 00 $4,170 00 83 40% Open 1/20/2010 0 0 12/30/2009 $5,000 00 $37.00 0 74% Open 1/20/2010 0 0 12/30/2009 $5,000 00 $37 00 0 74% Open 1/20/2010 0 0 12/30/2009 $5,000 00 537 00 0 74% Open 1/20/2010 0 0 12/30/2009 $5,000 00 $37 00 0 74% Open 1/20/2010 1 1 .,1/8/2010 $30,551 00 $30,356 00 99 36% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1294 3002 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Open 1/20/2010 1 1 1/11/2010 $33,263 00 $32,432.00 97 50% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1304 217 CUSTER AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98901 Final Draw 2/17/2010 0 0 2/15/2010 $4,105 00 $4,105 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1305 805 n 34TH AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Open 2/17/2010 0 0 2/15/2010 $4,500 00 $4,133 00 91.84% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1317 112 S 8TH STREET , YAKMIA WA, 98901 Open 3/3/2010 1 1 3/3/2010 $12,000 00 $0 00 0 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1322 1411 S 8th Avenue , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 3/22/2010 0 0 3/19/2010 $4,153 00 $4,153 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1323 1420 W Lincoln Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 3/22/2010 0 0 3/19/2010 $325.00 $325 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1324 1518 Fairbanks Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 4/19/2010 0 0 3/19/2010 $67,241 00 $61,241 00 91 08% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1328 6301 CRESTFIELDS , SUNNYSIDE WA, 98902 Final Draw 10/8/2010 0 0 7/20/2010 $4,494 00 $4,494 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1329 1310 FAIRBANKS , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Open 10/8/2010 0 0 7/20/2010 $5,000 00 $4,660 00 93 20% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1330 33 W MEAD , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 10/8/2010 0 0 7/20/2010 $4,414 00 $4,414 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1331 611 S 18TH AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 10/8/2010 0 0 7/20/2010 $4,579.00 $4,579 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1332 1015 S 2ND AVE , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 11/22/2010 0 0 7/20/2010 $4,739 00 $4,739 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1333 1405 W LINCOLN AVE , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 11/22/2010 1 1 7/20/2010 $55,361 00 $54,179 00 97 86% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1334 3009 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 10/8/2010 0 0 10/5/2010 $246 00 $246 00 100.00% 2UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1335 3009 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 10/8/2010 0 0 10/5/2010 $246 00 $246 00 100 00% j" TION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1337 3007 Hathaway St , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 11/22/2010 0 0 10/5/2010 $31,000 00 $23,128 00 74 61% w ,TION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1341 620 Freemont , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 11/22/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $4,224 00 $4,224 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1342 605 N 4th St , YAKIMA WA, 98901 Final Draw 11/22/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $4,350 00 $4,350 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1343 221 Custer , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 11/22/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $4,074 00 $4,074 00 100.00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1344 1108 S 2nd Ave , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Canceled 11/19/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $0 00 $0 00 0 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1345 1335 S 41st Ave , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Canceled 11/19/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $0.00 $0 00 0 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1346 1314 E.Viola , YAKIMA WA, 98901 Canceled 11/19/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $0 00 $0 00 0 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1347 1501 S 12th Ave , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/1/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $674 00 $674 00 100.00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1348 1206 McKinley , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 11/24/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $4,518 00 $4,518 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1349 407 Peach , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 11/24/2010 0 0 11/10/2010 $4,557 00 $4,557 00 100.00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1352 703 Pleasant Ave , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 11/22/2010 $4,758 00 $4,758 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1353 902 N 29th Ave , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 11/30/2010 $4,153.00 $4,153 00 100 00% 2UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1357 619 N 16th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 12/4/2010 $4,229 00 $4,229 00 100 00% 2UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1358 1001 S 20th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 12/4/2010 $4,254 00 $4,254 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1359 604 S 16th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 12/15/2010 0 0 12/4/2010 $484 00 $242.00 50 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1360 1303 S 11th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/17/2010 0 0 12/4/2010 $383 00 $383 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1361 3103 Hathaway St , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 12/14/2010 $33,118 00 $33,118 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1362 3104 Hathaway St , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/15/2010 0 0 12/14/2010 $30,295 00 $30,295 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1365 305 S 13th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/17/2010 0 0 12/16/2010 $81 00 $81 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1366 1004 S 18th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/17/2010 0 0 12/16/2010 $81 00 $81 00 100 00% 21"!"'ITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1367 1006 S 10th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 12/16/2010 $4,351 00 $4,351 00 100 00% ION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1368 1008 S 6th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 2/14/2011 0 0 12/16/2010 $4,081 00 $4,039 00 98 97% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1369 918 N 4th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 2/8/2011 $4,338 00 $4,338 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1370 312 N 27th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 2/8/2011 $4,275 00 $4,275 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1371 1516 S 10th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 2/8/2011 $4,275 00 $4,275 00 100 00% 2UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1372 316 S 8th Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 2/8/2011 $4,191 00 $4,191 00 100 00% )UISITION ONLY 34952 YAKIMA 1373 907 Pleasant Ave , Yakima WA, 98902 Final Draw 2/14/2011 0 0 2/8/2011 $4,127 00 $4,127 00 100 00% )UISITION AND NEW C 34952 YAKIMA 1350 815 Fruitvale Blvd , Yakia WA, 98902 Open 12/15/2010 0 0 11/19/2010 $200,000 40 $101,155 00 50 58% 2UISITION AND NEW C 34952 YAKIMA 1351 3103 HATHAWAY , YAKIMA WA, 98902 Final Draw 12/16/2010 0 0 11/19/2010 $264,393 00 $264,393 00 100 00% )UISITION AND NEW C 34952 YAKIMA 1374 3109 Hathaway St , Yakima WA, 98902 Open 2/15/2011 0 0 2/7/2011 $117,709 38 $28,347 00 24 08% 23 (1 of 7) - Count of CDBG Activities with Disbursements by Activity Group & Matrix Code ged by: antee: 34952:YAKIMA r Program Year: 2010 :ivity Group quisition quisition onomic Development or^mic Development nic Development onomic Development using using using using blic Facilities and Improvements blic Facilities and Improvements blic Facilities and Improvements blic Services blic Services blic Services neral Administration and Planning neral Administration and Planning Activity Category Clearance and Demolition (04) ARR, Metr Underway Underway Activitie Completed t Completed Act Prograrr Total Activities Disbu 0 1 1 1 2 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 2 4 2 6 2 2 18 ED Direct Financial Assistance to For -Prot 0 ED Technical Assistance (18B) 0 Micro -Enterprise Assistance (18C) 0 Rehab; Single -Unit Residential (14A) Rehabilitation Administration (14H) Code Enforcement (15) Public Facilities and Improvement (Genes 0 Street Improvements (03K) 0 Public Services (General) (05) 0 Fair Housing Activities (if CDGS, then sub 0 General Program Administration (21A) 0 $1,746.00 $1,746.00 $5,000.00 $9,330.00 $36,380.00 $50,710.00 $407,820.00 $138,738.00 $164,552.00 $711,110.00 $129,125.00 $0.00 $129,125.00 $97,103.00 $30,668.00 $127,771.00 $215,845.00 $215,845.00 $1,236,307.00 1 $6,332.00 2 $8,078.00 1 $6,332.00 2 $8,078.00 0 $0.00 1 $5,000.00 1 $0.00 3 $9,330.00 1 $976.00 2 $37,356.00 2 $976.00 6 $51,686.00 2 $18,635.00 3 $426,455.00 1 $10,618.00 2 $149,356.00 1 $16,663.00 2 $181,215.00 4 $45,916.00 7 $757,026.00 2 $0.00 3 $129,125.00 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 2 $0.00 4 $129,125.00 3 $6,264.00 7 $103,367.00 1 $2,877.00 3 $33,545.00 4 $9,141.00 10 $136,912.00 2 $28,402.00 4 $244,247.00 2 $28,402.00 4 $244,247.00 15 $90,767.00 33 $1,327,074.00 ,23 (2 of 7) - CDBG Sum of Actual Accomplishments by Activity Group and Accomplishment Type ged by: antee: 34952:YAKIMA r Program Year: 2010 tivity Group quisition quisition quisition c--- -nic Development nic Development onomic Development onomic Development onomic Development onomic Development onomic Development onomic Development using using using using using using using blic Facilities and Improvements Facilities and Improvements L. Facilities and Improvements blic Facilities and Improvements blic Facilities and Improvements blic Services blic Services blic Services blic Services blic Services tal Matrix Code Clearance and Demolition (04) Clearance and Demolition (04) Total ED Direct Financial Assistance to For -Profits ED Direct Financial Assistance to For -Profits ED Technical Assistance (18B) ED Technical Assistance (18B) ED Technical Assistance (18B) Micro -Enterprise Assistance (18C) Micro -Enterprise Assistance (18C) Total Rehab; Single -Unit Residential (14A) Rehab; Single -Unit Residential (14A) Rehabilitation Administration (14H) Rehabilitation Administration (14H) Code Enforcement (15) Code Enforcement (15) Total Public Facilities and Improvement (General) Public Facilities and Improvement (General) Street Improvements (03K) Street Improvements (03K) Total Public Services (General) (05) Public Services (General) (05) Fair Housing Activities (if CDGS, then subjec Fair Housing Activities (if CDGS, then subjec Total Accomplishment T Mi Open Count Housing Units Total Jobs Total Business Jobs Total Business Total Housing Units Total Housing Units Total Persons Total Public Facilities Total Persons Total - Persons Total Persons Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,352 33,352 33,352 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76,801 76,801 0 0 76,801 110,153 Completed 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 23,963 23,963 24,001 214 214 1 1 7,080 7,080 7,295 39,446 39,446 0 0 39,446 205,535 205,535 31,423 31,423 236,958 307,700 Program Year Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 38 57,315 57,315 57,353 214 214 1 1 7,080 7,080 7,295 39,446 39,446 0 0 39,446 282,336 282,336 31,423 31,423 313,759 417,853 t23 (3 of 7) - CDBG Beneficiaries by Racial / Ethnic Category aged by: antee: 34952.YAKIMA r Program Year: 2010 fusing -Non Hou: Race Source Ty' Mei Total Persons Total Hispanic Persoi Total Households Total Hispanic Households Busing White MC 0 0 195 87 using Black/African American MC 0 0 12 0 Busing Amer. Indian/Alaskan Nativ MC 0 0 7 0 ),_. ' Ig Other multi -racial MC 0 0 1 0 i-:_ ..g Total 0 0 215 87 in Housing White MC 38 9 0 0 in Housing Total 38 9 0 0 tal White MC 38 9 195 87 tal Black/African American MC 0 0 12 0 tal Amer. Indian/Alaskan Nativ MC 0 0 7 0 tal Other multi -racial MC 0 0 1 0 tal Total 38 9 215 87 PR23 (4 of 7) - CDBG Beneficiaries by Income Category Paged by: Grantee: 34952:YAKIMA For Program Year: 2010 Income Levels Source Type (for Funding Fact Source) Mi Owner Occupied Renter i Persons Housing Extremely Low (&It;=30%) MC 90 0 0 Housing Low (>30% and &It;=50%) MC 125 0 0 Housing Mod (>50% and &It;=80%) MC 0 0 0 r 'sing Total Low -Mod MC 215 0 0 i, ..ging Non Low -Mod (>80%) MC 0 0 0 Housing Total Beneficiaries MC 215 0 0 Non Housing Extremely Low (&It;=30%) MC 0 0 0 Non Housing Low (>30% and &It;=50%) MC 0 0 16 Non Housing Mod (>50% and &It;=80%) MC 0 0 22 Non Housing Total Low -Mod MC 0 0 38 Non Housing Non Low -Mod (>80%) MC 0 0 0 Non Housing Total Beneficiaries MC 0 0 38 PR23 (5 of 7) - Home Disbursements and Unit Completions Paged by: Grantee: YAKIMA For Program Year: 2010 Activity Type Source Tyr Metrics Disbursed Amount Units Completed Units Occupied First Time Homebuyers MC $112,004.00 37 37 - MC $0.00 0 0 Total, Homebuyers and Homeowners MC $112,004.00 37 37 Grand Total MC $112,004.00 37 37 PR23 (6 A of 7) - Home Unit Completions by Percent of Area Median Income Paged by: Grantee: YAKIMA For Program Year: 2010 Activity Type Source Ty! Mi Units Complete Units Completed Units Completes Units Completed Units Completed 31% - 50% 51% - 60% 61% - 80% Total 0% - 60% Total 0% - 80% First Time Homebuyers MC 6 6 25 12 37 MC 0 0 0 0 0 Total, Homebuyers and Homeowners MC 6 6 25 12 37 Grand Total MC 6 6 25 12 37 23 (7 of 7) - Home Unit Completions by Racial / Ethnic Category ged by: antee: YAKIMA r Program Year: 2010 Source Type (for I Activity Type First Time Homebuyers First Time Homebuye - lite MC tal Total, Homebuyers an Total, Homebuyers and Homeowners Grand Total Grand Total Metrics Units Completed Units Completed - His Units Cc Units Ci Units Completed Units Completed - Hispanics Units Completed Units Completed - Hispanics 37 25 0 0 37 25 37 37 25 0 0 37 25 37 25 25 PR 26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report Metrics Grantee YAKIMA , WA Program Year 2010 PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES 01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 1,283,426.00 03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 0 04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 0 05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 129,605.23 06 RETURNS 8,466.25 07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 0 08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07) 1,421,497.48 PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES 09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNIN 1,082,827.00 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENI 0 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 1,082,827.00 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 244,247.00 13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 0 14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14) 1,327,074.00 16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15) 94,423 48 PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD 17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 0 18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI -UNIT HOUSING 0 19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 1,074,749.00 20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 0 21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20) 1,074,749 00 22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/LINE 11) 99.25% LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS 23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION PY: PY: PY- 24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALC 0 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 0 26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) 0.00% PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS 27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 136,912.00 28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 0 31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 136,912.00 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 1,283,426.00 33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 54,496.00 34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 0 35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34) 1,337,922.00 36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31/LINE 35) 10.23% PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP 37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 244,247 00 38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 0 41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 244,247 00 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 1,283,426 00 43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 129,605.23 44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 0 45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44) 1,413,031.23 46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41/LINE 45) 17.29% IDIS - PR33 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development DATE: 02-24-11 Office of Community Planning and Development TIME: 12:47 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 1 Home Matching Liability Report YAKIMA, WA Fiscal Match Total Disbursements Match Liability Year Percent Disbursements Requiring Match Amount 1998 12.5% $345,407.27 $310,314.27 $38,789.28 1999 12.5% $176,212.18 $121,527.18 $15,190.89 2000 12.5 % $882,715.15 $811,672.15 $101,459.01 2001 12.5% $663,351.00 $620,434.00 $77,554.25 2002 25.0% $688,217.00 $574,270.00 $143,567.50 2003 0.0% $865,938.48 $0.00 $0.00 2004 0.0% $367,155.00 $0.00 $0.00 2005 0.0% $400,292.11 $0.00 $0.00 2006 0.0% $668,010.00 $0.00 $0.00 2007 0.0% $823,249.00 $0.00 $0.00 2008 0.0% $287,403.00 $0.00 $0.00 2009 12.5 % $588,555.00 $509,394.00 $63,674.25 2010 12.5% $569,830.00 $480,735.00 $60,091.87 ECTION SEVEN City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services 2010 CDBG ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES " Public Input Recommendations ( Includes 2009 Carry Forwards) 2010 Actual BALANCE* Projected Expenses* as AS OF HUD Programs (CDBG) Expenses 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 A. CDBG Single Family Rehabilitation 570.202 (b) P8 Senior / Disabled Rehabilitation Program 650,000 458,371 191,629 P11 Single Family Rehabilitation Program 50,000 50,000 P11 Single Family First Time Homebuyer 32,978 32,978 P23 Single Famility Rehabilitation - 308 Irrigation 5,000 5,000 P3 Rehabilitation Relocation 570.201 (i) 4,000 4,000 Total CDBG Single Family Rehabilitation 741,978 458,371 283,607 B. Economic Development 570.203 (b) Prior & Ongoing Obligations: P12 Whirlpool - Grant 45,000 45,000 P12 Unknown (Sect 108 Contract) 239,000 239,000 P12 RCDR - Grant 2010 50,000 50,000 0 P12 Section 108 6,000 83 5,917 P12 Workforce: Job Fair 5,000 5,000 0 Total Economic Development - 345,000 55,083 289,917 C. Community / Public Services 670.201 (e) P7 Fair Housing Counseling 507.201 (k) 4,000 2,428 1,572 P9 OIC of WA. SECC Programs Year 2009 75,000 27,733 47,267 P6 Graffiti Abatement (Approved in Spring 07 by HUD) 40,714 7,766 32,948 P9 Energy Assistance Program (Senior/Disabled) 5,000 970 4,030 Total Community / Public Services 124,714 38,897 85,817 D. Public Facilities 570.201 (c) P20 SouthEast Community Center/ Miller Park Activity Ctr 50,000 50,000 P20 "A" St. Improvement 261,863 168,360 93,503 P20 Infrastructure 148,137 148,137 Total Public Facilities 460,000 168,360 291,640 P26 E. Neighborhood Improvements / Clean -Up P25 Clearance: Removal of Dangerous Buildings 570.201(d) 20,000 8,481 11,519 0 • Total Neighborhood Improvements / Clean -Up 20,000 8,481 11,519 (r.vd:r.:: P ,.-1E30 630 Grand Estimated Totals for Year 2010 1,691,692 729,192 962,500 611.6cr 962,500 * Project "Actual Expenses" and Balances listed here represent actual Program Activity Costs They do not include Activity Delivery Costs. Code Compliance in included as part of program but not included in balance less 1,691,692 729,192 962,500 Before Carry Forwards 612,016 Carry Forward Total 2009 to 2010 1,079,676 Total Program Dollars After Carry Forwards 1,691,692 w/o Code Compliance 2/24/2011 iC Budget Prep.2nira 3uesstimate 1,852,322 Total including Code Compliance Program City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development 2010 HOME PROJECTS EXPENDITURES RUNNING BALANCES (Does Include 2009 Carry Forwards) 2010 Projected Expenses Actual Expenses* as 12/31/2010 BALANCE* AS of 12/31/2010 I. 1st Time Homebuyers (up to $50,000 ) 3009 Hathaway 3004 Hathaway 3007 Hathaway 3103 Hathaway 3104 Hathaway (bv address) P19 Total for 1st Time Homebuyers: 341,690 42,0291 31,194 29,944 33,118 30,295 341,690 299,661 268,467 238,522 __ 205,404 175,110 175,110 341,690 166,580 175,110 11. Down Payment Assistance (up to $4,000 ea for 55) 1411 S 8th Ave 6301 Crestfields 1310 Fairbanks 33 W Mead 611 S 8th Ave 1015 S 2nd Ave 620 Freemont 221 Custer 605 N 4th St 1206 McKinley 407 Peach St 1501 S. 12th Ave 703 Pleasant Ave. 902 N 29th Ave 619 N 16th Ave 1001 S 20th Ave 604 S 16th Ave 1303 S 11th Ave 305 S 13th Ave 1004 S 18th Ave 1008 S 6th Ave 1006 S 10th Ave 918 N 4th Ave 312 N 27th Ave 1516 S 10th Ave 316 S 8th Ave 907 Pleasant (by address) P15 2/24/2011 mag Page 1 of 2 r,'3C/CJ 1 4000 2 4000 3 4000 4 4000 5 4000 6 4000 7 4000 8 4000 9 4000 10 4000 11 4000 12 4000 13 4000 14 4000 15 4000 16 4000 17 4000 18 4000 19 4000 20 4000 21 4000 22 4000 23 4000 24 4000 25 4000 26 4000 27 4000 4,000 112,000 4,000 108,000 4,000 104,000 4,000 100,000 4,000 96,000 4,000 92,000 4,000 88,000 4,000 84,000 4,000 80,000 4,000 76,000 4,000 72,000 4,000 68,000 4,000 64,000 3,653 60,348 4,000 56,348 4,000 52,348 4,000 48,348 4,000 44,348 4,000 40,348 4,000 36,348 4,000 32,348 4,000 28,348 4,000 24,348 4,000 20,348 4,000 16,348 4,000 12,348 4,000 8,348 Program City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development 2010 HOME PROJECTS EXPENDITURES RUNNING BALANCES (Does Include 2009 Carry Forwards) 2010 Projected Exaenses Actual Expenses* as 12/31/2010 BALANCE* AS of 12/31/2010 28 29 Total Down Payment Assistance: 4000 4000 107,653 8,348 _.. 8,348 8,348 116,000 107,653 8,348 10. Lot Acquisition P 17 55,398 1420 W Lincoln 325 325 55,073 1405 W Lincoln 55,073 55,073 0 Total for Lot Acquisition: 55,398 55,398 � 0 s IV. New Construction P 18 P18. "Hines" Development Project 50,000 107 49,893 Total for New Construction: 50,000 107 49,893 VI. Senior / Disabled Rehabilitation P 22 (up to $15,000 each) 0 Total for New Construction: 0 0 0 VII. CHDO (by address) P14 (Minimum for 2009: $ ) 794,106 794,106 0 1) OIC of WA for Marvin Gardens Project - Reserve (CR) 2) OIC of WA for Marvin Gardens Project - Operating (CO) 71,656 71,656 0 3) Habitat for Humanity for Marvin Gardens 50,000 50,000 0 4) Habitat for Humanity. AQ of 1518 Fairbanks & 908 S 5th Ave 75,000 75,000 0 5) OIC: Revolving Loan Fund 200,000 200,000 0 6) Habiatat For Humanity: AQ: 1206 S 16th Ave. 158,361 120,042 38,319 7) Other 0 Total CHDO: 1,349,123 1,310,803 38,320 (TOTALS FOR 2010 HOME: 1,912,211 1,640,541 0 * Project expenses and balances listed here represent actual Program Activity Costs. They do not include Activity Delivery Costs. Before Carry Forwards Carry Forward Total from 2009 to 2010 After Carry Forwards 909,558 1,002,653 1,912,211 2/24/2011 mag Page 2 of 2 t 1,912,211 -1,640,541 271,670 48M 329,738 48Y 1,310,803 1,640,541 271,670 J 271,670 City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services ANNUAL RECONCILIATION 2010 EXPENDITURES: Total from Expenditure Detail Report for Year Less HOPE 3 Expenditures - SU 332 Less NSP Expendtures--SU NSP1 Less Non -Federal Expenditures - SU 340 Plus Expenditure Reductions for Year Total CDBG & HOME Expenditures for Year REVENUES: CDBG - Current Year: CDBG - Prior Year: CDBG-R Prior Year: HOME - Current Year: HOME - Prior Year: 124.330.33114.2CY 124.330.33114.2PY 124.330.33911.42R 124.337.33114.2HM 124.337.33114.2HP CDBG - Program Income Used for Year HOME - Program Income Used for Year CDBG - Recapture Used for Year HOME - Recapture Used for year Total CDBG & HOME Revenues for Year 3,479, 728.81 -89,132.71 -597,045.98 -18,923.91 631,487.27 135, 918.00 1,100, 783.00 306,460.00 68, 552.00 780,442.00 115,315.28 163, 001.00 8,972.00 726, 965.00 2,392,155 278,316 735,937 3,406,113 Difference 3,406,408 -295 CDBG - Current Year: CDBG - Prior Year: CDBG-R - Prior Year: CDBG - Program Income Used for Year CDBG - Recapture Used for Year 124.330.33114.2CY 124.330.33114.2PY 124.330.33911.42R HOME - Current Year: 124.337.33114.2HM HOME - Prior Year: 124.337.33114.2HP HOME - Program Income Used for Year HOME - Recapture Used for year CDBG: 135,918 1,100,783 306,460 115,315 8,972 1,667,448 68,552 780,442 163,001 726,965 HOME 1,738,960 TOTAL: 3,406,408 2/28/2011 mag Mary'sMonthly.Annual Bal rasa URI ttoconuact Activity U a. Impartment or [sousing anti r oilmen Approval No. 2502-0355 reporting burden P this collection of infor abort Is estimated to average .5 hours per reepome, including the lime for reviewing instructions, searching existng data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The anion is vohmary. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. me Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minonly Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities t the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minonty Business Development. If the anion is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. y Act Notice = The United Sates Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or 1 outside the United Stales Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law. nee/Project OwnadDevelopedSponaorBui1der/Agency Check if 2. Location (City, Sate Zip Code) Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 IH CPD Housing no of Conan Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Plume Number (Including Mw Code) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 2E3 5. Program Code (NIX applicable for CPD programs.) See esplanation of Codes at baron of Page Use a _separate sheet for each program code. 6. Dae Suhmiued to Field 10/8/2010 rope( Number or HUD ;e Number or other ificanon of properly, awning unit. etc. Anusol of Contract or Subcorract 7b. Type of Trade Code (See below) 7c. Conuactar or Subcontractor Business Racial/Burnie (See below) 7d. Wommn Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Pnme Co tractor Identification (ID) Number 7(. Sec. 3 7P. Subcotannor Identification (ID) Number 7h Sec. 3 7i Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j. i Name Street City State TSP le ...0530008 81,514.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 S1,406.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslees Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 52,380.40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosle{s Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 $2,164.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 51,623.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 81,644.64 1 1 N 91.1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 81,623.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 $3,841.10 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boaters Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 $1,947.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pea Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 82,164.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 91,947.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslets Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 81,655 46 1 1 N 91-1417773 Baslers Painting 501 W Pim Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 $2,705.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bodes Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 $3,246.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 81,947 60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslet's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 10-MC530008 82,055.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 _ Bosler's Painting 501 W Pae Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 $33,866.60 lion anion/Training 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Public Housing: = New Construction 6 = Professional 2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Repair 4 = Service 5 = Project Mang[. 7 = Tenant Services 8 = Education/Training 9 = AdJg. Apprabal 0 = Other 7d: Racist/Ethnic Codes: 1 = White Americans 2 = Bladr Americans 3= Native Americans 4 = hungrier Americans 5 = AsiaJPacific American 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Homing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): 1 = All hared, including Scdso not 2-- Flexible Subsidy 3 = Section 8 Noninsured Non-HFDA 4 = Insured (Management) 5 =Section 202 6 =1 -111D -Held (Management) 7 = Public/India Housing 8= Section ill l PAGE #1 s editions are obsolete. �.D\-31'6. r �1 forn HUD -2516 (8/98) Tact and Subcontract Activity U.Y. impartment Or mousing and Urban Development : reporting burden]f . this collection of information as estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing inotructicms, searching existing data sources, gath nation is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. ave Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities it the total program activity and the designated ntinonly business enterpnse (MBE) goals The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerting Minority Business Development If the carton is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. cy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United Sates Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. 1t will not be disclosed or d outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law. Approval No. 2502-0355 and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewutg the collection of information. The into/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency Check if 2. Location (City, Slate Zip Code) f Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 114 CPD Housing me of Contact Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Phone Number (Including Area Code) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 213D 5. Program Cade (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See eduction of Coda ut bottom of Page Use a sesame sheet for each proersm code. 6. Owe Submitted in Field 10/8/2010 Project Number a HUD Ise Number or other iificstion of property. 'welling unit. etc. a. Amoum of cow= or Subconact 7b. Type of trade Code (Sec below) 7c. Contractor or Subcontractor Business naciaVEtemic (See below) 7d. Wonun Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Rime Contractor Idemificatios (ID) Number 7f. Sec. 3 7g. Subcomactor Identification (ID) Nurnbcr 7h Sec. 3 7i. Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j. Name Street City State Zip I. -.,C530008 92,705.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10-MC530008 82,813.20 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslet's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 91,623.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bailees Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 85,301.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslees Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 l-10-MC530008 83,029.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslefs Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10-MC530008 91,298.40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 93,678.70 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 92,596.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 91,514.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Baslets Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 97,249 40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boaters Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 86,297.24 1 I N 91-1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 82,164.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 91,352.50 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yalima WA 98902 1- 10-MC530008 91,514.80 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 I-10-MC530008 $2,272.20 I 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 1-t0-MC530008 83,462.40 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 $48,873.84 lotion uceu mars niuq 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Public Housing: 1 = New Cotdrucuon 6 = Prot'essiooal 2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Repair 4 = Service 7 = Tama Services 8 = EAnatiodrnininn Y = ArdhJFingg Appaissl 5 = Project Mangl. 0 = Other 7d: Racial/Eihaic Codes: 1 = White Americans 2 = Blade Amnesia 3 = Native Americas 4 = hispanic Ameeions 5 = AStaJPacific Americas 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): 1 = All hared mcludirg Sedioo8 2= Flexible Subsidy 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Nae-HFDA 4 = Insured (ilungnc¢) 5 = Section 202 6 = HUD -Held (Managonal) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #2 ns editions tie obsolete. Cam HUD -2516 (8/98) act and Subcontract Activity U.S. Uepartmeol of Hoasmg and Urban Development reporting burd.:n fir this collection of information is eatinwted to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing dant sources, gath atiom is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. live Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Pians shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development If the ation is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. y Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in thus form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or Approval No 2.502-0355 and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The 1 outside the Unitod States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consent, except as required or permitted by Law ttee/Project Owner/Developer/Sporuor/Bwlder/Agency Check H. 2. Location (City, State Zip Code) Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 IH CPD Housing re of Contact Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Phone Number (Including Arca Code) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 2[D 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a sepa to sheet for each proaae code. 6. rate Submitted to Field 10/8/2010 reject Number or HUD e Number or other ification of property. lwclligg writ etc. 'e. Amount of Comas or Subcoreact 7b. Type of Trade Code (See below) 7c Contractor or Subcontractor Business Racial/Ethnic (See below) 7d. Woman Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Prime Connector Identification (ID) Number 71. Sec. 3 7g. Subcontractor Identification (ID) Number 76 Sec. 3 71. Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j. Name Street City State Zip lc ...C530008 $2,648.74 1 1 N 91.1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yalama WA 98902 l0-MC530008 83,137.80 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 82,645 49 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Swrunitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 86,596.95 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+Construction 1611 Summitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 $3,451.581 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Summitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 84,641.78 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Summitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 88,702.521 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Summnitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 $7,281.86 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Summitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 55,593.94 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Suwnirnew Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 85,307.21 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Summitview Yakima WA 98902 10-MC530008 84,921 14 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 10-MC530008 $999 15 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mitres Rd Yakima WA 98901 10-MC530008 81,180.90 1 1 N 91-125724 linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 10-MC530008 $4,333.62 1 1 N 91-125724 linden Etectoc 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 10-MC530008 $5,934.66 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 10-MC530008 53,116.16 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 $70,493.50 mm cauu✓1)siuurx a 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Pub& Horsing: 1 = New Construction 6 = Professional 2 = Substaaial Rehab. 3 = Repair 4 = Service s editions we obsolete. 7 = Tema Services 8 = Edaotionrfrainuhe 9 = Md./Engrg. Appraisal =- Project Mange. 0=Other 7d: Rscid/Etbalc Codes: 1 = White Americans 2 = Blade Mnaaw6 3 = Native Americans 4 = Hbspanic Americans 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Code. (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): I = All Insured. including Seclior8 2== Flexible Subsidy 3 =Section 8 Noninsured, NavH bDA 4 = Insured (Management) S = Sedum 202 6 = HUD -Held (Management) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #3 form HUD -2516 (8/98) CN Gil - J - �) Pest and JtlbcODVact Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Approval No. 2502-0355 reporting burd:n for this collection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information The nation is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. rive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities it the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minonty business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development If the talion is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. cy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Noosing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or d outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law ntee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency Check if. 2. Location (City, State Zip Code) f Yakima; Neighborhood Development Services PH Yalama, WA 98901 1H CPD Housing me of Comet Person Archie M Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Pion Number (including Arca Code) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Penod April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 21i) 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD progranss) Sce explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Usc a separate shit for each program code. 6 Date Submitted to Field 10/8/2010 'roject Number or HUD sc Number or oder lificauon of property, 'welling unit, etc. a. Annum of Contract or Subcoact n 7b Type of Trade Code (Sec below) 7c. Contractor or Subcontractor Business Racial/Ethnic (Sec below) 7d Woman Owned Business (Yes or No) 7e. Prune Cernndnf Identbcatien (ID) Number 7f. Sec. 3 7g. Subconractor Identification (ID) Number 7h Sec. 3 7i. Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j Name Street City State Zip -, .C530008 $4,878.74 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $4,358.30 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $2,932 22 1 I N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $1,921.63 1 I N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $4,292 30 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $3,129 14 1 1 N 26-3028850 Gamache & Sippola Heating 4415 Terrace Hgts Dr Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 94,652.60 1 1 N 26-3028850 Gamache & Sippola Heating 4415 Terrace Hgts Dr Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 91,716.05 1 1 N 93-1125539 AAA Maxxurn Constr 5808A Sumnutview 8169 Yakima WA 98908 -10-MC530008 $1,623.00 1 1 N 93-1125539 AAA Maxxum Conan S808A Summitview #169 Yakama WA 98908 -10-MC530008 55,648.04 1 1 N 91-2083592 Superior Roofing 608 N 20th Ave Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $2,249 48 1 1 N Trepanier Excavation 17001 Sununitview Rd Cowtche WA 98923 -10-MC530008 94,530 33 1 1 N 82-0557566 Central Mechanical 619 West "J" St Yakima WA 98902 $41,931.83 pion ('railing er 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Public Housing: 1 = New Consuudion 2 = Substmnmal Rehab. 3 = Repair 4 = Service 5 = Project Mangt. 6 = Professnmml 7 = Tonnes Services 8 = Education/Training 9 = Arch/Fagg. Apprais*l 0 = Other 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: I = White Americans 2 = Black Americans 3 = Native Am cricans 4= Hl panic Armors 5= Asian/Pacific Americans 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): I = All Insured, including SWionS 2= Flexible Subsidy 3 = Section 8 Noninsured Non-HFDA 4 = Insured (Misname[) 5 = Section 202 6 =HUD -Held (Management) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #4 s editions arc obsolete. for) HUD -2516 (8/98) / 1 / I oty Limns Veklme.DBO Zoning Zoning Category SP Suburban Residential R. t Single Family R-2 Two Family R3 Muttl-Family 8- t Professional Business _ 8-2 Local Business ' MB Hutoncal Business SCC Sman Convenience Center LCC Large Convenience Center CBD Central Business District GC General Commercial Mit Light Industrial M-2 Heavy Industrial RD Regional Development AS Airport Support 28 0 291 0 323 0 jet 1iH-11111`• - • / 314 � �11UIt1///Ilrt/Tntq/1+,4` I111111sitgat 11/t1t 'j► til%It11 "• ,.,,, 1 City of Yakima Census Tracts 1,750 875 0 1,750 Feel IN NI 164 41 5.5....x... 0 „,,,.3;••4,'5* et d 163 toil.* ierb 6 • Ars 0% 1/ritillea 441 _„1 41111.4.4.110111. -- ; ' ' "� 02 punt #`Hat 41i/iapil ' . poi up • '� •,. 11 II HIIIfsour""4"?`, 1 TiaslttHtiits/tm s�• - 0111110 •• •• • iiflli►i�ifi/fIs/ti//.+batt 283. -•.--• /toss w lit /usssis M— DIM 114 0. ...._.iii// • $ 6f/i1tlTilti i/istwuq1 133 0 \. • 175 0 rya, M ow Ow ••1.•'"•♦ 2111186111141611,,��`.'` u.�111,,1 : ...r. O • : .\ 0•, • 4• 11111•\ -1111 \y 11/II\11/IIIII\IIIII\/I/1 \/\\\\\\//III\\\/ : I� 'q/ \ • • 44` '1/11/111\ lir 1111111 Y • 5.5% J S%IIIL 1 !• onm, IBM J I I :4 • : / i\Ir •in0*lb 00 4E\\ 0%10 ▪ Bas \� .•J\Ir Jr\3 ria GOh 'p\\1//\IL �11�\\ , 26.5%,1 11 I- r r 5! • 1 •I�t - 11 1 $• 7.80% 1 26.5% 4 1 3 • .. - • • 1in' • S\\r w11L • • • • • f111n11\\a1r 3. B ID II IR El NI NB II MI 3 : fury I1.OMMBMHO 1 1 1 11.11 NM i! In MO In OM MI N M S t— i N--- OM MI MO MA 1 1 1 23.70% 7.30% 1 2 45.60% 3 1 1 ��—u�� 1 66.80% 1 4 170.10% �,r!l•�•••w�' ...46.20°/.•���. 5 omorressersaL it . . . . - 1 1 L.., -am-.. :hums! :' 1 • • • ! 0% I11111I\I\L 100% 1 95.50%• : 2 1 • 191999!1 4 s y, �..� 1 'Tuan nnu r - ;13 quur1 1 17111111111111911811111111111111 . . ` . . . . IP IM III t>rn.MN9MMil g1MIN r9AlN) SE NE 41111i7 NI 1 62.80% 1 50.80% 51.60% 3 1 2 1 is Le ?nd /\II\\I11 City Limits Census Tracts Block Groups �. • " I Census Block Groups 1. Groups Over 51% 0 494 970 1,940 2,910 Feet . IIE" R4 • • ., • • • • • • •• •• • • • • • • • • • • • 49, 1, I, • • n o •• ••. •• •• • 1• • 4.9 rT 1 fi _ft -q �n_1.1>,r,1111111�:-I11,:H�!�; a 11 wu -- r -� ..t 11 • :1111111- __ _ == PWII.IIII Ilul. ahr: NIILI�Jir IIIIIIIIIII!!I! PCIIIIIIIIIiC • r111111lllllllfi 1' ulilll I nIIIII1.! 11111Yu '1l .2 -111 nlllm= = ruo mum= -au jun ur- ig a =— 171 E"g IN AGIni3 1;C _'1!: VIM 1 C!!!!10 mill Ea 11151:11 1111111 r1' .11111111 =11111111 an 1111 JrII.. :.r u= m. Oki .1111111No5--g- em pnn�n• mmllm 111! =_ =11.••1= 6 R==11111.. 111==: '•1111111 111111110 11111111111 innu1llU nnun1.11111i111 llllllllui MI1111111'•-"Ir- mum �.�9::111-1ZUllll •ilii 1IIII= :unm n lonm N.IIII i :nuun nnu p.��_ cli ,.••rill' •u'(III ll,f :ulilair Inmi: .. Nh n1llftl. N1711111I1141,1111 r n1 I i nn uuiin nnul n u um ili 11 linin II I 1.1 I -fill 1111/11/ 11 1.1 ''11It1 I. ngnnlu lallniin nmic: - Illi =e•• . .4. Ih1IlU,M.:. i 11111a Illllllp �1,•=1111111'11= ._ !.3l1Hll1 ;ii111 In111 5 I gll1.' -r _ 11Y11Hl1 I1-iWllll!. 01= .'GIil14� n.N.1 1+rs nu . =w -..,u. . 'N� uIIIIIII IlY1B11111N� •4I IUNIN1UMWL -•IIp1-illuxT11III= ..11,11111101 FTT57I ':2 N piE . 1u1 Eia oil Er" — iutu'j nn n ne uun..� 111 ' !11.1 ` VIZ so EIC C IIF i �•�i�'�i 1m V 111111"1 .o .. ., Ary11 a. ii ■■ f7 -�fi MOM vim!ie !� ` 4474 SI ilii • dig • _ l ill �-- I J ,,,,7-1,,,--:Le-.77-1,,d-111. I 1IIil _LI I . 7-7 7- s*":.. -7,T,-;"1 alewy,��s�� ,=f IInIn1 1!!./R. _1.111111111111111_ Li 11 9112119 _=I.-� =_=-=_All -11111= 11111gm =E. Cllwi ;1i 1.a 11! milia, 1116 -111w 111 a_ r91411.4121m1I 111W1 ris �1 ;1u111111 _=-!=.= EllanirCrTfil � r.- ®f�JLtlmm■111 tom VI Tammo Renewal Commun._�/ Yakima City Limits — - Census Tracts Renewal Community Tracts Scale -1 in = 2000ft 0 1000 2000 Created: January 18, 2008 ECTION EIGHT CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statues and regulations governing the consolidated plan, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing — The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan — It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential anti -displacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug Free Workplace — It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about — (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs ;and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will — (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipts of such notices. Notice shall include the identification numbers(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7 Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs 1,2,3,4,5 and 6. Anti -Lobbying - To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form —LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti -lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all sub -awards at all tiers including, ( subcontracts, sub - grants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub - recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of Jurisdiction — The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to cavy out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan — The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 — It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. Signature/Authorized Official City Manager Title g2%is-7/o Date Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that; Citizen Participation — It is in full compliance and following detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105 Community Development Plan — Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing, expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CFR 24- 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570). Following a Plan — It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds — It has complied with the following criteria: 1 Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available); 2 Overall benefit. The aggregate use of CDBG funds including section 108 guaranteed loans during program year(s) , (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period: 3 Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. The Jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate -income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force — it has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction, Compliance With Anti -discrimination laws — The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC.2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. Lead -Based Paint — Its activities concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35, subparts A,B,J,K and R; Compliance with Laws — It will comply with applicable laws. Signature/Authorized Official (bate City Manager Title S CT 10 N NINE Annual Performance Re, HOME Program U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development ' '-:NiOPPIF Approval No. 2506-0171 (exp 8/31/2009) Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2.5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless that collection displays a valid OMB control number. The HOME statute imposes a significant number of date collection and reporting requirements. This includes information on assisted properties, on the owners or tenants of the properties, and on other programmatic areas. The information will be used: 1) to assist HOME participants in managing their programs, 2) to track performance of participants in meeting fund commitment and expenditure deadlines, 3) to permit HUD to determine whether each participant meets the HOME statutory income targeting and affordability requirements; and 4) to permit HUD to determine compliance with other statutory and regulatory program requirements. This data collection is authorized under Title II of the Cranston -Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act or related authorities Access to Federal grant funds is contingent on the reporting of certain project -specific data elements Records of information collected will be maintained by the recipients of the assistance Information on activities and expenditures of grant funds is public information and is generally available for disclosure Recipients are responsible for ensuring confidentiality when public disclosure is not required. This form is intended to collect numeric data to be aggregated nationally as a complement to data collected through the Cash and Management Information (C/MI) System. Participants should enter the reporting period in the first block. The reporting period is October 1 to September 30 Instructions are included for each section if further explanation is needed. Submit thls form on or before December 31 Send one copy to the appropriate HUD Field Office and one copy to: HOME Program, Rm 7176, 451 7th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20410 This report is for period (mm/dd/yyyy) Starting 10/01/2009 Ending 09/30/2010 Date Submitted (mmrddtyyyy) 12/31/2010 Part 1 Participant identification 1. Participant Number M-10-MC530203 2. Participant Name CITY OF YAKIMA, OFFICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SVS (ONDS) 3. Name of Person completing this report ARCHIE M. MATTHEWS 4 Phone Number (Include Area Code) 509-575-6101 5. Address 112 S 8TH STREET 6. City YAKIMA 7 State WA 8. Zip Code 98901 Part 11 Program Income Enter the following program income amounts for the reporting period: in block 1, enter the balance on hand at the beginning; in block 2, enter the amount enerated; in block 3, enter the amount expended; and in block 4, enter the amount for Tenant -Based rental Assistance. 1 Balance on hand at Beginning 2. Amount received during 3. Total amount expended 4. Amount expended for Tenant- 5. Balance on hand at end of of Reporting Period 59 Reporting Period N/A during Reporting Period Based Rental Assistance 8 Reporting Period (1 + 2 - 3) = 5 4,490 195,165.77 211,064 148,657 N/A 0 150,944.44 66,897 Part 111 Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) and Women Business Enterprises (WBE) In the table below, indicate the number and dollar value of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period. page 1 of 2 form HUD -40107 (11/92) a. Total Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) 1. White Non -Hispanic b Alaskan Native or American Indian c. Asian or Pacific Islander d. Black Non -Hispanic e. Hispanic A. Contracts 1 Number 59 N/A N/A N/A 8 51 2. Dollar Amount 195,165.77 N/A N/A N/A 44,221.33 150,944.44 B Sub -Contracts 1 Number 2 Dollar Amount C Contracts 1 Number a. Total b. Women Business Enterprises (WBE) c. Male N/A N/A N/A 2. Dollar Amount N/A N/A N/A D Sub -Contracts 1 Number N/A N/A N/A 2 Dollar Amounts N/A N/A N/A page 1 of 2 form HUD -40107 (11/92) Part IV Minority Owners of Rental Pr( In the table below, indicate the number of HOML assisted rental property owners and the total dollar amour, of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted during the reoortin9 period. Part V Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition The data provided should reflect only displacements and acquisitions occurring during the reporting period a. Total Minority Property Owners f. White Non -Hispanic b. Alaskan Native or American Indian c. Asian or Pacific Islander d. Black Non -Hispanic e. Hispanic 1 Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. Dollar Amount N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Part V Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition The data provided should reflect only displacements and acquisitions occurring during the reporting period page 2 of 2 form HUD -40107 (11/92) a Number b Cost 1 Parcels Acquired 1 45361 11 2 Businesses Displaced N/A N/A 3. Nonprofit Organizations Displaced N/A N/A 4 Households Temporarily Relocated, not Displaced N/A N/A Households Displaced a. Total Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) f. White Non -Hispanic b. Alaskan Native or American Indian c. Asian or Pacific Islander d. Black Non -Hispanic e. Hispanic 5 Households Displaced - Number N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6 Households Displaced - Cost N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A page 2 of 2 form HUD -40107 (11/92) 14 25 14 01-14-11 AIMMS/KEYSTONE EXPENDITURE DETAIL REPORT FOR 10*01 TO 10*12 Page 57 FUND 124 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION PO # VOUCH # CHECK # CHECK DT VENDOR NAME VENDOR # TYPE AMOUNT 124-124-337-0000-55920-270 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT 124-124-337-2312-55920-48M HOME SINGLE FAM-HINES DEVELOP HINES DEVELOPMENT/PROJ TRACK IPR 32057 HINES DEVELOPMENT 124-124-337-HS08-55920-48M HOME PRGM-SINGLE FAMILY REHAB ACH 1411 S 8TH AVE P17: 1420 W LINCOLN AVE• APPRA 10-02022 10020751 843063 ACH 1405 W LINCOLN ACH MENDEZ 3009 HATHAWAY ACH ESTRELLA 3004 HATHAWAY ACH 6301 CRESTFIELDS ACH 1310 FAIRBANKS ACH 33 W MEAD ACH 611 S 18TH AVE ACH 3007 HATHAWAY ACH 1015 S 2ND AVE CORR INC ACCT CHGD REV/CORR JE 20990 REV/CORR JE 20990 ONDS GARZA/SMITH REFUND FOR OV ACH 620 FREMONT ST ONDS-OIC CLOSING ACH 221 CUSTER AVE ACH 605 N 4TH ST P17 DE1405 W LINCOLN AVE. DEM 10-06844 10071901 848946 P19 3007 HATHAWAY SUMBBORDIN 10-06687 10071667 848965 P17 1405 W LINCOLN ASBESTOS 10-06688 10071654 849011 ACH 1206 MCKINLEY ACH 407 PEACH ST ACH 1501 S 12TH AVE ACH 703 PLEASANT AVE ACH 920 N 29TH AVE REV/CORR JE 20990 REV/CORR JE 20990 TOTAL FOR 124-124-337-0000-55920-270 HINES DEVELOPMENT TO SEP ACCT LABOR TOTAL FOR 124-124-337-2312-55920-48M ACH 1411 S 8TH AVE 02/11/10 WESTERN APPRAISERS INC ACH 1405 W LINCOLN AVE ACH 3009 HATHAWAY MENDEZ ACH 3004 HATHAWAY ESTRELLA ACH 6301 CRESTFIELDS ACH 1310 FAIRBANKS ACH 33 W MEAD ACH 611 S 18TH AVE ACH 3007 HATHAWAY ACH 1015 S 2ND AVE 1405 W LINCOLN REV CORR JE 20990 REV CORR JE 20990 07/29/10 07/29/10 07/29/10 ACH 620 FREMONT ST ACH 221 CUSTER AVE ACH 605 N 4TH ST RUSSELL CRANE SERVICE VALLEY TITLE GUARANTEE TRI -VALLEY CONSTRUCTION ACH 1206 MCKINLEY AVE ACH 407 PEACH ST ACH 1501 S 12TH AVE ACH 703 PLEASANT AVE ACH 902 N 29TH AVE REV CORR JE 20990 REV CORR JE 20990 PRE 25 14 PRE 19 52 PRE 28 06 PRE 23 18 PRE 23 71 PRE 23 30 PRE 22.97 PRE 23 48 PRE 28 77 292 95 JOE -50,000 00 JOE 35 76 -49,964 24 JOE 4,000 00 04325-01 APE 325 00 JOE 45,361 11 JOE 42,029 26 JOE 31,194 23 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000.0,0 JOE 29,881 49 JOE 4,000 00 JOE -885 62 JOE 885 62 JOE 885.62 CRE -928 00 JOE 4,000 00 CRE -125,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 02503-01 APE 4,923 10 02791-01 APE 63 00 05580-01 APE 3,895 20 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 4,000 00 JOE 3,652 50 JOE 885 62 JOE 885 62 U rill H� HNU JtVtRt FISCAL UISTREc- uUCTIONS APPLICABLE FOR FY2009 and t ST Participating Jurisdiction/State Families in Poverty (> 11.5%) $PCI 1999 (<$16,190) % Income Growth (<3.9%) Match Reductions Fiscal Distress Presidential Disaster WA BELLINGHAM 9 4 19,477 WA SEATTLE 6.9 30,306 WA SPOKANE 11.1 18,461 WA VANCOUVER 9 4 20,165 WA YAKIMA 15,9 Y 16,488 50% WA CLARK COUNTY 5 2 22,247 WA PIERCE COUNTY 5.3 21,788 WA SPOKANE COUNTY 6 0 19,918 WA TKING COUNTY CONSORTIUM 4 8 28,898 WA KITSAP COUNTY CONSORTIUM 6.3 22,317 WA LONGVIEW CONSORTIUM 13.3 Y 17,686 50% WA RICHLAND CONSORTIUM 10.5 20,095 WA SNOHOMISH COUNTY CONSORTIUM 4.9 23,375 WA TACOMA CONSORTIUM 11.7 Y 19,464 5Q% WA THURSTON COUNTY CONSORTIUM 5.8 22,415 Page 1 HOME Match Report U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No 2506-0171 Office of Community Planning and Development (exp 12/31/2012) Part I Participant Identification 1 Participant No. (assigned by HUD) 2. Name of the Participating Jurisdiction M-10-MC530203 City of Yakima Match Contributions for Federal Fiscal Year (yyyy) 2010 3 Name of Contact (person completing this report) Archie M Matthews 5 .Street Address of the Participating Jurisdiction 1125 8th St 4 Contact's Phone Number (include area code) 509-575-6101 6 City Yakima 7 State WA 8. Zip Code 98901 Part II Fiscal Year Summary 1 Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 22,678,975 2 Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year (see Part I11 9 ) 6,052,693 3 Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (line 1 + line 2) 4 Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 5 Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (line 3 minus line 4) 28,731,668 47,118 28,684,550 Part 111 Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year 7 Site Preparation, 1 Project No I or Other ID i 2 Date of Contribution n iB/YYYY) 12/31/10 12/31/10 3 Cash (non -Federal sources) $132,227 $66,713 4 Foregone Taxes, Fees, Charges 5 Appraised Land / Real Property 6. Required Infrastructure Construction Materials, Donated labor 8 Bond 9 Total Financing Match $132,227 ismr 10 -01 -non 1 10 -02 -non I $66,713 10 -03 -non I 12/31/10 $945 1 $945 10 -04 -non 12/31/10 $162,660 $162,660 10 -05 -non 12/31/10 $5,690,148• $5,690,148 - i 1 I Total $6,052,693 H---- i -- page 1 of 4 pages form HUD -40107-A (12/94) HOME Match Report U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development OMB Approval No. 2506-0171 (exp 12/31/2012) Part I Participant Identification Match Contributions for Federal Fiscal Year (yyyy) 2009 Amendec 1 Participant No (assigned by HUD) M-09-MC530203 2. Name of the Participating Jurisdiction City of Yakima 3. Name of Contact (person completing this report) Archie M Matthews 5 Street Address of the Participating Jurisdiction 112 S. 8th St 6. City Yakima 4 Contact's Phone Number (include area code) (509)5756101 7 State WA 8. Zip Code 98901 Part II Fiscal Year Summary 1 Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 15,756,843 2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year (see Part 111.9 ) 7,897,364 3 Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (line 1 + line 2) 4 Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 5 Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (line 3 minus line 4) 23,654,207 45,305 23,608,902 Part III Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year 7 Site Preparation, 1 Project No or Other ID 2. Date of Contribution 3 Cash (non -Federal sources) 4 Foregone Taxes, Fees, Charges 5 Appraised Land / Real Property 6 Required Infrastructure Construction Materials, Donated labor 8. Bond Financing 9 Total Match 09 -non fed -01 (mm/ddlyyyy) 12/31/09 $48,715 $48,715 09 -non fed -02 12/31/09 $125,838 $125,838 09 -non fed -03 12/31/09 $906 $906 09 -non fed -04 12/31/09 $7,585,872 $7,585,872 09 -volunteer hours 12/31/09 $136,033 $136,033 TOTAL $7,897,364 page 1 of 4 pages form HUD -40107-A (12/94) HOME Match Report U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No 2506-0171 Office of Community Planning and Development Part I Participant Identification 1 Participant No (assigned by HUD) 2. Name of the Participating Jurisdiction M-10-MC530203 City of Yakima (exp 12/31/2012) iMatch Contributions for Federal Fiscal Year (yyyy) 2010 Amendec 3 Name of Contact (person completing this report) Archie M Matthews 5 Street Address of the Participating Jurisdiction 112S 8th St 4 Contact's Phone Number (include area code) 509-575-6101 6. City Yakima 7 State WA 8. Zip Code 98901 Part II Fiscal Year Summary 1 Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 23,608,902 2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year (see Part 111.9 ) 3 Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (line 1 + line 2) 4 Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 5 Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (line 3 minus line 4) 3,704,143 27,313,045 34,151 27,278,894 Part III Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year 7 Site Preparation 1 Project No 2. Date of or Other ID Contribution 3 Cash (non -Federal sources) 4 Foregone Taxes, Fees, Charges 5. Appraised Land / Real Property 6. Required Infrastructure Construction Materials, Donated labor 8. Bond Financing 9 Total Match (mm/dd/yyyy) 10 -non fed -01 12/31/10 $6,747 $6,747 10 -non fed -02 12/31/10 $30,469 $30,469 10 -non fed -03 12/31/10 $1,005 $1,005 10 -non fed -04 12/31/10 $5,690,148 $5,690,148 10 -volunteer hours 12/31/10 $160,210 $160,210 Total $3,704,143 page 1 of 4 pages form HUD -40107-A (12/94) Final FY 2010 Fair Market Rent Documentation System The Final FY 2010 Yakima, WA MSA FMRs for All Bedroom Sizes The following table shows the Final FY 2010 FMRs by unit bedrooms Final FY 2010 FMR Final FY 2010 FMRs By Unit Bedrooms One- Two- Three- Four - Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Efficiency $494 $580 $750 $988 $1,042 DEPARTME. 9F COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC L LOPMENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 ' Fax (509) 575-6176 April 2, 2010 Laura Richmond, Resident Manager Sommerset Apartments 711 W. Walnut #201 Yakima, WA. 98902 Dear Sommerset Apartments, Sommerset Apartments, which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), requires that the units that are rented be monitored annually for 15 years. Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 711 W. Walnut needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2008". Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenant's income verification Please return the report form to our office prior to Thursday, April 15, 2010. Also, we have enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file. It is also time for property site inspection since the last one was in 2007 Please contact our Senior Program Supervisor, Orville Otto (575-6101) to set up a time. We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101. Sincerely, Archie M. Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor Cc- Orville Otto 1999 DEPAR" T OF COMMUNITY AND ECONON. EVELOPMENT William R. Look, Director Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 O Fax (509) 575-6176 April 19, 2010 Next Step Housing Laura Richmond Sommerset Resident Manager 711 W Walnut Street, Apt. 109 Yakima, WA 98902 Dear Ms. Richmond The Sommerset Apartments at 711 W Walnut Street is a Federally HOME -assisted property funded through the City of Yakima, Office of Neighborhood Development Services, which is still in the affordability (monitoring) period The affordability period for 711 W Walnut Street is 15 years (2003-1018). Home rules required that HOME -assisted rental units be monitored annually through the affordability period for Maximum rents, utility allowances, and tenant income verification. HOME rules also required on-site Housing Quality Standards (HOS) inspections of each unit every three (3) years through the affordability period Thank you for your magnificent cooperation in allowing us to do the inspections of your two Federally HOME -assisted property rental units on April 19, 2010 I am happy to say that the two units looked well -kept and passed inspection. Please remember the affordability requirements for your property outline further monitoring thru the year 2018 ONDS will continue to send you annual monitoring forms as well as scheduling inspections every three years Your next inspection is not due until spring of year 2013 If you have any questions, regarding this matter, please call me at (509) 575-6101 Orville F Otto II Senior Program Supervisor C File John Mifsud Office' of N hood Develop meA tt Service/s- 1 Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing PROJECT. Sommerset Apartments/Laura Richmond ADDRESS: 711 W. WALNUT NO OF UNITS. 2 No. OF HOME UNITS: 2 Date: April 2010 REPORTING PERIOD: APRIL 2009 TO MARCH 2010 Unit No Tenant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance 563,-4 72g, - Utility Allowance ., Max Rent ,20&, Monthly Unit Reiit: 206<- Tenant's Annual Gross Income ID1 664 1QJ 0°81- Compliance Y/N? V Y Unit Status (PJ Only) 1 ii <S --I io11i3 / l .Ly 'a -1 -0 20-1 r3rouj n it-koct y8 - 14'174 -Lit - , Date: 'ICG 6 EXT Sr HousiN G `[ R\1k.[ ENR lc I ILIA • I R \ NSI 1ION \L I'LR \I \NL\ I Resident Info Sheet 2009 (Do not enter data into shaded cells ) Name(s)- Adeana Brown Date Ethnicity- E/A Adults. 1 Children Unit Size 2 Bdrm Move In Date Gross Annual Income at Move In: Building: Sommerset 4-1-09 4-1-09 $10,008 Unit #. 207 Referral source Family Size: Move In Rent. Percent of AMI: Target AMI Triumph 2 $442 23% 50% Documentation of Income (for each wage-earning adult 18 years or older in residence) First, identify all income sources for wage earner (For example Employment, SSI, ADATSA, etc.) Second, secure a copy of all documents that verify each income source for the Resident File Third, highlight the exact amount on the actual document verifying the income Fourth, doublecheck the amount on income verification document matches entry on this sheet. Name #1 Wage Earner: Adeana Brown Income Soure #1 Mels Diner Income Soure #2 Income Soure #3 Document: Employment Verification Document: Document: (Monthly) Amount: $834 Amount: Amount: TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: $834 TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME: $10,008 Name #2 Wage Earner Income Soure #1 Income Soure #2. Income Soure #3 Document. Document: Document: Amount: Amount: Amount TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME: (Monthly) GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL GROSS HOUSEHOLD INCOME: Yakima Area Median Incomes as of March 2009 $10,008 1 person 2 persons 3 persons 4 persons 5 persons 6 persons 7 persons 8 persons $38,200 $43,600 $49,100 $54,500 $58,900 $63,200 $67,600 $71,900 \FXT STEP Housixc SERVICE -ENRICHED • TRANSION.AL PERMANENT Resident Info Sheet 2009 (Do not enter data into shaded cells ) Name(s) Daniel Simonis Date 3-26-09 Referral source Sommerset Ethnicity E/A Adults 1 Children Unit Size: 1 Bdrm Move In Date. 4-5-08 Gross Annual Income: Building Sommerset $11,825 Unit it 111 Family Size: Rent Percent of AMI: Target AMI - 1 $206 31% 30% Documentation of Income (for each wage-earning adult 18 years or older in residence) First, identify all income sources for wage earner (For example Employment, SSI, ADATSA, etc.) Second, secure a copy of all documents that verify each income source for the Resident File Third, highlight the exact amount on the•actual document verifying the income Fourth, doublecheck the amount on income verification document matches entry on this sheet. Name #1 Wage Earner Daniel Simonis Income Soure #1 SSA Income Soure #2: Veterans Income Soure #3 Document: Award Letter DocumentAward Letter Document: (Monthly) Amount: $639 Amount: $346 Amount: TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: $985 TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME: $11,825 Name #2 Wage Earner Income Soure #1 Income Soure #2. Income Soure #3 Document: Document: Document: Amount Amount: Amount: TOTAL MONTHLY INCOME: TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME: (Monthly) GRAND TOTAL ANNUAL GROSS HOUSEHOLD INCOME: Yakima Area Median Incomes as of March 2009 $11,825 1 person 2 persons 3 persons 4 persons 5 persons 6 persons 7 persons 8 persons $38,200 $43,600 $49,100 $54,500 $58,900 $63,200 $67,600 $71,900 DEPARTMENT u, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6101 • Fax (509) 575-6176 Inspection Date 4/19/2010 Time. 1 30 p m Realtor Phone HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS, CODE REQUIREMENTS AND DETERIORATED PAINT VISUAL ASSESSMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST HOMEBUYER. (Property Manager) Laura Richmond SELLER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 711 W Walnut (/i, NA'- k #? o 7 g 6 PROPERTY AGE. SECTION ONE: BUILDING EXTERIOR PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Condition of foundation 2.Condition of roof 2.Ventilation/Cooling 3 Condition of stairs, rails, & porches .. 3 Water heater 4 Condition of exterior surfaces (siding, soffit, etc) 7 4.Rough plumbing 5 Condition of chimney id /A r( / ❑ o 0 5 Sewer 6 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered SECTION TWO: BUILDING SYSTEMS PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1.Heating equipment 2.Ventilation/Cooling �, 3 Water heater ` 4.Rough plumbing / 5 Sewer 7, j 6 Electrical service/Wiring 7 Ceiling condition 7 Smoke Detectors er"-- 9/ ef o o ❑ SECTION THREE: LIVING ROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 .Floor condition 2 Window condition 3.Door condition ` 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Sink condition 5 Ceiling condition 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions j 6 Wall condition 7 Ceiling condition 7 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered er"-- 9/ ef o o ❑ SECTION FOUR: KITCHEN PASS "FAIL COMMENTS 1 .Floor condition 2 Window condition 3.Door condition 2 4.Electrical fixtures 5 Sink condition 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions j 7 Ceiling condition 8 Wall condition 9 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered d i? ❑ o o SECTION FIVE: BATHROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number. Evaluation Results: Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices. Failed Visual Assessment of Detenorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results: Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices DEPARTMENT G. COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6101 • Fax (509) 575-6176 inspection Date 4/19/2010 Time. 1 30 p m Realtor Phone HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS, CODE REQUIREMENTS AND DETERIORATED PAINT VISUAL ASSESSMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST HOMEBUYER (Property Manager) Laura Richmond SELLER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: PROPERTY AGE 711 W Walnut , 4 1/1 SECTION ONE: BUILDING EXTERIOR PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Condition of foundation 2 Condition of roof ,.f. V 2 Ventilation/Cooling 3 Condition of stairs, rails, & porches 4 Condition of exterior surfaces (siding, soffit, etc) / 3 Water heater 7- 5 Condition of chimney it -0 r o/ g/ r ❑ o ❑ j 6 Condition of paint- a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered SECTION TWO: BUILDING SYSTEMS PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Heating equipment 2 Window condition 7 2 Ventilation/Cooling 3.Door condition 3 Water heater 7- 4 Rough plumbing j 5 Sewer 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions 6 Electrical service/Wrong :7' 7/ 7 Smoke Detectors c7.-- / ram 0 ❑ o SECTION THREE: LIVING ROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1.Floor condition 2 Window condition 7 2 Window condition 3.Door condition 3.Door condition .."/- 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Sink condition 5 Ceiling condition 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions 6 Wall condition 7 Ceiling condition 7/ 7 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) clipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered c7.-- / ram 0 ❑ o SECTION FOUR: KITCHEN PASS 1 FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Window condition 7 3.Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Sink condition 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions 7 Ceiling condition 7/ 8 Wall condition ,% 9 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 7 r/ 0 ❑ ❑ SECTION FIVE: BATHROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition V- FAH, COMMENTS 2 2 Window condition / 3 Door condition 2 Window condition ' P 4.Electrical fixtures/Ventilation 4 Electrical fixtures 3 Door condition ►r( 5 Toilet condition �/ r 4 Electrical fixtures/Ventilationjjj 6 Wash basin/Laboratory conditions 6 Wall condition / 0 o 0 7 Tub or shower unit condition 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered e/ r i 7 Ceiling condition �� 8 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered ❑ o o 9 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered V (2(,„ ref 0 o n SECTION SIX: LAUNDRY ROOM/UTILITY ROOM:, PASS FAH, COMMENTS 1 Floor condition / 2 Window condition 2 Window condition ' P 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 3 Door condition ►r( 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Ceiling condition r 4 Electrical fixtures/Ventilationjjj 6 Wall condition / 0 o 0 5 Ceiling condition 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered e/ r i 6 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered ❑ o o ❑ ❑ o SECTION SEVEN: BEDROOM NO 1: location PASS/ FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition / 2 Window condition 3 Door condition r 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures VA 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Ceiling condition r 6 Wall condition / 0 o 0 ❑ o ❑ 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered e/ r b 0 ❑ SECTION EIGHT: BEDROOM NO 2: location PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition / 2 Window condition /11- r 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures VA 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Ceiling condition 6 Wall condition 6 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 0 o 0 ❑ o ❑ 7 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered SECTION NINE: BEDROOM NO 3: location PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition / 2.Window condition /11- 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Ceiling condition 6 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ SECTION TEN: DINING ROOM OR DINING AREA PASS- FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition / 2 Window condition / 3.Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures f 5 Ceiling condition 7 FAIL COMMENTS 6 Wall condition �/ 7 Condition of paint: ) a) cracking, scaling, or peelingElb) chipping or loose �'- o c) adequately treated or covered r� o SECTION ELEVEN: OTHER ROOM: location PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Window condition ) 3 Door condition tl V %l 4 Electrical fixtures/1* 5 Ceiling condition // 5 Wall condition 6 Wall condition 6 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered ❑ o ❑ o ❑ ❑ SECTION TWELVE: ENTRIES, HALLWAYS OR STAIRCASES: PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Door condition ) 3 Electrical fixtures tl V %l 4 Ceiling condition // 5 Wall condition 6 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ SECTION THIRTEEN: UNHABITABLE ROOMS: PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Electrical conditions 2.Potentially hazardous features )/ 3 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered o o 0 ,- ❑ 0 SECTION FOURTEEN: SUMMARY OF INSPECTION (If failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint see Section 15 on next page) INSPECTOR SIGNATURE SECTION FIFTEEN: kip 9' ATE Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results. Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices: PASS i L VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF DETERIORATED PAINT: (If failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint see Section 15 on next page) INSPECTOR SIGNATURE SECTION FIFTEEN: kip 9' ATE Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results. Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices: Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint - Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results. Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results: Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices: DEPARTME. OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC L ELOPMENT William R. Cook, Director Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 E Fax (509) 575-6176 April 2, 2010 YWCA of Yakima Attn: Donna Hatton 818 W. Yakima Avenue Yakima, WA. 98902 Dear Donna, The YWCA, which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), requires that the units that are rented be monitored annually for 15 years. Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 818 W. Yakima Avenue needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2009". Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenant's income verification Please return the report form to our office prior to Thursday, April 15, 2009. We have also enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file. It is also time for property site inspection since the last one was in 2007 Please contact our Senior Program Supervisor, Orville Otto (575-6101) to set up a time. We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101 Sincerely, Archie M. Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor Cc• Orville Otto ORM [[18:1-dri_c4 L j3 trl_Gf [1 -1 (- \` 1 5 YWCA Yakima T 509-248-7796 818 W Yakima Avenue F 509-575-5398 Yakima, WA 98902 www ywcayakima org r0 Apnl 12, 208.9 Archie Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor City of Yakima — Department of Community & Economic Development 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Archie JJ --o Per your letter of April 2, 20aa please find enclosed the 2009 Project Monitoring Report Rental Housing as required by HUD Since the units being reported upon are not yet in operation, we have no rental data to report for 2009 Due to funding delays, we have had to reschedule construction on this project. The new target date for completion and occupancy is September, 2011. I will inform your office if there is any change to this schedule. I will also contact Orville Otto, per your letter, to schedule a property site inspection Please let me know if you require additional information or have any questions Sincerely, Donna Hatten Director of Projects/Grants Mgmt. Enclosure 2009 Project Compliance Report Rental Housing 1 C(yofYakincv Office/ of N hood'De�veZop vnontService/k i Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing PROJECT: YWCA ADDRESS: 818 W. YAKIMA AVENUE No. OF UNITS. 16 No. OF HOME UNITS: 2 Date: April 2010 REPORTING PERIOD: APRIL 2009 - MARCH 2010 Unit No Tenant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance Utility Allowance Max Rcnt Monthly Unit Rent Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance Y/N9 Unit Status (PJ Only) u A Reviewer: Date: 31 w., ,� ��- �; )to ALS d % DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 • Fax (509) 575-6176 October 27, 2010 Diane McClaskey, Manager Pear Tree Place 2900 Powerhouse Rd. Yakima, WA. 98902 Dear Diane, 1) Pear Tree Place, which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), requires that the units that are rented be monitored annually for 20 years. Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 2900 Powerhouse Rd needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2010". Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 201U Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Prujeut Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of either your tenants HUD form 50059, ur any other available vcnfication of their income. Please return the report form to our office prior to Monday, November 15, 2010. Also, we have enclosed the 2011 Fair Market Rent for your file. We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101. Archie M. Matthews ONDS Manager 30 39tid Yakima 11111' w?4 E0Z069b60S bO:EZ 0t0Z/tE/01 City of Y 9f fl;ce' of IVeiughborh000LVeIve,lopPKe nt Serv%cok PROJECT: Pear Tree Place Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing ADDRESS: 2900 POWERHOUSE RD., YAKIMA, WA. No. OF UNFTS: 26 No. OF HOME UN<Ts: 5 Date: 11 (/10 REPORTING PERIOD: OCTOBER 1.2009 TO SEPT. 30. 2010 A B C D E F G H 1 J K L Uni- No. I'eoant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance Utility allowance MIR Rent ore MDQ j( Unit Kent Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance YfN? Unit Status (PJ Only) o • ' 1 *a A g c773 5$0 Seo : v 9N i til f1):= y .! 7 750 S V I17 �a Cp �} 0°,1 ,� 31OS qT46 '746r.096 X I I D Fturia6 7 3 ff/di Yr 54 ciiic sfi 0o0 Reviewer: 6e/ Date: /0 2000 (F) -Rent ARowunce- Maximum rent after deductin pprcpriate r,tility cons. (G) - Utility .4llowance- anpr onriate utility costfrgvres from local PHA or info obtained from utility prot.iders. (NJ — Maximum Rent- airman: allowedfor aovpronriate It bedroom :snit as per 2008 Rental Income Limits Chart. (1) —Monthly Unit Rent — What volt currently charge the tenant for rent and utility allowance. 1\EXT STEP Date: ttli/)o OUSING SutvIi.E•ENRICHLD • TRANS UONAL & PERMANENT Number of pages including cover sheet: q TO: jf & i it FROM: puty Director, Diana McClaskey PHONE: PHONE: 509-249-0390 FAX: 6'75— r76 FAX: 509-469-0203 ,REMARK 0.1-thscANe ou_v- Oialu03_rcP ex.asP-"n Thank you in advance for your cooperation, Diana McCiaskey Deputy Director Next Step Housing Yakima, WA Diana@nextstephousing.com TO 3Jt,d EOZ069b605 bO:EZ 0TOZ/TE/0T PACIFICoRPOWER A DIVISION OF PACIFIC Ml. John Mifsud Executive Director Next Step Housing 124 Crestmont Drive Oakland, CA 94619 RF.• Mnntlily I ftility Allnwslnce Fctimate. Pear Tree Place Apartments 1 & 11 , Yakima, WA Uate: U 1 r26/ I 0 Dear Mr. Mifsud: The Pear Tree Place apartment complexes 1 & [1 are located in PacifiCorp's electric service area. We have received the monthly KWI-I usage analysis prepared by your energy consultant, Paul Reavley, for this property. This analysis stated that electricity provided by PacifiCorp is used for appliances (e.g. laundry, food preparation and refrigeration, lighting) and for heating. Mr. Rcavlcy's estimates for lighting and appliances are based on information from his database. Mr. Reavley advises that he is a certified professional in Washington State in the field of building energy analysis. Mr. Reavley is currently a building energy analyst and trainer at the Building Performance CenLvr (BPC) of the Opportunity Council in Bellingham, Washington. The BPC currently is contracted by the Washington Community, Trade and Economic Development agency to provide best practices training for the 26 weatherization agencies operating in the state. Mr. Reavley is the BPC trainer in the use of the DOE approved energy auditing software which he has used for calculating the utility allowances for the Pear Tree apartments. PacifiCorp has applied its residential electric rate, effective January 1, 2010 to the monthly kilowatt-hour tables Mr Reavley has produced. PacifiCorp does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the KWh estimates produced by Mr. Reavley, however, we have confirmed that the rate has been applied correctly, to the KWh table, to calculate the estimated monthly electrical energy cost for the types of Pear Tree apartments listed below. Pear Tree I Pear Tree II • 1 bedrm unit $39.04/month * 2 bedrm unit $43.72/month * 2 bedrm unit $47.49/month * 4 bedrm unit 569.81/month '' Small 3 bedrm unit $58.18/month * Large 3 bedrm unit $64.28/month If you have questions regarding the analysis, please contact Paul Reavley, Building Performance Center.. A PacifiCorp Customer Service Representative at 1-888-221-7070 can answer questions regarding PacifiCorp's current rates Sincerely, Tenney Clawson Business Consultant Pacific Power Cc Paul Reavley 13PC h0 39Cd E0Z069b60S bO:EZ OTOZ/ZE/01 DEP'AFa_ OF COMMUNITY AND ECON01. Willuarn R. Cook, Director Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street _Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 5%5-6101 6 Fax. (509) 575-6176 April 2, 2010 Triumph Treatment Ann- Beth Danhardt 102 S Naches Avenue Yakima, WA. 98901 Dear Beth, __ 'iELOPMENT Riel House, which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), requires that the units that are rented be monitored annually for 20 years Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the Riel House property located at 600 Superior Lane, needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2009" Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenant's 2009 income verification Please return the report form to our office prior to Thursday, April 15, 2010 Also, we have enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101 Sincerely, Archie M Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor At2",- 1 e' 2U!O City of Ya kimao' O ffc& of Nei gh&orhood' Dewdap I e4vtt ServLce' 1 CIF SL,;VICEs Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing Project Name: Riel House Owner Name: Triumph Treatment Services Project ID: 3 ty; , , •,phi Reporting Period: From 4/1/09 To 3/31/10 B C D E F G H I J K L Unit No d Low or High Horne Rent Unit? Tenant Name #Persons 0 of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert Max Rent Utility Allowance Monthly Unit Rent Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance Y/N? Unit Status (PJ Only) E-6 Low Tracy Clair 2 1 3/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes W-2 Low Rosa McCartney 3 1 01/10/09 378 84 Included $378 84 $5,902 08 Yes E-4 Low Angelina O'Neel 3 1 01/09 403 00 Included $403 00 $13,080 00 Yes E-7 Low Shellene Kurtz 2 1 1/5/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes W-7 Low Alisha Little 2 1 1/10/09 333 00 included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes W-5 Low Nicole Jim 2 1 3/9/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes E-8 Low Brandie Rizor 2 1 3/4/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes W-1 Low Kathrine Jelinek 2 1 4/24/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $4,774 08 Yes W-8 Low Monique Mitchell I 1 1/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No E-3 Low Heather Wilson 2 1 2/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 No W-4 Low Jeri Hicks 3 1 5/15/09 403 00 included $403 00 $13,524 00 Yes E-5 Low Sara Foxley I 1 1/16/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-3 Low Felicia Atkins 2 1 5/12/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 09 Yes W-6 Low Latisha Vineyard 2 1 6/24/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes W-6 Low Lorraine George I 1 3/1 1/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes E-2 Low Dana Allemand I 1 3/6/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $8,080 00 Yes L-'a Low Marisol L. Arteaga 3 1 9/15/09 403 00 Included $403 00 $7,210 08 Yes E-1 Low Jennifer L. Jokela 2 1 07/27/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $8,616 00 Yes W-8 Low Anita M Stotesberry 2 1 2/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 No E-3 Low Melissa R. Ewing 2 1 3/30/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 09 Yes E-1 Low Maria E Gentry 2 1 3/13/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes E-5 Low Kathleen J Yallup 2 1 2/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes W-2 Low Tonya M Commet 2 1 6/20/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $4,308 00 Yes E-6 Low Cheryl M Matthews 2 1 5/12/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes E-7 Low Patricia L Cipriano 2 1 11/13/09 403 00 Included $403 00 $7,932 00 Yes E-8 Low Tiffany Roberts 1 1 6/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-1 Low Anita Stotesberry 2 1 7/02/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes E-1 Low Linda Lozano 1 1 7/14/09 $0 00 Included $40 00 $4,092 00 Yes W-4 Low Ashley Castro 1 1 6/09 SO 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-7 Low Ida I Louis 1 1 7/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-4 Low Linda Baisden 2 1 11/09/09 239 40 Included $239 40 $5,164 02 Yes E-I Low April Erickson I 1 70/07/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-5 Low Randy Juarez 2 1 10/16/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $12,396 00 Yes E-1 Low Amanda Ashley 2 1 2/24/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes E-1 Low Shannon Hunt 1 1 07/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-6 Low Jessica Foss 1 1 07/09 40 00 Included $0 00 $7,908 00 No E-I Low Lynse D Trujillo 3 1 11/21/09 378 84 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes W-7 Low Danielle McRae 1 1 07/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-6 Low Cascade Adams 1 1 08/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-8 Low Kathryn J Edwards 2 1 08/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 No W-3 Low Belinda R Castillo 2 1 09/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 SO 00 No E-7 Low Alice D Wesley 2 1 8/27/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 No w'-' Low Jennifer Johnson 1 1 11/13/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes W-8 Low Cassandra Longoria 1 1 09/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 SO 00 No W-2 Low Marissa I3ethay 1 1 09/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-2 Low Kathleen Patterson 2 1 10/08/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 No W-8 Low Kendra C Cuble 2 1 11/10/09 150 00 Included $150 00 $5,436 00 Yes E-7 Low Brittany McKtnny 1 1 11/04/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $466 08 No E-8 Low Victoria Munoz 2 1 3/11/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes W-3 Low Quavadia Lloyd 2 1 10/02/09 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes E-2 Low Emily Chancy 1 1 10/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No E-6 Low Tara Darrow 2 l 2/25/10 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 Yes E-4 Low Trina Brooks 1 1 2/10/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes E-2 Low Casey Johnson 1 1 2/23/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes E-2 Low Cheryl Paul 1 1 10/29/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes W-2 Low Amber N Walker 2 1 2/18/10 320 84 Included $320.84 $4,774 08 Yes E-7 Low Tonya Commet 2 1 2/22/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $16,704 00 Yes E-3 Low Tiffany D Scott 1 1 12/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-1 Low Mary Cagey 1 1 12/09 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes W_i Low Tia Quenzer 3 1 2/19/10 363 00 Included $363 00 $6,744 00 Yes E-2 Low Michelle Armas 1 1 2/8/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 '$0 00 No W-7 Low Melinda A. Vanzant 2 1 12/31/09 320 84 Included $320 84 $$4,774 08 Yes W-7 Low Kristy Rieve 1 1 1/20/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No E-2 Low Nessa Prince 1 1 2/23/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $4,308 00 Yes W-4 Low Dana Garza 3 1 2/8/10 201 84 Included $201 84 $3,778 08 Yes E-4 Low "tiffany Brown 2 1 2/17/10 320 84 Included $320 84 $4,774 08 No E-2 Low Tessa Brown l 1 2/18/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes W-5 Low Monica Klinger 2 1 3/10/10 300 95 Included $300 95 $4,535 40 Yes W-6 Low Alicia Jones 2 1 3/2/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,616 00 No E-1 1 Low Sophia Stewart 1 1 3/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No E-4 Low Sarah Peregoy 3 1 3/10/10 403 00 Included $403 00 $6,096 00 Yes E-2 Low Sabrina Vickers 1 1 3/17/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 Yes E-5 Low Sparrow Peterson 1 1 3/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-3 Low Mary Cagey 2 1 3/19/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes E-5 Low Rebecca Presler 1 1 3/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No W-6 Low Kaila Totus 1 1 3/10 $0 00 Included $0 00 $0 00 No E-8 Low Mary Miller 2 1 3/25/10 333 00 Included $333 00 $5,436 00 Yes W-6 Low Carmen Gomez 2 1 3/10 115 00 Included $l 15 00 $3,348 00 Yes W-8 Low Vera Pcrry 1 1 3/10_ Included Yes Date: 04//1 J ,2010 DEPAR 1,4E, , . OF COMMUNITY AN J ECOINOAL LC ey` . ELOPMENT William R. Cook, Director Office of Neighborhood Developrrerit Set Vices 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509)575-6101 c Fax (509) 575-6176 April 2, 2010 Rudolfo and Elvia Garcia 701 S 4th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Rudolfo and Elvia, You own a duplex which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which requires that the unit that is rented be monitored annually for 15 years Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 701 S 4th Street needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2008" Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenants 2009 IRS Tax Return and W -2"s Please return the report form to our office prior to Thursday, April 15, 2010 Also, we have enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file It is also time for property site inspection since the last one was in 2007 Please contact our Senior Program Supervisor, Orville Otto (575-6101) to set up a time We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101. Sincerely, Archie M Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor Cc Orville Otto clay of Ytu, ofr of IV64hoodi DeAie,Lcip mon t Service PROJECT. Rudolfo and Elvia Garcia ADDRESS. 701 S. 4TH ST NO OF UNITS: 2 No. OF HOME UNITS. 1 Date: April 2010 REPORTING PERIOD: APRIL 2009 TO MARCH 2010 A B C D E F G H I J K L Unit No Tenant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance Utility Allowance Max Rent Monthly Unit Rent Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance Y/N? Unit Status (PJ Only) -_7_— �. r Be bi,:kz q op ic.) o 1-1-"L 9, 9 6 1 3 . oo 6 (J / ____22 i I PD. k 6 A1 ��tiLLL !! Reviewer: Date: 57. , 2010 (F) - Rent Allowance- Maximum rent after deducting appropriate utility costs. (G) - Utility Allowance- appropriate utility cost figures from local PHA, or info obtained frorn uttltty providers. (H) – Maximum Rent- amount allowed for appropriate # bedroom unit as per 2008 Rental Income Limits Chart. (I) – Monthly Unit Rent – What you currently charge the tenan for rent and utility allowance. OF COMMUNITY AD ECON•- iv ELOPMENT Wt11tc. a?. Jok, Director Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 0 fax (509) 5756176 May 20, 2010 Rudolfo and Elvia Garcia 701 S 4th Street Yakima, WA 98901 Dear Rudolfo and Elvia, You own a duplex which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which requires that the unit that is rented be monitored annually for 10 years Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 701 S 4th Street needs to be "At or below the listed Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2008" Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenants 2009 IRS Tax Return and W -2"s Please return the report form to our office prior to Friday, June 4, 2010 Also, we have enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101 Sincerely, fcriokrchie M Matthews ONDS Manager DEPARTML OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC . 'ELOPti4ENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, ]Washington 98901 (509) 575-6101 Fax (509) 575-6176 January 20, 2010 Rose of Mary % Coast Management Attn Katherine Reyes 2829 Rucker Ave Everett, WA 98201 Dear Katherine, Rose of Mary, which was funded in part with Federal HOME funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), requires that the units that are rented be monitored annually for 20 years Please note that as a HUD assisted property still within the affordability period, the property located at 5301 Tieton Drive, Suite C needs to be "At or below the fisted Fair Market Rent amounts listed for 2009" Enclosed is a copy of the Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent data sheet and the Project Compliance report form for you to complete and then attach a copy of your tenant's HUD form 50069 Please return the report form to our office pnor to Fnday, February 26, 2010. Also, we have enclosed the 2010 Fair Market Rent for your file We appreciate your time and if you have any questions, feel free to call me at (509) 575-6101 Sincerely, Archie M Matthews ONDS Operations Supervisor 0 f fi-c& o f h oo& DvveLo-p vne s t,t Sorvi e' 1 • Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing PROJECT: Rose of Mary ADDRESS: 227 S. 56TH AVENUE NO. OF UNITS: 40 Prepared y 4'a-tVief iijC E No. OF HOME UNITS: 9 Date: January 20, 2010 REPORTING PERIOD: JANUARY 2009 TO DECEMBER 2009 es • 4/25. 5- 7. c 44 .'re_ yes ce COas frn9 4. cem Unit No Tenant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance Cons�act flear Utility Allowance Max Rent 1049 r HR. Monthly Unit Rent TEAJ.4AIT AASNEAi- Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance Y/N? Unit Statu (PJ Only) / 1 0 HonBali /7 .:•.-.. a. .., i y V'l• 0`d 72 J 563 244 /772 F 206 Ltni i;- ! .'o>l•0.•o ,-/ZS" 5-4- 563 /63 9466 G o9 t�•`IVfilA'TlM 1 1 i -ii --61c,1 428 5* 6'63 .231 159/2. , .z.' WeJ/ �` /J, /, 79 L/ 2 5* 563 i4 x'32 1.1 Y 21 i .r�,°V)slet- d ito•1, b9 42g. 5* 6'63 366 / ''a ':?1' Y 3'07 ?le Ise"; ti v 11 • , • I'. Ci •j° i- V ams I 563 144 ?..T7 17 \,,,3o Boe.+f1i` f ,1,6:9 429 � 5 p' 06i 2�ry a,,t /I0 Y 310 fl1ei 'o/f' ; I/./•6`/ 42:' 6"4'4 563 .2� '9' /4/ i `r��r 314 �Vi1457)/ of 1 11 °r °C 7? `/ 93 J`i' 563 .. 5 cy /23 a 8 1 Reviewer: Date: .2/5//0 , 2010 Jun 23 2009 4151PM HP SERJET FAX p.2 • .. jar•, �''�, � :'a`:,• PP it ', •xi 'r � ,• „�Q., :r.,i ; hr''�,t)t 1.�t+'Ji 1r". \ 1�� �•if •;,� 4 I : � ' +y• �tt leek( Il k 4• i �. Y is 'r:It.•' { i �l,d ,I: , ,f` MW -irw•y i) II ,✓ill' s� 1 di , r :l i'; i�: 9 I s, e .Q•. �4 F774. n. kr .>• �, r. �.m :-r)u }, j i it . A l tf. ,, f, }'A..{!.;,YI, >" o ; :,{�. f s.., s , .. ;) al.�J )\ i• � I A:{ !" I: '':. (7; . i� h I,IUU(t'�:,t ' :� :SjSm 'Cu p ''ttir. ... ';1 (,!�b (' �{(r�°. !. ,, Rt' ',It f, t't �k .5 1 +'�, • t, .4 :f:a' . �•. ,r i� ,�pr j,.', 1, 1 C'. :y ,� e , �1:.�'1 r ''1n ;, i1 , i,!. I Y N %;' II. Nwilt7 , n, � ;it t t , .i , warb cu�r li ."IlJ ;i)'t C spaZgaat •�P L411 �ttClt:: r •'' c r '';,.1.6:4.,uta ."r . ,"!11 1, j ,t if 1j ..3 . Read this before you complete and sign this form HUD -600$9 Public Reporting Burden. The reporting burdon for this collection M information le (estimated to average 55 minutes per response, Including this lime for roeiewing Instructions, searching existing data aourcee, gathering end maintaining this dela Hooded, and completing and reviewing the ooilection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information Including euggeatione for reducing this bwden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (20020204),Washington, DC 20503. The information Is being collected by HUD to determine an applicant's eligibility, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenent(s) must pay toward rent end utllltlea. HUD uses thea Inforrnat!on to mishit in managing certain MUD properties, to protect the Government's financial Interest, end to verify the accuracy of the Information furnished. HUD ora Public Housing Authority (PHA) may conduct a computer match to verity the information you provide. This Information may be released to appropriate Federal, State, and Nicer agencies, when relevant, and to civil, criminal, or regulatory investigators and prosecutors. However, the Information wi4 not be otharwlee discloeed or released outside of HUD, except iso permuted or required by taw. You mutt provide ell of the Information roqueeted, Inciudtng the Social Security Numbers (SSNe) you, and ale other household family members ago six (6) yours and older, hove and w. Giving rho SSNa of ell leerily members age sex (e) ysors and older is mandatory; not providing the $GN, will affect your eligibility. Failure to provide any informntlon may result In a delay or re)eceon of your eligibility approval. _ Privacy Act Slabament. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Is authorized to collect this information by the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.); the Housing and Urban -Rural Recovery Act of 19B3 (P.L. 98-1B1); the Harming and Community Development Technical Amendments of 1984 (P.L. 98.479); and by the Houeing and Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3543). Tonant(s)' Certlflul)on - l/Wa cartlty that the Information In Sections C, 0, and E of this form are true end complete to the beet of my/our knowledge and belief. IM/a understand that Uwe can be fined up to $10,000, or Imprisoned up to five years, or loose the subeldy HUD pay* and have my/our rent Increased, if Vw■ furnish false or incomplete Information, Owner's Certification • I certify that thla Tenant's eligibility, rani and esaistanoe paymenta have been computed In accordance with HUD's' regulation; and administrative procedurea and that all required verflcatione were obtained. Waring to Owneni and Tenant.. ley signing this form, you are Indicating that you have read the above Privacy Act Statement and are agreeing with tho applicable Certification. Fats. Claim Statement. Warning: U.S. Code, Title 91, Section 3729, Pelee Claims, provides a civil penalty of not baa than 86,000 end not more than S 10,000, plus. 3 time$ the amount of damages for any person who knowingly presents. or causes to by preaentod, a telae or fraudulent claim; or who knowingy makes, or caused to bo used, a fel a$ record or testament; or conspire, to defraud the Government by getting a false ortl'audulent claim allowed or paid. •\`` a ;" Ill :,L :: .r.+,...1772' :,5 , .. , t,. �?: ",,t.. \ .j, � rI• ,;� 1., ...III'` +'f �l e'',i'11.�' ›'' re,. i, :. ieetI'1.tT",e 11 .'e ' "di l(: x..7-.., ,, lid 'i'o Ri ,,-., 04,,.. �_�A.Ai �>....,... r;, t "t 1!'ii!' i•': t•.,: tR i .... •.�i' ^1;1 ...e,...•sr'�Ia�IFrl2) ))9t{��th1N �ifY�+„!li�. ��• ,Jr�'�' ..�:i.�0 (, r,a?r' i� {r. :1! k! Y""�' Namo vi Ptolsaf ROSE OF MARY TERRACE UNI Number 110 ElleoIWe Dalt) 07/e1rzooe CirtMOI Von Typo eetivw Reo eecauon Heed or Household Bette rrbnemoltne Treat Tenenl Payment 20B Assistance P*yntUnt 101 Tonkin! Rant 7,44 ,,I ., r,)JL'A,.�i:� !I!•j, {. .,n Vi:',•' i.• N:1 ,fuel 'Y •'pi tai• 11'fi... `ill:: :;(IA .(;--.1.1 14,;. ,k -! " , ,:.. .., 5L'�!' ).P at : ,..; ,,; 11..4. , 8 , ` i) q:'. : ill' I agf?titAlg .�.1 'Cil,1 NI.� '•�•'li I{II ,��.1 )li;LI''' „t t YI ii1-011I}• !u'A:'e telt`; ' (1'';• . r/rtei —);•:` 41v 4.:i ,I4. Ari,..:tris.N :At{:i:, t H.ad or ,. oho!dy•/[ 69 .e..10 - 71 r-4'tell e et''- • t)ato: — c‘,2‘.3— ''' 7 Other Adult Der s / C .H.ao Data: OUIUr Adult Date: Olhar A t Dote: Othw Adair Data: Other Achill ill Patee Other Adult Dale' Other Mull Dulu: Other Adult Data: other AdJit Data: othot Adult Data: Other Adult Data: Olhar Adult Data: w 3 ...t10;. Id •`h❑ ,.., T, ,".1 j, rl •jE "ty�ifV•. .,,f ,..nql) J 1 t1V.1' :*�'r' '' LTc• •1,t.. ,,Y l ii i , 4.; l`t:? t \ ' i t '' • it la t` to r�llat' n.:. .:11 1:. ;11' 1,,, .11., 4 $' ,...- ,.:,. ii, ss. l� 4 Ni.:): (sf�ii!s -�� '� .11,. ��� b.�{Ag ¢:�.�?�l �,(1 1 a 1� �••'. l4 b.,r•R,,. lt; t!h{IPr''�•,��- !„ ,`�+•,;- -../ � Date f� OwnetlAyat� -^ / �il� i 7. �4 ''-12,,) r -O 4 AnUtlpeWct Voucher Dale____,. ■Chea Ihla box if Tenant Is ab to alpn for a logltlmala reason /08,0,,200v Previous eeralons of this form are obsolete. 7hle form also replaces HUD -60051 -D, -E, -F, & -G. Page 1of 2 orm HB 4360.3 Rev 1 Previous versions of this form are obsolete. This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not for with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1 Project Name ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 13.Effective Date 07/01/2009 23 Unit Number 110 (110) 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 08/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2. Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 07/01/2010 25.Building ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 07/01/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4 Property ID 07/01/2008 27. Previous Unit No 5.Project Number 171EE023 18 CertifiCation• 28.Security Deposit 365 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19 Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20.Correction Type 30.Market Rent B.PIan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction 9 HUD -Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 10 FIPS County Code 33 Gross Rent 482 11.Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36 First Name 37 MI 38. Rel. 39 Sex 40. Race 41 Eth. 42, Birth Date 43 Special Status 44 Student Status 45 ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48 Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Monhalland Bette L H -Head F W 2 04/16/1931 E 239-40-1627 EC 78 02 Monhalland Troy E S M W 2 10/27/1928 E 569-38-1971 EC 80 03 04 05 - 06 - - 07 08 50.Family 51.Family 52.Family is Mobility Impaired? N____ is Hearing Impaired? N_ is Visually Impaired? N__ 53.Number of Family Members 2 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59 Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents _ 0 56.Number of Eligible Members 2 63.Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name 64.Previous Head ID - - 61.Previous Head First Name 65.Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66 Mbr No 67 Income Type Code 68 Amount 69 SSN Benefits Claim No. 75. Mbr. No. 76. Description 77 Status 78 Cash Value 79 ActualIncome Yearly 80. DiDDe teed 5,016 12,708 01 Bank of America - Checkil C 1,123 0 01 02 Social Security Social Security 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 1.123 70 Total Employment Income 17,724 82.Actual income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 0 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0.02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 0 73 Total Other Income 74 Total Non -Asset Income 17,724 85.Asset Income 0 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86. Total Annual Income 17,724 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108 Total Tenant Payment 298 87 Low Income Limit 34,900 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109.Tenant Rent 244 88 Very Low Income Limit 21,800 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110.Utility Reimbursement 0 89 Extremely Low Income Limit 100. 3% of Income 532 111.Assistance Payment 184 90 Current Income Status 101.Disability Expense 0 112. Welfare Rent 0 91 Eligibility Universe Code 102 Disability Deduction 0 113. Hardship Exemption 92 Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 5,940 114 Waiver Type Code 93.Inconle Exception Code 104,Medical Deduction 5,408 94 Police/Security Tenant? 105.Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier? 106.Total Deductions 5 808 Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 11,916 96. Household n__-. n ,.t n rnrm 1.11 inAnnso (0912008) Previous versions of this form are obsolete. This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Sep 01 2005 12:10PM HP .SERJET FAX �q- 'n.,,�l�.•y,l"W'',iS �! 1, ]� I' � (` �r, j � ll�,r 1 ;.,. _ .. ,yil; is f' '?1J3J1 t'^ � �1!trLCi!. i'(1 I'� ' I:: W`ti, t': i 1`J�II' i 1 r ,,i STI: ; �.'CXp7�1�'� r • .' ,`lJ�,ij'1 j0b1Nri � k9 U�Lrtprd I1-.vy.. � •i1dr j. 'r�l°ISI Read this before you complete and sign thls form HUD -60099 Public Reporting 0urden, The reportln0 burden for thio collection of Information is estimated to average 55 minutes per response, including the ume for reviewing Inetructions, soarchIng existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, end completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other expect of Ws collection of Information Including cuggeationa for reducing this burden, to tho Otboe of Msnsgemertt end Hedge!, Paperwork Reduction Protect (Z5020204),Washington, DC 20603, Tha Information Is being collected by HUD to determine an applloante eligibility. the recommended unit size, end the amount the tenant(a) must pay toward rent and utilities. HUD uses thle Infurmetion to armlet In managing certain HUD properties, to protea the Governments lanenzial interest and to verify the accuracy of the Information furnished. HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) may oonduet a computer match to verify the information you provide, Thla Information may oa released to appropriate Federal, State, and local agenotea, when relevant, and to civil, criminal, or regulatory Investigators and prosecutors. However, lho Information w111 not be *them's,* disclosed or released outside of HUD. axoept es permitted or required by law. You must provide all of the Informellon requested, Including the Social Security Numbers ($9Ne) you, and all other ho eehoId family members age six (8) years and older, have and use Giving the SSNa of all family members age six (6) years and older le mandatory; not providing the SSNs will affect your eligibility. Failure to provide any Information may moult In a delay or rejection of your eligibility approval. Privacy Aot Statement. The Department of Housing end Urban Development (HUD) Is authorised t olI collect Information andthe U.S. Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437 et. seq.); the Housin and Urban -Rural Recons Act of 1983 (P.L.g munity Development Technical Arrrendmente of 1964 (P.L. 98.479); end by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3643). forrn ere god ete to the beet of our endabelief. INV* understand thataAAve can be Med up to $ that the 10,000 n In or imprisoned p to flveend E of �yeare, or lose the subsidy HUD pays and have my/our rent increased, If IMA furnish false or Incomplete Information, Owner's Certification - I certify that this Tenant's eligibility, rent and aseiatenco payments have been camputad In accordance with HUP'e regulations and admdniatretIve procedures and that all required verifications were obtained Wanting to Owners and Tenants. 9y aipning this form, you are Indloating that you have read the above Privacy Act Statement and are agreeing with the appUUGabla Certification. Falai, Claim Statement. Warning: U.B. Code, Title31, Section 3729. raise Cneo proo ides a causascivril to propenat)' 0f n, nota thorirttan udv0mt end Gam; oorrehthen 310,000, plus 3 Mosee the amount of damages for any parson who knowingly p oe knowingly makes, or caused to be used, a faire record or statement; or conrrplies to duhnud the Government by patting a false or fraudulent claim allowed or paid. p,3 IIJi .I :{.. `.1.'•, v1,L-. ,i�ki: M.liV{� :t�n44g�:J,ts4!v�rl:�i;±}1}I,;al';Irtt+ltti�s�!t�;IPSwiiuksYljla�l!(i�i—�, ��f4�!1:; (ar�r.�`��' Nems or Protect ROSE OF MARY TERRACE Heed or HOU$OfOId Iletin Hunter iDi?iaifali :fefCiit;St'(iTel:t6+iU ilii (�iif;<9bit :ti ll Fctl� u+tliljltt(11i1e'l1 Ki?eiiidlrn rhga;i1a3 Dale: of Howe/thole `bTpnuse/Co•Hand Olrer Adult 1-3'.1: Unit Number 205 Toto) Tenant Payment 217 yr Olhor Adult . MINER Enactive Dote 10,011200a Aselotonco Payment 2ee ;r i3) Iii; fel`jni4te.iree..e1).JI:l, >.�/71,.'•F l: Certification Typo Annual RGW1UnceUun Torlent Runt 163 utfl a t ilii aliltifils4il(al if 6�' 1) Date: Date: Other Adult Other Adun Date: Date: OU1ur P1.1111 Date Other AdUn Date: Other Adult Dab: Otner Adult Date: Other Atlutt Other Adult f ,.. z u �,,�. `+'`rP�'7" i r �� f9Pa�vgAollyw,;�glE'!"J!/ilh.Jlt'n�n wall r jjAiti ;/ (l; t` .4 t�tr!er:4 �,�ia�;.�,17 i cit fikla1 ll . fl..tift��i a ;y 1 {�v))(4av�s?t�tt` t�' kru�tdir t Ynittii:N35iJ 1i�1� 4..i'� .A �[ u`' i D}1�e r I � /t f...,.. 1 I�/i t'J 0,.,rtetlApeiit Mitdpeted Voucher 3ais t 0/U1 f20o9 Dote: Othor Adult Dale: Dow: Other Adult Data: /4.-----4L/\ ChrIcJtvitt) boxi ta unable to algin for .lepttlmate reason Previous versions of this form are obsolete. Page 1 of 2 Thle form also replaces HUD -00008 -13, -E, -F, & -G. form HUD -50059 (09/2008) He 4340.3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing I-or iersonai rcecoras UINLT - rrur WI with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1 Project Name 13.Elfective Date 10/01/2009 23 Unit Number 206 (206) ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 14.Anticipated Voucher Dale 10/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2 Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15 Next Recertification Date 10/01/2010 25 Building ID 3.Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move-In Date 10/08/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4.Property ID 17 Unit Move-in Date 10/08/2008 27.Previous Unit No. 5 Project Number 171EE023 18.Certification Type Annual Recertification 28 Security Deposit 204 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20 Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8 Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correclron date 31 Contract Rent 428 9.I-IUD-Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33.Gross Rent 482 11.Previous Housing Code Standard 12. Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37. MI 38. Rel. 39 Sex 40. Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43 Special Status 44 Student Status 45 ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48 Age al Cert. 49. Work Codes 01 Hunter Hattie M H-Head F 8 2 06/25/1934 E 328-28-8445 EC 75 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 j 50 Family 51.Family is Mobility Impaired' _ N is Hearing Impaired? N 53.Number of Family Members 1 _ 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59 Expected Family Addition • Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents 0 52,Family is Visually Impaired/ - N 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 63.Previous Effective Date 60. Previous Head Last Name 64 Previous Head ID - - 61.Previous Head First Name 65.Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66 Mbr No. 67 Income Type Code 68 Amount 69. SSN Benefits Claim No. 75 Mbr. No. 76 Description 77 Status 78 Cash Value 79. lYes Yearly Actual 80. e Divested t ed 01 Social Security 9,066 01 01 Bank of America - Checkin Bank of America - Savings U U 1 75 0 0 0 70 Total Employment Income 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 75 82.Actual Income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 9,066 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0 02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Impuled Income from Assets 0 73 Total Other Income 0 85.Asset Income 74 Total Non-Asset Income 9,066 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86 Total Annual Income 9,066 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108.Total Tenant Payment 217 87 Low Income Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109.Tenant Rent 163 88.Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110. Utility Reimbursement 0 89. Extremely Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 272 111.Assistance Payment 265 90 Current Income Status 101.Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 91.Eligibility Universe Code 102.Disabilily Deduction 0 113.Hardship Exemption 92. Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 0 114 Waiver Type Code 93.Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 0 94.Police/Security Tenant'? 105 Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier? 106 Total Deductions 400 96 Household Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 8,666 - 08 Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G age form HUD -50059 (09120 ) HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Feb 02 2010 3: 29PM HP '- " hkkJL- I r Hx 0 :,t I It It 4 1'.y4 i l, s I !, i rr tl t •C I��J ,rnriv, I 5, Icl ),e,..i, ��)i Jm Iii-.., (( ( 1 aa' ` ._1 �J '. 14i p .I.! .��11�,1;1' a i44 'v I''td.,Ji I� q �t I , tj r;n�.� , ' }r' i1 ' i �'1 )V'i'`, t t. :, �. ,. t i I 'i' :�t{ sVi • t111t. '• p .:...,1. CtU y1'6 WI. • r( If11' Al.r' a �I H , �7: 1 f �e 0! i' �r l � '' / %..� �Ir ii 3+f`` �L h i tlBl78 a a IIIIrWt911b Al::�;ilb I a J' twi.+tr 7+'11ry6:y i•• a]1 t t � ,rr pt 1 �Y ,:' 1, :':� II. :gal • i'! • ,., t i., • tl r.Iv.�.�, . �,rL.�.: t. ,r ,,, . ••.: •Ir AUC , r !'I '�°!` .' Q) , °i..'1Y1,•• SIJ,. f Jl; ';(9i` „ . .•Ili ft r • tr._• ,i 1° ` �'' �ai I' 'hill' ,. . r' t• la'1' '`, r- '1W: M, l irMi I I ''';1 'tl. �iSilli lilt n li :J. UI'd �xln tI :�r� �Mtati 'i ,j,r . �1Nq� e 1 ;alt 1� �Itr• yY,,���i1L1ItI� II�'1'1p1pR,1f t1•{�r(r��1r �t,'��y�ppy���1Ay1l�►nl����1r, f t��OifIC111I lfy(111, IltiG•%�Il:aryJ1)1NJ4i4rSt�RDLIf'�t 1 t r /(�I Read this before you complete and sign this form HUD -5006e - Public Reporting Burden. The reporting burden for thle collection of information is eatimatbd to average 55 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing Inatructions, searching existing data aourcee, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing end reviewing the collection of information. Send oornmonts regarding thle burden eetlmate or any other aspect of this collection of Information Including suggestions for reducing thio burden, to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Protect (25020204),Weshington, DC 20603, The information is being collected by HUD to determine an applicant's eligibility, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenant(*) must pay toward rent and utilities, HUD uses this Information to aealet In managing certain HUD properties, to protect the Government's financial interest, and to verify the accuracy of the Information furnished. HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) may conduct a computer match to verify the information you provide. This Information may be released to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, when relevant, and to civil, criminal, or regulatory investigators and prosecutors. However, the Information will not be otherwise disclosed or released outalde of HUD, except as permitted or required by law. You must provide alI of the information requested, Inoiuding the Social Security Numbers (SSNa) you, and all other household family members age six (8) years and older, have and use, Giving the SSNa of all family members age six (6) yearn} and older le mandatory; not providing the 55Na will affect your eligibility, Failure lo provide any Information may result in a delay or rejection of your eligibility approval, Privacy Act Statement. The Department of Houaing and Utah Development (HUD) Is authorized to collect this information by the U.S. Housing Act of 1937, ea amended (42 (A.C. 1437 et. seq.); the Houaing and Urban-Rurol Recovery Act of 1983 (P L. 88.181); the Housing end Community Development Technical Arriendmenta of 1864 (P,L. 98.479); and by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3543). Tenant e))' Certification - I/VVe certify that the Information In Sections C, D, and E of this form are true and complete to the best of my/our Knowledge and belief. l/We understand that I/we can be flned up to $10,000, or imprisoned up to five year's, or lose the eubeldy HUD pays and have my/our rent inoreaeed, if I/we furnish false or Incomplete Information. Owner's CertmcatIon -I certify that thle Tenant's eligibility, rent and assistance payments nave been computed in accordance with HUD's regulations and administrative procedures and that all required verifications were obtained. Warning to Owners and Tenants. By signing this form, you ere Indicating that you have read the above Privacy Act Statement and are agreeing with the applicable Certification. • False Claim 5tetement. Warning: U.S. Code, Title 31, Section 9729, False Claims, provides a civil penalty of not leas than $6,000 and not more than $10,000. plus 3 times the amount of damages for any person who knowingly preeenta, or causes to be presented, a talon or trauduient claim; or who knowingly makes, or caused to be used, a fatal record or 'statement; or coneplrea to defraud the Government by getting a Mise or fraudulent claim allowed or paid. {�� �•i ���� trr..�:i ��.;�:..'. .�';rN..% t7310"Y�'IP.iril"':fi.l �•;V''r(. ,N . i...' is _rb" �M1 rtl� ?'�! :'lwfie.:.:.. " Y.:ti I ,. 7q. N4Y3 .tiAla r � un' j,tii �2 .;>.,%'.;`�:;Ulkl �' ' ',rI;i... J, ...yllr;,f. >: 11. y ;♦t, ry 1 �{ nr;-, i, •4'• "! '`r �V yf�': I'1q� ill F'!" 1, t1 a. • t III( Nam. or Project ROSE OF MARY TERRACE Unit Number 209 Effective Data 09/04/2009 Certification Two Move -in Heed of Houa.hold Minnie Cummins Total Tenant Payment 285 Aeeletana Payment 197 Tenant Rent 231 :- • i"MJ P iw3 e1i�� `•° r.i • )lplf�iy 'j 1 •. •, s���f 1• t - :a ' �Rh:ilr,.. art'A . j �.-!,:j t1,7..e. ,;.' �'irdr . .ittivl.i.L,.v.,�:r :tat t,, -,,re:. � ,• 4t:v.ip..: ;(1lIl.r,1, Heaci f Houeehold ." Date Other Adult Qj Date; Spouse 1 Co -Head Date; Other Adult Dale: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Cate: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Data: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: ruJti, .11 l- ' i419i vI?IR,J..t-rf�U^I fie. i1I;,:r9, 1,v 0. t�tF".,va. iu�• ,.., ;... i .:I, „ 1 yi7'0)fep}rcep-T:r ii �y ''' 1iY.11'-�47 'It :..m.„ , ,t. I E,4'.LL'.- : dI:.,', '', .. D.. (0 'll' a [ ' k . + ,, :,: rt -f.;'. Ownerl ;.n Date / [.]Check this box H Ten '1 • able to sign fora legitimate MPS 0 Mllapeted voucher Date 11ro1/2aoe Previous versions oV't s form are obsolete, • This form Mao reeler a HUD -50058.0, -E, -F, & -0. Page 1 cf 3 farm HUD -50069 (09/2008) 118 4350.3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not for with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1.Project Name ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 13.Effective Date 09/04/2009 23 Unit Number 209 (209) 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Dale 09/01/2010 25.8uilding ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move -In Date 09/04/2009 26 Unit Transfer Code 4 Property ID 17 Unit Move -in Date 09/04/2009 27.Previous Unit No. 5 Project Number 171EE023 18.Certitication Type Move -In 28.Security Deposit 285 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19 Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20.Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8.Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9 HUD -Owned Protect? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33 Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37. MI 38 Rel. 39. Sex ' 40 Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Dale 43 Special Status 44 Student Status 45. ID Code (SSN) 46 Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48. Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Cummins Minnie L H -Head F W 2 03/31/1935 E 536-32-5196 EC 74 02 03 04 05 06 07 - 08 50. Family is Mobility Impaired'? N 53.Number of Family Members ____ 1__ 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 51 Family is Hearing Impaired? N __ 52. Family is Visually Impaired? N 59. Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents_ 0 __ 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 63.Prewous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name 64.Previous Head ID - - 61 Previous Head First Name 65.Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66. Mbr No.Claim 67 Income Type Code 68 Amount 69. SSN Benefits No. 75. Mbr No. 76 Description 77 Status 78 Cash Value 79. Actual Yearly Income 80. e Divestedate 01 01 Pensions Social Security 1,950 13,961 01 01 01 Chase Bank - Checking Yakima Valley Credit Unio Yakima Valley Credit Unio 000 618 86 372 0 0 1 70.Total Employment Income 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 1,076 82.Actual Income from Assets 1 71 Total Pension Income 15,911 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0.02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Inlputed Income from Assets 0 73.Total Other Income 0 85.Asset Income 1 74 Total Non -Asset Income 15,911 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86 Total Annual Income 15.912 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108 Total Tenant Payment 285 87.Low Income Limit 30,500 98.Child Care Expense(work) 0 109.Tenant Rent 231 88.Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110.Utility Reimbursement 0 89. Extremely Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 477 111.Assistance Payment 197 90 Current Income Status 101.Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 91 Eligibility Universe Code 102.Disability Deduction 0 113.Hardship Exemption 92.Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 4,575 114 Waiver Type Code 93.tncome Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 4,098 94. Police/Security Tenant? 105 Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier? 106 Total Deductions 4,498 96.Household Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 11,414 ^ . D 50059 09/2008 Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G form HU ( ) HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Oct 02 2009 3;14PM HI. SERJET FAX p,8 ---'t, y1r=y' !ya}', �'` 1.. t . qty y4. �'Y•, (1b� �I'n' r }.d =ah l { i '4r. .(�f111�r���pyk';: :$�.�m�,:�� #�""�• Ir f ;;I!IiI :•0 t '•-'111 y pP .; i�lll '.a• I �. Ott i '� IIC;:f ,t,1�di.� I I '' 'I'e��+R Ii','' I� :. , . , it h') 1:�::• I bC," ('ria ,1f •. t�) . Phil r7U� s� y 1 �.� 'Qj', •* Y ' i{•l-�f•�•I ' ti:° 1 �: , 1 1. r 4�.k1�I(p��„laytp..���,yp���,>; t. Ij4; '1: i F,p, II ':�1�I 'f iJ , �'� 1.' i • °; .14?( , :1 M:.•; •, n l(tl� 'J'I pI(n tk'��°. .((rF: . , .iL. (.. ., . Pal 'q! • :r,.4' �:j p. j ip�l.. •l' 1� .. } r }jti ill' , _I -•' . ..I 'Y. F l .•,•1' �{My ri ii. , . t) �-�b:�r` %MUM i4:i.s„ 119011�ffi,AM'aA �Iq� ,,p��`p�������� �(.�. i kl�``1�{theyi7i.l:h Yrrae�+.56tkior:, '3'44 aa I'%`� INVIEVtfkYAxilOiIlrVd'[.91676':rt9I%rJy1 .1H1' �rk, ('" it! Reed thle before you complete and sign thla form HUD -60068 Public Reporting Burdon, The reporting burden for this collection of Information le estimated to avorege 65 minutes per foapanse, Including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing deft sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, end completing and reviewing the collodion o1 Information. Send comments regarding thte burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of Information Including suggeettons for reducing this burden, to the Of toe of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (20020204),WashIngton, DC 20003, The Information le being collected by HUD to determine en eppitcant's ellgibllhy, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenant(s) must pay toward rent and utilities, HUD uses this Information to anklet In maneging certain HUD properties, to protect the Government's financial interest, and to verify the accuracy of the Information furnished, HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) May conduct a computer match to verify the information you provide, This Information maybe roioesed to appropriate Federal, State, and local aienclee, when relevant, end to civil, criminal, or regulatory Investigators and proaecutora. However, tho Infonrallun will not be otherwise disclosed or released outside of HUD, except as permitted or required by law. You must provide all of the Information requested, Including the Social Security Numbers (ESNs) you, end all other household family montane age ebc (B) years and older, have and use. Giving the 8SNa or al femUy members ego six (8) years and older le mandatory; not provsding the SSNe will affect your eligibility. failure to provide eny Information may mull Ina delay or rejection of your eligibility epprovel. Privacy Act Statement. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) la authorized to collect this Informetlon by the U 3. Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437 et. seq.); the Housing and Urben•Rural Recovery Act of 1983 (P.L. 9B-181); the Housing and Community Development Technical Amendments of 1884 (P,L. 98-479); and by the Housing end Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3543). Tanint(e)' Certification -I/We certtfy that tha information In Sections C, D, and E of thio form are true and complete to the' beat of my/our knowledge and belief. I/We understand that Ilwe can be fined up to $10,000, or imprisoned up to fivo years, or lose the subsidy HUD pays and havo my/aur rant Increased, If I/we furnish false or Incomplete information, Owher'e Certification -1 certify that this Tenant's eligibility, rant and assistance payments have been computed In accordance with HUD's regulations and administrative procedures end that all required verifications were obtained. Warning to Owners and Tenants. By signing this form, you are Indicating that yuu hove read the above Privacy Act Statement and ere agreeing wth the applicable Certification. False CI■Im Statement. Warning: U S. Code, Title 31, Section 3729, Pelee Claims, provIdee a civil penalty of not lea. than 55,000 and not more than Si 0,000, plus 3 timers the amount of demagog for any person who knowingly presents, or settees to bo praaanted, a (alae or fraudulent claim; or who knowingly makes, or caused to be used, a false record or statement; or conspires to defraud the Government by getting s feta. or fraudulent claim avowed or paid. . f c <,�,( z i)I,,I( ,.. '''.°1I,)1init"ir_."i r.- 2°�3(Ir'tbjsi�a; c•`.•lit' }./tigtltiU/, `'•'rl )(Bildt}. rliit0 fijj9 � 1 Av .. 17 4`i ip�#ill t �„�n'14, I �sl�t�f�' 't":�il�)' fli4rail _ .,,f%iiti1J(olt: „ )11,1il itl..• 1,. llim:.... Nun:o of Project R0SEOFMARY TERRACE Unn Numb*, 210 Effective Oste 11/01/200 Certification Typo AnnualRecerti6Cat'.on Hudd of Household Total Tonunl Payment toe Assistance Payment 284 Tenant tient 144 9orah Welh :1C (n : A,1 f) � .,�L� �' {15 15: I ;�t,,,,(( ,1 ';''P 7rr��V n �:ji rr' ., ••,4 t Tyd( h%3 X�� `,:, �t"s Il.ih'IMirilli;: :)� I.Y1f' rullf�l.ji}:'' ��N file Lr�:::.<i': , �I.�l�..l'Q� .. I; .ai �• � 15, l Ir �'': l•a(li .1{j �irI1hl1rG. 'IIr,U,! �14llFiil�..N14111ih1II}l�i:fidrl:� gli ,. ri YI{!1111 I Y r��, ��� :i}Itt�ii�fi:-.;. 1(i'.�{ili�l:rGhi.1, ' Hudo •ioueehOkf i+-t—L1-1.) 21-6-. Delo; - — .a S a OltvrAdvlt Date: spouse 1 Co -Hand Oats; Olwr Adult Data: outer Advo [tete. Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Othor Aduh Dale ,--- Other Ndult fele: Other Adult Pato: Other Apull Delo: Other Adult Dote: 0ther Ado!! Dow. Other Adult Polo: 137.,•11134'41'0)��ti •L7J .,. _, , 1✓.: b1Sgi s— U411111Si!i{i l-d,e �t'e'�k��tnliNpy Ttf4IIIF�blam14Ill ti•t'rI ll t4u Own Of/Aga �`_ /f /��`� civ 1` C S V Cr _ c�G��' ' Anticipated Voucher cele ■ Chock 1Ne box If Tanen' able to men !or 0 Iu0:IlmulatNu n 11/0112000 .. ._-- •---. 1,1 111 t•,Atrk /AR Non s\ Previous versions of tfila form are obsolete. This form a160 replaces HUD -80069 -D, -E, -F, d -G. sae10r1 OCC Sperc Date .--- /0/0 //C) k HB 4350.3 Sev 1 Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not for with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1 Project Name ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 13.Effective Date 11/01/2009 23.Unit Number 210 (210) 14 Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 11/01/2010 25.Building ID 3. Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move-In Date 11/08/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4.Property ID 17 Unit Move-in Date 11/08/2008 27.Previous Unit No. 5.Project Number 171EE023 18.Certification Type Annual Recertification 28.Security Deposit 342 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20.Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8 Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9.HUD-Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32 Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33.Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37 MI 38. Rel. 39 Sex 40 Race 41 Eth. 42 Birth Date 43. Special Status 44 Student Status 45 ID Code (SSN) 46 Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48 Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Wells Sarah H-Head F 8 2 05/11/1930 E 122-26-7850 EC 79 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 50.Family 51.Family 52. Family is Mobility Impaired? N_ is Hearing Impaired? N is Visually Impaired? N 53.Number of Family Members 1 54.Number of Non -Family Members _ 0 _ 55.Number of Dependents __ 0 _ _ 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59. Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 63.Previous Effective Date 11/08/2008 60.Previous Head Last Narne Wells 64.Previous Head ID 122-36-7850 61 Previous Head First Name Sarah 65.Previous Head Birth Date 05/11/1930 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66. Mbr No. 67 Income Type Code 68. Amount 69. SSN Benefits Claim No. 75 r. Mbr. No. 76. Description Desate cr 77 Status 78 Cash Value 79 Actual Yerly 80 01 01 Social Security Supplemental Securit 5,856 2,472 01 Bank of America - Savings C 29 0 70 Total Employment Income 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 29 82.Actual Income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 8.328 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0 02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 0 73 Total Other Income 0 85.Asset Income 0 74 Total Non-Asset Income 8.328 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86 Total Annual Income 8,328 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108.Total Tenant Payment 198 87.Low Income Limit 30,500 98.Child Care Expense(work) 0 109 Tenant Rent 144 88 Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110.Utility Reimbursement 0 89 Extremely Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 250 111.Assistance Payment 284 90 Current Income Status 101 .Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 91.Eligibilily Universe Code 102.Disability Deduction 0 113 Hardship Exemption 92.Sec. 8 Assist 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 0 114 Waiver Type Code 93.Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 0 94.Police/Security Tenant? 105 Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier? 106 Total Deductions 400 96 Household Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 7,928 a.....-, uu rn_Annro rno/onnR\ Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Feb 02 2010 2: 4SPM HP.--"1SERJET FAX ►> est ( �; o' I�E� I 1�:' '� firs I IIS J;1�� �rr,11, g� ki I,.,. Vl i) 11tI t) ��;. EP. �,j„ . • .; i t;3,r 4!;. t .1Mq.Iu!>r: MO WHAM t' ,i"i p. c Read title before you complete and s gn this form HUD.1OOE i Public Reporting Burden, The reporting burden for thla collection of Information le est{mated to average 68 minutes per reaponee, including the time for reviewing Instructions, searching exleting dots sources, gathering and molntaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden eat►mate or any other aspect of this collection of information Inoluding suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (26020204),Waahington, DC 20603. The Information la being collected by HUD to determine an eppllcant'a eligibility, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenant(s) must pay toward rent and utilities, HUD uses this information to assist In managing certain HUD properties, to protect the Govemment'a financial Interest, and to verify the accuracy of the Information furnished. HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) may conduct a computer match to verify the Information you provide. Thla information may be *leased to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, when relevant. and to civil, criminal, or rtagutatory Investigators and prosecutors. However, the Information will not be otherwise dleclased or released outside of HUD, except as permeated or required by law. You must provide all of the information requested, Including the Social Security Numbers (9SNa) you, and all other household family members age ad (6) years and older, have and use. Giving the SSNe of all family members ase Mx (6) years and older is mandatory: not providing the SSW* will affect your ellgblllty. Failure to provide any informatlon may reautt In a delay or refection of your eligibility approval. Privacy Act Statement The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) la authorised to collect this Information by the U.8. Housing Act of 1937, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1437 et. seq.); the Houatng end Urban -Rural Recovery Act of 1983 (P.L, 98-181): the Housing and Community Development TecnnIcal Amendments of 1984 (P.L. 98-479): and by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U 8.0 3543), Tenant(a)' Certification - I/We certify that the Information In Sections C, 0, and E of this form are true and complete to the bast of my/our knowledge and belief. WVe understand that I/we can be fined up to 510,000, or Imprisoned up to five year's, or lose the subsidy HUD pays and have my/our rent increased, It Uwe furnish false or Incomplete information, Owner's Certification - I certify that title Tenant'a eligibility, rent and assistance payments have been computed in accordance with HUO'a regulations and edminIstrative procedures and that all requlred verifications were obtained. warning to Owner* and Tenants. the applicable Certification. False Claim Statement Weming: U.S. Code, Title 31, Section 3729, False Claims, provides a civil penalty of not lees than 55,000 and not mora than 510,000, plus 3 times the amount of damages for any person who knowingly preaenta, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim: or who knowingly make', or caused to be used, a false record or statement; or consplres to defraud the Government by petting a false or fraudulent claim allowed or paid. 6y signing this form, you era Indicating that you have read the above Privacy Act Statement and are agreeing with yj Y•�YI' r ^:�taIIJR ll Name of Pro)sat Ro6E OF MARY TERRACE Head of Household ' Karen Canner Unit Number Effective Oats 211 10/01/2009 Certincatton 'Nee Annual Recertification AUC' 'ir. �.9 Total Tenant Payment Aasletence Payment 420 e2 •iliiatiglia ' 3(I�iii 7tff§��1i�y�sniG:,li )1I1!):' .::lit {�i>IIS Tanen( Rent 350 Jit teAei.41,kCge1V4iii` Nik 1 �,� 64iA1Y�l dd apou • Cofiea Date: Other Adult Dela. Other Adult Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Date: Other Adult Other Adult Oats: Other Adult Data: Other Adult Date: Other Adrll Date Other Adult Date: Other Adult Data: Other Adult 7�y G_',(Iyi,:oirryf 1W ....r,9, tlay,v fir ,yl,? r!{ .�1. BVI (pr, jj�..C.�.,i. ¢r.:�ll.� 1 IN�1 ! d`,-•..:?.11�.'d4h�liRY.R]'".' 4 � tl.Wl•;;: �r ,.�I'rld�:::. r -y� � II � fir.; •r•..�I� `% ..;'i fie• /Age _myJ�r %%�� Owner/Agent m/��;�/rIIIw ❑ Check t :o box It Tenant le unab so pf r a legitimate reason aC Previous verelone of thte form obsolete. This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, E. -G. Page 1 of 2 Date: .0.464liaj 1)14.0 4 ; �N II I r11dI(tt r;:.���tl:�ss)1:7 Date Anticipated voucher Date 11/01t20oe fofm HUD --50059 (09/2008) HB 4300.3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing i -or Hersonai rcecoros UIVL r - nur iui with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1.Project Name 13.Effeclive Date 10/01/2009 23.Unrt Number 211 (211) ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No of Bedrooms 1 2 Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 10/01/2010 25.Building ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move•In Date 10/03/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4 Property ID 17 Unit Move -in Date 10/03/2008 27.Previous Unit No 5 Project Number 171EE023 18 Certification Type Annual Recertification 28.Security Deposit 418 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29 Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20 Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8 Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9 HUD -Owned Project'? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33.Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35. Last Name 36 First Name 37 MI 38. Rel. 39 Sex 40. Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43. Special Status 44 Student Status 45 ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48. Age at Cert. 49. Work Codes 01 Conner Karen F H -Head F W 2 10/29/1943 E 539-42-1819 EC 65 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Family Members 1-- 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 50.Family is Mobility Impaired') N 53.Number of 0 Impaired?_ N 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 51 Family is Hearing _ Dependents 0 59 Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 52.Family is Visually Impaired?_ N __ 55.Number of _ _ 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 63.Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name 64.Previous Head ID 61.Previous Head First Name 62.Previous Head Middle Initial 65 Previous Head Birth Date Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66. Mbr No. 67 Income Type Code 68. Amount 69. SSN Benefits Claim No 75. Mbr. No. 76. Description 77 Status 78. Cash Value 79. ActualYearly 80 ate Dives ed 01 01 01 Social Security Business 8,729 9,360 01 01 Yakima Valley Credit Unioi Yakima Valley Credit Unio C C 50 488 0 0 70.Total Employment Income 9,360 81 Cash Value of Assets 538 82,Actuat Income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 8,729 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0 02 72 Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 0 73.Total Other Income 0 85 Asset Income 0 74 Total Non -Asset Income 18,089 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86.Total Annual Income 18,089 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108.Total Tenant Payment 420 87. Low Income Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109 Tenant Rent 366 88.Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110 Utility Reimbursement 0 89. Extremely Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 543 111.Assistance Payment 62 90.Current Income Status 101 Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 Eligibility Universe Code 102.Disability Deduction 0 113.Hardship Exemption _91 92.Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 1 416 114 Waiver Type Code 93.Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 873 94 Police/Security Tenant? 105.Elderly Family Deduction 400 95.Survivor of Qualifier? 106 Total Deductions 1.273 96. Household Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 16,816 Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G age o form HUD -50059 (09/2008) HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Oct 02 2009 3:I6PM HI ISERJET FAX p. 11 Previous versions of IN are obeolete. Thle form also repleoos J0.50050 -D, -F, -F, & -0. Page 1 of 2 DDD /� -1OCT 0 5 2009 L f ;% l . , ,. COMPLIANCE O cc. Spec: �,,. , . t; �' / % Date: /t>>/i,/i/fJ c• L. L7 form HUD -50059 (09/2008) HB 4360.3 Rev 1 ulu qq .:0# % A !+MRQ R�� , n t 1 ^7: • � f• ' , c ' tl '.411�i,. � ,. }t{ ' f.: t �l 1 • ih v1l , • H fl•-' ..11' 'fi'.L �{i,��.,r, o" y :'• n ' ,r -. 4., 1 6HU! •.�l.y?U f• rt IMH� rJ'.: t•� . } „A r "' �r P " ' •,I' i for • R�� • ,, itGI � SI' .ST'S }4� tis' �i. ' f •• . " r r jr • 1 •, 1 1.. . • r. illi i r J t J t I1 41 . I r "r'•. y.••: ilii Iw .li yl .', el- 1 � . ),: ' , ' <•i�l I j� !,! � i Sr. •.i , 1 tit �. I p •1 1�. d L • �h, ,d,r�{: NI.%#„ y,.:,. ,C'Y •, ,iOS� t a"I rF' .,. .1 •s� �. • if'' �1•• .. • ^t 1 :yr:, 2. `I . e1 • , 1 rr,. •); lit @,> + ..,)„!;;;;,:.?,114 iJt�' 1 1 f, y,,{ r Mai : ra ;d r , •:, ' ll l Jl4il4w"p ,•, ;-:Y !:4'N,thJ'i:Jri 1, . :►' !'• o!i �.• .' !. ).a:. ?� i d 1g l,•: ° "•, ,ar! ii 1 is . Rend this before you complete and sign this form HU13•60D69 Public Reporting Burden. Thor tenoning burden for thle collection of information is estimated to average 55 minutest por roaponee, Including the Ume for reviewing Iriatruettona, smirching existing data sources, pothering and maintaining the data needed, end completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any othor aspect of thin collection of Information Including euggealions fur reducing this burden, to the Office of Management end 13vdget, Poperwork Roduotlon Prosect (26020204),Waahlnpton, DC 20503. The information Is being collected by HUD to delermine an epplicant'a eligibility, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenant(a) must pay toward rent end utW1tee. HUD ueee this information to aaalet In manoging certain HUD properties, to protect the Government's flnanolal Interest, and to verify the axuracy of the Information furnished. HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) may conduct a computer match to verty the Information you provide. This Information may be released to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, when relevant, and to civil, criminal, or regulatory Inveatlgatora and prosecuoora• However, the umation Information will net be otherwise disclosed or released outside of HUD, except aa permitted or required by low, You must sora nil ideoldsit of thee information Ns of aWtang the Sabialer Security Numbers and(6o�dat Ia , and all Mandata y; notr pd familyGiving thu 55fYs of all family members apo atx (H) yMandatory;providing thelSSNmembers laffect youe elz r eligibility, Faitule to provide any thu Information may result In a delay or rejuotion el your eitgfblllty approval, Privacy Act Statement. The Department of Housing and Urban DavNopment (HUD) Is authorized to collect thle Information by the U.S. Housing Ad of covery Act 011983 Development Technica7, as amended l Amendments of 1 84 (P.L 98.479); and by end the Housing eand Communtty Development Act o 1967 (42 U.S.O. tho Housing 3543)d . our st of iete to the up toof fivale furm are true and yeara. or lose the a b dy HUD pays and have my/our knowledge be fined up to $10.000, or Imprn In Secidone isoned dand canthat end b lioff. WVa undda stand that Uwe e certify Increased, If Uwe furnish false or Incomplete Information. Owner's Cerefleetlon - I certify that this Tenant's eligibility, rent and asalat■noe payrneMs have been computed In accordance with HUD's regulations and administrative procedures and that all required veriticatlona were obtelnwd. VVarnIng to Owners and Tenants. By signing thte form, you are Indicating that you have read the above Prtvacy Act Statement and are agreeing with tho applicable Certification. False Claim Statement, Warning: U,9, Code, Tale 31, Section 3729, Faille Claims, provides a civil penalty of not tela than 85,000 and not more then $1(3,000, plus 3 times the amount of damages for any person who knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a fslee or fraudulent daim; or who knowingly makes, or coursed to be treed, a false record or statement; or conspires to defraud the Government by getting a false or fraudulent claim allowed or pstg. , ''*ri,flr1lg, ,• FiIIYii >.tin,x,ry� r,d:;. , a,IfiNIlt,i� V..; r7n:.ilbt ` SR'4ulJlll f ai ; :: ltipiIkA ,ti Noma or Protect MARY TERRACE unit Number 30T Effective Data it/eV-Audi Caronoation Typo Annual Recertlricatiun AWE OF Head of Household Total Tenni Payment 7Va Assistance Payment led Tonont Rout 144 Ru1hWNaon a •.•... :•:.,.•,:c,,.:(e '11; "{1{ r 17i ++tt11'�gqt,�, •' • r.,'>,l,)' 1 (eI (itM ; is',T. 9 r , • 4rp, l.4 i tu;m;CIl1,7 ?, wilt unaiai;: ,;...i ,,^ ,.• :r; l� a A SINNW� Dere: •. � a ur �., 0, OtherAtlUn spouse Co'Haad Date: OU,or Advil Date: U1horAduli Dom' Othw Adult Date: Outer Adult Dale: 0thor Mull Date: • OuterAdtrh Dote. — Other Mull Data: OlhYr Adult Uwe: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Dote: 0pwr Aoult Date `atr��,,r�rx�r,.g�r11,r iIlilig id r6 ,I ,;•'4, '' .I Nt ilia; iiJ'�e• e',u'rl 'IlIsyi' i:, ,•..`' I �i��ngs'elydlitM(r.,��f�,: .. � / (r�1 Donner" 'r/ �,-• • .�Z,� Ds _ -. Q 2�I .�.. j n check (hie box if Tenant t u D. •sign for a legitimate reespr, L1 T.1_ Y-, ci At111rjpOtOd VOVChOr Dote 11/0112009 Previous versions of IN are obeolete. Thle form also repleoos J0.50050 -D, -F, -F, & -0. Page 1 of 2 DDD /� -1OCT 0 5 2009 L f ;% l . , ,. COMPLIANCE O cc. Spec: �,,. , . t; �' / % Date: /t>>/i,/i/fJ c• L. L7 form HUD -50059 (09/2008) HB 4360.3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not for with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1.Project Name ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 13 Effective Date 11/01/2009 23 Unit Number 307 (307) 14 Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Narne Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 11/01/2010 25.Building ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move -In Date 11/01/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4.Property ID 17.Unit Move -in Date 11/01/2008 27 Previous Unit No 5 Project Number 171EE023 18. Certification Type Annual Recertification 28 Security Deposit 197 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29. Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20.Correction Type 30 Market Rent 8 Plan of Action Code 21 Cerl.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9.HUD-Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33.Gross Rent 482 11.Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37, MI 38. Rel. 39 Sex 40 Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43. Special Status 44. Student Status 45. ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48. Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Wilson Ruth M H -Head F W 2 10/31/1945 E 537-46-7777 EC 64 02 03 - 04 05 06 07 08 - - 50.Family 51 Family is Mobility Impaired? N is Hearing Impaired? N 53.Number of Family Members 1 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58 Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59 Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents 0 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 52.Family is Visually Impaired? N 63.Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name 64 Previous Head ID 61 Previous Head First Name 65 Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66 Mbr No. 67 Income Type Code 68. Amount 69 SSN Benefits Claim No 75 Mbr. No. 76 Description 77 Status 78. Cash Value 79 Actual Yearly Income 80. Date Divested 01 01 Social Security Supplemental Securit 3,810 4,524 01 U.S Bank - C ? 112 0 70.Total Employment Income 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 112 82.Actual Income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 8,334 83.HUD Passbook Rate 0.02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 0 73 Total Other Income 0 85.Asset Income 0 74 Total Non -Asset Income 8,334 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86.Total Annual Income 8,334 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108 Total Tenant Payment 198 87 Low Income Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109 Tenant Rent 144 88.Very Low Income Limit 19.100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110 Utility Reimbursement 0 89 Extremely Low Income Limit- 100. 3% of Income 250 111.Assistance Payment 284 90 Current Income Status 101.Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 91.Eligibility Universe Code 102 Disability Deduction 0 113.Hardship Exemption 92 Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 0 114 Waiver Type Code 93 Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 0 94 Police/Security Tenant? 105 Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier? 106.Total Deductions 400 96.1lousehold Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 7,934 Previous versions of this form are obsolete. This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G age o -JV VJJ tV JIGVVU) HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Jul 15 2009 111 42A HF SERJET FAX p . 1 ,.t ?F�qn f` 1' :u), r ” t" '0.1� ] ... / •n. r �1 S '✓' ? I I! ! �ih: �. r'Ih ,,:. I . ft¢S t. •: it,•, ,:rr;,:,` ,1. (j •;��}11,1y¢3���ru� b�<`, :rs,�.��.�P,� �,i4. �urcr l' •I.S•1. `;fQ. ` :%p��j Q J `iIS, ;r,, •.'' rl` +f� G�• '` 01 Y o1 '{l��l -.n• � 4:F;:'�:; •,,'t --���y;ll! frt .Ilit �e �+� 1! �i s?, r (•IS!1,1''.�,r.`I , , l lit r•�sn, ,• ,.:, � ` /lNol,, 1 F•p�{}I)•1 �ltfitui,%r'•' rt�: ,r. .? a ,� .tl tl�tll;t,.r.. — • :;�: ��. � t n. ,. -Y;'.,;%L1i*: S`it1'f' ..,. ,.. 0 .. ,e I i' fli,. '. ;;�I-:r ...'AL ,lin �1♦ � '� .. . • L r l,MY },•„''; � l� : - ;:. ,\ ( it vi., F ' 'l:' tin $4 n Kr• O , ' (�• ' Si'.L?,i:>...,r::,,,t, . ....,. ..,. •. p ,:�Y.','n. P'- . � ' N�l�•'.�\.. � r � � �. la 1 . � {.� , �r}u �., .s;,1,1,, 'A: '. k ' 111 .'1 .O. .'r .'af!��:~t�� Read this before you complete and sign this form HUD -6005e Public Reporting Burden. Tha reporting burden for this eolioctlon of Information Is estimated to average be minutes par response, Including the time for reviewing Instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing tho collection of Information, Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of thla collection of information Inctudine eugoeetlone tor reducing this burden, l0 the Office of Management end Budget. Papervrorlt Raductton Project (25020204),Washington, DC 20503.T e Information 8ibeing c collectedU604 la by HUD to determine an sppNcent'e eligibility, the recommended unit stze, and the amount the tenent(s) must pay Information to aeelet In managing certain HUD properties, to protect the Government's financial Interest, and to verity the securecy of the infore1atl0n furnished. HUD or a Publlc Housing Authority (PHP) may conduct a computer match to verity the Information you provide. This Information may be released to appropriate Federal, Stats, and local agendas, when relevant, and to CIVII, criminal, or regulatory Inveetlgatore and prosecutors. However, the Information will not be otherwise disclosed or released outside of HUD, except as permltted or required by law. You ligmust pros tind ide olearlt of the havh and use information requested, Including the SOCiai Security Numbers (SSNe) you, and all other household family members e six (5) ye Glving the SSNs of all family members age six (8) years and older la mandatory; not providing the SSNa will affect your eligibility. Failure to provide any Information may result In ■ delay or rejection of your eligibility spprovel. Privacy Act 8tatemenL The Daps nment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Is authorized to collect this information by the U.S. Housing Act of 1937. ea amended (42 U.S.C. 1497 et, seg.); the Housing and Urban -Rural Recovery Ad of 1983 (P'L. 98-i 81), the Housing and Community Develpment TechnlCei Amendments of 1984 (P.1.. 98.479); and by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987 (42 U S.C. 3543). otns /our VICriyledge and ballet l/Wei understand that can be red up t 310,000, orrImD coned up to five years or lose the subsidere true and y HUD pays and havto the beat of ye my/our ent Increased, 11 Uwe furnish fates or Incomplete Information, , Owners Certification - I eerily that this Tenant's allgiblilty, rent and aselatanee payments have been computed In accordance with HUD's regulations and adminletretive procedures and that alt required verifications were obtained. Warning to Owners end Tenants. By signing this toren, you ere indicating that you have read the above Privacy Act Statement and are agreeing with the applicable Certs icatlen. False Calm Statement, Warning: U.S, Code, Title 31, Section 3729, False Claims. provides a civil ponaity of not lase than 35,000 end not more than knowin0. nglyplus 3 makes, r ca sed to be used, damagess the amount V ialesy eoord or etatemGntn who n or conapiree o defraud the Goveowingly presents. or cousin to Pernment by getting e fala false or fraudulent ee or fravdru etm, or nl claim who allowed or pard. -:ti-0'. ;is-'..pfF4, Ij)ra ih rint,TA,;.\:0401sr4*I ittiiiiltr,� .x+p4�t'ir•-s• $1;iSY1 q4l', ;1,; t.!.':.", ;:fjlriq�I/t ,,. ... Effective 0910 Certillwtkvi Type Home of Project Unit Number 309 09rot12006 Annual Ruart(l&0llon ROSE OF MARY TERRACE Head of Household Asp Boston Total Tanani Payment �3en Assistance Noymont 14:•0 .. Tartest Runt 282 . '1�n�?(l•�ti�J�ri ^'41�j�::�:.� �- ��;':�:''ciU��RtSk�xd��� r i�(L�'�. ', IhM1 .i+ o. H f Household `f 41--1.4--"/(--) pato: r"T.( 11 I r i Other Adult Date: J....)) .� Spousal Co•Hoad Date: Other Adult Uatu: - 011ier Adult Oats Ulmer AdUIIa' timer Adult Dula Other Adult Oels: Other Adult Dote: Otter Adult OM: Ulmer noun Delo: Other Adult Oak: gtf5er AOUtI Dale: Other Adult 0.11: :,d,1w,'"w V `y,F;a iv\ fa -;,.ic':',1 !.s.r,•r:•: .: c, . -; .,,,!•...,--,-.:-.1.,).t.,..!... r,. ?a n.,, ., -,.....y. -7!J i! iiL `:. ''S4i7'r5;. IOn( ;44.:: '( ,,),-J 4.10...T8Jft; ,,ltdTr'.5;`;- Owner/Age Dela , 0 Chou( this box li Tanant.io u . e to sign for s leglarneta reason J Anticipated voucher Dm aarolh009 ` n form HUD -50059 (09/20081 Previous versions of Ihst fyh*r ars o4ealatis. This form also replaces FiU0-50060-D,-E,-F, & .0. HB 4350.3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing uui rcIDvtial ,.vvvlv. ..••- • ••-• •-. with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1.Project Name 13 Effective Date 09/01/2009 23 Unit Number 309 (309) ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 09/01/2009 24. No. of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 09/01/2010 25 Building ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 16. Project Move -In Date 09/01/2008 26.Unil Transfer Code 4.Property ID 17 Unit Move -in Date 09/01/2008 27 Previous Unit No. 5 Project Number 171EE023 18 Certification Type Annual Recertification 28 Security Deposit 347 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20 Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8 Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9 HUD -Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32. Utility Allowance 54 10.FIPS County Code 33 Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37 MI 38 Rel. 39 Sex 40 Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43 Special Status 44 I Student Status 45. ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48 Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Boesen Alice M H -Head F W 2 09/18/1940 E 530-24-8937 EC 68 02 - - 03 04 __ 05 _ _ 06 07 08 __ 50.Family 51.Family 52 Family is Mobility Impaired? is Hearing Impaired?_ is Visually Impaired? N N _ N__ 53.Number of Family Members _ 1 _ 54.Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Additio i - Adoption 0 58. Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59. Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents _ 0__ 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 63 Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name - - 64_Previous Head ID 61 Previous Head First Name 6.Previous Head Birth Date 62. Previous Head Middle initial Section D. Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66 Mbr No 67 Income Type Code 68 Amount 69 SSN Benefits Claim No 75 Mbr. No. 76 Description 77 Status 78. Cash Value 79. Actual early 80. ed Divese ted 01 Social Security 15,110 110 01 01 Bank of America - Checkin Bank of America • Savings C C 144 1 0 0 70.Total Employment Income 0 Value of Assets 145 81 Cash Income from Assets 0 71 Total Pension Income 15,110 82.Actual Passbook Rate 0.02HUD Pass 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 83. 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 73.Total Other Income 0 85.Asset Income 0 Total Non -Asset Income 15.110 74 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86 Total Annual Income 15 110 97 Deduction for Dependents 0 108 Total Tenant Payment 336 Income Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109 Tenant Rent 282 87 Low 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110 Utility Reimbursement 0 Low Income Limit 19 100 88.Very Extremely Low Income Limit 700. 3% of Income 453 111 Assistance Payment 146 89 90 Curren/ Income Status 101 Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 Universe Code 102.Disabilil Deduction 0 y 113.Hardship Exemption 91.Eligibilily Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 IndicatorExpense 103 Medical 1,726 114 Waiver Type Code 92 Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 1,273 93 94.Police/Security Tenant? 105. Elderly Family Deduction 400 Qualifier. 106.Total Deductions 1,673 95 Survivor of as Hnusehold Assistance Status N 107 Adjusted Annual Income 13,437 ____ , i, in cnncn Inn/7nnf\ ' Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G. Page 2 0 HB 4350.3 Rev 1 Feb U2 2UIU e: b F—'r1 I-11-' 1 tt<Jt I rr1A r • ,. y.. Jt Off 1.t s r 1 A r f1 '� o �. l.. `tr t; `' 1 V '. ,i 'I. e ""j. '`": }Y ifiic.:. . b „ .J I y tid�{',{'Wac.l� • , I,I�;ir', l ril:i; . 1 ) fir. �>-..., t1,1 I Y '+; rt item:: ,<; ii r 1 • ;;.C`,.•. •• lff T'I1$I. `` *.k•rii:.� '1 i'• 7, t ,4 1:: �t�.�.�� n (�y (1l�i • • Ih.l I If mmtk1.lt, ', V.11 .. 1 J•,� Jh ,. �,. it`i . t%.91411r I u'. 11lac'. ,. .r. ark . e E�,r�c . 1 , `.. 1 1' �AlSI ".'• :'1, y ;I I!!" ti:...ill;. I1 'fit �. n 1 ,�!' 1 r 1�1 .:'-r11.'.1 ll 1°'' , ,gyp• IItt I �,I�,tlfi. U 1. '. t'''Mil. 1_•�I _fir t 11 'ti'e'r •'1 � e � ;ii?a_ .y y{. I ,i� f�WJ.� .` e►l tAl ! as� � Y1 +1 111 t11 I�' ` ,", .. , ,:, ...+/.!`Ill 1s.:1 11 I: 4>3 l;t` E. 1I,,, ', ....,, 1 ,'1: ti • � t 4BAEM:. hlt����rYi�ti fi+, hl. tri u'. Reed this before you complete and sign thia form HUD Public Reporting Burden. The reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average for reviewing InatructIona, eearching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the date needed, Information. Send comments regarding thin burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of Information burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (28020204),Waehington, by HUD to determine en applicant's eligibility, the recommended unit size, and the amount the tenant(,) Information to sestet In managing certain HUD properties, to protect the Government's financial interest, furnished. HUD or a Public Housing Authority (PHA) may conduct a computer match to verify the Information released to appropriate Federal, $tate, and local.agencies, when relevant, and to civil, criminal, or regulatory Information will not be otherwise disclosed or releaaad outside of HUD, except as permitted or required requested, Induding the Social Security Numbers (SSNs) you, and ell other household family members the SSNs of all family members age six (8) years and ceder is mandatory; not providing the SSNs will affect Information may result In a delay or rejection of your eligibility approvvl. Privacy Act Statement, The Department of Houteng,and Urban Development (HUD) is authorized to of 1937, es amended (42 U.S.C, 1437 et, eeq.); the Housing and Urban -Rural Recovery Act of 1983 (P.L. Development Technical Amendments of 1984 (P.L. 98-479); and by the Housing and Community Development Tenent(e ' Certiflaatian - 1/We certify that the Information in Sections C, D, and E of this toren are true and belief, ItWe underatsrnd that 1/we can be fined up to $10,000, or Imprisoned up to five years, or loae increased, If Itve furnish false or incomplete Information. Owner's Certification • 1 certlty that this Tenant's eligibility, rent and eeeletence payments have been and adminlatretive procedures and that all required verifications were obtained. Warning to Owners and Tenants. By signing thta form, you are Indicating that you have read the above the applicable Certification. False Claim Statement Warning: U.S. Code, Title 31, Section 3729, False Claims, providea a civil penalty 310,000, plus 3 times the amount of damages for any person who knowingly preaenta, or causes to be knowingly malas, or caused to be ueed, a fele° record or statement; or conspires to defraud the Government allowed or paid -80059 58 minutes per response, Including the erne and completing and reviewing the collection of including euggestione for reducing this DC 20803. The Information le being collected must pay toward rent and utilities. HUD ease thta and to verify the accureoy of the Information you provide. This Information may ba Inveettgatore and prosecutors. However, the by law. You must provide all of the Information age ale (8) yearn and older, have and use. Giving your eligibility, Failure to provide any collect thle information by the U.S. Housing Act 08.181); the Housing and Community Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3543). and complete to the beat of my/our knowledge the subsidy HUD pays and have my/our rent computed in accordance with HUD's regulations Privacy Act Statement and ere agreeing with of not tela than $5,000 and not more than presented, a false or fraudulent claim; or who by getting a teles or fraudulent claim Q� i i.. ^<I� -•..r,. �y., t +�y.q '.,( flR:i�111Ni13iM�,y:�..F'Pli'�k1I1��f17111t��:n:Jr,.�:...�: I l I , ::1'''v '.w 7n rll'r..tl, :'I:I:"T L ' I1pIry n00 r Y '•"",ge :`, a 1' ;ft'' >if;iA9#tFrt�r�1,15� �11(rt t�..t:NIR;. ,� �•l.dl,itti;;��.•._• {� �� � q r��(j� „ P1bt3 ) 1 lip, AIRF' YIV"Sill' Thillik � ��1`�yl�ttl�l{l •!,,L,1„, Q 'r"tv, m tt�i f • '1 VIkl4 Y7i trop„ ,rY•'r Name of Project ROSE OF MARY TERRACE Unit Number 310 EtfeCttve Date 11(01/2009 Curt Actaeon 'Type Annual Recertification Head of Household Marjorie Metcalf Total Tenant Payment 343 Aeeielants Payment 139 Tenant Rant s 13i�.il2,��J�U}l l��RI1 :IjLt'��`'f`��',"i 'tir`-11111Qggfilffl'1ai0. .i ill all. •MI IlatoilIti(t{liili yrti-SNtrT:1* pli4!:i,1N�(l}pi��a?4 f Hou@hoid • / j/ Date: r' 07 Other Adut Data: Spousal Head ' Date: Other Adult Date; Other Adult Date: OtherAduk note• Dinar Aault Data: Other Adult Dan: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Date: Other Adult Dela: Other Adult Date, Other Adult Date. Other Adult Date: er ,,..,,1y»c,n4.—'''''1'!'‘'"'.''":-r.'1',•1 +VluYd,,:.T, p:. r-...:1.•,,: >,r .,.::._ 11i)•;%,.1.�vr.r't'i1f:<.;I;:u,I..Nitr:�rrt�aitr;ii�.t�+tiri _ : ,.,,•:n,-;, ,f •.. l II Ir' : ; �� igr 4if 'a���l;�ali:i�t$�i: 1. i l"fil th i4 i!1} i .1 01Nnr/' • ' //, • -�/.6 4 Kl• 7028 'O .... III Check this box If Tens Is r'• a to elan fora legitimate re: • /<..., Anticipated voucher Date 11/01/200a ui irt_enri n r nnevlAt Previous versions of this form are obsolete. Tile form also replaces HUD -30069 -D, -E, -F, & -O. age 1 of 2 HB 4350,e Rev 1 for Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not Submission to the Federal Government with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1.Project Name 13. Effective Date 11/01/2009 23,Unil Number 310 (310) ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15.Next Recertification Date 11/01/2010 25.Building ID 3 Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move -In Date 11/01/2008 26.Unit Transfer Code 4.Property ID 17 Unit Move -in Date 11/01/2008 27.Previous Unit No. 5 Project Number 171EE023 18.Certification Type Annual Recertification 28.Security Deposit 315 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29.Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20.Correction Type 30.Market Rent 8.Plan of Action Code 21 Cert.Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9 HUD -Owned Project. NO 22 Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10 FIPS County Code 33.Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12.Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36. First Name 37 MI 38 Rel. 39 Sex 40. Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43 Special Status 44 Student Status 45. ID Code (SSN) 46. Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48. Age at Cert. 49. Work Codes 01 Metcalf Marjorie A H -Head F W 2 04/25/1933 EH 531-30-5383 EC 76 02 03 - 04 - _ 05 06 _ 07 • _ 08 50. Family 51.Family 52.Family is Mobility Impaired? _ N__ is Hearing Impaired? N is Visually Impaired? N 53.Number of Family Members 1 __ 54 Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition - Adoption 0 58 Expected Family Addition - Pregnancy 0 59. Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55.Number of Dependents 0 56. Number of Eligible Members 1 63.Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name - - 64.Previous Head ID 61.Prewous Head First Name 65.Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D. Income information Section E. Asset Information 66. Mbr No 67 Income Type Code 68. Amount 69 SSN Benefits Claim No. 75. Mbr. No. 76. Description 77 Status 78. Cash Value 79 Ac�ncomYee arly 80 Date Divested 01 01 Social Security Social Security 578 13 534 01 01 Wells Fargo - Checking Wells Fargo - Savings C C 11 0 0 0 Total Employment Income 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 11 70 71 Total Pension Income 14,112 82.Actual Income from Assets 0 002 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 Passbook Rate 83.HUD0 Other Income 0 84.Imputed Income from Assets 0 73.Total Total Non -Asset Income 14,112 85 Asset Income 74 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 14,112 97. Deduction for Dependents 0 108 Total Tenant Payment 343 86 Total Annual Income 0 109.Tenant Rent 2b9 Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 87.Low Income 88. Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110.Utility Reimbursement 0 Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 423 111,Assistance Payment 139 89.Extremely Current Income Status 101 Disability Expense 0 112 Welfare Rent 0 90 Universe Code 102. Disability Deduction 0 113. Hardship Exemption 9 i.Eligibilily 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Medical Expense 203 114 Waiver Type Code 92 Sec. Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 0 93 Tenant? 105.EIderly Family Deduction 400 94.Police/Security 400 Survivor of Qualifier? 106 Total Deductions 95 Status N usted Annual Income 13,712 107.Adjusted i Assistance n..,... ' „f 0 form HUD -50059 (09/2008) Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Oct 02 2009 3: 15PH HF }SERJET FHX p, 10 m!1 o: ' l 1._ 1�,., n ,t� �. lot r • ':;!(;y' (' . Irti ail t� , t��' �,,S � '. y •. a"h . :�,. ,t;,:; �( '' ut, 1 � �t',,:�)� 7�l i:�11�::. 1 (�:l iY ,7A Ja tv I• fit •pf�t."' .�?.� .)' J , a .'., t' Ile , r*' P : tl••' y,airr r,' .4< � r+' _ ,'I. r tiL� l.+ k a • ' s�', L•i,�t'n�_ . • , t ` ' 11' �} I. G`, 1l: ., '? �f4p� t ..Pl.:h. ld: ii , ; Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G age t o HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Owner's Certification of Compliance U.S. Department of Housing For Personal Records ONLY - not for with HUD's Tenant Eligibility And Urban Development Submission to the Federal Government and Rent Procedures Office of Housing Record for Landlords Federal Housing Commissioner Section B. - Summary Information 1 Project Name ROSE OF MARY TERRACE 13.Effective Date 11/01/2009 23 Unit Number 314 (314) 14.Anticipated Voucher Date 11/01/2009 24.No. of Bedrooms 1 2.Subsidy Name Section 202 PRAC 15 Next Recertification Date 11101/2010 25 Budding ID 3. Secondary Subsidy Type 16.Project Move -In Date 11/13/2008 26 Unit Transfer Code 4 Property ID 17 Unit Move -in Date 11/13/2008 27 Previous Unit No 5 Project Number 171EE023 18.Certitication Type Annual Recertification 28 Security Deposit 290 6 Contract Number WA19S051004 19.Action Processed 29 Basic Rent 0 7 Telecom Address TRACM08055 20 Correction Type 30.Market Rent B.Plan of Action Code 21 Cert Correction date 31 Contract Rent 428 9.HUD-Owned Project? NO 22.Prev Subsidy Type 32.Utility Allowance 54 10 FIPS County Code 33 Gross Rent 482 11 Previous Housing Code Standard 12 Displacement Status Not Displaced Section C. Household Information 34 No. 35 Last Name 36 First Name 37 MI 38 Rel 39 Sex 40 Race 41 Eth. 42. Birth Date 43 Special Status 44 Student Status 45 ID Code (SSN) 46 Elig. Code 47 Alien Reg. Number 48 Age at Cert. 49 Work Codes 01 Jameson Wilma H -Head F W 2 05/24/1936 E 511-30-5394 EC 73 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 4 - 50.Family 51 Family is Mobility Impaired'_N _ is Hearing Impaired? N 53 Number of Family Members _ 1 54,Number of Non -Family Members 0 57 Expected Family Addition Adoption 0 58 Expected Family Addition -Pregnancy 0 59 Expected Family Addition - Foster Children 0 55 Number of Dependents 0 56.Number of Eligible Members 1 52 Family is Visually Impaired'? N_ 63.Previous Effective Date 60.Previous Head Last Name 64 Previous Head ID 61.Previous Head First Name 65.Previous Head Birth Date 62.Previous Head Middle Initial Section D Income Information Section E. Asset Information 66 Mbr No. 67 Income Type Code 68 Amount 69 SSN Benefits Claim No 75. Mbr. No 76. Description 77 Status 78 Cash Value 79 Actual Yearly Income 80 Date Divested 01 Social Security 12,269 01 01 01 01 Ameriprise Financial - IRA Amenprise Financial - Cas Bank of America - Checkir Bank of America - Savings 0000 2,956 1,130 1,181 0 38 3 0 0 0 81 Cash Value of Assets 5.267 70 Total Employment Income 12,269 82 Actual Income from Assets 41 71 Total Pension Income 0 83 HUD Passbook Rate 0 02 72.Total Public Assistance Income 0 84 Imputed Income from Assets 105 73 Total Other Income 74 Total Non -Asset Income 12,269 85 Asset Income 105 Section F. Allowances & Rent Calculations 86.Total Annual Income 12,374 97.Deduction for Dependents 0 108.Total Tenant Payment 259 87 Low Income Limit 30,500 98 Child Care Expense(work) 0 109 Tenant Rent 205 88.Very Low Income Limit 19,100 99 Child Care Expense(school) 0 110.Utility Reimbursement 0 89 Extremely Low Income Limit 100 3% of Income 371 111.Assistance Payment 223 90 Current Income Status 101 Disability Expense 0 112.Welfare Rent 0 91 Eligibility Universe Code 102.Disability Deduction 0 113.Hardship Exemption 92.Sec. 8 Assist. 1984 Indicator 103.Med cal Expense 2,000 114 Waiver Type Code 93.Income Exception Code 104.Medical Deduction 1,629 94 Police/Security Tenant? 105.Elderly Family Deduction 400 95 Survivor of Qualifier's 106 Total Deductions 2,029 96. Household Assistance Status N 107.Adjusted Annual Income 10,345 .. .--- .. In rnnrn ,nein nno1 Previous versions of this form are obsolete This form also replaces HUD -50059 -D, -E, -F, & -G age t o HB 4350 3 Rev 1 Final FY 2009 Fair Market Rent Documentation System The Final FY 2009 Yakima, WA MSA FMRs for All Bedroom Sizes The following table shows the Final FY 2009 FMRs by unit bedrooms Final FY 2009 FMR Final FY 2009 FMRs By Unit Bedrooms Efficiency $480 One - Bedroom $563 Two - Bedroom $728 Three - Bedroom $959 Four - Bedroom $1,011 Final FY 2010 Fair Market Rent Documentation System The Final FY 2010 Yakima, WA MSA FMRs for All Bedroom Sizes The following table shows the Final FY 2010 FMRs by unit bedrooms Final FY 2010 FMRs By Unit Bedrooms Efficiency Final FY 2010 FMR $494 One - Bedroom $580 Two - Bedroom $750 Three - Bedroom $988 Four - Bedroom $1,042 City ofYa ©ff ce o f N D eveto-p vitont- Se rvCce4y PROJECT. Tapia ADDRESS: 1312 S. 8TH ST. NO. OF UNITS. 2 Project Compliance Report: Rental Housing No. OF HOME UNITS: 1 Date: January 20, 2010 REPORTING PERIOD: JANUARY 2009 TO DECEMBER 2009 Unit No Tenant Name # Persons # of Bedrooms Date of Last Income Cert. Rent Allowance Utility Allowance Max Rent Monthly Unit Rent Tenant's Annual Gross Income Compliance YIN? Unit Status (PJ Only) F Reviewer: Date: ,:3/ / v , 2010 c FEB 2 5 2010 OFFICE OF NEIGHBORF ' DEPARTMENT (. �OMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Office of Neighborhood Development Services 112 South Eighth Street Yakima, Washington 98901 Phone (509) 575-6101 • Fax (509) 575-6176 Inspection Date 4/12/10 Time 430 pm Realtor Phone HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS, CODE REQUIREMENTS AND DETERIORATED PAINT VISUAL ASSESSMENT INSPECTION CHECKLIST HOMEBUYER Victor Tapia SELLER: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1312 S 8tt' St. PROPERTY AGE SECTION ONE: BUILDING EXTERIOR PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Condition of foundation ,„�� 2 Condition of roof e'er 3 Condition of stairs, rads, & porches l 4 Condition of exterior surfaces (siding, soffit, etc) / �/ 5 Condition of chimney N(j¢ 6 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered r/ L37 o" 0 o SECTION TWO: BUILDING SYSTEMS PASS AiL COMMENTS 1 Heating equipment V 2 Ventilation/Cooling 3 Water heater l 4 Rough plumbing 4 5 Sewer f 6 Electrical service/Wiring 7 Smoke Detectors 0/. c' 0 o o • LiViNG ROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition V 2 Window condition 3 Door condition l 4 Electrical fixtures 4 5 Ceiling condition f 6 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 0/. c' 0 o o • s KITCHEN vv�_ — PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 .Floor condition 2 Window condition 3 Door condition / 4 Electrical fixtures 4 5 Sink condition / 6 Cabinet/Countertop conditions 7 Ceiling condition 8 Wall condition 9 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered / c+' �/ a' o o o SECTION FIVE: BATHROOM PASS FAIL COMMENTS SECTION SiX: LAUNDRY ROOM/UTILITY ROOM: PASS 1 Floor condition ,. 1 Floor condition i' 7 2 Window condition te. 2 Window condition A//1$ 3 Door condition / 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 4 Electrical fixtures/Ventilation 4 Electrical fixtures/Ventilation . 5 Toile! condition n., -"- j6 5 Ceiling condition / 6Wash basin/Laboratory conditions % 6 Wall condition ...."- 7 Tub or shower unit condition / 7 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered I. rj o7 7 Ceiling condition /7 8 Wall condition 7 9 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 0/7 i 0.°7 [J 0 o SECTION SiX: LAUNDRY ROOM/UTILITY ROOM: PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition i' 7 2 Window condition A//1$ .7- 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 4 Electrical fixtures/Ventilation . ,7 5 Ceiling condition / ,.---- /7 6 Wall condition ...."- i t?'---- V 0 0 7 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered I. rj o7 0 o o SECTION SEVEN: BEDROOM NO l: location N I,t.O PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floorcondition i' 7 2 Window condition 3 Door condition .7- 3 Door condition 4 Electrical fixtures 4 Electrical fixtures 5 Ceiling condition ,7 5 Ceiling condition 6 Wall condition ,.---- /7 6 Wall condition 7Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered i t?'---- V 0 0 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered BEDROOM NO 2: location j\-iij PASS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Window condition / 3 Door condition // 4 Electrical fixtures I 5 Ceiling condition 6 Wall condition 7 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling h) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered V re/ Li7 0 0 0 • BEDROOM NO 3: location PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Window condition / 3 Door condition1 // 4 Electrical fixtures I 5 Ceiling condition 6 Wall condition 7 Condition of paint. a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered 0 0 o 0 • DINING ROOM OR DINING AREA PAS FAIL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition 2 Window condition / 3.Door condition // 4 Electrical fixtures Ceiling condition PASS FAiL COMMENTS 6 Wall condition ,% 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered EV ;,y/ r✓ 00 n r 1 2 Potentially hazardous features SECTION ELEVEN: OTHER ROOM: location PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Floor condition ,% 2 Window condition 2 Potentially hazardous features 3 Door condition ,A /- A___ 4 Electrical fixtures /d/� /� J ❑ o 11 5 Ceiling condition J 6 Wall condition / of Gam 0 o 7 Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose . c) adequately treated or covered 0 0 r -i ❑ ❑ SECTION TWELVE: ENTRIES, HALLWAYS OR STAIRCASES: PASS FAiL, COMMENTS 1.Floor condition ,% 2 Door condition 2 Potentially hazardous features 3 Electrical fixtures /- A___ 4 Ceiling condition 3 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered J ❑ o 11 5 Wall condition .(.7.- /6i 6Condition of paint a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered / of Gam 0 o SECTION THIRTEEN: UNHABITABLE ROOMS: PASS FAiL COMMENTS 1 Electrical conditions 2 Potentially hazardous features �1 A___ 3 Condition of paint: a) cracking, scaling, or peeling b) chipping or loose c) adequately treated or covered J ❑ o 11 El o ❑ SECTION FOURTEEN: SUMMARY OF INSPECTION PASS VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF DETERIORATED ]PAINT: „FATE, (If failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint see Section 15 on next page) IN CTOR SIGNATURE SECTION FIFTEEN: A"H' ATE Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint• Failed Inspection Section number. Evaluation Results: Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices. Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint: Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results: Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices Failed Visual Assessment of Deteriorated Paint• Failed Inspection Section number: Evaluation Results Recommended Repairs Using Safe Work Practices. tract and Subcontract Activity U$. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No. 2577-0088 OMB Approval No. 2502-0355 c reporting burden: f this co}Izction of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching wasting data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The enation is voluntary HUD may not collect this mfomiation, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. utive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities st the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programa for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minonty Business Development. if the nation is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. icy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or :d outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your corsets, except as required or permitted by Law mice/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency if 2. Location Ci State ZipCode) (City, if Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 IH CPD Housing one of Comae' Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Phone Number (including Arca Code) (509) 5756101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep 30, 26(} 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs) See orptarmnon of Codes at bosom o Page Use a swanatc sheet for each program code 6, nue Sut+mivul to field 10/8/2010 Project Number or 11130 ase Number or odor eii cation of propmy, , 'welling unit, etc n. Amount of Contract or Suboorract 7b. Type of Trade Code (Sec below) 7c. Contractor or Subcontractor Business Racial/Fttmic (Sec below) 7d. Wotan Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Prier Coteranor lderaiftcauon (ID) Number 10. Sec. 3 7g Subcontractor Idaailication (ID) Nurturer 76 Sec. 3 7i. Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j. ) Name Street City Stale Zip 1-10-MC530008 $1,514.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslet's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 81,406.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 82,380.40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bostets Paintig; 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 $2,164.00 I 1 N 91-1417773 Boslets Painting_ 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 81,623.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslets Paining;501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 81,644.64 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosleta Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10-MC530008 $1,623 00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10.MC530008 53,841 101 1 N 91-1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-l0-MC530008 $1,947.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boater's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10-MC530008 82,164.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslet'a Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $1,947.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Basleta Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $1,655.46 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosleta Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $2,705.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pune Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 I-10-MC530008 83,246.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslets Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 81,947.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bailer's Painting 501 W Pune Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 t-10-MC530008 82,055.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 _ Boelats Painting _ 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 S33,866.60 W wvuruction ucatiodfrawinn w 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Public Housing: = Ncw Curauuctian 6 = Professional 2 = Substamral Rehab. 3 = Repair 4 = Service 5 = Project Mang_ 7= Taira Services 8= Education/Training 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 0=Other 7d: Raclai/Etbnic Codes: = Whin Americans 2 = Blade Americans 3= Native Americans 4 = Hispanic Americans 5= Asian/Pacific Americans 6= Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): 1 = All Insured, including Section8 2= Flexible Subsidy 3 = Section 8 Noninsured Non-HFDA 4 = maned (Manmgansrd) 5 = Section 202 6 = HUD -Held (Maaagcrtem) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #1 IS editions are obsolete. form HUD -2516 (8/98) tract and Subcontract Activity 1 S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval Ne, 2577-0088 OMB Approval No 2502-0355 c reporting burde this 9ollection of information is estimated to average .5 hears per response, including the time for reviewing mstrructions, searcbutg existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The [nation is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this Conn, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. wive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities sr the total program activity and the designated minority business enterpnse (MBE) goals- The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development If the nation is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals icy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Secuon 1701 et seq., and regulation It will not be disclosed or si outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your corset , except as required or permitted by Law mice/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Budder/Agency if. 2. Location Ci State ZipCode) (City, sf Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 IH CPD Housing eine of Contact Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Phone Number (Including Arca Code) (509) 575-6101 4. ReportingPeriod 2[2{� April 1, 2010 - Sep 30, 5. ProgramCode (Not applirsble for CPD programs.) explanation of Coad pr ugam hof Pege Usc a Sec ratesheet separate shut far cads " 6. Dare Snxtannxed in Field 10/8/2010 Project Number or HUD ase Number or other Sification of property, 'welling ural, etc. Amount of Cordran or Subcatact 7b. Type of Trade Code (Sec below) 7c. Contractor or Subcontractor Busuiess Racial/Ethnic (Sec below) 74. Woman Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Prime Cortrscuu Identification (ID) Number 7f. Sec. 3 7g Subcontractor Identification (ID) Number 78 Sec 3 7i. Contactor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j Name Street City State Zip 3-10-MC530008 $2,705.00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 $2,813 20 1 1 N 91-1417773 Bosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3.10-MC530008 $1,623 00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 $5,301 80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 $3,029.60 1 1 N 91-1417773 lSosler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 81,298.40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boster's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 $3,678.70 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boslet's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 82,596.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $1,514.80 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3- I 0-MC530008 $7,249 40 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $6,297.24 1 1 N 91-1417773 Hostel's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 3-10-MC530008 $2,164 00 1 1 N 91-1417773 Boiler's Painting 501 W Pine Hollow Rd Union Gap WA 98903 1-10-MC530008 $1,352.50 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S Seth Ave Yakima WA 98902 L 10-MC530008 $1,514.80 1 I N 9 1-1 806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 1-10-MC530008 $2,272.20 1 I N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 8 91h Ave Yakima WA 98902 1-I0-MC530008 $3,462 40 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 $48,873.84 w Loiatmaxon ucatia✓frainimr her 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Pnblk Housing: 6 = Professional 1 = New Cmanrction 2 = Substantial Rehab. 7 = Repair 4 = Service 5 = Pro)ca Mangt. 7 = Taunt Services 8= Educarron/Trauurt 9= Arch../F_ngig Appraisal 0 = Other 7d: Raclal/Etbalc Coder: 1= White Americans 2 = Blade Americans 3 = Native Amines 4 = Hlspmxic Ameriaxs 5= Asian/Pacific Americans 6= Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and l e Ail insured, including Scdrons 2= Flexible Subsidy 3= ScWWoo 8 Noninsured Non-HFDA 4 = Maned (Management) t) Indian Housing programs only): 5 = Section 202 6 = HUD -Held (Management) 7 = Pubhc/Indra Housing 8= Scctron811 PAGE #2 us editions arc obsolete. form HUD -2516 (8/98) tract and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No 2577-0088 OMB Approval No. 2502-0355 reporting bard:t:`fr 2 Ihia.go(lection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The nation is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. utive Orders datr.d July 14, 1983, directs the Minonty Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The tnformahon is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities st the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of nunority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development If the nation is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. icy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Adrnauetrationh, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or d outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or pennitted by Law mtee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency Check if 2 Location (City, State Zip Code) if Yakima, Neighborhood Development Services Pli Yakima, WA 98901 111 CPD Housing me of Conan Person Archie M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b. Phone Number (Includmg Arca Code) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 2a) 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a separate sheet for each program code. 6 Date Submitted to Field 10/8/2010 Project Number or HUD Ise Number or aha ailication of property, 'welling unit etc a. Amount of Cantu or Subcuruact 7b Type of Trade Code (See below) 2c. Coranctor or Subcontractor Business RaciaVFutnic (Ste below) 7d. Woman Owned Business (Yes or No) 7e Prime Contractor Identfficatlou (ID) Number 7f. Sec. 3 7g. Subcontractor Identification (ID) Number 7h Sec 3 7i Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7J Name Street City State Zip I-10-MC530008 $4,878.74 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakma WA 98901 1-10-MC530008 $4,358 301 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Frutivale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 1-10-MC530008 $2,932.22 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yakuna Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 l-10-MC530008 $1,921.63 1 1 N 91-2116595 Yaldma Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 l-10-MC530008 94,292 301 1 N 91-2116595 Yakima Glass 1103 Fruitvale Blvd Yakima WA 98901 1-10-MC530008 93,129 14 1 1 N 26-3028850 Gamache & Sippola Heating 4415 Terrace Hgts Dr Yakima WA 98901 1-10-MC530008 $4,652 60 1 1 N 26-3028850 Gamache & Stppola Heating 4415 Terrace Hgts Dr Yakima WA 98901 I-l0-MC530008 $1,716.05 1 1 N 93-1125539 AAA MaxuConstr xm 5808A Shmitvtew #169 m Yakima WA 98908 1-10-MC530008 $1,623.00 1 1 N 93-1125539 AAA Maxxum Constr 5808A Surunitview #169 Yakima WA 98908 1-10-MC530008 85,648.04 1 1 N 91-2083592 Superior Roofing 608 N 20th Ave Yakima WA 98902 1-10-MC530008 $2,249 48 1 1 N Trepanier Excavation 17001 Summit sew Rd Cowiche WA 98923 t-10-MC530008 $4,530.331 1 N 82-0557566 Central Mechanical 619 West "J" St Yakima WA 98902 $41,931.83 w Lu emiction ucation/framine ter 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Housing/Public Housing: l = Now Caniiruction 2 = Substantial Raub. 3 = Repair 4 = Service 5 = Projcn Mangt 6 = Professional 7 = Tenant Services 8= Education/Training 9= Arch/figrg Appraisal 0= Other 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: I = White Americans 2 = Blank American 3= Naive Arnenoans 4 = His rntc Amuicans 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): 1= All Insured including Seuion8 2= Flaublc Subsidy 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-EWDA 4 = hatred (Management) 5 = Section 202 6 = HUD -Held (Management) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #4 IS editions are obsotcre. form HUD -2516 (8/98) tine[ and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development repotting burs, � -ajs iiotiection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The Cation is voluntary HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. eve Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities t the total program activity and the designated nunority business enterprise (M130) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of nunonty business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development. If the Lotion is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goats nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals. try Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, n authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or i outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consent, except as required or permitted by taw OMB Approval No. 257 /-OtRW UMb Approval No 2502-0355 nice/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency Check if: 2 Location (City, State Zip Code) f Yakima Neighborhood Development Services PH Yakima, WA 98901 IH CPD Housing me of Conan Pcnan Arsine M. Mathews, ONDS Manager 3b Phone Number (Including Arca Codc) (509) 575-6101 4. Reporting Period April 1, 2010 - Sep. 30, 2) 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See ealanlion of Codes at bottom of Page Use a senate shed for wch program code. 6. Dae submitted lo Field 10/8/2010 'mien Number or HUD sc Number or other 410ation of property, 'welling =It etc. 'a Amours of Contras or Subcontan 7b. Type of Trade Code (See below) 7c, Contractor or Subcontractor Business Raeral/F.t sic (See below) 7d. Woman Owned Business (Yes or No) 7c. Prinz Contractor Identification 9D) Number 7f. Sec. 3 7g. Subcontractor Identification (ID) Number 7h Sec. 3 71. Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7 J _ - ,. Name Street City State Zip -10-MC530008 $2,648 74 1 1 N 91-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 83,137.80 1 1 N 91.-1806992 Action Rooter 1510 S 9th Ave Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $2,645.49 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+Conatrucnon 1611 Sumurutview Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $6,596 95 I 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Stutunitview Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $3,451.581 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Sui mutnew Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $4,641 78 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Surmmtnew Yakima WA 98902 -I0-MC530008 88,702.52 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Cons!rucbon 1611 Surnmitnew Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $7,281.861 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Stmmutnew Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $5,593.94 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Surunitview Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $5,307.21 1 4 N 27-0695148 A+ Construction 1611 Sumnutview Yakima WA 98902 -10-MC530008 $4,921.14 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $999 15 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $1,180.90 1 1 N 91-125724 LsndenElectric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $4,333.62 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Minnie Rd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 85,934.66 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 -10-MC530008 $3,116 16 1 1 N 91-125724 Linden Electric 9401 Mieras Rd Yakima WA 98901 $70,493.50 w Lmsruaion caliornareiaut¢ ter 7c: Type of Trade Codes: Hous /Pubdk Lfaustng: I = Ncw Construction 6= Professional 2 = Substantial Rrhab. 3= Repair 4 = Service 5 = Project Mang. 7 = Taunt Services 8= EdscauaYrrainm¢ 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 0 = Other 7d: Raclal/Ethelc Codes: I = White Amancarn 2.= Black Americana 3 = Native Americom 4 = Hispanic Americans 5= Asian✓Paclftc Ameicusrs 6 = Hasidic Jews 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only): I = All Insured. including Segton8 2= Flexible Subsidy 3 =Section 8 Noninsured, Nai.LJFDA 4 = Insured (Management) 5 =Section 202 6 = HUD -Held (Marugenma) 7 = Public/India Housing 8 = Section 811 PAGE #3 is editions are obsolete. form HUD -2516 (8/98) a daily part of your life P O ➢OX 9668, YAKIMA, WASHINGTON 98909 (509)248-1251 INVOICE 10942 City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Dev Svcs 112 S 8th Street YAKIMA, WA 98901 (509)575-6101 02/13/11 Legal Advertising The Yakima Herald -Republic City of Yakima Office of Neigh 9 25 inches @ 513 42 per inch 1 Issues = $124 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON,) COUNTY OF YAKIMA DEBDIE MARTIN, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she/he Is the ACCOUNTANT of Yakima Herald -Republic, Inc , a daily newspaper Said newspaper is a legal newspaper approved by the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Yakima County under an order made and entered on the 13th day of February, 1968, and it is now and has been for more than six months prior co the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newpaper in Yakima, Yakima County, Washington. Said newspaper is now and has been during all of said time printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper That the annexed is a true copy of a City of Yakima Office of Neigh, it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper once each DAY and for a period of 1 DAYIS) to -wit; on the 13th day of FEBRUARY, 2011 and the such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 9124 14 Y IP ACCOUNTANT SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before jhe this l6tI fey of February, 2011 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yakima sorgnborno on DevelopServices (ONOS) 800120ST .OR PUBLIC [ OMMENT AND PU0110 hijE TING rhe City of Yairima, 011rce r1 Nergnoorhood Devel- q,ment Senrces011l pro• ede Ma 2010 Cons_¢Irdal/ •d_/ LIgal Perl°r mcg Ind Evaluation Report CAPERI for public review Ind comment his Consolidated Annual error and 102101- n Report es a summary it performances and a onVakmsCommunrSnon Me y .I ia' levelopmenl Olock Grant CDOG) and HOME In• mnl Partnership pro- selunded by the U. S teparlmenl of Mousing Hd Urban Development UD) for fiscal year 010. the lends expend.. d on mese programs are dmtntstered by the 011tce I Neighborhood Develop. lent Services. °pies 01 Il19 Consolldat- d Annual Performance nd Evaluation Report will e available starting Mon. ay, February 28, 2011 al 1a lollowi09 leca10/ 0' Crly ClerAs Olrrce, City Hall 129 N. 2,10 Suver, Yakrrna, WA 92901 Neighborhood Oeverop- 1e nr Services, 112 0 8111 Srreel, Yakima, WA 98901 nllen Public comment tele repot will be a - oed beglmmmg Monday, en,uary 28, 2011 qh 5:00 p rease ads orecomments the attention Archie Matthews, thew s, Man- or. 112 5. LiBt7t Street, WA 9990oh 0 1, '800110 Meeting rs heduted for March 2, 111 al 9:30 a.m. al Inn rklma City 11011 localed 129 N. 2nd Street, Vain. a. Washmglon 99901 the second floor in the ED Conlerenoe r addmonal in10rmal on Intact fne 011100 of :nghborhood Develop - Ser. 111 push 9th v1Site.50 0 call 011100 al (509) 575. 01 no Moderate income izens living within In 1k ma city limits raged l end, Re s . est l°r assistance under provisions °I the nertcans with Otsab111- sAct, Spanish Ir nsla. other scan made 1 advanceby Ipng or contacting us a1 abo.te address. 1550487) February 13, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) COUNTY OF YAKIMA ) DEBBIE MARTIN, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is the Accountant of El Sol de Yakima a weekly newspaper Published in the Spanish language continually as a weekly newspaper in Yakima, Yakima County, Washington Said newspaper is now and has been during all of said time printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper That the annexed is a true copy of a: CIUDAD DE YAKIMA which was published in the regular weekly issue (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper once each day and for a period of 1 day to -wit; on the 15TH day of FEB 2011 the day of FEB 2011 the day of FEB 2011 the day of FEB 2011 the day of FEB 2011 and the such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 100.05 I Accountant SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before r this 15TH day $ FEB 2011 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Yakima. Ciudad de Yakima Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades (ONDS) SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS Y AUDIENCIA PUBLICA La Ciudad de Yakima, Oficina de los Servicios de De- sarrollo de Comunidades va a proveer el Reporte de Evaluacidn y Consolidacion de Cumplimiento Anual del 2010 (CAPER) para el reviso y comentarios del publico. El Reporte de Evaluation y Consolidacion de Gumpli- miento Anual es un sumario de los cumplimientos del Ciudad de Yakima's programa Enganche del Desarrollo de la Comunidad (CDBG) y los programas de HOME Los fondos de CDBG y HOME para el•ano fiscal def 2010 son parte del Departamento del Desarrollo de Cu- bierta y Urbano de los Estados Unidos. Los Tondos ex- pendidos en programas fueron administrados por la Ofi- cina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades. Copias del Reporte de Evaluacidn y Consolidacion de Cumplimiento Anual van a ser disponibles empezando el tunes 28 de Febrero 2011 en las proximas localiza- ciones. Oficina de City Clerks, Oficina del Alcalde, 129 N 2nd St, Yakima WA 98901 Oficina de los Servicios Del Desarrollo de Comuni- dades, 112 S 8th St, Yakima, WA 98901 Comentario Publico Por Escrito en el reporte seran aceptados empezando el lunes 28 de febrero hasta el merles 15 de marzo 2011 a las 5:00 de la tarde. Favor de mandar comentarios a atencion Archie M. Mat- thews, ONDS Manager, 112 S th Street, Yakima, WA 98901 El horario de la Audiencia Publica es el 2 de Marzo del 2011 a las 9:30 de la manana en la Sala de Concilio de la Oficina del Alcalde localizado en 129 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA 98901 Para informacion adicional, por fa- vor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de los Servi- dos del Desarrollo de Comunidades localizado a 112 S th St o Ilamar al numero de telefono de la oficina a 509- 575-6101 Los ciudadanos de bajos mgresosmoderados que vi- ven dentro de los limites de la caudad de Yakima estan invitados a asistir Solicitud de asistencia bajo provi- sioner de la Actua de los Americanos con debilidades, traduccion en espanol, u otros servicios, por favor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de Servicios del De- sarrollo de Comunidades. (09556488) February 13, 2011 COMUNICADO PARA NOTIFICAR AL PUBLICO NO HABER ENCONTRADO IMPACTO EN EL AMBIENTE .. La Oficina de Servicios de Desarrollo de Vecindario de la Ciudad de Yakima 112 al sur de la Calle 8a, - Yakima WA. 98901 - (509) 575-6101 Archie M. Matthews, Director de ONDS A TODAS LAS AGENCIAS, GRUPOS Y PERSONAS INTERESADAS La arriba mencionada Oficina de Servicios de Desarrollo de Vecindario del Condado de Yakima en el Estado de Washington se propone sohcitar al Departamento de Urbanization y Vivienda de EUA (HUD por sus siglas en ingles) para liberar fondos Federales bajo el Programa Sohdario de Inversion en VIVIENDA (Titulo II del Acta de Vivienda Asequible Nacional Cranston -Gonzalez de 1990) para el siguiente proyecto. Proyecto de Vivienda Asequible al Norte de la Calle 3° Construccion de Casas Unifamiliares Residenciales Norte de Ia Calle 3a en Yakima, Washington aproximadamente a una cuadra al este de la ,intersection de la Calle "S". Parcelas numeros 191307-33523, 191307-33524, 192307-33525, 191307- "33527 y 191.307-33528. Costo total estimado $840,000 Esta actividad se Il'evarela cabo durante vanos a "nos. Ha side determinado; que tat solicited' para libe ar fondos no co'ristituira una accion que afecte srgnrficantemente la calidad; d'el 'ambiente humano y, de acuerdo con la antenormente mencionada Ciudad de. Yakima. se ha decidido no, preparar• una Declaration: de hilt? actc,Ambrentaf bald la Pohza Ainbiehtal Nacioha'V del Acta de 1969 - Un Registro de. Revision; Ambiental perteneciente a este proyecto fue hecho por la mencionada iud'ad`de Yakima en,cuyos•doeu:mentos.de.l"a; revision ainbiental•_del proyecto•esta'blece ampliamente as, razones+por lacualessla! declaracicliyoaes requerrda El-Registro•deRevision•Am'bienta'lse7encuentra •en•', • un ex4pediente• en, lac direction. seiralada con= a'nterioiidad y esfa disponible para e, am•rnacion y fotocopiado"publacos;}'enYu � fiarar'•io;de Sam a 5).pm de`lunes•a vierness t ci se ha' p opues o=l'a cond-uccion! de iiia"s evis ones ambientales para tai proyecto antendres a la.requerida::para la liberation -de f'' • os oridol;. ` Tod'a's la> agetieias g� t pos3y p'ersona's-ipteresadas ed d'Or a coiiocer su desacuerdo con. la, decision ue avala, la Inexistence x " ' _ - .. 9., j ia; dE Irrpac4 S ertifica lfei Oa 1Ayitedea a env ai sus coinQntangs% 4c.17 os par.,a cons deracre".ri del D reetor:de Servicios de Desarrollo de Vecindario'de Ia-Ciudad�!`deleYakima'. Todds los! eomentarios:-r:.ecibido`si alp sur•.Kde: la Calle 8" nue lero 112, Yakima, WA. 98901, a mal tardar- el d a; 2= de, marzo"d"e` 2011 se an.corisiderados: y la Oficina de Se`rvicios, de Desarrollo d'e. Veciridano de la Ciudad •d'e'Ya:bora' no solicitaraA Ia,`hbe"raeiori de fondos Federales o tomara, ninguna accion administrativa.Oda; relacion al.proyecto-.'ajntes de la fecha especificada en las'lineas precedences if* AD'OYPARANOTI:F1C`AR ACERCADE; OLICITIrn DE` ., ', , , fLII RACAQ?V DE F®PIDbS A TODAS' LAS'-AGENCIAS, GRUPOS Y PERSONAS INTERESADOS El3`d'e marzo'de' 201;1$ d.alreded'o de este dia, la Ciudad de Yakima sohcitara al Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de EUA la liberation de fondos Federales para el proyecto deserrto arriba. La Ciudad de'Yakima estd certi'ficando a HUD que la Ciudad de, Yakima y el jefe ejecutiv& u otro oficial de la Ciudad de Yakima aprobado por HUD en su capacidad oficial como el Director de la Ciudad de.Yak-ima, consrenten aceptar- la jurisdiction de las cortes Federales si toda accion es traidaa reforzar las responsabilidades=en relation a las.revisiones ambientales, tomando la decision, y accion, y que estas responsabihdades flan sido satrsfactorras. El efecto legal de la certification esta bajo su aprobacron, la Ciudad de Yakima podria usar fondos del Programa Solidario de Inversion en VIVIENDA, y HUD habra satrsfecho sus responsabilidades bajo la Palma Ambiental Nacional del Acta de 1969 y leyes y autondades relativas. HUD aceptara una objecron a su aprobacron de la liberation de fondos y aceptacion de la certification solo si no se trata de las siguientes bases: (a) Que la certification no fue ejecutada por el jefe ejecutivo u otro oficial de la entidad responsable aprobada por HUD-, o (b) que el Registro de Revision Ambiental de la entidad responsable del proyecto mdreara omrsion de una decision requenda, conclusrones o paso aphcable al proyecto en el proceso de repaso ambiental. Objeciones a la Liberation de Fondos deben estar preparadas y entregadas de acuerdo al procedimiento requendo (24 CFR Parte 58)'y puede ser drngido a HUD a John W Peters, Director de la Oficina de Planeacron y Desarrollo Comunitano Oficina de Planeacron y Desarrollo Comunitar"io de Ia Oficma Federal de Construccion de Seattle Avenida First numero 909, Suite 300 - Seattle, WA 98104-1000 Objeciones basadas en fundamentos distintos a los establecidos arriba no serail consideradas por HUD 'codas las objeciones deberan ser recibidas por HUD en 15 dias a partir de la fecha en que HUD recibe la solicitud de la Entidad Responsable para la liberation de fondos y certification, o dentro del perrodo especificado Pu'. .do en Viva el 24 de Febrero !� Legallohces k, City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND PUBLIC MEETING The City of Yakima, Office of Neighborhood Devel- opment Services will pro- vide the 2010 Consolidat- ed Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for public review and comment. This Consolidated Annual Performance and Evalua- tion Report is a summary of performance and ac- complishments on the City of Yakima's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and, HOME In- vestment Partnership pro- grams funded by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for fiscal year 2010. The funds expend- ed on these programs are administered by the Office of Neighborhood Develop- ment Services. Copies of the Consolidat- ed Annual' Pe"rforfnance and Evaluation Report{will be available starting; Mon- day, February 28; 201 Vat thefollowing locatio"ns: City Clerks Office, City Hat 129 N. 2ridStieet, Yakima, WA 98901 Neihborhood Develop- ment Services, 112 S. 8th Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Written •Public comment on the report will be ac- cepted beginning Monday, February28,, 2011 through 5:00, p:m. on Tuesday; .March 15, 2011 Ptease address comments to the attention of: Archie IN. Matthews, ONOS Man- ager, 112' St 8th Street, Yakima, WA 98901 A "Public Meeting" is scheduled for March 2, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. at the Yakima City Hall located at 129 N. 2nd Street, Yaki- ma, Washington 98901, on the sei:orid floor in the CED' Conference room. For additional information, contact the Office of Neighborhood Develop- ment Services at 112 South 8th Street or call our office at (509) 575- 6101 Low and Moderate income citizens living within the Yakima city limits are en- couraged to attend. Re- quest for assistance under the provisions of the Americans with Disabili- ties Act, ,Spanish transla- tion, or other services, can be made in advance by calling or contacting us al the above address. (09556487) February 13, 2011 F.:" 8' L e5' - zr fs" a u .;,,i•. s>i+CT �°'re�i . t7gp Sjf�eQF�leS_ Ciudad de Yakima Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades (ONDS) SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS Y AUDIENCIA PUBLICA La Ciudad de Yakima, Oficina de los Servicios de De- sarrollo de Comunidades va a proveer el Reporte de Evaluacion y Consolidacion de Cumplimiento Anual del 2010 (CAPER) para el reviso y comentarios del publico. EI Reporte de Evaluacion y Consolidacion de Cumpli- miento Anual es un sumario de los cumplimientos del Ciudad de Yakima's programa Enganche del Desarrollo de la Comunidad (CDBG) y los programas de HOME. Los tondos de CDBG y HOME para el ano fiscal del 2010 son parte del Departamento del Desarrollo de Cu- bierta y Urban() de los Estados Unidos. Los tondos ex- pendidos en programas fueron administrados por fa Ofi- cina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades. Copies del Reporte de Evaluacion y Consolidation de Cumplimiento Anual van a ser disponibles empezando el lunes 28 de Febrero 2011 en las proximas localiza- ciones. Oficina de City Clerks, Oticina del Alcalde, 129 N 2nd St, Yakima WA 98901 Oficina de los Servicios Del Desarrollo de Comuni- dades, 112 S 8th St, Yakima, WA 98901 Comentario Publico Por Escrito en el reporte seran acep4ados eritpezarido el Tunes 28 de febrero hasta el marts 15 de rna'rzo 2011 a las 5:00 de la tarde. Favor de' rriandar comentarios a atencion: Archie M. Mat- thews, ONDS Manager, 112 S th Street, Yakima, WA 98901 El h9rario de la Audiencia Pubtica es el 2 de Marzo del 2011 a Ias9:30 de la manana en la Sala de Concilio de fa Oficina de( Alcalde localizado en 129 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA 98901 Para infonnacion adicional, por fa- vor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de los Servi- cios del Desarrollo de Gomunidades localizado a 112 S th St o Ilamar al numero de telefono de la oficina a 509- 575-6101 I Los ciudadanos de bajos ingresos y moderados que vi- ven dentro de los limites de la ciudad de Yakima estan invitados a asistir Solicitud de asistenaa bajo provi- ;siones de la Acttia de los Americanos con debitidades, traduccion en espanol, u otros servicios, por favor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de Servicios del De- sarrollo de Comunidades. (09556488) February 13, 2011 CIUDAD DE YAKIMA Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades (ONDS) EMIL 1101.1206 o,.CITUSI,v SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS Y AUDIENCIA PUBLICA La Ciudad de Yakima, Oficina de los Servicios de Desarrollo de Comunidades va a proveer el Reporte de Eval'uacion y Consolidacion de Cumphmiento Anual del 2010 (CAPER) para el reviso y comentanos del publico. El Reporte de Evaluation y Consolidacion de Cumphmiento Anual es un sumario de los cumplimientos del Ciudad de Yakima's programa Enganche del Desarrollo de la Comunidad (CDBG) y los programas de HOME. Los fondos de CDBG y HOME para el ano fiscal del 2010 son parte del Departamento del Desarrollo de Cubierta y Urbano de los Estados Unidos Los fondos expendidos en programas fueron admimstrados por la Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comumdades. Comas del Reporte de Evaluation y Consolidacion de Cumplimiento Anual van a ser disponibles empezando el lunes 28 de Febrero 2011 en las proximas localizaciones. Oficina de City Clerks, Oficina del Alcalde, 129 N 2nd St, Yakima WA 98901 Oficina de los Servicios Del Desarrollo de Comunidades, 112 S 8th St, Yakima, WA 98901 Comentario Publico Por Escrito en el reporte serail aceptados empezando el lunes 28 de febrero hasta el martes 15 de marzo 2011 a las 5:00 de la tarde. Favor de mandar comentarios a atencion: Archie M. Matthews, ONDS Manager, 112 S th Street, Yakima, WA 98901. El horario de la Audiencia Publica es el 2 de Marzo del 2011 a las 9 30 de la manana en la Sala de Concilio de la Oficina del Alcalde localizado en 129 N 2nd St, Yakima„ WA 98901 Para information adicional, por favor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades localizado a 112 S th St o llamar al numero de telefono de la oficina a 509-575-6101 Los cludadanos de baps ingresos y moderados que viven dentro de los limites de la caudad de Yakima estan invitados a asistir Solicitud de asistencia bajo provisiones de la Actua de los Americanos con debilidades, traduccion en espafiol, u otros servicios, por favor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades Publicado en Viva el 17 de febrero 2011 NOTICE TO PUBLIC OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT The City ofYakima Offiee of NO0horbpp:d. Development Services 112 S. 8th Street, - Yakima WA. 98901 - (509) 5.75-6101 Archie M. Matthews, ONDS Manager TO ALL INTERESTED AGENCIES, GROUPS AND PERSONS The above-named eity ofNalOaa,NeighbarhOO-Develapment Seryiees of Ya,kimaCQUiltY in the State of Washington proposes to request the U.S. Ir.epartnient of Housing and Urban, Development (HUD) to release Federal fund's tinder the HOME Investment Partnerships Program ( Title 11 of the Cranston -Gonzalez National AffdrdablO Housing Act of 1990), for the fallowing project: N 3rd Street Affordable HoOgfig. Project . •,.- • . Constructioi of Single fathily residential homes North 3rd Street in Y.akinia, Washington approximately one block north of the East "Sr Street intersection. kareeli iniMbers 191307-33523, 191307-33524, 192307-33525, 191307-33521 and 191367-33.Mi Rt10ted totali cot $84. 01,060) Th:1`,$'.40:iii4Y.061$15'elgraria00* multiple years Its hs eenJeterkhiried that such request for release of fiinds will not constitute an action significantly effecting the quality of the human environment and accardinglY, the above named CitY'Of Yakiina3Ilisct0040t5401374601=0:airErivirOtimental Impact Statementunder the National •.. Environmental Poli4 ct of 1969' • An Environmental Review Record pertaining id this project has been made by the above,. • , - named City of Yakima **A, documents the envirannental review of the project and more - sets foth t4ei"04:** whv such st0t4*ritis not retlired. The Environmental Review Recordis on file ;4i the above ,.•4cir':.:'444tio is 04ii**for puthe examination and copying, upon request between the, hour' of 8am to 5 pm Ivi4fay *-44-404. No artheii of such 044ct is proposed to be conducted prior id) the request for release of funds. All interested agencies, groups and persons' disagreeing with this Finding of No Significant f131.0.40 decision are ipvited to vAifte'n C'tiiripentSi for consideration by the City of Yakinaa. Neighborhood Development Services Matag'ersAll such written comments so received at. 11:2:S 8th giroe, Yakima, WA i 98901 on or; before 2011$e.Oosicipred and the' Cif si of Yakima Neighborhood Development Servic0 will not request the rel'ease' of PederlmIncIOr fate Any administrative action pertaining to the prOjekt Pi-ior to the dale specified in the preceding sentence. NOTICE OF INTENT.To.NROEST RELEASE pF FUNDS' TO ALL INTERESTED' AppitiEs, GROUPS AND PERSONS Ono,' about Mareh. 3,4411', the Pity of Yakiraa,WOrequest-the U.S Department of Housing and Urban DeVeropinent, to releaaetEederaI funds for thei:iiiiiect described above. The City of Yakima is certifPig, to HUD that the city of Yakima and the, chief executive officer or other officer of the City of Yakima approved by HUD in his official capacity as the Yakima City Manager, consent to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts if all action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to environmental reviews, decision making, and action, and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. The /gal effect of the certification is that upon its approval, the City of Yakima may use the HOME Investment Nit nerShip Program funds, and HUD will have satisfied its responsibilities under the National Envirofinientat Policy Act of 1969 and related, laws and authorities. HUD will accept an objection to its approval of the release of funds and acceptance of the certification only if it is on one of the following bases: (a) That the certification was not in fact executed by the chief executive officer or other officer of the responsible entity approve& by HUD-, or (b) that the responsible entity's Environmental Review Record for the project indicated omission of a required decision, finding or step applicable to the project in the environmental review process. Objections to the Release of Funds must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedure (24 CFR Part 58) and may be addressed to HUD at John W. Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development Seattle Federal Office Building Office of Community Planning and Development 909 First Avenue, Suite 300 - Seattle, WA 98104-1000 Objections on bases other than those stated above will not be considered by HUD All objections must be received by HUD within 15 days from the time HUD receives the Responsible Entity's request for release of funds and certification, or within the time period specified whatever is later. Publicado en Viva el 17 de febrero egal1JOo ces`a Cityof Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Services (ONDS) REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND PUBLIC MEETING The City of Yakima, Office of Neighborhood Devel- opment Services will pro- vide the 2010 Consolidat- ed Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for public review and comment. This Consolidated Annual Performance and Evalua- tion Report is a summary of performance and ac- complishments on the City of Yakima's Community Development •Block Grant (CD,BG.) and HOME In- vestment Partnership pro- grams funded by the U. S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for fiscal year 2010. The funds expend- ed on these programs are administered by the! Offce of Neighboifiood Develop merit Services. Copies ofritl e:'Consofidat- ed Annuat-° Performance and Evaluation°Retyw poiill , be available staging Mon- day, February .28 20-11^; at the following locations: i Crc'y Clerks Office; City Hail .129 N. 2rid5ueet Yakima„WA,28901 NeighborhOlod Develop- ment Services, 112 S. 8th Street- Yakima, WA 93901 Written Public comment on the report will be ac- cepted beginning Monday, February 28,� ' 2011 ttirough S:00, p:m: on Tuesday;{ March .115; 2011 Please address comments to the attention of: Archie M4Matthew_s: ONDS` Man- ager„' 112 S; 8th Street, Yakima, WA`98901 A "Public Meeting” is scheduled for March 2, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. at the Yakima City Hall located at 129 N. 2nd Street, Yaki- ma, Washington 98901, on the second' floor in the CED Conference room. For additional information, contact the Office of Neighborhood Develop- ment Services at 112 South 6th Street or call our office at (509) 575- 6101 Low and Moderate income citizens living within the Yakima city limits are en- couraged to attend. Re- quest for assistance under the provisions of the Americans with Disabili- ties Act, .Spanish transla- tion, or other services, can be made in advance by calling or contacting us at the above address. (09556487) February 13, 2011 Ciudad de Yakima Oficina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades (ONDS) SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS Y AUDIENCIA PUBLICA La Ciudad de Yakima, Ofitina de los Servicios de De- sarrollo de Comunidades va a proveer el Reporte de Evaluacion y Consolidation de Cumplimiento Anual del 2010 (CAPER) para el reviso y comentanos del publico. El Reporte de Evaluacion y Consolidacidn de Cumpli- miento Anual es un sumario de los cumplimientos del Ciudad de Yakima's programa Enganche del Desarrollo de la Comunidad (CDBG) y los programas de HOME. Los tondos de CDBG y HOME para el ano fiscal del 2010 son parte del Departamento del Desarrollo de Cu- bierta y Urbano de los Estados Unidos. Los tondos ex- pendidos en programas f ueron admmistrados por la Ofi- cina de los Servicios del Desarrollo de Comunidades. Copies del Repone de Evaluacion y Consolidacidn de Cumplimiento Anual van a ser disponibles empezando el limes 28 de Febrero 2011 en las proximas localize- clones Oficina de City Clerks, Oficina del Alcalde, 129 N 2nd St, Yakima WA 98901 Oficina de los Servicios Del Desarrollo de Comuni- dades, 112 S 8th St, Yakima, WA 98901 Comentario Publico Por Escrito en et reporte seran aceptados empezando el tunes 28 de febrero hasta el martes 15 de marzo 2011 a las 5:00 de la tarde. Favor de mandar comentarios a atencion: Archie M. Mat- thews, ONDS Manager, 112 S th Street, Yakima, WA 98901 El horario de la Audiencia Publica es el 2 de Marzo del 2011 a las 9:30 de la manana en la Sala de Concilio de la Oficina del Alcalde localizado en 129 N 2nd St, Yakima, WA 98901 Para informacion adicional, por fa- vor de ponerse en contacto con la Oficina de los Servi- tios del Desarrollo de Comunidades localizado a 112 S th St o Ilamar al numero de telefono de la oficina a 509- 575-6101 i Los ciudadanos de bajos ingresos y moderados que vi- ven dentro de los limites de la ciudad de Yakima estan invitados a asistir Solititud de asistencia bajo provi- siones de la Actua de los Americanos con debilidades, 'traduccion en espanol, u otros servicios, por favor de ponerse en contado con la Oficina de Servicios del De- sarrollo de Comunidades. (09556488) February 13, 2011 City of Yakima Office of Neighborhood Development Seriricec (ONOS) REQUEST:FOR PUBLIC COMAAENT AND PUBVIC MEETING The City of Yakima; Office of Neighborhood Devel- opment $erviceS will pro- vide the.2010,C6iisdlidat- erl Annual Perfarifienee and.fi.Eyelbation 7Repod (CAPER). fpr lin review and carnment. I This Consolidated Annual Perforrnenberisd Evalua- tion ,OePprt",is: -surtimkity • of performance" ab cOmpli_Stirnerils.'bnikie,City 'of • Cie'Veldbip-ent.131dck7.Grant (CDBG) r117 veglitiertf:Eleitketity'p pre- : JratriS7!filfided. by the lif;!.‘. HpusingT 20)0`.. 11)'e7-itt(id,so.e_3coeric). ed,oli'ttieSez,*.pfpgi!ems,itire terfritiniStereitibV;tneiOffic..er t•CifrNeigh,bOrtioxid.:D.,evetOp'-; thCcno!idat- ed' Ani( ,;eT7fOrritenCe, aridiErii,*(Yaiii9rt *6,0112.04f be e(ia)lablir2Stirtingt Mon, day,,•F:etirCe'rjrg5lii2ptlff.at th ti.i;),WiitgACe?,,, I Citeljr.SiOfficeqty, Hoie,,19,70i:1§ 0trept, Yakiiti.,*0,08q0:1; Neijtitiqii,ipiikcydkjipp meriAqOrtiled§;1,:f?$.,8th Street,' Yakima; *I' - • -0.8976:t?' A uPubliC '',ilyleetir,?9" is scheduled for. NrCti_,:. 15, 2011 at 7100.7):9111'at.the Yaki(ria,,,Citie'HallAde,lated at 129.:Ny-211cPO4ettt.Yaki3 ma; WiliiiigtOt99,9161, on the'reecPtid;„ftbAn inlbe cEp',COnferende.,, room. For additiptiatInfp1;n4tion, conteCi\fltyie- 'Office ' of Neighbortio,64'1,TiDe'ye(op- ment ,SeNiCeS at 112 Seuttit. iEtti,,Street.',Or calt our 'office at (509) 55- 6101 Low, and Moderate.,income citizens living ,witliin the Yakfria oily lirnits are en- couragarf to atterid. 'Re- quest for assistance under the provisions , of the Americans Witt'. ties Act, Spanish transla- tion, or other seniibes; can be made in advance by calling or contacting us at the above address. (09556633) February 27, 2011 YAKIMA HERALD -REPUBLIC • yakimaherald.com Civic CALENDAR YAKIMA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, 6 p.m. Council Chambers —Yakima City Hall, 129 N. Second St. PUBLIC HEARINGS Final Public Hearing on the 2010 Consolidated Annual Performance Evalu- ation Report. Closed Record Public Hearing to consider the city of Yakima Planning Commission's recommenda- tion on amendments to the city of Yakima's 2010/2011 Urban Area Zoning Ordinance. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS Report on installation or upgrading street lighting in high -crime neighborhood locations using Community Development Block Grant funds. Report on Design Review Guidelines and Cer- tificate of Appropriateness for Barge -Chestnut Neigh- borhood Historic District. Consideration of a request from the Yakima Air Terminal for financial reimbursement from the city of Yakima and Yakima County for legal costs. Consideration of reports from Finance.Department: A. Fourth Quarter 2010 Accounts Receivable Report. B. Fourth Quarter 2010 Treasury Report. Consideration of a Reso- lution adopting the 2010 Comprehensive Emergency Management Program as the official emergency response plan for the city of Yakima. Consideration of a resolution authorizing execution of a nonexclusive license agreement with Allied Arts of Yakima Val- ley for the Fresh Hop Ale Festival. Consideration of a resolution authorizing execution of an amendment to an interlocal agreement with the city of Selah for Yakima Transit fixed -route and paratransit services . Consideration of a resolution authorizing execution of an intergov- ernmental cooperative purchasing agreement with the city of Kennewick. Final contract payment for Belsaas and Smith Con- struction Inc. for Yakima Downtown Futures Phase 4 — 8th Street— Chestnut Avenue to A Street. ORDINANCES First Reading off an ordi- nance amending the 2011 Budget for 2010 Year -End Encumbrances (no action required at this meeting; second reading scheduled 4/5/11). Second Reading of an ordinance amending the 2011 Budget and making appropriations in the 333 - Law and Justice Capital Fund and the 152 -Police Grants Fund to purchase grant funded public safety equipment and services. Other Business A. City Council Retreat Preliminary Agenda. B. City Manager Execu- tive Search Firm Selection — scoring matrix. Adjournment to March 22 at 2 p.m. at the Yakima Convention Center for a City Council Retreat. Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Council meeting shall be the vol- untary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the council. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the council, and the council does not endorse the religions beliefs or views of this, or any other speaker. NO WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE RECIEVED