HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/01/1992 Study Session / Business Meeting 416
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
STUDY SESSION /BUSINESS MEETING
1. ROLL CALL
The City Council met in session on this date at 2:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of City Hall, Yakima, Washington. Mayor
Pat Berndt, presiding, Council Members Clarence Barnett,
Henry Beauchamp, Bill Brado, Lynn Buchanan, Skip Semon and
Bernard Sims present on roll call. City Manager Zais,
Assistant City Attorney Paolella, City Clerk Roberts and
Deputy City Clerk Skovald also present.
2. INVOCATION /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Ray Paolella, Assistant
City Attorney.
3. OPEN DISCUSSION FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
A. PROCLAMATIONS (if applicable)
Mayor Berndt declared September 1992 as Yakima Greenway Month.
The proclamation, which encouraged all Yakima citizens and
visitors to take part in the 4th Annual Duck Race and other
festivities, was presented to Cece Vogt.
4. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER KKR DEVELOPMENT /RON KNIGHT MASTER
APPLICATION FOR PROPERTY IN VICINITY OF SOUTH WASHINGTON
AVENUE AND 15TH AVENUE (TABLED AT 8/18/92 MEETING - REMOVE
FROM TABLE)
It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SIMS, TO REMOVE THIS
ITEM FROM THE TABLE. The motion carried by unanimous voice
vote.
This being the time set for the public hearing, Dan Valoff,
Associate Planner, explained a public meeting was held on
August 18, 1992, to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation for the master application submitted by
KKR Development. This public hearing was being held in order
for the applicant to work with the neighborhood on some of
their concerns.
Ron Knight, from KKR Development, responded to Council
Member Beauchamp's request by meeting with the neighborhood on
August 28, 1992. In order to address the concerns of the
neighborhood (increased traffic, fear of property values
decreasing, density, and other concerns), Mr. Knight presented
an amended proposal which includes zoning all of the property
R -2, other than lots 1 -5 of phase two. He presented Council
with a packet of information containing an appraisal from
427
SEPTEMBER .1, 1992, .
Chris Schmidt stating there is no evidence of gain or loss of
value to the homes in this area due to this development.
Mr. Knight also submitted photos of other R -2 property in R -1
neighborhoods. He read into the record a letter of support
from Jim Jaeger, . who lives adjacent to this property on Pierce
Avenue. Mr. Knight also read, a petition he previously
presented to Council. There was discussion on whether this
compromised proposal constitutes a significant enough change
to warrant remand to the Hearing Examiner. It was the
consensus to continue with the hearing.
Mayor Berndt opened the public hearing and asked for anyone
wishing to speak in favor of the project.
Lee Arnett, owner of property at the corner of 16th Avenue and
Mead, explained he owns an apartment complex and was concerned
that people have the wrong impression about rentals. Whether
rentals are good or bad depends on the management, and whether
property adjacent to it is effected depends on the reputation
of the rental property.
Ron Coleman, 5503 West Arlington, who has been a builder for
nine years, did not think R -1 homes should be built in this
area. The duplexes proposed to be built would be an excellent
buffer zone for the area.
Monte Scacco, 3419 Cascade Loop, recently completed a project
very similar to this proposed project. He explained that the
average is 1.4 occupants per unit, the units are approximately
1,000 square feet and have two - bedrooms, renting for
approximately $600 per month.
Sue Charlot, 203 South 68th Avenue, is a property manager of
approximately 350 units. The units she manages are comprised
of single family dwellings, multi - family units and duplexes.
There are no vacancies because of the housing shortage. She
urged the Council to approve this project.
Dan Arnett, an independent business owner, quoted rental
statistics about properties in Yakima.
David Rodman, 7508 Barge Court, a home builder, stated his
units are rented before they are finished being built. Out of
the 25 units in his development, 60 -70 percent of the
occupants are single, mid -to -older people. The quality of the
people renting is better than most expect.
2
428
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
Karen Quigley Fife, 1701 South 15th Avenue, spoke in favor of
the project. Reality is that progress has to come, sometimes
in your own back yard.
Bill Huibregste, 501 North 2nd Street, stated this project is
in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Urban Area
Zoning Ordinance, and is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Vision 2010 Statement. He requested
consideration and approval of the project.
Mayor Berndt asked if there was anyone present to speak
against the project.
J. C. Ditzler, 1615 South 14th Avenue, stated there is a
petition with 8 signatures in favor of the project, and there
is a petition with 94 signatures opposed to the project.
There is an inordinate amount of opposition to this project.
The majority of the people support the intention of the R -1
zoning.
Becky St. John, 1612 South 14th Avenue, did not feel there was
a compromise. She presented a picture of a hole in the street
on 14th Avenue and Pierce left by a survey crew.
Byron Hahner, 1806 South 15th Avenue, stated there would be
too much traffic and would be too dusty if this project was
completed.
Mary Stafford, 1812 South 15th Avenue, stated that the gravel
street she lives on would be taking the most traffic if this
project was approved.
Tom Bridges, 1702 South 15th Avenue, expressed concern about
traffic conditions and school problems that will not be
compatible to the area.
Bill Campbell, 1206 Spokane Street, would like to see the area
remain R -1.
Mary Ann Ramierez, 1208 Spokane Street, stated she was against
this development.
Harold Gordon, 1616 South 15th Avenue, stated he would like
to see the area remain R -1.
Becky St. John stated the opponents to the project would be
willing to address a compromise: R -2 zoning on 16th Avenue
and the balance remain R -1; or R -2 on 16th Avenue and west
side of 15th Avenue, with a blending of duplex and single
3
429
SEETEMBER 1, 1992.
family homes, two duplexes for one single family home mix on
15th Avenue. The first alternative is preferred.
Betty Stolte, 1622 South 15th Avenue, was against this type of
development.
Dave Winton, 905 Pleasant, spoke for his mother, who is
against having it rezoned. She wants it to stay R -1.
Rose Laguna, 1308 Perry Court, stated her neighbors heard
about this proposed development by word of mouth. She stated
many neighbors did not hear about this proposal. Mayor Berndt
explained the ordinance whereby the City sends out letters to
property owners within 300 feet, and that was not Mr. Knight's
fault.
Mayor Berndt requested anyone else who wished to speak in
opposition with specific comments about a buffer zone.
Sharon Washburn, 1306 Spokane Street, was opposed to this
development. She likes her quiet neighborhood. She was under
the impression the area would remain R -1.
Dave Ramierez, 1208 Spokane Street, stated he was opposed to
the rezone. He was under the impression the area would remain
R -1. This neighborhood,has been overburdened with duplexes;
there is other property close by that is already zoned for
this purpose.
Bruce Olson, 1306 Perry .Court, expressed concern about "toys"
(boats, motor homes, etc.) that people will park on the
street. Another concern is when people use the cul -de -sac to
turn around when a wrong turn is made.
Mayor Berndt asked for any rebuttals or brief closing comments
from Mr. Knight or Mr. Huibregste.
Mr. Huibregste commented on the traffic issue. This was one
of the specific issues addressed in the design of the
subdivision. It is often good practice to distribute the
traffic, not focus it all into one location. In his opinion,
this proposal does that.
Mayor Berndt closed the public hearing and asked for Council
discussion. All Council members claimed no exparte contact.
Council. Member Beauchamp asked about Criterion Park where old
houses have been moved in. What rules does the City have
about moving an old house into a neighborhood and then not
putting a lawn in, or not painting the structure, and just
4
430
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
leaving it the way it was moved. Council Member Beauchamp
stated there needs to be rules for that. Council Member
Beauchamp recognized the testimony on both sides, the pictures
of the proposed duplexes presented by Mr. Knight being
attractive, the plans for project management are good, but he
finds it difficult to go against the many neighbors in
opposition to this project. He would like to pursue some of
the suggestions on compromise. Even though it will not
satisfy all the neighbors, it seems like there are some who
would be willing to look at some formal compromise. Council
Member Buchanan stated it is very seldom to see so many people
from such a small area at any hearing and it would be wrong
for the Council to continue with this hearing, so it was MOVED
BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY BEAUCHAMP, TO DENY THE REZONE IN ITS
PRESENT CONDITION. Council Member Brado stated he believes
the best possible use for this property is duplexes, which
would not hinder the value of the surrounding property. He
appreciated the fact Mr. Knight took the time to try to work
this out, but there are so many people against the project.
Mayor Berndt stated there was still room for compromise and we
are shutting the door on the compromise by the vote; Council
Member Buchanan stated there are too many people in
opposition, and he will listen to them; Council Member Semon
explained he has concerns about forcing something on the
community, even though he thinks the project is a good one,
but this kind of sentiment cannot be ignored from a
neighborhood that is adamantly opposed to it; Council
Member Sims stated the citizens must realize that with an R -1
zoning, duplexes can be placed on each and every one of these
lots and possibly will because of the demand for housing.
Council member Barnett called for a vote on the motion. The
motion carried by a 6 -1 roll call vote; Berndt voting nay.
Council Member Buchanan directed staff to bring a change in
the ordinance so when a plat is made or a rezone is made,
Council can have a say about what goes on after three years.
There have been a lot of rezones in Yakima, and what happens
afterwards is not always what was voted on at the time of the
rezone. Council Member Beauchamp directed staff to bring back
legislation, which would require those units that have been
moved into a neighborhood be made comparable to the existing
neighborhood.
Council recessed at 4:05 p.m. and resumed at 4:15 p.m.
It was requested that Items Nos. 5 and 6 be reversed on the agenda.
5
Y _ 43 1
SEPTEMBER 1,-1992
6. RECONSIDERATION OF REPORT FROM PARKS AND RECREATION REGARDING
RECONSIDERATION OF 1992 BUDGET POLICY ISSUE ON PROPOSED CITY
UTILITY IN -LIEU OF TAX FOR PARKS (REQUIRES MOTION TO REMOVE
FROM TABLE)
It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECONDED BY SEMON, TO REMOVE THE ITEM
FROM THE TABLE. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote;
- Buchanan temporarily absent.
Dave Flaherty, Manager of Parks and Recreation Division, was
present to answer questions.
Philip Salatino, 209 Park Avenue, objected to the sewer charge
because in the last five years it has been raised five times.
It is not fair to senior citizens.
Allen J. Schmid, President of Greater Yakima Chamber of
Commerce, reported the Board of Directors of the Chamber met
with the Parks and Recreation Director and the Director of
Finance and discussed the proposed 2 percent increase on the
In- Lieu -Of Tax. Even though the Greater Chamber of Commerce
has been in support of parks and recreation over the years;
they have felt for some time the need for a comprehensive park
master plan. With this in mind, Mr. Schmid urged any action
on this issue be deferred until a master plan is completed and
approved. He understood this master plan will be completed
within the next six months.
Richard Andring, 203 South 8th Avenue, commended the Council
for its decision regarding the tennis court lighting.
However, he was surprised at the way the wiring was
disconnected. He expressed his opinion of what should be
done.
Ester Huey, 3209 Tieton Drive, spoke in favor of the increase,
not only as a concerned citizen, but also on behalf of the
Yakima County Substance Abuse Coalition. She urged the
Council to consider this as an investment in the wellness of
the community. She read into the record a letter in support
of the increase from Betsy Nagle - McNaughton, Director of
Adolescence Pregnancy and Parenting Program, and Secretary of
the Yakima Youth Commission.
Christy Silvas, President of the Child Abuse and Neglect
Coordinating Council of Yakima, presented a letter thanking
David Flaherty and his'staff for providing excellent parks and
recreation services to the people of the community. The
6
432
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
programs available through the Parks and Recreation Division
contribute to the prevention of child abuse and neglect. She
urged approval of the proposed increase.
It was MOVED BY SIMS, SECOND BY BEAUCHAMP, TO APPROVE THE
REQUEST TO INCREASE THE IN- LIEU -OF TAX FROM 2 TO 4 PERCENT.
It was MOVED BY BEAUCHAMP, SECONDED BY SEMON, TO AMEND THE
MOTION TO APPROVE THIS 2 PERCENT FOR ONE YEAR. The motion
carried by 6 -1 voice vote; Barnett voting nay. The question
was called for a vote on the motion, as amended. The motion
carried,by a 5 -2 voice vote; Barnett and Brado voting nay.
Council Member Barnett stated he was definitely in favor of
parks. He will be wholeheartedly supporting the operation and
maintenance levy proposed for 1993 and the capital bond issue
for 1993. Nearly every week, Council Member Barnett receives
calls from citizens, usually elderly widows, who tell him they
are having great difficulty paying the increase in utility
rates. During the past week, Council Member Barnett also
talked to a landlord who has taken the burden of paying the
utility rates for several elderly widows. This In- Lieu -Of -Tax
on City utilities concept is definitely impacting the basic
needs of people. Council Member Barnett does not feel utility
rates of the City's enterprise funds should fund parks and
recreation. Council. Member Barnett quoted a letter to
selected businesses, dated July 9, 1992, "Since police
operations are a function of general government, state law
prohibits funding for them from any source other than general
government, making any financial assistance from other areas,
such as transit, sewer, water, or refuse impossible." Council
Member Barnett stated parks is also a function in the general
government. The funding mechanism of In- Lieu -Of Tax from the
City utilities of water, sewer, and refuse to support parks,
in Council Member Barnett's opinion, violates the principles
stated in the letter, and City utilities are making definite
financial assistance to a function of general government.
Council Member Barnett feels it has further been exemplified
in the staff report, which states that the Utility In- Lieu -Of
Tax for parks will be factored into any utility rate analysis
for City water, sewer, and refuse currently underway and, in
future years, as a cost of business of each of the utilities.
Mayor Berndt asked City Manager Zais if this was normal
procedure for cities to have this kind of in- lieu -of tax. He
indicated it is common throughout the state. It is a tax for
general government raising support purposes and is legitimate
for any general purpose government expenditure because it is
a tax. City Manager Zais explained this increase is proposed
to be effective, January 1, 1993. Formal legislation will be
brought back to Council.
7
�$ 433
ra n
SEPTEMBER.1, 1992,
Council Member Semon stated he does not enjoy raising taxes.
It should be put into perspective how much this increase will
actually cost. According to calculations from Finance, an
average household with two garbage cans and 1,000 cubic feet
of water would see an increase in this tax of approximately
$7.80 a year. Council Member Semon explained the community
will have an opportunity to vote on the amount of money to
spend on parks; that is why for one year's time, current
programs can be maintained and then if the community chooses
not to tax themselves, then so be it.
Council Member Sims wondered what this community would look
like if the entire police budget of $7 million was put into
pro- active programs. Since nobody is willing to step up to
the mark to try that and until that actually happens, there is
no way of knowing what the impact would be. When there are
good people out in the community supporting positive programs,
developing our youth and community, Council Member Sims sees
the need to look at that, as a Council, because. 70 percent of
the budget is spent toward police activities that address only
one -half of one percent of the citizens. He did not speak
against the law and justice programs, but thought it is a
punitive approach that needs to be turned around. Those people
who are causing the - problems need to be directed toward the
right programs so they can become productive citizens.
City Manager Zais answered a question from John Nichols, a
Yakima citizen, regarding the "AFSCME settlement."
5. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCING OPTIONS FOR CITY SHARE OF FUNDING
POLICE AND LEGAL CENTER
City Manager Zais presented an overview of the Police /Legal
facility funding proposal for Council's consideration. Review
of the history of the project, funding options, potential cost
and benefits of the project, and the cost of not proceeding
with the project were discussed.
Pleas Green, Chief of Police, stated it is very critical to
develop a facility to meet present and future needs. He
specified the various features needed in the facility.
Council Member Barnett commented that the consolidated City
police /fire dispatch center has always been referred to as a
911 communications dispatch center. Now it is referred to as
a consolidated City police dispatch center. Council
Member Barnett expressed concern about duplication of
training /conference meeting area space. Police Chief Green
8
434
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
described the needed new facility would be much like the
existing facilities, only larger to accomplish training and
conference /meeting needs.
Fred Mercy, 212 North 4th Street, representing both the
Catholic Diocese of Yakima and himself, commented on the
process and the effect of the tax on some of the people he
represents. City Manager Zais explained the three proposals
under consideration to raise the money for the City's share of
police and legal center.
Police Chief Green presented a letter from Sheriff Blair
supporting the proposed new facility. The ongoing problems
with holding /booking prisoners and the time it takes were
briefly outlined by Chief Green. He answered Council
Member Beauchamp's question how additional booking personnel
would expedite the process and reduce costs.
Council Member Barnett stated the passage of the 0.1% sales
tax is a necessary component to operate the police /legal
center, and it is anticipated it will be put on the ballot in
1992. He suggested the Council wait until it passes, and then
take action on one of the proposed options. In the interim the
issues of design and site could be further considered.
Council Member Brado suggested a site should be found, next a
decision should be made as to what will be built and obtain
firm bids, and then decide how to fund the project.
Mayor Berndt stated a determination needs to be made whether
the Council is in total agreement to proceed with this project
because preparation time is needed to decide the issues of
site and design.
Larry Mathews, a Yakima citizen, spoke against the proposed
police /legal facility because he does not think it is
justified.
Ernie Berger, 1206 South 37th Avenue, spoke in favor of an
expanded law and justice facility. He urged the Council to
not rush into it. Mr. Berger strongly believes this project
should be a joint county /city endeavor.
John Nichols, a Yakima citizen, stated the police officers
need better equipment. He inquired about funding for law and
justice facilities.
9
r 3.. ...
435
SEPTEMBER 1,,:. -1992
Phil Salatino, a Yakima citizen, spoke in favor of this
project stating the current facility is completely
I/ overcrowded.
Council Member Semon stated a decision needs to be made, and
if we are supportive of this, and we can agree on a financing
package, we should move ahead with the project. There is
nothing that will happen in the next 60 days that will lessen
the need for this facility.
Mayor Berndt stated her willingness to consider delaying the
funding mechanism, if there is consensus to go forward with
this project, so some of the questions can be answered and a
credible, informed, decision can be made.
Gary Webster, speaking on behalf of the Greater Yakima Chamber
of Commerce, commented on a recent survey reporting the
majority of those surveyed thought this issue should be
brought to a vote of the people.
Council Member Buchanan commented that everyone wants a new
police facility, but no one wants to pay for it. Being
representatives of the voters, we need to speak whether we are
in favor or not in favor of this issue. We heard that any tax
we do will affect the poor. That is probably quite true, but
at the same time, out of the nine districts the police
department has, generally two officers cover three districts
west of 16th and the rest of the officers cover the districts
east of 16th where the poorer people live. They need some
more protection. It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY SEMON,
THAT THE CITY OF YAKIMA DOES NEED A NEW POLICE. FACILITY AND
THAT WE ADOPT, WHAT IS REALLY A COUNCIL PROPOSAL NOT A STAFF
RECOMMENDATION, AND DIRECT LEGISLATION BE PREPARED TO INCREASE
THE UTILITY TAX LID TO $4,000; BUSINESS LICENSE FEES BE
INCREASED BY 15 PERCENT; AND THE CITY'S IN- LIEU -OF TAX ON
UTILITIES BE INCREASED BY .5 PERCENT TO SUPPORT THE DEBT
SERVICE ON A COUNCILMATIC BOND. Council Member Barnett stated
he favors going out on a general obligation bond. After
further discussion, it was MOVED BY BEAUCHAMP, SECONDED BY
BRADO, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO DEFER FINAL ACTION ON THIS
MATTER UNTIL AFTER THE NOVEMBER ELECTION, AND TO PROCEED WITH
SITE SELECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN. Council Member
Beauchamp suggested some available options can be considered
to come up with the funding mechanism, depending on the
outcome of the General Election. Mayor Berndt suggested that
if there is a Council commitment to find a way to do this
project, the costs of site selection and design be incurred
before the funding is decided. Council Member Semon commented
that before money is spent on site selection and design, it
10
4a6
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
should be determined whether there is a Council consensus to
fund this with councilmatic bond. A poll of Council members
indicated there was a majority. The question was called for
a vote on the motion as amended. The motion passed on a 4 -3
voice vote.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Berndt referred to the items placed on the Consent
Agenda, questioning whether there were any additions or
deletions from either Councilmembers or citizens present. It
was the general consensus to add Item No. 10 to the Consent
Agenda. The City Clerk then read the Consent Agenda items,
including resolutions and ordinances by title. It was MOVED
BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY BARNETT, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS
READ, BE ADOPTED. The motion carried by unanimous roll call
vote. (Subsequent paragraphs preceded by an asterisk ( *)
indicate items on the Consent Agenda handled under one motion
without further discussion.)
*8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE JUNE 9, 1992 SPECIAL COUNCIL
MEETING AND JULY 7, 1992 BUSINESS MEETING
The Council minutes of the June 9, 1992 Special Council
meeting and July 7, 1992 Business meeting were approved,
having been duly certified accurate by two Council members and
no one present wishing to have said minutes read publicly.
9. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
None
*10. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION CALLING FOR SPECIAL ELECTION ON
NOVEMBER 3, 1992 BALLOT TO BAN FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS
RESOLUTION NO. D -6181, A RESOLUTION providing for the
submittal to the electors of the City of Yakima, Washington,
enactment of an ordinance banning the sale, storage, use,
possession and discharge of fireworks within the City of
Yakima to be voted upon at a special election to be held in
conjunction with the State General Election to be held on
November 3, 1992.
11
•
SEPTEMBER 1, ..1992.
*11 CONSIDERATION. OF RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY LONG PLAT
FOR CEDAR HILLS SUBDIVISION
I/ RESOLUTION NO. D -6182, A RESOLUTION approving the preliminary
plat submitted by Vern Holbrook and Cedar Hills Estates, Inc.
(First Addition to Suburban Acre Homes) for ten lots in the
vicinity of South 18th Avenue between King Street and Tahoma
Avenue in the City of Yakima, subject to all of the conditions
contained in the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation.
*12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR TRAFFIC COUNTING WITH COG AND TRAFFICOUNT, INC.
RESOLUTION NO. D -6183, A RESOLUTION authorizing the execution
of an Agreement with Yakima Valley Conference of Governments
and Trafficount, Inc.
*13. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1992 BUDGET AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE NORTH 1ST STREET / "D" STREET
RESIGNALIZATION PROJECT
An Ordinance appropriating funds for the North 1st Street / "D"
Street Resignalization Project having been read by title only
at the August 25, 1992 meeting, was brought before the Council
for a second reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 3485, AN ORDINANCE amending the 1992 budget for
the City of Yakima; making appropriations for Signalization of
the North 1st & "D" Street Intersection from Unappropriated
Fund Balances within various Funds for expenditure during
1992.
*14'. FIRST READING OF 'ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1992 BUDGET AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR AFTER - SCHOOL RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR
YOUTH (NO FORMAL ACTION REQUIRED AT THIS MEETING)
An Ordinance appropriating funds for After - School Recreational
Programs for Youth, having been read by title only, was laid
on the table for one week until September 8, 1992.
15. OTHER BUSINESS
Information Items:
Items of information supplied to Council were: Memorandum
from Water & Irrigation Superintendent regarding Lead and
Copper Sampling of Drinking Water. 8/27/92; EPA Superfund
Fact Sheet - Yakima Plating Superfund Site. 8/25/92; EPA
Notice of public meeting on Proposed Plan and Abbreviated
12
431
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
Remedial Investigation for Yakima Pesticide Lab. 8/22/92;
Monthly Annexation Status Report for August 1992; Metro Plan
Status Report as of August 26, 1992; Rebound Plus Property
Status Report as of August 27, 1992; Memorandum from
Wastewater Superintendent and Industrial Maintenance Mechanic
regarding Clean Air Act - Air Conditioner Rules. 8/21/92;
Office of Housing and Neighborhood Conservation Elderly Co -Op
Monthly Report for August 1992; Legal Department Monthly
Report for June 1992; Agenda for August 27, 1992 Yakima Air
Terminal Board meeting and minutes of its July 23, 1992
meeting; and Agenda for August 26, 1992 Yakima Housing
Authority Board meeting and minutes of its June 24, 1992
meeting.
16. EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE LITIGATION
Due to the lateness of the hour, the Executive Session was
postponed one week.
17. ADJOURNMENT TO SEPTEMBER 2, 1992 AT 8:00 A.M. AT CAVANAUGH'S
FOR INFORMAL DISCUSSION WITH THE YAKIMA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
THEN TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 AT 7:00 A.M. AT THE YAKIMA CENTER
FOR INFORMAL DISCUSSION
It was MOVED BY BUCHANAN, SECONDED BY BARNETT, TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING TO SEPTEMBER 2, 1992, AT 8:00 A.M. AT CAVANAUGH'S,
WITH IMMEDIATE ADJOURNMENT THEREAFTER TO SEPTEMBER 8, 1992, AT
7:00 A.M. AT THE YAKIMA CENTER. The motion carried by
unanimous voice vote. The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
READ AND CERTIFIED ACCURATE BY: 1 /t r�✓�f 3
COUNCIL MEMB DATE
70
• 7P DATE
ATTEST:
(-Noe- (;t2.-e
CITY CLERK MAYOR
Minutes prepared by Deputy City Clerk Skovald.
13