HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/02/2011 09 Gang Injunction Report BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.
For Meeting of August 2, 2011
ITEM TITLE: Report on a gang injunction, and discussion on a possible draft
ordinance relating to trespass from City parks
SUBMITTED BY: Cynthia I. Martinez, Senior Assistant City Attorney,
by Jake Day, Legal Intern
CONTACT PERSON /TELEPHONE: Cynthia I. Martinez, (509) 575 -6033
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: The Washington State Legislature has not passed gang legislation
providing specific statutory authority for a gang injunction, or language similar to that found in
California's anti -gang law. The possibility of obtaining an injunction against gangs in the City has
been discussed. While the city is able to do the preparation work for an injunction against
Yakima gangs, it is uncertain whether the city would be granted the injunction. Another option
that has been discussed is the possibility of an ordinance to trespass people from city parks for
committing crimes or infractions in the parks. Such an ordinance would allow authorized
personnel the ability to trespass people from the city parks for committing crimes or infractions for
a specified period of time. If the Council wishes, staff could present an Ordinance regarding
trespass from City parks for consideration at the City Council meeting on August 16, 2011.
Resolution Ordinance Contract Other (Specify)
Contract Mail to (name and address):
Phone:
Funding Source
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
City Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consideration of a Motion to direct the Legal Department to
prepare an Ordinance regarding trespass from City parks for presentation at the City Council
business meeting on August 16, 2011.
BOARD /COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Public Safety Committee has heard the
report and the discussion on a possible °Ordinance regarding trespass from City parks, and
requested this matter to be forwarded to the full Council for a report and further discussion.
COUNCIL ACTION:
•
CM! OF YAKIMA
O LEGAL
DEPARTMENT
200 South Third Street, Yakima, Washington 98901 (509)575 -6060 Fax (509)575 -6160
MEMORANDUM
July 26, 2011
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Michael A. Morales, Interim City Manager
FROM: Cynthia I. Martinez, Senior Assistant City Attorney,
by Jake Day, Legal Intern
SUBJECT: Gang Injunction and City Parks Trespass Ordinance
Gang Injunction:
The Legal Department was asked to look into the possibility of implementing a gang
injunction against City of Yakima gangs. These types of injunctions have been
moderately successful in California and Utah. The Police Department has a Gang Unit
which would be able to provide us with the necessary police input and this is
something which the city could prepare.
Filing for an injunction would take a great deal of time and preparation. Even after all
of the preparation, there is no guarantee the City of Yakima would be granted the
injunction. California cities have based their injunction requests off California state
gang laws and California Supreme Court decisions. Washington does not have any
similar gang laws or court decisions. Instead, the Washington State Legislature has
declined to pass any such legislation. Without state legislation on which to base the
injunction, obtaining an injunction will be even more difficult.
If the city was granted an injunction there would still likely be a protracted legal battle.
National organizations have fought against gang injunctions in other states. California
cities have either won at the California Supreme Court or later come to negotiated
agreements with .these organizations. The gang injunction in place in Utah is currently
waiting on a Utah Supreme Court decision to determine its validity. All states that
have attempted an injunction have had it appealed.
Memo to Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
July 26, 2011
Page2of2
Park Ordinance:
A possible ordinance relating to parks would allow authorized personnel to trespass
any person from city parks when they have probable cause to believe that the person
has committed a crime or infraction while in a city park. This was suggested by the
Gang Unit and would not cost the city anything to implement.
If the City Council wishes to consider such a trespass ordinance, we can prepare a final
ordinance for your review for the next business meeting.
0
DRAFT
0 ORDINANCE NO.2011-
AN ORDINANCE concerning parks and playgrounds; amending Chapter 13.16 of the City
of Yakima Municipal Code to add a new section 13.16.146 relating to
trespass notifications when there is probable cause to believe a person
has committed a crime or infraction while in a City of Yakima park
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1. A new section is added to chapter 13.16 of the Yakima Municipal Code to read
as follows:
Chapter 13.16
RULES AND REGULATIONS
13.16.146 Trespass notifications for city parks
In addition to such other penalties as may be imposed by law for the
violation of posted rules and regulations or the commission of other offenses in
City of Yakima parks, the Yakima Police or the Parks and Recreation Manager
are authorized to issue trespass notifications to any person against whom they
have probable cause to believe has committed a crime or infraction while in a
City of Yakima park. The trespass notification will be valid for 30 to 365 days and
will identify the park or parks from which the offender is excluded.
Section 2. All remaining sections of chapter 13.16 of the Yakima Municipal Code remain the
same, including but not limited to the following sections:
13.16.149 Additional rules and regulations.
The parks and recreation commission is authorized to adopt further rules and
regulations, consistent with and to administer the provisions of this chapter,
affecting the control and use of parks and playgrounds. (Ord. 1184 § 6, 1969).
13.16.150 Penalty for violations.
It is unlawful for any person to violate or fail to comply with any rule or
regulation provided for in this chapter. Any person convicted of violating or of
failing to comply with any rule or regulation provided for in this chapter shall be
punished by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars or by imprisonment
in the city jail facility for a term not to exceed ninety days or by both such fine and
imprisonment. (Ord. 93 -69 § 1, 1993: Ord: 1533 § 7, 1973: Ord. 1184 § 4, 1969:
Ord. B -1381 § 2, 1952).
Section 3. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage,
approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this day of August,
2011.
Micah Cawley, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Publication Date:
Effective Date:
2
YAKIMA POLICE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: July 21, 2011
TO: Interim City Manager, Michael Morales
FROM: Acting Police Chief, Greg Copeland
SUBJECT: Safe Streets Task Force (SSTF) Reduction in Personnel
In mid-2010, members of the Yakima Police Department, with the approval of the
Yakima City Council, began the process of initiating a Safe Streets Task Force effort for . -
Yakima.
SSTF's are FBI - sponsored investigative groups whose mission is to identify, investigate,
and prosecute those individuals most responsible for violent criminal activity in the
community. The FBI component within the task force is very important. The presence
of the FBI means that federal investigative techniques and access to the federal judicial
system are available. Equally important, an SSTF designation means that the local
officers assigned to the task force would have overtime costs reimbursed, up to about
$17,000.00 a year and would have a vehicle provided. In some cases federal funds
provide for office space, computers, and other necessary items as well.
® YPD agreed early on to provide a sergeant and two officers to the effort. The FBI agreed
to assign an agent to the SSTF, and WSP agreed to provide a detective as well. YSO and
DOC (state probation) also agreed to provide an investigator, but opted to wait until the
funding was in hand before moving their officers to the SSTF location.
It was our belief that assigning those personnel and beginning operations even before
obtaining the Safe Streets designation would demonstrate to the DOJ our level of
commitment to the project and improve our chances of obtaining the federal designation.
In effect YPD was "all in" from the very beginning.
YPD went through a task force member application/selection process and our three
selected employees began working to set up the task force office location in October of
2010: YPD created a work space, and through a small Project Safe Neighborhoods grant
provided work stations, computers and a small budget for other equipment and some
overtime.
In January of 2011, they were joined by an FBI agent and by a WSP detective. In the
meantime, an SSTF applicatiorihad been submitted and was being considered by DOJ: -
All early indications were that Yakima, with our obvious gang problems would be
selected for funding. Unfortunately, due to the FBI, US Attorney's Office or the DOJ,
the Yakima SSTF project was suspended as were numerous other "pipeline" projects that
had not yet received formal approval. It was simply a reflection of the convoluted and
411 uncertain federal budget process. When it was learned that Yakima would not be a new
location, the FBI immediately pulled their agent out of the task force. The State Patrol
left their detective in place for a while longer, but eventually transferred him to the
Violent Crimes Task Force. Our three officers are the last remnants of the originally
composed task force.
The FBI, despite the federal budget difficulties, would still like to make something
happen in Yakima. However, they effectively have their hands tied until there is some
clarity to their budget. I spoke to a supervising agent from the Spokane FBI office earlier
this week. He said they would still like to do something in Yakima, but later in time and
with a different structure than that originally proposed. One possibility they are
considering is making Yakima part of a larger Eastern Washington SSTF. The timetable
for being able to accomplish that is still uncertain.
In the meantime, we at YPD have the 2012 budget process looming and, because of
increased jail costs approaching $700,000 this year (these negative impacts will still be
present in 2012), we must begin to streamline our operations. YPD lost three positions in
the 2011 budget and will suffer further cutbacks in the 2012 budget. For all the reasons
stated above, SSTF is the first part of our operation that we feel should be examined for
reduction. Our gang Enforcement and Pro -Act teams have already been reduced by fifty
percent and cannot absorb further losses.
We do not want to completely shut the door on SSTF. We definitely feel it is a concept
that could benefit the Yakima area. Unfortunately we need to reduce our manpower
commitment from a Sergeant and two officers down to one officer. The officer left in
"SSTF" will still be considered our department's contribution to the SSTF effort, but will
be moved for organizational purposes to work under the supervision of the YPD Gang
Enforcement Team. The Sergeant and the other officer would be transferred back to our
Patrol Division. This move would maintain our department's most important division,
patrol, while still keeping a "placeholder" if a Yakima SSTF ever comes to fruition. In
the meantime, the surviving SSTF officer could assist the Gang Unit and continue to .
work the SSTF investigations that are pending at this time.
It is possible, because it would cost less, to get one officer designated as an SSTF
participant than it would be to get three.
We believe, given all the circumstances, these steps are the proper course of action to
take.