HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-2008-014 Fruitvale Canal Piping; Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.RESOLUTION NO. R-2008-14
A RESOLUTION authorizing the City Manager to execute the engineering and
consulting services agreement with Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc. for
engineering and consulting services associated with the piping of the Fruitvale Canal
from N. 6th Ave. to "H" St and N. 9th St..
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima Water/Irrigation Division requires engineering
and consulting services associated with the piping of the Fruitvale Canal from N. 6th
Ave. to "H" St and N. 9th St. project, and
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima Water Division representatives complied with the
provisions of RCW 39.80 which concerns the procurement of engineering and
architectural services by a city; and
WHEREAS, Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc. has the necessary expertise
and experience to perform and provide the required engineering and surveying services
and is willing to do so in accordance with the attached agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to
enter into an agreement with Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc. for engineering and
consulting services associated with the piping of the Fruitvale Canal from N. 6th Ave. to
"H" St and N. 9th St. Project, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the attached and
incorporated the engineering and consulting services agreement with Huibregtse,
Louman Associates, Inc. for engineering and consulting services associated with the
piping of the Fruitvale Canal from N. 6th Ave. to "H" St and N. 9th St. Project.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th ay of Janus. 2008.
ATTEST:
Lae_hT71-0iirctLL_
City Clerk
avid dler,
ayor
i- Zoo `a'-1 `f
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AND
HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 2-1— � day of. —7:3Aw— vey , 2008, by and
between the City of Yakima, Washington, with principal offices at 129 North Second Street, Yakima, WA
98901, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC., 801 North 39'h
Avenue, Yakima, WA 98902 and which corporation and its principal engineers performing this Agreement are
licensed and registered to do business in the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "ENGINEER," for
FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Design Services, herein called the "PROJECT."
WITNESSETH:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY desires to retain the ENGINEER to provide engineering services for design and
construction of FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, as described in this Agreement
and subsequent Amendments thereto; and
WHEREAS, ENGINEER represents that it has available and offers to provide personnel with expertise
and experience necessary to satisfactorily accomplish the work within the required time and that it has no
conflicts of interest prohibited by law from entering into this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and ENGINEER agree as follows:
SECTION 1 INCORPORATION OF RECITALS
1.1 The above recitals are incorporated into these operative provisions of the Agreement.
SECTION 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.0.1 ENGINEER agrees to perform those services described hereafter. Unless'modified in writing by both
parties, duties of ENGINEER shall not be construed to exceed those services specifically set forth
herein.
2.0.2 ENGINEER shall use its best efforts to maintain continuity in personnel and shall assign Michael T.
Battle, PE, as Project Manager and Principal -in -Charge throughout the term of this Agreement unless
other personnel are approved by the CITY.
2.1 Basic Services: ENGINEER agrees to perform those tasks described in Exhibit A, entitled "City of
Yakima -.FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" (WORK) which is part of this
Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
2.2 Additional Services: CITY and ENGINEER agree that not all WORK to be performed by ENGINEER
can be defined in detail at the time this Agreement is executed, and that additional WORK related to
Project and not covered in Exhibit A may be needed during performance of this Agreement. CITY
may, at any time, by written order, direct the ENGINEER to revise portions of the PROJECT WORK
previously completed in a satisfactory manner, delete portions of the PROJECT, or request that the
ENGINEER perform additional WORK beyond the scope of the PROJECT WORK. Such changes
hereinafter shall be referred to as "Additional Services."
2.2.1 If such Additional Services cause an increase or decrease in the ENGINEER'S cost of, or time
required for, performance of any services under this Agreement, a contract price and/or completion
time adjustment pursuant to this Agreement shall be made and this Agreement shall be modified in
writing accordingly.
G.'PROPOSALS\2007\CAy of Yakwna'Fruitvale CanaMPS.doc 1
2.2.2 Compensation for each such request for Additional Services will be negotiated by the CITY and the
ENGINEER according to the provisions set forth in Exhibit C and, if so authorized, shall be considered
part of the PROJECT WORK. The ENGINEER shall not perform any Additional Services until so
authorized by CITY and agreed to by the ENGINEER in writing.
2.3 The ENGINEER must assert any claim for adjustment in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of
receipt by the ENGINEER of the written notification of change or of providing services related to an
asserted change, whichever is earliest.
SECTION 3 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
3.1 CITY -FURNISHED DATA: The CITY will provide to the ENGINEER all technical data in the CITY'S
possession relating to the ENGINEER'S services on the PROJECT including information on any
pre-existing conditions known to the CITY that constitute hazardous waste contamination on the
PROJECT site as determined by an authorized regulatory agency.
3.2 ACCESS TO FACILITIES AND PROPERTY: The CITY will make its facilities reasonably accessible
to ENGINEER as required for ENGINEER'S performance of its services and will provide labor and
safety equipment as reasonably required by ENGINEER for such access.
3.3 TIMELY REVIEW: The CITY will examine the ENGINEER'S studies, reports, sketches, drawings,
specifications, proposals, and other documents; obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor,
accountant, auditor, bond and financial advisors, and other consultants as CITY deems appropriate;
and render in writing decisions required of CITY in a timely manner. Such examinations and
decisions, however, shall not relieve the ENGINEER of any contractual obligations nor of its duty to
render professional services meeting the standards of care for its profession.
3.4 CITY shall appoint a City's Representative with respect to WORK to be performed under this
Agreement. City's Representative shall have complete authority to transmit instructions and receive
information. ENGINEER shall be entitled to reasonably rely on such instructions made by the CITY'S
Representative unless otherwise directed in writing by the CITY, but ENGINEER shall be responsible
for bringing to the attention of the CITY'S Representative any instructions which the ENGINEER
believes are inadequate, incomplete, or inaccurate based upon the ENGINEER'S knowledge.
3.5 Any documents, services, and reports provided by the CITY to the ENGINEER are available solely as
additional information to the ENGINEER and will not relieve the ENGINEER of its duties and
obligations under this Agreement or at law. The ENGINEER shall be entitled to reasonably rely upon
the accuracy and the completeness of such documents, services and reports, but shall be responsible
for exercising customary professional care in using and reviewing such documents, services, and
reports and drawing conclusions therefrom.
SECTION 4 AUTHORIZATION, PROGRESS, AND COMPLETION
4.1 In signing this Agreement, CITY grants ENGINEER specific authorization to proceed with WORK
described in Exhibit A. The time for completion is defined in Exhibit A, or as amended.
SECTION 5 COMPENSATION
5.1 COMPENSATION ON A TIME SPENT BASIS AT SPECIFIC HOURLY RATES: For the services
described in Exhibit A, compensation shall be according to Exhibit C - Schedule of Specific Hourly
Rates on a time spent basis plus reimbursement for direct non -salary expenses.
5.1.1 DIRECT NON -SALARY EXPENSES: Direct Non -Salary Expenses are those costs incurred on or
directly for the PROJECT including, but not limited to, necessary transportation costs, including
current rates for ENGINEER'S vehicles; meals and lodging; laboratory tests and analyses; printing,
binding and reproduction charges; all costs associated with other outside nonprofessional services
and facilities; special CITY -requested and PROJECT -related insurance and performance warranty
costs; and other similar costs. Reimbursement for Direct Non -Salary Expenses will be on the basis of
actual charges when furnished by commercial sources and on the basis of current rates when
furnished by ENGINEER. Estimated Direct Non -Salary Expenses are shown in Exhibit B.
G \PROPOSALS\20071CAy of YakimaTruitvale CanaMPS.Ooc 2
5.1.1.2 Travel costs, including transportation, lodging, subsistence, and incidental expenses incurred by
employees of the ENGINEER and each of the Subconsultants in connection with PROJECT WORK;
provided, as follows:
That a maximum of U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE allowed cents per mile will be paid
for the operation, maintenance, and depreciation costs of company or individually owned
vehicles for that portion of time they are used for PROJECT WORK. ENGINEER, whenever
possible, will use the least expensive form of ground transportation.
That reimbursement for meals inclusive of tips shall not exceed a maximum of $40 per day
per person. This rate may be adjusted on a yearly basis.
That accommodation shall be at a reasonably priced hotel/motel.
That air travel shall be by.coach class, and shall be used only when absolutely necessary.
5.1.2 Telephone charges, computer charges, in-house reproduction charges, first class postage, and FAX
charges are not included in the direct expense costs, but are considered included in the Schedule of
Specific Hourly Billing Rates.
5.1.3 Professional Subconsultants. Professional Subconsultants are those costs for engineering,
architecture, geotechnical .services and similar professional services approved by the CITY.
Reimbursement for Professional Subconsultants will be on the basis of 1.10 times the actual costs
billed by the Professional Subconsultant for services provided to the CITY through this Agreement.
Estimated Subconsultant costs are shown in Exhibit B.
5.2 Unless specifically authorized in writing by the CITY, the total budgetary amount for this PROJECT
shall not exceed that amount set forth in Exhibit B. The ENGINEER will make reasonable efforts to
complete the WORK within the budget and will keep CITY informed of progress toward that end so
that the budget or WORK effort can be adjusted if found necessary. The ENGINEER is not obligated
to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, nor is the CITY obligated to pay the
ENGINEER beyond these limits. When any budget has been increased, the ENGINEER'S excess
costs expended prior to such increase will be allowable to the same extent as if such costs had been
incurred after the approved increase, and provided that the City was informed in writing at the time
such costs were incurred.
5.3 The ENGINEER will use' its best efforts to submit to the City's Representative by the 10th day of each
calendar month an invoice for payment for PROJECT services completed through the accounting cut-
off day of the previous month. Such invoices shall be for PROJECT services and WORK performed
and costs incurred prior to the date of the invoice and not covered by previously submitted invoices.
The ENGINEER shall submit with each invoice a summary of time expended on the PROJECT for the
current billing period, copies of subconsultant invoices, and any other supporting materials determined
by the City.necessary to substantiate the costs incurred. CITY will use its best efforts to pay such
invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt and upon approval of the WORK done and amount billed.
CITY will notify the ENGINEER promptly if any problems are noted with the invoice. CITY may
question any item in an invoice, noting to ENGINEER the questionable item(s) and withholding
payment for such item(s). The ENGINEER may resubmit such item(s) in a subsequent invoice
together with additional supporting information required.
5.4 If payment is not made within sixty (60) days following receipt of approved invoices, interest on the
unpaid balance shall accrue beginning with the sixty-first (61) day at the rate of 1.0% per month or the
maximum interest rate permitted by law, whichever is less; provided, however, that no interest shall
accrue pursuant to Chapter 39.76 RCW when before the date of timely payment a notice of dispute is
issued in good faith by the CITY to the ENGINEER pursuant to the terms of RCW 39.76.020(4).
5.5 Final payment of any balance due the ENGINEER for PROJECT services will be made within
forty-five (45) days after satisfactory completion of the services required by this Agreement as
evidenced by written acceptance by CITY and after such audit or verification as CITY may deem
necessary and execution and delivery by the ENGINEER of a release of all known claims against
G.\PROPOSALSt2007\Ctty of YakimaTruitvale CanaMPS.doc 3
CITY arising under or by virtue of this Agreement, other than such claims, if any, as may be
specifically exempted by the ENGINEER from the operation of the release in stated amounts to be set
forth therein.
5.6 Payment for any PROJECT services and WORK shall not constitute a waiver or release by CITY of
any claims, right, or remedy it may have against the ENGINEER under this Agreement or by law, nor
shall such payment constitute a waiver, remission, or discharge by CITY of any failure or fault of the
ENGINEER to satisfactorily perform the PROJECT WORK as required under this Agreement.
SECTION 6 RESPONSIBILITY OF ENGINEER
6.1 The ENGINEER shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical adequacy and accuracy,
timely completion, and the coordination of all plans, design, drawings, specifications, reports, and
other services furnished by the ENGINEER under this Agreement. The ENGINEER shall, without
additional compensation, correct or review any errors, omissions, or other deficiencies in its plans,
designs, drawings, specifications, reports, and other services. The ENGINEER shall perform its
WORK according to generally accepted civil engineering standards of care and consistent with
achieving the PROJECT WORK within budget, on time, and in compliance with applicable laws,
regulations, and permits.
6.2 CITY'S review or approval of, or payment for, any plans, drawings, designs, specifications, reports,
and incidental WORK or services furnished hereunder shall not in any way relieve the ENGINEER of
responsibility for the technical adequacy, completeness, or accuracy of its WORK.and the PROJECT
WORK. CITY'S review, approval, or payment for any of the services shall not be construed to operate
as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or at law or any 'cause of action arising out of the
performance of this Agreement.
6.3 In performing WORK and services hereunder, the ENGINEER and its subcontractors, subconsultants,
employees, agents, and representatives shall be acting as independent contractors and shall not be
deemed or construed to be employees or agents of CITY in any manner whatsoever. The
ENGINEER shall not hold itself out as, nor claim to be, an officer or employee of CITY by reason
hereof and will not make any claim, demand, or application to or for any right or privilege applicable to
an officer or employee of CITY. The ENGINEER shall be solely responsible for any claims for wages
or compensation by ENGINEER employees, agents, and representatives, including subconsultants
and subcontractors, and shall save and hold CITY harmless therefrom.
6.4 INDEMNIFICATION:
(a) ENGINEER agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the CITY harmless from loss, cost, or
expense, including legal fees, of any kind claimed by third parties, including without limitation
such loss, cost, or expense resulting from injuries to persons or damages to property, caused
solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the ENGINEER, its employees, officers, and •
subconsultants in connection with the PROJECT. In the event that any lien is placed upon
the property of the CITY or any of the CITY'S officers, employees, or agents as a result of the
negligence or willful misconduct of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall at once cause the
same to be dissolved and discharged by giving bond or otherwise.
(b) CITY agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the ENGINEER harmless from loss, cost, or
expense, including legal fees, of any kind claimed by third parties, including without limitation
such loss, cost, or expense resulting from injuries to persons or damages to property, caused
solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its employees, or agents in
connection with the PROJECT.
(c) If the negligence or willful misconduct of both the ENGINEER and the CITY (or a person
identified above for whom each is liable) is a cause of such third party claim, the loss, cost, or
expense shall be shared between the ENGINEER and the CITY in proportion to their relative
degrees of negligence or willful misconduct and the right of indemnity will apply for such
proportion.
G \PROPOSALS\2007\Crty of Yakima\Fruitva{e CanaMPS.doc 4
6.5 In any and all claims by an employee of the ENGINEER, any subcontractor, anyone directly or
indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, the
indemnification obligations under this Agreement shall not be limited, in any way by any limitation on
the amount or types of damages, compensation, or benefits payable by or for the ENGINEER or a
subcontractor under workers' or workmens' compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other
employee benefit acts. The ENGINEER waives its immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title
51, RCW. Such waiver has been mutually negotiated by the ENGINEER and the CITY as evidenced
by their specific and express initialing of this paragraph.
ENGINEER'S INITIALS
CITY'S INITIALS
6.6 It is understood that any resident engineering or Construction Observation provided by ENGINEER is
for the purpose of determining compliance with the technical provisions of PROJECT specifications
and does not constitute any form of guarantee or insurance with respect to the performance of a
contractor. ENGINEER does not assume responsibility for methods or appliances used by a
contractor, for the safety of construction work, or for compliance by contractors with laws and
regulations. CITY shall use its best efforts to ensure that the construction contract requires that the
contractor(s) indemnify and name CITY, the CITY'S and the ENGINEER'S officers, principals,
employees, agents, representatives, and engineers as additional insureds on contractor's insurance
policies covering PROJECT, exclusive of insurance for ENGINEER professional liability.
6.7 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS: In soils, foundation, groundwater, and other subsurface
investigations, the actual characteristics may vary significantly between successive test points and
sample intervals and at locations other than where observation, exploration, and investigations have
been made. Because of the inherent uncertainties in subsurface evaluations, changed or
unanticipated underground conditions may occur that could affect total PROJECT cost and/or
execution. These conditions and cost/execution effects are not the responsibility of the ENGINEER,
to the extent that ENGINEER has exercised the applicable standard of professional care and
judgment in such investigations.
SECTION 7 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET
7.1 The general PROJECT schedule and the budget for both the entire PROJECT and its component
tasks shall be as set forth in this Agreement and attachments. The project schedule and performance
dates for the individual tasks shall be mutually agreed to by the CITY and the ENGINEER within
fifteen days after execution of this Agreement. The performance dates and budgets for tasks may be
modified only upon written agreement of the parties hereto. The performance date for tasks and the
completion date for the entire PROJECT shall not be extended nor the budget increased because of
any unwarranted delays attributable to the ENGINEER, but may be extended or increased by the
CITY in the event of a delay caused by special services requested by the CITY, or because of
unavoidable delay caused by any governmental action, or other conditions beyond the control of the
ENGINEER which could not be reasonably anticipated.
7.2 Not later than the tenth day of each calendar month during the performance of the PROJECT, the
ENGINEER shall submit to the CITY'S Representative a copy of the current schedule and a written
narrative description of the WORK accomplished by the ENGINEER and subconsultants on each
task, indicating a good faith estimate of the percentage completion thereof on the last day of the
previous month. Additional oral or written reports shall be prepared at the request of the CITY for
presentation to other governmental agencies and/or to the public.
SECTION 8 REUSE OF DOCUMENTS
8.1 All internal WORK products of the ENGINEER are instruments or service of this PROJECT. There
shall be no reuse, change, or alteration by the CITY or others acting through or in behalf of the CITY
without written permission of the ENGINEER, which shall not be reasonably withheld will be at the
CITY's sole risk. The CITY agrees to indemnify the ENGINEER and its officers, employees,
subcontractors, and affiliated corporations from all claims, damages, losses, and costs, including, but
not limited to, litigation expenses and attorney's fees, arising out of or related to such unauthorized
reuse, change, or alteration; provided, however, that the ENGINEER will not be indemnified for such
G:PROPOSALS\2007\C ty of Yakima\Frurtvale Canal\APS doc 5
claims, damages, losses, and costs including without limitations litigation expenses and attorney fees
where caused by the ENGINEER's own acts or omissions.
8.2 The ENGINEER agrees that ownership of any plans, drawings, designs, specifications, computer
programs, technical reports, operating manuals, calculations, notes, and other WORK submitted or
which are specified to be delivered under this Agreement or which are developed or produced and
paid for under this Agreement, whether or not complete, shall be vested in the CITY.
SECTION 9 AUDIT AND ACCESS TO RECORDS
9.1 The ENGINEER, including its subconsultants, shall maintain books, records, documents and other
evidence directly pertinent to performance of the WORK under this Agreement in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently applied. The CITY or the CITY'S
duly authorized representative, shall have access to such books, records, documents, and other
evidence for inspection, audit, and copying for a period of three years after completion of the
PROJECT. The CITY shall also have access to such books, records, and documents during the
performance of the PROJECT WORK if deemed necessary by the CITY to verify the ENGINEER'S
WORK and invoices.
9.2 Audits conducted pursuant to this section shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and established procedures and guidelines of the reviewing or auditing agency.
9.3 The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from access to
records pursuant to this section provided that the ENGINEER is afforded the opportunity for an audit
exit conference and an opportunity to comment and submit any supporting documentation on the
pertinent portions of the draft audit report and that the final audit report will include written comments,
if any, of the ENGINEER.
9.4 The ENGINEER shall ensure that substantially the foregoing paragraphs are included in each
subcontract for WORK on the Project.
9.5 Any charges of the ENGINEER paid by the CITY found by an audit to be inadequately substantiated
shall be reimbursed to the CITY.
SECTION 10 INSURANCE
10.1 Prior to beginning WORK under this Agreement, the ENGINEER shall provide Certificates of
Insurance satisfactory to the CITY as evidence that policies providing the following coverage and
limits of insurance are in full force and effect. The CITY and the CITY'S officers, principals,
employees, representatives, and agents shall be designated as additional insured on all such policies
except for professional liability and Worker's Compensation. Such insurance shall be primary to the
extent covered as additional insureds and other insurance maintained or carried by the CITY shall be
separate and distinct and shall not be contributing with the insurance listed hereunder.
10.1.1 Comprehensive general liability insurance, including personal injury liability, blanket contractual
liability, and broad -form property damage liability coverage. The combined single limit for bodily injury
and property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
10.1.2. Automobile bodily injury and property damage liability insurance covering owned, non -owned, rented,
and hired cars. The combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage shall be not less than
$1,000,000 per occurrence.
10.1.3. Statutory workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by state law.
10.1.4. Professional liability insurance. The limit of liability shall be not less than $1,000,000.
Failure of either or all of the additional insureds to report a claim under such insurance shall not
prejudice the rights of the CITY, its officers, employees, agents, and representatives thereunder. The
CITY and the CITY'S officers, principals, employees, representatives, and agents shall have no
obligation for payment of premiums because of being named as additional insureds under such
G \PROPOSALS\2007Y,;rty of YakunaWnirtvale CanaMPS.doc 6
insurance. None of the policies issued pursuant to the requirements contained herein shall be
canceled, allowed to expire, or changed in any manner so as to affect the rights of the City thereunder
until thirty (30) days after written notice to the CITY of such intended cancellation, expiration, or
change.
SECTION 11 SUBCONTRACTS
11.1 ENGINEER shall be entitled, to the extent determined appropriate by ENGINEER, to subcontract any
portion of the WORK to be performed under this Agreement.
11.2 Any subconsultants or subcontractors to the ENGINEER utilized on this PROJECT, including any
substitutions thereof, will be subject to prior approval by CITY, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. Each subcontract shall be subject to review by the CITY'S Representative, if
requested, prior to the subconsultant or subcontractor proceeding with the WORK. Such review shall
not constitute an approval as to the legal form or content of such subcontract. The ENGINEER shall
be responsible for the architectural and engineering performance, acts, and omissions of all persons
and firms performing subcontract WORK.
11.3 CITY hereby authorizes the ENGINEER to subcontract with the persons and firms listed below:
None anticipated.
11.4 The ENGINEER shall submit, along with its monthly invoices, a description of all WORK completed by
subconsultants and subcontractors during the preceding month and copies of all invoices thereto.
SECTION 12 ASSIGNMENT
12.1 This Agreement is binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. This
Agreement may not be assigned by CITY or ENGINEER without prior, written consent of the other,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
SECTION 13 INTEGRATION
13.1 This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and ENGINEER as to those matters
contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to
those matters covered herein. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing
signed by both parties.
SECTION 14 JURISDICTION AND VENUE
14.1 This Agreement shall be administered and interpreted under the laws of the State of Washington.
Jurisdiction of litigation arising from this Agreement shall be in that state. If any part of this Agreement
is found to conflict with applicable laws, such part shall be inoperative, null, and void insofar as it
conflicts with said laws, but the remainder of this Agreement shall be in full force and effect. Venue of
all disputes shall be Yakima County, State of Washington.
SECTION 15 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT and NONDISCRIMINATION
15.1 In connection with the Services under this Agreement, ENGINEER agrees to comply with the
applicable provisions of State and Federal Equal Employment Opportunity and Nondiscrimination
statutes and regulations.
SECTION 16 SUSPENSION OF WORK
16.1 CITY may suspend, in writing by certified mail, all or a portion of the WORK under this Agreement if
unforeseen circumstances beyond CITY'S control are interfering with normal progress of the WORK.
ENGINEER may suspend, in writing by certified mail, all or a portion of the WORK under this
Agreement if unforeseen circumstances beyond ENGINEER's control are interfering with normal
progress of the WORK. ENGINEER may suspend WORK on PROJECT in the event CITY does not
pay invoices when due, except where otherwise provided by this Agreement. 'The time for completion
GAPROPOSALS120071City of Yabma\Fruitvale CanaMPS.r1oc 7
of the WORK shall be extended by the number of days WORK is suspended. If the period of
suspension exceeds 90 days, the terms of this Agreement are subject to renegotiation, and both
parties are granted the option to terminate WORK on the suspended portion of Project in accordance
with SECTION 17.
SECTION 17 TERMINATION OF WORK
17.1 Either party may terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, if the other party materially breaches its
obligations under this Agreement and is in default through no fault of the terminating party. However,
no such termination may be effected unless the other party is given: (1) not less than fifteen (15)
calendar days written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, of intent to terminate;
and (2) an opportunity for consultation and for cure with the terminating party before termination.
Notice shall be considered issued within seventy-two (72) hours of mailing by certified mail to the
place of business of either party as set forth in this Agreement.
17.2 In addition to termination under subparagraph A of this Section, CITY may terminate this Agreement
for its convenience, in whole or in part, provided the ENGINEER is given: (1) not less than fifteen (15)
calendar days written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, of intent to terminate;
and (2) an opportunity for consultation with CITY before termination.
17.3 If CITY terminates for default on the part of the ENGINEER, an adjustment in the contract price
pursuant to the Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on
unperformed services or other WORK, and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time of
termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs or damages CITY has incurred, or is
likely to incur, because of the ENGINEER'S breach. In such event, CITY shall consider the amount of
WORK originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that
WORK is in a form or of a type which is usable and suitable.to CITY at the date of termination and the
cost to CITY of completing the WORK itself or of employing another firm to complete it. Under no
circumstances shall payments made under this provision exceed the contract price. In the event of
default, the ENGINEER agrees to pay CITY for any and all damages, costs, and expenses whether
directly, indirectly, or consequentially caused by said default. This provision shall not preclude CITY
from filing claims and/or commencing litigation to secure compensation for damages incurred beyond
that covered by contract retainage or other withheld payments.
17.4 If the ENGINEER terminates for default on the part of CITY or if CITY terminates for convenience, the
adjustment pursuant to the Agreement shall include payment for services satisfactorily performed to
the date of termination, in addition to termination settlement costs the ENGINEER reasonably incurs
relating to commitments which had become firm before the termination, unless CITY determines to
assume said commitments.
17.5 Upon receipt of a termination notice under subsections 17.1 or 17.2 above, the ENGINEER shall (1)
promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or
otherwise make available to CITY all originals of data, drawings, specifications, calculations, reports,
estimates, summaries, and such other information, documents, and materials as the ENGINEER or its
subconsultants may have accumulated or prepared in performing this Agreement, whether completed
or in progress, with the ENGINEER retaining copies of the same.
17.6 Upon termination under any subparagraph above, CITY reserves the right to prosecute the WORK to
completion utilizing other qualified firms or individuals; provided, the ENGINEER shall have no
responsibility to prosecute further WORK thereon.
17.7 If, after termination for failure of the ENGINEER to fulfill contractual obligations, it is determined that
the ENGINEER has not so failed, the termination shall be deemed to have been effected for the
convenience of CITY. In such event, the adjustment pursuant to the Agreement shall be determined
as set forth in subparagraph 17.4 of this Section.
17.8 If, because of death, unavailability or any other occurrence, it becomes impossible for any key
personnel employed by the ENGINEER in PROJECT WORK or for any corporate officer of the
ENGINEER to render his services to the PROJECT, the ENGINEER shall not be relieved of its
obligations to complete performance under this Agreement without the concurrence and written
G\PROPOSALS12007\Gty of Yak,ma\Frwivale CanalAPS.doc 8
approval of CITY. If CITY agrees to termination of this Agreement under this provision, payment shall
be made as set forth in subparagraph 17.3 of this Section.
SECTION 18 ARBITRATION
18.1 All claims, counterclaims, disputes, and other matters in question arising out of, or relating to, this
AGREEMENT or the breach thereof may be decided by arbitration .in accordance with the
Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining. Either
CITY or ENGINEER may initiate a request for such arbitration, but consent of the other party to such
arbitration shall be a necessary precondition to arbitration.
SECTION 19 NOTICE
19.1 Any notice required to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be directed to the party at the
address set forth below. Notice shall be considered issued and effective upon receipt thereof by the
addressee -party, or seventy-two hours after mailing by certified mail to the place of business set forth
below, whichever is earlier.
CITY: City of Yakima
2301 Fruitvale Boulevard
Yakima, WA 98902
Attn: Mr. David Brown, Water and Irrigation Manager
ENGINEER:. HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
801 North 39"' Avenue
Yakima, WA 98902
Attn: Jeffrey T. Louman, PE, President
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their
respective authorized officers or representatives as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF YAKIMA HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Signature Sig :ture
Printed Name:
R. A. Zais, Jr.
Title:
City Manager
Date: /%J 7/C)$'
Attest
ity Clerk
•
G \PROPOSALS\20071C.ty of Yakima1FnnMale CanaMPS.doc
CITY CONTRAC r NO: (9,4f "
RESOLUTION NO: !, azar --/y
Printed Name:
Jeffrey T. Louman
ti
Title:
President
Date: /2--/ (47g3
9
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF YAKIMA
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that R.A. Zais, Jr., is the person who appeared before me,
and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to
execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the City Manager of CITY OF YAKIMA to be the free and
voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: /-",47
Seal or Stamp
W A T k/
S\�N EXP/ �s
Vn
G \PROPOSALS\2007\City of Yakima\Fruitvale CanaMWPS clot
Z/.vois /w I J, 7 JN $
My commission expires:
10
Printed Name
03 -4S-dole
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
COUNTY OF YAKIMA
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jeffrey T. Louman, PE, is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was
authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the President of Huibregtse, Louman
Associates, Inc., to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the
instrument.
Dated:
Seal or Stamp
G \PROPOSALS\2007\Cdy of Yakima\Fruitvale CanaMPS doc
• C%7Z/! -44ttn )
natu e c
crIgair-
Title
Printed Name
My commission expires: 3/to`Dci
11
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF YAKIMA - FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
SCOPE OF WORK
During the term of this AGREEMENT, the ENGINEER shall perform professional services in connection with
the following project:
City of Yakima - Fruitvale Canal Pipeline Improvement Project
This scope of work shall include the furnishing of all services, labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and
incidentals necessary to conduct and complete the work as indicated hereinafter. The work to be performed
involves project management, and project formulation, investigation, and preliminary engineering.
1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
A. The project manager will coordinate ENGINEER'S design team to ensure that the work is
completed on schedule, is technically competent, and meets the CITY'S needs. The project
manager will provide overall project management for ENGINEER'S work element, including
coordination with subconsultants, progress reports, and invoicing.
B. Attend up to three (3) project meetings in Yakima with CITY staff to coordinate the design
aspects of the project with the CITY.
2. PROJECT FORMULATION, INVESTIGATION, AND PRE -ENGINEERING
A. Perform topographic field survey of the Fruitvale Canal project alignment, from N. 6'h
Avenue/Willow Street intersection to N. 7"' Street/E. H Street intersection (approximately
4,700 I.f.). HLA will field survey the existing Fruitvale Canal to include ditch cross sections,
pipe sizes, culvert crossings, depth of flow (if available), locating underground utility markings
provided by others, and visible surface features such as water valves, manholes, sidewalks,
and structures immediately adjacent to the canal location. The purpose of the topographic
survey is to provide information upon which to determine the improvement recommendation.
HLA will prepare a topographic survey of the canal alignment showing field located surface
features and utilities of record. Underground utilities will be shown based on field markings
provided by the local "call before you dig" locating service and record drawings provided by
the City of Yakima.
C. The topographic survey does not include excavation work to determine utility locations and
depth.
D. The City of Yakima shall arrange for safe access to and make all provisions for HLA and
HLA's consultants to enter upon public and private property as required to perform the
services under this Agreement.
Perform field investigations to determine the condition of the existing irrigation system
including road crossings, utility conflicts, points of connection, and overall canal
characteristics.
Prepare engineering report of existing conditions, improvement recommendations, project
construction phasing, and preliminary cost estimates.
G \PROPOSALS\2007\City of Yakima\Fruitvale Canai\APS tloc
12
The following professional services work for this project is provided for information only at this time. The
scope and cost of professional services are intended to be negotiated and incorporated into this agreement by
supplement/addendum at a later date with the mutual agreement of CITY and ENGINEER:
3. DESIGN AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. On the basis of approved recommendations from Tasks 1 and 2 above, perform the final
design and prepare complete Plans and Specifications for bid call on the proposed work, as
authorized by the City.
B. Furnish the CITY thirty (30) copies of the final Plans and Specifications for bidding and
construction. It is anticipated that the ENGINEER will prepare up to two (2) complete sets of
plans and specifications for this FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
with each set of plans and specifications ready bidding in Fall 2008 and Fall 2009, to coincide
with irrigation canal shut down.
C. Furnish to the CITY engineering data for and assist in the preparation of the required
documents so that the CITY may secure approval of such governmental authorities as have
jurisdiction over design criteria applicable to the Project.
D. Answer and supply such information as is requested by prospective bidders.
E. Prepare and issue addenda, if necessary.
F. Prepare the Engineer's Estimate of construction cost.
G. Attend bid opening and participate in the bid opening and evaluation process.
H. Prepare tabulation of all bids received by the CITY and review bidder's qualifications.
Make recommendation of construction contract award to the lowest responsible bidder.
4. SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
A. Furnish the field survey crew necessary to set horizontal and vertical control for the
improvements authorized for construction.
B. Furnish a qualified resident engineer who shall make construction observations and be on the
job at all times that significant work is in progress, whose duty shall be to provide surveillance
of project construction for substantial compliance with Plans and Specifications.
C. Prepare progress reports on the Project for the days during which a resident engineer is
present and file same with the CITY.
D. Consult and advise the CITY during construction and make a final report of the completed
work.
E. The City of Yakima is required to monitor the contractor's payment of prevailing wage rates.
As part of construction services, HLA will monitor General Contractor and Subcontractor
compliance with State labor standards during the construction phase of this project. This
work includes checking monthly certified payrolls, conducting employee interviews in the field,
and issuing letters of non-compliance and/or letters of missing documents. HLA will perform
this task until the project has been accepted by the City of Yakima. At that time, HLA will turn
over all files kept by HLA during the performance of this task to the City of Yakima. It will
then be the City of Yakima's responsibility to pursue any outstanding labor issues.
F. Review Contractor's submission of samples and shop drawings, where applicable.
G PROPOSALS120071City of YakimalFruitvate CanaINAPS.doc
13
G. Recommend progress payments for the construction contractor to the CITY.
H. Prepare and submit proposed contract change orders when applicable.
Prepare and furnish reproducible record drawings from as -built drawings furnished by the
construction inspector and Contractor. If as -built drawings from the Contractor are not
received by HLA within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the letter of
recommendation of project acceptance, HLA will submit the reproducible record drawings to
the City of Yakima with a note stating that no as -built information was received by HLA.
G \PROPOSALS120071Gh of Yakima'Frurtvale Canal APS tloc
14
EXHIBIT B
FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Professional Fees
Compensation for professional services will be on a time spent basis at the specific hourly rates shown on
Exhibit C, plus reimbursement for direct non -salary expenses.
The following spreadsheet shows the estimated time and expenses to perform design engineering, plans,
specifications, and estimate for this FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT work. The maximum
amount of compensation to the ENGINEER for this work will be $55,000.00. This maximum amount will not be
exceeded without the written agreement of the CITY and the ENGINEER.
PROJECT TITLE: FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CLIENT. CITY OF YAKIMA
JOB NUMBER: 07- Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
DATE: October 24, 2007
ENGINEER'S HOURLY ESTIMATE
TASK
NO
PROJECT TASK
Principal
Engineer
Licensed
Prof.
Engineer
Principal
Land
Surveyor
CAD
Tech-
nician
2 -Man
Survey
Party
Clerical
TOTAL
HRS
TASK
DIRECT
COSTS
$141
$117
$131
$85
$155
$57
1
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
A
Project Management
16
32
0
0
0
8
56
6,456.00
B
Project Meetings
12
12
0
6
0
8 38
4,062.00
2
PROJECT FORMULATION, INVESTIGATION, AND PRE -ENGINEERING
A
Topographic field surveying
4
8
16
40
120
0
188
25,596.00
B
Field investigations
16
32
0
16
0
4
68
7,588.00
C
Preliminary Engineering Report
8
32
0
16
0
16
72
7,144.00
D
Incorporate Agency Review
Comments
2
4
0
4
0
4
14
1,318.00
E
Final Engineering Report
4
8
0
8
0
8
28
2,636.00
Labor Subtotal
62
128
16
90
120
48 '
464
54,800.00
EXPENSES:
hours
$/hr
Computers:
0.00
Travel.
Cost/
Unit
Air Tnps
Ground
Trp.
Days
Trip
Miles
Air Travel
$0.00
0.00
Mileage
$0.00
0.00
Meals/Lodging
$0.00
0.00
Misc. expenses:
FAX
0.00
TELEPHONE
0.00
POSTAGE
0.00
PRINTING
200.00
G''PROPOSALS12007\City of Yakima\Fruitvale CartaMPS.doc
15
PROJECT TITLE: FRUFTVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CLIENT CITY OF YAKIMA
SUB -CONSULTANTS -
1. None Anticipated
0.00 X 1.1 1
0.00
Subtotal - Labor
54,800.00
Subtotal - Expenses
200 00
Subtotal - Subconsultants
0.00
Total - PROJECT FORMULATION, INVESTIGATION, AND PRE -ENGINEERING
$55,000 00
G \PROPOSALS\2007\City of Yakima\Ruitvale CanaRAPS doc 16
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF RATES
FOR
HUIBREGTSE, LOU AN ASSOCIATES, INC.
(January 1, 2008, Through December 31, 2008)
Licensed Principal Engineer $141.00 per hour
Licensed Principal Land Surveyor $131.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Engineer $117.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor $108.00 per hour
Project Engineer $97.00 per hour
CAD Technician $85.00 per hour
Resident Engineer/Inspector $81.00 per hour
Surveyor $81.00 per hour
Senior Engineering Technician $81.00 per hour
Engineering Technician $57.00 per hour
Word Processing Technician $57.00 per hour
Two Man Survey Party $155.00 per hour
Three Man Survey Party $202.00 per hour
Vehicle Mileage $0.35 per mile
Global Positioning Survey System Fee $77.00 per hour
G:\PROPOSALS120071Crty of Yakima\Frurtvale Cana(1APS.doc
17
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF RATES
FOR
HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
(January 1, 2009, Through December 31, 2009)
Licensed Principal Engineer $148.00 per hour
Licensed Principal Land Surveyor $136.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Engineer $123.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor $112.00 per hour
Project Engineer $101.00 per hour
CAD Technician $89.00 per hour
Resident Engineer/Inspector $84.00 per hour
Surveyor $84.00 per hour
Senior Engineering Technician $84.00 per hour
Engineering Technician $59.00 per hour
Word Processing Technician $59.00 per hour
Two Man Survey Party $161.00 per hour
Three Man Survey Party $210.00 per hour
Vehicle Mileage $0.40 per mile
Global Positioning Survey System Fee $78.00 per hour
G \PROPOSALS2007\City of Yaklma'FruMale CanaMPS.tloc
18
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADDENDUM NO. 1
This Addendum, hereinafter identified as Addendum No. 1, is hereby entered into and made a part of the
Agreement between City of Yakima, Washington, and Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc., for Professional
Services first entered into"on the 21st day of January, 2008 by the CITY OF YAKIMA, hereinafter called the
"CITY," and HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter called the "ENGINEER."
WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties
hereto do mutually agree to amend, revise, and/or add the following to the referenced Agreement:
SECTION 2 - SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 Basic Services: ENGINEER agrees to perform additional work tasks described in the
attached Addendum No. 1 Exhibit A: Fruitvale Canal Pipeline Improvement Project —
Design and Final Plans and Specifications.
SECTION 5 - COMPENSATION
5.1 COMPENSATION ON A TIME SPENT BASIS AT SPECIFIC HOURLY RATES: For the
services described in the attached Addendum No.1 Exhibit A, compensation shall be on a
time spent plus expenses basis with estimated fees shown on the attached Addendum No.1
Exhibit B at the ENGINEER's normal hourly billing rates shown on Exhibit C.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto duly enter into and execute this Addendum No. 1, as of this
day of April , 2009.
CITY OF YAKIMA HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Signature
Printed Name: R. A. Zais, Jr. Printed Name: Jeffrey T. Louman, PE
Title: City Manager
Date: c\\0\
Attest /—Q2._0a.
City Clerk
City Contract No. 2008-15
Resolution No.
R-2008-14
G.\ PROJECTS\2008\08030\APS-Addendum Not - Final Design doc
Title:
President
Date: Lf-/aVo
ADDENDUM NO. 1
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF YAKIMA - FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
SCOPE OF WORK
During the term of this AGREEMENT, the ENGINEER shall perform professional services in connection with
the following project:
City of Yakima - Fruitvale Canal Pipeline Improvement Project
This scope of work shall include the furnishing of all services, labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and
incidentals necessary to conduct and complete the work as indicated hereinafter. The work to be performed
involves project management, and design and final plans and specifications.
3. DESIGN AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. The project manager will coordinate ENGINEER'S design team to ensure that the work is
completed on schedule, is technically competent, and meets the CITY'S needs. The project
manager will provide overall project management for ENGINEER'S work element, including
coordination with subconsultants, progress reports, and invoicing.
B. Assist City in the preparation of funding application(s) necessary to be considered for
construction funding for the Fruitvale Canal Improvements, as directed by the City.
C. Attend up to two (2) project meetings in Yakima with CITY staff to coordinate the .design
aspects of the project with the CITY.
D. Perform the final design and prepare complete Plans and Specifications for bid call on the
proposed work, as authorized by the City.
E. Furnish the CITY thirty (30) copies of the final Plans and Specifications for bidding and
construction for each Phase of work. It is anticipated that the ENGINEER will prepare up to
two (2) complete sets of plans and specifications for this FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT to coincide with Phase 1 (6th Avenue to BNSF) & Phase 2
(BNSF to 7th Street) Improvements identified in the May 2008 Fruitvale Canal Study. Each set
of plans and specifications to be ready for bidding in Fall 2009 and Fall 2010 to coincide with
irrigation canal shut down and available construction funding. Plans and Specifications for
Phase 3 (BNSF Crossing) are not included in this Addendum No. 1.
F. Furnish to the CITY engineering data for and assist in the preparation of the required
documents so that the CITY may secure approval of such governmental authorities as have
jurisdiction over design criteria applicable to the Project.
G. Answer and supply such information as is requested by prospective bidders.
H. Prepare and issue addenda, if necessary.
I. Prepare the Engineer's Estimate of construction cost.
J. Attend bid opening and participate in the bid opening and evaluation process.
K. Prepare tabulation of all bids received by the CITY and review bidder's qualifications.
L. Make recommendation of construction contract award to the lowest responsible bidder.
G \PROJECTS\2008\08030\APS-Addendum Not - Final Design doc 2
ADDENDUM NO. 1
EXHIBIT B
FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Professional Fees
Compensation for professional services will be on a time spent basis at the specific hourly rates shown on
Exhibit C, plus reimbursement for direct non -salary expenses.
The following spreadsheet shows the estimated time and expenses to perform design engineering, plans,
specifications, and estimate for this FRUITVALE CANAL PIPELINE IMPROVEMENT work. The maximum
amount of compensation to the ENGINEER for this work will be $126,760.00. This maximum amount will not
be exceeded without the written agreement of the CITY and the ENGINEER.
Project Title: Fruitvale Canal Improvement Project (Phase 1 & 2 only of May 2008 Canal Study)
Client: City of Yakima
Job Number: 08030 - Final Design Phase
Date. 6 -Apr -09
i ENGINEER'S HOURLY ESTIMATE
Task
No.
Project Task
Licensed
Principal
Engineer
Project
Engineer
Principal
Land
Surveyor
CAD
Technician
2 -Man
Survey
Party
Word
Processing
Technician
Total Hours
Task Direct
Costs
$148
$101
$136
$89
$161
$59
1
DESIGN AND FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATE
.,A
Project Management
32
40
8
0
0
8
88
$10,336
B
Project Meetings
12
12
0
16
0
4
44
$4,648
C
Funding Application
18
48
0
16
0
16
98
$9,880
D
Field investigations and field surveying
12
40
8
0
18
0
78
$9,802
E
Perform the preliminary design
40
130
6
240
8
12
436
$43,222
F
In-house project review, quality control
8
16
4
8
0
4
40
$4,292
G
Incorporate Agency review comments
8
16
0
24
0
4.
52
$5,172
H
Final design, Plans, and Specifications
24
64
6
120
4
8
226
$22,628
I
Furnish copies of Plans and Specifications
4
6
0
0
0
4
14
$1,434
J
Furnish engineering data for approvals
4
8
0
0
0
2
14
$1,518
K
Answer bidders questions
6
12
0
0
0
0
18
$2,100
L
Prepare and issue addenda
4
8
0
10
0
4
26
$2,526
M
Prepare Estimate of construction cost
4
16
0
10
0 '
'4
34
$3,334
N
Attend bid opening
4
4
0
0
0
0
8
$996
0
Prepare tabulation of bids
2
4
0
0
0
4
10
$936
P
Make recommendation of contract award
2
4
0
0
0
4
10
$936
Labor Subtotal
184
428
32
444
30
78
. 1196
$123,760
EXPENSES:
Cost
$/hr
Ground
Days'
Miles
Travel:
Mileage
$0.40
0
$0.00
Meals/Lodging
$0.00
Misc. Expenses:
Advertisement
$2,000.00
Telephone
Postage
Outside Printing
$1,000.00
Sub -Consultants.
None Anticipated
$0.00
Mark-up
1.1
$0.00
Subtotal - Labor
$123,760.00
Subtotal - Expenses
$3,000.00
Subtotal - Subconsultants
$0.00
Total - DESIGN AND FINAL PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
$126,760.00
G 1PROJECTS\2008\08030WPS-Addendum No1 - Final Design doc
3
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF RATES
FOR
HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
(January 1, 2009, Through December 31, 2009)
Licensed Principal Engineer $148.00 per hour
Licensed Principal Land Surveyor $136.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Engineer $123.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor $112.00 per hour
Project Engineer $101.00 per.hour
CAD Technician $89.00 per hour
Resident Engineer/Inspector $84.00 per hour •
Surveyor $84.00 per hour
Senior Engineering Technician $84.00 per hour
Engineering Technician $59.00 per hour
Word Processing Technician $59.00 per hour
Two Man Survey Party $161.00 per hour
Three Man Survey Party $210.00 per hour
Vehicle Mileage $0.40 per mile
Global Positioning Survey System Fee $78.00 per hour
G\PROJECTS\2008\08030\APS-Addendum Not - Final Design doc 4
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF RATES
FOR
HUIBREGTSE, LOUMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
(January 1, 2010, Through December 31, 2010)
Licensed Principal Engineer $154.00 per hour
Licensed Principal Land Surveyor $142.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Engineer $128.00 per hour
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor $116.00 per hour
Project Engineer $105.00 per hour
CAD Technician' $92.00 per hour
Resident Engineer/Inspector $87.00 per hour
Surveyor $87.00 per hour
Senior Engineering Technician $87.00 per hour
Engineering Technician $61.00 per hour
Word Processing Technician $61.00 per hour
Two Man Survey Party $167.00 per hour
Three. Man Survey Party $218.00 per hour
Vehicle Mileage $0.45 per mile
Global Positioning Survey System Fee $80.00 per hour
G.\PROJECTS\2008\08030APS-Addendum Not . Final Design.doc 5
ITEM TITLE.
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No 44
For Meeting of 1/15108
Resolution authorizing execution of an engineering and consulting services
agreement with Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc. for services associated
with the piping of the Fruitvale Canal from North 6th Avenue to "H" Street and
North 9th Street
SUBMITTED BY Dave Brown, Water/Irrigation Manager
Dave Zabel!, Assistant City Manager
CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Dave Brown / 575-6204
SUMMARY EXPLANATION.
Staff respectfully requests City Council to approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Manager
to execute the accompanying contract with Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc, of Yakima, WA for the
Pre -Engineering for the piping, of the Fruitvale Canal from N 6th Ave to "H" St and N 9th St. (commonly
referred to as the Fruitvale Wasteway), and subsequent contracts for the design, production of
construction documents and contract administration. This contract requires Huibregtse, Louman
Associates, Inc to develop pre -engineering report that outline material requirements, pipe sizing,
construction methods and phasing for the piping of the Fruitvale Canal from N 6th Ave. to "H" St and N
9th St. Financial support for this contract will be from appropriations approved by Council in the 479
Irrigation Improvement CIP Fund Before actual design and production of contract documents begin,
the project report will be used to coordinate with the Parks Department and the Bike -Pedestrian
Committee to determine if there are ways to incorporate this canal into the City's pathway system
Not to Exceed Engineering Cost $55,000
Resolution X_ Ordinance . Contract X Other Specify)
Mail to Mike Battle, PE, Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc; 801 N. 39t Ave. Yakima, WA 98902 Phone 509-966-
7000
Funding Source 479 Irrigation Improvement CIP Fund
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL.
City Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the
accompanying Agreement for pre -engineering of the piping of the Fruitvale Canal and
subsequent contracts for the design, production of construction documents and contract
administration by Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc, of Yakima, WA.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION.
0 COUNCIL ACTION.
-- 6 if
CITY OF YAKIMA
WATER & IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
FRU ITV
LE CANAL I ,y�
STUDY
4
Prepared by:
PROVEMENTS
Haallbregstse, Loos cul an Associates, inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue *Yakima, WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 o FAX (509) 965-3800
Gene Soules, PE
HLA Project No. 08030
2301 Fruitvale Blvd.
Yakima, WA 98902
Phone (509) 576-6480
Fax (509) 575-6187
MAY 2008
J
City of Yakima
Fruitvale Canal Improvements Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 2
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS..., 2
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS 2
SECTION 1 — INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 BACKGROUND 4
1.2 SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION 4
SECTION 2 — GOALS AND DESIGN CRITERIA 6
2.1 GOALS 6
2.2 DESIGN CRITERIA 6
SECTION 3 — EVALUATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 8
3.1 PIPE SIZE AND TYPE 8
3.2 ACCESS STRUCTURE TYPE AND LOCATIONS 8
3.3 STORM DRAIN CONNECTIONS 8
3.4 CONCRETE SIDE SLOPE PANEL REMOVALS 9
3.5 BRIDGE SPAN REMOVALS 9
3.6 UTILITY COORDINATION 9
3.7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 9
3.8 PHASING PROPOSAL 10
SECTION 4 — PROJECT COST ESTIMATE 11
4.1 COST ESTIMATING CRITERIA 11
4.2 COST ESTIMATE 11
APPENDIX — Vicinity Map — Project Limits
Existing Condition Photos
Existing Topography Drawings of Project Limits
G \PROJEC?S2C08\08030+.Fruitvale Study Report.doc I
Frultvale Canal Improvements Study
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE AND._SCOPE_QF STUDY
This report presents the results of a preliminary design study for the piping a major portion of
the City of Yakima's Fruitvale Canal located between North 6th Avenue and North 7th Street. An
investigation was conducted for the purpose of developing recommendations for design and
construction, and was done in accordance with the direction of the City of Yakima's
Water/Irrigation Department.
The project limits was surveyed and photographed to determine all physical constraints that
would need to be addressed in the recommended design. Utility crossings and connections,
both private and public, were noted and included in our design. -Results of the field
investigations were analyzed to develop recommendations for the proposed piping of the canal
Field topography and specific under crossing details are presented in the Appendix.
This report has been prepared to summarize the information obtained during this study and to
present our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction and the
conditions encountered. Design assumptions and a discussion of physical constraints and
constructability are included in the report.
RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
The results of our analysis have brought us to the following conclusions and recommendations.
o Construct a single 42" diameter pipe line with a capacity of approximately 60 cfs to
replace the existing open canal.
o Construct a new flow control structure at the Old Union Ditch diversion at the east end of
the project with new weir gates, trash rack(s) and security fencing.
o Provide access structures at regular intervals for maintenance of the pipeline.
a Remove all existing street, alley, and sidewalk spans and replace with backfill and
roadway restoration.
o Restore storm drainage connections to current storm drainage design standards or
relocate to new retention locations.
o Backfill new pipeline to minimum cover requirements and hydroseed.
• Remove chain link fence except along private properties.
o Postpone piping the BNSF property until more favorable requirements can be negotiated
with BNSF.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
After determining the overall estimated costs for the entire project it is'recommendethlie
:prolect;be"divided°'into'tl reecphases;oftdritfruction. A summary of estimated capital costs for
each phase of construction is provided in Table ES.1.
G 1PROJECTS\2008108030\Fruitvale Study Report doc 2
Table ES. 1 Summary of Estimated Project Costs
Fruitvale Canal Improvements
City of Yakima
Construction Phase Estimated Project Costs (1)
Phase 1 — N. 6th Ave. to BNSF Property
Phase 2 — N. Front St. to N. 7th St.
Phase 3 — BNSF Property Only
$ 757,333
$1,282,590
$1,216,885
Note:
(1) Capital costs include a 25% contingency, engineering and construction administration at 25%, an 8.1% tax
cost, and escalation factor.
G \PROJECTS\2003',0&,30\Frurvale Study Reper.dcc 3
Section 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The Fruitvale Canal Improvement Preliminary Design study includes engineering services to
review, recommend, and oversee improvements to one of the City of Yakima's major irrigation
canals. When originally constructed in the early 1900's, the Fruitvale Canal was an open
irrigation canal originating at its diversion from the Naches River. The canal was routed
southeasterly along Powerhouse Road, then east along Lincoln Avenue to a point where its
flows dropped through a small power plant before continuing northeasterly to Willow Street and
then east to where it out falls to the Yakima River. Various canal systems along this route divert
their share of water from the Fruitvale Canal. Near the intersection of N. 10th Avenue and
Willow Street, a portion of the Old Union Canal joins what flow is left in the Fruitvale Canal.
From this point the majorit-YIoft tf a =flow=inrthe Frditva e4Ca al' onsitTtlei aliportion ;of. th.e ld
Union a ha esti M atiaMtairdfiralia'AggeriffaitliffigMWATerriMFORKWAffiVififiltratirkiVnto
:various storm 'draiittystems connected'to the eIdf<UfiionManal est mated'totil3F 6'cfs:
The section of Fruitvale Canal involved in this study is the last major open canal section. Other
portions of this canal system have been piped and pedestrian pathways constructed over the
canal right-of-way. The canal crosses under seventeen separate concrete bridge spans and
four timber railroad bridge spans. In addition there are several locations east of N. 1St Street,
where concrete sidewalk slabs span the canal. There are two utility pipelines believed to be
General 308 Irrigation System lines that cross aerially over the open canal between N. 4th
Avenue and N. 6th Avenue. Most all other utility crossings were found to be attached to the
street or alley bridge structures. The canal right-of-way is fenced all around with chain-link
fence except where the canal crosses Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad property.
A major overhead transmission and distribution power line is located within the canal way. An
abandoned railroad spur line is adjacent to the canal right-of-way from N. Front Street to N. 7th
Street.
The existing canal is an open ditch with cast -in-place concrete sidewall panels lining the canal
for its entire length. The condition of the concrete canal lining panels varies from intact and in-
place to completely failed and falling into the bottom of canal, or in some cases completely
missing. It is approximated 60% to 70% of the concrete side panels have failed. The entire
length of the canal's bottom is covered with rock and sediment to varying depths. Grass, weed
and tree root intrusions, tires, and other debris can be observed all along the canal.
Concrete bridge spans at City streets, alleys, and sidewalks vary in the size and type of each
span. This study does not include any inspection and/or analysis of the structural condition and
capacity of each structure.
Existing storm drain lines found to outlet to the canal at six locations will need to be a
consideration in the piping design.
1.2 SCOPE AND AUTHORIZATION
The scope of this improvement study deals with the section of Fruitvale Canal from N. 6th
Avenue to N. 7th Street. The major contemplated improvement for the Fruitvale Canal is to pipe
and backfill the open canal from N. 6th Avenue to N. 7th Street. In an effort to provide an efficient
and safe irrigation canal system, the City initiated the preparation of a Fruitvale Canal
G \PROJECTS12008\08030\Fruitvale Study Repon.doc 4
Improvement Preliminary Design Study. Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc. (HLA) was
requested to prepare this design study, which included the following tasks:
• Project development meetings and coordination with the City
• Field investigations and data collection
• Recommended Construction Methods and Materials
• Development of implementation schedule and costs.
Several planning level assumptions were made during the study, and are documented in the
report. Should future conditions deviate from the assumptions stated in this report, revisions
and adjustments to the report recommendations would likely be necessary.
G \PRGJECTS`2008108030\Fruitva!e Stud, Repos` doc 5
Section 2
GOALS AND DESIGN CRITERIA
To meet the City's desire to pipe the irrigation canal the following initial design goals and criteria
were used to determine the preliminary design.
2.1 GOALS
The major goals of this canal piping project are:
® Provide piping to replace the open canal with an equivalent flow capacity.
® Provide good maintenance access features.
• Minimize debris, sediment, and tree root intrusions which may restrict flow.
• Eliminate the need for structural street, sidewalk and alleys bridge spans over the canal
and their maintenance and inspection costs.
® Reduce the City's liability risk for an open canal.
® Design improvements to be compatible with developing a pedestrian pathway in the
future possibly connecting to the Greenway Pathway.
2.2 DESIGN CRITERIA
Maintenance considerations to be included in our design criteria are:
o Access ports for cleaning should be installed at a maximum of 600 feet spacing.
® Access ports need to be located where Vac -truck equipments can easily access.
® Access ports should provide sump for sediment catchment during operation and
cleaning.
o Provide access structures for trash rack cleaning and flow regulation at N. 7th Street.
Construction considerations to be included in our design criteria are:
® Clearance over canal piping shall be 1 foot minimum to finish rigid pavement grade.
• Clearance over canal piping shall be 1 foot minimum to bottom of flexible pavement
grade.
• Removal of concrete sidewall panels will be necessary to place new piping west of N.
Front Street and some damaged panels east of N. Front Street.
• Remove all spans across the canal and replace with backfill and appropriate surfacing.
® Removal of major arterial bridge decks shall require major traffic control.
r \PROJ_C T S;2G08':08030\F-u vale Study Report doc 6
• Piping across BNSF property will require removal of four timber bridge structures. The
structures will be replaced with structural concrete beams over the new pipe. This work
will require some staging to keep trains moving.
• Concrete work should avoid the colder winter temperatures.
Timing and scheduling consideration to be included in our design criteria are:
• Work shall be done during the off -irrigation season, generally between October and
March.
• Depending on available funding, completion of the total project may take several winters.
G \PROJECTS120081080301Fruitvale Study Reporz.doc 7
Section 3
EVALUATVON AND PROPOSED IRflPROVEIJIENTS
3.1 PIPE SIZE AND TYPE
In determining the recommended pipe material and diameter, it was necessary to first determine
the existing maximum flow rates. Through discussions with the City Irrigation and Waste Water
Divisions,, flows; in;the Fruitvale=Canal:yat;N46m Avenue'werCdeterrriined to? Bella gelytrfrom "storm
water, systemlinfiltration4and-Laround Tcfs .from'the-Old Union Canal:. Using measurements of
the high water mark (taken at the pipe discharging to the Fruitvale Canal at the upstream end of
this stud K. a�=�, ;. .
th-e;:aveca°"'e�;h�' draulic° rade�'line=`and"`i" e� fou �hnessrfacto��;tfe",calculated��flowsare:
`�" n. - ,., .x, ��,�.tt:n��7>r:-T�s�Ekx'i'�Wt�fi'Yf�"51+2 ;'fitj 5; ::q�-
arounq 47='sefs. TA'single42!1"diamete'r•1pi e..will�yp gvidelar'flow,ca acity�of:.ap roxirnatelysN6Q efs,
allgwingafo ,a,ofilty n the bottom.pf
The field investigation found six locations within the project limits where existing storm drain
flows discharge to the Fruitvale Canal. After discussions with the City's Waste Water Division, it
was decided these flows will be allowed to discharge to the new canal pipeline. Some form of
pretreatment of these flows may be necessary. Determination of the method and design for any
pretreatment is outside the scope of this study.
The types of ;pipe .cons det;ed {ier tl is} -design study were` High s Density :Polyethylene (HDPE)
cofriaed RE farad 'cor gated `PVC p" Corrugated metal pipe or concrete pipe were not
considered due to the problem with joints not being water or silt tight as is the plastic pipes. The
corrugated PVC pipe has the advantage of being stronger and stiffer than the corrugated PE
pipe and has a thinner wall thickness, but is not available in 42" diameter. HDPE pipe provides
the best infiltration and exfiltration performance with joints being completely fused in the field.
HDPE takes specialized equipment and certified contractors for installation. Also because of its
thick shell thickness HDPE has less inside diameter and therefore less conveyance capacity
compared to the corrugated PE pipe. The additional effort in installation, material cost, and
reduced conveyance capacity eliminates HDPE from further consideration. Itis5ecommended
two 5�'ob "�'�i'�"c^i-��a��2Lk'.'�'�'S ��.x: �- �....,.'
corrugated PE pipe betused to.const"ruct the, new�,ca nal pip'el ilC••
3.2 ACCESS STRUCTURE TYPE AND LOCATIONS
Two types of access structures were considered to provide maintenance at regular intervals
along the piping project. The first type is a traffic bearing precast concrete vault with 24"
diameter man access opening. The height of the vault would match the finish backfill grade
over the pipeline and at the bottom provide a 1 foot deep sump for sediment capture and
removal. The other type of access structure considered was a 42" diameter tee installed in the
pipeline and a 42" riser extended to a reinforced concrete slab with a manhole casting at
finished grade. Both types of structures would be traffic bearing and provide sufficient access
for a vac -truck cleaning equipment. The vault structure would allow man access to the bottom
of vault where the tee type of structure would not. The tee structure would be less expensive to
construct. If not cost prohibitive;fit_-isIecommended_touse::concrete-vaultacces*.stfuctures.
3.3 STORM DRAIN CONNECTIONS
At the direction of the Waste Water Division all existing storm drain connections will be
connected to the new canal pipeline. It is recommended some type of pretreatment or
G:\PPOJECTS\2008\08030\=ruitvale Study Report.doc 8
screening be included at the storm drainage source to prevent debris being directed to the new
pipeline.
3.4 CONCRETE SIDE SLOPE PANEL REMOVAL
A large percentage of the existing concrete side slope panels have deteriorated and slid or
fallen over into the bottom the open canal. In order to properly construct the new pipeline these
concrete panels should be removed and disposed of. This is particularly true in the canal west
of N. Front Street where the canal bottom is narrower than is east of N. Front Street. Where
panels are in good condition, are not displaced and do not interfere with the installation of the
new canal piping, it is recommended they be left in-place to save costs.
3.5 BRIDGE SPAN REMOVALS
In most cases where the existing canal crosses under a street, alley, or concrete sidewalk
spans, the concrete side slope panels exist. In a majority of these crossings the deteriorated
condition of the concrete panels would require their removal in order to place the new pipeline.
Limited room under most of these structures preclude the use any conventional power
equipment for their removal. Manual removal of these concrete panels, pipe bedding
excavation, placement of the pipeline, and the backfilling and compaction would be very difficult
and costly.
It is`prepomrnendedgeach¢stt�ralle 4�and 4sidewaI s an�=:be; renioved'`4and� the4new. 3it`eIine
installed using convectiona0eel equiRment- and Ymethods. This would better ensure the proper
placement of the pipeline and would eliminate these traffic and pedestrian bearing structures
from the City's inventory. The streets, alleys, and sidewalks would be repaired to City
construction standards.
3.6 UTILITY COORDINATION
The project will involve coordination with both public and private utilities including the City of
Yakima Water and Irrigation and Waste Water Departments, Cascade Natural Gas, Pacific
Power, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. There are six existing irrigation pipelines
that cross aerially over the new canal pipeline. Construction of the new canal pipeline is
anticipated to be during winter shutdown so any adjustments or relocation of these lines should
not be a problem. As discussed earlier, there are several storm drains that will be connected to
the new canal pipeline. No problems with these connections are assumed. PT glI5orkjk or
etmanent ife I WO titigkotggiejONAffigeijiAg Iines Twill;be = pps4hat'edr er- the yGit-'ys :franchise
agfeements. There is a major transmission power pole line all along and adjacent to the new
canal pipeline. There may be need for the power company to provide support of their poles
while work is being done near them.
3.7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the design and evaluation criteria discussed in Sections 2 and 3, the following
improvements are recommended.
• Construct a single 42" diameter pipe line with a capacity of approximately 60 cfs to
replace the existing open canal.
G.\PROJECTS\2008\08030\Fruitvale Study Report doc 9
• Construct a new flow control structure at the Old Union Ditch diversion at the east end of
the project with new weir gates, trash rack(s) and security fencing.
• Provide access structures at regular intervals for maintenance of the pipeline.
• Remove all existing street, alley, and sidewalk spans and replace with backfill and
roadway restoration.
• Restore storm drainage connections to current storm drainage design standards or
relocate to new retention locations.
• Backfill new pipeline to minimum cover requirements and hydroseed.
• Remove chain link fence except along private properties.
• Postpone piping the BNSF property until more favorable requirements can be negotiated
with BNSF.
3.8 PHASING OF IMPROVEMENTS
In discussions with the various divisions of the City involved in the recommended improvements
there is a lack of available funding sources at least in the near future to contemplate the
completion of the entire project in one contract.
It is assumed as funding becomes available, these improvements will be done in multiple
phases. It would be recommended the work begin at N. 6th Avenue and progress easterly to N.
7th Street. That portion of canal crossing, the;Burlingtop.Northern Santa'Fe.rRailroad'pr`opeety
would not be piped'until such. time' it becomes a=pnonty with the•City.
G\PROJECTS\2008\08030\Fruitvale St id% Report.doc 10
Section 4
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
4.1 COST ESTIMATING _CRITERIA
The cost estimates presented in this study are opinions developed from previous construction
bid tabulations, information from material suppliers, and experience on other projects. The
estimates were prepared to allow budgeting and project phasing, and to allow evaluation of
customer rates and funding participation from various divisions in the City.
4.2 COST ESTIMATE
Estimated project costs are presented in Table 4.1. Costs are summarized for each proposed
phase of work and show the total project costs for construction, engineering and administration,
taxes, contingency, and escalation.
Table 4.1 Preliminary Cost Estimate
City of Yakima
Fruitvale Canal Improvements
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
(6th Ave to BNSF)
(BNSF to 7th St.)
(BNSF Crossing)
Items
Total
Total
Total
$1,460,300
Mobilization
$40,800
$69,000
$65,500
Project Temporary Traffic Control
$20,000
$25,000
$20,000
Remove Existing Fence
$8,750
$12,000
$0
Concrete Liner Removal
$30,000
$40,500
$4,750
Remove Exist 60" RCP
$1,000
$0
$0
Concrete Structure Removal (Alleys)
$0
$8,000
$0
Concrete Sidewalk Removal
$4,125
$0
$0
Timber Canal Cover Removal
$0
$0
$1,300
Concrete Bridge Removal
$36,750
$99,000
$0
Timber Bridge Removal
$0
$0
$100,000
BNSF Labor, Permits, Material, etc Costs
$0
$0
$480,000
Unclassified Excavation Including Haul
$5,500
$8,500
$1,500
PE Pipe, 42 In. Diam.
$174,900
$300,300
$37,400
Select Backfill
$30,000;
$81,250
$5,000
Storm Drain Connection
$600
$3,000
$0
Access ManholeNault
$24,000
$30,000
$0
Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter
$3,850!
$8,400
$0
Cement Concrete Sidewalk
$1,300
$10,400
$0
Asphalt Roadway Repair
$16,900!
$44,200
$0
Concrete Roadway Repair
$42,500
$0
$0
Hydroseeding
$2,400
$1,600
$0
Weir Gates
$0;
$8,000
$0
Chain Link Fence, 6 ft high w/gate
$0
$2,800
$0
Trash Rack
$0
$2,400
$0
Minor Change
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
Subtotal $448,375
$759,350
$720,450
Contingency 25%
$112,094
$189,838
$180,113
Sales Tax 8.1%
$45,398
$76,884
$72,946
Engineering and Administration 25%
$151,467
$256,518
$243,377
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$757,300
$1,282,600
$1,216,900
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
2008-2009
2009-2010
2014-2015
ESCALATION
0%
5%
20%
TOTAL ESTIMATE PROJECT COST
$757,300
$1,346,700
$1,460,300
G.\PROJECTS12008\080301Fruitvale Study Report doc 11
P OJ ECT LI '' ITS
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF YAKIMA
WATER & IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT
FRUITVALE CANAL IMPROVEMENTS
HLA PROJECT NO. 08030
N. 6TH AVE. TO N. 4TH AVE.
1
N. 4TH AVE. TO N. 1ST AVE.
BNSF PROPERTY TO N. FRONT ST.
N. FRONT ST. TO N. 1ST ST.
N. 1ST ST. TO N. 2ND ST.
5
N. 2ND ST. TO N. 3RD ST.
N. 3RD ST. TO N. NACHES AVE.
N. NACHES AVE. TO N. 7TH ST.
OLD UNION DITCH DIVERSION AT N. 7TH ST.
9
FRUITVALE BLVD N
-- OUINCE ST
--S
ti
—I—
PROJECT
LOCATION.
O
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
EXISTING FEATURES NEW FEATURES
CONDUITS
FENCE
GAS LINE
SANITARY SEWER
DOMESTIC WATER
STORM DRAIN
OVERHEAD POWER
IRRIGATION
TREE
UTIUTY POLE
MANHOLE
DRYWELL
CATCH BASIN
FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
WATER BLOWOFF
SPUCE BOX
STREET LIGHT
WATER METER
Q, DATUM ELEVATION
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
HLA JOB No. 08030
MAY 2008
SHEET 1
SHEET 2
SHEET 3
SHEET 4
SHEET 5
SHEET 6
SHEET 7
SHEET 8
SHEET 9
SHEET 10
SHEET 11
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET
PLAN AND PROFILE B.O.P. - 6+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 6+00 - 11+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 11+00 - 16+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 16+00 - 21+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 21+00 - 26+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 26+00 - 31+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 31+00 - 36+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 36+00 - 41+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 41+00 - 46+00
PLAN AND PROFILE 46+00 - E.O.P.
INT off' S(o(
Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
301 North 39th Avenue •.Yakima. WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 FAX (509) 965-3800
E,'l100 1II..d 11, 1010
Cil
SUMJECT TO
NEWMON
JOB NUMBER: DATE.
08030 2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030 dwg
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION
DATE
DESIGNED BY GWS
ENTERED BY AJH
COVER SHEET
SHEET
1
OF
X
0
8
ID
0)
_c
ts5
0
- - -
6" DUCTILE IRON
6" DUCTILE IRON
+0
5' CONC. PIPE 5' CONC. PIPE
STA. 6+00
NO
F—
LLI
LL../
1/7
MATCHLINE
0 10 20
40
MN :
1090
1085
1080
1075 L
• 1.
_
I
I
-
1
1 ,
•
1 ..
_ - -
._• •.•
i 7
. .7I
--I. - - . 1 ., i !
1070 1r ! !
1065
106.0
1
i ; L
7 ;
•1
. !
,
LI
1. -
- --
;
I 1
; ; -- 1
I ...
-
r• 7
-L_
1+00
• • • • • • • • • • •• •
•• 1, .
, .
. ;
•••• •
-1 i • •
I .
. • .
- ; . I
- I-774 ;-: H
_ .
-- .
;
._. .
--
.. , ; •-•
;
._.
;. • ;. • .7 ;
'
" I .
- I: 1090
---
. ,
1085
-- I
;7; 1
.._ • ,.
- ;
'! 1075
, .
1 7
.
; .
_
4.
.
, ,.
2+00
3+00
• I
I
4+00
5+00
1_1
1-L I 1070
1060
6+00
AC, Hulbregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue <.Yakimo. WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 .1' FAX (509) 965-3800
SUBJECT 70
RailV
REVIISEDiki
JOB NUMBER: DATE.
08030 2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE. RCPRF010.dwg
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION
DATE
DESIGNED BY- GWS
ENTERED BY- AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE B O.P. TO STA. 6+00
SHEET
2
OF
X
STA. 6+00
I-
LJW
U)
MAfCHLINE
F
O
/
Q
LU
a
co
O
-c
APPROX. 0.7' THICK
N
70 20
40
-1 1090
1085
-- 1080
Iuibregtse, Lowman Associates, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue •Yakima, WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 + FAX (509) 965-3800
UVJ
SM o JCC`C rO
KI & 1-11 NEYllSBOM
JOB NUMBER: DATE.
08030 2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE. RCPRF010.dwg
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION DATE
DESIGNED BY GWS
ENTERED BY. AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 6+00 TO 11+00
SHEET
3
OF
X
/N
/
/
0 0 10 20 40
O
Q
!n
I--
n
/RLINC
/7".._,..,.,'
In
�
I-
�0t 4tDn� l =_ _-_�_�--- _\\—I
I–
___. —.—.—. — —.—.—.—..—..—._.
_..—..—..—..—..—.._...—.
'.
En
S
W
Z
J
S
}-
6 DUCTILE
/
/
IRON
D
m
n
c
CD
LL1
Z_
J
F--
M
1085
r ,
,
1085
,
,
1080
L
h
1080
—_
i
, 1
,
1075•
: I
1075
,
1070 'I
r
i
1070
1065
•
--- —
-- ! _
_L.I
1065
1060 !•
I
i
•—
1060
1055
'
---'—
.
1055
r
-
-
I
i -
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00
Soo
JOB NUMBER:
DATE.'
SHEET
E
vASy ��
08030
2-22-08
CITY OF YAKI MA
LotmanAssociates,Inc.
Hulbregtse, �,ot1I111�1 Associ tes, ■ll\ •
� , t J
M
n
FILE NAMES.
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING •PLANNING
; z
^p�
J U
L
LI
V lJ
U��l iq
DRAWING. SHEEiS.dwg
FRU ITVALE CANAL
�.,
"o_
_ _
PLAN: 08030.1 O.
PROFILE. RCPRFOIO.dwg
IMPROVEMENTS
OF
801 North 39th Avenue •Yok{ma, WA 98902
,,,, P'7.0 ...P`
oJECT o
O O
(509) 966-7000 o FAX (509) 965-3800
'•,ONAL F;
DESIGNED BY- GWS
X
ENTERED BY AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 11+00 TO 16+00
1 E'o:RES m..a (Ti 1010 ,
REVISION
DATE
STA. 16+00
MATCHLINE
RAILING
X
X
X
" BONC 12" CONC.
12" CONC.
8" DECK
V
2" DIAM.
RAILING=
STA. 21+00
W
W
MATCHLINE
0
10
20
40
1075
1070
1065 1
1060 •
Huibre tse Lowman Associates,Inc.
Q >
vB 1Y. Sp
VF,• 1IV
��°` f
S + -
�P
x6 4k_;ufi0
s,E
/ONAL B,-
JOB NUMBER:
08030
DATE.
2-22-08
CITY OF YA I \
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
I 1 V
A
SHEET
5
OF
v
X
v
SUBJECT'
^pS)
J 11
EC
��\�/��
_ LJ�/
TO
1
_ LI \J
o
E V E
��(%
LI
O M
OLE NAMES.
DRAWING. 08030.dwg.dwg
PLAN:
PROFILE. RCPRF010 dwg
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue '. Yakima. WA 98902
DESIGNED BY. GWS
ENTERED BY AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 16+00 TO 21+00
(509) 966-7000 + FAX (509) 965-3800
REVISION
DATE
_<o=es m t n, 100 1
MIN
0
0
UT
LLI0
I-
-r
LJ
V)
MATCHLINE
21+
RAILING
1111111111101111111111111111111111ManwIl
--
lealTS 1U0.1d
'HStreet
8" STEE 12" CONC.DRAIN
4
III- II FINI
r
8" STEEL W/ 4"
_GAS 1N5IDE
1111111111111111111111111M1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
STA. 26+00
uJ
LLI
If/
MATCHLINE
10
20
40
•
1085 -
1080
1075
-; •
f
i-: - '
I
i
- LI
I
• , .
1070
1065
1060 1
1055 ,
t' 1085
- 1
. • -1a 1080
• 1 7
- 1075
--'--7 'T . . • ; 1 ;
i
H
• 1 ,
; •
......
-1 •.•
I . • ...
I ' . . -., . ' •-• .
••
• •.' ..,-
. .t . i, ,.. . ..........: .•...
. H-- . ._. _. ...._ _.
- ,
..
:..
. . , .
-.,.
- ! _
.....
.
,._ _
.41 •. i
i ..
‘ ..
r... ,
. _
•. -•_. ,
•-• C. . . • .
•.•
....
. --1 ' I
-' ..•
i - •_.
. . .
...•
.1 .._ .. •
i..
_ •
--;
--_
.1- ..4
-I--
--
•
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+00
25+00
•-• 'II - ;
...• .
1.:
1070
1065
I.! 1060
1055
, .
26+00
• Hulbregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue +Yakima. WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 + FAX (509) 965-3800
PH EL M
SUZJECT
Nn,N)
RIEVM110H
JOB NUMBER: DATE.
08030 2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030 dwg
PROFILE. RCPRF010 dwa
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION
DATE
DESIGNED BY GWS
ENTERED BY- AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 21+00 TO 26+00
SHEET
6
OF
X
`
N
S'
0 10 20 40
00
0
+
N
Q
N
'H' Street 139362
139301
180360
+
i IA I I I - ,° H--'-n I- I I
i I I I I a
I I � I n a I, = —
- 4
'_
I '
x X— X
,_ - - - F x Y
�—
H
. .-_
- _
+UU
9 +00
-_- _---_ I
_.._.._
LJ
'-\-_
_.__
- - -
N2" STEEL PIPE
RAILING
i
fJ
7
eL
(n
cD
w
Z
1 r
r
1085
1085
-
1080
_I
-
- - 080
—
1075
i
/ I
—/
075
— — —
�--
1070
1070 .
- '
i '
-
I
—
. !
_
- • -. - - - - - - ,' .::1065
i
1065
1060
--
-
_ -
- � __ _ -- —
- - -
_
I
060
-
1 - 1
_. 11055
— — — — — '
-
26+00 27+00 --- 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00
JOB NUMBER:
DATE.
SHEET
W S'Q�
08030
2 22-DS
CITY OF YA K
I M A
Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
ANG
FCS°�w4.96, ex
p
o
FILE NAMES.
FRUITVALE CANAL
T
r f
M
o
DRAWING. SHEETS.dw
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING PLANNING
r �" m
- u
V
u
-
j���
PLAN: 08030.dwg9
PROFILE RCPRF010.dw
IMPROVEMENTS
OF
901 North 39th Avenue •t• Yakima, WA 98902
G r /".57"1 " 4w
D N
SUBJECT �O G3CM���OUV
X
(509) 966-7000:- FAX (so9) 965-3800
ss-,, 6T'°`
DESIGNED BY GWS
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 26+00 TO 31+00
1E E: m.,d n, tao
REVISION
DATE
ENTERED BY. AJH
0 10 20 40
O
1.,<(,)M
f/0.(3)
13 OVER 6 'H' Street 181400
O
LO
Q
N
7liIli IIIIll11101I1IIII111111111111lllil!1IUIlIi Atutii!!!CC_ U1Ijln!
j !i111 1111.0441- " til
lIiIi1.1101
11
i
! III I 1 I i I ! n_ I a -L- . III -!Iii i n! ,
x
___ ._ _
_
..-
Iji
+uu
I�_ I
I
----- — — — — — — —
i
CO
\2" STEEL PIPE _
•r !
24" STUMP
W
Z
J
I
Q
Q
-(-T3
a
W
z
1085
i
i
1085
1080
•
1
— I`
I
11080
1075
r
j
"
L I I
—
1075
I
•
y. �
X
1
i
I I I
1070 j _. — _ _ _
1 _ -
1070
—
1065I
I
i
:
1 L
I
r -t
- 1
1065
1060
-
i.
1060
1055
i
r
_
_i
_ 1055
31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00
�� W. S�
JOB NUMBER
DATE.
SHEET
v.,,,,,,
08030
2-22-08
CITY OF YAK
I MA
$Ii9ibregtse, Lotman Associates, Isco
iGC�
�FT- �> IT
o�
Ian
/�
M
FILE NAMES.
8
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING
r�
1Z1
_
11V1J y
/r,�
1�1 11
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
FRUITVALE CANAL
�••®
�c%�r�4f�.���w
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE. RCPRF010.dwg
IMPROVEMENTS
Of
801 North 39th Avenue oYaklma, WA 98902
p o
(509) 966-7000 -:•• FAX (509) 965-3800
YSTONAL -'s
DESIGNED BY. GWS
AND
X
ENTERED BY. AJH
PLAN PROFILE STA. 31+00 TO 36+00
1E <P,REs M.S. q, 100 I
REVISION
DATE
0 10 20 40
C8
O
0
+
co
4--)
181460
O
CR
8" CONC.S0
— —
LI
'1 I' Street 181461
4'• STEEL
RAILING 2" STEEL
0
8" CONC.SD
RAILING
0
+
:T-
Q
-
1in
-
11 liHIIIlljiljllllifitl[I7it1lili
hili T
e. n II 1 u H I I A I
,m nn II 1 1_- 11111 1
I . 1 n
-- - -
e,
- -
--
r
W
?u+uu7+00
- --- - -- n+uu -. - ---
+UO
�
•
L Ii
f±G0
--•" • .._I
LLI
_ _. _._
C
_ _
2" STEEL STEEL
WLI
Z
=
2
-6" CONC.
S
0)
CD
CDI
"o" CONC.
=
I—
Q
1080 _ _
.. _ _ .___. _
_ - _--_ _ _- _ ! .- - -
.• - - ' I 1080
.
1075I
L !
i 1075
te, � ' -, _
I _. _, _. _.
- I
_. _ _
_. I
._.
1070 I \ I _ -1-
�
1070
J/
_. _ - .. ! `�T - /
1065. i t y _
I
11065
----= - —� —
1060 ._. i
-- i -
a
,_ y
i . -_ —_ _
r
_ 1
1060
_ --__ '-
1055
_ _I _- ___.� _.-_L__�_ I_---
-1--_
-
- �_-- -
-F
I
- - -- '- -- 1 - .
'
1055
1050
! I '- �
l i-
• i - I- - I -- -
- -
- I- i- --i - 11050
-;-
- - + -
- _
36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00
g i * Inc.
Hulbregtse, �.UiIIHIat! Associates, ICl
S��`�{
wElY S•O`/
ca
'
N +
P "" 0J .�
^fir_of L 1,s;'
JOB NUMBER:
08030
DATE.
2-22-08
CITY O F YA K I M A
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
SHEET
9
OF
v
X
n n
OVENJEC7
J U
o nn
_ Ll
V
7O
11
o
'E
�n
V EIOEIO<1V
J Lt
((����
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE RCPRFOI O.dwg
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING •PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue •:•Yakima, WA 98902
DESIGNED BY GWS
ENTERED 8Y AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA, 36+00 TO 41+00
a
(509) 966-7000'. FAX (509) 965-3800
REVISION
DATE
_, _,,, Lwo ,
0
0
F -
UJ
(f)
MATCHLINE
hE
1111111
'ROI
41+00
182460
'HStreet
6" STEEL
182402
182461
141111111 11111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111W1111111111111111111111111112111111111111111111111111111111111111111M11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111.11101111
ACCESS TO CANAL
anueny seLpeN
1—.
3
44,00
4--
-6- STEEL
45)-00
C)
cn
(13
co
STA. 46+00
UJ
MATCHLINE
10
20
1080
1075
'- I- ,- -, • _ -1- . ,
_ .. •., ., -'' . . 1 • • ._
,_ -.1: ....-_-;_:-J --- ___ •-::. _ _ _ ; , -, -- --•
7. .._ _,_I_. , ., .._• .. ...... . „, i : t :
: : . - • .
—I---, ,._ ..... ....• .._ . . II --- I-- 1080
--..
_ • . I .,. _ i-. _ • .... .
•,_ .., _ -L. -; 1 •-.-- I ; ,-: :, i
• _ ,.... ,
- ; - _L , ,- . _ . ; _• _ , _ ...L._ ..._ . -
__. 1---, 1075
_____I_____ ____ - - ,- . • , _
__ .. _ . • _ . . '
, -
1070_
1065
1060
-,. -.- • . .
... . ..-. ...... • . ,
, , • - i :, - '-;
,- • .'r • . i r . • . • ....
-. . i , i. i • 1 , ' - r - i ' - • ' -.1
._ ._. .
, • . , , _ ' I- ; 1 1
. .
_ ,. : • :---77----,-\; ..
. . . . . ,
_ .............—--,-, -
•-. . • . • _. . . . .
. I
1 •
, ..- . - ..-.- • ...
I • I • ,
..-
I ... , ,
-I - . ... . ;
, i i i , ' _ ; .,•-I , -1 , 1. ,_
A ; _ _
_ - . _
.._ •_- " I —LI _ I
—\,==•, L - - - --I--- lI- I - - - II -
...,.
- r ------- ---
1055
1050
. \ •
: 1 r
• -I r I
, I L
..--,-..H•.-..- -...-e..-.---... .-.1.-..,...,. ...-.-,-,.... 1---...-._
;-
41+00
42+00
-
r— • _,_
' • , •
-H- . 1065
r ,
L .
, , i ' : I ,- 1 •- .... ,. i
I . .
.
I • r
p •
r
. p
. . . .... •_• p
. _ 1-• -- _ I
_ .
___________i__, . • . L __H.__ ____ ._.•_•_
1 •
IL
I • r
7••••••";
•
43+00 44+00
1060
-
- _ . • . : -i .
• L - I-• ' I 1050
_. ---I
• .... . ..,.. _
. .. . ...
. .1
----. i
. . . , .... .
_-. - . ..
-
--. . , . '
45+00 46+00
Hulbregtse, Lowman Associates, Inc.
CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue +Yakima, WA 98902
(509) 966.-7000 + FAX (509) 965-3800
; ii7
SUBJEC7 `TO HIEWMON
JOB NUMBER:
08030
DATE.
2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE RCPRF002 dwg
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION
DATE
DESIGNED BY- GWS
ENTERED BY- AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 41+00 TO 46+00
SHEET
10
OF
X
0
0
2' FOOT
—BRIDGE
6+00
MATCHLINE
(../)
CD
CD
0
20
40
1080
i
1075 '
-7 Ft 1
I -- -I- -1
I '--
.I
•-..,
I • I-
!..- • -
i I I- '
1: . --L
' I
-7-
1070
•
- ,
•
-13-
. . • . . , •
1 1 • I i . .
. . , i ! ,, I I- --- •
•• •
! ,1 I. ',-
! j- 3 I J ,
. ,. : , ; ,
:,.-- I
J... J r I - . . . -
•- . - , , - ,, - - - , f , .--, ...-, ' J1080
. . -- 7 7 1 •
L - I
_
1- :- . ,_ ; .. . .,__ , ,._ j j34J-.1 .;.-3., , i _ 1 _ ,__ . _i_,:.
, 7 j : 1 -1- -47, -I I - , I 4 I- -
.:
. ,_
7. , , I 1 , , I , /fl I
._ _t • _
-.4 -- •I - j
...• .
. ._2 .. , . i ' 1 _
1075
. .
. . "
.._. • _
" • :
_4_,_i j-
; .
-- I .
;'..
— I ;
j- • I
I4 • , -4, . • .
; J • -I
— . _ -- I -I ,
, - .._.. ..
-I_ 4: - ......._. • I
-IL j4- I
-44 4- Il
4
I -, 11 -4.,.
- .
I 1 • • j 1060
' I . • : , , r 1
13.-; i
i-
. ' ; -
r ,
-.1 1055
_____... •1 i
I
, L • ' ' ._'. 1-. . 1-. ',..: ---ff
_ . • . .
,
1 EL
.1 . .
I I "
; • j ;
I • 4-
; •41 I
-3
1065 ; ; • .
• ;
1050
I • ,
7-
, IV 7 -!•/ ._ 7 ;-- I II.: 4/- / - 1 -I
I . :
; • ,; : • : . Ir. , 7t,_- '
; • I •
I I
- -•
I _I
' !
;
-- I
_ --
• I ; • ; ; ; ; •
•
•
-7 :1 1070
L..
. -
I -
. L
1-3 . • _ ._
• , . . 4 _ _. ..... -i
._ ....
-- I ._. -L-I-I.-- -- - -j
•-
•- • -
- • •
-• - 1050
46+00 47+00 48+00
49+00
50+00 51+00
Huibregtse, Louman Associates, Inc.
41;&*-• CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING PLANNING
801 North 39th Avenue •Yakima, WA 98902
(509) 966-7000 a FAX (509) 965-3800
PN)
SUBJECT TO
REVDSDON
JOB NUMBER: DATE.
08030 2-22-08
FILE NAMES.
DRAWING. SHEETS.dwg
PLAN: 08030.dwg
PROFILE. RCPRF010.dwg
CITY OF YAKIMA
FRUITVALE CANAL
IMPROVEMENTS
REVISION DATE
DESIGNED BY- GWS
ENTERED BY- AJH
PLAN AND PROFILE STA. 46+00 TO E.O.P.
SHEET
11
OF
X