HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-042 Wastewater connection rates • .
ORDINANCE NO. 98- 4 2
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Yakima relating to wastewater connection charges;
amending Chapter 7.58 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code; and providing for related
matters.
WHEREAS, the City of Yakima (the "City ") is authorized by RCW Title 35 to acquire,
construct, own, operate, and provide financing for systems of sewerage, and to establish rates,
fees, and charges therefor;
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the best interests of the citizens of
the City that ordinances related to such systems of sewerage, wastewater rates, fees, charges,
and related matters be amended as set forth in this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the rates, fees, and charges contained in this
411, .
Ordinance are fair, just, and reasonable;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
Section 1, Chapter 7.58 of the City of Yakima Municipal. Code .is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Chapter 7.58
WASTEWATER. CONNECTION CHARGE
Sections:
7.58.030 A. Connection to the wastewater system -- Connection
charge imposed.
7.58.050 Base Treatment Plant Charge.
7.58.060 Base Trunks /Interceptors Charge.
7.58.070 Base Collection Pipes Charge.
7.58.075 Maximum Lot Size.
7.58.090 B. Recalculation of Charges.
•
September 16, 1998 1
7.58.030 Connection to the wastewater system -- Connection charge imposed.
A connection charge is imposed on the owner of any facility to be connected to the
wastewater system when the owner of the facility to be so connected has not paid a wastewater
connection charge for connecting such facility to the wastewater system, subject to the
provisions below. Payment of the connection charge does not convey any ownership interest in
the wastewater system. Payment of the connection charge authorizes connection only to the
designated lot and is not transferable to any other lot.
A. Any facility located on a lot that has participated in a local improvement district for
wastewater facilities; the Final Assessment Roll of which was passed prior to January 1, 1992,
September. 3, 1997, shall be assessed the capital cost recovery charge which was in effect at
the time the Final Assessment Roll was passed in lieu of a connection charge;
B. A connection charge shall not be imposed against any facility located on a lot that has
participated in a local improvement district for wastewater facilities and has paid or is paying
the capital cost recovery charge as part of its local improvement district facility assessment;
and
C. If prior to December 10, 1996, the owner or developer of a lot has entered into an
agreement with the City providing for deferral of the payment of the capital cost recovery
charge for said lot, said owner or developer may pay on or before June 23, 1998, the capital
cost recovery charge that was in effect at the time such agreement was entered. If such payment
is not made on or before June 23, 1998, the amount of the connection charge shall be
determined by reference. to sections 7.58.040 through 7.58.090.
7.58.050 Base Treatment Plant Charge.
The base treatment plant charge includes both an equitable share of the cost of the
existing wastevvater treatment plant and a reasonable estimate of the actual cost of connection to
the wastewater treatment plant (including costs associated with expanding the plant). The
amount of this charge is a function of the amount of water flowing to the facility to be connected
and the zone in which the facility is located. The treatment plant charge for single dwelling
units (SDUs) is uniform within each zone. The treatment plant charge for a non -SDUs is
calculated as a function of the water meter size for the facility. A charge shall be imposed for
each water meter, except for any water meter installed for the sole purpose of irrigation or fire
flows. The base treatment plant charge for a particular facility shall be determined by
reference to the following chart:
From Effective Date through Dcc. 31, 1098
-Meter --Size Zone -4 Zone -2 Zone -3
S 8771 .31 $1 ,459.81 $2,780.23
ex ( 4 ) 81,156.07 $2,189.72 $4,170.35
$1,542.62 $2,019.62 $5,560.46
nonresidential 3/4" 8491 .91 $5.67.68 $1 ,081.16
all uses 1" $1,770.86 $2,043.66 $3,802.18
211 esesrl -�" — $5,312:50 _ — $6,13G 98 $11,676.55
all uses 2" $8,264.04 $9,537.09 $18,163.52
all uses 3" —$4- 0,330.04 $11,921.36 $22,704.40
all uses 4" $13,281.49 $15,327.46 829,101,38
4 110
September 16, 1998 2
• all uses 6" 1 1 $20,436.61 $38,921.84
4-49 -9
E,; e,zz . Zone 1} Zone .2 Zone 3
SFD (3/4 ") 3-7-9-44-5 $1,503.60 $2,863.64
duplex (@ 3/4 ") 31,191.67 . 32,255.41 3-4
triplex (@ 3/4 ") 31 ,588.30 $3, 35,727.27
fiefifeSiCleft " $584.71 31,1 13.6 0
all uses 1" $1,823.09 32,104.97 $4,008.95
all uses 1.5" 35,471.37 $6,314.91 312,026.85
all uses 2" 38,511.06 $9,823.20 318,708.43
all uses 3" 310,639.95 $12,279.00 $23,385.54
all uscs 4" $13,679.93 315,787.28 330,067.12
all uses 6" 318,239.91 321,040. .
20
Meter Size Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
SFD (3/4 ") 384-88 $1,548.71 32,049.55
duplex (@ 3/4 ") 31 ,227.42 $2,323.07 34,424.32
triplex (@ 3/4") $1,636.57 33,007.42 35,809.09
$521 -.86 376.0 -2.26 31 ,147.00
all uses 1" $1,878.71 $2,168.12 $4,129.22
all uscs 1.5" $5,636.13 36,504.36 312,387.65
all uses 2" 38,767.32 310,117.89. 819,269.68
• all uses 3" 310,959.14 . $12,647.37 324,087.10
all uses 4" 316,260.90. 330,960.13
all uses 6" $18,787.10 321,68.1.20 $41,292.18
From Effective Date through Dec. 31, 1998
Meter Size Zone.1 Zone 2 Zone 3
SFD (3/4 ") $591.31 $591 .31 $1,202.67
duplex . $886.97 $886.97 $1 ,804.01
triplex (@ 3/4 ") $1,182.62 $1 ,182.62 $2,405.34
nonresidential 3/4" $384.72 $384.72 $782.42
all uses 1" $1,384.98 $1,384.98 $2,816.71
all uses 1.5" _ $4,154.95 $4,154.95 $8,450.13
all uses 2" $6,463.26 $6,463.26. $13,144.64
all uses 3" $8,079.07 $8,079.07 $16,430.80
all uses 4" $10,387.38 $10,387.38 $21,125.31
all uses 6" 313,849.83 $13,849.83 $28,167.08
September 16, 1998 3
•
For Calendar Year 1999
Meter Size Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
SFD (3/4 ") $609.05 $609.05 $1 ,238.75
duplex (@ 3/4 ") $913.57 $913.57 $1,858.13
triplex (@ 3/4 ") $1,218.10 $1,218.10 $2,477.50
nonresidential 3/4" $396.26 $396.26 $805.89
all uses 1" $1 ,426.53 $1 ,426.53 $2,901.21
all uses 1.5" $4,279.60 $4,279.60 $8,703.63
all uses 2" $6,657..16 $6,657.16 $13,538.98
all uses 3" $8,321.44 $8,321.44 $16,923.72
all uses 4" $10,699.0.0 $1 0,699.00 $21 ,759.07
all uses 6" $.14,265.32 $14,265.32 $29,012.09
For Calendar Year 2000
Meter Size Zone 1 .Zone 2 Zone 3
• $627.32 $627.32 $1 ,275.91
_ (@ 3/4") $940.98 $940.98 $1,913.87
$2,551.83
nonresidential $408.15 $- 0 : $830.07
all uses 1" $1,469.33 $1,469.33 $2,988.25
all uses 1.5" $ • ' $4,407.99 $8,964.74
all uses 2" $6,856.87 $6,856.87 $13,945.15
all uses 3" $8,571.09 $8,571.09 $17,431.44
all uses 4" $11,019.97 $11,019.97 $22,411.84
all uses 6" $14,693.28 $14,693.28 $29,882.46
Base treatment plant charges for water meter sizes not listed above shall be established by the
wastewater superintendent based upon the same methodology and data as the charges listed above.
September 16, 1998 4
}
• 7.58.060 Base Trunks/Interceptors Charge...
•
The base trunks /interceptors charge includes both an equitable share of the cost of the
existing trunks /interceptors and a reasonable estimate of the actual cost of connection to the
trunks /interceptors (including costs associated with expanding the trunks /interceptors). This
charge is a function of the size of the lot to be connected. The base trunks /interceptors charge
shall be determined by multiplying the lot area (measured in square feet (sf)) by the following
rate for the appropriate zone in which the lot is located; PROVIDED that the Future element of
the base trunks /interceptors charge may be waived if the lot owner or developer extends a
trunk/interceptor from the existing trunk/interceptor through or along the entire length of the
lot as required by the sewer comprehensive planning analysis for the area:
Zonc 1 Zene -2 Zonc 3
1997 a $0.032 $0=1 -7 g
4-9-9-9 $-0 = 833 $0.176 4
2 -0-0 -0 $-0 -0•4 $-9 - 4-8-1 _ $0,-2-9-0
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
1 9 9 8 $0.036 $0.195 $0.262
1 9 9 9 $0.037 $0.201 $0.270
2 0 0 0 $0.038 $0.207 $0.278 '
III
7.58.070 Base Collection Pipes Charge.
The base collection pipes charge includes both an equitable share of the cost of the
existing collection pipes and a reasonable estimate of actual cost of connection to the
collection pipes (including costs associated with expanding the collection pipes). This charge is
a function of the size of the lot to be connected. The base collection pipes charge shall be
determined by multiplying the lot area (measured in square feet (sf)) by the following rate for
the appropriate zone in which the tot is located; PROVIDED that a collection pipes charge may be
waived if: (a) the lot is within a collection pipe system installed and paid for by the developer of
the lot; (b) the lot owner extends a collection pipe from the existing collection pipe system
through or along the entire length of the lot as required by the sewer comprehensive planning
analysis for the area; or (c) the lot is connected to a collection pipe system originally financed
by local improvement district assessments to which contribution was made for the lot:
Zone- Zone -2 Zone-3
1 9 9 7 $ $-0-.-0-8-8 $0=2-8-0 $0
1 9 9 9 $-9-0 91 $-9 -288 $-0.3-86
-0-0 -9 $-0-.49-4 4 $ 0.2 97 • • . $0=8-9-8
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
1 9 9 8 $0.078 $0.283 $0.376
1 9 9 9 $0.080 $0.291 $0.387
• 2 0 0 0 $0.083 $0.300 $0.3.99
September 16, 1998 5
7.58.075 Maximum lot size.
A maximum lot size of 20,000 square feet may shall be utilized in calculating charges
under 7.58.060 and 7.58.070 for Single Dwelling Units. -when the entire lot is currently
. - : - - - - - - • - e -
7.58.090 Recalculation of Charges.
A Improvement, change in use. In the event any facility, lot, tract or parcel is
improved, or the use thereof is changed or intensified so as to increase the number or size of
water meter(s), then the amount of the connection charge is subject to recalculation and
increase according to Sections 7.58.040 - .075. Credit shall be allowed for the size of any
existing meter(s) removed by virtue of this change or intensification, PROVIDED that, in no
case shall the credit exceed the cost of the charge. Any such increase shall be paid in the time
and manner specified by Section 7.58.080.
B. Additional subdivision of Tots. At such time that any existing lot connected to the
wastewater system is subdivided, a wastewater connection charge shall be assessed against each
new lot formed. No additional charge shall be imposed upon the lot where the facilities that were
originally connected are located, unless an increase in water meter size is involved. Any
additional charges due as a result of subdivision shall be determined as set forth in paragraph A
of this section and shall be paid in the time and manner specified in Section 7.58.080.
C. As an additional and concurrent method of collection of any such delinquent
wastewater connection charges, the customer service manager may suspend the water service or
supply to the premises under the same authority provided in Section 7.60.100.
Section. Effective Date; This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after
its adoption and publication as provided by law. `_
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this Co day of
OCT -IEW , 1998.
CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
/
By C
John Puccinelli, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
•
City Clerk
Publication Date: /6-9
Effective Date: 1 )
September 16, 1998 6
4110 CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned, clerk of the City of Yakima, Washington (the "City ") and
keeper of the records of the City Council (the "Council ") DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
,rr 1. That the attached ordinance is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.
cis8- 4a of the Council (hereinafter called the "Ordinance "), duly passed at a regular
meeting thereof held on the Cp day of C Tc 6 R , 1998.
2. That said meeting was duly convened and held in all respects in accordance with
law, and to the extent required by law, due and proper notice of such meeting was given; that a
legal quorum was present throughout the meeting and a legally sufficient number of members of
the Council voted in the proper manner for passage of said Ordinance; that all other
requirements and proceedings incident to the proper passage of said Ordinance have been duly
fulfilled, carried out and otherwise observed; and that I am authorized to execute this
certificate.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City this day of , 1998.
•
City Clerk
•
September , 16, 1998 . 7
0 BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. ,7 3
For Meeting Of 10/6/98
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Resolution Adopting Revised Wastewater
Connection Charge Study Update and Approving Ordinance Revising
Wastewater Connection Rates and Charges.
SUBMITTED BY: Dick Zais, City Manager
Glenn Rice, ACM
Doug Mayo, Utility Engineer
CONTACT PERSON /TELEPHONE: Doug Mayo /575 -6077
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
The Wastewater Connection Charge Ordinance ( #97 -38), approved in June of 1997,
consolidated the then existing Capital Cost Recovery Charge and Sewer Connection Charge
provisions of the Yakima Municipal Code into a single charge.
During consideration of and since adoption of that ordinance, City Council has been very
• clear in its stated position that City staff should closely review its work, entertain serious
public comment and, where adjustments are merited, directed that those changes be
(...continued...)
Resolution X Ordinance X Contract _Other (Specify) Revised Wastewater
Connection Charge Study Update.
Funding Source Revenues from this program would be allocated to either the
wastewater collection system project fund (476) or the wastewater facilities project fund
(478)
APPROVED FOR SUBMIA f \
Z
City Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests City Council adopt, by attached resolution, the Revised
Wastewater Connection Charge Study Update and approve the attached ordinance
revising wastewater connection rates and charges.
BOARD /COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
0 COUNCIL ACTION:
(...continued. from front page...)
brought before City Council. Wastewater staff, with valuable technical assistance by Gary
Saleba, EES Consulting, Inc., and legal review by Preston, Gates and Ellis, have,, at City
Council's direction, revised the Wastewater Connection Charge Study Update and Rate
ordinance. This review and revision process was deemed appropriate because of the
following circumstances:
A) the City received its new National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
wastewater discharge permit in October of 1997 -- with its attendant capital obligations
discussed previously under a separate report;
B) the City recently adopted its Comprehensive Plan required under the Growth
Management Act (GMA); and
C) two years additional data was available to supplement the data set which the original
report was based upon.
In summary, items reviewed which affected revisions in the report submitted in February
of this year and remain pertinent in the attached report and rate ordinance included:
1) revised capacity of existing treatment facility per new NPDES permit;
2) updated future "Treatment" expense due to NPDES mandates and expansio
requirements;
3) updated projection of new accounts based upon adopted City Comprehensive Plan;
4) updated projection of future connected area based upon adopted City Comprehensive
Plan;
5) re- allocation of future and existing trunks due to most recent GMA population
projections;
6) allocated portion of existing trunkage to Zone 3;
7) update of number of existing accounts per current information;
8) update of estimated historic cost (projects not closed in 1995 at time of original report)
with actual costs;
9) transfer of some 1995 future costs to 1997 historic costs (projects completed since 1995);
and
10) inclusion of 20,000 square foot "cap" on residential lots for the purposes of calculating
the trunkage and collection elements of the charge.
At the February 3, 1998 Council Meeting, concern over the proposal was raised by Yakima
County. At the County's request, the Council delayed action on the proposal to lower
charges. Over the past several months, the City has held a series of meetings with County
representatives and their consultants during which their concerns with the Study were
discussed. In response to their concerns, the following revisions were incorporated into
the attached report and rate ordinance:
•
•
•
11) adjustment of rates to accommodate the City's current Wastewater debt service equity
position;
12) update of average consumption of Inside and Outside retail residential customers per
current information.
In addition to the adjustment to the charges, the proposed Ordinance also address:
1) a modification to the date which cuts off Local Improvement Districts (LID's) from the
old charge system (see section 7.58.030.A.) This affects a very few potential customers
within some newly formed LID's.;
2) section 7.58.060 clarifies that only the future element of the Base Trunk Charge may be
waived;
3) section 7.58.075 limits to 20,000 square feet the parcel size to be utilized in calculating
charges for Single Dwelling Units;
4) finally, section 7.58.090. C. clarifies language.
Please note that in every case, in every Zone, for each lot size illustrated, a reduction is
proposed. The reduction ranges from 1.3% to 32.1% depending on Zone and lot size.
However, the reduction for an average sized lot is about 10% for each zone: These revised
rates represent a significant and substantial decrease while still preserving the City's
objective of requiring growth to pay its own way.
HISTORY:
The 1987 Comprehensive Plan for Sewerage System recognized the shortfall of the existing
Capital Cost Recovery Charge. That report recommended the charge be; 1) extended to "all
properties connecting to the sewer system ", and 2) the rate be adjusted to accommodate
trunk sewer construction to future sub basins. Neither of these recommendations was
acted on at that time.
The adopted 1994 Cost of Service and Rate Study proposed and, subsequent to Council
approval in December of 1994, implemented a rate setting philosophy which reduced
existing City Retail customer subsidies of other user classes. This updated study continues
that philosophy by assigning, where appropriate, the capital costs of necessary system
growth to new customers.
The Wastewater Connection Charge Ordinance ( #97 -38), approved in June of 1997,
consolidated the existing Capital Cost Recovery Charge and Sewer Connection Charge
systems codified in the Yakima Municipal Code, into a single charge based on 1) the
volume of wastewater estimated to be generated by a new connection, and 2) the area of
the lot connecting the wastewater system. Rates were established for each of three
geographical zones.
•
The intent of Ordinance #97 -38 was to ensure that new customers shoulder a more
equitable share of the cost of the system and reduce City retail customer's current and
future subsidy burden. Those revenues not sufficiently recovered from a connection
charge program will ultimately come from another source -- monthly City user rates. City
Retail rate payers had historically borne the burden of the financial under - performance of
the past CCRC and Connection Charge systems.
In a previous transmittal memorandum, dated June 1, 1995, staff estimated, for
comparison purposes only, that City Retail rates would need to be increased 15 percent to
recover the same annual revenue which this program identified it would generate given
connection trends at that time. We believed, and still believe, a rate increase of this size
for new growth would not be acceptable to existing customers. The conclusion, therefore,
was that without the Wastewater Connection Charge program to recover the cost of new
growth, we would not have sufficient resources to build the pipe and treatment facilities
necessitated by growth.
Current City policy directs that there be minimal subsidy of future growth by the citizens of
Yakima: While we pursue funding for capital needs, these sources are very limited and
uses restricted. Accordingly, growth must find a way to pay for itself.
. Previous Wastewater Connection Charge proposal transmittals to City Council and th
City Mangers Office have included estimated connection charges for discussion purpose
The following Attachment 1 provides the latest estimates of average connection charge
for the three zones when the developer constructs the collection system. The dollar
amounts shown will change over time with construction cost indices (CCI) and the actual
costs of facilities projects for growth related expansion.
The enclosed . table "Attachment 1; Wastewater Connection Charge Comparison" provides
a comparison between 1997 adopted rates, the February 1998 proposed rates arrived at
through the update analysis of items 1 -10 discussed above, rates which include the debt
service credit (City equity position) listed as item #11 above, and rates which include
adjustment for a usage ..factor of 1.0 between Inside and Outside retail residential
customers, listed as item #12 above.
•
•
• Attach"! •
• •
f
Wastewater Connection Charge Comparison
•
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1
_ The purpose of the Wastewater Connection Charge Rates Is to ensure that new customers shoulder an equitable share of the historic cost of the sum, -
as well as the actual cost of the connecting.
ZONE 1 ZONE 2 • ZONE 3
lot size _
Adopted proposed osed > rGi .:Equit ; ::::.::::Usage; : ::::: Adopted proposed :; City ; ;! ige? Adopted proposed ! lrqul sag
P : IY Y
(square feet) Jun -97 on 2/3/98 debt senn F gt;tor_ (1 0) Jun -97 on 2/3/98 d ebt'servico: Focit : (1 0 } Jun -97 on 2/3/98 debt ffiervMC9 1* idr. (1 >0) •
13' ':::::$4::•:246- . L. . ...
5 183.
77 4 740
•
8,000 51 .249.38 $1, 148.24 `:5'1;�.3�_;8�j`;�1:080 :17:: $ 3,419.92 $ 2.930.02 :;:;$2';$9 :5',60,_., 7,. S5, S . .. ,.. .:.::: ::: . : 4....:. : . • .:: » : :.:
" s;z le ..:' 4:8."/0 » >; -14.3% ^'» . �8r1°1'0:: < >;;' -8.2% ::`: >'1'Q:8 ?` > : ...:
% change -8.1 % . .:.: . .
..:.
% chan a from proposed :0::: 0..i...1%:1-....:-...:: 5 9%;;;; :
::: :- ; 1..°/b; 1:1::(19'0::::;: 10: ::;': -1:6 O :.
9 P P�
is 2<.2`Yo ' °!a'< 1 '12 . 1 !..7*........:,
:. >
chan a Iron adopted : . . .
4ii :396 i3 5%:.:: : : .:: 1 : : ..;: :: ;.: k : -: :23
' :::: : :;:-
change 031.85 ";::>:`:::'!>:' »'
: ' 1;81k$ . 5 .. ,.:.24,..1. 0.. .
85.01 6 50
12 000 51.398.71 $1,335.44 $,.l O R >aT:' : :5'1:x252; 34 $3.933.22 :$.36d�80$3;34257: 58.0 $ 55 .. ;: >:;::.:: �•
% change -4.5% • 1 % d,3% - 7 8 % 2 3% : -0.5% 8 8% : -4,S °,
: 1. 6. :2 r7 9o- /<: 5:5 >i 6 . 8q
% change from proposed
0 . 470 :: : :: ':'. 1 4. 5"!a< ><' -s>:. 1 55C:: : >:: >::a: 9 3%.; :; :::; .,.;-:1.3x3. %. ;.
. .
% a from ad x.1:9 <1 ;:._: 1 0.. : . .
9 adopted P
x 7 2 0 .
4 $8,614.25 . ... ::,_0
7. $8 0 1 ... .. .
20,000 $1.897.48 $1.709.83 :::: 53fi8 $4598c57 55.884.83 $5.939 2 : $ . :487 - . _ �.:. , - $ ± :. ..
* >:..4 0*:i: 0.9% >:: :.7.696:.1 .::. ` 113% ii 9.5% 6 9% '. >`:: ! >::' ::
% chance 0.7% "'
..: .
: ;47 ; �' >:: >. ' 89/. <::> <:::>�u 9%: >:: :; ':.:iii:;10:0 °7► • 9'. change from proposed :: �: :1Oi %:::'` >;�6. �>: 8 ; :.. ;; : : -
• 8 X6..0%: rs:.';::;8 ;0% , ::::: :;: : >I:4*::: ::1
% change from adopted : >:' > 5'ib ::z:::> -
::..: : :.: - :.
9 °P
- : - 7 7 0
5 :::::8 :0 1' 01 6.2 : .
1 0.5 8
814.2 801 ::..$
' ' 10 2 9
S S
30,000 52.070.90 51, 709.83 ;;3�tg388�;;�1;598;57;: $7.938.57 $5.939.62 - $ , ... :
.i ., "%:;: : g'::':: :;:;: ! : :': 1 -1 4.9% :0:'-6:9"10 _< :: -''S i - > <-- -
%Cha a -17.4% :::'�j01% >'. »::;::;4,0;IP.;.; - 25.2% `s'`T:BIu:; >:._1 %.
.::::..
...:
% change from propose d 10 a:�a ; :: : ..: .:: 2 0:.: >';:::; - ': >: >:; 7.89(;:: ``::'.''g ?8 %::::::: >: • -
9 P P� •
*/. change from adopted :' > :' X5;8 % ::s>::: 7 :6'14:;: '. " :X360.4::;>. : ::33 % >:: >:: r' ° ; :<::z.:<:::. % >;:>
• Maximum lot size of 20,000 per SDU proposed. _ I F _. . .
As explained In the report, parcel sIze was the criterion used to distribute costs ohs. The length (cost) of the pipes is directly related to the size of parcels served. _
Adjustments following CIty!County discussions. ` _ t _ _,-
" Rates for all Zones credited for City Debt Service Equity Position. _ _1_ . _ _ _ __ _ ___ _
"' SDU usage for all Zones considered to be equal; this shall be reconsidered with each update per consumption records. I •
. 9129198
•