Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-3107 REZONE PROPERTY 3 T. 0 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE affirming the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to rezone property and grant an administrative • adjustment in the vicinity of 1104-1106 Ledwich Avenue, and amending the zoning map of the City of Yakima. WHEREAS, on April 20, 1988, the Hearing Examiner held a hearing on a master application request initiated by Charles W. Meyer, Jr. for the rezone of property in the vicinity of 1104-1106 Ledwich Avenue, Yakima, Washington, the legal description of which is set out hereinbelow, from R-2, Two Family Residential District, to M-1, Light Industrial District and to administratively adjust a side yard setback, and WHEREAS, as a result of that hearing, the Hearing Examiner recommended to the City Council that the rezone and said administrative adjustment be granted, and WHEREAS, at its public meeting on June 14, 1988, the City Council voted to affirm said decision of the Hearing Examiner, now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA: Section 1. The decision of the Hearing Examiner, recom- mending the rezone and administrative adjustment of property in the vicinity of 1104-1106 Ledwich Avenue in the City of Yakima, Washington, the legal description of which is as follows: Lot 22, Lot 23 and the South 10 feet of Lot 24, Block 1, Terminal Addition according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume "I", Page 42, records of Yakima County, Washington. from R-2, Two Family Residential District, to M-1, Light Industrial District, is hereby affirmed; and that property is hereby rezoned to M-1, Light Industrial District. Section 2. The request for an administrative adjustment of the south setback requirements on the subject property from thirty feet to twenty-four feet is hereby approved. rezone.ord/G5 1 Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Hearing Examiner's recommendation (No. 88-2-17) a true copy of which is attached to this ordinance and incorporated as if fully set forth. Section 4. The City of Yakima zoning map is hereby 410 amended to correspond to the rezone ordained by Section 1 of this ordinance. Section 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file with the Yakima County Auditor a certified copy of this ordinance. Section 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty days after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 1 day of July, 1988. ckt \,,,e&A/1/4--e - Mayor ATTEST: • dAt City, lerk Publication Date 519 %; JUL 1 Effective Date AUG 1 4196 410 rezone.ord/G5 2 OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER • FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA PHILIP A. LAMB 311 NORTH THIRD STREET, P.O. BOX 4 (509)248-0706 YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98907 May 25, 1988 ' • • • Glenn Rice, Director • City of Yakima Community & Economic Development 129 N. 2nd Street Yakima, WA 98901 RE: Charles W. Meyer, Jr. No. UAZO RZ #1-88 and UAZO ADM ADJ #6-88 Dear Glenn: Enclosed is my Examiner's Recommendation on the above application, which was heard April 20, 1988. Sincerely, Philip A. Lamb Hearing Examiner PAL/bf Enc. cc w/enc: Mr. Richard Anderwald Mr. Graham Tollefson - - III storage and administrative offices. The south lot is undeveloped and is the one which the applicant intends to purchase. Adjacent • land uses and zoning are as follows: .•; KA •• • Location Zoning xisting Land Use North M-2 Light Industrial • (across Nob Hill) South R-2 Residential (Duplex & single-family) East M-2 Undeveloped West R-2 Residential (Duplex) 3. Project Description. This property is at the southwest end of the Nob Hill overpass. A paved one-way eastbound access road with 25-foot right-of-way branches off Nob Hill at the base of the overpass and generally parallels Nob Hill in providing a connection to Ledwich. This access road has recently been, since the hearing, expanded to two lanes by the City. Traffic westbound on Nob Hill must enter a traffic safety island to turn onto the access road. Traffic leaving the site will be forced to turn left as they enter Nob Hill, because the new two-lane street is going to be signed requiring left turns only for both trucks and automobiles. An alley borders the west side of the site and some vehicles may use this alley than the street to access the property. The alley has a 20-foot right-of-way, is graveled, and serves as access for parking for residential properties in the block. Ledwich Avenue is classified as a local access street and has a 50-foot right-of-way. Nob Hill Blvd. is a major arterial having approximately 60 feet of right-of-way at this point. The proposed use is that of a mini-storage building. Table 4-1 in the zoning ordinance sets forth permitted land uses. Residential mini-storage is a Class 3 use in R-2, whereas commercial storage is not permitted whatsoever. The applicant intends to use a portion ot the building to store inventory for another business of his which is located at another site. Commercial storage facilities are not permitted in R They are defined at YMC §15.02.020 (page 19) as meaning enclosed storage areas designated as support facilities for commercial activities HEARING EXAMINER EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 2 FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA • POST OFFICE BOX 4 YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98907 1909/ 248-0706 2 and used for the storage of retail materials. Residential, mini- storage is defined as meaning enclosed areas providing storage for residential goods and/or recreational vehicles within the structure. Footnote 5 to Table 4-1 which lists permitted l'nd • uses (page 36) states: "no sales, storage or commercial goods, repair facilities, offices, light manufacturing or other uses shall be permitted in residential mini-storage facilities." Because of this applicant's honesty in indicating the true use he intends to make of the mini-storage, he is compelled to seek a rezone, since there is no method for granting a conditional use permit or treating this as a planned development under the ordinance. The proposed structure would be 96 feet by 26 feet, 2,496 square feet in size. It will be single-story. An administrative adjustment for the south side yard is necessary since the applicant wants the building to be 26 feet wide in order to properly store large cars and boats. The lot is only 50 feet wide, thus leaving 24 feet instead of the required 30-foot setback from a residential district. Except for a six-foot cyclone fence with privacy strips, the setback area between the building and the residential district would be fully paved for parking and access to the storage units. Plans indicate seven storage units within the structure, two accessed from the alley, one from Ledwich, and four from the internal paved area. No curb breaks are shown on the plans but they would appear to require or encourage the full 50-foot width of access from Ledwich and the alley to be left open for accessing the site. The maximum curb break allowed from Ledwich to this site pursuant to YMC §8.64,010 is 30 feet. 4. yakima Urt2an__Area_gpmprehensiye_Plall, The plan indicates that residential uses are not compatible w.Lth industrial uses (Table OLU-1, page 24, Plan Summary). The residential district immediately south and west of the subject project is an established moderate density residential neighborhood. However, public opinion is one element of the HEARING LkAMINER EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 3 FOR THE CM,' AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA HOST OF ICE BOX 4 YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98907 (SOW 248-0706 • 2 Nf decision - making process, and in this instance there is no known opposition to the rezone. 5. Yakima Urban Area Zoning 0 dinance. The criteria for rezones established by YMC 15.23.030.5 are considered below: 5.1 Testimony. All testimony was in favor of the • proposal, other than the recommendation by staff. At the hearing it was learned that the City is currently making the frontage road a two -way street. At the request of the Examiner, Mr. Lehman looked into this and determined that after the improvements are made the frontage road will include a stop sign next to Nob Hill Blvd. and two no right turn signs, prohibiting both truck and automobile traffic from turning right. The reason for the improvements is to enhance truck traffic in the area. Trucks use this frontage road for access to Rainier Plastics. 5.2 Suitability of the Property. This lot is clearly suitable for a storage development. It is not as clear that the property is suitable for all purposes permitted by M -1, Light Industrial, zoning. The property is immediately adjacent to M -2 zoning, across Ledwich Avenue, and M - -1 zoning exists to the south and east. There are clearly some M -1 uses which would be inappropriate next to a residential zone. The size of this property, including both the lot on which the storage is to be built together with the Mr. Coffee lot, is fairly small, and it is unlikely that many M -1 uses will ever find this particular property suitable, because of its small size. Nevertheless, this rezone is a fairly crude tool to use to accommodate the applicant's desire to build what is in effect residential mini - storage, except for that portion of the storage used by him to store his own commercial goods. There does not appear to be a less intrusive tool to use to permit the applicant to achieve his objective while still being sensitive to the public welfare. 5.3 Agency_Recommendations. The City Traffic Engineer HEARING EXAMINER EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 4 FOR THE CT' AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA POST OFFICE BOX 4 YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98907 1509) 248 -0706 • 0 • has concerns about site access by large vehicles, and • potential higher volumes of traffic that could result from industrial or commercial development of this area. The lack of a left turn lane for westbound Nob Hill Blvd. traffic and the limitations of the access road are of specific concern. He also recommends that curb cuts be limited to 35 feet. • These concerns and recommendations were received prior to the improvements undertaken by the City, changing the frontage road from a one -lane to a two -lane road. Those improvements have already been made notwithstanding the concerns of the City Traffic Engineer. It was clear at the hearing that there was a lack of coordination amongst city departments, because the Planning Department had no idea that the improvements to the frontage road were taking place and had based their recommendation for denial in part on the fact that the frontage road was clearly inadequate. At this time I am unaware of any resolution of the problem with westbound traffic on Nob Hill entering a traffic safety island to turn left onto the access road. 5.4 Compliance With Comprehensive _ an and Zoning Ordinance. This is an odd situation, but it does not appear that there are insurmountable compatibility problems with the residential neighborhood. The compatibility problems will arise in the future if this is converted from mini. - storage to some other more noxious use. Given the size of the property, the street layout, and its location adjacent to other light industrial zoning, the proposed rezone will not in all likelihood adversely affect the neightorhood. 5.5 Adeaua_of ___PublicFacilities. Public facilities such as sewer and water are available. The traffic and vehicular access problem has already been discussed. 5.6 !..otiipatibiljty. Compatibility has been discussed above and does not appear to currently present a problem. 5.7 Public_Need. The applicant wants to bu.i.id a storage facility which will probably have no adverse impact HEAFtiNC; EXAMINER EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION - 5 FOR THE Crry AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA POST OFFICE BOX 4 YAKIMA. WASHINGTON 98907 (509) 248 -0706 • • - : - - • on anything, either within the immediate neighborhood or within the entire urban area. This rezone, however, is a double-edged sword in that although this use may be completely satisfactory, some future use permitted in the M- 1 zone may not at all be satisfactory in this location. In my judgment the risk of that is remote given the small size of the property involved and its configuration within the neighborhood. It seems unreasonable to stand in the way of a proposal which in and of itself has no foreseeable adverse impact upon the community. The ideal situation would be to have some sort of mechanism within the ordinance which would permit this use to exist as a Class 3 use under the existing R-2 zoning, on some sort of conditional basis, without changing the zoning, which in turn permits the possibility of a whole host of unpleasant uses next to a residential neighborhood. 6. Environmental Review. A Determination of Non- Significance was issued by the City on April 5, 1988. 7. Public Notice. Public notice of the hearing before the Examiner has been provided as follows: April 6, 1988 - Published in Yakima Herald Republic. April 6, 1988 - Mailed to property owners within 300 feet. April 6, 1988 - Property posted. From the foregoing Findings, the Examiner makes the following: CONCLUSIONS 1. The Examiner has jurisdiction. 2. On balance, subject to the Findings above, the proposed rezone conforms to the goals and policies of the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and to the intent of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance; the property is suitable for uses permitted in the M-.1 District; any problems with neighborhood compatibility can apparently be esolved; and a public need exists for the proposed change. 3. Al]. notice provisions of the ordinance have been EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER 'S RECOMMENDATION - 6 FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA POST OFFICE 80X 4 YAK IMA. WASHINGTON 98907 (509) 248-0706 411 • . rS 1 2 _ . 1 i j complied with. Based upon the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Examiner submits to the Yakima Board of County Commissioners the following: RECOMMENDATION Approve this rezone application, including the request to administratively adjust the south setback requirement from 30 feet to 24 feet, subject to construction of a cyclone fence with privacy strips on the south property line, and that curb cuts be limited to 35 feet. Respectfully submitted this 2S---day of May, 1988. PHILIP A. B Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER EXAMINER'S HECOM:MENDATIOH - FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF YAKIMA POST OFFICE BOX 4 YMU MA. WASHINGTON 98907 (509) 248 -0706 •