HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-009 Land Development Fees 410 ORDINANCE NO. 98- 0 0
AN ORDINANCE relating to zoning and land use; amending existing land development fees
2 and adding a new fee for Administrative Adjustments of certain Class 1 and 2 uses ;
3 and amending Section 15.26.010B of the City of Yakima Municipal Code.
4 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF YAKIMA:
SECTION 1.
6 Subsection 15.26.010B of the City of Yakima Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
7 1. Urban Area Zoning Ordinance YMC 15
8 A CLASS 1 REVIEW Fee
9 • Development Permit for Class 1 Use (Table 4-1) No charge
10 ii. Temporary Uses (15.04.100) No charge
iii. Class 1 Home Occupations (Table 4-2) $34- $32
12
13
14 i. Development Permits for Class 2 Uses, except as below $263 $274
15 ii. Single or Double wide Manufactured Homes
4110 16 requiring Class 2 Review (Table 4-3) $263 $274
17 iii. Temporary Hardship Units $446 8121
18 V. Class 2 Home Occupations (Table 4-2) $263 $274
19 v. Changes to Class 1 or 2 developments requiring
20 Class 2 Review $263 $274
21
22 i. Development Permits for uses requiring Class 3 Review,
23 except as listed below $453 $471
24 il. Single or Double Wide Manufactured Homes requiring
25 Class 3 Review (Table 4 5391 5407
26 iii. Class 3 Home Occupations (Table 4-2) $39-1 $407
27 iv. Changes to existing or approved Class 3 developments
28 or Adjustments of Development standards to existing
Class 3 Use $394- 5407
79 v. A change from one nonconforming use to another;
30 or expansion of a nonconforming use $394- $407
31
32 11 A APJOSTMgSnOE
33 , Standards of Class 1 and Class 2 Uses (15.10.020) in Commercial
34 or Industrial zones not adjoining residential zones $62
as
36 . Administrative Adjustments for all other Class (1) & (2) uses $1-29 $134
1998 Fee Ordinance
2/9/98
.. ,
37 e
• 38 Administrative Adjustments of Class 3 uses • $391 $407
39 . ,
40 i':t:6!:'::M60.ifi.k.fitti.i■f.§:10::':#XtStticiOrt5tIttrtiPIPIarigagnina
41 UNDER 15.17.040 AND 15.17.050. 1
. 42
43 if;:!;•iiiiii':!..V.401■M'Fgg$39:112:11:6 ACRES
44 REQUESTED Less than 3.0 - 10.0 - 20.0 - 50 or
45 CLASSIFICATION 2.9 9.9 9.9 49.9 more
46 . To Industrial Zone $474 $490 $648 $674 $747$777 $845-$879 $868 $903
47 To Commercial Zone $474 $490 $648$674 $747$777 $845 $879 $868-$903 •
as To Residential Zone $360 $374 $474 $490 . $520 $541 $557 $579 $648-$674
49
50
51 . Fee
52 t;.S!i,VAttaS;T ........ ttg $121 $126
::. ......:.......... ..., .......... .........,,,,•::::::::::••:::::-
... ...........................................................................,........................................................
53
54 ItrIstrEitputrAmbvs:....iwtfrefitxtuNdtjamint:grefia
55 i. No hearing $67 la)
56 Li. With Hearing $429 $134
57
III
58
59 i. To the Hearing Examiner $449 $124
60 ii. To the Legislative Body $449 $124
61
62 . lij:.„:.1'yr.,A$.TT....•.2.VITI:c.kriP.N*.::;:i See Section 15.11110(b)
63
64 II. YMC 14 (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE)
65 iA.
66 i. Preliininary Plat — $10 per lot plus $256 $266
67, ii. Final Plat . Recording Fee plus $
68 iii. Plat Variance, Alteration . $429 $134
69
70 :
71 i. Preliminary Application $5 per lot plus $465 $112
Recording,
n ii. Final Plat fee
73 iii. Exemptions
74 a. Lot line adjustments, Financial Segregations $29 ILO
75 b. All Others • No charge
.76 iV. Appeals , . $449 $124
77 V. Variance $449 i_izi 40
78
79 311::'::S $256 $266
2
1998 Fee Ordinance
2/9/98 •
•
so (RCW 35.79) . ( +50% appraised value)
81
82 : TLL Y BA SEME NT R 1► .:: >:> »: »: » >:: >s $141 $147
83
84 <: STAT IRO !IENTA
85 A . Environmental Checklist as required by 6.88 YMC $1-29 $134
86 B SEPA Appeal $446 $152
87 C. Environmental Impact Statements Actual Cost including but not
88 limited to staff wages, benefits,
89 overhead, & consultant services.
90
91 ' �I SHORELINE PETITS >< > «>
165
92
93 r .
94
95
96 SECTION 2
97 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage, approval and
al 98 publication as provided by law and by the City charter.
99
0
100
101 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this day of M
102
103
104 /
105 John Puccinelli, Mayor
106
107
108
109 ATTEST:
110
111
112 �I 1 f`"' "`i A°' ' k
113 City Clerk"
114
115 cam,
116 Publication Date: .3
117. Effective Date: if
118
•
•
3
1998 Fee Ordinance .
2/9/98
•
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YAKIMA, WASHINGTON
AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. Lf
For Meeting Of tllarch 3. 1998
ITEM TITLE: 1998 Fee Schedule Amendments for Land Development
Ordinance
SUBMITTED BY: Glenn Rice, Acting Director
Community and Economic Development
CONTACT PERSON /TELEPHONE: Joan Davenport, Supervising Plann-
(575 -6164)
SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
On February 3, 1998 the Yakima City Council conducted a public meeting to consider
proposed amendments to the Fee Schedule for Land Development Ordinance. The
Council accepted the staff report and directed legislation to be submitted. These fees
have been recalculated and checked for accuracy in the rounding to the nearest
dollar.
In addition, staff was directed to prepare a Fee Schedule study, which will be
presented later in the year, with 1999 Budget matters. The attached staff report provide
details of the study as directed and the previous deliberations.
Resolution _ Ordinance. Contract _ Other (Specify) Staff Report
Funding Source None --
APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL:
Gt y Manager
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Ordinance to implement Fee Schedule
Amendments.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
COUNCIL ACTION:
• City of Yakima, Washington
Department of Community and Economic Development •
Planning Division Staff Report
For Council Meeting of March 3, 1998
Subject: 1998 Fee Schedule Amendments for Land
Development Ordinance
Contact Person: Joan Davenport, Supervising Associate Planner
(575- 6164)
Background
On February 3, 1998 the Yakima City Council considered a staff
report identifying proposed 1998 amendments to the Fee Schedule
for Land Development applications. The Council accepted the staff
report and directed staff to prepare an ordinance which implements
a 4.0% increase over the 1997 Fee Schedule, based up the Seattle-
Tacoma Area Consumer Price Index (CPIU) one year increase for the
first half of the period1996 -1997, as reported by the US Bureau of
Labor.
There was considerable discussion between Council members and the
public regarding whether the Seattle - Tacoma CPIU was the most
appropriate measure for application within the Yakima Valley. In
addition, there was some discussion regarding the practice of
rounding fees to the nearest dollar, especially on fees of less than
$100 which may result in a higher than 4.0% increase.
Council direction was to prepare the 1998 Fee Schedule based upon
the method which has been used since 1990 (Seattle - Tacoma CPIU,
rounded to nearest dollar). Further, the Council directed staff to
prepare a fee study which covered the following .items:
1. Determine what percentage of the fee should cover staff and
processing costs;
2. Determine which cost of living index should be used
annually in calculating fee changes;
3. Prepare a comparison of fees used by other jurisdictions.
411 The above noted study will be prepared in 1998 and be considered
with the 1999 Budget discussions.