The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-033 Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan ORDINANCE NO. 99 -33 AN ORDINANCE Concerning land use comprehensive planning and adopting the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan recommended by the Regional Planning Commission on February 23, 1999, and as recommended by the Yakima Urban Area Joint Board on June 4, 1999,as a sub - element of The Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as adopted and incorporated in section 1.42.070 of the Yakima Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the Terrace Heights area lies within the City of Yakima Urban Growth Area, and WHEREAS, the Yakima Urban Area - Comprehensive Plan as adopted in 1997 d as _amended in 1998 does not include future land use designations or make other detailed provisions for land use in the Terrace Heights area BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE -CITY OF YAKIMA, WASHINGTON: Section 1. Subsection 1.42.070 of the City of Yakima Municipal Code, and Ordinance 779 §§ 1 and 2, 1966, as amended by Ordinance 972 § 1, 1967, Ordinance 2579 § 1, 1981, Ordinance 97- 22, and are hereby amended to read as follows: 1.42.070 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan: adoption and amendment • procedures A. Plan Adoption: The 1997 Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan ( "the Plan") shall consist of the November, 1996, Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan Draft as modified by the February 11, 1997, Yakima Urban Area Joint Board Recommended Changes, and the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan recommended by the Regional Planning Commission on February 23, 1999, and as recommended by the Yakima Urban Area Joint Board on June 4, 1999, which shall be a sub- element of the Plan. The Plan and its elements and plans including those incorporated by reference are lipreby adopted as the official comprehensive land use plan for the City of Yakima, as required by chapter 36.70A RCW. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law and by the City Charter. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, signed and approved this 17th day of August, 1999. John Puccinelli, Mayor ATTEST: J City Clerk Publication Date: 8 -20 -99 Effective Date: 9 -19 -99 lap \ sepa /gma \gwa- \scrap- plztn.adeption \comp plan adoption °rdO9. /29/99 .12:52 TIM ORDINANCE ADOPTING TERRACE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY PLAN Page 1 r. ii „. : . , . ., II __ _ _ _ - /I erase • t N Ill - -_,_ . f 4: ' . 1111 , 11 , A ,,, it:v. w - 1....- - . _ . -.;:,‘ .. - . _. . 4.. . . II _ _ _ ._ _ . ____ .... _ _ - _ , . .....„ , .:. . i 1 - ti) 1 ' .t. !.! . .-..., ,. fy A ' t i, t f; , � Pit • i i , c. jam,. •wt�r`� , e -- -;.:.--•_-;_....- . 7:7". . i - t • , -- . e - s ir..1" . ii- 1. • . � , s f y� + _ l w� t Taylor Kkin, Age 6 Regional Planning Commission Recommendation February 23, 1999 . Exhibit A .. YAIIMMA URBAN AREA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF CONSIDERING ) A RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT THE ) TERRACE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ) PLAN AS AN AMENDMENT TO ) THE YAKIMA URBAN AREA ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ) Reasons for Action, Findings of Fact Analysis of Factors Considered Controlling and Action Taken WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Counties and cities within them to prepare long range comprehensive plans pursuant to RCW 36.70A and related Chapters; and, WHEREAS, the document entitled the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Yakima on April 1, 1997 and by Yakima County on April 29, 1997 as the new comprehensive plan for Yakima County in fulfillment of the requirements of the GMA; and,ti. WHEREAS, the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1997 established the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area as part of the greater Yakima Urban Growth Area and, WHEREAS, Plan 2015, the Yakima County Comprehensive Plan adopted May 20, 1997, included the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area as part of Yakima Urban Growth Area; and, WHEREAS, the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan as adopted in 1997 and amended in 1998 did not include future land use designations or other detailed planning for the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area; and, WHEREAS, the Terrace Heights Improvement Association was recognized in 1994 by the Board of Yakima County Commissioners as the official neighborhood organization for the Terrace Heights community; and, WHEREAS, in cooperation with the Terrace Heights Improvement Association, the County solicited comments from Terrace Heights residents through community meetings and surveys, and has kept residents informed through direct mailings and inserts in the newsletter of the Terrace Heights Improvement Association; and, WHEREAS, in August 1997, a Steering Committee was formed, with the assistance of the • Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 1 Exhibit B 11 Terrace Heights Improvement Association, to prepare a draft Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Steering Committee met ten times between September 10,1997 and January 5, 1998 to review background information and develop plan concepts, future land use map, goals, policies, and implementation tools; and, WHEREAS, on November 6, 1997, more than 100 residents attended a community open house to review conceptual drawings, the proposed master plan map, and goals; and, WHEREAS, in January 1998, copies of the plan were made available to the public; and WHEREAS, the Yakima County' Planning Department conducted environmental review of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan and determined, on March 25, 1998, that the plan will not have a significant adverse impact upon the quality of the environment; and, WHEREAS, on October 26, 1998, the Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission ( "the Commission ") began its study of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan; and, WHEREAS, on December 1, 1998, the Commission held a special meeting to tour the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area and, WHEREAS, on December 7 and 14, 1998 and February 2, 1999, the Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to receive testimony on the draft Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan; and, WHEREAS, all persons desiring to either provide written testimony or speak for or against or in relation to the draft Plan were given a full and complete opportunity to be heard; and, - WHEREAS, the Commission conducted deliberations on February 2 and 23, 1999 to evaluate and to decide how they would respond to testimony received; and, WHEREAS, the Commission, havin g carefully carefull considered the written and oral testimony of the public and agencies in its deliberations, requested staff to make certain changes to the plan, and has reviewed those changes; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is now satisfied that this matter has been sufficiently considered; - NOW, THEREFORE, the Regional Planning Commission hereby makes and enters the following: Findings of Fact Plan 20I5IFEIS Page 2 I. REASONS FOR ACTION -1- The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires cities and counties to plan for land under their jurisdiction, including the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land; provisions for housing; capital facilities requirements and funding sources; capacities and locations of existing and future utilities; and the levels of service and needs of transportation facilities. -2- Detailed land use and other planning was not completed for the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area in the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1997. II. FINDINGS OF FACT The Regional Planning Commission ( "the Commission ") has reviewed the draft plan prepared by the Steering Committee, and has received and considered public testimony at public hearings conducted on December 7 and 14, 1998, and February 2, 1999: The Commission has determined the following: Future Land Use Designations: -1- Urban Reserve. The Urban Reserve was established to address areas within Urban Growth Areas that are outside existing sewer service areas where no land use or service plans have been developed. The uncertainty of the Urban Reserve has the effect of putting pressure on land outside the Urban Growth Area. A more specific land use designation helps set requirements and standards for land development. The Urban Reserve will eventually become urban, and needs to be developed at urban levels. -2- Flood Plain Overlay. Flood plains and floodways need to be shown on the future land use map. Institutional Designation. At the Commission's recommendation, the Institutional designation was eliminated by the City of Yakima and Yakima County during the November 1998 adoption of amendments to the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan. • Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 3 -4- Parks. Although the Commission removed the "Parks, and Open Space" land use designation from the Urban Area Plan, Terrace Heights residents have said that parks need to be referenced in the plan. - 5 The Yakima County Parks Plan identifies various size parks. Generally, "pocket parks" are not supported to due the difficulty and cost of maintenance. Some type of organization will be needed to maintain the proposed system of parks, pathways, and landscaping. Implementation may require initiation of a parks district or other funding mechanism, supported by the Terrace Heights residents. -6- Greenway Overlay District. The portion of the Greenway Overlay District around Keys Road and SR 24 is not currently under jurisdiction of the Yakima Urban Area Zoning Ordinance, but is within the Yakima Urban Growth Area. The Greenway Overlay District needs to be expanded into this area to be consistent with the Greenway Master Plan adopted by Yakima County and the City of Yakima. -7- Warren Acres Road Area. Neighborhood preferences and access support designation of Warren Acres Road and the adjacent "T" short plat to the east of the ditch as Low Density Residential, rather than Moderate Density Residential. Existing zoning is R -1 on both sides of the ditch. -8- Terrace Heights Drive, south side between 33' and 37"' Streets. Neighborhood preference is to avoid "strip" commercial along Terrace Heights Drive. Development of the Temple and Edwards properties will provide adequate commercial area. The Commission considered the character of the area and the change of elevation. The Commission determined that a change to lower density is within the overall intent of the plan. This change applies to the four parcels on the south side of Terrace Heights Drive that are marked white on RPC draft 1 (2/2/99) of the future land use map: 3 parcels west of Warren Acres Road and one east of Warren Acres Road. -9- 33r Street from Terrace Heights Drive to Keys Road. As an aid to future land use planning, the conceptual location of the proposed realignment of 33r Street has been added to the future land use map. This project is included in the county's adopted 6 -year Transportation improvement Plan for 1999 -2004. Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 4 -10- West side of Butterfield Road, North of Terrace Heights Drive. Several land owners in this area testified that they would prefer future land use designation as industrial, rather than low density residential. While difficulty in providing sewer service limits development potential, certain light industrial uses could occur with very limited services. -11- East of 57 Street, North of Roza Hill Drive. Only half of this large parcel is located within the sewer service area, and none is currently within the sewer district. To avoid split designation, the entire parcel should be left as low density residential. This designation would allow a mix of residential development types provided that the overall density remained low. Associated zoning should be suburban residential until public water and sewer become available. Utilities -12 Sewer. Approximately 50% of the Terrace Heights Sewer District's allocation of sewage treatment plant capacity is currently used. It is not anticipated that the existing allocation would need to be increased during the planning period. If infiltration can be reduced, additional capacity would be available. -13- The Keys Road Interceptor, scheduled for replacement, serves all existing industrial uses along Keys Road between Butterfield Road and Terrace Heights Drive, east to the Temple property and the spillway on Marsh Road, and terminates on North Butterfield Road and East Keys Road. There are plans to extend the interceptor further west in the future. -14 Water. An estimated 4,200 new connections are available under existing water rights. The 4,200 new connections would serve more than 10,000 persons, which is beyond the 8,000 growth estimate. Water supply facilities currently have capacity to serve an estimated 1,400 additional residential service connections, while storage facilities have capacity to serve an estimated 1,900 additional residential service connections. Approximately 1,000 connections are currently served. -15- Solid Waste. The Terrace Heights landfill is expected to close around the year 2007. Preferred final land use would be open space or recreation with no permanent enclosed structures. Approximately 400 acres are in use. Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 5 • Transportation Facilities -16- Streets. Planned street improvements include: 1) A 4 -lane arterial at 33" Street from Terrace Heights Drive to SR 24. This would be a new street through the Temple property. The Gun Club Road to Terrace Height Drive connection is planned for 1999. 2) A 4 -lane improvement of Nob Hill Boulevard/SR 24 from 18 Street to Keys Road. 3) A 4 -lane improvement of Roza Hill Drive from Maple Avenue to 57 Street within the next 2 years. Planned street improvements should be shown on the future land use map. -17- Street projects under study include: 1) A study of traffic patterns and projections for the entire Terrace Heights area with assessments of future needs. 2) An east -west arterial in the northern area which would be parallel to Terrace Heights Drive. 3) A canal crossing to connect Beaudry Road to Bittner Road. -18- Constraints on road improvements: 33rd Street north of Terrace Heights Drive: Most right -of -way for future road expansion would need to be acquired from properties on east side of road, since cemetery plots are as close as 5 feet from fence on west side. Right -of -way constraints would limit 33' to three lanes. Maple Avenue: Improvement of the Maple Avenue/Terrace Heights Drive intersection might involve realignment of school playgrounds. Yakima River Crossings: Access to Terrace Heights is limited to crossings at Terrace Heights Drive and Nob Hill Boulevard/SR 24. -19- Yakima County has set a level of service "C" for Terrace Heights Drive, which equals 1,640 cars in one direction during peak hours. The current level of service is `B ". The County's preliminary approval of projects in northeastern Terrace Heights consumes most of the remaining capacity. -20- Maple Street Relocation. Based on discussions between the County Works Department and the school district, the text and future land use map have been revised to show a proposed new road alignment along the north side of the Terrace heights Elementary School property located at N. 41' Street and Terrace Heights Drive. Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 6 • -21- Additional Bridge Across Yakima River. Area residents have repeatedly mentioned the need for a third crossing over the Yakima River, in addition to Terrace Heights Drive and Nob Hill Boulevard. Yakima County needs to study the feasibility of an additional river crossing. The text and future land use map have been revised to reflect this need. Road Extensions. The alignments of road extensions required to meet the demands of new developments will be determined through a traffic impacts study to be conducted in the spring and fall of 1999. -22- East - West Connection. Several comments addressed the need for another bridge, and expressed doubts regarding the ability of either Rest Haven Road or Nob Hill Boulevard to alleviate traffic demands on Terrace Heights Drive. The text and future land use map have been revised to show the conceptual location of a future east -west corridor and river crossing connecting the three new large subdivisions with the city of Yakima. -23- Railroad Crossings. Although traffic on Terrace Heights Drive is occasionally interrupted by train traffic, the timing and frequency of these interruptions is not sufficient to increase to a level that' requires grade separation. Implementation -24- Design Guidelines. Development and implementation of design guidelines are anticipated following plan adoption. -25- Pathway Planning. Pathway implementation will require an on -going community effort following plan adoption. III. CONCLUSIONS -1- The Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission continues to recognize the need for coordinated long- range planning to guide the growth, development and conservation choices that will face both public and private decision - makers over the next twenty years. The Commission also recognizes the need for a comprehensive plan to guide future work by citizens, their governments, community organizations and businesses in the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area. Findings of Fact Plan 20 /5/FEIS Page 7 -2- The Commission considers the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan to be a needed supplement to the Yakima Urban Area Comprehensive Plan, providing a basis for zoning, other future land use decisions, design guidelines, public infrastructure investments, and other decisions in the Terrace Heights Urban Service Area. -3- The Commission realizes that its role in development and adoption of a plan for Terrace Heights is part of a larger process that will require further review and implementation following its adoption. -4- The Commission determined that while the Steering Committee's draft plan generally satisfied the GMA requirement for detailed land use and other planning in Terrace Heights, several issues raised by the public, planning staff, and Commission members required changes to the plan before forwarding it to the Board of Yakima County Commissioners for their consideration. The Commission directed staff to make the required changes, and the maps, text, goals and policies of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan were revised accordingly. -5- The Commission understands that the plan must comply with the State of Washington's comple array of thirteen state planning goals, statutes and administrative codes known as the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA). The Commission believes that the plan complies with the GMA consistent with the values, customs and culture of the citizens of Yakima County. -6- Public Involvement requirements of the GMA have been fulfilled in the development of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan. -7- The requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act have been met. -8- After due review of the draft plan, consideration of issues raised, and subsequent revision of the draft plan, the Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission is now satisfied with the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan, as revised at the direction of this Commission. IV. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS CONSIDERED CONTROLLING The Yakima Urban Area Planning Commission considers all 25 Findings of Fact and all 8 Conclusions heretofore entered to be controlling. Findings of Fact Plan 2015/FEIS Page 8 Y. ACTION TAKEN The Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission, in view of the above reasons for action, findings of fact, conclusions, and analysis of factors considered controlling, agrees with the principles, concepts, goals, and policies of the draft Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan, as revised, _- and recommends its adoption by the Yakima City Council and the Board of Yakima County Commissioners. Actin• 's 1 ... . - ... , 1999. / / ��!' _ v1- 0 r, i , , 0 , : ,,, _ _ _ _ 4 r , , . _ . . . Qe—kX.N.ClaE,2210.V3 7 AT ST: '' !Q t i_.� Richard F. Anderwald, Secretary Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission G: \USERS\ELAINET\TERRHTS\PC FOFth.doc 02/25/1999 06:06 • Findings of Fact Plan 2015IFEIS Page 9 • BEFORE THE YAIQMA URBAN AREA JOINT BOARD Date: June 4, 1999 Time: - 9:00 A.M. — 10:30 A.M. Location: Room 420, Yakima County Courthouse, Yakima, Washington Record of Proceedings Present: Jesse S. Palacios, Yakima County Commissioner Jim Lewis, Yakima County Commissioner _ Mary Place, Yakima City Council John Klingele, Yakima City. Council • Nathan Kwak, Union Gap City Council Richard Anderwald, Director of Planning, Yakima County Don Skone, Planning Manager, City of Yakima Elaine Taylor. Planning Department, Yakima County Phil Hoge, Planning Department, Yakima County Bill Rathbone, City of Union Gap Planning Department Bob Young, Central Washington State Homebuilders Kara Kondo, Regional Planning Commission Member John Hodkinson, Regional Planning Commission Member Bernie Sims, Yakima City Council Clarence Barnett, Yakima City Council The purpose of the meeting was to review the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan and the Terrace Heights Concurrent Zoning Map as recommended by the Yakima Urban Area Regional Planning Commission. The County Planning staff reviewed the additional changes recommended by staff. The first one being the future land use map in Hartford Road area due to flood plain mapping revisions. The second being the future land use and concurrent zoning maps for Sun Country Mobile Home Park. Dick Anderwald recommended that the amendments be done first then do the action items. Dick reviewed the amendments specifically: 1. Changing the future land use map to reflect the location of the floodplain as recommended in the staff report. 2. Clean up the mobile home park to R -1 Low Density, including removing the open space designation. Also remove open space designation in Terrace Estates. 3. Update Table 6 — Distribution of Vacant Land in the Terrace Heights UGA (housekeeping item) 4. Mark the railroad (housekeeping item) Motion made by Council member John Klingele calling for the vote to forward to the legislative bodies. All members voted in favor. Motion includes all the map amendments. Dick Anderwald was directed to set hearing date for consideration before the legislative bodies and have a joint meeting. Mary Place reminded that both city and county staff should get together to discuss comp plan amendments and have things completed prior to building season. Dick responded that New Vision is sponsoring an effort at looking at applications for new development building permits. That would be a good point to bring this aspect into that purpose. Mary mentioned that several persons from the building community have commented concerns to her. Meeting adjourned. Yakima Urban Area Joint Board Minutes June 4, 1999 Exhibit C 1 ' • MEMO May 28, 1999 TO: Board of County Commissioners Yakima City Council Members FROM: Yakima County Planning Department Dick Anderwald, Director; Phil Hoge, Planner, 574-2230 SUBJECT: Additional changes recommended by county Planning Department staff (re: Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan and Concurrent Zoning map) The following issues and staff recommendations were discussed with the RPC at their April 20, 1999 meeting. The RPC concurred with the staff recommendations. Item A: Future Land Use map in Hartford Road area: Issue: After the RPC completed its recommendation of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan on February 23, 1999, it was discovered that the floodway had been incorrectly mapped in the area of Hartford Road, which had resulted in non - floodway areas being designated "Parks and Open Space" by the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan (Future Land Use, map 5). Except for the Yakima Greenway Foundation's property that the Greenway hopes to develop as a park, this non - floodway property should not be designated "Parks and Open Space." Staff recommendation: As indicated on the attached map entitled "Item A," revise Map 5 (Future Land Use) in the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan to correctly indicate the floodway in the vicinity of Hartford Road and to change the land use designation from "Parks and Open Space" to "Low Density Residential." Item B: Future Land Use and Concurrent Zoning maps for Sun Country Mobile Home Park: Issue: After the RPC completed its recommendation of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan on February 23, 1999, it was discovered that the current density of each lot in Sun Country Mobile Home Park (located north of Gun Club Road and east of Keys Road) is less than 7 dwelling units per acre. When the reserved open spaces of this development are taken into account, the whole development is much less than 7 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the "High Density Residential" designation of this property in the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan and the "R -3" designation in the Concurrent Zoning map does not reflect the actual use of the property. No testimony was received during the course of the planning process for this property to become high density. It is currently zoned R -1. Staff recommendation: As indicated on the attached map entitled "Item B," revise Map 5 (Future Land Use) in the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan to change the Sun Country Mobile Home Park's "High Density Residential" designation to "Low Density Residential." Also, revise the Concurrent Zoning map to change the same area from "R -3" to "R -1." Exhibit D I/ ' i i" � I air y � , / - A I ' / I Item A �' ' H �.: i .. � if I . j/i jZ It - : ..7.71/"...71--.,.., �i tlr. •s1 a'' la b : �Ipo�o ii \ aP) Veal W11 lu: . )1111 . t ii be u , Jn ¢t • i t at ;'� rail�bk , Ks �.� . " ! om ..,.....„4...,,,, Rede sf r, e qs n,iamapis yif •. ','i !t illusq i e1w 1- an= y J u / � q . c iri 1°`'. c am ' y 3. . anJ S . A L. k I r\ /` '' f r 3 Tal ust ' TS J' �IOx ,roa" . o� a . �, g na ^ .,, # x� \ / �llicel A2r l TS fc 1 •.: h must O nJ u c ic J, I T ` l` .\, • . 'Y\ i I . ,. ti ., h 11 L (9 1,.t V et'151 .., ,„ . hur t mcnt�: j . �ti,,, Resid 1 I 64. „.„ ,, 51 .. 10■1 'k''''''./..,,,,., Ilk \UAL III ;VT:I ' \ •'N .\/, ‘ A •1 IALMII I , — • ' c. ' I a ) .. — ur I r ... v.' - '' u11 '''s ^ . \ S ( /.. ' AG \ .40 e 1 I t s \ lands.�'�pes: ' Strea Ty ALT • ♦♦ �11�� > t * i * • ti I t , Three i � 11,4;".-:41 x ` i { p ♦ ♦♦ � lJV� � '� 1 . �1 Thr. y' :4: • 1 Si $na to , - F Fiv o . 1 ♦� ♦ to a � 1 Q'.. i p f..l.. ..„ . hovel use . , .4,4t ■ ' _ grim (WAC� 1 3 t 4 4 � aslnn d� Rc, Fish Wildli e- �.,. -.. - 1 1 .. ..ecleral e, . g ... • agemeettAgen , - '-- ��,� ♦♦♦ • akim 1 �+ �:1► FT:C'1' , � t • a ��jCTOB 1 •_ � 995 _. _ _ _ 1� � 1 ♦ � ♦ ♦ r4,.;.,„ �,� ?.. 4,11 • .. , • \ . - • C4 l * . , _ ... ._ .,..._.. - Ittob 0 \ \ A h - _ ■ E r ∎•— t � s 0000 � ♦oo i .... It14101 . \ I, INk_ r f 161 ' 1 177. lig Ns.....Y>:.> \ \ ‘1 . ' 1"P 0 hi- , -,,,,,,\,,,,,,, . \\ . -,,_77.4,..:, .:.-_____- ,-.-___. ._ . „ mil: , .._, h A , 'NV - N, _ Ili. - 21 l' A 1 ,l& ..._ � .t ! � ' ihifIe i ., N (>� \s\ { r :,; . li ....... .. , --, 1 ... ,�� ! ` bract, III • I Parcel 8 1731005 \\ �- . 1 M0° \ a eet 1 \ -' / / 6. � - . Map 1- = 60 %, .. .. -. - -. 1 f '`... 1 I. t . i .....0 Item B C • '.1.. a.) sun Country Mo ' bile Ap Hom , lim a pia - ,! r , : , . ,„‘ .... , . * ,, *‘ . , Use and Concurrent Zoning maps) ■ \ – N N . % ' ' r' ', • ).:', t,,, 'I,„ . , , ,,' , ,.'''`!';-,:.,. ,• .1 \ • • Ifil ' I - ' .''' ;: , , • ; ' - . 1 . , .." "`• • \ Ci) C4 1 1 i •" ill ,,...4,. \ :., , . :'' .., :', ' ;'',..1;,,r: '.:".',1,.: , \ ql lb III . ,.;.,,;., • \ ,,,..,; ■ (L) 0 -4.4 +ma) • • 141 •.•,...-...,•., ,,,.:..,•..-,,,, , •,,,:. r .,,,-,,s,,, • , ‘ ,', •.i.... t..:.-,..• .:. ,.....„.1,.,11. , \ C) . .'• e1 • ' • ' ‘ l. * rigi ,:•;•*" . 140 .1 ' r `1: ' " 4') T ' \ IN • :: !,,,',',?,, :,' ,. ,,, ., ,',I I, .. • .„' ''.. ' . "•'' , ' .': s, C/) .1 1 1:1 1 4 111111 1 1110 11 • •fl: .i.4,..r.:,..:..',,y'.i.,*1 b, , l Iti i m 11 vi t,i i i I I z ,,, . • 1 \ , . lap v 44,11 - 111 J. .. .1 4 71 " .. P4 ''•'.- ' t:.. :, ; ' ' . \ , , ili alin ilie cr), ir t 11111 . , . , . , • . . ; ' e..,_ N .4„. , ■ DA . .. • . /1P4v; LA 0 : N fa *o p \ *:■4%,L 4‘w.■ . „ -,..., • IPt . . un Club Id. #,wa.,_ , . , .. ..,. , , , .,..f.,•;t 7 .41n r ,, . A§ W ' '‘....U.SZ3.'.' V....M.L V:ab - 7.2-r- '.. a ''''..''' ‘.. '*' ' '- ' F::::1:1 := ''' ' '''. '''' -' -1-'''''' ' ''''' Al.... ' * it,. 44,1,t:A■• rf ( 1 1%- t s,1 , -''S .: ' , ' ",,; "1, '', IC47 '',.',:r...-Tr.,:. ,a7,377,', - .,.. -,..,,,......7,---1 '7•1'....ree,.. , ,, ,, I , A.4 2 1,4, : ig rif '21 ,, ' ,4, 1 1.7P.,,,,,.., ,,,,,,, ,.,.!% ” '„„, ".. ."?. 511 , 3172 .....,, iiTh''''.77F"'. ".• ."."1.,...'"'4';'"?.A:-..--.--1.!............,:ie-t:,-.,...'..."....../ ., ., t„,„::-`,Wizqr,‘,t4:•.gr;`,,;•::...?;f, .4`,F7,,,,,,,,,A1:k.:ti:•„:„.*,„ :. ,; , ` , .';,P . . , :,z :, :r;.b" , '`.' ,. ::',..- '',' . -,:.., ..,''.!..',..;'',':.'1,...t,'..1,:',;,,,,:,., q.,11.4,,,%.(14i)!..•`'.:::.".•la2V,11;21.,,G4P5,,,Ff.',WA::" *k",t t■;•ii , 2, ,,':, : ::.„. : . y .„., '..,,,.,.,-. „: ,,.. „ ..,,,.. -, 7 I '4.i, -- :',C: 45 j- 1 . -,, , , Y., -- 415 . '!' - :'' .'''..:,--:,-',..,'„,':;;,-'-• ' ' ?..;.',:::.;:-,":'' '.'''' `ri': ; ';`,, , . 4",:',!, ...;%. ;''` ,;:::',''', .... '..: :.:, ';,`,',..,',',', ,' '; ' . :24 . ':'•:, . 1 , 7 ' 40) ' 4.0i . :.!%: - 4/' \ 41 4 'i" : 41‘, ..1t0::! r. : :1 ?:.- 1 - 2'... "- ; . ,... :-.. '. :?..' ..-:",;.-':'%'.`.; : ',*.1::1,,;•:".1, l ' - P - . ; . ; ,' ;* ' 4 :7,;4 , p3 1 4 ,4 ,tik,: 1 0,. 1 : ti,g4, : .!"?;', ;4: ' '4,?;' 4 ,''.:,',.. l','-': -.,'::- - '; -'. , ;A•': ', I • i:- '',:i 1 ; ? :::4,,T,m:ell'*V;:.-7..45: i 'n) ; ': ".1 ''' :i-7' '..', : %,''',' .:','.' %1'1'..s LI - I V:: ',. ' -,,, ''''': ' I'. ':,- .--,..':, ', -. -, '' ;<'::: * . ' .. '' . 'tli' ,,') "..' .,': ,` '. '-.'',. . ' • , :. . , . * ' : . : , ' ' ' ' , ., ' , , --,-., : ' . ...1 .' I ",- - - . -• :. II '' ,:; :'-'' : j. .:- ' k: :-.',; .....1.2; - 'i ' +;. - !; .- 1';'A. , t ,* ; ',. 3 - 7, !....?, - ' , ...i''K;ie. tt ii,i';.;' , 11• 1 ;,';;:i.141A.4";;;;;74f4s ' ., 0.. '', f; ..;,''.• ' : , ',:.• ; - . ?, . ,.! ,.. ' . .....,„:' , ' '. :1 ../ :- 1 , ..:i -2.,--..- -.-t..71 , -, , -.: ...... i: - :1-y.,,,,,'. ,,Nrrwi T ',:r.:., :":'` , Y • . : :: 7 . : . ,. .::;',:f . ":4:P ; lit , - Y. " .?:?... ' ;' ,1j. : 1 : • A'..11‘ ,I: ',1; \-%:, .... ' -- I .'''': .....* '' : ,. :' ' ''..';;;. ,',' ' : ' . ' ..,:••• ',.....fi .11‘ -:"".- ' r '''l l '-''' '. ' .. ". ''. ' ...,..;\'' ' :',:.'4:.';':!--:': j' ' 'N 1 - '-'" ' : ' '''' ' ' ' • ' . ,,,s, ,..c,....;,.?1, .....,..;::,..,.; %,:.7,.......?,..,:;,:;p:.:.... ,: ",.. 4 .t--. ,:',...',',. ii.''..': :'''. 1 ..: .. " I. ;;\ ' '' , . .' S ,,,;,,,,' ::' i 1: ; 9 !. :7.f), j :At iYi .. f e 1 V ' ....,'. ■ ,;1 i 4.... 0 ' .il'f,?(: e.;; ,,,....•.: ,: NI ,.,.. ..., .. ,, : . ....,:...,.... ......_,.. __, .r.,1,...: • ,.. , ,. '..:. .`,1 :',...: `,., •-.....-•,,,„.:..,.::' G ,' '. ti`;'"t „1,, ,,r :„...,..,„,,,„,-,- .4 , .;,,, , .1/4.,,;.,...., ts.. ., : .... „ ..,..., ,....... „ / ..-2,,,,,,,,,, 7 -,- . . : .... . ....,; - ,',1.74 .. .„4 2 , .1,..,,41. .-..r. .> ,„1:re;.;:t-eAN--,i; ..'11!;?,.....-1.-4,:,f.,.::',6"'- 111.':;,:y.::::-.1'-1 A 'Parcel Noit19 3214% 7 k 1 . "133.1i 7 d, 1 ,h"'": \ , 1,. .., 1 1,.. ' '''''44''' ' '1 "2- ' r '' ?.. :,'''''''' .:-..*:,,'..'..!:-;:, ';'..-,-'-':.':. , N s k, '4.'4 01:1' 1.6: ..- " , ii- 4 X2.1. * ':,14":,%4'. .;'). '„,. ':.' : l‘i 7 r :10;. ) 4•1 -7 :*,';‘,- r, ',;, ,:,,,., ` • '' stri'''' ' '. N 'k ' 'v ''''' ' ..' 1. "'I'L'Y ' ''' Y.' `''..."..,-.• '''LLI .:''.;...;:`.;;''. I ,''.. 4 :, .' -: MaPsdale.11004030 • ............ . .... .. ... . ... .:.. . . ' - - ' - . , . , . ' ..,.. . • •. , ..., : , /. . .: . . . .,, , ..4..., . — , ... . . , . . , .. ,. ' ° • Figure 5: Future Land Use ---___- - - -,..... is innip emin lil 1111 +1714 m. \\ NN.N.....,.................,.....„...„....„, lib, RPC Recommendation \\\ Num* -- li periple illionarilri f --- Incorporating 6-4-99 Joint AMU ' • .1 k' ..1;1111= r lir Board Modification mili // \ i 1111 III 111 i 410111 51 I fl I 1 1 . i i 1 i 2 o r n a l In IM , \ mg OMI _. -' . .. _____ , I • , __ , ,,,..,,, . - ......._ - _ __ __._ 41/4411 ''‘' -\ '`, ! ' ‘ i x 011111 I ill lir I lli r iff il 1 . 111.11171111 IM P II Si I l■ ,i & • L I ha. ilt 111111110L II UMW. 1 mamma IIN -IN . - I Low Density Residential r:: p■ A k#, v ii li r A p . 6 r .L . ■1411 1 41•0 1 .... boa - - le _ _ __ Medium Density Residential ,..p.7.... ,4I ZIA% 11111=1EFS■ • wit =I E-::) ,1111 III .6= Erma. 4 , \\'' _ r -_.-.::::-■ ;kVA*, ..„,,,. 11 k - A \Ii0.44••=11111 1 1/1", ill High Density Residential =E: 1EL-- = fr. .k \ '_ ;i likteNtt , ' 46, .50 • w'l MINI I= m ra 7 ' . tp.0 ire, ii, ,, lip. • ■L Mho w \ i--4-110 O. • , '"..--. ■ \ •\* 4 ,0111IIIIIM:\ iv wil Ipm, • , 41 mmo • I 1 Professional Office ____.- _I.- 1- r IVA', 4* illiz,4\ 1:172,..MMO,..Sliklig alMalk a MMI. • a, NI iiiiiii V.`" .... T.'S fa_ la ' $ . ' ...1 leb, Int: NUMMI ing pliv 11.6"111=1 : ..rnitt7r11.11111111„.718. 00000 1. A I. Neighborhood Commercial t%'. 1 -' - - VA si• ,S, ) '„,- , 1 i.. 14 L _ _ _ 1 J . 4 P :. • \ • , 1 VI -....4171 1,,,,, 440414 11 t: RS "Mil lia „00:$1,: III ii. 1.--sa 35.-: '=-1::. :-.14. \ ( , _ , , s' -■ - - , ..N...L wilt. i 22 an e la lopt-/ vow N. a .... 4 •1111: a :I ..: 7 . 4:41 El Large Convenience Center .... s. •" as simile , i,, .,,, ..L_ , 4 _ ,.......' ' ' •••• • ' • 0----- I vit ,,,, 1114'2 ..■* 111.:...?... .. 00c:ilium i ,- r .. .... _ . v *A' __., 0 . e. ............. • Arterial Commercial --., , it \ .1. a ..- m. -,.. --H•olatqi ,.. 4,4 64•4- !maim. --... eimm....z.-, . ,„• • A #) #.4%* I, , ■ • •4 ************ 1 1 I ilit. 4.4 1.01. Itt. *1-1.% 1 4.-S , 1 ;;;;; r4 „■ . 1 .-ti i 'NO,' .. ' ' roll q \ il - k) , t . • 0, v.. )..,t$ III industrial I ckt,v-At % 4 ti 1- 4 ■.4,, ‘v . 4 _x, .,..,,:,,,-;.-....,!!';' '! , ;\ - 1 -4a v vveNv Art ' '. l .1`%1A.• %:*•:4::::".g , 5 ....._ ........ ,,:. ........ 1:1:1 SS% mew - .It AIL\ si ' . ••■•• • r wirA . - - ' \ `um ■ 0. 4,* , /` :is •ii,„•13 tins. 11 II Parks & Open Space 1 i mm l 4-2 ''41 , ,., " 0 Ilk tlit SS ..' ." Si .1 1 ... . Se '''', ' • ""'" ' '--- \ ' \ Ral li Asi set /'_,' liar 11 V-' Vol - --r. Va s la s'y emu ..< „e__=_-__z____ 4000 1..- ..... Bill=...• Immo E 11% 10 os.I SS SIS r- ar■ 00. ''' .-‘ - 2 '1s \ 1 : -"IN ...: =12 a ****** olio _ atm II i I - :;4b. _ /4 1111L da 'GE ' ' 2 ?:..7 Greenway Overlay District ''T lb N, , ...-., ... __1,,,,_, , - \\\. I ini 1 ,1 m L.L,...41 'c,,3 . no, ,....7am mu 11 0.4)P mud IL a It 1 1 11.4 V*11 41 4 w - 7 .0 11 - • E hi , 1 .. - ___o_ vi....... .....,......... ans• I 11. . 11k. 104 ° Mt eel VAIIIIIIIII ram .."1,-4.-,„ -': :" MI 1 ' \ , R.11111111111 i If • 411111 Ire * p ripispv • or - Railroad Spur to Moxee -- Si: %loo oi %RI S. ".■ 911111111 7.IIIIrMINI 1 millINIMIll lionsi, Ei i■iim .. .... \Ad* I ., vpilE=1 le ittro - .11- 11,7.; so le oo 0 , 0 Vol E V-A i .s.■■ - IN Imi - ormomm MAIII :,' .1 It; _A. • raw •Kilill k - ilV lo s V, 0 ts ..5.: 1..! NEEEftE el imam 1 a Imam \„..., \ _ riak _ , . = IN _Ai.- ••■ , a imisign IP -lm ---- Future Road Corridor i 40 st ft* ra V.I.: ., faiiii--1 0= tiqiiiimu mil 4 11 IP 0 V V. .''' .. IA =MI11111111 URN a■■■11111 mi, VEDA 126-.1--Tos \ . - .- • „,-.:. SI.: 0 .... lit t.s. =II- = - .7-- . 1 ettlailliWifft■Allitml. Imosill1111 (Note: Approximate -it si/I, 0 ,,, SS: v--* :::•• ...g E - ro gi - i i tit! I, , . mewl* \ \ i nr.;M: h *- NI .•••• alignments are shown. s s.....- • li 014 11;14 ■•••• ....sm.!! g- g - 1 Ilill! -- • -mai =lin i IN = imi tt. -,...... IL. -41 0- .0.• 1... E,E writ MEI # MIME -... tim VEN Future engineering will \ I '1= IIII tril XIII N OM . . 1 I 1111 MIMI determine their exact "•, V 111111% 111 1/4. maim 6 : "- - B111 ..... 1111 mil li 1 ,,, v: _ \ , Ell Ell L -:-_ i Ell , :-_- irkr,41111111 '' matiiiiiliw.■ INN locations.) rs A% *° VII EU,1111 al ) 111 -1111m =, No Ili le. I V- * .t. -- s 4 1-1-51 t r- r e ." 5' %. V.1. 54: 1 = -. -, 0 Si• .41 !. let V:. V). :;... St VS ,==. t.= el. 1 ' i Si ta 0, .?-:,,,,tt. V..% l L 1 iiiMMUMMi 1 t• - ..r. 11% V... 3 v -.2,=. -1.• Ilk \ \ 11: It rS,.... 1 .." --- a E z--.1= i l 11111 11111111 . 0 0 1:,:.-- al= f El ._ _1... III E. mum . lip, . ' 'illi -.■ ' . 'Mini - 1- Mu , ,, . 1.----011=Tv, ! ......... i 311-. am 1 _.. 41 MITL i !' . 6 j ,.........„.. ; 11 Jfa Lk - ......, - ' - k ........___ ' *Aar I B .4 74:.; IR I V '' '' " - 1. ‘ .- ,,, \ , liabnii 11 ai i., ■\ ‘ Imkeyo 1 7 t.W „ • . . a ,7,,,,i, ....iiiov • 1 rAvi r as ■ Nararc,011111 br ,,, . I. MEN ."--...... mr ,......... MI 41 . • .. . low- ; V% ,Nroarkosomill f 11 1 m ElPr 41,11 ,,,, ramm III g lill m mg IPIv. m ags. Is E R EN MI g Erg No = .. Erni p ....I mow NIIIP l i ill *Corridor's alignment West of the arrow is not yet determined. FEMA Designations: Floodway 1 II , . - 1 ■ s, . ',-,:: miglit: , 111111111. 14, 1 Ira ME 1 11 11 Ii-ty iml !IE.! IE EL cm 1 IMIIIII 1 •••-- ,. 1 L \ 1.1 : 11 8:11 .1 . 1 11TA - 7. 1 M MI 1 4 - 11 " - r.,„ li'll - - III I ill .\, _ ._ 41k,r, !NM' \ b\___- ' Al \ lir 11110.1117111111114p7r . Floodplain IL A . ig • 1111111111111■ I 1 W %II 1124 . II OS III 5: Nv..3 , .1._ / \ r Exhibit E ..774-..,E. ■ own .. 1 I i , ...1 ii. = _w_miumm $0... , , -e,..i. I- , - - \ ■ iiiri p- Mk 1 ■ _ ..■simm NN No E b Hi illIMMOII: IIIIIIIHI 1\ '... 1 \ 1 i • r , - t5, • , Patrict i s • : 5 5 it li E M. IIIIIIMII! rill N :1 '41 11 PI ... _ __ _ , i 8 • - -..' ,/^.6 n _!J IAL. nip 11 k won 1. 1 1■ .4,,,,7--- ----- '. N . t; , ',) (: _ri - M Burml V I a Wit 1 1 11 116:I, E Al , gliii El 1 Ilk% LIM Ilr" Ella ri 1 111 11111L1 L # \ 1 ' i 1 r -- ' , \ ' I \ 4 i kir4M11 ,... ei - ....1, r in H.= im ......1.1111011 mom : ..... _,41).,.\\ i )0 •,i r i i 7 1 , - I i'l -'-`--- -"" ■ / ' 1,,i A 2 Z,S EMI 1 EBI EL 711E1 14 N 111111111.• temsuall -. 1111 -I 4, " 4t et.., - .-, 4- - .4 , I I fl IIIIIILI NNW Ere i 1 irM ' reemmr• =Eli 0 gm 1111 11 IIII1 11111 Mall - , , . ,‘,,,, ---- A • I 111111E MN Mapscale: 1" = 2000 Feet _ = \ It mimunium giumiqa a :=0:110a --12 "i'l 06 1 1 % i .13.. \ - 111111 _ _4011 ,Ir 1 EL 'WEI": 8 111111i Ille.E1 MI i I /...A111.14■.\ i 1 - - --1 I 1 % ‘ ‘: i Ji \\, IIII.p 1 1 = FE 01 11: 1 iil L ii I 1 pipi II 1111111 Mogi is ohm Ammon 1 , , ...,....„---,... / , ! .. , _-_-__................k._.,.._ ___.i _ . ,• H %- • • . __ illi I imp_ mi lks. 1 mi. .11 r .2 alk . . i 41 MIMI. Ul Ell IINUEMIll Ivo IIIIIIIIME ' - - 1 NEE 1 • • \`. Mill\ lam. • ..d.„,....,p kraifizi . '4,. '', ; 1 -- , - i - H ..,-E-- - ,L=. - -_; ---- - \ . ‘1" 1111 Will I. II MI ri li = i Ill 1 NM III im ,MI lin ■-- .:1 11ilifignir. ■ lil 2 iing1111116.111 VIIIIM.-....1111‘ _ ___u.....__, - -- LH-- : ■ ' IA a' Loz; o MO ,...... ".1 * 4 ---- - 11 - -- • • „ 4° I OM Yakima County Geographic Information Gamic. II IC: I MK in AHOMEMIIMI In HIP•11111111. sun 1111 • i • Al- t■ \ .1,4 ■ III In 129 N 2nd 51 Ftrn 421 Yakima, WA 99901 /disk_5/proje ts/c•untylplanning • help ts/futu el s I 111.11111111 MILi. 12 rd' -1 ._' - ---- - 7 - i 7.4:74■7 - - :ar....&,..... bi-. ......,.., ...,. (5001574-2990 June 23.1999 \_.. , \ j . . r BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL YAIQMA, WASHINGTON AGENDA STATEMENT Item No.: For Meeting of: August 17, 1999 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of an ordinance adopting the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan. SUBMITTED BY: William Cook, Director of Community and Economic Development CONTACT PERSON/TELEPHONE: Don Skone, Planning Manager (575-618' 1 SUMMARY EXPLANATION: • The Board of Yakima County Commissioners has requested City adoption of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan. The City Council and Board held public hearings on this item on June 29, 1999 and July 12, 1999. The Board has subsequently taken action and now requests City of Yakima adoption. Adoption of the Yakima Urban Area Plan, the City's Growth Management Act (GMA) plan, did not complete the GMA process for Terrace Heights. Future land use designations, as well as other required elements, were not completed for Terrace Heights. Adoption of the Terrace Heights Neighborhood Plan will now fulfill the GMA requirements for the Terrace Heights area and enable Yakima County to apply amended urban area zoning classifications to this unincorporated neighborhood. Terrace Heights is within the Yakima Urban Area and the City Of Yakima and Yakima County have previously engaged in joint planning for the neighborhood. Resolution Ordinance X Contract Other Specify Funding Source: APPROVAL FOR SUBMITTAL: Manager STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance BOARD /COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: